Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rmserror #47

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 24, 2023
Merged

Rmserror #47

merged 7 commits into from
Oct 24, 2023

Conversation

b-r-hamilton
Copy link
Collaborator

Added functions rmserror and controladj - these are unweighted versions of datacost and controlcost
I just added lines to runtests that check the functionality of these, wasn't quite sure what good values would be for all the different cases. Perhaps another commit with proper @tests for these would be good.
Other thought - right now, the structure of BLUEs doesn't allow for you to index y or x. I wrote versions of these methods in OPT2k that allow for some indexing, and then let you assess the rmserror of a particular sediment core over time or the controladj propagated to the surface. Not sure if this is something that it would be useful to add to BLUEs because it would force you to make some decisions about preferred structure, but happy to discuss it more.

Copy link
Owner

@ggebbie ggebbie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks handy!

I suggest making the names similar as they have similar functionality, i.e., controladj -> rmscontrol. The suffix adj could have multiple meanings -- either write out the full word or drop it, I think.

@ggebbie
Copy link
Owner

ggebbie commented Oct 13, 2023

Regarding the additional functions not included here, if they are general enough, they can be added.

@b-r-hamilton b-r-hamilton merged commit 3b1690a into main Oct 24, 2023
1 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants