Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Spotbugs back in #3740

Closed
seadowg opened this issue Mar 24, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Add Spotbugs back in #3740

seadowg opened this issue Mar 24, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels
help wanted Issues that are well-specified and don't require too much context.

Comments

@seadowg
Copy link
Member

seadowg commented Mar 24, 2020

We recently had to remove Spotbugs because of an issue on their side. We should see if this is something we can work around or if not wait for a fix.

@seadowg seadowg added the help wanted Issues that are well-specified and don't require too much context. label Mar 24, 2020
@SaumiaSinghal
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @seadowg! I would like to look into it.

@SaumiaSinghal
Copy link
Contributor

@opendatakit-bot claim

@seadowg
Copy link
Member Author

seadowg commented Mar 25, 2020

@SaumiaSinghal ooops I left out that it was removed in #3728 so good to use that as a starting point rather than master

@getodk-bot
Copy link
Member

getodk-bot commented Apr 4, 2020

Hello @SaumiaSinghal, you have been unassigned from this issue because you have not updated this issue or any referenced pull requests for over 15 days.

You can reclaim this issue or claim any other issue by commenting @opendatakit-bot claim on that issue.

Thanks for your contributions, and hope to see you again soon!

@grzesiek2010
Copy link
Member

Spotbugs does not work well with kotlin so now as we add all the new code using kotlin I think it doesn't make sense to add spotbugs back.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Issues that are well-specified and don't require too much context.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants