-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suppress empty fields #41
Comments
What about a link to the repository? Examples |
Good idea.
…On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 12:12 PM Michael Wayne Goodman < ***@***.***> wrote:
What about a link to the repository?
Examples
Contribute an example <https://github.com/globalwordnet/gwadoc/>
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#41 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIPZRT3CBB54DMLHXA5LILSJ7NLVANCNFSM4SKYFJAQ>
.
--
Francis Bond <http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home/fcbond/>
Division of Linguistics and Multilingual Studies
Nanyang Technological University
|
Should the comment section also be suppressed where there is no comment? |
@gconnect I think the comments can just be suppressed. They are not expected like the examples, definitions, etc. are. |
Closed
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
If a relation has no tests or examples, then maybe we should just show nothing, rather than explicitly say "no tests", ...
What do you all think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: