Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: parse credential bytes #258

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 25, 2024
Merged

feat: parse credential bytes #258

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 25, 2024

Conversation

james-d-elliott
Copy link
Member

This adds methods to parse raw byte slices instead of an io.Reader via protocol.ParseCredentialCreationResponseBytes and protocol.ParseCredentialRequestResponseBytes.

This adds methods to parse raw byte slices instead of an io.Reader via protocol.ParseCredentialCreationResponseBytes and protocol.ParseCredentialRequestResponseBytes.
@james-d-elliott james-d-elliott requested a review from a team as a code owner July 17, 2024 12:53
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes introduce new functions for parsing credential request and creation responses directly from byte slices, enhancing flexibility and usability. A new utility function, decodeBytes, is also added to handle JSON decoding from byte data. This streamlines operations by allowing developers to work with byte slices instead of io.Reader, improving the overall API for credential-related functionalities.

Changes

Files Change Summary
protocol/assertion.go, protocol/credential.go New functions ParseCredentialRequestResponseBytes and ParseCredentialCreationResponseBytes added, allowing parsing from byte slices instead of io.Reader.
protocol/decoder.go Introduced decodeBytes to decode JSON from byte slices, enhancing the decoding process and handling trailing data.

Poem

🐇 In the land of bytes and code,
A new path for parsing we strode.
From slices, our data will flow,
With joy in our hearts, watch it glow!
Here’s to the changes, so bright and new,
Hopping along, we code and we brew! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
protocol/decoder.go (1)

26-39: Consider improving the error message for clarity.

The error message "The body contains trailing data" is the same as in decodeBody. To differentiate, consider specifying that the data is from a byte slice.

-    return errors.New("The body contains trailing data")
+    return errors.New("The byte slice contains trailing data")
protocol/assertion.go (1)

78-86: Consider improving the error message for clarity.

The error message "Parse error for Assertion" is the same as in ParseCredentialRequestResponseBody. To differentiate, consider specifying that the data is from a byte slice.

-    return nil, ErrBadRequest.WithDetails("Parse error for Assertion").WithInfo(err.Error())
+    return nil, ErrBadRequest.WithDetails("Parse error for Assertion from byte slice").WithInfo(err.Error())
protocol/credential.go (1)

90-98: Consider improving the error message for clarity.

The error message "Parse error for Registration" is the same as in ParseCredentialCreationResponseBody. To differentiate, consider specifying that the data is from a byte slice.

-    return nil, ErrBadRequest.WithDetails("Parse error for Registration").WithInfo(err.Error())
+    return nil, ErrBadRequest.WithDetails("Parse error for Registration from byte slice").WithInfo(err.Error())
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f5fa279 and 44470c8.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • protocol/assertion.go (1 hunks)
  • protocol/credential.go (1 hunks)
  • protocol/decoder.go (2 hunks)

@james-d-elliott james-d-elliott merged commit b382edc into master Jul 25, 2024
6 checks passed
@james-d-elliott james-d-elliott deleted the feat-parse-bytes branch July 25, 2024 20:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant