



Produced by Don Kostuch




  [Transcriber's note:

  Page numbers are enclosed in curly braces, e.g. {99}. They are
  located where page breaks occurred in the original book. Paragraphs
  are not broken.

  When a paragraph flows around illustrations the "next" page
  immediately preceding or following the illustrations jumps to
  account for the pages occupied by the illustrations. The location of
  the paragraph following the illustration group is indicated as
  {52 continued}. The material following {10}, up to the next {}, is on
  page 10, even if the next page number is not 11.

  Italic are enclosed in underscores: _this is italicized_.

  End Transcriber's note]



WHERE HALF THE WORLD IS WAKING UP



  [Illustration: COUNT SHIGE-NOBU OKUMA OF JAPAN]
  (From a photograph and autograph given the author)

  Count Okuma, one of the Genro or Elder Statesmen of Japan and
  ex-Premier of the Empire, is an opponent of his country's high
  protective tariff and an earnest advocate of international
  arbitration.



WHERE HALF THE WORLD IS WAKING UP



THE OLD AND THE NEW IN JAPAN, CHINA, THE
PHILIPPINES, AND INDIA, REPORTED
WITH ESPECIAL REFERENCE TO
AMERICAN CONDITIONS

BY
CLARENCE POE

Author of "A Southerner in Europe," "Cotton: Its Cultivation and
Manufacture," Editor "The Progressive Farmer," Sec'y North Carolina
Historical Association, etc., etc.



Garden City New York
DOUBLEDAY, PAGE & COMPANY
1911



ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, INCLUDING THAT OF TRANSLATION INTO FOREIGN
LANGUAGES, INCLUDING THE SCANDINAVIAN



COPYRIGHT, 1911, BY CLARENCE POE



THE COUNTRY LIFE PRESS
GARDEN CITY, N. Y.



TO

THE RIGHT HONORABLE JAMES BRYCE


IN WHOM ACHIEVEMENT, CHARACTER AND PERSONAL CHARM MEET IN RARE
SYMMETRY; WHO HAS WON THE WISDOM OF AGE WITHOUT LOSING THE DEW OP
YOUTH; AND WHOSE GENEROUS FRIENDSHIP HAD MADE ME HIS DEBTOR BEFORE IT
AIDED ME ANEW IN PLANNING AND EXECUTING MY ORIENTAL TOUR



{vii}


PREFACE

"The human race, to which so many of my readers belong," as Mr.
Gilbert Chesterton begins one of his books by saying, has half its
members in Asia. That Americans should know something about so
considerable a portion of our human race is manifestly worth while.
And really to know them at all we must know them as they are to-day.

Vast changes are in progress, and even as I write this, the revolution
in China, foreshadowed in the chapters written by me from that
country, is remaking the political life of earth's oldest empire. From
Japan to India there is industrial, educational, political ferment.
The old order changes, yielding place to the new.

"Where Half the World is Waking Up" is not inappropriate therefore as
the title of the book now offered to the public. The reader will
kindly observe here that I have written of where half the world is
waking up and not merely of the waking-up itself. My purpose has been
to set forth the old and the new in due proportion; to present the
play of new forces against and upon the ancient, the amazingly
ancient, forces that have dominated whole races for centuries. In most
places, in fact, the ancient force is still clearly the dominant one.
Observe, too, therefore, that I have written not of where half the
world has waked up, but only of where it is waking up. The significant
thing is that the waking is really taking place at all, and of this
there can be no doubt.

It was, in short, with the hope of securing for myself and presenting
to others a photograph of the Orient as it is to-day that I made my
long trip through Japan, Korea, Manchuria, {viii} China, the
Philippines, and India during the past year. It was not a pleasure
trip nor yet a hurried "seaport trip." I travelled either entirely
across or well into the interior of each country visited, and all my
time was given to study and research to fit me for the preparation of
these articles.

That despite of the care exercised the book contains some errors, is
doubtless true. The sources of information in the Orient are not
always easy to find, nor always in accord after one finds them.
Consider, for example, the population of Manchuria: it seems a simple
enough matter, yet it required the help of consuls of two or three
nations to enable me to sift out the truth from the conflicting
representations of several writers and so-called authorities.

For my part I can only claim a laborious and painstaking effort to get
the facts. Letters of introduction to eminent Englishmen kindly
furnished me by Ambassador Bryce opened the doors of British
officialdom for me, and the friendship of Mr. Roosevelt and letters
from Mr. Bryan and our Department of State proved helpful in other
ways. I thus had the good fortune not only to get the ready fraternal
assistance of my brother newspaper men (of all races) everywhere, and
the help of English, German, and American consuls, but I was aided by
some of the most eminent authorities in each country visited--in
China, by H. E. Tang Shao-yi, Wu Ting Fang, Sir Robert Bredon, Dr. C.
D. Tenney, Dr. Timothy Richard; in Japan, by ex-Premier Okuma,
Viscount Kaneko, Baron Shibusawa, Dr. Juichi Soyeda; in Hong Kong, by
Governor-General Sir Frederick Lugard; in Manila by Governor-General
Forbes, Vice-Governor Gilbert; in India, the members of the Viceroy's
Cabinet, Hon. Krishnaswami Iyer, Dr. J. P. Jones, etc, etc. To all of
these and to scores of others, my grateful acknowledgments are
tendered. They helped me get information, but of course are in no case
to be held responsible for any opinions that I have expressed.

To Mr. G. D. Adams, of Akron, Ohio, and Dr. Arthur {ix} Mez, of
Mannheim, Germany, two generous fellow-travellers, my thanks are due
for the use of many of their photographs, and I am also indebted to
_The World's Work_ and _The Review of Reviews_ for permission to
republish articles that have already appeared in these magazines. The
larger number of chapters included in this volume, however, were
originally prepared with a view to their use in my own paper, The
Progressive Farmer. They are, therefore, often more elementary in
character, let me say in the outset, than if they had been written
exclusively for bookbuyers, but it is my hope that their journalistic
flavor, even if it has this disadvantage, will also be found to have
certain compensating qualities.

Perhaps just one other thing ought to be said: that practically every
article about any country was written while I was still in the country
described. In this way I hoped not only to write with greater
freshness and vividness, but I was enabled to have my articles revised
and criticised by friends well informed concerning the subjects
discussed. The reader will please bear in mind, therefore, that a
letter about Tokyo is also a letter from Tokyo, a letter about Korea
is a letter from Korea, etc., and shift his viewpoint accordingly. I
have also thought it best to be frank with the reader and let the
chapters on China remain exactly as they were written--presenting a
pen picture of the Dragon Empire as it appeared on the eve of the
outbreak, while the revolution was indeed definitely in prospect but
not yet a reality.

-----

"Give us as many anecdotes as you can," was old Samuel Johnson's
advice to Boswell, when that worthy proposed to write of Corsica; and
this wise suggestion I have sought to keep in mind in all my travel.
Moreover, another saying of the great lexicographer's comes quaintly
into my memory as I conclude this Foreword: "There are two things
which I am confident I could do very well," he once remarked to Sir
Joshua Reynolds; "one is an introduction to any literary work stating
{x} what it is to contain, and how it should be executed in the most
perfect manner: the other is a conclusion, showing from various causes
why the execution has not been equal to what the author promised to
himself and to the publick!"

C. P.
Raleigh, N. C.
December 1, 1911.



{xi}


CONTENTS

CHAPTER                                                 PAGE

I. Japan: The Land of Upside Down                          3

  A Land of Contradictions
  Music as an Example
  Marriage and the Home Life
  Patriarchal Ideas Still Dominant.

II. Snapshots of Japanese Life and Philosophy              9

  What a Japanese City Is Like
  Strange Clothing of the Japanese
  Who Ever Saw So Many Babies?
  Alphonse and Gaston Outdone
  The Grace of the Little Women
  How the Old Japan and the Old South Were Alike
  A "Moral Distinction" Between Producers and Non-Producers.

III. Japanese Farming and Farmer Folk                     17

  Japanese Farm Children Getting More Schooling
    than American Farm Children
  No Illiteracy in the New Japan
  Where Five Acres Is a Large Farm
  How Iowa Might Feed the Whole United States
  Farming Without Horses or Oxen
  What the Japanese Farmers Raise
  The Crime of Soil-waste
  All Work Done by Hand
  Cooperative Credit Societies a Success
  Farm Houses Grouped in Villages
  "A Seller of the Ancestral Land"
  The Japanese Love of the Beautiful a Suggestion for America.

IV. "Welfare Work" in Japanese Factories                   29

  Manufacturing Bound to Increase
  Tariff Legislation Unfair to Agriculture
  A Visit to a Progressive Japanese Factory
  How the Factory Operatives Are Looked After
  Stricter Factory Legislation Coming.

V. Does Japanese Competition Menace the White Man's Trade   34

  A Study of Japanese Industrial Conditions
  Japanese Labor Cheap but Inefficient
  Actual Cost of Output Little Cheaper than in America
  Laborers in a State {xii} of Deplorable Inexperience
  Illustrations of Japanese Inefficiency
  Some Current Misconceptions Corrected
  Labor Wage Has Increased 40 Per Cent, in Eight Years
  The Burden of Taxation
  High Tariff Will Decrease Japan's Export Trade
  Subsidy Policy Destroying Individual Initiative
  Japanese Competition Not a Serious Menace to the White Man.

VI. Buddhism, Shintoism, and Christianity in Japan         48

  The Artistic Touch of the Japanese
  Religion Without Morals
  Buddhism in Fact vs. Buddhism Idealized by Arnold
  Official Notices Prohibiting Christianity
  Christianity "Puts Too High an Estimate on Woman"
  The Worth of the Individual Not Recognized
  The Elemental Significance of Japan's Awakening
  A New Type of Civilization.

VII. Korea: "The Land of the Morning Calm" 60

  I Have Become a Contemporary of David
  The Fascination of a Primitive City
  Some Odd Korean Customs-A True Romance and an Odd One
  Many Faces Marked by Smallpox
  A Typical Monarchy of Ancient Asia-The Honorable Mr. Yang-ban
  Six Men to Carry Fifty Dollars' Worth of Money
  Japanese Annexation
  Splendid Work of Foreign Missionaries.

VIII. Manchuria: Fair and Fertile                          70

  Some First-hand Stories of the Russo-Japanese War
  A Bit of History with a Lesson
  The Site of the World's Next Great War
  Manchuria: Fair and Fertile
  Fat Harvests of Food, Feed, and Fuel
  A Land Where Everybody "Knows Beans"
  Golden Opportunities for Stock-raising
  Better Plows and Level Culture
  Graves as Thick as Corn Shocks

IX. Where Japan Is Absorbing an Empire                     78

  Manchuria the One Great Oriental Empire Not Yet Developed
  Its Strategic Importance
  Why the "Open Door" Concerns Us All
  Japan's Shrewd Policies {xiii}
  Contempt of Chinese Authority
  Japan at Home vs. Japan in Manchuria
  How the Open Door Policy Was Violated
  Will Manchuria Go the Way of Korea?
  A Bit of Chinese Wit and Wisdom
  Truth Is in the Interest of Peace.

X. Light from China on Problems at Home                    93

  A Chinese Martyr-Hero
  The Most Tremendous Moral Achievement of Recent Times
  A Lesson for America
  Putting Officials on Salaries
  Money Changers and Title Changers
  Making Education Practical
  The Parcels Post and Tariff Reform.

XI. The New China: Awake and at Work                     102

  The Coming National Parliament
  The Successful War Against Opium
  China's Right-about-face in Education
  Building Up an Army
  Attacking the Graft System
  Railroads, Posts, and Telegraphs
  America's Relations with China.

XII. A Trip into Rural China                             116

  The Camels from Mongolia
  Strange Traffic and Travel in Nankou Pass
  The Great Wall of China
  Surprisingly Progressive Farming Methods.

XIII. From Peking to the Yangtze-Kiang                   123

  Street Life in Peking
  History That Is History
  Martyrdoms That Have Enriched the World
  Average Wages 15 to 18 Cents a Day
  Homes Without Firesides
  All China a Vast Cemetery
  Keeping on Good Terms with Dragons
  The Blessings of Our Alphabet
  Confucius as a Moral Teacher
  My Friendship with a Descendant of Confucius.

XIV. Sidelights on Chinese Character and Industry         132

  Healthy Public Sentiment
  Slavery and Foot-binding Still Practised
  "Big Feet No B'long Pretty"
  The Popularity of a No. 2 Wife
  The Virtue That Is Next to Godliness Largely Disregarded
  Some Discredited Americans Discovered Abroad
  A 600-Mile Trip on the Yangtze {xiv} River
  An Interview with Wu Ting Fang
  Farming on the Yangtze
  Shanghai Factory Laborers Paid 12 Cents a Day.

XV. Farewell to China                                     142

  A City of 2,000,000 People Without a Vehicle
  A Dead Chinaman More Important and Respected Than a Live One
  Queer Features of Chinese Funerals
  Cruelty of Chinese Punishments
  A Sample of Chinese Humor: The Story of the Magic Jar
  Amusing Trials of a Land Buyer
  "Pidgin English"
  Everything Is Saved
  The Influence That Is Remaking China.

XVI. What I Saw in the Philippines                       153

  In Manila
  A Trip Through Five Provinces
  What the Philippine Country Looks Like
  Every Filipino Has Cigarette and a Clean Suit
  A Mania for Cock-fighting
  Snapshots of Philippine Life
  Labor the One Thing Lacking.

XVII. What the United States Is Doing in the Philippines 163

  Thirty Thousand White People and 7,000,000 Filipinos
  Rich Resources and Varied Products
  Millions in Lumber
  How the Islands Are Governed
  Restricting the Suffrage
  Education: Achievements of the American Government
  Postal Savings Banks and the Torrens System
  Public Health Work
  Building Roads
  And Then Keeping Them Up
  "A George Junior Republic."

XVIII. Asia's Greatest Lesson foe America . . 173

  Where 10 Cents a Day Is a Laborer's Wage
  The Savage Struggle for Existence in the East
  Tasks Heart-sickening in Their Heaviness
  Where Women Are Burden-bearers
  $12 a Year for a Farm Hand
  An Overcrowded Population Not the Chief Cause of Asia's Poverty
  A Defective Organization of Industry Responsible
  Foolish Opposition to Labor-saving Tools
  Our Debt to Machinery
  Knowledge Itself a Productive Agency
  Ineffectiveness of Oriental Labor
  Tools and Knowledge the Secret of Wealth
  Importance of Our Racial Heritage
  The Final Lesson.

{xv}

XIX. The Straits Settlements and Burma                   186

  The Amazing Industry of the Chinese
  Easy Money in Cocoanuts
  How Germany Is Capturing Oriental Trade
  Rangoon the City of Gorgeous Colors
  Burma's Buddhist Temples
  Rangoon's Beasts of Burden
  Where the Elephants Do the Work
  Some First-hand Jungle Stories
  My Lord the Elephant
  Good-by to Burma.

XX. Hinduism--and the Himalayas                         198

  Theoretical vs. Practical Hinduism
  The Kalighat Temple, Calcutta
  Human Sacrifices
  Two Indian Places of Worship: A Contrast
  A Visit to Benares
  Burning the Bodies of the Dead
  "Religion" as It Is in Benares
  The Himalayas: A New and Happier Subject.

XXI. "The Poor Benighted Hindus"                         210

  India's Enormous Population
  "The Wealth of the Indies" a Romance
  A Typical Indian Village
  No Chairs, Mattresses, Knives, or Forks Used
  Where It Is 105 at Midnight
  "Gunga Din" in Evidence
  The Lady of Banbury Cross Outdone.

XXII. Hindu Farming and Farm Life                        218

  Primitive Tools Used by Farmers
  What Crops Are Grown
  Where Drought Means Death
  Reducing the Ravages of Famine
  Usury and a Remedy
  Where America Is Behind
  Landowner and Farm Laborer
  Salaam, O Little Folk!

XXIII. The Caste System in India                         226

  No Man May Rise Higher, but May Fall Lower
  How Fatalism Sustains Caste
  Contamination by Touch
  A Bone Collector's Pride of Rank
  The "Thief Caste"
  Caste and the Banyan Tree
  A Maharaja's Defence of Caste
  Some Forces That Are Battering Down the System
  Foreign Travel Weakening Caste.

XXIV. The Plight of the Hindu Woman                      236

  "Woman Is Not to Be Trusted"
  Twelve-year-old Brides and Bridegrooms
  A Wedding Procession in Agra {xvi}
  5000 Rupees for a Wedding Feast
  The Plight of the Child-wives
  Cruel Treatment of Widows
  The Picture Not Wholly Dark
  One Worthy Tribute to the Grace of Woman.

XXV. More Leaves from an India Notebook                 246

  Some Historic Indian Cities
  India No More Homogeneous than Europe
  English Rule: An Interview with Mr. Krishnaswami Iyer
  Indian Wealth in a Few Hands
  16 Cents a Day an Incredibly High Wage
  No Horses on Indian Farms
  Bombay a Great Cotton Market
  The Story of a Man-eater
  A Snake Story to End With.

XXVI. What the Orient May Teach Us                     261

  Conservation the Keynote
  What Neglect of Her Forests Has Cost China
  Forestry Lessons from Japan and Korea
  Conserving Individual Wealth
  The Essential Immorality of Waste
  Avoiding the Wastes of War
  Preserving Our Physical Stamina and Racial Strength
  A Lesson from China
  Patriotism as a Moral Force
  The Coming "Conflict of Color"
  Oriental vs. Occidental Ideals.


{xvii}

ILLUSTRATIONS

Count Shige-Nobu Okuma of Japan           Frontispiece

                                                  PAGE

The Giant Avenue of Cryptomerias at Nikko           13

Typical Japanese Costumes and Temple Architecture   14

Japanese Farming Scenes                             19

Japanese School Children                            20

The Great Buddha (Diabutsu) at Kamakura             53

The Degenerate Koreans at Rest and at Work          54

Like Scenes from Our Western Prairies               81

Manchurian Women (showing peculiar head-dress)      82

Chinese Waste-paper Collector                       82

Pu Yi the Son of Heaven and
  Emperor of the Middle Kingdom                    105

How China Is Dealing with Opium Intemperance       106

A Man-made Desert                                  117

Pumping Water for Irrigation                       117

Transportation and Travel in China                 118

Fashionable Chinese Dinner Party                   137

How Lumber Is Sawed in the Orient                  137

A Quotation from Confucius                         138

The Great Wall of China                            147

Chinese Woman's Ruined Feet                        147

Chinese School Children                            148

The American Consulate at Antung                   148

A Filipino's Home                                  157

The Carabao, the Work-stock of the Filipinos       158

An Old Spanish Cathedral                           158

Society Belles of Mindanao, Philippine Islands     181

A Street Scene in Manila                           181
{xviii}
Two Kinds of Workers in Burma                      182

Types at Darjeeling, Northern India,
  and at Delhi, Central India                      205

Two Rangoon Types                                  206

A Hindu Faquir                                     213

Some Fashionable Hindus                            213

Hindu Children                                     214

The Taj Mahal from the Entrance Gate               241

Gunga Din on Dress Parade                          242

Bathing in the Sacred Ganges at Benares            249

The Battle-scarred and
  World-famous Residency at Lucknow                250

Burning the Bodies of Dead Hindus                  255

An Indian Camel Cart                               255

Travel in India                                    256


{xix}

WHERE HALF THE WORLD IS WAKING UP



{3}


I

JAPAN: THE LAND OF UPSIDE DOWN

"I cannot help thinking," said one of my friends to me when I left
home, "that when you get over on the other side of the world, in Japan
and China, you will have to walk upside down like the flies on the
ceiling!"

While I find that this is not true in a physical sense, it is true, as
Mr. Percival Lowell has pointed out, that, with regard to the manners
and customs of the people, everything is reversed, and the surest way
to go right is to take pains to go dead wrong! "To speak backward,
write backward, read backward, is but the A B C of Oriental
contrariety."

Alice need not have gone to Wonderland; she should have come to Japan.

I cannot get used, for example, to seeing men start at what with us
would be the back of a book or paper and read toward the front; and it
is said that no European or American ever gets used to the
construction of a Japanese sentence, considered merely from the
standpoint of thought-arrangement. I had noticed that the Japanese
usually ended their sentences with an emphatic upward spurt before I
learned that with them the subject of a sentence usually comes last
(if at all), as for example, "By a rough road yesterday came John,"
instead of, "John came by a rough road yesterday."

And this, of course, is but one illustration of thousands that might
be given to justify my title, "The Land of Upside Down," the land of
contradictions to all our Occidental ideas. That {4} Japan is a land
"where the flowers have no odor and the birds no song" has passed into
a proverb that is almost literally true; and similarly, the far-famed
cherry blossoms bear no fruit. The typesetters I saw in the _Kokumin
Shimbum_ office were singing like birds, but the field-hands I saw at
Komaba were as silent as church-worshippers. The women carry children
on their backs and not in their arms. The girls dance with their
hands, not with their feet, and alone, not with partners. An ox is
worth more than a horse. The people bathe frequently, but in dirty
water. The people are exceptionally artistic, yet the stone "lions" at
Nikko Temple look as much like bulldogs as lions. A man's birthday is
not celebrated, but the anniversary of his death is. The people are
immeasurably polite, and yet often unendurably cocky and conceited.
Kissing or waltzing, even for man and wife, would be improper in
public, but the exposure of the human body excites no surprise. The
national government is supposed to be modern, and yet only 2 per cent,
of the people--the wealthiest--can vote. Famed for kindness though the
people are, war correspondents declared the brutality of Japanese
soldiers to the Chinese at Port Arthur such as "would damn the fairest
nation on earth." Though the nation is equally noted for simplicity of
living, it is a Japanese banker, coming to New York, who breaks even
America's record for extravagance, by giving a banquet costing $40 a
plate. The people are supposed to be singularly contented, and yet
Socialism has had a rapid growth. The Emperor is regarded as sacred
and almost infallible, and yet the Crown Prince is not a legitimate
son. Although the government is one of the most autocratic on earth,
it has nevertheless adopted many highly "paternalistic"
schemes-government ownership of railways and telegraphs, for example.
The people work all the time, but they refuse to work as strenuously
as Americans. The temples attract thousands of people, but usually
only in a spirit of frolic: in the first Shinto temple I visited the
priests offered me sake (the national liquor) {5} to drink. Labor per
day is amazingly cheap, but, in actual results, little cheaper than
American labor.

It is amid such a maze of contradictions and surprises that one moves
in Japan. When I go into a Japanese home, for example, it is a hundred
times more important to take off my shoes than it is to take off my
hat--even though, as happened this week when I called on a celebrated
Japanese singer, there be holes in my left sock. (But I was comforted
later when I learned that on President Taft's visit to a famous Tokyo
teahouse his footwear was found to be in like plight.)

Speaking of music, we run squarely against another oddity, in that
native Japanese (as well as Chinese) music usually consists merely of
monotonous twanging on one or two strings--so that I can now
understand the old story of Li Hung Chang's musical experiences in
America. His friends took him to hear grand opera singers, to listen
to famous violinists, but these moved him not; the most gifted
pianists failed equally to interest him. But one night the great
Chinaman went early to a theatre, and all at once his face beamed with
delight, and he turned to his friends in enthusiastic gratitude: "We
have found it at last!" he exclaimed. "That is genuine music!" . . .
And it was only the orchestra "tuning up" their instruments!

I might as well say just here that this story, while good, always
struck me as a humorous exaggeration till I came to Japan, but the
music which I heard the other night in one of the most fashionable and
expensive Japanese restaurants in Tokyo was of exactly the same
character--like nothing else in all the world so much as an orchestra
tuning up! And yet by way of modification (as usual) it must be said
that appreciation of Western music is growing, and one seldom hears in
classical selections a sweeter combination of voice and piano than
Mrs. Tamaki Shibata's, while my Japanese student-friend has also
surprised me by singing "Suwanee River" and other old-time American
favorites like a genuine Southerner.

Take the social relations of the Japanese people as another {6}
example of contrariety. Here the honorable sex is not the feminine but
the masculine. There is even a proverb, I believe, "Honor men, despise
women." Perhaps the translation "despise" is too strong, but certainly
it would be regarded as nothing but contemptible weakness for young
men to show any such regard for young women, or husbands for their
wives, as is common in America. The wives exist solely for their
husbands, nor must the wife object if the husband maintains other
favorites, or even brings these favorites into the home with her. And
although a man is with his wife a much greater part of his time than
is the case in America, he may have little or no voice in selecting
her; in fact, he may see her only once before marrying.

After having seen probably half a million or more Japanese, Sundays
and week-days, I have not noticed a single young Japanese couple
walking together, and in the one case where I saw a husband and a wife
walking thus side by side I discovered on investigation that the man
was blind!

"For a young couple to select each other as in America," said a young
Japanese gentleman to me, "would be considered immoral, and as for a
young man calling on a young woman, that never happens except
clandestinely." And when I asked if it was true that when husband and
wife go together the woman must follow the man instead of walking
beside him as his equal, he answered: "But it is very, very seldom
that the two go out together."

My Japanese friend also told me that the young man often has
considerable influence in selecting his life-partner (in case it is
for life: there is one divorce to every three to five marriages), but
the young woman has no more voice in the matter than the commodity in
any other bargain-and-sale. When a young man or young woman gets of
marriageable age, which is rather early, the parents decide on some
satisfactory prospective partner, and a "middleman" interviews the
parents of the prospective partner aforesaid, and if they are willing,
and {7} financial and other considerations are satisfactory, it
doesn't matter what the girl thinks, nor does it matter much whether
young Barkis himself is "willin'." The Sir Anthony Absolutes in Japan
indeed brook no opposition. All of which, while not wholly commendable
(my young Japanese friend himself dislikes the plan, at least in his
own prospective case), has at least the advantage of leaving but
remarkably few bachelors and old maids in Japan. Here every man's
house may not be his castle, but it is certainly his nursery. Usually,
too, in the towns at least, his home is his shop; the front part full
of wares, with no hard and fast dividing line between merchandise
rooms and the living rooms, children being equally conspicuous and
numerous in both compartments.

Japan is still governed largely on patriarchal lines. The Emperors
themselves depend largely on the patriarchal spirit for their power,
claiming direct descent in unbroken line from the Sun-Goddess, while
the people are supposed to be themselves descendants of Emperors or of
minor gods. In family life the patriarchal idea is still more
prominent, the father being the virtual ruler until he abdicates in
favor of the eldest son.

Ancestor-worship is general, of course, and a typical case is that of
my young Nikko friend, who tells me that in his home are memorial
tablets to six of his most recently deceased ancestors, and that hot
rice is placed before these tablets each morning. Now the teaching is
that the spirits of the dead need the odor of the rice for
nourishment, and also require worship of other kinds. Consequently the
worst misfortune that can befall a man is to die without heirs to
honor his memory (the mere dying itself is not so bad); and if an
oldest son die unmarried such action amounts almost to treason to the
family.

Moreover, if a man be without sons (daughters don't count), he may
adopt a son; and the cases of adoption are surprisingly frequent.
Count Okuma, ex-prime minister of the empire, whom I visited last
Sunday, adopted his son-in-law as his {8} legal son. A distinguished
banker I visited is also an adopted son; and in a comparatively brief
list of eminent Japanese, a sort of abbreviated national "Who's Who,"
I find perhaps twenty cases in which these eminent officials and
leaders have been adopted and bear other family names than those with
which they were born.

The willingness to give up one's name in adoption, viewed in the light
of the excessive devotion to one's own ancestors and family name, is
only another illustration of Japanese contrariety. It is a land of
surprises.

Miyanoshita, Japan.


{9}


II

SNAPSHOTS OF JAPANESE LIFE AND PHILOSOPHY


"What is a Japanese city like?" Well, let us "suppose," as the children
say. You know the American city nearest you, or the one you live in.
Suppose then you should wake up in this city to-morrow morning and
find in the first place that forty-nine people out of every fifty have
put on such unheard-of clothing as to make you rub your eyes in wonder
as to whether you are asleep or awake; next, that everybody has become
six inches shorter, and that all these hundred-thousand five-foot men
and four-foot women have unanimously developed most violent
sunburn--have become bronzed almost beyond recognition.

Moreover, the high buildings you once knew have all disappeared, and a
wilderness chiefly of tiny one and two story houses has taken their
places, wherein the first story, even in two-story buildings, is so
low that all your new brown friends warn you by a gesture to duck your
head as you go through the doors, while the second story is usually
little more than a garret.

Next, a wild jargon of unmeaning voices strikes your ear and you
discover that ninety-nine people out of a hundred have forgotten how
to speak English. More than this, the English signs are no more, and
on the billboards and before the business offices are marks that look
as if a thousand ostriches fresh from a thousand ink barrels had been
set to scratching new signs to take the places of the old. You pick up
a book {10} or the morning paper, and the same thing has happened--pig
tracks, chicken tracks, and double bowknots fantastically tied instead
of English type--and everybody begins at the back of the book and
reads toward him instead of reading the way you have grown used to!

And the buggies, carriages, and automobiles: what on earth has become
of them? There's hardly a horse in sight, but dozens or scores of men
with bare legs and odd clothes, each flying around pulling a light
two-wheeled jinrikisha, a man or a woman seated in each man-drawn
"buggy"; and there are dozens of other bare-legged men laboriously
pulling heavy loads of vegetables, freight, and even lumber and giant
telegraph poles! You jump into one of the rickshaws and forget your
strange little Puck-like steed in the marvel of your surroundings till
a voice from the shafts makes you feel like Balaam when the ass spoke
to him!

By this time you begin to get a hazy idea as to how the people are
dressed, and as nearly as you can make out, it is something like this:

Evidently all the inhabitants of an ancient Roman city, a modern
American town, a half-dozen Hindoo villages, and several thousand
seashore bathers have all thrown their clothes--(or the lack of
them!)--into one tremendous pile, and everybody has rushed in
pell-mell and put on the first thing, or the first two or three
things, that came to hand. There is every conceivable type of
clothing, but perhaps the larger number have wound up with something
like a light bathing suit and a sort of gingham dressing-gown belted
over it; and if one has less than this, why, then, as the Japanese
say, "_Shikata na gai_" (All right; it can't be helped). In the shops
and stores one passes a few men clad only in their own integrity and a
loin-cloth, and both children and grown people dress with a hundred
times more disregard of convention than the <DW64>s in America.

Of shoes, there is an equally great variety as of clothing, {11} but
the majority of men, women, and children (in muddy weather at least)
have compromised on the "getas," a sort of wooden sole strapped on the
foot, with wooden pieces put fore and aft the instep, these pieces
throwing the foot and sole about three inches above ground. It looks
almost as difficult to walk in them as to walk on stilts, but away the
people go, young and old, and the muddy places marked by the strange
footwear look as if the corrugated wheels of a hundred mowing-machines
had passed along! In most cases the clatter of the "get as" is the
loudest noise on the streets, for the Japanese are remarkably quiet:
in Tokyo to-day I saw a thousand of them waiting to see the Empress,
and an American crowd would literally have made more noise in a minute
than they made in an hour.

On entering their houses, as we have already noticed, the people take
off their getas, sandals, shoes or whatever outer footwear is
used--for the very good reason that the people sit on the floor (on
mats or on the floor itself), eat on the floor (very daintily,
however), and sleep on the floor, so that to walk over the floor here
with muddy feet would be the same as if an American should walk
roughshod over his chairs, table and bed. Even in the Japanese
department store I visited this morning cloth covers were put on my
shoes, and this afternoon at the Ni-no Go Reiya Shinto temple I had to
go in my stocking feet.

Then the babies--who ever saw as many babies to the square inch? About
10 per cent of the male population seems to be hauling other men, but
50 per cent, of the female population seems hardly enough to carry the
wise and happy-looking little <DW61> babies--not in go-carts (a go-cart
or a hired nurse is almost never seen), but on the back. And these
little women who when standing are only about as tall as you are when
sitting--they seem hardly more than children themselves, so that you
recall Kipling's saying of Japan: "A four-foot child walks with a
three-foot child, who is holding the hand {12} of a two-foot child,
who carries on her back a one-foot child."

Boys in their teens are also seen with babies strapped on their backs
in the same loose-fitting, sack-like baby-holders, and after work-time
the father takes a turn at the same business. You are reminded of the
<DW64> who said to another: "'Fo Gawd, Bill, you's got the mos' chillun
any <DW65> I ever seed. Why, I passed yo' house yistiddy mornin' at
nine erclock and throwed a brick on top and hollered 'Fiah!' an' at
five erclock in the evenin' <DW65> chillun was still runnin' out!" It
seems sometimes as if such an incident, with <DW61> children substituted
for <DW64>s (I doubt if there is a <DW64> here), might actually happen
in Japan.

And those two men bowing to each other as they meet--are they
rehearsing as Alphonse and Gaston for the comedy show to-night, or are
they serious? No, they are serious, for yonder is another pair meeting
in the same way, and yonder another couple separating with even more
violent "convulsions of politeness"--and nobody laughing but yourself.
No wonder the Japanese are strong: they only need to meet a few
friends a day to get exercise enough to keep them in trim! Look again:
those women meeting at the depot, for example (for there are
familiar-looking street cars and less familiar-looking passenger cars
amid all these strange surroundings). There is the woman with her hair
combed straight back, which, I am told, means that she is a widow; one
with an odd Japanese topknot, which means that she is married, and a
younger one whose hair is arranged in the style of unmarried girls;
and though they are evidently bosom friends, they do not embrace and
kiss at meeting--to kiss in public would be shocking to the
Japanese--and you can only guess the depth of their affection by the
greater warmth and emphasis of their bows to one another.


{13}

  [Illustration: THE GIANT AVENUE OF CRYPTOMERIAS AT NIKKO.]
  This magnificent avenue, twenty-five miles in length, consists of
  trees planted by daimyos, or small lords, as a memorial to the great
  Japanese warrior and statesman, Iyeyasu. A spirit of simplicity and
  love of nature has produced a nobler monument than extravagance
  could possibly have done.

{14}

  [Illustration: TYPICAL JAPANESE COSTUMES AND TEMPLE ARCHITECTURE.]
  In the temple picture notice also how the limbs of the trees have
  been trained. Many fantastic effects are often produced in this way.


{12 continued}

They are trained in politeness from their youth up, are these
Japanese; and it is perhaps the greatest charm of both young and old.
I must have seen a full hundred thousand Japanese {15} by this time,
and I do not recall one in the attitude of scolding or abuse, while
authorities tell me that the Japanese language simply has no words to
enable one to swear or curse. I was also interested to have the
American Ambassador here tell me that in all his three years' stay in
Japan, and with all the freedom with which a million children run
about the streets and stores, he has never seen a man impatient with a
child. At the Imperial University yesterday morning I noticed two
college boys part with the same deep courtesy used by the older men,
and the little five-year-old girl near Chuzenji the other day thanked
me for my gift with the most graceful of Eastern salaams.

I shall not say that the excessive ceremoniousness of the men does not
at times seem ludicrous, but when you come to your hotel dining-room,
and the inexpressibly dainty little Japanese girls, moving almost
noiselessly on their sandaled feet (no getas indoors) welcome each
guest with smiling bows, happy, refined and graceful, a very different
impression of Japanese courtesy comes over you. In America,
unfortunately, the like courteous attention under such circumstances
might be misinterpreted, but here you are only reminded of how a
thousand years of courtesy and gentle manners have given the women of
Japan--pretty though they are not, judged by our Western standards--an
unsurpassed grace of manner and happiness of disposition together with
Shakespeare's well-praised "voice, soft and low, an excellent thing in
woman."

And here and everywhere, as in the old fable of the man with the
overcoat, must not such sun-like gentleness be more powerful in
compelling deference than all the stormy strength of the "new woman"?

Which reminds me that however much the social, political, and economic
revolution of the last forty years may have changed the national
character (and upon this point I shall not speak till later), it is
certain that Old Japan and the Old South were distinguished for not a
few characteristics {16} in common. For example, we are reminded of
the South's ante-bellum civilization when we learn that in old Japan
"the business of money-making was held in contempt by the superior
classes," and of all forms of business, agriculture was held in
highest esteem. Next to the nobility stood the Samurai, or soldier
class, the social rank of all other persons then being as follows: (1)
farmers, (2) artisans, (3) merchants. And farming was thus not only
regarded as the most honorable of all occupations, but farmers in the
early ages were privileged to wear swords, the emblem of rank next to
the nobility. Below the farmers ranked the mechanic element, while as
Lafcadio Hearn tells us:

  "The commercial class (A kindo), including bankers, merchants,
  shopkeepers, and traders of all kinds, was the lowest officially
  recognized. The business of money-making was held in contempt by the
  superior classes; and all methods of profiting by the purchase and
  resale of the produce of labor were regarded as dishonorable. . . .
  There is a generally, in militant society, small respect for the
  common forms of labor. But in old Japan the occupation of the farmer
  and artisan were not despised; trade alone appears to have been
  considered degrading, and the distinction may have been partly a
  moral one."

I wonder if there is not really a great deal more than we have
realized in what Hearn here suggests as to the soundness and essential
"morality" of the Japanese plan of ranking farming and manufacturing
above trade as occupations? Morally and economically considered, it is
the men who actually produce wealth rather than those men who trade or
barter in the products of other men's labor who deserve most honor.
They serve the world best: The barterers are, in limited numbers,
necessary and useful servants of those who do produce, but the
strength of a state manifestly lies in the classes who are really
creators of values.

Tokyo, Japan.


{17}


III

JAPANESE FARMING AND FARMER FOLK


I went yesterday to the Agricultural College of the Imperial
University of Japan, situated at Komaba, near Tokyo, where I had an
appointment with Director Matsui. My purpose was to get further
information concerning the general condition of Japanese farmers and
Japanese farming, but the biggest fact my researches brought out was
not in regard to rice or barley or potatoes or taro, or any other
field product of the Mikado's empire.

Rather it was a fact with regard to what is in every land the most
important of all crops--the crop of boys and girls. And the big fact I
discovered was simply this:

These brown Mongolian farm children, whose land we opened to
civilization but fifty years ago, and whom we thought of but yesterday
as backward "heathen"--they are getting, as a general proposition,
just twice as much schooling as is furnished pupils in many of our
American rural districts: their parents are providing, in their zeal
for their children's welfare, just twice as good educational
facilities as we are giving many of our white farm boys and
girls--boys and girls who have in their veins the blood of a race
which has carried the flag of human progress for a thousand years, and
whom we are expecting to continue leaders in civilization and
enlightenment.

In other words, so Doctor Matsui told me (and I went to-day to the
Japanese National Department of Education to verify the fact), the
Japanese farm boys and girls are getting ten months' schooling a year,
while the farm boy or girl {18} in my own state is getting only five
or six months--and when I was in a country school fifteen years ago,
not nearly so much as that! Do you wonder that I avoided telling the
Japanese educational officer just how our provision for farm boys and
girls compared with Japan's? Also that I neglected to tell him how we
compare in the matter of utilizing school advantages, when he showed
me that of all the children between six and fourteen in all the empire
of Japan the school attendance is 98 per cent.--98 out of every 100
children of "school age" attending school, and in several provinces 99
out of every 100! Thirty-five years ago the average school attendance
in Japan was only 28, and in 1893 only 59, but by the time of the war
with Russia it had passed 90, and since then has been climbing
straight and steadily toward the amazing maximum itself, the official
figures showing a gain of 1 per cent, a year--94 per cent., then 95,
then 96, then 97, and now 98, and the leaders are now ambitious for 99
or 100, as they told me to-day.

When this officer of an "inferior race" showed me, furthermore, that
Japan is so intent upon educating every boy and girl in her borders
that she compels attendance on the public schools for eight years, I
didn't tell him that in civilized America, in the great enlightened
nation so long held up to him as a model, demagogues and others in
many states on one pretext or another have defeated every effort for
effective compulsory education laws, so that if a boy's parents are
indifferent to his future, the state does not compel them to give him
a fighting chance in life--for the state's own sake and for the boy's.


{19}

  [Illustration: JAPANESE FARMING SCENES.]
  The upper picture shows a rice field in the foreground, tea
  alongside the buildings, and the graceful feathery bamboo in the
  background; also, an unusual sight on a Japanese farm, a group of
  cattle. The lower picture shows the work of transplanting rice.


{20}

  [Illustration: JAPANESE SCHOOL CHILDREN.]
  Boys predominate in the upper picture, girls in the lower. A system
  of compulsory education is enforced in Japan, and 98 per cent, of
  the children of school age attend. Even the country schools run ten
  months in the year--longer than in a majority of our states.


{18 continued}

With these facts before me, as I have said, I did not make any
vainglorious boasts of the great educational progress of our own
states these last twenty years: However much progress we have made,
these brown Japanese "heathen" have beaten us. While there is no
official census on the question of illiteracy here, every Japanese man
in his twenties must serve {21} two years in the army (unless he is in
a normal school studying to be a teacher), and a record is made as to
the literacy or illiteracy of each recruit. That is to say, there is a
place where the fact of any recruit's inability to read would be
recorded, but the Department of Education informed me to-day that the
illiterate column is now absolutely blank.

There are no illiterates among Japan's rising generation.

More than this, we have to reflect that it is in their poverty that
the Japanese are thus doing more than we are doing in our plenty. We
waste more in a year than they make. Even with a hundred acres of land
the American farmer is likely to consider himself poor, but when I
asked my Japanese guide the other day if two _cho_ (five acres) would
be an average sized farm here he said: "No, not an average; such a man
would be regarded as a middle-class farmer--a rather large farmer."
And the figures which I have just obtained in a call on the national
Department of Agriculture and Commerce more than justify the reply.

Forty-six farmers out of every 100 in Japan own less than one and one
quarter acres of land; 26 more out of every 100 own less than two and
one half acres, and only one man in a hundred owns as much as
twenty-five acres. (In the matter of cultivation also I find that 70
per cent, cultivate less than two and one half acres, and nearly half
are tenants.)

This year the situation is even worse than usual, for disastrous
floods have reduced the rice crop, which represents one half Japan's
crop values, 20 per cent, below last year's figures, and many people
will suffer.

Ordinarily, however, these little handkerchief-sized farms yield
amazingly. It has been shown by Prof. F. H. King that the fields of
Japan are cultivated so intensively, fertilized so painstakingly, and
kept so continuously producing some crop, that they feed 2277 people
to the square mile--21,321 square miles of cultivated fields in the
main islands supporting a population of 48,542,376. If the tilled
fields of Iowa, for {22} example, supported an equal number of people per
square mile, the population so supported would be over 100,000,000.
That state alone could feed the entire population of the United States
and then have an excess product left for export to other countries! If
North Carolina did as well with her cultivated land she would support
30,000,000 people, and if Mississippi's 11,875 square miles of land
under cultivation supported each 2277 persons, then 27,041,375 people,
or thirteen times the present population of the state, could live off
their produce!

And yet these Japanese lands have been in cultivation for unnumbered
centuries. Some of them may have been cleared when King Herod trembled
from his dream of a new-born rival in Judea, and certainly "the glory
that was Greece and the grandeur that was Rome" had not faded from the
earth when some of these fields began their age-long ministry to human
need. And they have been kept fertile simply by each farmer putting
back on the ground every ounce of fertility taken from it, for
commercial fertilizers were absolutely unknown until our own
generation.

Of course, with a population so dense and with each man cultivating an
area no larger than a garden-patch in America, the people are poor,
and the wonder is that they are able to produce food enough to keep
the country from actual want. Practically no animal meat is eaten; if
we except fish, the average American eats nearly twice as much meat in
a week as the average Japanese does in a year: to be exact, 150 pounds
of meat per capita is required per year for the average American
against 1.7 pounds for the average Japanese! Many of the farmers here
are too poor even to eat a good quality of rice. Consequently Japan
presents the odd phenomenon of being at once an exporter and a large
importer of rice. Poor farmers sell their good rice and buy a poorer
quality brought in from the mainland of Asia and mix it with barley
for grinding.

Only about one farmer in three has a horse or an ox; in most cases all
the work must be done by hand and with crude tools. {23} It is
pitiful--or rather I should say, it would be pitiful if they did not
appear so contented--to see men breaking the ground not by plowing but
by digging with kuwas: long-handled tools with blades perhaps six
inches wide and two feet long. At the Agricultural College farm in
Komaba I saw about thirty Japanese weeding rice with the kama--a tool
much like an old-fashioned sickle except that the blade is straight:
the right hand quickly cut the roots of the weed or grass plant and
the left hand as quickly pulled it up. With the same sickle-like kamas
about thirty other Japanese were cutting and shocking corn: they are
at least too advanced to pull fodder, I was interested to notice!

With land so scarce, it is of course necessary to keep something on
the ground every growing day from year's end to year's end. Truckers
and gardeners raise three crops a year. Rice, as a rule, is not sown
as with us, but the plants are transplanted as we transplant cabbage
or tomato plants (but so close together, of course, that the ripening
fields look as if they had been sown), in order that the farmer may
save the time the rice plants are getting to the transplanting stage.
That is to say, some other crop is maturing on the land while the rice
plants are growing large enough to transplant. Riding through the
country almost anywhere you will notice the tender young plants of
some new crop showing between the rows of some earlier-planted crop
now maturing or newly harvested.

The crops in Japan are not very varied. Rice represents half the
agricultural values. Next to rice is the silkworm industry, and then
barley, wheat, vegetables, soy beans, sweet potatoes, and fruits.
There is especial interest in fruit growing just now. Sweet potatoes
grow more luxuriantly than in any other country I have ever seen, and
are much used for food. I have seen one or two little patches of
cotton, but evidently only for home spinning, although I hear it said
that in Korea, which has just been formally annexed as Japanese
territory, cotton can be profitably grown. A much {24} cultivated
plant, with leaves like those of the lotus or water-lily, is the taro,
which I also saw growing in Hawaii; its roots are used for food as
potatoes are.

Every particle of fertility of every kind, as I have said, is
religiously saved, and in recent years a considerable demand for
commercial fertilizers has sprung up, $8 to $10 worth per acre being a
normal application.

So much for the farming country as it has impressed me around Tokyo. A
few days ago I saw a somewhat different agricultural area--280 miles
of great rice-farming land between Miyanoshita and Kyoto. This country
is different from that around Yokahoma and north of Tokyo in that it
is so much more rolling and mountainous (majestic Mount Fuji, supreme
among peaks, was in sight several hours) and greater efforts are
therefore necessary to take care of the soil.

But when such effort is necessary in Japan, it is sure to be made. The
population is so dense that every one realizes the essential
criminality of soil-waste, of the destruction of the one resource
which must support human life as long as the race shall last.

Much of the land is in terraces, or, perhaps I should say, tiers. That
is to say, here will be a half-acre or an acre from eighteen inches to
six feet higher (all as level as a threshing-floor) than a similar
level piece adjoining. While the levelling is helpful in any case for
the preservation of fertility and the prevention of washing, the tier
system is necessary in many cases on account of the irrigation methods
used in rice growing. While the lower plot is flooded for rice, upland
crops may be growing on the adjacent elevated acre or half-acre.

The hillside or mountain <DW72>s are also cultivated to the last
available foot, and in dry seasons you may even see the men and women
carrying buckets uphill to water any suffering crop. In nearly all
cases the rows are on a level. Where there was once a slanting
hillside the Japanese here dig it down or grade it, and the
mountainsides are often enormous steps or {25} stairs; one level
terrace after another, each held in place by turf or rock wall.

Rice growing, as it is conducted in Japan, certainly calls for much
bitter toil. The land must be broken by hand; into the muddy, miry,
water-covered rice fields the farmer-folk must wade, to plant the rice
laboriously, plant by plant; then the cultivation and harvesting is
also done by hand, and even the threshing, I understand. When we
recall that the net result of all this bitter toil is only a bare
existence made increasingly hard by the steady rise in land-taxes, and
that the Japanese people know practically none of the diversions which
give joy and color to American and English country life, it is no
wonder that thousands of farmers are leaving their two and three acre
plots, too small to produce a decent living for a family, to try their
fortunes in the factories and the towns. Specifically, it may be
mentioned that the boys from the farms who go into the army for the
compulsory two years' service are reported as seldom returning to the
country.

True, the government is trying to help matters to some extent (though
this is indeed but little) by lending money to banks at low rates of
interest with the understanding that the farmers may then borrow from
these banks at rates but little higher; and there are also in most
communities, I learn, "cooperative credit societies" (corresponding
somewhat to the mutual building and loan societies in American towns),
by means of which the farmers escape the clutches of the Shylock
money-lenders who have heretofore charged as high as 20 to 30 per
cent. for advances. The Japanese farmers invest their surplus funds in
these "cooperative credit societies," just as they would in savings
banks, except that in their case their savings are used solely for
helping their immediate neighbors and neighborhoods. A judicious
committee passes upon each small loan, and while the interest rates
might seem high to us, we have to remember that money everywhere here
commands higher interest than in America.

{26}

I am the more interested in these "cooperative credit societies,"
because they seem to me to embrace features which our American farmers
would do well to adopt.

It is said that the farmers live on better food than they had twenty
years ago, but I should think that there has been little improvement
in the little thatch-roofed houses in which they live. These houses
are grouped into small villages, as are the farm houses in Europe, the
farmer going out from the settlement to his fields each working day,
much after the fashion of the workers on the largest American
plantations. Buildings corresponding to our American two-story houses
are almost never seen in towns here and absolutely never in farming
sections, the farm home, like the town home, usually consisting of a
story and a half, with sliding walls of paper-covered sash between the
rooms, a sort of box for the fire on which the meals are cooked, and
no chimney--little better, though much cleaner, than the <DW64> cabins
in the South. In winter the people nearly freeze, or would but for the
fact that the men put on heavy woolens, and the women pile on cotton
padding until they look almost like walking feather beds.

True as are the things that I have said in this article, I fear that
my average reader would get a very gloomy and false conception of
Japanese farm life if I should stop here. The truth is that, so far as
my observation goes, I have seen nothing to indicate that the rural
population of Japan is not now as happy as the rural population in
America. If their possessions are few, so are their wants. In fact.
Dr. Juichi Soyeda, one of the country's leading men, in talking to me,
expressed a doubt as to whether the new civilization of Japan will
really produce greater average happiness than the old rural seclusion
and isolation (a doubt, however, which I do not share). "Our farm
people," he said, "are hard-working, frugal, honest, cheerful, and
while their possessions are small, there is little actual want among
them. A greater {27} number than in most other countries are
home-owners, and, altogether, they form the backbone of an empire."

Doctor Soyeda went on to give a noteworthy illustration of the
affection of the people for their home farms. "The Japanese," he said,
"have a term of contempt for the man who sells an old homestead."
There is no English word equivalent to it, but it means "a seller of
the ancestral land," and to say it of a man is almost equivalent to
reflecting upon his character or honor! I wish that we might develop
in America such a spirit of affection for our farm homes.

I wish, too, that we might develop the Japanese love of the beautiful
in nature. No matter how small and cramped the yard about the tiny
home here, you are almost sure to find the beauty of shrub and tree
and neatly trimmed hedge, and in Tokyo the whole population looks
forward with connoisseur-like enthusiasm to the season for wistaria
blooms in earliest spring, to the cherry blossom season in April, to
lotus-time in mid-summer, and to the chrysanthemum shows in the fall.
The fame of Tokyo's cherry blossoms has already gone around the world,
and thus they not only add to the pleasure of its citizens, but give
the city a distinction of no small financial advantage as well.

Why may not our civic improvement associations, women's clubs, etc.,
get an idea here for our American towns? A long avenue of beautiful
trees along a road or street, even if trees without blossoms, would
give distinction to any small village or to any farm. Every one who
has been to Europe will recall the long lines of Lombardy poplars that
make the fair vision of many French roads linger long in the memory,
and I can never forget the magnificent avenue of
cryptomerias--gigantic in size, straight as ship masts, fair as the
cedars of Lebanon--that line the road leading to the great Shogun
Iyeyasu's tomb in Nikko.

Lastly, these people are fired by the thought that a better day is
coming. Their children are going to school, as the {28} older folk
could not, and as a Japanese editor said to me this week:

"Every boy in the empire believes he may some day become Premier!"


What is the lesson of it all? Is it not just this: That we in America
should feel highly favored in that we have such magnificent resources,
and yet as sharply rebuked in that we are doing so little with them.

And most of all, is there not need for us to emulate the broad
patriotism and the heroic spirit of self-sacrifice in which the Land
of the Rising Sun, in spite of dire poverty, is providing ten-months
schools for every boy and girl in all its borders? And, indeed, how
otherwise can we make sure, before it is too late, that our American
farm boys and girls will not be outdistanced in twentieth-century
achievement by the children of a people our fathers regarded only as
hopeless "heathen?"

Tokyo, Japan.


{29}


IV

"WELFARE WORK" IN JAPANESE FACTORIES


The obvious truth is that the agricultural population of Japan is too
congested. It is a physical impossibility for a people to live in
genuine comfort on such small pocket-handkerchief pieces of land, even
though their standards do not call for shoes or tables, beds or
chairs, Western houses or Western clothing. The almost exclusive use
of hand labor, too, is uneconomic, seen from a large standpoint, and
it would seem that in future farmers must combine, as they are already
beginning to do, in order to purchase horses and horse-power tools to
be used in common by a number of farmers. In the Tokyo Seed, Plant &
Implement Company store the other day I saw a number of widely
advertised American tools, and the manager told me the demand for them
is increasing.

Thus with a smaller number of men required to produce the nation's
food, a larger number may engage in manufacturing, and gradually the
same principle of division of labor which has brought Western people
to high standards of living, comfort, and earning power will produce
much the same result in Japan. Already wages, astonishingly low as
they are to-day to an ordinary American, have increased 40 per cent,
in the last eight or ten years, this increase being partly due to the
general cheapening of money the world over, and partly also to the
increased efficiency of the average laborer.

Unfortunately, however, Japan is not content to rely upon natural law
for the development of its manufactures. Adam {30} Smith said in his
"Wealth of Nations" (published the year of our American Declaration of
Independence), that the policy of all European nations since the
downfall of the Roman Empire had been to help manufacturing, the
industry of the towns, rather than agriculture, the industry of the
country--a policy in which America later imitated Europe. Japan now
follows suit. For a long time the government has paid enormous
subsidies to shipbuilding and manufacturing corporations, and now a
high tariff has been enacted, which will still further increase the
cost of living for the agricultural classes, comprising, as they do,
two thirds of the country's population.

"'With your cheap labor and all the colossal Oriental market right at
your door," I said to Editor Shihotsu of the _Kokumin Shimbun_ a day
or two ago, "what excuse is there for further dependence on the
government? What can be the effect of your new tariff except to
increase the burdens of the farmer for the benefit of the
manufacturer?" And while defending the policy, he admitted that I had
stated the practical effect of the policy. "They are domestic
consumption duties," was his phrase; and Count Okuma, one of the
empire's ablest men, once Minister of Agriculture, has also pointed
out how injuriously the new law will affect the masses of the people.

"Some would argue," he said in a speech at Osaka, "that the duties are
paid by the country from which the goods are imported. That this is
not the case is at once seen by the fact that an increase in duty
means a rise in the price of an article in the country imposing the
duty, and this to the actual consumer often amounts to more than the
rise in the duty. In these cases consumers pay the duty themselves;
and the customs revenues, so far from being a national asset, are
merely another form of taxation paid by the people." And the masses in
Japan, already staggering under the enormous burden of an average tax
amounting to 32 per cent, of their earnings (on account of their wars
with China and Russia and their enormous army and navy expenditure),
are ill-prepared to stand further {31} taxation for the benefit of
special interests. On the whole, there seems to have been much truth
in what a recent authority said on this subject:

  "The Japanese manufacturers are concerned only to make monopoly
  profits out of the consumer. If they can do that, they will not
  worry about foreign markets, from which, in fact, their policy is
  bound more and more to exclude them."

In any case, manufacturing in Japan is bound to increase, but it ought
not to increase through unjust oppression of agriculture or at the
expense of the physical stamina of the race. This fact is now winning
recognition not only from the nation at large, but from
public-spirited manufacturers as well.

Some very notable evidence upon this point came to me Wednesday when
influential friends secured special permission, not often granted to
strangers, for me to visit the great Kanegafuchi Cotton Spinning
Company's plant near Tokyo--the great surprise being not that I
succeeded in getting permission to visit this famous factory, though
that was partly surprising, but in what I saw on the visit.

Much has been said and written as to the utterly deplorable condition
of Japanese factory workers, and I was quite prepared for sights that
would outrage my feelings of humanity. Imagine my surprise, therefore,
when I found the manager making a hobby of "welfare work" for his
operatives and with a system of such work modelled after the Krupp
system in Germany, the best in the world! And as the Kanegafuchi
Company has seventeen factories in all, representing several cities
and aggregating over 300,000 spindles, being one of the most famous
industries of Japan, it will be seen that its example is by no means
without significance.

The Kanegafuchi's Tokyo factories alone employ 3500 operatives, and
they are cleaner, I should say, than most of our stores and offices.
The same thing is true of their great hospital and boarding-house, and
the dining-room is also {32} surprisingly clean and well kept. Of the
welfare work proper a whole article could be written. Each operative
pays 3 per cent, of his or her wages (most operatives are women) into
a common insurance and pension fund, and the company, out of its
earnings, pays into the fund an equal amount. From this a pension is
given the family of any employee who dies, while if an operative gets
sick or is injured, a committee, assisted by Director Fuji, allows a
suitable pension until recovery. In the case, however, of
long-standing disease or disability, help is given, after ten years,
from still another fund. This employees' pension fund now amounts to
$143,000, while other funds given partly or wholly by the company
include $30,000 for operatives' sanitary fund, $112,000 in a fund "for
promoting operatives' welfare," and $15,000 for erecting an
operatives' sanatorium. The company also has a savings department,
paying 10 per cent, on long-time deposits made by employees. There is
an excellent theatre and dance hall at the Tokyo plant, and I suppose
at the other branches also, and five physicians are regularly employed
to look after the health of operatives.

While the hours of labor in Japan generally are inexcusably long and,
as a rule, only two rest days a month are allowed, the Kanegafuchi
Company observes the Biblical seventh-day rest with profitable
results. The work hours are long yet, it is true, ten hours having
been the rule up to October 1, and now nine and one half hours. The
ten hours this summer embraced the time from 6 to 6, with a half
hour's rest from 9 to 9:30, one hour from 11:30 to 12:30, and another
half hour from 3 to 3:30; a system of halfway rests not common in
America, I believe.

Conditions at Kanegafuchi, of course, are not ideal, nor would I hold
them up as a general model for American mills. Rather should America
ask: "If Japan in a primitive stage of industrial evolution is doing
so much, how much more ought we to do?" More noteworthy still is the
fact that the sentiment of the country is loudly and insistently
demanding a law {33} to stop the evils of child labor and night work for
women, which, on the whole, are undoubtedly bad--very bad. The
Kanegafuchi welfare work is exceptional, but it is in line with the
new spirit of the people.

That Japan with its factory system not yet extensive, its people used
to a struggle for existence tenfold harder than ours, and with a
population comprising only the wealthy or capitalist class--that under
such conditions, these Buddhist Japanese should still make effective
demand for adequate factory labor legislation is enough to put to
shame many a Christian state in which our voters still permit
conditions that reproach our boasted chivalry and humanity. Perhaps
all the changes needed cannot be made at once without injury to
manufacturing interests, but in that case the law should at least
require a gradual and steady approach to model conditions--a distinct
step forward each six months until at the end of three years, or five
years at longest, every state should have a law as good as that of
Massachusetts.

Tokyo, Japan.


{34}


V

DOES JAPANESE COMPETITION MENACE THE WHITE MAN'S TRADE?


I

With all the markets of the Orient right at Japan's doors and labor to
be had for a mere song--four fifths of her cotton-factory workers,
girls and women averaging 13-1/2 cents a day, and the male labor
averaging only 22 cents--it is simply useless for Europe and America
to attempt to compete with her in any line she chooses to monopolize.
Now that she has recovered from her wars, she will doubtless forge to
the front as dramatically as an industrial power as she has already
done as a military and maritime power, while other nations, helpless
in competition, must simply surrender to the Mikado-land the lion's
share of Asiatic trade--the richest prize of twentieth-century
commerce.

In some such strain as this prophets of evil among English and
American manufacturers have talked for several years. For the last few
months, professing to see in Japan's adoption of a high protective
tariff partial confirmation of their predictions, they have assumed
added authority. Their arguments, too, are so plausible and the facts
as to Japan's low wage scale so patent that the world has become
acutely interested in the matter. I account myself especially
fortunate, therefore, in having been able to spend several weeks under
peculiarly favorable circumstances in a first-hand study of Japanese
industrial {35} conditions. I have been in great factories and
business offices; I have talked with both Japanese and foreign
manufacturers who employ laborers by the thousand; I have had the
views of the most distinguished financial leaders of the empire as
well as of the great captains of industry; I have talked with several
men who have served in the Emperor's cabinet, including one who has
stood next to the Mikado himself in power; and at the same time I have
taken pains to get the views of English and American consular
officials, commercial attaches and travelers, and of newspaper men
both foreign and native.

And yet after having seen the big factories and the little
factory-workers in Tokyo and Osaka, after having listened to the most
ambitious of Japan's industrial leaders, I shall leave the country
convinced of the folly of the talk that white labor cannot compete
with Japanese labor. I believe indeed that the outlook is encouraging
for manufacturing in the Mikado's empire, but I do not believe that
this development is to be regarded as a menace to English or American
industry. Any view to the contrary, it seems to me, must be based upon
a radical misconception of conditions as they are.

In the very outset, the assumed parallel between Japan's rise as a
military power and her predicted rise as an industrial power should be
branded as the groundless non sequitur that it is. "All our present
has its roots in the past," as my first Japanese acquaintance said to
me, and we ignore fundamental facts when we forget that for centuries
unnumbered Japan existed for the soldier, as the rosebush for the
blossom. The man of martial courage was the goal of all her striving,
the end of all her travail. Society was a military aristocracy, the
Samurai the privileged class. And at the same time commerce was
despised as dishonorable and industry merely tolerated as a necessary
evil. In the Japan of Yalu, Liao-yang, and Mukden we have no modern
Minerva springing full-armed from the head of Jove, but rather an
unrecognized Ulysses {36} of ancient skill surprising onlookers merely
ignorant of the long record of his prowess. Viewed from the same
historical standpoint, however, industrial Japan is a mere learner,
unskilled, with the long and weary price of victory yet to pay.

In the race she has to run, moreover, the Mikado-land has no such
advantages as many of our people have been led to believe. In America
it has long been my conviction that cheap labor is never cheap; that
so-called "cheap labor" is a curse to any community--not because it is
cheap but because it is inefficient. The so-called cheap <DW64> labor
in the South, for example, I have come to regard as perhaps the
dearest on the continent. Here in Japan, however, I was quite prepared
to find that this theory would not hold good. By reason of conditions
in a primitive stage of industrial organization, I thought that I
might find cheap labor with all the advantages, in so far as there are
any, and few of the disadvantages, encountered elsewhere. But it is
not so. An American factory owner in Osaka, summing up his Job's
trials with raw Japanese labor, used exactly my own phrase in a
newspaper article a few days ago, "Cheap labor is never cheap." And
all my investigations have convinced me that the remark is as
applicable in Japan as it is in America or England.

The per capita wages of Japanese laborers here are, of course,
amazingly low. The latest 1910 statistics, as furnished by the
Department of Finance, indicate a daily wage (American money) of 40
cents for carpenters, 31-1/2 cents for shoemakers, 34 cents for
blacksmiths, 25-1/2 cents for compositors, 19-1/2 cents for male farm
laborers, and 22 cents for male weavers, and 12 cents for female. In
the cotton factories I visited, those of the better sort, the wages
run from 5 cents a day for the youngest children to 25 cents a day for
good women workers. In a mousselaine mill I was told that the average
wages were 22-1/2 cents, ranging from 10 cents to a maximum of 50
cents for the most skilled employees. And this, be it remembered, was
{37} for eleven hours' work and in a factory requiring a higher grade
of efficiency than the average.

But in spite of the fact that such figures as these were well known to
him, it was my host in the first Japanese house to which I was
invited--one of the Emperor's privy councillors, and a man of much
travel and culture who had studied commercial conditions at home and
abroad rather profoundly--who expressed the conclusion that Japanese
factory labor when reduced to terms of efficiency is not greatly
cheaper than European, an opinion which has since grown rather trite
in view of the number of times that I have heard it. "In the old
handicrafts and family industries to which our people have been
accustomed," my host declared, "we can beat the world, but the moment
we turn to modern industrial machinery on a large scale the newness of
our endeavor tells against us in a hundred hindering ways. Numbers of
times I have sought to work out some industrial policy which had
succeeded, and could not but have succeeded, in England, Germany, or
America, only to meet general failure here because of the unconsidered
elements of a different environment, a totally different stage of
industrial evolution. Warriors from the beginning and with a record
for continuous government unsurpassed by any European country, our
political and military achievements are but the fruitage of our long
history, but in industry we must simply wait through patient
generations to reach the stage represented by the Englishman,
Irishman, or German, who takes to machinery as if by instinct."

All my investigations since have confirmed the philosophy of this
distinguished Japanese whose name, if I should mention it, would be
familiar to many in America and England. In the Tokyo branch of the
Kanegafuchi Spinning Company (a company which controls 300,000
spindles) the director, speaking from the experience of one of the
greatest and best conducted industries in Japan, declared: "Your
skilled factory laborers in America or England will work four sides of
a ring frame; our unskilled laborer may work only one." A young
Englishman in another factory declared: "It takes five men here to do
work that I and my mate would take care of at home." An American
vice-consul told me that it takes three or four times as much Japanese
as foreign labor to look after an equal number of looms. A Japanese
expert just back from Europe declared recently that "Lancashire labor
is more expensive than ours, but really cheaper." Similarly the Tokyo
correspondent of the London _Times_ summing up an eight-column review
of Japanese industry, observed: "If we go to the bottom of the
question and consider what is being paid as wages and what is being
obtained as the product of labor in Japan, we may find that Japanese
labor is not cheaper than in other countries."


{38}


II

My own conviction is that in actual output the Japanese labor is
somewhat cheaper than American or European labor, but not greatly so,
and that even this margin of excess in comparative cheapness
represents mainly a blood-tax on the lives and energies of the
Japanese people, the result of having no legislation to restrain the
ruinous overwork of women and little children--a grievous debt which
the nation must pay at the expense of its own stamina and which the
manufacturers must also pay in part through the failure to develop
experienced and able-bodied laborers. The latest "Japan Year Book"
expresses the view that "in per capita output two or three skilled
Japanese workers correspond to one foreign," but under present
conditions the difficulty here is to find the skilled workers at all.
When Mr. Oka, of the Department of Commerce and Agriculture, told me
that the average Japanese factory hand remains in the business less
than two years, I was astonished, but inquiry from original sources
confirmed the view. With the best system of welfare work in the
empire, the Kanegafuchi Company keeps its laborers two and a half {39}
to three years, but in a mill in Osaka of the better sort, employing
2500 hands, I was told that only 20 per cent, had been at work as long
as three years. Under such conditions, the majority of the operatives
at any time must be in a stage of deplorable inexperience, and it is
no wonder that the "Year Book" just quoted goes on to confess that
"one serious defect of the production is lack of uniformity in
quality--attributed to unskilled labor and overwork of machinery."

The explanation of this situation, of course, is largely to be found
in the fact that Japanese industries are women's industries--there
being seven times as large a proportion of women to men, the
Department of Commerce informs me, as in European and American
manufacturing. These women workers are mostly from the country. Their
purpose is only to work two or three years before getting married, and
thousands of them, called home to marry the husbands their parents
have selected, or else giving way physically under strain, quit work
before their contracts expire. "We have almost no factory laborers who
look on the work as a life business," was an expression often repeated
to me.

Not only in the mills, but in numerous other lines of work, have I
seen illustrations of the primitive stage of Japan's industrial
efficiency. As a concrete illustration I wish I might pass to each
reader the box of Kobe-made matches on the table before me (for
match-making of this sort is an important industry here, as well as
the sort conducted through matrimonial middlemen without waiting for
the aid or consent of either of the parties involved). I have never in
my life seen such a box of matches in America. Not in a hundred boxes
at home would you find so many splinters without heads, so many
defective matches. And in turning out the boxes themselves, I am told
that it takes five or six hands to equal the product of one skilled
foreign laborer. "It takes two or three Japanese servants to do the
work of one white servant" is the general verdict of housekeepers,
while it has also been brought to my {40} attention that in shops two
or three clerks are required to do the work of one at home. A Japanese
newspaper man (his paper is printed in English) tells me that linotype
compositors set only half as many ems per hour as in America. In
short, the general verdict as I have found it is indicated by what I
have written, and the most enthusiastic advocate of Japanese cheap
labor, the captain of the steamer on which I came from America, rather
spoiled his enthusiasm for getting his ship coaled at Nagasaki for
7-1/2 cents a ton, by acknowledging that if it rained he should have
to keep his ship waiting a day to get sufficient hands.

Moreover, while the Japanese factory workers are forced into longer
hours than labor anywhere else--eleven hours at night this week,
eleven hours in the day next week--I am convinced that the people as a
whole are more than ordinarily averse to steady, hard, uninterrupted
toil. "We have a streak of the Malay in us," as a Japanese professor
said to me, "and we like to idle now and then. The truth is our people
are not workers; they are artists, and artists must not be hurried."
Certainly in the hurried production of the factory the Japanese
artistic taste seems to break down almost beyond redemption, and the
people seem unable to carry their habits of neatness and carefulness
into the new environment of European machinery. "Take the Tokyo street
cars," said an ex-cabinet officer to me; "the wheels are seldom or
never cleaned or oiled, and are half eaten by rust." The railroads are
but poorly kept up; the telephones exhaust your patience; while in the
case of telegraphing, your exasperation is likely to lose itself in
amazed amusement. A few days ago, for example, I sent a telegram from
Osaka to Kobe, took my rickshaw across town, waited for a slow train
to start, and then reached Kobe and the street destination of my
message before it did.

In considering the failure of Japanese labor to bring forth a
satisfactory output, however, one thing more should be said, and that
is that we should not put the blame wholly on the {41} wage-earner.
Not a small proportion of the responsibility lies at the door of
inexpert managers. The family system of production has not only been
the rule for generations with that minority of the people not engaged
in farming, but it is still the dominant type of Japanese industry,
and it will take time even to provide opportunities for training a
sufficient corps of superintendents in the larger lines of production.

In further illustration of my argument that cheap labor is not proving
so abnormally profitable, I may question whether Japanese factories
have paid as good dividends, in proportion to prevailing rates of
interest on money, as factories in England and America. Baron
Shibusawa, the dean of Japanese financiers and one of the pioneers in
cotton manufacturing, is my authority for the statement that 12 per
cent, would be a rather high estimate of the average rate of dividend,
while figures furnished by the Department of Finance show that for ten
years the average rate of interest on loans has been 11.25 per cent.

The fact that Western ideas as to Japan's recent industrial advance
have been greatly exaggerated may also be demonstrated just here.
While the latest government figures show that in twelve years the
number of female factory operatives increased from 261,218 to 400,925
and male factory operatives from 173,614 to 248,251, it is plain that
a manufacturing population of 649,000 in a country of 50,000,000 souls
is small, and the actual progress has not been so great as the
relative figures would indicate. Moreover, many so-called "factories"
employ less than ten persons and would not be called factories at all
in England or America. The absence of iron deposits is a great
handicap, the one steel foundry being operated by the government at a
heavy loss, and in cotton manufacturing, where "cheap labor" is
supposed to be most advantageous, no very remarkable advance has been
made in the last decade. From 1899 to 1909 English manufacturers so
increased their trade that in the latter year they imported $222 worth
of raw {42} cotton for every $100 worth imported ten years before, while
Japan in 1909 imported only $177 worth for each $100 worth a decade
previous--though of course she made this cotton into higher grade
products.


III

It must also be remembered that the wages of labor in Japan are
steadily increasing and will continue to increase. More significant
than the fact of the low cost per day, to which I have already given
attention, is the fact that these wages represent an average increase
per trade of 40 per cent, above the wages eight years previous. The
new 1910 "Financial and Economic Annual" shows the rate of wages of
forty-six classes of labor for a period of eight years. For not one
line of labor is a decrease of wages shown, and for only two an
increase of less than 30 per cent.; sixteen show increases between 30
and 40 per cent., seventeen between 40 and 50 per cent., eight from 50
to 60 per cent., three from 60 to 70 per cent., while significantly
enough the greatest increase, 81 per cent., is for female servants, a
fact largely due to factory competition. In Osaka the British
vice-consul gave me the figures for the latest three-year period for
which figures have been published, indicating in these thirty-six
months a 30 per cent. gain in the wages of men in the factories and a
25 per cent, gain in the wages of women.

Of no small significance in any study of Japanese industry must also
be the fact that there are in Japan proper a full half million fewer
women than men (1910 figures: men, 25,639,581; women, 25,112,338)--a
condition the reverse of that obtaining in almost every other country.
Now the young Japanese are a very home-loving folk, and even if they
were not, almost all Shinto parents, realizing the paramount
importance of having descendants to worship their spirits, favor and
arrange early marriages for their sons. And what with this competition
for {43} wives, the undiminished demand for female servants, and a
half million fewer women than men to draw from, the outlook for any
great expansion of manufacturing based on woman labor is not very
bright. Moreover, with Mrs. Housekeeper increasing her frantic bids
for servants 81 per cent, in eight years, and still mourning that they
are not to be had, it is plain that the manufacturer has serious
competition from this quarter, to say nothing of the further fact that
the Japanese girls are for the first time becoming well educated and
are therefore likely to be in steadily increasing demand as
office-workers. Upon this general subject the head of one of Osaka's
leading factories said to me: "I am now employing 2500 women, but if I
wished to enlarge my mill at once and employ 5000, it would be
impossible for me to get the labor, though I might increase to this
figure by adding a few hundred each year for several years."

Unquestionably, too, shorter hours, less night work, weekly holidays,
and better sanitary conditions must be adopted by most manufacturers
if they are to continue to get labor. The Kobe _Chronicle_ quotes Mr.
Kudota, of the Sanitary Bureau, as saying that "most of the women
workers are compelled to leave the factories on account of their
constitutions being wrecked" after two or three years of night work,
consumption numbering its victims among them by the thousands. Either
the mills must give better food and lodging than they now provide or
else they must pay higher wages directly which will enable the
laborers to make better provision for themselves.

Yet another reason why wages must continue to advance is the steady
increase in cost of living, due partly to the higher standard
developed through education and contact with Western civilization, but
perhaps even more largely to the fearful burden of taxation under
which the people are staggering. A usual estimate of the tax rate is
30 per cent. of one's income, while Mr. Wakatsuki, late Japanese
Financial Commissioner to London, is quoted as authority for the
statement {44} that the people now pay in direct and indirect taxes,
35 per cent, of their incomes. And I doubt whether even this estimate
includes the increased amounts that citizens are forced to pay for
salt and tobacco as a result of the government monopoly in these
products, or the greatly increased prices of sugar resulting from the
government's paternalistic efforts to guarantee prosperity to sugar
manufacturers in Formosa.


IV

Higher still, and higher far than anything the nation has ever yet
known, must go the cost of living under the new tariff law. From a
British textile representative I learned the other day that a grade of
English woollens largely used by the Japanese for underwear will cost
over one third more under the new tariff, while the increased duty on
certain other lines of goods is indicated by the table herewith:

  PERCENTAGE OF DUTY TO COST OF ARTICLE

                 Old Tariff New Tariff

  Printed goods       3        22

  White lawns        10        47

  Shirtings          10        39

  Cotton Italians     3        35

  Poplins             8        19

  Brocades           10        22

Neither a nation nor an individual can lift itself by its bootstraps.
The majority of the thoughtful people in the empire seem to me to
realize even now that through the new tariff Japanese industry, as a
whole, is likely to lose much more by lessened ability to compete in
foreign markets than it will gain by shackled competition in the home
markets. Farseeing old Count Okuma, once Premier, and one of the
empire's Elder Statesmen, seemed to realize this more fully than any
other man I have seen. "Within two or three years from the time the
new law goes into force," he declared, "I am {45} confident that its
injurious effects will be so apparent that the people will force its
repeal. With our heavy taxes the margin of wages left for comfort is
already small, and with the cost of living further increased by the
new tariff, wages must inevitably advance. This will increase the cost
of our manufactured products, now exported mostly to China, India, and
other countries requiring cheap or low-grade goods, and where we must
face the competition of the foremost industrial nations of the world.
As our cost of production increases, our competition with Europe will
become steadily more difficult and a decrease in our exports will
surely follow. It is folly for one small island to try to produce
everything it needs. The tariff on iron, for example, can only hamper
every new industry by increasing the cost of machinery, and must
especially hinder navigation and shipbuilding, in which we have made
such progress." Not a few of the country's foremost vernacular dailies
are as outspoken as Count Okuma on this point, and the Kobe
_Chronicle_ declares that, with diminished exports to Japan, "British
manufacturers will find compensation in the lessened ability of the
Japanese to compete in China; and Japan will find that she has raised
prices against herself and damaged her own efficiency."

That such will be the net result of Japan's new policy seems to me to
admit of no question. Unfortunately, certain special lines of British
and American manufacture may suffer, but, on the whole, what the white
man's trade loses in Japan will be recompensed for in China and India.
Even after Japan's adoption of the moderately protective tariff of
1899 her export of yarns to China--in the much discussed "market right
at her doors"--dropped from a product of 340,000 bales to a recent
average of 250,000 bales. From 1899 to 1908, according to the latest
published government figures, the number of employees in Japanese
cotton factories increased only 240--one third of 1 per cent.--or from
73,985 to 74,225, to be exact, while I have already alluded to the
figures showing the {46} comparative English and Japanese imports of
raw cotton from 1890 to 1909 as furnished me by Mr. Robert Young, of
Kobe, Japan in this period going from $30,000,000 to $54,000,000, or
77 per cent., while England's advance was from $135,000,000 to
$300,000,000, or 122 per cent. The increase in England's case, of
course, was largely, and in Japan's case almost wholly, due to the
increased price of the cotton itself, but the figures are none the
less useful for the purposes of comparison.

In the frequent attempts of the Japanese Government to stimulate
special industries by subsidies and special privileges there is, it
seems to me, equally as little danger to the trade of Europe and
America in general (though here, too, special industries may suffer
now and then), because Japan is in this way simply handicapping
herself for effective industrial growth. Just at this writing we have
an illustration in the case of the Formosan sugar subsidy which seems
to have developed into a veritable Frankenstein; or, to use a homelier
figure, the government seems to be in the position of the man who had
the bear by the tail, with equal danger in holding on or letting go.
Already, as a result of the system of subsidies, bounties and special
privileges, individual initiative has been discouraged, a dangerous
and corrupting alliance of government with business developed, public
morals debased (as was strikingly brought out in the Dai Nippon sugar
scandal), and the people, as Mr. Sasano, of the Foreign Department,
complains, now "rely on the help of the government on all occasions."
On the same point the Tokyo _Keizai_ declares that "the habit of
looking to the government for assistance in all and everything,
oblivious of independent enterprise . . . has now grown to the chronic
stage, and unless it is cured the health and vitality of the nation
will ultimately be sapped and undermined."

As for increasing complaints of "low commercial morality" brought
against Japanese merchants, that is not a matter of concern in this
discussion, except in so far as it may prove a form of Japanese
commercial suicide. But to one who holds {47} the view, as I do, that
the community of nations is enriched by every worthy industrial and
moral advance on the part of any nation, it is gratifying to find the
general alarm over the present undoubtedly serious conditions, and it
is to be hoped that the efforts of the authorities will result in an
early change to better methods.


V


Such is a brief review of the salient features of present-day Japanese
industry, and in no point do I find any material menace to the general
well-being of American and European trade. It is my opinion that the
Japanese will steadily develop industrial efficiency, but that in the
future no more than in the present will Japan menace European and
American industry (unless she is permitted to take unfair advantages
in Manchuria, Korea, etc.), for just in proportion as efficiency
increases, just in the same proportion, broadly speaking, wages and
standards of living will advance. The three--efficiency, wages, cost
of living--seem destined to go hand in hand, and this has certainly
been the experience thus far. And whatever loss we may suffer by
reason of Japan gradually supplanting us in certain cruder forms of
production should be abundantly compensated for in the better market
for our own higher-grade goods that we shall find among a people of
increasing wealth and steadily advancing standards of living.

In any fair contest for the world's trade there seems little reason to
fear any disastrous competition from Japan. Perhaps she has been
allowed to make the contest unfair in Manchuria or elsewhere, but
that, as Mr. Kipling would say, is another story.

Kobe, Japan.


{48}


VI

BUDDHISM, SHINTOISM, AND CHRISTIANITY IN JAPAN


One of the most fascinating places in all Japan is Kyoto, the old
capital of the empire, and one of its most picturesque and historic
cities. Without great factories such as Osaka boasts of, without the
political importance of Tokyo, and without shipping advantages such as
have made Kobe and Yokahoma famous, Kyoto is noted rather for
conserving the life of old Japan. Here are the family industries, the
handicrafts, and a hundred little arts in which the Land of the Rising
Sun excels.

Little themselves in stature, the people of Japan are best in dealing
with little things requiring daintiness, finish, and artistic taste.
Some one has said that their art is "great in little things and little
in great things," and unlike many epigrams, it is as true as it is
terse.

A traveler gets the impression that most of their shops, or "stores,"
as we say in America, are for selling bric-a-brac, toys, lacquer ware,
bronzes, or ornamental things of one kind or another; but perhaps this
is largely because they give an artistic or ornamental appearance to a
thousand utensils and household articles which in America would be raw
and plain in their obvious practicality. The room in which I write is
a fine illustration of this: finished in natural, unpainted woods,
entirely without "fussiness" or show, and yet with certain touches and
bits of wood carving that make it a work of art. Upon this point I
must again quote Lafcadio Hearn, whose {49} books, although often more
poetic and laudatory than accurate, are nevertheless too valuable to
be neglected by any student of Japan:

  "It has been said that in a Greek city of the fourth century before
  Christ every household utensil, even the most trifling object, was
  in respect of design an object of art; and the same fact is true,
  though in another and stranger way, of all things in a Japanese
  home; even such articles of common use as a bronze candlestick, a
  brass lamp, an iron kettle, a paper lantern, a bamboo curtain, a
  wooden tray, will reveal to educated eyes a sense of beauty and
  fitness entirely unknown to Western cheap production."

Like most old Japanese cities, Kyoto is proud of its temples, Buddhist
and Shinto. And perhaps I should explain just here the difference
between these two faiths that were long merged into one, but have been
dissociated since the restoration of the Emperor to his old-time
powers forty years ago. Shinto is the ancient Japanese system of
ancestor-worship, with its doctrine of the divine descent of the
Mikado from the Sun-goddess and its requirement that every faithful
adherent make daily offerings to the spirits of the family's
ancestors. With the future life or with moral precepts for this life
it does not concern itself. "Obey the Emperor and follow your own
instincts," is the gist of the Shinto religion, in so far as it may be
called a religion at all: the tendency is to consider it only a form
of patriotism and not a religion.

Buddhism, on the other hand, is an elaborate system of theology
comprising a great variety of creeds, and insisting upon much
ecclesiastical form and ceremony, however little it may have to do
with practical morals. "The fact is, we Japanese have never gotten our
morals from our religion," said one quasi-Buddhist newspaper man to me
in Tokyo. "What moral ideas we have came neither from Shintoism nor
Buddhism, but largely from Confucius and the Chinese classics."

Buddhism as it left India may have been a rather exalted religious
theory, but if so, then in Japan it has certainly {50} degenerated
into a shameless mockery of its former self. To read Sir Edwin
Arnold's glorification of theoretical Buddhism in his "Light of Asia,"
and then see practical Buddhism in Japan with all its superstitions
and idolatries, is very much like hearing bewitched Titania's praise
of her lover's beauty and then turning to see the long ears and hairy
features of the ass that he has become.

Nor is it without significance that Sir Edwin Arnold himself coming to
Buddhist Japan dropped into open and flagrant immoralities such as a
Christian community would never have tolerated, while the foremost
American-bred apologists for Buddhism here have been but little
better. One of the greatest and wealthiest temples in Kyoto is more
notorious right now for the vices of its sacred (?) officials than for
any virtues in its creed, and one of the high priests, like the
Emperor himself, has a dozen or more women in his household. Some
Buddhists are making an earnest effort to bring about at least an
outward reformation of their organization, but the difficulties are
such as to make the success of the undertaking very improbable. With
the usual Japanese quality of imitativeness they have started "Young
Men's Buddhist Associations," "Sunday schools," etc., and are also
beginning to follow the example set by the Christians of participating
in philanthropic and charitable work. In the Buddhist service I
attended last Sunday the gorgeously robed priest sat on a raised altar
in the centre of the room, with other priests ranged about him, and
the general service, as usual, was much as if they had copied the
Catholic ritual.

After the Buddhist ceremonies, I went to the Christian service at the
Congregational School, or Doshisha, where the sound of the
American-born minister's voice was punctuated by the street sounds of
whirring rickshaw wheels and the noisy getas of passing Buddhists,
while outside the window I could see the bamboo trees and the now
familiar red disk and white border of the Mikado's flag. Prayer was
offered for {51} "the President of the United States, the King of
Great Britain, the Emperor of Germany, and the Emperor of Japan."

At night I was even more interested, even though I could not
understand a word, in a native Japanese service I attended for half an
hour. Although there was a downpour of rain the chapel was comfortably
filled and the faces of the worshippers, I thought, were of more than
ordinary intelligence and promise, while their sincerity is
illustrated by the fact that numbers of the women Christians are
actually depriving themselves of suitable food in order to give money
for erecting a larger church building.

The next evening I took tea with a missionary who has in his home one
of the public notices (dated March, 1868,) and common throughout the
empire forty odd years ago, prohibiting Christianity, the ancient
penalty being nothing less than death itself. The explanation of this
notice is found in a bit of history. Three hundred and sixty years ago
the Catholics came here, started missions, and made many converts
among the lords or daimyios, who ordered their followers also to
become Catholics, with the result that by the time of the first
English settlement at Jamestown, in 1607, there were from 600,000 to
1,000,000 Christians, nominal and actual, away over here in Japan.
Seven years later, however, government persecution began, Christianity
was put under the ban, and so remained until eight years after our
Civil War ended. Many Christians suffered martyrdom for their faith in
this long period; and a few who escaped detection even secretly handed
their faith down from father to son through all the long generations
until tolerance came again.

Dr. A. D. Hail, of Osaka, tells me that even as late as 1885 an old
man from the "backwoods," as we should say, came to a village where
Dr. Hail's brother was a missionary, discovered for the first time
that a man might be a Christian without being punished, and then
confessed that each day he had worshipped secretly at a little
Catholic shrine hidden in {52} his wall, as his father and his father's
father had done before him.

As another illustration of the changed attitude toward Christianity, I
may mention that a Japanese Buddhist once came to Doctor Hail's
services armed with a dagger to kill the preacher, but had his
attention caught by the sermon while waiting his chance and is now a
missionary himself!

Perhaps in no other respect is Christianity working a greater change
than in the general estimate of woman, although this is an objection
the natives openly urge against Christianity. Just as in any conflict
of interest the family in Japan has been everything and the individual
nothing, so in every disagreement between husband and wife his
opinions count for everything, hers for nothing. The orthodox and
traditional Japanese view as to a woman's place has been very
accurately and none too strongly set forth by the celebrated Japanese
moralist, Kaibarra, writing on "The Whole Duty of Woman":

  "The great lifelong duty of a woman is obedience. . . . Should her
  husband be roused at any time to anger, she must obey him with fear
  and trembling, and never set herself up against him in anger and
  forwardness. A woman should look on her husband as if he were Heaven
  itself and never weary of thinking how she may yield to her husband,
  and thus escape celestial castigation."

Similarly, in the "Greater Learning for Women" it is declared:

  "The five worst maladies that afflict the female mind are
  indocility, discontent, slander, jealousy and silliness. These five
  maladies infest seven or eight out of every ten women, and it is
  from these that arises the inferiority of women to men."


{53}

  [Illustration: THE GREAT BUDDHA (DIABUTSU) AT KAMAKURA.]
  This gigantic figure of Buddha (a man's head would barely reach the
  statue's feet) singularly expresses the spirit of serene
  contemplation for which the Buddhist religion stands; is indeed,
  hauntingly suggestive of that dreamy Nirvana which it teaches is the
  goal of existence. There is perhaps no finer piece of statuary in
  the East than this.

{54}

  [Illustration: THE DEGENERATE KOREANS AT REST AND AT WORK.]
  The favorite occupation is smoking, but in the lower picture three
  men together are managing to operate one spade. One man rams it into
  the ground, and the other two (by means of ropes attached) jerk out
  the shovelful of earth!


{52 continued}

The wife of the missionary I visited in Osaka told me one or two
amusing incidents--amusing in one aspect and pathetic in another--that
are of interest in this connection. A Japanese member of her church
declared: No, no, Mrs. {55} "Hail, you can't ever make me believe that
my wife is as good as I am!" On another occasion she was teaching a
Sunday-school class concerning the woman of Samaria, and asked: "Why
did Jesus ask the woman to call her husband?" And the Japanese answer
was: "Because he was going to talk on intellectual things and she
needed some man to help her understand!"

Dr. Sidney Gulick, with whom I had tea in Kyoto, tells of tying his
wife's shoes on the street, on one occasion, only to find the Japanese
amazed that a man should so humble himself. His wife's taking his arm
in walking was also regarded as the height of impropriety!

No religion of the Far East has ever recognized the dignity of woman,
probably because no religion has ever recognized the worth of the
individual. Just as I have said, that in the old days, and almost as
largely to-day, in the relations of the home, it was the family that
counted and not the individual, so in his relations to the larger
world beyond the individual formerly counted for nothing when weighed
against the wishes of the superior classes. In the earliest days, when
the lord died, a number of his subjects were buried with him to wait
upon his spirit in the Beyond. Later, with the same object in view,
wives and servants committed suicide on the death of the master. Even
now it is regarded as honorable for a girl to sell herself into shame
to save the family from want.

The same antipodal difference between East and West--here "the family
is the social unit" and with us the individual himself--explains the
system of adoption: a younger son not being essential to the
maintenance of the family cult may be adopted into another family,
while the eldest son may not. On the same principle the father rules,
not because of what he represents as an Individual, but because he
represents the Family. Whenever he chooses, he abdicates, and must
then join his other children in obeying the eldest son.

In the relations of citizenship the same disregard of {56} individual
rights was the ancient rule, not merely in the fact that for centuries
the smallest details of everyday life were regulated by law, but more
seriously in that the Samurai, or privileged class, might "cut down in
cold blood a beggar, a merchant, or a farmer on the slightest
provocation, or simply for the purpose of testing his sword," while in
case of the ruin of their cause it was the honorable and natural thing
for soldiers to commit "hari-kiri"--that is to say, commit suicide by
disemboweling themselves. A Japanese writer recently declared that
"the value of the individual life is an illustration of the Christian
spirit" that is profoundly influencing Japan, and he mentioned as an
example that formerly suicide, in such circumstances as I have
mentioned, "was regarded as an honorable act; now it is regarded as a
sin."

Without professing the religion of fatalism which so influences the
peoples of the Nearer East, the Japanese soldiers behave like
fatalists because the fundamental basis of the social order for
centuries has been the necessity of the Individual to sacrifice
pleasure, comfort, or life itself when required either by the Family
or by the Social Order. And this partially explains why it is said in
sober earnest that the highest ambition of most Japanese schoolboys
to-day is to die for their Emperor.

---

This is my last letter from Japan, and my next letter will be from
Korea--if the cholera doesn't get me. It has been raging in Osaka and
in Kobe, both of which cities I have thought it necessary to visit in
order to get first-hand information about industrial conditions.
Ordinarily, the cholera victim lives only a few hours. The first day's
record here in Kobe, I believe, showed six cases and five deaths.
Gradually, however, cholera is being stamped out, just as we have
eradicated yellow fever in Cuba and the South, and just as we shall
eventually come to recognize the prevalence of typhoid in any town as
a disgrace--an evidence of primitive and uncivilized {57} sanitary
conditions. A friend of mine who came to Osaka in 1879 tells me that
there were 10,000 cholera victims in that one city that year--the
yellow flag on almost every street, and all through the night the
sound of men hurrying past with new victims for the hospitals or with
new corpses for the burning. In the thirteen years 1878-91 more than
313,000 Japanese died of the scourge.

I regret to say good-by to Japan. It is a tremendously interesting
country. For just as America represents the ultimate type of
Occidental civilization, so does Japan represent the ultimate type of
Oriental civilization.

More than this, it is here that the full tides of Oriental and
Occidental life are now meeting for the first time in human history.
For centuries uncounted the yellow man advanced across the plains and
peaks of Asia, finding at last in these outlying islands his
farthermost outpost, and so tarried here in the Farthest East, "the
Land of the Rising Sun." He hardly thought of the existence of a West,
but if his Buddha-like composure had been ruffled by such a thought,
he might have droned monotonously:

  "Oh, East is East, and West is West,
   and never the twain shall meet."

But while the yellow man had thus moved steadily eastward, the white
man, starting from the land of the Euphrates, had pitched his camp,
with each succeeding generation, nearer and nearer the setting sun.
Greece--Rome--Spain--France--England--then four hundred years ago,
more restless than the Mongolian, the white man dared the seas that
hemmed him in and found a new continent to people. Westward still the
course of empire then continued until in our time the white man
planted his civilization on the Pacific Coast.

There was no more West.

Then it was, as if in obedience to a cosmic, racial instinct deeper
than reason, the white man sent his messengers across the new-found
ocean and awakened the Sleepy World {58} of the Yellow Man by the
booming of Perry's guns off Yokahoma.

The Kingdom of Heaven, we are told, cometh not with observation, and
the deeper meaning of the greatest events in human history may often
escape the attention of contemporaries. My father and yours, perhaps,
heard little and thought less of Perry's exploit, and yet it marked
not merely a new historical epoch, but a new act in the long drama of
human evolution itself. Curious, too, it is to observe how the strange
world-destiny that shapes our ends gave to it a stage-setting in
keeping with its dramatic significance. Not to England, nor to any
other great naval and commercial Power of the time, but to the young
United States--the nation that had found the ultimate West--came the
unlikely but strangely fitting task of opening the Farthest East to
Western trade and thought.

When at last the world has grown old and nations and empires not yet
formed shall themselves have gone the mortal way common alike to human
creatures and human creations, I think the far historian will record
few events either more dramatic or more pregnant with undreamed-of
meaning than Perry's entrance into Japanese waters just five years
after the discovery of gold in California had ended the world-old
drama of our westward march.

So to-day, as I have said, the full tides of Orient and Occident have
rushed together in Japan, and it is not merely a land of curious
customs and strange phenomena, but a land in which the contrasts exist
side by side, and most interesting of all, a land of strangely
mingling social and industrial currents. East and West have met, and
we wait to see what forces in each shall prevail when the shock of
their fierce encounter shall have passed. For it is not merely Japan,
but all Asia, whose future may be affected by the outcome of the new,
tense struggle here between the ideals of West and East.

As on the streets of Tokyo and Yokahoma the Japanese {59} in European
dress jostles his brother in native garb, as streams of men in coats
and trousers and shoes mingle with men wearing kimonas, hikamas, and
getas, so in the minds of the people the teachings of modern science
and Confucian classic meet; the faith of the Christian grapples with
the faith of the Buddhist; the masterful aspirations of Western
civilization surge against the old placidity of the East.

What shall be the outcome? Upon nothing else, it seems to me, depends
so much as upon the religious foundation upon which Japan seeks to
build the structure of her newer and richer life. Many of her people,
if I may change the figure, are seeking to put the new wine of
Christian civilization into the old bottles of Shinto and Buddhist
ritualism. That this must fail is, I think, self-evident. Many others,
like the iconoclasts of the French Revolution, would sweep away all
religion, but they will find that they are fighting against an
ineradicable instinct of human nature, the innate craving of the
divine in man.

In my own brief stay in Japan I have seen enough to convince me of the
truth of both the foregoing observations. I confess that I came to the
country with a distinct doubt as to the wisdom of stressing mission
work here--came thinking the field less promising then elsewhere. But
I go away with no such feeling. What I have seen and heard has
dispelled my doubts. Speaking simply as a journalist and a student of
social and industrial conditions, I believe that to-day Japan needs
nothing more than Christian missionaries--men who are willing to
forget dogma and tradition and creedal differences in emphasizing the
fundamental teachings of Christ Himself, and who have education,
sympathy, and vision to fit them for the stupendous task of helping
mold a new and composite type of human civilization, a type which may
ultimately make conquest of the whole Oriental half of our human race.

Kobe, Japan.


{60}


VII

KOREA: "THE LAND OF THE MORNING CALM"


I have become a contemporary of David and the patriarchs of Israel. In
the civilization into which I have come science and invention are in
swaddling clothes, the Pyramids are yet young, the great nations of
Western Europe still in the womb of Time.

This at least is how I have felt now that, having left Japan, I am
travelling through Korea, "the Land of the Morning Calm"--or "Chosen,"
as the Japanese will call it hereafter--whose authentic recorded
history runs back into the twelfth century before the Christian era,
and whose general features must have changed but little in all this
time. A typical Korean view of the present year might well be
photographed to illustrate a Sunday-school lesson from the Old
Testament.

The men in the fields I have seen plow with bullocks harnessed in the
primitive fashion of the earliest civilization. Their plow stocks are
of wood rough-hewn from their native forest trees, the plowman here
never standing between the "plow-handles," as we say, because there is
only one handle and that little better than a stick of firewood. With
sickles equally primitive I have seen men cutting the ripe rice in the
fields; with flails, beating out their grain. Their houses, hardly
high enough to stand up in, are little more than four square rock
walls with roofs of straw, over which pumpkin vines clamber or on
which immense quantities of red pepper are drying in the autumn sun.
Nor would the dress of the people--everybody {61} in white (or what
was once white) garments--have seemed strange in ancient Judea.

There is also the same mixture of plains and peaks as Bible pictures
of the Holy Land have made familiar, and at night, as October's
hunters' moon glorifies all the landscape, a faint light gleaming here
and there from an opening in the rock huts, and with Arcturus and the
Pleiades of Job in the sky, it has seemed almost sacrilege to mar the
ancient environment by such an anachronism as a modern railway
locomotive. Rather, in looking out over the picturesque mountains and
valleys and sniffing the cool, dry air, you feel "the call of the
wild" in your blood. Across long centuries the life of your far-gone
nomadic ancestors calls to you. Almost irresistibly you are moved to
take a human friend and a friendly horse or pony and pitch your camp
out under the great stars--larger and brighter indeed do they seem to
burn here in the Orient--and feel the dew on your face as you awaken
in the "morning calm" of the ancient Hermit Kingdom, whose feeble life
was snuffed out, like the flame of a burnt-down candle, but a few
short months ago.

As I came into Seoul three nights ago I found it hardly less
fascinating than the country through which I had travelled during the
day. Through ancient streets, unlit by any electric glare, strangely
robed, almost spirit-like white figures were gliding here and there in
the moonlight, singly or in groups, and but a few minutes' ride in our
rickshaws brought us to the old South Gate. Great monument of a dead
era is it, relic of the days when Seoul trusted to its ten miles of
massive stone walls (already a century old when Columbus set sail from
Palos) to keep out the war-like Mongol and Tartar.

In Japan I found a different world from that which I had known, but a
world in which East and West were strangely mingled: much of the
familiar with the unfamiliar. Here in Korea, on the contrary, I have
found the real East, the Asia of romance, of tradition and of fable,
almost untouched by {62} Western influences--dirty, squalid,
unprogressive, and yet with a fascination all its own. Great bare
mountains look down on the capital city, the old city-wall climbing
their steep sides, and the historic Han flows through an adjacent
valley. The thatched or tiled roofs of the houses are but little
higher than one's head, and I shall never forget what a towering
skyscraper effect is produced by a photographer's little two-story
studio building on the main street of the city. Practically every
other building is but little higher and not greatly larger as a rule,
than the pens in which our American farmers fatten hogs in the fall.
Most American merchants would expect to make more in a day than the
average white-robed, easy-going Seoul merchant has in stock, but he
smokes his long-stemmed pipe in peaceful contemplation of the world
and doesn't worry. There are no sidewalks in Seoul, of course,
although it has been for five centuries (until now) the capital of a
kingdom, and a quarter of a million people call the city their home;
no carriages or buggies, no sewerage, and but few horses. There are
miserable little overloaded ponies that the average farmer would feel
that he could pitch single-handed into his barn-loft, but the
burden-carriers are mostly bulls that are really magnificent in
appearance, both oxen and ponies carrying loads on their backs that an
American would expect to crush them.

The customs are odd indeed. Men wear enormous straw hats as a badge of
mourning, but the usual style of head-dress is to shave the extreme
summit of the head, while the rest of the hair grows long and is
braided up in a sort of topknot with a little bird-cage hat above it.
This hat is then tied under the chin as an American woman would tie
hers.

Girls are but little seen on the streets, custom requiring them to
stay indoors before marriage, and the married women, when on the
street are likely to wear a sort of green wrap thrown over their heads
and shoulders that leaves only their eyes and contiguous facial
territory exposed. The tourist is at first {63} inclined to think that
there are many young girls on the streets, but this is because the
boys dress as we have grown used to seeing girls dress in America.
Take the young boy who waits on my table: fair of feature in his neat
white dress, and with a long glossy hair-plait hanging down his back,
you would think him some fair Korean maiden. When he gets married a
little later, probably at seventeen or eighteen, he will shave his
head (not necessarily as a sign of mourning!) and wear his hair
thereafter in the manner described in the preceding paragraph. An
English missionary-doctor's pretty daughter here yesterday (and how
pretty an English or American girl does look in this far land!) told
me that a Korean girl of twenty or twenty-one is regarded as a rather
desperate old maid, and the go-betweens, who arrange the marriages
here as they do in Japan, are likely to charge a rather steep sum for
getting a husband for one so far advanced in spinsterhood! The chances
are that the groom doesn't see his bride until the ceremony, and she
doesn't even see him then, for according to the curious custom here
the bride's eyes are sealed up until late afternoon of her wedding
day. More than this, custom requires that the bride must keep
absolutely unbroken silence all the day long, and for a varying length
of time thereafter. Mrs. Bishop in her book on Korea asserts that "it
may be a week or several months before the husband knows the sound of
his wife's voice,"--and the nature of the dear creatures in America
will of course insure the ready acceptance of her statement!

The go-betweens are often not very scrupulous, and for good fees
sometimes manage to palm off damsels of unsatisfactory features on
unsuspecting swains, or match undesirable young fellows with girls
vastly superior to them. A rather amusing instance was reported to me
by the young lady from whom I have just quoted. One of the officials
or noblemen in Seoul had a daughter whom the go-between was preparing
to marry off into a family of rank in another city. A few days before
the wedding-day-set-to-be, some one came to {64} the father of the
bride and said: "Did you know that your prospective son-in-law has a
hare-lip?" Now a hare-lip in Korea is not merely such an undesirable
addition to one's countenance as to make a Mrs. Wiggs happy because of
being without it, but under the old dispensation no one with a
harelip, or other like facial blemish, could be presented at court and
thereby introduced into the Four Hundred of this capital city.
Therefore the father waxed thoughtful from his topknot to the end of
his long-stem pipe. "I tell you what I'll do," he finally said to his
wife. "We'll go ahead with the ceremony, but instead of my daughter
I'll substitute my orphan niece." And he did, and the young fellow
didn't know any better for a week.

Fortunately, however, my story doesn't end here. I am extremely glad
to add the usual "lived-happily-ever-after" peroration, for that was
really what happened in this case. The father of my young lady
informant, who is a doctor, sewed up the young fellow's lip, he was
presented at court, and the real daughter who so narrowly escaped
marrying may be an old maid, for all I know.

In such a high, dry climate as this one would expect to find little
tuberculosis, but I am told that there is really a great deal of it,
due to the carelessness of the families where there are victims, and
to the generally unsanitary conditions. A daughter of one of the
Southern missionaries here, having contracted the malady, has just
gone to Arizona in search of cure. Everywhere on the streets I
encounter faces marked by smallpox, and formerly to have had the
disease was the rule rather than the exception. In fact, instead of
alluding to a man's inexperience by saying "He hasn't cut his eye
teeth," as we do, a Korean would say: "He hasn't had smallpox." Since
vaccination became the rule, however, there are very few cases.

Infant mortality here, as in America, is one of the greatest factors
in the high death-rate, but conditions are improving. {65} And so long
as authorities declare that in America half the infant death-rate is
due to ignorance or neglect, we haven't much right to point a scornful
finger at Korea, anyhow.

I have already alluded to the fact that the old monarchial government
of Korea ended its inglorious career but a few short months ago. While
the records of the nation run back more than three thousand
years--probably to a period when Job was so superbly reproaching his
comforters in the Land of Uz--the late dynasty runs back only 500
years. We Americans, I may say in passing, are accustomed to think of
men of five hundred years ago, or even of John Smith and Pocahontas,
as very ancient, but a pedigree of only five hundred years wouldn't
entitle a family to enter good society over here. But though only five
hundred years in power, this recent dynasty succeeded in doing about
as much devilment and as little good as many dynasties much older in
years. One of the missionaries explained to me yesterday that it was
only when the King got very mad that he would order heads cut off
without reason--but then the Koreans are very lazy and his inactivity
at other periods may have been due to sloth.

The truth is, that most of these Oriental monarchies have been corrupt
beyond the belief of the average American. When I was a boy I used to
hear the old men in country churches thank God for the blessings of
orderly government and for the privilege of worshipping as they chose,
"with no one to molest us or make us afraid." As a rule, we take such
things as matters of course, but when one comes over here into Asia
and into countries where the people have been cursed by corrupt
governments, where innocent lives have been taken upon the mere whim
of the government, where property has been confiscated with no better
reason, and where men have had to die for their faiths:--when he, in
short, comes into lands where the rights of neither life, property nor
conscience have been respected, he is likely to prize his American
privileges somewhat more highly.

{66}

The old Korean dynasty was not only corrupt, but unspeakably stupid.
Like the people, the King relied on sorcerers or fortune-tellers to
find a lucky day or a lucky time of the moon to do whatever he wished,
and in case of sickness consulted the mutang, or conjurer, instead of
a doctor. Thus when the prince had smallpox some years ago, the mutang
declared that the Smallpox Spirit or devil (who must always be
referred to with great respect as "His Excellency") would not leave
unless allowed to ride horseback clear to the Korean boundary, three
hundred miles away; and a gayly caparisoned horse was accordingly led
the entire distance for His Excellency, the Smallpox Spirit, to ride
away on!

The government was also unfeignedly corrupt. Offices were given, just
as lives were taken merely at the whim of the Throne. Taxes were
farmed out, the grafting collectors taking from the people probably
five or six times as much as finally reached the public treasury. More
than this, the nobility robbed the people at will, and there was no
authority from whom they could get redress. Woe unto the man who
became energetic and industrious under the old dispensation! First,
the tax-gatherers would relieve him of the bulk of his swollen
fortune, and what was left the noble or "Yang-ban," as a noble was
called, would take the trouble to borrow but never take the trouble to
repay. For the Yang-ban was a "gentleman," he was. It was beneath his
dignity to work--even to guide the reins of the horse he rode--but it
was not beneath his dignity to sponge on his friends (I think the verb
"to sponge" is too expressive to remain slang) or to borrow without
repaying. Moreover, in case of extremity, it is said that Mother
Yang-ban and Sister Ann might take in washing, as is recorded in the
classic lays of our own land, but Father never defiled himself by
doing anything so dishonorable as an honest day's work.

But alas and alack! for the degeneracy of our times. The Yang-bans in
Korea have been deprived of their ancient {67} privileges, and I fear
that even their fellows in America are by no means treated with the
ancient deference and respect due to persons of such exalted merit and
blue-blood.

What with the arbitrary and oppressive system of tax-robbery and the
extortions of the Yang-bans it is not surprising that the Koreans here
became disinclined to labor, while those who went to Manchuria, where
there has been "proper security for the gains of industry" are said to
be quite a different folk--energetic because there has been
encouragement to be energetic. The old Korean system of taxation being
arbitrary, the only way to escape a raid by the tax-gatherer was to
appear not to have anything worth raiding, and with the coinage
confined usually to the copper "cash" (each "cash" worth a small
fraction of a cent), it was difficult for a man to have much money
without everybody knowing it. If a man had much he needed a warehouse
to store it in. Mrs. Bishop in her book, already referred to, speaks
of a time when it took 3200 "cash" to equal a dollar in our money,
making each coin worth 1-32 of a cent, and it took six men or one pony
to carry $50 worth of coin! Another instance is mentioned in the
Japanese official Year Book on Korea. The Japanese army bought $5000
worth of timber in the interior, where the people were not used to any
other currency, with the result that "the army had to charter a small
steamer and fill her completely with this copper cash to finance the
transaction!" I bought a few long, necklace-like strings of this old
Korean money at ten cents a string, and even then probably paid too
much.

When I bought my ticket for Korea it was nominally an independent
monarchy under a Japanese "protectorate," but the day before I sailed
from San Francisco, Japanese aggression took another step and the
country was formally annexed as a part of the Japanese Empire. There
is little doubt, I suppose, that the Japanese will give the Koreans
better government than the old monarchy gave them, but one {68} cannot
excuse all the methods by which Japan fastened her rule on the island.
Yesterday morning I went out to the Old North Palace, a deserted and
melancholy memorial of vanished power, stood on the throne where
Korean kings once held audience, and saw the royal dwelling in which
the Japanese and their aids killed the Queen in 1895, and also saw the
place where they burned her body. The Japanese minister at that time
was recalled and placed on trial for the offence, and, though he
escaped conviction, the evidence of his guilt was undoubted. It has
been estimated that in about eighteen months in 1907-'08, "12,916
Koreans, called 'insurgents' by the Japanese and patriots by their
fellow countrymen, were killed by the Mikado's soldiers and gendarmes,
only 160 of whom lost their lives." This looks more like butchery than
war. Moreover, the Japanese themselves have to admit that there were
inexcusable delays in paying for land seized from Koreans, and in view
of all the circumstances it is questionable whether the Korean hatred
or dislike of Japan will become very much less cordial than it is
to-day.

Perhaps in no country in the world has missionary work been more
successful than in Korea (there are probably 125,000 Protestants now,
while there were only 777 thirteen years ago), and I have been
interested to learn that there is absolutely no truth in the Japanese
newspaper reports that immense numbers of native Christians are
leaving the church since annexation. On the contrary, reports from all
over the country are good, and Seoul itself is just now in the midst
of a most thoroughgoing and successful Christian revival, with 1800
conversions reported during the first ten days. At a Methodist mission
school I visited this morning I found that a hundred of the native
pupils had been canvassing the town a part of three successive
afternoons with the result that they had brought in the names of 697
Koreans expressing a desire to become Christians.

Here in Korea there is no waste of energy or money through {69}
denominational divisions. Each denomination has its own sphere of
activity, preventing duplication of effort, and my general observation
has convinced me that the criticisms of foreign mission work sometimes
heard in America are based on a radical misconception of conditions.
Even the non-Christians, in the great majority of cases, speak in high
praise of the splendid work of the missionaries. A typical expression
is that found in the latest issue of the Shanghai _National Review_,
now before me, which may be expected to speak impartially. Referring
to an address by Doctor Morrison, the Peking correspondent of the
London _Times_, it says:

  "Doctor Morrison eulogized the work of the missionaries and we
  cannot conceive that anybody who really knows of their work at first
  hand, not as it is to be found in extreme cases, but as ordinarily
  carried on, should do otherwise than eulogize it."

Seoul, Korea.


{70}


VIII

MANCHURIA--FAIR AND FERTILE


"Uneasily sleeps Mukden to-night"--I remember yet how one of the
dispatches began which brought so vividly to my mind the meaning of
the great death-grapple here between the Japanese and Russian hosts in
1905.

  [Footnote: "Uneasily sleeps Mukden to-night. In the main street
  lamps burn dimly. Along dark roads in heavy dust are marching
  columns. The cool night is full of the low rustle of movement. Near
  the station, in over-filled hospitals, are heard low groans. The
  wounded arrive in a never-ceasing stream of carts, and another
  stream of ambulances moves northward, for the place must be cleared
  for to-day's victims. The eternal pines whisper above the Tombs of
  Chinese Emperors. In the fields watch fires are burning stores and
  evacuated villages----" And the correspondent goes on to tell of the
  wearied forces gathering for further fighting with the coming of
  dawn--men footsore and weak for want of food and water and rest. For
  forty-eight hours the Japanese had not eaten.]

The story in a nutshell is this:

  "After the capitulation of Port Arthur, Oyama pressed toward Mukden,
  where Kuropatkin had established his headquarters, and there from
  February 24 to March 12 occurred probably the most desperate battle
  in modern history, if not in all history. About eight hundred
  thousand men were engaged. Again Oyama won, and Kuropatkin retreated
  in fairly good order about a hundred miles north of Mukden."

So runs the historian's brief record of the titanic struggle five
years ago in the ancient Manchurian city to which I have come. What
Gettysburg was in our Civil War, that Mukden was in the first great
contest between the white race and the Mongolian. Here covetous Death
for once was satisfied, his gruesome garnering seen at each wintry
nightfall in the {71} windrows of bloody and mangled bodies strewn along
miles of snowy trenches.

I have heard all sorts of war traditions in Mukden: that at one time
the Japanese thought themselves beaten in the battle and had ordered a
retreat, when, a Russian force giving way, they turned quickly to
press the advantage and snatched victory from what they had thought
was ruin. There are many stories, too, of the inefficiency of the
Russian officers, stories made all the more probable in the light of
the Russian Commander Kuropatkin's memoirs to the same general effect.
"Why, the English would put one of their admirals against the wall and
shoot him like a common seaman for such gross neglect of duty as went
entirely unpunished among Russian generals," was one man's comment as
he talked with me. "The Rooshians were good fighters--fought 'and to
'and with the butt of their muskets--and if they 'ad 'ad good
commanders the <DW61>s would never have won," said an Englishman who had
seen service in India. A railway man also told me of the debauchery
and profligacy of the Russian officers, disreputable women travelling
regularly with them to and fro, drunkenness being also common. About
the same charges were reported to me by a Japanese officer. In fact,
it is said that the Japanese contrived to get a very considerable
quantity of champagne to the Russian headquarters one day, and the
next day made a slaughter-pen of the Russian camp while the Cossack
commanders were still hopelessly befuddled from too much drinking!

The truth is that the Japanese, from camp-followers to
commander-in-chief, were prepared for war and the Russians were not.
From the day that Russia, aided by France and Germany, forced Japan to
cede back to China some of the fruits of her victory over the Chinese,
from that hour Japan nursed and fed fat her rankling grudge and bided
her time as deliberately as a tiger waiting to spring. While I was in
Japan an Englishman told me that immediately after Russia forced Japan
{72} to give up her spoils of victory he was amazed to see the
tremendous interest in the military drills in all the Japanese
schools. When he asked what it meant, there was one frank answer: "We
are getting ready to lick Russia."

It should also be observed that when the war came on the Japanese were
not only in a state of preparedness so far as battleships and army
drill and munitions of war were concerned, but they were also prepared
in the vital matter of proper medical attendance.

"When your American soldiers went with Shafter into Cuba the army was
utterly without proper medical corps and equipment, and the death-rate
was disgracefully high. But the first Japanese who fell in crossing
the Yalu were taken at once to the best of Japanese surgeons and cared
for in the most approved of modern military hospitals." So said a
frank Scotchman to me yesterday, and in the light of the official
statistics I could say nothing in palliation of the unpleasant
allusion to America. When the war with Russia ended, Baron Takaki,
Surgeon-General of the Japanese Army, boasted that whereas in the
Spanish-America War "fourteen men died from preventable diseases to
one man killed on the field of battle," the Japanese had lost only one
man from disease to every four from bullets. Now the Japanese, as
usual, had not worked out any of the principles of medical science,
sanitation, and hygiene which enabled them to make this remarkable
record, but they showed their characteristic facility in taking the
white man's inventions and getting as much or more--more in this
case--out of them than the white man himself.

The Japanese record, showing in such amazing fashion what a wisely
directed health organization may accomplish, is worth remembering not
only in connection with plans for military efficiency, but also in
connection with plans for general public health activities at home.
Every State should spend five times as much for this public health
work as at present.

In 1910 the forgetful Manchurian earth bears but few traces {73} of
the fierce contest that only five or six years ago scarred its bosom,
and the serried shocks of newly harvested corn, _kaoliang_ (sorghum)
and millet--in some infrequent instances fertilized by the dead men's
bones--are seen on fields where contending armies struggled. Let it be
so for a little while; let the Manchurian peasant sow and garner in
peace while he may; for still the war cloud hangs heavy above China's
Three Eastern Provinces, and in the next struggle the peasant's blood
may redden his own fields. For that the fighting has not ended is to
me perfectly clear. By reason of the Japanese railroad monopoly
through the very heart of Southern Manchuria, and her leased territory
on the coast, Japan has obtained power bordering on control, and
everything goes to show that she has fully made up her mind to
complete and retain that control.

Moreover, when one has seen the great Manchurian empire, it is easy to
understand how it has now roused the covetousness of Japan just as the
temptation a few years ago proved too strong for Russia. Immense
farming areas are only thinly settled; some of the richest of the
world's mineral resources have only been touched.

A day or two ago I went out to see Mr. Edward C. Parker, in charge of
the agricultural experiment farm here (he is a Minnesota man, I
believe), and found him enthusiastic over his corn crop just
harvested. "I have been so surprised by the growth of corn this year,"
he declared, "that I could hardly believe my own eyes. I have never
seen finer seed ears anywhere." Among American states, only Iowa, he
declares, is probably more fertile than Manchuria; with stock-raising
to prevent land-deterioration, all the vast southern section could
beat Illinois growing crops, and the same thing could be said of the
northern country but for its colder climate. About Harbin, where the
South Manchuria Railway joins the Trans-Siberian Line, one may see
cuts thirty feet deep and the soil rich to the bottom. Most of
Manchuria is level--strikingly like our Western Corn Belt and Wheat
Belt--and the {74} soil is of wind-drift origin "like a great
snow-blanket," very easily tilled. The plowing is done with a
steel-tipped wooden beam such as I have already written of seeing in
Korea, and only the favoring physical texture of the soil explains the
fat harvests of food, feed, and fuel achieved under such methods.

It has been a positive joy to me in traveling through the country here
in late October to see the great shocks of kaoliang, millet and corn
(even with labor at 20 cents a day out here, the people don't pull
fodder!), quaint-looking farmhouses almost surrounded by well-stuffed
barns, and corn cribs packed until the overflowing yellow ears spill
out the ampler cracks. The kaoliang is a sort of sorghum, the grain
being used for food, while the stalks, which contain but little sugar,
are used for fuel. Consequently the barnyards packed to the limit and
running over with

  "The garnered largess of the fruitful year"

not only mean feed for all the variegated animals that are used in
Manchurian agriculture, but fuel for the long Manchurian winters as
well. I even find the peasants digging up the roots and stubble to be
dried and burned in the houses.

One sees but a small proportion of good horses here, and practically
no four-wheeled farm wagons. Unlike Japan, however, Manchuria does
have its farm vehicles: great heavy two-wheeled carts drawn by from
two to eight horses, donkeys, and asses. Sometimes there is a big
horse or two, then one or two donkeys half the size of the horses, and
a couple of little asses or burros half the size of the donkeys--and
maybe a bull thrown in for good measure. It looks as if the Whole
Blamed Family of work-stock had been hitched to pull the cart. The
Whole Blamed Family is often needed, too, for the roads in China are
ample proof that we needn't expect ours in America or anywhere else to
get any better by letting them alone three thousand years. The Chinese
have tried it, and it doesn't work. The October roads are so bad in
many places that if {75} the carts had four wheels instead of two not
even the combined aggregation in the team could pull them out of the
mud. A little later, however, the roads freeze over solidly and stay
so for five or six months--and then the Manchurian farmers go on long,
slow pilgrimages carrying their products to the larger
markets--sometimes two or three hundred miles from home.

The pride and glory of Manchuria, the talk of its citizens, the
foundation of its prosperity, the backbone of its commerce, the symbol
of its wealth, is the bean--the common soja, or soy bean as we know
it. What corn is to our Corn Belt and what cotton is to our Southern
States, that the bean is to Manchuria: supreme among products. There
is no class of people not affected by the prosperity or the adversity
of his Majesty the Bean. Bankers, merchants, farmers, even the ladies
one meets in the drawing-rooms in the foreign concessions, not only
"know beans," but can talk beans too. If the present rate of progress
is maintained, it will not be long until no one will enumerate the
world's great crops--wheat, corn, oats, rice, rye, barley, cotton,
etc.--without including beans. The first beans were shipped to Europe
only about four years ago, and the London _Times_ correspondent
estimates that next year Europe will take $35,000,000 worth. In a very
great measure the beans have the same properties as cottonseed, an oil
being extracted that is used for much the same purposes as cottonseed
oil, while the residue called "bean cake" is about the equivalent of
cottonseed meal. It is somewhat superior, Mr. Parker says, to
cottonseed meal or linseed meal as a stock feed, but is now chiefly
used for fertilizing purposes. My first acquaintance with the bean
cake was in Japan, where I found it enriching the earth for
vegetable-growing, Japan importing an average of half a million tons a
year to put under its crops. Manchuria also uses not a little for the
same purpose. The more intelligent Manchurian farmers, however, are
learning that it is a waste to rot one of the best cattle feeds in the
{76} world and get its fertilizing value only--just as our American
farmers, it is gratifying to see, are at last waking up to the
disgraceful folly of using cottonseed meal as a crop-producer without
first getting its other value as a meat-producer.

I find out, furthermore, that what old Maury's Geography led me to
believe was a vast Desert of Gobi here in North China or Mongolia
alongside Manchuria is not a genuine desert at all, but chiefly a
great grass plain with golden possibilities as a cattle country. Mr.
Parker declares that if cattle were grown on these immense ranges and
brought to Manchuria in the fall to be fattened off on bean cake,
millet, etc., Harbin, Chang-chun, Mukden, and other Manchurian cities
might soon build packing plants that would rival Chicago's in bigness.
This system of stock-raising would also solve the problem of
maintaining soil fertility, just as it would bring relief to those
sections of America where the policy of selling everything off the
land and putting nothing back threatens disaster.

The old ridge system of growing crops, the rows thrown up as high as
the little plows will permit and the crops planted on top, is the
general practice here, and Mr. Parker is making an effort through the
experiment farm to convince the people of the advantages of level
cultivation. He also wishes to introduce better plows. "The truth is,"
he says, "that we never had any real plows until James Oliver and John
Deere invented theirs. All the plowing before that was merely
scratch-work, and here in Manchuria the plows are hardly better than
those the Egyptians used. But for the extremely light, ash-like,
wind-drift soil the people with such crude tools could hardly make
enough to subsist on."

In Korea I noticed some moderately fair cotton fields, and in
Manchuria I have also found a few patches, though the climate here is
obviously too cold for its profitable production. I find that the
Japanese have great faith in the future of the industry in Korea.

This notice of Manchurian farming would not be complete {77} without
some mention of the queer aspect of many of the cultivated fields--
thick-dotted with earth mounds, around which the rows are curved and
twisted, these mounds resembling medium-sized potato hills. They
contain not vegetables, however, but bones. Each cone-shaped mound is
a Chinaman's grave. I first noticed this method of burying in Korea,
but the mounds are quite low there--all that I saw, at least, except
the Queen's Tomb at Seoul. Here in Manchuria they are about three or
four feet high in most cases, and sometimes six. One of the famous
sights of Mukden is the Peilang, or Northern Tomb, where old Taitsun,
the first great Manchu Emperor of China, lies buried, and the grave
proper (reached after a long approach of temple buildings, magnificent
gates, images, and monuments) is a huge earth mound, probably an acre
in extent. The base is thrown up twenty-five or thirty feet high and
surrounded by a rock wall, while the cone-shaped summit runs up about
twenty feet higher. The Chinese have a deep-rooted superstition as to
the existence of a sort of devil or "fung-shui" in the ground, and to
disturb this fung-shui may prove the direful spring of more "woes
unnumbered" than the Iliad records. Such a fung-shui is supposed to
exist under the surface of the earth about the Mukden royal tombs,
and, accordingly, the railroad between Mukden and Peking had to run
twenty-five miles out of its proper course in order not to disturb it.

Mukden, Manchuria.


{78}


IX

WHERE JAPAN IS ABSORBING AN EMPIRE


"The Open Door in Manchuria--of what concern is it to me any more than
the revolution in Portugal or the Young Turks movement in
Constantinople?" With some such expression the average American is
likely to dismiss the question--a question whose determination may
prove the pivot on which will swing the greatest world-movements of
our time as well as the prosperity of many European and American
industries, and that of the labor dependent upon them.


I

Concerning Manchuria and all the issues involved in the present
struggle for its possession, all kinds of misconceptions are rife.
That it is a small country; that it is an infertile country; that it
must be already well developed in point of population and consumption
of goods: this is only the ABC of Manchurian misinformation.

In answer, it need only be said that Manchuria is larger than all our
New England, Middle, and South Atlantic States from Maine to Georgia
inclusive, and that into its borders all of Great Britain (England,
Scotland and Wales), together with all of the German Empire, could be
crowded, and still leave a gap so big that Holland, Belgium, and
Switzerland would lack thousands of square miles of filling it: while
as to population Manchuria has only 18,000,000 people as compared with
{79} 118,000,000 in the European countries just mentioned. And after
having travelled in all of them as well as in Manchuria I should say
that the Asiatic area is the more fertile.

The possibilities of such an empire situated in the fairest portion of
Asia's temperate zone are simply illimitable. No one who has been
through the fruitful lands of the American Corn Belt and Wheat Belt
and goes later through Manchuria can fail to note the similarity
between them in physical appearance and natural resources, and it may
well be that what the settlement of the West has meant in America
these last fifty years the development of Manchuria will mean in Asia
these next fifty.

In itself the sheer creation of such a country--larger far than Great
Britain and Germany, as rich as Illinois and Manitoba--would appeal
at once to American commerce and industry, but you have only begun to
grasp the significance of Manchuria when you compare it to the
creation of such an empire in some favored portion of the sea.

Manchuria means all this, but it means more: Its possession would give
such vastly increased influence to any Power possessing it as to make
that Power a menace to the commercial rights of all other nations in
Asia--rights of almost vital importance both to Europe and America.
England and Germany, of course, are already dependent upon foreign
trade for their prosperity, and President McKinley was never so
seerlike as when, in his last speech at Buffalo, he reminded the
American people that their own future greatness depends upon the
development of trade beyond the seas. And it was to Asia, the greatest
of continents, and especially to China, the greatest of countries on
this greatest of continents, that he looked, as we must also look
to-day. In Secretary Hay's memorial address on McKinley, which I had
the good fortune to hear, the dead President's determined efforts to
maintain the ancient integrity of the Dragon Empire were fittingly
mentioned as one of his most distinguished services to his people and
his time. {80} To keep the immense area of China from spoliation by
other nations and to preserve to all peoples equal commercial rights
within boundaries are absolutely essential to the proper future
development of both European and American commerce and industry.


II

This is why the Open Door in Manchuria is a matter of very real
concern to every Occidental citizen; this is why the other nations
after the ending of the Russo-Japanese War were careful to see that
these belligerents guaranteed a continuance of the Open Door policy;
this is why it is of importance to us to know whether this pledge is
being kept.

In centering my attention upon Japan in this article let me say in the
outset, I am not to be understood as being one whit more tolerant of
Russian than of Japanese aggression in Manchuria--I am not. In the
Russo-Japanese War my sympathies were all with Japan, my present
friendships with numbers of her sons I prize very highly, but I cannot
blind myself to the fact that she is apparently "drunk with sight of
power" in the Orient.

As conditions are to-day, the reason for giving primary attention to
Japan's position in Manchuria rather than Russia's must be
self-evident. In the first place, the territory embraced in her sphere
of influence is more important and contains two thirds the population.
Then again: Northern Manchuria being cold and inhospitable, Japan's
sphere not only covers the fairer and more favored section
agriculturally, but from the standpoint of military strategy (as a
mighty war taught all the world) Japan is vastly better placed. With
Port Arthur in her possession, and the new broad-gauge line from
Antung and Mukden enabling her to rush troops across the Sea of Japan
and through Korea to Manchuria without once getting into foreign
waters or on foreign soil, she could ask nothing better. And finally
and most significant of all, Russia has {83} suffered perhaps the greatest
humiliation in her history by reason of Manchurian aggression; she has
learned Japan's point of vantage; and whatever advance she makes in
the near future will be only by Japanese sufferance and connivance.

{81}

  [Illustration: LIKE SCENES FROM OUR WESTERN PRAIRIES.]
  Manchuria is a vast empire--one of the most fertile portions of the
  earth's surface. The great money crop is the soy bean, and the lower
  picture shows miles of beans and bean-cake awaiting shipment at
  Changchun.


{82}

  [Illustration: MANCHURIAN WOMEN (SHOWING PECULIAR HEAD-DRESS),]


  [Illustration: CHINESE WASTE-PAPER COLLECTOR.]
  Everything in China is scrupulously saved--except human labor. That
  is wasted on a colossal scale through the failure to use improved
  machinery or scientific knowledge.


{83 continued}

Whatever may be the meaning of the alleged secret treaty between Japan
and Russia, the great truth which all nations need to remember is
this: Whatever scotches Japanese aggression in Manchuria scotches
Russian aggression at the same time--automatically and simultaneously.
To the Open Door in Manchuria Japan carries the key.


III

Japan's primary commercial advantage over all other nations in South
Manchuria, her railway monopoly, together with the use she is making
of this monopoly and her plans to maintain it, we must now consider
more in detail.

When the war with Russia ended, Japan succeeded Russia in the control
of what is now the South Manchurian Railway, running from Dairen
(formerly Dalny) to Chang-chun, 438 miles, through the very heart of
the country, and she also obtained from China the right "to maintain
and work the military line constructed between Antung and Mukden
_and_"--as if of secondary importance--"to improve the said line so as
to make it fit for the conveyance of commercial and industrial goods
of all nations." The stipulation with regard to the South Manchurian
Railway was that China should have the right to buy it back in 1938,
and with regard to the Antung-Mukden line, in 1932, by paying the
total cost--"all capital and all moneys owed on account of the line
and interest." And just here Japan is playing a wily game.

Consider, for example, the Antung-Mukden line just referred to, now
regarded as a part of the South Manchurian system. Although running
through a very mountainous and sparsely settled area, it is of immense
importance to Japan {84} from a strategic standpoint, connecting Mukden as
it does with the Japanese railway in Korea leading directly to Fusan,
and thus enabling Japan to transport troops across her own territory
to Manchuria without taking any of the risks involved in getting out
of her own waters and boundaries. The paramount military importance of
the line is further indicated by the fact that no one had thought of a
commercial line here at all. Simply as a matter of war-time necessity
Japan stretched a 2-1/2-foot narrow-gauge line across these mountain
barrens to transport her troops in 1905. It is interesting to see,
therefore, how she has now interpreted her right to "work, maintain
and improve"--especially "improve"--this line. In October I spent two
days travelling over its entire length (188 miles), most of the time
on the narrow-gauge part, and I was amazed to see on what a
magnificent scale the new broad-gauge substitute line is now building.
In striking contrast to the traditional Japanese tendency to
impermanence in building, this line is constructed regardless of
expense as if to last for a thousand years. Tunnel after tunnel
through solid rock, the most superb masonry and bridges wherever
streams intervene, the best of ballast to make an enduring
roadbed--all these indicate the style of the new, not "improved" but
utterly reconstructed, line which is building for Japan's benefit at
China's expense--at China's expense directly if she buys it back in
1932, at China's expense indirectly if she doesn't.

It will be remembered, of course, that according to her agreement with
China, Japan was to begin the work of "improving" the Antung-Mukden
line within two years. Whether she was strangely unable to make any
sort of beginning in the period, or whether she purposely delayed it
in order to show her contempt for Chinese sovereignty in Manchuria, it
is difficult to say; what is known is only that the Mikado's
government let its treaty rights lapse, and then when China objected
to a renewal, defied China, and proceeded with the work of
"improvement" by what was euphemistically termed "independent action."

{85}

Incidentally, it may be recalled just here that in the Portsmouth
Peace Treaty Japan and Russia jointly promised the rest of the world
"to exploit their respective railways in Manchuria exclusively for
commercial and industrial purposes and in no wise for strategic
purpose."

That Japan (in the event no other method of getting control of
Manchuria appears) hopes to make the railroads too expensive for the
hard-pressed Peking government to buy back is self-evident. She is
looking far ahead, as those interested in the continuance of the Open
Door policy must also look far ahead. The real Open Door question is
not a matter of the last four or five years or of the next four or
five years, but whether after a comparatively short time the Door is
to be permanently closed as in Korea. If it be said that Japan is only
human in laying many plans to gain so rich an empire, let it also be
said that other nations are only human if they wish to protect their
own interests.


IV

For one thing, as has been suggested, Japan has a perfectly obvious
plan to make the railways too expensive for China to purchase when the
lease expires, and just here some comparisons may be in order. In
Japan proper the government-owned railway stations are severe and
inexpensive structures in which not one yen is wasted for display and
but little for convenience. When I was in Tokyo, for example,
Ex-Premier Okuma, in a public interview, called attention to the
disreputable condition and appearance of the leading station
(Shimbashi) in the Japanese capital, declaring that foreign tourists
must inevitably have their general impressions of the country
unfavorably influenced by it, so primitive and uninviting is its
appearance. But when it comes to the South Manchurian Railway, also
under the control of the Japanese Government (five sixths of the
investment held by the government and one {86} sixth by individual
Japanese), one finds an entirely different policy in force. Handsome
stations, built to accommodate traffic for fifty years to come, have
been erected. In Dairen, "virtually the property of the railway
company," the system has built a magnificent modern city--street
railways, waterworks, electric light plants, macadamized roads, and
beautiful public parks. More than this, the railway company, not
content with the best of equipment for every phase of legitimate
railway work, including handsome stations and railway offices, such as
Japan proper never sees, has also erected hotels which, for the
Orient, may well be styled sumptuous, in five leading cities of
Manchuria. Comparatively few travellers go to Mukden, and yet the
hotel which the South Manchurian Railway has erected there, for
example, is perhaps not excelled in point of furnishing and equipment
anywhere in the Far East.

In buying back the railroads, therefore, China will be expected not
only to pay for the railways themselves but for all the irrelevant
enterprises--hotels, parks, cities--in which the railway companies
have embarked; for lines "improved" beyond recognition, and for lines
built not even with a view to ultimate profit, but for their strategic
importance to a rival and possibly antagonist nation! As an Englishman
said to me: "It's much the same as if I, a poor man, should rent you a
$1000 house, agreeing to stand the expense of some improvements when
taking it back, and you should spend $10,000 in improving my $1000
house--and largely to suit your own peculiar business and purposes."

More than this, Japan, as I have said, is determined to keep her
absolute monopoly on South Manchurian railway facilities. In Article
IV of the Portsmouth Peace Treaty Japan and Russia reciprocally
engaged not to "obstruct any general measures, common to all
countries, which China may take for the development of the commerce
and industry of Manchuria," but in December of the same year Japan
caused China to yield a secret agreement prohibiting any new line "in
the {87} neighborhood of and parallel to" the South Manchurian Railway
or any branch line that "might be prejudicial" to it. Japan, under
threat of arms, forced China to abandon the plan for the
Hsinmintun-Fakumen line after arrangements had been made with an
English syndicate, and later Japan and Russia on the same pretext
prevented the proposed Chinchow-Aigun line across Mongolia and
Manchuria, although a hundred miles or more away from the South
Manchurian line.


V

That Japan, then, holds the whip hand in Manchuria, and expects to
continue to hold it, is very clear. With China as yet too weak to
protect herself, Japan is virtually master of the situation. Let us
ask then--since this is in an American book--whether the Open Door
policy is being enforced even now; to ask it of any one in Manchuria
is to be laughed at. I tried it once in a Standard Oil office and the
man in front of me roared, and an unnoticed clerk at my back,
overhearing so absurd a question, was also unable to contain his
merriment. It is not a question of the fact of the shutting-up policy,
Chinese and foreigners in Manchuria will tell you; it is only a
question as to the extent of that condition.

The truth is that the ink was hardly dry on the early treaties before
the discriminations began. The military railroads, which Japan was in
honor bound to all the world to use only for war purposes, were used
for transporting Japanese goods before the military restrictions with
regard to the admission of other foreign goods were removed. The
Chinese merchant and his patrons were famishing for cotton "piece
goods" and other manufactured products, and the Japanese goods coming
over were quickly taken up and a market for these particular "chops"
or "trademarks" (the Chinaman relies largely on the chop) was
established. By the time European and American goods came back their
market in many cases {88} had already been taken away. In some cases,
too, their trademark rights had been virtually ruined by the closeness
of Japanese imitation. Even on my recent tour, among consuls of three
nations, at Manchurian points, I did not find one who did not mention
some recent case of trademark infringement.

Then came the period of freight discriminations and rebates, when the
Japanese (principally the Mitsui Bussan Kaisha, the one great octopus
of Japanese business and commerce) secured freight rates that
practically stifled foreign business competitors. The railway company
now asserts that rebates (formerly allowed, it alleges, because of
heavy shipments) are no longer given; but in many cases the evil
effects of the former rebating policy remain in that Japanese traders
were thus allowed to rush in during a formative period and establish
permanent trade connections.

Meanwhile, too, the relations between the Japanese Government and the
Mitsui Bussan Kaisha are so close that competitors are virtually in
the plight of having to ship goods over a line owned by a
rival--without any higher tribunal to guarantee equality of treatment.
As was recently declared:

  "Two directors of the South Manchurian Railway are also directors of
  Mitsui Bussan Kaisha. The traffic manager of the railway is an
  ex-employee of Mitsui. The customs force at Dalny is not only
  entirely Japanese--no other foreigner in charge of a Chinese customs
  office employs exclusively assistants of his own nationality--but a
  number of the customs inspectors are ex-employees of Mitsui. The
  Mitsui company also maintains branches all through Manchuria in and
  out of treaty ports. In this way they escape the payment of Chinese
  likin, or toll taxes. The Chinese have agreed that these taxes--2
  per cent, on the value of the goods each time they pass to a new
  inland town--shall not be paid so long as they remain in the hands
  of the foreigner. American piece goods often pay likin tax, two,
  three, or four times, while the Japanese--sometimes legitimately by
  reason of their branch houses, sometimes illegally by bluffing
  Chinese officials or smuggling through their military areas--manage
  to escape likin almost altogether."

It may not be true that the Japanese customs officials at Dairen (the
treaty provides that China shall appoint a Japanese {89} collector at
this port), ignorantly or knowingly, allow Japanese goods to be
smuggled through to Manchuria--although consuls of three nations a few
months ago thought the matter serious enough to suggest an
investigation--but the evasion of likin taxes in the interior is an
admitted fact.

More flagrant still is another violation of international treaty
rights. Under Chinese regulations foreign merchants are not allowed to
do business in the Manchurian interior away from the twenty-four open
marts, but it has been shown that several thousand Japanese are now
stationed within the prohibited area, and Japan's reply to the Chinese
Viceroy's protest is that he should have objected sooner and that it
is now too late. Meanwhile, many Chinese merchants both in the
interior and along the South Manchurian Railway, themselves paying the
regular likin and consumption taxes, are finding themselves unable to
compete with the Japanese, who refuse to pay these taxes. Thus Japan
is gradually rooting out the natives who stand in her way, and, day by
day, tightening her grip on the country.

She is advancing step by step as she did in Korea.

On the whole, the Mikado's subjects seem already to count themselves
virtual masters of the country. Inside their railway areas and
concessions they have their own government; in the majority of cases
while in Manchuria I found it more convenient to use the Japanese
telegraph or the Japanese postal system than the Chinese; and where I
stopped at the little towns along the line it was a Japanese officer
who came to inquire my name and nationality. When I was in Mukden the
German consul there had just had two Chinese meddlers arrested for
spying on his movements, only to find that they were acting under the
direction of Japanese officials who claimed immunity for them! The
fact that they have their soldiers back of them, and that they can be
tried only in their own courts, also gives the Japanese unlimited
assurance in bullying the natives. At Mukden the Japanese bellboy
struck my Chinese rickshaw {90} man to get his attention. At Taolu
some weeks ago some Japanese merchants who were there doing business
illegally (for it is not an open mart) were interfered with, with the
result that the Japanese authorities when I was in Mukden were
preparing a formal demand for satisfaction, including indemnity for
any injury to an unlawful business!

Manifestly, the new masters of Manchuria propose to teach the natives
their place. "If a Chinaman is killed by a Japanese bullet," as a
Chinaman of rank said to me in Manchuria, "the fault is not that of
the man who fired the bullet: the Chinaman is to blame for getting in
the way of it!"


VI

Those who apologize for Japanese aggressiveness in Manchuria, those
who excuse or sympathize with her evident purpose to make Manchuria
walk the way of Korea, have but one argument for their position--the
pitiably abused and threadbare plea that the Japanese have won the
country by the blood they shed in the war with Russia. The best answer
to this is also a quotation from the distinguished and witty Chinaman
just mentioned. "The Japanese," said he, "claimed they were fighting
Russia because she was preparing to rob China of Manchuria; now they
themselves out-Russia Russia. It is much as if I should knock a man
down, saying, 'That man was about to take your watch,' and then take
the watch myself!"

The aptness of the simile is evident. My sympathy, and the sympathy of
every other American acquaintance of mine as far as I can now recall,
was with Japan in her struggle because of our hot indignation over
Russian aggressiveness. But if Japan had said, "I am fighting to put
Russia out only that I may myself develop every identical policy of
aggrandizement that she has inaugurated," it is very easy to see with
what different feelings we should have regarded the conflict.

{91}

Moreover, Japan's legitimate fruits of victory do not extend to the
control or possession of Manchuria. As one of the ablest Englishmen
met on my tour in the Far East pointed out, Japan's purposes in
inaugurating the war were four: (1) to get a preponderating influence
in Korea; (2) to get the control of the Tsushima Straits, which a
preponderating influence in Korea would give her; (3) to drive Russia
from her ever-menacing position at Port Arthur; and (4) to arrest (as
she alleged) the increasing influence and power of Russia in
Manchuria.

All these things she has gained. Furthermore, she now has actual
possession of Korea. The menace of a great Russian navy has been swept
away. Again, she has become (with the consent of England) the
commanding naval power in the eastern Pacific; and she has gained an
influence in South Manchuria at least equal to that which Russia had
previous to the war.

And yet one hears the plea that unless she gets Manchuria her blood
will have been spilt without result! Unless she can do more in the way
of robbing China than she went to war with Russia for doing, she will
not be justified!

Among representatives of five nations with whom I discussed the matter
in Manchuria I found no dissent from the opinion that Japan will never
get out of Manchuria, unless forced to do so by a speedily awakened
China or by the most emphatic and unmistakable attitude on the part of
the Powers. Chinese, English, Americans, Germans--all
nationalities--in Manchuria agree that thus far the way of Manchuria
has been the way of Korea and that only favoring circumstances--a
rebellion fomented in China or whatever excuse may serve--is needed
for the same end to be reached.

Then with Japanese customs duties to complete the shutting out of
foreign goods, now made only partially possible by the discrimination
of a railway monopoly, and with the entire Chinese Empire and foreign
trade rights within it menaced by the added preeminence of Japan, the
people of Europe and America {92} may wake up too late to find out at
last that the Open Door in Manchuria is a matter of somewhat more
general importance than the disturbances in Turkey or the change of
government in Portugal.

Be it said, in conclusion, however, that if the white nations take
heed in time all this may be prevented. China's waking up may serve
the same purpose, but it is doubtful whether she will develop
sufficient military strength for this. In any case there need be and
should be no war, and in describing conditions as I found them my
purpose is to help the cause of peace and not that of bloodshed. For
if the Powers realize the seriousness of the situation and give
evidence of such feeling to Japan that she will realize the bounds of
safety, there will be no trouble. But a continued policy of ignorance,
indifference, or inactivity means that Japan will probably go so far
that she cannot retreat without a struggle. Truth is in the interest
of peace.

Mukden, Manchuria.



{93}


X

LIGHT FROM CHINA ON PROBLEMS AT HOME


I am here in China's ancient capital at one of the most interesting
periods in all the four thousand years that the Son of Heaven has
ruled the Middle Kingdom. The old China is dying--fast dying; a new
China is coming into being so rapidly as to amaze even those who were
most expectant of rapid change. The dreams of twelve years ago, that
have since seemed nothing but dreams, are coming into actual
realization.

Great reforms were then proposed--twelve years ago--and the Emperor
sanctioned edict after edict for their introduction. But their hour
had not yet come.

I talked yesterday with one of the men whose voice was most potent at
that time: a man whose heart was then aflame with the idea of remaking
China. They dared much, did these men, and Tantsetung, a Chinaman of
high rank and a Christian, consecrated himself on his knees to the
great task, with all the devotion of a Hannibal swearing allegiance to
Carthage. But reaction came. The Emperor was deposed and the Empress
Dowager substituted, and Tantsetung and five other leaders were
beheaded.

Now, however, dying Tantsetung's brave words have already been
fulfilled: "You may put me to death, but a thousand others will rise
up to preach the same doctrine." A new reign has come; the Empress
Dowager, dying, has been succeeded by a mere boy, whose father, the
Prince Regent, holds the imperial sceptre. But the sceptre is no
longer all-powerful. {94} For the first time in all the cycles of
Cathay the voice of the people is stronger than the voice of the
Throne. Men do not hesitate any day to say things for which, ten years
ago, they would have paid the penalty with their heads.

There are many things that give one faith in the future of China, but
nothing else which begets such confidence as the success of the
crusade against the opium habit. Four years ago, when the news went
out that China had resolved to put an end to the opium habit within
ten years--had started on a ten years' war against opium--there were
many who scoffed at the whole project as too ridiculous and quixotic
even for praise; there were more who regarded it as praiseworthy but
as being as unpromising as a drunkard's swearing off at New Year's,
while those who expected success to come even in twice ten years
hardly dared express their confidence among well-informed people.

"If there is anything which all our contact with the Chinese has
taught more unquestionably than anything else, it is that the Chinaman
will always be a slave to the opium habit." So said a professedly
authoritative American book on China, published only five years ago,
and to hold any other opinion was usually regarded as contradictory to
common sense. "We white Americans can't get rid of whiskey
intemperance with all our moral courage and all our civilization and
all our Christianity. How then can you expect the poor, ignorant
Chinaman to shake off the clutches of opium?" So it was said, but
to-day the most tremendous moral achievement of recent
history--China's victory over opium-intemperance already assured and
in great measure completed, not in ten years, but in four--stands out
as a stinging rebuke to the slow progress our own people have made in
their warfare against drink-intemperance.

To shake off the opium habit when once it has gripped a man is no easy
task. Officials right here in Peking, for example, died as a result of
stopping too suddenly after the {95} edict came out announcing that no
opium victim could remain in the public service. But a member of the
Emperor's cabinet, or Grand Council, tells me that 95 per cent, of the
public officials who were formerly opium-smokers have given up the
habit, or have been dismissed from office. Five per cent, may smoke in
secret, but with the constant menace of dismissal hanging like a
Damocles sword over their heads, it may be assumed that even these few
are breaking themselves from the use of the drug.

Formerly it was the custom for the host to offer opium to his guests,
but the Chinese have now quite a changed public sentiment. Because
they recognize that opium is ruining the lives of many of their
people, and lessening the efficiency of many others, because they
regard it as a source of weakness to their country and danger to their
sons, it has become a matter of shame for a man to be known as an
opium-smoker, even "in moderation." To be free from such an enervating
dissipation is regarded as the duty not only to one's self and one's
family, but to the country as well: it is a patriotic duty. I saw a
cartoon in a native Chinese paper the other day in which there were
held up to especial scorn and humiliation the weakling officials who
had lost their offices by reason of failure to shake off opium. In
short, the opium-smoker, instead of being a sort of "good fellow with
human weaknessess"--and with possibilities, of course, of going
utterly to wreck--has become an object of contempt, a bad citizen.

The earnestness of the people has been strikingly illustrated in the
great financial sacrifices made by farmers and landowners in sections
where the opium poppy was formerly grown. The culture of the poppy in
some sections was far more profitable than that of any other crop; it
was, in fact, the "money crop" of the people. In fact, to stop growing
the opium poppy has meant in some cases a decrease of 75 per cent, in
the profit and value of the land. Farms mortgaged on the basis of old
land values, therefore, had to be sold; peasants who had {96} been
home-owners became homeless. And yet China has thought no price too
great to pay in the effort to free herself from this form of
intemperance. Well may her leading men proudly declare, as one did to
me to-day: "While America dares not undertake the task of stopping the
whiskey curse among less than a hundred million people, we are
stopping the opium curse among over four hundred millions." It should
also be observed that there is little drunkenness over here. At a
dinner party Friday evening my hostess thought it worth while to
mention as a matter of general interest to her guests (so rare is the
occurrence) that she had seen a drunken Chinaman that day. I have not
yet seen one.

China is waking up, and I am glad she is. She is going into industrial
competition with all the world, and I am glad that she is. I believe
that every strong and worthy nation is enriched by the proper
development of every other nation. But in this coming struggle the
people whom vice or dissipation has rendered weak sooner or later must
go down before the men who, gaining the mastery over every vicious
habit, keep their bodies strong and their minds clear. In thunder
tones indeed does China's victory over opium speak to America. If we
are to maintain our high place among the nations of the earth, if we
are to keep our leadership in wealth and industry, we can do it only
by freeing ourselves, as heroically as the yellow man of the Orient is
doing in this respect, from every enervating influence that now
weakens the physical stamina, blunts the moral sense, or befogs the
brain.

The new China is devoting itself to a number of other reforms to which
the people of America may well give attention. The curse of graft
among her public officials ("squeeze" it is called over here) is one
of the most deep-rooted cancers with which she has to contend.
Officers have been paid small salaries and have been allowed to make
up for the meagreness of their stipends by exacting all sorts of fees
and tips. Before the coming parliament is very old, however, it will
{97} doubtless undertake to do away with the fee and "squeeze" system,
stop grafting, and put all the more important offices on a strict
salary basis. Under the old fee system of paying county and city
officials in the United States, as my readers know, we have often let
enormous sums go into office-holders' pockets when they should have
gone into improving our roads and schools. The Chinese system not only
has this weakness, but by reason of the fact that the fees are not
regularly fixed by law, as is the case with us, the way is opened for
numberless other abuses.

Currency reform is in China a matter hardly second in importance to
the abolition of "squeeze." There is no national currency here; each
province (or state, as we would say) issues its own money when it
pleases, just as the different American states did two generations
ago. I remember hearing an old man tell of going from the Carolinas to
Alabama about 1840 and having to pay heavy exchange to get his
Carolina money changed into Alabama money. So it is in China to-day.
You must get your bills of one bank or province changed whenever you
go into another bank or province, paying an outrageous discount, and a
banking corporation will even discount a bill issued by another branch
of the same corporation. Thus a friend of mine with a five-dollar
Russia-Asiatic banknote from the Peking branch on taking it to the
Russia-Asiatic's branch at Hankow gets only $4.80 for it.

Nor is this all: All kinds of money are in circulation, the values
constantly fluctuating, and hundreds and thousands of men make a
living by "changing money," getting a percentage on each transfer.
Take the so-called 20-cent pieces in circulation; they lack a little
of weighing one fifth as much as the 100-cent dollar; consequently it
takes sometimes 110 and again 112 cents "small coin" to equal one
dollar! The whole system is absurd, of course, and yet when the
government proposes to establish a uniform national currency it is {98}
said that the influence of these money-changers is so great as to make
any reform exceedingly slow and difficult.

And yet let not my readers at home with this statement before them
proceed too hastily to laugh or sneer at China for unprogressiveness.
For my part, as I have thought of this matter of money transfer over
here, the whole question has seemed to me to be on all-fours with our
question of land title transfers at home, and the more I have thought
of it the firmer has the conviction become. In fact, China's failure
to adopt a modern currency system is perhaps even less a sinning
against light than our failure to adopt the Torrens system of
registering land titles. The man who makes a living by changing money
and investigating its value is no more a parasite than the man who
makes a living changing titles or investigating their value; the
hindrance of trade and easy transfer of property is no more excusable
in one case than the other; and the 90 per cent, that China might save
by a better system of money transfers is paralleled by the 90 per
cent, that we might save by a better system of title transfers.

Mr. Money-Changing Banker, fattening needlessly at the expense of the
people, prevents currency reform in China--yes, that is true. But
before we assume superior airs let us see if Mr. Title-Changing
Lawyer, also fattening needlessly at the expense of the people, does
not go to our next legislature and stifle any measure for reforming
land-title registration. And in saying this I am not to be understood
as making any wholesale condemnation of either Chinese bankers or our
American lawyers. The ablest advocates of the Torrens system I know
are lawyers, men who say that lawyers ought to be content with the
really useful ways of earning money and not insist on keeping up
utterly useless and indefensible means of getting fees out of the
people. Such lawyers, indeed, deserve honor; my criticism is aimed
only at those who realize the wisdom of a changed system but are led
by selfishness to oppose it.

{99}

After all, however, the most revolutionary and iconoclastic reform in
the new China is the changed policy of the schools. For thousands of
years the education has been exclusively literary. The aim has been to
produce scholars. A thorough knowledge of the works of the sages and
poets, and the ability to write learned essays or beautiful verses,
this has been the test of merit. When Colonel Denby wrote his book on
China five years ago he could say:

  "The Chinese scholar knows nothing of ancient or modern history
  (outside of China), geography, astronomy, zoology or physics. He
  knows perfectly well the dynastic history of his own country and he
  composes beautiful poems, and these are his only accomplishments."

But now all this is changed. The ancient system of selecting public
officials by examination as to classical scholarship was abolished the
year after Colonel Denby's book was published, and the new ideal of
the school is to train men and women for useful living, for practical
things, and to combine culture with utility. Japanese education now
has the same aim. There, in fact, even the study of the languages is
made to subserve a practical end. Where the American boy studies Latin
and soon forgets it, the Japanese boy studies English and continues to
read English and speak it on occasion the rest of his life, increasing
his efficiency and usefulness in no small measure as a result. In
Japan, too, I found the keenest interest in the teaching of
agriculture to boys and domestic science to girls; and in all these
things China is also moving--blunderingly, perhaps, but yet making
progress--toward the most modern educational ideas.

As a matter of fact, much as America has talked these last ten years
of making the schools train for more useful living, China and Japan
have actually moved relatively much farther away from old standards
than we have done, and if they should continue the same rate of
advance for the next thirty years we may find their schools doing more
for the efficiency {100} of the people than our American schools are
doing. And when I say this let not the cry go up that I am decrying
culture. Already I anticipate the criticism from men who cling to old
standards of education with even more tenacity than absurdly
conservative China has done. I am not decrying culture, but I am among
those who insist that culture may come from a study of useful things
as well as from a study of useless things; that a knowledge of the
chemistry of foods may develop a girl's mind as much as a knowledge of
chemistry that is without practical use; and that a boy may get about
as much cultural value from the knowledge of a language which does put
him into touch with modern life as from the knowledge of a language
which might put him into touch with ancient life but which he will
probably forget as soon as he gets his diploma. Slow-moving and
tradition-cursed China and Japan, as we thought them a generation ago,
have already committed themselves to making education train for actual
life. Has America given anything more than a half-hearted assent to
the idea?

The practical value of this article, I am reminded just here, has to
do almost entirely with legislation. You may wish to remind your
member of the legislature of the parallel between the wasteful and
antiquated money-transfer system in China and the equally wasteful and
antiquated title-transfer system at home; you may wish to inform your
member of the legislature and your school officials of the advance of
practical education in the Orient; and you may wish to remind both
your member of the legislature and your congressman of China's
successful crusade against the opium evil as an incentive for more
determined American effort against the drink evil. Let me conclude
this letter, therefore, with two more facts with which you may <DW8>
your representatives in Washington. (Which reminds me to remark,
parenthetically, that every reform the Chinese are getting to-day
comes as a result of persistently bringing pressure on their
officials; and this {101} parenthetical observation may be as full of
suggestion as any idea I have elaborated at greater length.)

The two facts with which you may stir up your servants in Washington
are just these:

First, in regard to the parcels post. Here in China the other day I
mailed a package by parcels post to another country for about half
what it would have cost me to mail it from one county-seat to another
at home. How long are we going to be content to let so-called
"heathen" countries like China have advantages which so-called
enlightened, progressive America is too slow to adopt?

Secondly, the tariff. Here in the hotel where I write this article one
of the foremost journalists in the Far East tells me that the average
tariff-protected American industry sells goods to Asiatic buyers at 30
per cent. less than it will sell to the people at home. Thirty per
cent., he says, is the usual discount for Oriental trade. An electric
dynamo which is sold in America for $1000, for instance, is sold for
Chinese trade at $550 or $600. Quite a number of times on this trip
have men told me that they can get American goods cheaper over here,
after paying the freight ten thousand miles, than we Americans can buy
them at our own doors. For example, a man told me a few weeks ago of
buying fleece-lined underwear at half what it costs at home; a
missionary tells me that he saves 20 cents on each two-pound can of
Royal baking powder as compared with American prices; Libby's meats
are cheaper in London than in San Francisco; harvesting machinery made
in Chicago is carried across land and sea, halfway around the world,
and sold in far-away Siberia for less than the American farmer can buy
it at the factory gates.

And these are only a few instances. Hundreds of others might be given.
How long the American people are going to find it amusing to be held
up in such fashion remains to be seen.

Peking, China.


{102}


XI

THE NEW CHINA: AWAKE AND AT WORK


Within eighteen months China will have a parliament or a revolution
(she may have both). Such at least is the prediction I am willing to
risk, and it is one which I believe most foreigners in Peking would
indorse.

And the coming of a parliament, popular government, to guide the
destinies of the vast empire over which the Son of Heaven has reigned
supreme for more than four thousand years--this is only one chapter in
the whole marvelous story, not of China Awakening, but of China Awake.
For the breaking with tradition, the acceptance of modern ideas, which
but yesterday was a matter of question, is now a matter of history.
"China Breaking Up" was the keynote of everything written about the
Middle Kingdom ten years ago; "China Waking Up" has been the keynote
of everything treating of it these last five years.

Sir John Jordan, British Minister to China, does not exaggerate when
he declares that in a European sense China has made greater progress
these last ten years than in the preceding ten centuries. The
criticism one hears most often now is, not that the popular leaders
are too conservative, but that they are if, anything, too radical; are
moving, not too slowly, but too rapidly.

Instead of the old charge that China is unwilling to learn what the
West has to teach, I now hear foreigners complain that a little
contact with Europe and America gives a leader {103} undue influence.
"Let an official take a trip abroad and for six months after his
return he is the most respected authority in the empire." Instead of
English missionaries worrying over China's slavery to the opium habit,
we now have English officials embarrassed because China's too rapid
breaking loose from opium threatens heavy deficits in Indian revenues.
Instead of the old extreme "states' rights" attitude on the part of
the provinces, as illustrated by the refusal of the others to aid
Manchuria and Chihli in the war with Japan, the beginnings of an
intense nationalism are now very clearly in evidence. Even Confucius
no longer looks backward. A young friend of mine who is a descendant
of the Sage (of the seventy-fifth generation) speaks English fluently
and is getting a thoroughly modern education, while Duke Kung, who
inherits the title in the Confucian line, is patron of a government
school which gives especial attention to English and other modern
branches--by his direction. Significant, too, is the fact that the
ancient examination halls in Peking to which students have come from
all parts of the empire, the most learned classical scholars among
them rewarded with the highest offices, have now been torn down, and
where these buildings once stood Chinese masons and carpenters are
fashioning the building that is to house China's first national
parliament--unless the parliament comes before this building can be
made ready.

And so it goes. When a man wakes up, he does not wake up in a part of
his body only, he wakes up all over. So it seems with Cathay. The more
serious problem now is not to get her moving, but to keep her from
moving too rapidly. In his Civic Forum address in New York three years
ago, Wu Ting Fang quoted Wen Hsiang's saying, "When China wakes up,
she will move like an avalanche." A movement with the power of an
avalanche needs very careful guidance.

The one question about which every Chinese reformer's heart is now
aflame is that of an early parliament. By the imperial decree of 1908
a parliament and a constitution were {104} promised within nine years.
At that time there was little demand for a parliament, but with the
organization of the Provincial Assemblies in the fall of 1909 the
people were given an opportunity to confer together and were also
given a taste of power. For the first time, too, they seem to have
realized suddenly the serious plight of the empire and the fact that
since the deaths of the late Emperor and Empress Dowager, and the
dismissal of Yuan Shih-Kai by the Prince Regent acting for the infant
Emperor, the Peking government is without a strong leader.
Consequently the demand for a hastened parliament has grown too
powerful to be resisted. True, when the delegates from all the
Provincial Assemblies voiced this demand to the Prince Regent last
spring his reply was the Edict of May 29, declaring that the programme
outlined by their late Majesties, like the laws of the Medes and
Persians, could not be changed. Furthermore, the Throne remarked
significantly: "Let no more petitions or memorials upon this subject
be presented to Us; Our mind is made up."

Unfortunately for the peace of the Regent, however, John Chinaman is
absurdly and obnoxiously persistent on occasion. If you will not heed
other appeals, he may commit suicide on your doorstep, and then you
are bewitched for the rest of your days, to say nothing of your
nights. The talk of an earlier parliament would not down even at the
bidding of the Dragon Throne. Quietly unmanageable delegations waited
upon viceroys and compelled these high officials to petition for a
reopening of the question. Down in Kiang Su a scholar cut off his left
arm and with the red blood wrote his appeal. In Union Medical
Hospital, here in Peking, as I write this, a group of students are
recovering from self-inflicted wounds made in the same cause. Going to
the Prince Regent's, they were told that the Prince could not see
them. "Very well," they declared, "we shall sit here till he does." At
length the Prince sent word that, though he could not receive them, he
would consider their petition, and the students then sliced the {107}
living flesh from their arms and thighs as evidence of their
earnestness, coloring their petition with their blood.


{105}

  [Illustration: PU YI, THE SON OF HEAVEN AND EMPEROR OF THE MIDDLE
  KINGDOM.]
  The baby sovereign of one of the vastest and oldest of empires is
  shown here in the lap of his father. Prince Chun, the Regent.


{106}

  [Illustration: HOW CHINA IS DEALING WITH OPIUM-INTEMPERANCE.]
  Burning a pile of pipes of reformed smokers at Hankow. The amazing
  success of China's crusade to free her people from the opium curse
  may be justly reckoned one of the greatest moral achievements in
  history--a challenge to our Western world.

{107 continued}

At this period of our drama there came upon the stage a new actor, at
first little heeded, but quickly becoming the dominating figure--the
Tzucheng Yuan, or National Assembly. This body, consisting of 100
nobles and men of wealth or scholarship appointed by the Throne, and
100 selected members of Provincial Assemblies approved by the
viceroys, was expected to prove a mere echo of the royal wishes. "It
is evident that the government is to have a docile and submissive
assembly. Mediocrity is the chief characteristic of the members
chosen." So wrote one of the best informed Americans in China, some
weeks before it assembled, October 3. Reuter's press agent in Peking
predicted through his papers that a few pious resolutions would
represent the sum total of the Assembly's labors.

And yet the first day that these two gentlemen went with me to look in
on the Assembly we found it coolly demanding that the Grand Council,
or imperial cabinet, be summoned before it to explain an alleged
breach of the rights of Provincial Assemblies!

From the very beginning the course of this National Assembly in
steadily gathering unexpected power to itself has reminded me of the
old States-General in France in the days just before the Revolution,
and I could not help looking for Danton and Robespierre among the
fiery orators in gown and queue on this occasion. Significantly, too,
I now hear on the authority of an eminent scholar that Carlyle's great
masterpiece is the most popular work of historical literature ever
translated into Chinese. May it teach them some lessons of restraint
as well as of aggressiveness!

Be that as it may, the Assembly has proved untamable in its demands
for an early parliament, not even the hundred government members
standing up against the imperious pressure of public opinion. In late
October the Assembly {108} unanimously petitioned the Throne to hasten the
programme of constitutional government. The day this petition was
presented it was currently rumored in Peking that unless the Prince
Regent should yield the people would refuse to pay taxes. But he
yielded. The trouble now is that he did not yield enough to satisfy
the public, and there is every indication that he will have to yield
again, in spite of the alleged unalterableness of the present plan,
which allows a parliament in 1913 instead of in 1916, as originally
promised. A parliament within eighteen months seems a safe prediction
as I write this.

It also seems safe to prophesy that the powers of the parliament will
be wisely used. In local affairs the Chinese practically established
the rule of the people centuries before any European nation adopted
the idea. Nominally, the local magistrate has had almost arbitrary
power, but practically the control has been in the hands of the
village elders. When they have met and decided on a policy, the
magistrate has not dared run counter to it. In much the same fashion,
governors and viceroys of provinces have been controlled and kept in
check. Thus centuries of practical self-government in local affairs
have given the Chinese excellent preparation for the new departure in
national affairs. What is proposed is not a new power for the people
but only an enlargement or extension of powers they already exercise.

Parliamentary government is the one great accomplishment the Chinese
people are now interested in, because they propose to make it the tool
with which to work out the other Herculean tasks that await them.
Happy are they in that they may set about these tasks inspired by the
self-confidence begotten of one of the greatest moral achievements of
modern times. I refer, of course, to the almost marvellous success of
their anti-opium crusade which I have already discussed.

Mr. Frederick Ward, who has just returned from a visit to many
provinces, finding in all the same surprising success {109} in enforcing
anti-opium regulations, declares: "It is the miracle of the Middle
Kingdom and a lesson for the world."'

China's next great task is the education of her people, and the remedy
for pessimism here is to compare her present condition, not with that
of other nations, but with her own condition ten years ago. A reported
school attendance of less than one million (780,325 to be exact) in a
population of 400,000,000 does not look encouraging, but when we
compare these figures with the statistics of attendance a few years
ago there is unmistakable evidence of progress. In the metropolitan
province of Chihli, for example, I find that there are now more
teachers in government schools than there were pupils six years ago,
and the total attendance has grown from 8000 to 214,637!

Even if China had not established a single additional school, however,
or increased the school attendance by even a percentage fraction, her
educational progress these last ten years would yet be monumental. For
as different as the East is from the West, so different, in literal
fact, are her educational ideals at the present time as compared with
her educational ideals a decade ago. At one fell blow (by the Edict of
1905) the old exclusively classical and literary system of education
was swept away, made sacred though it was by the traditions of
unnumbered centuries. Unfortunately the work of putting the new
policies into effect was entrusted to the slow and bungling hands of
the old literati; but this was a necessary stroke of policy, for
without their support the new movement would have been hopelessly
balked.

The old education taught nothing of science, nothing of history or
geography outside of China, nothing of mathematics in its higher
branches. Its main object was to enable the scholar to write a learned
essay or a faultless poem, its main use to enable him by these means
to get office. Under the old system the Chinese boy learned a thousand
characters before he learned their meaning; after this he took up a
book {110} containing a list of all the surnames in the empire, and the
"Trimetrical Classics," consisting of proverbs and historical
statements with each sentence in three characters. Now he is taught in
much the same way as the Western boy. The old training developed the
powers of memory; the new training the powers of reasoning. The old
education enabled the pupil to frame exquisite sentences; the new
gives him a working knowledge of the world. The old looked inward to
China and backward to her past; the new looks outward to other
countries and forward to China's future. The old was meant to develop
a few scholarly officials; the new, to develop many useful citizens.
"Even our students who go abroad," as a Peking official said to me,
"illustrate the new tendencies. Formerly they preferred to study law
or politics; now they take up engineering or mining."

A consideration of Chinese education, however brief, would not be fair
without mention of the crushing handicap under which her people labor
and must always labor so long as the language remains as it is
to-day--without an alphabet--separate and arbitrary characters to be
learned for each and every word in the language. This means an
absolute waste of at least five years in the pupil's school life,
except in so far as memorizing the characters counts as
memory-training, and five years make up the bulk of the average
student's school days in any country. If it were not for this handicap
and the serious difficulty of finding teachers enough for present
needs, it would be impossible to set limits to the educational advance
of the next twenty years.

The school and the teacher have always been held in the highest esteem
in China. Her only aristocracy has been an aristocracy, not of wealth,
but of scholarship; her romance has been, not that of the poor boy who
became rich, but of the poor boy who found a way to get an education
and became distinguished in public service. Under the old system, if
the son of a hard-working family became noted for aptness in the {111}
village school, if the schoolmaster marked him for a boy of unusual
promise, the rest of the family, with a devotion beautiful to see,
would sacrifice their own pleasure for his advancement. He would be
put into long robes and allowed to give himself up wholly to learning,
while parents, brothers, and sisters found inspiration for their own
harder labors in the thought of the bright future that awaited him.
The difficulty is that education has been regarded as the privilege of
a gifted few, not as the right of all. In a land where scholarship has
been held in such high favor, however, once let the school doors open
to everybody and there is little doubt that China will eventually
acquire the strength more essential than armies or battleships: the
power which only an educated common people can give.

China's next great purpose is to develop an efficient army. "Might is
right" is the English proverb that I have found more often on the
tongues of the new school of Chinese than any other; and we must
confess that other nations seem to have tried hard enough to make her
accept the principle. In the old days there was a saying, "Better have
no son than one who is a soldier." To-day its new foreign-drilled army
of 150,000 to 200,000 men is the boast of the Middle Kingdom, and the
army is said to be the most honestly administered department of the
government. In sharp contrast to the old contempt for the soldier, I
now find one of the ablest journals in the empire (the Shanghai
_National Review_) protesting that interest in military training is
now becoming too intense: "Scarce a school of any pretensions but has
its military drill, extending in some instances as far as equipment
with modern rifles and regular range practice, and we regret to notice
that some of the mission schools have so far forgotten themselves as
to pander to this militarist spirit."

It has often been said, of course, that the Chinese will not make good
soldiers, but whether this has been proved is open to question.
Certainly, in view of their wretchedly inferior {112} equipment, their
failure to distinguish themselves in the war with Japan cannot be
regarded as conclusive. Take, for example, this description by an
eye-witness:

  "Every tenth man [among the Chinese soldiers] had a great silk
  banner, but few were armed with modern weapons. Those who had rifles
  and modern weapons at all had them of all makes; so cartridges of
  twenty different sorts and sizes were huddled together without any
  attempt at classification, and in one open space all sorts were
  heaped on the ground, and the soldiers were fitting them to their
  arms, sometimes trying eight or ten before finding one to fit the
  weapon, throwing the rejected ones back into the heap."

No sort of efficiency on the part of the rank and file could have
atoned for such criminal indifference to equipment on the part of the
officers. It seems to be the opinion of the military authorities with
whom I have talked that the Chinese army is now better manned than
officered. "Wherever there has been a breach of discipline, I have
found it the officers' fault," an American soldier told me.

The annexation of Korea, once China's vassal, by Japan, and that
country's steadily tightening grip on Manchuria have doubtless
quickened China's desire for military strength. Moreover, she wishes
to grow strong enough to denounce the treaties by which opium is even
now forced upon her against her will, and by which she is forced to
keep her tariff duty on foreign goods averaging 5 per cent., alike on
luxuries and necessities.

The fifth among China's Herculean labors is the cleansing of her
Augean stables, and by this I can mean nothing else than the abolition
of the system of "squeeze," or graft, on the part of her officials. In
fact, no other reform can be complete until this is accomplished. The
bulk of every officer's receipts comes not from his salary, which is
as a rule absurdly small, but from "squeezes"--fees which every man
who has dealings with him must pay. In most cases, of course, these
fees have been determined in a general way by long usage, but their
acceptance opens the way for innumerable abuses. High {113} offices are
auctioned off. When I was in Manchuria it was currently reported that
the Governor of Kirin had paid one hundred thousand taels for his
office. When I was in New-chwang the Viceroy of Manchuria had just
enriched himself to the extent of several thousand taels by a visit to
that port. The men who had had favors from him or had favors to ask
left "presents" of a rather substantial character when they called. I
learn from an excellent authority that when an electric lighting
contract was let for Hankow or its suburbs a short time ago the
officials provided a squeeze for themselves of 10 per cent., but that
the Nanking officials, in arranging for electric lights there, didn't
even seem to care whether the plant worked at all or not: they were
anxious only to make a contract which would net them 35 per cent, of
the gross amount! Under such circumstances it is not surprising to
learn that many an office involving the handling of government
revenues has its price as definitely known as the price of stocks or
bonds.

In private business the Chinese have a reputation for honesty which
almost any other nation might envy. With their quickened spirit of
patriotism they will doubtless see to it that their public business is
relieved of the shameless disgrace that the "squeeze system" now
attaches to it.

These are some of the big new tasks to which awakened China is
addressing herself. Of course, the continued development of her
railways is no less important than any other matter I have mentioned,
but railway building cannot be regarded as one of China's really new
tasks. For years she has been alive to the importance of uniting the
people of the different provinces by means of more railways, more
telegraph lines, and better postal service. The increase in number of
pieces of mail handled from 20,000,000 pieces in 1902 to 306,000,000
in the last fiscal year bears eloquent testimony alike to the progress
of the post office and to the growing intelligence of the people. By
telegraph the people of remotest Cathay now make their wishes known to
the Son of Heaven and the {114} Tzucheng Yuan; it was by telephone
that this Tzucheng Yuan, or National Assembly, requested the Grand
Council of the Dragon Empire to appear before it on the day of my
first visit. The slow and stately camel caravans still come down from
Mongolia to Peking--I have seen them wind their serpentine length
through the gates of the Great Wall at Nankou as they have been doing
for centuries past--but no longer do they bring the latest news from
the tribes about Desert Gobi. Across 3500 miles of its barren wastes
an undaunted telegraph line now "hums the songs of the glad parts of
the earth."

It is no longer worth while to speculate upon the probability of a new
China; the question now is as to how the new China is going to affect
the United States and the rest of the world. From our Pacific Coast,
China is our next-door neighbor, and vastly nearer in fact than any
map has ever indicated. Even New York City is now nearer to Shanghai
and Hong Kong, in point of ease of access, than she was to Chicago a
century ago. How Japan's awakening has increased that country's
foreign trade all the world knows--and China has eight times the
population of Japan proper, and twenty-eight times the area, with
almost fabulously valuable natural resources as yet untouched! Some
one has said that to raise the Chinese standard of living to that of
our own people would be (from the standpoint of markets) equivalent to
the creation of four Americas. The importance of bringing about closer
commercial relations between the United States and the Middle Kingdom
can hardly be overestimated.

It is to be hoped, however, that in our desire to cultivate China's
friendship we shall not go to the length of changing our policy of
excluding Asiatic immigration. To the thoughtful student it must be
plain that in the end such a change would lead only to disastrous
reaction. At the same time we might well effect a change in our
methods of enforcing that policy. There is nothing else on land or sea
that the Celestial so much dreads as to "lose face," to be humiliated,
and it {115} is the humiliation that attaches to the exclusion policy
rather than the policy itself that is the great stumbling-block in the
way of thorough cordial relations with America. You wouldn't so much
object to having the servant at the door report his master not at home
to visitors, but you would object to having the door slammed in your
face; and John Chinaman is just about as human as the rest of us.
Moreover, our own friendliness for John should lead us to adopt the
more courteous of these two methods. Why should not our next exclusion
law, therefore, be based upon the idea of reciprocity, and provide
that there shall be admitted into America any year only so many
Chinese laborers as there were American laborers admitted into China
the preceding year?

Finally, it must always be remembered that the awakening of China is a
matter far more profound than any statistics of exports or imports or
railway lines or industrial development. The Dragon Empire cannot
become (as she will) one of the mightiest Powers of the earth, her
four hundred million people cannot be brought (as they will be
brought) into the full current of the world's activities, without
profoundly influencing all future civilization. For its own sake
Christendom should seize quickly the opportunity offered by the
present period of flux and change to help mold the new force that it
must henceforth forever reckon with. "The remedy for the yellow peril,
whatever that may be," as Mr. Roosevelt said while President, "is not
the repression of life, but the cultivation and direction of life."
The school, the mission, the newspaper--these are the agencies that
should be used. Japan has thousands of teachers in China and scores of
newspapers, but no other nation is adequately active. The present
kindly feeling for America guarantees an especially cordial reception
for American teachers, ministers, and writers, and those who feel the
call to lands other than their own cannot find a more promising field
than China.

Peking, China.



{116}


XII

A TRIP INTO RURAL CHINA


I can't get over (and I hope I never shall) my boyish interest in the
great strange animals that walk along behind the steam piano in the
circus parades. And the animals that I like to see most, I believe,
are the elephants and the camels. The elephant has about him such
quiet, titanic, unboasting strength, such ponderous and sleepy-eyed
majesty, as to excite my admiration, but the camel has almost an equal
place in my interest and esteem.

He is a funny-looking beast, is the camel, and he always reminds me of
Henry Cates' story of the very little boy who started making a mud man
in the spring branch, but before he got the second arm on, a storm
came up, and when he came back his man had mysteriously disappeared.
But when Johnny went to town next day and for the first time in his
life saw a one-armed man, the whole mystery cleared, and rushing up,
he demanded: "Why didn't you wait for me to finish you?" Somehow the
camel, like Johnny's mud man, always looks to me as if he got away
before he was finished. He is either a preliminary rough sketch
accidentally turned loose on the world, or else he got warped somehow
in the drying process--great, quiet, shaggy, awkward, serene,
goose-necked, saddle-backed Old Slow and Steady!


{117}

[Illustration: A MAN-MADE DESERT.]


[Illustration: PUMPING WATER FOR IRRIGATION.]
  The destruction of China's mountain forests has made deserts of vast
  areas that were once fair and fruitful. The lower picture, showing
  Chinese pumping water by human treadmill, furnishes another
  illustration of the Orient's waste of labor.


{118}

[Illustration: TRANSPORTATION AND TRAVEL IN CHINA.]
  The camels that come down from Mongolia and wind their unhurried way
  from Chien Men Gate to the Gate of the Heavenly Peace form one of
  the most picturesque of the many picturesque sights in fascinating
  old Peking. The right-hand picture shows the author utilizing the
  most rapid means of transit in the mountains north of Peking.


{116 continued}

Let me confess, therefore, that hardly anything else on my entire tour
has given me more pleasure than the sight of the camel trains about
Peking and all the way to the end of the Nankou Pass in the mountains
north of the ancient Chinese {119} capital. At the Pass this morning I saw
three such camel trains coming down from Mongolia and the Desert of
Gobi: long, slow-moving, romantic caravans that made me feel as if I
had become a character in the Arabian Nights or a contemporary of
Kublai-Khan. One of the trains was the longest I have yet
seen--twenty-five or thirty camels, I should say, treading Indian-file
with their usual unostentatious stateliness, a wooden pin through each
camel's nostrils from which a cord bound him to the camel next ahead,
a few strangely dressed drivers guiding the odd Oriental procession.

Nor were the camels the only strange travellers encountered by my
party, a young Frenchman, the German, and myself, as we rode our
little donkeys mile after mile of rocky way from Nankou village
through the Pass. To begin with, we were ourselves funny-looking
enough, for my donkey was so small that he could almost walk under the
belly of my saddle-horse at home, and my feet almost touched the
ground. The donkeys ridden by my friends were but little larger, and
altogether we looked very much like three clowns riding trick mules--
an effect somewhat heightened when the Frenchman's donkey dropped him
twice in the mud! It was our clothing, however, our ordinary American
and European trousers, coats, overcoats and hats, and the fact that we
wore no queues down our backs, that made us objects of curiosity to
the Mongolian and Manchurian camel-drivers, shepherds, horse-traders,
and mule-pack drivers whom we met on the way, just as we were
interested in the sheepskin overcoats, strange hats, etc., which we
found them wearing along with the usual cotton-padded garments. These
cotton-padded clothes are much like those heavily padded bed-quilts
ineptly called "comforts," and as the poor Chinese in the colder
sections of the empire cannot afford much fire in winter, they add one
layer of cotton padding after another until it is difficult for them
to waddle along.

On the whole, the life and travel we found on our donkey-ride over the
rough roads of Nankou Pass were Biblical in their {120} very
simplicity and primitiveness. Most of the men we meet come from away
up in Mongolia, where no railroad has yet gone, and the camels and the
donkeys (the donkeys in most cases larger than those we rode) bring
down on their backs the Mongolian products--wool, hides, grain,
etc.--and carry back coal, clothing, and the other simple supplies
demanded by the rude peasantry of Mongolia. We met several pack trains
of donkeys, sometimes twenty-five or forty, I suppose, each carrying a
heavy load of sacks on his back, or perhaps big, well-packed baskets
or goods-boxes carefully balanced. A horse over here will tote about
as much as a horse at home would pull. Then there were several immense
droves of sheep: in one drove two or three thousand, I estimated, and
every sheep with a black face and a white body, so that the general
effect was not unlike seeing a big bin of black-eyed peas. The Chinese
raise immense numbers of long-eared black hogs, too, and drive them to
market loose in the same way that they drive their sheep. We also met
two or three droves of mountain horses, a hundred or more to the
drove.

But it would have been well worth while to make the trip if we had
gotten nothing else but the view of and from the Great Wall at the end
of the journey. About two thousand miles of stone and brick,
twenty-seven feet high, and wide enough on top for two carriages to
drive abreast, this great structure, begun two thousand years ago to
keep the wild barbarian Northern tribes out of China, is truly "the
largest building on earth," and one of the world's greatest wonders.
It would be amazing if it wound only over plains and lowlands, but
where we saw it this morning it climbed one mountain height after
another until the topmost point towered far above us, dizzy,
stupendous, magnificent. By what means the thousands and thousands of
tons of rock and brick were ever carried up the sheer steep
mountainsides is a question that must excite every traveller's wonder.
Certainly no one who has walked on top of the great wall, climbing
among the clouds from one {121} misty eminence to another, as we did
to-day, can ever forget the experience.

Perhaps it was well enough, too, that the weather was not clear. The
mists that hung about the mountain-peaks below and around us; the
roaring wind that shepherded the clouds, now driving them swiftly
before it and leaving in clear view for a minute peak after peak and
valley after valley, the next minute brushing great fog-masses over
wall and landscape and concealing all from view--all this lent an
element of mystery and majesty to the experience not out of keeping
with our thought of the long centuries through which this strange
guard has kept watch around earth's oldest empire. Dead, long dead and
crumbled into dust, even when our Christian era began, were the hands
that fashioned these earlier brick and laid them in the mortar, and
for many generations thereafter watchmen armed with bows and arrows
rode along the battlements and towers, straining their eyes for sight
of whatever enemy might be bold enough to try to cross the mighty
barrier.

However unwise the spirit in which the wall was built, we cannot but
admire the almost matchless daring of the conception and the almost
unparalleled industry of the execution. Beside it the digging of our
Panama Canal with modern machinery, engines, steam power and
electricity, considered simply as a feat of Herculean labor, is no
longer a subject for boasting. To my mind, the very fact that the
Chinese people had the courage to conceive and attempt so colossal an
enterprise is proof enough of genuine greatness. No feeble folk could
even have planned such an undertaking.

On this trip into the heart of China, however, I have noticed a number
of things of decidedly practical value in addition to the merely
curious things I have just reported. In the first place, I have been
simply amazed to find that these Chinese farmers around Peking,
Nankou, and Tien-tsin are far ahead of some of our farmers in the
matter of horsepower help in plowing.

{122}

Coming up from Peking to Nankou, I found farmers in almost every field
busy with their fall plowing or late grain sowing, and while there
were dozens and dozens of three-horsepower plows, I saw only one or
two one-horsepower plows on the whole trip. This is all the more
surprising in view of the fact that labor is so cheap over here--15
cents a day American money would be a good wage for farm hands--but
evidently the farmers realize that although plow hands are cheap, they
must have two or three horses in order to get the best results from
the soil itself. One-horse plows do not put the land in good
condition. With two, three, or four horses or donkeys (they use large
donkeys for plowing, even if small ones for riding) they get the land
in good condition in spite of the fact that they cannot get the good
plows that any American farmer may buy. I rode donkey-back through
some farming country yesterday and watched the work rather closely.
The plows, like those in Korea, have only one handle, but are much
better in workmanship. Here they are made by the village
carpenter-blacksmith, and have a large steel moldboard in front, and
below it a long, sharp, broad, almost horizontal point.

The Chinese farmers, it should also be observed in passing, fully
realize the importance of land rolling and harrowing. It is no
uncommon sight to see a man driving a three-horse harrow. It is also
said that for hundreds of years the Chinese have practised a suitable
rotation of crops and have known the value of leguminous plants.

Nankou Pass, China.



{123}


XIII

FROM PEKING TO THE YANGTZE-KIANG


I shall have to go back to Peking some time. You must hurry out of the
city, men tell you there, or else ere you know it the siren-like Lure
of the East will grip you irresistibly; and I felt in some measure the
soundness of the counsel. The knowledge that each day the long trains
of awkward-moving camels are winding their unhurried way from
Chien-Men Gate to the Gate of the Heavenly Peace, the yellow-tiled
roofs of the Forbidden City gleaming ahead of them, while to the left
are the faint gray-blue outlines of the Western Hills--all this will
be to me a silent but perpetual invitation to go back.

The very life in the streets presents a panorama of never-failing
interest. One can never forget the throngs of Chinese men in gowns and
queues (the wives wear the trousers over here!), the nobles and
officers in gorgeous silks and velvets; the fantastic head-dress of
the Manchu ladies, and the hobbling movements of the Chinese women
hampered by ruined feet; the ever-hurrying rickshaws with perspiring,
pig-tailed coolies in the shafts; the heavy two-wheeled Peking carts
like half-sized covered wagons; the face of some fashionable foreign
or native woman glimpsed through the glass windows of her sedan chair,
eight runners bearing on their shoulders their human burden; the long
lines of shop fronts with such a pleasing variety of decorative color
as to make one wonder why artists have not made them famous; the
uniformed soldiers from every nation on the earth to guard the various
legations, and {124} Chinese soldiers with cropped hair and foreign
clothing. The strange street noises, too, will linger in one's memory
ever after: the clattering hoofs of fleet Mongolian ponies, the
jingling bells of the thousands of sturdy little saddle donkeys, the
rattling of the big cowbells on the dusty camels, the clanging gong of
a mandarin's carriage, outriders scurrying before and behind to bear
testimony to his rank, and the sharp cries of peddlers of many kinds,
their wares balanced in baskets borne from their shoulders.

Or perhaps there is a blaze in the street ahead of you. Some man has
died and his friends are burning a life-sized, paper-covered horse in
the belief that it will be changed into a real horse to serve him in
the Beyond; and imitations of other things that might be useful to him
are burned in the same way.

Or perhaps a marriage procession may pass. A dozen servants carry
placards with emblems of the rank of the family represented by the
bride or groom, numerous other servants bear presents, and the bride
herself passes by concealed in a gorgeous sedan chair borne on the
shoulders of six or eight coolies.

Fascinating as it is for its present-day interest, however, Peking is
even richer in historic interest. And by historic in China is not
meant any matter of the last half-hour, such as Columbus's discovery
of America or the landing at Plymouth Rock; these things to the
Chinaman are so modern as to belong rather in the category of recent
daily newspaper sensations along with the Pinchot-Ballinger
controversy or the Thaw trial. If he wishes something genuinely
historic, he goes back three or four thousand years. For example, a
friend of mine, at a little social gathering in New England some time
ago, heard a young Chinese student make a talk on his country.
Incidentally he was asked about a certain Chinese custom. "Yes,"' he
answered, "that is our custom now, since we changed. But it has not
always been so. We did the other way up to four or five centuries
before Christ." Whereupon the audience, amazed at the utterly casual
mention of an event two thousand {125} years old as if it were a happening
of yesterday, was convulsed in merriment, which the young Chinaman was
entirely unable to understand.

When Christ was born Peking (or what is now Peking, then bearing
another name), having centuries before grown into eminence, had been
destroyed, rebuilt, and was then entering upon its second youth. About
the time of the last Caesars it fell into the hands of the Tartars,
who gave place to the Mongols after 1215. It was during the reign of
the Mongol Emperor, Kublai Khan, that Marco Polo visited his capital,
then called Cambulac. Seventy-three years before Columbus discovered
America the Emperor Yung-loh, whose tomb I saw near Nankou, built the
great wall that surrounds the Tartar City to this day--forty feet
high, wide enough on top for four or five carriages to drive abreast,
and thirteen miles around.

Yet the history which the foreigner in Peking is likely to have most
often in mind is really very recent. For it has been only ten years
and a few months since the famous Boxer outbreak. The widely current
idea is that this Boxer movement originated in anti-missionary
sentiment, but this is not borne out by the facts. The late Col.
Charles Denby, long American Minister to China, pointed out very
clearly that the main cause was opposition to the land-grabbing
policies of European nations. Once started, however, it took the form
of opposition to everything foreign--missionaries and non-missionaries
alike. I passed the old Roman Catholic Cathedral the other day in
company with a friend who gave me reminiscences of the siege that
sounded like echoes of the days of the martyrs; stories of Chinese
Christian converts butchered like sheep by their infuriated fellow
countrymen. When the Pei-tang, in another part of the city, was
finally rescued by foreign troops, the surviving Christians and
missionaries were dying of starvation; they had become mere wan,
half-crazed skeletons, subsisting on roots and bark.

The heroism shown by many of the Chinese Christian converts {126}
during this Boxer uprising has enriched the history not only of the
church, but of mankind; for what man of us is not inspired to worthier
things by every high deed of martyrdom which a fellowman anywhere has
suffered? Into the Pei-tang the Boxers hurled arrow after arrow with
letters attached offering immunity to the Chinese converts if they
would abandon their Christian leaders, but not even starvation led one
to desert. Colonel Denby estimated that in the whole empire 15,000
Chinese Christians were butchered and that only 2 per cent of them
abandoned their faith. A missionary told me the other day of one
family who took refuge in a cave, but when finally smoked out by
suffocating flames, refused life at the cost of denying their Master,
and went to death singing a hymn in Chinese, "Jesus Is Leading Me." At
Taiyan-fu an especially touching incident occurred: Five or six young
girls, just in their teens, were about to be killed, when a leader
intervened, declaring: "It is a pity to slaughter mere children," and
urged them to recant. Their only answer was: "Kill us quickly, since
that is your purpose; we shall not change." And they paid for their
faith with their lives.

I am writing this down on the Yangtze-Kiang (Kiang means river in
Chinese), having boarded a steamer at Hankow, the famous Chinese
industrial centre, about 600 miles south of Peking. About Hankow I
found farming much more primitive than that around Peking, Nankou, and
Tientsin. Instead of the three and four horse plows I found in North
China, the plowmen about Hankow seem to rely chiefly on a single ox.
The farms, too, are much smaller. No one here speaks of buying a
"farm"; he buys a "field." In Kwang-tung there is a saying that one
sixth of an acre "will support one mouth." As nearly as I can find
out, the average wages paid farm laborers is about 10 cents (gold) a
day. The average for all kinds of labor, a member of the Emperor's
Grand Council tells me, is about 35 to 38 cents Mexican, or 15 to 18
cents gold a day.

In forming a mental picture of a rural scene anywhere in {127} China
or Japan there are three or four things that must always be kept in
mind. One is that there are no fences between fields; I haven't seen a
wooden or wire farm-fence since I left America. A high row or ridge
separates one field from another, and nothing else. In the next place,
there are no isolated farm-houses. The people live in villages, from
ten to fifty farmhouses grouped together, and the laborers go out from
their homes to the fields each morning and return at evening. The same
system, it will be remembered, prevails in Europe; and as population
becomes denser and farms grow smaller in America, we shall doubtless
attempt to group our farm homes also. Even now, much more--vastly
more--might be done in this respect if our farmers only had the plan
in mind in building new homes. Where three or four farms come near
together, why should not the dwellings be grouped near a common
centre? It would mean much for convenience and for a better social
life. Another notable difference from our own country is the absence
of wooden buildings or of two-story buildings of any kind. In this
part of China the farmhouse is made of mud bricks, or mud and reeds,
or else of a mixture of mud and stone, and is usually surrounded by a
high wall of the same material.

Again, there are no chimneys. While my readers are basking in the
joyous warmth of an open fire these wintry nights they may reflect
that the Chinaman on this side of the earth enjoys no such comfort.
Enough fire to cook the scanty meals is all that he can afford. To
protect themselves against cold, as I have already pointed out, the
poor put on many thicknesses of cotton-padded cloth. The rich wear
furs and woolens. When a coolie has donned the maximum quantity of
cotton padding he is about as nearly bomb-proof as an armor-plated
cruiser. Certainly no ordinary beating would disturb him.

At this time of the year (the late fall) farmers are busy plowing and
harrowing. On my last Sunday in Peking I went out to the Temple of
Agriculture, where each spring the Emperor or Prince Regent comes and
plows sixteen rows, the purpose {128} being to bear testimony to the
high honorableness of agriculture and its fundamental importance to
the empire. This happens, as I have said, in early spring, but it is
in late fall that Chinese do most plowing. They are also busy now
flailing grain on ancient threshing-floors of hard-baked earth, or
grinding it in mills operated by a single donkey.

In this part of China the mound-like graves of the millions--possibly
billions--of the Chinese dead are even more in evidence than in the
northern provinces. Let China last a few more thousand years with its
present customs and the country will be one vast cemetery, and the
people will have to move away to find land to cultivate. As not one
grave in a thousand is marked by a stone of any kind, it would seem as
if they would not be kept up, but the explanation is that each
Chinaman lives and dies hard by the bones of his ancestors. The care
of their graves is one of life's most serious duties. Even when John
goes to America, half his fortune, if need be, will be used to bring
his body back to the ancestral burying ground.

In a land so given over to superstition I have no doubt that the most
horrible disasters would also be expected as the penalty for
interfering with any grave. It seems odd that a people who had a
literature centuries before our Anglo-Saxon ancestors emerged from
barbarism should now be the victims of superstitions almost as gross
as those prevailing in Africa; but such are the facts. Chang
Chih-tung, who died a few months ago, was one of the most progressive
and enlightened Chinese statesmen of the last hundred years, but not
even a man of his type could free himself from the great body of
superstition handed down from generation to generation.

In Wuchang I crossed an amazingly steep, high hill known as "Dragon
Hill," because of the Chinese belief that a dragon inhabits it. This
long hill divides the city into two parts; every day hundreds and
sometimes possibly thousands of people must climb up one side and down
the other in getting from one part of the town to another. Therefore,
when Chang {129} Chih-tung was Viceroy in Hankow he decided that he
would make a cut in this hill and save the people all this trouble.
And he did. Very shortly thereafter, however, he sickened of a painful
abscess in his ear, and the Chinese doctors whom he consulted were
quick in pointing out the trouble. By making the cut in the hill, they
told him, he had offended the earth dragon which inhabits it, and
unless the cut were filled up Chang might die and disaster might come
upon the city. Of course, there was nothing for him to do but to
restore the ancient obstruction to travel, and so it remains to this
day.

In sight from Dragon Hill is another hill known as Tortoise Hill,
supposed to be inhabited by a tortoise spirit or devil, and at its
foot are some lakes in which it has long been said that the tortoise
washes its feet. Now these lakes are on property owned by the Hanyang
Steel & Iron Works and they decided a few years ago that they would
either drain off the water or else fill up the lakes so as to get more
land. But before they got started the Chinese civil authorities heard
of it and notified the Hanyang Company that such a proceeding could
not be tolerated. The tortoise would have nowhere to wash his feet,
and would straightway bring down the wrath of Heaven on all the
community!

It is from superstitions such as these that the schools must free the
Chinese before the way can be really cleared for the introduction of
Christianity. The teacher is as necessary as the preacher. And the
task of getting the masses even to the point where they can read and
write is supremely difficult. The language, it must be remembered, has
no alphabet. Each word is made not by joining several letters
together, as with us, but by making a distinct character--each
character an intricate and difficult combination of lines, marks, and
dots. Or perhaps the word may be formed by joining two distinct
characters together. For example, to write "obedience" in Chinese you
write together the characters for "leaf" and "river," the significance
being that true obedience is as trusting {130} and unresisting as the
fallen leaf on the river's current. My point is, however, that for
each word a distinct group of marks (like mixed-up chicken tracks)
must be piled together, and the task of remembering how to recognize
and write the five thousand or more characters in the language would
make an average American boy turn gray at the very thought. My friend
Doctor Tenney, of the American Legation in Peking, asserts that at
least five years of the average Chinese pupil's school life might be
saved if the language were based on an alphabet like ours instead of
on such arbitrary word-signs.

There is one thing that must be said in favor of the Chinese system of
education, however, and that is the emphasis it has always laid on
moral or ethical training. The teaching, too, seems to have been
remarkably effective. Take so basic a matter as paying one's debts,
for example: it is a part of the Chinaman's religion to get even with
the world on every Chinese New Year, which comes in February. If he
fails to "square up" at this time he "loses face," as his expressive
phrase has it. He is a bad citizen and unpopular. Consequently all
sorts of things may be bought cheaper just before the New Year than
any other time. Every man is willing to make any reasonable sacrifice,
selling his possessions at a great discount if necessary, rather than
have a debt against him run over into the new period--an excellent
idea for America!

I do not know whether Confucianism is responsible for this particular
policy, but at any rate the fact remains that outside the Bible the
world has never known a more sublime moral philosophy than that of
Confucius. It means much, therefore, that every Chinese pupil must
know the maxims and principles of the great sage by heart. Moreover,
as Confucius did not profess to teach spiritual truth, the
missionaries in China are fast coming to realize that it is both
unnecessary and foolish to urge the people to abandon Confucianism.
The proper policy is to tell the Chinese, "Hold on to all that is good
and true in Confucius. There is very little in his teachings that is
{131} in conflict with religion, and Christian leaders now recognize
him as one of the greatest moral forces the world has known. But to
the high moral teaching of the Chinese master you must add now the
moral teachings of Christianity and, more essential still, the great
body of spiritual truth which Confucianism lacks." The grand old man
among Chinese missionaries, Dr. W. A. P. Martin, who has been in the
work since 1850, said to me in Peking, "Some of the best Christians
are now the best Confucianists."

Confucianism, as any one can see by reading the books, is no more a
substitute for Christianity than Proverbs is for St. John's Gospel. As
Doctor Brewster, another missionary, says, "We do not ask an American
scholar to renounce Plato to become a Christian; why should we ask a
Chinaman to renounce Confucius?"

Confucius lived five centuries before Christ, and at his old home in
Shantung are the graves alike of his descendants and his
ancestors--the oldest family burying ground in the world. "No monarch
on earth can trace back his lineage by an unbroken chain through so
many centuries." In Peking I was so fortunate as to form a friendship
with a descendant of Confucius of the seventy-fifth generation--Mr.
Kung Hsiang Koh--a promising and gifted senior in the Imperial College
of Languages. At my request he inscribed a scroll for me in beautiful
Chinese characters, representing one of my favorite quotations from
his world-famous ancestor. I give an English translation herewith:

  "Szema-New asked about the Superior Man. The Master said, 'The
  superior man is without anxiety or fear.'

  "'Being without anxiety or fear,' said New, 'does this constitute
  what we should call the superior man?'

  "The Master replied, 'When a man looks inward and finds no guilt
  there, why should he grieve? or what should he fear?'"

On board _S. S. Kutwo_, Yangtze River, China.



{132}


XIV

SIDELIGHTS ON CHINESE CHARACTER AND INDUSTRY


Having mentioned some of the good points of John Chinaman (and he has
many excellent points), it is also necessary to point out some of his
shortcomings. The trouble with John is that he had some tiptop
ancestors, but he fell into the habit of looking backward at them so
continuously that he has failed, in recent centuries, to make any
further progress. He had a civilization and a literature when our
white ancestors were wearing skins; but there he stopped, so that we
have not only caught up with him, but have passed him almost
immeasurably. The result is that now China is waking up to find that a
great number of ancient abuses, both in public and private life, must
be sloughed off if she is to become a genuinely healthy modern nation.

Of what has been accomplished with reference to opium I have already
written at length. But this is only a beginning.

With the opium evil under foot, China will still have other dragons to
slay--if I may use the term dragon in an evil sense in a country whose
national emblem is the dragon. For one thing, slavery still exists in
China. A friend of mine in Peking told me of an acquaintance, an
educated Chinaman, who bought a young girl two years ago for two
hundred taels (about $120 gold), and says now he would not take one
thousand two hundred (about $720 gold). Already, however, a vigorous
sentiment for the complete abolition of slavery has {133} developed
over the empire. About six months ago an imperial edict was issued
prohibiting slave trading, decreeing that child-slaves should become
free on reaching the age of twenty-five, and opening ways for older
slaves to buy their freedom. The peons or slaves of the Manchu princes
were, however, excepted from the terms of this edict.

Foot-binding also continues a grievous and widespread evil. Formerly
every respectable Chinese father bound the feet of all his girls.
Fathers who did not were either degraded men, reckless of public
opinion, or so bitterly poor as to require the services of their
daughters in unremitting manual labor. Consequently, a natural foot on
a woman became a badge of social inferiority: a Chinaman of prominence
wouldn't marry her. Now, however, many of the wealthier upper-class
Chinamen in the cities are letting their girls grow up with unbound
feet, and this custom will gradually spread until the middle and lower
classes generally, seeing that fashion no longer decrees such a
barbaric practice, will also abandon it.

The progress of the reform, however, is by no means so rapid as could
be wished. A father with wealth may risk getting a husband for his
daughter even though she has natural feet, but ambitious fathers among
the common people fear to take such risks. An American lady whose home
I visited has a servant who asked for two or three weeks' leave of
absence last summer, explaining that he wished to bind the feet of his
baby daughter. My friend, knowing all the cruelty of the practice, and
having a heart touched by memories of the heart-rending cries with
which the poor little creatures protest for weeks against their
suffering, pleaded with the servant to let the child's feet alone. But
to no effect. "Big feet no b'long pretty," he said, and went home
unconvinced.

"The feet," according to the brief statement of ex-Minister Charles
Denby, "are bandaged at an age varying from three to five years. The
toes are bent back until they penetrate the sole of the foot, and are
tightly bound in that position. The {134} parts fester and the toes
grow into the foot." The result is that women grow up with feet the
same size as when they were children, and the flesh withers away on
the feet and below the knees. Throughout life the fashion-cursed girl
and woman must hobble around on mere stumps. When you first see a
Chinese woman with bound feet you are reminded of the old pictures of
Pan, the imaginary Greek god with the body of a man and the feet of a
goat. The resemblance to goat's feet is remarkably striking. As the
women are unable to take proper exercise--except with great
pain--there is little doubt that their physical strength has been
seriously impaired by this custom, and that the stamina of the whole
race as well has suffered in consequence.

Whenever a foreigner--it is the white man who is "the foreigner" over
here--begins a comparison or contrast between the Chinese and the
Japanese, he is sure to mention among the first two or three things
the vast difference in moral standards with regard to family life. The
cleanness of the family life in China, he will tell you, is one of the
great moral assets of the race, while the contrary conditions largely
prevailing in Japan would seem to threaten ultimate disaster to the
people.

As in most Asiatic countries, however, there is in China no very
definite moral sentiment against a man's marrying more than one wife.
In fact, it is regarded not as a question of morals but of expense. It
is one of the privileges of the Chinaman who can afford it, and the
No. 1 wife is often glad for her husband to take a No. 2 and a No. 3
wife, because the secondary wives are somewhat under her authority and
relieve her of much work and worry. A few months ago a Chinaman in
Hankow had a very capable No. 2 wife who was about to quit him to work
for some missionaries, whereupon Wife No. 1, Wife No. 3, and the
much-worried husband all joined in a protest against the household's
losing so capable a woman.

All these three wives were in subjection to the husband's mother,
however, until the old lady took cholera last year, and {135} in a day
or so was dead. The prevalence of awful scourges, such as cholera and
bubonic plague, is another evil which the new China must conquer.
These diseases are due mainly, of course, to unsanitary ways of
living, and when you have been through a typical Chinese city you
wonder that anybody escapes. The streets are so narrow that with
outstretched arms you can almost reach from side to side, and the
unmentionable foulness of them often smells to heaven.

Moreover, if you have the idea that the typical Chinaman is content to
live only on rice, prepare to abandon it. Hogs are more common in a
village of Chinamen than dogs in a village of <DW64>s; and, in some
cases, almost equally at home in the houses. I saw a Chinese woman in
Kiukiang feeding a fat porker in the front room, while, in the narrow
streets around, hogs and dogs were wandering together or lying
contentedly asleep in the sunshine by the canal bank. In fact, the
ancient Chinese character for "home" is composed of two
characters--"pig" and "shelter"--a home being thus represented as a
pig under a shelter!

Small wonder that cholera is frequent, smallpox a scourge, and leprosy
in evidence here and there. Quite recently a couple of mission
teachers of my denomination have died of smallpox: they "didn't
believe in vaccination." Shanghai, as I write this, is just recovering
from a bubonic plague scare. There were one or two deaths from the
plague among the Chinese, whereupon the foreigners put into force such
drastic quarantine regulations that the Chinese rebelled with riots.
The whites then put their cannon into position, the volunteer soldiers
were called out, and it looked at one time as if I should find the
city in a state of bloody civil war, but fortunately the trouble seems
now to have blown over.

Unfortunately the ignorant Chinese put a great deal more faith in
patent medicines and patent medicine fakirs than they do in approved
sanitary measures. It is interesting to find that American patent
medicines discredited at home by {136} the growing intelligence of our
people have now taken refuge in the Orient, and are coining the poor
Chinaman's ignorance into substantial shekels. Worst of all, some of
the religious papers over here are helping them to delude the
unintelligent, just as too many of our church papers at home are
doing.

In Shanghai I picked up a weekly publication printed in Chinese and
issued by the Christian Literature Society, and asked what was the
advertisement on the back. "Dr. Williams's Pink Pills for Pale
People," was the answer.

One of the most peculiar things about China is the existence of almost
unlimited official corruption side by side with high standards of
honesty and morality in ordinary business or private life. I have
already referred to the system of "squeeze" or graft by which almost
every official gets the bulk of his earnings. In Shanghai it is said
that the Taotai, or chief official there, paid $50,000 (gold) for an
office for which the salary is only $1500 (gold) a year.

Against this concrete evidence of official corruption place this
evidence of a high sense of honor in private life. A young Chinaman,
employed in a position of trust in Hankow, embezzled some money. The
company, knowing that his family was one of some standing, notified
the father. He and his sons, brothers of the thief, went after the
young fellow and killed him with an ax. The community as a whole
approved the action, because in no other way could the father free his
family from the disgrace and ostracism it would have incurred by
having an embezzler in it.


{137}
[Illustration: FASHIONABLE CHINESE DINNER PARTY.]

[Illustration: HOW LUMBER IS SAWED IN THE ORIENT--THERE ARE
PRACTICALLY NO SAW MILLS.]


{138}

[Illustration: A QUOTATION FROM CONFUCIUS.]
  This is the upper part of a scroll kindly written for the author by
  Mr. Kung Hsiang Koh (or Alfred E. Kung as he signs himself in
  English). Mr. Kung is a descendant of Confucius (Kung Fut-zu) of the
  seventy-fifth generation, and the complete quotation of which the
  scroll is a reproduction in Chinese characters reads as follows:

  "Ssu-ma Niu asked for a definition of the princely man."

  "The Master said: 'The princely man is one who knows neither grief
  nor fear.' 'Absence of grief and fear?' said Niu, 'Is this the mark
  of a princely man?' The Master said, 'If a man look into his heart
  and find no guilt there, why should he grieve? Or of what should he
  be afraid?'"


{136 continued}

The Yangtze River trip from Hankow to Shanghai, mentioned in my last
letter, I found very interesting. We were three days going the 600
miles. The Yangtze is the third largest river in the world and
navigable 400 miles beyond Hankow, or 1000 miles in all. It would be
navigable much farther but for a series of waterfalls. Nearly thirty
miles wide toward the mouth, its muddy current discolors the ocean's
blue forty miles out in the Pacific, I am told. In fact, I think {139}
it must have been that distance that I last saw the great turgid
stream off the Shanghai harbor. Even as far up as Hankow the river
becomes very rough on windy days. Consequently, when I wished to go
across to Wuchang, I found that the motor boat couldn't go, so
tempestuous were the waves, but a rather rickety looking little native
canoe called a "sampan," with tattered sails, bobbing up and down like
a cork, finally landed me safely across the three or four miles of
sea-like waves. All the way from Hankow to Peking one encounters all
sorts of Chinese junks and other odd river-craft. In many cases they
look like the primitive Greek and Roman boats of which one sees
pictures in the ancient histories. The Chinese are excellent sailors
and manage their boats very skilfully. The greatest canal that the
world knows was begun by them in the time of Nebuchadnezzar and
finished thirteen centuries ago.

Until very recently, however, the Chinese have not wanted railways.
Coming from Hankow to Shanghai I passed in sight of the site of the
old Woosung-Shanghai Railway, the first one built in China; but before
it got well started the people tore it up and threw it into the river.

In Shanghai I met his Excellency Wu Ting Fang, formerly Minister to
the United States, and he told me of his troubles in building, under
Li Hung Chang's directions, what turned out to be the first permanent
railway in China. This was less than twenty-five years ago. Li Hung
Chang said to Mr. Wu: "If we ask the authorities to let us build a
railway, they'll refuse, so I am going to take the responsibility
myself. The only way to overcome the prejudice against railways is to
let the people see that a railroad isn't the evil they think it is."
Accordingly, Mr. Wu set to work on the Tongshan Railway. He built
first ten miles, then twenty more. Then as the road was working well,
and its usefulness demonstrated, he and Li Hung Chang thought they
might get permission from the Throne to construct a line from Tientsin
to Peking. Successful in this effort, they went ahead with the survey
and {140} imported from America the materials for building the
line--and then came a new edict forbidding them to proceed! The matter
had been taken up by the viceroys and governors, and 80 per cent, of
them had opposed building the line!

Now, less than twenty-five years later, John Chinaman is calling for
railroads in almost every non-railroad section, and the railroads
already built are paying handsome dividends. Everybody seems to
travel. Besides the first-class and second-class coaches, most trains
carry box-cars, very much like cattle-cars and without seats of any
kind, for third-class passengers. And I don't recall having seen one
yet that wasn't chock full of Chinamen, happy as a similar group of
Americans would be in new automobiles. A missionary along the line
between Hankow and Peking says that he now makes a 200-mile trip in
five hours which formerly took him nineteen days. Before the railway
came he had to go by wheelbarrow, ten miles a day, his luggage on one
side the wheel, and himself on the other. Thousands of these
wheelbarrows, doing freight and passenger business, are in use in
Shanghai and the regions roundabout. A frame about three feet wide and
four feet long is built over and around the wheel, and a coolie will
carry as much as half a ton on one of them.

Along the Yangtze a considerable quantity of cotton is grown, and I
went out into some of the fields in the neighborhood of Shanghai. The
stalks were dead, of course, and in some cases women were pulling them
up for fuel, but I could see that the Chinese is a poorer variety than
our American cotton, and is cultivated more poorly. Instead of
planting in rows as we do, the peasants about Shanghai broadcast in
"lands" eight or ten feet wide, as we sow wheat and oats. About
Shanghai they do not use the heavier two and three horse plows I found
about Peking; consequently the land is poorly broken to begin with,
and the cultivation while the crop is growing amounts to very little.
No sort of seed selection or variety breeding has ever been attempted.
No wonder that {141} the stalks are small, the bolls small and few in
number, and the staple also very short.

From my observation I should say that with better varieties and better
cultivation China could easily double her yields without increasing
her acreage. There is likely to be some increase in acreage, too,
however, because farmers who have had to give up poppy culture are in
search of a new money crop, and in most cases will take up cotton.

As I have said before, the coolie class wear padded clothes all
winter, and as they have no fire in their houses, they naturally have
to wear several suits even of the padded sort. I remember a speech
Congressman Richmond P. Hobson made several years ago in which he
spoke of having seen Chinamen with clothes piled on, one suit on top
of another, until they looked like walking cotton bales. Some of his
hearers may have thought this an exaggeration, but if so, I wish to
give him the support of my own observation and that of a preacher. As
a Chinaman came in the street-car in Shanghai Friday my missionary
host remarked: "That fellow has on four or five suits already, and
he'll put on more as the weather gets colder."

Mr. Currie, the English superintendent of the International Cotton
Mills at Shanghai, told me as I went through his factory that the
Chinese men and women he employs average about 12 cents a day
(American money), but that from his experience in England he would say
that English labor at 80 cents or a dollar a day is cheaper. "You'd
have more for your money at the week's end. One white girl will look
after four sides of a ring spinning frame; it takes six Chinese, as
you see. Then, again, the one white girl would oil her own machine;
the Chinese will not. In the third place, in England two overseers
would be enough for this room, while here we must have seven."

Hong Kong.



{142}


XV

FAREWELL TO CHINA


With this letter we bid farewell to China. When I see it again it will
doubtless be greatly changed. Already I have come too late to see
poppy fields or opium dens; too late to see the old-time cells in
which candidates for office were kept during their examination
periods; too late, I am told, to find the flesh of cats or dogs for
sale in the markets. If I had waited five years longer, it is likely
that I should not have found the men wearing their picturesque queues
and half-shaven heads; before five years, too, a parliament and a
cabinet will have a voice in the government in which until now the one
potent voice has been that of the Emperor, the "Son of Heaven"
divinely appointed to rule over the Middle Kingdom. All over the
country the people are athrill with a new life. Unless present signs
fail, the century will not be old before the Dragon Empire, instead of
being a country hardly consulted by the Powers about matters affecting
its own interests, will itself become one of the Powers and will have
to be consulted about affairs in other nations.

Be it said, to begin with, that I am just back from Canton, the most
populous city in China and supposedly one of the half dozen most
populous in the whole world. As no census has ever been taken, it is
impossible to say how many people it really does contain. The
estimates vary all the way from a million and a half to three
millions. Half a million people, it is said, live on boats in the
river. Some of them are born, marry, grow old, and die without ever
having known a home {143} on land. And these boats, it should be
remembered, are no larger than a small bedroom at home. I saw many of
them yesterday afternoon, and I also saw many of the women managing
them. The women boatmen--or boat-women--of Canton are famous.

Think of a city of two or three million people without a vehicle of
any kind--wagon, buggy, carriage, street-car, automobile, or even a
rickshaw! And yet this is what Canton appears to be. I didn't see even
a wheelbarrow. The streets are too narrow for any travel except that
of pedestrians, and the only men not walking are those borne on the
shoulders of men who are walking. My guide (who rejoices in the name
of Ah Cum John) and I went through in sedan chairs--a sort of chair
with light, narrow shafts before and behind. These shafts fit over the
heads and bare shoulders of three coolies, or Chinese laborers, and it
is these human burden-bearers who showed us the sights of Canton.

To get an idea of what the city is like, fancy an area of about thirty
square miles crowded with houses as thick as they can stand, every
house jam up against its neighbors, with only walls between--no room
for yards or parks or driveways--and these houses dense with people!
Then punch into these square miles of houses a thousand winding
alleys, no one wide enough to be called a street, and fill up these
alleys also with hurrying, perspiring, pig-tailed Chinamen. There are
no stores, shops or offices such as would look familiar to an
American, but countless thousands of Chinese shops wide open to the
streets, with practically no doors in evidence.

Such is Canton: a human hive of industry: a maze of labyrinthine
alleys crowded with people, the alleys or streets too narrow to get
the full light of day!

Outside this crowded city of Canton's living masses is the even larger
and more crowded city of Canton's dead. From the highest point on the
city wall my guide pointed out an unbroken cemetery extending for ten
miles: the hills dotted {144} with mounds until they have the
appearance of faces pitted by smallpox.

For the Chinaman, however unimportant in actual life, becomes a man of
importance as soon as he dies, and his grave must be carefully looked
after. The finest place I saw in Canton was the mortuary where the
dead bodies of wealthy Chinamen are kept until burial. The handsome
coffins I saw ranged in value from $1400 to $2700 Mexican, or half
these amounts American money. The lacquered surfacing accounts for the
high cost.

Nor are these departed Celestials kept here for a few days only.
Sometimes it is a matter of several years, my guide told me, the
geomancers or fortune-tellers being employed all this time in finding
a suitable site for a grave. These miserable scoundrels pretend that
the soul of the dead man will not rest unless he is buried in just the
right spot and in just the right kind of soil. Perhaps no professional
man in China earns as much as these fakirs. Sometimes it happens that
after a man has been dead two or three years his family suffers a
series of misfortunes. A frequent explanation in such cases is that
the wrong site has been chosen for the dead man's burial place.
Another geomancer is then hired and told to find a new grave where the
soul will rest in peace. Of course, he charges a heavy fee.

In one $1400 coffin I saw was the body of a wealthy young Chinaman who
died last spring. Three times a day a new cup of tea is placed on the
table for his spirit, and on the walls of the room were scores of silk
scrolls, fifteen feet long, expressing the sympathy of friends and
relatives. Around the coffin, too, were almost life-size images of
servants, and above it a heap of gilded paper to represent gold. When
the geomancers finally find a suitable grave for the poor fellow he
will be buried, and these paper servants and this paper gold will be
burned, in the belief that they will be converted into real servants
and real gold for his use in the spirit world.

{145}

A friend of mine in Peking who saw the funeral of the late Emperor and
Empress Dowager told me some interesting stories of the truly Oriental
ceremonies then celebrated. Tons of clothes and furs were burned, and
vast quantities of imitation money. A gorgeous imitation boat, natural
size and complete in every detail from cabins to anchors, steamer
chairs, and ample decks, was fitted up at a cost of $36,000 American
money, and burned. Furthermore, as my friend was coming home one
evening, he was surprised to see in an unexpected place, some distance
ahead, a full regiment of soldiers, gorgeous in new uniforms, and
hundreds of handsome cavalry horses. Getting closer, what was his
amazement to find that these natural-size soldiers and steeds were
only make-believe affairs to be burned for the dead monarchs! To
maintain their rank in the Beyond they must have at least one full
regiment at their command!

Since we are on such gruesome subjects we might as well finish with
them now by considering the punishments in China. I went out to the
execution grounds in Canton, but it happened to be an off-day when
nobody was due to suffer the death sentence. I did see the cross,
though, on which the worst criminals are stretched and strangled
before they are beheaded. The bodies of these malefactors are not
allowed ordinary burial, but quick-limed, I believe. There were human
bones beside the old stone wall where I walked, and when a Chinese
brat lifted for a moment a sort of jute-bagging cover from a barrel
the topmost skull of the heap grinned ghastly in the sunlight.

The cruelty of Chinese punishments is a blot upon her civilization.
When I was in Shanghai a friend of mine told me of having been to a
little town where two men had just been executed for salt-smuggling.
Salt is a government monopoly in China, or at least is subject to a
special revenue duty, so that salt smuggling is about equivalent to
blockading whiskey in America.

{146}

Recognized forms of punishment are death by starvation and "death by
the seventy-two cuts"--gradually chopping a man to pieces as if he
were a piece of wood. This latter punishment is for treason. To let a
bad criminal be hanged instead of beheaded is regarded as a favor, the
explanation being that the man who has his head cut off is supposed to
be without a head in the hereafter.

The worst feature of the whole system is the treatment of prisoners to
make them confess. The Chinese theory is that no one should be
punished unless he confesses with his own mouth. Consequently the most
brutal, sickening tortures are practised to extort confession, and, in
the end, thousands and thousands of innocent men, no doubt, rather
than live longer in miseries far worse than death, have professed
crimes of which they were innocent.

But let us turn now to happier topics--say to an illustration of
Chinese humor. Very well; here is the sort of story that tickles a
Chinaman: it is one they tell themselves:

A Chinaman had a magic jar. And when you think of a jar here don't
think of one of the tiny affairs such as Americans use for preserves
and jams. The jar here means a big affair about half the size of a
hogshead: I bathed in one this morning. It was in such jars that Ali
Baba's Forty Thieves concealed themselves. Well, this magic jar had
the power of multiplying whatever was put into it. If you put in a
suit of clothes, behold, you could pull out perhaps two or three dozen
suits! If you put in a silver dollar, you might get out a hundred
silver dollars. There doesn't seem to have been any regularity about
the jar's multiplying properties. Sometimes it might multiply by two,
while again it might multiply by a hundred.

At any rate, the owner of the magic receptacle was getting rich fairly
fast, when a greedy judge got word of the strange affair somehow.
Accordingly he made some kind of false charge against the man and made
him bring the jar into court. {149} Then the judge pretended that he
couldn't decide about the case, or else pretended that the man needed
punishment for something, and so wrongly refused to give the citizen's
property back. Instead the magistrate took the jar into his own home
and himself began to get rich on its labors.


{147}

[Illustration: THE GREAT WALL OF CHINA.]
  The building of the Great Wail, considered simply as a feat of
  Herculean labor, leaves us no room to boast over the Panama Canal.


[Illustration: CHINESE WOMAN'S RUINED FEET.]
  The lower picture shows the terrible deformity produced by
  foot-binding.


{148}

[Illustration: CHINESE SCHOOL CHILDREN.]
  The upper picture suggests a word about the amazing fertility of the
  Oriental races--the Japanese, for example, increasing from their
  birth-rate alone as fast as the United States from its birth-rate
  plus its enormous immigration.


[Illustration: THE AMERICAN CONSULATE AT ANTUNG.]
  A great need of America in the East is better consular buildings.
  Witness this one at Antung.


{149 continued}

Now, when this happened, the friends of the mistreated man began to
murmur. Failing to do anything with the magistrate, they appealed to
the magistrate's father--for though you may be fifty or seventy years
old in China, if your father is living you are as much subject to his
orders as if you were only ten; this is the case just as long as you
both live. But when the father spoke about the complaints of the
people the magistrate lied about the jar somehow, but not in a way
entirely to deceive the old fellow. He decided to do some
investigating, and went blundering around into a dark room in search
of the jar, and before he saw what he was doing came upon it and fell
into it. Whereupon he cried to his son to pull him out.

The son did come, but when he pulled out one father, behold there was
another still in the jar--and then another and another and another. He
pulled out one father after another till the whole room was full of
fathers, and then he filled up the yard with fathers, and had six or
eight standing like chickens on the stone wall before the accursed old
jar would quit! And to have left one father in there would naturally
have been equivalent to murder.

So this was the punishment of the unjust magistrate. He had, of
course, to support all the dozens of aged fathers he pulled out of the
jar (a Chinaman must support his father though he starve himself), and
it is to be supposed that he used up all the wealth he had unjustly
piled up, and had to work night and day as well all the rest of his
life. Of course the jar, too, had to be returned to its owner, and in
this way the whole community learned of the magistrate's unfairly
withholding it.

This story is interesting not only for its own sake, but for {150} the
light it sheds on Chinese life--the relations of father and son; the
unjust oppression of the people by the officials in a land where the
citizen is without the legal rights fundamental in American
government; and, lastly, the "Arabian Nights" like flavor of this
typically Chinese piece of fiction.

One of the funny things among the many funny things I have encountered
in China is the peculiar way of buying or selling land, as reported to
me by Rev. Dr. R. T. Bryan. If you buy land from a Chinaman, about
Shanghai at least, without knowing the custom of the country, you may
have to make him three additional payments before you get through with
him. For, according to the custom, after the first payment he will
give you a deed, but after a little while will come around sighing,
regretting that he sold the land and complaining that you didn't pay
enough. Accordingly, you will pay him a little more, and he will give
you what is called a "sighing paper," certifying that the "sighing
money" has been paid. A few days or weeks pass and he turns up again.
You didn't pay him quite enough before. Therefore, you make another
small payment and he gives you the "add-a-little-more" paper showing
that the "add-a-little-more" money has been paid. Last of all, you
make what is called the "pull-up-root" payment, and the land is safely
yours.

Of course, the impatient foreigner hasn't time for this sort of thing,
consequently he pays enough more in the beginning to cancel these
various dramatic performances. Doctor Bryan's deed certifies that the
"sighing money," "add-a-little-more money," and "pull-up-root money"
have all been settled to start with.

"Pidgin English," or the corruptions of English words and phrases by
means of which foreigners and Chinese exchange ideas, is also very
amusing. "Pidgin English" means "business English," "pidgin"
representing the Chinaman's attempt to say "business." Some of the
Chinese phrases are very useful, such as "maskee" for our "never
mind." Other good phrases {151} are "chop-chop" for "hurry up,"
"chin-chin" for "greeting," and "chow-chow" for "food."

"Have you had plenty chow-chow?" my good-natured Chinese elevator-boy
in Shanghai used to say to me after dinner; and the bright-eyed little
brats at the temples in Peking used to explain their failure to do
anything forbidden by saying they should get "plenty bamboo
chow-chow"! Bamboos are used for switches (as well as for ten thousand
other things), and "bamboo chow-chow" means the same thing to the
Chinese boy as "hickory tea" to an American boy!

A Scotch fellow-passenger was telling me the other day of the saying
that "The Scotchman keeps the Sabbath day, and every other good thing
he can lay his hands on." Now, the Chinaman, unlike the Scotchman,
doesn't keep the Sabbath, but he does live up to all the requirements
of the second clause of the proverb. Nothing goes to waste in China
except human labor, of which enough is wasted every year to make a
whole nation rich, simply because it is not aided by effective
implements and machinery. The bottles, the tin cans, the wooden boxes,
the rags, the orange peels--everything we throw away--is saved. And
the coolies work from early morn till late at night and every day in
the week. Their own religion does not teach them to observe the
seventh day, and this requirement of Christianity, in China as well as
in Japan, is regarded as a great hardship upon its converts.

Buddhism in China, as in Japan, it may also be observed just here, is
now only a hideous mixture of superstition and fraud. As I found
believers in the Japanese temples rubbing images of men and bulls to
cure their own pains, so in the great Buddhist temple at Canton I
found the fat Buddha's body rubbed slick in order to bring flesh to
thin supplicants, while one of the chief treasures of the temple is a
pair of "fortune sticks." If the Chinese Buddhist wishes to undertake
any new task or project, he first comes to the priest and tries out
its advisability with these "fortune sticks." If, when dropped to the
{152} floor, they lie in such a position as to indicate good luck, he
goes ahead; otherwise he is likely to abandon the project.

Let me close this chapter by noting a remark made to me by Dr. Timothy
Richard, one of the most eminent religious and educational workers in
the empire.

"Do you know what has brought about the change in China?" he asked me
one day in Peking. "Well, I'll tell you: it is a comparative view of
the world. Twenty years ago the Chinese did not know how their country
ranked with other countries in the elements of national greatness.
They had been told that they were the greatest, wisest, and most
powerful people on earth, and they didn't care to know what other
countries were doing. Since then, however, they have studied books,
have sent their sons to foreign colleges and universities, and they
have found out in what particulars China has fallen behind other
nations. Now they have set out to remedy these defects. The
comparative view of the world is what is bringing about the remaking
of China."

In China, no doubt, the men who have brought the people this
"comparative view of the word" were criticised sometimes for presuming
to suggest that any other way might be better than China's way; but
they kept to their work--and have won. Doctor Richard himself did much
effective service by publishing a series of articles and diagrams
showing how China compared with other countries in area, population,
education, wealth, revenue, military strength, etc. Such comparisons
are useful for America as a country, and for individual states and
sections as well.

Hong Kong, China.



{153}


XVI

WHAT I SAW IN THE PHILIPPINES


Of the cruelty of Chinese punishments I have already had something to
say, but there is at least one thing that should be said for the
Chinese officials in this connection: No matter how heinous his crime,
they have never sent a criminal from Hong Kong to Manila in an
Indo-China boat in the monsoon and typhoon season.

Dante could have found new horrors for the "Inferno" in the voyage as
I made it. From Saturday morning till Sunday night, while the storm
was at its height, the waves beat clean over the top of our vessel. A
thousand times it rolled almost completely to one side, shivered,
trembled, and recovered itself, only to yield again to the wrath and
fury of mountain-like waves hurled thundering against it and over it.
The crack where the door fitted over the sill furnished opening enough
to flood my cabin. In spite of the heat not even a crack could be
opened at the top of the window until Monday morning. A bigger ship a
few hours ahead of us found the sea in an even more furious mood. The
captain stayed on the bridge practically without sleep three days and
nights, going to bed, spent with fatigue and watching, as soon as he
came at last into sight of Manila. Two weeks ago the captain of
another ship came into port so much used up that he resigned and gave
his first mate command of the vessel, while still another vessel has
just limped into Manila disabled after buffeting the storm for a brief
period.


{154}


At any rate, the trip is over now, and I write this in Manila, with
its tropical heat and vegetation, its historic associations, its
strange mixture of savage, Spanish, and American influences. The Pasig
River, made famous in the war days of '98, flows past my hotel, and
beautiful Manila Bay, glittering in the fierce December sunlight,
recalls memories of Dewey and our navy. But the moss-green walls about
the old Spanish city remind us of days of romance and tragedy more
fascinating than any of the events of our own generation. In the days
when Spain made conquest of the world these streets were laid out, and
the statues of her sovereigns, imperious and imperial, still stand
here to remind us that nations, like men, are mortal, and that for
follies or mistakes a people no less surely than an individual must
pay the price.

Nor let our own proud America, boasting of her greater area and richer
resources, think she may ignore the lessons the history of her
predecessors here may teach. The statue of Bourbon Don Carlos in his
royal robe that stands amid the perennial green of the Cathedral
Park--it may well bring our American officers who look out daily upon
it, and the other Americans who come here, a feeling not of pride but
of profound and reverent humility:

  "God of Our Fathers, known of old.
     Lord of our far-flung battle-line.
   Beneath whose awful hand we hold
     Dominion over palm and pine.
       Judge of the nations, spare us yet,
       Lest we forget, lest we forget!"

In order to see what the Philippine country looks like, I left Manila
Thursday and made the long, hot trip to Daguban, travelling through
the provinces of Rizal, Bulacan, Pampanga, Tarlac, and Pangasinan. The
first four of these are known as Tagalog provinces; the fifth is
inhabited by Ilocanos and Pampangans. Three dialects or languages are
spoken by the {155} tribes in the territory covered. Not far beyond
Daguban are savage dog-eating, head-hunting tribes; taos, or peasants,
buy dogs around Daguban and sell to these savages at good profits.

The provinces I travelled through are typical of Filipinoland
generally. Rather sparsely settled, only the smaller part of the land
is under cultivation, the rest grown up in horse-high tigbao or Tampa
grass, or covered with small forest trees. Among trees the feathery,
fern-like foliage of the bamboo is most in evidence; but the
broad-leaved banana ranks easily next. The high topknot growth of the
cocoanut palm and the similar foliage of the tall-shanked papaya
afford a spectacle unlike anything we see at home. About Daguban
especially many cocoanuts are grown, and the clumps of trees by the
Agno River reminded me of the old Bible pictures of the River Nile in
the time of Pharaoh--especially when I looked at the plowing going on
around them. For the Filipino's plow is modelled closely on the old
Egyptian implement, and hasn't been much changed. A properly crooked
small tree or limb serves for a handle, another crooked bough makes
the beam, and while there is in most cases a steel-tipped point, some
of the poorer farmers have plows made entirely of wood. A piece of
wood bent like the letter U forms the hames; another piece like U with
the prongs pulled wide apart serves as a singletree. Then, with two
pieces of rope connecting primitive hame and single-tree, the
Filipino's harness is complete.

Before going into any further description of the plows, however, let
us get our picture of the typical country on the Island of Luzon as I
saw it on this hot December day. Great fields of rice here and there,
ripe for the harvest, and busy, perspiring little brown men and women
cutting the crop with old-fashioned knives and sickles; the general
appearance not unlike an American wheat or oat harvest in early
summer. Bigger fields of head-high sugarcane at intervals, the upper
two feet green, the blades below yellow and dry. Some young corn, some
of it tasselling, some that will not be in tassel before the last of
{156} January. Some fields of peanuts. Here and there a damp
low-ground and a sluggish river. Boats on the rivers: small freight
boats of a primitive type and long canoes hewed out of single logs.

Most striking of all are the houses in which the people live,
clustered in villages, as are farmhouses in almost every part of the
world except in America. Surrounded in most cases by the massive
luxuriance of a banana grove, the Filipino's hut stands on stilts as
high as his head, and often higher. One always enters by a ladder. In
most instances there are two rooms, the larger one perhaps 10 x 12
feet, and a sort of lean-to adjoining, through which the ladder comes.
A one-horse farmer's corn crib is about the size of the larger
Filipino home. And it is made, of course, not of ordinary lumber, but
of bamboo--the ever-serviceable bamboo--which, as my readers probably
know, strongly resembles the fishing-pole reeds that grow on our river
banks. The sills, sleepers, and scaffolding of the house are made of
larger bamboo trunks, six inches or less in diameter; the split trunks
form the floor; the sides are of split bamboo material somewhat like
that of which we make our hamper baskets and split-bottom chairs; the
roofing is of _nipal_, which looks much like very long corn shucks.

In short, imagine an enormous hamper basket, big enough to hold six or
eight hogsheads, put on stilts, and covered with shucks: such in
appearance is the Filipino's house. Around it are banana trees bent
well toward the ground by the weight of the one great bunch at the
top, and possibly a few bamboo and cocoanut trees. For human ornaments
there are rather small and spare black-haired, black-eyed,
brown-skinned men, women, and children in clothing rather gayly
--as far as it goes: in some cases it doesn't go very far. The
favorite color with the women-folk is a sort of peach-blossom mixture
of pink and white or a bandanna-handkerchief combination of red and
white. Bare feet are most common, {159} but many wear slippers, and
not a few are now slaves enough to fashion to wear American shoes. The
men, except the very poorest, wear white, nor is it a white worn dark
by dirt such as Koreans wear, but a spotless, newly washed white.
Nearly every Filipino seems to have on clothes that were laundered the
day before. A sort of  gauze is frequently the only outer
garment worn by either men or women on the upper part of the body.


{157}

[Illustration: A FILIPINO'S HOME.]
  Nearly all the native houses I saw in the rural Philippines were of
  this type--about this size, set on stilts, and constructed of
  similar material. The scene is not quite natural-looking, however,
  without a banana grove and a fighting cock or two.


{158}

[Illustration: THE CARABAO, THE WORK-STOCK OF THE FILIPINOS.]


[Illustration: AN OLD SPANISH CATHEDRAL.]
  Of all the native Oriental peoples, the Filipinos alone have become
  thoroughly Christianized. The great majority are Catholics.


{159 continued}

The beast of burden in the Philippines, the ungainly, slow-moving
animal that pulls the one-handled plows and the two-wheeled carts, is
the _carabao_. The _carabao_, or water buffalo, is about the size of
an ordinary American ox, and much like the ox, but his hide is black,
thick, and looks almost as tough as an alligator's; his horns are
enormous, and he has very little hair. Perhaps his having lived in the
water so much accounts for the absence of the hair. Even now he must
every day submerge himself contentedly in deep water, must cover his
body like a pig in a wallow: this is what makes life worth living for
him. Furthermore, when he gives word that he is thirsty Mr. Tao (the
peasant) must not delay watering him; in this hot climate thirst may
drive him furiously, savagely mad, and the plowman may not be able to
climb a cocoanut tree quick enough to escape hurt.

I saw quite a few goats, some cattle, a few hogs, and, of course, some
dogs. Much as the Filipino may care for his dog, however, he always
reserves the warmest place in his heart for nothing else but his
gamecock, his fighting rooster. Cock-fighting, and the gambling
inseparably connected with it, are his delight, and no Southern
planter ever regarded a favorite fox-hound with more pride and
affection than the Filipino bestows on his favorite chicken. In grassy
yards you will see the rooster tied by one leg and turned out to
exercise, as we would stake a cow to graze, while his owner watches
and fondles him. I shall never forget a gray-headed, bright-eyed,
barefooted old codger I saw near Tarlac stroking the feathers of his
bird, while in his eyes was the pride as of a woman over {160} her
first-born. A man often carries his gamecock with him as a <DW64> would
carry a dog, and he is as ready to back his judgment with his last
_centavo_ as was the owner of Mark Twain's "Jumping Frog" before that
ill-fated creature dined too heartily on buckshot. Sundays and saints'
days are the days for cock-fighting--and both come pretty often.

I wish I could give my readers a glimpse of the passengers who got on
and off my train between Manila and Daguban: Filipino women carrying
baskets on their heads, smoking cigarettes, and looking after
babies--in some cases doing all three at once; Filipino men, likewise
smoking, and with various kinds of luggage, including occasional
gamecocks; Filipino children in most cases "undressed exceedingly," as
Mr. Kipling would say; and American soldiers in khaki uniforms and
helmets. At one place a pretty little twelve-year-old girl gets
aboard, delighted that she is soon to see America for the first time
in six years. For a while I travel with an American surveyor whose
work is away out where he must swim unbridged streams, guard against
poisonous snakes, and sleep where he can. An army surgeon tells me as
we pass the site of a battle between the Americans and the Filipino
insurgents eleven years ago: the Filipinos would not respect the Red
Cross, and the doctors and hospital corps had to work all night with
their guns beside them, alternately bandaging wounds and firing on
savages. In telling me good-bye a young Westerner sends regards to all
America. "Even a piece of Arizona desert would look good to me," he
declares; "anything that's U.S.A." A young veterinarian describes the
government's efforts to exterminate rinderpest, a disease which in
some sections has killed nine tenths of the _carabao_. A campaign as
thorough and far-reaching as that which the Agricultural Department at
home is waging against cattle ticks is in progress, but the ignorant
farmers cannot understand the regulations, and are greatly hindering a
work which means so much of good to them.

Such are a few snapshots of Philippine life.

{161}

Of the vast natural resources of the Philippines there can be no
question. With a fertile soil, varied products, immense forest wealth,
and possibly extensive mineral wealth; with developing railway and
steamship lines; with the markets of the Orient right at her doors and
special trade advantages with the United States--with all these
advantages, the islands might soon become rich, if there were only an
industrious population.

Unfortunately, the Filipino, however, doesn't like work. Whether or
not this dislike is incurable remains to be seen. Perhaps as he comes
into contact with civilization he may conceive a liking for other
things than rice, fish, a loin-cloth, and shade--plenty of shade--and
proceed to put forth the effort necessary to get these other things.
Already there seems to have been a definite rise in the standards of
living since the American occupation. "When I came here in '98," Mr.
William Crozier said to me, "not one native in a hundred wore shoes,
and hats were also the exception; you can see for yourself how great
is the change since then."

Moreover, in not a few cases Americans who have complained of
difficulty in getting labor have been themselves to blame: they tried
to hire and manage labor the American way instead of in the Filipino
way. The _custombre_, as the Spanish call it--that is to say, the
custom of the country--is a factor which no man can ignore without
paying the penalty.


I am having to prepare this article very hurriedly, and I must
postpone my comment on the work of the American Government until
later. In closing, however, I am reminded that just as the old proverb
says, "It takes all sorts of people to make a world," so I am seeing
all sorts. A week ago yesterday the Hong Kong papers announced that
Mr. Clarence Poe would be the guest at luncheon of his Excellency the
Governor-General, Sir Frederick Lugard, K. C. M. G., C. B., D. S. O.,
etc., and Lady Lugard, in the executive mansion; yesterday {162} I had
"chow" (food) in a Filipino's place, "The Oriental Hotel, Bar, and
Grocery," away up in the Province of Pangasinan, and climbed to my
room and cot on a sort of ladder or open work stairs such as one might
expect to find in an ordinary barn! It was the best place I could find
in town.

Nor do the incongruities end here. After getting my evening meal I
walked out in the warm December moonlight, past the shadows of the
strange buildings and tropical trees--and all at once there burst out
the full chorus of one of the world's great operas, the magnificent
voice of a Campanini or Caruso dominating all!

Great is the graphophone, advance agent of civilization!

Manila, P. I.



{163}


XVII

WHAT THE UNITED STATES IS DOING IN THE PHILIPPINES


There are so many islands in the Philippine group, which I have just
left behind me (I write in a steamer off Manila), that if a man were
to visit one a day, without stopping for Sundays, it would take him
eight years to get around. Most of these islands though, of course,
are little more than splotches on the water's surface and do not
appear on the map. The two big ones, Mindanao and Luzon, contain three
fourths of the total land surface of 127,000 square miles, leaving the
other one fourth to be divided among the other 3138 islets.

The land area statistics just given indicate that the Philippines are
about the size of three average American states and the population
(7,000,000) is about three times that of an average American
commonwealth. There are only about 30,000 white people in the islands,
and 50,000 Chinese. Chinese immigration is now prohibited.

The 7,000,000 native Filipinos who make up practically the entire
population represent all stages of human progress. The lowest of them
are head-hunters and hang the skulls of their human enemies outside
their huts, as an American hunter would mount the head of an elk or
bear. The great majority, however, have long been Christians and have
attained a fair degree of civilization. Even among the savage tribes a
high moral code is often enforced. The Igorrotes, for example, though
some of their number make it a condition of marriage {164} that the
young brave shall have taken a head, shall have killed his man, have
remarkable standards of honor and virtue in some respects, and
formally visit the death penalty as the punishment for adultery.
Because roads or means of communication have been poor the people have
mingled but little, and there are three dozen different dialects. In
the course of a half day's journey by rail I found three different
languages spoken by the people along the route. The original
inhabitants were Negritos, a race of pigmy blacks, of whom only a
remnant remains, but the Filipino proper is a Malayan.

Filipinos are unique in that they alone among all the native peoples
of Asia have accepted Christianity. Fortunate in being without the
gold of Mexico or Peru, the Philippines did not attract the more
brutal Spanish adventurers who, about the time of Magellan's
discovery, were harrying wealthier peoples with fire and sword.
Instead of the soldier or the adventurer, it was the priest, his soul
aflame with love for his church, who came to the Philippines, and the
impression made by his virtues was not negatived by the bloody crimes
of fellow Spaniards mad with lust of treasure. The result is that to
this day probably 90 per cent, of the Filipinos are Catholics. Before
the priests came, the people worshipped their ancestors, as do other
peoples in the Far East.

The only Asiatics who have accepted Christianity, the Filipinos are
also the only Asiatics among whom women are not regarded as degraded
and inferior beings. "If the Spaniards had done nothing else here," as
a high American official in Manila said to me, "though, as a matter of
fact, we are beginning to recognize that they did a great deal, they
would deserve well of history for what they have accomplished for the
elevation of woman through the introduction of Christianity. No other
religion regards woman as man's equal."

The testimony I heard in the Philippines indicated that the female
partner in the household is, if anything, superior in authority to the
man. She is active in all the little business {165} affairs of the
family, and white people sometimes arrange with Filipino wives for the
employment of husbands!

The resources of the islands, as I have already said, are magnificent
and alluring. In the provinces through which I travelled, less than 10
per cent. of the land seemed to be under cultivation, and statistics
show that this is the general condition. A small area has sufficed to
produce a living for the tao, or peasant, and he has not cultivated
more--a fact due in part to laziness and in part to poor means of
transportation. What need to produce what cannot be taken to market?
This fact, in my opinion, goes far to account for Filipino
unaggressiveness.

According to the latest figures, the average size of the farms in the
Philippines, including the large plantations, is less than eight
acres, and the principal products are hemp, sugarcane, tobacco,
cocoanuts, and rice. The Manila hemp plant looks for all the world
like the banana plant (both belong to the same family), and the
newcomer cannot tell them apart. The fibre is in the trunk or bark.
Sisal hemp, which I found much like our yucca or "bear grass," is but
little grown. Sugarcane is usually cultivated in large plantations, as
in Louisiana, these plantations themselves called _haciendas_, and
their owners _hacienderos_. The tobacco industry is an important one,
and would be even if the export averaging half a million cigars for
every day in the year were stopped, for the Filipinos themselves are
inveterate smokers. The men smoke, the women smoke, the children
smoke--usually cigarettes, but sometimes cigars of enormous
proportions. "When I first came here," Prof. C. M. Conner said to me,
"it amused me to ask a Filipino how far it was to a certain place, and
have him answer, 'Oh, two or three cigarettes,' meaning the distance a
man should walk in smoking two or three cigarettes!" Cocoanut-raising
is a very profitable industry--all along the Pasig River in Manila you
can see the native boats high-packed with the green, unhusked product,
and two towns in Batanzas shipped 1500 carloads last year. It is also
believed that {166} the rubber industry would pay handsomely. The
rubber-producing trees I saw about Manila were very promising.

Coffee plantations brought their owners handsome incomes until about
twenty years ago, when the blight, more devastating than the cotton
boll weevil, came with destruction as swift as that which befell
Sennacherib. I heard the story of an old plantation near Lipa, whose
high-bred Castilian owner once lived in splendor, his imported horses
gay in harness made of the finest silver, but the blight which ruined
his coffee plants was equally a blight to his fortunes and his home
and it is now given over to weeds and melancholy ruins. In some
sections, however, coffee is still grown successfully, and I was much
interested in seeing the shrubs in bearing.

The Philippines are about the only place I have found since leaving
home where the people are not trying to grow cotton. In California, in
the Hawaiian Islands, in Japan, in Korea, and even in Manchuria as far
north as Philadelphia, I have found the plants, and of course in China
proper. But I should add just here, that in Southern China, about
Canton, I did not find cotton. As for the industry in the Philippines,
a Southern man, now connected with the Agricultural Department in
Manila, said to me: "Cotton acts funny here. It runs to weed. I
planted some and it opened five or six bolls a stalk and then quit:
died down." He showed me some "tree cotton," about twenty feet high,
and also some of the Caravonica cotton from Australia, which is itself
much like a small tree.

When it comes to the lumber industry, not even Col. Mulberry Sellers
would be likely to overestimate the possibilities the Philippines
offer. There are literally millions in it. The government is leasing
immense areas on a stumpage royalty of about 1 per cent., and as
railways are built the industry will expand. Fortunately, there are
strict regulations to prevent the destruction of the forests. They
must be used, not wasted. The authorities realize that while timber is
a crop like other crops, it differs from the other crops in that the
harvesting must {167} never be complete. The cutting of trees below a
certain minimum size is forbidden.

And now a word as to the activities of the American Government in the
islands and the agencies through which these activities are conducted.
The supreme governing body is known as the Philippine Commission,
consisting of the Governor-General, who is ex-officio president, and
seven other members (four Americans, three Filipinos) appointed by the
President of the United States. Four of these commissioners (three of
these are Americans) are heads of departments, having duties somewhat
like those of Cabinet officers in America. This commission is not only
charged with the executive duties, but it acts as the Upper House or
Senate of the Philippine Congress. That is to say, the voters elect an
Assembly corresponding to our House of Representatives, but no
legislation can become effective unless approved by the Philippine
Commission acting as the Upper House. In the first two elections,
those of 1907 and 1909, the advocates of early independence, opponents
of continued American supremacy, have predominated. The result has
been that the American members of the commission have had to kill
numberless bills passed by the Assembly. On the other hand, some very
necessary and important measures advocated by the commission, measures
which would be very helpful to the Filipinos, are opposed by the
Assembly either through ignorance or stubbornness. Most of the
Assembly members are of the politician type, mestizos or half-breeds
(partly Spanish or Chinese), and very young. "In fact," a Manila man
said to me, "when adjournment is taken, it is hard for a passerby to
tell whether it is the Assembly that has let out or the High School!"
The people in the provinces elect their own governors and city
officials.

In some respects the legislation for the Philippines adopted by the
American officials at Washington and Manila has been quite
progressive. To begin with, our Republican National {168}
Administration frankly recognized the blunders made in the South
during Reconstruction days, and has practically endorsed the general
policy of suffrage restriction which the South has since adopted. When
the question came up as to who should be allowed to vote, even for the
limited number of elective offices, no American Congressman was heard
to propose that there should be unrestricted manhood suffrage.
Instead, the law as passed provides that in order to vote in the
Philippines one must be 23 years of age, a subject of no foreign
power, and must either (1) have held some responsible office before
August 13, 1898, or (2) own $250 worth of property or pay $15 annually
in established taxes, or (3) be able to speak, read, and write English
or Spanish. Of course, the Filipinos, with a few exceptions, do not
"speak, read, or write" English or Spanish; they have been taught only
their own dialect. I understand that only 2 per cent, of the people
can vote under these provisions.

It should be said just here, however, that the government is now
making a magnificent effort to educate all the Filipinos, and the
schools are taught in English. The fact that half a million boys and
girls had been put into public schools was the first boasted
achievement of the American administration of the islands. It was,
indeed, a great change from Spanish methods, but in the last three or
four years the officials have been rapidly waking up to the fact that
while they have been getting the Filipinos into the schools, they have
not been getting them into the right sort of schools.

With the realization of this fact, a change has been made in the kind
of instruction given. More and more the schools have been given an
industrial turn. When I visited the Department of Education in Manila
I found that old textbooks had been discarded and new text-books
prepared--books especially suited to Philippine conditions and
directed to practical ends. Instead of a general physiology describing
bones, arteries, and nerve centres, I found a little book on {169}
"Sanitation and Hygiene in the Tropics," written in simple language,
profusely illustrated, and with information which the pupil can use in
bettering the health of himself, his family, and his neighborhood.
Instead of a general book on agriculture, I found a book written so as
to fit the special needs, crops, and conditions in the Philippines.
Moreover, I found the officials exhibiting as their chief treasures
the specimens of work turned out by the pupils as a result of the
practical instruction given them.

"I really think," said one of the officers, "that we have carried the
idea of industrial education, of making the schools train for
practical life, much farther in the Philippines than it has been
carried in the United States. The trouble at home is that our teachers
don't introduce industrial education early enough. They wait until the
boy enters the upper grades--if he doesn't leave school before
entering them at all, as he probably does. In any case, they reach
only a few pupils. Our success, on the other hand, is due to the fact
that we begin with industrial education in the earlier grades and get
everybody."

And right here is a valuable lesson for those of us who are interested
in getting practical training for white boys and girls in America as
well as for brown boys and girls in the Philippines.

Another progressive step was the introduction of postal savings banks
for the Filipinos before any law was passed giving similar advantage
to the white people of the United States. The law has worked well. In
fact, the increase in number of depositors last year, from 8782 to
13,102--nearly 50 per cent, in a single twelve-month--would indicate
that the people are getting enthusiastic about it and that it is
achieving magnificent results in stimulating thrift and the saving
habit.

The government has also introduced the Torrens System of Registering
Land Titles, as it has done in Hawaii. Formerly {170} the farmer or
the peasant paid 20 per cent, or more for advances or loans. With his
land registered under the Torrens system the bank will lend him money
at a normal rate of interest, with nothing wasted in lawyers' fees for
expensive investigations of all previous changes in title since the
beginning of time. Judge Charles B. Elliott, now Secretary of Commerce
and Police for the islands, was on the Minnesota Supreme Bench when
the Torrens plan was put into force there, and he is enthusiastic
about its workings both in his home state in America and in the
Philippines.

For the public health an especially fruitful work has been done by the
Americans, albeit the Filipino has often had much to say in criticism
of the methods of saving life, and but little in praise of the work
itself. "The hate of those ye better, the curse of those ye bless" may
usually be confidently counted on by those who bear the White Man's
Burden, and this seems to have been especially true with regard to
health work in the East. In the Philippines the farmers object to the
quarantine restrictions that would save their carabao from rinderpest;
they object to the regulations that look to stamping out cholera, and
I suppose the isolation and colonization of lepers, who formerly ran
at large, has also been unpopular. In spite of opposition, vaccination
is now general; pock-marked Filipinos will not be so common in future.

Nor is it likely that there will be many reports of cholera outbreaks
such as an ex-army nurse described to me a few days ago: "When I was
in Iloilo in 1902," she said, "it was impossible to dig graves for the
poor natives as fast as they died. The men were kept digging, at the
point of the bayonet, all night long--pits 100 feet long, 7 feet wide
and 7 feet deep, in which the bodies of the dead were thrown and
quick-limed--and yet I remember that on one occasion 235 corpses lay
for forty-eight hours before we could find graves for them."

In Manila statistics show that 44 per cent. of the deaths are {171} of
babies under one year old, and the ignorance of the mothers as to
proper methods of feeding and nursing has resulted in a shockingly
high death rate of little ones all over the Philippines. I noticed
that the new school text-book on sanitation and hygiene gives especial
attention to the care of infants, and it is said that already the
school boys and girls are often able to give their mothers helpful
counsel. In this fact we have another good suggestion for the school
authorities at home, where it is said that proper knowledge and care
would save the lives of a million infants a year.

Hardly less important than the school work has been the road-building
undertaken by the American officials. And in Philippine road work a
most excellent example has been set for the states at home, in that
the authorities have given attention not only to building roads but to
maintaining them after they are built. Too many American communities
vote a heavy bond issue for roads and think that ends the matter. In
the Philippines no such mistake has been made. "With the heavy rains
here," the Governor-General said to me, "our entire investment in a
piece of good road would be lost in four years' time if repair work
were not carefully looked after."

The system adopted for keeping up the roads is very interesting.
Everywhere along the fine highways I travelled over there were at
intervals piles or pens of crushed stone and other material for
filling up any hole or break. For each mile or so a Filipino is
employed--he is called a _caminero_--and his whole duty is to take a
wheelbarrow and a few tools and keep that piece of road in shape.

Prizes of $5000 each are also offered to the province that maintains
the best system of first-class roads, to the province that spends the
largest proportion of its funds on roads and bridges, and to the
province that shows the best and most complete system of second-class
roads.

That the Filipinos are unfit to face the world alone there can be
little doubt. As to whether it is our business in that {172} case to
manage for them is another question. The Filipinos are, like our
<DW64>s, a child-race in habits of thought, whatever they may be from
the standpoint of the evolutionist. "I never get angry with them,
however much they may obstruct my plans," an American of rank said to
me, "for I look on them as children. We are running a George Junior
Republic; that's what it amounts to." Another American, who has had
some experience with the Assembly, said to me: "When you have
explained and reiterated some apparently simple proposition, they will
come to you a day or so later with some elementary question amazing
for its childishness." A large number of excellent measures for which
the Assembly has received the credit were really instigated by the
commission--"personally conducted legislation," it is called.

The Filipinos come of a race which has achieved more than the <DW64>
race, but on the whole they are probably hardly better fitted for
self-government than the <DW64>s of the South would be to-day if all
the whites should move away. As a Republican of some prominence at
home said to me in Manila: "A crowd of ten-year-old schoolboys in
Chicago would know better how to run a government."

The mere fact that the Filipinos are not capable of managing wisely
for themselves, of course, is not enough to justify a colonial or
imperialistic policy on the part of the United States. It is not our
business to go up and down the earth taking charge of everybody who is
not managing his affairs as well as we think we could manage for him.
But, in any case, there is no use to delude ourselves as to what are
the real qualifications of Mr. Filipino.

I believe that the United States should eventually withdraw from the
islands, but when it does so there should be an understanding with the
Powers that will prevent the natives from being exploited by some
other nation.

China Sea, off Manila Harbor.



{173}


XVIII

ASIA'S GREATEST LESSON FOR AMERICA


The prosperity of every man depends upon the prosperity (and therefore
upon the efficiency) of the Average Man.

So I have argued for years, in season and out of season, in newspaper
articles and in public addresses; and the most impressive fact I have
discovered in all my travel through the Orient is the fundamental,
world-wide importance of this too little accepted economic doctrine.
It is the biggest lesson the Old World has for the New--the biggest
and the most important.

In America, education, democratic institutions, a proper organization
of industry: these have given the average man a high degree of
efficiency and therefore a high degree of prosperity as compared with
the lot of the average man in Asia or Europe--a prosperity heightened
and enhanced, it is true, by the exploitation of a new continent's
virgin resources, but, after all, due mainly, primarily, as we have
said, to the high degree of efficiency with which the average man does
his work.

And while there may be "too much Ego in our Cosmos," as Kipling's
German said about the monkey, for us to like to admit it, the plain
truth is that, no matter what our business, we chiefly owe our
prosperity not to our own efforts, but to the high standards of
intelligence, efficiency, and prosperity on the part of our people as
a whole. We live in better homes, eat more wholesome food, wear better
clothing, have more leisure {174} and more recreation, endure less
bitter toil; in short, we find human life fairer and sweeter than our
fellow man in Asia, not because you or I as individuals deserve so
much better than he, but because of our richer racial heritage. We
have been born into a society where a higher level of prosperity
obtains, where a man's labor and effort count for more.

In China a member of the Emperor's Grand Council told me that the
average rate of wages throughout the empire for all classes of labor
is probably 18 cents a day. In Japan it is probably not more, and in
India much less. The best mill workers I saw in Osaka average 22 cents
a day; the laborers at work on the new telephone line in Peking get 10
cents; wheelbarrow coolies in Shanghai $4 a month; linotype operators
in Tokyo 45 cents a day, and pressmen 50; policemen 40; the
ironworkers in Hankow average about 10 cents; street-car conductors in
Seoul make 35 cents; farm laborers about Nankou 10 cents; the highest
wages are paid in the Philippines, where the ordinary laborer gets
from 20 to 50 cents.

  Since writing the foregoing I have looked up the latest official
  statistics for Japan in the "Financial and Economic Annual for
  1910," the latest figures compiled to date being for 1908. In 1908
  wages had increased on the whole 40 per cent, above 1900 figures,
  and I give herewith averages for certain classes of workmen for 1899
  and 1908:

                        Daily Wages in Cents
                           1899     1908
  Farm laborer, male     $0.13     $0.19
  Farm laborer, female     .08-1/2   .11-1/2
  Gardener                 .24       .34
  Weaver, male             .15       .22
  Weaver, female           .09       .12
  Shoemaker                .22-1/2   .32-1/2
  Carpenter                .25       .40
  Blacksmith               .23       .34
  Day laborer              .17       .26-1/2

  When I asked Director Matsui what he paid the hands I saw at work on
  the Agricultural College farm, he answered, "Well, being so near
  Tokyo, we have to pay 30 to 40 sen (15 to 20 cents) a day, but in
  the country, generally, I should say 20 to 35 sen" (10 to 13-1/2
  cents a day).


{175}


Moreover, there is a savage struggle for employment even at these low
figures; men work longer hours than in America, and their tasks are
often heart-sickening in their heaviness: tasks such as an American
laborer would regard as inhuman.

Take, for example, the poor fellow who pulls the jinrikisha. He is
doing the work that horses and mules do at home, and for wages such as
our Southern <DW64>s would refuse for ordinary labor. More than this,
in most cases he is selling you not only his time but his life-blood.
Run he must with his human burden, and faster than Americans would
care to run without a burden; and the constant strain overtaxes his
heart and shortens his days. More than this, he must go in all kinds
of weather, and having become thoroughly heated, must shiver in the
winter wind or driving rain during waits. The exposure and the
overtaxing of the heart are alike ruinous. The rickshaw man's life, I
was told in Japan, is several years shorter than that of the average
man.

And yet so many men are driven by the general poverty into the
rickshaw business that I have hardly found a city in which it is not
overcrowded. In Peking on one occasion I almost thought my life
endangered by the mob who jostled, tugged, and fought for the
privilege of earning the 15 or 20 cents fare my patronage involved. In
Hong Kong two runners, wild-eyed with the keenness of the savage
struggle for existence, menaced the smaller, younger man I had hired
as if they would take me by force from his vehicle to their own--and
this for a climb so steep that I soon got out and walked rather than
feel myself guilty of "man's inhumanity to man" by making a fellow
being pull me. Fiercer yet was the competition in Hankow, where not
even the brutal clubbing of the policeman was enough to keep the men
in order. In wintry Newchwang I think I suffered almost as much as my
rickshaw man did merely to see him wading through mud and foulness
such as I should not wish my horse to go through at home--though if he
had {176} not waded I should have had to, and he was the more used to
it!

I mention the hard life of the Oriental laborer who pulls the
jinrikisha because it is typical. The business would not be crowded if
it were not that the men find life in other lines no better. Consider
the men who carried me in my sedan chair in Canton. As each man fitted
the wooden shafts over his shoulders I could see that they were welted
with corns like a mule's shoulders chafed by the hames through many a
summer's plowing.

Consider, too, the thousands of Chinese and Japanese who do the work
not of carriage horses, but of draft horses. From the time you land in
Yokahoma your heart is made sick by the sight of half-naked
human-beings harnessed like oxen to heavily laden carts and drays.
Bent, tense, and perspiring like slaves at the oar, they draw their
heavy burdens through the streets. One or two men wearily pull an
immense telegraph pole balanced on a two-wheeled truck. Eight or ten
men are harnessed together dragging some merchant's heavy freight.
Four to a dozen other men carry some heavy building-stone or piece of
machinery by running bamboo supports from the shoulders of the men
behind to the shoulders of the men in front: you can see the constant,
tortuous play of the muscles around each man's rigid backbone while
the strained, monotonous, half-weird chorus, "Hy-ah! Hullah! Hee-ah!
Hey!" measures their tread and shifts the strain from man to man, step
by step, with the precision of clock work. On the rivers in China,
too, one sees boats run by human treadmill power: a harder task than
that of Sisyphus is that of the men who sweat all day long at the
wheel, forever climbing and never advancing.

Nor do the women and children of the Orient escape burdens such as
only men's strong shoulders should bear. Children who should have the
freedom that even the young colt gets--how my heart has gone out to
them cheated out of the joys {177} of childhood! And the women with
children strapped on their backs while they steer boats and handle
passengers and traffic about Hong Kong! Or leave, if you will, the
water-front at Hong Kong and make the hard climb up the steep,
bluff-like, 1800-foot mountainside, dotted with the handsome
residences of wealthy Englishmen: you can hardly believe that every
massive timber, every ton of brick, every great foundation-stone was
carried up, up from the town below, by the tug and strain of human
muscle--and not merely human muscle, but in most cases the muscles of
women! Probably no governor in any state in America lives in a
residence so splendid as that of the governor-general of Hong
Kong--certainly no governor's residence is so beautifully situated,
halfway up a sheer mountain-<DW72>--and yet the wife of the
governor-general told me that the material used in the building was
brought up the mountainside by women!

Hardly better fare the women in the factories. I mentioned in a former
letter the mills in Shanghai where women work 13-1/4 hours for 12
cents a day; and in most cases the women in Eastern factories are
herded together in crowded compounds little better than the workhouses
for American criminals!

Or consider the rice farmers who wade through mud knee-deep to plant
the rice by hand, cultivate it with primitive tools, and harvest it
with sickles. And after all this, they must often sell the rice they
grow, and themselves buy cheaper millet or poorer rice for their own
food. The situation has probably improved somewhat since Col. Charles
Denby published his book five years ago, but in its general outlines
the plight of the typical Chinese farmer as described by him then is
true to-day:

  "The average wage of an able-bodied young man is $12 per annum, with
  food and lodging, straw shoes, and free shaving--an important item in
  a country where heads must be shaved three or four times a month.
  His clothing costs about $4 per annum. In ten years he may buy one
  third of an acre of land ($150 per acre) and necessary implements.
  In ten years more he may {178} double his holdings and become
  part-owner in a water buffalo. In six years more he can procure a
  wife and live comfortably on his estate. Thus in twenty-six years he
  has gained a competence."

So much by way of a faint picture of existing industrial conditions in
the Orient. Let us now see what there is for us to learn from these
facts.

First of all, we may inquire why such conditions obtain. Why is it
that the Oriental gets such low wages, and has such low earning power?
"An overcrowded population," somebody answers, "in China, for example,
four hundred million people--one fourth the human race--crowded within
the limits of one empire. This is the cause."

I don't believe it.

There is a limit no doubt beyond which increase of population, even
with the most highly developed system of industry, might lead to such
a result, but I do not believe that this limit has been reached even
in China. The people in England live a great deal better to-day than
they did when England had only one tenth its present population. The
average man in your county has more conveniences, comforts, and a
better income than he had in your grandfather's day when the
population was not nearly so dense. The United States with a
population of ninety odd million pays its laborers vastly better than
it did when its population was only thirty million.

The truth is that every man should be able to earn a little more than
he consumes; there should be a margin, an excess which should
constitute his contribution to the "commonwealth," to the race. Our
buildings, roads, railroads, churches, cathedrals, works of
art--everything which makes the modern world a better place to live in
than the primitive world was: these represent the combined
contributions of all previous men and races. And if society is so able
to handle men that they produce any fraction more than they consume,
the more men the better the world.

{179}

My conviction is that the Oriental nations are poor, not because of
their dense populations, but because of their defective industrial
organizations, because they do not provide men Tools and Knowledge to
work with.

Ignorance and lack of machinery--these have kept Asia poor; knowledge
and modern tools--these have made America rich.

If Asia had a Panama Canal to dig, she would dig it with picks, hoes,
and spades and tote out the earth in buckets. Nothing but human bone
and sinew would be employed, and the men would be paid little, because
without tools and knowledge they must always earn little. But America
puts brains, science, steam, electricity, machinery into the Big
Ditch--Tools and Knowledge, in other words--and she pays good wages
because a man thus equipped does the work of ten men whose only force
is the force of muscle.

But Asia--deluded, foolish Asia--has scorned machinery. "The more work
machinery does, the less there will be for human beings to do. Men
will be without work, and men without work will starve." With this
folly on her lips she has rejected the agencies that would have
rescued her from her never-ending struggle with starvation.

Oftentimes, we know, the same cry has been heard in England--and alas!
even in America; our labor unions even now sometimes lend a willing
ear to such nonsense. There were riots in England when manufacturers
sought to introduce labor-saving methods in cotton-spinning; and when
railroads were introduced among us there were doubtless thousands of
draymen, stage-drivers, and boatmen who, if they had dared, would have
torn up the rails and thrown them into the rivers, as the Chinese did
along the Yangtze-Kiang. With much the same feeling the old-time hand
compositors looked upon the coming of the typesetting machine.

And yet with all our engines doing the work of millions of draymen and
cabmen, with all our factory-machines doing the {180} work of hundreds
of thousands of weavers and spinners, with all our telegraphs and
telephones taking the place of numberless messengers, runners, and
errand boys, and with a population, too, vastly in excess of the
population when old-fashioned methods prevailed, the fact stands out
that labor has never been in greater demand and has never commanded
higher wages than to-day.

With a proper organization of industry it seems to me that it must
ever be so--certainly as far ahead as we can look into the future.
When a machine is invented which enables one man to do the work it
formerly required two men to do in producing some sheer necessity for
mankind, an extra man is released or freed to serve mankind by the
production of some comfort or luxury, or by ministering to the things
of the mind and the spirit.

And it is the duty of society and government, it may be said just
here, to facilitate this result, to provide education and equality of
opportunity so that each man will work where his effort will mean most
in human service. Knowledge or education not only cuts the shackles
which chain a man down to a few occupations, not only sets him free to
labor where he can work best, but is also itself a productive
agency--a tool with which a man may work better.

Take the simple fact that cowpeas gather nitrogen from the air: a man
may harness this scientific truth, use it and set it to work, and get
results, profits, power, from it, as surely as from a harnessed horse
or steam engine. And so with every other useful bit of knowledge under
heaven. Knowledge is power.


{181}

[Illustration: "SOCIETY BELLES" OF MINDANAO, PHILIPPINE ISLANDS.]


[Illustration: A STREET SCENE IN MANILA.]


{182}

[Illustration: TWO KINDS OF WORKERS IN BURMA .]
  One of the pleasures of being "on the road to Mandalay" was to see
  the--

  "Elephints a-pilin' teak
  In the sludgy, squdgy creek"

  The elephants of Rangoon are as fascinating as the camels of Peking.
  But one never gets hardened to the every-day Oriental spectacle of
  human beings harnessed like oxen to weary burdens, many of which
  make those in the lower picture look light by comparison.


{180 continued}

All this doctrine Asia has rejected, or has never even got to the
point of considering. In America a motorman or conductor by means of
tools and knowledge--a street-car for a tool and the science of
electricity for knowledge--transports forty people from one place to
another. These men are high-priced laborers considered from an
Oriental standpoint and yet {183} it costs you only five cents for
your ride, and five minutes' time. In Peking, on the other hand, it
takes forty men pulling rickshaws to transport the forty passengers;
and though the pullers are "cheap laborers," it costs you more money
and an hour's time to get to your destination--even if you are so
lucky as not to be taken to the wrong place.

Forty men to do the work that two would do at home! Men and women
weavers doing work that machines would do at home. Grain reaped with
sickles instead of with horses and reapers as in America. Sixteen men
at Hankow to carry baggage that one man and a one-horse dray would
carry in New York. Women carrying brick, stone, and timber up the
mountainside at Hong Kong--and the Chinese threatened a general riot
when the English built a cable-car system up the incline; they
compelled the owners to sign an agreement to transport passengers
only--never freight! No sawmills in the Orient, but thousands of men
laboriously converting logs into lumber by means of whipsaws. No
pumps, even at the most used watering places, but buckets and ropes:
often no windlass. No power grain-mills, but men and women, and, in
some cases, asses and oxen, doing the work that the idle water-powers
are given no chance to do.

These are but specimen illustrations. In the few industries where
machinery and knowledge are brought into play ordinary labor is as yet
but little better paid than in other lines because such industries are
not numerous enough to affect the general level of wages. The net
result of her policy of refusing the help of machinery is that Asia
has not doubled a man's chances for work, but she has more than halved
the pay he gets for that work. And why? Because she has reduced his
efficiency. A man must get his proportion of the common wealth, and
where the masses are shackled, hampered by ignorance and poor tools,
they produce little, and each man's share is little.

Suppose you are a merchant: what sort of trade could you hope for
among a people who earn 10 cents a day--the head {184} of a family
getting half enough to buy a single meal in a second-rate restaurant?
Or if you are a banker, what sort of deposits could you get among such
a people? Or if a railroad man, how much traffic? Or if a
manufacturer, how much business? Or if a newspaper man, how much
circulation? Or if a doctor, lawyer, teacher, or preacher, how much
income?

Very plain on the whole must be my two propositions:

(1) That the Asiatic laborer is poor, the American laborer well-to-do,
because the Asiatic earns little, the American much--a condition due
to the fact that the American doubles, trebles, or quadruples his
productive capacity, his earning power, by the use of tools and
knowledge, machinery and education. The Oriental does not.

(2) Your prosperity, in whatever measure you have it; the fact that
your labor earns two, three, or ten times what you would get for it if
you had been born in Asia; this is due in the main, not to your
personal merit, but to your racial inheritance, to the fact that you
were born among a people who have developed an industrial order, have
provided education and machinery, tools and knowledge, in such manner
that your services to society are worth several times as much as would
be the case if you were in the Orient, where education has never
reached the common people.

Pity--may God pity!--the man who fancies he owes nothing to the
school, who pays his tax for education grudgingly as if it were a
charity--as if he had only himself to thank for the property on which
the government levies a pitiable mill or so for the advancement and
diffusion of knowledge among mankind. Pity him if he has not
considered; pity him the more if, having considered, he is small
enough of soul to repudiate the debt he owes the race. But for what
education has brought us from all its past, but for what it has
wrought through the invention of better tools and the better
management (through increased knowledge) of all the powers with which
men labor, our close-fisted, short-sighted {185} taxpayer would
himself be living in a shelter of brush, shooting game with a bow and
arrow, cultivating corn with a crooked stick! Most of what he has he
owes to his racial heritage; it is only because other men prosper that
he prospers. And yet owing so much to the Past, he would do nothing
for the Future; owing so much to the progress the race has made, he
would do nothing to insure a continuance of that progress.

"Line upon line; precept upon precept." At the risk of possible
redundancy, therefore, let me conclude by repeating: Whatever
prosperity you enjoy is largely due to what previous generations have
done for increasing man's efficiency by means of knowledge and tools;
your first duty to your fellows is to help forward the same agencies
for human uplift in the future. And while this is the first duty of
the individual, it is even more emphatically the first duty of a
community or a commonwealth.

This is Asia's most important lesson for America.

Singapore, Straits Settlements.



{186}


XIX

THE STRAITS SETTLEMENTS AND BURMA


The Straits Settlements and Burma I have seen in the dead of winter,
and yet with no suggestion of snow, bare fields, or leafless trees.
The luxuriant green of the foliage is never touched by frost, and in
Singapore, only seventy-seven miles from the equator, summer and
winter are practically alike.

"But you must remember that we are here in the wintertime," a
fellow-traveller remarked when another had expressed his surprise at
not finding it hotter than it really was--the speaker evidently
forgetting that at the equator December is as much a summer month as
July, and immediately south of it what are the hot months with us
become the winter months there. And Singapore is so close to the
equator that for it "all seasons are summer," and the _punkah wallas_
(the coolies who swing the big fans by which the rooms are made
tolerable) must work as hard on Christmas Day as on the Fourth of
July.

The vegetation in the Straits Settlements is such as writers on the
tropics have made familiar to us. The graceful cocoanut palms are
silhouetted against the sky in all directions; the dense, heavy
foliage of the banana trees is seen on almost every street; the
sprawling, drunken banyan tree, a confusion of roots and branches,
casts its dense shadows on the grateful earth; and all around the city
are rubber plantations, immense pineapple fields, and uncleared
jungle-land in which wild beasts and poisonous serpents carry on the
unending {187} life-and-death struggle between the strong and the weak.
Singapore, in fact, is said to have been called "the Lion City" for a
long while because of the great number of lions found in the
neighborhood. I saw the skins of elephants and tigers killed nearby,
and also the skin of a Singapore alligator fifteen feet long.

There is probably no place on earth in which there have been brought
together greater varieties of the human species than in Singapore. I
was told that sixty languages are spoken in the city, and if diversity
of color may be taken as an indication of diversity of language, I am
prepared to believe it. There are many Indians or Hindus, most of them
about as black as our <DW64>s, but with the features of the Caucasian
in the main--sharp noses, thin lips, and straight glossy black hair;
but 72 per cent, of the population of Singapore is Chinese.

It is interesting to observe that John Chinaman seems to flourish
equally in the Tropics and in the Temperate Zone. Here in Singapore
under an equatorial sun, or in Canton on the edge of the Tropics, he
seems as energetic, as unfailing in industry, as he is in wintry
Mukden or northern Mongolia. For hours after sunset many of the
Chinese shops in Singapore present as busy an appearance as at
mid-day, and the pigtailed rickshaw men, with only a loin-cloth about
their bare bodies, seem to run as fast and as far as they would if
they were in Peking.

The Chinese are a wonderful people, and I am more and more impressed
with the thought of what a hand they are to have in the world's
affairs a hundred years hence when they get thoroughly "waked up."
They were first brought to Singapore, I understand, as common
laborers, but now their descendants are among the wealthiest men and
women in the place and ride around in automobiles, while descendants
of their one-time employers walk humbly on the adjacent sidewalks. It
is a tribute to the untiring industry, shrewdness, and business skill
of the Chinaman that nowadays when people {188} anywhere speak of
desiring Celestials as laborers, they add, "Provided they are under
contract to return to China when the work is finished, and do not
remain to absorb the trade and wealth of the country."

From Singapore we made a very interesting trip to Johore, a little
kingdom about the size of ten ordinary counties, and with a population
of about 350,000. The soil and climate along the route are well suited
to the cultivation of rubber trees, and considerable areas have
recently been cleared of the dense jungle growth and set to young
rubber plants. One of my friends who has a rubber plantation north of
Singapore says that while rubber is selling now at only $1.50 a pound
as compared with $3 a pound a few months ago, there are still enormous
profits in the business, as the rubber should not cost over 25 cents a
pound to produce. Some of the older plantations paid dividends of 150
per cent, last year, and probably set aside something for a rainy day
in addition.

Yet not even these facts would have justified the wild speculation in
rubber, the unreasoning inflation in values, which proved a veritable
"Mississippi Bubble" for so many investors in Europe and Asia last
year. Shares worth $5 or $10 were grabbed by eager buyers at $100
each. I know of a specific instance where a plantation bought for
$16,000 was capitalized at $230,000, or 20 for 1, and the stock
floated. When the madness had finally spent itself and people began to
see things as they were, not only individuals, but whole communities,
found themselves prostrated. Shanghai will not recover for years, and
some of its citizens--the young fellow with a $1500 income who
incurred a $30,000 debt in the scramble, for example--are left in
practical bondage for life as a result. The men who have gone into the
rubber-growing industry on a strictly business basis, however, are
likely to find it profitable for a long time to come.

The cocoanut industry is also a profitable one, although the modest
average of 10 per cent., year in and year out, has {189} not appealed
to those who have been indulging in pipe dreams about rubber. Where
transportation facilities are good, the profits from cocoanuts
probably average considerably in excess of 10 per cent., for the trees
require little care, and it is easy for the owners to sell the product
without going to any trouble themselves. In one section of the
Philippines, I know, the Chinese pay one peso (50 cents gold) a tree
for the nuts and pick them themselves. And when we consider the great
number of the slim-bodied trees that may grow upon an acre, it is not
surprising to hear that many owners of cocoanut groves or plantations
live in Europe on the income from the groves, going to no trouble
whatever except to have the trees counted once a year.

Penang, where we spent only a day, is almost literally in the midst of
an immense cocoanut plantation, and I was much interested in seeing
the half-naked Hindus gathering the unhusked fruit for shipment. The
tall, limbless trunks of the trees, surmounted only by a top-knot of
fruit and foliage, are in nearly every case gapped and notched at
intervals of about three feet to furnish toe-hold for the natives in
climbing.

After tiffin on this winter day, instead of putting on gloves and
overcoats, we went out on a grassy lawn, clad in linen and pongee as
we were, and luxuriated in the cool shade of the palm trees. The dense
foliage of the tropical jungle was in sight from our place by the
seaside, and in the garden not far away were cinnamon trees, cloves,
orchids, rubber trees, the poisonous upas, and palms of all varieties
known.

Penang is a rather important commercial centre, and exports more tin
than any other place on earth. The metal is shipped in molten bars
like lead or pig iron, and to one who has associated tin only with
light buckets, cups, and dippers, it is surprising how much strength
it takes to move a bar of the solid metal the size of a small
watermelon.

The imports of Penang are also not inconsiderable, and in walking
through the warehouses along the wharves I was {190} struck by the
number of boxes, crates, bales, and bundles bearing the legend, "Made
in Germany." The Germans are today the most aggressive commercial
nation on earth, and I find that their government and their business
houses are searching every nook and corner of the globe for trade
openings. Unlike our American manufacturers, it may be observed just
here, they are quick to change the style of their goods to meet even
what they may regard as the whims of their customers, and this is an
advantage of no small importance. If a manufacturer wishes to sell
plows in the Philippines, for example, it would not be worth while for
him to try to sell the thoroughly modern two-handled American kind to
begin with. He should manufacture an improved one-handled sort at
first and try gradually to make the natives see the advantages of
using two handles. At present, as an American said to me in Manila, if
you should seek to sell a Filipino a two-handled plow he would
probably say that two handles may be all right for Americans who are
not expert at plowing, but that the Filipino has passed that stage!

I mention this only by way of illustrating the necessity of respecting
the _custombre_, or custom, of the country. The Germans realize this,
and we do not.

One day by steamer from Penang brought us to Rangoon, the capital and
most important city in Burma, and (next to Bombay and Calcutta) the
most important in British India. We had heard much of the place,
situated thirty miles up the river "on the road to Mandalay," but
found that even then the half had not been told. If there were nothing
else to see but the people on the streets, a visit to Rangoon would be
memorable, for nowhere else on earth perhaps is there such
butterfly-like gorgeousness and gaudiness of raiment. At a little
distance you might mistake a crowd for an enormous flower-bed. All
around you are men and women wearing robes that rival in brilliancy
Joseph's coat of many colors.

The varieties in form of clothing are as great as the varieties {191}
in hue. The Burmese babies toddle about in beauty unadorned, and for
the grown-ups there is every conceivable sort of apparel--or the lack
of it. Most of the laborers on the streets wear only a loin-cloth and
a turban (with the addition of a caste-mark on the forehead in case
they are Hindus), but others have loose-fitting red, green, yellow,
blue, striped, ring-streaked or rainbow-hued wraps, robes, shirts or
trousers: and the women, of course, affect an equal variety of colors.

"The whackin' white cheroot" that the girl smoked in Kipling's "Road
to Mandalay" is also much in evidence here; or perhaps instead of the
white cheroot it is an enormous black cigar. In either case it is as
large as a medium-sized corncob, that the newly landed tourist is
moved to stare thereat in open-eyed amazement. How do Kipling's verses
go?

  "'Er petticoat was yaller, an' 'er little cap was green.
  An' 'er name was Supi-yaw-lat--jes' the same as Theebaw's Queen,
  An' I seed her first a-smokin' of a whackin' white cheroot.
  An' a-wastin' Christian kisses on a 'eathen idol's foot."

They are all there in Rangoon yet--the gorgeous coloring of the lady's
raiment, her cheroots, and the heathen idols--

  "Bloomin' idol made o' mud.
  Wot they called the Great Gawd Bud."

How many images of Buddha there are in the city it would be impossible
to estimate--I saw them not only in the pagodas, but newly carved in
the shops which supply the Buddhist temples in the interior--and the
gilded dome of the Shwe Dagon Pagoda, "the most celebrated shrine of
the entire Buddhist world," glitters like a beacon for miles before
you reach the city. Nearly two thirds the height of the Washington
Monument, it is gilded from top to bottom--with actual gold leaf,
Rangoon citizens claim--and around it are innumerable smaller pagodas
and shrines glittering with mosaics of  glass in imitation of
all the gems known to mortals. {192} Studied closely, they appear
unduly gaudy, of course, but your first impression is that you have
found a real Aladdin's palace, a dazzling, glittering dream of
Oriental splendor and magnificence. To these shrines there come
to-day, as there have been coming for more than twenty centuries,
pilgrims from all lands where Buddha's memory is worshipped, pilgrims
not only from Burma, but from Siam, Ceylon, China, and Korea. I shall
not soon forget the feeble looks of the old white-haired pilgrim whom
two women were helping up the steep ascent as I left the Pagoda after
my second visit there. I am glad for his sake, and for the sake of all
the millions to whom Buddha's doctrine is "the Light of Asia," that it
is a religion at least without the degrading, blighting tendencies of
Hinduism, and that the smiling faces of the images about the Shwe
Dagon present at least some faint idea of a God who tempers justice
with mercy and made human life good rather than a God of cruelty who
made life a curse and a mockery. Every traveller who sees Buddhist
Burma after having seen Hindu India comments on the greater
cheerfulness and hopefulness of the Burman people, and especially the
happier lives of the women--all a result, in the main, of the
difference in religion.

And yet Burman Buddhism, in all conscience, is pitiable enough--its
temples infested by fortune-tellers, witches, and fakirs, its faith
mingled with gross superstitions and charms to propitiate the "nats"
or spirits which are supposed to inhabit streams, forests, villages,
houses, etc., and to have infinite power over the lives and fortunes
of the people. A common sight on the morning streets is a group of
yellow-robed priests with their begging bowls, into which pious
Buddhists put food and other offerings; without these voluntary
offerings the priest must go hungry. A curious custom in Burma, as in
Siam, requires every youth to don the priestly robe for a few days and
get his living in this way.

The ordinary beast of burden in Rangoon is the Indian {193} bullock.
Often pure white, usually with a well-kept appearance and with a
clean, glossy coat of short hair, he looks as if he should be on the
way to a Roman sacrifice with garlands about his head. Teams of black
Hindus, three quarters naked, are also seen pulling heavy carts and
drays; and it may be that the small boys utilize the long-eared goats
(they have heavy, drooping ears like a foxhound's) to pull their small
carts, but this I do not know. The work-beast of the city that
interested me most was the elephant, and henceforth the elephants of
Rangoon shall have a place alongside the camels of Peking in my memory
and affection. Of course, the elephants of Rangoon are not so numerous
as are the camels in China's capital, but those that one sees display
an intelligence and certain human-like qualities that make them
fascinating.

One morning I got up early and went to McGregor & Co.'s lumber yard at
Ahloon on the Irrawaddy to see the trained elephants there handle the
heavy saw-logs which it is necessary to move from place to place. It
was better than a circus.

  "Elephants a-pilin' teak
  In the sludgy, squdgy creek."

It is very clear that my lord the Elephant, like most other beings in
the Tropics, doesn't entirely approve of work. What he did at Ahloon
on the morning of my visit he did with infinite deliberation, and he
stopped much to rest between tugs. Also when some enormous log, thirty
or forty feet long and two or three feet thick, was given him to pull
through the mire, he would roar mightily at each hard place, getting
down on his knees sometimes to use his strength to better advantage,
and one could hardly escape the conclusion that at times he "cussed"
in violent Elephantese. The king of the group, a magnificent tusker,
pushed the logs with his snout and tusks, while the others pulled them
with chains. But the most marvellous thing is how the barefooted,
half-naked driver, or mahout, astride the great giant's shoulders,
makes him {194} understand what to do in each case by merely kicking
his neck or prodding his ears.

At one time while I watched, a tuskless elephant or mutna got his log
stuck in the mud and was tugging and roaring profanely about his
trials, when the tusker's mahout bid that royal beast go help his
troubled brother. Straightway, therefore, went the tusker, leaving
great holes in the mud at each footprint as if a tree had been
uprooted there, gave a mighty shove to the recalcitrant log, and there
was peace again in the camp.

For stacking lumber the elephant is especially useful. Any ordinary
sized log, tree or piece of lumber he will pick up as if it were a
piece of stovewood and tote with his snout, and in piling heavy plank
he is remarkably careful about matching. Eying the pile at a distance,
he looks to see if it is uneven or any single piece out of place, in
which case he is quick to make it right. The young lady in our party
was also much amused when the mahout called out, "Salaam to memsahib"
("Salute the lady"), and his lordship bowed and made his salutation as
gracefully as his enormous head and forelegs would permit.

One of my fellow-passengers, a rubber planter from the Straits
Settlements, has worked elephants, has used them on the plantation and
as help in building bridges, and has told me some interesting stories
concerning them. He had two--one a tusker worth 2500 rupees, or
$833-1/3, and the other a mutna (without tusks) worth 2250 rupees, or
$750. On one occasion the mutna heard "the call of the wild," and went
back to the jungle. Evidently, though, his wild brethren didn't like
the civilized ways he brought back with him, for when he returned home
later two thirds of his tail had been pulled off, and he bore other
marks of struggle on his body. The tusker on one occasion ran mad (as
they will do now and then) and killed one of his keepers.

I was also interested to hear how a wild elephant is caught. Driven
into a stockade, the tamed elephants close in {195} on him, and the
mahouts get him well chained before he knows what has happened. For a
day or two he remains in enforced bondage, then two or three of the
great tamed creatures take him out for a walk or down to the river
where he may drink and bathe himself. Moreover, the other mahouts set
about taming him--talk to him in the affectionate, soothing, half
hypnotizing way which Kipling has made famous in his stories, and
stroke his trunk from discreet but gradually lessening distances. In a
couple of months "my lord the Elephant" is fully civilized, responds
promptly to the suggestions of his mahout, and a little later adopts
some useful occupation.

In Siam the elephants are much used in managing the immense rafts of
teak trees that are floated down the rivers for export. My friend the
rubber planter has also had one or two good travelling elephants on
which he used to travel through the jungle from one plantation to the
other, a distance of twenty-five miles. On more than one occasion he
has run into a herd of wild elephants in making this trip. On good
roads, elephants kept only for riding purposes will easily make seven
miles an hour, moving with a long, easy stride, which, however, they
are likely to lose if set to heavy work.

Perhaps the greatest difficulty about the elephant is the great
quantity of food required to keep him going. Eight hundred pounds a
day will barely "jestify his stummuck," as Uncle Remus would say, and
when he gets hungry "he wants what he wants when he wants it," and
trumpets thunderously till he gets it. The skipper on a
Singapore-Rangoon steamer told of having had a dozen or more on board
a few months ago, and their feed supply becoming exhausted, they waxed
mutinous and wrathy, evincing a disposition to tear the whole vessel
to pieces, when the ship fortunately came near enough to land to
enable the officers to signal for a few tons of feed to be brought
aboard for the elephants' breakfast.

I haven't seen a white elephant yet, but in the Shwe Dagon {196}
Temple I found a lively eight-months-old youngster, an orphan from
Mandalay, that could eat bananas twice as fast as my Burmese boy-guide
and I could peel them, and the boy-guide in question assured me that
he will turn white by the time he is two or three years old. Which
would be very interesting if true, but I fear it isn't.

I am now hurrying on to India proper and must conclude my impression
of Burma with this letter. In Rangoon the lighter-skinned and
lighter-hearted Burmese contrast rather notably with the dark and
serious Hindus. Many of the Hindus are in Burma only temporarily. One
ship that I saw coming into Rangoon from the Coromandel Coast, India,
was literally spilling over with 3000 brown Hindu coolies. They will
work through the Burman rice harvest--rice is the one great crop of
the country--at eight to twelve annas (16 to 24 cents) a day, and
after three or four months of this will return home. Because they are
so poor at home the steamship charges only ten rupees ($3) for
bringing them to Rangoon, but requires fifteen rupees for carrying
them back.

Nor should I fail to mention another thing that impressed me very much
in Rangoon: the graves of the English officers who were killed in the
war with the Burmans many years ago, and are now buried within the
walls of the picturesque old Buddhist Temple. True it is that the sun
never sets on the English flag; and one finds much to remind him, too,
that the sun never sets on the graves of that flag's defenders.
Scattered through every zone and clime are they: countless thousands
of them far, far from the land that gave them birth. Nearby the place
where those of the Shwe Dagon sleep I stood on the temple walls and
looked out on the fading beauty of the tropic sunset, the silvery
outline of the Irrawaddy River breaking into the darkening green of
the jungle growth. And then came up the cool night breeze of the
Torrid Zone--more refreshing and delightful than our Temperate climate
ever knows. As gentle and caressing as a mother's lullaby, how {197}
it crooned among the foliage of the cocoanut palms, whispered among
the papaya leaves, and how joyously the great blades of the bananas
welcomed it!

With that fair view before our eyes, with the breezes as if of Araby
the Blest making mere existence a joy, we take our leave of Burma.

Rangoon, Bunna.



{198}


XX

HINDUISM--AND THE HIMALAYAS


If it were any other country but India, I might write last of the
religion the people profess, but, since it is India, it is the first
thing to be considered. Religion is the supreme fact of Indian life--
if we may call religion what has been more properly defined as "a
sacred disease."

Certainly nowhere else on earth is there a country where the entire
life of the people is so molded by their spiritual beliefs. Two
children are born the same day. The one, of high-caste parentage,
Brahminism has irrevocably decreed shall be all his life, no matter
how stupid or vicious, a privileged and "superior" being, to whom all
lower orders must make obeisance. The other, born of a Dom father and
mother, Brahminism has decreed shall be all his life, no matter how
great his virtue or brilliant his mind, an outcast whose mere touch
works pollution worse than crime. And through the lifetime of each,
Brahminism, or Hinduism, as the supreme religion of India is called,
will exercise over him an influence more potent and incessant than any
civil government has ever exercised over its subjects.

About theoretical or philosophical Hinduism there is admittedly a
certain measure of moral beauty, but to get even this from Hindu
literature one must wade through cesspools of filth and obscenity and
must shut his eyes to pitiably low ideals of Deity, while in its
practical manifestations modern Hinduism is the most sickening
combination of superstition, idolatry, and {199} vice that now
disgraces the name of religion in any considerable portion of the
earth. The idea of the transmigration of souls, "Samsara," the belief
that you have had millions of births (as men and animals) and may have
millions more (unless you earlier merit the favor of the gods and win
release from life), and that what you are in your present life is the
result of actions in previous existence, and what you do in this
present existence will influence all your future rebirths--this is a
doctrine that might be a tremendous moral force if it were linked with
such ideals as distinguish the Christian religion. In practical
Hinduism, however, the emphasis is not on worthy living, not on
exalted moral conduct, as the thing essential to divine favor, but on
rites and ceremonies, regard for the priests, rigid observance of
caste, sacred bathing, and the offering of proper sacrifices to fickle
or bloodthirsty gods and goddesses. In their religion no Isaiah makes
terrible and effective protest against the uselessness of form; no
Christ teaches that God can be worshipped only in spirit.

Another doctrine, that Self, that a man's own soul is an Emanation of
God, a part of the Divine Essence, and the purpose of man's existence
to hasten a final absorption into God--this also (although destructive
of the idea of individuality, the sacredness of personality, so
fundamental in Christian thought) would seem to be a tremendous moral
force, but it is vitiated in much the same way as is the idea of
Samsara, while it is further weakened by the fact that the Hindu gods
themselves are often represented as immoral, bloodthirsty, obscene and
criminal.

Enmeshed in vicious traditions and false doctrine, its philosophy and
purer teachings known only to a cultured few, the Higher Hinduism
"powerless to be born," is only the illusion which it would teach that
all else is, while practical Hinduism hangs like a blight over a land
whose people are as the sands of the sea for multitude. If all the
human race alive to-day were to pass in review before you, every
eighth person in the {200} ranks would be a Hindu. And to realize in
what manner Hinduism guides its 200,000,000 followers it is only
necessary to visit some of their most celebrated temples.

It is an extreme illustration, no doubt, but since it was the first
Hindu shrine I visited, we may begin with the Kalighat in Calcutta.
This temple is dedicated to Kali, or "Mother Kali," as the
English-speaking temple priest who conducted me always said, the
bloody goddess of destruction. That terrible society of criminals and
assassins, the Thugs (its founder is worshipped as a saint), had Kali
as their patron goddess and whetted their knives and planned their
murderous crimes before her image: all this in a "temple" of
"religion."

The representations of Kali befit her character. Fury is in her
countenance and in her three red eyes. Her tongue lolls from her
mouth. In one of her four hands is the dripping, bloody head of a
slaughtered enemy. Her necklace is of the heads of her slain. Her
girdle is the severed hands of the dead men. Tradition says that she
constantly drinks blood; and each man who comes to worship her brings
a little wet, trembling kid: the warm blood that flows after the
priestly ax has done its work is supposed to please the terrible
goddess. The morning of my visit there were sacrifices every few
minutes, and on the great day of Kali-worship, in October, the place
runs ankle-deep in blood.

In the old days--and not so long ago at that--there were human
sacrifices at Kalighat, and when I asked the priest concerning them,
his significant answer was that the British Government would no longer
allow them. He made no claim that Hinduism itself has changed! Their
Kaliki Purana says that one human sacrifice delights Kali for a
thousand years, and in spite of British alertness a bloody human head
bedecked with flowers was found in a Kali temple near Calcutta not
many years ago, and at Akrha, also near Calcutta, human sacrifice has
been attempted within a decade.

From the Kalighat temple the priest of Mother Kali took me {201} to
the edge of the dirty, murky Hoogli (sacred as a part of the Ganges
system), where in its consecrated filth scores of miserable pilgrims
were washing away their sins or "acquiring merit" with the gods. On
the way we passed the image of Juggernaut, the miserable stable-like
shelters in which the pilgrims are lodged, and the image of Setola,
"the Mother of the Smallpox," as the priest called her, to which
smallpox victims come for cure. Back again to the temple, the priest
assured me that if I would give the other priests a few annas (an anna
is worth 2 cents of our money) they would drive back the shrieking,
bloodstained, garlanded crowds of half-naked "worshippers" and give me
a view of the Kali idol. The money forthcoming--and the high priest,
in expectation of a tip, coming out to lend his assistance--there
ensued such a Kilkenny fight between the priests and the dense mob of
"worshippers," such knocking, kicking, scrouging, as never any man got
for the same amount of money in any prize-fight, until finally I got a
swift glimpse of the idol's hideous head.

Then having paid the greedy priest and the high priest (like the
daughters of the horseleech they always cry for "more") I went back to
my hotel, properly edified, let us believe, by this spectacle of Hindu
"religion."

It was Sunday morning.

Could I have been otherwise than impressed when I went that afternoon
to another Indian religious service--this time of Christians--and
compared it with what I had seen in the morning? Instead of a
money-hunting priest sitting beside a butcher's block and exacting a
prescribed fee from each pushing, jabbering, suppliant of a
bloodthirsty goddess, herself only one of the many jealous gods and
goddesses to be favored and propitiated--instead of this there was a
converted Indian minister who told his fellows of one God whose
characteristic is love, and whose worship is of the spirit. And
instead of the piteous bleating of slaughtered beasts there was the
fine rhythm of hymns whose English names one could easily {202}
recognize from their tunes in spite of the translation of the words
into the strange tongue of the Bengali.

At home, I may say just here, I am not accused of being flagrantly and
outrageously pious; but no open-minded, observant man, even if he were
an infidel, could make a trip through Asia without seeing what a
tremendously uplifting influence is the religion to which the majority
of Americans adhere as compared with the other faiths, and how
tremendously in Christian lands it has bettered and enriched the lives
even of those of

  "Deaf ear and soul uncaring"

who ignore it or deride it. In no spirit of cant and with no desire to
preach, I set down these things, simply because they are as obvious as
temples or scenery to any Oriental traveller who travels with open
eyes and open mind.

But let us now go to Benares, the fountain-head of the Hindu faith,
the city which is to it what Mecca is to Mohammedanism and more than
Jerusalem is to Christianity. And Benares is so important that I must
give more than a paragraph to my impressions of it.

The view of the river-front from the sacred Ganges I found
surprisingly majestic and impressive. The magnificent, many-storied
pilgrim-houses, built long ago by wealthy princes anxious to win the
favor of the gods, tower like mountains from the river bank. A strange
mingling of many styles and epochs of Oriental architecture are they,
and yet mainly suggestive of the palaces and temples that lined the
ancient Nile. An earthquake, too, has heightened the effect by leaving
massive ruins, the broken bases of gigantic columns, that seem to
whisper tales even older than any building now standing in Benares.
For Benares, although its present structures are modern, was old when
the walls of Rome were built; it was historic when David sat on the
throne of Israel.

But while one may find elsewhere structures not greatly {203} unlike
these beside the Sacred River, nowhere else on earth may one see
crowds like these--crowds that overflow the acres and acres of stone
steps leading up from the river's edge through the maze of buildings
and spill off into the water. There are indeed all sorts and
conditions of men and women. Princes come from afar with their
gorgeous retinues and stately equipages, and go down into the
bathing-places calling on the names of their gods as trustingly as the
poor doomed leper who thinks that the waters of Mother Gunga may bring
the hoped-for healing of his body. Wealthy, high-caste women whose
faces no man ever sees except those that be of their own
households--they too must not miss the blessing for soul and body to
be gained in no other way, and so they are brought in curtained,
man-borne _palki_ and are taken within boats with closed sides, where
they bathe apart from the common herd. Men and women, old and young,
high and low (except the outcasts)--all come. There are once-brown
Hindus with their skins turned to snowy whiteness by leprosy, men with
limbs swollen to four or five times natural size by elephantiasis,
palsied men and women broken with age, who hope to win Heaven (or that
impersonal absorption into the Divine Essence which is the nearest
Hindu approach to our idea of Heaven) by dying in the sacred place.

A great many pilgrims--may God have pity, as He will, on their poor
untutored souls--die in despair, worn out by weakness and disease, ere
they reach Benares with its Balm of Gilead which they seek; but many
other aged or afflicted ones die happier for the knowledge that they
have reached their Holy City, and that their ashes, after the quick
work of the morrow's funeral pyre, will be thrown on the waters of the
Ganges. "_Rama, nama, satya hai_" (The name of Rama is true): so I
heard the weird chant as four men bore past me the rigid red-clad
figure of a corpse for the burning. No coffins are used. The body is
wrapped in white if a man's, in red if a woman's, strapped on light
bamboo poles, and before {204} breakfast-time the burning wood above
and beneath the body has converted into a handful of ashes that which
was a breathing human being when the sun set the day before.

Other writers have commented on the few evidences of grief that
accompany these Hindu funerals. In Calcutta mourners are sometimes
hired--for one anna a Hindu can get a professional mourner to wail
heart-breakingly at the funeral of his least-loved mother-in-law--but
somehow the relatives of the dead themselves seem to show little
evidence of grief. "But where are the bereaved families?" I asked a
Hindu priest as we looked at a few groups of men and woman sitting and
talking around the fires from whence came the gruesome odor of burning
human flesh. "Oh, those are the families you see there," he replied.
And sure enough they were--I suppose--although I had thought them only
the persons hired to help in the cremation. One ghastly feature of the
funerals occurs when the corpse is that of a father. Just before the
cremation is concluded it is the son's duty--in some places I visited,
at least--to take a big stick and crack the skull in order to release
his father's spirit!

But, after all, reverting to the question of mourning, why should the
Hindu mourn for his dead? Human life, in his theology, is itself a
curse, and after infinite rebirths, the soul running its course
through the bodies of beasts and men, the ultimate good, the greatest
boon to be won from the propitiated gods, is "remerging in the general
soul," the Escape from Being, Escape from the Illusions of Sense and
Self; not Annihilation itself but the Annihilation of Personality, of
that sense of separateness from the Divine which our encasement in
human bodies gives us. Where Christianity teaches that you are a son
of God and that you will maintain a separate, conscious, responsible
identity throughout eternity, Hinduism teaches that your spirit is a
part of the Divine and will ultimately be reabsorbed into it. Its
doctrine in this respect is much like that of Buddhism. Inevitably
neither religion {207} lays that emphasis on personality, the sacredness of
the individual life, which is inherent in Christianity and Christian
civilization, just as the absence of this principle is characteristic
of the social and political institutions of the Orient.


{205}

[Illustration: TYPES AT DARJEELING, NORTHERN INDIA, AND AT DELHI,
  CENTRAL INDIA.]
  India has not a homogeneous population. There are almost as many
  races, types, and languages as in the continent of Europe. The
  right-hand figure in the upper picture bears a striking resemblance
  to a North American Indian. The instrument in his hands is a
  praying-wheel.


{206}

  TWO RANGOON TYPES.

[Illustration: Supi-yaw-lat and her "whackin' white cheroot."]

[Illustration: A Hindu girl.]

  Rangoon is a city of gorgeous colors and varied human types. But one
  need not go far to find the Burmese girl Kipling has immortalized:

  "'Er petticoat was yaller and 'er little cap was green,
   An er name was Supi-yaw-lat--jes' the same as Theebaw's Queen
   An' I seed her first a-smokin' of a whackin' white cheroot.
   An' a wastin' Christian kisses on a 'eathen idol's foot'"


{207 continued}

But let us get back to Benares and its pilgrims. They do not all die,
nor do they spend all their time bathing in the sacred waters of
"Mother Gunga," as the Ganges is called. Naturally there are many
temples in which they must worship, many priests whom they must
support. There are said to be 2000 temples in Benares and the high
priest of one of them--while sparring for a bigger tip for his
services--told me that he was at the head of 400 priests supported by
his establishment alone (the Golden Temple).

And such temples as they are! I have seen the seamy side of some great
cities, but for crass and raw vulgarity and obsceneness there are
"temples" in Benares--so-called "temples" that should minister to
man's holier nature, with so-called "priests" to act as guides to
their foulness--that could give lessons to a third-rate Bowery den. No
wonder that the Government of India, when it made a law against
indecent pictures and carvings, had to make a special exception for
Hindu "religious"(!) pictures. There is a limit, however, even to the
endurance of the British Government, and at the Nepalese Temple I was
told that the authorities do not allow such structures to be built
now. Moreover, it is not only admitted that the temples in many parts
of India are the resort of the lowest class of women, "temple girls"
dedicated to gods and goddesses, but their presence is openly defended
as proper.

Most of the temples in Benares, too, are as far from cleanliness as
they are from godliness. The Golden Temple with its sacred cows penned
up in dirty stalls, its ragged half-naked worshippers, its holy
cesspool known as "The Well of Knowledge," its hideous,
leprosy-smitten beggars, its numerous emblems of its lustful god
Krishna, and its mercenary priests, {208} is a good illustration. And
the famous Monkey Temple (dedicated like the Kalighat to Mother Kali)
I found no more attractive. This temple is open to the sky and the
most loathsome collection of dirty monkeys that I have ever had the
misfortune to see were scrambling all around the place, while the
monkey-mad, bloodstained, goat-killing priests, preying on the
ignorance of the poor, and itching for a few annas in tips, won a
place in my disgust second only to that occupied by their monkey
companions. I left and went out to the gate where the snake-charmers
were juggling with a dozen hissing cobras. It was pleasanter to look
at them.

That night an eminent English artist, temporarily in Benares,
discoursed to me at length though vaguely on the beauties of Hindu
religious theory, but what I had seen during the day did not help his
argument. Emerson's phrase may well be applied to Hinduism, "What you
are speaks so loud that I cannot hear what you say."

Not that it has anything to do with Hinduism but simply to get a
better taste in the mouth at the end, let us turn in conclusion to a
happier subject. Some days ago I went to Darjeeling on the boundary of
northern India and on the edge of the great Himalaya mountain range.
In sight from its streets and from nearby peaks are the highest
mountains formed by the Almighty's hand, the sublimest scenery on
which the eye of mortal man may ever rest.

Long before daylight one morning I bestrode a sure-footed horse and
wound my way, with two friends of a day, as friends on a foreign tour
are likely to prove, to the top of Tiger Hill, from which point we
looked across the boundaries of Tibet and saw the sun rise upon a view
whose majesty defied description. In the distance on our left there
glittered in its mantle of everlasting snow, and with its twin
attendants, the summit of Mt. Everest, 29,002 feet high, the highest
mountain on the surface of the earth. Even grander was the view
directly in front of us, for there only one third as far away as
Everest, royal {209} Kinchinjunga shouldered out the sky, its colossal,
granite masses, snow-covered and wind-swept, towering in dread majesty
toward the very zenith. Monarch of a white-clad semicircle of kingly
peaks it stood, while the sun, not yet risen to our view,  the
pure-white of its crest with a blush of rose-tint, and in a minute or
two had set the whole vast amphitheatre a-glitter with the warm hues
of its earliest rays. Across forty-five miles of massive chasms and
rugged foothills (these "foothills" themselves perhaps as high as the
highest Alps or Rockies) we looked to where, thousands of feet higher
yet, there began the eternal snow-line of Kinchinjunga, above which
its further bulk of 11,000 additional feet formed a dazzling
silhouette against the northern sky. Stand at the foot of Pike's Peak
and imagine another Pike's Peak piled on top; stand at the foot of
Mount Mitchell and imagine four other Mount Mitchells on top of one
another above its highest point--the massive bulk in either case
stretching thousands and thousands of feet above the line of
everlasting snow. Such is Kinchinjunga.

Spellbound we watched as if forbidden intruders upon a view it was not
meet for any but the high gods themselves to see. About it all was a
suggestion of illimitableness, of more than earthly majesty, of
infinite serenity and measureless calm, which sat upon our spirits
with a certain eerie unworldliness.

It only confirmed an almost inevitable conjecture when I learned later
that it was in sight of the Himalayas that Gautama Buddha dreamed his
dream of the Nirvana and of its brooding and endless peace in which
man's fretful spirit--

  "From too much love of living
   From hope and fear set free"--

may find at last the rest that it has sought in vain through all our
human realm of Time and Place.

Lucknow, India.



{210}


XXI

"THE POOR BENIGHTED HINDUS"


GREAT indeed are the uses of Poetry. Consider by way of illustration
how accurately and comprehensively some forgotten bard in four short
lines has pictured for us the true condition of the inhabitants of
England's great Indian Empire:

  "The poor, benighted Hindu,
  He does the best he kin do
  He sticks to his caste from first to last.
  And for pants he makes his skin do."

A Mr. Micawber might dilate at length upon how this achievement in
verse informs us (1) as to the financial condition of the people, to
wit, they are "poor," the average annual income having been estimated
at only $10, and the average wages for day labor in the capital city
of India only 6 to 20 cents per diem; (2) as to their intellectual
condition, "benighted," ninety men in each hundred being unable to
read or write any language, while of every thousand Indian women 993
are totally illiterate; (3) as to the social system, each man living
and dying within the limits of the caste into which he is born; and
(4) as to the clothing, garb or dress of the inhabitants (or the
absence thereof), the children of both sexes being frequently attired
after the manner of our revered First Parents before they made the
acquaintance of the fig tree, while the adults also dispense generally
with trousers, shoes, and stockings, and other impedimenta of our
over-developed civilization.

{211}

Great indeed are the uses of poetry. In all my letters from India I
shall hardly be able to do more than expand and enlarge upon the great
fundamental truths so eloquently set forth in our four-line poetry
piece.

If it be sound logic to say that "God must have loved the common
people because he made so many of them," then the Creator must also
have a special fondness for these "poor benighted Hindus," for within
an area less than half the size of the United States more than
300,000,000 of them live and move and have their being. That is to
say, if the United States were as thickly populated as India, it would
contain 600,000,000 people. It is also said that when the far-flung
battle-line of Imperial Rome had reached its uttermost expansion that
great empire had within its borders only half as many people as there
are in India to-day. India and its next-door neighbor, China, contain
half the population of the whole earth. In other words, if the Chinese
and East Indians were the equals of the other races in military
prowess the combined armies of all other nations on the globe, of
every nation in Europe, North America, South America, Africa,
Australia, the Isles of the Sea, and of the rest of Asia, would be
required to defeat them.

Obviously, such a considerable portion of the human family calls for
special study. And if we would study them we must not confine
ourselves to a tour of a few cities in North India, interesting as
these cities are.

The significant man in India (where about eight tenths of the people
live on the soil) is not the trader, a city-dweller in these few large
centres of population, but the ryot or farmer, in the thousands and
thousands of little mud-house villages between the Himalaya <DW72>s and
Cape Comorin. The significant economic fact in India is not the
millions of dollars once spent on royal palaces but the $7 to $30
spent in building this average peasant's home or hut. The significant
social fact is not the income of some ancient Mogul or some modern
Rajah {212} estimated in lakhs of rupees, but the five or six cents a
day which is a laborer's wage for millions and millions of the people.

For these reasons I have been no more interested in the famous cities
I have seen than in the little rural villages whose names may have
never found place in an English book. Let us get, if we can, a pen
picture of one of these villages in north central India.

As I approached it from a distance it looked like an enormous mass of
ant-hills, for the low windowless one-story huts, as has been
suggested, are made of yellowish sun-dried clay, and are often roofed
with clay also--made flat on top with a little trench or gutter for
drainage. Perhaps the majority, however, have thick sloping roofs of
straw, the eaves being hardly as high as a man's head. Very thick are
the mud walls of the houses, eighteen inches or more in most cases,
and as the floor is also the bare earth, there is no woodwork about
such a dwelling except the doors and a few poles to hold up the roof.
In one or two small rooms of this kind without a window or chimney
(oftener perhaps in one room than in two) a whole family lives, cooks,
and sleeps.


{213}

[Illustration: A HINDU FAQUIR.]


  [Illustration: SOME FASHIONABLE HINDUS.]
  The faquirs do not like to be photographed, and this follow in the
  upper picture was snapped just in the act of rising from his bed of
  spikes. This is only one of many methods of self-torture practised
  in the hope of winning the favor of the gods.


{214}


[Illustration: HINDU CHILDREN--NOTICE THE FOREHEAD CASTE MARKS.]


{212 continued}

The streets, if such they may be called, are often little more than
crooked water-rutted paths, so narrow that one may reach from the mud
walls of the houses on one side to the mud walls on the other, and so
crooked that you are likely to meet yourself coming back before you
get to the end. Or perhaps you wind up unexpectedly in some
_mahullah_--a group of huts representing several families of kinsfolk.
Enclosed by a mud wall, the little brown bright-eyed, black-haired,
half-naked children are playing together in the little opening around
which the houses are bunched, and the barefooted mothers are cooking
_chapatis_, spinning cotton on knee-high spinning wheels, weaving in
some wonderfully primitive way, gathering fuel, or are engaged in
other household tasks. The equipment of one of these human ant-hills,
called a home, is about as primitive as the building itself. There is,
of course, a bed or cot: it is about {215} half knee-high, and the heavy
twine or light rope knitted together after the fashion of a very
coarse fish-net is the only mattress. The coarse grain which serves
for food is stored in jars; the meagre supply of clothing hangs in one
corner of the room; there are no chairs, knives or forks. The stove or
fireplace is a sort of small clay box for the fire, with an opening on
top for the kettle or oven. In one corner of the room is the fuel: a
few small sticks and dried refuse from cow stalls that Americans use
for fertilizing their fields. "We have found rather bad results," a
missionary told me, "from providing Indian girls with mattresses,
chairs, knives, forks, etc., at our mission schools. Later, when they
marry our native workers, the $5-a-month income of the family (which
is about all they can expect) is insufficient to provide these
luxuries, and the girl's recollections of former comforts are likely
to prove a source of dissatisfaction to her."

At first you ask, "But why are there no windows in the houses? Surely
the people could leave openings in the clay walls that would give
light and ventilation?" The answer is that most of the year the
weather is so hot that the hope of the owner is to get as nearly
cave-like conditions as possible; to find, as it were, a cool place in
the earth, untouched by the fiery glare of the burning sun outside.
Even in north central India in the houses of the white men, where
everything has been done to reduce the temperature and with every
punkah-fan swinging the room's length to make a breeze, the
temperature in May and June is 106 or higher, and at midnight in the
open air the thermometer may reach 105. "It is then no uncommon
thing," a friend in Agra told me, "to find even natives struck down
dead by the roadside; and the railways have men designated to take and
burn the bodies of those who succumb to the heat in travel by the
cars."

In such a warm climate the dress of the people, as has already been
suggested, is not very elaborate. In fact, the garb of the adult man
is likely to be somewhat like the uniform of the {216} Gunga Din (the
Indian _bhisti_ or water-carrier for the British regiment):

  "The uniform 'e wore
  Was nothin' much before
  An' rather less than 'arf o' that be'ind--
  For a twisty piece o' rag
  And a goatskin water-bag
  Was all the field equipment 'e could find."

In cold weather, however, the majority of the men are rather fully
covered, and in any case they add a turban or cap of some gaudy hue to
the uniform just suggested.

As for the dress of the women, a typical woman's outfit will consist
of, say, a crimson skirt with a green border, a navy-blue piece of
cloth as large as a sheet draped loosely (and quite incompletely)
around the head and upper part of the body, and a breast-cloth or
possibly a waist of brilliant yellow. This combination of hues, of
course, is only a specimen. The actual colors are variable but the
brilliancy is invariable.

Furthermore, the celebrated Old Lady of Banbury Cross, who boasted of
rings, on her fingers and bells on her toes, would find her glory
vanish in a twinkling should she visit India. Not content with these
preliminary beginnings of adornment, the barefooted Hindu woman
wears--if she can afford it--a band or two of anklets, bracelets
halfway from wrist to elbow, armlets beyond the elbow, ear-rings of
immense size, a necklace or two, toe-rings and a bejewelled nose-ring
as big around as a turnip. Sometimes the jewelry on a woman's feet
will rattle as she walks like the trace-chains on a plow-horse on the
way to the barn.

This barbaric display of jewelry, it should be said, is not made
solely for purposes of show. The truth is that the native has not
grown used to the idea of savings banks (although the government is
now gradually convincing him that the postal savings institutions are
safe), and when he earns a spare rupee he puts it into jewelry to
adorn the person of himself or {217} his wife. If all the idle
treasures which the poor of India now carry on their legs, arms, ears,
and noses were put into productive industry, a good deal might be done
to alleviate the misery for which the agitators profess to blame the
British Government.

Calcutta, India.



{218}


XXII

HINDU FARMING AND FARM LIFE


In the rural villages, of course, the majority of the inhabitants are
farmers, who fare afield each morning with their so-called plows or
other tools for aiding the growth of their crops. The Indian plow is,
I believe, the crudest I have found in any part of the wide world. It
consists of a simple handle with a knob at the top; a block of wood
with an iron spike in it about an inch thick at one end and tapering
to a point at the other; and a tongue to which the yoke of bullocks
are attached. The pointed spike is, perhaps, sixteen inches long, but
only a fraction of it projects from the wooden block into which it is
fastened, and the ordinary plowing consists only of scratching the two
or three inches of the soil's upper crust.

The Allabahad Exposition was designed mainly to interest the farmers
in better implements, and its Official Handbook, in calling attention
to the exhibit of improved plows, declared:

  "The ordinary Indian plow is, for certain purposes, about as
  inefficient as it could be. Strictly speaking it is not a plow at
  all. It makes a tolerably efficient seed-drill, a somewhat
  inefficient cultivator, but it is quite incapable of breaking up
  land properly."


The other tools in use on the Indian farm are fit companions for the
primitive plow. Some one has said that 75 cents would buy the complete
cultivating outfit of the Hindu ryot! I saw men cutting up
bullock-feed with a sort of hatchet; the threshing methods are
centuries old; the little sugarcane mills {219} I found in operation
here and there could have been put into bushel baskets. The big ox
carts, which together with camel carts meet all the requirements of
travel and transportation, are also heavy and clumsy, having wheels as
big as we should use on eight-horse log-wagons at home. These wheels
are without metal tires of any kind, and the average cost of one of
the carts, a village carpenter told me, is $25.

As to the other crops grown by the Indian ryot, or farmer, I cannot
perhaps give a better idea than by quoting the latest statistics as to
the number of acres planted to each as I obtained them from the
government authorities in Calcutta.


  Rice                     73,000,000
  Wheat                    21,000,000
  Barley                    8,000,000
  Millets                  41,000,000
  Maize                     7,000.000
  Other grains             47,000,000
  Fodder crops              5,000,000
  Oilseeds: linseed,
    mustard, sesamum, etc. 14,000,000
  Sugarcane                 2,250,000
  Cotton                   13,000,000
  Jute                      3,000,000
  Opium (for China)           416,000
  Tobacco                   1,000,000
  Orchard and garden        5,000,000


It is somewhat surprising to learn that of the 246,000,000 acres under
cultivation to supply 300,000,000 people (the United States last year
cultivated 250,000,000 acres to supply 90,000,000) only 28,000,000
acres were cropped more than once during the year. With the warm
climate of India it would seem that two or more crops might be easily
grown, but the annual dry season makes this less feasible than it
would appear to the traveller. Even in January much artificial
crop-watering must be done, and no one can travel in India long
without growing used to the sight of the irrigation wells. Around them
the earth is piled high, and oxen hitched to the well ropes draw up
the water in collapsible leather bags or buckets. A general system of
elevated ditches then distributes the water where it is needed.

Concerning the drought, a resident of Muttra said to me that {220}
there practically no rain falls from the middle of January to the
middle of June. "In the latter part of the drought," he said, "the
fields assume the appearance of deserts; only the dull green of the
tree-leaves varies the vast, monotonous graybrown of the
far-stretching plains. The streams are dried up; the cattle hunt the
parched fields in vain for a bit of succulence to vary their diet of
dry grass. But at last there comes the monsoon and the rains--and then
the Resurrection Morning. The dead earth wakens to joyous
fruitfulness, and what was but yesterday a desert has become a
veritable Garden of Eden."

But, alas! sometimes the rains are delayed--long, tragically long
delayed! The time for their annual return has come--has passed, and
still the pitiless sun scorches the brown earth as if it would set
afire the grass it has already burned to tinder-dryness. The ryot's
scanty stock of grain is running low, the daily ration has been
reduced until it no longer satisfies the pangs of hunger, and with
each new sunrise gaunt Famine stalks nearer to the occupants of the
mud-dried hut. The poor peasant lifts vain hands to gods who answer
not; unavailingly he sacrifices to Shiva, to Kali, to all the
heartless Hindu deities of destruction and to unnamed demons as well.
The Ancient Terror of India approaches; from time immemorial the
vengeful drought has slain her people in herds, like plague-stricken
cattle, not by hundreds and thousands, but by tens of thousands and
hundreds of thousands. In Calcutta I saw several young men whom the
mission school rescued from starvation in the last great famine of
1901-02 and heard moving stories of that terrible time. Many readers
will recall the aid that America then sent to the suffering, but in
spite of the combined efforts of the British Government and
philanthropic Christendom, 1,236,855 people lost their lives. To get a
better grasp upon the significance of these figures it may be
mentioned that if every man, woman, and child in eight American states
and territories at that time (Delaware, Utah, Idaho, New Mexico,
Arizona, Montana, Wyoming, and Nevada) had been {221} swallowed up in
a night, the total loss of life would not have been so great as in
this one Indian famine.

Appalling as these facts are, it must nevertheless be remembered that
the loss would have been vastly greater but for the excellent system
of famine relief which the British Government has now worked out. It
has built railways all over India, so that no longer will it be
possible for any great area to suffer while another district having
abundance is unable to share its bounty because of absence of
transportation. In the second place, the government has wisely
arranged to give work at low wages to famine sufferers--road building,
railroad building, or something of the kind--instead of dispensing a
reckless charity which too often pauperizes those it is intended to
help. Before the British occupation India was scourged both by famine
and by frequent, if not almost constant, wars between neighboring
states. The fighting it has stopped entirely, the loss by drought it
has greatly reduced; and some authority has stated (I regret that I
have not been able to get the exact figures myself) that for a century
before the British assumed control, war and famine kept the population
practically stationary, while since then the number of inhabitants has
practically trebled.

Not unworthy of mention, even in connection with its work in relieving
famine sufferers, is the excellent work the British Government is
doing in enabling the farmers to free themselves from debt. The
visitor to India comes to a keener appreciation of Rudyard Kipling's
stories and poems of Indian life because of the accuracy with which
they picture conditions; and the second "Maxim of Hafiz" is only one
of many that have gained new meaning for me since my coming:

  "Yes, though a <DW5> die, to him is remitted Jehannum,
   If he borrowed in life from a native at 60 per cent. per annum."'

When I first heard of "60 per cent, per annum," and even of 70 per
cent, or 80 per cent., as the ordinary rate of interest paid {222} by
the Indian ryot to the merchant or money-lender, I could not believe
it, but further investigation proved the statement true. In the United
Provinces I found that in some cases the ryot has been little better
than a serf. The merchant has "furnished him supplies," adding
interest at the rate of one anna on each rupee at the end of each
month--6-1/4 per cent., not a year but a month, and that compounded
every 30 days! In one case that came to my attention, two orphan boys
twenty years ago, in arranging the marriage of their sister, borrowed
100 rupees at 50 per cent, interest. For seventeen years thereafter
they paid 50 rupees each year as interest, until an American
missionary took up the account at 5 per cent, instead of 50, and in
two years they had paid it off with only 7 rupees more than they had
formerly paid as annual tribute to the money-lender. In many such
cases debts have been handed down from generation to generation, for
the Hindu code of honor will not permit a son to repudiate the debts
of his father; and son, grandson, and great-grandson have, staggered
under burdens they were unable to get rid of.

In this situation the cooperative credit societies organized under
government supervision have proved a godsend to the people, and
thousands of ryots through their aid are now getting free of debt for
the first time in their lives, and their families for perhaps the
first time in generations. Each member of a cooperative credit society
has some interest in it; the government will lend at 4 per cent, an
amount not greater than the total amount deposited by all the members;
stringent regulations as to loans and their security, deposit of
surplus funds, accounting, etc., are in force, and altogether the plan
is working remarkably well. The latest report I have shows that in a
single twelvemonth the total working capital of these societies
increased more than 300 per cent.

The United States seems to be about the only fairly civilized country
in which some form of cooperative credit society, with government aid,
has not been worked out.

{223}

Of great help to the small farmer also has been the action of the
government in regulating land-rents in crowded districts. The courts
see to it that no landlord raises rents unfairly. One Brahmin
freeholder I met in a small village (he owned 250 acres, worth from
$130 to $275 per acre) told me his rents were 32 to 40 rupees (or from
$10 to $13) per acre. He grows wheat and cotton, and appeared to be
quite intelligent as well as prosperous, although he wore nothing save
a turban and an abbreviated lower garment not quite stretching from
his loins to his knees, the rest of his body being entirely naked.

That the day laborer in India can have but small hope of buying land
at $100 to $300 an acre (and I think these prices general) is
indicated by the fact that when I asked, in the next village, the wage
per month, I was told, "Four or five rupees ($1.28 to $1.60), the
laborer boarding himself."

"And how much is paid per day when a single day's labor is wanted?" I
asked.

"Two annas and bread," was the reply. (An anna is 2 cents.)

My informant was the schoolmaster of Khera Kalan village. At his
school he told me that the children of farmers were allowed tuition
free; the children of the village people pay 1 to 3 annas a month. But
so hard is the struggle to get enough coarse grain to keep soul and
body together (the peasant can seldom afford to eat rice or wheat)
that few farm children are free from work long enough to learn to read
and write.

It is heartbreaking to see the thousands and thousands of bright-eyed
boys and girls growing up amid such hopeless surroundings. I shall not
soon forget the picture of one little group whom I found squatted
around a missionary's knees in a little mud-walled yard just before I
left Khera Kalan that afternoon. Outside a score of camels were
cropping the leaves from the banyan trees (the only regular
communication with the outside world is by camel cart) and the men of
the village {224} were grinding sugarcane on the edge of the
far-reaching fields of green wheat and yellow-blossomed mustard. Not
far away was a Hindu temple; not far away, too, the historic Grand
Trunk Road which leads through Khyber Pass into the strange land of
Afghanistan. It is the road, by the way, over which Alexander the
Great marched his victorious legions into India, and over which
centuries later Tamerlane came on his terror-spreading invasion. But
this has nothing to do with the little half-naked boys and girls we
are now concerned with. They had gathered around the Padre to recite
the Ten Commandments and the Lord's Prayer in Hindustani. I asked how
many had been to school (only one responded), asked something about
their games, told them something about America, and then their
instructor inquired (interpreting all the time for me, of course):

"And what message would you like for the Sahib to give the boys and
girls of America for you?"

"Tell them, Salaam," was the quick chorus in reply.

"And that is good enough, I guess," remarked the American who is now
giving his life to the Indian people, "for Salaam means. Peace be to
you."

So indeed I pass on the message to the fortunate boys and girls of the
United States who read this article. "Salaam,"--Peace be to you.
Little Ones. You will never even know how favored of Heaven you are in
having been born in a land where famine never threatens death to you
and your kindred, where the poor have homes that would seem almost
palatial to the average Indian child; where educational opportunities
are within the reach of all; where the religion of the people is an
aid to moral living and high ideals instead of being a hindrance to
them; where no caste system decrees that the poorest children shall
not rise above the condition of their parents; where a wage-scale
higher far than six cents a day enables the poorest to have comforts
and cherish ambitions; and where the humblest "boy born in a log
cabin" may dream of the Presidency instead {225} of being an outcast
whose very touch the upper orders would account more polluting than
the touch of a beast.

Ah, the little fate-cursed Indian brats, some of them wearing rings in
their noses and not much else, who send the message through me to
you--think of them to-night and be glad that to you the lines have
fallen in pleasanter places.

Salaam, indeed, O happy little folk of my own homeland across the
seas! Peace be to you!

Jeypore, India.



{226}


XXIII

THE CASTE SYSTEM IN INDIA


Of Hinduism as a religious or ecclesiastical institution we had
something to say in another chapter; of Hinduism as Social Fact bare
mention was made. And yet it is in its social aspects, in its
enslavement of all the women and the majority of the men who come
within its reach, that Hinduism presents its most terrible phases. For
Hinduism is Caste and Caste is Hinduism. Upon the innate,
Heaven-ordained superiority of the Brahmin and the other twice-born
castes, and upon the consequent inferiority of the lower castes, the
whole system of Brahminism rests.

Originally there were but four castes: The Brahmin or priest caste who
were supposed to have sprung from the head of Brahma or God; the
Kshatriya or warrior caste who sprang from his arms, the Vasiya or
merchant and farmer class who sprang from his thigh, and the Sudra or
servant and handicraftsmen class who came from his feet. The idea of
superiority by birth having once been accepted as fundamental,
however, these primary castes were themselves divided and subdivided
along real or imaginary lines of superiority or inferiority until
to-day the official government statistics show 2378 castes in India.
You cannot marry into any one of the other 2377 classes of Hindus; you
cannot eat with any of them, nor can you touch any of them.

Thus Caste is the Curse of India. It is the very antithesis of
democracy--blighting, benumbing, paralyzing to all aspiration and all
effort at change or improvement.

{227}

No man may rise to a higher caste than that into which he is born; but
he may fall to a lower one.

There is no opportunity for progress; the only way to move is
backward. Don't kick against the pricks therefore. You were born a
Brahmin with wealth and power because you won the favor of the gods in
some previous existence; or you were born a Sudra, predestined to a
life of suffering and semi-starvation, because in your previous
existence you failed to merit better treatment from the gods. If you
are only a sweeper, be glad that you were not born a pig or a cobra.
Kismet, Fate, has fixed at birth your changeless station in this life;
and, more than this, it has written on your brow the things which must
happen to you throughout your whole existence.

The Brahmin put himself into a position of superiority and then said
to all the other classes: Rebel not at the inequalities of life. They
are ordained of the gods. The good that the higher castes enjoy is the
reward of their having conducted themselves properly in previous
existences. Submit yourself to your lot in the hope that with
obedience to what the Brahmins tell you, you may possibly likewise win
birth into a higher caste next time. But strike a Brahmin even so much
as with a blade of grass and your soul shall be reborn into twenty and
one lives of impure animals before it assumes human shape again.

Never in human history has the ingenuity of a ruling class devised a
cleverer or a crueller mode of perpetuating its supremacy. Never has
there been a religion more depressing, more hopeless, more deadening
to all initiative. "_Jo hota so hota_,"--"What is happening was to
happen"--so said the wounded men who had gone to the Bombay hospital
to have their limbs amputated a few days before I got there. "It is
written on my forehead," a man will often say with stoical
indifference when some calamity overtakes him, in allusion to the
belief that on the sixth night after birth Vidhata writes on every
man's forehead the main events of his life-to-be, and no act {228} of
his can change them. "I was impelled of the gods to do the deed," a
criminal will say in the courts. "And I am impelled of the gods to
punish you for it," the judge will sometimes answer. If plague comes,
the natives can only be brought by force to observe precautions
against it. "If we are to die, we shall die; why offend the gods by
attempting interference with their plans?" The fatalism of the East as
expressed by Omar Khayyam is the daily creed of India's millions:

  "We are no other than a Moving Row
   Of Magic Shadow-shapes that come and go. . . .

  "But helpless Pieces of the Game He plays
   Upon this Checkerboard of Nights and Days."

It is in this fatalistic conception of life that caste is rooted; but
for this belief that all things are predestined, no people would ever
have been so spiritless as to submit to the tyranny of the caste
system. Perhaps it should also be added that the belief in the
transmigration of the soul has also had a not inconsiderable
influence. Though you have fared ill in this life, a million rebirths
may be yours ere you finally win absorption into Brahma, and in these
million future lives the gods may deal more prodigally with you.
Indeed, the things you most desire may be yours in your rebirth. "You
are interested in India; therefore you may have your next life as an
Indian," an eminent Hindu said to me. But Heaven forbid!

At any rate, with this double layer of nourishing earth--the belief,
first, that what you are now is the result of your actions in previous
lives, and, secondly, that there are plenty more rebirths in which any
merit you possess may have its just recompense of reward, the caste
system has flourished like the Psalmist's green bay tree, though its
influence has been more like that of the deadly upas.

If you are a high-caste man you may not only refuse to eat with or
touch a low-caste man, your equal perhaps in {229} intelligence and in
morals, but in some cases you may even demand that the low-caste man
shall not pollute you by coming too near you on the road. On page 540
of the 1901 "Census of India Report" will be found a table showing at
what distances the presence of certain inferior classes become
contaminating to a Brahmin! Moreover, the low-caste man, offensive to
men, is taught that he is equally offensive to the gods. He must not
worship in the temples; must not even approach them. Usually it is
taken for granted that no Pariah will take such a liberty, but in some
places I have seen signs in English posted on the temple gates warning
tourists who have low-caste servants that these servants cannot enter
the sacred buildings.

Not only are these creatures of inferior orders vile in themselves,
but the work which they do has also come to be regarded as degrading.
A high-caste man will not be caught doing any work which is "beneath
him." The cook will not sweep; the messenger boy would not pick up a
book from the floor. The liveried Brahmin who takes your card at the
American Consulate in Calcutta once lost his place rather than pick up
a slipper; rather than humiliate himself in such fashion he would walk
half a mile to get some other servant for the duty. It is no uncommon
thing to find that your servant will carry a package for you, but will
hire another servant if a small package of his own is to be moved. "I
had a boy for thirteen years, the best boy I ever had, till he died of
the plague," a Bombay Englishman said to me, "and he shaved me
regularly all the time. But when I gave him a razor with which to
shave himself, I found it did no good. He would have 'lost caste' if
he had done barber's work for anybody but a European!"

"I have a good sweeper servant," a Calcutta minister told me, "but if
I should attempt to promote him beyond his caste and make a
house-servant of him, every other servant I have would leave,
including my cook, who has been a Christian twenty years!"

The absurdities into which the caste system runs are well {230}
illustrated by some facts which came to my notice on a visit to a
school for the Dom caste conducted by some English people in Benares.
The Doms burn the bodies of the dead at the Ganges ghats, and do other
"dirty work." Incidentally they form the "thief caste" in Benares, and
whenever a robbery occurs, the instant presumption is that some Dom is
guilty. For this reason a great number of Doms (they belong to the
Gypsy class and have no houses anywhere) make it a practice to sleep
on the ground just outside the police station nearly all the year
round, reporting to the authorities so as to be able to prove an alibi
in case of a robbery. So low are the Doms that to touch anything
belonging to one works defilement; consequently they leave their most
valuable possessions unguarded about their tents or shacks, knowing
full well that not even a thief of a higher caste will touch them.

"We had a servant," a Benares lady said to me, "who lost his place
rather than take up one end of a forty-foot carpet while a Dom had
hold of the other end. The new bearer, his successor, did risk helping
move a box with a Dom handling the other side of it, but he was
outcasted for the action, and it cost him 25 rupees to be reinstated.
And until reinstated, of course, he could not visit kinsmen or friends
nor could friends or kinsmen have visited him even to help at a
funeral; his priest, his barber, and his washerman would have shunned
him. Again, our bearer, who is himself an outcast in the eyes of the
Brahmins, will not take a letter from the hands of our Dom chiprassi
or messenger boy. Instead, the messenger boy drops the letter on the
floor, and the bearer picks it up and thus escapes the pollution that
would come from actual contact with the chiprassi." Moreover, there
are social gradations even among the Doms. One Dom proudly confided to
this lady that he was a sort of superior being because the business of
his family was to collect the bones of dead animals, a more
respectable work than that in which some other Doms engaged!

Similarly, Mrs. Lee of the Memorial Mission in Calcutta {231} tells
how one day when a dead cat had to be moved from her yard her sweeper
proudly pulled himself up and assured her that, though the lowest
among all servants, he was still too high to touch the body of a dead
animal!

My mention of the Doms as the thief caste of Benares makes this a
suitable place to say that I was surprised to find evidences of a
well-recognized hereditary robber class in not a few places in India.
The Thugs, or professional murderers, have at last been exterminated,
but the English Government has not yet been able to end the activities
of those who regard the plunder of the public as their immemorial
right. In Delhi a friend of mine told me that the watchmen are known
to be of the robber class. "You hire one of them to watch your house
at night, and nothing happens to you. I noticed once or twice that
mine was not at his post as he should have been, but had left his
shoes and stick. He assured me that this was protection enough, as the
robbers would see that I had paid the proper blackmail by hiring one
of their number as chowkidar."

In Madura, in southern India, I found the robber element carrying
things with a much higher hand. "There's where they live," Dr. J. P.
Jones, the well-known writer on Indian affairs, said to me as we were
coming home one nightfall, "and the people of Madura pay them a
tribute amounting to thousands of rupees a year. They have a god of
their own whom they always consult before making a raid. If he
signifies his approval of a robbery, it is made; otherwise,
not--though it is said that the men have a way of tampering with the
verdict so as to make the god favor the enterprise in the great
majority of cases."

India's most famous tree, the banyan, grows by dropping down roots
from a score or a hundred limbs; these roots fasten themselves in the
earth and later become parent trees for other multiplying limbs and
roots, until the whole earth is covered. In much the same fashion the
Indian caste system has {232} developed. Instead of the four original
castes there are now more than five hundred times that number, and the
system now decrees irrevocably before birth not only what social
station the newborn infant shall occupy from the cradle to the grave
(or from the time the conch shell announces the birth of a man-child
till the funeral pyre consumes his body, to use Indian terminology),
but also decrees almost as irrevocably what business he may or may not
follow. A little American girl of my acquaintance once announced that
she hadn't decided whether she would be a trained nurse, a
chorus-girl, or a missionary; but Hinduism leaves no one in any such
embarrassing quandary. Whether a man is to be a priest or a thief is
largely decided for him before he knows his own name.

"But isn't the system weakening now?" the reader asks, as I have also
asked in almost every quarter of India. The general testimony seems to
be that it is weakening, and yet in no very rapid manner. Eventually,
no doubt, it will die, but it will die hard. A few weeks ago, a
Parliament of Religions was held in connection with the Allabahad
Exposition, with his Highness the Maharaja of Darbhanga as the
presiding officer. In the course of his "Presidential Address" the
Maharaja delivered a lengthy eulogy of the caste system, resorting in
part to so specious an argument as the following:

  "If education means the drawing forth of the potentialities of a boy
  and fitting him for taking his ordained place as a member of society,
  then the caste system has hitherto done this work in a way which no
  other plan yet contrived has ever done. The mere teaching of a youth
  a smattering of the three R's and nothing else in a primary school
  is little else than a mere mockery. Under the caste system the boys
  are initiated and educated almost from infancy into the family
  industry, trade, profession, or handicraft, and become adepts in
  their various lines of life almost before they know it. This unique
  system of education is one of the blessings of our caste
  arrangement. We know that a horse commands a high price in the
  market if it has a long pedigree behind it. It is not unreasonable
  to presume that a carpenter whose forefathers have followed the same
  trade for centuries will be a better carpenter than one who is new
  to the trade--all other advantages being equal."

{233}

In the phrase, "his ordained place as a member of society," we have
the keynote of the philosophy upon which the whole caste system rests.
It suits the Maharaja of Darbhanga to have the people believe that his
sons were "ordained" of Heaven to be rulers, even if "not fit to stop
a gully with," and the Sudra's sons "ordained" to be servants, no
matter what their qualities of mind and soul. But the caste system is
rotting down in other places and some time or other this "ordained"
theory will also give way and the whole vast fabric will totter to the
ruin it has long and richly merited.

The introduction of railways has proved one of the great enemies of
caste. Men of different rank who formerly would not have rubbed elbows
under any considerations sit side by side in the railway cars--and
they prefer to do it rather than travel a week by bullock-cart to
reach a place which is but a few hours by train. Consequently the
priests have had to wink at "breaking caste" in this way, just as they
had to get around the use of waterworks in Calcutta. According to the
strict letter of the law a Hindu may not drink water which has been
handled by a man of lower caste (in Muttra I have seen Brahmins hired
to give water to passersby), but the priests decided that the payment
of water-rates might be regarded as atonement for the possible
defilement, and consequently Hindus now have the advantages of the
city water supply.

Foreign travel has also jarred the caste system rather severely. The
Hindu statutes strictly forbid a man from leaving the boundaries of
India, but the folk have progressed from technical evasion of the law
to open violation of its provisions. In Jeypore I saw the half-acre of
trunks and chests which the Maharaja of that province used for
transporting his goods and chattels when he went to attend the
coronation of the King of England. The Maharaja is a Hindu of the
Hindus, claims descent from one of the high and mighty gods, and when
he was named to go to London, straightway declared that the {234}
caste law against leaving India stood hopelessly in the way. Finally,
however, he was convinced that by taking all his household with him,
his servants, his priests, material for setting up a Hindu temple, a
six-months' supply of Ganges water, etc., he might take enough of
India with him to make the trip in safety, and he went. Now many are
going without any such precautions, and a moderate fee paid to the
priests usually enables them to resume caste relations upon their
return.

Sometimes, however, the penalties are heavier. A Hindu merchant of
Amritsar, who grew very friendly with a Delhi friend of mine on a
voyage from Europe, said just before reaching Bombay: "Well, I shall
have to pay for all this when I get home, and I shall be lucky if I
get off without making a pilgrimage to all the twelve sacred places of
our religion. And in any case I shall never let my wife know that I
have broken caste by eating with foreigners." My impression is,
however, that only in a very few cases now is the crime of foreign
travel punished so severely. In Madras I met one of the most eminent
Hindu leaders, Mr. Krishnaswami Iyer. "Caste has kept me from going
abroad until now," he told me, "but I have made up my mind to let it
interfere no longer. Just as soon as business permits, I shall go to
Europe and possibly to America."

Christianity is another mightily effective foe of Caste. As in the
olden days, it exalts the lowly and humbles the proud. In Muttra I
found a converted high-caste Brahmin acting as sexton of a Christian
church whose members are sweepers--outcast folk whom as a Hindu he
would have scorned to touch. On the other hand, the acceptance of
Christianity frees a man from the restrictions imposed upon a low
caste, even though it does not give him the privileges of a higher
caste and thus often wins for the Christianized Hindu higher regard
from all classes. Thus there was in Moradabadad some years ago the son
of a poor sweeper who became a Christian, and was a youth of such fine
promise that a way was {235} found for him to attend Oxford
University. Returning, he became a teacher in Moradabadad Mission
School and won such golden opinions from his townspeople that when he
died the whole city--Hindus, Mohammedans and Christians alike--stopped
for his funeral.

In its present elaborate form the caste system is undoubtedly doomed.
It is too purely artificial to endure after the people acquire even a
modicum of education. Perhaps it was planned originally as a means of
preserving the racial integrity and political superiority of the Aryan
invaders, but for unnumbered centuries it has been simply a gigantic
engine of oppression and social injustice. At the present time no
blood or social difference separates the great majority of castes from
the others: each race is divided into hundreds of castes; and so high
an authority as Mr. Krishnaswami Iyer assured me that even in the
beginning all the castes save the Sudras were of the same race and
blood.

If the purpose of caste, however, be in part to prevent the
intermarriage of radically different races, this may be accomplished,
as it is accomplished in our own Southern States, without restricting
the right of the individual to engage in any line of work for which he
is fitted or to go as high in that work as his ability warrants.
Booker Washington, born in the South's lowest ranks, becomes a
world-figure; had he been born in India's lowest caste, he would have
remained a burner of dead bodies. To compare the South's effort to
preserve race integrity with India's Juggernaut of caste is absurd.

Bombay, India.



{236}


XXIV

THE PLIGHT OF THE HINDU WOMAN


In India marriage is as inevitable as death, as Herbert Compton
remarks. There are no bachelors or old maids. Children in their
cradles are not infrequently given in marriage by their parents; they
are sometimes promised in marriage (contingent upon sex) before they
are born.

"You are married, of course?" the zenana women will ask when an
American Bible-woman calls on them; and, if the answer is in the
negative, "Why not? Couldn't they get anybody to have you?"

"Every girl at fourteen must be either a wife or a widow," is an
Indian saying almost unexceptionally true. And the lot of woman is
hard if she be a wife; it is immeasurably harder if she be a widow.
Hinduism enslaves a majority of the men within its reach; of the women
within its reach it enslaves all.

I think it was George William Curtis who said, "The test of a
civilization is its estimate of woman"; and if we are to accept this
standard, Hindu civilization must take a place very near the bottom.
In the great temple at Madura are statues of "The Jealous Husband" who
always carried his wife with him on his shoulder wherever he went; and
the attitude of the man in the case is the attitude of Hinduism as a
system. It bases its whole code of social laws upon the idea that
woman is not to be trusted. Their great teacher, Manu, in his "Dharma
Sastra" sums up his opinion of woman in two phrases: "It is the nature
of woman in this world to cause men to sin. A female is able to draw
from the right path, not a fool {237} only, but even a sage." And the
"Code of Hindu Laws," drawn up by order of the Indian Government for
the guidance of judges, declares:

  "A man both by day and by night must keep his wife so much in
  subjection that she by no means is the mistress of her own actions.
  If the wife have her own free will, notwithstanding she be sprung
  from a superior caste, she will behave amiss. A woman is not to be
  relied on."

  "Confidence is not to be placed in a woman. If one trust a woman,
  without doubt he must wander about the streets as a beggar."

In accordance with these ideas the life of the Hindu woman has been
divided into "the three subjections." In childhood she must be subject
to her father; in marriage to her husband; in widowhood to her sons
or--most miserable of all!--lacking a son, to her husband's kinsmen.
Her husband is supposed to stand to her almost in the relation of a
god. "No sacrifice is allowed to women apart from their husbands,"
says Manu, "no religious rite, no fasting. In so far only as a wife
honors her husband so far is she exalted in Heaven." And a recent
Hindu writer says, "To obey the husband is to obey the Vedas (the
Hindu scriptures). To worship the husband is to worship the gods."

Hinduism and the caste system, hard on the men, are doubly hard on the
women. The women may no more rise above their caste than the male
members of the family; and they are predestined to take up life's most
serious duties before their fleeting childhood has spent itself. No
wonder they look old before they are thirty!

If any one doubts the prevalence of child-marriage in India, a trip
through the country will very quickly dispel his doubts. A law enacted
by the British Government a few years ago decrees that while the
marriage ceremonies may be performed at any age, the girl shall not go
to her husband as his wife until she is twelve years old; but it is
doubtful if even this mild measure is strictly enforced. In Delhi I
attended an elaborate {238} and costly Hindu wedding-feast and was
told that the bride was "eleven or twelve" and would go to her
husband's home (he lives with his father, of course) the following
week. My travelling servant told me that he was married when he was
sixteen and his wife ten, though she remained two years longer with
her parents before coming to him. The first American lady I met in
India was telling of a wedding she had recently attended, the bride
being a girl of eleven and the groom a year or two older. In
Secunderabad a friend of mine found a week-old Brahmin girl baby who
had been given in marriage, and in the house where he visited was a
ten-year-old girl who had been married two years before to a man of
thirty.

In prescribing a marriageable age for high-caste Hindu girls Manu
named eight as a minimum age and twelve as the maximum. The father who
delays finding a husband for his daughter until after she is twelve is
regarded as having committed a crime--though it must always be
remembered that girls and boys in India mature a year or two younger
than boys and girls in the United States.

One reason for arranging early marriages is that the cost increases
with the age of the girl, and the wedding ceremonies in all cases are
expensive enough. Weddings in India furnish about as much excitement
as circuses at home. My first introduction to a Hindu wedding was in
Agra one Sunday afternoon--though Sunday in the Orient, of course, is
the same as any other day--and the shops were in full blast (if such a
strenuous term may be used concerning the serene and listless Hindu
merchant) and the craftsmen and potters were as busy as they ever are.
From afar the sound of drums smote my ear, and as the deafening
hullabaloo came nearer its volume and violence increased until it
would have sufficed to bring down the walls of Jericho in half the
time Joshua took for the job. Just behind the drummers came two
gorgeously clad small boys astride an ass begarlanded with flowers;
and when the musicians stopped for a minute to tighten their drums so
as {239} to make confusion worse confounded, I made inquiry as to the
meaning of the procession. Then it developed that the eight-year-old
small boy in front, dressed in red and yellow silk and gauze and who
ought to have been at home studying the Second Reader, was on his way
to be married, and the little chap riding behind him was the brother
of the bride. It was very hard to realize that such tots were not
merely "playing wedding" instead of being principal participants in a
serious ceremony!

The wedding-feast which I attended in Delhi was arranged for a couple
who came from the higher ranks of Hindu society, and though no one
could have asked for a more gracious welcome than my American friend
and I received, I very much doubt if any one of the high-caste folk
about us would have condescended to eat at the same table with us even
to end a three-days' hunger. The groom, Harri Ram by name, was a
nice-looking boy of fourteen, clad in a velvet suit and apparently
pleased with the show of which he was It. There had already been a
three or four days' wedding ceremony at the bride's house, we were
told, and this was the fifth and last day of the ceremonies and feasts
arranged by the groom's father. One thousand people had been invited
and, judging from the richness of the food with which we were served,
I should think that my friend's estimate of the total cost, 5000
rupees, or $1633, was none too high.

Not only are the wedding ceremonies expensive, but a poor father, or a
father with several daughters to find husbands for, must often strain
his credit to the utmost in providing dowries. It is said that among
the humbler classes a father will sometimes mortgage his wages for
life to secure money for this purpose. Then, too, the marriage-broker
or middleman who has gone to the groom's father with the story that
the bride is "as beautiful as the full moon, as graceful as a young
elephant, and with a voice as sweet as a cuckoo's"--he must also be
paid for his indispensable services.

{240}

Not to be envied is the little damsel of twelve who leaves her
childhood home and goes out as the bride of a boy or man--whose face
she may never have seen but once or twice--to take up the hard life of
a Hindu wife in the home of her father-in-law and mother-in-law. Yet
from her infancy she has been bred in an atmosphere full of suggestion
of the inferiority of womankind, and to her it is probably not so
galling as we fancy that she is never accounted worthy of eating at
the same table with her husband, but must be content with what he
leaves. Even Christianity can move but slowly in bringing the people
to a higher appreciation of the dignity of womanhood. "Some of my
girls are engaged to be married," Mrs. Lee, of the Lee Memorial Home
in Calcutta, said to me, "and when their fiances come to call, after
the Christian fashion, the girls must remain standing as inferiors
while the boys are seated."

Once married, the Hindu wife has two things to dread: either that her
husband may die or that he may supplant her by a second wife. If she
lives seven years as a wife without giving birth to a son, the husband
is authorized by law and religion to take a second spouse; and in
nearly all such cases the lot of the first wife is a hard one. Rev. W.
J. Wilkins says that a servant in his employ married a second wife and
insisted that the first should not only support herself but contribute
the bulk of her wages for the support of wife No. 2. The older wife is
tantalized by the thought that she herself was selected by the parents
of her husband, while the new wife is probably his own choice; and
another cause of jealousy is found in the new wife's youth. For no
matter how old the man himself may be--forty, fifty or sixty--his
bride is always a girl of twelve or thereabouts--and for the very
simple reason that practically no girls remain single longer, and
widows are never allowed to remarry. A story was told me in Bombay of
a Hindu in his fifties who was seeking a new wife and sent an agent to
his native village and caste with power to negotiate.


{241}

[Illustration: THE TAJ MAHAL FROM THE ENTRANCE GATE.]
  The most beautiful building on earth with a story no less beautiful
  than the building itself.


{242}

[Illustration: GUNGA DIN ON DRESS PARADE.]

  Ordinarily the Indian water carrier, or _bhisti_, is attired more
  nearly after the manner described in Kipling's poem:

    "The uniform 'e wore
    Was nothing much before
    An' rather less than 'arf o' that be'ind.
    For a twisty piece o' rag and a goatskin leather bag
    Was all the field equipment 'e could find."


{243}

"My friends have persuaded me that I ought not to marry a very young
girl," he said to the agent, "get an older one therefore--oh, it
doesn't matter if she is twenty-four."

The agent left and two days thereafter the Hindu received this
message: "Can't find one of twenty-four. How about two of twelve
each?"

The sorrows of a superseded wife, however, are as nothing to the
troubles of a Hindu widow. The teaching of Brahminism is that she is
responsible through some evil committed either in this existence or a
previous one, for the death of her husband, and the cruelest
indignities of the Hindu social system are reserved for the bereaved
and unfortunate woman. If a man or boy die, no matter if his wife is
yet a prattling girl in her mother's home, she can never remarry, but
is doomed to live forever as a despised slave in the home of his
father and mother. Her jewels are torn from her; her head is shaved;
and she is forced to wear clothing in keeping with the humiliation the
gods are supposed to have justly inflicted upon her. In a school I
visited in Calcutta I was told that there were two little widows, one
five years old and one six.

Formerly and up to the time that the British Government stopped the
practice less than a century ago, it was regarded as the widow's duty
to burn herself alive on her husband's funeral pyre. "It is proper for
a woman after her husband's death," said the old Code of Hindu Laws,
"to burn herself in the fire with his corpse. Every woman who thus
burns herself shall remain in Paradise with her husband 35,000,000
years by destiny. If she cannot burn, she must in that case preserve
an inviolable chastity." This rite of self-immolation was known as
suttee, and it is said that in Bengal alone a century ago the suttees
numbered one hundred a month. It was an old custom to set up a stone
with carved figures of a man and a woman to mark the spot where a
widow had performed suttee, and travellers to-day still find these
gruesome and barbaric memorials here and there along the Indian
roadsides. {244} Moreover, the present general treatment of widows in
India is so heartbreakingly cruel that many have been known to declare
that they would prefer the suttee.

And yet we may be sure that the picture is not wholly dark; that a
kind providence mingles some sunshine with the shadows which blacken
the skies of Indian womanhood. Men are often better than their customs
and sometimes better than their religions. The high-caste Hindu and
Mohammedan women who are supposed to keep their faces veiled and (in
the case of the Hindus at least) must not even look out of the windows
of their zenanas, manage to get a little more freedom than the strict
letter of the law allows; and the Hindu father and husband, doing good
by stealth, sometimes pours out in secret an affection for his
womenfolk which it would not be seemly for the world to know about.
Standing with a friend of mine on a high flat housetop in Calcutta one
day, I saw a Hindu father on the next-door housetop proudly and
lovingly walking and talking with his daughter who was just budding
into maidenhood. "His affection is quite unmistakable," my friend said
to me, "and yet if in public, he would never give any sign of it."

Nor can the lot of the Indian woman ever be regarded as hopeless while
the country holds the peerless Taj Mahal, the most beautiful monument
ever erected in memory of a woman's love. True, Shah Jehan, the
monarch who built it, was not a Hindu: he was a Mohammedan. And yet
Mohammedanism, although its customs are less brutal, places woman in
almost the same low position as Hinduism. In considering the status of
woman in India, therefore, scorned alike by both the great religions
of the country, it is gratifying to be able to make an end by
referring to this loveliest of all memorial structures. Of all that I
saw in India, excepting only the magnificent view of the Himalayas
from Tiger Hill, I should least like to forget the view of the Taj
Mahal in the full glory of the Indian full moon.

The inscription in Persian characters over the archway, "Only the Pure
in Heart May Enter the Garden of God," {245} is enough to assure one
that Arjmand Banu, "The Exalted One of the Palace," whose dust it was
built to shelter, was a queen as beautiful in character as she was in
form and feature. We know but little about her. There are pictures
which are supposed to carry some suggestion of her charm; there are
records to show that it was in 1615 that she became the bride of the
prince who later began to rule as "His Imperial Highness, the second
Alexander (Lord of the two Horns) King Shah Jehan," and we may see in
Agra the rooms in the palace where she dwelt for a time in the Arabian
Nights-like splendor characteristic of Oriental courts,

"Mumtaz-i-Mahal," they called her--"Pride of the Palace." And seven
times Arjmand Banu walked the ancient way of motherhood--that way
along which woman finds the testing of her soul, the mystic reach and
infinite meaning of her existence, as man must find his in some bitter
conflict that forever frees him from the bonds of selfishness. Seven
times she walked the mother's ancient way down to the gates of Death
and brought back a new life with her, but the eighth time she did not
return. And grief-stricken Shah Jehan, carrying in his heart a sorrow
which not all his pomp nor power could heal, declared that she should
have the most beautiful tomb that the mind of man could plan. So the
Taj was built--"in memory of a deathless love," and in a garden which
is always sweet with the odor of flowers, at the end of an avenue of
fountains and stately cypress trees, and guarded by four graceful,
heaven-pointing minarets, "like four tall court-ladies tending their
princess," there stands this dream in marble, "the most exquisite
building on earth."

With the memory of its beautiful dome and sculptured detail in our
thoughts, let us take leave of our subject; trusting that the Taj
itself, like a morning star glittering from a single rift in a
darkened sky, may form the prophecy of a fairer dawn for the womanhood
of the country in which it is so incongruously placed.

Madras, India.



{246}


XXV

MORE LEAVES FROM AN INDIA NOTE-BOOK


There are many show places and "points of interest" in India that have
a hundred times more attention in the guide books, but there is a
simple tomb in Lucknow--it cost no more than many a plain farmer's
tombstone in our country burying-places--which impressed me more than
anything else I saw excepting only the Himalayas, the Taj Mahal and
the view of Benares from the river.

It is the tomb of the heroic Sir Henry Lawrence, who died so glorious
a death in the great mutiny of 1857. No commander in all India has
planned more wisely for the defence of the men and women under his
care; and yet the siege had only begun when he was mortally wounded.
He called his successor and his associates to him, and at last, having
omitted no detail of counsel or information that might enable them to
carry out his far-seeing plans, he roused himself to dictate his own
immortal epitaph:


            Here Lies

          HENRY LAWRENCE

      Who Tried to Do His Duty

  May the Lord Have Mercy on his Soul.


And so to-day these lines, "in their simplicity sublime," mark his
last resting place; and one feels somehow that not even the great
Akbar in Secundra or Napoleon in Paris has a worthier monument.

{247}

There are many places in India to which I should like to give a
paragraph. I should like to write much of Delhi and its palaces in
which the Great Moguls once lived in a splendor worthy of the monarchs
in the Arabian Nights--no wonder the stately Diwan-i-Khas, or Hall of
Public Audience, bears the famous inscription in Persian:

  "If there be Paradise on earth.
   It is this, oh, it is this, oh, it is this!"

In the ruins of seven dead and deserted Delhis round about the present
city and the monuments and memorials which commemorate "the old
far-off unhappy things" of conquered dynasties and romantic epochs,
there is also material for many a volume.

Then there is Cawnpore with its tragic and sickening memories of the
English women and children (with the handful of men) who were
butchered in cold blood by the treacherous Nana Dhundu Pant; and I was
greatly interested in meeting in Muttra one of the few living men, a
Christianized Brahmin, who as a small boy witnessed that terrible
massacre which for cruelty and heartlessness is almost without a
parallel in modern history.

In Agra is the Pearl Mosque, which is itself an architectural triumph
splendid enough to make the city famous if the Taj had not already
made it so; the Great Temple in Madura is one of the most impressive
of the strictly Hindu structures in India; in Madras I found a curious
reminder of early missionary activity in the shape of a cathedral
which is supposed to shelter the remains of the Apostle Thomas; and
the ruins of the once proud and imperial but now utterly deserted
cities of Amber and Fatehpuhr-Sikri have a strange and melancholy
interest. But all these have been often enough described, and there
are things of greater pith and moment in present-day India to which we
can better give attention.

{248}

One thing concerning India, which should perhaps have been said in the
beginning, but which has not had attention until now, is the fact that
it is no more a homogeneous country than Europe is--has perhaps,
indeed, a greater variety of languages, peoples, and racial and
traditional differences than the European continent. I have already
called attention to the fact that there are 2378 castes. There are
also 40 distinct nationalities or races and 180 languages. For an
utterly alien race to govern peacefully such a heterogeneous
conglomeration of peoples, representing all told nearly one fifth of
the population of the whole earth, is naturally one of the most
difficult administrative feats in history, and Mr. Roosevelt probably
did not give the English too high praise when he declared: "In India
we encounter the most colossal example history affords of the
successful administration by men of European blood of a thickly
populated region in another continent. It is the greatest feat of the
kind that has been performed since the break-up of the Roman Empire.
Indeed, it is a greater feat than was performed under the Roman
Empire."

I was interested to find that the American-born residents of India
give, if anything, even higher praise to British rule than the British
themselves. "I regard the English official in India," one
distinguished American in southern India went so far as to say to me,
"as the very highest type of administrative official in the world.
More than this, 90 per cent. of the common people would prefer to
trust the justice of the British to that of the Brahmins." In Delhi an
American missionary expressed the opinion that the American
Government, if in control of India, would not be half so lenient with
the breeders of sedition and anarchy as is the British Government.

It should be said, however, that there are now fewer of these
malcontents, and these few are less influential than at any time for
some years past. In Madras I was very glad to get an interview with
Mr. Krishnaswami Iyer, one of the most distinguished of the Hindu
leaders.


{249}

  [Illustration: BATHING IN THE SACRED GANGES AT BENARES.]


{250}

  [Illustration: THE BATTLE-SCARRED AND WORLD-FAMOUS RESIDENCY AT
  LUCKNOW.]
  The writer was shown through the historic fortress by William
  Ireland, one of the few living survivors of the great siege. In
  Muttra the writer also met Isa Doss, a Hindu (now a Christian
  preacher) who saw the massacre of the English women and children by
  the treacherous Nana Dhundu Pant.


{251}

"Lord Morley's reforms," he declared, "have been so extensive and have
satisfied such a large proportion of our people that the extremists no
longer have any considerable following. We no longer feel that it is
England's intention to keep us in the condition of hopeless helots.
The highest organization for the government of the country is the
British Secretary of State and his council; Lord Morley placed two
Indians there. In India the supreme governmental organization is the
Governor-General and his council; he put an Indian there. In three
large provinces--Bombay, Madras, and Bengal--Indians have been added
to the executive councils."

"For the first time, too, our people are really an influential factor
in the provincial and imperial legislative councils. We have had
representation in these councils, it is true, for fifty years; but it
was not until 1892 that representation became considerable, and even
then the right of the people to name members was not recognized.
So-called constituencies were given authority to make nominations, but
the government retained the right to reject or confirm these at
pleasure."

"Now, however, through Lord Morley's and Lord Minto's reforms, the
number of Indians on these councils has been more than doubled--in the
case of the Imperial Council actually trebled--and the absolute right
given the people to elect a large proportion, averaging about 40 per
cent. of the total number, without reference to the wishes of the
government. In fact, with two fifths of all the members chosen by the
people and a considerable number of other members chosen from
municipal boards, chambers of commerce, universities, etc., we now see
the spectacle of Provincial Councils with non-official members in the
majority. In Bombay the non-official element is two thirds of the
whole; and in Madras also the non-official members could defeat the
government if they chose to combine and do so. But of course the
greater willingness of the government to cooperate with the people has
brought {252} about a greater willingness on the part of the people to
cooperate with the government."

"The appointment of Indians to the highest offices charged with the
responsibility of government; the increased representation given the
people on the legislative and executive councils; the recognition of
the right of the people to elect instead of merely to nominate
members; and the surrender of majority-control to the non-official
element--all these are very substantial gains, but the spirit back of
them is worth more than the reforms themselves. While there is a
feeling in some quarters that the government has not gone far enough,
the large majority of my educated countrymen regard the advance as
sufficient for the present and look forward with hope to a further
expansion of our powers and privileges."

If I may judge by what I gathered from conversation with Hindus,
Mohammedans, Parsees, I should say that no one has given a more
accurate and clear-cut statement of the feelings of the Indian people
than has Mr. Krishnaswami Iyer in these few terse sentences.

"The wealth of the Indies" has been a favorite phrase with romantic
writers from time immemorial; and a book now before me speaks in the
most matter-of-course way of "the prosperous and peaceful empire." Yet
the Indian is really one of the poorest men on earth. The wealth with
which the Moguls and kings of former ages dazzled the world was wrung
from the hard hands of peasants who were governed upon the theory that
what the king wanted was his, and what he left was theirs. Even the
splendid palaces and magnificent monuments, such as the Taj Mahal,
were built largely by forced, unpaid labor. In some cases it is said
that the monarch did not even deign to furnish food for the men whom
he called away from the support of their families.

An ignorant people is always a poor people, and we have already seen
that only 10 per cent. of the men in India can read or write, and of
these 10 per cent. the majority are Brahmins. {253} Then, again, the
people use only the crudest tools and machinery; and a third factor in
keeping them poor is the system of early marriage. When it is a common
thing for a boy of fifteen or sixteen to be the father of a growing
family, it is easy to see that not much can be laid up for rainy days.

Owing to the absence of diversified industries, the crudeness of the
tools, the ignorance of the men behind the tools, and the over-crowded
population of folk hard-pressed by poverty, the wages are what an
American would call shamefully low. An Englishman who had lived in an
interior jungle-village, five days by bullock-cart from a railway,
told me that twenty years ago laborers were paid 2 rupees (64 cents) a
month, boarding themselves, or 4 rupees ($1.28) a year and grain. The
wages have now advanced, however, to 5 rupees ($1.60) a month where
the man boards himself; and for day labor the wages are now five annas
(10 cents) instead of two annas (4 cents) twenty years ago.

In Madura a well-educated Hindu with whom I was talking rang the
familiar changes on the "increasing cost of living," and pointed out
that in four or five years the cost of unskilled labor has increased
from eight to twelve cents. "And in some towns," he declared, looking
at the same time as if he feared I should not believe his story,
"they are demanding as much as 8 annas (16 cents) a day!" In Bombay I
was told that coolies average 16 to 20 cents a day; spinners in jute
factories, $1.16 a week, weavers, $1.82. In a great cotton factory I
visited in Madras, employing about 4000 natives (all males) the
average wages for eleven and a half hours' work is $3.84 to $4.85 a
month. In Ahmedabad, another cotton manufacturing centre, about the
same scale is in force. Miners get 16 to 28 cents a day. Servants,
$3.20 to $3.84 a month.

The women in Calcutta (some of them with their babies tied out to
stakes while they worked) whom I saw carrying brick and mortar on
their heads to the tops of three and four story buildings, get 3 to 4
annas a day--6 to 8 cents. In {254} Darjeeling the bowed and
toil-cursed women laden like donkeys, whom I found bringing stone on
their backs from quarries two or three miles away managed to make 12
to 16 cents a day for their bitter toil up steep hills and down, for
eight long hours. Women who carried lighter loads of mud, making 50
trips averaging 20 miles of travel, earned only 8 cents, as did also
the women with babies strapped on their backs, who nevertheless toiled
as steadily as the others.

"As for the men I pay these strong, brawny Bhutia fellows 8 annas (16
cents) a day," the contractor told me, "but those Nepalese who are not
so strong get only 5 annas for shovelling earth."

Director of Agriculture Couchman of the Madras Presidency gave me the
following as the usual scale of wages for farm work: men 6 to 8 cents;
women 4 to 6; children 3 to 5, the laborers boarding themselves.

With this Mr. Couchman, whom I have just mentioned, I had a very
interesting interview in Madras which should shed some light on Indian
agriculture.

"In Madras Presidency," he told me, "we cultivate 10,000,000 acres of
rice, which is the favorite food of the people. As it is expensive
compared with some cheaper foods, however, the people put 4,500,000
acres to a sort of sorghum--not the sorghum cultivated for syrup or
sugar but for the seed to be used as a grain food--and also grow
4,000,000 acres of millet the seed of which are used as a grain food."

"Then we grow 2,000,000 acres in cotton, but cotton in India is grown
only on black soils. We want some for red soils, and we are also
seeking to increase the yield and the length of staple in the
indigenous varieties. In both these points the Indian cotton now
compares very badly with the American. Our average yield is only about
50 to 100 pounds lint per acre, and the staple is only three quarters
to five eights of an inch in length, and not suitable for spinning
over 20s in warp."


{255}

[Illustration: BURNING THE BODIES OF DEAD HINDUS.]


[Illustration: AN INDIAN CAMEL CART.]


{256}

[Illustration: TRAVEL IN INDIA.]
  How the author and his friends made the trip from Jeypore to Amber


{257}

"Of course, with our dense population, land is high and our system of
farming expensive. Good irrigated wet land, used chiefly for rice, is
worth from $166 to $500 per acre, renting for $20 to $25; dry land
sells for $17 to $133 per acre and rents for from $3 to $5. It is
commonly said that a man and his family should make a living on two
acres, and the usual one-man farm consists of 5 to 10 acres of wet
land or 30 to 50 of dry. The wet land farmers are generally renters,
the others owners. Of course, you have noticed that no horses are used
on the farms, nothing but bullocks; nor do I think that horses will be
used for a long time to come. We are making some progress in
introducing better methods of farming. Little, of course, can be done
with bulletins where such a small percentage of the people can read,
but demonstration farms have proved quite successful, and the
government is much pleased with the results obtained from employing
progressive native farmers to instruct their neighbors."

The advancing price of cotton has proved a matter of hardly less
interest to India than to America, and for several years the crop has
been steadily increasing. The 1910-11 crop (the picking ended in May)
was almost 4,500,000 bales of 400 pounds each. The necessity for
growing food crops, however, is so imperative that the cotton acreage
cannot be greatly increased--at least not soon. During our Civil War,
it will be remembered, India did her uttermost; and Bombay laid the
foundations of her greatness in the high prices then paid for the
fleecy staple. Hers is still a great cotton market and down one of her
main streets from morning to night one sees an almost continuous line
of cotton carts, drawn by bullocks and driven by men almost as black
as our <DW64>s in the South. I was very much interested in seeing how
much better the lint is baled than in America. In the first place the
bagging is better--less ragged than that we commonly use--and in the
next place it is held in place by almost twice as many encircling
bands or ties as our bales.

{258}

All in all, I regret to say good-by to India. Its people are poor; its
industries primitive; its religion atrocious; its climate generally
oppressive, and yet, after all, there is something fascinating about
the country. For one thing, there is a large infusion of Aryan blood
among the people, and after one has spent several months among the
featureless faces of the Chinese and Japanese, these Aryan-type faces
are strangely attractive. The speech of the people, too, is
picturesque beyond that of almost any other folk, as readers of
Kipling have come to know. It is very common for a beggar to call out,
"Oh, Protector of the Poor, you are my father and mother, help me,
help me."

"I salute you," said our old guide at the Kutab Minar, speaking in his
native Hindustani, which my friend interpreted for me. "I know that
you are the kings of the realm, but I have eaten your salt before, and
I am willing to eat it again."

At the end, of course, he wished a tip. "But ask him why I should give
him anything," I said to my friend.

Replying, he mentioned first the number of his children, the blindness
of his wife, and then dropped into the picturesque native plea:
"Besides, you are my father and mother, the king of the realm, and if
I may not look to you, to whom shall I look?"

"Well, so much lying ought to be worth four annas," I said, and left
him happier with the coin.

There is one thing, of course, that would never do: it would never do
to write about India without saying something about lions, tigers, and
snakes. Last of all, therefore, let me come to this topic.

I didn't see any tigers, let me say frankly, except those in
cages--though there was one in Calcutta which had slain men and women
before they caught him, and whose titanic fury as he lunged against
his cage-bars, gnashing at the men before him, I shall never forget. A
jackal howled at my room-door in Jeypore one night; between Jeypore
and Bombay monkeys {259} were as thick as rabbits were in the old
county where I was reared; in Delhi only lack of time prevented me
from getting interested in a leopard hunt not many miles away; en
route to Darjeeling I saw a wild elephant staked out in the woods near
where he had evidently been caught; and near Khera Kalan I saw wild
deer leaping with their matchless grace across the level plains.

"In my district," one missionary told me, "five or six people a month
are killed by tigers and panthers and even more by snakes. One panther
carried off a man from my kitchen. We found his body half-eaten in the
jungle. It is customary when a body is found in this condition for
hunters to gather around it and await the return of the tiger or
panther. He will come back when hungry, and there is no other way so
sure for getting a man-eater."

As for snakes, I may mention that when I spent the night with a friend
in Madura I was shown a place near the house where a deadly cobra had
been seen (his bite kills in twenty minutes), while upon retiring I
was given the comforting assurance that it was not safe to put my foot
on the floor at night without having a light in the room!

As I rode out with Dr. J. P. Jones, of Pasamaila, he pointed to a
grassy mound near the roadside and said.

"See that grave over there? There's rather an interesting story
connected with it which I'll tell you. One day about four years ago
three snake-charmers came to my house, and as I had an American friend
and his son with me, I decided for the boy's sake to have them try
their art. Only two of the men had flutes, but one went into my garden
and one took up his post on another side of the house, and began to
play. It wasn't long before one called out, 'Cobra!' and sure enough
there was the snake, which he captured; but on coming back he declared
that he had been bitten. In fact, he showed a bruise, but I knew that
snake-charmers counterfeit these bites, so I would not believe him.
Then the other charmer also cried {260} 'Cobra!' and captured another
snake. They showed me the fangs of each serpent, and I gave them four
annas. 1 also offered them four annas more if they would kill the
serpents; but of course they would not. 'Man kill cobra, cobra kill
man,' is one of their sayings. And so they left, but the man who
captured the first snake hadn't gone twenty steps before he fell in
convulsions and died. He had really been bitten, and that is his grave
which you see there."

Madura, India.



{261}

XXVI

WHAT THE ORIENT MAY TEACH US


But, after all, what may the Orient teach us? The inquiry is a
pertinent one. Perhaps it is all the more pertinent because, while
acknowledging that the old East may learn much from the young West, we
are ordinarily little inclined to look to the Orient for instruction
for ourselves. In fact, we are not inclined to look anywhere.

That the germ and promise of all the new Japan was in the oath taken
by the young Mikado in 1868, "to seek out knowledge in all the world,"
we are ready to admit, and we are also ready to admit the truth of
what Dr. Timothy Richard said to me in Peking last November. "This
revolutionary progress in China has come about," he remarked, "because
for twenty years China has been measuring herself with other
countries. It is a comparative view of the world that is remaking the
empire."

In our own case unfortunately, certain natural conditions as well,
perhaps, as the excessive "Ego in our Cosmos," conspire to keep us
from this corrective "comparative view of the world." We are not
hemmed about by rival world-powers, whose activities we are compelled
to study, as is the case with almost every European nation. Barring
the Philippines (and their uncertain value) we have no far-flung
battle line to lure our vision beyond borders. And thus far our
growing home markets have been so remunerative that not even commerce
has induced as to look outward, with the incidental results of {262}
bringing us to realize our defects and remedy them, our strong points
and emphasize them.

For these reasons, I made my trip through the Orient with an increased
desire to bring home the lessons its long experience should teach us.
And now that I come to summarize these lessons I find a single note
running through all--from beginning to end. And this keynote may be
given in a single word. Conservation: the conservation not only of our
natural resources, but of racial strength and power, of industrial
productiveness, of commercial opportunities, and of finer things of
the spirit.

Taking up first the matter of natural resources, I may mention that
hardly anything that I saw on my entire trip burned itself more deeply
into my memory than the heavy penalty that the Celestial Empire is now
paying for the neglect of her forests in former years.

In the country north of Peking I found river valley after river valley
once rich and productive but now become an abomination of
desolation--covered with countless tons of sand and stone brought down
from the treeless mountainsides. So long as these <DW72>s were
forest-clad, the decaying leaves and humus gave a sponge-like
character to the soil upon them, and it gave out the water gradually
to the streams below. Now, however, the peaks are in most cases only
enormous rock-piles, the erosion having laid waste the country
roundabout; or else they are mixtures of rock and earth rent by gorges
through which furious torrents rush down immediately after each
rainfall, submerging once fruitful plains with rock and infertile
gully-dirt. Where the thrifty, pig-tailed Chinese peasant once
cultivated broad and level fields in such river valleys, he is now
able to rescue only a few half-hearted patches by piling the rock in
heaps and saving a few intervening arable remnants from the general
soil-wreck.

Especially memorable was the ruin--if one may call it such--of a once
deep river, its bed now almost filled with {263} sand and rock, that I
crossed on my little Chinese donkey not far from the Nankou Pass and
the Great Wall. Even the splendid arches of a bridge, built to span
its ancient flood, were almost submerged in sand. Instead of the
constant stream of water that once gladdened the lowlands, there is in
each rainy season a mad torrent that leaves a ruinous deposit behind,
and, later, long weeks when the river-bed is as dry as a desert. So it
was when I saw it last fall; and the old stone bridge, almost
sand-covered like an Egyptian ruin, was at once a melancholy monument
to the gladness and fertility of a vanished era, and an argument for
forest-conservation that should carry conviction to all who see it.

The next day as I rode amid the strange traffic of Nankou Pass I found
this argument translated into even more directly human terms. For of
the scores of awkward-moving camels and quaint-looking Mongolian
horses and donkeys that I saw homeward-bound after their southward
trip, a great number were carrying little bags of coal--dearly bought
fuel to be sparingly used through the long winter's cold in quantities
just large enough to cook the meagre meals, or in extreme weather to
keep the poor peasants from actually freezing. Only in the rarest
cases are the Chinese able to use fuel for warming themselves; they
can afford only enough for cooking purposes.

Yet in sight of the peasant's home, perhaps--in any case, not far
away--are mountain peaks too steep for cultivation, but which with
wise care of the tree-growth would have provided fuel for thousands
and tens of thousands, and at a fraction of the price at which wood or
coal must now be bought.

Japan, Korea, and India--the whole Orient in fact--bear witness to the
importance of the forestry messages which Gifford Pinchot and Theodore
Roosevelt have been drumming into our more or less uncaring ears for a
decade past. When I reached Yokohama I found it impossible to get into
the northern part of the island of Hondo because of the {264} flood
damage to the railroads, and the lives of several friends of mine had
been endangered in the same disaster. The dams of bamboo-bound rocks
that I found men building near Nikko and Miyanoshita by way of remedy
may not amount to much; but there is much hope in the general
programme for reforesting the desolated areas, which I found the
Japanese Department of Agriculture and Commerce actively prosecuting.
Here is a good lesson for America. In Korea, however, the Japanese
lumbermen, even in very recent years, have given little thought to the
morrow and with such results as might be expected. The day I reached
Seoul, one of its older citizens, standing on the banks of the Han
just outside the ancient walls, remarked, "When I was young this was
called the Bottomless River, because of its great depth. Now, as you
can see, it is all changed. The bed is shallow, in some places nearly
filled up, and it has been but a few weeks since great damage was done
by overflows right here in Seoul."

Yet another kind of conservation to which our people in Occidental
lands need to give more earnest heed is the conservation of the
individual wealth of the people. The wastefulness of the average
American is apparent enough from a comparison of conditions here with
conditions in Europe--when I came back from my first European trip I
remarked that "Europe would live on what America wastes"--but a
comparison of conditions in America with those in the Orient is even
more to our discredit. In Lafcadio Hearn's books on Japan we find a
glorification of the Japanese character that is unquestionably
overdone on the whole, but in his contrast between the wasteful
display of fashion's fevered followers in America and the ideals of
simple living that distinguished old Japan, there is a rebuke for us
whose justice we cannot gainsay. Take an old Japanese sage like Baron
Shibusawa, who, like Count Okuma, it seems might well have been one of
Plutarch's men, and you are not surprised to hear him mention the
extravagance of America as the thing that impressed him more {265}
than anything else in traveling in our country. "To spend so much
money in making a mere railroad station palatial as you have done in
Washington, for example, seems to me uneconomic," he declared.

What most impressed him and other Oriental critics with whom I talked,
be it remembered, was the wastefulness of expenditures not for genuine
comforts but for fashion and display--the vagaries of idle rich women
who pay high prices for half-green strawberries in January but are
hunting some other exotic diet when the berries get deliciously ripe
in May, and who rave over an American Beauty in December but have no
eyes for the full-blown glory of the open-air roses in June. It is
such unnatural display that most grates against the "moral duty of
simplicity of life," as Eastern sages have taught it.

"When I was in the Imperial University here in Tokyo," a Japanese
newspaper man said to me, "my father gave me six yen a month, $3
American money. I paid for room, light, and food $1.20 a month; for
tuition, 50 cents; for paper, books, etc., 30 cents; and this left me
$1 for pocket money expenditures, including the occasional treat of
eating potatoes with sugar!" In such Spartan simplicity the victors of
Mukden, Liao-yang and Port Arthur were bred.

The great founder of the Tokugawa dynasty, Iyeyasu, whose tomb at
Nikko situated at the end of a twenty-five mile avenue of giant
cryptomerias, is the Mecca of all tourists, has expressed in two
memorable sayings the Japanese conception of the essential immorality
of waste, of the regard that is due every product of human labor as
being itself in some sense human or at least a throb with the blood of
the toiler who has wrought it and moist with the sweat of his brow.
When virtual dictator of Japan, Iyeyasu was seen smoothing out an old
silk kakama. "I am doing this," he said, "not because of the worth of
the garment in itself, but because of what it needed to produce it. It
is the result of the toil of some poor woman, and that is why I value
it. If we do not think while {266} using these things, of the toil and
effort required to produce them, then our want of consideration puts
us on a level with the beasts." Again, when opposing unnecessary
purchases of costly royal garments, he declared. "When I think of the
multitudes around me, and the generations to come after me, I feel it
my duty to be very sparing, for their sake, of the goods in my
possession."

No wonder Hearn declares of this "cosmic emotion of humanity" which we
lack that "we shall certainly be obliged to acquire it at a later date
simply to save ourselves from extermination."

The importance of saving the wealth of nations from the wastes of war
and the wastes of excessive military expenditures is another lesson
that one brings home from a study of conditions abroad. While our
American jingoes are using Japan as a more or less effective bogy to
work their purposes, peace advocates might perhaps even more
legitimately hold it up as a "horrible example" to point their moral
as to how war drains the national revenues and exhausts the national
wealth. In the Mikado's empire the average citizen to-day must pay 30
per cent, of his total income in taxes, the great proportion of this
enormous national expenditure growing out of past wars and
preparations for future wars. No wonder venerable Count Okuma, once
Premier of the Empire, said to me: "I look for international
arbitration to come not as a matter of sentiment but as a matter of
cold financial necessity. Nations have labored for centuries to build
up the civilization of to-day: it is unthinkable that its advantages
must be largely sacrificed for the support of enormous non-productive
armies and navies. That would be simply the Suicide of Civilization."

For the lesson of all this I may quote the words of Dr. Timothy
Richard, one of the most distinguished Englishmen in China, in the
same conversation from which a fragment was quoted in the beginning of
this article:

{267}

"The world is going to be one before you die, sir," he said as we
talked together just outside the walls of the Forbidden City. "We are
living in the days of anarchy. Unite the ten leading nations; let all
their armaments be united into one to enforce the decrees of the
Supreme Court of the World. And since it will then be the refusal of
recalcitrant nations to accept arbitration that will make necessary
the maintenance of any very large armaments by these united nations,
let them protect themselves by levying discriminating tariff duties
against the countries that would perpetuate present conditions."

All this I endorse. The necessity of preserving the national wealth
from the wastes of war I regard as one of the most important lessons
that we may get from the Orient. And yet I would not have the United
States risk entering upon that military unpreparedness which must
prove a fool's paradise until other great nations are brought to
accept the principle of arbitration. The proper programme is to
increase by tenfold--yes, a hundredfold--our personal and national
efforts for arbitration, at the same time remembering that so long as
the community of nations recognizes the Rule of Force we cannot secede
and set up a reign of peace for ourselves. If it takes two to make a
quarrel, it also takes two to keep a peace. We must be in terrible
earnest about bringing in a new era, and yet we cannot commit the
folly of trying to play the peace game by ourselves. It is not
solitaire.

Even more important, whether we consider it from the standpoint of the
general welfare or as a matter of national defence, is the
conservation of our physical stamina and racial strength. Whether the
wars of the future are commercial or military it doesn't matter. The
prizes will go to the people who are strong of body and clear of mind.
"The first requisite," said Herbert Spencer, "is a good animal," and
not even the success of a Peace Court will ever prevent the good
animal--the power of physical vigor and hardness with its {268}
concomitant qualities of courage, discipline, and daring--from
becoming a deciding factor in the struggle between nations and between
races. It has been so from the dawn of history and it will ever be so.

And just here we may question whether the growth of wealth and luxury
in the United States is not tending here, as it has tended in all
other nations, toward physical softness and deterioration. It may be
argued on the contrary that while a few Occidental children are
luxury-weakened, a great body of Oriental children are
drudgery-weakened. But is there not much more reason to fear that in
our case there is really decay at both ends of our social system--with
the pampered rich children who haven't work enough, and with the
hard-driven poor who have too much? The overworking of the very young
is certainly a serious evil in America as well as in Asia; and even in
this matter the Eastern folk are perhaps doing as well, according to
their lights, as we are. In China manufacturing is not yet extensive
enough for the problem to be serious; but in both Japan and India I
found the government councils thoroughly aroused to the importance of
conserving child-life, and grappling with different measures for the
protection of both child and women workers. My recollection is that
the four thousand brown-bodied Hindu boys (there were no girls) that I
found at work in a Madras cotton mill already have better legal
protection than is afforded the child-workers in some of our American
states.

For a long time, too, we have been accustomed to think of the Oriental
as the victim of enervating habits and more or less vicious forms of
self-indulgence. But while this may have been true in the past, the
tide is now definitely turning. Fifty years of agitation in the United
States have probably accomplished less to minimize intemperance among
us than ten years of anti-opium agitation has accomplished in ridding
China of her particular form of intemperance. I went to China too late
to see the once famous opium dens of Canton and Peking; {269} too late
to see the gorgeous poppy-fields that once lined the banks of the
Yangtze; and on the billboards in Newchang I found such notices as the
following concerning morphine, cocaine and similar drugs:

  "In accordance with instructions received through the
  Inspector-General from the Shuiwu Ch'u the public is hereby notified
  that henceforth the importation into China of cocaine ... or
  instruments for its use, except by foreign medical practitioners and
  foreign druggists for medical purposes, is hereby prohibited."

And these foreign doctors handling cocaine are heavily bonded. The
Chinaman of to-day is giving up opium, is little given to other forms
of intemperance, is afire with new enthusiasm for athletics and for
military training; and he is already so physically adaptable that I
found him as hardy and untiringly energetic beneath an equatorial sun
in Singapore as in the rigorous climate of north-central Manchuria. It
made me wonder if the "meek who are to inherit the earth" in the end
may not prove to be the Chinese!

Perhaps if the United States were a less powerful nation, or if we
realized more fully the keenness of the coming world-struggle for
industrial supremacy, we might find our patriotism a stronger force in
warding off some of the evils that now threaten us. In his address to
the German navy, Emperor William recently urged the importance of
temperance because of the empire's need of strong, clear-headed men,
unweakened by dissipation; and there can be little doubt that some
such patriotic motive has had not a little to do with the anti-opium
movement in awakening China. Certainly the Japanese with their almost
fanatical love of country are easily influenced by such appeals, and
keep such reasons in mind in the training of their young. "For the
sake of the Emperor you must not drink the water from these condemned
wells; for the sake of the Emperor you must observe these sanitary
precautions--lest you start an epidemic and so weaken the {270}
Emperor's fighting forces!" So said the Japanese sanitary officers in
the war with Russia; and when the struggle ended Surgeon-General
Takaki was able to boast in his official report:

 "In the Spanish-American War fourteen men died from disease to one
 from bullets. We have established a record of four deaths from
 disease to one from bullets."

In studying these Eastern peoples one is also led inevitably to such
reflections as Mr. Roosevelt gave utterance to in his Romanes lectures
a few months ago. Not only are the Orientals schooled from their youth
up to endure hardness like good soldiers, but their natural increase
contrasts strikingly with the steadily decreasing birth-rate of our
French and English stocks. In Japan I soon came to remark that it
looked almost as unnatural to see a woman between twenty and forty
without a baby on her back as it would to see a camel without a hump;
and Kipling's saying about the Japanese "four-foot child who walks
with a three-foot child who is holding the hand of a two-foot child
who carries on her back a one-foot child" came promptly to mind. In
view of these things it is not surprising to learn that in the last
fifty years Japan has increased in population, through the birth rate
alone, "as fast as the United States has gained from the birth rate
plus her enormous immigration." The racial fertility of the Chinese is
also well known; a Chinaman without sons to worship his spirit when he
dies is not only temporarily discredited but eternally doomed. As for
India, that every Hindu girl at fourteen must be either a wife or a
widow is a common saying, and readers of "Kim" and "The Naulahka" will
recall the ancient and persistent belief that the wife who is not also
a mother of sons is a woman of ill-omen.

Mr. Putman Weale abundantly justifies the title of his new book, "The
Conflict of Color"--the seeming foreordination of some readjustment of
racial relations if present tendencies continue--when he asserts that
while the white races double {271} in eighty years, the yellow or
brown double in sixty, and the black in forty.

This last consideration, that of a possible readjustment of racial
relations, leads us very naturally to inquire, What are the qualities
that have given the white race the leadership thus far? And what may
we do for the conservation of these qualities?

There are, of course, certain basic and fundamental reasons for white
leadership that I need not elaborate. For one thing, there is the
tonic air of democratic ideals in which long generations of white men
have lived and developed as contrasted with the stifling absolutism of
the East. There is also our emphasis upon the worth of the Individual,
our conception of the sacredness of personality, as compared with the
Oriental lack of concern for the individual in its supreme regard for
the family and the State. And even more important perhaps is the fact
that the white man has had a religion that has taught--even if
somewhat confusedly at times--that "man is man and master of his
fate," that he is not a plaything of destiny, but a responsible son of
God with enormous possibilities for good or evil, whereas the Oriental
has been the victim of benumbing fatalism that has made him
indifferent in industry and achievement, though it has given him a
greater recklessness in war. It would also be difficult to exaggerate
the influence which our radically different estimate of woman has had
upon Western civilization. And here we have to consider not only
woman's own direct contributions to progress, but also the indirect
influence of our regard for woman, not as an inferior and a plaything,
but as a comrade and helpmeet. How frequently the ideal of English
chivalry--

  "To love one maiden only, cleave to her,
   To worship her by years of noble deeds"--

has been the inspiration of the best that men of our race have
wrought, it needs only a glance at our literature to {272} suggest.
These things are indeed basic and fundamental and the question of
their conservation, the preservation of the ideals of the Occident as
compared with those of the Orient, is supremely important not only to
us as a nation but to all our human race. But when one comes to
consider only the sheer economic causes of the difference between
Oriental poverty and Occidental plenty, it seems to me impossible to
escape the conviction, already expressed and elaborated that it is
mainly a matter of tools and knowledge, education and machinery.

In the Orient every man is producing as little as possible; in the
Occident he is producing as much as possible. That is the case in a
nutshell.

With better knowledge and better tools, half the people now engaged in
food-production in Asia could produce all the food that the entire
rural population now produces, and the other half could be released
for manufacturing--thereby doubling the earning power and the spending
power of the whole population.

It is universal education and modern machinery, far more than virgin
resources, that have made America rich and powerful. Let her make
haste then to learn this final lesson that the Orient teaches--the
necessity of conserving in the fullest degree all the powers that have
given us industrial supremacy: the power of the trained brain and the
cunning hand reinforced by all the magic strength that we may get from
our Briarean "Slave of the Lamp," modern machinery. We must thoroughly
educate all our people. Was it not an Oriental prophet who wrote: "My
people are destroyed for lack of knowledge?" In China only 1 per cent,
of the people can now read and write, and the highest hope of the
government is that 5 per cent, may be literate by 1917. In India only
5 per cent, can read and write. In Japan for centuries past, the
education of the common man has also been neglected, but she is now
compelling every child to go into the schools, {273} and her industrial
system will doubtless be revolutionized at a result.

In no case must we forget that education, if it is to be effective,
must train for efficiency, must link itself with life and work, must
be practical. I had thought of the movement for relating the school to
industry as being confined to America and Europe. But when I landed in
Japan I found the educational authorities there as keenly alive to the
importance of the movement as ours in America; in China I found that
the old classical system of education has been utterly abandoned
within a decade; in the Philippines it was the boast of the
Commissioner of Education that the elementary schools in the islands
give better training for agriculture and industry than those in the
United States; and in India the school authorities are earnestly at
work upon the same problem.

Knowledge and tools must go hand in hand. If this has been important
heretofore it is doubly important now that we must face in an
ever-increasing degree the rivalry of awakening peoples who are strong
with the strength that comes from struggle with poverty and hardship,
and who have set themselves to master and apply all our secrets in the
coming world-struggle for industrial supremacy and racial
readjustment.


THE END

{274}

{275}

INDEX



American commerce abroad,          87-8, 91-2
American goods sold lower abroad,  101
Ancestor worship, Japan,           7-8
Area and population,
  Manchuria,                       78;
  Philippines,                     163;
  India,                           211
Artistic Japanese,                 40, 48-9


Beans in Manchuria,                75-6
Beasts, India's wild,              258-60
Benares,                           202
Boxer troubles,                    125-26


Camels in China,                   116-17
Canton,                            142
Caste system,                      226-35;
  effect on labor,                 229;
  robber caste,                    231;
  defended,                        232
Child marriage in India,           237-8
Children, Hindu,                   223-4
China, premonitions of revolution, 93, 102-6.
China Sea,                         153
Chinese hardiness,                 187-8
Chinese immigration,               114-15
Christian vs. Hindu philosophy,    199, 204-5
Christian vs. Oriental philosophy, 271
Cocoanut planting,                 189
Confucianism,                      103
Conservation of forests,           262-4
Cooperative credit societies,
  Japan,                           25;
  India,                           222
Crops--
  Rice,                            23-5;
  cotton,                          23, 76, 140, 168, 254-7;
  India's crops,                   219
Currency reform in China,          97-98

Diseases and sanitation,           56-64, 72, 135, 170-71
Dress,
  Japanese,                        10-11;
  Indian,                          216

Education,                         272;
  Japanese,                        17;
  Chinese,                         99, 109-11;
  Filipino,                        168-9;
  Indian,                          210
Elephants, Stories about,          193-5
Extravagance, American,            264-6

Factory child labor,               268;
  Japan,                           33
Family government,                 7, 149
Famines in India,                  218-20

Farm animals,
  Japan,                           22;
  Manchuria,                       74;
  Philippines,                     159
Farming--
  Japan,                           21-28;
  Manchurian,                      76;
  Chinese,                         122, 126-8, 140-41, 177;
  Philippine,                      155-6, 165;
  Indian,                          218-23, 255-7;
  tools,                           23, 190, 218;
  houses,                          26, 127, 156, 212
Fatalism,                          227-8
Filipino character,                172
Filipino houses,                   156
Foot binding. Chinese,             133-84
Funeral and burial customs,        77, 124, 128, 144-5, 203-4, 243

Ganges,                            203
German commercial activity,        190
Government,
  Japanese,                        4;
  Korea's corrupt,                 65-7;
  Chinese,                         108
Great Wall,                        120-21

Himalayas, The,                    208-9
Hindu gods and goddesses,          200
Hindu village described,           212

{276}

India, English rule in,            248-52
India's diversity of races,        248
Individual, repression of,         55-6
Industrial efficiency,             37, 40, 141


Japan control in
  Korea,                           67-8;
  Manchuria,                       78-92
Japanese city described,           9-11
Japanese-Russian War,              70-72; 90-91

Korea, 60-69

Language--
  Japanese spoken,                 3;
  written,                         9-10;
  Chinese,                         129-30
Lawrence, Sir Henry,               246
Love of nature, Japanese,          27

Machinery, Asia's refusal to use,  183
Manchuria's fertility,             73-4
Manila,                            154
Manufacturing, Japan,              31, 34-47
Marriage customs,
  Japanese,                        5-7, 139;
  Korean,                          63;
  Chinese,                         134;
  Indian,                          236-43
Missionary work,                   59, 69;
  Japan,                           61;
  Korea,                           68;
  Philippines,                     164
Moral standards,                   134, 136
Music,                             5


Odd customs,
  Japan,                           3-6, 12;
  Korean,                          65
Okuma, Count, interviewed,         44-5; 266
Open door in Manchuria, The,       78-92
Opium, China's crusade against,    94-6; 108

Parcels post,                      101
Peking, Glimpses of,               123-25
Perry's Expedition,                58
Persecution of Christians,         51-2, 125-6
Philippine government,             167-70
Philippine resources,              165-7
Philippine scenery,                155-6
"Pidgin English,"                  150-51
Politeness, Japanese,              12, 13
Postal savings banks,              169
Poverty of Oriental people,        175, 210, 252
Practical education,               99, 273
Punishments, Chinese,              145-6

Racial fertility,                  7, 11, 270-71
Railways,
  Manchurian,                      83-6;
  Chinese,                         139-40
Rangoon,                           190-91
Religions,
  Shintoism,                       49;
  Buddhism,                        49-50, 151, 122-3;
  Confucianism,                    130-31;
  Hinduism,                        198-208, 227
Roads,                             74;
  in Philippines,                  171
Rubber speculation,                188

School term, Japan,                17-18
Size of farms,
  Japan,                           21;
  China,                           126
Slavery in China,                  132
Social gradations, Japanese,       16
"Squeeze" system in China,         96, 112
Story, A Chinese,                  146-7
Superstitions,                     77, 128-9

Taj Mahal described,               244-5
Tariff--
  Japanese,                        30, 44-6;
  Chinese,                         112
Taxes in Japan,                    30
Torrens land titles,               98, 169-70
Tropical vegetation,               186


Wages--
  Japan,                           29, 34, 36, 42, 174;
  China,                           126, 141, 174, 177;
  Burma,                           196;
  India,                           210, 223, 253-4
War spirit,                        267;
  Japan,                           35, 72, 266;
  China,                           111-12
Wedding, A Hindu,                  239
Welfare work in Japanese factories 31-3
Woman's degraded position,         271;
  Japan,                           6, 52-6;
  India,                           236-44
Women laborers,                    39, 43, 177, 253-4
Wu Ting Fang interviewed,          139

Yang-bans, The,                    66
Yangtze River,                     138-9





End of Project Gutenberg's Where Half The World Is Waking Up, by Clarence Poe

*** 