Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(chore) (refactor) pipe result of each gsub instead of modifying original #1009

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 29, 2017
Merged

(chore) (refactor) pipe result of each gsub instead of modifying original #1009

merged 2 commits into from
May 29, 2017

Conversation

jesperronn
Copy link
Contributor

Simpler to just pipe the result of each command to the next.

…inal

Simpler to just pipe the result of each command to the next.
@kivikakk
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good; refreshing CI, will merge on green.

@kivikakk
Copy link
Contributor

Ah; this fails as gsub! returns nil when no changes are made. Consider changing all gsub! to gsub?

@jesperronn
Copy link
Contributor Author

jesperronn commented May 29, 2017

Thanks for feedback, I will change impl. Sorry for the long response. I completely forgot about this PR

@kivikakk
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me! And no worries, I was just coming through and cleaning things up. :)

@kivikakk kivikakk merged commit 46325ba into github:master May 29, 2017
@jesperronn jesperronn deleted the patch-1 branch May 29, 2017 10:42
Copy link

@Masoudahmadi304 Masoudahmadi304 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minereum

@Masoudahmadi304 Masoudahmadi304 mentioned this pull request Jan 30, 2022
@github github deleted a comment from Masoudahmadi304 Feb 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants