-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 750
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add internal annotation #2558
Add internal annotation #2558
Conversation
(I don't rust, so feel free to ignore me completely.) I joined the stream late so was curious to look at parts of the code again after, and noticed some things that seem suspicious about completions for types. Hopefully the comments I added are getting at the right bits of code for the issue. |
72f4743
to
4016fae
Compare
Thank you @DanielSherlock for pointing this out! I've fixed the bug and added some tests to make sure that internal types do appear in the completions for the same module they're defined in |
Glad I could help! 👍 |
4016fae
to
849da22
Compare
Could you rebase on main please? 🙏 |
ab68197
to
fd2a252
Compare
Is this WIP @giacomocavalieri ? |
Yes I still have to finish addressing your review comments, I'll be working on this shortly! |
6c192b6
to
7fb5a16
Compare
ccbbe51
to
a81954f
Compare
Turning |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice!! And what an effort 💪 I've left a few small notes inline. Thank you!
… the same module they're defined in Thank you so much @DanielSherlock for pointing this out!
df11479
to
c3e5528
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!!!
This PR adds the
@internal
annotation, closing #2486Why is this a WIP PR?