Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

tests shouldn't fail if the analysis is more precise than expected #41

Closed
vogler opened this issue Jan 14, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

tests shouldn't fail if the analysis is more precise than expected #41

vogler opened this issue Jan 14, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
testing

Comments

@vogler
Copy link
Collaborator

vogler commented Jan 14, 2016

Running the regression tests with intervals makes almost all the tests fail.
@vogler vogler added the testing label Jan 14, 2016
@vogler vogler mentioned this issue Jan 14, 2016
Closed
vogler added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 30, 2016
@vogler
make dbg.regression say if the assert failed or improved (UNKOWN …
9cdd105 
…= maybe, `UNKNOWN!` = must)

TODO adjust tests (use UNKOWN, UNKNOWN!, get rid of NOWARN), #41, #42
@michael-schwarz michael-schwarz mentioned this issue Mar 10, 2021
Closed
keremc pushed a commit to keremc/analyzer that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2021
@antoinemine
Merge pull request goblint#41 from dhil/4.08-compatibility
6f84992 
Compatibility with OCaml trunk (4.08.0+dev0)
@jerhard
Copy link
Member

jerhard commented May 7, 2021

See the updated issue #110

@jerhard jerhard closed this as completed May 7, 2021
jerhard pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 26, 2022
@Dudeldu
Find another location where get_ikind results in an error (#41)
d31be72 
* Find another location where get_ikind results in an error
* Further refine determining safe casts with floats
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
testing
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@vogler @jerhard