fix empty parameters list issue #821
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #821 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 74.73% 74.81% +0.08%
==========================================
Files 63 63
Lines 15700 15678 -22
==========================================
- Hits 11733 11730 -3
+ Misses 3967 3948 -19 |
Swatinem
reviewed
Nov 17, 2023
the symbolic_proguardmapper_remap_frame function
Swatinem
approved these changes
Nov 17, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Use a specific boolean flag to decide whether to deobfuscate based on parameters list or line numbers.
Empty parameters list should not be used to make this discrimination, but at the same Time
Option<T>type is not FFI safe therefore we cannot use it for the Rust bindings.