You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the new feature you'd like
There should be a federated merge function added so that when I perform a GetElements operation, I can see which elements came from which subgraph.
Describe alternatives you've considered
It could be implemented as an option rather than a merge function.
Additional context
Results from ConcatenateMergeFunction look like this: [el1, el2, el3]
Results from this new merge function would like something like: {graph1: [el1, el2], graph2: [el3]}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Might be worth looking at using some part of the stream library to do this as the map() method might work quite well, there is also #3075 open to investigate other features we could use too.
* better handle cache related operations
* basic testing to ensure named ops work
* sonar smells
* whitespace
* add option to let results stay separate #3118
* add option to specify to use default graph ids
* typo
* check style
---------
Co-authored-by: p29876 <165825455+p29876@users.noreply.github.com>
Describe the new feature you'd like
There should be a federated merge function added so that when I perform a GetElements operation, I can see which elements came from which subgraph.
Describe alternatives you've considered
It could be implemented as an option rather than a merge function.
Additional context
Results from ConcatenateMergeFunction look like this:
[el1, el2, el3]
Results from this new merge function would like something like:
{graph1: [el1, el2], graph2: [el3]}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: