Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove python 3.3 from test environments #98

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 3, 2018

Conversation

ReblochonMasque
Copy link
Contributor

@ReblochonMasque ReblochonMasque commented Jun 3, 2018

twisted requires python 3.4+
In relation to PR #95 TravisCI error

twisted requires python 3.4+
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 3, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 9da533f on ReblochonMasque:patch-2 into 39a7c6d on glyph:master.

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 9da533f on ReblochonMasque:patch-2 into 39a7c6d on glyph:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 9da533f on ReblochonMasque:patch-2 into 39a7c6d on glyph:master.

@glyph
Copy link
Owner

glyph commented Jun 3, 2018

Thanks for your contribution.

@glyph glyph merged commit 6b370ef into glyph:master Jun 3, 2018
@hugovk
Copy link
Contributor

hugovk commented Jun 10, 2018

Python 3.3 is EOL and no longer receiving security updates (or any updates) from the core Python team, so how about removing instead of just commenting?

Can also remove 3.3 from:

By the way, here's the pip installs for automat from PyPI for May 2018:

python_version percent download_count
2.7 57.26% 100,491
3.6 24.31% 42,663
3.5 16.10% 28,255
3.4 1.93% 3,385
3.7 0.40% 697
2.6 0.01% 12
3.3 0.00% 8
3.2 0.00% 2
Total 175,513

Source: pypinfo --start-date 2018-05-01 --end-date 2018-05-31 --percent --markdown automat pyversion

@glyph
Copy link
Owner

glyph commented Aug 27, 2018

@hugovk Sure. Do you want to do another PR? :)

@hugovk
Copy link
Contributor

hugovk commented Aug 27, 2018

Please see #103 :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants