Repository navigation
[audit-workflows] Agentic Workflow Audit — 2026-10-23 #71497
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Agentic Workflow Audit Agent. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #71712. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
Across 465 unique run records collected in five pages, the adjusted success rate was 87.5% (87.1% raw), excluding two intentional-failure test runs. No missing tools were reported. The clearest shared issues are 24 failures in the
Handle agent failurestep, eight failures restoring daily AIC observations, recurring AI Moderator no-job runs, and incomplete log coverage for the 30-day request.24-hour audit
summary.engine_counts: copilot 176, pi 132, codex 71, claude 52, aider 3, goose 2, opencode 2, and one each for agy, crush, cursor, deepseek-harness, gemini, kiro, and pydantic-ai.Findings and recommendations
Handle agent failurefailed in 24 workflows, including driver-exit cases. Fix the shared handler and trace the upstream driver failures separately so the aftermath step does not hide root causes.Restore daily AIC scan observationsfailed in eight workflows. Investigate the common activation/artifact restore path and add coverage for the affected workflows.Workflow health chart
The two observed dates show 92.3% adjusted success on Oct 22 (60/65) and 86.7% on Oct 23 (325/375). Because 28 days are absent from the sample, this is not evidence of a month-long decline.
Token usage chart
The sample contains 8.76M tokens on Oct 22 and 50.72M on Oct 23, alongside 65 and 400 run records respectively; the difference mainly reflects sample volume and does not establish higher per-run usage. A seven-day moving average is unavailable with only two observed days.
References:
All reactions