Fix incorrect issue filter in user dashboard #23630

yp05327 · 2023-03-22T09:00:23Z

Changes:

Fixed logic problems when filtering issues.
- Avoid displaying all issues of the repo which user only created an issues/be mentioned/be assigned
- Team permission doesn't work
Display all issues count info in repo filter to avoid displaying strange ui as following:

(selected a repo in repo filter which have no issues created by user, then access created by you)
After fix:

yp05327 · 2023-03-24T01:44:57Z

routers/web/user/home.go

@@ -444,21 +444,6 @@ func buildIssueOverview(ctx *context.Context, unitType unit.Type) {
 		repoOpts.TeamID = team.ID
 	}

-	switch filterMode {


I don't know whether we need to remove repoOpts above in this PR. it is not used.

yp05327 · 2023-03-24T01:48:02Z

models/issues/issue.go

@@ -1402,17 +1404,64 @@ func issuePullAccessibleRepoCond(repoIDstr string, userID int64, org *organizati
 	} else {
 		cond = cond.And(
 			builder.Or(
-				repo_model.UserOwnedRepoCond(userID),                          // owned repos
-				repo_model.UserAccessRepoCond(repoIDstr, userID),              // user can access repo in a unit independent way
-				repo_model.UserAssignedRepoCond(repoIDstr, userID),            // user has been assigned accessible public repos


repo_model.UserAssignedRepoCond is only used here.
Do I need to remove it or keep it.

yp05327 · 2023-03-24T01:48:08Z

models/issues/issue.go

-				repo_model.UserOwnedRepoCond(userID),                          // owned repos
-				repo_model.UserAccessRepoCond(repoIDstr, userID),              // user can access repo in a unit independent way
-				repo_model.UserAssignedRepoCond(repoIDstr, userID),            // user has been assigned accessible public repos
-				repo_model.UserMentionedRepoCond(repoIDstr, userID),           // user has been mentioned accessible public repos


yp05327 · 2023-03-24T01:48:10Z

models/issues/issue.go

-				repo_model.UserAccessRepoCond(repoIDstr, userID),              // user can access repo in a unit independent way
-				repo_model.UserAssignedRepoCond(repoIDstr, userID),            // user has been assigned accessible public repos
-				repo_model.UserMentionedRepoCond(repoIDstr, userID),           // user has been mentioned accessible public repos
-				repo_model.UserCreateIssueRepoCond(repoIDstr, userID, isPull), // user has created issue/pr accessible public repos


All `access_mode` value of Owner Teams are 0(AccessModeNone) in `team_unit` table, which should be 4(AccessModeOwner) In `team` table: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/227409457-1b9660ae-8cf7-49c8-a013-1850b46baebc.png) In `team_unit` table: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/227409429-a793dd90-4ae1-4191-b95b-e288c591f9fd.png) ps: In #23630, `access_mode` in `team_unit` is used to check the team unit permission, but I found that user can not see issues in owned org repos.

yp05327 · 2023-04-20T05:06:58Z

Got the sql in mssql. Have no idea with the error.

sql

SELECT
    issue.repo_id AS repo_id,
    COUNT(*) AS count
FROM
    [issue]
    INNER JOIN
        [repository]
    ON  [issue].repo_id = [repository].id
WHERE
    (
        issue.is_closed = ?
    )
AND (
        issue.is_pull = ?
    )
AND repository.is_archived = ?
AND (
        repository.owner_id = ?
    OR  issue.repo_id IN(
            SELECT
                [access].repo_id
            FROM
                [access]
                INNER JOIN
                    repository
                ON  [repository].id = [access].repo_id
                INNER JOIN
                    user
                ON  [user].id = [repository].owner_id
            WHERE
                [access].user_id = ?
            AND [access].mode > ?
            AND (
                    (
                        [user].type = ?
                    AND (
                            [access].repo_id IN(
                                SELECT
                                    [team_repo].repo_id
                                FROM
                                    team_repo
                                    INNER JOIN
                                        team_user
                                    ON  [team_user].team_id = [team_repo].team_id
                                    INNER JOIN
                                        team_unit
                                    ON  [team_unit].team_id = [team_repo].team_id
                                WHERE
                                    [team_user].uid = ?
                                AND [team_unit].[type] = ?
                                AND [team_unit].[access_mode] > ?
                            )
                        OR  [access].repo_id IN(
                                SELECT
                                    repo_id
                                FROM
                                    [collaboration]
                                WHERE
                                    [collaboration].user_id = ?
                            )
                        )
                    )
                OR  [user].type = ?
                )
        )
    OR  (
            repository.is_private = ?
        AND issue.id IN(
                SELECT
                    issue_assignees.issue_id
                FROM
                    issue_assignees
                WHERE
                    issue_assignees.assignee_id = ?
            )
        )
    OR  (
            repository.is_private = ?
        AND issue.id IN(
                SELECT
                    issue_user.issue_id
                FROM
                    issue_user
                WHERE
                    issue_user.is_mentioned = ?
                AND issue_user.uid = ?
            )
        )
    OR  (
            repository.is_private = ?
        AND issue.id IN(
                SELECT
                    issue.id
                FROM
                    issue
                WHERE
                    issue.is_pull = ?
                AND issue.poster_id = ?
            )
        )
    )
GROUP BY
    issue.repo_id

wxiaoguang · 2023-04-20T05:11:06Z

Try to quote all names, like user, mode, type.

wxiaoguang · 2023-04-20T06:31:05Z

Hmm, CI passes. That's why I recommend to use two words for variable names / table names / column names @lunny It saves a lot of debugging time.

ps: the SQL seems quite complex ......

lunny · 2023-04-20T06:56:07Z

Hmm, CI passes. That's why I recommend to use two words for variable names / table names / column names @lunny It saves a lot of debugging time.

ps: the SQL seems quite complex ......

Yes, too complex.

yp05327 · 2023-04-20T07:50:47Z

It works now.
Then the next step is improving the SQL. 😄

ps: maybe we should also add some new tests.

silverwind · 2023-05-18T12:18:18Z

Should re-test, I recall @lunny made some recent changes surrounding filters that may impact this.

yp05327 · 2023-07-21T07:52:11Z

Simplified the SQL in UserUnitAccessRepoCond, as I found AccessibleRepositoryCondition function which is what I need.

models/issues/issue_list.go

silverwind · 2023-08-09T15:48:26Z

models/issues/issue_list.go

+				}),
+		),
+	)
+}


What's the difference between these functions and the ones in repo_model? Maybe outline in a comment the differences?

The functions in repo_model are only used here (but will cause the issue). So we can remove them or move these new functions into repo_model. I didn't do that because I'm not sure whether the functions in repo_model are only designed for issuePullAccessibleRepoCond.

The difference is that the functions in repo_model use issue.repo_id in repo_ids to filter the issue, so all issues in these repos will be caught.
So we need use issue.id in issue_ids to get the correct issues.

silverwind

Let's try it I guess.

lunny · 2023-08-23T08:33:46Z

I think this has been replaced by #26657 ?

denyskon · 2023-09-10T10:31:24Z

@yp05327 What do you think, can this PR be closed?

yp05327 · 2023-09-11T01:53:34Z

After update go version to 1.21.0 in my dev container, I can't run Gitea correctly now, so it will take some times for me to confirm this. 😕

yp05327 · 2023-09-11T02:04:42Z

Got it work!
Then it seems that there are some new problems. I can not see some issues created by the user:
(these two screenshots come from Testuser)

yp05327 · 2023-09-11T02:08:20Z

As we have rewrite the search engine for issues, I will close this PR.
But there are still some issues now, and I think we need to add more CI tests.

yp05327 force-pushed the fix-issues-in-user-dashboard branch from f087fa3 to 313520e Compare March 23, 2023 09:01

fix

5343ec1

yp05327 force-pushed the fix-issues-in-user-dashboard branch from 313520e to 5343ec1 Compare March 24, 2023 00:43

fix ui

085a44e

yp05327 changed the title ~~[WIP] Fix incorrect issue filter in user dashboard~~ Fix incorrect issue filter in user dashboard Mar 24, 2023

yp05327 commented Mar 24, 2023

View reviewed changes

GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Mar 24, 2023

yp05327 commented Mar 24, 2023

View reviewed changes

yp05327 mentioned this pull request Mar 24, 2023

Fix owner team access mode value in team_unit table #23675

Merged

fix unit test

da6e7f8

yp05327 force-pushed the fix-issues-in-user-dashboard branch from ed31247 to da6e7f8 Compare March 24, 2023 06:03

yp05327 added 2 commits April 6, 2023 15:51

Merge branch 'main' into fix-issues-in-user-dashboard

0d7eecd

Merge branch 'main' into fix-issues-in-user-dashboard

448d141

fix sql error

862c853

yp05327 force-pushed the fix-issues-in-user-dashboard branch from ff4432a to 862c853 Compare April 20, 2023 05:21

wxiaoguang mentioned this pull request Apr 20, 2023

Support upload outputs and use needs context on Actions #24230

Merged

Merge branch 'main' into fix-issues-in-user-dashboard

99458cb

Merge branch 'main' into fix-issues-in-user-dashboard

97b4490

pull-request-size bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 22, 2023

fix broken changes

331a4e8

pull-request-size bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 22, 2023

Merge branch 'main' into fix-issues-in-user-dashboard

71b4011

improve

b3e982f

Merge branch 'main' into fix-issues-in-user-dashboard

1582bb1

silverwind reviewed Aug 9, 2023

View reviewed changes

models/issues/issue_list.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Update models/issues/issue_list.go

33ba5c9

silverwind reviewed Aug 9, 2023

View reviewed changes

silverwind approved these changes Aug 20, 2023

View reviewed changes

GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Aug 20, 2023

Merge branch 'main' into fix-issues-in-user-dashboard

6415db9

denyskon added the issue/needs-feedback For bugs, we need more details. For features, the feature must be described in more detail label Sep 10, 2023

yp05327 closed this Sep 11, 2023

go-gitea locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 10, 2023

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Fix incorrect issue filter in user dashboard #23630

Fix incorrect issue filter in user dashboard #23630

yp05327 commented Mar 22, 2023 •

edited

yp05327 Mar 24, 2023

yp05327 Mar 24, 2023

yp05327 Mar 24, 2023

yp05327 Mar 24, 2023

yp05327 commented Apr 20, 2023

wxiaoguang commented Apr 20, 2023

wxiaoguang commented Apr 20, 2023

lunny commented Apr 20, 2023

yp05327 commented Apr 20, 2023 •

edited

silverwind commented May 18, 2023

yp05327 commented Jul 21, 2023

silverwind Aug 9, 2023

yp05327 Aug 18, 2023

silverwind left a comment

lunny commented Aug 23, 2023

denyskon commented Sep 10, 2023

yp05327 commented Sep 11, 2023

yp05327 commented Sep 11, 2023 •

edited

yp05327 commented Sep 11, 2023

Fix incorrect issue filter in user dashboard #23630

Fix incorrect issue filter in user dashboard #23630

Conversation

yp05327 commented Mar 22, 2023 • edited

yp05327 Mar 24, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

yp05327 Mar 24, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

yp05327 Mar 24, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

yp05327 Mar 24, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

yp05327 commented Apr 20, 2023

wxiaoguang commented Apr 20, 2023

wxiaoguang commented Apr 20, 2023

lunny commented Apr 20, 2023

yp05327 commented Apr 20, 2023 • edited

silverwind commented May 18, 2023

yp05327 commented Jul 21, 2023

silverwind Aug 9, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

yp05327 Aug 18, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

silverwind left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

lunny commented Aug 23, 2023

denyskon commented Sep 10, 2023

yp05327 commented Sep 11, 2023

yp05327 commented Sep 11, 2023 • edited

yp05327 commented Sep 11, 2023

yp05327 commented Mar 22, 2023 •

edited

yp05327 commented Apr 20, 2023 •

edited

yp05327 commented Sep 11, 2023 •

edited