field "issue" not returned in species API

[damianooldoni]

Searching occurrences by issue via API returns field issues (see example with issue DEPTH_UNLIKELY) as expected. The same is not true while searching names/species (see example1 with issue NO_SPECIES and example2 with issue ORIGINAL_NAME_DERIVED). The data are clearly well filtered, but it would be nice to get the field issues as for occurrences as well.
Or am I missing something? Thanks.

[damianooldoni]

Speaking more generally, all GBIF API except /species/ don't return issues. Example using Acidianus ambivalens (Zillig & Böck, 1987) Fuchs & al., 1996 with key = 1000048 and issue ORIGINAL_NAME_DERIVED:

1. /species/: https://api.gbif.org/v1/species/1000048
2. /species/match/: https://api.gbif.org/v1/species/match?name=Acidianus%20ambivalens%20(Zillig%20&%20B%C3%B6ck,%201987)%20Fuchs%20&%20al.,%201996
3. /species/search/: https://api.gbif.org/v1/species/search?q=Acidianus%20ambivalens%20(Zillig%20&%20B%C3%B6ck,%201987)%20Fuchs%20&%20al.,%201996
4. /species/suggest https://api.gbif.org/v1/species/suggest?q=Acidianus%20ambivalens%20(Zillig%20&%20B%C3%B6ck,%201987)%20Fuchs%20&%20al.,%201996

[MortenHofft]

Thanks for noticing this. You are right, it isn't in the response and on the face of it, I would agree that is makes sense to have it there. For now, you would have to look up the individual keys to get the issue list (e.g. https://api.gbif.org/v1/species/1000041)

@mdoering you might well have an opinion on this?