Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use explicit key mapping for flow keys #61

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 23, 2023

Conversation

tdakkota
Copy link
Member

@tdakkota tdakkota commented Apr 23, 2023

Fixes #60.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 23, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 89.47% and project coverage change: +0.09 🎉

Comparison is base (c6b72e5) 77.52% compared to head (03d700e) 77.61%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #61      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.52%   77.61%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          22       22              
  Lines        7274     7292      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits         5639     5660      +21     
+ Misses       1261     1255       -6     
- Partials      374      377       +3     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
emitterc.go 56.55% <89.47%> (+0.65%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@ernado ernado merged commit d6b7a40 into main Apr 23, 2023
@tdakkota tdakkota deleted the fix/use-explicit-key-if-it-is-flow-mapping branch April 23, 2023 19:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

FuzzDecodeEncodeDecode: did not find expected ',' or '}'
2 participants