-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
x/vulndb/client: frequent failures in TestClient #46419
Labels
FrozenDueToAge
NeedsInvestigation
Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.
release-blocker
vulncheck or vulndb
Issues for the x/vuln or x/vulndb repo
Milestone
Comments
(Release blocker for Go 1.17 via #11811.) |
bcmills
added
okay-after-beta1
Used by release team to mark a release-blocker issue as okay to resolve either before or after beta1
release-blocker
NeedsInvestigation
Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.
labels
May 27, 2021
Looks like CL 323132 fixed this everywhere except |
Oh bah, I missed the js-wasm section of the initial issue, will send a fix in a moment. |
Change https://golang.org/cl/324089 mentions this issue: |
gopherbot
pushed a commit
to golang/vulndb
that referenced
this issue
Jun 2, 2021
Since it doesn't support doing things with sockets. Updates golang/go#46419. Change-Id: I22c86706d5ab9ffc6b62ca850aab6621eddedea7 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/vulndb/+/324089 Trust: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
heschi
removed
the
okay-after-beta1
Used by release team to mark a release-blocker issue as okay to resolve either before or after beta1
label
Jun 10, 2021
I believe this has been fixed. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
FrozenDueToAge
NeedsInvestigation
Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.
release-blocker
vulncheck or vulndb
Issues for the x/vuln or x/vulndb repo
There appear to be three different failure modes, perhaps all related to the same underlying problem:
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/android-386-emu
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/dragonfly-amd64
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/linux-386
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/linux-386-sid
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/linux-amd64
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/linux-amd64-jessie
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/linux-amd64-wsl
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/linux-arm-aws
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/linux-arm64-aws
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/linux-ppc64-buildlet
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/linux-ppc64le-buildlet
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/linux-ppc64le-power9osu
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/openbsd-amd64-64
2021-04-20T18:00:48-e0c00fa/dragonfly-amd64
2021-04-20T18:00:48-e0c00fa/linux-arm-aws
2021-04-20T18:00:48-e0c00fa/linux-ppc64le-buildlet
2021-04-20T18:00:48-e0c00fa/linux-ppc64le-power9osu
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/windows-386-2008
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/windows-amd64-2016
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/windows-amd64-longtest
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/windows-amd64-race
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/windows-arm64-aws
2021-04-20T18:00:48-e0c00fa/windows-386-2008
2021-04-20T18:00:48-e0c00fa/windows-amd64-2016
2021-04-20T18:00:48-e0c00fa/windows-amd64-longtest
2021-04-20T18:00:48-e0c00fa/windows-amd64-race
2021-05-21T02:20:14-c856ba8/js-wasm
2021-04-20T18:00:48-e0c00fa/js-wasm
CC @FiloSottile @rolandshoemaker
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: