



Produced by Chris Curnow, Wayne Hammond and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
file was produced from images generously made available
by The Internet Archive)






[Transcriber’s Note:

Italic text delimited by underscores, bold text delimited by equal
signs.

Single underscore followed by text enclosed by braces indicates
subscript.

Caret followed by single character or text enclosed by braces text is
superscript text.]




RIVER AND CANAL ENGINEERING




_By the Same Author_


    HYDRAULICS WITH WORKING TABLES. Second Edition. 160 illustrations,
    xii + 311 pp., 8vo (1911).

  =12/-= net.

    PUNJAB RIVERS AND WORKS. Second Edition. 47 illustrations, viii +64
    pp., folio (1912).

  =8/-= net.

    IRRIGATION WORKS (in the press). 27 illustrations, vi + 130 pp.,
    8vo (1913).

  =6/-= net.

    THE SUCTION CAUSED BY SHIPS. Explained in Popular Language. 2
    plates, 26 pp., 8vo, sewed (1912).

  1/- net.


E. & F. N. SPON, LTD., LONDON




  RIVER AND CANAL
  ENGINEERING

  THE CHARACTERISTICS OF OPEN FLOWING
  STREAMS, AND THE PRINCIPLES
  AND METHODS TO BE FOLLOWED IN
  DEALING WITH THEM

  BY

  E. S. BELLASIS, M.INST.C.E.

  RECENTLY SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER IN THE IRRIGATION BRANCH OF
  THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OF INDIA

  _72 ILLUSTRATIONS_

  [Illustration]

  London
  E. & F. N. SPON, LTD., 57 HAYMARKET, S.W.

  New York
  SPON & CHAMBERLAIN, 123 LIBERTY STREET

  1913




TABLE OF CONTENTS


  CHAPTER I

  INTRODUCTION

  ARTICLE                                                           PAGE

  1. Preliminary Remarks                                               1
  2. Résumé of the Subject                                             1
  3. Design and Execution of Works                                     3
  4. The Hydraulics of Open Streams                                    4


  CHAPTER II

  RAINFALL

  1. Rainfall Statistics                                               6
  2. Available Rainfall                                                9
  3. Measurement of Rainfall                                          13
  4. Influence of Forests and Vegetation                              14
  5. Heavy Falls in Short Periods                                     15


  CHAPTER III

  COLLECTION OF INFORMATION CONCERNING STREAMS

  1. Preliminary Remarks                                              18
  2. Stream Gauges                                                    19
  3. Plan and Sections                                                21
  4. Discharge Observations                                           21
  5. Discharge Curves and Tables                                      23
  6. Small Streams                                                    24
  7. Intermittent Streams                                             25
  8. Remarks                                                          26


  CHAPTER IV

  THE SILTING AND SCOURING ACTION OF STREAMS

  1. Preliminary Remarks                                              27
  2. Rolled Material                                                  29
  3. Materials carried in Suspension                                  31
  4. Methods of Investigation                                         33
  5. Quantity and Distribution of Silt                                35
  6. Practical Formulæ and Figures                                    37
  7. Action on the Sides of a Channel                                 40
  8. Action at Bends                                                  42
  9. General Tendencies of Streams                                    45


  CHAPTER V

  METHODS OF INCREASING OR REDUCING SILTING OR SCOUR

  1. Preliminary Remarks                                              48
  2. Increase of Scour or Reduction of Silting                        48
  3. Production of Silt Deposit                                       51
  4. Arrangements at Bifurcations                                     53
  5. A Canal with Headworks in a River                                54
  6. Protection of the Bed                                            58


  CHAPTER VI

  WORKS FOR THE PROTECTION OF BANKS

  1. Preliminary Remarks                                              60
  2. Spurs                                                            61
  3. Continuous Lining of the Bank                                    64
  4. Heavy Stone Pitching with Apron                                  71


  CHAPTER VII

  DIVERSIONS AND CLOSURES OF STREAMS

  1. Diversions                                                       73
  2. Closure of a Flowing Stream                                      75
  3. Instances of Closures of Streams                                 80


  CHAPTER VIII

  THE TRAINING AND CANALISATION OF RIVERS

  1. Preliminary Remarks                                              84
  2. Dredging and Excavating                                          84
  3. Reduction of Width                                               85
  4. Alteration of Depth or Water-Level                               88
  5. Training and Canalising                                          89


  CHAPTER IX

  CANALS AND CONDUITS

  1. Banks                                                            92
  2. Navigation Canals                                                93
  3. Locks                                                            96
  4. Other Artificial Channels                                       100


  CHAPTER X

  WEIRS AND SLUICES

  1. Preliminary Remarks                                             102
  2. General Design of a Weir                                        105
  3. Weirs on Sandy or Porous Soil                                   106
  4. Various Types of Weirs                                          111
  5. Weirs with Sluices                                              115
  6. Falling Shutters                                                121
  7. Adjustable Weirs                                                126
  8. Remarks on Sluices                                              128


  CHAPTER XI

  BRIDGES AND SYPHONS

  1. Bridges                                                         132
  2. Syphons and Culverts                                            135
  3. Training Works                                                  136


  CHAPTER XII

  DRAINAGE AND FLOODS

  1. Preliminary Remarks                                             141
  2. Small Streams                                                   141
  3. Rivers                                                          146
  4. Prediction of Floods                                            150
  5. Prevention of Floods                                            153
  6. Lowering the Water-Level                                        154
  7. Flood Embankments                                               156


  CHAPTER XIII

  RESERVOIRS AND DAMS

  1. Reservoirs                                                      162
  2. Capacity of Reservoirs                                          167
  3. Earthen Dams                                                    174
  4. Masonry Dams                                                    181


  CHAPTER XIV

  TIDAL WATERS AND WORKS

  1. Tides                                                           190
  2. Tidal Rivers                                                    192
  3. Works in Tidal Rivers                                           196
  4. Tidal Estuaries                                                 197
  5. Works in Tidal Estuaries                                        198


  CHAPTER XV

  RIVER BARS

  1. Deltaic Rivers                                                  203
  2. Other Rivers                                                    205

  APPENDIX A. Fallacies in the Hydraulics of Streams                 209

      ”  B. Pitching and Bed Protection                              212

  INDEX                                                              213




PREFACE


The object of this book is to describe the principles and practice
adopted in the Engineering of Open Streams. If the book seems to be
somewhat small for its object, it will, it is hoped, be found that this
is due to care in the arrangement and wording.

Sources of information have been acknowledged in the text, but special
mention may be made of lectures given by Professor Unwin at Coopers
Hill College, of Harcourt’s large work on _Rivers and Canals_, of the
papers[1] by Binnie on rainfall, by Shaw on the closing of the river
Tista, by Harcourt on movable weirs and on estuaries, by Strange on
reservoirs, and by Ottley and Brightmore, Gore and Wilson, and Hill
on the stresses in masonry dams; of the articles by Bligh[2] on weirs
with porous foundations and by Deacon[3] on reservoir capacity, of
the Indian Government paper by Spring on “River Control on the Guide
Bank System,” and of the Punjab Government paper containing Kennedy’s
remarks on silting and scour in the Sirhind Canal. The two papers last
mentioned are not easily accessible, and they contain matter of great
interest. The important points, often obscured by masses of detail or
figures, have been extracted.[4]

Silting and scour (CHAP. IV.) had already been dealt with in
_Hydraulics_,[5] but some further information has since come to light
and the subject has been treated afresh and the matter re-written.

  E. S. B.

CHELTENHAM, _1st May 1913_.




RIVER AND CANAL ENGINEERING




CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION


1. =Preliminary Remarks.=--River and Canal Engineering is that branch
of engineering science which deals with the characteristics of streams
flowing in open channels, and with the principles and methods which
should be followed in dealing with, altering, and controlling them.
It is not necessary to make a general distinction between natural and
artificial streams; some irrigation canals or other artificial channels
are as large as rivers and have many of the same characteristics. Any
special remarks applicable to either class will be given as occasion
requires.


2. =Résumé of the Subject.=--CHAP. II. of this book deals with the
collection of information concerning streams, a procedure which is
necessary before any considerable work in connection with a stream can
be undertaken, and often before it can even be decided whether or not
it is to be undertaken. CHAP. III. deals with rainfall, and describes
how rainfall figures and statistics can be utilised by the engineer in
dealing with streams.

CHAP. IV. explains the laws of silting and scouring action, a subject
of great importance and one to which the attention ordinarily given
is insufficient. The general characteristics of streams, being due
entirely to silting or scouring tendencies, are included in this
chapter. CHAP. V. describes how silting or scouring may be, under some
circumstances, artificially induced or retarded.

CHAP. VI. deals with various methods of protecting banks against
erosion or damage. CHAP. VII. treats of diversions or the opening
out of new channels, and with the opposite of this, viz. the closing
of channels, a feat which, when the stream is flowing, is sometimes
very difficult to achieve. This chapter also deals with dredging and
excavation.

CHAP. VIII. discusses the subject of the training of streams, a class
of work which is generally undertaken in order to make them navigable
or to improve their existing capacities for navigation, but may be
undertaken for other reasons. The main features of this kind of work
are the narrowing and deepening of the stream, often the reduction of
the velocity and <DW72>, and generally the raising of the water-level.
In this kind of work a channel may be completely remodelled and even
new reaches constructed. CHAP. IX. deals with artificial channels of
earth or masonry, and includes navigation canals.[6]

In CHAPS. X. and XI. the chief masonry works or isolated structures--as
distinguished from general works which extend over considerable
lengths of channel--are dealt with, and those principles of design
discussed which affect the works in their hydraulic capacities. General
principles of design applicable to all kinds of works, such as the
thicknesses of arches or retaining walls, are not considered; they can
be found in books on general engineering design.

CHAP. XII. treats of storm waters and river floods, and shows how works
can be designed for getting rid of flood water and how floods can be
mitigated or prevented, one of the chief measures, the widening of the
channel and the lowering of the water-level, being the opposite of that
adopted for training works. Embankments for stopping flooding are also
dealt with. CHAP. XIII. deals with reservoirs, including the design of
earthen and masonry dams.

CHAPS. XIV. and XV. deal with tidal waters, river mouths and estuaries,
and works in connection with them, viz. the training of estuaries and
the methods of dealing with bars, the object being in all cases the
improvement of the navigable capacities of the channels.


3. =Design and Execution of Works.=--After obtaining full information
concerning the stream to be dealt with, careful calculations are,
in the case of any large and important work, made as to the effects
which will be produced by it. These effects cannot always be exactly
foreseen. Sometimes matters can be arranged so that the work can be
stopped short at some stage without destroying the utility of the
portion done, or so that the completed work can be altered to some
extent.

In works for controlling streams there is, as will appear in due
course, a considerable choice of types of work and methods of
construction. In practice it will generally be found that there are,
in any particular locality, reasons for giving preference to one
particular type or kind of work or, at all events, that the choice is
limited to a few of them, either because certain kinds of materials
and appliances can be obtained more cheaply and readily than others,
or because works of a particular type have already been successfully
adopted there, or because the people of the district are accustomed to
certain classes of work or methods of construction. In out-of-the-way
places it is often undesirable to avoid any type of work which cannot
be quickly repaired or readily kept in order by such means as exist
near the spot.

It is sometimes said that perishable materials, such as trees,
stakes, and brushwood, cannot produce permanent results. They can
produce results which will last for a long time and which may even be
permanent. By the time the materials have decayed, the changes wrought
may have been very great, deposits of shingle or silt may have occurred
and become covered with vegetation, and there may be little tendency
for matters to revert to their former condition. If the expense of
using more lasting materials had had to be incurred, the works might
never have been carried out at all. On the Mississippi enormous
quantities of work have been done with fascines.


4. =The Hydraulics of Open Streams.=--When any reach of a stream
is altered, say by widening, narrowing, or deepening, so that the
water-level is changed, there will also be a change in the water-level,
a gradually diminishing change, for some distance upstream of the
reach. Also in the lowest portion of the reach the change will
gradually diminish and it will vanish at the extreme downstream end
of the reach. In the next lowest reach there is no change. Thus if it
is desired that the change in the water-level shall take full effect
throughout the whole of a reach, the change in the channel must be
carried further down. If a weir is built there is no change in the
water-level downstream of it except such as may be due to loss of
water in the reach upstream of it. The above points are mentioned here
because, although they are really questions of hydraulics, they are of
much importance and of very general application.

Matters connected with the hydraulics of open streams seem to lend
themselves in a peculiar way to loosely expressed remarks and
fallacious opinions. The set of a stream towards a bank is sometimes
supposed to profoundly affect the discharge of a diversion or branch.
Its effect is simply that of “velocity of approach,” which, as is
well known, is quite small with ordinary velocities, and is merely
equivalent to a very small increase of head. Narrow bridges or other
works are sometimes said to seriously “obstruct” a stream without any
observations being made of the fall in the water surface through the
bridge. This fall is the only measure of the real obstruction.[7]




CHAPTER II

RAINFALL


1. =Rainfall Statistics.=--The mean annual rainfall varies very greatly
according to the locality. In England it varies from about 20 inches
at Hunstanton in Cambridgeshire, to about 200 inches at Seathwaite in
Cumberland; in India, from 2 or 3 inches in parts of Scinde, to 450
inches or more at Cherrapunji in the Eastern Himalayas.

Rain is brought by winds which blow across the sea. Hence the rainfall
in any country is generally greatest in those localities where the
prevailing winds blow from seaward, provided they have travelled a
great distance over the sea. Rainfall is greater among hills than
elsewhere, because the temperature at great elevations is lower.
Currents of moist air striking the hills are deflected upwards, become
cooled, and the water vapour becomes rain. This process, if the hills
are not lofty, may not produce its full effect till the air currents
have passed over the hills, and thus the rainfall on the leeward <DW72>s
may be greater than elsewhere, but on the inner and more lofty ranges
the rainfall is generally greatest on the windward side.

Thus the rainfall may vary greatly at places not far apart. An extreme
instance of this occurs in the Bombay hills, where the mean annual
falls at two stations only ten miles apart are respectively 300 inches
and 50 inches.

In temperate climates the rainfall is generally distributed over all
the months of the year; in the tropics the great bulk of the rain often
falls in a few months.

The fall at any one place varies greatly from year to year. To obtain
really reliable figures concerning any place, observations at that
place should extend over a period of thirty to thirty-five years. The
figures of the mean annual fall will then probably be correct to within
2 per cent. The degree of accuracy to be expected in results deduced
from observations extending over shorter periods is as follows:--

  No. of years       25    20    15    10     5
  Error per cent.     3    3¼     5     8    15

These figures were deduced by Binnie (_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._, vol.
cix.) from an examination of rainfall figures obtained over long
periods of time at many places scattered over the world. The errors
may, of course, be plus or minus. They are the averages of the errors
actually found, and are themselves subject to fluctuations. Thus the 15
per cent. error for a five-year period may be 16 or 13, the 8 per cent.
error for a ten-year period may be 8½ or 7½, with similar but minute
fluctations for the other periods.

Binnie’s figures also show that the ratio of the fall at any place in
the driest year to the mean annual fall, averages ·51 to ·68, with a
general average of ·60, and that the ratio in the wettest year to the
mean annual fall averages 1·41 to 1·75, with a general average of 1·51.
For India the general averages are ·50 and 1·75. These figures are
useful as a means of estimating the probable greatest and least annual
fall, but they are averages for groups of places. The greatest fall at
any particular place may occasionally be twice the mean annual fall. At
some places in India, in Mauritius, and at Marseilles it has been two
and a half times the mean annual fall. The least annual fall may, in
India, be as low as ·27 of the mean. In England the fall in a dry year
has, once at least, been found to be only ·30 of the mean annual fall.
The mean fall (average for all places) in the three driest years is,
from Binnie’s figures, about ·76 of the mean annual fall. The figures
given above, except when a particular country is mentioned, apply to
all countries and to places where the rainfall is heavy, as well as to
those where it is light. But in extremely dry places the fluctuations
are likely to be much greater. At Kurrachee, with a mean annual fall of
only 7·5 inches, the fall in a very wet year has been found to be 3·73
times, and in a very dry year only ·07 times the mean annual fall.

In the United Kingdom the probable rainfall at any place in the
driest year may be taken as ·63 of the mean annual fall. For periods
of two, three, four, five and six consecutive dry years, the figures
are ·72, ·77, ·80, ·82, and ·835. These figures are of importance in
calculations for the capacity of reservoirs (CHAP. XIII., _Art. 2_).

When accurate statistics of rainfall are required for any work, the
rainfall of the tract concerned must be specially studied and local
figures obtained for as many years as possible. Very frequently it is
necessary to set up a rain-gauge, or several if the tract is extensive
or consists of several areas at different elevations. Sometimes there
is only a year or so in which to collect figures. In this case the
ratio of the observed fall to that, for the same period, at the nearest
station where regular records are kept, is calculated. This ratio is
assumed to hold good throughout, and thus the probable rainfall figures
for the new station can be obtained for the whole period over which
the records have been kept at the regular station. The volumes of the
British Rainfall Organisation contain a vast amount of information
regarding rainfall. For a large area there should be one rain-gauge for
every 500 acres, for a small area more. In the case of a valley there
should be at least three gauges along the line of the deepest part--one
at the highest point, one at the lowest, and one midway as regards
height--and two gauges half way up the sides and opposite the middle
gauge (_Ency. Brit._, Tenth Edition, vol. xxxiii.). Some extra gauges
may be set up for short periods in order to see whether the regular
gauges give fair indications of the rainfall of the tract. If they do
not do so some allowances can be made for this.


2. =Available Rainfall.=--The area drained by a stream is called its
“catchment area” or “basin.” The available rainfall in a catchment area
is the total fall less the quantity which is evaporated or absorbed
by vegetation. The evaporation does not chiefly take place directly
from the surface. Rain sinks a short distance into the ground, and
is subsequently evaporated. The available rainfall does not all flow
directly into the streams. Some sinks deep into the ground and forms
springs, and these many months later augment the flow of the stream and
maintain it in dry seasons. The available rainfall of a given catchment
area is known as the “yield” of that area.

Estimation of the available rainfall is necessary chiefly in cases
where water is to be stored in reservoirs for town supply or
irrigation. The ratio of the available to the total rainfall depends
chiefly on the nature and steepness of the surface of the catchment
area, on the temperature and dryness of the air, and on the amount
and distribution of the rainfall. The ratio is far greater when the
falls are heavy than when they are light. Again, when the ground is
fairly dry and the temperature high--as in summer in England--nearly
the whole of the rainfall may evaporate; but when the ground is soaked
and the temperature low--as in late autumn and winter in England--the
bulk of the rainfall runs off. In the eighteen years from 1893 to 1900
the average discharge of the Thames at Teddington, after allowing for
abstractions by water companies, was in July, August, and September 12
per cent. of the rainfall--6·9 inches--in its basin, and in January,
February, and March 60 per cent. of the fall which was 5·9 inches. The
total fall in the year was 26·4 inches. Some rivers in Spain discharge,
in years of heavy rainfall, 39 per cent., and in years of light
rainfall 9 per cent. of the rainfall (_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._, vol.
clxvii.). The discharge of a river is not always greatest in the month,
or even the year, of greatest rainfall.

The table opposite gives some figures obtained by comparison of
rainfall figures and stream discharges. The case of the area of 2208
acres near Cape Town is described in a paper by Bartlett (_Min. Proc.
Inst. C.E._, vol. clxxxviii.), and it is shown by figures that part
of the rainfall in the rainy season went to increase the underground
supply which afterwards maintained the flow in the dry season.

  +------------------------+-------------+-----------------+---------+---------------+-----------------------+
  |        Place.          |  Catchment  |Period over which| Total   |   Available   |      Remarks          |
  |                        |    Area.    |  Observations   |Rainfall |   Rainfall.   |                       |
  |                        |             |    Extended.    |Observed.|               |                       |
  +------------------------+-------------+-----------------+---------+---------------+-----------------------+
  |                        |   Acres.    |                 | Inches. |Ratio to Total.|                       |
  |Nagpur, Central India   |    4,224    |June to September|   44    |      ·40      |                       |
  |                        |             |(Monsoon period).|         |               |                       |
  |   ”          ”         |      ”      |      ”          |   30    |      ·27      |                       |
  |Mercara, South India    |       48    | Whole year.     |  119    |      ·37      |Gravelly soil overlying|
  |King William’s Town,    |             |                 |         |               |  granite.             |
  |  Cape Colony           |   67,200    |     ”           |   27    |      ·21      |Hills with forest and  |
  |Near Cape Town, Cape    |             |                 |         |               |  bush.                |
  |  Colony                |      110    |May to October   |   31·5  |      ·51      |Bare hills.            |
  |Near Cape Town, Cape    |             |(rainy season).  |         |               |                       |
  |  Colony                |    2,208    |     ”           |   43    |      ·40      |    ”                  |
  |Melbury Moor, Devonshire|     ...     | Whole year.     |   50·7  |      ·54      |                       |
  |Newport, Monmouthshire  |     ...     |     ”           |   40    |      ·40      |                       |
  |Newport, Isle of Wight  |     ...     |     ”           |   32    |      ·40      |                       |
  |Basin of Nepean River,  |  284 sq.    |                 |         |               |                       |
  |  N.S.W.                |   miles     |     ”           |   44·3  |      ·44      |Bare, broken ground.   |
  |Basin of Cataract River,|             |                 |         |               |                       |
  |  N.S.W.                | 70 sq. miles|     ”           |   54    |      ·45      |     ”      ”          |
  +------------------------+-------------+-----------------+---------+---------------+-----------------------+

The following statement shows how the available rainfall may vary from
year to year. The figures are those of a catchment area of 50 square
miles on the Cataract River, New South Wales (_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._,
vol. clxxxi.):--

  +-----+---------+---------------+-------------------------------------+
  |Year.|Rainfall.|   Available   |          Remarks.                   |
  |     |         |   Rainfall.   |                                     |
  +-----+---------+---------------+-------------------------------------+
  |     | Inches. |Ratio to Total.|                                     |
  |1895 |  34·1   |      ·84      |Heavy rain falling on saturated area.|
  |1896 |  33·7   |      ·28      |Evenly distributed fall.             |
  |1897 |  44·7   |      ·49      |Heavy rains in May.                  |
  |1898 |  56·4   |      ·45      |  ”     ”      February (15 ins.).   |
  |1899 |  54·9   |      ·43      |  ”     ”      August (11·5 ins.).   |
  |1900 |  26·1   |      ·50      |  ”     ”      May and July.         |
  |1901 |  37·4   |      ·11      |Evenly distributed fall.             |
  |1902 |  29·9   |      ·06      |                                     |
  |1903 |  41·7   |      ·23      |No heavy fall.                       |
  +-----+---------+---------------+-------------------------------------+

The manner in which the available rainfall may vary from month to month
is shown in the following statement, which gives the figures for 1905
for the Sudbury River in Massachusetts:--

  +---------+---------+-----------------------+
  | Month.  |Rainfall.|  Available Rainfall.  |
  +---------+---------+-----------------------+
  |         | Inches. |    Percentage of fall.|
  |January  |   5·3   |           48          |
  |February |   2·2   |           24          |
  |March    |   3·2   |          142          |
  |April    |   2·7   |          104          |
  |May      |   1·3   |           40          |
  |June     |   5·0   |           16          |
  |July     |   5·5   |            6          |
  |August   |   2·7   |            8          |
  |September|   6·9   |           31          |
  |October  |   1·5   |           18          |
  |November |   2·1   |           23          |
  |December |   4·0   |           40          |
  |         |         |                       |
  +---------+---------+-----------------------+
  | Total   |  42·3   |     Average 39·5      |
  +---------+---------+-----------------------+

Rankine gives the ratio of the available rainfall to the whole fall as
1·0 on steep rocks, ·8 to ·6 on moorland and hilly pasture, ·5 to ·4
on flat, cultivated country, and nil on chalk. These figures are only
rough. The figures for rocks and pastures are too high. The loss from
evaporation and absorption is not proportional to the rainfall. It is
far more correct to consider the loss as a fairly constant quantity
in any given locality but increasing somewhat when the rainfall is
great. The available rainfall in Great Britain has generally been
overestimated. Sometimes it has been taken as being ·60 of the whole
fall. More commonly the loss is taken to be 13 to 15 inches. This is
correct for the western mountain districts, where the rainfall is
about 80 inches and the soil consists chiefly of rocks partly covered
with moorland or pasture. In other parts of the country, especially
where flat, the loss is often 17 to 20 inches. All the above figures
are, however, general averages. The proper estimation of the available
rainfall at any place in any country depends a great deal on experience
and judgment, and on the extent to which figures for actual cases of
similar character are available. Regarding the “run-off” from saturated
land during short periods, see CHAP. XII., _Arts. 1_ and _2_.


3. =Measurement of Rainfall.=--A rain-gauge should be in open ground
and not sheltered by objects of any kind. The ordinary rain-gauge is
a short cylinder. This is often connected by a tapering piece to a
longer cylinder of smaller diameter. In this the rain is stored safely
and is measured by a graduated rod. The measurement can be made more
accurately than if the diameter was throughout the same as at the
top. In other cases the water is poured out of the cylinder into a
measuring vessel. If the rain-gauge was sunk so that the top was level
with the ground, rain falling outside the gauge would splash into it
and vitiate the readings unless the gauge was surrounded by a trench.
Ordinarily the top of the gauge is from 1 to 3 feet above the ground.
When it is 1 metre above the ground the rain registered is said to be
on the average about 6 per cent. less than it should be, owing to the
fact that wind causes eddies and currents and carries away drops which
should have fallen into the gauge. The velocity of the wind increases
with the height above the ground, and so does the error of the
rain-gauge. Devices for getting rid of the eddies have been invented by
Boernstein and Nipher (_Ency. Brit._, Tenth Edition, vol. xviii.), but
they have not yet come into general use. The Boernstein device is being
used experimentally at Eskdalemuir. It would appear that much splashing
cannot take place when the ground is covered with grass, and that in
such a case the top of the gauge could be 1 foot above the ground, thus
making the error very small.

If the ground is at first level, then rises and then again becomes
level, a rain-gauge at the foot of the <DW72> will, with the prevailing
wind blowing up the <DW72>, register too much, and a rain-gauge just
beyond the top of the <DW72> will register too little (_Ency. Brit._,
Tenth Edition, vol. xxxiii.).


4. =Influence of Forests and Vegetation.=--When the ground is covered
with vegetation, and especially forests, the _humus_ or mould formed
from leaves, etc., absorbs and retains moisture. It acts like a
reservoir, so that the run-off takes place slowly and the denudation
and erosion of the soil is checked. The roots of the trees or other
vegetation also bind the soil together. Vegetation and forests thus
mitigate the severity of floods and reduce the quantity of silt brought
into the streams. They also shield the ground from the direct rays of
the sun and so reduce evaporation, and thus, on the whole, augment the
available rainfall. Forests render the climate more equable and tend to
reduce the temperature, and they thus, at least on hills, increase the
actual rainfall to some extent.

If a forest is felled and replaced by cultivation, the ploughing of
the soil acts in the same way as the _humus_ of the forest, and the
crops replace the trees; and it has been stated that in the U.S.A.
the cultivation is as beneficial as the forests in mitigating floods
and checking denudation of the soil (_Proc. Am. Soc. C.E._, vol.
xxxiv.). But when forests are felled they are not, at least in hilly
country, always replaced by cultivation. Measures to put a stop to the
destruction of forests or to afforest or reforest bare land may enter
into questions of the régime of streams or the supply of water. On the
Rhine, increase in the severity of floods was distinctly traced to
deforestation of the drainage area.

It is usually said that forests act as reservoirs by preventing snows
from melting. This is disputed in the paper above quoted, and it is
stated that in the absence of forests the snow forms drifts of enormous
depth, and these melt very gradually and act as reservoirs after the
snow in the forests has disappeared.


5. =Heavy Falls in Short Periods.=--When rain water, instead of being
stored or utilised, has to be got rid of, it is of primary importance
to estimate roughly--exact estimates are impossible--the greatest
probable fall in a short time. This bears a rough ratio to the mean
annual fall. The maximum observed falls in twenty-four hours range,
in the United Kingdom, generally from ·05 to ·10 of the mean annual
fall--but on one occasion the figure has been ·20,--and in the tropics
from ·10 to ·25. Actual figures for particular places can be extracted
from the rain registers, but the probability of their being exceeded
must be taken into account. The greatest fall observed in twenty-four
hours in the United Kingdom is 7 inches, and in India 30 inches in the
Eastern Himalayas.

But much shorter periods than twenty-four hours have to be dealt with.
The following figures are given by Chamier (_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._,
vol. cxxxiv.) as applicable to New South Wales, and he considers
that they are fair guides, erring on the side of safety, for other
countries:--

  Duration of fall in hours     1     4    12   24
  Ratio of fall to maximum
    daily fall                  ¼     ½     ¾    1

The above figures are probably safe for England. For India the case is
far otherwise. The following falls have been observed there:--

  +----------+-------+--------------+--------+
  |  Period. | Fall. |Rate per Hour.|Remarks.|
  +----------+-------+--------------+--------+
  |          |Inches.|   Inches.    |        |
  |7 hours   | 10    |      1·43    |        |
  |4·5 hours |  7·7  |      1·7     |        |
  |2 hours   |  8    |        4     |        |
  |1 hour    |  5    |        5     |        |
  |20 minutes|  1·6  |      4·8     |        |
  |10 minutes|  1    |        6     |        |
  +----------+-------+--------------+--------+

The falls of 1 inch in ten minutes were frequently observed near the
head of the Upper Jhelum Canal, a place where the annual rainfall is
not more than 30 inches (see also CHAP. XII., _Art. 1_). In some parts
of the Eastern Himalayas, where 30 inches of rain has fallen in a day,
it is possible that 8 inches may have fallen in an hour. In England 4
inches has fallen in an hour. The heaviest falls in short periods do
not usually occur in the wettest years, and they may occur in very dry
years. Nor do they always occur on a very wet day.




CHAPTER III

COLLECTION OF INFORMATION CONCERNING STREAMS


1. =Preliminary Remarks.=--The information which is required concerning
streams depends on the character of the stream and on the nature of the
work which is to be done. For the present let it be supposed that the
stream is large and perennial. Other kinds of streams will be dealt
with in _Arts. 6_ and _7_. In dealing with a large perennial stream it
is nearly always necessary to know the approximate highest and lowest
water-levels, and these can generally be ascertained by local inquiry,
combined with observations of water marks; but a higher level than the
highest known and a lower level than the lowest known are always liable
to occur, and must to some extent be allowed for. If navigation exists
or is to be arranged for, the highest and lowest levels consistent with
navigation must be ascertained. The highest such level depends chiefly
on the heights of bridges. A plan to a fairly large scale is also
necessary in most cases.

If an embankment to keep out floods is to be made along a river which
is so large that its flood-level cannot be appreciably affected by the
construction of the work, it may be necessary to obtain information
only as to the actual flood-levels, and as to the extent to which
the stream is liable to erode its bank. If a length of the bank of a
stream has to be protected against scour, it is necessary to know of
what materials the bed and bank are composed, and whether the channel
is liable to changes and to what extent. It is also desirable to know
to what extent the water transports solids, if any. In some kinds of
protective work these solids are utilised.

But in cases where the stream is to be much interfered with, it is
necessary to have full information concerning it, not only as regards
water-levels, changes in the channel, and transport of solids, but as
regards the longitudinal profile and cross-sections, and the discharges
corresponding to different water-levels. The collection of some of this
information, particularly as to the water-levels and discharges at
different times of the year and in floods, may occupy a considerable
time.

Methods of ascertaining the quantity of silt carried in the water of
a stream are described in CHAP. IV., _Art. 4_. Remarks regarding the
other kinds of information required--the stream being still supposed to
be large and perennial--are given in _Arts. 2_ to _5_ of this chapter.
The degree of accuracy required in the information depends, however,
on the importance of the work, and sometimes the procedure can be
simplified. Detailed remarks on gauges and on the instruments used and
methods adopted for observing discharges and surface <DW72>s, are given
in _Hydraulics_, CHAP. VIII. and Appendix H.


2. =Stream Gauges.=--Unless the stream being dealt with is an
artificial one, it is unlikely that the flow in the reach with which
the work is concerned will be uniform. The rise and fall of the water
at one place cannot therefore be correctly inferred from those at
another. It will be desirable to have two gauges, either read daily
or else automatically, recording the water-level, one near each end
of the reach concerned, with intermediate gauges if the reach is very
long. If, in or near the reach, there is already a gauge which has been
regularly read, it may be sufficient to set up only one new gauge,
and to read it only for such a period of time as will give a good
range of water-level, and to compare the readings with those of the
old gauge. The readings of the new gauge for water-levels outside the
range of those observed can then be inferred, but if the stream is very
irregular this may involve some trouble (_Art. 4_).

In the case of a large stream which shifts its course, the reading
of a gauge does not give a proper indication of the water-level. In
other words, the distance of the gauge from the two ends of the reach
is subject to alteration. The case is the same as if the stream was
stable and the gauge was shifted about. In such a stream there ought,
if accuracy is required, to be a group of two or more gauges for each
point where there would be only one if the stream was not a shifting
one. Also, owing to erosion of the bank or the formation of a sandbank,
it may often be necessary to shift the gauge. When possible it should
be kept in a fixed line laid down at right angles to the general
direction of the stream. When shifted, its zero level should be altered
in such a way that the reading at the new site at the time of shifting
is the same as it was before shifting. When the gauge is moved back
to the original site its zero should be placed at its original level,
though this may give rise to a sudden jump in the reading for the
reason given in the first sentence of this paragraph.


3. =Plan and Sections.=--Making a survey and plan, and laying down on
it the lines for longitudinal and cross-sections, and taking levels
for the sections, are ordinary operations of surveying. If any land
is liable to be flooded, its boundaries should be shown on the plan
and on some of the cross-sections. Unless the water is shallow, it is
necessary to obtain the bed levels from the water-level by soundings,
the level of a peg at the water-level having been obtained by
levelling. All the sections should show the water-level as it was at
some particular time, but the water-level will probably have altered
while the survey was in progress, and allowance must be made for this.
The pegs at all the cross-sections and on both banks of the stream--for
the water-levels at opposite banks may not be exactly the same--may,
for instance, be driven down to the water-level when it is steady,
and thereafter any changes in it noted and the soundings corrected
accordingly.

In order to ascertain what changes are occurring in the channel it may
be necessary to repeat the soundings at intervals and, if there is much
erosion of the bank, to make fresh plans.


4. =Discharge Observations.=--For a large stream it is necessary to
observe the discharges by taking cross-sections and measuring the
velocity. If there is a sufficient range of water-levels, it will
be possible to make actual observations of a sufficient number of
discharges. If soundings cannot, owing to the depth or velocity, be
taken at high water, they must be inferred from those previously
taken, but this does not allow for changes in the channel, which are
sometimes considerable and rapid. If there is not a sufficient range of
water-level, the discharges for some water-levels must be calculated
from those at other water-levels. In this case observations of the
surface <DW72> will be required, and the discharge site should be so
selected that no abrupt changes in the channel will come within the
length over which the observations are to extend. This length should
be such that the fall in the water surface will be great enough to
admit of accurate observation. If the cross-section of the stream is
nearly uniform throughout the whole of this length, or if it varies
in a regular manner, being greatest at one end of the length and
least at the other end. the differences in the areas of the two end
sections being not more than 10 or 12 per cent., then the velocity
and cross-section of the stream can be observed in the usual manner
at the centre of the length; but otherwise they should be observed at
intervals over the whole length, or at least in two places, one where
the section is small and one where it is great, and the mean taken. Or
the velocity can be observed at only one cross-section and calculated
for the others by simple proportion and the mean taken. The coefficient
C can then be found from the formula C = V/√(RS). To find the discharge
for a higher or lower water-level, the change in the value of C
corresponding to the change in R can be estimated by looking out the
values of C in tables, and the discharge calculated by using the new
values of C and R and the new sectional area, S remaining unaltered.
But if the channel is such that, with the new water-level, a change in
S is likely to have occurred, this change must be allowed for. Any such
change will be due to the changed relative effects of irregularities,
either in the length over which the observations extended or downstream
of that length. The effect of irregularities in the bed is greatest at
low water. The effect of lateral narrowings is greatest at high water.
Since a change of 10 per cent. in S causes a change of only 5 per cent.
in V, it will usually suffice to draw on the longitudinal section the
actual water surface observed and to sketch the probable surface for
the new water-level. If the whole channel is fairly regular for a long
distance downstream of the discharge site, no <DW72> observations need
be made nor need several sections be taken in order to find V. The
changed value of C should, however, be estimated in the manner above
indicated. For this purpose any probable value of S will suffice.


5. =Discharge Curves and Tables.=--Ordinarily it will be possible,
by plotting the observed discharges as ordinates, the gauge readings
being the abscissæ, to draw a discharge curve and from it construct a
discharge table. Unless the channel is of firm material and not liable
to change, there are likely to be discrepancies among the observed
discharges, so that a regular discharge curve will not pass through
all the plotted points. If the discrepancies are not serious, they can
be disregarded and the curve drawn so as to pass as near as possible
to all the points, but otherwise trouble and uncertainty may arise.
The soundings should be compared in order to see whether changes
have occurred in the channel. If such changes do not account for the
discrepancies, the cause must be sought for in some of the recorded
velocities. If no sources of error in these can be found, such as
wind, it is possible that the velocity has been affected by a change
in the surface <DW72> owing to some change in the channel downstream
of the length. Failing this explanation, the discrepancies must be set
down to unknown causes. With an unstable channel and where accuracy
is required, the sectional areas and velocities should be regularly
tabulated or plotted so that changes may be watched and investigated.
To do this it may be necessary to take surface <DW72> observations, or
to set up extra gauges which will show any changes in the <DW72>.

If, downstream of the discharge site, there is any place where
affluents come in and bring varying volumes of water, or where gates
or sluices are manipulated, and if the influence of this extends up to
the discharge site, the water-level there no longer depends only on
the discharge, and a discharge table must be one with several columns
whose headings indicate various conditions at the place where the
disturbances occur.

In order to show how the gauge readings and discharges vary from day to
day throughout the year, a diagram should be prepared showing the gauge
readings and discharges as ordinates, the abscissæ being the times in
days starting from any convenient date as zero. Such a diagram, showing
only gauge readings, is given in fig. 56, CHAP. XII.


6. =Small Streams.=--Small streams will now be considered, those, for
instance, which are too small to be navigable and which occasionally
run dry or nearly dry. If the water of the stream is to be stored for
water supply, power or irrigation purposes, full information as to
discharges and silt carried will be required. If the stream is small
enough the discharges can be ascertained by means of a weir of planks.
The discharge is then known from the gauge readings. Cross-sections
and large scale plans will not be required unless the stream is to be
altered or embanked. If the water, instead of being stored, is to be
got rid of, as in drainage work, the only information required as to
discharges is the maximum discharge. Large scale plans, sections, or
information as to silt or water-levels (except as a means of estimating
the discharge) will not be required unless the stream is to be altered
or embanked.

In all these cases of small streams the information required is
generally, as has been seen, less than in the case of large perennial
streams, but it is generally more difficult to obtain. If the stream
is ill-defined or its flow intermittent, especially if it is also very
small and the place sparsely inhabited, it may be difficult to obtain
any discharge figures except those based on figures of rainfall. The
method of obtaining such figures has been stated in CHAP. II. The
figures required are those of the annual and monthly fall when the
water is to be stored, and those of the greatest fall in a short period
when the water is to be got rid of. Of course a plan of the catchment
area is required.


7. =Intermittent Streams.=--In the case of large streams whose flow is
intermittent, the information required will, as before, depend upon the
circumstances. Such streams occur in many countries. The difficulty
in obtaining information is often very great. To obtain figures of
daily discharge a gauge must be set up in the stream and a register
kept. The chief difficulty in an out-of-the-way place is likely to
be the obtaining correct information as to the maximum discharge.
Information, derived from reports or from supposed flood marks, as to
the highest water-level, may be inaccurate, and information based on
rainfall figures may be extremely doubtful owing to the large size of
the catchment area, the absence of rain gauges, and the difficulty,
especially if the rain is not heavy, in estimating the available fall.
All sources of information must be utilised and, whenever possible,
observations should be made over a long period of time.


8. =Remarks.=--Very much remains to be done in collecting and
publishing information concerning the ratio of the discharges to the
rainfall. By observing a fall of rain and the discharge of a stream
before and after the fall, it is possible to ascertain the figures
for that occasion, but they will not hold good for all occasions.
Continuous observations are required. The chief obstacle is the
expense. Not only have measuring weirs and apparatus for automatically
recording the water-level to be provided, but the weirs would often
cause flooding of land involving payment of compensation. The most
suitable places for making observations are those where reservoirs for
water-works exist or are about to be made.




CHAPTER IV

THE SILTING AND SCOURING ACTION OF STREAMS


1. =Preliminary Remarks.=--When flowing water carries solid substances
in suspension, they are known as “silt.” Material is also moved by
being rolled along the bed of the stream. The difference between silt
and rolled material is one of degree and not of kind. Material of
one kind may be rolled and carried alternately. The quantity of silt
present in each cubic foot of water is called the “charge” of silt.
Silt consists chiefly of mud and fine sand; rolled material of sand,
gravel, shingle, and boulders. When a stream erodes its channel, it is
said to “scour.” When it deposits material in its channel, it is said
to “silt.” Both terms are used irrespective of whether the material is
silt or rolled material. A stream of given velocity and depth can carry
only a certain charge of silt. When it is carrying this it is said to
be “fully charged.”

If a stream has power to scour any particular material from its
channel, it has power to transport it; but the converse is not true.
If the material is hard or coherent, the stream may have far more
difficulty in eroding it than in merely keeping it moving. And there is
generally a little more difficulty even when the material is soft.

Silting or scour may affect the bed of a channel or the sides or both.
The channel may thus decrease or increase in width or--if one bank is
affected more than, or in a different manner to, the other--alter its
position laterally whether or not it is altering its bed level, and
_vice versa_.

The cross-section of a stream is generally “shallow,” _i.e._ the width
of the bed is greater than the combined submerged lengths of the sides,
and the action on the bed is generally greater than on the sides.

Silting and scouring are generally regular or irregular in their action
according as the flow is regular or irregular, that is, according as
the channel is free or not from abrupt changes and eddies. In a uniform
canal fed from a river, the deposit in the head reach of the canal
forms a wedge-shaped mass, the depth of the deposit decreasing with
a fair approach to uniformity. Salient angles or places alongside of
obstructions are most liable to scour, and deep hollows or recesses
to silt. Eddies have exceptionally strong scouring power. Immediately
downstream of an abrupt change scour is often severe. An abrupt change
is one, whether of sectional area or direction of flow, and whether or
not accompanied by a junction or bifurcation, which is so sudden as to
cause eddies. The hole scoured alongside of an obstruction may extend
to its upstream side, though there is generally little initial tendency
to scour there. An obstruction is anything causing an abrupt decrease
in any part of the cross-section of a stream, whether or not there is a
decrease in the whole cross-section, _e.g._ a bridge pier or spur.

Most streams vary greatly at different times both in volume and
velocity and in the quantity of material brought into them. Hence the
action is not constant. A stream may silt at one season and scour at
another, maintaining a steady average. When this happens to a moderate
extent, or when the stream never silts or scours appreciably, it is
said to be in “permanent régime,” or “stable.” Most streams in earthen
channels are either just stable and no more, or are unstable.

Waves, whether due to wind or other agency, may cause scour, especially
of the banks. Their effect on the bed becomes less as the depth of
water increases, but does not cease altogether at a depth of 21 feet,
as has been supposed. Salt water possesses a power of causing mud, but
not sand, to deposit.

_Arts. 2_, _3_, and _6_ of this chapter refer to action on the bed of a
stream. Action on the sides will be considered in _Art. 7_.

Weeds usually grow only in water which has so low a velocity that it
carries no silt to speak of, but if any silt is introduced the weeds
cause a deposit. The weeds also thrive on such a deposit.


2. =Rolled Material.=--If a number of bodies have similar shapes, and
if D is the diameter of one of them and V the velocity of the water
relatively to it, the rolling force is theoretically as V^2 D^2, and
the resisting force or weight as D^3. If these are just balanced, D
varies as V^2, or the diameters of similarly shaped bodies which can
just be rolled are as V^2 and their weights as V^6. From practical
observations, it seems that the diameters do not vary quite so rapidly
as they would by the above law, the weights being more nearly as V^5.

Let a stream of pure water having a depth D, and with boulders on its
bed, have a velocity V just sufficient to move them very slowly. Any
larger boulders would not be moved. Any smaller boulders would move
more quickly. Similarly, fine sand would be rolled more quickly than
coarse sand. If the velocity of the stream increases, larger boulders
would be moved. Streams are thus constantly sorting out the materials
which they roll. If the bed is examined it will be found that large
boulders exist only down to a certain point, smaller boulders, shingle,
gravel, coarse sand and fine sand following in succession.

If the water, instead of being pure, is supposed to contain silt, this
may affect its velocity--it is not, however, known to do so--but, given
a certain velocity, it is not likely that the rolling power of the
stream is much affected by its containing silt.

It is sometimes supposed that increased depth gives increased rolling
power, because of the increased pressure, but this is not so. The
increased pressure due to depth acts on both the upstream and
downstream sides of a body. It is moved only by the pressure due to the
velocity.

When sand is rolled along the bed of a stream there is usually a
succession of abrupt falls in the bed. After each fall there is a long
gentle upward <DW72> till the next fall is reached. The sand is rolled
up the long <DW72> and falls over the steep one. It soon becomes buried.
The positions of the falls of course keep moving downstream. The height
of a fall in a large channel is perhaps 6 inches or 1 foot, and the
distance between the falls 20 or 30 feet. A fall does not usually
extend straight across the bed but zigzags.

It has sometimes been said that the inclination of the bed of a stream,
when high, facilitates scour, the material rolling more easily down a
steep inclined plane. The inclination is nearly always too small to
have any appreciable direct effect. The inclination of the surface of
the stream of course affects its velocity, and this is the chief factor
in the case.

A sudden rise in the bed of a stream does not necessarily cause rolled
materials to accumulate there, except perhaps to the extent necessary
to form a gentle <DW72>. Frequently even this <DW72> is not formed,
especially if the rolled material is only sand. The eddies stir it up
and it is carried on. The above remarks apply also to weirs or other
local rises in the bed.


3. =Materials carried in Suspension.=--It has long been known that
the scouring and transporting power of a stream increases with its
velocity. Observations made by Kennedy have shown that its power to
carry silt decreases as the depth of water increases (_Min. Proc. Inst.
C.E._, vol. cxix.). The power is probably derived from the eddies which
are produced at the bed. Every suspended particle tends to sink, if its
specific gravity is greater than unity. It is prevented from sinking by
the upward components of the eddies. If V is the velocity of the stream
and D its depth, the force exerted by the eddies generated on 1 square
foot of the bed is greater as the velocity is greater, and is probably
as V^2 or thereabouts. But, given the charge of silt, the weight of
silt in a vertical column of water whose base is 1 square foot is as D.
Therefore the power of a stream to support silt is as V^2 and inversely
as D. The silt charge which a stream of depth D can carry is as V^{½}.
V is called the “critical velocity” for that depth, and is designated
as V_{0}.

The full charge must be affected by the nature of the silt. The
specific gravity of fine mud is not much greater than that of water,
while that of sand is about 1·5 times as great. Moreover, the particles
of sand are far larger than the particles of mud. If two streams of
equal depths and velocities are fully charged, one with particles of
mud and the other with particles of sand, the latter will sink more
rapidly and will have to be more frequently thrown up. They will be
fewer in number. From some observations referred to by Kennedy (_Punjab
Irrigation Paper_, No. 9, “Silt and Scour in the Sirhind Canal,” 1904),
it appears that in a fully charged stream which carried 1/3300 of
its volume of a mixture of mud and sand of various grades, sand of a
particular degree of coarseness formed only 1/35,000 of the volume of
the water, but that when the same stream was clear and was turned on to
a bed of the coarse sand it took up 1/15,000 of its volume. It would
thus appear that the full charge of silt is less as its coarseness and
heaviness are greater. This is in accordance with the laws mentioned
above (_Art. 2_, par. 1). See also CHAP. V., _Art. 2_, last paragraph.

It is probable that fine mud is carried almost equally into all
parts of the stream, whereas sand is nearly always found in greater
proportion near the bed and, as before remarked, some materials may
be rolled and suspended alternately. The charge of mixed silt which a
stream can carry is, no doubt, something between the charge which it
can carry of each kind separately, but the laws of this part of the
subject are not yet fully known. From the observations above referred
to, Kennedy concludes that a canal with velocity V_{0} will carry in
suspension 1/3300 to 1/5000 of its volume of silt, according as it is
charged with sand of all classes or only with the heavier classes.

Let a stream be carrying a full charge of any kind of silt. Then if
there is any reduction in velocity, a deposit will occur--unless there
is also a reduction of depth--until the charge of silt is reduced
again to the full charge for the stream. The deposit generally occurs
slowly, and extends over a considerable length of channel. The heavier
materials are, of course, deposited first. If a stream is not fully
charged, it tends to become so by scouring its channel. It is generally
believed that a stream fully charged with silt cannot scour silt from
its channel, or bear any introduction of further silt. This seems to
be correct in the main, but the remarks made in the latter part of the
preceding paragraph must be taken into consideration.

It has been stated (_Art. 2_) that a weir or a sudden rise in the bed
does not necessarily cause an accumulation of rolled material. It never
causes a deposit of suspended material unless it causes a heading up
and reduction of velocity to below the critical velocity.


4. =Methods of Investigation.=--The quantity of silt in water is found
by taking specimens of the water and evaporating it or, if the silt is
present in great quantity, leaving it to settle for twelve hours--an
ounce of alum can be added for every 10 cubic feet of water to
accelerate settlement--drawing off the water by a syphon, and heating
the deposit to dry it. The deposit is then measured or weighed. It is
best to weigh it. If clay is filled into a measure, the volume depends
greatly on the manner in which it is filled in. When silt deposits in
large quantities in a channel, or when heavy scour occurs, the volume
deposited or scoured is ascertained by taking careful sections of the
channel.

[Illustration: FIG. 1.]

Silt is best classified by observing its rate of fall through still
water. A sand which falls at ·10 feet per second is, in India, called
class (·1), and mixed sand which falls at rates varying from ·1 to ·2
feet per second is called class ·1/·2. Fig. 1 shows a sand separator
designed by Kennedy. The scale is ⅛. It has a syphon action, and the
rate of flow can be altered by altering the length of the exit pipe.
Suppose it is desired to measure the sand of class (·10) and all
heavier kinds. The pipe is adjusted so as to give a velocity of ·1 foot
per second to the upward flowing water, which then carries off all silt
of class (·10) or finer. All heavier silt falls into the glass tube.
It can be separated again by being mixed with water and passed through
the instrument again, the velocity of flow through the instrument being
increased.

The quantity of silt present at various depths can be found by pumping
specimens of water through pipes. At each change of depth the pipe,
delivery hose, etc., should be cleaned. Allowance must be made for the
velocity of ascent of the water up the pipe. Suppose this to be 1·4
feet per second. Then the velocity of sand of class (·2) would be 1·2
feet per second, and the quantity of sand actually found in the water
would have to be increased by one-sixth.


5. =Quantity and Distribution of Silt.=--The quantity of silt present
in water varies enormously. Fine mud, even though sufficient to
discolour the water, may be so small in volume that it only deposits
when the water is still, and even then deposits slowly. In the river
Tay, near Perth, the silt was found to be ordinarily 1/10,000 of the
volume of water, and at low water only 1/28,000. In the river Sutlej at
Rupar, near where it issues from the Himalayas, the silt in the flood
season is extremely heavy. Out of 360 observations, made at various
depths, during the flood seasons of four successive years, in water
whose depth ranged up to 12 feet, the silt was once found to be 2·1
per cent. by weight of that of the water. It was more than 1·2 per
cent. on four occasions, and more than 0·3 per cent. (or 3 in 1000)
on sixty-four occasions. Generally about one-half of the silt was
clay and sand of classes finer than (·10), about one-third was sand
of class ·1/·2, and the residue was sand of class ·2/·3. The sand of
the river Chenab is generally coarser than that of the Sutlej. There
are very great differences in the degree of coarseness of river sand.
The sand in any river becomes finer and finer as the gradient flattens
in approaching the sea. Sea sand has been found to be of class (·20).
In the Sirhind Canal, which takes out from the Sutlej at Rupar, the
maximum quantity of suspended silt observed in the four flood seasons
was 0·7 per cent., on one occasion out of 270, and it exceeded 0·3 per
cent. on twenty-five occasions. About 80 per cent. of the silt was clay.

In another part of the paper quoted, it is stated that the silt
suspended in the canal water averaged, during the whole of one flood
season, about 1/1700 of the volume of the water. This would be about
1/1200 by weight. The silt deposited in the bed of the canal, in a
period of a few days, was sometimes as much as 1/1000 of the water
which had passed along, and occasionally as much as 1/500. It was
nearly all sand, only about 3 per cent. being clay. Silt of classes
finer than (·1) gave no trouble, and were to be eliminated in future
investigations. In a canal, as in a river, the sand on the bed becomes
finer the further from the head.

Regarding the distribution of the silt at various depths, in water 5 to
17 feet deep, the quantity of silt near the bed may, when the charge is
heavy and consists of mixed silt, be 1¼ to 3 times that at the surface.
If the charge is fine mud, there is likely to be as much silt at the
surface as near the bed, if sand, there may be none at the surface and
little in the upper part of the stream.

In all cases single observations are likely to show extraordinarily
discordant results; a number of observations must be made at each point
and averaged.


6. =Practical Formulæ and Figures.=--A stream which carries silt
generally rolls materials along its bed. The proportion between the
quantities of material rolled and carried is never known, and this
makes it impossible to frame an exact formula applicable to such cases,
but Kennedy, from his observations on canals fully charged with the
heavy silt and fine sand usually found in Indian rivers near the hills,
arrived at the empirical formula for critical velocities

    V = ·84 D^{·64}

The observations were made on the Bari Doab Canal and its branches, the
widths of the channels varying from 8 feet to 91 feet, and the depths
of water from 2·3 feet to 7·3 feet. The beds of these channels have,
in the course of years, adjusted themselves by silting or scouring, so
that there is a state of permanent régime, each stream carrying its
full charge of silt, and the charges in all being about equal. From
further observations referred to above (_Art. 3_, par. 2) it appears
that this kind of silt forms about 1/3300 of the volume of the water,
and that on the Sirhind Canal, sand coarser than the (·10) class,
formed 1/35,000 of the volume of water.

The formula gives the following critical velocities for various
depths:--

   D =     1     2     3     4     5     6     7
  V_{0} = ·84  1·30  1·70  2·04  2·35  2·64  2·92

           D =      8     9    10
          V_{0} = 3·18  3·43  3·67.

In Indian rivers not near the hills the silt carried is not so heavy,
and the critical velocities are supposed to be about three-fourths of
the above. Thrupp (_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._, vol. clxxi.) gives the
following ranges of velocities as those which will enable streams to
carry different kinds of silt. It does not appear that the streams
would be fully charged except at the higher figure given for each case.

  D = 1·0              10·0
  V = 1·5  to  2·3      3·5 to 4·5 (Coarse sand).
  V =  ·95 to  1·5      2·3 to 3·5 (Heavy silt and fine sand).
  V =  ·45 to   ·95     1·2 to 2·3 (Fine silt).

It cannot be said that the exact relations between D and V are yet
known, but it is of great practical importance to know that V must vary
with D. The precise manner in which it must vary does not, for moderate
changes, make very much difference. In designing a channel a suitable
relation of depth to velocity can be arranged for, and one quantity or
the other kept in the ascendant, according as scouring or silting is
the evil to be guarded against.

The old idea was that an increase in V, even if accompanied by an
increase in D, _e.g._ simply running a higher supply in a given
channel, gave increased silt-transporting power. In a stream of very
shallow section this is probably correct, for V increases faster than
D^{·64} (_Hydraulics_, CHAP. VI., _Art. 2_). In a stream of deep
section a decrease in D gives increased silt-transporting power.
If the discharge is fixed, a change in the depth or width must be
met by a change of the opposite kind in the other quantity. In this
case widening or narrowing the channel may be proper according to
circumstances. In a deep section widening will decrease the depth
of water, and may also increase the velocity, and it will thus give
increased scouring power. In a shallow section, narrowing will increase
the velocity more than it increases D^{·64}. In a medium section it is
a matter of exact calculation to find out whether widening or narrowing
will improve matters.

If the water entering a channel has a higher silt-charge than can be
carried in the channel, some of it must deposit. Suppose an increased
discharge to be run, and that this gives a higher silt-carrying power
and a smaller rate of deposit per cubic foot of discharge, it does not
follow that the deposit will be less. The quantity of silt entering
the channel is now greater than before. Owing to want of knowledge
regarding the proportions of silt and rolled material, and to want of
exactness in the formulæ, reliable calculations regarding proportions
deposited cannot be made.

The channels in which the observations above referred to were made have
all assumed nearly rectangular cross-sections, the sides having become
vertical by the deposit on them of finer silt; but the formula probably
applies approximately to any channel if D is the mean depth from side
to side, and V the mean velocity in the whole section.

If the ratio of V to D differs in different parts of a cross-section,
there is a tendency towards deposit in the parts where the ratio is
least, or to scour where it is greatest. There is a tendency for the
silt-charge to adjust itself, that is, to become less where the above
ratio is less, but the irregular movements of the stream cause a
transference of water among all parts, and this tends to equalise the
silt-charge.

Dubuat gives the following as the velocities close to the bed which
will enable a stream to scour or roll various materials. The bed
velocity is probably less than the mean velocity in the ratio of about
·6 to 1 in rough channels, and about ·7 to 1 in smooth channels:--

  Gravel as large as peas           ·70 feet per second
    ”           ”    French beans  1·0   ”    ”    ”
    ”  1 inch in diameter          2·25  ”    ”    ”
  Pebbles 1½ inch in diameter      3·33  ”    ”    ”
  Heavy shingle                    4·0   ”    ”    ”
  Soft rock, brick, earthenware    4·5   ”    ”    ”
  Rock of various kinds            6·0   ”    ”    ”
                                     and upward.

The figures for brick, earthenware, and rock can apply only to
materials of exceedingly poor quality. Masonry of good hard stone
will stand 20 feet per second, and instances have occurred in which
brickwork has withstood a velocity of 90 feet per second without injury
so long as the water did not carry sand and merely flowed along the
brickwork. If there are abrupt changes in the stream, causing eddies,
or if there is impact and shock, or if sand, gravel, shingle, or
boulders are liable to be carried along, velocities must be limited.


7. =Action on the Sides of a Channel.=--It has been seen that the laws
of silting and scour on the bed of a channel depend on the ratio of the
depth to the velocity. The same laws probably hold good in the case of
a gently shelving bank, so that here again V ought to vary as D^{·64}.
The velocity near the angle where the <DW72> meets the water surface
seems to decrease faster than D^{·64}. At all events, silt tends to
deposit in the angle and the <DW72> to become steep.

When the <DW72> is steep the law seems to be different, the tendency for
deposit or scour to occur on the bank depending on the actual velocity
without much relation to the depth. The velocity very near to a steep
bank is always low relatively to that in the rest of the stream. Thus
there is often a tendency for silt to deposit on the bank, especially
in the upper part, and for the side to become vertical except for a
slight rounding at the lower corner. A bank may receive deposits when
the bed may be receiving none, and it may have a persistent tendency
to grow out towards the stream. The growth of the bank is generally
regular, the line of the bank being preserved, but it may be irregular,
especially if vegetation, other than small grass, becomes established
on the new deposits.

When scour of the sides of a channel occurs it may occur by direct
action of the stream on the sides near the water-level, or by action
at or near the toe of the <DW72>, which causes the upper part of the
bank to fall in. Such falling in is generally more or less irregular,
and the bank presents an uneven appearance. The fallen pieces of bank
may remain, more or less intact, especially if they are held together
by the roots of grasses, etc., where they fell, and prevent further
scour occurring along the toe of the <DW72>. Falling in of banks is most
liable to occur in large streams and with light soils. It may be caused
by the waves which are produced by steamers and boats or, especially in
broad streams, by wind. The action on the banks at bends is discussed
in _Art. 8_.

Thus in designing a channel according to the principles laid down in
_Art. 6_, the question of action on the sides of the channel has to
be dealt with as follows. Whether or not the velocity is to be low,
relatively to the depth, _i.e._ whether or not deposit on the bed
is more likely to occur than scour, care can be taken not to make it
actually too low, and not to make it actually too high, particularly if
the soil is light and friable. With ordinary soils a mean velocity of
3·3 feet per second in the channel is generally safe as regards scour
of the sides. Any velocity of more than 3·5 feet per second may give
trouble. A velocity of less than 1 foot per second is likely to give
rise to deposit on the sides.

In channels in alluvial soils the falling in of banks is sometimes said
to occur more when the stream is falling than at other times. This has
been noticed on both the Mississippi and the Indus. The cause has been
said to be the draining out of water which had percolated into the
bank, the water in flowing out carrying some sand with it. The effect
of this cannot however be great.


8. =Action at Bends.=--At a bend, owing to the action of centrifugal
force and to cross-currents caused thereby, there is a deposit near the
convex bank and a corresponding deepening--unless the bed is too hard
to be scoured--near the concave bank. The water-level at the concave
bank is slightly higher than at the convex bank. The greatest velocity
instead of being in mid-stream is nearer the concave bank.

As the transverse current and transverse surface <DW72> cannot commence
or end abruptly, there is a certain length in which they vary. In
this length the radius of curvature of the bend and the form of the
cross-section also tend to vary. This can often be seen in plans of
river bends, the curvature being less sharp towards the ends.

When once a stream has assumed a curved form, be it ever so slight,
the tendency is for the bend to increase. The greater velocity and
greater depth near the concave bank react on each other, each inducing
the other. The concave bank is worn away, or becoming vertical by
erosion near the bed, cracks, falls in, and is washed away, a deposit
of silt occurring at the convex bank, so that the width of the stream
remains tolerably constant. The bend may go on increasing, and it often
tends to move downstream.

[Illustration: FIG. 2.]

In fig. 2 the deep places are shown by dotted lines. Along the straight
dotted line there is no deep place. Such a line would be used for a
ford. At low water it becomes a shoal. This is the chief reason why a
tortuous stream at low water consists of alternate pools and rapids.
It is sometimes said that deep water occurs near to a steep hard bank.
Such deepening is due to bends or obstructions which give the current a
set towards the bank, or it is due to irregularities in the bank which
cause eddies. In a straight channel with even and regular banks there
is no such deepening.

When a bend has formed in a channel previously straight, the stream
at the lower end of the bend, by setting against the opposite bank,
tends to cause another bend of the opposite kind to the first. Thus
the tendency is for the stream to become tortuous and, while the
tortuosity is slight, the length, and therefore the <DW72> and velocity,
are little affected; but the action may continue until the increase
in the length of the stream materially flattens the <DW72>, and the
consequent reduction in velocity causes erosion to cease. Or the stream
during a flood may find, along the chord of a bend, a direct route
with, of course, a steeper <DW72>. Scouring a channel along this route
it straightens itself, and its action then commences afresh. Short
cuts of this kind do not, however, occur so frequently as is sometimes
believed. In some streams the bends acquire a horse-shoe shape and the
neck becomes very narrow and short cuts may then occur. Otherwise they
are not common. V increases only as √(S), and if the country is covered
with vegetation it is not easy for a stream to scour out a new channel.

The effect of bends on the velocity of a stream is not well understood.
In case of a bend of 90° the increased resistance to flow when the bend
is absolutely sudden (a sudden bend is known as an “elbow”) amounts
perhaps to V^2/(2_g_). Whether it is greater or less in the case of
a gentle bend of 90° is not known. In the case of a pipe there is a
certain radius which gives a minimum resistance (_Hydraulics_, CHAP.
V.). The increased resistance at a bend is due partly to the fact that
the maximum velocity is no longer in the centre of the stream, and
partly to the fact that the velocities at the different parts of the
cross-section have to be rearranged at the commencement of the bend and
again at its termination. Thus the effect of a bend of 45° is a good
deal more than half of that of a bend of 90°. Two bends of 45°, both
in the same direction, with a straight reach between them, will cause
more resistance than a single bend of 90° with the straight reach above
or below the bend. If the two bends of 45° are in different directions
the resistance will be still greater. A succession of sharp bends may
produce a serious effect, amounting to an increase in roughness of
the channel. A succession of gentle bends, of any considerable angle,
cannot of course occur within a moderate length of channel.

When there is head to spare there is clearly no objection to bends,
except that the bank may need protection. At a place where the bank has
in any case to be protected, _e.g._ at a weir, there is no objection to
an elbow.


9. =General Tendencies of Streams.=--Since the velocity is greater
as the area of the cross-section is less, a stream always tends
to scour where narrow or shallow, and to silt where wide or deep.
The cross-section thus tends to become uniform in size. Suppose
two cross-sections to be equal in size but different in shape. The
velocities of the two sections will be equal. The tendency of the bed
to silt will (_Art. 6_) be greater at the deeper section and, when
silting has occurred on the bed, the section will be reduced and there
will be a tendency to scour at the sides. Thus the cross-sections tend
to become also uniform in shape. If a bank of silt has formed in a
stream, the tendency is for scour to occur. There is also a tendency
for silt to deposit just below the point where the bank ends. Hence a
silt bank often moves downstream.

Owing to the tendency to scour alongside of, or downstream of,
obstructions (_Art. 1_), it is clear that a stream constantly tends to
destroy obstructions.

There is an obvious tendency for silt to deposit where the bed <DW72>
of a stream flattens, and for scour to take place where it steepens
(_Hydraulics_, figs. 16 and 17, pp. 24 and 25), and thus the tendency
is for the <DW72> to become uniform.

In a natural stream flowing from hilly country to a lake or sea, the
<DW72> is steepest at the commencement and gradually flattens. There
is thus a tendency for the bed to rise except at the mouth of the
stream. This rising tends to increase the <DW72> and velocity in the
lower reaches, and this again enhances the tendency, described in the
preceding article, of the stream to increase in tortuosity.

When a silt-bearing stream overflows its banks the depth of water on
the flooded bank is probably small and its velocity very low, and a
deposit of silt takes place on the bank. When the deposit has reached
a certain height it acts like a weir on the water of the next flood,
which flows quickly over it and, instead of raising it higher, deposits
its silt further away from the stream. In this way a strip of country
along the stream gradually becomes raised, the raising being greatest
close to the stream. The country <DW72>s downwards in going away from
the stream. In other words, the stream runs on a ridge. If the bank
becomes raised so high that flooding no longer occurs, the raising
action ceases, but if, as is likely in alluvial country, the bed of the
stream also rises, the action may continue and the ridge become very
pronounced.

Some rivers have very wide and soft channels which are only filled
from bank to bank in floods, if then. The deep stream winds about in
the channel, and the rest of it is occupied by sandbanks and minor
arms. The winding is the result of the velocity being too great for
the channel. The streams, especially the main stream, constantly shift
their courses by scouring one bank or the other. Now and then the main
stream takes a short cut, either down a minor arm or across an easily
eroded sandbank. This is a very different matter from a short cut
across high ground. The sandbanks receive deposits of silt in floods,
but are constantly being cut away at the sides. Such rivers frequently
erode their banks to an extraordinary extent. The Indus sometimes cuts
into its bank 100 feet or more in a day, and it may cut for half a mile
or more without cessation. The tortuosity of such a stream increases as
it gets nearer the sea. The actual length of the Indus in the 400 miles
nearest the sea is 39 per cent. greater than its course measured along
the bank. In the reach from the 600th to the 700th mile from the sea,
the difference is only 3 per cent. For a detailed description of some
such rivers, see _Punjab Rivers and Works_.

Sometimes general statements are made regarding silting or scour in
connection, for instance, with a stream which is confined between
embankments or training walls, or has overflowed its banks or is held
up by a weir. It is impossible to say that any such condition, or any
condition, will cause silting or scour, unless the velocity depth and
silt charge are known.




CHAPTER V

METHODS OF INCREASING OR REDUCING SILTING OR SCOUR


1. =Preliminary Remarks.=--Most important works which affect the régime
of a stream have some effect on its silting or scouring action, but
this is not generally their chief object. Such works will be dealt
with in due course, and the effects which they are likely to produce
on silting or scouring will be mentioned. In the present chapter only
those works and measures will be considered whose chief object is to
cause a stream to alter its silting or scouring action. It does not
matter, so far as this discussion is concerned, whether the object
is direct, _i.e._ concerned only with the particular place where the
effect is to be produced, or indirect, as, for instance, where a stream
is made to scour in order that it may deposit material further down the
stream. The protection of banks from scour is considered in CHAP. VI.
Dredging is dealt with in CHAP. VIII.


2. =Production of Scour or Reduction of Silting.=--Sometimes the silt
on the bed of a stream is artificially stirred up by simple measures,
as, for instance, by scrapers or harrows attached to boats which are
allowed to drift with the stream, or by means of a cylinder which has
claw-like teeth projecting from its circumference and is rolled along
the bed, or by fitting up boats with shutters which are let down close
to the bed and so cause a rush of water under them, or by anchoring
a steamer and working its screw propeller. It is thus possible to
cause a great deal of local scour, but the silt tends to deposit again
quickly, and it is not easy to keep any considerable length of channel
permanently scoured. The system is suitable in a case in which a local
shallow or sandbank is to be got rid of and deposit of silt a little
further down is not objectionable. It may be suitable in a case in
which the bed is to be scoured while a deposit of silt at the sides of
the channel is required, especially if some arrangement to encourage
silt deposit at the sides is used (_Art. 3_, par. 4; also CHAP. VI.,
_Art. 3_).

Holding back the water by means, for instance, of a regulator or
movable weir, and letting it in again with somewhat of a rush, will,
if frequently repeated, have some effect in moving silt on in the
downstream reach. Regarding the upstream reach, it has been remarked
(CHAP. IV., _Art. 3_) that a weir does not necessarily cause silt
deposit. If, in a stream which does not ordinarily silt, a regulator or
movable weir causes, when the water is headed up, some silt deposit,
the cessation of the heading up not only removes the tendency to silt,
but the section of the stream, at the place where the deposit occurred,
is less than elsewhere, and there is thus a tendency to scour there. If
a regulator is alternately closed and opened, no permanent deposit of
much consequence is likely to occur.

A stream may be made to scour its channel by opening an escape or
branch. This causes a draw in the stream, and an increase in velocity
for a long distance upstream of the bifurcation (_Hydraulics_, CHAP.
VII., _Art. 6_). This procedure is sometimes adopted on irrigation
canals. The escape is generally opened in order to reduce the quantity
of water passing down, but it may be opened solely to induce scour or
prevent silting. The floor of the escape head is usually higher than
the bed of the canal, but this does not interfere with operations
except at low supplies. It may (CHAP. IV., _Art. 2_) have some effect
on the quantity of rolled material passed out of the escape.

If there is a weir in the river below the off-take of the canal, and
if the escape runs back to the river and thus has a good fall, the
scouring action in the canal may be very powerful.

If the main channel has a uniform <DW72> throughout, the <DW72> of its
water surface is greater upstream of the escape than downstream of the
escape, and there is thus an abrupt reduction of velocity and possibly
a deposit of silt in the main channel below the escape. This may or
may not be objectionable. In the case of an irrigation canal, it is
far less objectionable than deposit in the head of the canal. The best
point for the off-take of any escape or scouring channel depends on
the position of the deposits in the main channel. The off-take should
be downstream of the chief deposits, but as near to all of them as
possible. A breach in a bank acts of course in the same way as an
escape.

A stream of clear water when sent down a channel will scour it if the
material is sufficiently soft. In the case of the Sirhind Canal, it has
already been mentioned (CHAP. IV., _Art. 3_), that when the river water
became clear after the floods the proportion of coarse sand, _i.e._
sand above the (·10) class, carried by the canal water was about
1/15,000 by volume. This was in the period from 22nd September to 7th
October. From 8th to 23rd October the proportion averaged 1/32,000 from
24th October to 8th November 1/44,000, and from 9th to 24th November
1/85,000. The reason of this reduction was that the comparatively clear
water kept picking up the sand from the bed and moving it on, the finer
kinds being moved most quickly. As the coarse sand left on the bed
became less in quantity, the water took up less. It appears, however,
that the water also picked up some clay which was left, and that the
total suspended silt in November was 1/9000 of the water. All the
observations mentioned in this paragraph appear to have been made at
Garhi, 26 miles from the head of the canal.


3. =Production of Silt Deposit.=--Works or measures for causing silt
deposit may be undertaken in order to cause silt deposit in specific
places where it will be useful, or in order to free the water from
silt. Sometimes both objects are combined.

If a stream can be turned into a large pond or low ground--a bank being
built round it if necessary--it can be made to part with some or all of
its silt whether rolled or suspended. Even if the pond is so large that
the velocity becomes imperceptible, the whole of the suspended matter
will not deposit unless it has sufficient time, but the matter which
remains in the water is likely to be extremely small in amount. The
silting up of marshes, pools, borrow-pits, etc., is now being effected,
or should be effected, in places where mosquitoes and malaria are
prevalent.

In the upper or torrential part of a stream, a high dam, provided with
a sluice and a high-level waste weir, may be built across it. The space
above the dam becomes more or less filled with gravel, etc. This has
been done in Switzerland (_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._, vol. clxxi.). In
the U.S.A. long weirs have been built in order to stop the progress of
detritus from gold mines. Such detritus was liable to choke up rivers
and damage the adjoining lands. The detritus from hill torrents can
also be reduced by afforestation of the hill sides.

[Illustration: FIG. 3.]

[Illustration: FIG. 4.]

When a stream is in embankment--irrigation channels are frequently
so--the bank can be set back (fig. 3), and suspended silt will then
deposit on the berms. The object of this arrangement is generally to
create very strong banks in low ground. A similar plan can be adopted
when the berm is only slightly below the water-level and even when it
is only occasionally submerged. In this case the deposit of a small
bank of silt along the edge of the berm next the stream will prevent
the access of fresh supplies of silt-bearing water to the parts further
away. Gaps should be cut in the bank of silt at intervals, and cross
banks made to form “silting tanks,” as shown in fig. 4. The inlets to
the tank should be large, and the outlets small, so that the water in
the tank may have little velocity. It is not, however, correct to have
the outlet so small--unless the water contain very little silt--that
there is very little flow through the tank. The tanks will generally
be silted up most quickly by allowing a good flow through them, even
though only a small proportion of the silt in the water is deposited.
Regular banks arranged to form tanks on the above principle can be made
behind the original banks of a canal in cases where the original banks
were not, for any reason, set back.

When a channel is made in low ground and the excavation is not
sufficient to make the banks, borrow-pits can be dug in the bed of the
channel. Such pits should not be long and continuous, but wide bars
should be left so that a number of short pits will result. These pits
will trap rolled material as well as suspended silt. The object in
this case is to free the water from silt and to reduce the size of the
channel and thus reduce the loss of water from percolation.

On the Indus, where it has a strong tendency to shift westwards, long
earthen dams or groynes are run out from the west bank across the
sandbanks. One object is to cause silt deposit, and so increase the
quantity of material which the river will have to cut away, but whether
this result is achieved is doubtful. The sandbanks receive deposits in
any case. A groyne may increase the deposit on its upstream side, but
it cuts off the flood water from its downstream side and so reduces the
deposit there.


4. =Arrangements at Bifurcations.=--At a bifurcation, as where a branch
takes off from a canal, it is possible to reduce the quantity of rolled
material entering the canal by raising its bed or constructing a
weir or “sill” in its head. This arrangement may have great effect in
excluding boulders, shingle, or gravel. As regards rolled sand, it has
much less effect than might be expected (CHAP. IV., _Art. 2_). If the
canal is reduced in width (fig. 5) there will be eddies below the bed
level of the branch. They will stir up the sand and some of it will
enter the branch. If the canal is not reduced in width, eddies will be
produced in the surface water, and they will affect the bed.

The above remarks apply also to the case of a canal taken off from a
river when there are no works in the river.

[Illustration: FIG. 5.]

[Illustration: FIG. 6.]


5. =A Canal with Headworks in a River.=--In the case of a canal taking
off from a river and provided with complete headworks, it is possible
to do a great deal more. The case of the Sirhind Canal, already
referred to (CHAP. IV., _Arts. 5_ and _6_), is a notable example. The
canal (fig. 6) is more than 200 feet wide, the full depth of water
10 feet, and the full discharge about 7000 cubic feet per second. In
1893 when the irrigation had developed, and it became necessary to run
high supplies in the summer--July, August, and part of September--the
increase in the silt deposit threatened to stop the working of the
canal. In the autumn and winter, say from 25th September to 15th
March, the water entering the canal is clear and much of the deposit
was picked up by it, but not all. In the five years 1893 to 1897
inclusive, the following remedial measures were adopted. Increased
use was made of the escape at the twelfth mile. This did some good,
but there was seldom water to spare. In 1893 to 1894 the sill of the
regulator was raised to 7 feet above the canal bed, and it was possible
to raise it 3 feet more by means of shutters. This had little effect.
The coarsest class of sand was ·4, and the velocity of the water, even
of that part of it which came up from the river bed and passed over
the sill, was over 2 feet per second, so that all sand was carried
over. In 1894 to 1895 the divide wall, which had been only 59 feet
long, was lengthened to 710 feet, so as to make a pond between the
divide wall and the regulator,[8] but probably the leakage through the
under-sluices was often as much as the canal supply, and the water in
the pond was thus kept in rapid movement and full of silt. The canal
was closed in heavy floods. This did some good, but probably the canal
was often closed needlessly when the water looked muddy but contained
no excessive quantity of sand. The above comments on the measures taken
were made by Mr Kennedy when chief engineer. The above measures did
not reduce the silt deposits, but the scour in the clear water season
improved, probably because higher supplies were run owing to increased
irrigation. The deposit in the upper reaches of the canal, when at
its maximum about the end of August of each year, was generally more
than twenty million cubic feet. From the year 1900 a better system
of regulation was enforced, the under-sluices being kept closed as
much as possible, so that there was much less movement in the pond and
much less silt in its water. By 1904 the deposit in the canal had been
reduced to three million cubic feet, and no further trouble occurred.

During the period from 20th September 1908 to 10th October 1908 the
quantity of silt in the canal above Chamkour (twelfth mile) decreased
from 19,325,800 cubic feet to 12,477,600 cubic feet. The quantity
scoured away was 6,848,200 cubic feet. During this period no silt
entered the canal. The quantity which passed out of the reach in
question in suspension was 4,183,660 cubic feet, so that 2,664,540
cubic feet of material must have been rolled along the bed. The rolled
material was 64 per cent. of the suspended material. During this period
the Daher escape, in the twelfth mile, was open, and the mean velocity
in the canal just above the escape was about 4 feet per second, the
depth of water being about 10 feet. The velocity near the escape was
thus greater than the critical velocity for mixed silt (CHAP. IV.,
_Art. 6_), and even a long way up the canal it would be in excess of
the critical velocity. The water seems to have carried about 1/1800
of its volume of silt. Whether the above proportions of rolled to
suspended matter would hold good in a fully charged stream flowing with
the critical velocity it is not easy to say.

As silt deposits in the pond, the velocity of the water in it, along
the course of the main current towards the canal, increases and
eventually the water begins to carry coarse sand dangerous for the
canal. In order to ascertain when this state of affairs has been
reached, two methods of procedure are possible. One is to frequently
test specimens of the water in the pond along the course of the main
current and see when it contains more than 1/15,000 of its volume of
coarse sand. This plan would be troublesome and liable to error, and
is rejected by Kennedy, who suggests that the depth and velocity of
the water in the pond be frequently observed along the course of the
main current. As soon as the velocity exceeds the critical velocity for
mixed silt, it is time to close the canal and open the under-sluices
and scour out the deposit from the pond. The period in which most silt
is believed to have been deposited in the canal is the spring and early
summer, say from 15th March to 1st July. This is the time when the
snows are melting and the river water is clear. It can then carry more
sand than in the rains--1st July to 15th September,--when it is muddy.

Kennedy also suggests that some under-sluices should be provided at
the far side of the river, _i.e._ at the right-hand side of the weir.
It would then be possible, by opening them, to let floods pass without
interfering with the pond.

The two spurs or groynes, shown in the plan, were constructed in 1897
so as to cause the stream to flow along the face of the canal regulator
and not allow deposits to accumulate there. The depth of silt deposited
in a great part of the pond amounted at times to 8 or 10 feet.


6. =Protection of the Bed.=--It is possible to afford direct protection
from scour to the bed of a stream by constructing walls across it,
but unless the walls are near together the protection will not be
effective. An arrangement used in some streams in Switzerland consists
of tree trunks secured by short piles and resting on brushwood. But
as long as the walls are not raised above the bed they cannot entirely
stop scour, unless extremely close together. If raised above the bed
they form a series of weirs.

The weirs must be so designed that the depth of water in a reach
between two weirs is great enough to reduce the velocity down to the
critical velocity, or less. The fall in the water surface at each
weir being very small, the discharge over the weir can be found by
considering it as an orifice extending up to the downstream water
surface, and the head being the fall in the surface at the weir.

To stop scour of the bed by direct protection without raising the
water-level, the bed can be paved, a plan adopted in artificial
channels with very high velocities. The paving can be of stones,
bricks, or concrete blocks. The Villa system of protection, which has
been used in Italy, France, and Spain, consists of a flexible covering
laid on the bed. Prisms of burnt clay or cement are strung on several
parallel galvanized iron wires, which are attached to cross-bars so as
to form a grid a few feet square. The grids are loosely connected to
one another at the corners, and the whole covering adjusts itself to
the irregularities of the bed (_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._, vol. cxlvii.).

The special protection or paving required in connection with weirs and
such-like works is considered in CHAP. X., _Arts. 2_ and _3_.




CHAPTER VI

WORKS FOR THE PROTECTION OF BANKS


1. =Preliminary Remarks.=--The protection of a length of bank from
scour may be effected by spurs, which are works projecting into the
stream at intervals, or by a continuous lining of the bank. A spur
forms an obstruction to the stream (CHAP. IV., _Art. 1_), and when
constructed, or even partly constructed, the scour near its end may
be very severe, even though there may be little contraction of the
stream as a whole. If the bed is soft a hole is scoured out. Into
this hole the spur keeps subsiding, and its construction, or even its
maintenance, may be a matter of the greatest difficulty. A high flood
may destroy it. If it does not do so, it may be because the stream has,
for some reason, ceased to attack the bank at that place. A continuous
lining of the bank is not open to any objection, and is generally
the best method of protection. Spurs made of large numbers of rather
small trees, weighted with nets filled with stones, have been used on
the great shifting rivers of the Punjab which swallowed up enormous
quantities of materials. The use of spurs on such rivers has now, in
most cases, been given up. If L is the length of a spur measured at
right angles to the bank, the length of bank which it protects is about
7 L--3 L upstream and 4 L downstream,--but the spur has to be strongly
built, and its cost is, in many cases, not much less than the expense
of protecting the whole bank with a continuous lining.

Whatever method is adopted, a plan, large enough to show all
irregularities, should always be prepared, and the line to which it is
intended that the bank shall be brought marked on it.

[Illustration: FIG. 7.]

Sometimes natural spurs exist as, for instance, where a tree projects
into a stream or has fallen into it, and the holes between the spurs
may be deep, so that a continuous protection would be expensive. Or
there may be trees standing in such positions that, if felled, they
will be in good places for spurs. In cases such as the above, spurs may
be suitable even in a stream with a soft channel.

Regarding the use of spurs or groynes for diversion works or for
reducing the width of a stream, see CHAP. VII., _Art. 1_, and CHAP.
VIII., _Art. 3_.


2. =Spurs.=--A spur may be made of--

    (_a_) Loose stone, which may be faced with rubble above low-water
    level (fig. 7).

    (_b_) Layers of fascines weighted with gravel or stones.

    (_c_) Earth or sand closely covered with fascines.

    (_d_) A double line of stakes with fascines or brushwood laid
    between them (fig. 8).

    (_e_) A single line of stakes with planking or basket work on its
    upstream side, or with twigs or wattle laid horizontally and passed
    in and out of the stakes, as in fig. 20.

    (_f_) A single tree with the thick end of the trunk on the bank and
    with stakes, if necessary, to prevent the current from moving it.

    (_g_) A number of small trees heaped together and weighted with
    nets full of stones.

    (_h_) A layer of poles and over them a layer of fascines on which
    are built walls of fascine work so arranged as to form cells or
    hollow rectangular spaces which become filled with silt.

    (_i_) Large fascines running out into the stream and having their
    inner ends staked to the bank while the outer ends float, other
    fascines being added over them and projecting further into the
    stream, and the whole eventually sinking.

[Illustration: FIG. 8.]

Combinations of the above are also used, for instance, (_d_) or (_e_)
may be used for the upper portion, the foundation being (_a_) or (_c_).

[Illustration: FIG. 9.]

[Illustration: FIG. 10.]

[Illustration: FIG. 11.]

Instead of running out at right angles to the bank a spur may be
inclined somewhat downstream. This somewhat reduces the eddying and
scour round the end. The ends of a system of spurs should be in the
line which it is intended that the edge of the stream shall have
(fig. 9). The tops of short spurs are usually above high flood level.
Sometimes spurs are made to <DW72> downwards (fig. 10), and they then
cause less disturbance of the water and less scour than if built to the
form shown by the dotted line. Such spurs are sometimes combined with
a low wall running across the bed of the stream, the whole forming a
“profile” of the cross-section to which it is intended to bring the
channel. Regarding such walls, see CHAP. V., _Art. 6_. When a spur is
long it may have small subsidiary spurs (fig. 11) to reduce the rush of
water along it; or its end may have to be protected in the same manner
as the advancing end of a closure dam (CHAP. VII., _Art. 2_).

The following is a curious case of misconception of the action
of spurs. In 1909 the river Indus was eroding its right bank and
threatening to destroy the town of Dera Ghazi Khan. A clump of date
palms formed a promontory and resisted erosion to some extent. A
suggestion was made--by an engineer of eminence who had formerly been
consulted in the case--to the effect that the date palms be removed,
the reason given being that they caused disturbance and scour. On this
principle spurs would have to be made not to protect a bank but to
cause it to be eroded.


3. =Continuous Lining of the Bank.=--The lining or protection of a
bank may be of stone or brick pitching (figs. 12 and 13), loose stone
(fig. 14), fascines (fig. 15), turfing, plantations, brushwood, or of
other materials laid on the <DW72>s. Before protecting a bank it is
best to remove irregularities and bring it to a regular line. This can
generally be done most easily by filling in hollows, but sometimes it
is done by cutting off projections. It is also necessary to make the
side <DW72> uniform. Where the <DW72> is as shown by the dotted lines in
figs. 12 to 14, filling in can be effected, but cutting away the upper
part of the <DW72> is also feasible. Such cutting away has been proposed
as a remedy in itself in cases where the steep upper part of the <DW72>
was falling in, but it is not much of a remedy.

Stone pitching may rest, if boats are required to come close to the
bank, on a toe wall of concrete, as in fig. 13,[9] or otherwise on a
foundation of loose stone, as in fig. 12. When concrete is used the
bed is dredged to such a depth as will provide against undermining by
scour. Sloping boards attached to piles are placed along the front face
and the concrete is thrown in under water. The <DW72> of stone or brick
pitching is usually from 2 to 1 to 1 to 1, but it may be as steep as
½ to 1. The earth behind the pitching must be well rammed in layers.
In order to prevent the earth from being eaten away by the water which
penetrates through the interstices of the stone or brick, a layer, 3
to 6 inches thick, of gravel or ballast is placed over the earth and
rammed. When loose stone is used, dredging is not necessary, but the
stone is allowed to gradually sink down and more is added at the top. A
certain proportion of the stones should be of large size.

[Illustration: FIG. 12.]

[Illustration: FIG. 13.]

When fascining is used, long twigs are made into bundles and tied up
at every 2 feet so as to form fascines about 4 to 6 inches thick, and
these are laid on the <DW72>s and secured by pegs driven in at short
intervals, between the fascines.

[Illustration: FIG. 14.]

[Illustration: FIG. 15.]

Sometimes the pitching or loose stone is not carried up to the top
of the bank, or even up to high flood-level, and the bank above the
pitching is protected by turfing--the pieces of turf being placed on
edge normally to the <DW72> if very steep (fig. 14) or laid parallel to
the <DW72> if it is not very steep--or, above ordinary water-level, by
plantations of osiers or willows which obstruct the water and tend to
cause silting, and whose roots bind the banks together.

[Illustration: FIG. 16.]

Another method of using fascines is to lay them on the <DW72>s with
their lengths normal to the direction of the stream. The upper end of
a fascine is above low water, and the lower end extends down to the
bed of the stream. Sometimes large ropes made of straw, or rough mats
made of grass, are laid on the <DW72>s and pegged down, or mattresses of
fascines are laid on the <DW72>s and weighted with stones.

[Illustration: FIG. 17.]

A deep recess in the bank (fig. 16) can be filled in, before the
protection is added, with earth well rammed. On the Adige the filling
material consisted (fig. 17) of <DW19>s filled with stones, small cross
dams being made at intervals, as shown by the dotted lines, to arrest
flood water and cause it to deposit silt. At the back of the berm,
poplar or willow slips were planted, and these grew up and their roots
held the bank together. This system succeeded well.

A method of protection which is suitable when the water contains
much silt is what is known in India as bushing. Large leafy branches
of trees are cut and hung, as shown in fig. 18, by ropes to pegs.
They must be closely packed so as not to shake. At first they require
looking after, but silt rapidly deposits and the branches become fixed
and no longer dependent on the ropes. If the work is carefully done,
the result is a smooth, regular, and tenacious berm, as per dotted line
in the figure.

[Illustration: FIG. 18.]

[Illustration: FIG. 19.]

Another method, used on canals, is to make up the bank with earth and
to revet it with twigs or reeds, as shown in fig. 19. The foundation
must be taken down well below bed-level, otherwise the work may slip.
This kind of work cannot be done except when the canal is dry.

If the bank consists of sand or of very sandy soil, it must in any
case have a flat side <DW72> such as 3 to 1. If the sand is in layers
alternating with firm soil, it is a good plan to dig out some of the
sand and to replace it with clods of hard earth.

Staking (fig. 20) may be used, the stakes being one or two feet apart
from centre to centre, and long twigs laid horizontally being passed
in and out of the stakes, or bushing filled in behind the stakes. But
bushing alone is cheaper and nearly as good.

[Illustration: FIG. 20.]

For protecting the banks of the Indus it has been proposed (_Punjab
Rivers and Works_, CHAP. IV.) to use trees in exactly the same manner
as bushing, the trees being grown in several rows parallel to the river
so that whenever the river, by eroding its bank, comes up to the lines
of trees the first row will fall in. The first row would be chained to
the second, which would take the place of the pegs used in bushing. The
other rows would remain as a reserve.

The Villa system of bed protection (CHAP. V., _Art. 6_) has also been
successfully used for bank protection on the Scheldt, and on the
Brussels-Ghent Canal, the prisms being about 10 × 10 × 4 inches, and
having overlapping joints. The bands of prisms are placed in position
by a boat, the bands unrolling over a drum. The boat is provided with
an oscillating platform carrying rollers at its end. A thin layer of
gravel is laid over the bank and is pressed down by the rollers before
the prisms are laid on it (_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._, vol. cxxxiv., and
vol. clxxv.).

In the case of the river mentioned in CHAP. XI., _Art. 3_, where
extremely high velocities were met with, cylindrical rolls of
wire-netting were made, each 50 feet long and 5 feet in diameter, and
filled with boulders. These rolls can be used for bank protection. The
netting was made by wires 6 inches apart, crossing each other at right
angles and tied together at the crossings by short pieces of wire.

[Illustration: FIG. 21.]

On ship canals a berm (fig. 21) is frequently made a few feet below the
water-level. It serves as a foundation for the pitching, which need
not usually extend down to more than 5 feet below the water-level.
Below that the wash has little or no effect on the banks. On ordinary
navigation canals a similar berm is sometimes made--one or two feet in
width and a foot or less below the water-level--and rushes are planted
on it.

Sometimes a bank has been protected by a kind of artificial weed,
consisting of bushes or branches of trees attached to ropes. The end
of the rope is fastened to the bank and the weeds float in the stream
alongside the bank.

To protect a bank from ice, which exercises an uplifting force on
pitching, use has been made of a covering of a kind of reinforced
concrete consisting of slabs of concrete with wires embedded in it,
and fastened to the bank by wires, 20 inches long, running into the
bank, these wires being embedded in mortar so as to act like stakes.

[Illustration: FIG. 22.]


4. =Heavy Stone Pitching with Apron.=--On the great shifting rivers of
India a system of bank protection is adopted, consisting of a pitched
<DW72> with an apron (fig. 22). The system is used chiefly in connection
with railway bridges or weirs, but it has been used in one instance,
that of Dera Ghazi Khan, for the protection of the bank near a town.
When, as is usual, the flood-level is higher than the river bank, an
artificial bank is made. In any case the bank is properly aligned. The
pitching has a <DW72> of 2 to 1, and consists of quarried blocks of
stone loosely laid, the largest blocks weighing perhaps 120 lbs. The
apron is laid at the time of low water on the sandbank or bed of the
stream. If necessary, the ground is specially levelled for it. It is
intended to slip when scour occurs. The following dimensions of the
apron are given by Spring (_Government of India Technical Paper_, No.
153, “River Training and Control on the Guide Bank System,” 1904).
The probable maximum depth of scour can be calculated as explained
in CHAP. XI., _Art. 3_. If this depth, measured from the toe of the
<DW72> pitching is D, and if T is the thickness considered necessary
for the <DW72> pitching, then the width of the apron should be 1·5 D,
and its thickness 1·25 T next the <DW72> and 2·8 T next the river. It
will then be able to cover the scoured <DW72> to a thickness of 1·25 T.
This thickness is made greater than T because the stone is not likely
to slip quite regularly. The thickness T should, according to Spring,
be 16 inches to 52 inches, being least with a slow current and a
channel of coarse sand, and greatest with a more rapid current and fine
sand; but since the sand is generally finer as the current is slower,
it would appear that a thickness of about 3 feet would generally be
suitable. Under the rough stone there should be smaller pieces or
bricks. Along the top of the bank there is generally a line of rails
so that stone from reserve stacks, which are placed at intervals along
the bank, can be quickly brought to the spot in case the river anywhere
damages the pitched <DW72>.

For the special protection to banks required near weirs and similar
works, see CHAP. X., _Arts. 2_ and _3_.




CHAPTER VII

DIVERSIONS AND CLOSURES OF STREAMS


1. =Diversions.=--When a stream is permanently diverted the new course
is generally shorter than the old one, and the diversion is then often
called a cut-off. The first result of a cut-off is a lowering of
the water-level upstream and a tendency to scour there, and to silt
downstream of the cut-off. Fig. 23 shows the longitudinal section of a
stream after a cut-off _A B_ has been made. The bed tends to assume the
position shown by the dotted line. If both the diversion and the old
channel are to remain open, the water-level at the bifurcation will be
lowered still more, and the tendency to scour in the diversion will be
reduced.

[Illustration: FIG. 23.]

If the material is soft enough to be scoured by the stream, it is often
practicable to excavate a diversion to a small section and to let it
enlarge itself by scour. This operation is immensely facilitated if
the old channel can be closed at the bifurcation. The question whether
the scoured material will deposit in the channel downstream of the
diversion must be taken into consideration; also the question whether
the diversion will continue to enlarge itself more than is desirable.
The velocity in the diversion will be a maximum if its section is
of the “best form,” _i.e._ if its bed and sides are tangents to a
semicircle whose diameter coincides with the water surface, but this
may not (CHAP. IV., _Art. 6_) be the section which will give most
scour. In order to prevent the enlargement of the diversion taking
place irregularly, the excavation can be made as shown in fig. 24,
water being admitted only to the central gullet. The side gullets
should not be quite continuous, but unexcavated portions should be left
at intervals, so that if the water in scouring out the channel breaks
into the gullet, it will not be able to flow along it until it has
broken in all along.

[Illustration: FIG. 24.]

If a diversion is made, not with the object of lowering the water-level
but merely in order to shorten the channel, the increased velocity
caused by the steepened <DW72> may be inconvenient. In this case a weir
or weirs can be added (CHAP. VIII., _Art. 4_).

If the water contains sufficient silt to enable the abandoned loop to
be silted up within a reasonable time, it may be desirable to do this.
The silting up may, for instance, increase the value of the land. The
loop should be closed at its upper end. Water entering the lower end
will cause a deposit there. When the lower end is well obstructed by
silt, the upper end should be opened.

The set of the stream, due, for instance, to a bend at the point
where a diversion takes off has very little to do with the quantity
of water which goes down the diversion. The only effect of the set of
the stream is a slight rise of the water-level as compared with the
opposite bank. Similarly, the angle at which the diversion takes off
is only of importance in giving, in some cases, a velocity of approach
whose effect is generally small. The distribution of the water between
the diversion and the old channel really depends on their relative
discharging capacities. If the required quantity of water does not flow
down a diversion it can be dredged.

Sometimes a long spur is run out to send the water towards the off-take
of a diversion. The effect of this is very small--it merely causes a
set of the stream,--unless its length is so great that it amounts to
something like a closure dam. It is sometimes said that it is easier
to lead a river than to drive it. This remark is probably based on the
fact that spurs, such as those under consideration, generally produce
little effect, whereas the excavation of a diversion or the deepening
of a branch by dredging it, is more likely to produce some result.
There is, however, no certainty about this. Sometimes too much is
expected of such channels. Calculations are not always made as to the
scouring power of the stream, nor is account always taken of the fact
that as the cut scours its gradient flattens.


2. =Closure of a Flowing Stream.=--The closure of a flowing stream by
means of a dam is usually attended with some difficulty and sometimes
with enormous difficulty. There may be little trouble in running out
dams from both banks for a certain distance, but as soon as the gap
between the dams becomes much less than the original width of the
stream, the water on the upstream side is headed up and there is a rush
of water through the gap, which tends to deeply scour the bed and to
undermine the dams. The smaller the gap becomes the greater is the rush
and scour.

The closure is most easily effected at or near to the place where the
stream bifurcates from another. Then, as the gap decreases in width,
some of the water is driven down the other stream and it does not rise
so much. Eventually all the water goes down the other stream, and
the total rise is only so much as will enable this other stream to
carry the increased discharge. If the closure is not effected near a
bifurcation, the rise of the water will go on even after the closure is
completed, and it will not cease, unless the water escapes or breaks
out somewhere, until it has risen to the same level as that to which it
would have risen if the closure had been at the bifurcation, or perhaps
not quite to the same level, since there may still be a slight <DW72> in
the water surface and a small discharge which percolates through the
dam. Sometimes in such a case it is possible to arrange for temporary
escapes or bifurcations, which will be shallow and therefore easily
closed, after the main closure has been completed.

A closure is, of course, far more easily effected where the bed is hard
than where it is soft. Very often it is best to close temporarily at
such a place or near a bifurcation, even if the permanent dam has to be
elsewhere, and then to construct the permanent dam in the dry channel,
or in the still water, and remove the temporary one or cut a gap in it.

Generally the best method to adopt in a closure is to cover the bed
of the channel beforehand--unless it is already hard enough--with a
mattress or floor, such that it cannot be scoured as the gap closes.
A floor may consist of a number of stones or sandbags dropped in from
boats or by any suitable means, and placed with care so that there
shall not be gaps or mounds. Sandbags should be carefully sewn up. A
mattress may be made of fascines laid side by side and tied together,
floated into position, weighted and sunk. Even a carpet made of matting
or cloth and suitably weighted has sufficed in some cases. If the
scour is likely to be such that stones or sandbags will be carried
away, the stones may be placed in nets, baskets, or crates. Sandbags
may also be placed in nets. Probably the long rolls of wire-netting
filled with stones, described in CHAP. VI., _Art. 3_, would be better
than anything, and the diameter could be reduced somewhat. The floor or
mattress need not usually extend right across the stream. It must cover
a width much greater than--perhaps twice as great as--the width of the
gap is likely to be when scour begins. Its length, measured parallel
to the direction of the stream, must be such that severe eddies in
the contracted stream will have ceased before the stream reaches its
downstream edge. It need not extend to any considerable distance
upstream of the line of the dam.

The dams when started from the banks can generally be of simple earth
or gravel, or loose stones, but before they have advanced far they
will probably require protection at the ends by stones, or by staking
and brushwood, or by fascines. As soon as the dams have advanced well
onto the mattress and their ends have been well protected, it is best
to cease contracting the stream from the sides and to contract it
from the bottom by laying a number of sandbags across the gap so as to
form a submerged weir. In this way the rush of water is spread over
a considerable width of the stream. The weir is then raised until it
comes up above water. Leakage can be stopped by throwing in earth, or
gravel, or bundles of grass on the upstream side. Sometimes it is best
to construct the mattress over the whole width of the stream, and to
effect the closure entirely by a weir, carrying each layer right across
before adding another. The banks of the stream, if not hard, can be
protected by sandbags, stones, staking or fascining.

The chief cause of failures of attempts to close flowing streams is
neglect to provide a proper floor or mattress. The stones or other
materials may be of insufficient weight or not closely laid, or the
extent of the floor may be insufficient. In a soft channel and deep
water loose stones in almost any quantity may fail unless a mattress of
fascines is laid under them. Another cause of failure is running short
of materials, such as sandbags. Allowance should be made for every
contingency, including making good any failure of parts of the work.
Enormous sums of money have been wasted, and vast inconvenience, loss
and trouble incurred, in futile attempts to close breaches in banks, or
gaps in dams.

Sometimes the gap is closed by sinking a barge loaded with stones, or
by sinking a “cradle” or large mattress made of fascines, taken out to
the site by four boats, one supporting each corner, and then loaded
with stones and sunk. Another method is to run out a floating mattress
of fascines from one side of the gap to the middle and sink it, then
to proceed similarly on the other side, and so on.

An excellent plan, when it can be adopted, is to have more than one
line of operations, so that the heading up of the water is divided
between them.

In India closures of streams having depths of 6 or 8 feet are effected
by means of rough trestles made from trunks of small trees and placed
at intervals in the stream like bridge piers, one leg of the trestle
inclined upstream and one downstream. Each pair of adjacent trestles
is connected by a number of rough, horizontal poles. Against these are
placed bundles of brushwood. Earth is at the same time collected and
is rapidly added at the last. The chief danger is the undermining of
the bed by scour. This is prevented by driving in stakes and placing
brushwood against them. Closures of small channels or of breaches in
the banks of canals are effected by means of staking and brushwood.
Where dangerous breaches are liable to occur, it is a good plan to have
a barge, fitted up with a small pile-driver and carrying a supply of
sheet piles, ready at a convenient spot.

Hurdle <DW18>s, first used on the Mississippi, were employed on the
Indus in 1902 to close partially the main channel of the river.
There were to be three <DW18>s, each <DW18> consisting of three lines of
very long piles--some were 60 feet long,--driven into the bed of the
stream, which was to be protected with mattresses made of fascines and
extending right across it, with their heads above flood-level. The
idea was not to wholly stop the flow of the water, but to obstruct it
so much that silt would deposit, the channel become choked up, and the
water find a course down another channel. The work was begun in March
1902, and was in progress in May of the same year when an unusually
early flood put a stop to it. The <DW18>s had at this time advanced
considerable distances from the right bank of the stream, but none
had been completed. Two <DW18>s out of the three were for the most part
carried away. The river, however, took a new course, starting from a
point far upstream, the western channel became a creek, and the remains
of the <DW18>s were soon embedded in silt.

In any case in which the provision of a proper mattress has been
omitted, or when the mattress has been destroyed, or when a breach has
occurred in an embankment, whenever, in short, it is evident that the
gap cannot be closed until some other escape for the water is provided,
it may be possible to provide such an escape by cutting partly through
the dam or embankment on the downstream side at another place, and
thoroughly protecting the place and extending the protection downstream
and away from the dam or embankment. The water can then be let in, and
the closure of the old gap attempted. If a closure is effected, the
protected gap can then be closed. Sometimes it may be desirable to make
such a protected gap beforehand and with deliberation.

Dams for closing streams which are dry can be made similarly to flood
embankments (CHAP. XII., _Art. 7_). Sand does very well, provided it is
protected by a covering of clay or by fascining.


3. =Instances of Closures of Streams.=--In 1904 the Colorado River
broke into the Salton Sink--a valley covering 4000 square miles.
Unsuccessful attempts were made to close the stream by two rows of
piles with willows and sandbags between them, by a gate 200 feet long,
supported on 500 piles, and by twelve gates each 12 feet wide. A
“rock-fill” dam was then constructed on a mattress 100 feet wide and
1·5 feet thick. The river, which was 600 feet wide, broke through, but
was stopped by the construction of three parallel rock-fill dams in the
gap (_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._, vol. clxxi.).

[Illustration: FIG. 25.]

At the site of the railway bridge over the river Tista in Bengal, it
was necessary to close the main stream (fig. 25), which flowed at the
left side of the channel, while the bridge had been built at the right.
The bed was of sand, width 500 feet, depth 6 feet, and discharge 3700
cubic feet per second. The first attempt to close the stream was made
at M N, a floor of stone 200 feet long, 20 feet wide, and 2 feet
thick, being laid in the middle of the stream, and dams of earth,
sandbags, and stones being run out from each bank. As the gap decreased
in width the bed was torn up and the work failed. The heading up was 3
feet 9 inches. It was recognised later that the site should have been
at the bifurcation higher up, and that the stone floor should have been
laid on a mattress.

In the next working season the dams C D and E F G were made. The dam C
D was of earth. Two walls, each consisting of a double line of bamboos
with the spaces between the lines filled with bundles of grass weighted
with earth, were run out 50 feet in advance of the earthwork near the
lines of the toes of the <DW72>s. Along the line of the upper wall a
mattress of broken bricks 10 feet in width, and 1 foot thick, was laid,
and was kept 50 feet in advance of the wall. A total length of 1000
feet of embankment was made in five months and pitched on its upstream
side. The end was strongly protected by a mass of stone. The embankment
F G was of earth. The dam E F consisted of three lines of piles driven
10 feet into the bed. A mattress weighted with stones extended for 20
feet upstream of the dam and 40 feet downstream. A gap of 150 feet was
left at D E, and was not protected by a floor of any kind. A channel,
parallel to F G and extending to K, had been dug to a width of 200
feet. During the floods the heading up at D E was about 2·5 feet, and
the water was 30 feet deep. The line E F was greatly damaged and was
repaired. The cut F G K gradually enlarged, and by the end of the
floods more water was going down it than down the main stream. The gap
D E was finally closed by means of a line of bamboos and grass, the
bed being protected by a carpet, 100 × 50 feet, made of common cloth
weighted with sandbags. The success of the operations turned on the
scouring out of the cut F G K. It is remarkable that the gap D E did
not become wholly unmanageable in the floods (_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._,
vol. cl.).




CHAPTER VIII

THE TRAINING AND CANALISATION OF RIVERS


1. =Preliminary Remarks.=--When a stream is trained or regularised it
is generally made narrower, but sometimes narrow places have to be
widened. Deepening has also very frequently to be effected. The object
of training is generally the improvement of navigation, but it may be
the prevention of silt deposit. Some natural arms of rivers which form
the head reaches of canals in the Punjab are wide and tortuous, and
they are sometimes trained. Training often includes straightening or
the cutting-off of bends, as to which reference may be made to CHAP.
VII.


2. =Dredging and Excavating.=--When a flowing stream is to be deepened,
the work is usually done by dredgers. Dredgers can remove mud, sand,
clay, boulders, or broken pieces of rock. The “bucket ladder” dredger
is the commonest type. The “dipper” dredger is another. Both these
can work in depths of water ranging up to 35 feet. The “grab bucket”
dredger can work up to any depth and in a confined space. The “suction
dredger” drawls up mud or sand mixed with water. A dredger may be
fitted with a hopper or movable bottom, by means of which it can
discharge the dredged material--this, however, involves cessation
of work while the dredger makes a journey to the place where the
material is to be deposited--or it can discharge into hopper barges or
directly on to the shore by means of long shoots. For small works in
comparatively shallow water the “bag and spoon” dredger, worked by two
men, can be used.

When rock has to be removed under water it is blasted or broken up by
the blows of heavy rams provided with steel-pointed cutters.

In widening a channel the excavation can be carried down in the
ordinary way to below the water-level, a narrow piece of earth, like a
wall, being left to keep the water out. If the channel cannot be laid
dry, the work can be finished by dredging.

Regarding methods by which the stream is itself made to deepen or widen
its channel, reference may be made to CHAP. V.


3. =Reduction of Width.=--If a channel which is to be narrowed is
not a wide one, the reduction in width can be effected by any of the
processes described under bank protection (CHAP. VI.). But in a wide
channel, reduction of the width by any direct process is generally
impracticable. The expense would generally be prohibitive. Earth, if
filled in, is liable to be washed away unless protected all along.
Reduction in the width of a large channel is nearly always effected
either by groynes (fig. 26) or by training walls (fig. 27). Spurs or
short groynes for bank protection have been already described (CHAP.
VI., _Art. 2_). Groynes for narrowing streams are made in the same way
and of the same materials, but are longer. They are at right angles
to the stream or nearly so. Groynes in the river Sutlej have been
mentioned in CHAP. V., _Art. 5_, and are shown in fig. 6, p. 55.
Whether groynes or training walls are used, the object is to confine
the stream to a definite zone and to silt up the spaces at the sides.
These spaces when partly silted can be planted with osiers or with
anything which will grow when partly submerged, and this will assist in
completing the silting.

[Illustration: FIG. 26.]

[Illustration: FIG. 27.]

A training wall can be made of any of the materials used for groynes.
In order to silt up the spaces between each wall and the adjacent bank
of the stream, other walls are run at intervals across them. Usually
the training walls and cross walls are carried up only to ordinary
water-level, sometimes only to low-water level. Floods can thus spread
out and submerge the walls and deposit silt. If the walls are carried
up too high it may be necessary, in order to give room for floods,
to space them too far apart, and this, as will be seen below, is
objectionable.

The difference between training walls and groynes is one of degree
rather than one of kind. The material most commonly used is, in
either case, loose stone--with pitching, if desired, above low-water
level,--but it may be wattled stakes. If the water of the stream
contains silt at all stages of the supply, gaps can be left in training
walls so that silt deposit may occur at all times and not only in
floods. If the walls are of wattled stakes, water will pass through
them, and it may not be necessary to leave any gaps. Groynes are
frequently made with =T=-heads (fig. 26), and they are thus equivalent
to training walls with long gaps in them. The edge of the narrowed
channel usually forms somewhat as shown in the figure. If the groynes
are placed so near together as to give a regular channel, the cost is
not likely to be much less than that of training walls.

The alignment of training walls or groynes should be such as will give
the best channel consistent with economy in cost. The best channel is
generally that which is most free from sharp bends. It is assumed for
the present that no cuts or diversions of such lengths as to materially
alter the gradient are to be made, but that a certain amount of choice
of alignment is afforded by the reduced width of the trained channel
and by small diversions or easings of bends. It is sometimes said that
straight reaches are objectionable because the stream will tend to
wander from side to side and cause shoals, whereas in a bend there will
be no such tendency. The difficulty as to shoaling will be greatest at
low water, but it is likely to be serious only when the width between
the training walls is too great. If the width cannot be reduced to such
an extent as to do away with the trouble, it may be better to adopt a
curved course. The width between the training walls should generally be
the same throughout, whether the reaches are straight or curved, but
in view of the preceding remarks it may be desirable, where a reach
cannot be otherwise than straight and where shoaling is feared, to give
the straight portion a reduced width with of course a greater depth,
and similarly to reduce the width at reverse changes of curvature. In
curves which are at all sharp the curvature should be rather sharper in
the middle of the curve than at the ends (CHAP. IV., _Art. 8_).


4. =Alteration of Depth or Water-Level.=--When the width of a stream
is altered, the depth of water--the gradient being supposed to be
unchanged--must alter in the opposite manner. A narrowing of the
channel by training necessitates an increase in the depth of water,
and the same remark applies if an arm of the stream is closed. The
increase in depth may be effected either by raising the water-level or
by lowering the bed--as may be convenient--or both. If the bed is to be
lowered and is of hard clay, it may be necessary to dredge it and, when
this has been done, training may be unnecessary. If the bed is of soft
mud, a dredged channel is likely to fill up again, and training alone
will be the method to adopt. If the bed is moderately hard, say compact
sand, it may be suitable to train the channel first and then to dredge
if necessary. In any case, shoals of hard material may have to be
dredged or rocks, whether these form shoals or lateral obstructions,
to be blasted or otherwise broken up (_Art. 2_). In cases where it
is desired to raise the water-level without any lowering of the bed,
training is of course necessary. In any case in which the bed is likely
to scour to a lower level than is desired, or if the bed is to be
raised, the measures described in CHAP. V., _Art. 6_, may be adopted,
but they are hardly likely to be suitable and satisfactory in all cases.


5. =Training and Canalising.=--The steps so far described, together
with any of those described in CHAPS. V. and VI., exhaust the list
of what can be done so long as only the cross-section of a stream is
dealt with. This is often called the “regulation” of a stream, though
“training” is a more satisfactory term.[10]

[Illustration: FIG. 28.]

A mere alteration of the cross-section of a stream will not always
afford a solution of the problem to be solved. Frequently a change
of gradient is required. The gradient can be steepened by means of
straightenings, or flattened by introducing weirs, or perhaps by
adopting a course somewhat more circuitous than was intended. This
extended scope of operations is known as canalising in the case of a
river, and remodelling in the case of a canal.

Suppose that it is desired to alter the cross-section of a stream,
at ordinary water-level, so as to reduce the width and increase the
depth (fig. 28). If the mean depth is doubled, the new width will be
about equal to 1/(3·2) of the old width (_Hydraulics_, CHAP. VI.,
_Art. 2_). If this gives too narrow a channel, it may be desirable to
flatten the gradient. If it gives too wide a channel, the gradient can
be steepened or a greater depth adopted. While the width and depth of
the stream will be fixed so as to be suitable for the navigation, the
ratio of depth to velocity should be so arranged, if this is possible,
as to minimise trouble connected with silting or scour (CHAP. IV.,
_Art. 6_). A remodelled channel is, in short, designed in exactly the
same way as a new channel. The depth of water exercises the greatest
effect on the discharge, and the gradient the least. The weak point in
a scheme which includes weirs is the difficulty of dealing with floods.
A scheme perfect in all other respects may be vitiated because of the
obstruction, caused by weirs, to the passage of floods. The difficulty
is got over by means of movable weirs. The whole subject of weirs is
dealt with in CHAP. X.

Training or canalising should not be effected in any reach of a
stream without regard to other reaches. A mere local lowering of the
water-level by dredging may accentuate the effect of a shoal at the
upper end of the reach.

When the water-level is raised by a weir or by narrowing the
channel--though in the latter case the raising may not be permanent--it
is generally best to commence the work from the upstream end. The
raising of the water-level will then not interfere with the execution
of the rest of the work. But in a case of widening, where the
water-level upstream of the work is lowered, the work can conveniently
be begun at the downstream end, and the remark applies also to a case
of straightening, provided that the new channel is not so small that
it at first causes no lowering. In any case in which there is a doubt
whether the whole of the scheme will be carried out, the reach to be
dealt with first can be decided on according to circumstances. There is
no general reason for selecting an upstream or downstream reach, except
that any raising or lowering of the water-level will extend upstream of
the reach and not downstream of it (CHAP. I., _Art. 4_).

Training walls and groynes, if made with stakes or fascines or any
materials except stone, require careful watching and maintenance.




CHAPTER IX

CANALS AND CONDUITS


1. =Banks.=--All banks which have to hold up water should be carefully
made. The earth should be deposited in layers and all clods broken
up. In high banks the layers should be moistened and rammed. The
dotted lines in fig. 29 show two possible courses of percolation
water. The vertical height--from the water-level to the ground outside
the bank,--divided by the length of the line of percolation is the
hydraulic gradient, as in the case of a pipe, and this gradient is
more or less a measure of the tendency to leakage. A bank which has
water constantly against it nearly always becomes almost water-tight in
time. The time is less or greater according as the soil is better, and
according to the amount of care with which the bank is made.

[Illustration: FIG. 29.]

The side <DW72>s of banks vary with the soil. Generally they are 1½ to
1, but they are sometimes 2 to 1 or even 3 to 1 if the soil is bad or
sandy, or if great precautions against breaches are to be taken.

Leakage can sometimes be stopped by throwing chaff or other finely
divided substances into the water at the site of the leak. In other
cases it is necessary to dig up part of the bank, find the channel
by which the water is escaping, and fill it up by adding earth and
ramming. On some navigable canals in France it was at one time the
custom to lay the reach dry, when a bad leak occurred, and to dig away
the bank and lay slabs of concrete or puddle over the place. This plan
was abandoned, and instead of it sheet piles are driven in. They are
then withdrawn one at a time and, if any leakage occurs, the space is
filled with concrete.

The dimensions of a bank should depend to some extent on the head of
water against it and on the volume of the stream whose water it holds
up. A breach is obviously more serious the greater the volume of the
escaping water. This volume depends on the size of the stream and on
its velocity. In navigation canals in England the bank on the side
opposite the towing-path is usually 4 to 6 feet wide and 1½ feet above
the water. In irrigation canals in India the bank of a very large canal
is 2 feet above the water and 20 feet wide, while that of a small canal
with 6 feet of water is 8 or 10 feet wide and 1½ feet above the water,
and that of a small distributary channel with 3 feet of water is 4 feet
wide and 1 foot above the water. The soil is often poor.

Further remarks, which apply to banks of special height or special
importance, are given under Embankments (CHAP. XII., _Art. 6_).


2. =Navigation Canals.=--A navigation canal is sometimes all on one
level, but generally different reaches are at different levels, the
change being made by means of locks. A “lateral” canal--the most common
kind--runs along a river valley more or less parallel to the river. It
is frequently cheaper to construct such a canal than to canalise the
river. A “summit” canal crosses over a ridge and connects two valleys.
A navigation canal requires a supply of water to make good the losses
which occur by lockage, leakage, or absorption and evaporation. A canal
may be of any size, according to the size of the boats which are to be
used. There is always room, except in short reaches where the expense
of construction has to be kept down, for two boats to pass one another.

A lateral canal obtains water from the river or from the small
affluents which it crosses. For a summit canal it may be necessary to
provide storage reservoirs. The canal crosses the ridge where it is
low, and the reservoirs are made on higher ground. Reservoirs may be
required also for other canals to hold water for use in dry seasons or
in order to fill the canal quickly when laid dry for repairs.

In tropical countries weeds grow profusely in canals which have still
or nearly still water. Traffic tends to keep them down, but they have
to be cleared periodically.

In designing a barge canal the chief considerations generally are that
it shall not be in such low ground or so near a river as to be liable
to damage by floods, that it shall not traverse very permeable soil or
gravel--this is often found near a river,--that the material excavated
shall be as nearly as possible equal to that required, at the same
place, for embankment, and that as far as possible high embankments,
which are very expensive to construct and are more or less a source of
danger, shall be avoided. The side <DW72>s of the banks of a navigation
canal depend on the nature of the soil. They are generally 1½ to 1, but
the inner <DW72> may be 2 to 1. The banks are generally 1½ or 2 feet
above the water-level, the width of the bank on the towing-path side
ranging from 8 to 16 feet, but being generally 12 feet and the width
of the other bank 4 to 6 feet. The width of a canal is made sufficient
for two boats to pass, and the depth is 1½ to 2 feet greater than the
draught of the boats used. In some cases the banks are protected by
pitching for short lengths, but generally they are merely turfed. The
sides near the water surface wear away, so that the side <DW72> becomes
steeper in the upper part and flatter in the lower part. The resistance
of a boat to traction in a canal is given by the formula

    R = _r_(8·46)/(2 + (A/_a_)),

where _r_ is the resistance in a large body of water and A and _a_ are
the areas of the cross-sections of the canal and of the immersed part
of the boat. When A is six times _a_, R is only 6 per cent. more than
_r_. In practice A is never less than six times _a_.

Regarding methods of protecting banks, see CHAP. VI.

A ship canal is a barge canal on a large scale. The speed of ships has
to be strictly limited to avoid damage to the banks.

The Manchester Ship Canal takes in the waters of the Irwell and the
Mersey, and conveys them for several miles. It is thus a canalised
river for part of its course. Below that it is a tidal stream, the tide
being admitted at its lower end where it joins the estuary of the
Mersey, and passing out higher up where it leaves the estuary after
skirting it. This circulation of water is beneficial to the estuary.

The Panama Canal might have been constructed at one level, but the cost
of this, and the time occupied, would have been double that of making
it a summit canal. The water of the river Chagres is to be impounded to
form a lake of great extent that will not only supply water for lockage
but will itself form part of the high-level reach of the canal, and
ships will be able to traverse it at greater speed than in the rest of
the canal.

Some Indian irrigation canals have been constructed so as to be
navigable. The increase in cost has usually been enormously in excess
of any resulting benefits.


3. =Locks.=--An ordinary lock is shown in fig. 29A. The space above the
head gates is called the “head bay,” and that below the tail gates the
“tail bay.” The floor of the lock is often an inverted arch. Sometimes
the floor is of cast-iron. The “lift wall” is generally a horizontal
arch. The gates when closed press at their lower ends against the
“mitre sills”; and the vertical “mitre posts” at the edges of the
gates meet and are pressed together. The gate, in opening and closing,
revolves above the cylindrical “heel post”--which stands in the “hollow
quoin” of the lock wall--and when fully open is contained in the “gate
recess.”

A lock is always strongly built, of masonry or concrete. The walls have
to withstand the earth pressure when the lock is laid dry for repairs.
The floor has to withstand the scouring action from the sluices.
Regarding the upward pressure of the water when the lock is empty,
see CHAP. X., _Art. 3_. The lift or difference in the water-levels of
the two reaches of a barge canal is generally from 4 to 9 feet, but
occasionally it is much more.

[Illustration: FIG. 29A.]

The gates of small locks are generally of wood and are counterbalanced.
Those of large locks are of wood or steel, and the weight is generally
taken by rollers. Ordinary wood should not be used if the _Teredo
navalis_ exists in the waters. An iron gate, if enclosed on all sides
by plating, is buoyant, and the rollers and anchor straps which hold
the upper ends of the heel posts are thus relieved of much weight. The
gates of the Panama Canal locks are 110 feet long and 7 feet thick, and
the height ranges from 48 feet to 82 feet.

The sluices for filling and emptying a lock are placed in the gates or
in the walls. The gates and sluices are generally worked by hydraulic
power or by electricity.

Locks are frequently arranged in flights. There are, in a few
instances, 20 to 30 locks in a flight, the total lift being 150 to 200
feet. By this means the number of gates is reduced, the tail gates of
one lock being the head gates of the rest, and there is a saving in
labour in working the locks.

Let L be the volume of water contained in a lock between the levels of
the upper and lower reaches, and let B be the submerged volume of a
boat. The “lockage” or volume of water withdrawn from the upper reach
of the canal is shown in the following statement:--

  +---------+---------+------------+-----------+---------+-------------------------+
  |         |         |            |           |         |        Lockage.         |
  |Reference| Number  | Direction  |  Lock or  | Lock or +-----------+-------------+
  | Number  |of Boats.| of Travel. |   Locks   | Locks   |  Single   |  Flight of  |
  | of Case.|         |            |   Found.  | Left.   |   Lock.   | _m_  Locks. |
  +---------+---------+------------+-----------+---------+-----------+-------------+
  |    1    |    1    |   Down.    |  Empty.   |  Empty. |   L - B   |    L - B    |
  |         |         |            |           |         |           |             |
  |    2    |    1    |     ”      |   Full.   |    ”    |     - B   |      - B    |
  |         |         |            |           |         |           |             |
  |    3    |    1    |    Up.     |  Empty.   |  Full.  |   L + B   |   _m_L + B  |
  |         |         |            |           |         |           |             |
  |    4    |    1    |     ”      |   Full.   |    ”    |   L + B   |    L + B    |
  |         |         |            |           |         |           |             |
  |    5    |  2_n_   |  Up and    | Going     |  Going  |  _n_L     |    _mn_L    |
  |         |         |   down     |down, full.|  down,  |           |             |
  |         |         |alternately.| Going up, |  empty. |           |             |
  |         |         |            |   empty.  |Going up,|           |             |
  |         |         |            |           |  full.  |           |             |
  |         |         |            |           |         |           |             |
  |    6    |   _n_   |   Down.    |   Empty.  |  Empty. | _n_L-_n_B | _n_L - _n_B |
  |         |         |            |           |         |           |             |
  |    7    |   _n_   |     ”      |   Full.   |    ”    |  (_n_-1)L | (_n_ - 1)L  |
  |         |         |            |           |         |  - _n_B   |   -_n_B     |
  |         |         |            |           |         |           |             |
  |    8    |   _n_   |    Up.     |   Empty.  |  Full.  | _n_L+_n_B |(_m_+_n_-1)L |
  |         |         |            |           |         |           |     +_n_B   |
  |         |         |            |           |         |           |             |
  |    9    |   _n_   |     ”      |   Full.   |    ”    | _n_L+_n_B | _n_L + _n_B |
  |         |         |            |           |         |           |             |
  |   10    | { _n_   |   Down.}   |           |         |           |             |
  |         | { _n_   |   Up.  }   |     ”     |    ”    | (2_n_-1)L |(_m_+2_n_-2)L|
  +---------+---------+------------+-----------+---------+-----------+-------------+

In the case of a single lock, if two boats are to pass through, one
descending and one ascending (cases 2 and 3), the descending boat would
be passed through first if the lock were full, and the ascending boat
first if empty; in either case, the total lockage is L, or L/2 for
each boat. This also appears from case 5. Cases 6 to 10 show that if
a long train of boats descends, even though the lock is full for the
first boat or if a long train ascends even the lock is empty for the
first boat, the total lockage is nearly L per boat. Thus in a single
lock, boats should pass up and down alternately so far as this may be
possible.

In the case of a flight of _m_ locks, a single boat in descending uses
no more water than if there were only one lock, the same water passing
from lock to lock, but in ascending it uses more. In the case of a
number (2_n_) of boats going up and down alternately (case 5), the
lockage is _m_ _n_ L, the lockage per lock per boat being L/2, but in
the case of a long train of boats descending followed by an equal train
ascending (cases 7 and 8), the lockage is less. If _n_ is supposed to
be equal to _m_, the average lockage per boat is as follows:--

  _m_       =   1     2    3      4      5      6      Infinity

  Lockage   =   L/2   L   7L/6   5L/4   13L/10  4L/3    3L/2
  per boat

Thus in a case where _n_ and _m_ are very large, the average lockage
per boat, when the boats pass up and down in trains, is to the lockage
per boat, when the single boats pass up and down alternately through
_m_ single locks all at different places, as 3 is to _m_. The reason
for the difference, which may appear puzzling, is that when the locks
are at different places they are worked independently of one another.

Sometimes a lock is provided with intermediate gates which provide a
short lock for short vessels. In the Manchester Ship Canal, alongside
each lock there is another of smaller size to be used for small vessels
and thus save lockage. At the Eastham lock, where the Manchester Ship
Canal descends into the estuary of the Mersey, there is, below the tail
gates, an extra pair of gates opening towards the estuary, so that the
lock can be worked when the water of the estuary is higher than that
in the canal. Water can be economised by means of a “side-pond,” into
which the upper portion of the water from a lock can be discharged and
utilised again when the lock has to be filled. If two locks are built
side by side, each acts as a side-pond to the other. Two flights of
locks can be built side by side.

Sometimes instead of a lock there is an inclined plane, up or down
which are drawn on rails caissons containing water in which the boats
float. The rails extend below the water-levels of the two reaches, and
the caissons can thus be run under the boats. “Lifts” have also been
constructed by which the boats can be lifted bodily and swung over from
one reach to the other.


4. =Other Artificial Channels.=--The method of calculating the
discharges of channels in which water is to flow is a question of
hydraulics. The principles and rules to be followed, in the design of
earthen channels, have been stated in CHAP. IV., _Art. 6_, and in CHAP.
VIII., _Art. 5_. The design of banks has been dealt with in _Art. 1_
of this Chapter. For conveying water for the supply of towns, or for
other purposes, masonry conduits are often used. A usual form is shown
in fig. 30. The curving of the profile of the cross-section gives an
increased sectional area and hydraulic radius, and hence an increased
discharge.

[Illustration: FIG. 30.]




CHAPTER X

WEIRS AND SLUICES


1. =Preliminary Remarks.=--Every structure which interferes at all
with a stream causes an abrupt change in the stream (CHAP. IV., _Art.
1_). At an abrupt change there are always eddies, and these have a
peculiar scouring effect. This effect is greatest where the velocity
of the stream is abruptly reduced as where, for instance, after being
contracted by an obstruction, it expands again or where it falls over
a weir or issues from a sluice opening. In all cases of this kind the
protection of the structure from scour is of primary importance.

The site of a weir or other permanent structure should, if the stream
is unstable, be in a fairly straight reach, or at least not be
immediately downstream of a bend. This is because of the tendency of
bends to shift downstream (CHAP. IV., _Art. 8_). There is no particular
advantage in selecting a narrow place. A narrow place is likely to be
deep or it may be liable to widen. In a hard and stable stream there is
no restriction as to site.

Weirs are frequently constructed for purposes of navigation, as
mentioned in CHAP. VIII. They are also used in streams which are not
navigable in order that the gradient may not be too steep, and in
irrigation canals for the same reason. They are used both in rivers
and canals in order that the water-level may be raised and water drawn
off by branch channels for purposes of manufactures, water-power or
irrigation.

Upstream of a weir there is more or less tendency for silt to deposit,
but it by no means follows that there will be deposit (CHAP. IV., _Art.
2_, last par., and _Art. 3_, last par.). When deposit of sand or mud is
feared, small horizontal passages, known as “weep holes,” may be left
in the weir at the level of the upstream bed. In the old Nile barrages
iron gratings were provided, but they were needlessly large.

[Illustration: FIG. 31.]

An inherent defect of an ordinary weir is that it obstructs the passage
of floods. The obstruction may or may not be of consequence. Sometimes
it is of great consequence. Attempts have been made to partially remedy
the evil by placing the weir obliquely to the stream, thus giving it
a greater length. At ordinary water-levels the flow over the crest of
the weir is normal to its length, or nearly so. Supposing that the
water has to be held up to a given level, the crest of the weir must be
higher, because of its greater length, than if it were normal to the
stream. In a flood the water has a high velocity and flows over the
weir in a direction nearly parallel to the axis of the stream, so that
the effective length of the weir is not much greater than if it were
normal to the stream, and, its crest being higher, it obstructs the
flood as much. Oblique weirs are usually made as in fig. 31. If made in
one straight line, there might be excessive action on the bank at the
lower end.

If the weir is lengthened, not by being built obliquely but by a
widening of the stream at the site, the crest has to be raised and
nothing is gained.

The only arrangement by which a weir can be made to hold up water when
a stream is low and to let floods pass freely, consists in having part
of the weir movable, _i.e._ consisting of gates, shutters or horizontal
or vertical timbers, which can be withdrawn to let floods pass, and
can be manipulated to any extent so as to regulate the amount of
water passing. A familiar instance of a movable weir is the one which
is usually placed across a mill stream, the wooden gates working in
grooves in the masonry.

Above a weir in Java, 162 feet long, there was a great accumulation of
shingle in the bed of the river, and the head of a canal taking off
above the weir became choked. The crest of the weir on the side away
from the canal was raised 5¼ feet and the crest sloped gradually down,
a length of 43 feet on the side next the canal remaining as it was.
This was quite successful. It was practically a contraction of the
river near the canal off-take, and this must have caused scour, so that
the bed became lower than the floor of the canal head and the shingle
was not carried in. The shingle, however, is said to have been carried
over the weir (_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._, vol. clxv.).

A lock is an adjunct to a weir, used when navigation has to be provided
for. The lock may be placed close to the weir or it may be in a side
channel, the upstream end of the lock being about in a line with the
weir. Locks have already been discussed in CHAP. IX., _Art. 3_.

Frequently a “salmon ladder” has to be provided. It consists of a
series of steps or a zigzag arrangement so that the velocity of the
water is not too great for the fish to ascend.


2. =General Design of a Weir.=--Unless the bed and sides of the channel
are of rock, a weir has side walls and rests on a strong floor or
“apron.” These need not extend far upstream, but must extend some way
downstream because of the scouring action of the water.[11] A common
type of weir is shown in fig. 32. The downstream face is made sloping,
so that the water may not fall vertically and strike the floor below
the weir. The thickness and length of the floor depend on the volume
of water to be passed and on the height which it will fall and on the
nature of the soil, and are generally matters of judgment, though rules
regarding them, applicable to certain special cases, are given in the
next article.

[Illustration: FIG. 32.]

The upper corners of the weir should be rounded. This prevents their
being worn away; but the rounding of the upstream corner has another
advantage. If the corner is sharp, the stream springs clear from it and
the weir holds up the water higher, especially in floods. With small
depths of water the difference is less, and it vanishes when there is
only a trickle of water. Thus a crest rounded on the upstream side
holds up low-water nearly as well as a sharp-edged crest, but lets
floods pass more freely. Any batter given to the upstream face has a
similar advantage. The rounding is of more importance as the batter is
less. For similar reasons, the upstream wing walls should be splayed
or even curved so as to be tangential to the side wall, and not built
normally to the stream. These advantages are sometimes lost sight of.
The downstream walls are splayed to reduce the swirl.

The body of the weir may be of rubble and the face-work of dressed
stone. In large weirs the stones are sometimes dowelled together.
Where, as in many parts of India, stone is expensive, brick is used for
small weirs, the crest and faces being brick on edge.

Downstream of the floor, unless the channel is of very hard material,
there is paving or pitching of the bed and pitching of the sides, and
these may terminate in a curtain wall. The bank pitching may be of any
of the kinds described in CHAP. VI., _Art. 3_, and the bed paving as
described in CHAP. V., _Art. 6_, but downstream of a weir the eddying
is continuous and the lap of the water on the bank is ceaseless, and
good methods are necessary. Sometimes planking, laid over a wooden
framing or attached to piles, is used instead of paving and pitching.

In case the height of a weir is great relatively to its thickness, the
danger of its being overturned must be considered. To be safe against
overturning, the resultant of the pressure on the weir must pass
through the middle third of its base (see fig. 62, CHAP. XIII.).

[Illustration: FIG. 33.]


3. =Weirs on Sandy or Porous Soil.=--If the channel is very soft or
sandy the weir may be built on one or more lines of wells. The wells
are not so much to support the weir as to form a curtain and prevent
streams, due to the hydraulic gradient A E (fig. 33), from forming
under the structure and gradually removing the soil. It is assumed
in the case represented by the figure that the maximum head occurs
when the downstream channel is dry. Any removal of soil from under
the weir may cause its destruction. The wells should be as close
together as possible, and the spaces between them carefully filled up
with brickwork or concrete to as great a depth as possible, and below
that by piles. Instead of wells, lines of sheet piling--cast-iron or
wood--can be used. A good fit should be made, but it is not necessary
that the joints should be absolutely water-tight. The object is to
flatten the hydraulic gradient by increasing the length travelled
by the water from B E to B L G H E. Of course, no flattening occurs
at a point where the curtain is not water-tight, but if only small
interstices exist, none but small trickles of water can pass, and
the interstices will probably soon be choked up, just as the sand in
a filter bed becomes clogged and has to be washed. In any case, no
important stream could develop otherwise than round the toe of the
curtain. It has been stated that when a curtain is water-tight the
water follows the line B L M G H K E, but this requires proof. Another
plan is to cover the bed and sides of the channel with a continuous
sheet of concrete extending upstream of the weir from B to D--thus
flattening the hydraulic gradient from A E to F E. Instead of concrete,
clay puddle can be used with pitching over it. The choice between the
different methods depends largely on questions of cost and facility of
construction. It has been said that a certain amount of leakage occurs
under structures such as the Okla weir (_Art. 4_), which nevertheless
remains undamaged. There have, however, been cases in which failures of
works have occurred, especially when there has been a great difference
between the water-levels of the upstream and downstream reaches, from
no other apparent cause than the passage of water underneath the works.

Weirs in porous soils have been discussed by Bligh (_Engineering
News_, 29th December 1910), who gives the following as safe hydraulic
gradients (_s_) or ratio of the greatest head A B to the length B E:--

  Fine silt and sand as in the Nile   1 in 18
  Fine micaceous sand as in Colorado
    and Himalayan rivers              1 in 15
  Ordinary coarse sand                1 in 12
  Gravel and sand                     1 in  9
  Boulders, gravel and sand           1 in  4 to 1 in 6

These figures are probably quite safe enough even for the most
important works and for those where the heading up is constant. For
small works or for regulators (_Art. 5_) where the heading up is not
constant, steeper gradients are permissible. Much also depends on
the condition of the water. If it contains much silt, all interstices
will probably become choked up. The hydraulic gradient in the case of
the Narora weir across the Ganges was 1 in 11. The weir failed after
working for twenty years. It was rebuilt with a gradient of 1 in 16. In
the Zifta and Assiut regulators on the Nile the gradients are 1 in 16·4
and 1 in 21.

[Illustration: NARORA WEIR AS ORIGINALLY BUILT.]

[Illustration: NARORA WEIR AS RECONSTRUCTED.]

[Illustration: FOUNDATION OF THE ZIFTA REGULATOR, RIVER NILE.]

Regarding the upward pressure on the floor due to the hydrostatic
pressure from the head A B, there is a theory that the weight of a
portion of the floor at any point P should be able to balance the
pressure due to a head of water P R. This, supposing the masonry to be
twice as heavy as water, would give a thickness of floor equal to half
P R. According to Bligh, the theoretical thickness ought, for safety,
to be increased by one-third. Practically the thickness need not, in
most cases, be made even so great as is given by the theoretical rule.
On canals in the Punjab it is certainly less. Water passing through
soil or fine sand does not exert anything like the pressure which it
exerts when passing through a pipe. It acts in the same manner as in a
capillary tube. It is only in coarse sand or gravel or boulders that
water flows as in a pipe.[12] If the tail water covers the floor, the
weight of a portion of floor is reduced by the weight of an equal
volume of water. If the foundation of any part of the floor is higher
than B E, the upward pressure on it is reduced because the water has to
force its way upwards through the soil.

Bligh also states as an empirical rule that in order to provide
efficiently against scour the length of floor B E should be 4/_s_
√(H/13), where H is the maximum head A B; and he points out that in a
case where this length is less--as it usually is--than that necessary
to give a hydraulic gradient of the requisite flatness, according to
the rule previously quoted, it is better to add an upstream floor B
D, which may be of puddle and therefore cheap, than to add to the
downstream floor a length E C which must be of masonry or concrete, and
that this arrangement, by shifting the line of hydraulic gradient from
A E to F E, gives a reduced upward pressure on the downstream floor.

The length E N to which pitching, if of “rip-rap” type, should extend
is given by Bligh as 10/_s_ √(H/10) √(_q_/75), where _q_ is the maximum
discharge in cubic feet per second passing over a 1-foot length of the
weir, and H is the head A B.


4. =Various Types of Weirs.=--The type of weir shown in fig. 32 may
be varied by steepening or flattening the <DW72>s of one or both
faces. Flattening increases the cost but gives a greater spread for
the foundations. It may, however, be combined with a decrease in the
width of the crest. Flattening of the downstream <DW72> reduces the
shock of the water on the floor, but the <DW72> itself, especially
the lower portion, has to stand a good deal of wear, and the length
exposed to this is increased. Flattening the upstream <DW72> facilitates
the passage of floods. The same result is obtained by making the
crest <DW72> upwards (fig. 34). In a small stream or in an irrigation
distributing channel, a weir may be a simple brick wall with both faces
vertical and corners rounded.

[Illustration: FIG. 34.]

Weirs in America are often built of crib-work filled with stones. Weirs
are also made of sheet piling filled in with rubble, and the top may be
protected by sheet iron. A weir made on the Mersey in connection with
the Manchester Ship Canal works was so made. There were three rows of
piles and the filling in the back part was of clay.

Sometimes the downstream faces of weirs used to be made curved (figs.
35 and 36), the object being to reduce the shock of the falling water,
but the advantage gained is not very appreciable, and this type of weir
is not very common.

[Illustration: FIG. 35.]

[Illustration: FIG. 36.]

The Okla weir (fig. 37) across the river Jumna near Delhi was built
about thirty-eight years ago on the river bed, which consisted of fine
sand. The depth of water over the crest in floods is 6 to 10 feet. The
material, except the face-work and the three walls, is dry rubble.

[Illustration: FIG. 37.]

When the reach of channel downstream of a weir has a bed-level much
lower than that of the upstream reach--this is often the case in
irrigation canals,--the work is known as a “fall” or “rapid.” At a
fall the water generally drops vertically, and a cistern (fig. 38) is
provided. The falling water strikes that in the cistern and the shock
on the floor is greatly reduced. An empirical rule for the depth of the
cistern, measured from the bed of the downstream reach, is

    K = H + ∛H √D,

where H is the depth of the crest of the fall below the upstream
water-level, and D is the difference between the upstream and
downstream water-levels. At some old falls on Indian canals the water,
as it begins to fall into the cistern, is made to pass through a
grating which projects with an upward inclination from the crest of the
weir at the downstream angle. This splits up the water and reduces the
shock, but rubbish is liable to collect.

[Illustration: FIG. 38.]

In the usual modern type of canal fall in India the weir has no raised
crest, and the water is held up by lateral contraction of the waterway
just above the fall. The opening through which the water passes is
trapezoidal (fig. 39), being wide at the water-level and narrow at
the bed-level. In a small channel there is only one opening, but in a
large canal there are several side by side, so that the water falls in
several distinct streams. The curved lip shown in the plan is added
to make the water spread out and cause less shock to the floor. The
dimensions of the openings are calculated so that however the supply
in the canal may vary, there is never any heading up or drawing down.
The detailed method of calculation for finding C F and the ratio of
A B to B C is given in _Hydraulics_, CHAP. IV. In cases where it is
only necessary for the notch to be accurate when the depth of water
ranges from B C to three-fourths B C, it will suffice to calculate
as follows:--Let _b_ be the bed width of the canal, and let Q be the
discharge and B the mean width of the stream when the depth of water is
B C. Decide on the number of notches, and let W be the width of a notch
calculated as if it were to be rectangular, _i.e._ by the ordinary
weir formula. Increase the width to W´ = 1·05 W. Then make the notch
trapezoidal, keeping the mean width W´, and making the bottom width _w_
(or C F), such that _w_/W´ = _b_/B. The top width of the notch is of
course increased as much as the bottom width is reduced.

[Illustration: FIG. 39.]

A rapid has a long downstream <DW72>, which is expensive to construct
and difficult to keep in repair, especially as the canals can only be
closed for short periods. Rapids exist in large numbers on the Bari
Doab Canal in India, the face-work consisting in many cases of rounded
undressed boulders--with the interstices filled up by spawls and
concrete--which stand the wear well. Rapids have again been used on the
more modern canals in places where boulders are obtainable, and where
deep foundations would have given trouble in unwatering. The upstream
face of a rapid is vertical, or has a steep <DW72>.

[Illustration: FIG. 40.]


5. =Weirs with Sluices.=--The long weirs built across Indian rivers
below the heads of irrigation canals generally extend across the
greater part of the river bed. In the remaining part--generally the
part nearest the canal head--there is, instead of the weir, a set of
openings or “under-sluices” (fig. 40) with piers having iron grooves in
which gates can slide vertically. The piers may be twenty feet apart
and five feet thick. The gates are worked by one or more “travellers,”
which run on rails on the arched roadway. The traveller is provided
with screw gearing to start a gate which sticks. When once started it
is easily lifted by the ordinary gears. The gates descend by their own
weight. The gate in each opening is usually in two halves, upper and
lower, each in its own grooves, and both can be lifted clear of the
floods. In intermediate stages of the river these gates have to be
worked a good deal. (See also CHAP. V., _Art. 5_.) Usually the weir
has, all along its crest, a set of hinged shutters, which lie flat at
all seasons, except that of low water in the river.

[Illustration: FIG. 41.]

The canal head consists of smaller arched openings, provided with gates
working in vertical grooves and lifted by a light traveller. If the
floor of the canal head is higher than the beds of the river and the
canal, it may be said to be a weir, but otherwise the canal head is
merely a set of sluices without a weir.

The barrage of the Nile at Assiut (fig. 41), and the old barrages of
the Rosetta and Damietta branches, consist of sets of sluices without
weirs. At Assiut there are piers five metres apart and gates working in
grooves like those, above described, at Indian headworks.

[Illustration: FIG. 42.]

The “dam” across the Ravi, at the head of the Sidhnai Canal in the
Punjab, also consists of sluice openings without a weir. The piers are
connected by horizontal beams (fig. 42), against which, and against
a sill at their lower ends, rest a number of nearly vertical timber
“needles,” fitting close together, which can be removed when necessary
by men standing on a foot-bridge. In floods the needles are all removed
and laid on the high-level bridge (not shown in the drawing), the
foot-bridge being then submerged. With needles the span between two
piers can be greater than would be possible with a gate. Needles can
be used up to a length of 12 or 14 feet, excluding the handle which
projects above the horizontal beam. They can be of pine, about 5 inches
deep in the direction of the stream, and 4 inches thick.

Where a branch takes off from a canal in India there are usually no
fixed weirs but two sets of piers--one in the canal and one in the
branch,--with openings and gates like those at the canal heads, or else
with wider openings and needles. These works are called regulators.
The gates are worked by travellers or by fixed windlasses or racks and
pinions. Very small gates for distributaries are often worked entirely
by screw gearing. For the smaller branches the gates are replaced by
sets of planks or timbers lying one above another and removed by means
of hooks. They are replaced by means of the hooks or by being held in
position some little height above the water, and dropped. They are
finally closed up by ramming.

In the case of either planks or needles, leakage can be much reduced by
throwing shavings or chopped straw into the water upstream of them.

Needles can be provided on their downstream sides with eye-bolts just
above the level of the beam against which their upper ends rest. They
can then be attached by chains or cords to the beam or to the next
pier, and cannot be lost when released. They can be released by a lever
which can be inserted under the eye-bolt. By pushing the head of a
needle forward and inserting a piece of wood under it, a little water
can be let through. In this way, or by removing needles here and there,
the discharge can be adjusted with exactness.

At a needle weir in an Indian canal all the needles in one opening are
reported to have broken simultaneously. A possible explanation is that
one needle broke and that the velocity thus set up in the approaching
stream caused the others to break. On another occasion when a canal was
dry all the needles were blown down.

Sometimes the beam or bar against which the upper ends of the needles
rest is itself movable. At Ravenna, in Italy, the bar between any two
piers has a vertical pivot at one pier and can swing horizontally. Its
other end is held by a prolongation of the next bar, near to its pivot.
If the end bar of the weir is released, each bar in turn is released
automatically.

At Teddington on the Thames the oblique weir, 480 feet long, has
thirty-five gates, which extend over half the length of the weir. They
are worked by travellers which run on a foot-bridge. The openings do
not extend down to the river bed, but are placed on the top of a low
weir. The other half of the weir is fixed. The gates are raised to let
floods pass.

At Richmond on the Thames the arrangements are similar, the gates being
counterbalanced to admit of easy and rapid raising. When raised they
are tilted into a horizontal position so as not to obstruct the view.

In Stoney’s sluice gates a set of rollers is interposed between the
gate and the groove. The rollers are suspended from a chain, one end
of which is attached to the top of the gate and the other end to the
groove. The rollers thus move up or down at half the rate of the gate,
and some of them are always in the proper position for taking the
pressure. Escape of water between the gate and the groove is prevented
by a rod which is suspended on the upstream side of the gate close
to its end, and is pressed by the water against the pier. Stoney’s
sluice gates, with spans ranging up to 30 feet, have been used on the
Manchester Ship Canal for the sluices by which the water of the river
Weaver is passed across the canal, and at locks for passing the flood
waters of the Irwell and Mersey down the canal. The gates are balanced
by counterweights.

Frame weirs,[13] used chiefly on rivers in France but also in Belgium
and Germany, are a modification of the needle and plank arrangements
above described. For the masonry piers there are substituted iron
frames or trestles, which are hinged at the floor-level so that, when
the timbers have been removed, the frame can be turned over sideways
and lie flat on the floor, thus leaving the waterway absolutely clear
from side to side of the stream. The foot-bridge which rests on the
frames is removed piece by piece. The frames are raised again by means
of chains attached to them. In order that the frames may not be too
heavy they are spaced 3 to 4 feet apart, or very much nearer than when
masonry piers are used. Horizontal planks can thus be used of shorter
lengths than the needles, and they can be made up into greater widths
so that the leakage is less.

A further modification consists in placing the bridge platform above
flood-level, and in hinging the frames to it instead of to the floor.
The frame turns about a horizontal axis parallel to the length of the
weir. A weir of this kind can be used for greater depths of water than
the ordinary frame weir.

In some cases the horizontal planks are connected together by hinges so
that they form a “curtain.” The curtain is raised by rolling it up by
means of a traveller. It admits of rapid and accurate adjustment of the
water-level, but there is considerable scouring action below a curtain
when it is somewhat raised.

[Illustration: FIG. 43.]


6. =Falling Shutters.=--In Thénard’s system, first used in France,
a shutter (fig. 43) is hinged at its lower edge and is held up by
a strut. When the lower end of the strut is pushed aside it slides
downstream and the shutter falls flat. To enable the shutter to
be raised again an upstream shutter, which ordinarily lies flat
and is held down by a bolt, is released, and it is then raised by
the current to the extent permitted by a chain attached to it. The
downstream shutter is then raised. Thénard’s system was not much used
in France because the river had to fall to a level somewhat too low
for navigation before the shutters could be raised. The sudden jerk
on the chain of the upstream shutter is also liable to do damage. The
system has been adopted on some of the long weirs which cross Indian
rivers downstream of the heads of irrigation canals. To prevent damage
by shock, a hydraulic brake was designed by Fouracres. It consists of
a piston which travels along a cylinder and drives water out through
small holes. The shutters are placed on the top of the fixed weir,
where they usually lie flat, except in the low water season, any
adjustments of the river discharge being effected by means of the
under-sluices.

In the Chanoine system of falling shutters (fig. 44), used first in
France, the shutter is hinged at a point rather higher than the centre
of pressure. The hinge is supported by a vertical trestle, which is
hinged at its lower end and is supported by a strut which slides in
a groove and rests against a stop. When the water rises to a certain
height above the top of the shutter, it is turned by the force of
the water into a horizontal position. The struts can then be pushed
sideways out of the stops by means of a “tripping bar,” which lies
along the floor parallel to the line of shutters and is worked from the
bank. The struts, trestles, and shutters then fall flat. To close the
weir the shutters are first raised into the horizontal position which
they occupied before falling, by means of a hook worked from a boat or
by chains attached to a foot-bridge running across the river upstream
of the weir. They can then be easily closed by a boat-hook. The water
closes them of itself if it falls low enough.

[Illustration: FIG. 44.]

When the shutters fall a great rush of water occurs. To obviate this
a valve is made in the upper half of the shutter. It consists of a
miniature shutter on the same principle as the main shutter. The pivot
of the main shutter is made at such a height that the shutter will not
turn over when only a small depth of water flows over it. Instead of
this the valve comes into operation. The valve also facilitates the
raising of the shutter. Again, instead of the tripping bar, which
would sometimes have to be of great length or be liable to damage owing
to stones jamming in its teeth, the shutter can be released by pulling
the strut upstream so that it falls into a second groove, down which
it slides. When a tripping bar is used, its teeth can be so arranged
that the shutters are released a few at a time, first singly, then
in twos and threes. Sometimes there are gaps of a few inches between
one shutter and the next, and the gaps can be closed by needles if
necessary.

Chanoine shutters can be very rapidly lowered, and they are used in
France and in the U.S.A. in places where sudden floods occur. They
are also used for navigation “passes” where most of the heavy traffic
is downstream and where it is too heavy to be dealt with in a lock. A
foot-bridge across the stream or across the navigation pass is always
an assistance, but sometimes it cannot be used when there is much
floating rubbish or ice. With a foot-bridge the cost is greater than
that of a needle weir.[14]

[Illustration: FIG. 45.]

In the Bear Trap weir (fig. 45) the upstream shutter rests against
the downstream one. Both are raised by admitting water from the upper
reach, by means of a culvert, through an opening in the side wall, and
they are made to fall by placing this opening in communication with
the downstream instead of the upstream reach. This kind of shutter is
only suitable for passes of moderate width, and it is rather expensive
on account of the culverts.[15]

Shutters with fixed supports are used on the Irwell and Mersey. A fixed
frame is built across the stream (fig. 46) and the shutters are hinged
to it. When the water rises to a certain height above its top, the
shutter turns into a horizontal position, but as this causes a severe
rush of water the shutter is usually raised by a chain attached to its
lower end and worked from the bank. When in a horizontal position,
it is held there by a ratchet. When the stream falls the ratchet is
released and the shutter is closed by the stream. This kind of shutter
cannot be used where there is navigation.

On the weir 4000 feet long across the river Chenab at Khanki in the
Punjab, the falling shutters, 6 feet high and 3 feet wide, are hinged
at the base and held up by a tie-rod on the upstream side. The trigger
which releases the rod is actuated by means of a wire rope carrying a
steel ball, and worked by a winch from the abutment of the weir or from
one of the piers, which are 500 feet apart. A winch is fixed on the top
of each pier, and communication with the piers is effected by means of
a cradle slung from a steel wire rope, which rests on standards and
runs across the weir. The wire rope which carries the steel ball passes
over a series of forks, one on each shutter. When one trigger has been
released, that shutter falls and the ball hangs loose. A further haul
on the rope causes it to actuate the trigger of the next shutter, and
so on. If it is desired to drop only some of the shutters, the rope
is passed over the forks of those shutters only. The shutters can
be raised by means of a crane which runs along the weir on rails
downstream of the shutters or, if the water is too high to allow of
this, by a crane in the stern of a boat which is moored upstream of the
weir and allowed to drop down.

[Illustration: FIG. 46.]

[Illustration: FIG. 47.]


7. =Adjustable Weirs.=--Drum weirs, invented by Desfontaines, have
been used in France and Germany. Two paddles (fig. 47) are fixed on a
horizontal axis and can turn through about 90°, the lower paddle, which
should be slightly the larger, working in a “drum,” which is roofed
over and can, by means of sluices, be placed in communication with
either the upper or lower reach of the stream. According as the upper
paddle is to be raised or lowered, water is admitted from the upper
reach above or below the lower paddle, the water on its other side
being at the same time placed in communication with the lower reach.
On the weirs first made on the Marne, the height of the upper paddle
was 3 feet 7½ inches, and there were, in a weir, a number of pairs of
paddles, each being 4 feet 11 inches wide. By having sluices at both
abutments communicating with both reaches, and by opening or closing
each of them more or less, the various paddles can be made to take up
different positions, and thus perfect control over the discharge is
obtained by simply turning a handle to control a sluice gate. A weir
has since been made with a single pair of paddles extending right
across the opening (33 feet), and the height of the upper paddle is
over 9 feet.[16]

The chief objection to drum weirs is the necessity for the hollow or
drum, which renders the work very expensive, except when only a small
depth of water is held up.

[Illustration: FIG. 48.]

The old sluice gates of the Nile barrages were made segmental (fig.
48), turned on pivots in the piers, and were raised by chains.

In some factories in Bavaria and Switzerland there are self-acting
shutters which revolve on a horizontal axis at the lower edge, and
are counterbalanced by cylindrical weights which roll on ways in the
side wall. This arrangement is suitable when there is only one span,
which can, however, be as great as 30 feet. An adjustable weir used
at Schweinfurt on the Maine, consists of a hollow iron cylinder, 59
feet long and 10 feet in diameter, running across the stream. The
cylinder is pear-shaped in cross-sections, and can be made, by means of
mechanism, to revolve, the water passing over it. Another kind used at
Mulhausen on the Rhine consists of a hollow iron cylinder 85 feet long
and 9·8 feet in diameter. The whole cylinder can be raised by winches
(_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._, vols. cliii. and clvi.).


8. =Remarks on Sluices.=--In all kinds of sluice openings or
regulators, the principles of design as regards protection of the bed
and sides, splaying and curving of walls and piers, thickness of floor,
and prevention of the formation of streams under the structure are the
same as laid down for weirs.

In order that a pier may be safe from being overturned by the pressure
of the water when the gates or timbers are down, the resultant of its
weight, including that of anything resting on it, and of the water
pressure on it, must pass through the middle third of its length. This
generally occurs when there is an arched roadway. Otherwise it must be
arranged for by prolonging the base of the piers downstream, and giving
the downstream side a batter or steps.

The floor should usually be placed at a level somewhat lower than the
mean bed-level of the stream. The bed may possibly be lowered in course
of time. Lowering the floor also gives a greater thickness of water
cushion to take the shock of water falling over the gates or planks. It
is convenient to build, on the floor, a low wall or sill, reaching up
to the level of the bed or thereabouts, and running across from pier
to pier under the line of gates or needles. The height of the gates
or needles can thus be reduced, and there is little chance of silt or
stones collecting and interfering with them. In the case of needles the
wall must be strong enough to resist their horizontal pressure. If ever
the bed is lowered, the wall can easily be cut down or removed.

Sluices with gates are, of course, used in connection with works other
than weirs or regulators, as, for instance, in reservoirs or locks, or
generally for communication between any two bodies of water. The gate
may or may not be wholly submerged. If it is not wholly submerged,
planks can be used. Needles can be used if the flow is always in one
direction and never in the reverse direction. In all cases protection
downstream of the opening is required.

In designing a set of sluice openings or regulators, it is sometimes
the custom to make the total area of waterway the same as that of the
stream in its unobstructed condition. There is no particular reason why
it should be the same. In a description of the Assiut Barrage (_Min.
Proc. Inst. C.E._, vol. clviii., p. 30), it is mentioned that one of
the reasons for placing the floor lower than the river bed was that
the width of the waterway of the barrage was less than that of the
river. The bed has to be heavily protected in any case, and the proper
principle is to fix a velocity which is considered to be safe and, the
maximum discharge being known, to determine the area of the waterway
accordingly. In the case of a very wide river like the Nile, with a
well-defined channel, it is inconvenient to make the distance between
the abutments of a work much less than the width of the channel, but
so far as velocity is concerned, the floor need not usually be lower
than the bed. The protection given to the channel on the upstream side
of the barrage (fig. 41) seems to be rather greater than necessary.
The thickness of the floor (9 feet 10 inches) seems excessive. The
thickness originally proposed was much less.

Of the many kinds of apparatus described in this chapter each
possesses some advantages and disadvantages. Gates require a bridge
with powerful lifting apparatus, and are suitable for large bodies of
water and great depths. Comparing needles with planks, the former can
be worked by one man and admit of rapid removal, and require far fewer
piers. Planks require two men, and are sometimes liable to jam, but
obstruct floating rubbish less than needles, and in shallow water give
rise to less leakage. Whether needles or planks are used, masonry piers
are most suitable where sand or gravel are liable to accumulate on the
floor, or where there is much floating rubbish. The hinged frames are
suitable in other cases. Falling shutters of the Chanoine type admit of
very rapid lowering, and can be used without a foot-bridge. The drum
weir is perfect in action, but its cost is high.

At any system of sluices the regulation should be so arranged as to
minimise the chances of damage to the bed and banks where this is at
all likely to occur. If the gates are opened only near one side of the
structure, there will be a rush of water on that side, and serious
damage may occur. The opening should be done symmetrically and, as far
as possible, distributed along the whole length.

Until experience has shown it to be unnecessary, soundings should be
taken at regular periods of time downstream of every important work
where scour can occur. When scour is found to have occurred at any
particular part of the work, the rush of water at such places should,
as far as possible, be prevented, and a chance given for silting to
occur.

Unless experience shows that damage is not likely to occur, a stock
of concrete blocks, sandbags, or other suitable materials should be
kept on the spot ready for use. Life-buoys should be provided on any
work where large volumes of water are dealt with, especially if it is
unfenced in any part, or if any of the men employed are casual workers.

Regarding works for preventing a river from shifting its course so as
to damage or destroy a weir or similar work, see CHAP. XI., _Art. 3_.




CHAPTER XI

BRIDGES AND SYPHONS


1. =Bridges.=--Bridges are of many kinds. In this book only those parts
of them are considered which are exposed to the stream. If a bridge has
piers, there must be some disturbance of the water. The disturbance
will be least when the area of the waterway of the bridge is at least
as great as that of the stream, and when its shape is as nearly as
possible the same. For small streams, a single span clearing the whole
stream may be adopted, especially when the channel is of soft material,
but for a large stream the cost of intermediate piers, even with a
certain amount of protection for them or with deep foundations, will be
more than counterbalanced by the smaller thickness of arch or depth of
girder.

Generally a bridge has vertical abutments which limit the waterway,
but it may have land-spans, and in this case the stream as it rises
can spread out. Piers and abutments should be so designed that abrupt
changes in the section of the stream are, as far as possible, avoided,
the piers being rounded or boat-shaped at both ends and the abutments
suitably curved (fig. 49). Boat-shaped piers, besides presenting the
neatest appearance, cause the least amount of disturbance.

A bridge can be made safe against scour either by giving deep
foundations to the piers and abutments or by adding a floor and, if
necessary, pitching. The former course is usually adopted and is
the best. But in a case in which the discharge of a stream is to be
increased or has been underestimated, it is often far easier to add a
floor to an existing bridge than to increase the span of the bridge. In
order to increase the waterway the floor can be “dished,” _i.e._ made
at a level lower than the bed of the stream[17] and gradually sloped
up--the <DW72>s being pitched--both upstream and downstream of the
bridge, to meet the bed.

[Illustration: FIG. 49.]

In any case in which the water rises above the crown of the arch, the
bridge becomes a syphon, and a floor is probably necessary unless the
foundations are very deep, or unless the rise of water above the crown
is temporary.

[Illustration: FIG. 50.]

In the case of Indian rivers which have soft channels, and are
ordinarily of moderate width but are subject to occasional floods when
the width of the stream is multiplied several times and becomes very
great, it is the rule to make the span of a railway bridge far less
than this greater width. The stream during floods scours out a deep
channel through the bridge with great rapidity, and no heading up worth
mentioning occurs. The foundations of the piers are very deep, being
frequently 50 feet below the lowest point of the river bed which can
be found anywhere within several miles of the bridge. The span of the
bridge can be arrived at by considering a general cross-section of
the river as it is when in high flood, and assuming that scour to the
depth of the lowest point, found as just explained, will take place in
one-third of the span of the bridge. The span can then be so fixed as
to give no heading up. It is not assumed that there will be no increase
in velocity through the bridge. The velocity in the deep scoured
portions will be increased. The piers are protected by loose stone
(fig. 50). The spans vary from 100 to 250 feet. The bridge over the
river Chenab at Wazirabad had originally sixty-four spans of 145 feet
each. The number of spans has since been reduced to twenty-eight. With
a very long bridge, the current of the shifting stream is more likely
to strike the bridge obliquely, though this is not the chief reason for
reducing the length. Long spans, say 250 feet, have been found to be
better than shorter spans; the cost of the stone protection round the
piers is of course less (_Government of India Technical Paper_, No.
153, “River Training and Control on the Guide Bank System,” by Sir F.
J. E. Spring, C.I.E., 1904).


2. =Syphons and Culverts.=--Syphons are used to pass drainage channels
or other streams under canals or other lines of communication. In the
case of a masonry syphon under a stream which may be dry while the
syphon is full, the weight of the arch and its solid load must be not
less than the upward pressure of the water passing through the syphon.
The channel sometimes has a vertical drop at the upstream side (fig.
51) and a <DW72> at the downstream side. The <DW72> enables any solid
materials to be carried through, and facilitates cleaning out and
unwatering. The drop at the upstream side does not give rise to any
shock on the floor when the syphon is full, but a <DW72> is preferable
if there is room for it, and it causes less loss of head.

[Illustration: FIG. 51.]

A culvert which is liable to run full and which has a steep approach
channel (fig. 52) may become suddenly drowned on the upstream side. As
soon as the water rises to the crown of the arch, the wet border of
the culvert increases and this reduces the velocity and discharge. The
water coming down the approach channel then rises abruptly, and the
increased section of the stream causes a reduced velocity of approach,
and this further reduces the discharge through the culvert. The heading
up continues until the difference in the upstream and downstream
water-levels is great enough to readjust matters (_Min. Proc. Inst.
C.E._, vol. clxxxvi.). The possibility of this heading up occurring
should be attended to in the design. In the case of a culvert in a
railway embankment where heavy floods have to be passed, the culvert
may be made bell-mouthed by a curved embankment constructed on its
upstream side.

[Illustration: FIG. 52.]


3. =Training Works.=--The object of the upstream and downstream
protections already described (CHAP. X.) is to prevent damage to the
structure owing to the disturbance caused by the structure itself.
When a river is given to shifting its course (CHAP. IV., _Art. 9_)
and cutting away its banks, protection of another kind is required.
The stream, if left to itself, may cut away one bank upstream of the
structure for a long distance, and eventually damage, or destroy by
undermining, the upstream pitching and the abutment itself. This is
known as outflanking. If in the neighbourhood of the line A B (fig.
53) there is nothing for the river to damage,--if, for instance, the
structure is a weir with a canal, if any, only on the opposite bank of
the river,--and if the land is of no particular value, the case could
conceivably be met by protecting the abutment on all sides, but even
then there might be a chance of the erosion of the bank continuing
until the stream had formed a connection at C with the downstream
reach. This, of course, in the case of a weir, would render the work
useless and might even destroy it.

[Illustration: FIG. 53.]

In the case of a bridge carrying a road or railway, or of a syphon or
aqueduct carrying a canal or other stream, it is wholly inadmissible
to allow the stream to cut away even as far as the point A for fear
of its severing the line of communication. Thus in every case it is
practically necessary to prevent any serious erosion of the bank
upstream of the structure. In ordinary cases it is sufficient to
protect the bank C D by any of the methods given in CHAP. VI., _Art.
3_, the protection being turned inwards, as shown at D, to prevent the
end of it being damaged.

In the case of railway bridges across the great shifting rivers of
India, protection used at one time to be afforded by various systems
of spurs. This has now been abandoned in favour of Bell’s guide banks
(fig. 54), which are found to be far more satisfactory. These guide
banks are discussed in the paper by Spring quoted above (_Art. 1_).
The spaces behind the guide banks become filled with water, at least
during floods, and are meant to be silted up. An opening in the
railway embankment should be provided at A, and another on the opposite
side of the river, to ensure a constant flow of water (CHAP. V., _Art.
3_), but they should not be large enough to cause high velocity. The
chief danger to which a guide bank is liable is outflanking when the
stream assumes the position shown. To guard against this danger it is
necessary to have very strong and massive heads to the guide banks.
When the bank of the eroding stream, downstream of the guide bank head,
becomes a semicircle or thereabouts, the stream takes a short-cut
across the sandbank, and to encourage this an artificial cut can be
dug, at the season of low water, on any suitable line.

[Illustration: FIG. 54.]

If the guide banks were made with an increased width of opening at
the upper end, this would reduce the chance of outflanking but would
increase the danger from a direct attack such as indicated, in the
figure, on the left bank. It has been suggested that the width at
the upstream end should be less than at the bridge, but this seems
undesirable. Probably the form shown in fig. 54 is the proper one. The
length of the guide bank upstream of the bridge is made about equal
to the span of the bridge between the two guide banks. If made less
than this, the river might cut into the line of railway. The length of
guide bank downstream of the bridge is generally 300 to 500 feet, being
greater as the velocity of the river is greater and the sand of its bed
finer.

[Illustration: FIG. 55.]

The Bengal Dooars Railway runs near the foot of the Bhutan Himalayas,
and crosses some broad river channels which, after the excessively
heavy rains which occur, are filled by streams of very high velocities.
One such channel or set of channels (fig. 55), more than half a mile
wide, is provided with a bridge whose waterway consists of ten spans
of 60 feet each. The railway embankment across the remainder of the
channel having been breached in many places in 1903, protection was
afforded by T-headed spurs and other groynes, the first arrangement,
which withstood the floods of 1904, being as shown in the figure. The
triangular apex of the A-shaped groyne, south-east of the bridge, was
added in 1905 because, in its absence, the water struck the bridge
obliquely. After the addition there was a great deposit of silt in
the neighbourhood of the four T-headed spurs. Next year the river,
in a great flood, rose over the top of the railway embankment near
these spurs, and finally caused a breach 600 feet wide. The embankment
was afterwards raised. The velocity through the bridge seems to have
approached 18 feet per second. The bridge had at first no floor. A
floor was added, but was much damaged by the floods (_Min. Proc. Inst.
C.E._, vol. clxxiii.). The level of the floor is not given, but it
would seem to have been desirable to make it at a very low level. The
rising of the stream over the railway embankment was attributed to the
silting up near the T-headed spurs. The addition of the triangular
portion above referred to would seem to have somewhat assisted this
process. If all the trouble could have been foreseen, it might have
been best to build an additional bridge 2000 feet south-east of the
existing bridge. The groynes were composed of the wire-network rolls,
described in CHAP. VI., _Art. 3_, piled pyramid fashion.




CHAPTER XII

DRAINAGE AND FLOODS


1. =Preliminary Remarks.=--_Arts. 2_ and _3_ of this Chapter deal
with the calculation of flood discharges, _Art. 2_ dealing with small
streams, in which the water has to be got rid of, and _Art. 3_ with
large streams. The remaining articles discuss the methods of predicting
floods and of preventing them from doing damage. When the discharge
figures have been arrived at in any case, the necessary masonry works
can be designed in accordance with the principles described in CHAPS.
X. and XI. For remarks regarding the design of channels and banks, see
CHAP. IX., _Art. 4_, and also _Art. 6_ of the present Chapter.

In England, land near a stream or flooded area is said to be “awash”
when the flood water rises to within 3 feet of the surface of the
ground. The drainage of such land is apt to be unsatisfactory. If land
is flooded or awash, it may be desirable to shift the outfall of a
branch drain to a point lower down in the main outfall.


2. =Small Streams.=--In dealing with small streams, such as branch
drains or natural streams not far from their sources, the engineer
is concerned only with their maximum discharges. He has to design
culverts, bridges or syphons to pass the streams under roads or other
works, or to design channels or waste weirs for them. In a settled
country there may be already some works in existence on the same
stream, and these may form a guide, or it may be possible to obtain
local information as to the height or volume of floods. Even in such a
case rainfall figures will be most useful. In districts where there is
no settled population, and in any case where the stream is ill-defined,
and the flow fitful, the rainfall figures may afford the only, or at
least far the best, means of estimating the discharge.

The rainfall to be considered in all these cases is the maximum likely
to fall in a short period of time. The catchment areas dealt with are
small, say 5 square miles or less. It must be assumed that the fall of
rain extends to all parts of the catchment area, and that its duration
is sufficient for the water from all parts of it to reach the site of
the work. The different valleys or divisions of the catchment area
should be considered separately, and regard must be had, not only to
the area of each division, but to its length and declivity measured
along the course of the stream which drains it. On these two factors
depend the time taken by the rain water to reach the site of the work.
The rate at which the rain water flows over the ground into rills or
small subsidiary streams may be taken to be ¼ mile per hour in flat
land, and 1 mile per hour on steep hill sides. The velocity of the
current in the rills and larger streams is generally 2 to 4 miles per
hour. It can, when necessary, be calculated roughly from the size and
<DW72> of the stream. To be on the safe side, the highest probable
figure can be taken.

The time taken by the water to flow from the furthest points of the
catchment area to the site of the work having been arrived at as above,
the next thing is to estimate the probable maximum intensity of the
rainfall during that time over the whole catchment area. The only
figures immediately available will be the mean annual rainfall, or
perhaps the maximum fall in twenty-four hours, but it has been shown
(CHAP. II., _Art. 5_) how the probable maximum fall over a shorter
period may be estimated.

The next thing to be calculated is the “run-off,” _i.e._ the probable
proportion of the rainfall which will at once run off. This may be less
than the proportion which will eventually become “available,” because
some of it may go to feed the underground supply from which springs are
fed. The proportion running off a small area in a short time would,
under most circumstances, be rather difficult to estimate, but in the
case under consideration, only the probable maximum figure is required.
This occurs when the ground is saturated. Under these circumstances the
ratio of the run-off to the total fall may be somewhat as follows:--

  Steep rocky hillsides  ·70 to ·90
  Ordinary hills         ·50 ”  ·75
  Undulating country     ·40 ”  ·50
  Flat country           ·30 ”  ·35

The figures can be increased when the surface is specially hard or
frozen, and decreased when it is soft, sandy, covered with woods or
vegetation, or cultivated.

Whether or not the above procedure is necessary in its entirety
depends chiefly on the size of the proposed work and on the degree
of inconvenience likely to arise from any wrong estimation of the
discharge.

In designing syphons to carry torrents across the Upper Jhelum Canal
in the Punjab, the discharge from a catchment area of ·79 square miles
was found to be about 4000 cubic feet per second. This is at the rate
of about 5000 cubic feet per second per square mile, and is equivalent
to a run-off of 7·8 inches in an hour. The catchment area was among
low hills, not far from the Himalayas, and the declivities of the
rills were very steep. The superintending engineer, Mr R. E. Purves,
states[18] that the discharge observations were reliable, and that
falls of rain of an inch in ten minutes occur not infrequently, even
though the fall in twenty-four hours might not exceed 2 or 3 inches. In
order to account for the discharge in the case under consideration, it
would at first seem to be necessary to assume not only that a fall at
the rate of 7·8 inches per hour had occurred, but that the whole of it
had run off. It is not, however, necessary to assume quite so much. The
ground being saturated, the rain falling in a period of five minutes
might be reaching the discharge site with little loss. A suddenly
increased fall at the rate of 6 inches per hour might then occur, and
the water travelling more quickly and with hardly any loss, would
overtake that already passing the site. This case seems to show that
for a very small catchment area the whole of the fall, and more, must
be allowed for.

The Chief Engineer of the Punjab did not accept the above figures.[19]
He remarked that observations taken under great difficulties as to time
and place are liable to error, and he considered that an allowance
of rainfall at the rate of 4·8 inches per hour--a rate which had
been observed elsewhere--and a run-off of ·75 of the fall would be
sufficient. He accepted a discharge of 2000 cubic feet per second for
catchment areas of less than 5 square miles, assuming the run-off to
be ·75 of the fall, but afterwards increased the figure to 2400 cubic
feet per second. The chief engineer did not overlook the fact that
in the designs for the drainage aqueducts a free-board of 5 feet had
been allowed, and perhaps this led to an acceptance of an estimated
discharge less than would otherwise have been accepted. It does not
seem to be at all certain that the figure put forward by Mr Purves was
far wrong. When the original project estimate for the Upper Jhelum
Canal was framed, the irrigation engineers had had no experience of
small and steep catchments, and no one had suspected that the discharge
per square mile would be anything like the above. The sums of money
provided for works for the passages of torrents had to be increased in
ratios varying from 2·5 to 1 to 6 to 1.

The following statement shows the figures for other small catchment
areas in the neighbourhood of the Upper Jhelum Canal:--

  +----------+------------------+---------+
  |Catchment |   Discharge per  | Run-off.|
  |  Area.   |    square mile.  |         |
  +----------+------------------+---------+
  |Sq. miles.| Cub. ft. per sec.| Inches. |
  |          |                  |         |
  |   .79    |        5000      |   7·8   |
  |  1·47    |        3825      |   5·82  |
  |  2·96    |        2214      |   3·46  |
  +----------+------------------+---------+

In the south-east of New South Wales flood discharges of 135 and 84
cubic feet per second have been found for catchment areas of ·91 and
2·5 square miles respectively in broken country.


3. =Rivers.=--It is possible to apply the methods of the preceding
article to large catchment areas, but the results would be quite
unreliable. If the calculations were made so as to err on the side of
safety, the resulting discharges would often be enormous. The following
table shows some figures based on actual flood discharges. None of
the localities have excessive rainfalls, though most are liable to
occasional very heavy falls. In mountainous districts in the North
of England and in Scotland the flood discharges per square mile of
catchment area have been found to vary from 64 to 320 cubic feet per
second.

  +-----------+---------+-----------+---------+---------------+----------+
  |           |         |           |         |Flood Discharge|          |
  | Reference |Country. | Locality. |Catchment| per sq. mile  | Remarks. |        |
  |  Number.  |         |           |  Area.  | of Catchment  |          |
  |           |         |           |         |  Area.        |          |
  +-----------+---------+-----------+---------+---------------+----------+
  |           |         |           |Sq. miles|   Cub. ft.    |          |
  |           |         |           |         |   per sec.    |          |
  |      1    |  India. |  Upper    | 5 to 10 |     1613      |          |
  |           |         | Jhelum.   |         |               |          |
  |      2    |    ”    | Nagpur.   |    6·6  |      480      |          |
  |      3    |  South  |Near Cape  |   34·5  |       78      |          |
  |           | Africa. | Town.     |         |               |          |
  |           |         |           |         |               |          |
  |      4    |    ”    |Near Port  |   35    |      640      |Estimated.|
  |           |         |Elizabeth  |         |               |          |
  |      5    |New South|South-East |   49    |       37      |          |
  |           |  Wales. | District. |         |               |          |
  |      6    |  India. |  Upper    |   56    |     1000      |          |
  |           |         | Jhelum.   |         |               |          |
  |      7    |    ”    |    ”      |  174    |      550      |          |
  |      8    |New South|South-East |  418    |       11·2    |          |
  |           |  Wales. |District.  |         |               |          |
  |      9    |  India. |Kali Nadi  | 2593    |       51      |Estimated |
  |           |         |  Stream.  |         |     or more   |roughly.  |
  +-----------+---------+-----------+---------+---------------+----------+

The tendency of the figures in column 5 of the table is to decrease as
the catchment area increases. This tendency has long been known, and
attempts have been made to found on it formulæ for calculating flood
discharges. One such formula is Q = _c_ M^{3/4} where Q is the flood
discharge in cubic feet per second and M is the area of the catchment
in square miles. The formula is roughly correct, _c_ being a constant
for catchment areas of not dissimilar characters and with rainfalls
not differing much. But for other cases there is no knowing how _c_
may vary, and this renders the formula practically useless. The author
of another such formula quotes cases Nos. 5 and 8 in the above table,
and the two cases mentioned at the end of _Art. 2_ as agreeing fairly
well with the result of his formula. The tendency just mentioned is
due to the fact that every river is composed of tributaries which have
their own small catchment areas but are, when measured to the general
outlet or point where the discharge is under consideration, of very
different lengths, to the improbability of heavy rainfall occurring
over all these small areas at such times as to cause the different
flood waves to arrive simultaneously at the outlet, and to the facts
that in the case of the longer tributaries the flood waves flatten
out (_Hydraulics_, CHAP. IX., _Arts. 3_ and _4_) so as to arrive more
gradually, and that, unless rain is also falling all along their
courses, these longer tributaries undergo losses from evaporation and
absorption. But occasionally it happens that the various flood waves
do arrive at the outlet more or less simultaneously, and that the
rainfall continues so long and is so widely distributed--though not
necessarily of the same intensity as that which caused the flood--that
the flood waves do not flatten out and that losses in the channels do
not occur. Floods can thus vary to an extraordinary degree in severity,
and formulæ are quite useless. This is why floods occur surpassing all
previous records, as, for instance, the recent floods in Paris. However
severe a flood may be, it can never be said that the maximum has, even
probably, been attained unless it can be shown that the rainfall has
been so heavy, so long continued, and so distributed that anything
worse is not likely to occur.

The best method of estimating the flood discharge of a large perennial
stream is to ascertain, by local inquiry, the height to which it is
known to have risen, and to take cross-sections of the channel and
calculate the discharge (CHAP. III., _Arts. 4_ and _5_). In designing
works, allowance can be made for a flood exceeding any known before.
This method applies also to a case in which a river is formed by the
junction of two or more large tributaries. It is possible that the
tributaries have not, within the memory of man, been in high flood
simultaneously. If so, the chances of this occurring are no greater and
no less than if the stream was composed merely of a number of small
affluents. Remarks regarding intermittent streams are given in CHAP.
III., _Art. 7_.

Since an acre contains 43,560 square feet, and a twelfth of this is
3630, it follows that a fall of 4 inches of rain, of which 1 inch runs
off, in an hour, gives a discharge of 3630 cubic feet per hour, or
about 1 cubic foot per second. This is 640 cubic feet per second for a
square mile. The figures in column 5 of the above table show that the
run-off was, in the cases quoted, generally far less than 1 inch. In
case No. 4 it was 1 inch, and in case No. 2 it was 3/4 inch.

In the case of the Kali Nadi (No. 9 in the table) an aqueduct to carry
the Lower Ganges Canal over the stream was being designed. The flood
discharge, estimated from the supposed flood-level and cross-section of
the stream was (_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._, vol. xcv.) 26,352 cubic feet
per second. The discharge, estimated by assuming a fall of 6 inches of
rain in twenty-four hours over the catchment area--then believed to
be 3025 square miles--and a run-off of ·25 of the fall, was 114,950
cubic feet per second. This figure was rejected on the ground that the
rainfall would not be continuous over so large an area as 3025 square
miles. An allowance of 7 cubic feet per second per square mile was made
and, a fresh survey having shown that the catchment area was only 2593
square miles, a discharge of 18,000 cubic feet per second was allowed
for. The aqueduct was built, about the year 1875, with five arched
spans of 35 feet each, the total area of the waterway being about 3000
square feet. The length of the piers and abutments was 212 feet, the
width of the canal carried over the aqueduct being 192 feet. In 1884
the aqueduct was partly destroyed by a flood whose discharge was about
44,000 cubic feet per second. In July 1885 it was wholly destroyed
by a flood whose discharge was estimated at 132,475 cubic feet per
second, but was probably more. The discharge must have been more than
51 cubic feet per second per square mile. The aqueduct was rebuilt with
a waterway of about 15,000 square feet. Below the aqueduct there was a
bridge which had been standing for a hundred years. Its waterway was
only 1146 square feet. It was not much damaged by the flood of 1884,
but much of the water passed round it, breaking through the embanked
roadway or pouring over it. It is understood that the bridge was
destroyed by the flood of 1885.

This case shows the necessity for making every possible allowance in
calculating flood discharges for important works. The smallness of
the discharge, as calculated from the cross-section of the stream,
was probably owing to its being dry when the survey was made, so that
the velocity could not be observed, but it is probable that such a
discharge as wrecked the aqueduct had never before passed down the
stream.


4. =Prediction of Floods.=--At any place high up on the course of a
stream, the occurrence of a flood can often be predicted when rain
storms--often accompanied in the tropics by lightning--can be seen to
be occurring towards the sources of the stream. For any station lower
down the stream and for precise information in any case, the readings
of gauges higher up the stream can be telegraphed. If the station is at
a great distance from the gauge and if there is railway communication,
the readings can be sent by post.

In order to be able to predict the time of the arrival of a flood at
the lower station the reading of a gauge there, and also of that at the
upper station, should be taken at frequent intervals. In the case of
large rivers and distances of hundreds of miles, the interval may be
six or even twelve hours, but in other cases it should be much less.
If the readings are plotted, as in fig. 56, oblique lines can be drawn
to connect the saliences and depressions, and the time taken by each
change can thus be readily seen. When the upper part of the stream is
formed by two or more important tributaries there should be a gauge in
each.

As to what constitutes a flood, the gauge diagram of a river (fig.
56) is generally such that a line can be sketched as shown dotted.
The rises above this line are floods. The maximum flood discharge of
a Northern Indian river is estimated roughly as being 100 times the
low-water discharge. Leslie’s rule for floods in the British Isles
is that if all the daily discharges of a stream during the year are
ranged in order of magnitude, the discharges of the upper quarter are
considered to be floods.

[Illustration: FIG. 56.]

In India it is sometimes arranged that a telegram shall, in the
low-water stage of the river, be sent from the upper station when a
rise of 2 feet occurs in twenty-four hours or any less period, with
a further telegram for any such subsequent rise. The telegram states
the exact reading on the gauge and whether the water is rising steady
or falling. This is given as indicating the procedure that may be
followed where the telegraph has to be used, but when long and frequent
telegrams are not desirable.

The advancing end of a flood wave may, while the wave is rising and
being formed, travel rapidly, but when the wave has been formed it
travels at the ordinary rate of flow of the risen stream. The advancing
end of a trough may, while it is being formed, travel rapidly, but
after formation it travels at the ordinary rate of the fallen stream
(_Hydraulics_, CHAP. IX., _Arts. 3_ and _4_). Thus the rate at which
a change in water-level travels down a stream depends at first on the
amount of the rise or fall, but afterwards on the water-level of the
risen or fallen stream.

By taking the above facts into consideration and noting the actual
times obtained from the diagram, it will be possible to arrive at
the probable time that will be taken by any change. It will also be
possible to predict the height of the flood. If it is worth while, an
empirical formula can be got out. If there are tributaries, each with
a gauge, the matter will be more difficult. Probably the floods in the
tributaries will arrive at different times, but even in such cases
empirical formulæ have been arrived at, especially in France, and are
mentioned in various volumes of the Proceedings of the Institution of
Civil Engineers.

In all cases predictions are liable to be more or less upset if rain
falls in the tract between the upper and lower gauges. In very dry
weather the speed of a flood wave may be somewhat reduced, and the
height to which it rises will almost certainly be reduced.

The full effect of a change will not be felt at the lower station
unless the change at the upper station is maintained for a sufficiently
long period. A short wave or trough flattens out. Thus in any empirical
formula or system of prediction, the time over which the change extends
at the upper gauge must be taken into account, or else there must be
several upper gauges and the readings of all of them be taken into
account.

In mountainous districts landslips sometimes occur and block the
valley of a stream which then forms a lake. The water gradually rises
and eventually flows over the dam and sweeps it away causing a flood,
which is of great suddenness and height but decreases very quickly
in height as it travels down the valley. In a case which occurred in
the Himalayas in 1888 the inhabitants of the valleys, from the dam to
the point where the river debouches from the hills, were compelled by
Government to vacate all habitations below the probable level of the
flood, and no loss of life occurred. Similar floods, but on a smaller
scale, may be caused by the bursting of ordinary reservoir dams. In
some continental rivers ice may obstruct the stream and cause floods.


5. =Prevention of Floods.=--The extended use of field drains has, in
recent years, done much to increase the severity of floods in England
and other countries. One method of mitigating or preventing floods
is the construction of reservoirs for storing the water. Reservoirs
locally known as “washes,” formed by setting back the embankments,
exist on the Fen rivers. One wash, on the Nene, below Peterborough, is
12 miles long and half a mile wide and is filled, in floods, to a depth
of 7 feet and holds 1 inch of rainfall over the river basin, and this
is found to be sufficient. Reservoir construction is, however, in most
cases, impracticable owing to the expense. To store the water which is
given by 1 inch of rain in the basin of the Thames, a reservoir would
be needed 50 feet deep and covering about 7 square miles. It might cost
£7,000,000.

The afforestation or reforestation of river basins (CHAP. II.,
_Art. 4_) is also occasionally undertaken, but is not generally
practicable.[20]

The most practicable methods for preventing flooding are lowering the
water-level of the stream and constructing embankments along it. These
will be considered in the next two articles.


6. =Lowering the Water-Level.=--The water-level of a given length of
stream can be lowered by lowering the bed, widening the channel or
straightening the channel. The efficiency of these processes is in
the order named. As stated in CHAP. I., _Art. 4_, the alteration to
the channel must in any case be continued to some point downstream of
the reach under consideration. Let the channel be supposed to be of
“shallow” section with sloping sides. Let W be the mean width, D the
depth, and S the <DW72>. Let it be required to lower the water-level by
an amount equal to D/5. This can be effected by lowering the bed by
about 25 per cent. of D, or by increasing the width by about 50 per
cent., or by increasing the <DW72> by about 100 per cent. If the bed is
lowered, V is not affected, and the mean width is reduced. Increase
in W reduces D, and therefore reduces the hydraulic radius and the
velocity. Hence the large amount of widening necessary. When S is
increased the velocity, if R remains the same, is affected only as √S
(_Hydraulics_, CHAP. VI., _Art. 2_), but the depth of water is reduced
and R therefore reduced. Dressing the sides of a channel, so as to make
it smoother, produces the same effect as a slight widening.

It does not, of course, follow that lowering the bed is always the
best plan and straightening the worst. Any one of the processes may be
more or less impracticable because, for instance, of the hardness of
the material to be removed, or the expense--including compensation--of
removing obstructions.

A particular kind of widening consists in digging a new channel and
keeping both the new and the old channel open.

If a channel contains a weir, or a local raised portion of bed forming
a kind of submerged weir, or a contracted place or narrow bridge, the
upstream water-level can be lowered by simply removing or reducing the
obstruction. The lowering of the water-level will be greatest at the
site of the obstruction, and will be zero at some point far upstream
(_Hydraulics_, CHAP. VII., _Art. 5_). If the raised portion forms a
long shoal, its removal--supposing its height above the general bed to
be the same--will have more effect than if it were short. If the height
of the raised portion is small compared to the depth of water, or the
amount of contraction small compared to the width of the stream, the
removal may have much less effect than might appear (CHAP. I., _Art.
4_).

In soft soils one advantage of the straightening system for lowering
the water-level is that short-cuts can be dug to a small section, and
left to enlarge themselves (CHAP. VII., _Art. 1_).

Another advantage is that after any diversions have enlarged themselves
to the size of the rest of the channel--or have originally been so
excavated--the whole channel may scour, and the water-level continue to
fall. This, of course, should be allowed for if likely to occur.

The same thing may occur in the case of the removal of a weir, shoal,
or contracted piece of channel. The scour will act at first close to
the site of the obstruction, but it may work upstream.

In widening or deepening a channel for the purpose of mitigating
floods, it is a good plan to begin work at the downstream end, because
the lowering of the water-level will extend upstream beyond the reach
in which work is done, and this may facilitate work further upstream.
As regards any tendency for a widened reach to silt up again, any such
silting is not likely to be great in a short period of time, and need
not prevent the carrying on of work in various reaches, if this is
convenient.


7. =Flood Embankments.=--A flood embankment may be close to the edge
of the river or it may be set back. If set back it need not follow all
the windings of the stream. The setting back of an embankment gives
an increased waterway to the stream during floods, and therefore a
lower flood-level, but the effect of this is trifling in cases where
the depth of the water on the flooded land is small, especially if
such land is covered with vegetation, or is otherwise much obstructed.
Setting back is generally necessary in cases where the stream is
liable to erode the banks to any considerable extent. In such a case
the embankment should not be so near to the river as to be in much
danger from erosion, but the ground, as already stated (CHAP. IV.,
_Art. 9_), generally falls, in going away from the river, so that when
an embankment is set well back it is in lower ground, more expensive
and more liable to breach. The most suitable alignment is a matter
of judgment, and depends largely on the extent to which the river is
likely to shift.

Embankments should, where possible, be made in straight or properly
curved reaches. A flood embankment, at least at its upstream end,
should terminate in ground which is above flood-level. The top of an
embankment should be, in the case of a large river, 2 or 3 feet above
the high flood-level of the river. It should, of course, be graded
parallel to the general high flood-level, but neither the gradient nor
the height of the flood is usually known with accuracy (CHAP. II.,
_Arts. 1_ and _2_). There is generally a record or mark of some high
flood, and this is taken provisionally as the flood-level. Or the level
is calculated approximately from the flood readings on the nearest
river gauge. If experience shows that the embankment is too low, it
is raised. The cross-section of an embankment depends on the soil, on
the extent of damage which results if a breach occurs, on the funds
available, and on the value of the land which the embankment has to
occupy.

Where an affluent enters the river it will probably be necessary to run
out branch embankments. Sometimes cross embankments are run from the
main embankment to high land. Their object is to localise the damage if
a breach occurs. Along the back of the embankment there may be a drain
and it can be made to discharge its water, when the river is not in
flood, through the embankment by means of sluices or by pipes closed
by flap valves which will not allow flood water from the river to pass
through. There may be sluices in the embankment for the purpose of
irrigating the land at the back.

The immediate effect of the construction of flood embankments along a
river is to raise the water-level, because the floods can no longer
spread out over the country, but this effect will not be great if the
sectional area of the flood water was small or its velocity low. The
river may or may not tend, after the construction of flood embankments,
to raise or lower its bed. It has already been remarked that questions
of silting or scouring cannot be answered in a general manner. In the
case, however, of floods spilling over a piece of country, the depth
of the flood water is generally small and the country more or less
obstructed. Some deposit of silt generally occurs. The construction of
an embankment reduces the area of the flood water, and thus generally
reduces the silting and leaves more silt in the river proper. The depth
and velocity in the river are increased. Everything depends on which
is increased most. Most likely the stream is of shallow section and
the velocity is increased most (CHAP. IV., _Art. 6_, par. 6), and the
increased silt-supporting power may make up for the increased charge of
silt.

Sometimes when a main embankment is set far back, a subsidiary
embankment of smaller section is constructed closer to the stream. This
is often objectionable. The smaller embankment is liable to breach, and
the water then rises suddenly instead of gradually against the main
embankment, which is thus endangered to some extent, especially as it
is dry instead of being soaked.

It is often said that one effect of embanking a reach of a river is
to increase the severity of floods further downstream. The importance
of this is generally exaggerated. The narrowing of the flood stream
in the embanked portion causes the flood to travel more quickly and
rise higher in that particular reach. At a place further downstream
the same effect is produced, but in a less degree and only because
of the increased velocity and consequent reduction in the flattening
out of the flood wave, especially when the rise is soon succeeded
by a fall. When there is a gradual rise lasting for a considerable
time--and this is most likely to cause a high flood--there is no rise
of the flood-level downstream of the embanked reach, except such as is
due to the increase in the discharge of the stream consequent on the
absorption and evaporation being less than before, owing to the reduced
area of flooding in the embanked reach. In the case of a long-continued
rise, such as that just mentioned, it is the reach immediately upstream
of the embanked reach which will, to some extent, share in the
increased height of the floods.

An embankment may suitably have side <DW72>s of 4 to 1 on the river
side and 3 to 1 on the land side, with a top 10 feet wide and 3 feet
above high flood-level. On the Irrawaddy the top width is generally 8
feet. For very high and very low embankments it is 10 feet and 3 feet
respectively. In Holland 1 foot above high flood-level was at one time
supposed to be the rule, but in practice it was usually 4 feet. With
sandy soil the riverward <DW72> prescribed was 6 to 1. Such flat <DW72>s
are not necessary if fascining or stiff soil is used as a protection.
On the Rhine the top width of embankments consisting of gravel and sand
has been made about 15 feet, but the side <DW72>s were 1½ to 1 and 1 to
1. The embankments had spurs to keep off the current.

Sand, protected as above, makes a good embankment, and rats do not
burrow into it. Of course, if a breach occurs in an embankment
consisting mainly of sand, it will enlarge very quickly. In some cases
an embankment has a core wall of sand or of clay puddle. In Holland,
on sandy soil, a trench 8 feet wide is made and taken down to the clay.

Embankments require to be made with great care. The earth should be
deposited in layers. In Holland, horses are driven up and down over
each layer. In some parts of India the earth for embankments is brought
from the borrow pits by scoops drawn by bullocks. The earthwork is of
so excellent a character, owing to the earth being trodden down, that
no settlement has to be allowed for. Where the soil is sand the top
and faces of the embankment should be of good stiff soil, if it can be
obtained, for a thickness of 9 inches or a foot, or else the face next
the river should be protected by fascining (CHAP. VI., _Art. 3_) for 2
feet above, and several feet below high flood-level. Such protection
may be necessary in any case where waves are liable to occur. In
Holland embankments are turfed, and trees and shrubs are not allowed to
grow. In the Punjab the growth of all kinds of jungle is encouraged. It
binds the soil together and protects it from the wash of waves and from
winds which blow away sand and dust, and so wear the embankment slowly
away.

In embanking a long reach of a river it is convenient to begin from
the upstream end, because otherwise floods may get behind the finished
part of the embankment and, becoming impounded in a “pocket” formed by
the embankment and high land, rise to an abnormal height and, unless
gaps in the embankment have been left or are subsequently made, cause
breaches.

During high floods pegs should be driven in at frequent intervals,
to mark the high flood-levels. If a higher flood occurs, the peg is
shifted. The levels of the pegs can be observed at leisure.

When a breach occurs in an embankment, the first thing to do is to
protect the ends so that the breach shall not lengthen. If the water
passing through a breach becomes pocketed, the embankment may have to
be cut to let it out.

Regarding the stoppage of leakages, see CHAP. IX., _Art. 1._ Regarding
the closure of breaches, see CHAP. VII., _Art. 2_.

For a description of flood embankments along the great shifting rivers
of Northern India, see _Punjab Rivers and Works_.

    _Note to Art. 5._--Floods can sometimes be mitigated by sinking
    pits in the flooded area so that the flood water comes in contact
    with permeable strata and is absorbed by them.




CHAPTER XIII

RESERVOIRS AND DAMS


1. =Reservoirs.=--The object of a reservoir is to store water for
town supply or for irrigation or other purposes. Reservoirs for the
water supply of towns are divided into “impounding reservoirs” and
“service reservoirs,” the latter being of comparatively small size,
and their object being to store, near to the town, a supply sufficient
for a short period. Instead of one impounding reservoir there may be
several, formed by various dams and one discharging into another. When
a reservoir is mentioned without qualification, an impounding reservoir
is meant. A reservoir is generally made by blocking up a valley by
means of a dam of earth or masonry. The site of the dam should be
selected at a place where the valley is narrow. The lowest portion or
“bottom water” of a reservoir is usually not drawn upon, because it is
less pure than the rest, and it has to be left, in dry weather, for the
fish. It is not included in calculating the capacity of the reservoir.

In Great Britain, when the water of a stream is impounded,
“compensation water” has to be given back to the stream lower down.
This compensation water is generally given in the form of a constant
supply, and amounts to perhaps a quarter of the available supply. It
has to be included in calculating the daily supply taken out of the
reservoir. The advantage to the stream in having this addition to it
during dry weather is very great.

It has already been seen (CHAP. IX., _Art. 1_) that in an earthen bank
which has to retain water the leakage generally decreases rapidly and
the bank becomes almost impermeable. The same is true of the surface of
a valley, in the case of most ordinary soils, provided that it is kept
submerged. Any portions which become exposed to the sun and weather are
likely to crack and give rise to percolation. Thus a reservoir formed
by the construction of a dam resting on the surface of the ground may
be more or less water-tight according to circumstances. There are many
which are sufficiently water-tight. But in most cases the dam--or an
impervious core-wall--is carried down to an impervious stratum. A
masonry dam is carried down to rock.

In the case of dams of considerable height the soil should be examined
by borings. If there is an inclined stratum not well connected with
that below it, unequal settlement of the dam may occur; and this
may also happen if there is a thick stratum of clay, owing to its
compressibility.

Except for very high dams--those, for instance, more than 110 or
120 feet in height measured from the ground to the water-level--an
earthen dam is cheaper than a masonry dam. It is also more easily
raised and strengthened--though this operation has also been effected
on masonry dams--in case, for instance, of the silting up of the
reservoir, a process which is slow in England, but not so slow when
water containing much silt is dealt with, as in the case of irrigation
reservoirs in India. Sometimes a dam consists of a wall of masonry
or concrete with earth behind it as a support. Whatever kind of dam
is used, its construction always demands very great care. Serious
disasters, with much loss of life, have occurred owing to failures of
dams.

A reservoir with an earthen dam is provided with a waste weir for the
purpose of passing off flood water, which might otherwise overtop the
dam and destroy it. Generally the waste weir is a continuation of the
line of the dam. Its crest has to be below the high-water level of
the reservoir, but not lower than can be helped, and its length has
therefore to be considerable. Sometimes it is provided with grooved
piers between which planks are placed in the season when floods are not
likely to occur.

In connection with irrigation reservoirs in Western India, it has been
pointed out by Strange (_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._, vol. cxxxii.) that
a long high-level waste weir is best suited to cases in which the
replenishment of the reservoir is uncertain, and that in cases where
it is nearly certain, the high-level weir prevents the water-level in
the reservoir being quickly lowered in the case of an accident or for
the purpose of effecting repairs, impounds the earliest floods, which
are most charged with silt, and causes the water area to be a maximum,
and therefore gives all floods the maximum time in which to deposit
silt. He accordingly suggests that the crests of waste weirs in these
reservoirs should be shortened and lowered and provided with falling
shutters (this had been done in one reservoir and has since been done
in another), and that sluices be added with sills at a still lower
level than the lowered crest. These proposals seem to be entirely
reasonable, though of course it would be necessary to have skilled
supervision over the working of the sluices. Sometimes the waste weir
is made in a separate place, being separated from the dam by a saddle.

A masonry dam may act as its own waste weir, the flood water flowing
over the crest and down the rear <DW72>; but in cases where heavy floods
are liable to occur it is usual to provide a separate waste weir by
cutting away the side of the gorge either close to the dam or at some
other place.

While a dam is in course of construction arrangements must be made to
deal with flood water. Generally the construction of some part of the
dam has to be deferred to let the water pass. In the case of a masonry
dam it does not much matter what part is thus deferred provided the
usual procedure of stepping the work back is followed. In the case
of an earthen dam it is best to defer a portion, not in the lowest
ground where the dam is highest, but to one side of it, thus allowing
the highest part of the dam to be brought up continuously. Temporary
embankments and weirs can be constructed to cause the water to traverse
the desired route without doing damage. Stepping of the earthwork
should be avoided as far as possible. If it has to be adopted, the
steps should be small. Sometimes the flood water is conveyed away by
means of a “by-wash,” by an entirely different route.

[Illustration: FIG. 57.]

In Indian reservoirs the discharge over the waste weir may at times
be great. The waste weir is sometimes in the position shown in fig.
57, _a e_ being the weir. In such a case a special hydraulic problem
arises. In a case where a stream whose velocity is V issues from a
reservoir or takes off at right angles from a larger stream there is
(_Hydraulics_, CHAP. II., _Arts. 19_ and _20_) a fall in the water of
about V^2/2_g_. The same thing occurs downstream of a weir, at least
when there is a clear fall which is vertical or nearly so, so that the
water after falling has no horizontal velocity. The water has to be
started afresh on its course. In the case represented by the figure,
the width of the channel is often restricted because of high ground
beyond _f_, and the velocity in the channel may be very high. Suppose
the channel below _e f_ to be of brickwork with vertical sides, and
to have a 20-foot bed, a <DW72> of 1 in 500, and a depth of water of
10 feet. The velocity may be 15 feet per second, and V^2/2_g_ is 3·49
feet. If the water has a clear fall over the weir at _e_, allowance
must be made for a depth of water of 13·49 feet, not 10 feet, in the
channel at _e_. Ordinarily the length _a e_ will be much greater,
relatively to _e f_, than shown in the figure. Suppose that _a e_ is
300 feet and that the <DW72> of the floor of the channel is carried on
at 1 in 500 from _e f_ up to _a_, _b_, _c_, and _d_, following in each
case the lines marked on the figure which represent the directions of
flow. The length _f a_ will be about 310 feet, and the floor level
at _a_ will be about ·62 feet higher than at _e f_. The water-levels
below the weir will be in each case 13·49 feet above the floor. This
should be allowed for in the design. It is true that the stream on
first starting into horizontal motion below the weir moves more or
less at right angles to it, and has thus a large sectional area and a
low velocity; but it very soon has to turn parallel to the weir and
acquire the full velocity of 15 feet per second, and there must be the
requisite extra head to give this velocity. If the weir is drowned, the
water on passing over it may have a high horizontal velocity, but it
will be at right angles to the axis of the channel, and its effect will
be wasted in eddies.


2. =Capacity of Reservoirs.=--A reservoir depends for its supply on
the yield of a particular valley or valleys which form its catchment
area, and the capacity of the reservoir or reservoirs can be altered
by altering the height or number of the dams. The need for a reservoir
is entirely owing to the inequality in the distribution of the
rainfall. If the rain fell in equal quantities week by week, the daily
fluctuations could probably be equalised by the service reservoirs. The
impounding reservoir could be quite small. Actually, a reservoir is
needed to “equalise” the flow--that is, to give a steady flow for an
intermittent one. The smaller the reservoir, the sooner it will go dry
in a drought and the sooner it will overflow in wet weather and cause
waste of the water. In other words, the larger the reservoir the better
it will fulfil its function of equalising the flow and the greater the
degree to which the catchment area will be utilised.

[Illustration: FIG. 58.]

In the British Isles the distribution of the rainfall which is most
trying for a reservoir, occurs when the rain is heavy during the winter
and very light in summer. Fig. 58 shows a diagram for a reservoir
in the driest year, when the rainfall is (CHAP. II., _Art. 1_) ·63
of the mean annual fall. The distribution of the fall is supposed
to be unfavourable as just described. The lower part of the figure
shows the water-level at the end of each month, the reservoir being
supposed to have vertical sides so that the quantity of water in it is
proportional to the depth of water. The upper part of the figure shows
the water impounded (available fall multiplied by area of catchment)
in full lines, and the consumption in a dotted line. The distance
between the two lines in any month is the same as the rise or fall of
the reservoir in that month. There is supposed to be no overflow, and
the total consumption of water in the year is equal to the quantity
impounded in the year, so that the levels of the reservoir water
surface on 1st January and 31st December, as shown by the horizontal
lines A, B at the left and right of the figure, are the same. Deacon,
who has investigated the subject, has found (_Ency. Brit._, Tenth
Edition, vol. 33, “Water Supply”) that, in order to satisfy the above
conditions, the capacity of the reservoir must be 30 per cent. of the
water impounded during the year, or about 110 days’ consumption. On
1st January the reservoir must be about two-thirds full. At the end
of February it is ready to overflow. At the end of August it is just
becoming dry. The daily consumption is supposed to be steady throughout
the year.

As an instance, suppose the catchment area to be 1000 acres, the mean
annual fall 60 inches, with a loss from evaporation and absorption
of 14 inches. The available rainfall of the year is (see last column
of table below) 23·8 inches, or 1·983̇ feet. The water impounded and
consumed during the year is 1000 × 43,560 × 1·983̇ × 6·25 = 539,962,000
gallons. The reservoir capacity must be 3/10ths of this, or 161,988,600
gallons. This is represented by the height C E. If the mean available
rainfall in January and February is 6·3 inches, or ·525 feet, the
water impounded during those months is 1000 × 43,560 × ·525 × 6·25 =
143,931,000 gallons, and the consumption is 539,962,000/6 = 89,993,667
gallons. The difference, 53,937,333 gallons, represents the addition
A C, to the reservoir. Similarly, the light summer rainfall causes
the depletion A E, and the heavy rainfall in the last four months of
the year the addition E B. If the height of the reservoir above A B
were less than A C, there would be overflow at the end of February;
and if the depth below A B were less than A E, the reservoir would go
dry before the drought ended. If the capacity of the reservoir were
increased either at the top or bottom, the cost would be increased and
nothing would be gained. It is not meant that the highest and lowest
levels of any reservoir designed as above would always, in the driest
year, exactly correspond with the points of overflow and going dry, but
they would do so nearly. Deacon states that such a reservoir would fail
only once in fifty years, and then only for a short time.

The reservoir considered above does not, as already remarked, fully
utilise the yield of the catchment area. In a wetter year there
would be overflow and the yield from the reservoir would not be much
increased. In order to equalise the flow of the two driest years
the capacity of the reservoir must be increased, its yield being
also increased, and so on for larger groups of years. By collecting
information for large numbers of places in the British Isles, Deacon
has prepared diagrams and tables which show the capacities and yields
of reservoirs. The following table gives the figures for the case where
the rainfall is 60 inches and the loss by evaporation and absorption 14
inches:--

  +-----------+-------------+-----------+----------+--------+---------+
  | Number of |             |           |Column 2 ÷|        |         |
  |   Driest  | Net Capacity|           | Column 3 |        |         |
  |Consecutive| of Reservoir|           | or Number|Ratio of|         |
  | Years the |    for a    |   Daily   | of Days’ |Rainfall|Available|
  |  Flow of  |  Catchment  | Yield of  |  Supply  |to Mean |Rainfall.|
  |   which   | Area of 100 |Reservoir. | contained| Annual |         |
  |  is to be |   acres.    |           |  in the  | Fall.  |         |
  | Equalised.|             |           |Reservoir.|        |         |
  +-----------+-------------+-----------+----------+--------+---------+
  |           |   Gallons.  |  Gallons. |          |        | Inches. |
  |    1      | 166,000,000 | 1,475,000 |   113    |  ·63   |  23·8   |
  |    2      | 258,000,000 | 1,815,000 |   142    |  ·72   |  29·2   |
  |    3      | 329,000,000 | 1,987,000 |   165    |  ·77   |  32·2   |
  |    4      | 390,000,000 | 2,103,000 |   190    |  ·80   |  34·0   |
  |    5      | 441,000,000 | 2,187,000 |   201    |  ·82   |  35·2   |
  |    6      | 487,000,000 | 2,255,000 |   216    |  ·835  |  36·1   |
  +-----------+-------------+-----------+----------+--------+---------+

The figures in the fifth column are those given in CHAP. II., _Art.
1_. The figures in the last column show the corresponding available
falls, after deducting the loss of 14 inches. It will be seen that,
owing to this deduction, the available falls for the shorter periods
are reduced in a greater ratio than the figures in the fifth column.

In arranging for the supply of towns in the British Isles it is usual
to design the reservoirs so as to equalise the flow of the three driest
consecutive years. Existing reservoirs, old and new, usually contain
from 140 to 170 days’ supply, but some contain less. The above table
shows that for the assumed fall of 60 inches and loss of 14 inches, the
capacity of a reservoir, to allow for a six-year dry period, has to be
49 per cent. more than for a three-year dry period, while the daily
supply from it is only 13 per cent. greater.

The following statement gives Deacon’s figures for mean annual
rainfalls ranging from 30 to 100 inches. The columns marked R show the
reservoir capacities in millions of gallons, and those marked S the
daily yields of the reservoirs in thousands of gallons. The figures
for other falls can be interpolated. For a fall of, for instance, 50
inches, the figures, whether of R or S, are practically a mean between
those for falls of 40 and 60 inches.

  +----------+-----------+------------+------------+------------+
  |  Number  |  F = 30.  |   F = 40.  |  F = 60.   |  F = 100.  |
  | of Years |           |            |            |            |
  |  whose   |           |            |            |            |
  |  Supply  |           |            |            |            |
  |is to be  +-----+-----+-----+------+-----+------+-----+------+
  |Equalised.|  R. |  S. |  R. |  S.  |  R. |  S.  |  R. |  S.  |
  +----------+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+------+-----+------+
  |    1     |  35 | 300 |  79 |  695 | 166 | 1475 | 345 | 3040 |
  |    2     |  85 | 470 | 140 |  900 | 258 | 1815 | 495 | 3600 |
  |    3     | 120 | 560 | 190 | 1050 | 329 | 1987 | 610 | 3900 |
  |    4     | 150 | 620 | 230 | 1110 | 390 | 2103 | 710 | 4100 |
  |    5     | 175 | 650 | 260 | 1170 | 441 | 2187 | 800 | 4230 |
  |    6     | 195 | 680 | 290 | 1220 | 487 | 2255 | 887 | 4320 |
  +----------+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+------+-----+------+

In all cases the loss is supposed to be 14 inches annually. If it is
15 or 13 inches, the reservoir capacity is less or more by about five,
ten, or fifteen million gallons, according as the number of years in
column 1 is 1, 3, or 6. And the daily yield is less or more by about
50,000 gallons.

With a low rainfall the advantage of a large reservoir is somewhat
increased. The capacity of the six-year reservoir for a fall of 30
inches is 63 per cent. more than that of the three-year reservoir, but
the supply is 22 per cent. greater.

The figures given above for reservoir capacities are suitable for the
British Isles. They assume that the distribution of the rainfall is the
least favourable that is at all likely to occur. Deacon states that
the figures do not relieve the engineer of the exercise of judgment.
As regards the British Isles, the chief questions on which judgment
has to be exercised are whether to equalise the flow of three years or
of another number, and how much to allow for loss. As already stated,
three years is the period usually taken. The figures are suitable for
most places in Europe, but in some places, _e.g._ on the Mediterranean
coast, the distribution of the rainfall is somewhat less favourable
than in the British Isles. In other parts of the world, and notably in
or near the tropics, the distribution of the rainfall must be specially
studied, and a diagram be prepared on the same principle as in the case
of fig. 58. The diagram should be extended to cover the desired number
of years. In hot countries loss by evaporation from the surface of the
reservoir should be allowed for. In India during the hot dry months
this loss may be half an inch in twenty-four hours.

In the article above quoted it is shown that if, as commonly happens,
the consumption of water is, in summer, greater than the mean, and in
winter less, the conditions are still more trying for the reservoir;
and that in the case where the summer consumption is 13 per cent.
greater than the mean, the capacity of the reservoir which impounds the
water of the driest year must be 33 per cent., instead of 30 per cent.,
of the total supply impounded during the year. It would then contain
121 days’ instead of 110 days’ mean supply. In the table on page 170
the number of days’ supply is 113. From this it appears that the tables
from which extracts have been given are calculated on the basis of a
constant consumption. This, however, in the case where the number of
years whose supply is equalised is greater than one, makes, owing to
the increased size of the reservoir, no practical difference.

The calculations for the great reservoirs in Radnorshire for the supply
of the city of Birmingham are as follows (_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._,
vol. clxxx.). The ratio of the mean fall in the three driest years to
the mean annual fall was taken as ·80 instead of ·77. There is some
difference of opinion as to the best figure:--

  Mean annual fall determined from readings
    of various gauges                          65 inches
  Mean fall of three driest years              52   ”
  Deduct loss from evaporation and absorption
    and losses during floods                   15   ”
  Available rainfall                           37   ”

This multiplied by 44,000 acres, the area of the catchment, gives 102
million gallons per day. Of this, 27,000,000 gallons is compensation
water, leaving 75,000,000 gallons for Birmingham. Capacity of
reservoirs, 17,250,000,000 gallons, or 169 days’ supply.

[Illustration: FIG. 59.]


3. =Earthen Dams.=--Before an earthen dam is made, any soft soil on the
site should be removed and the ground downstream of the site should
be drained. A few trenches, running parallel to the axis of the dam,
can be dug so as to give the dam a hold, though there is never any
danger of its being moved horizontally by the thrust of the water.
If the ground has a side-long <DW72> it should be benched as shown in
fig. 59. The front <DW72> of an earthen dam is generally about 3 to 1,
and the rear <DW72> about 2 to 1. The top has a width of ⅓ to ½ the
greatest depth of water held up, and is 5 to 10 feet above the highest
water-level. The borrow pits from which the earth for the dam is got
should not be near enough to it to in any way affect its stability.

[Illustration: FIG. 60.]

In England, and generally in other countries, an earthen dam has a
core-wall (fig. 60) which is carried down to an impervious stratum,
and is keyed into it to a depth of a foot or more in the case of
hard rock and several feet in the case of clay. On this core-wall
the impermeability of the dam chiefly depends. The core-wall may be
of clay puddle, concrete, or masonry. In England it is generally of
clay puddle. The core-wall sometimes extends down to a depth of 100
or 200 feet. Its top is horizontal and about level with the highest
water-level. It is desirable not to make the foundation stepped,
but to let it follow the profile of the impervious stratum. The
wall is keyed at its ends into the sides of the valley or gorge. A
core-wall of concrete or masonry is, in a high dam, necessarily a
comparatively thin structure, and it may be subjected to great strains
by unequal pressures of the earth which surrounds it. It is therefore
to some extent liable to crack. A core-wall of concrete used for the
water-works of Boston, U.S.A., is 100 feet high, 8 feet thick at the
base, and 4 feet thick at the top. A clay-puddle wall, being plastic
and moist, at least during the period immediately succeeding the
construction of the work, is not very liable to crack. The top width
of a puddle wall may be 4 to 10 feet, and the batter of the sides from
1 in 20 to 1 in 8. The clay used for the wall above the ground-level
should contain about 33 per cent. of sand and stones. This diminishes
its shrinkage if it dries. It should not be given too much water in
mixing. It should be thoroughly mixed and worked up and trodden down.

The clay puddle and the earth of the dam should be carried up
uniformly. The allowance for settlement may be 1/30 to 1/50. The earth
should be deposited in thin layers, moistened and rammed, and all clods
broken. In India and some other countries, instead of the earth being
rammed, cattle or sheep are driven over it repeatedly. This makes
earthwork of most excellent quality, and the settlement, if any, is
very small.

In cases where, owing to a fissure in the rock below the bottom of the
puddle trench, water comes through under the puddle, it is usual to
carry it away in a pipe running vertically in a groove up the side of
the trench and then horizontally till it emerges from the dam. Such
water, and any other leakage, can often in Great Britain be used as
part of the compensation water. There is, however, a certain chance,
when there are water-bearing fissures in the rock below the bottom of
the trench, that some percolating stream of water may wash away the
puddle, and it is preferable to use a concrete core-wall in such cases,
carrying it up to about ground-level and keying it into a much thicker
wall of puddle which is carried up to the water-level.

It has been suggested that the clay puddle or other impervious layer
should be placed, not vertically and in the middle of the dam, but
lying on the upstream face of the dam, so as to keep out water from
the whole dam instead of from only half of it. Objections to this, if
clay puddle is used, are that vermin may bore holes in it, and that,
with some clays, it would slip. These objections might be overcome to
some extent by laying a pitching of concrete blocks over the puddle.
Other objections, applying also when masonry or concrete is used, are
that the superficial area and cost are increased, and that cracks would
occur from settlement of the earth and from changes of temperature when
the water in the reservoir was low. A good many cases have occurred in
which an impervious layer laid on the <DW72>s has failed from one cause
or another. In France it is usual to rely on such a layer--concrete
is used--and to dispense with a core-wall. The practice of having a
vertical wall appears to be the best, and is the most widely adopted.
When puddle is used the weight of the mass above it forces it to
completely fill the trench, and when once it is in position and covered
up it is not at all likely to be damaged.

[Illustration: FIG. 61.]

The outer portion of a high embankment sometimes slips (fig. 61), and
precautions should be taken against this. A slip may occur if the site
of the dam has not been carefully selected as to geological formation,
or if there is unequal settlement owing to the work having been done at
different times. One cause of slips is sudden and partial changes in
the degree of saturation, and another cause is excessive saturation.
Some clays when wet require extremely flat side <DW72>s, and will
not stand even at 5 to 1. The outer parts of the embankment are not
required for stopping percolation (this will be further considered in
the following paragraph), and, though they must be carefully laid and
consolidated, they should be of porous material, and the part on the
downstream side of the dam must be well drained. A series of surface
drains may be arranged and filled with loose stone and gravel. There is
also a distinct advantage in using heavy material such as small stone
for the lowest portion of the outer parts on both sides of the dam.
When good material cannot be obtained, the side <DW72> on the downstream
side of the dam may be flattened. A side <DW72> starting at the top
with 3 to 1 and becoming 4 to 1 lower down, and finally 5 to 1 at the
base, is a very good form for prevention of slipping and generally
for the safety of a dam. The part on the side next the reservoir is
not likely to slip. It becomes soaked, but it has the pressure of the
water against it and is pitched. In Madras, where reservoirs are very
numerous, the <DW72> on the side next the water is generally only 1½ to
1.

The different parts of an earthen dam fulfil two distinct functions.
Some parts, which may be called the staunches, have to stop the
percolation of water from the reservoirs. Other parts, which may
be called the supports, have merely to hold up the staunches. In
the British type of dam the portion nearest the core-wall on either
side (fig. 60) is generally made of earth specially selected for
impermeability. The distance to which it extends from the wall depends
partly on the quantity of such earth available. In any case it has to
be very carefully made and consolidated, to avoid unequal pressures
on the core-wall, or unequal settlement which might cause it to part
from the wall. One of its functions is to keep the core-wall moist
when the water-level in the reservoir falls. Whether it is also to
be considered as a staunch or a support might at first appear to be
of no consequence, but it is of importance as affecting the question
of drainage. The support on the downstream side of the dam must, as
has just been seen, be made of porous material and be well drained;
but obviously a staunch must not be porous, nor can it be penetrated
by drains. The question must be decided in each case according to
judgment. In a discussion which took place on the above-mentioned paper
by Strange, at the Institution of Civil Engineers, much diversity of
opinion was expressed among eminent engineers as to the desirability
of draining the downstream half of the dam, _i.e._ the part downstream
of the core-wall. By some it was urged that drainage is necessary to
lessen the chance of the earthwork slipping. Others contended that any
drain which penetrates the dam must facilitate the percolation of water
from the reservoir. It is clear that some of the speakers regarded
the dam downstream of the core-wall as being partly staunch, and some
as being wholly support. If for any reason there seems a chance of
water leaking through the core-wall, it is desirable to regard the
earth-filling next to it as staunch.

In Western India a kind of puddle is made by mixing three parts of
“black cotton soil” with two of sand. The object of the puddle wall is
only to prevent water from finding its way along the surface of the
ground. It is carried down only to a fairly water-tight stratum and
is carried up only to 1 foot above the ground. Above that the mass of
the dam is made of black cotton soil as a staunch, with more porous
material on both sides of it.

In order to afford full protection against waves and their splashes,
the pitching on the upstream face of a dam should extend up to a height
of 5 feet, measured vertically, above the highest water-level. In the
case of a dam in which the “fetch” or distance over which the waves
have been in process of formation exceeds two miles, the above height
should be slightly increased.[21] The pitching is usually of stones
roughly squared at their outer ends and laid on a layer of broken
stones.

The water from a reservoir is usually drawn off by means of pipes which
are laid inside a masonry culvert built under the dam. The pipes can
thus be inspected. The culvert is blocked at its upstream end by a
thick masonry wall through which the pipes pass. Accidents which have
happened in the past have been due to weakness of the culvert or to
water finding its way along the outside of the masonry. The culvert can
be made of proper strength, and it should have a thick coating of clay
puddle which is worked into the clay-puddle core-wall of the dam. If
the core-wall is of masonry or concrete, the masonry of the culvert is
properly joined to it. In many cases the culvert and pipes are taken
through a cutting or tunnel and not under the dam.

At the upstream end of the culvert there is a masonry tower--access to
it is obtained from the top of the dam by a foot-bridge,--and from it
valves for opening and closing the pipes are worked. If the reservoir
is for the water supply of a town, it is arranged, by means of a
vertical pipe, that the draw-off can be at various levels so that the
surface-water can always be used. In the case of some of the towers at
the reservoirs whence Birmingham is now supplied, the vertical pipe
consists of a number of steel cylinders with gun-metal faces which are
so accurately made that the joint is water-tight when one cylinder
merely stands on another. The draw-off is obtained from a given level
by lifting a particular number of cylinders. Sometimes the tower is
made of reinforced concrete. When it is lofty it should be strong
enough to resist a strong wind, blowing when the reservoir is empty.


4. =Masonry Dams.=--For heights much exceeding 110 or 120 feet a
masonry dam may be cheaper than an earthen dam; and in case a flood
occurs while work is in progress the masonry might suffer little
injury, while earthwork might be swept away completely. Masonry dams
are usually built of random rubble masonry with faces of dressed stone.
Such masonry weighs about 140 lbs. per cubic foot, and is ordinarily
quite safe when subjected to pressures of 20 tons per square foot, but
in a masonry dam a high factor of safety is necessary, and 15 tons per
square foot may be allowed. In a wall of such masonry with both faces
vertical, the pressure, owing to the weight of the wall, will reach the
above limit when the wall has attained a height of about 220 feet.

In a masonry dam, although the masonry is always of the best quality,
it is a rule to calculate the dimensions so as to give no tension on
any part of the masonry. Any crack or opening of a joint, occurring
perhaps before the masonry had hardened, would let in water, and its
pressure would tend to gradually extend the crack and eventually to
overturn the portion above the crack.

Fig. 62 shows the upper part of a masonry dam. The lines with arrows
show the vertical force due to the weight of the masonry above A B, the
horizontal force due to the water-pressure on it--acting at two-thirds
of the depth,--and the resultant of these two. In order that there may
be no tension on the masonry, the resultant must always fall within
the middle third of the thickness of the dam. In order to prevent its
falling outside the middle third, the downstream face must be splayed
out, and the splay will go on increasing somewhat. Suppose, now, that
the reservoir is laid dry. It will be found that in the case of a dam
more than 100 feet high the pressure due to the weight of the wall
alone will fall outside the middle third--to the upstream side of it,
of course--of the thickness of the wall, and a slight splay must be
given to the upstream side. The vertical pressure of the water on this
splayed part must be taken into consideration. The limit of pressure,
15 tons per square foot, may eventually be reached owing to the height
of the dam, and additional splay may have to be given for this. When
the outside splay becomes considerable a further allowance is made
for it, because the stress at the edge of a horizontal section is
tangential to the face. In order that the tangential stress may not
exceed 15 tons per square foot, the vertical stress at the outer edge
of a horizontal section of the dam must not exceed about 12 tons. By
following the above rules the section of the dam can be calculated,
beginning from the top and working downwards. The resulting profile of
the dam is somewhat as shown in fig. 63. If a masonry dam is designed
on the principles given above--that is, so as to be safe as regards
crushing and overturning--it will be safe as regards shearing or
sliding horizontally, but a test calculation can easily be made for
this.

[Illustration: FIG. 62.]

[Illustration: FIG. 63.]

Calculations of the above kind do not, of course, enable all the
stresses in a solid mass of masonry to be found. Great stresses are
caused by expansion and contraction owing to changes in temperature.
Others are caused by the connections of the dam with the rock on which
it rests and with the sides of the gorge. The method of calculation
described above indicates a suitable form for the profile of a dam. The
large factor of safety adopted allows for other stresses. The sections
of the oldest dams, made in Spain, were somewhat as shown in fig. 64,
and contained about twice as much material as was necessary. The object
of the calculations is to save this needless expenditure.

Masonry dams designed on the above principles have been constructed for
heights ranging up to nearly 300 feet, measured from the foundation
to the top. The foundation is always on hard rock free from fissures.
Generally a foundation trench is cut. The ends of the dam are carried
into the rock on the sides of the gorge. They should not, however,
if the sides of the gorge are steep, be built in with mortar, but be
allowed to expand and contract vertically, a water-tight joint being
made by means of asphalt (_Ency. Brit._, Tenth Edition, vol. 33, “Water
Supply”). This obviously reduces the straining. A dam should be built
in cool weather, so that any stresses to which it will eventually be
subjected owing to changes in temperature will be chiefly compressive.
The upstream face should be as water-tight as possible. There should
not, however, be too sudden a change in the character of the masonry
from the face work to the inside work. If there are any springs, they
must be carefully connected to pipes and carried outside the dam. No
water must be permitted to get under or inside the dam, either from
springs in the sides of the gorge or from the water in the reservoir.
Many existing dams leak slightly where they join the sides of the
valley, and most have developed some vertical cracks normal to the
face.

[Illustration: FIG. 64.]

Out of some hundred high masonry dams which have been erected, only
three are known to have failed. Of these, the Puentes dam was partly
founded on piles; and in two, the Habra and Bouzey dams, the rule of
the middle third was not attended to. Another dam, not so high, the
Austin dam, in Texas, U.S.A., failed seven years after construction.
It was 65 feet high and founded on limestone, the width of the base
being 66 feet. Springs in the bed and sides of the gorge had, during
the construction of the dam, given much trouble, and had, after its
completion, forced their way through the underlying rock. At the time
of failure 11 feet of water was passing over the dam, which sheared in
two places, a length of 440 feet of it being pushed forward for 40 or
50 feet without overturning, but subsequently breaking up. The dam was
founded in a trench cut in the rock. The rock on the downstream side of
the foundation trench appears to have been worn away by the water, so
that there was no longer a trench (_Scientific American_, 28th April
1900). The above, however, does not seem to be sufficient to account
for failure. The horizontal water-pressure on a 1-foot length of the
dam would be 180,000 lbs. and the weight of masonry to be moved perhaps
320,000 lbs. It seems probable that water from upstream found its way
under the dam and exercised a lifting force on it and so caused it to
slide.

If a masonry dam, instead of being straight, is made curved on plan,
with its convexity upstream, it acts as an arch, and its thickness
can, in the case of a fairly narrow gorge, be greatly reduced. This
type of dam is a suitable one to use when the sides of the gorge are
of firm and solid rock and there is no doubt about their being able to
stand the thrust without yielding. Several dams of very considerable
size have recently been built in this way. The thickness of the upper
part of the dam and the ratio of the versed-sine of the arch to the
span can be decided on by the methods used for arches in general. The
lower part of the dam is made thicker. The lowest part cannot act as
an arch, because it is attached to the foundation. It is, however,
assisted by the portion above it, which acts as an arch, and thus
need not be so thick as in a “gravity” section. The Bear Valley dam,
which is 64 feet high, is only 3 feet thick at the top. The thickness
increases gradually to 8½ feet at 48 feet from the top. The chord
of the curve is 250 feet and the radius of curvature 335 feet. If
the gorge is wide, the thickness of the arch comes out so great that
nothing is saved by adopting the curved form. But in such a case, and
in any case, a dam can be made slightly curved so as to offer a greatly
increased resistance to overturning. It need not act as an arch, and
can be prevented from so acting, in order that excessive stresses may
be avoided, by letting the ends of the dam, after they have entered the
grooves cut in the sides of the gorge, stop short of the ends of the
grooves.

[Illustration: FIG. 65.]

During the last few years much attention has been given to the
investigation of the stresses to which a masonry dam is subjected. Some
investigations have been theoretical and others practical, models of
india-rubber and other substances having been used for experiment. The
investigations show that generally the stresses in a model of a dam are
very much the same as would be expected, but that there is a tensile
stress, previously overlooked, near the point M (fig. 65), where the
dam rests on its foundation. The tension is on the foundation, on the
line M N, and is due to the horizontal thrust of the water. It is
natural that in an elastic model this stress should manifest itself
by deformation. In the case of an actual dam resting on rock, matters
are different; but this tensile stress deserves consideration. For the
present let it be supposed that there is no trench, the dam merely
standing on the rock. Suppose that the rock has only the thickness
M R. There is tension in M N, and probably compression in N R. It
is assumed that, along the base M P, there is perfect union between
the dam and the rock. The tension to which the rock is occasionally
subjected owing to changes of temperature may exceed any tension due to
the water-pressure, but it is conceivable that the tension occurring
from both causes might cause a crack at M N, and that this might extend
to R. This implies a minute sliding of the dam and of the rock below
it, movement taking place on the plane R Q. The thrust of the water is
now resisted by the rock downstream of P Q. The dam, with the rock M
R Q P adhering to it, tends to rotate about the point P. The tendency
to rotate will be enhanced if water enters M R, and still more if it
enters R Q. No rotation can, however, take place unless the rock at M
R is splintered away. The rock would also have to fracture at P Q. It
has been suggested that the upstream face of the dam be made curved
as shown by the dotted line. This would shift the chief tension to _m
n_, and the dam, with the rock beneath it and the weight of the water
above the curved portion, would obviously offer an increased resistance
to rotation about P. The cost of the dam would of course be increased.
The danger of a crack forming at M N seems to exist only when there is
a thin upper stratum of rock not firmly connected to rock below. When
this condition is believed to exist, a masonry dam, if built at all,
should have the upstream face curved as above described. In the case of
any existing dam of great height, when the above condition is suspected
to exist, the reservoir might be laid dry, and if any crack at M N is
discovered a curved portion could be added; but in this case the union
between the new and the old work would be imperfect, and the curve
should start from high up on the upstream face of the dam. It has been
suggested that asphalt or some impervious material be laid on the rock
to prevent water from entering any crack. It would, however, not only
have to be laid upstream of the dam, but to extend under part of the
dam, and thus weaken it to some extent.

In the case (fig. 63) in which the dam is founded in a deep trench,
the building up of the upstream triangular space and uniting the
material both to the dam and to the side of the trench, might be of
some use, but a crack might form in it. It would be desirable to add a
curved portion, as above described, on the top of the rock if sound,
or to remove the unsound rock and widen the trench and then add the
curved portion. Adding material to the downstream triangular space,
and uniting it well, would also increase the resistance of the dam to
overturning, not so much because of the additional weight, as because
of the raising of the point about which the dam would have to revolve
in overturning.

Several recent dams have been built of cyclopean concrete, blocks
of rock as heavy as 10 tons being sometimes used in the work. Such
blocks are laid on one of their flat faces. In the U.S.A. some
reservoirs have been made with walls of reinforced concrete, backed
by earth embankments (_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._, vol. clxxxix.), and
also of cyclopean masonry reinforced with steel rods. Another kind
of dam which has been used in the U.S.A. is the rock-fill dam with a
core--corresponding to the puddle wall in an earthen dam--of steel
plates riveted together and made water-tight and inserted into the rock
at each side. In the case of the East Canyon Creek Reservoir, Morgan,
Utah, the dam is 110 feet high. The steel plates vary in thickness
from 3/8-inch at the bottom to ¼-inch at the top, and are embedded in
asphaltum concrete and rest on a concrete base. The dry-stone work
of the dam is hand-packed on both faces, and also on both sides of
the core. The rest is thrown in. The upstream face is 1 to 1, and the
downstream face 2 to 1. The waste weir is at one end of the dam and is
continued by a flume, so that the water falls clear of the dam. The
outlet is a tunnel in the rock.




CHAPTER XIV

TIDAL WATERS AND WORKS


1. =Tides.=--The tides or “tidal waves” are caused by the attraction of
the moon and the sun. The phenomena are complex, and a full discussion
of their causes need not be given here. When the tide rises it is said
to “flow,” and it is called the flood tide; when it falls it is called
the ebb tide. The period between one tide and the next, _e.g._ from
high water to high water, is about twelve hours, twenty-five minutes.
At a spring tide the range of the tide is greater than usual; at a
neap tide less. Where there are channels, as, for instance, the seas
which surround the British Isles, the tidal waves run up them as the
tide rises in the neighbouring ocean, and run back as it falls. At some
places, as Southampton, the tide comes in from two directions, and
there is a double tide. The times and levels of high and low water at
various places have been ascertained by observation, and are recorded.
The levels are, however, liable to be affected by winds. A wind blowing
towards the shore raises the level of both high and low water; a wind
blowing off shore lowers both levels. A severe storm in the North Sea
has caused a double tide at London Docks, by accelerating the North Sea
tidal wave.

In a funnel-shaped estuary, especially if it faces the direction of the
tidal wave in the sea, the tide in going up the channel increases in
velocity, and the momentum of the water causes it to rise higher and
higher as the width decreases. At the upper end of the Bristol Channel
the range of the tide is double the range in the sea outside the
channel. The Bay of Fundy is another place where a similar phenomenon
occurs. When a river or estuary is shallow and the range of the tide
is great, so that its rise is rapid, the flood tide in some cases
advances in the form of a wave or “bore,” causing a sudden rise in the
water-level and a sudden reversal of the flow of the stream. A bore is
most pronounced at spring tides. That of the Severn is well known.

In the case of a tide running along a coast or up an estuary, the water
of the flood tide, after it has ceased to rise, continues for a short
time, owing to its momentum, to flow in the same direction as before.
The same thing happens when the ebb tide ceases to fall. The tide also
acquires special velocity, just as a river does, round any projecting
headland.

The rise and fall of the tide are least rapid near the turns of the
tide. If the time from the beginning to the end of the flow be divided
into six equal parts, the proportional rise of the water will be
approximately as follows. And similarly with the fall during the ebb.

  Time             1    2    3    4    5   6
  Rise of water  ·067  ·25  ·5  ·75  ·933  1

Tidal waters are frequently charged, more or less, with silt, obtained
from the shore or from shallows near it, either by currents or tidal
waves sweeping along it, or by the action of ordinary waves. Tidal
waters flowing up and down the lower portions of rivers render them to
an enormous degree more capable of carrying navigation and, especially
if they become enlarged and form estuaries, more capable of being
altered by training works.

A tide-gauge is constructed on the same principle as a self-registering
stream-gauge. The rise and fall of the water are reduced, by mechanism,
to a convenient range, and are recorded on a band carried on a drum,
which is caused to revolve by clockwork. Another kind, which depends on
the use of an inverted syphon filled with air and a syphon of mercury,
is described in _Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._, vol. clxiv.

[Illustration: FIG. 66.]


2. =Tidal Rivers.=--Let A B (fig. 66) be the surface of the lower part
or mouth of a river, supposed to be of uniform width, and let B be the
mean sea-level. As the tide rises to D the water of the river is headed
up and assumes the line A D. When the tide falls to F there is a draw,
the river surface taking the line A F. If the rise of the tide B H is
so great that the discharge of the river cannot keep pace with it, so
as to fill up the whole space between A and H to the level of H, there
will be a flow of sea water from H to some point M, and of river water
from A to M. The point M will be lower than A and H. If the tide now
turns and the water-level H begins to fall, there will still be a flow
along H M. For a brief period it will be due to momentum, but it will
continue until, by the rise of the water-level at M and the fall at
H, the surface has assumed the form indicated by the dotted line A N
J. While this is happening, the point corresponding to M--where the
concave curve of the upland water meets the convex curve of the tidal
water--rises higher and shifts seaward. The character of the two curves
remains the same, but they become flatter and the surface N J nearly
level.

Thus the time of high tide at M is later than at H. It is later for
each point passed in going up the river from H towards A. Eventually a
point A is reached where there is no tide, that is, no rise or fall.
Far below this point, between A and B, there is a point above which
there is no upward current but only a slackening of the downstream
flow. At H a diagram showing the rise and fall of the tide is
symmetrical, at N the rises and falls are less than at H, and the
periods of their occurrence later. In going up the river the duration
of the flood tide decreases and that of the ebb tide increases. The
flood tide attains its greatest velocity soon after its commencement,
the ebb tide towards its close. The distances to which the tidal
influence extend are of course greater the greater the range of the
tide and the flatter the <DW72> of the river. The discharge of the
river of course varies. The greater the discharge the more the rise
of the river tends to keep pace with that of the tide and the less
the distance to which the tidal influence extends. On a longitudinal
section of the river, the high-water line will be shown as A N H. This
is merely done for convenience. It is never high water at all points
simultaneously. To show the actual state of affairs at various stages
of the tide, series of lines must be drawn as in fig. 67, where the
firm lines show the flood, and the dotted lines the ebb tide.

The flow in the tidal reach of a river is the same as if the water
was alternately headed up by a movable weir and then allowed to flow
freely and be drawn down. If the water carries silt, the tendency for
deposit to occur is (CHAP. V., _Art. 2_) no greater than if there was
no heading up or drawing down. The tendency depends chiefly on whether
there is, on the average, any reduction in velocity or increase in
depth as compared with the non-tidal upstream reach, and whether the
water in that reach is fully charged with silt. If both the answers are
in the negative, no deposit due to river silt is likely to occur in the
tidal reach.

[Illustration: FIG. 67.]

If the sea water is charged with silt, it will of course carry silt
into the river as it flows up, but the whole volume of water which
enters has to flow out again. On the whole, the tendency for silt to be
deposited in the river is due only to the period of “slack tide” near
the time when the flow ceases. The tendency is seldom marked.

If the sea water carries silt and the river water is clear, the latter
assists of course in removing any deposit--that is, it tends to keep
the channel clear.

If the river channel is soft and if the sea water carries no silt, it
may, in passing up and down the river, become charged with silt and
return to sea still carrying it. It thus has a scouring effect on the
channel, and may deepen or widen it. If, owing, for instance, to the
flattening of the bed <DW72> in its lower reaches, the river tends to
deposit its own silt in its tidal reach, the sea water may prevent this
deposit. Thus, as regards silting in the tidal reach of the river,
the tidal water of the sea has little prejudicial effect if it is
silt-laden, and a beneficial effect if it is not. Silt is likely to
deposit in the tidal reach of a river of uniform width, only in a case
in which the river water carries much silt, and the <DW72> is flat or
cross-section great compared to that of the upper reach.

Sea water is heavier than fresh water by about 2·4 per cent., and this,
to some extent, prevents their mixing. At all stages of the flood tide
the tendency at the point where the fresh water meets the salt water is
for the fresh water to accumulate towards the surface and the sea water
towards the bottom. When the tide begins to flow up the river there
may be a low-level salt water current moving landward and a high-level
fresh water current moving seaward, but this is quite a temporary state
of affairs. The surface <DW72> is landward, and the water moving seaward
is not moving in obedience to the surface <DW72>. It is only moving as
a result of momentum previously acquired. The low-level current may
have some extra velocity and extra scouring power, but this cannot be
much, because the mean landward velocity of the whole stream must,
owing to the internal resistances caused by the two currents, be less
than it would be if there were not two currents. Moreover, the state of
affairs is temporary. The two kinds of water mix eventually, and their
temporary separation has no considerable effect on the general tendency
of the river in the tidal reach to scour or to silt.

A body of water included at any moment between any two cross-sections
of the tidal portion of a river may not reach the sea during the next
ebb tide. In this case it will flow back up the channel with the next
flood tide, and so be kept moving up and down, getting nearer, however,
to the sea at each tide.

De Franchimont has shown (_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._, vol. clx.) how a
diagrammatic route-guide can be prepared for any tidal river to show
pilots or captains of vessels the best times for starting on voyages up
or down the river, and for passing each point on it.


3. =Works in Tidal Rivers.=--If any works are required in the tidal
portion of a river, the principles to be followed in designing them
are the same as if the river was non-tidal. All that has been said
in CHAP. VIII., _Arts. 1_ to _3_, applies to them. The river may be
straightened or trained or dredged. Generally training and dredging
are combined. Any dredging in the portion of the river nearest the sea
will not, of course, alter the water levels near the mouth, but it will
alter them further up. The tide will come up in greater volume and will
rise higher and extend further up. The ebb will be facilitated, and the
low-water level will be lowered. If any narrowing of the channel near
its mouth is effected by training walls for the purpose of lowering
the bed, the effect on the volume of tidal water entering the river
must be taken into consideration. If the narrowing is confined to a
reach near the mouth, and if the resulting deepening is not sufficient
to counteract the effect of the narrowing, the volume of tidal water
reaching the unnarrowed portions of the channel will be reduced, and
this may be injurious. Its scouring action may be insufficient. The
proper course may be to continue the narrowing upstream. If this is
done, then it is obvious that the width of channel in which deep water
is to be maintained at high water, or which is to be kept free from
deposit, is reduced in about the same proportion as the volume of tidal
water is reduced, and no harm is likely to result.

Any weir or similar structure which abruptly stops the flow of the tide
up a river checks it of course for a long distance back, perhaps to the
mouth. Old London Bridge used to obstruct the tide, and its removal
increased the range of the tide, and was beneficial.

Tidal rivers generally widen out to some extent near their mouths, and
are thus rather estuaries than rivers. The works in such rivers are
more fully discussed in _Art. 5_.


4. =Tidal Estuaries.=--If, instead of a river of uniform width, there
is an estuary whose width increases steadily towards the sea so that it
is funnel-shaped, the conditions described in _Art. 2_ are modified. An
estuary is formed first by the waves of the sea, which wear away the
angles at the mouth of the river and allow the tide to enter in greater
volume, and then by the flow and ebb of the tides. The <DW72> of the
bed of the estuary is usually much flatter than that of the river, and
the water surface is as shown in fig. 67. The tidal movements extend
further upstream than in the case of a river, not only because of
the greater difficulty experienced by the upland water in filling up
the wide channel of the estuary, but because of the momentum of the
tidal water driving its way up the funnel-shaped channel (_Art. 1_).
The capacity of the estuary is of course much greater than is required
for the discharge of the upland water alone. If the sea-level remained
always at one height and if the upland water contained silt, it would
tend to deposit in the estuary and would certainly deposit in it to
some extent. The action of the sea water is the same as described in
_Art. 2_, scouring if it is clear when entering, of less account if
it is not clear. Owing to the funnel shape of the estuary, the tide
rises higher at its upper end than if the estuary were replaced by a
river channel, and the tide also extends further up. This may partly
or wholly compensate for the greater tendency of silt to deposit in an
estuary as compared with a river channel.

The ebb tide in an estuary does not always follow exactly the same
course as the flood tide. Of course the lowest parts of the estuary are
filled first and emptied last, but the channels are not all continuous.
A channel open at its lower end may have a dead end at its upper
termination, and _vice versa_. Also, at sharp bends in the channels,
the momentum of the water may cause differences in the paths traversed
by the flowing and ebbing currents. Wherever there is a deep channel
the water from the adjacent sandbanks tends, towards the close of the
ebb, to flow cross-wise into the channel, and in doing this it to some
extent washes down the banks into the channel.


5. =Works in Tidal Estuaries.=--Estuaries, when shallow, offer great
facilities for training. It used at one time to be said that any
change which reduces the volume of tidal flow must be injurious. It
would be injurious to restrict the mouth of the estuary, unless it
were exceptionally wide, and leave the rest untouched. If the whole
estuary is narrowed, and a suitable funnel shape preserved, the width
to be kept open is, relatively to the size of the mouth, no greater
than before, and the tide may flow up as far as before, and rise to as
high a level. The narrowing, if properly arranged, will improve the
shape of the estuary and cause an increased scour. The effect of the
upland water is also greater in the narrower channel. Improvements to
estuaries are not, however, restricted to training. There is always
one or more deep channels, and the best of these can be selected and
improved by dredging. The channel should be one along which both the
flood tide and the ebb tide will run. The above remarks as to training
do not apply to a case in which there is a bar outside the mouth of the
estuary. Training might check the scour at the bar. Bars are treated of
in CHAP. XV.

If an estuary is not funnel-shaped, if, for instance, it widens out
very rapidly, the tidal flow is much less effective in keeping the
channel open. In this case, training works, which would give the
necessary funnel shape, are indicated rather than dredging. If an
estuary is narrow at the entrance, the flow is much less powerful,
unless the narrow part is of greater depth, but even then the force of
the tide is reduced owing to the change in the shape of the channel.

The bed of an estuary may be of such soft or sandy material that a
dredged channel would be likely to be quickly filled up again by the
slipping in of material at the sides (_Art. 4_). In such a case an
untrained channel can only be kept open to its full depth by constant
dredging, and probably the best course is to construct a trained
channel, although it may be more expensive than in the case of a
harder channel, because of the depth to which the foundations of the
walls must be sunk into the soft bed. Also, if the bed of the estuary
is constantly shifting, a dredged channel alone will not succeed,
and training must be resorted to. Again, the bed may be of such hard
material that training walls would not cause it to scour. In this case
a channel should be dredged and need not be trained. For the great body
of intermediate cases in which the deep channel can be formed either by
dredging or training, both methods can be adopted. A common plan is to
train the upper part and to dredge the lower part where the estuary is
wider and the training walls would be more exposed to the waves.

[Illustration: FIG. 68.]

When an estuary is thus partly trained, the deepening due to the
training does not extend far beyond the point where the walls
terminate. The deposit of material along the sides of the estuary
may, however, extend some distance further down in places where the
tide can no longer have free play. This occurred in the Seine estuary
(fig. 68). The authorities of Havre, which lies at one side of the
estuary not far from its mouth, feared that if the training walls were
brought further down, the deposits might extend to their neighbourhood.
The reduction in the capacity of the estuary, due to the deposits,
caused it to become filled up more quickly, and the time of high water
at Havre was advanced. The dotted lines show a good arrangement of
training walls proposed by Harcourt.

There is no doubt that it is always feasible to carry training walls
right through an estuary, or at least down to a point where deep water
is reached, and if a proper funnel shape is given to the channel the
reduction of the tidal flow and silting up of the spaces behind the
walls need not cause any trouble. Training the complete estuary was
carried out in the case of the Tees, where, however, the estuary was
not of great length, and was not of a good shape for keeping itself
open. Any affluents entering the estuary can be provided with separate
trained channels. Difficulty may, however, arise if there are towns
which would be shut off from the estuary by the silt banks.

Generally the line selected for the trained or dredged channel should,
though it must be as short and direct as possible, coincide as nearly
as possible with that which the water naturally tends to keep open.
This may be toward one side of the estuary or the other, according to
the direction from which the tidal wave approaches. In the case of
the Dee, the best line was not adopted, attention having been chiefly
given to the question of silting up the spaces outside the walls and so
reclaiming land, a matter which should always be treated as of quite
secondary importance. Training walls in estuaries are generally built
only up to half-tide level. Were it not for the expense they might be
built up to high-water level. In the Seine estuary the walls were made
of blocks of chalk.

Whether a trained channel will keep itself open or will need periodical
dredging depends, of course, on the amount of silt in the water and on
its velocity and depth. The question must be worked out and calculated
as in the case of a non-tidal river.

The estuary of the Mersey differs from most others. Towards the mouth,
near Liverpool, it is narrow and it widens out further inland. The
tides, running through the narrow portion, to fill up the large inland
basin and to empty it again, keep the narrow part scoured to a great
depth. It was proposed to train the wide portion for the Manchester
Ship Canal. The training would, no doubt, have succeeded, but, owing to
the silting up of the greater part of the estuary, the scouring near
Liverpool would have been very greatly reduced and serious damage done
to that port.




CHAPTER XV

RIVER BARS


1. =Deltaic Rivers.=--When a river flows into a tideless sea its silt
deposits and forms a shoal or bar. This shoal may in time extend and
rise up to the water-level. The current of the river makes its way
through it in various directions, and in this way a delta is formed
and constantly extends seawards. This flattens the <DW72> of the lower
portions of the river, and causes raising of the bed in the reaches
upstream, and this again may cause the water to break out further
upstream and form fresh channels to the sea. The bars at the mouths
of deltaic rivers are generally formed with great rapidity, and they
are apt to form a complete hindrance to navigation. They are sometimes
partly scoured away by floods in the river, but in this case the
scoured material may deposit on the outer <DW72>s of the bar. If a river
which carries silt has no delta, it is probably because there is a
littoral current, which prevents the silt from depositing. On the other
hand, if a river brings down very heavy sediment, a delta may be formed
even when tidal flow is not wholly absent. This occurs in the case of
the Ganges.

The bars at the mouths of deltaic rivers cannot usually be kept down
by dredging except at great expense. The usual method of dealing with
them is to run out two parallel jetties, in continuation of the river
banks, so as to bring the mouth of the river out to the bar. The river
then scours a channel through the bar and, if the walls are not too
far apart, the depth will probably become as great as in the river and
sufficient for navigation. The river, however, tends to at once form a
new bar further out. The rapidity with which the new bar forms will be
greater or less as the specific gravity of the materials carried by the
river is greater or less, and as the strength of any littoral current
is less or greater. Clay is spread far out while sand quickly sinks.
All deposits are, however, swept away if there is a strong littoral
current. The steeper the <DW72> of the bed of the sea away from the
bar the longer the new deposit will take in forming a fresh bar. Also
the less the discharge of the river the less the deposit will be. The
branch of a deltaic river selected for improvement by having the bar at
its mouth removed, should be one which has a small discharge and whose
mouth is in a position where there is a strong littoral current. In the
case of the Rhone, the branch selected was the eastern one, whose mouth
was not exposed to any littoral current. Moreover, the other branches
of the river were closed, and this increased the discharge of the
branch which was left open. The work did not succeed. In other cases,
the parallel jetty method has succeeded, and notably in the case of the
Mississippi. In this case willow mattresses weighted with stones were
used. The question of keeping down the discharge does not, however,
appear to have always received sufficient attention. In the case of the
Mississippi the “South pass” was selected for improvement. In order to
remove a shoal its upper end was narrowed and its discharge reduced.
The upper ends of the other “passes” were then obstructed so as to
restore the discharges of all the passes to their former amounts. The
wisdom of this step is questionable. It is desirable to keep down the
discharge of the branch which is to be improved to the lowest limit
consistent with free navigation.

If the width of the river near its mouth is greater than is desirable
for the width between the jetties, the latter are sometimes made to
converge though their outer ends are made parallel.

In the case of the Mississippi the jetties were made with a slight
curve to the right. It would seem desirable always to make the jetties
with quite a considerable curve. The jetty which was convex to the
channel could then probably be shortened. In a case where there is a
littoral current, say to the right, the curve of the jetties could be
to the right, so that the stream on issuing would tend to merge into
the current and assist it.


2. =Other Rivers.=--It often happens that the materials--sand, gravel,
and shingle--of which a sea beach is composed shift gradually along
the shore. This is known as “littoral drift.” It is by some supposed
to be due to the action of the tides, and by others to the action of
waves, the drift taking place in the direction of the prevailing winds,
excluding those which are off shore. The latter cause is the more
probable.

Most rivers have bars at their mouths. In the case of deltaic rivers
the bar, as already stated, is caused by the heavy silt carried by the
river, though it may be assisted by littoral drift. In the case of
non-deltaic rivers flowing into tideless seas, the quantity of silt is
not enough to form a bar, and the same is generally true in the case of
tidal rivers where the volume of tidal water is usually much greater
than that of the upland water. In both these classes of rivers the
formation of the bars is due chiefly to littoral drift or to sediment
brought in by the sea water. The bar, as in the case of deltaic rivers,
may be partly scoured away by a flood in the river, and the scoured
material may deposit on the seaward <DW72> of the bar. Generally, the
navigation channel across a bar of this kind can be kept sufficiently
deep by dredging, but sometimes jetties, like those mentioned in the
preceding article, have been constructed, and in this case there is
the great advantage that the bar is not liable to form further out. If
littoral drift tends to accumulate, the jetties, or at least the one
on the side whence the drift comes, can be lengthened. This was done,
as mentioned by Harcourt (_Rivers and Canals_, CHAP. IX.), in the case
of the rivers Chicago, Buffalo, and Oswego, which flow into the Great
Lakes of America. The same writer states that the jetties at the Swine
mouth of the tideless river Oder were made to curve to the left, the
convex or left-hand jetty being the shorter, but that this exposed the
mouth to littoral drift coming from the left. The river, upstream of
the jetties, had a slight curve towards the left, but this could have
been corrected or, at all events, the jetties made to curve to the
right.

A case (fig. 69) where parallel jetties were recently constructed in a
tidal sea is that of the mouth of the Richmond River, New South Wales
(_Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._, vol. clx.).

[Illustration: FIG. 69.]

In the case of a bar at the mouth of an estuary, parallel jetties would
be too far apart. In such cases converging breakwaters (fig. 70)
are sometimes made, especially if the tidal capacity of the estuary
is small. The entrance is generally 1000 to 2500 feet wide. If made
narrow, it would reduce the tidal flow too much. The space inside the
breakwaters adds to the tidal capacity, and thus induces scour at the
bar. The case is similar to that of the Mersey estuary (CHAP. XIV.,
_Art. 5_), the breakwaters assisting scour at the bar, though perhaps
slightly interfering with the tidal flow in the estuary.

[Illustration: FIG. 70.]

Converging breakwaters also tend to stop littoral drift, and the space
inside them acts as a harbour of refuge in storms and as a sheltered
place where dredgers can work (_Rivers and Canals_, CHAP. XI.). They
have to be heavily built and are very expensive, and they are generally
adopted only when there is an important seaport, and when they can be
put to all the uses above indicated.




APPENDIX A


=Fallacies in the Hydraulics of Streams= (CHAP. I., _Art. 4_, and CHAP.
VI., _Art 2_).--In an inundation canal in India the supply during
floods was excessive. Orders were given that a flume be made at the
head, as shown in fig. 71. The sides were to be revetted, as shown
in fig. 19 (CHAP. VI., _Art. 3_); the length, excluding the splayed
parts, was to be 200 feet, and the floor was to be a mattress well
staked or pegged down. The order stated that “by this means we cannot
get into the canal much more than its true capacity.” With 9 feet of
water, a surface fall of 4 inches in 300 feet would give a velocity
of some 6·5 feet per second, and a further fall of about 8 inches
would be required at the head of the flume to impress this velocity on
the water. The flume would reduce the depth of water in the canal by
1 foot, _i.e._ from 9 feet to 8 feet. This would not be in anything
like the proportion desired. Moreover the flume, unless the bed was
extremely well protected, would be destroyed. The above is a case of
exaggerating the effect of an “obstruction.”

[Illustration: FIG. 71.]

Again, on a branch canal it was observed that “wherever cattle
crossings exist there is a deep silt deposit which practically blocks
the branch.” The deposit exists because the sides of the channel are
worn down. A wide place always tends to shoal (CHAP. IV., _Art. 9_). If
the deposit obstructed the flow of water there would be a rush of water
past it, and it could not exist.

The Gagera branch of the Lower Chenab Canal--the left-hand branch in
fig. 72--was found to silt. It was proposed to make a divide wall (fig.
72) extending up to full supply level. The idea is unintelligible. The
silt does not travel by itself but is carried or rolled by the water.
As long as water entered the Gagera branch, silt would go with it. The
authorities, who had apparently accepted the proposal, altered the
estimate when they received it, and ordered the wall to be made as
shown dotted and of only half the height. This was done. The idea seems
to have been that the wall would act as a sill and stop rolling silt.
This is intelligible, but see CHAP. IV., _Art. 2_, last paragraph.
Moreover, there was a large gap, A B, in the wall. The work is said to
have proved useless, and proposals have been made to continue the wall
from A to B. In this form it is conceivable that it may be of use.

[Illustration: FIG. 72.]

In a river, the rises and falls at different places are not, of
coarse, the same, even when they are long continued. In the river
Chenab, at the railway bridge at Shershah, the rise from low water to
high flood is generally a foot or two more than the rise at a point 25
miles upstream. It has been suggested that the railway embankments,
which run across the flooded area, cause a heading up of the stream. If
this were the case, to any appreciable extent, there would be a “rapid”
through the bridge, which, if it did not destroy the bridge, would at
least be visible and audible.

The exaggerated ideas which often prevail regarding the tendency of a
river, when in flood, to scour out a new channel, have been mentioned
in CHAP. IV., _Art. 8_. Spring, in his paper on river control, admits,
when mentioning Dera Ghazi Khan, that there was little danger, but in
mentioning the Chenab Bridge at Shershah he quotes, without disputing
it, an opinion of the opposite kind (_Government of India Technical
Paper_, No. 153, “River Training and Control on the Guide Bank System”).

For some other fallacies, see _Hydraulics_, CHAP. VII., _Arts. 9_ and
_15_.




APPENDIX B


=Pitching and Bed Protection= (CHAP. VI., _Art. 3_, and CHAP. X.,
_Art. 2_).--Any scour upstream of a weir is merely due to the eddies
formed upstream of the crest (_Hydraulics_, CHAP. II., _Art. 7_), and
is not serious. And, similarly, as to scour upstream of a pier. A hole
formed alongside a pier or obstruction, if there is no floor, may work
upstream. The chief use of a floor extending far upstream is to flatten
the hydraulic gradient (CHAP. X., _Art. 3_).

For pitching of the sides, monolithic concrete is not very suitable,
because it may settle unequally and crack. For heavy pitching, concrete
blocks can be used. They can rest on a layer of 3 to 6 inches of
rammed ballast or gravel. The toe wall, as shown in fig. 13, page 65,
is sometimes dispensed with, the pitching being merely continued to a
suitable depth below the bed, and the bottom edge being at right angles
to the <DW72> instead of horizontal. The portion below the bed may be of
concrete.




INDEX


  Abrupt changes in streams, 28.

  Alterations in a channel, upstream effect, 4.

  Aqueduct, Kali Nadi, 149.

  Available rainfall, 9.


  Bank protection, 60.

  -- -- artificial weeds, 70.

  -- -- berms, 70.

  -- -- bushing, 68.

  -- -- fascining, 66.

  -- -- heavy stone pitching with apron, 71.

  -- -- on the Adige, 67.

  -- -- reinforced concrete, 70.

  -- -- rolls of wire-netting, 70, 140.

  -- -- staking, 69.

  -- -- trees, 68.

  -- -- twig revetment, 68.

  -- -- Villa system, 69.

  Banks, 92.

  -- Bell’s guide, 137.

  -- continuous lining of, 64.

  -- dimensions of, 93.

  -- guide, 137.

  -- side <DW72>s of, 92.

  Barrage of the Nile, Assiut, 117.

  Bars, river, 203.

  Bed, protection of, 58.

  -- -- Villa system, 59.

  Bell’s guide banks, 137.

  Bends, effect of, 44.

  -- short cuts of, 44.

  Bengal Dooars Railway, bridge and floods, 139.

  Bifurcation of a channel, 53.

  Birmingham water supply, 173.

  Borrow-pits in bed of channel, 53.

  Breakwaters, converging, 207.

  Bridges, 132.

  -- foundations or floor, 132.

  -- on Indian rivers, 134.

  -- piers and abutments, 132.

  -- protection of, 137.

  -- at Wazirabad, 134.

  British Rainfall Organisation, 9.


  Canalisation of rivers, 84.

  Canals, 92.

  -- fall, 113.

  -- headworks, 54.

  -- navigation, 93.

  -- rapid, 113.

  -- Ship, 95.

  Catchment area, “yield,” 9.

  Channel, alterations in, 4.

  Chanoine falling shutters, 121.

  Chenab River at Shershah, 210.

  Choice of types of work, 3.

  Closures of streams, Colorado River, 80.

  -- -- cradle for, 78.

  -- -- Tista River, 81.

  Collection of information concerning streams, 18.

  Colorado River, closure of, 80.

  Conduits, 92, 100.

  Cradle for closing streams, 78.

  Culverts, 135.

  -- flooding of, 136.


  Dams, culvert of, 180.

  -- design of masonry, 181.

  -- earthen, 174.

  -- masonry 181.

  -- -- construction of, 185.

  -- -- design, 181.

  -- -- failures of, 185.

  -- -- stresses in, 185.

  -- pitching of, 179.

  -- reservoir, 162.

  -- Sidhnai Canal, 117.

  -- tower for culvert, 180.

  Dee estuary, 201.

  Dera Ghazi Khan, Indus at, 71.

  Discharge curves, 23.

  -- observations, 21.

  -- tables, 24.

  Divide wall, Gagera branch canal, 209.

  Drainage, 141.

  Dredging and excavating, 84, 88.

  Drift, littoral, 205.


  Eddies, scouring power of, 28.

  Embankments, 156.

  -- design of, 157.

  -- Holland, 159.

  -- Irrawaddy, 159.

  -- Rhine, 159.

  -- slips in, 177.

  Estuaries, Dee, 201.

  -- Mersey, 202.

  -- Seine, 200.

  -- tidal, 197.


  Fall, canal, 113.

  Fallacies in hydraulics, 5.

  Falling shutters, Chanoine, 121.

  -- -- Fouracres, 121.

  -- -- Khanki, 124.

  -- -- Thénard’s, 121.

  Flood discharge, estimating, 148.

  Floods, 141, 146.

  -- Bengal Dooars Railway, 139.

  -- formulæ for, 147.

  -- prediction, 150.

  -- prevention, 153.

  Flowing stream, closure of, 75.

  Ford in a river, 43.

  Forests and vegetation, influence of, on rainfall, 14.

  Formulæ for floods, 147.


  Groynes or spurs, 58, 60, 61.

  -- on the Indus, 53.

  Guide banks, 137.


  Headworks of a canal, 54.

  Holland, embankments, 159.

  Hurdle <DW18>s, 79.

  Hydraulics of open streams, 4.

  -- -- fallacies in, 209.


  Important works, precautions at, 130.

  Indian rivers and bridges, 134.

  Indus, groynes on, 53.

  Information concerning streams, collection of, 18.

  Inundation canal, flume in, 209.

  Irrawaddy, embankments, 159.

  Irrigation channels in embankment, 52.

  Irwell, weir on, 124.


  Jetties, in continuation of river banks, 204.

  -- Mississippi, 205.

  -- Richmond River, New South Wales, 206.


  Kali Nadi, aqueduct, 149.

  Khanki, falling shutters at, 124.


  Leakage, stoppage of, 78.

  Lockage, 98.

  Locks, 96.

  -- in flights, 98.


  Mersey estuary, 202.

  Mississippi jetties, 48.


  Narora weir, 109.

  Navigation canals, 93.

  Needles, regulator, 117.

  New South Wales, available rainfall, 12.


  Obstruction, effect of, 5.

  Obstructions in streams, 28.

  Okla weir, 112.

  Open streams, hydraulics of, 4.


  Perishable materials, use of, 4.

  Permanent régime of streams, 29.

  Pitching, 64.

  Prediction of floods, 150.

  Prevention of floods, 153.

  Protection of banks (see Bank protection).


  Rainfall, 6.

  -- available, 9, 26.

  -- -- New South Wales, 9.

  -- -- Sudbury River, Massachusetts, 12.

  -- -- various countries, 11.

  -- British Organisation, 9.

  -- “catchment area,” “basin,” 9.

  -- distribution of, 7.

  -- driest year, 7.

  -- evaporation, 9.

  -- heavy falls in short periods, 15.

  -- influence of cultivation, 15.

  -- -- of forests and vegetation, 14.

  -- local figures, 8.

  -- measurement of, 13.

  -- observations, period of, 7.

  -- statistics, 6.

  -- variation of, 6.

  Rain-gauge, 8, 13.

  Rapid, canal, 113.

  Regulators, 118.

  Reservoirs, 162.

  -- capacity, 167.

  -- compensation water, 162.

  -- leakage, 163.

  -- waste weir, 164.

  Résumé of the subject, 1.

  Rhine, embankments, 159.

  Richmond river, jetties, 206.

  -- weir at, 119.

  River bars, 203.

  -- training groynes, 85.

  -- -- walls, 85.

  Rivers, deltaic, 203.

  -- floods in, 146.

  -- non-deltaic, 205.

  -- tidal, 192.

  -- training and canalisation, 84, 89.

  Run-off in small streams, 143.


  Salt water, effect of, 29.

  Sand separator, 34.

  Sandbanks, 47.

  Scour (see Silt and scour).

  Seine estuary, 200.

  Set of stream, effect of, 5.

  Ship canals, 95.

  Shutters, self-acting, Switzerland and Bavaria, 127.

  Silting and scouring, 27.

  Silt and scour, action at bends, 42.

  -- -- -- on sides of channel, 40.

  -- -- effect of regulator or movable weir, 49.

  -- -- in the Sirhind Canal, 32, 54.

  -- -- increasing or reducing, 48.

  -- -- materials carried in suspension, 3.

  -- -- methods of investigation, 33.

  -- -- practical formulæ and figures, 37.

  -- -- production of, 48.

  -- -- rolled materials, 29.

  -- -- sand separator, 34.

  -- -- scrapers or harrows, 48.

  -- clay and sand, 36.

  -- deposit, production of, 51.

  -- in river Sutlej, 35.

  -- in river Tay, 35.

  -- quantity and distribution of, 35.

  -- upstream of weirs, 103.

  Sidhnai Canal, dam, 117.

  Sirhind Canal, silt and scour in, 32, 54.

  Slips in embankments, 177.

  Sluice gates, Stoney’s, 119.

  Sluices, 102.

  Small streams, floods in, 141.

  Soundings, 21.

  Spurs or groynes, 58, 60, 61.

  Stream gauges, 19.

  -- diversions of, 73.

  -- general tendencies of, 45.

  -- information concerning intermittent, 25.

  -- -- -- small, 24, 25.

  -- overflow, 46.

  -- shifting, 20, 47.

  Sudbury River, Massachusetts, available rainfall, 12.

  Surface <DW72> observations, 22.

  Survey of a stream, 21.

  Sutlej River, silt in, 35.

  Syphons, 132, 135.


  Tay River, silt in, 35.

  Teddington, weir at, 119.

  Tidal estuaries, works in, 198.

  -- river, diagrammatic route-guide, 196.

  -- rivers, 192.

  -- works in, 196.

  Tide-gauges, 192.

  Tides, 190.

  Tista River, closure of, 81.

  Training of rivers, 84.

  Types of work, choice of, 3.


  Upper Jhelum Canal, syphons to carry torrents, 144.


  Velocities which enable a stream to scour, 40.

  Villa system of bank protection, 69.

  -- -- bed protection, 59.


  Waste weir, hydraulic problem, 165.

  Water supply, Birmingham, 173.

  Waterway, area of, in regulators, 129.

  Wave, travel of, down a stream, 152.

  Waves, effect of, 29.

  Wazirabad, bridge at, 134.

  Weeds, artificial, 70.

  -- growth of, 29.

  Weirs, 102.

  -- adjustable, 126.

  -- Bear Trap, 123.

  -- drum, 127.

  -- frame, 120.

  -- general design of, 105.

  -- Narora, 109.

  -- oblique, 103.

  -- Okla, 112.

  -- on sandy or porous soil, 106.

  -- Richmond, 119.

  -- silt deposit, upstream of, 103.

  -- types of, 111.

  -- waste, 164.

  -- with sluices, 115.

  Wire-netting for bank protection, 70, 140.

  Works, design and execution of, 3.


  Zifta Regulator, 109.


PRINTED BY NEILL AND CO., LTD., EDINBURGH.


FOOTNOTES:

[1] _Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._

[2] _Engineering News._

[3] _Encyclopædia Britannica._

[4] The paper by Spring--in size it is a book--will repay perusal by
engineers engaged on railway bridges over large shifting rivers. London
Agents, Constable & Co.

[5] _Hydraulics with Working Tables._ Spon, 1912.

[6] Irrigation canals are dealt with in _Irrigation Works_ (Spon, 1913).

[7] See also Appendix A.

[8] The regulator runs across the canal head; the under-sluices are a
continuation of the weir, between the divide wall and the regulator.

[9] See also Appendix B.

[10] On Indian canals the term “regulation” is applied to the control
of the discharge at the regulators or off-take works.

[11] See also Appendix B.

[12] _Irrigation Works_, CHAP. I., _Art. 4_.

[13] _Min. Proc. Inst. C.E._, vols. lx. and lxxxv.

[14] _Rivers and Canals_, Harcourt.

[15] _Rivers and Canals_, Harcourt.

[16] _Rivers and Canals_, Harcourt.

[17] The foundations of piers and abutments should be deep enough to
allow of this.

[18] _Report on the Revised Estimate, Upper Jhelum Canal._

[19] _Revised Estimate of the Upper Jhelum, Upper Chenab, and Lower
Bari Doab Canals._

[20] See also Note on p. 161.

[21] The height of a wave is supposed to be 1·4√(fetch), but this
allows nothing for splashing.


[Transcriber’s Note:

Obvious printer errors corrected silently.

Inconsistent spelling and hyphenation are as in the original.]





End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of River and Canal Engineering, by 
Edward Skelton Bellasis

*** 