



Produced by Douglas L. Alley, III, Chris Curnow and the
Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
(This file was produced from images generously made
available by The Internet Archive)








[Illustration: Plate I]

                                   AN
                              INTRODUCTION
                                   TO
                              ENTOMOLOGY:

                                   OR
                                ELEMENTS
                                 OF THE
                     _NATURAL HISTORY OF INSECTS_:

                              WITH PLATES.

                  By WILLIAM KIRBY, M.A. F.R. AND L.S.
                           RECTOR OF BARHAM,
                                  AND
                      WILLIAM SPENCE, ESQ. F.L.S.

                            IN FOUR VOLUMES.
                                VOL. I.

                            _FIFTH EDITION._

                                LONDON:
                              PRINTED FOR
                 LONGMAN, REES, ORME, BROWN, AND GREEN,
                            PATERNOSTER ROW.

                                 1828.

                                LONDON:
                       PRINTED BY RICHARD TAYLOR,
                     RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET.

[Illustration]

                                   TO
                          THE RIGHT HONOURABLE
                       SIR JOSEPH BANKS, BARONET,
               ONE OF HIS MAJESTY'S MOST HONOURABLE PRIVY
                                COUNCIL,
              KNIGHT GRAND CROSS OF THE ORDER OF THE BATH,
                  PRESIDENT OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY, ETC.
                      WHOSE UNRIVALLED LIBRARY AND
                        PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS
              HAVE FURNISHED MUCH OF THE MOST INTERESTING
                        MATTER THAT IT CONTAINS,
                          THE FOLLOWING WORK,
                  IN WHICH AN ATTEMPT IS MADE TO COPY
                        HIS ILLUSTRIOUS EXAMPLE,
               BY POINTING OUT THE CONNEXION THAT EXISTS
               BETWEEN NATURAL SCIENCE, AND AGRICULTURE,
                             AND THE ARTS,
                        IS, WITH HIS PERMISSION,
                       MOST GRATEFULLY INSCRIBED
                          BY HIS MOST OBLIGED

                              AND OBEDIENT SERVANTS,
                                           THE AUTHORS.




                             ADVERTISEMENT
                            TO THIS EDITION.


Since the original Edition of the present work was published, a gradual
and great alteration has taken place in the nomenclature of the genera,
occasioned by the old ones being further subdivided according to their
natural groups, and each distinguished as a genus or subgenus by its
peculiar name. These names in the present Edition, in order to keep
pace with the progress of the science, have been generally adopted,
and some new ones introduced. The improved Index, which may be had
separately by the purchasers of the former Editions, will point out
from what old genera the new ones have been separated.




                                PREFACE.


One principal cause of the little attention paid to Entomology in
this country, has doubtless been the ridicule so often thrown upon
the science. The botanist, sheltered now by the sanction of fashion,
as formerly by the prescriptive union of his study with medicine, may
dedicate his hours to mosses and lichens without reproach; but in
the minds of most men, the learned as well as the vulgar, the idea
of the trifling nature of his pursuit is so strongly associated with
that of the diminutive size of its objects, that an _entomologist_ is
synonymous with every thing futile and childish. Now, when so many
other roads to fame and distinction are open, when a man has merely
to avow himself a botanist, a mineralogist, or a chemist--a student
of classical literature or of political economy--to ensure attention
and respect, there are evidently no great attractions to lead him
to a science which in nine companies out of ten with which he may
associate promises to signalize him only as an object of pity or
contempt. Even if he have no other aim than self-gratification, yet
"the sternest stoic of us all wishes at least for some one to enter
into his views and feelings, and confirm him in the opinion which he
entertains of himself:" but how can he look for sympathy in a pursuit
unknown to the world, except as indicative of littleness of mind[1]?

Yet such are the genuine charms of this branch of the study of
nature, that here as well as on the continent, where, from being
equally slighted, Entomology now divides the empire with her sister
Botany, this obstacle would not have been sufficient to deter numbers
from the study, had not another more powerful impediment existed--the
want of a popular and comprehensive Introduction to the science.
While elementary books on Botany have been multiplied amongst
us without end and in every shape, Curtis's translation of the
_Fundamenta Entomologiae_, published in 1772; Yeats's _Institutions
of Entomology_, which appeared the year after; and Barbut's
_Genera Insectorum_, which came out in 1781--the two former in too
unattractive, and the latter in too expensive a form for general
readers--are the only works professedly devoted to this object, which
the English language can boast.

Convinced that this was the chief obstacle to the spread of
Entomology in Britain, the authors of the present work resolved to
do what was in their power to remove it, and to introduce their
countrymen to a mine of pleasure, new, boundless, and inexhaustible,
and which, to judge from their own experience--formed in no
contracted field of comparison--they can recommend as possessing
advantages and attractions equal to those held forth by most other
branches of human learning.

The next question was, in what way they should attempt to accomplish
this intention. If they had contented themselves with the first
suggestion that presented itself, and merely given a translation of
one of the many Introductions to Entomology extant in Latin, German
and French, adding only a few obvious improvements, their task would
have been very easy; but the slightest examination showed that,
in thus proceeding, they would have stopped far short of the goal
which they were desirous of reaching.--In the technical department
of the science they found much confusion, and numerous errors and
imperfections--the same name sometimes applied to parts anatomically
quite different, and different names to parts essentially the same,
while others of primary importance were without any name at all. And
with reference to the anatomy and physiology of insects, they could
no where meet with a full and accurate generalization of the various
facts connected with these subjects, scattered here and there in the
pages of the authors who have studied them.

They therefore resolved to begin, in some measure, _de novo_--to
institute a rigorous revision of the terms employed, making such
additions and improvements as might seem to be called for; and
to attempt a more complete and connected account of the existing
discoveries respecting the anatomical and physiological departments
of the science than has yet been given to the world:--and to these
two points their plan at the outset was limited.

It soon, however, occurred to them, that it would be of little use to
write a book which no one would peruse; and that in the present age
of love for light reading, there could not be much hope of leading
students to the dry abstractions of the science, unless they were
conducted through the attractive portal of the economy and natural
history of its objects. To this department, therefore, they resolved
to devote the first and most considerable portion of their intended
work, bringing into one point of view, under distinct heads, the most
interesting discoveries of Reaumur, De Geer, Bonnet, Lyonet, the
Hubers, &c., as well as their own individual observations, relative to
the noxious and beneficial properties of insects; their affection for
their young; their food, and modes of obtaining it; their habitations;
societies; &c. &c.: and they were the more induced to adopt this plan,
from the consideration, that, though many of the most striking of
these facts have before been presented to the English reader, a great
proportion are unknown to him; and that no similar generalization (if a
slight attempt towards it in Smellie's _Philosophy of Natural History_,
and a confessedly imperfect one in Latreille's _Histoire Naturelle des
Crustaces et des Insectes_ be excepted) has ever been attempted in any
language.--Thus the entire work would be strictly on the plan of the
_Philosophia Entomologica_ of Fabricius, only giving a much greater
extent to the _Oeconomia_ and _Usus_, and adverting to these in the
first place instead of in the last.

The epistolary form was adopted, not certainly from any idea of their
style being particularly suited to a mode of writing so difficult
to keep from running into incongruities: but simply because this
form admitted of digressions and allusions called for in a popular
work, but which might have seemed misplaced in a stricter kind of
composition;--because it is better suited to convey those practical
directions, which in some branches of the pursuit the student
requires;--and lastly, because by this form, the objection against
speaking of the manners and economy of insects before entering upon
the definition of them, and explaining the terms of the science--a
retrograde course, which they have chosen from their desire to
present the most alluring side of the science first--is in great
measure, if not wholly, obviated.

Such is the plan which the authors chalked out for themselves--a
plan which in the execution they have found so much more extensive
than they calculated upon, that, could they have foreseen the piles
of volumes through which it has entailed upon them the labour of
wading, often to glean scarcely more than a single fact--the numerous
anatomical and technological investigations which it has called
for--and the long correspondence, almost as bulky as the entire
work, unavoidably rendered necessary by the distant residence of the
parties--they would have shrunk from an undertaking, of which the
profit, if by great chance there should be any, could not be expected
to repay even the cost of books required in it, and from which any
fame must necessarily be confined to a very limited circle. But
having entered upon it, they have persevered; and if they succeed in
their grand aim, that of making converts amongst their countrymen
to a study equally calculated for promoting the glory of God and
the delight and profit of man, they will not deem the labour of the
leisure hours of six years ill bestowed.

And here it may be proper to observe, that one of their first and
favourite objects has been to direct the attention of their readers
"from nature up to nature's God." For, when they reflected upon the
fatal use which has too often been made of Natural History, and
that from the very works and wonders of God, some philosophists, by
an unaccountable perversion of intellect, have attempted to derive
arguments either against his being and providence, or against the
Religion revealed in the Holy Scriptures, they conceived they might
render some service to the most important interests of mankind,
by showing how every department of the science they recommend
illustrates the great truths of Religion, and proves that the
doctrines of the Word of God, instead of being contradicted, are
triumphantly confirmed by his Works.

"To see all things in God" has been accounted one of the peculiar
privileges of a future state; and in this present life, "to see God
in all things," in the mirror of the creation to behold and adore the
reflected glory of the Creator, is no mean attainment; and it possesses
this advantage, that thus we sanctify our pursuits, and, instead of
loving the creatures for themselves, are led by the survey of them and
their instincts to the love of Him who made and endowed them.

Of their performance of the first part of their plan, in which
there is the least room for originality, it is only necessary for
the authors to say that they have done their best to make it as
comprehensive, as interesting, and as useful as possible: but it is
requisite to enter somewhat more fully into what has been attempted
in the anatomical, physiological, and technical parts of the work.

As far as respects the general physiology and _internal_ anatomy of
insects, they have done little more than bring together and combine the
observations of the naturalists who have attended to these branches
of the science: but the _external_ anatomy they have examined for
themselves through the whole class, and, they trust, not without some
new light being thrown upon the subject; particularly by pointing out
and giving names to many parts never before noticed.

In the _Terminology_, or what, to avoid the barbarism of a
word compounded of Latin and Greek, they would beg to call the
_Orismology_ of the science, they have endeavoured to introduce
throughout a greater degree of precision and concinnity--dividing
it into _general_ and _partial_ Orismology;--under the former
head defining such terms as relate to _Substance_, _Resistance_,
_Density_, _Proportion_, _Figure_, _Form_, _Superficies_, (under
which are introduced _Sculpture_, _Clothing_, _Colour_, &c.)
_Margin_, _Termination_, _Incision_, _Ramification_, _Division_,
_Direction_, _Situation_, _Connection_, _Arms_, &c.; and under the
latter those that relate to the body and its parts and members,
considered in its great subdivisions of _Head_, _Trunk_, and
_Abdomen_. In short, they may rest their claim of at least aiming
at considerable improvement in this department upon the great
number of new terms, and alterations of old ones, which they have
introduced--in external Anatomy alone falling little short of 150.
If it should be thought by any one that they have made too many
changes, they would remind him of the advice of Bergman to Morveau,
when reforming the nomenclature of Chemistry, the soundness of
which Dugald Stewart has recognised--"_Ne faites grace a aucune
denomination impropre. Ceux qui savent deja, entendront toujours;
ceux qui ne savent pas encore, entendront plutot._"

Throughout the whole publication, wherever any fact of importance not
depending on their own authority is mentioned, a reference to the
source whence it has been derived is generally given; so that, if the
work should have no other value, it will possess that of saving much
trouble to future inquirers, by serving as an index to direct them in
their researches.

The authors are perfectly sensible that, notwithstanding all their
care and pains, many imperfections will unavoidably remain in their
work. There is no science to which the adage, _Dies diem docet_, is
more strikingly applicable than to Natural History. New discoveries
are daily made, and will be made it is probable to the end of time;
so that whoever flatters himself that he can produce a perfect work
in this department will be miserably disappointed. The utmost that
can reasonably be expected from naturalists is to keep pace with the
progress of knowledge, and this the authors have used their best
diligence to accomplish. Every new year since they took the subject in
hand up to the very time when the first sheets were sent to the press,
numerous corrections and alterations have suggested themselves; and
thus they are persuaded it would be were they to double the period of
delay prescribed by Horace. But Poetry and Natural History are on a
different footing; and though an author can plead little excuse for
giving his verses to the world while he sees it possible to polish
them to higher excellence, the naturalist, if he wishes to promote the
extension of his science, must be content to submit his performances to
the public disfigured by numerous imperfections.

In the introductory letter several of the advantages to be derived
from the study of Entomology are pointed out; but there is one,
which, though it could not well have been insisted upon in that
place, is too important to be passed over without notice--its value
in the education of youth.

All modern writers on this momentous subject unite in recommending
in this view, Natural History: and if "the quality of accurate
discrimination--the ready perception of resemblances amongst
diversities, and still more the quick and accurate perception of
diversity in the midst of resemblances--constitutes one of the most
important operations of the understanding; if it be indeed the
foundation of clear ideas, and the acquisition of whatever can be
truly called knowledge depends most materially on the possession of
it:"--if "the best logic be that which teaches us to suspend our
judgements;" and "the art of seeing, so useful, so universal, and yet
so uncommon, be one of the most valuable a man can possess,"--there
can be no doubt of the judiciousness of their advice. Now of all the
branches of Natural History, Entomology is unquestionably the best
fitted for thus disciplining the mind of youth; and simply from these
circumstances, that its objects have life, are gifted with surprising
instincts admirably calculated to attract youthful attention, and are
to be met with every where. It is not meant to undervalue the good
effects of the study of Botany or Mineralogy: but it is self-evident
that nothing inanimate can excite such interest in the mind of a
young person as beings endowed with vitality, exercising their powers
and faculties in so singular a way; which, as Reaumur observes, are
not only alive themselves, but confer animation upon the leaves,
fruits, and flowers that they inhabit; which every walk offers to
view; and on which new observations may be made without end.

Besides these advantages, no study affords a fairer opportunity of
leading the young mind by a natural and pleasing path to the great
truths of Religion, and of impressing it with the most lively ideas
of the power, wisdom, and goodness of the Creator.

Not that it is recommended to make children collectors of insects,
nor that young people, to the neglect of more important duties and
pursuits, should generally become professed Entomologists; but, if
the former be familiarized with their names, manners, and economy,
and the latter initiated into their classification, it will be an
excellent method of strengthening their habits of observation,
attention, and memory, equal perhaps, in this respect, to any
other mental exercise: and then, like Major Gyllenhal, who studied
Entomology under Thunberg about 1770, and after an interval of twenty
years devoted to the service of his country, resumed his favourite
pursuit with all the ardour of youth, and is at this time giving to
the world a description of the insects of Sweden invaluable for its
accuracy and completeness--they would be provided in their old age
with an object capable not merely of keeping off that _taedium vitae_
so often inseparable from the relinquishment of active life, but of
supplying an unfailing fund of innocent amusement, an incentive to
exercise, and consequently no mean degree of health and enjoyment.

Some, who, with an ingenious author[2], regard as superfluous all
pains to show the utility of Natural History in reference to the
common purposes of life, asking "if it be not enough to open a source
of copious and cheap amusement, which tends to harmonize the mind,
and elevate it to worthy conceptions of nature and its Author? if a
greater blessing to a man can be offered than happiness at an easy
rate unalloyed by any debasing mixture?"--may think the earnestness
displayed on this head, and the length which has been gone in refuting
objections, needless. But Entomology is so peculiarly circumstanced,
that without removing these obstacles, there could be no hope of
winning votaries to the pursuit. Pliny felt the necessity of following
this course in the outset of his book which treats on insects, and a
similar one has been originally called for in introducing the study
even to those countries where the science is now most honoured. In
France, Reaumur, in each of the successive volumes of his immortal
work, found it essential to seize every opportunity of showing that
the study of insects is not a frivolous amusement, nor devoid of
utility, as his countrymen conceived it; and in Germany Sulzer had to
traverse the same road, telling us, in proof of the necessity of this
procedure, that on showing his works on insects with their plates to
two very sensible men, one commended him for employing his leisure
hours in preparing prints that would amuse children and keep them out
of mischief, and the other admitted that they might furnish very pretty
patterns for ladies' aprons! And though in this country things are not
now quite so bad as they were when Lady Glanville's will was attempted
to be set aside on the ground of lunacy, evinced by no other act than
her fondness for collecting insects, and Ray had to appear at Exeter
on the trial as a witness of her sanity[3], yet nothing less than line
upon line can be expected to eradicate the deep-rooted prejudices
which prevail on this subject. "Old impressions," as Reaumur has well
observed, "are with difficulty effaced. They are weakened, they appear
unjust even to those who feel them, at the moment they are attacked by
arguments which are unanswerable; but the next instant the proofs are
forgotten, and the perverse association resumes its empire."

The authors do not know that any curiosity will be excited to ascertain
what share has been contributed to the work by each of them; but if
there should, it is a curiosity they must be excused from gratifying.
United in the bonds of a friendship, which, though they have to thank
Entomology for giving birth to it, is founded upon a more solid
basis than mere community of scientific pursuits, they wish that,
whether blame or praise is the fate of their labours, it may be
jointly awarded. All that they think necessary to state is, that the
composition of each of the different departments of the work has been,
as nearly as possible, divided between them;--that though the letter,
or series of letters, on any particular subject, has been usually
undertaken by one, some of the facts and illustrations have generally
been supplied by the other, and there are a few to which they have
jointly contributed;--and that, throughout, the facts for which no
other authority is quoted, are to be considered as resting upon that
of one or other of the authors, but not always of him, who, from local
allusions, may be conceived the writer of the letter in which they are
introduced, as the matter furnished by each to the letters of the other
must necessarily be given in the person of the supposed writer.

       *       *       *       *       *

In acknowledging their obligations to their friends, the first place
is due to SIMON WILKIN, Esq. of Costessey near Norwich, to whose
liberality they are indebted for almost all the plates which illustrate
and adorn the work; most of which have been drawn and engraved by his
artist Mr. JOHN CURTIS, whose intimate acquaintance with the subject
has enabled him to give to the figures an accuracy which they could
not have received from one less conversant with the science. Nor is
the reader less under obligation to Mr. Wilkin's liberality than the
authors, who, if the drawings, &c. had been to be paid for, must
necessarily have contented themselves with giving a much smaller number.

To ALEXANDER MACLEAY, Esq. they are under particular obligations, for
the warm interest he has all along taken in the work, the judicious
advice he has on many occasions given, the free access in which he
has indulged the authors to his unrivalled cabinet and well-stored
library, and the numerous other attentions and accommodations by
which he has materially assisted them in its progress.

To the other friends who have kindly aided them in this undertaking
in any way, they beg here to offer their best thanks.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] It is with no slight degree of satisfaction that the authors of
the present work observe the progress the science it recommends has
made in the public estimation since the first publication of this
volume: so that the complaint made in the above paragraph must now be
regarded as applicable only to a former state of the science.

[2] Dr. Aikin.

[3] See Harris's _Aurelian_ under _Papilio Cinxia_.




                          CONTENTS OF VOL. I.


  Letter                                                         Page

     I. Introductory,                                            1-20

    II. Objections answered,                                    21-58

   III. Metamorphoses of Insects,                               59-79

    IV. Direct Injuries caused by Insects,                     80-144

     V. Indirect Injuries caused by Insects.
          1. Injuries to our living animal Property,          145-166

    VI. Indirect Injuries continued.
          2. Injuries to our living vegetable Property,       167-214

   VII. The same subject continued.--The Ravages of Locusts,  215-226

  VIII. Indirect Injuries concluded.
          3. Injuries to our dead Property, whether
               animal or vegetable,                           227-249

    IX. Indirect Benefits derived from Insects,               250-299

     X. Direct Benefits derived from Insects,                 300-338

    XI. Affection of Insects for their Young,                 339-381

   XII. Food of Insects,                                      382-401

  XIII. The same subject continued,                           402-431

   XIV. Habitations of Insects.
          1. Of Solitary Insects,                             432-472

    XV. Habitations of Insects continued.
          2. Of Insects in Society,                           473-513




                                   AN
                              INTRODUCTION
                                   TO
                              ENTOMOLOGY.




                               LETTER I.


DEAR SIR,

I cannot wonder that an active mind like yours should experience
no small degree of tedium in a situation so far removed, as you
represent your new residence to be, from "the busy hum of men."
Nothing certainly can compensate for the want of agreeable society;
but since your case in this respect admits of no remedy but patience,
I am glad you are desirous of turning your attention to some pursuit
which may amuse you in the intervals of severer study, and in part
supply the void of which you complain. I am not a little flattered
that you wish to be informed which class in the three kingdoms of
nature is, in my opinion, most likely to answer your purpose; at the
same time intimating that you feel inclined to give the preference to
Entomology, provided some objections can be satisfactorily obviated,
which you have been accustomed to regard as urged with a considerable
semblance of reason against the cultivation of that science.

Mankind in general, not excepting even philosophers, are prone to
magnify, often beyond its just merit, the science or pursuit to which
they have addicted themselves, and to depreciate any that seems
to stand in competition with their favourite: like the redoubted
champions of romance, each thinks himself bound to take the field
against every one that will not subscribe to the peerless beauty
and accomplishments of his own Dulcinea. In such conflict for
pre-eminence I know no science that, in this country, has come off
worse than Entomology: her champions hitherto have been so few, and
their efforts so unavailing, that all her rival sisters have been
exalted above her: and I believe there is scarcely any branch of
Natural History that has had fewer British admirers. While Botany
boasts of myriads, she, though not her inferior either in beauty,
symmetry, or grace, has received the homage of a very slender train
indeed. Since therefore the merits of Entomology have been so little
acknowledged, you will not deem it invidious if I advocate the cause
of this distressed damsel, and endeavour to effect her restoration to
her just rights, privileges, and rank.

Things that are universally obvious and easy of examination, as they
are the first that fall under our notice, so are they also most
commonly those which we first feel an inclination to study; while, on
the contrary, things that must be sought for in order to be seen, and
which when sought for avoid the approach and inquiring eye of man,
are often the last to which he directs his attention. The vegetable
kingdom stands in the former predicament. Flora with a liberal hand
has scattered around us her charming productions; they every where
meet and allure us, enchanting us by their beauty, regaling us by
their fragrance, and interesting us as much by their subservience to
our luxuries and comfort, as to the necessary support and well-being
of our life. Beasts, birds, and fishes also, in some one or other
of these respects, attract our notice; but insects, unfortunate
insects, are so far from attracting us, that we are accustomed to
abhor them from our childhood. The first knowledge that we get of
them is as tormentors; they are usually pointed out to us by those
about us as ugly, filthy, and noxious creatures; and the whole insect
world, butterflies perhaps and some few others excepted, are devoted
by one universal ban to proscription and execration, as fit only to
be trodden under our feet and crushed: so that often, before we can
persuade ourselves to study them, we have to remove from our minds
prejudices deeply rooted and of long standing.

Another principal reason which has contributed to keep Entomology
in the back ground arises from the diminutive size of the objects
of which it treats. Being amongst the most minute of nature's
productions, they do not so readily catch the eye of the observer;
and when they do, mankind in general are so apt to estimate the worth
and importance of things by their bulk, that because we usually
measure them by the duodecimals of an inch instead of by the foot
or by the yard, insects are deemed too insignificant parts of the
creation, and of too little consequence to its general welfare, to
render them worthy of any serious attention or study. What small
foundation there is for such prejudices and misconception, I shall
endeavour to show in the course of our future correspondence; my
object now, as the champion and advocate of Entomology, is to point
out to you her comparative advantages, and to remove the veil which
has hitherto concealed those attractions, and that grace and beauty,
which entitle her to equal admiration at least with her sister
branches of Natural History.

In estimating the comparative value of the study of any department in
this branch of science, we ought to contrast it with others, as to
the rank its objects hold in the scale of being; the amusement and
instruction which the student may derive from it; and its utility to
society at large. With respect to public utility, the study of each
of the three kingdoms may perhaps be allowed to stand upon nearly an
equal footing; I shall not, therefore, enter upon that subject till
I come to consider the question _Cui bono?_ and to point out the
uses of Entomology, but confine myself now to the two first of these
circumstances.

As to rank, I must claim for the entomologist some degree of
precedence before the mineralogist and the botanist. The mineral
kingdom, whose objects are neither organized nor sentient, stands
certainly at the foot of the scale. Next above this is the
vegetable, whose lovely tribes, though not endued with sensation,
are organized. In the last and highest place ranks the animal world,
consisting of beings that are both organized and sentient. To this
scale of precedence the great modern luminary of Natural History,
notwithstanding that Botany was always his favourite pursuit, has
given his sanction, acknowledging in the preface to his _Fauna
Suecica_, that although the vegetable kingdom is nobler than the
mineral, yet the animal is more excellent than the vegetable. Now it
is an indisputable axiom, I should think, that the more exalted the
object the more excellent the study. By this observation, however,
I would by no means be thought to depreciate or discountenance the
study either of plants or minerals. All the works of our Creator are
great, and worthy of our attention and investigation, the lowest in
the scale as well as the highest, the most minute and feeble, as well
as those that exceed in magnitude and might. Nor ought those whose
inclination or genius leads them to one department, to say to those
who prefer another--"we have no need of you"--for each in his place,
by diffusing the knowledge of his works and adding to the stock of
previous discoveries, contributes to promote the glory of the Great
Architect of the universe and the good of his creatures.

It is not my wish to claim for my favourite science more than of
right belongs to her; therefore, when the question is concerning
rank, I must concede to the higher orders of animals, I mean Fishes,
Amphibia, Birds, and Quadrupeds, their due priority and precedence.
I shall only observe here, that there may exist circumstances which
countervail rank, and tend to render the study of a lower order of
beings more desirable than that of a higher: when, for instance,
the objects of the higher study are not to be come at or preserved
without great difficulty and expense; when they are few in number;
or, when they are already well ascertained and known: circumstances
which attach to the study of those animals that precede insects,
while they do not attach to the study of insects themselves.

With regard to the amusement and instruction of the student, much
doubtless may be derived from any one of the sciences alluded to:
but Entomology certainly is not behind any of her sisters in these
respects; and if you are fond of novelty, and anxious to make new
discoveries, she will open to you a more ample field for these than
either Botany or the higher branches of Zoology.

A new vertebrate animal or plant is seldom to be met with even by
those who have leisure and opportunity for extensive researches; but
if you collect insects, you will find, however limited the manor
upon which you can pursue your game, that your efforts are often
rewarded by the capture of some non-descript or rarity at present not
possessed by other entomologists, for I have seldom seen a cabinet
so meagre as not to possess some unique specimen. Nay, though you
may have searched every spot in your neighbourhood this year, turned
over every stone, shaken every bush or tree, and fished every pool,
you will not have exhausted its insect productions. Do the same
another and another, and new treasures will still continue to enrich
your cabinet. If you leave your own vicinity for an entomological
excursion, your prospects of success are still further increased;
and even if confined in bad weather to your inn, the windows of your
apartment, as I have often experienced, will add to your stock. If a
sudden shower obliges you at any time to seek shelter under a tree,
your attention will be attracted, and the tedium of your station
relieved, where the botanist could not hope to find even a new
lichen or moss, by the appearance of several insects, driven there
perhaps by the same cause as yourself, that you have not observed
before. Should you, as I trust you will, feel a desire to attend to
the manners and economy of insects, and become ambitious of making
discoveries in this part of entomological science, I can assure you,
from long experience, that you will here find an inexhaustible
fund of novelty. For more than twenty years my attention has been
directed to them, and during most of my summer walks my eyes have
been employed in observing their ways; yet I can say with truth, that
so far from having exhausted the subject, within the last six months
I have witnessed more interesting facts respecting their history than
in many preceding years. To follow only the insects that frequent
your own garden, from their first to their last state, and to trace
all their proceedings, would supply an interesting amusement for the
remainder of your life, and at its close you would leave much to be
done by your successor; for where we know thoroughly the history of
one insect, there are hundreds concerning which we have ascertained
little besides the bare fact of their existence.

But numerous other sources of pleasure and information will open
themselves to you, not inferior to what any other science can
furnish, when you enter more deeply into the study. Insects, indeed,
appear to have been nature's favourite productions, in which, to
manifest her power and skill, she has combined and concentrated
almost all that is either beautiful and graceful, interesting and
alluring, or curious and singular, in every other class and order
of her children. To these, her valued miniatures, she has given the
most delicate touch and highest finish of her pencil. Numbers she
has armed with glittering mail, which reflects a lustre like that of
burnished metals[4]; in others she lights up the dazzling radiance of
polished gems[5]. Some she has decked with what looks like liquid
drops, or plates of gold and silver[6]; or with scales or pile, which
mimic the colour and emit the ray of the same precious metals[7].
Some exhibit a rude exterior, like stones in their native state[8],
while others represent their smooth and shining face after they have
been submitted to the tool of the polisher: others, again, like so
many pygmy Atlases bearing on their backs a microcosm, by the rugged
and various elevations and depressions of their tuberculated crust,
present to the eye of the beholder no unapt imitation of the unequal
surface of the earth, now horrid with mis-shapen rocks, ridges, and
precipices--now swelling into hills and mountains, and now sinking
into valleys, glens, and caves[9]; while not a few are covered with
branching spines, which fancy may form into a forest of trees[10].

What numbers vie with the charming offspring of Flora in various
beauties! some in the delicacy and variety of their colours, colours
not like those of flowers evanescent and fugitive, but fixed and
durable, surviving their subject, and adorning it as much after
death as they did when it was alive; others, again, in the veining
and texture of their wings; and others in the rich cottony down that
clothes them. To such perfection, indeed, has nature in them carried
her mimetic art, that you would declare, upon beholding some insects,
that they had robbed the trees of their leaves to form for themselves
artificial wings, so exactly do they resemble them in their form,
substance, and vascular structure; some representing green leaves, and
others those that are dry and withered[11]. Nay, sometimes this mimicry
is so exquisite, that you would mistake the whole insect for a portion
of the branching spray of a tree[12]. No mean beauty in some plants
arises from the fluting and punctuation of their stems and leaves, and
a similar ornament conspicuously distinguishes numerous insects, which
also imitate with multiform variety, as may particularly be seen in the
caterpillars of many species of the butterfly tribe (_Papilionidae_),
the spines and prickles which are given as a _Noli me tangere_ armour
to several vegetable productions.

In fishes the lucid scales of varied hue that cover and defend them
are universally admired, and esteemed their peculiar ornament; but
place a butterfly's wing under a microscope, that avenue to unseen
glories in new worlds, and you will discover that nature has endowed
the most numerous of the insect tribes with the same privilege,
multiplying in them the forms[13], and diversifying the colouring of
this kind of clothing beyond all parallel. The rich and velvet tints
of the plumage of birds are not superior to what the curious observer
may discover in a variety of _Lepidoptera_; and those many-
eyes which deck so gloriously the peacock's tail are imitated with
success by one of our most common butterflies[14]. Feathers are
thought to be peculiar to birds; but insects often imitate them in
their antennae[15], wings[16], and even sometimes in the covering of
their bodies[17].--We admire with reason the coats of quadrupeds,
whether their skins be covered with pile, or wool, or fur; yet are
not perhaps aware that a vast variety of insects are clothed with all
these kinds of hair, but infinitely finer and more silky in texture,
more brilliant and delicate in colour, and more variously shaded than
what any other animals can pretend to.

In variegation insects certainly exceed every other class of
animated beings. Nature, in her sportive mood, when painting
them, sometimes imitates the clouds of heaven; at others, the
meandering course of the rivers of the earth, or the undulations
of their waters: many are veined like beautiful marbles; others
have the semblance of a robe of the finest net-work thrown over
them; some she blazons with heraldic insignia, giving them
to bear in fields sable--azure--vert--gules--argent and or,
fesses--bars--bends--crosses--crescents--stars, and even animals[18].
On many, taking her rule and compasses, she draws with precision
mathematical figures; points, lines, angles, triangles[19], squares,
and circles. On others she portrays, with mystic hand, what seem
like hieroglyphic symbols, or inscribes them with the characters and
letters of various languages, often very correctly formed[20]; and,
what is more extraordinary, she has registered in others figures
which correspond with several dates of the Christian era[21].

Nor has nature been lavish only in the apparel and ornament of
these privileged tribes; in other respects she has been equally
unsparing of her favours. To some she has given fins like those
of fish, or a beak resembling that of birds[22]; to others horns,
nearly the counterparts of those of various quadrupeds. The bull[23],
the stag[24], the rhinoceros[25], and even the hitherto vainly
sought for unicorn[26], have in this respect many representatives
amongst insects. One is armed with tusks not unlike those of the
elephant[27]; another is bristled with spines, as the porcupine and
hedge-hog with quills[28]; a third is an armadillo in miniature;
the disproportioned hind legs of the kangaroo give a most grotesque
appearance to a fourth[29]; and the threatening head of the snake is
found in a fifth[30]. It would, however, be endless to produce all
the instances which occur of such imitations: and I shall only remark
that, generally speaking, these arms and instruments in structure and
finishing far exceed those which they resemble.

But further, insects not only mimic, in a manner infinitely various,
every thing in nature, they may also with very little violence
be regarded as symbolical of beings out of and above nature. The
butterfly, adorned with every beauty and every grace, borne by
radiant wings through the fields of ether, and extracting nectar
from every flower, gives us some idea of the blessed inhabitants of
happier worlds, of angels, and of the spirits of the just arrived at
their state of perfection. Again, other insects seem emblematical of
a different class of unearthly beings: when we behold some tremendous
for the numerous horns and spines projecting in horrid array from
their head or shoulders;--others for their threatening jaws of
fearful length, and armed with cruel fangs: when we survey the dismal
hue and demoniac air that distinguish others, the dens of darkness in
which they live, the impurity of their food, their predatory habits
and cruelty, the nets which they spread, and the pits which they sink
to entrap the unwary, we can scarcely help regarding them as aptly
symbolizing evil demons, the enemies of man, or of impure spirits for
their vices and crimes driven from the regions of light into darkness
and punishment[31].

The sight indeed of a well-stored cabinet of insects will bring before
every beholder not conversant with them, forms in endless variety,
which before he would not have thought it possible could exist in
nature, resembling nothing that the other departments of the animal
kingdom exhibit, and exceeding even the wildest fictions of the most
fertile imagination. Besides prototypes of beauty and symmetry, there
in miniature he will be amused to survey (for the most horrible
creatures when deprived of the power of injury become sources of
interest and objects of curiosity), to use the words of our great poet,

                        ... all prodigious things
          Abominable, unutterable, and worse
          Than fables yet have feign'd, or fear conceiv'd,
          Gorgons, and Hydras, and Chimaeras dire.

But the pleasures of a student of the science to which I am desirous
of introducing you, are far from being confined to such as result from
an examination of the exterior form and decorations of insects: for
could these, endless as they seem, be exhausted, or, wonderful as they
are, lose their interest, yet new sources, exuberant in amusement and
instruction, may be opened, which will furnish an almost infinite fund
for his curiosity to draw upon. The striking peculiarity and variety of
structure which they exhibit in their instruments of nutrition, motion,
and oviposition; in their organs of sensation, generation, and the
great fountains of vitality,--indeed their whole system, anatomically
considered, will open a world of wonders to you with which you will
not soon be satiated, and during your survey of which you will at
every step feel disposed to exclaim with the Roman naturalist--"In
these beings so minute, and as it were such non-entities, what wisdom
is displayed, what power, what unfathomable perfection[32]!" But even
this will not bring you to the end of your pleasures: you must leave
the dead to visit the living; you must behold insects when full of life
and activity, engaged in their several employments, practising their
various arts, pursuing their amours, and preparing habitations for
their progeny: you must notice the laying and kind of their eggs; their
wonderful metamorphoses; their instincts, whether they be solitary
or gregarious; and the other miracles of their history--all of which
will open to you a richer mine of amusement and instruction, I speak
it without hesitation, than any other department of Natural History
can furnish. A minute enumeration of these particulars would be here
misplaced, and only forestall what will be detailed more at large
hereafter; but a rapid glance at a very few of the most remarkable of
them, may serve as a stimulus to excite your curiosity, and induce you
to enter with greater eagerness into the wide field to which I shall
conduct you.

The lord of the creation plumes himself upon his powers of invention,
and is proud to enumerate the various useful arts and machines to
which they have given birth, not aware that "He who teacheth man
knowledge" has instructed these despised insects to anticipate him
in many of them. The builders of Babel doubtless thought their
invention of turning earth into artificial stone, a very happy
discovery[33]; yet a little bee[34] had practised this art, using
indeed a different process, on a small scale, and the white ants on
a large one, ever since the world began. Man thinks that he stands
unrivalled as an architect, and that his buildings are without a
parallel among the works of the inferior orders of animals. He would
be of a different opinion did he attend to the history of insects:
he would find that many of them have been architects from time
immemorial; that they have had their houses divided into various
apartments, and containing staircases, gigantic arches, domes,
colonnades, and the like; nay, that even tunnels are excavated by
them so immense, compared with their own size, as to be twelve times
bigger than that projected by Mr. Dodd to be carried under the Thames
at Gravesend[35]. The modern fine lady, who prides herself on the
lustre and beauty of the scarlet hangings which adorn the stately
walls of her drawing-room, or the carpets that cover its floor,
fancying that nothing so rich and splendid was ever seen before,
and pitying her vulgar ancestors, who were doomed to unsightly
white-wash and rushes, is ignorant all the while, that before she or
her ancestors were in existence, and even before the boasted Tyrian
dye was discovered, a little insect had known how to hang the walls
of its cell with tapestry of a scarlet more brilliant than any her
rooms can exhibit[36]; and that others daily weave silken carpets,
both in tissue and texture infinitely superior to those she so much
admires. No female ornament is more prized and costly than lace, the
invention and fabrication of which seems the exclusive claim of the
softer sex. But even here they have been anticipated by these little
industrious creatures, who often defend their helpless chrysalis, by
a most singular covering, and as beautiful as singular, of lace[37].
Other arts have been equally forestalled by these creatures. What
vast importance is attached to the invention of paper! For near six
thousand years one of our commonest insects has known how to make
and apply it to its purposes[38]; and even pasteboard, superior
in substance and polish to any we can produce, is manufactured by
another[39]. We imagine that nothing short of human intellect can
be equal to the construction of a diving-bell or an air-pump--yet a
spider is in the daily habit of using the one, and, what is more, one
exactly similar in principle to ours, but more ingeniously contrived;
by means of which she resides unwetted in the bosom of the water,
and procures the necessary supplies of air by a much more simple
process than our alternating buckets[40]--and the caterpillar of
a little moth knows how to imitate the other, producing a vacuum,
when necessary for its purposes, without any piston besides its own
body[41]. If we think with wonder of the populous cities which have
employed the united labours of man for many ages to bring them to
their full extent, what shall we say to the white ants, which require
only a few months to build a metropolis capable of containing an
infinitely greater number of inhabitants than even imperial Nineveh,
Babylon, Rome, or Pekin, in all their glory?

That insects should thus have forestalled us in our inventions
ought to urge us to pay a closer attention to them and their ways
than we have hitherto done, since it is not at all improbable that
the result would be many useful hints for the improvement of our
arts and manufactures, and perhaps for some beneficial discoveries.
The painter might thus probably be furnished with more brilliant
pigments, the dyer with more delicate tints, and the artisan with a
new and improved set of tools. In this last respect insects deserve
particular notice. All their operations are performed with admirable
precision and dexterity; and though they do not usually vary the
mode, yet that mode is always the best that can be conceived for
attaining the end in view. The instruments also with which they
are provided are no less wonderful and various than the operations
themselves. They have their saws, and files, and augers, and gimlets,
and knives, and lancets, and scissors, and forceps, with many other
similar implements; several of which act in more than one capacity,
and with a complex and alternate motion to which we have not yet
attained in the use of our tools. Nor is the fact so extraordinary as
it may seem at first, since "He who is wise in heart and wonderful in
working" is the inventor and fabricator of the apparatus of insects;
which may be considered as a set of miniature patterns drawn for our
use by a Divine hand. I shall hereafter give you a more detailed
account of some of the most striking of these instruments; and if
you study insects in this view, you will be well repaid for all the
labour and attention you bestow upon them.

But a more important species of instruction than any hitherto
enumerated may be derived from entomological pursuits. If we attend
to the history and manners of insects, they will furnish us with
many useful lessons in Ethics, and from them we may learn to improve
ourselves in various virtues. We have indeed the inspired authority
of the wisest of mankind for studying them in this view, since he
himself wrote a treatise upon them, and sends his sluggard to one for
a lesson of wisdom[42]. And if we value diligence and indefatigable
industry; judgement, prudence, and foresight; economy and frugality;
if we look upon modesty and diffidence as female ornaments; if we
revere parental affection--of all these, and many more virtues,
insects in their various instincts exhibit several striking examples,
as you will see in the course of our correspondence.

With respect to religious instruction insects are far from
unprofitable; indeed in this view Entomology seems to possess
peculiar advantages above every other branch of Natural History.
In the larger animals, though we admire the consummate art and
wisdom manifested in their structure, and adore that Almighty
power and goodness which by a wonderful machinery, kept in motion
by the constant action and re-action of the great positive and
negative powers of Nature, maintains in full force the circulations
necessary to life, perception, and enjoyment; yet as there seems
no disproportion between the objects and the different operations
that are going on in them, and we see that they afford sufficient
space for the play of their systems, we do not experience the same
sensations of wonder and astonishment that strike us when we behold
similar operations carried on without interruption in animals
scarcely visible to the naked eye. That creatures, which in the scale
of being are next to non-entities, should be elaborated with so much
art and contrivance, have such a number of parts both internal and
external, all so highly finished and each so nicely calculated to
answer its end; that they should include in this evanescent form
such a variety of organs of perception and instruments of motion,
exceeding in number and peculiarity of structure those of other
animals; that their nervous and respiratory systems should be so
complex, their secretory and digestive vessels so various and
singular, their parts of generation so clearly developed, and that
these minims of nature should be endowed with instincts in many cases
superior to all our boasted powers of intellect--truly these wonders
and miracles declare to every one who attends to the subject, "The
hand that made us is divine." We are the work of a Being infinite in
power, in wisdom, and in goodness.

But no religious doctrine is more strongly established by the
history of insects than that of a superintending Providence. That
of the innumerable species of these beings, many of them beyond
conception fragile and exposed to dangers and enemies without end,
no link should be lost from the chain, but all be maintained in
those relative proportions necessary for the general good of the
system; that if one species for a while preponderate, and instead
of preserving seem to destroy, yet counterchecks should at the same
time be provided to reduce it within its due limits; and further,
that the operations of insects should be so directed and overruled as
to effect the purposes for which they were created and never exceed
their commission: nothing can furnish a stronger proof than this,
that an unseen hand holds the reins, now permitting one to prevail
and now another, as shall best promote certain wise ends; and saying
to each, "Hitherto shalt thou come and no further."

So complex is this mundane system, and so incessant the conflict
between its component parts, an observation which holds good
particularly with regard to insects, that if instead of being under
such control it were left to the agency of blind chance, the whole
must inevitably soon be deranged and go to ruin. Insects, in truth,
are a book in which whoever reads under proper impressions cannot
avoid looking from the effect to the cause, and acknowledging his
eternal power and godhead thus wonderfully displayed and irrefragably
demonstrated: and whoever beholds these works with the eyes of the
body, must be blind indeed if he cannot, and perverse indeed if
he will not, with the eye of the soul behold in all his glory the
Almighty Workman, and feel disposed, with every power of his nature,
to praise and magnify

          "Him first, Him last, Him midst, Him without end."

And now having led you to the vestibule of an august temple, which in
its inmost sanctuary exhibits enshrined in glory the symbols of the
Divine Presence, I should invite you to enter and give a tongue to
the Hallelujahs, which every creature in its place, by working his
will with all its faculties, pours forth to its great Creator: but I
must first endeavour to remove, as I trust I shall effectually, those
objections to the study of these interesting beings which I alluded
to in the outset of this letter, and this shall be the aim of my next
address.

                                                  I am, &c.

FOOTNOTES:

[4] The genera _Eumolpus_, _Lamprima_, _Rynchites_.

[5] _Cryptorhynchus corruscans._ N.B. Germar (_Insect. Spec. Nov._
i. 216--) regards this insect as synonymous with Illiger's _Eurhin
cupratus_, the description of which I had not seen when the Century
of Insects (_Linn. Trans._ xii.) was written, nor am I able now to
speak decisively on the subject.--K.

[6] _Helicopis Cupido_, _Argynnis Passiflorae_, _Lathonia_, &c.

[7] _Pepsis fuscipennis_, _argentata_, &c.

[8] The species of the genus _Trox_.

[9] Many of the _Scarabaeidae_, _Dynastidae_, &c.

[10] Many caterpillars of _Butterflies_. Merian _Surinam_, t. xxii.
xxv. &c. and of _Sawflies_. Reaum. v. _t._ xii. _f._ 7, 8-14.

[11] Various species of the genera _Locusta_ and _Mantis_, F.

[12] Many species of _Phasma_.

[13] De Geer, I. _t._ 3. _f._ 1-34, &c.

[14] _Vanessa Io_.

[15] _Culex_, _Chironomus_, and other _Tipulariae_.

[16] _Pterophorus._

[17] Hairs of many of the _Apidae. Mon. Ap. Ang._ I. _t._ 10, ** d. 1.
_f._ 1. _b._

[18] _Ptinus imperialis_, L.

[19] _Trichius delta_, F.

[20] _Acrocinus longimanus_, F. _Vanessa, C. album, Acronycta_
[Greek: ps], _Plusia_ [Greek: g].

[21] On the underside of the primary wings near the margin in
_Argynnis Aglaia_, _Lathonia_, _Selene_, &c.

[22] _Empis_, _Asilus_.

[23] _Onthophagus Taurus_, Curtis _Brit. Ent. t._ 52.

[24] _Lucanus Cervus._

[25] _Oryctes._

[26] _Dynastes Hercules._

[27] _Andrena spinigera. Melitta._ ** c. K.

[28] _Hispa._

[29] This insect belonged to the late Mr. Francillon, and was purchased
at his sale by Mr. MacLeay. Mr. W. S. MacLeay informs us that he has
given the name of _Eusceles_ to the group to which it belongs.

[30] _Raphidia ophiopsis._

[31] This idea seems to have been present to the mind of Linne and
Fabricius, when they gave to insects such names as _Belzebub_,
_Belial_, _Titan_, _Typhon_, _Nimrod_, _Geryon_, and the like.

[32] Plin. _Hist. Nat._ l. 11. c. 2.

[33] Gen. xi. 3.

[34] _Megachile muraria._

[35] The white ants.

[36] _Megachile Papaveris._

[37] The late ingenious Mr. Paul, of Harleston in Norfolk, under the
bark of a tree discovered a considerable portion of a fabric of this
kind, which from its amplitude must have been destined for some other
purpose.

[38] The common wasp.

[39] _Polistes nidulans._

[40] _Argyroneta aquatica._

[41] _Tinea serratella_, L.

[42] 1 Kings iv. 33. Prov. vi. 6-8.




                               LETTER II.

                         _OBJECTIONS ANSWERED._


In my last I gave you a general view of the science of Entomology,
and endeavoured to prove to you that it possesses attractions and
beauty sufficient to reward any student who may profess himself
its votary. I am now to consider it in a less alluring light, as a
pursuit attended by no small degree of obloquy, in consequence of
certain objections thought to be urged with great force against it.
To obviate these, and remove every scruple from your mind, shall be
the business of the present letter.

Two principal objections are usually alleged with great confidence
against the study and pursuit of insects. By some they are derided as
trifling and unimportant, and deemed an egregious waste of time and
talents; by others they are reprobated as unfeeling and cruel, and as
tending to harden the heart.

       *       *       *       *       *

I. I shall begin with the first of these objections--that the
entomologist is a mere trifler. As for the silly outcry and abuse
of the ignorant vulgar, who are always ready to laugh at what they
do not understand, and because insects are minute objects conclude
that the study of them must be a childish pursuit, I shall not waste
words upon what I so cordially despise. But since even learned men
and philosophers, from a partial and prejudiced view of the subject,
having recourse to this common-place logic, are sometimes disposed
to regard all inquiry into these minutiae of nature as useless and
idle, and the mark of a little mind; to remove such prejudice and
misconceptions I shall now dilate somewhat upon the subject of _Cui
bono?_

When we see many wise and learned men pay attention to any particular
department of science, we may naturally conclude that it is on
account of some profit and instruction which they foresee may be
derived from it; and therefore in defending Entomology I shall first
have recourse to the _Argumentum ad verecundiam_, and mention the
great names that have cultivated or recommended it.

We may begin the list with the first man that ever lived upon
the earth, for we are told that he gave a name to every living
creature[43], amongst which insects must be included; and to give an
appropriate name to an object necessarily requires some knowledge of
its distinguishing properties. Indeed one of the principal pleasures
and employments of the paradisiacal state was probably the study
of the various works of creation[44]. Before the fall the book of
nature was the Bible of man, in which he could read the perfections
and attributes of the invisible Godhead[45], and in it, as in a
mirror, behold an image of the things of the spiritual world. Moses
also appears to have been conversant with our little animals, and
to have studied them with some attention. This he has shown, not
only by being aware of the distinctions which separate the various
tribes of grasshoppers, crickets &c. (_Gryllus_, L.) into different
genera[46], but also by noticing the different direction of the
two anterior from the four posterior legs of insects; for, as he
speaks of them as going upon four legs[47], it is evident that he
considered the two anterior as arms. Solomon, the wisest of mankind,
made Natural History a peculiar object of study, and left treatises
behind him upon its various branches, in which _creeping things_ or
insects were not overlooked[48]; and a wiser than Solomon directs
our attention to natural productions, when he bids us _consider_ the
lilies of the field[49], teaching us that they are more worthy of our
notice than the most glorious works of man: he also not obscurely
intimates that insects are symbolical beings, when he speaks of
scorpions as synonymous with evil spirits[50]; thus giving into
our hands a clue for a more profitable mode of studying them, as
furnishing moral and spiritual instruction.

If to these scriptural authorities we add those of uninspired
writers, ancient and modern, the names of many worthies, celebrated
both for wisdom and virtue, may be produced. Aristotle among the
Greeks, and Pliny the elder among the Romans, may be denominated the
fathers of Natural History, as well as the greatest philosophers of
their day; yet both these made insects a principal object of their
attention: and in more recent times, if we look abroad, what names
greater than those of Redi, Malpighi, Vallisnieri, Swammerdam,
Leeuwenhoek, Reaumur, Linne, De Geer, Bonnet, and the Hubers? and
at home, what philosophers have done more honour to their country
and to human nature than Ray, Willughby, Lister, and Derham? Yet all
these made the study of insects one of their most favourite pursuits;
and, as if to prove that this study is not incompatible with the
highest flights of genius, we can add to the list the name of one of
the most sublime of our poets, Gray, who was very zealously devoted
to Entomology. As far therefore as names have weight, the above
enumeration seems sufficient to shelter the votaries of this pleasing
science from the charge of folly.

But we do not wish to rest our defence upon authorities alone; let
the voice of reason be heard, and our justification will be complete.
The entomologist, or, to speak more generally, the naturalist (for
on this question of _Cui bono?_ every student in all departments of
Natural History is concerned), if the following considerations be
allowed their due weight, may claim a much higher station amongst the
learned than has hitherto been conceded to him.

There are two principal avenues to knowledge--the study of words
and the study of things. Skill in the learned languages being often
necessary to enable us to acquire knowledge in the former way,
is usually considered as knowledge itself; so that no one asks
_Cui bono?_ when a person devotes himself to the study of verbal
criticism, and employs his time in correcting the errors that have
crept into the text of an ancient writer. Indeed it must be owned,
though perhaps too much stress is sometimes laid upon it, that this
is very useful to enable us to ascertain his true meaning. But after
all, words are but the arbitrary signs of ideas, and have no value
independent of those ideas, further than what arises from congruity
and harmony, the mind being dissatisfied when an idea is expressed
by inadequate words, and the ear offended when their collocation is
inharmonious. To account the mere knowledge of words, therefore, as
wisdom, is to mistake the cask for the wine, and the casket for the
gem. I say all this because knowledge of words is often extolled
beyond its just merits, and put for all wisdom; while knowledge of
things, especially of the productions of nature, is derided as if it
were mere folly. We should recollect that God hath condescended to
instruct us by both these ways, and therefore neither of them should
be depreciated. He hath set before us his word and his world. The
former is the great avenue to truth and knowledge by the study of
_words_, and, as being the immediate and authoritative revelation
of his will, is entitled to our _principal_ attention; the latter
leads us to the same conclusions, though less directly, by the study
of _things_, which stands next in rank to that of God's word, and
before that of any work of man. And whether we direct our eyes to the
planets rolling in their orbits, and endeavour to trace the laws by
which they are guided through the vast of space, whether we analyse
those powers and agents by which all the operations of nature are
performed, or whether we consider the various productions of this our
globe, from the mighty cedar to the microscopic mucor--from the giant
elephant to the invisible mite, still we are studying the works and
wonders of our God. The book, to whatever page we turn, is written
by the finger of him who created us; and in it, provided our minds
be rightly disposed, we may read his eternal verities. And the more
accurate and enlarged our knowledge of his works, the better shall
we be able to understand his word; and the more practised we are in
his word, the more readily shall we discern his truth in his works;
for, proceeding from the same great Author, they must, when rightly
interpreted, mutually explain and illustrate each other.

Who then shall dare maintain, unless he has the hardihood to deny
that God created them, that the study of insects and their ways is
trifling or unprofitable? Were they not arrayed in all their beauty,
and surrounded with all their wonders, and made so instrumental (as
I shall hereafter prove them to be) to our welfare, that we might
glorify and praise him for them? Why were insects made attractive, if
not, as Ray well expresses it, that they might ornament the universe
and be delightful objects of contemplation to man[51]? And is it not
clear, as Dr. Paley has observed, that the production of beauty was
as much in the Creator's mind in painting a butterfly or in studding
a beetle, as in giving symmetry to the human frame, or graceful
curves to its muscular covering[52]? And shall we think it beneath
us to study what he hath not thought it beneath him to adorn and
place on this great theatre of creation? Nay, shall we extol those
to the skies who bring together at a vast expense the most valuable
specimens of the arts, the paintings and statues of Italy and Greece,
all of which, however beautiful, as works of man, fall short of
perfection; and deride and upbraid those who collect, for the purpose
of admiring their beauty, the finished and perfect chef-d'oeuvres of
a Divine artist? May we gaze with rapture unblamed upon an Apollo of
Belvedere, or Venus de Medicis, or upon the exquisite paintings of a
Raphael or a Titian, and yet when we behold with ecstasy sculptures
that are produced by the chisel of the Almighty, and the inimitable
tints laid on by his pencil, because an insect is the subject, be
exposed to jeers and ridicule?

But there is another reason, which in the present age renders the
study of Natural History an object of importance to every well-wisher
to the cause of Religion, who is desirous of exerting his faculties
in its defence. For as enthusiasm and false religion have endeavoured
to maintain their ground by a perversion of the text of _scripture_,
so also the patrons of infidelity and atheism have laboured hard to
establish their impiety by a perversion of the text of _nature_. To
refute the first of these adversaries of truth and sound religion,
it is necessary to be well acquainted with the _word_ of God; to
refute the second, requires an intimate knowledge of his _works_;
and no department can furnish him with more powerful arguments of
every kind than the world of insects--every one of which cries out
in an audible voice, There is a God--he is Almighty, all-wise,
all-good--his watchful providence is ever, and every where, at work
for the preservation of all things.

But since mankind in general are too apt to look chiefly at this
world, and to regard things as important or otherwise in proportion
as they are connected with sublunary interests, and promote our
present welfare, I shall proceed further to prove that the study of
insects may be productive of considerable utility, even in this view,
and may be regarded in some sort as a necessary or at least a very
useful concomitant of many arts and sciences.

The importance of insects to us both as sources of good or evil, I
shall endeavour to prove at large hereafter; but for the present,
taking this for granted, it necessarily follows that the study of
them must also be important. For when we suffer from them, if we do
not know the cause, how are we to apply a remedy that may diminish
or prevent their ravages? Ignorance in this respect often occasions
us to mistake our enemies for our friends, and our friends for our
enemies; so that when we think to do good we only do harm, destroying
the innocent and letting the guilty escape. Many such instances have
occurred. You know the orange- fly of the wheat, and have
read the account of the damage done by this little insect to that
important grain; you are aware also that it is given in charge to
three little parasites to keep it within due limits; yet at first it
was the general opinion of unscientific men, that these destroyers
of our enemy were its parents, and the original source of all the
mischief[53]. Middleton, in his "_Agriculture of Middlesex_,"
speaking of the Plant-louse that is so injurious to the bean, tells
us that the lady-birds are supposed either to generate or to feed
upon them[54]. Had he been an entomologist, he would have been in no
doubt whether they were beneficial or injurious: on the contrary, he
would have recommended that they should be encouraged as friends
to man, since no insects are greater devourers of the Aphides. The
confounding of the apple Aphis (_A. lanigera, Myzoxyla?_[55]) that
has done such extensive injury to our orchards, with others, has led
to proceedings still more injurious. This is one of those species
from the skin of which transpires a white cottony secretion. Some
of the proprietors of orchards about Evesham, observing an insect
which secreted a similar substance upon the poplar, imagined that
from this tree the creature which they had found so noxious was
generated; and in consequence of this mistaken notion cut down all
their poplars[56]. The same indistinct ideas might have induced them
to fell all their larches and beeches, since they also are infested
by Aphides which transpire a similar substance. Had these persons
possessed any entomological knowledge, they would have examined and
compared the insects before they had formed their opinions, and being
convinced that the poplar and apple Aphis are distinct species, would
have saved their trees.

But could an entomological observer even ascertain the species of any
noxious insect, still in many cases, without further information, he
may fall short of his purpose of prevention. Thus we are told that
in Germany the gardeners and country people, with great industry,
gather whole baskets full of the caterpillar of the destructive
cabbage moth (_Mamestra Brassicae_), and then bury them, which, as
Roesel well observes[57], is just as if we should endeavour to kill
a crab by covering it with water; for, many of them being full grown
and ready to pass into their next state, which they do underground,
instead of destroying them by this manoeuvre, their appearing again
the following year in greater numbers is actually facilitated. Yet
this plan applied to our common cabbage caterpillar, which does
not go underground, would succeed. So that some knowledge of the
manners of an insect is often requisite to enable us to check its
ravages effectually. With respect to noxious caterpillars in general,
agriculturists and gardeners are not usually aware that the best mode
of preventing their attacks is to destroy the female fly before she
has laid her eggs, to do which the moth proceeding from each must be
first ascertained. But if their research were carried still further,
so as to enable them to distinguish the pupa and discover its haunts,
and it would not be at all difficult to detect that of the greatest
pest of our gardens, the cabbage butterfly, the work might be still
more effectually accomplished. Some larvae are polyphagous, or feed
upon a variety of plants; amongst others that of the yellow-tail
moth (_Arctia chrysorhoea_); yet gardeners think they have done
enough if they destroy the web-like nests which so often deform our
fruit-trees, without suspecting that new armies of assailants will
wander from those on other plants which they have suffered to remain.
Thus will thousands be produced in the following season, which, had
they known how to distinguish them, might have been extirpated.
Another instance occurred to me last year, when walking with a
gentleman in his estate at a village in Yorkshire. Our attention was
attracted by several circular patches of dead grass, each having a
stick with rags suspended to it, placed in the centre. I at once
discerned that the larva of the cock-chafer had eaten the roots
of the grass, which being pulled up by the rooks that devour this
mischievous grub, these birds had been mistaken by the tenant for
the cause of the evil, and the rags were placed to frighten away his
best friends. On inquiry why he had set up these sticks, he replied,
"He could n't beer to see'd nasty craws pull up all'd gess, and sae
he'd set'd bairns to hing up some aud clouts to flay 'em away. Gin
he'd letten 'em alean they'd sean hev reated up all'd close." Nor
could I convince him by all that I could say, that the rooks were not
the cause of the evil. Even philosophers sometimes fall into gross
mistakes from this species of ignorance. Dr. Darwin has observed,
that destroying the beautiful but injurious woodpeckers is the only
alternative for preventing the injury they do to our forest-trees by
boring into them[58]; not being aware that they bore only those trees
which insects have previously attacked, and that they diminish very
considerably the number of such as are prejudicial to our forests.

From these facts it is sufficiently evident that entomological
knowledge is necessary both to prevent fatal mistakes, and to enable
us to check with effect the ravages of insects. But ignorance in
this respect is not only unfit to remedy the evil; on the contrary,
it may often be regarded as its cause. A large proportion of the
most noxious insects in every country are not indigenous, but have
been imported. It was thus that the moth (_Galleria Mellonella_) so
destructive in bee-hives, and the asparagus beetle (_Lema Asparagi_)
were made denizens of Sweden[59]. The insect that has destroyed all
the peach-trees in St. Helena was imported from the Cape: and at
home (not to mention bugs and cock-roaches) the great pest of our
orchards, before mentioned, the apple Aphis, there is good reason to
believe, was introduced with some foreign apple-trees. Now, extensive
as is our commerce, it is next to impossible, by any precautions, to
prevent the importation of these noxious agents. A cargo, or even a
sample, of peas from North America might present us with that ravager
of pulse, the pea-beetle (_Bruchus Pisi_); or the famed Hessian fly,
which some years ago caused such trepidation in our cabinet, might
be conveyed here in a ship-load of wheat. Leeuwenhoek's wolf (_Tinea
granella_) might visit us, in a similar conveyance, from Holland
or France. But though introduced, were Entomology a more general
pursuit, their presence would soon be detected, and the evil at once
nipt in the bud; whereas in a country where this science was not at
all or little cultivated, they would most probably have increased to
such an extent before they attracted notice, that every effort to
extirpate them would be ineffectual.

It is needless to insist upon the importance of the study of insects,
as calculated to throw light upon some of the obscurest points of
general physiology; nor would it be difficult, though the task might
be invidious, to point out how grossly incorrect and deficient are
many of the speculations of our most eminent philosophers, solely
from their ignorance of this important branch of Natural History. How
little qualified would that physiologist be to reason conclusively upon
the mysterious subject of generation, who should be ignorant of the
wonderful and unlooked-for fact, brought to light by the investigations
of an entomologist, that one sexual intercourse is sufficient to
fertilize the eggs of numerous generations of Aphides! And how
defective would be all our reasonings on the powers of nutrition and
secretion, had we yet to learn that in insects both are in action
unaccompanied by the circulating system and glands of larger animals!

In another point of view entomological information is very useful.
A great deal of unnecessary mischief is produced, and unnecessary
uneasiness occasioned, by what are called vulgar errors, and that
superstitious reliance upon charms, which prevents us from having
recourse to remedies that are really efficacious. Thus, for instance,
eating figs and sweet things has been supposed to generate lice[60].
Nine larvae of the moth of the wild teasel inclosed in a reed or goose
quill have been reckoned a remedy for ague[61]. Matthiolus gravely
affirms that every oak-gall contains either a fly, a spider, or a
worm; and that the first foretells war, the second pestilence, and
the third famine[62]. In Sweden the peasants look upon the grub of
the cock-chafer as furnishing an unfailing prognostic whether the
ensuing winter will be mild or severe; if the animal have a blueish
hue (a circumstance which arises from its being replete with food)
they affirm it will be mild, but on the contrary if it be white the
weather will be severe: and they carry this so far as to foretell,
that if the anterior part be white and the posterior blue, the cold
will be most severe at the beginning of the winter. Hence they call
this grub _Bemaerkelse-mask_, or prognostic worm[63]. A similar augury
as to the harvest is drawn by the Danish peasants from the mites
which infest the common dung beetle (_Geotrupes stercorarius_),
called in Danish _Skarnbosse_ or _Torbist_. If there are many of
these mites between the fore feet, they believe that there will be
an early harvest, but a late one if they abound between the hind
feet[64]. The appearance of the death's head hawk-moth (_Acherontia
Atropos_) has in some countries produced the most violent alarm and
trepidation amongst the people, who, because it emits a plaintive
sound, and is marked with what looks like a death's head upon its
back, regarded it as the messenger of pestilence and death[65]. We
learn from Linne that a similar superstition, built upon the black
hue and strange aspect of that beetle, prevails in Sweden with
respect to _Blaps mortisaga_, L.[66]; and in Barbadoes, according to
Hughes, the ignorant deem the appearance of a certain grasshopper in
their houses as a sure presage of illness to some of the family[67].

One would not think that the excrements of insects could be objects
of terror, yet so it has been. Many species of _Lepidoptera_,
when they emerge from the pupa state, discharge from their anus
a reddish fluid, which, in some instances, where their numbers
have been considerable, has produced the appearance of a shower of
blood; and by this natural fact, all those bloody showers, recorded
by historians as preternatural, and regarded where they happened
as fearful prognostics of impending evils, are stripped of their
terrors, and reduced to the class of events that happen in the
common course of nature. That insects are the cause of these showers
is no recent discovery; for Sleidan relates that in the year 1553
a vast multitude of butterflies swarmed through a great part of
Germany, and sprinkled plants, leaves, buildings, clothes and men,
with bloody drops, as if it had rained blood[68]. But the most
interesting account of an event of this kind is given by Reaumur,
from whom we learn that in the beginning of July 1608 the suburbs
of Aix, and a considerable extent of country round it, were covered
with what appeared to be a shower of blood. We may conceive the
amazement and stupor of the populace upon such a discovery, the alarm
of the citizens, the grave reasonings of the learned. All agreed
however in attributing this appearance to the powers of darkness,
and in regarding it as the prognostic and precursor of some direful
misfortune about to befall them. Fear and prejudice would have taken
deep root upon this occasion, and might have produced fatal effects
upon some weak minds, had not M. Peiresc, a celebrated philosopher of
that place, paid attention to insects. A chrysalis which he preserved
in his cabinet, let him into the secret of this mysterious shower.
Hearing a fluttering, which informed him his insect was arrived at
its perfect state, he opened the box in which he kept it. The animal
flew out and left behind it a red spot. He compared this with the
spots of the bloody shower, and found they were alike. At the same
time he observed there was a prodigious quantity of butterflies
flying about, and that the drops of the miraculous rain were not
to be found upon the tiles, nor even upon the upper surface of the
stones, but chiefly in cavities and places where rain could not
easily come. Thus did this judicious observer dispel the ignorant
fears and terror which a natural phenomenon had caused[69].

The same author relates an instance of the gardener of a gentleman
being thrown into a horrible fright by digging up some of the curious
cases, which I shall hereafter describe to you, of the leaf-cutter
bees, and which he conceived to be the effect of witchcraft
portending some terrible misfortune. By the advice of the priest
of the parish he even took a journey from Rouen to Paris, to show
them to his master: but he, happily having more sense than the man,
carried them to M. Nollet, an eminent naturalist, who having seen
similar productions was aware of the cause, and opening one of the
cases, while the gardener stood aghast at his temerity, pointed out
the grub that it contained, and thus sent him back with a light
heart, relieved from all his apprehensions[70].

Every one has heard of the death-watch, and knows of the
superstitious notion of the vulgar, that in whatever house its drum
is heard one of the family will die before the end of the year. These
terrors, in particular instances, where they lay hold of weak minds,
especially of sick or hypochondriac persons, may cause the event that
is supposed to be prognosticated. A small degree of entomological
knowledge would relieve them from all their fears, and teach them
that this heart-sickening tick is caused by a small beetle (_Anobium
tessellatum_) which lives in timber, and is merely a call to its
companion. Attention to Entomology may therefore be rendered very
useful in this view, since nothing certainly is more desirable than
to deliver the human mind from the dominion of superstitious fears,
and false notions, which having considerable influence on the conduct
of mankind are the cause of no small portion of evil.

But as we cannot well guard against the injuries produced by insects,
or remove the evil, whether real or arising from misconceptions
respecting them, which they occasion, unless we have some knowledge
of them; so neither without such knowledge can we apply them, when
beneficial, to our use. Now it is extremely probable that they might
be made vastly more subservient to our advantage and profit than at
present, if we were better acquainted with them. It is the remark of
an author, who himself is no entomologist: "We have not taken animals
enough into alliance with us. The more spiders there were in the
stable, the less would the horses suffer from the flies. The great
American fire-fly should be imported into Spain to catch mosquitos. In
hot countries a reward should be offered to the man who could discover
what insects feed upon fleas[71]." It would be worth our while to act
upon this hint, and a similar one of Dr. Darwin. Those insects might
be collected and preserved that are known to destroy the Aphides and
other injurious tribes; and we should thus be enabled to direct their
operations to any quarter where they would be most serviceable; but
this can never be done till experimental agriculturists and gardeners
are conversant with insects, and acquainted with their properties
and economy. How is it that the Great Being of beings preserves the
system which he has created from permanent injury, in consequence of
the too great redundancy of any individual species, but by employing
one creature to prey upon another, and so overruling and directing
the instincts of all, that they may operate most where they are most
wanted! We cannot better exercise the reasoning powers and faculties
with which he has endowed us, than by copying his example. We often
employ the larger animals to destroy each other, but the smaller,
especially insects, we have totally neglected. Some may think, perhaps,
that in aiming to do this we should be guilty of presumption, and of
attempting to take the government and direction of things out of the
hands of Providence: but this is a very weak argument, which might
with equal reason be adduced to prove that when rats and mice become
troublesome to us, we ought not to have recourse to dogs, ferrets, and
cats to exterminate them. When any species multiplies upon us, so as
to become noxious, we certainly have a just right to destroy it, and
what means can be more proper than those which Providence itself has
furnished? We can none of us go further or do more than the Divine Will
permits; and he will take care that our efforts shall not be injurious
to the general welfare, or effect the annihilation of any individual
species.

Again, with regard to insects that are employed in medicine or
the arts, if the apothecary cannot distinguish a Cantharis or
blister-beetle from a Carabus or Cetonia, both of which beetles I have
found mixed with the former, how can he know whether his druggist
furnishes him with a good or bad article? And the same observation
may with still greater force apply to the dyer in his purchase of
cochineal, since it is still more difficult to distinguish the wild
sort from the cultivated. There are, it is probable, many insects
that might be employed with advantage in both these departments: but
unless Entomology be more generally studied by scientific men, who are
the only persons likely to make discoveries of this kind, than it has
hitherto been, we must not hope to derive further profit from them.
It seems more particularly incumbent upon the professors of the divine
art of healing to become conversant with this as well as the other
branches of Natural History; for not only do they derive some of their
most useful drugs from insects, but many also of the diseases upon
which they are consulted, as we shall see hereafter, are occasioned by
them. For want of this kind of information medical men run the risk
of confounding diseases perfectly distinct, at least as to the animal
that causes them. It would be a most desirable thing to have professors
in each branch of Natural History in our universities, and to make
it indispensable, in order to the obtaining of any degree in Physic,
that the candidate should have attended these lectures. We may judge
from the good effects that the arts have derived from the present very
general attention to Chemistry, how beneficial would be the consequence
if Entomology were equally cultivated: and I shall conclude this
paragraph with what I think may be laid down as an incontrovertible
axiom:--That the profit we derive from the works of creation will
be in proportion to the accuracy of our knowledge of them and their
properties.

I trust I have now said enough to convince you and every thinking man
that the study of insects, so far from being vain, idle, trifling,
or unprofitable, may be attended with very important advantages to
mankind, and ought at least to be placed upon a level with many other
branches of science, against which such accusations are never alleged.

       *       *       *       *       *

But I must not conceal from you that there are objectors who will
still return to the charge. They will say, "We admit that the
pursuits of the entomologist are important when he directs his views
to the destruction of noxious insects; the discovery of new ones
likely to prove beneficial to man; and to practical experiments
upon their medical and economical properties. But where are the
entomologists that in fact pursue this course? Do they not in reality
wholly disregard the economical department of their science, and
content themselves with making as large a collection of species as
possible; ascertaining the names of such as are already described;
describing new ones; and arranging the whole in their cabinets under
certain families and genera? And can a study with these sole ends in
view deserve a better epithet than trifling? Even if the entomologist
advance a step further, and invent a new system for the distribution
of all known insects, can his laborious undertaking be deemed any
other than busy idleness? What advantage does the world derive from
having names given to ten or twenty thousand insects, of which
numbers are not bigger than a pin's head, and of which probably not a
hundredth part will ever be of any use to mankind?"

Now in answer to this supposed objection, which I have stated as
forcibly as I am able, and which, as it may be, and often is, urged
against every branch of Natural History as at present studied, well
deserves a full consideration, I might in the first place deny that
those who have the highest claim to rank as entomologists do confine
their views to the systematic department of the science to the neglect
of economical observations; and in proof of my assertion, I might refer
abroad to a Linne, a Reaumur, a De Geer, a Huber, and various other
names of the highest reputation; and at home to a Ray, a Lister, a
Derham, a Marsham, a Curtis, a Clark, a Roxburgh, &c. But I do not wish
to conceal that though a large proportion of entomologists direct their
views much further than to the mere nomenclature of their science,
there exists a great number, probably the majority, to whom the
objection will strictly apply. Now I contend, and shall next endeavour
to prove, that entomologists of this description are devoting their
time to a most valuable end; and are conferring upon society a benefit
incalculably greater than that derived from the labours of many of
those who assume the privilege of despising their pursuit.

Even in favour of the mere butterfly-hunter--he who has no higher
aim than that of collecting a _picture_ of _Lepidoptera_, and is
attached to insects solely by their beauty or singularity, it would
not be difficult to say much. Can it be necessary to declaim on the
superiority of a people amongst whom intellectual pleasures, however
trifling, are preferred to mere animal gratifications? Is it a thing
to be lamented that some of the Spitalfields weavers occupy their
leisure hours in searching for the _Adonis_ butterfly (_Polyommatus
Adonis_), and others of the more splendid _Lepidoptera_[72], instead of
spending them in playing at skittles or in an alehouse? Or is there in
truth any thing more to be wished than that the cutlers of Sheffield
were accustomed thus to employ their _Saint Mondays_; and to recreate
themselves after a hard day's work, by breathing the pure air of their
surrounding hills, while in search of this "untaxed and undisputed
game[73];" and that more of the Norwich weavers were fond of devoting
their vacant time to plant-hunting, like Joseph Fox recorded by Sir
James Smith as the first raiser of a Lycopodium from seed[74]?

Still more easy is it to advocate the cause of another description
of entomologists--the general collectors. These, though not
concerning themselves with the system, contribute most essentially
to its advancement. We cannot expect that princes, noblemen, and
others of high rank or large fortune, who collect insects, should
be able or willing to give up the time necessary for studying them
systematically: but their museums being accessible to the learned
entomologist afford him the use of treasures which his own limited
funds or opportunities could never have brought together. As to
others of less consequence that content themselves with the title
of collectors, they also have their use. Having devoted themselves
to this one department, they become more expert at it, than the
philosopher who combines deep researches with the collection of
objects; and thus are many species brought together for the use of
the systematist, that would otherwise remain unknown.

But to proceed to the defence of systematic entomologists.--These
may be divided into two great classes: the first comprising those
who confine themselves to ascertaining the names of the insects they
collect; the second, those who, in addition, publish descriptions of
new species; new arrangements of intricate genera; or extrications of
entangled synonyms; and who, in other respects, actively contribute
to the perfection of the system.

Now with regard to the first class, setting aside what may be urged in
behalf of the study of insects considered as the work of the Creator,
it is easy to show that, even with such restricted views, their pursuit
is as commendable, and as useful both to themselves and the community,
as many of those on which we look with the greatest respect. To say the
least in their favour, they amuse themselves innocently, which is quite
as much as can be urged for persons who recreate their leisure hours
with music, painting, or desultory reading. They furnish themselves
with an unfailing provision of that "grand panacea for the _taedium
vitae_"--employment--no unimportant acquisition, when even Gray was
forced to exclaim, with reference to the necessity of "always having
something going forward" towards the enjoyment of life, "Happy they
who can create a rose-tree or erect a honey-suckle; that can watch the
brood of a hen, or see a fleet of their own ducklings launch into
the water[75]!" and like the preceding class, they collect valuable
materials for the use of more active labourers, being thus at least
upon a par with the majority of book-collectors and antiquaries.

But this is the smallest half of the value of their pursuit. With
what view is the study of the mathematics so generally recommended?
Not certainly for any practical purpose--not to make the bulk of
those who attend to them, astronomers or engineers. But simply to
exercise and strengthen the intellect--to give the mind a habit
of attention and of investigation. Now for all these purposes, if
I do not go so far as to assert that the mere ascertaining of the
names of insects is equal to the study of the mathematics, I have
no hesitation in affirming that it is nearly as effectual; and
with respect to giving a habit of minute attention, superior. Such
is the intricacy of nature, such the imperfection of our present
arrangements, that the discovery of the name of almost any insect
is a problem, calling in all cases for acuteness and attention, and
in some for a balancing of evidence, a calculation of the chances
of error, as arduous as are required in a perplexed law-case; and a
process of ratiocination not less strict than that which satisfies
the mathematician. In proof of which assertion I need only refer
any competent judge to the elaborate disquisitions of Laspeyres,
called for by one work alone on the lepidopterous insects of a single
district--the _Wiener Verzeichniss_, which occupy above two hundred
octavo pages[76], and must have cost the learned author nearly as
much labour of mind as the _Ductor Dubitantium_ did Bishop Taylor.

Do not apprehend that this occasional perplexity is any deduction
from the attractions of the science: though in itself, in some
respects, an evil, it forms in fact to many minds one of the chief of
them. The pursuit of truth, in whatever path, affords pleasure: but
the interest would cease if she never gave us trouble in the chase.
Horace Walpole used to say that from a child he could never bring
himself to attend to any book that was not full of proper names; and
the satisfaction which he felt in dry investigations concerning noble
authors and obscure painters, is experienced by many an entomologist
who spends hours in disentangling the synonymy of a doubtful species.
Nor would it be easy to prove that the wordy researches of the one
are not to every practical purpose as valuable as those of the other.
We smile at the Frenchman told of by Menage, that was so enraptured
with the study of heraldry and genealogy, as to lament the hard case
of our forefather Adam, who could not possibly amuse himself with
such investigations[77]. But many an entomologist who has felt the
delicious sensation attendant upon the indisputable ascertainment of
an insect's name after a long search, will feel inclined to indulge
in similar grief for the unhappy lot of his successors, when all
shall be smooth sailing in the science.

But in behalf of those who are more eminently entitled to be called
entomologists--those who, not content with collecting and investigating
insects, occupy themselves in naming and describing such as have
been before unobserved; in instituting new genera or reforming the
old; and, to say all in one word, in perfecting the system of the
science, still higher claims can be urged. Suppose that at this
moment our dictionaries of the French and German languages were so
very defective, that we were unable by the use of them to profit from
the discoveries of their philosophers; the labours of a Michaelis
being a sealed book to our theologists, and those of La Place to our
astronomers. On this supposition, would not one of the most important
literary undertakings be the compilation of more perfect dictionaries,
and would not the humblest contributor to such an end be deemed most
meritoriously engaged? Now precisely what an accurate dictionary of a
particular language is towards enabling the world to participate in
the discoveries published in that language, is a system of Entomology
towards enabling mankind to derive advantage from any discoveries
relative to insects. A good system of insects containing all the known
species, arranged in appropriate genera, families, orders and classes,
is in fact a dictionary, putting it within our power to ascertain the
name of any given insect, and thus to learn what has been observed
respecting its properties and history as readily as we determine the
meaning of a new word in a lexicon. In order to impress upon you more
forcibly the absolute need of such a system, I must enter into still
further detail.

There is scarcely a country in which several thousand insects may
not be found. Now, without some scientific arrangement, how is the
observer of a new fact respecting any one of them, to point out to
distant countries and to posterity the particular insect he had in
view? Suppose an observer in England were to find a certain beetle
which he had demonstrated to be a specific for consumption; and
that it was necessary that this insect, which there was reason to
believe was common in every part of the world, should be administered
in a recent state. Would he not be anxious to proclaim the happy
discovery to sufferers in all quarters of the globe? As his remedy
would not admit of transportation, he would have no other means than
by describing it. Now the question is, whether, on the supposition
that no system of Entomology existed, he would be able to do this, so
as to be intelligible to a physician in North America, for instance,
eager to administer so precious a medicine to his expiring patient?
It would evidently be of no use to say that the specific was a
beetle: there are thousands of different beetles in North America.
Nor would size or colour be any better guide: there are hundreds of
beetles of the same size and the same colour. Even the plant on which
it fed would be no sufficient clue; for many insects, resembling each
other to an unpractised eye, feed on the same plant; and the same
insect in different countries feeds upon different plants. His only
resource, then, would be a  figure and full description of
it. But every entomologist knows that there exist insects perfectly
distinct, yet so nearly resembling each other, that no engraving,
nor any language other than that strictly scientific, can possibly
discriminate them. After all, therefore, the chances are, that our
discoverer's remedy, invaluable as it might be, must be confined to
his own immediate neighbourhood, or to those who came to receive
personal information from him. But with what ease is it made known
when a system of the science exists! If the insect be already
described, he has but to mention its generic and trivial names, and
by aid of two words alone, every entomologist, though in the most
distant region--whether a Swede, a German, or a Frenchman; whether a
native of Europe, of Asia, of America, or of Africa, knows instantly
the very species that is meant, and can that moment ascertain whether
it be within his reach. If the species be new and undescribed, it
is only necessary to indicate the genus to which it belongs, the
species to which it is most nearly allied, and to describe it in
scientific terms, which may be done in few words, and it can at once
be recognised by every one acquainted with the science.

You will think it hardly credible that there should be so much
difficulty in describing an insect intelligibly without the aid of
system; but an _argumentum ad hominem_, supported by some other
facts, will, I conjecture, render this matter more comprehensible.
You have doubtless, like every one else, in the showery days of
summer, felt no little rage at the _flies_, which at such times take
the liberty of biting our legs, and contrive to make a comfortable
meal through the interstices of their silken or cotton coverings. Did
it, I pray, ever enter into your conception, that these blood-thirsty
tormentors are a different species from those flies which you are
wont to see extending the lips of their little proboscis to a piece
of sugar or a drop of wine? I dare say not. But the next time you
have sacrificed one of the former to your just vengeance, catch one
of the latter and compare them. I question if, after the narrowest
comparison, you will not still venture a wager that they are the very
same species. Yet you would most certainly lose your bet. They are
not even of the same genus--one belonging to the genus Musca (_M.
domestica_), and the other to the genus Stomoxys (_S. calcitrans_);
and on a second examination you will find that, however alike in
most respects, they differ widely in the shape of their proboscis;
that of the Stomoxys being a horny sharp-pointed weapon, capable
of piercing the flesh, while the soft blunt organ of the Musca is
perfectly incompetent to any such operation. In future, while you
no longer load the whole race of the house-fly with the execrations
which properly belong to a quite different tribe, you will cease
being surprised that an ordinary description should be insufficient
to discriminate an insect. It is to this insufficiency that we must
attribute our ignorance of so many of the insects mentioned by
the older naturalists, previously to the systematic improvements
of the immortal Linne: and to the same cause we must refer the
impossibility of determining what species are alluded to in the
accounts of many modern travellers and agriculturists who have been
ignorant of Entomology as a science. Instances without number of this
impossibility might be adduced, but I shall confine myself to two.

One of the greatest pests of Surinam and other low regions in South
America, is the insect called in the West Indies, where it is also
troublesome, the chigoe (_Pulex penetrans_), a minute species, to the
attacks of which I shall again have occasion to advert. This insect
is mentioned by almost all the writers on the countries where it is
found. Not less than eight or ten of them have endeavoured to give a
full description of it, and some of them have even figured it; and
yet, strange to say, it was not certainly known whether it was a flea
(_Pulex_, L.) or a mite (_Acarus_, L.), till a competent naturalist
undertook to investigate its history, and in a short paper in the
_Swedish Transactions_[78] proved that Linne was not mistaken in
referring it to the former tribe.

The second instance of the insufficiency of popular description is even
more extraordinary. In 1788 an alarm was excited in this country by the
probability of importing, in cargoes of wheat from North America, the
insect known by the name of the Hessian fly, whose dreadful ravages
will be adverted to hereafter. However the insect tribes are in
general despised, they had on that occasion ample revenge. The privy
council sat day after day anxiously debating what measures should be
adopted to ward off the danger of a calamity, more to be dreaded, as
they well knew, than the plague or pestilence. Expresses were sent
off in all directions to the officers of the customs at the different
outports respecting the examination of cargoes--dispatches written
to the ambassadors in France, Austria, Prussia, and America, to gain
that information of the want of which they were now so sensible: and
so important was the business deemed, that the minutes of council and
the documents collected from all quarters fill upwards of two hundred
octavo pages[79]. Fortunately England contained one illustrious
naturalist, the most authentic source of information on all subjects
which connect Natural History with Agriculture and the Arts, to whom
the privy council had the wisdom to apply; and it was by Sir Joseph
Banks's entomological knowledge, and through his suggestions, that
they were at length enabled to form some kind of judgement on the
subject. This judgement was after all, however, very imperfect. As Sir
Joseph Banks had never seen the Hessian fly, nor was it described in
any entomological system, he called for facts respecting its nature,
propagation, and economy, which could be had only from America. These
were obtained as speedily as possible, and consist of numerous letters
from individuals; essays from magazines; the reports of the British
minister there, &c. &c. One would have supposed that from these
statements, many of them drawn up by farmers who had lost entire crops
by the insect, which they profess to have examined in every stage,
the requisite information might have been acquired. So far however
was this from being the case, that many of the writers seem ignorant
whether the insect be a moth, a fly, or what they term a bug. And
though from the concurrent testimony of several its being a two-winged
fly seemed pretty accurately ascertained, no intelligible description
is given, from which any naturalist can infer to what genus it
belongs, or whether it is a known species. With regard to the history
of its propagation and economy the statements were so various and
contradictory, that though he had such a mass of materials before him,
Sir Joseph Banks was unable to reach any satisfactory conclusion.

Nothing can more incontrovertibly demonstrate the importance of
studying Entomology as a science than this fact. Those observations,
to which thousands of unscientific sufferers proved themselves
incompetent, would have been readily made by one entomologist well
versed in his science. He would at once have determined the order
and genus of the insect, and whether it was a known or new species;
and in a twelvemonth at furthest he would have ascertained in what
manner it made its attacks, and whether it were possible that it might
be transmitted along with grain into a foreign country; and on these
solid data he could have satisfactorily pointed out the best mode of
eradicating the pest, or preventing the extension of its ravages.

But it is not merely in travellers and popular observers that the
want of a systematic knowledge of Entomology is so deplorable.
A great portion of the labours of the profoundest naturalists
has been from a similar cause lost to the world. Many of the
insects concerning which Reaumur and Bonnet have recorded the most
interesting circumstances, cannot, from their neglect of system, be
at this day ascertained[80]. The former, as Beckmann[81] states on
the authority of his letters, was before his death sensible of his
great error in this respect: but Bonnet, with singular inconsistency,
constantly maintained the inutility of system, even on an occasion
when, from his ignorance of it, Sir James Smith, speaking of his
experiments on the barberry, found it quite impossible to make him
comprehend what plant he referred to[82].

So great is the importance of a systematic arrangement of insects. Yet
no such arrangement has hitherto been completed. Various fragments
towards it indeed exist. But the work itself is in the state of a
dictionary wanting a considerable proportion of the words of the
language it professes to explain; and placing those, which it does
contain, in an order often so arbitrary and defective, that it is
difficult to discover even the page containing the word you are in
search of. Can it be denied, then, that they are most meritoriously
employed who devote themselves to the removal of these defects--to the
perfecting of the system--and to clearing the path of future economical
or physiological observers from the obstructions which now beset it?
And who that knows the vast extent of the science, and how impossible
it is that a divided attention can embrace the whole, will contend that
it is not desirable that some labourers in the field of literature
should devote themselves entirely and exclusively to this object?
Who that is aware of the importance of the comprehensive views of a
Fabricius, an Illiger, or a Latreille, and the infinite saving of time
of which their inquiries will be productive to their followers, will
dispute their claim to rank amongst the most honourable in science?

II. No objection, I think, now remains against addicting ourselves to
entomological pursuits, but that which seems to have the most weight
with you, and which indeed is calculated to make the deepest impression
upon the best minds--I mean the charge of inhumanity and cruelty.
That the science of Entomology cannot be properly cultivated without
the death of its objects, and that this is not to be effected without
putting them to some pain, must be allowed; but that this substantiates
the charge of cruelty against us I altogether deny. Cruelty is an
unnecessary infliction of suffering, when a person is fond of torturing
or destroying God's creatures from mere wantonness, with no useful end
in view; or when, if their death be useful and lawful, he has recourse
to circuitous modes of killing them, where direct ones would answer
equally well. This is cruelty, and this with you I abominate; but not
the infliction of death when a just occasion calls for it.

They who see no cruelty in the sports of the field, as they are
called, can never, of course, consistently allege such a charge
against the entomologist; the tortures of wounded birds, of fish that
swallow the hook and break the line, or of the hunted hare, being,
beyond comparison, greater than those of insects destroyed in the
usual mode. With respect to utility, the sportsman, who, though he
adds indeed to the general stock of food, makes amusement his primary
object, must surely yield the palm to the Entomologist, who adds to
the general stock of mental food, often supplies hints for useful
improvements in the arts and sciences, and the objects of whose
pursuit, unlike those of the former, are preserved and may be applied
to use for many years.

But in the view even of those few who think inhumanity chargeable
upon the sportsman, it will be easy to place considerations which may
rescue the entomologist from such reproof. It is well known that, in
proportion as we descend in the scale of being, the sensibility of the
objects that constitute it diminishes. The tortoise walks about after
losing its head; and the polypus, so far from being injured by the
application of the knife, thereby acquires an extension of existence.
Insensibility almost equally great may be found in the insect world.
This, indeed, might be inferred _a priori_, since Providence seems
to have been more prodigal of insect life than of that of any other
order of creatures, animalcula perhaps alone excepted. No part of the
creation is exposed to the attack of so many enemies, or subject to so
many disasters; so that the few individuals of each kind which enrich
the valued museum of the entomologist, many of which are dearer to him
than gold or gems, are snatched from the ravenous maw of some bird or
fish or rapacious insect; would have been driven by the winds into the
waters and drowned; or trodden underfoot by man or beast,--for it is
not easy, in some parts of the year, to set foot to the ground without
crushing these minute animals; and thus also, instead of being buried
in oblivion, they have a kind of immortality conferred upon them.
Can it be believed that the beneficent Creator, whose tender mercies
are over all his works, would expose these helpless beings to such
innumerable enemies and injuries, were they endued with the same sense
of pain and irritability of nerve with the higher orders of animals?

But this inference is reduced to certainty, when we attend to the
facts which insects every day present to us, proving that the very
converse of our great poet's conclusion, as usually interpreted,

          ... The poor beetle that we tread upon,
          In corporal sufferance finds a pang as great
          As when a giant dies,

must be regarded as nearer the truth[83]. Not to mention the peculiar
organization of insects, which strongly favours the idea I am
inculcating, but which will be considered more properly in another
place, their sang-froid upon the loss of their limbs, even those that
we account most necessary to life, irrefragably proves that the pain
they suffer cannot be very acute. Had a giant lost an arm or a leg,
or were a sword or spear run through his body, he would feel no great
inclination for running about, dancing, or eating. Yet a crane-fly
(_Tipula_) will leave half its legs in the hands of an unlucky boy
who has endeavoured to catch it, and will fly here and there with
as much agility and unconcern as if nothing had happened to it; and
an insect impaled upon a pin will often devour its prey with as
much avidity as when at liberty. Were a giant eviscerated, his body
divided in the middle, or his head cut off, it would be all over with
him; he would move no more; he would be dead to the calls of hunger;
or the emotions of fear, anger, or love. Not so our insects. I have
seen the common cock-chafer walk about with apparent indifference
after some bird had nearly emptied its body of its viscera: a
humble-bee will eat honey with greediness though deprived of its
abdomen; and I myself lately saw an ant, which had been brought out
of the nest by its comrades, walk when deprived of its head. The
head of a wasp will attempt to bite after it is separated from the
rest of the body; and the abdomen under similar circumstances, if
the finger be moved to it, will attempt to sting. And, what is more
extraordinary, the headless trunk of a male Mantis has been known to
unite itself to the other sex[84]. These facts, out of hundreds that
might be adduced, are surely sufficient to prove that insects do not
experience the same acute sensations of pain with the higher orders
of animals, which Providence has endowed with more ample means of
avoiding them; and since they were to be exposed so universally to
attack and injury, this is a most merciful provision in their favour;
for, were it otherwise, considering the wounds, and dismemberments,
and lingering deaths that insects often suffer, what a vast increase
would there be of the general sum of pain and misery! You will now, I
think, allow that the most humane person need not hesitate a moment,
whether he shall devote himself to the study of Entomology, on
account of any cruelty attached to the pursuit.

But if some morbid sentimentalist should still exclaim, "Oh! but I
cannot persuade myself even for scientific purposes to inflict the
slightest degree of pain upon the most insensible of creatures--"
Pray, sir or madam, I would ask, should your green-house be infested
by Aphides, or your grapery by the semianimate Coccus, would this
extreme of tenderness induce you to restrict your gardener from
destroying them? Are you willing to deny yourself these unnecessary
gratifications, and to resign your favourite flowers and fruit at the
call of your fine feelings? Or will you give up the shrimps, which
by their relish enable you to play a better part with your bread and
butter at breakfast, and thus, instead of adding to it, contribute
to diminish the quantity of food? If not, I shall only desire you
to recollect that, for a mere personal indulgence, you cause the
death of an infinitely greater number of animals, than all the
entomologists in the world destroy for the promotion of science.

To these considerations, which I have no doubt you will think
conclusive as to the unreasonableness and inconsistency of the
objections made against the study of Entomology on the score of
cruelty, I shall only add that I do not intend them as any apology
for other than the most speedy and least painful modes of destroying
insects; and these will be pointed out to you in a subsequent letter.
Every degree of unnecessary pain becomes cruelty, which I need not
assure you I abhor; and from my own observations, however ruthlessly
the entomologist may seem to devote the few specimens wanted for
scientific purposes to destruction, no one in ordinary circumstances
is less prodigal of insect life. For my own part, I question whether
the drowning individuals, which I have saved from destruction, would
not far outnumber all that I ever sacrificed to science.

My next letter will be devoted to the _metamorphoses_ of insects, a
subject on which some previous explanation is necessary to enable
you to understand those distinctions between their different
states, which will be perpetually alluded to in the course of our
correspondence: and having thus cleared the way, I shall afterwards
proceed to the consideration of the _injuries_ and _benefits_ of
which insects are the cause.

                                                  I am, &c.

FOOTNOTES:

[43] Gen. ii. 19.

[44] Linn. _Fn. Suec._ Praef.

[45] Rom. i. 19, 20.

[46] Levit. xi. 21, 22. Lichtenstein in _Linn. Trans._ iv. 51, 52.

[47] Levit. xi. 20. conf. Bochart. _Hierozoic._ ii. l. 4. c. 9. 497-8.

[48] 1 Kings iv. 33.

[49] Luke xii. 27.

[50] Ibid. x. 19, 20.

[51] "Quaeri fortasse a nonnullis potest, Quis Papilionum usus sit?
Respondeo, Ad ornatum Universi, et ut hominibus spectaculo sint: ad
rura illustranda velut tot bracteae inservientes. Quis enim eximiam
earum pulchritudinem et varietatem contemplans mira voluptate non
afficiatur? Quis tot colorum et schematum elegantias naturae ipsius
ingenio excogitatas et artifici penicillo depictas curiosis oculis
intuens, divinae artis vestigia eis impressa non agnoscat et miretur?"
Rai. _Hist. Ins._ 109.

[52] _Nat. Theol._ 213.

[53] Kirby, in _Linn. Trans._ iv. 232. 235. See also a letter signed
C. in the _Gent. Mag._ for August 1795. This little insect produces
no _galls_ like the other species of the genus (Latr. Gen. _Crust.
et Ins._ iv. 253. Meig. _Dipt._ i. 94.), yet it corresponds with the
characters of _Cecidomyia_ laid down both by Latreille and Meigen.

[54] P. 192.

[55] See Latr. _Familles Naturelles du Regne Animal_, 429.

[56] Collet, in _Month. Mag._ xxxii. 320.

[57] Roesel I. iv. 170.

[58] _Phytologia_, 518.

[59] _Fn. Suec._ 567, 1383.

[60] Amoreux, 276.

[61] Rai. _Cat. Cant._ 45. _Hist. Ins._ 341.

[62] _Comment. in Dioscor._ I. 1. c. 23. 214. Lesser. _L._ ii. 280.

[63] De Geer, iv. 275-6.

[64] Detharding _de Insectis Coleopteris Danicis_, 9.

[65] Reaum. ii. 289. This insect and its caterpillar is finely figured
in Mr. Curtis's elegant and scientific _British Entomology_, t. 147.

[66] _Faun. Suec._ 822.

[67] _Nat. Hist. of Barbad._ 85.

[68] Quoted in Mouffet, 107.

[69] Reaum. i. 667.

[70] Reaum. vi. 99-100. Kirby _Mon. Ap. Ang._ i. 157-8.

[71] Southey's _Madoc_, 4to, Notes, 519.

[72] Haworth _Lepid. Brit._ 44. 57.

[73]

            Oft have I smiled the happy pride to see
            Of humble tradesmen in their evening glee,
            When of some pleasing fancied good possest,
            Each grew alert, was busy and was blest:
            Whether the call-bird yield the hour's delight,
            Or magnified in microscope the mite;
            Or whether tumblers, croppers, carriers seize
            The gentle mind; they rule it and they please.
            There is my friend the weaver; strong desires
            Reign in his breast; 'tis beauty he admires:
            See to the shady grove he wings his way,
            And feels in hope the rapture of the day--
            Eager he looks, and soon to glad his eyes,
            From the sweet bower by nature form'd arise
          Bright troops of virgin moths, and fresh born butterflies.

                 *       *       *       *       *

            He fears no bailiff's wrath, no baron's blame,
            His is untax'd and undisputed game.
                                           Crabbe's _Borough_, p. 110.

[74] _Linn. Trans._ ii. 315.

[75] Letter to Dr. Wharton. Mason's _Life of Gray_, p. 28.

[76] Illig. _Mag._ ii. 33. iv. 3.

[77] Andrews's _Anecdotes_, 152.

[78] Swartz in _Kongl. Vet. Ac. Nya. band._ ix. 40. PLATE XXIII. FIG.
10.

[79] Young's _Annals of Agriculture_, xi. 406.

[80] No one knew Reaumur's _Abeille Tapissiere_ until Latreille,
happily combining system with attention to the economy of insects,
proved it to be a new species--his _Megachile Papaveris_.--_Hist. de
Fourmis_, 297.

[81] _Bibliothek._ vii. 310.

[82] _Tour on the Continent_, iii. 150.

[83] Shakespear's intention however in this passage was evidently
not, as is often supposed, to excite compassion for the insect, but
to prove that

          The sense of Death is most in apprehension,

the actual pang being trifling. _Measure for Measure_, Act iii. Scene 1.

[84] Dr. Smith's _Tour_, i. 162. _Journ. de Phys._ xxv. 336.




                              LETTER III.

                      _METAMORPHOSES OF INSECTS._


Were a naturalist to announce to the world the discovery of an animal
which for the first five years of its life existed in the form of a
serpent; which then penetrating into the earth, and weaving a shroud
of pure silk of the finest texture, contracted itself within this
covering into a body without external mouth or limbs, and resembling
more than any thing else an Egyptian mummy; and which, lastly, after
remaining in this state without food and without motion for three
years longer, should at the end of that period burst its silken
cerements, struggle through its earthy covering, and start into day a
winged bird,--what think you would be the sensation excited by this
strange piece of intelligence? After the first doubts of its truth
were dispelled, what astonishment would succeed! Amongst the learned,
what surmises!--what investigations! Amongst the vulgar, what eager
curiosity and amazement! All would be interested in the history of
such an unheard-of phenomenon; even the most torpid would flock to
the sight of such a prodigy.

But you ask, "To what do all these improbable suppositions tend?"
Simply to rouse your attention to the _metamorphoses_ of the insect
world, almost as strange and surprising, to which I am now about to
direct your view,--miracles, which, though scarcely surpassed in
singularity by all that poets have feigned, and though actually
wrought every day beneath our eyes, are, because of their commonness,
and the minuteness of the objects, unheeded alike by the ignorant and
the learned.

That butterfly which amuses you with its aerial excursions, one while
extracting nectar from the tube of the honeysuckle, and then, the
very image of fickleness, flying to a rose as if to contrast the hue
of its wings with that of the flower on which it reposes--did not
come into the world as you now behold it. At its first exclusion from
the egg, and for some months of its existence afterwards, it was a
worm-like caterpillar, crawling upon sixteen short legs, greedily
devouring leaves with two jaws, and seeing by means of twelve eyes so
minute as to be nearly imperceptible without the aid of a microscope.
You now view it furnished with wings capable of rapid and extensive
flights: of its sixteen feet ten have disappeared, and the remaining
six are in most respects wholly unlike those to which they have
succeeded; its jaws have vanished, and are replaced by a curled-up
proboscis suited only for sipping liquid sweets; the form of its head
is entirely changed,--two long horns project from its upper surface;
and, instead of twelve invisible eyes, you behold two, very large,
and composed of at least twenty thousand convex lenses, each supposed
to be a distinct and effective eye!

Were you to push your examination further, and by dissection to
compare the internal conformation of the caterpillar with that of the
butterfly, you would witness changes even more extraordinary. In the
former you would find some thousands of muscles, which in the latter
are replaced by others of a form and structure entirely different.
Nearly the whole body of the caterpillar is occupied by a capacious
stomach. In the butterfly this has become converted into an almost
imperceptible thread-like viscus; and the abdomen is now filled by
two large packets of eggs, or other organs not visible in the first
state. In the former, two spirally-convoluted tubes were filled with
a silky gum; in the latter, both tubes and silk have almost totally
vanished; and changes equally great have taken place in the economy
and structure of the nerves and other organs.

What a surprising transformation! Nor was this all. The change from
one form to the other was not direct. An intermediate state not
less singular intervened. After casting its skin even to its very
jaws several times, and attaining its full growth, the caterpillar
attached itself to a leaf by a silken girth. Its body greatly
contracted: its skin once more split asunder, and disclosed an
oviform mass, without exterior mouth, eyes, or limbs, and exhibiting
no other symptom of life than a slight motion when touched. In this
state of death-like torpor, and without tasting food, the insect
existed for several months, until at length the tomb burst, and out
of a case not more than an inch long, and a quarter of an inch in
diameter, proceeded the butterfly before you, which covers a surface
of nearly four inches square.

Almost every insect which you see has undergone a transformation as
singular and surprising, though varied in many of its circumstances.
That active little fly, now an unbidden guest at your table[85],
whose delicate palate selects your choicest viands, one while
extending his proboscis to the margin of a drop of wine, and then
gaily flying to take a more solid repast from a pear or a peach; now
gamboling with his comrades in the air, now gracefully currying his
furled wings with his taper feet,--was but the other day a disgusting
grub, without wings, without legs, without eyes, wallowing, well
pleased, in the midst of a mass of excrement.

The "grey-coated gnat," whose humming salutation, while she makes
her airy circles about your bed, gives terrific warning of the
sanguinary operation in which she is ready to engage, was a few
hours ago the inhabitant of a stagnant pool, more in shape like a
fish than an insect. Then to have been taken out of the water would
have been speedily fatal; now it could as little exist in any other
element than air. Then it breathed through its tail; now through
openings in its sides. Its shapeless head, in that period of its
existence, is now exchanged for one adorned with elegantly tufted
antennae, and furnished, instead of jaws, with an apparatus more
artfully constructed than the cupping-glasses of the phlebotomist--an
apparatus which, at the same time that it strikes in the lancets,
composes a tube for pumping up the flowing blood.

The "shard-born beetle," whose "sullen horn," as he directs his
"droning flight" close past your ears in your evening walk, calling
up in poetic association the lines in which he has been alluded to by
Shakespear, Collins, and Gray, was not in his infancy an inhabitant of
air; the first period of his life being spent in gloomy solitude, as
a grub, under the surface of the earth.--The shapeless maggot, which
you scarcely fail to meet with in some one of every handful of nuts
you crack, would not always have grovelled in that humble state. If
your unlucky intrusion upon its vaulted dwelling had not left it to
perish in the wide world, it would have continued to reside there until
its full growth had been attained. Then it would have gnawed itself
an opening, and having entered the earth, and passed a few months in
a state of inaction, would at length have emerged an elegant beetle
furnished with a slender and very long ebony beak: two wings, and
two wing-cases, ornamented with yellow bands; six feet; and in every
respect unlike the worm from which it proceeded.

That bee--but it is needless to multiply instances. A sufficient number
has been adduced to show, that the apparently extravagant supposition
with which I set out may be paralleled in the insect world; and that
the metamorphoses of its inhabitants are scarcely less astonishing than
would be the transformation of a serpent into an eagle.

These changes I do not purpose explaining minutely in this place: they
will be adverted to more fully in subsequent letters. Here I mean
merely to give you such a general view of the subject as shall impress
you with its claims to attention, and such an explanation of the states
through which insects pass, and of the different terms made use of to
designate them in each, as shall enable you to comprehend the frequent
allusions which must be made to them in our future correspondence.

The states through which insects pass are four: the _egg_; the
_larva_; the _pupa_; and the _imago_.

The first of these need not be here adverted to. In the _second_, or
immediately after the exclusion from the egg, they are soft, without
wings, and in shape usually somewhat like worms. This Linne called
the _larva_ state, and an insect when in it a _larva_, adopting
a Latin word signifying a _mask_, because he considered the real
insect while under this form to be as it were masked. In the English
language we have no common term that applies to the second state of
all insects, though we have several for that of different tribes.
Thus we call the  and often hairy larvae of butterflies and
moths _caterpillars_; the white and more compact larvae of flies, many
beetles, &c. _grubs_ or _maggots_[86]; and the depressed larvae of
many other insects _worms_. The two former terms I shall sometimes
use in a similar sense, rejecting the last, which ought to be
confined to true _vermes_; but I shall more commonly adopt Linne's
term, and call insects in their second state, _larvae_[87].

In this period of their life, during which they eat voraciously and
cast their skin several times, insects live a shorter or longer
period, some only a few days or weeks, others several months or
years. They then cease eating; fix themselves in a secure place;
their skin separates once more and discloses an oblong body, and they
have now attained the _third_ state of their existence.

From the swathed appearance of most insects in this state, in which
they do not badly resemble in miniature a child trussed up like a
mummy in swaddling clothes, according to the barbarous fashion once
prevalent here, and still retained in many parts of the continent;
Linne has called it the _pupa_ state, and an insect when under this
form a _pupa_;--terms which will be here adopted in the same sense.
In this state, most insects eat no food; are incapable of locomotion;
and if opened seem filled with a watery fluid, in which no distinct
organs can be traced. Externally, however, the shape of the pupae of
different tribes varies considerably, and different names have been
applied to them.

Those of the beetle and bee tribes are covered with a membranous
skin, inclosing in separate and distinct sheaths the external organs,
as the antennae, legs, and wings, which are consequently not closely
applied to the body, but have their form for the most part clearly
distinguishable. To these Aristotle originally gave the name of
_nymphae_[88], which was continued by Swammerdam and other authors
prior to Linne, who calls them _incomplete_ pupae, and has been
adopted by many English writers on insects[89].

Butterflies, moths, and some of the two-winged tribe, are in their
pupa state also inclosed in a similar membranous envelope; but their
legs, antennae, and wings, are closely folded over the breast and
sides; and the whole body inclosed in a common case or covering of a
more horny consistence, which admits a much less distinct view of the
organs beneath it. As these pupae are often tinged of a golden colour,
they were called from this circumstance _chrysalides_ by the Greeks,
and _aureliae_ by the Romans, both which terms are in some measure
become anglicized; and though not strictly applicable to ungilded
pupae, are now often given to those of all lepidopterous insects[90].
These by Linne are denominated _obtected_ pupae[91].

I have said that _most_ insects eat no food in the pupa state. This
qualification is necessary, because in the metamorphoses of insects,
as in all her other operations, nature proceeds by measured steps,
and a very considerable number (the tribe of locusts, cockroaches,
bugs, spiders, &c.) not only greatly resemble the perfect insect in
form, but are equally capable with it of eating and moving. As these
insects, however, cast their skins at stated periods, and undergo
changes, though slight, in their external and internal conformation,
they are regarded also as being subject to metamorphoses. These pupae
may be subdivided into two classes: first, those comprised, with some
exceptions, under the Linnean _Aptera_, which in almost every respect
resemble the perfect insect, and were called by Linne _complete_ pupae;
and secondly, those of the Linnean order _Hemiptera_, which resemble
the perfect insect, except in having only the rudiments of wings, and
to which the name of _semi-complete_ pupae was applied by Linne, and
that of semi-nymphs by some other authors[92]. There is still a fifth
kind of pupae, which are not, as in other instances, excluded from the
skin of the larva, but remain concealed under it, and were hence called
by Linne _coarctate_ pupae. These, which are peculiar to flies and some
other dipterous genera, may be termed _cased-nymphs_[93].

When, therefore, we employ the term _pupa_, we may refer
indifferently to the third state of any insect, the particular order
being indicated by the context, or an explanatory epithet. The terms
_chrysalis_, (dropping _aurelia_, which is superfluous,) _nymph_,
_semi-nymph_, and _cased-nymph_, on the other hand definitely
pointing out the particular sort of pupa meant: just as in Botany,
the common term _pericarp_ applies to all seed-vessels, the several
kinds being designated by the names of capsule, silicle, &c.

The envelope of _cased-nymphs_, which is formed of the skin of the
larva, considerably altered in form and texture, may be conveniently
called the _puparium_[94]: but to the artificial coverings of
different kinds, whether of silk, wood, or earth, &c. which many
insects of the other orders fabricate for themselves previously to
assuming the pupa state, and which have been called by different
writers, _pods_, _cods_, _husks_, and _beans_, I shall continue the
more definite French term _cocon_, anglicized into _cocoon_[95].

After remaining a shorter or longer period, some species only a few
hours, others months, others one or more years, in the pupa state,
the inclosed insect, now become mature in all its parts, bursts the
case which inclosed it, quits the pupa, and enters upon the fourth
and last state.

We now see it (unless it be an apterous species) furnished with
wings, capable of propagation, and often under a form altogether
different from those which it has previously borne--a perfect beetle,
butterfly, or other insect. This Linne termed the _imago_ state,
and the animal that had attained to it the _imago_; because, having
laid aside its _mask_, and cast off its _swaddling bands_, being no
longer disguised or confined, or in any respect imperfect, it is now
become a true representative or _image_ of its species. This state
is in general referred to when an insect is spoken of without the
restricting terms larva or pupa.

Such being the singularity of the transformations of insects, you
will not think the ancients were so wholly unprovided with a show of
argument as we are accustomed to consider them, for their belief in
the possibility of many of the marvellous metamorphoses which their
poets recount. Utterly ignorant as they were of modern physiological
discoveries, the conversion of a caterpillar into a butterfly, must
have been a fact sufficient to put to a nonplus all the sceptical
oppugners of such transformations. And however we may smile in this
enlightened age at the inference drawn not two centuries ago by Sir
Theodore Mayerne, the editor of Mouffet's work on insects, "that if
animals are transmuted so may metals[96]," it was not, in fact, with
his limited knowledge on these subjects, so very preposterous. It is
even possible that some of the wonderful tales of the ancients were
grafted on the changes which they observed to take place in insects.
The death and revivification of the phoenix, from the ashes of which,
before attaining its perfect state, arose first a _worm_ ([Greek:
skolex]), in many of its particulars resembles what occurs in the
metamorphoses of insects. Nor is it very unlikely that the doctrine
of the metempsychosis took its rise from the same source. What
argument would be thought by those who maintained this doctrine more
plausible in favour of the transmigration of souls, than the seeming
revivification of the dead _chrysalis_? What more probable, than that
its apparent reassumption of life should be owing to its receiving
for tenant the soul of some criminal doomed to animate an insect of
similar habits with those which had defiled his human tenement[97]?

At the present day, however, the transformations of insects have
lost that excess of the marvellous, which might once have furnished
arguments for the fictions of the ancients, and the dreams of
Paracelsus. We call them metamorphoses and transformations, because
these terms are in common use, and are more expressive of the sudden
changes that ensue than any new ones. But, strictly, they ought
rather to be termed a series of developments. A caterpillar is not,
in fact, a simple but a compound animal, containing within it the
germ of the future butterfly, inclosed in what will be the case of
the pupa, which is itself included in the three or more skins, one
over the other, that will successively cover the larva. As this
increases in size these parts expand, present themselves, and are
in turn thrown off, until at length the perfect insect, which had
been concealed in this succession of masks, is displayed in its
genuine form. That this is the proper explanation of the phenomenon
has been satisfactorily proved by Swammerdam, Malpighi, and other
anatomists. The first-mentioned illustrious naturalist discovered,
by accurate dissections, not only the skins of the larva and of
the pupa incased in each other, but within them the very butterfly
itself, with its organs indeed in an almost fluid state, but still
perfect in all its parts[98]. Of this fact you may convince yourself
without Swammerdam's skill, by plunging into vinegar or spirit of
wine a caterpillar about to assume the pupa state, and letting it
remain there a few days for the purpose of giving consistency to its
parts; or by boiling it in water for a few minutes. A very rough
dissection will then enable you to detect the future butterfly; and
you will find that the wings, rolled up into a sort of cord, are
lodged between the first and second segment of the caterpillar;
that the antennae and trunk are coiled up in front of the head; and
that the legs, however different their form, are actually sheathed
in its legs. Malpighi discovered the eggs of the future moth, in
the chrysalis of a silkworm only a few days old[99], and Reaumur
those of another moth (_Hypogymna dispar_) even in the caterpillar,
and that seven or eight days before its change into the pupa[100].
A caterpillar, then, may be regarded as a locomotive egg, having
for its embryo the included butterfly, which after a certain
period assimilates to itself the animal substances by which it is
surrounded; has its organs gradually developed; and at length breaks
through the shell which incloses it.

This explanation strips the subject of every thing miraculous, yet by
no means reduces it to a simple or uninteresting operation. Our reason
is confounded at the reflection that a larva, at first not thicker than
a thread, includes its own triple, or sometimes octuple, teguments;
the case of a chrysalis, and a butterfly, all curiously folded in each
other; with an apparatus of vessels for breathing and digesting, of
nerves for sensation, and of muscles for moving; and that these various
forms of existence will undergo their successive evolutions, by aid of
a few leaves received into its stomach. And still less able are we to
comprehend how this organ should at one time be capable of digesting
leaves, at another only honey; how one while a silky fluid should be
secreted, at another none; or how organs at one period essential to the
existence of the insect, should at another be cast off, and the whole
system which supported them vanish.

Nor does this explanation, though it precludes the idea of that
resemblance, in every particular, which, at one time, was thought
to obtain between the metamorphosis of insects, especially of the
_Lepidoptera_ order, and the resurrection of the body, do away that
general analogy which cannot fail to strike every one who at all
considers the subject. Even Swammerdam, whose observations have
proved that the analogy is not so complete as had been imagined,
speaking of the metamorphosis of insects, uses these strong words:
"This process is formed in so remarkable a manner in butterflies,
that we see therein the resurrection painted before our eyes, and
exemplified so as to be examined by our hands[101]." To see, indeed,
a caterpillar crawling upon the earth, sustained by the most ordinary
kinds of food, which, when it has existed a few weeks or months under
this humble form, its appointed work being finished, passes into an
intermediate state of seeming death, when it is wound up in a kind
of shroud and encased in a coffin, and is most commonly buried under
the earth, (though sometimes its sepulchre is in the water, and at
others in various substances in the air,) and after this creature
and others of its tribe have remained their destined time in this
death-like state, to behold earth, air, and water, give up their
several prisoners: to survey them, when, called by the warmth of
the solar beam, they burst from their sepulchres, cast off their
cerements, from this state of torpid inactivity, come forth, as a
bride out of her chamber,--to survey them, I say, arrayed in their
nuptial glory, prepared to enjoy a new and more exalted condition of
life, in which all their powers are developed, and they are arrived
at the perfection of their nature; when no longer confined to the
earth they can traverse the fields of air, their food is the nectar
of flowers, and love begins his blissful reign;--who that witnesses
this interesting scene can help seeing in it a lively representation
of man in his threefold state of existence, and more especially of
that happy day, when at the call of the great Sun of Righteousness,
all that are in the graves shall come forth, the sea shall give up
her dead, and death being swallowed up of life, the nations of the
blessed shall live and love to the ages of eternity?

But although the analogy between the different states of insects and
those of the body of man is only general, yet it is much more complete
with respect to his soul. He first appears in this frail body--a child
of the earth, a crawling worm, his soul being in a course of training
and preparation for a more perfect and glorious existence. Its course
being finished, it casts off the earthy body, and goes into a hidden
state of being in Hades, where it rests from its works, and is prepared
for its final consummation. The time for this being arrived, it comes
forth clothed with a glorious body, not like its former, though
germinating from it, for though "it was sown an animal body, it shall
be raised a spiritual body," endowed with augmented powers, faculties
and privileges commensurate to its new and happy state. And here the
parallel holds perfectly between the insect and the man. The butterfly,
the representative of the soul, is prepared in the _larva_ for its
future state of glory; and if it be not destroyed by the ichneumons
and other enemies to which it is exposed, symbolical of the vices that
destroy the spiritual life of the soul, it will come to its state
of repose in the _pupa_, which is its Hades; and at length, when it
assumes the _imago_, break forth with new powers and beauty to its
final glory and the reign of love. So that in this view of the subject
well might the Italian poet exclaim:

          Non v' accorgete voi, che noi siam' vermi
          Nati a formar l' angelica farfalla[102]?

The Egyptian fable, as it is supposed to be, of Cupid and Psyche,
seems built upon this foundation. "Psyche," says an ingenious and
learned writer, "means in Greek the human soul; and it means also a
butterfly[103], of which apparently strange double sense the undoubted
reason is, that a butterfly was a very ancient symbol of the soul--from
the prevalence of this symbol, and the consequent coincidence of the
names, it happened that the Greek sculptors frequently represented
Psyche as subject to Cupid in the shape of a butterfly; and that even
when she appears in their works under the human form, we find her
decorated with the light and filmy wings of that gay insect[104]."

The following beautiful little poem falls in so exactly with the
subject I have been discussing, that I cannot resist the temptation
I feel to copy it for you, especially as I am not aware that it has
appeared any where but in a newspaper.

                       THE BUTTERFLY'S BIRTH-DAY.

                BY THE AUTHOR OF "THE BUTTERFLY'S BALL."

          The shades of night were scarcely fled;
            The air was mild, the winds were still;
          And slow the slanting sun-beams spread
            O'er wood and lawn, o'er heath and hill:

          From fleecy clouds of pearly hue
            Had dropt a short but balmy shower,
          That hung like gems of morning dew
            On every tree and every flower:

          And from the Blackbird's mellow throat
            Was pour'd so loud and long a swell,
          As echoed with responsive note
            From mountain side and shadowy dell:

          When bursting forth to life and light,
            The offspring of enraptured May,
          The BUTTERFLY, on pinions bright,
            Launch'd in full splendour on the day.

          Unconscious of a mother's care,
            No infant wretchedness she knew;
          But as she felt the vernal air,
            At once to full perfection grew.

          Her slender form, ethereal light,
            Her velvet-textured wings infold;
          With all the rainbow's colours bright,
            And dropt with spots of burnish'd gold.

          Trembling with joy awhile she stood,
            And felt the sun's enlivening ray;
          Drank from the skies the vital flood,
            And wonder'd at her plumage gay!

          And balanced oft her broider'd wings,
            Through fields of air prepared to sail:
          Then on her vent'rous journey springs,
            And floats along the rising gale.

          Go, child of pleasure, range the fields,
            Taste all the joys that spring can give,
          Partake what bounteous summer yields,
            And live whilst yet 'tis thine to live.

          Go sip the rose's fragrant dew,
            The lily's honeyed cup explore,
          From flower to flower the search renew,
            And rifle all the woodbine's store:

          And let me trace thy vagrant flight,
            Thy moments too of short repose,
          And mark thee then with fresh delight
            Thy golden pinions ope and close.

          But hark! whilst thus I musing stand,
            Pours on the gale an airy note,
          And breathing from a viewless band,
            Soft silvery tones around me float!

          --They cease--but still a voice I hear,
            A whisper'd voice of hope and joy,
          "Thy hour of rest approaches near,
            "Prepare thee, mortal!--thou must die!

          "Yet start not!--on thy closing eyes
            "Another day shall still unfold,
          "A sun of milder radiance rise,
            "A happier age of joys untold.

          "Shall the poor worm that shocks thy sight,
            "The humblest form in nature's train,
          "Thus rise in new-born lustre bright,
            "And yet the emblem teach in vain?

          "Ah! where were once her golden eyes,
            "Her glittering wings of purple pride?
          "Conceal'd beneath a rude disguise,
            "A shapeless mass to earth allied.

          "Like thee the hapless reptile lived,
            "Like thee he toil'd, like thee he spun,
          "Like thine his closing hour arrived,
            "His labour ceased, his web was done.

          "And shalt thou, number'd with the dead,
            "No happier state of being know?
          "And shall no future morrow shed
            "On thee a beam of brighter glow?

          "Is this the bound of power divine,
            "To animate an insect frame?
          "Or shall not He who moulded thine
            "Wake at his will the vital flame?

          "Go, mortal! in thy reptile state,
            "Enough to know to thee is given;
          "Go, and the joyful truth relate;
            "Frail child of earth! high heir of heaven!"

A question here naturally presents itself--Why are insects subject
to these changes? For what end is it that, instead of preserving
like other animals[105] the same general form from infancy to old
age, they appear at one period under a shape so different from
that which they finally assume; and why should they pass through
an intermediate state of torpidity so extraordinary? I can only
answer that such is the will of the Creator, who doubtless had the
wisest ends in view, although we are incompetent satisfactorily
to discover them. Yet one reason for this conformation may be
hazarded. A very important part assigned to insects in the economy
of nature, as I shall hereafter show, is that of speedily removing
superabundant and decaying animal and vegetable matter. For such
agents an insatiable voracity is an indispensable qualification, and
not less so unusual powers of multiplication. But these faculties
are in a great degree incompatible. An insect occupied in the work
of reproduction could not continue its voracious feeding. Its life,
therefore, after leaving the egg, is divided into three stages.
In the first, as _larva_, it is in a state of sterility; its sole
object is the satisfying its insatiable hunger; and, for digesting
the masses of food which it consumes, its intestines are almost all
stomach. This is usually by much the longest period of its existence.
Having now laid up a store of materials for the development of the
future perfect insect, it becomes a _pupa_; and during this inactive
period the important process slowly proceeds, uninterrupted by the
calls of appetite. At length the perfect insect is disclosed. It
now often requires no food at all; and scarcely ever more than a
very small quantity; for the reception of which its stomach has been
contracted, in some instances, to a tenth of its former bulk. Its
almost sole object is now the multiplication of its kind, from which
it is diverted by no other propensity; and this important duty being
performed, the end of its existence has been answered, and it expires.

It must be confessed that some objections might be thrown out
against this hypothesis, yet I think none that would not admit of a
plausible answer. To these it is foreign to my purpose now to attend,
and I shall conclude this letter by pointing out to you the variety
of new relations which this arrangement introduces into nature. One
individual unites in itself, in fact, three species, whose modes
of existence are often as different as those of the most distantly
related animals of other tribes. The same insect often lives
successively in three or four worlds. It is an inhabitant of the
water during one period; of the earth during another; and of the air
during a third; and fitted for its various abodes by new organs and
instruments, and a new form in each. Think (to use an illustration of
Bonnet) but of the cocoon of the silkworm! How many hands, how many
machines does not this little ball put into motion! Of what riches
should we not have been deprived, if the moth of the silkworm had
been born a moth, without having been previously a caterpillar! The
domestic economy of a large portion of mankind would have been formed
on a plan altogether different from that which now prevails.

                                                  I am, &c.

FOOTNOTES:

[85] "Coenis etiam non vocatus ut Musca advolo." Aristophon _in
Pythagorista_ apud Athenaeum. (Mouffet, 56.)

[86] _Gentils_, or _gentles_, is a synonymous word employed by our
old authors, but is now obsolete, except with anglers. Thus Tusser,
in a passage pointed out to me by Sir Joseph Banks:--

          "Rewerd not thy sheep when ye take off his cote
           With twitches and patches as brode as a grote;
           Let not such ungentlenesse happen to thine,
           Least fly with her _gentils_ do make it to pine."

[87] For different kinds of larvae, see PLATES XVII. XVIII. XIX.

[88] _Hist. Anim._ l. 5. c. 10.

[89] PLATE XVI. FIG. 6-9.

[90] In explanation of the terms _Lepidoptera_, _Lepidopterous_,
_Coleoptera_, &c. which will frequently occur in the following pages
before coming regularly to definitions, it is necessary here to state
that they have reference to the names given by entomologists to the
different orders or tribes of insects, as under:

  1 _Coleoptera_ consisting of _Beetles_. Plate I. Fig. 1-6.

  2 _Strepsiptera_----of the genera _Xenos_ and _Stylops_. Plate
      II. Fig. 1.

  3 _Dermaptera_----of the _Earwigs_. Plate I. Fig. 7.

  4 _Orthoptera_----of _Cockroaches_, _Locusts_, _Grasshoppers_,
      _Crickets_, _Spectres_, _Mantes_, _&c._ Plate II. Fig. 2. 3.

  5 _Hemiptera_ consisting of _Bugs_, _Cicadae_, _Water-scorpions_,
      _Water-boat-men_, _Plant-lice_, _Cochineal_ Insects, &c. Plate
      II. Fig. 4. 5.

  6 _Trichoptera_ consisting of the _flies_ produced by the various
      species of _Case-worms_, _Phryganea_, L. Plate III. Fig. 4.

  7 _Lepidoptera_ consisting of _Butterflies_, _Hawkmoths_, and
      _Moths_. Plate III. Fig. 1-3.

  8 _Neuroptera_ consisting of _Dragon-flies_, _Ant-lions_,
      _Ephemerae_, _&c._ Plate III. Fig. 5. 6.

  9 _Hymenoptera_ consisting of _Bees_, _Wasps_, and other insects
      armed with a _sting_ or _ovipositor_, and its _valves_. Plate
      IV. Fig. 1-3.

  10 _Diptera_ consisting of _Flies_, _Gnats_, and other
      _two-winged_ insects. Plate IV. Fig. 4. 5. Plate V. Fig. 1.

  11 _Aphaniptera_ consisting of the _Flea_ tribe. Plate V. Fig. 2.

  12 _Aptera_----of _Mites_, _Lice_, &c. Plate V. Fig. 3-6.

[91] PLATE XVI. FIG. 10-13.

[92] PLATE XVI. FIG. 4. 5.

[93] PLATE XVII. FIG. 1-4.

[94] PLATE XVII. FIG. 2.

[95] PLATE XVII. FIG. 5-10.

[96] Epist. Dedicat.

[97] "A priest who has drunk wine shall migrate into a moth or
fly, feeding on ordure. He who steals the gold of a priest shall
pass a thousand times into the bodies of spiders. If a man shall
steal honey, he shall be born a great stinging gnat; if oil, an
oil-drinking beetle; if salt, a cicada; if a household utensil, an
ichneumon fly." _Institutes of Menu_, 353.

[98] Hill's _Swamm._ ii. 24. t. 37. f. 2. 4.

[99] _De Bombyce_, 29.

[100] Reaum. i. 359.

[101] Hill's _Swamm._ i. 127 a.

[102] Do you not perceive that we are caterpillars, born to form the
angelic butterfly?

[103] It is worthy of remark, that in the north and west of England
the moths that fly into candles are called _saules_ (souls), perhaps
from the old notion that the souls of the dead fly about at night in
search of light. For the same reason, probably, the common people in
Germany call them _ghosts_ (geistchen).

[104] Nares's _Essays_, i. 101-2.

[105] A few vertebrate animals, viz. frogs, toads, and newts, undergo
metamorphoses in some respects analogous to those of insects; their
first form as tadpoles being very different from that which they
afterwards assume. These reptiles too, as well as snakes, cast their
skin by an operation somewhat similar to that in _larvae_. There is
nothing, however, in their metamorphoses at all resembling the _pupa_
state in insects.




                               LETTER IV.

                     _INJURIES CAUSED BY INSECTS._

                            DIRECT INJURIES.


In the letter which I devoted to the defence of Entomology, I gave
you reason to expect, more effectually to obviate the objection
drawn from the supposed insignificance of insects, that I should
enter largely into the question of their importance to us both as
instruments of good and evil. This I shall now attempt; and, as I
wish to leave upon your mind a pleasant impression with respect to
my favourites, I shall begin with the last of these subjects--the
_injury_ which they do to us.

The Almighty ordains various instruments for the punishment of
offending nations: sometimes he breaks them to pieces with the iron
rod of war; at others the elements are let loose against them;
earthquakes and floods of fire, at his word, bring sudden destruction
upon them; seasons unfriendly to vegetation threaten them with
famine; the blight and mildew realize these threats; and often, the
more to manifest and glorify his power, he employs means, at first
sight, apparently the most insignificant and inadequate to effect
their ruin; the numerous tribes of _insects_ are his armies[106],
marshalled by him, and by his irresistible command impelled to the
work of destruction: where he directs them they lay waste the earth,
and famine and the pestilence often follow in their train.

The generality of mankind overlook or disregard these powerful,
because minute, dispensers of punishment; seldom considering in
how many ways their welfare is affected by them: but the fact is
certain, that should it please God to give them a general commission
against us, and should he excite them to attack, at the same time,
our bodies, our clothing, our houses, our cattle, and the produce of
our fields and gardens, we should soon be reduced, in every possible
respect, to a state of extreme wretchedness; the prey of the most
filthy and disgusting diseases, divested of a covering, unsheltered,
except by caves and dungeons, from the inclemency of the seasons,
exposed to all the extremities of want and famine; and in the end, as
Sir Joseph Banks, speaking on this subject, has well observed[107],
driven with all the larger animals from the face of the earth. You
may smile, perhaps, and think this a high- picture, but you
will recollect--I am not stating the mischiefs that insects commonly
do, but what they would do according to all probability, if certain
counter-checks restraining them within due limits had not been put in
action; and which they actually do, as you will see, in particular
cases, when those counter-checks are diminished or removed.

Insects may be said, without hyperbole, to have established a kind
of universal empire over the earth and its inhabitants. This is
principally conspicuous in the injuries which they occasion, for
nothing in nature that possesses or has possessed animal or vegetable
life, is safe from their inroads. Neither the cunning of the fox,
nor the swiftness of the horse or deer, nor the strength of the
buffalo, nor the ferocity of the lion or tiger, nor the armour of
the rhinoceros, nor the giant bulk or sagacity of the elephant, nor
even the authority of imperial man, who boasts himself to be the
lord of all, can secure them from becoming a prey to these despised
beings. The air affords no protection to the birds, nor the water to
the fish; insects pursue them all to their most secret conclaves and
strongest citadels, and compel them to submit to their sway. Flora's
empire is still more exposed to their cruel domination and ravages;
and there is scarcely one of her innumerable subjects, from the oak,
the glory of the forest, to the most minute lichen that grows upon
its trunk, that is not destined to be the food of these next to
nonentities in our estimation. And when life departs from man, the
inferior animals, or vegetables, they become universally, sooner or
later, the inheritance of insects.

I shall principally bespeak your attention to the injuries in question
as they affect ourselves. These may be divided into direct and
indirect. By _direct_ injuries I mean every species of attack upon our
own persons, and by _indirect_, such as are made upon our property. To
the former of these I shall confine myself in the present letter.

       *       *       *       *       *

Insects, as to their _direct_ attacks upon us, may be arranged in
three principal classes. Those, namely, which seek to make us their
food; those whose object is to prevent or revenge an injury which
they either fear, or have received from us; and those which indeed
offer us no violence, but yet incommode us extremely in other ways.

I hope I shall not too much offend your delicacy if I begin the first
class of our insect assailants with a very disgusting genus, which
Providence seems to have created to punish inattention to personal
cleanliness. But though this pest of man must not be wholly passed
over, yet, since it is unfortunately too well known, it will not be
at all necessary for me to enlarge upon its history. I shall only
mention one fact which shows the astonishingly rapid increase of
these animals, where they have once gotten possession. It is a vulgar
notion, that a louse in twenty-four hours may see two generations;
but this is rather overshooting the mark. Leeuwenhoek, whose love for
science overcame the nausea that such creatures are apt to excite,
proves that their nits or eggs are not hatched till the eighth day
after they are laid, and that they do not themselves commence laying
before they are a month old. He ascertained, however, that a single
female louse may, in eight weeks, witness the birth of five thousand
descendants[108]. You remember how wolves were extirpated from this
country, but perhaps never suspected any monarch of imposing a
tribute of _lice_ upon his subjects. Yet we are gravely told that in
Mexico and Peru such a _poll_-tax was exacted, and that bags full of
these treasures were found in the palace of Montezuma[109]!!! Were
our own taxes paid in such coin, what little grumbling would there be!

Two other species of this genus, besides the common louse, are, in
this country, parasites upon the human body----But already I seem
to hear you exclaim, "Why dwell so long on creatures so odious and
nauseating, whose injuries are confined to the _profanum vulgus_?
Leave them therefore to the canaille--they are nothing to us." Not
so fast, my friend--recollect what historians and other writers have
recorded concerning the _Phthiriasis_ or pedicular disease, and you
must own that, for the quelling of human pride, and to pull down the
high conceits of mortal man, this most loathsome of all maladies, or
one equally disgusting, has been the inheritance of the rich, the
wise, the noble, and the mighty; and in the list of those that have
fallen victims to it, you will find poets, philosophers, prelates,
princes, kings, and emperors. It seems more particularly to have
been a judgement of God upon oppression and tyranny, whether civil
or religious. Thus the inhuman Pheretima mentioned by Herodotus,
Antiochus Epiphanes, the Dictator Sylla, the two Herods, the Emperor
Maximin, and, not to mention more, the great persecutor of the
Protestants, Philip the Second, were carried off by it.

I say by this malady, _or one equally disgusting_, because it is not
by any means certain, though some learned men have so supposed, that
all these instances, and others of a similar nature, standing also
upon record, are to be referred to the same specific cause; since
there is very sufficient reason for thinking that at least _three_
different descriptions of insects are concerned in the various
cases that have been handed down to us under the common name of
_Phthiriasis_. As the subject of maladies connected with insects,
or produced by them, is both curious and interesting, although no
writer, that I am aware of, has given it full consideration, and
at the same time falls in with my general design, I hope you will
not regard me as guilty of presumption, and of intruding into the
province of medical men, if I enter rather largely into it, and
state to you the reasons that have induced me to embrace the above
hypothesis, leaving you full liberty to reject it if you do not find
it consonant to reason and fact. The three kinds of insects to which
I allude, as concerned in cases that have been deemed Phthiriasis,
are lice (_Pediculi_, L.) mites (_Acari_, L.), and _Larvae_ in general.

As far as the habits of the genus _Pediculus_, whether inhabiting man
or the inferior animals, are at present known, it does not appear,
from any well ascertained fact, that the species belonging to it
are ever _subcutaneous_. For this observation, as far as it relates
to man, I can produce the highest medical authority. "The louse
feeds on the surface of the skin," says the learned Dr. Mead in his
_Medica Sacra_; and Dr. Willan, in his palmary work on _Cutaneous
Diseases_, remarks with respect to the body-louse, "that the nits, or
eggs, are deposited on the small hairs of the skin," and that "the
animals are found on the skin, or on the linen, and not under the
cuticle, as some authors have represented." And he further observes,
that "many marvellous stories are related by Forestus, Schenkius and
others respecting lice bred under the skin, and discharged in swarms
from abscesses, strumous ulcers, and vesications. The mode in which
Pediculi are generated being now so well ascertained, no credit can
be given to these accounts." Thus far this great man, who however
supposes (in which opinion Dr. Bateman concurs with him) that the
authors to whom he alludes had mistaken for lice some other species
of insects, which are not unfrequently found in putrefactive sores.

If these observations be allowed their due weight, it will follow, that
a disease produced by animals residing under the cuticle cannot be a
true Phthiriasis, and therefore the death of the poet Alcman, and of
Pherecydes Syrius the philosopher, mentioned by Aristotle, must have
been occasioned by some other kind of insect. For, speaking of the
lice to which he attributes these catastrophes, he says that "they are
produced in the flesh in small pustule-like tumours, which have no pus,
and from which when punctured, they issue[110]." For the same reason,
the disorder which Dr. Heberden has described in his _Commentaries_,
from the communications of Sir E. Wilmot, under the name of _Morbus
pedicularis_, must also be a different disease, since, with Aristotle,
he likewise represents the insects as inhabiting tumours, from which
they may be extracted when opened by a needle. He says, indeed, that in
every respect they resemble the common lice, except in being whiter;
but medical men, who were not at the same time entomologists, might
easily mistake an Acarus for a Pediculus[111].

Dr. Willan, in one case of _Prurigo senilis_, observed a number
of small insects on the patient's skin and linen. They were quick
in their motion, and so minute that it required some attention to
discover them. He took them at first for small Pediculi; but under
a lens they appeared to him rather to be a nondescript species of
Pulex[112]; yet the figure he gives has not the slightest likeness
to the latter genus, while it bears a striking resemblance to the
former. It is not clear whether his draughtsman meant to represent
the insect with six or with eight legs: if it had only six, it was
probably a Pediculus; but if it had eight, it would form a new genus
between the _Acarina_ and the hexapod _Aptera_. Dr. Bateman, in reply
to some queries put to him, at my request, by our common and lamented
friend Dr. Reeve, relates that he understood from Dr. Willan, in
conversation, that the insect in question jumped in its motion. This
circumstance he regards as conclusive against its being a Pediculus;
but such a consequence does not necessarily follow, since it not
seldom happens that insects of the same tribe or genus either have or
have not this faculty; for instance, compare _Scirtes_ with _Cyphon_,
small beetles, and _Acarus Scabiei_ with other _Acari_[113].

Dr. Willan has quoted with approbation two cases from Amatus
Lusitanus, which he seems to think correctly described as
Phthiriasis. In one of them, however, which terminated fatally, the
circumstances seem rather hyperbolically stated--I mean, where it is
said that two black servants had no other employment than carrying
baskets full of these insects to the sea!! Perhaps you will think I
draw largely upon your credulity if I call upon you to believe this;
I shall therefore leave you to act as you please.--Thus much for pure
Phthiriasis, which term ought to be confined to maladies produced
by _lice_. I shall only further observe, that as many species as
exist of these, which are the causes of disease, so many kinds of
Phthiriasis will there be.

_Acari_, or mites, are the next insect sources of disease in the human
species, and that not of one, but probably of many kinds both local and
general. They are distinguished from Pediculi not only by their form,
but also often by their situation, since they frequently establish
themselves under the cuticle. With respect to local disorders, Dr.
Adams conjectures that Acari may be the cause of certain cases of
_Ophthalmia_. Sir J. Banks, in a letter to that gentleman, relates that
some seamen belonging to the Endeavour brig, being tormented with a
severe itching round the extremities of the eyelids, one of them was
cured by an Otaheitan woman, who with two small splinters of bamboo
extracted from between the _cilia_ abundance of very minute lice, which
were scarcely visible without a lens, though their motion, when laid
on the thumb, was distinctly perceived. These insects were probably
synonymous with the _Ciron des paupieres_ of Sauvages[114].--Le Jeune,
a French physician quoted in Mouffet, describes a case, in which what
seems a different species, since he calls them rather large, infested
the white of the eye, exciting an intolerable itching[115].--Dr. Mead,
from the _German Ephemerides_, gives an account of a woman suckling
her child, from whose breast proceeded very minute vermicles[116].
These were probably mites, and perhaps that species, which, from its
feeding upon milk, Linne denominates _Acarus Lactis_. The great author
last mentioned describes an insect, a native of America, under the
name of _Pediculus Ricinoides_, which, upon the authority of Rolander,
he informs us, gets into the feet of people as they walk, sucks their
blood, oviposits[117] in them, and so occasions very dangerous ulcers.
It would be an Acarus, he observes, but it has only six legs. Now
Hermann affirms, that some species of _Trombidium_ (a genus separated
by Fabricius from _Acarus_) have in no state more than six legs[118].
Others of the tribe of _Acarina_, and the insect in question amongst
the rest, may be similarly circumstanced; or those that Rolander
examined might have been larvae, which in this tribe are usually
hexapods.

Linne appears to have been of opinion that many contagious diseases are
caused by mites[119]. How far he was justified in this opinion I shall
not here inquire; facts alone can decide the question, and observations
made by men acquainted with Entomology as well as the science of
diseases. Considerable deference and attention, however, are certainly
due to the sentiments of so great a naturalist, in whom these necessary
qualifications were united in no common degree. With respect to the
dysentery and the itch, he affirms that this had been manifested to his
eyes. You will wish probably to know the arguments that may be adduced
in confirmation of this opinion; I will therefore endeavour to satisfy
you as well as I am able. The following history given by Linne seems to
prove the dysentery connected with these animals.

Rolander, a student in Entomology, while he resided in the house of
the illustrious Swede, was attacked by the disease in question, which
quickly gave way to the usual remedies. Eight days after, it returned
again, and was as before soon removed. A third time, at the end of the
same period, he was seized with it. All the while he had been living
like the rest of the family, who had nevertheless escaped. This,
of course, occasioned no little inquiry into the cause of what had
happened. Linne, aware that Bartholinus had attributed the dysentery
to _insects_, which he professed to have seen, recommended it to his
pupil to examine his feces. Rolander, following this advice, discovered
in them innumerable animalcules, which upon a close examination proved
to be mites. It was next a question how he alone came to be singled
out by them; and thus he accounts for it. It was his habit not to
drink at his meals; but in the night, growing thirsty, he often sipped
some liquid out of a vessel made of juniper wood. Inspecting this very
narrowly, he observed, in the chinks between the ribs, a white line,
which, when viewed under a lens, he found to consist of innumerable
mites, precisely the same with those that he had voided. Various
experiments were tried with them, and a preparation of rhubarb was
found to destroy them most effectually. He afterwards discovered them
in vessels containing acids, and often under the bung of casks[120]. In
the instance here recorded, the dysentery, or diarrhoea, was evidently
produced by a species of mite, which Linne hence called _Acarus
Dysenteriae_; but it would be going too far, I apprehend, to assert that
they are invariably the cause of that disease.

That _Scabies_, or the itch, is occasioned by a mite, is not a
doctrine peculiar to the moderns. Mouffet mentions Abinzoar, called
also Avenzoar, a celebrated Hispano-Arabian physician of Seville, who
flourished in the twelfth century, as the most ancient author that
notices it. He calls these mites little lice that creep under the skin
of the hands, legs, and feet, exciting pustules full of fluid[121].
Joubert, quoted by the same author, describes them under the name of
_Sirones_, as always being concealed beneath the epidermis, under which
they creep like moles, gnawing it, and causing a most troublesome
itching. It appears that Mouffet, or whoever was the author of that
part of the _Theatrum Insectorum_, was himself also well acquainted
with these animals, since he remarks that their habitation is not in
the pustule but near it: a remark afterwards confirmed by Linne[122],
and more recently by Dr. Adams[123]. In common with the former of these
authors, Mouffet further notices the effect of warmth upon them in
exciting motion[124]. Our intelligent countryman also observes that
they cannot be Pediculi, since they live under the cuticle, which lice
never do[125]. In the epistle dedicatory, the editor speaks also of
them as living in burrows which they have excavated in the skin near a
lake of water; from which if they be extracted with a needle and put
upon the nail, they show in the sun their red head and the feet with
which they walk[126]. And to close my _veteran_ authorities, Junius
thus explains the word Acarus, as I find him quoted in Gouldman's
useful dictionary, "A small worm, which eats under the skin, and makes
burrows in itching hands[127]."

In more modern times, microscopical figures have been added to
descriptions of the insect. Bonomo first furnished this valuable
species of elucidation. His figures, however, which are copied by
Baker in his work on the microscope, are far from accurate[128].
Those of De Geer and Dr. Adams are much more satisfactory, and
mutually confirm each other[129]. From them it is evident that the
same insect inhabits the scabies of Sweden and Madeira. Dr. Bateman,
in the letter before alluded to, informs his correspondent, that he
had seen that from Madeira, and gives it as his opinion, that there
cannot be a doubt of the existence of an _Acarus Scabiei_; an opinion
which he repeats in his late work on _Cutaneous Diseases_; and which,
according to Hermann[130], has been also rendered unquestionable by
Wichmann in his _Etiologie de la Gale_ (Hanovre 1786), a work I have
not had an opportunity of consulting. From all this we may regard the
point as so far settled, that an animal of this kind exists at least
as an occasional concomitant of scabies.

This fact being ascertained, a more complex inquiry remains, which
branches out into two distinct questions. Is scabies always produced
by these insects? Or, if this be not the case, Is the _animate_
scabies a distinct disease from the _inanimate_?

It is very remarkable that Linne, a physician as well as a
naturalist; and De Geer, one of the most accurate observers that ever
existed; should both assign the insect in question as the undoubted
cause of the _common_ scabies of their country; the one applying to
the disease he was speaking of the epithet of _communissima_, and
observing the fact to be notorious, (_cuique liquet_,) and the other
designating it by its well known French name "_La Gale_[131]." And is
it not equally remarkable that such men as John Hunter, Dr. Heberden,
Dr. Bateman, Dr. Adams, and Mr. Baker, should never, in this
country, have been able to meet with it? Did it indeed exist in our
common scabies, it seems impossible that it could have escaped the
observation of the two last of these gentlemen; Dr. Adams being so
well qualified to detect it from his observations in Madeira, and Mr.
Baker from his expertness in microscopical researches. Dr. Bateman,
in the letter above quoted, says, "I have hunted it with a good
magnifier, in many cases of itch, both in and near the pustules, and
in the red streaks or furrows, but always without success." In his
work on _Cutaneous Diseases_ he tells us, however, that he has seen
it, in one instance, when it had been taken from the diseased surface
by another practitioner. And though Dr. Willan in his book speaks
of the Acarus as the concomitant of this disease, yet his learned
friend just mentioned observes, that he admitted that it was not to
be found in ordinary cases, and indeed never seemed to have made up
his mind upon the subject. When I was at Norwich in 1812, Dr. Reeve
very kindly accompanied me to the House of Industry there, to examine
a patient whose body was very full of the pustules of this disorder;
but though we used a good magnifier, we could discover nothing like
an insect. I must observe, however, that our examination was made in
December, in severe weather, when the cold might, perhaps, render the
animal torpid, and less easy to be discovered.

From the above facts it seems fair to infer that this animal is not
invariably the cause of scabies, but that there are cases with which
it has no connexion. Now, from this inference, would not another
also follow, that the disease produced by the insect is specifically
distinct from that in which it cannot be found? Sauvages and Dr.
Adams are both of this opinion[132], the former assigning to it the
trivial name of _vermicularis_; and the latter proving, by very
satisfactory arguments, that it is different from the other. If they
were both _animate_ diseases, but derived from two distinct species
of animals, (for it seems not impossible that even our common itch
may be caused by a mite more minute than the other, and so more
difficult to find,) they would properly be considered as distinct
species; much more, therefore, if one be _animate_ and the other
_inanimate_. Nay this, I should think, would lead to a doubt whether
even their _genus_ were the same. I shall dismiss this part of my
subject with the mention of a discovery of Dr. Adams, which seems to
have escaped both Linne and De Geer--that the _Acarus Scabiei_ is
endowed with the faculty of leaping; (in this respect resembling the
insect found by Willan in _Prurigo senilis_ mentioned above;) for
which purpose its four posterior thighs are incrassated[133].

But besides these _Acarine_ diseases, there seems to be one (unless
with Linne we regard the plague as of this class[134]) more fearful
and fatal than them all. You will, perhaps, conjecture I am speaking
of that described by Aristotle and Sir E. Wilmot as the Phthiriasis,
and your conjecture will be right. But some think, and those men
of merited celebrity, that _mites_ have nothing to do in these and
similar cases, for that _maggots_ were the parasites mistaken for
lice. This, from the passage above quoted, appears to have been Dr.
Willan's opinion, to which, in the letter so often referred to, Dr.
Bateman subscribes; adding as a reason for excluding mites from being
concerned, that "they are too minute, and never have been seen in
such numbers as to be mistaken for lice." But both vary in size, some
of the former being larger than some of the latter. And allowing them
to be ever so minute, yet when they issue in swarms, as mites from a
cheese, they would be very visible, were it only from their motion.
Besides, as they are furnished with legs, their motions resemble
those of lice infinitely more than do the contortions of maggots. So
that a mite would be deemed a louse much sooner by an unentomological
observer than would a maggot. Whether mites have ever been seen in
such numbers as to be mistaken for lice, is the point in question;
and therefore, by itself, cannot be admitted for a valid argument.
Though _Acarus Scabiei_ does not appear to swarm in ordinary cases,
yet this is certainly no reason why other species may not do so.
Where it has once made a settlement, how incredibly, and in how
short a space of time, does the _Siro_ or cheese-mite multiply!
_Acarus Destructor_ and many other species are equally rapid in their
increase.--Millions of lice are said by Lafontaine, whom Hermann
calls a very exact describer, to show themselves in _Plica polonica_,
on the third day of the disease[135]; but whether the last-mentioned
author be correct in thinking it more probable that they are
mites[136], I have not the means of judging.

I shall now produce two instances where mites were evidently
concerned. Dr. Mead, from the _German Ephemerides_, relates the
miserable case of a French nobleman, from whose eyes, nostrils,
mouth, and urinary passage animalcules of a red colour, and
excessively minute, broke forth day and night, attended by the most
horrible and excruciating pains, and at length occasioned his death.
The account further says, that they were produced from his corrupted
blood. This was probably a fancy originating in their red colour:
but the whole history, whether we consider the size and colour of
the animals, or the places from which they issue, is inapplicable
to _larvae_ or maggots, and agrees very well with _mites_, some of
which, particularly _Leptus autumnalis_, are of a bright red colour.
The other case, and a very similar one, is that recorded by Mouffet
of Lady Penruddock; concerning whom he expressly tells us, that
Acari swarmed in every part of her body--her head, eyes, nose, lips,
gums, the soles of her feet, &c., tormenting her day and night,
till, in spite of every remedy, all the flesh of her body being
consumed, she was at length relieved by death from this terrible
state of suffering. Mouffet attributes her disease to the _Acarus
Scabiei_; but from the symptoms and fatal result it seems to have
been a different and much more terrific animal. He supposes, in this
instance, the insect to have been generated by drinking goat's milk
too copiously. This, if correct, would lead to a conjecture that it
might have been the _A. Lactis_, L.

These cases I hope will satisfy you that mites, as well as lice,
are the cause of diseases in the human frame. This, indeed, as has
been before observed, is allowed on all hands with respect to that
of the itch; and it is, certainly, not more improbable that man
should be exposed to the attack of several species of this genus,
than that three or four kinds of Pediculus should infest him. If you
are convinced by what I have written, you will concur with me in
thinking that the one are as much entitled to give their name to the
disease which they produce as the other; and the term _Acariasis_, by
which, with due deference to medical men, I propose to distinguish
generically all acarine diseases, will not be refused its place
amongst your _Genera Morborum_.

I shall now proceed to the remaining class of diseases mistaken for
Phthiriasis; those, namely, which are produced by _larvae_. There are
two terms employed by ancient authors, _Eulae_ ([Greek: Eulai]) and
_Scolex_ ([Greek: Skolex]), which seem properly to denote larvae; but
there is often such a want of precision in the language of writers
unacquainted with Natural History, that it is very difficult to make
out what objects they mean; and expressions which, strictly taken,
should be understood of larvae, may probably sometimes have been used to
denote the cause of either the pedicular or acarine disease. _Eulae_,
which term, though given by Hesychius as synonymous with _Scolex_, is
by Plutarch used as of different import[137], seems properly to mean
those larvae which are generated in dead carcases, at least so Homer
has more than once applied it[138]: it is therefore a word of a much
more restricted sense than _Scolex_, which probably belongs to the
larvae of every order of insects; for so Aristotle employs it, when he
says that all insects produce a _Scolex_, or are larviparous[139].
Yet when Homer compares Harpalion stretched dead upon the ground to a
_Scolex_[140], it should seem as if he used the word for an earth-worm,
which Aristotle commonly calls by a figurative periphrasis, "Entrails
of the earth[141]." In the Holy Scriptures this word is used to signify
larvae which prey upon and are the torment of living bodies[142]. It may
on this account, perhaps, be regarded as generally meaning such larvae,
to whatever order or genus they belong.

Dr. Mead, therefore, is most probably right when he considers the
disease stated by the ancients to be caused by _Eulae_ or _Scoleches_,
commonly translated worms, as distinct from Phthiriasis; and if so,
the inhuman Pheretima, who swarmed with _Eulae_, and Herod Agrippa, who
was eaten of _Scoleches_[143], were probably neither of them destroyed
either by Pediculi or Acari, but by larvae or maggots. And when Galen
prescribed a remedy for ulcers inhabited by _Scoleches_, observing that
animals similar to those generated by putrid substances are often found
in abscesses, he probably meant the same thing. The proper appellation
of this genus of diseases would be _Scolechiasis_.

This dissertation may perhaps appear to you rather prolix and
tedious: yet to settle the meaning of terms is of the first
importance. To inquire what ancient writers intended by the words
which they employ, and whether such as have been usually regarded as
synonymous are really so, may often furnish us with a clue to some
useful or interesting truth; and not seldom enable us to rescue their
reputation from much of the censure which has been inconsiderately
cast upon it. Because they did not know every thing, or so much as
we do, we are too apt to think that they knew nothing. That they
fell into very considerable errors, especially in subjects connected
with Natural History, cannot be denied; but then it ought to be
considered that they possessed scarcely any of those advantages by
which we are enabled to penetrate into nature's secrets. The want of
the microscope alone was an effectual bar to their progress in this
branch of science. Yet, in some instances, when they took a general
view of a subject, they appear to have had very correct ideas. This
observation particularly applies to the philosopher of Stagyra, whose
mighty mind and lyncean eye, in spite of those mists of prejudice
and fable that enveloped the age in which he lived, enabled him in
part to pierce through the gloom, and comprehend and behold the
fair outline that gives symmetry, grace and beauty to the whole of
nature's form, though he mistook, or was not able to trace out, her
less prominent features and minor lineaments.

       *       *       *       *       *

It is now time to return from this long digression, which however is
closely connected with the subject of this letter, to the point from
which I deviated. Taking my leave of the disgusting animals which
gave rise to it, I proceed to call your attention to another of our
pygmy tormentors, (_Pulex irritans_,) which, in the opinion of some,
seems to have been regarded as an agreeable rather than a repulsive
object. "Dear miss," said a lively old lady to a friend of mine,
(who had the misfortune to be confined to her bed by a broken limb,
and was complaining that the fleas tormented her,) "don't you like
_fleas_? Well, I think they are the prettiest little merry things in
the world.--I never saw a dull flea in all my life." The celebrated
Willughby kept a favourite flea, which used at stated times to be
admitted to suck the palm of his hand; and enjoyed this privilege
for three months, when the cold killed it. And Dr. Townson, from
the encomium which he bestows upon these vigilant little vaulters,
as supplying the place of an alarum and driving us from the bed of
sloth, should seem to have regarded them with feelings much more
complacent than those of Dr. Clarke and his friends, when their hopes
of passing "one night free from the attacks of vermin" were changed
into despair by the information of the laughing Sheik, that "the
king of the fleas held his court at Tiberias:" or than those of MM.
Lewis and Clarke, who found them more tormenting than all the other
plagues of the Missouri country, where they sometimes compel even the
natives to shift their quarters. If you unhappily view them in this
unfavourable light, and have found ordinary methods unavailing for
ridding yourself of these unbidden guests; I can furnish you with a
_probatum est_ recipe, which the first-mentioned traveller tells us
the Hungarian shepherds (who seem to have been stupidly insensible to
their value as alarums) find completely effectual to put to flight
these insects and their neighbours the lice. This is not, as you may
be tempted to think, by a remarkable attention to cleanliness.--Quite
the reverse.--They grease their linen with hog's lard, and thus
render themselves disgusting even to fleas! If this does not satisfy,
I have another recipe in store for you. You may shoot at them with
a cannon, as report says did Christina queen of Sweden, whose piece
of artillery, of Lilliputian calibre, which was employed in this
warfare, is still exhibited in the arsenal of Stockholm[144]. But,
seriously, if you wish for an effectual remedy, that prescribed by
old Tusser, in the following lines, will answer your purpose:

          "While wormwood hath seed, get a handfull or twaine,
           To save against March, to make flea to refraine:
           Where chamber is sweeped, and wormwood is strown,
           No flea for his life dare abide to be known."

To this genus belongs an insect, abundant in the West Indies and
South America, the attacks of which are infinitely more serious
than those of the common flea. You will readily conjecture that I
am speaking of the celebrated _Chigoe_ or _Jiggers_, called also
_Nigua_, _Tungua_, and _Pique_[145], (_Pulex penetrans_,) one of the
direst personal pests with which the sins of man have been visited.
All disputes concerning the genus of this insect would have been
settled long before Swartz's time, (who first gave a satisfactory
description and figure of it, proving it to be a _Pulex_, as has been
observed above[146],) had success attended the patriotic attempt
of the Capuchin friar recorded by Walton in his _History of St.
Domingo_, who brought away with him from that island a colony of
these animals, which he permitted to establish themselves in one
of his feet; but unfortunately for himself, and for science, the
foot intrusted with the precious deposit mortified, was obliged to
be amputated, and with all its inhabitants committed to the waves.
According to Ulloa, and his opinion is confirmed by Jussieu, there
are two South American species of this mischievous insect. It is
described as generally attacking the feet and legs[147], getting,
without being felt, between the skin and the flesh, usually under
the nails of the toes, where it nidificates and lays its eggs;
and if timely attention be not paid to it, which, as it occasions
no other uneasiness than itching, (the sensation at first, I am
assured, is rather pleasing than otherwise,) is sometimes neglected,
it multiplies to such a degree, as to be attended by the most fatal
consequences, often, as in the above instance, rendering amputation
necessary, and sometimes causing death[148]. The female slaves in
the West Indies are frequently employed to extract these pests,
which they do with uncommon dexterity. Yarico, so celebrated in
prose and verse, performed this kind office for honest Ligon, who
says, in his _History of Barbadoes_, "I have had ten (Chegoes) taken
out of my feet in a morning, by the most unfortunate Yarico, an
Indian woman[149]." Humboldt observes, "that the whites born in the
torrid zone walk barefoot with impunity in the same apartment where
a European recently landed is exposed to the attack of this animal.
The _Nigua_ therefore distinguishes what the most delicate chemical
analysis could not distinguish, the cellular membrane and blood of a
European from those of a creole white[150]."

You have already, perhaps, been satiated with the account before
given of our enemies of the _Acarus_ tribe: there are a few, however,
which I could not with propriety introduce there, as they do not
take up their abode and breed in us, which nevertheless annoy us
considerably. One of these is a hexapod so minute, that, were it not
for the uncommon brilliancy of its colour, which is the most vivid
crimson that can be conceived, it would be quite invisible. It is
known by the name of the harvest-bug, (_Leptus autumnalis_,) and is
so called, I imagine, from its attacking the legs of the labourers
employed in the harvest, in the flesh of which it buries itself at
the root of the hairs, producing intolerable itching, attended by
inflammation and considerable tumours, and sometimes even occasioning
fevers[151].--A similar insect is found in Brazil, abounding in
the rainy season, particularly during the gleams of sunshine, or
fine days that intervene; as small as a point, and moving very
fast. These animals get upon the linen and cover it in a moment;
afterwards they insinuate themselves into the skin and occasion a
most intolerable itching. They are with difficulty extracted, and
leave behind them large livid tumours, which subside in a day or two.
An insect very tormenting to the wood-cutters and the settlers on
the Mosquito shore and the bay of Honduras, and called by them _the
doctor_, is thought to be synonymous with this[152].--More serious
consequences have been known to follow the bite of another mite
related to the above, if not the same species, common in Martinique,
and called there the _Bete rouge_. When our soldiers in camp were
attacked by this animal, dangerous ulcers succeeded the symptoms just
mentioned, which, in several cases, became so bad, that the limb
affected was obliged to be taken off[153].

I was once collecting insects in Norwood, near London, when my hands
were covered by a number of small hungry ticks, which were so greedy
after blood, that they penetrated deep into my flesh, giving me no
little pain; and it was not without difficulty that I extracted
them. I suspect that this was the dog-tick (_Ixodes Ricinus_) which
is often found on plants; but I am not certain, as I neglected to
examine it, my attention at that time being almost wholly given to
_Coleoptera_. Lyonnet seems to have been attacked, in one of his
entomological excursions, by the same or a similar insect, which he
broke, so firmly had it fixed itself, in endeavouring to extract it;
and he was obliged to lay open the place lest an abscess should be
formed[154]. But the worst of all the tick tribe is the American
(_Ixodes americanus_) described by Professor Kalm. This insect,
which is related to the preceding, is found in the woods of North
America, and is equally an enemy to man and beast. They are there
so infinitely numerous, that if you sit down upon the ground, or
upon the trunk of a tree, or walk with naked feet or legs, they will
cover you, and, plunging their serrated rostrum into the bare places
of the body, begin to suck your blood, going deeper and deeper till
they are half buried in the flesh. Though at first they occasion no
uneasiness, when they have thus made good their settlement, they
produce an intolerable itching, followed by acute pain and large
tumours. It is now extremely difficult to extract them, the animal
rather suffering itself to be pulled to pieces than let go its hold;
so that the rostrum and head being often left in the wound, produce
an inflammation and suppuration which render it deep and dangerous.
These ticks are at first very small, sometimes scarcely visible,
but by suction will swell themselves out till they are as big as
the end of one's finger, when they often fall to the ground of
themselves[155]. The serrated haustellum of the ticks, which, like
the barbed sting of a bee, cannot be extracted unless the animal
cooperates, is well worth your inspection; and the species which
infests our dogs is so common that you will have no difficulty in
procuring one for examination.

I have now introduced you to the principal insects of the _Aptera_
order of Linne, which, in spite of all his care and all his power,
assail the lord of the creation, and make him their food. You will
here, however, perhaps accuse me of omitting one very prominent
annoyer of our comfort and repose, which you think belongs to this
tribe--the bed-bug (_Cimex lectularius_). When you are a more practised
entomologist, you will see clearly that this, though it has no wings,
appertains to another order: nevertheless it may be introduced here
without impropriety. Though now too common and well known, in this
country it was formerly a rare insect. Had it not, two noble ladies,
mentioned by Mouffet, would scarcely have been thrown into such an
alarm by the appearance of bug-bites upon them; which, until their
fears were dispelled by their physician, who happened also to be a
naturalist, they considered as nothing less than symptoms of the
plague. Being shown the living cause of their fright, their fears gave
place to mirth and laughter[156]. Commerce, with many good things, has
also introduced amongst us many great evils, of which noxious insects
form no small part; and one of her worst presents were doubtless the
disgusting animals now before us. They seem, indeed, as the above
fact proves, to have been productive of greater alarm at first than
mischief, at least if we may judge from the change of name which took
place upon their becoming common. Their original English name was
_Chinche_ or _Wall-louse_[157]; and the term _Bug_, which is a Celtic
word, signifying a ghost or goblin, was applied to them after Ray's
time, most probably because they were considered as "terrors by
night[158]." But however horrible bugs may have been in the estimation
of some, or nauseating in that of others, many of the good people of
London seem to regard them with the greatest apathy, and take very
little pains to get rid of them; not generally, however, it is to be
hoped, to such an extent as the predecessor of a correspondent in
Nicholson's _Journal_, who found his house so dreadfully infested by
them, that it resembled the Banian hospital at Surat[159], all his
endeavours to destroy them being at first in vain. And no wonder; for,
as he learned from a neighbour, his predecessor would never suffer them
to be disturbed or his bedsteads to be removed, till, in the end, they
swarmed to an incredible degree, crawling up even the walls of his
drawing-room; and after his death millions were found in his bed and
chamber furniture[160].

The winged insects of the order to which the bed-bug belongs, often
inflict very painful wounds.--I was once attacked by a small species,
near _Cimex Nemorum_, L. (_Hylophila_, K.), which put me nearly to as
much torture as the sting of a wasp. The water boatman (_Notonecta
glauca_), an insect related to the _Cimicidae_, which always swims
upon its back, made me suffer still more severely, as if I had been
burned, by the insertion of its rostrum; but the wound was not
followed by any inflammation; and long before me Willughby had made
the same discovery and observation[161]. St. Pierre, in his _Voyage
to Mauritius_, mentions a species of bug found in that island, the
bite of which is more venomous than the sting of a scorpion, and is
succeeded by a tumour as big as the egg of a pigeon, which continues
for four or five days. You are well acquainted with the history
and properties of the _Raia Torpedo_ and _Gymnotus electricus_;
but, I dare aver, have no idea that any _insect_ possesses their
extraordinary powers.--Yet I can assure you, upon good authority,
that _Reduvius serratus_, commonly known in the West Indies by the
name of the wheel-bug, can, like them, communicate an electric shock
to the person whose flesh it touches. The late Major-general Davies,
of the Royal Artillery, well known as a most accurate observer of
nature and an indefatigable collector of her treasures, as well as a
most admirable painter of them, once informed me, that when abroad,
having taken up this animal and placed it upon his hand, it gave him
a considerable shock, as if from an electric jar, with its legs,
which he felt as high as his shoulders; and, dropping the creature,
he observed six marks upon his hand where the six feet had stood.

You may now possibly think that I have nearly gone through the
catalogue of our _personal_ assailants of the insect tribes. If such,
however, is your expectation, I fear you will be disappointed, since
I have many more, and some tremendous ones, to enumerate: but as a
small compensation for such a detail of evils and injuries to which
our species is exposed from foes seemingly so insignificant, and of
acts of rebellion of the vilest and most despised of our subjects
against our boasted supremacy, the objects to which I shall next call
your attention are not, like most of our apterous enemies, calculated
to excite disgust and nausea when we see them or speak of them; nor
do they usually steal upon us during the silent hours of repose,
(though I must except here the gnat or mosquito,) but are many of
them very beautiful, and boldly make their attack upon us in open
day, when we are best able to defend ourselves. Borne on rapid wings,
wherever they find us, they endeavour to lay us under contribution,
and the tribute they exact is our blood. Wonderful and various are
the weapons that enable them to enforce their demand. What would
you think of any large animal that should come to attack you with a
tremendous apparatus of knives and lancets issuing from its mouth?
Yet such are the instruments by means of which the fire-eyed and
blood-thirsty horse-fly (_Tabanus_, L.) makes an incision in your
flesh; and then, forming a siphon of them, often carries off many
drops of your blood[162]. The pain they inflict, when they open a
vein, is usually very acute. A fly of this kind not only occasioned
Mr. Sheppard considerable pain by its bite, but also produced
swelling and blackness round one eye; and the flesh of his cheek and
chin was so enlarged from it as to hang down. And Mr. W. S. MacLeay
thus describes to me the annoyance he suffered from one of them. "I
went down the other day to the country, and was fairly driven out of
it by the _Haematopota pluvialis_, which attacked me with such fury,
that although I did not at last venture beyond the door without a
veil, my face and hands were swelled to that degree as to be scarcely
yet recovered from the effects of their venom. I was obliged on my
return to town to stay two days at home. Whenever this insect bites
me it has this effect, and I have never been able to discover any
remedy for the torture it puts me to." In this country, however,
the attacks of these flies are usually not frequent enough to make
them more than a minor "misery of human life;" but the burning-fly
(_brulot_) or sand-fly of America[163] and the West Indies,
which seem to be the same insect, causes a much more intolerable
anguish, which has been compared to what a red-hot needle or a
spark of fire would occasion us to endure. Lambert, in his _Travels
through Canada_, &c. says, "They are so very small as to be hardly
perceptible in their attacks; and your forehead will be streaming
with blood before you are sensible of being amongst them[164]."--Yet
we have one species (_Stomoxys calcitrans_) alluded to in a former
letter as so nearly resembling the common house-fly[165], which,
though its oral instruments are to appearance not near so tremendous,
is a much greater torment than the horse-fly. This little pest, I
speak feelingly, incessantly interrupts our studies and comfort in
showery weather, making us even stamp like the cattle by its attacks
on our legs; and, if we drive it away ever so often, returning
again and again to the charge. In Canada they are infinitely worse.
"I have sat down to write," says Lambert, (who though he calls it
the house-fly is evidently speaking of the Stomoxys,) "and have been
obliged to throw away my pen in consequence of their irritating bite,
which has obliged me every moment to raise my hand to my eyes, nose,
mouth, and ears in constant succession. When I could no longer write,
I began to read, and was always obliged to keep one hand constantly
on the move towards my head. Sometimes in the course of a few minutes
I would take half a dozen of my tormentors from my lips, between
which I caught them just as they perched[166]."

The swallow-fly (_Craterina Hirundinis_[167]), whose natural food is
the bird after which it is named, has been known to make its repast
on the human species. One found its way into a bed of the Rev. R.
Sheppard, where it first, for several nights, sorely annoyed a friend
of his, and afterwards himself, without their suspecting the culprit.
After a close search, however, it was discovered in the form of this
fly, which, forsaking the nest of the swallow, had by some chance
taken its station between the sheets, and thus glutted itself with
the blood of man.--In travelling between Edam and Purmerend in North
Holland (July 21, 1815), in an open vehicle, I was much teased by
another bird-fly (_Ornithomyia avicularia_) (two individuals of which
I caught) alighting upon my head, and inserting its rostrum into my
flesh.--Mr. Sheppard remarks, as a reason for this dereliction of
their appropriate food, that no sooner does life depart from the
bird that these flies infest, than they immediately desert it and
take flight, alighting upon the first living creature that they meet
with; which if it be not a bird they soon quit, but, as it should
seem from the above facts, not before they have made a trial how it
will suit them as food.

But of all the insect-tormentors of man, none are so loudly and
universally complained of as the species of the genus _Culex_, L.,
whether known by the name of gnats or mosquitos[168]. Pliny, after
Aristotle, distinguishes well between _Hymenoptera_ and _Diptera_,
when he says the former have their sting in their tail, and the
latter in their mouth; and that to the one this weapon is given as
the instrument of vengeance, and to the other of avidity[169]. But
the instrument of avidity in the genus of which I am speaking, is
even more terrible than that of vengeance in most insects that are
armed with it: like the latter also, as appears from the consequent
inflammation and tumour, it instills into its wound a poison; the
principal use of which, however, is to render the blood more fluid
and fitter for suction. This weapon, which is more complex than the
sting of hymenopterous insects, consisting of five pieces besides
the exterior sheath, some of which seem simply lancets, while others
are barbed like the spicula of a bee's sting, is at once calculated
for piercing the flesh and forming a siphon adapted to imbibe the
blood[170]. There are several species of this genus whose bite
is severe, but none is to be compared to the common gnat (_Culex
pipiens_, L.), if, as has been generally affirmed, it be synonymous
with the mosquito (though perhaps several species are confounded
under both names); and to this, the most insatiable of blood-suckers,
I shall principally direct your attention[171].

In this country they are justly regarded as no trifling evil; for
they follow us to all our haunts, intrude into our most secret
retirements, assail us in the city and in the country, in our
houses and in our fields, in the sun and in the shade: nay, they
pursue us to our pillows, and either keep us awake by the ceaseless
hum of their droning pipe, and their incessant endeavours to fix
themselves upon our face, or some uncovered part of our body; or, if
in spite of them we fall asleep, awaken us by the acute pain which
attends the insertion of their oral stings; attacking with most
avidity the softer sex, and trying their temper by disfiguring their
beauty. But although with us they are usually rather teasing than
injurious; yet upon some occasions they have approached nearer to
the character of a plague, and emulated with success the mosquitos
of other climates. Thus, we are told that in the year 1736 they were
so numerous, that vast columns of them were seen to rise in the air
from Salisbury cathedral, which at a distance resembled columns of
smoke, and occasioned many people to think that the cathedral was on
fire. A similar occurrence, in like manner giving rise to an alarm
of the church being on fire, took place in July 1812 at Sagan in
Silesia[172]. In the following year at Norwich, in May, at about six
o'clock in the evening, the inhabitants of that city were alarmed by
the appearance of smoke issuing from the upper window of the spire of
the cathedral, for which at the time no satisfactory account could
be given, but which was most probably produced by the same cause.
And in the year 1766, in the month of August, they appeared in such
incredible numbers at Oxford as to resemble a black cloud, darkening
the air and almost totally intercepting the beams of the sun. One
day, a little before sun-set, six columns of them were observed to
ascend from the boughs of an apple-tree, some in a perpendicular and
others in an oblique direction, to the height of fifty or sixty feet.
Their bite was so envenomed, that it was attended by violent and
alarming inflammation; and one when killed usually contained as much
blood as would cover three or four square inches of wall[173]. Our
great poet Spenser seems to have witnessed a similar appearance of
them, which furnished him with the following beautiful simile:

          As when a swarme of gnats at eventide
          Out of the fennes of Allan doe arise,
          Their murmuring small trumpets sownden wide,
          Whiles in the air their clust'ring army flies,
          That as a cloud doth seem to dim the skies;
          Ne man nor beast may rest or take repast
          For their sharp wounds and noyous injuries.
            Till the fierce northern wind with blust'ring blast
          Doth blow them quite away, and in the ocean cast.

In Marshland in Norfolk, as I learn from a lady who had an
opportunity of personal inspection, the inhabitants are so annoyed
by the gnats, that the better sort of them, as in many hot climates,
have recourse to a gauze covering for their beds, to keep them
off during the night. Whether this practice obtains in other fen
districts I do not know.

But these evils are of small account compared with what other
countries, especially when we approach the poles or the line, are
destined to suffer from them; for there they interfere so much with
ease and comfort, as to become one of the worst of pests and a real
misery of human life. We may be disposed to smile perhaps at the
story Mr. Weld relates from General Washington, that in one place
the mosquitos were so powerful as to pierce through his boots[174]
(probably they crept within the boots): but in various regions
scarcely any thing less impenetrable than leather can withstand their
insinuating weapons and unwearied attacks. One would at first imagine
that regions where the polar winter extends its icy reign would not
be much annoyed by insects: but however probable the supposition,
it is the reverse of fact, for nowhere are gnats more numerous.
These animals, as well as numbers of the _Tipulariae_ of Latreille,
seem endowed with the privilege of resisting any degree of cold,
and of bearing any degree of heat. In Lapland their numbers are so
prodigious as to be compared to a flight of snow when the flakes
fall thickest, or to the dust of the earth. The natives cannot take
a mouthful of food, or lie down to sleep in their cabins, unless
they be fumigated almost to suffocation. In the air you cannot draw
your breath without having your mouth and nostrils filled with
them; and unguents of tar, fish-grease, or cream; or nets steeped
in fetid birch-oil, are scarcely sufficient to protect even the
case-hardened cuticle of the Laplander from their bite[175]. In
certain districts of France, the accurate Reaumur informs us that he
has seen people whose arms and legs have become quite monstrous from
wounds inflicted by gnats; and in some cases in such a state as to
render it doubtful whether amputation would not be necessary[176].
In the neighbourhood of the Crimea the Russian soldiers are obliged
to sleep in sacks to defend themselves from the mosquitos; and
even this is not a sufficient security, for several of them die
in consequence of mortification produced by the bites of these
furious blood-suckers. This fact is related by Dr. Clarke, and to
its probability his own painful experience enabled him to speak. He
informs us that the bodies of himself and his companions, in spite
of gloves, clothes, and handkerchiefs, were rendered one entire
wound, and the consequent excessive irritation and swelling excited
a considerable degree of fever. In a most sultry night, when not a
breath of air was stirring, exhausted by fatigue, pain, and heat,
he sought shelter in his carriage: and, though almost suffocated,
could not venture to open a window for fear of the mosquitos.
Swarms nevertheless found their way into his hiding-place; and,
in spite of the handkerchiefs with which he had bound up his head,
filled his mouth, nostrils, and ears. In the midst of his torment
he succeeded in lighting a lamp, which was extinguished in a moment
by such a prodigious number of these insects, that their carcases
actually filled the glass chimney, and formed a large conical heap
over the burner. The noise they make in flying cannot be conceived
by persons who have only heard gnats in England. It is to all that
hear it a most fearful sound[177]. Travellers and mariners who have
visited warmer climates give a similar account of the torments there
inflicted by these little demons. One traveller in Africa complains
that after a fifty miles journey they would not suffer him to rest,
and that his face and hands appeared, from their bites, as if he was
infected with the small-pox in its worst stage[178]. In the East, at
Batavia, Dr. Arnold, a most attentive and accurate observer, relates
that their bite is the most venomous he ever felt, occasioning a
most intolerable itching, which lasts several days. The sight or
sound of a single one either prevented him from going to bed for a
whole night, or obliged him to rise many times. This species, which
I have examined, is distinct from the common gnat, and appears to be
nondescript. It approaches nearest to _C. annulatus_, but the wings
are black and not spotted. And Captain Stedman in America, as a proof
of the dreadful state to which he and his soldiers were reduced by
them, mentions that they were forced to sleep with their heads thrust
into holes made in the earth with their bayonets, and their necks
wrapped round with their hammocks[179].

From Humboldt also we learn that "between the little harbour of
Higuerote and the mouth of the Rio Unare the wretched inhabitants are
accustomed to stretch themselves on the ground, and pass the night
buried in the sand three or four inches deep, leaving out the head
only, which they cover with a handkerchief." This illustrious traveller
has given an account in detail of these insect plagues, by which it
appears that amongst them there are diurnal, crepuscular, and nocturnal
species, or genera: the _Mosquitos_ or _Simulia_ flying in the day; the
_Temporaneros_, probably a kind of _Culex_, flying during twilight; and
the _Zancudos_ or _Culices_ in the night. So that there is no rest for
the inhabitants from their torment day or night, except for a short
interval between the retreat of one species and the attack of another.
We learn from this author that the sting or bite of the _Simulium_ is
as bad as that of the _Stomoxys_ before noticed[180].

It is not therefore incredible that Sapor, king of Persia, as is
related, should have been compelled to raise the siege of Nisibis
by a plague of gnats, which attacking his elephants and beasts of
burthen, so caused the rout of his army, whatever we may think of the
miracle to which it was attributed[181]; nor that the inhabitants of
various cities, as Mouffet has collected from different authors[182],
should, by an extraordinary multiplication of this plague, have been
compelled to desert them; or that by their power to do mischief,
like other conquerors who have been the torment of the human race,
they should have attained to fame, and have given their name to bays,
towns, and even to considerable territories[183].

And now, which seems to you the greater terror, that the forest
should resound with the roar of the lion or the tiger, or with
the hum of the gnat? Which evil is most to be deprecated, the
neighbourhood of these ferocious animals, terrible as they are for
their cruelty and strength, or to live amidst the polar or tropical
myriads of mosquitos, and be subject to the torture of their
incessant attacks? When you consider that from the one, prudence and
courage may secure or defend us without any material sacrifice of our
daily comforts; while to be at rest from the other, we must either
render ourselves disgusting by filthy unguents, or be suffocated by
fumigations, or be content to be bound, head, hand and foot, shut out
from the respiration of the common air, and even thus scarcely escape
from their annoyance; you will feel convinced that the former is the
more tolerable evil of the two, and be inclined to think that those
cities, from which the lions were driven away by the more powerful
gnats, were no great gainers by the exchange[184]. With what grateful
hearts ought the privileged inhabitants of these happy islands to
acknowledge and glorify the goodness of that kind Providence which
has distinguished us from the less favoured nations of the globe,
by what may be deemed an immunity from this tormenting pest! for
the inroads which they make on our comfort, when contrasted with
what so many other people of every climate suffer from them, are
mere nothings. When we behold on one side of us the ravages of
the wide-wasting sword, on another those of infectious disease or
pestilence, on a third famine destroying its myriads, and on a fourth
life rendered uncomfortable by the terror of "noisome beasts," and
the attack of noxious insects: and when we look at home and see
every one eating his bread in peace, protected in his enjoyments
by equal laws executed by a mild government under a paternal
king, without fearing the sword of the oppressor; not scourged by
pestilence or famine, exposed to the attack of no ferocious animal,
and comparatively speaking but slightly visited by the annoyance of
insect tormentors; and especially when we further reflect that it is
his mercy and not our merits which has induced him thus to overwhelm
us with blessings, while other countries have been made to drink deep
of the cup of his fury, we shall see reason for an increased degree
of thankfulness and gratitude, and, instead of repining, be well
content with our lot, though our offences have not wholly been passed
over, and we have been "beaten with few stripes."

       *       *       *       *       *

Besides the insects that seek to make us their food, there are
others, which, although we are apt to regard them with the greatest
horror, do not attack us with this view, but usually to revenge some
injury which they have received, or apprehend from us. Foremost
in the list of these are those with four wings, which, according
to the observation of Pliny before quoted, carry their weapon, an
instrument of revenge, in their _tail_. These all belong to the
Linnean order _Hymenoptera_; and the tremendous arms with which they
annoy us, are two darts finer than a hair, furnished on their outer
side at the end with several barbs not visible to the naked eye,
and each moving in the groove of a strong and often curved sheath,
frequently mistaken for the sting, which, when the darts enter the
flesh, usually injects a drop of subtle venom, furnished from a
peculiar vessel in which it is secreted, into the wound, occasioning,
especially if the darts be not extracted, a considerable tumour,
accompanied by very acute pain. Many insects are thus armed and have
this power. Twice I have been stung by an Ichneumon; first by one
with a concealed sting, and afterwards by another of the family of
_Pimpla Manifestator_, with a very long exerted one. I had held the
insect by its sting, which it withdrew from between my fingers with
surprising force, and then, as if in revenge, stung me. _Pompilus
viaticus_, one of the spider-wasps, once, in this way, gave me
acute pain. Mr. W. S. MacLeay states that at the Havana he was once
stung by a gigantic _Pompilus_ (probably _P. Heros_), from which he
suffered a very short-lived pain, but the wound bled as if punctured
by a pin. The bleeding he conjectures carried off the venom. But
the insects which in this respect principally attract our notice
by exciting our fears, are the hive-bee, the wasp, and the hornet.
The first of these, the _bee_, sometimes manifests an antipathy
to particular individuals, whom it attacks and wounds without
provocation; but the two last, though apparently the most formidable,
are not so ill-tempered as they are conceived to be, seldom molesting
those who do not first interfere with or disturb them. We learn
from Scripture that the _hornet_ (but whether it was the common
species is uncertain) was employed by Providence to drive out the
impious inhabitants of Canaan, or subdue them under the hand of the
Israelites[185].--The effect produced by the sting of these animals
is different in different persons. To some they occasion only a very
slight inconvenience or a momentary pain; others feel the smart of
the wounds which they inflict for several days, and are thrown into
fevers by them; and to some they have even proved fatal[186]. Yet
these insects are certainly, in general, but a trifling evil. They
become, however, especially _wasps_, a very serious one to many,
from the mere dread of being stung by them, even though they should
not carry their fears to the same length with the lady mentioned by
Dr. Fairfax[187], in the _Philosophical Transactions_, who had such
a horror of them, that during the season in which they abound in
houses, she always confined herself to her apartment.

_Ants_ are insects of this order, which, though our indigenous
species may be regarded as harmless, in some countries are gifted
with double means of annoyance, both from their sting and their
bite. A green kind in New South Wales was observed by Sir Joseph
Banks to inflict a wound scarcely less painful than the sting of a
bee[188]. Another, from the intolerable anguish occasioned by its
bite, which resembles that produced by a spark of fire, and seems
attended by venom, is called the fire-ant. Captain Stedman relates
that this caused a whole company of soldiers to start and jump about
as if scalded with boiling water; and its nests were so numerous
that it was not easy to avoid them[189]. We are told of a third
species, which emulates the scorpion in the malignity of its sting
or bite[190]. Knox, in his account of Ceylon, mentions a black ant,
called by the natives _Coddia_, which he says "bites desperately, as
bad as if a man were burnt by a coal of fire; but they are of a noble
nature, and will not begin unless you disturb them." The reason the
Cinghalese assign for the horrible pain occasioned by their bite is
curious, and will serve to amuse you. "Formerly these ants went to
ask a wife of the _Noya_, a venomous and noble kind of snake; and
because they had such a high spirit to dare to offer to be related to
such a generous creature, they had this virtue bestowed upon them,
that they should sting after this manner. And if they had obtained a
wife of the Noya, they should have had the privilege to sting full
as bad as he[191]." Stedman's story of a large ant that stripped the
trees of their leaves, to feed, as was supposed, a blind serpent
under ground[192], is somewhat akin to this: as is also another,
related to me by a friend of mine, of a species of Mantis, now in
my cabinet, taken in one of the Indian islands, which, according
to the received opinion amongst the natives, was the parent of all
their serpents. Whence, unless perhaps from their noxious qualities,
could this idea of a connexion between insects and these reptiles be
derived? But to return from this digression----Madame Merian's Ant of
Visitation (_Oecodoma cephalotes_) will be considered in a subsequent
letter: but I cannot here omit a circumstance mentioned by Don Felix
de Azara, a late Spanish traveller, who confirms her account,--that
these animals are so alarming and tremendous in their attacks, that
if they enter a house in the night, the inhabitants are obliged to
rise with all speed and run off in their shirts.

I must next direct your attention to an insect, which perhaps
more than any other has in every age been an object of terror and
abhorrence--I mean the redoubted _scorpion_. And though I shall not,
with Aristotle, tell you of Persian kings employing armies for several
days in destroying them; or, with Pliny, of countries that they have
depopulated; yet my account will not be devoid of that species of
interest which the dread of its power to do us injury imparts to any
object. Could you see one of these ferocious animals, perhaps a foot
in length, a size to which they sometimes attain, advancing towards
you in their usual menacing attitude, with its claws expanded, and its
many-jointed tail turned over its head; were your heart ever so stout,
I think you would start back and feel a horror come across you; and,
though you knew not the animal, you would conclude that such an aspect
of malignity must be the precursor of malignant effects. Nor would you
be mistaken, as you will presently see. This alarming animal, though
like hymenopterous insects it is armed with a sting, is in no respect
related to that order, and forms the only genus, at present known, of
the others that is so armed. Even its sting is totally different from
that of bees, wasps, and other Hymenoptera, being more analogous to the
venomous tooth of serpents; it wounds us with no barbed darts concealed
in a sheath, but only with a simple incurved mucro terminating an
ampullaceous joint. Two orifices, or according to some three, are
said to instill the poison, which, we are informed, is sometimes as
white as milk. This venom in our European species is seldom attended,
except to minor animals, by any very serious consequences; yet when it
is communicated by the scorpion of warmer climates it produces more
baneful effects. The sting of certain kinds common in South America
causes fevers, numbness in various parts of the body, tumours in the
tongue, and dimness of sight, which symptoms last from twenty-four to
forty-eight hours. The only means of saving the lives of our soldiers
who were stung by them in Egypt, was amputation. One species is said
to occasion madness; and the black scorpion, both of South America and
Ceylon, frequently inflicts a mortal wound[193]. No known animal is
more cruel and ferocious in its manners; they kill and devour their
own young without pity as soon as they are born, and they are equally
savage to their fellows when grown up. Terrible however and revolting
as these creatures appear, we are gravely told by Naude, that there is
a species of scorpion in Italy which is domesticated, and put between
the sheets to cool the beds during the heats of summer[194]!!

I must next say something of insects that annoy us solely by their
_jaws_. Of this description is _Galeodes araneoides_ which is related
to the scorpion, although devoid of a sting. The bite of this animal,
which is a native of the Cape of Good Hope and of Russia[195], is
represented to be often fatal both to man and beast. Another species
of _Galeodes_ is described by Professor Lichtenstein, which, from the
trivial name that he has given it (_fatalis_), may be supposed to be
as venomous as the former[196].

The bite of one of the centipedes (_Scolopendra morsitans_)--the
under-jaws, or rather arms, of which are armed with a strong
claw, furnished like the sting of the scorpion with an orifice,
visible under a common lens[197], from which poison issues--is less
tremendous than that of the animal last mentioned: but though not
mortal, its wounds are more painful than those produced by the sting
of the scorpion; and as these animals creep every where, even into
beds, they must be very annoying in warm climates where they abound.
Dr. Martin Lister, in his _Travels_, has given us a figure of an
insect related to this genus, that he saw in Plumier's collection,
which appears to have been eighteen inches in length, and three
quarters of an inch in width, having ninety-five legs on each side,
the first eight of which are armed with double claws, and two inches
of the tail being without legs. It may form a distinct genus, and is
probably a native of South America. Yet even this monstrous insect
is nothing to those at Carthagena, mentioned by Ulloa, (if indeed we
may credit his account, or if his translator has not mistaken his
meaning,) which sometimes exceeded a yard in length and five inches
in breadth! The bite of this gigantic serpent-like creature, he tells
us, is mortal, as well it may, if a timely remedy be not applied.
From its cylindrical form it should be a Julus[198].

In this catalogue of noxious insects I must not omit those which
every where force themselves upon our notice, and are viewed
with general disgust. I mean the numerous family of Arachne, the
insidious spiders. Few of these, however, are really personal
assailants of man. The principal is that which has given rise to so
much discussion, and has so much employed the pens of naturalists
and physicians--the famous _Tarentula_ (_Lycosa Tarentula_). The
effects ascribed to its wounds, and their wonderful cure supposed
to be wrought by music and dancing, have long been celebrated: but
after all there seems to have been more of fraud than of truth in
the business; and the whole evil appears to consist in swelling and
inflammation. Dr. Clavitio submitted to be bitten by this animal, and
no bad effects ensued; and the Count de Borch, a Polish nobleman,
bribed a man to undergo the same experiment, in whom the only result
was a swelling in the hand, attended by intolerable itching. The
fellow's sole remedy was a bottle of wine, which charmed away all his
pain without the aid of pipe and tabor[199].

There is however a spider (_Theridium_ 13_-guttatum_) the bite
of which is said to be very dangerous, and even mortal. Thiebaut
de Berneaud, in his _Voyage to Elba_[200], affirms that in the
Volterrano he knew that several country people and domestic animals
died in consequence of it. And according to Mr. Jackson, a spider,
called there the _Tendaraman_, is found in Marocco which has venomous
powers equally formidable. The bite of this insect, which is about
the size and colour of a hornet but rounder, and spins a web so fine
as to be almost invisible, is said to be so poisonous that the person
bitten survives but a few hours. In the cork forests the sportsman,
eager in his pursuit of game, frequently carries away on his garments
this fatal insect, which is asserted always to make towards the head
before inflicting its deadly wound[201].

       *       *       *       *       *

I suspect you will think this list long enough; and I believe it
includes the most remarkable insects that assail the surface of our
bodies, to answer either the demands of hunger or the stimulus of
revenge. There is however a third class of insect annoyers, as I
observed at the beginning of this letter, which, though they neither
make us their food, nor attack us under the impulse of fear or revenge,
incommode us extremely in other ways. These must now be detailed to you.

How extremely unpleasant is the sensation which that very minute fly,
_Thrips physapus_, excites in sultry weather, merely by creeping over
our skin! I have sometimes found this almost intolerable. A similar
torment reckoned by Ulloa a kind of Mosquito, infests the inhabitants
of Carthagena in South America. They are there called _Mantas blancas_,
and creeping between the threads of the gauze curtains that keep off
the former pest, though they do not bite, occasion an itching that
is dreadfully tormenting[202]. But these are nothing compared with
the teasing attacks of another gnat (_Simulium reptans_), which, as
Linne informs us, who misnamed it a Culex, is so incredibly numerous
in Lapland, as entirely to cover a man's body, turning a white
dress into a black one, occupying the whole atmosphere, filling the
mouth, nostrils, eyes, and ears of travellers, and thus preventing
respiration, and almost choking them. These little animals, he says, do
not bite, but torture incessantly by their titillation[203].--In New
South Wales a small ant was observed by Sir Joseph Banks, inhabiting
the roots of a plant, which when disturbed rushed out by myriads, and
running over the uncovered parts of the body produced a sensation of
this kind that was worse than pain.

The common house-fly is with us often sufficiently annoying at the
close of summer; but we know nothing of it as a tormentor compared
with the inhabitants of southern Europe.--"I met (says Arthur Young
in his interesting _Travels through France_) between Pradelles and
Thuytz, mulberries and flies at the same time; by the term _flies_
I mean those myriads of them which form the most disagreeable
circumstance of the southern climates. They are the first torments
in Spain, Italy, and the Olive district of France: it is not that
they bite, sting, or hurt, but they buzz, tease, and worry: your
mouth, eyes, ears, and nose, are full of them: they swarm on every
eatable,--fruit, sugar, milk, every thing is attacked by them in such
myriads, that if they are not incessantly driven away by a person who
has nothing else to do, to eat a meal is impossible. They are however
caught on prepared paper and other contrivances with so much ease and
in such quantities, that were it not from negligence, they could not
abound in such incredible quantities. If I farmed in these countries,
I think I should manure four or five acres every year with dead
flies.--I have been much surprised that the late learned Mr. Harmer
should think it odd to find, by writers who treated of southern
climates, that driving away flies was an object of importance. Had he
been with me in Spain and in Languedoc in July and August, he would
have been very far from thinking there was any thing odd in it[204]."

Our friend Captain Green, of the sixth regiment of the East India
Company's native troops, relates to me, that in India, when the mangoes
are ripe, which is the hottest part of the summer, a very minute black
fly makes its appearance, which, because it flies in swarms into the
eyes, is very troublesome, and causes much pain, is called there the
_eye-fly_. At this season the eyes are attacked by a disease, supposed
to be occasioned by eating the mangoes, but more probably the result of
the irritation produced by the fly in question, which, however, they
admit, carries the infection from one person to another.

You know that the hairs taken from the pods of _Dolichos pruriens_
and _urens_, L., commonly called _Cowhage_ and _Cow-itch_[205],
occasion a most violent itching, but perhaps are not aware
that those of the _caterpillars_ of several Moths will produce
the same disagreeable effect. One of these is the procession
moth, (_Lasiocampa processionea_) of which Reaumur has given so
interesting an account. In consequence of their short stiff hairs
sticking in his skin, after handling them, he suffered extremely
for several days; and being ignorant at first of the cause of the
itching, and rubbing his eyes with his hands, he brought on a
swelling of the eye-lids, so that he could scarcely open them. Ladies
were affected even by going too near the nest of the animal, and
found their necks full of troublesome tumours, occasioned by short
hairs, or fragments of hair, brought by the wind[206]. Of this nature
also is the famous Pityocampa of the ancients, the moth of the fir
(_Lasiocampa Pityocampa_), the hairs of which are said to occasion a
very intense degree of pain, heat, fever, itching and restlessness.
It was accounted by the Romans a very deleterious poison, as is
evident from the circumstance of the Cornelian law "_De sicariis_"
being extended to persons who administered _Pityocampa_[207].

In these cases the injury is the consequence of irritation produced by
the hair of the animal; but there are facts on record, which prove that
the juices of many insects are equally deleterious. Amoreux, from a
work of Turner, an English writer on cutaneous diseases, has given the
following remarkable history of the ill effects produced by those of
_spiders_. When Turner was a young practitioner, he was called to visit
a woman, whose custom it was, every time she went into the cellar with
a candle, to burn the spiders and their webs. She had often observed,
when she thus cruelly amused herself, that the odour of the burning
spiders had so much affected her head, that all objects seemed to turn
round, which was occasionally succeeded by faintings, cold sweats, and
slight vomitings: but, notwithstanding this, she found so much pleasure
in tormenting these poor animals, that nothing could cure her of this
madness, till she met with the following accident: The legs of one
of these unhappy spiders happened to stick in the candle, so that it
could not disengage itself; and, the body at length bursting, the venom
was ejaculated into the eyes and upon the lips of its persecutrix. In
consequence of this, one of the former became inflamed, the latter
swelled excessively, even the tongue and gums were slightly affected,
and a continual vomiting attended these symptoms. In spite of every
remedy the swelling of the lips continued to increase, till at length
an old woman, by the simple application for fifteen days of the leaves
and juice of plantain, together with some spider's web, ran away with
all the glory of the cure[208]. Ulloa gives us a remarkable account of
a species of spider, or perhaps mite, of a fiery red colour, common in
Popayan, called _Coya_ or _Coyba_, and usually found in the corners of
walls and among the herbage, the venom of which is of such malignity,
that on crushing the insect, if any fall on the skin of either man
or beast, it immediately penetrates into the flesh, and causes large
tumours, which are soon succeeded by death. Yet, he further observes,
if it be crushed between the palms of the hands, which are usually
callous, no bad consequence ensues. People who travel along the valleys
of the Neyba, where these insects abound, are warned by their Indian
attendants, if they feel any thing stinging them, or crawling on their
neck or face, not so much as to lift up their hand to the place, the
texture of the Coya being so delicate that the least force causes them
to burst, without which there is no danger, as they seem otherwise
harmless animals. The traveller points out the spot where he feels
the creature to one of his companions, who, if it be a Coya, blows
it away. If this account does not exaggerate the deleterious quality
of the juices of this insect, it is the most venomous animal that is
known; for he describes it as much smaller than a bug. The only remedy
to which the natives have recourse for preventing the ill effects
arising from its venom is, on the first appearance of the swelling, to
swing the patient over the flame of straw or long grass, which they do
with great dexterity: after this operation he is reckoned to be out of
danger[209].--The poisoned arrows which Indians employ against their
enemies have been long celebrated. The Coya may, in the western world,
have furnished the poison for this purpose. An author quoted in Lesser
tells us that an ant as big as a bee is sometimes used, and that the
wound inflicted by weapons tinctured with their venom is incurable.
Patterson also gives a recipe by which the natives of the southern
extremity of Africa prepare what they reckon the most effectual poison
for the point of their arrows. They mix the juice of a species of
Euphorbia, and a caterpillar that feeds on a kind of sumach (_Rhus_,
L.), and when the mixture is dried it is fit for use[210].

And now I think you will allow that I have made out a tolerable
list of insects that attack or annoy man's body externally, and a
sufficiently doleful history of them. That the subject, however, may
be complete, I shall next enumerate those that, not content with
afflicting him with _exterior_ pain or evil, whether on the surface
or under the skin, bore into his flesh, descend even into his stomach
and viscera; derange his whole system, and thus often occasion his
death. The punitive insects here employed are usually larvae of the
various orders, and they are the cause of that genus of diseases I
before noticed, and proposed to call _Scolechiasis_.

I shall begin my account with the first order of Linne, because people
in general seem not aware that any _beetles_ make their way into the
human _stomach_. Yet there is abundant evidence, which proves beyond
controversy that the meal-worm (_Tenebrio Molitor_), although its usual
food is flour, has often been voided both by male and female patients;
and in one instance is stated to have occasioned death[211]. How these
grubs should get into the stomach it is difficult to say--perhaps the
eggs may have been swallowed in some preparation of flour. But that
the animal should be able to sustain the heat of this organ, so far
exceeding the temperature to which it is usually accustomed, is the
most extraordinary circumstance of all.--Dr. Martin Lister, who to the
skill of the physician added the most profound knowledge of nature,
mentions an instance, communicated to him by Mr. Jessop, of a girl who
voided three hexapod larvae similar to what are found in the carcases
of birds[212], probably belonging either to the genus _Dermestes_, or
_Anthrenus_: and in the _German Ephemerides_ the case also of a girl
is recorded, from an abscess in the _calf_ of whose _leg_ crept black
worms resembling beetles[213].

The larvae of some beetle, as appears from the description, seem to
have been ejected even from the _lungs_. Four of these, of which the
largest was nearly three quarters of an inch long, were discovered in
the mucus expelled after a severe fit of coughing by a lady afflicted
with a pulmonary disease; and similar larvae of a smaller size were
once afterwards discharged in the same way[214].

No one would suppose that _caterpillars_, which feed upon vegetable
substances, could be met with alive in the stomach; yet Dr. Lister
gives an account of a boy who vomited up several, which, he observes,
had sixteen legs[215]. The eggs perhaps might have been swallowed
in salad; and, as vegetables make a part of most people's daily
diet, enough might have passed into the stomach to support them when
hatched.--Linne tells us that the caterpillar of a moth (_Aglossa
pinguinalis_), common in houses, has also been found in a similar
situation, and is one of the worst of our insect infesters.--In a
very old tract, which gives a figure of the insect, a caterpillar
of the almost incredible length of the middle finger is said to
have been voided from the _nostrils_ of a young man long afflicted
with dreadful pains in his head[216].--But the most extraordinary
account with respect to lepidopterous larvae (unless he has mistaken
his insects) is given by Azara, the Spanish traveller before quoted;
who says that in South America there is a large brown _moth_, which
deposits its young in a kind of saliva upon the flesh of persons who
sleep naked; these introduce themselves under the skin without being
perceived, where they occasion swelling attended by inflammation and
violent pain. When the natives discover it, they squeeze out the
larvae, which usually amount to five or six[217].

But amongst all the orders, none is more fruitful in devourers
of man than the _Diptera_. The Gad-fly (_Oestrus_, L.) you have,
doubtless, often heard of, and how sorely it annoys our cattle and
other quadrupeds; but I suspect have no notion that there is a
species appropriated to man. The existence, indeed, of this species
seems to have been overlooked by entomologists (though it stands in
Gmelin's edition of the _Systema Naturae_[218], upon the authority of
the younger Linne,) till Humboldt and Bonpland mentioned it again.
Speaking of the low regions of the torrid zone, where the air is
filled with those myriads of mosquitos which render uninhabitable
a great and beautiful portion of the globe, they observe that to
these may be joined the _Oestrus Hominis_, which deposits its eggs
in the skin of man, causing there painful tumours[219]. Gmelin
says that it remains beneath the skin of the abdomen six months,
penetrating deeper, if it be disturbed, and becoming so dangerous
as sometimes to occasion death. The imago he describes as being of
a brown colour, and about the size of the common house-fly; so that
it is a small species compared with the rest of the genus. Even
the gad-fly of the ox, leaving its proper food, has been known to
oviposit in the jaw of a woman, and the bots produced from the eggs
finally caused her death[220].--Other flies also of various kinds
thus penetrate into us, either preying upon our flesh, or getting
into our intestines. Leeuwenhoek mentions the case of a woman whose
leg had been enlarging with glandular bodies for some years. Her
surgeon gave him one that he had cut from it, in which were many
small maggots: these he fed with flesh till they assumed the pupa,
when they produced a fly as large as the flesh-fly[221].--A patient
of Dr. Reeve of Norwich, after suffering for some time great pain,
was at last relieved by voiding a considerable number of maggots,
which agree precisely with those described by De Geer as the larvae of
his _Musca domestica minor_, (_Anthomyia canicularis_, Meig.) a fly
which he speaks of as very common in apartments[222].--In Paraguay
the flesh-flies are said to be uncommonly numerous and noxious.
Azara relates[223] that, after a storm, when the heat was excessive,
he was assailed by such an army of them, that in less than half an
hour his clothes were quite white with their eggs, so that he was
forced to scrape them off with a knife; adding, that he has known
instances of persons, who, after having bled at the nose in their
sleep, were attacked by the most violent headaches; when at length
several great maggots, the offspring of these flies, issuing from
their nostrils, gave them relief.--In Jamaica a large blue fly buzzes
about the sick in the last stages of fever; and when they sleep or
doze with their mouths open, the nurses find it very difficult to
prevent these flies from laying their eggs in the nose, mouth, or
gums. An instance is recorded of a lady who, after recovering from
a fever, fell a victim to the maggots of this fly, which from the
nose found their way through the _os cribriforme_ into the cavity
of the skull, and afterwards into the brain[224]. One of the most
shocking cases of _Scolechiasis_ I ever met with is related in Bell's
_Weekly Messenger_ in the following words: "On Thursday, June 25,
died at Asbornby, (_Lincolnshire_) John Page, a pauper belonging
to Silk-Willoughby, under circumstances truly singular. He being
of a restless disposition, and not choosing to stay in the parish
workhouse, was in the habit of strolling about the neighbouring
villages, subsisting on the pittance obtained from door to door: the
support he usually received from the benevolent was bread and meat;
and after satisfying the cravings of nature, it was his custom to
deposit the surplus provision, particularly the meat, betwixt his
shirt and skin. Having a considerable portion of this provision in
store, so deposited, he was taken rather unwell, and laid himself
down in a field in the parish of Scredington--when from the heat of
the season at that time, the meat speedily became putrid, and was
of course struck by the flies: these not only proceeded to devour
the inanimate pieces of flesh, but also literally to prey upon the
living substance; and when the wretched man was accidentally found
by some of the inhabitants, he was so eaten by the maggots that his
death seemed inevitable. After clearing away as well as they were
able these shocking vermin, those who found Page conveyed him to
Asbornby, and a surgeon was immediately procured, who declared that
his body was in such a state that dressing it must be little short of
instantaneous death; and in fact the man did survive the operation
but a few hours. When first found, and again when examined by the
surgeon, he presented a sight loathsome in the extreme; white maggots
of enormous size were crawling in and upon his body, which they
had most shockingly mangled, and the removing of the external ones
served only to render the sight more horrid[225]."--A medical friend
of mine, at Ipswich, gave me this winter an apode larva voided by a
person of that place with his urine, which I now preserve in spirits
and can show you when you visit me. It appears to me to belong to
the _Diptera_ order, yet not to the fly tribes (_Tanystoma_, Latr.),
but rather to the _Tipulariae_ of that author, with which however it
does not seem to agree so entirely as to take away all doubt. It is
a very singular larva, and I can find none in any author that I have
had an opportunity of consulting which at all resembles it. That you
may know it, should you chance to meet with it, I shall here describe
it. _Body_, three fourths of an inch in length, and about a line in
breadth; opaque, of a pale yellow colour; cylindrical, tapering
somewhat at each extremity; consisting of twenty articulations
without the head: _Head_ reddish brown, heartshaped, much smaller
than the following joint; armed with two unguiform mandibles; with a
biarticulate palpus attached exteriorly to the base of each. These
mandibles appear to be moved by a narrow black central tendon under
the dorsal skin terminating a little beyond the base of the first
segment; besides this, there are four others, two on each side of
it, the outer ones diverging, much slenderer, and very short. The
last or anal joint of the body very minute; exerting two short,
filiform horns, or rather respiratory organs. I could discover, in
this animal, no respiratory plates, such as are found in the larvae
of _Muscidae_, _&c._ nor were the tracheae visible. When given to me,
it was alive and extremely active, writhing itself into various
contortions with great agility. It moved, like other dipterous larvae,
by means of its mandibles. Upon wetting my fingers more than once, to
take it up when it had fallen from a table upon which it was placed,
the saline taste with which it was imbued was so powerful that it
was some time before it was dissipated from my mouth.--I shall only
mention one more instance, because it is a singular one. The larva
of _Helophilus pendulus_, a fly peculiarly formed by nature for
inhabiting fluids, has been found in the stomach of a woman[226].

You will smile when I tell you that I have met with the prescription
of a famous urine-doctor, in which he recommends to his credulous
patient to take a certain number of _sow bugs_ per diem, by this
name distinguishing, as I suppose, the pill-millepede (_Armadillo
vulgaris_), once a very favourite remedy. What effect they produced
in this case I was not informed; but the learned Bonnet relates that
he had seen a certificate of an English physician, dated July 1763,
stating that, some time before, a young woman who had swallowed these
animals alive, as is usually done, threw up a prodigious number of
them of all sizes, which must have bred in her stomach[227].--Another
apterous species appears to have been detected in a still more
remarkable situation. Hermann, the author of the admirable _Memoire
Apterologique_, whose untimely death is so much to be lamented, informs
us that an Acarus figured and described in his work (_A. marginatus_),
was observed by his artist running on the _corpus callosum_ of the
_brain_ of a patient in the military hospital at Strasbourg, which
had been opened but a minute before and the two hemispheres and the
_pia mater_ just separated. He adds that this is not the first time
that insects have been found in the brain. Cornelius Gemma, in his
_Cosmocritica_, p. 241, says that on dissecting the brain of a woman
there were found in it abundance of vermicles and _punaises_[228].

It was customary in many countries in ancient times to punish certain
malefactors by exposing them to be devoured by wild beasts: but
to expose them to _insects_ for the same purpose was a refinement
in cruelty, which seems to have been peculiar to the despots of
Persia. We are informed that the most severe punishment amongst the
Persians was that of shutting up the offender between two boats of
equal size; they laid him in one of them upon his back, and covered
him with the other, his hands, feet, and head being left bare. His
face, which was placed full in the sun, they moistened with honey,
thus inviting the flies and wasps, which tormented him no less than
the swarms of maggots that were bred in his excrements and body, and
devoured him to the very entrails. He was compelled to take as much
food as was necessary to support life, and thus existed sometimes for
several days. Plutarch informs us that Mithridates, whom Artaxerxes
Longimanus condemned to this punishment, lived seventeen days in
the utmost agony; and that, the uppermost boat being taken off at
his death, they found his flesh all consumed, and myriads of worms
gnawing his bowels[229]. Could any natural objects be made more
horrible and effectual instruments of torture than _insects_ were in
this most diabolical invention of tyranny?

In this enumeration of evils derived from insects, I must not wholly
pass over the serious and sometimes fatal effects produced upon some
persons by eating honey, or even by drinking mead. I once knew a lady
upon whom these acted like poison, and have heard of instances in
which death was the consequence. Sometimes, when bees extract their
honey from poisonous plants, such results have not been confined to
individuals of a particular habit or constitution. A remarkable proof
of this is given by Dr. Barton in the fifth volume of _The American
Philosophical Transactions_. In the autumn and winter of the year
1790, an extensive mortality was produced amongst those who had
partaken of the honey collected in the neighbourhood of Philadelphia.
The attention of the American Government was excited by the general
distress, a minute inquiry into the cause of the mortality ensued,
and it was satisfactorily ascertained that the honey had been chiefly
extracted from the flowers of _Kalmia latifolia_.

Amongst other _direct_ injuries occasioned by these creatures, perhaps,
out of regard for the ladies, I ought to notice the alarm which many of
them occasion to the loveliest part of the creation. When some females
retire from society to avoid a wasp; others faint at the sight of a
spider; and others, again, die with terror if they hear a death-watch:
these groundless apprehensions and superstitious alarms are as much
real evils to those who feel them, as if they were well founded. But
having already adverted to this subject, I shall here only quote the
observation of a wise man, that "Fear is a betraying of the succours
that reason offereth[230]." The best remedy, therefore, in such cases
is going to reason for succour. In a few instances, indeed, the evil
may take root in a constitutional defect, for there seems to be some
foundation for the doctrine of natural antipathies: but, generally
speaking, in consequence of the increased attention to Natural History,
the reign of imaginary evils is ceasing amongst us, and what used
to shake the stout hearts of our superstitious ancestors with anile
terrors, is become a subject of interesting inquiry to their better
informed descendants, even of the weaker sex.

And now, my friend, I flatter myself you feel disposed to own the
truth of my position, however it might startle you at first, and will
candidly acknowledge that I have proved the empire of these despised
insects over man's person: and that, instead of being a race of
insignificant creatures, which we may safely overlook, as having no
concern with, they may, in the hands of Divine Providence, and even
of man, become to us fearful instruments of evil and of punishment. I
shall next endeavour to give you some idea of the _indirect_ injuries
which they occasion us by attacking our property, or interfering with
our pleasure or comfort--but this must be the subject of another letter.

                                                  I am, &c.

FOOTNOTES:

[106] Joel ii. 25.

[107] _On the Blight in Corn_, p. 9.

[108] Leeuw. _Epist._ 98. 1696.

[109] Bingley, _Anim. Biogr._ first edition, iii. 437. St. Pierre's
_Studies_, &c. i. 312.

[110] _Hist. Animal._ l. 5. c. 31.

[111] From the terms employed by Aristotle and Dr. Mead in their
Account of these cases, it appears that the animal they meant could not
be maggots, but something bearing a more general resemblance to lice.

[112] _On Cutaneous Diseases_, 87, 88; and _t._ 7. _f._ 4.

[113] Latreille at first considered this as belonging to a distinct
genus from the common mite (_Acarus domesticus_), which he named
_Sarcoptes_; but upon its being discovered that it also has
mandibles, he has suppressed it. _N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat._ xxi. 221.

[114] _On Morbid Poisons_, 306, 307.

[115] Mouffet, 267.

[116] _Medica Sacra_, 104, 105.

[117] It is to be hoped this new word may be admitted, as the _laying
of eggs_ cannot otherwise be expressed without a periphrasis. For the
same reason its substantive _Oviposition_ will be employed.

[118] _Mem. Apterologique_, 19.

[119] Insecta ejusmodi minutissima, forte _Acaros_ diversae speciei
causas esse diversorum morborum contagiosorum, ab analogia et
experientia hactenus acquisita, facili credimus negotio. _Amoen. Ac._
v. 94.

[120] _Amoen. Ae._ v. 94-98.

[121] Mouffet, 266.

[122] Acarus sub ipsa pustula minime quaerendus est, sed longius
recessit, sequendo rugam cuticulae observatur. _Amoen. Ac._ v. 95.
not. **.

[123] _Observations_, &c. 296.

[124] Extractus acu et super ungue positus, movet se si solis etiam
calore adjuvetur. _ubi supr._ Ungui impositus vix movetur: si vero oris
calido halitu affletur, agilis in ungue cursitat. _Fn. Suec._ 1975.

[125] Neque Syrones isti sunt de pediculorum genere, ut Johannes
Langius ex Aristotele videtur asserere: nam illi extra cutem vivunt,
hi vero non. _ubi supr._

[126] Imo ipsi _Acari_ prae exiguitate indivisibiles, ex cuniculis prope
aquae lacum quos foderunt in cute, acu extracti et ungue impositi, caput
rubrum, et pedes quibus gradiuntur ad solem produnt. p. vi.

[127] Teredo sive exiguus vermiculus, qui subter cutim erodit agitque
cuniculos in pruriginosis manibus. Gouldman tells us these _Acari_
were also called _Hand-worms_. Another English name is given in
Mouffet, viz. _Wheale-worms_.

[128] _Osservazioni intorno a pellicelli del corpo umano fatte dal
Dottor_ Gio Cosimo Bonomo, &c. _f._ 1-3. Baker _On Microsc._ i. _t._
13. _f._ 2.

[129] De Geer, vii. _t._ 5. _f._ 12. 14.

[130] _Mem. Apterologique_, 79.

[131] I am informed by my learned friend Alexander MacLeay, Esq. late
Secretary to the Linnean Society, that, in the north of Scotland, the
insect of the itch is well known, and easily discovered and extracted.

[132] This opinion Dr. Bateman thinks probably the true one. _Cutan.
Dis._ 197.

[133] It may be mentioned here as a remarkable fact, that the _Acarus
Scabiei_ was discovered by M. Latreille upon a New Holland quadruped
(_Phascolomys fusca_, Geoffr.) of the Marsupian tribe. _N. Dict.
d'Hist. Nat._ xxi. 222.

[134] _Amoen. Ac._ ubi supr. 101.

[135] _Traites de Chirurgie_, &c. Leipsig. 1792.

[136] _Mem. Apterolog._ 78.

[137] _In Artaxerx._

[138] _Il._ [Greek: ch]. l. 599. [Greek: o] l. 414.

[139] [Greek: Ta de entoma panta skolekotokei]. _De Generat. Animal._
l. 2. c. 1.

[140] _Il._ [Greek: u]. l. 654-5.

[141] [Greek: Ges entera]. _De Animal. Incessu_, c. 9. _De Generat.
Animal._ l. 3. c. 11.

[142] Mark ix. 44. 46. 48.

[143] [Greek: Skolekobrotos]. Acts xii. 23.

[144] Linn. _Lach. Lapp._ ii. 32. note *.

[145] Latreille after De Geer (vii. 153--.) supposes the _Pique_ and
_Nigua_ of Ulloa to be synonymous with _Ixodes americanus_, L. _Hist.
Nat._ vii. 364. but it is evident from _Ulloa's_ description (_Voy._
i. 63. Engl. Trans.) that they are synonymous with the _Chigoe_, or
_Pulex penetrans_.

[146] See above p. 50.

[147] Captain Hancock, late commander of His Majesty's ship the
Foudroyant, to whose friendly exertions I am indebted for one of the
finest collections of Brazil insects ever brought to England, informs
me that they will attack any exposed part of the body. He had them
once in his hand.

[148] Piso and Margr. _Ind._ 289.

[149] p. 65.

[150] _Personal Narrative_, E. T. v. 101.

[151] _Natural. Miscell._, ii. t. 42.

[152] Lindley in the _Royal Military Chronicle_ for March 1815, p. 459.

[153] I owe this information to the late Robinson Kittoe, Esq.
formerly clerk of the Cheque in the King's Yard, Woolwich.

[154] Lesser _L._ ii. 222, note *.

[155] De Geer, vii. 154-60.

[156] _Theatr. Ins._ 270. This happened in 1503; which circumstance
refutes Southall's opinion that bugs were not known in England before
1670.

[157] Rai. _Hist. Ins._ 7. Mouffet. 269. They were called also
_punez_, from the French _punaise_.

[158] Hence our English word _Bug-bear_. In Matthews's _Bible_, Ps.
xci. 5. is rendered, "Thou shalt not nede to be afraid of any _bugs_ by
night." The word in this sense often occurs in Shakespear. _Winter's
Tale_, act iii. sc. 2. 3. _Hen._ VI. act v. sc. 2. _Hamlet_, act v. sc.
2. See Douce's _Illustrations of Shakespear_, i. 329.

[159] The Banian hospital at Surat is a most remarkable institution.
At my visit, the hospital contained horses, mules, oxen, sheep,
goats, monkeys, poultry, pigeons, and a variety of birds. The most
extraordinary ward was that appropriated to rats and mice, _bugs_,
and other noxious vermin. The overseers of the hospital frequently
hire beggars from the streets, for a stipulated sum, to pass a night
amongst the _fleas_, _lice_, and _bugs_, on the express condition of
suffering them to enjoy their feast without molestation. Forbes's
_Oriental Memoirs_.

[160] Nicholson's _Journal_, xvii. 40.

[161] Proboscis in cutem intrusa acerrimum dolorem excitat, qui tamen
brevi cessat. Rai. _Hist. Ins._ 58.

[162] One took eight drops from Reaumur, iv. 230. PLATE VII. FIG. 5.

[163] Bartram's _Travels_, 383.

[164] i. 127. The West India sand-fly was noticed by the late Robinson
Kittoe, Esq., who however did not recollect their fetching blood.

[165] See above, p. 48-49.

[166] _Travels_, &c. i. 126.

[167] See Curtis' _Brit. Ent._ t. 122.

[168] It has been generally supposed by naturalists, that the
Mosquitos of America belong to the Linnean genus _Culex_; but the
celebrated traveller Humboldt asserts that the term _Mosquito_,
signifying a _little fly_, is applied there to a _Simulium_, Latr.
(_Simulia_, Meig.), and that the _Culices_, which are equally
numerous and annoying, are called _Zancudoes_, which means _long
legs_. The former, he says, are what the French call _Moustiques_,
and the latter _Maringouins_. _Personal Narrative_, E. T. v. 93.

[169] Plin. _Hist. Nat._ l. xi. c. 28. Aristot. _Hist. Animal._ l. i.
c. 5.

[170] Pliny was aware of this double office of the proboscis of a
gnat, and has well described it. "Telum vero perfodiendo tergori
quo spiculavit ingenio? Atque ut in capaci, cum cerni non possit
exilitas, ita reciproca geminavit arte, ut _fodiendo_ acuminatum
pariter _sorbendoque_ fistulosum esset." _Hist. Nat._ l. xi. c. 2.

[171] Humboldt has described several South American species.
_Personal Narrative_, v. 97. note *. Engl. Tr.

[172] Germar's _Magazin der Entomologie_, i. 137.

[173] _Philos. Trans._ 1767, 111-13. I once witnessed a similar
appearance at Maidstone in Kent.

[174] Weld's _Travels_, 8vo. edit. 205. Yet Mouffet affirms the same:
"Morsu crudeles et venenati, triplices caligas, imo _ocreas_, item
perforantes." 81.

[175] Acerbi's _Travels_, ii. 5. 34-5. 51. Linn. _Flor. Lapp._ 380-1.
_Lach. Lapp._ ii. 108. De Geer, vi. 303-4.

[176] Reaum. iv. 573.

[177] Dr. Clarke's _Travels_, i. 388.

[178] Jackson's _Marocco_, 57.

[179] _Travels_, ii. 93. Mr. W. S. MacLeay, in a letter I recently
received from him, observes, speaking of his residence at the Havana;
"The disagreeables are ants, scorpions, mygales, and mosquitos. The
latter were quite a pest on my first arrival within the tropics; but
now I mind them about as much as I did _gnats_ in England."

[180] Humboldt's _Personal Narrative_, E. T. v. 87-. Most writers
by the term mosquitos mean gnats; and for them it is here chiefly
employed, but may be regarded as including both plagues.

[181] Theodorit. _Hist. Eccl._ 1. ii. c. 30.

[182] Mouffet, 85. Amoreux, 119.

[183] Viz. _Mosquito_ Bay in St. Christopher's; _Mosquitos_, a town
in the Island of Cuba; and the _Mosquito_ country in North America.

[184] Mouffet, 85.

[185] Deut. vii. 20. Josh. xxiv. 12.

[186] Amoreux, 242.

[187] _Philos. Trans._ i. 201.

[188] Hawkesworth's _Cook_, iii. 223.

[189] Stedman, ii. 94.

[190] Bingley, iii. 385, first edit.

[191] Knox's _Ceylon_, 24.

[192] Stedman, ii. 142.

[193] Ulloa's _Voy._ i. 61, 62. Dr. Clarke's _Travels_, i. 486.
Amoreux, 197. Mr. W. S. MacLeay relates to me that soon after his
arrival at the Havana he was stung by an immense scorpion, but was
agreeably surprised to find the pain considerably less than the sting
of a wasp, and of incomparably shorter duration.

[194] Andrews's _Anecdotes_, 427. See on the subject of Scorpions
Amoreux, 41-54. 176-205.

[195] Fab. _Suppl._ 294. 2.

[196] _Catal. Ham._ 1797. 151-195.

[197] PLATE VII. FIG. 13. _a"_.

[198] Ulloa's _Voyage_, i. 61.

[199] Amoreux, 217-226. See also 67-70.

[200] p. 31.

[201] Jackson's _Marocco_, second edit.

[202] Ulloa, i. 64. Probably the _Cafafi_, a white fly noticed by
Humboldt, is synonymous with this of Ulloa, which could only be
prevented from creeping between the threads of the curtains by
keeping them wet. _Personal Narrative_, E. T. v. 107.

[203] _Lach. Lapp._ i. 208, 209. _Fl. Lapp._ 382, 383. It appears
however, from other authors, that they do bite.

[204] Young's _Travels in France_, i. 298. These flies are equally
troublesome and tormenting in Sweden. See _Amoen. Acad._ iii. 343.

[205] Cowhage has been administered with success as an
_anthelminthic_, as has likewise spun glass pounded; the spicula of
these substances destroying the worms. The hair of the caterpillars
here alluded to, and perhaps also of the larva of _Euprepia Caja_,
(the Tiger-Moth,) might probably be equally efficacious.

[206] Reaum. ii. 191-5.

[207] Mouffet, 185. Plin. _Hist. Nat._ l. xxxviii. c. 9. Amoreux, 158.

[208] Amoreux, 210-212.

[209] Ulloa's Voyage, b. vi. c. 3. Hamilton (_Travels in Colombia_,
as quoted in the Literary Gazette, April 28, 1827.) also mentions a
spider called the _Caya_, rather large, found in the broken ground
and among the rocks, from the body of which a poison so active is
emitted, that men and mules have died in an hour or two after the
venomous moisture had fallen on them. This is evidently the same
insect with that mentioned by Ulloa, and confirms the above account
of its venomous effects.

[210] Waterton (_Wanderings in S. America_, 53.) gives the recipe
by which the Macousho Indians prepare the poison, in which they dip
their arrows. It consists of a vine called the Wourali, which is the
principal ingredient; the roots and stalks of some other plants;
two species of ants, the sting of one of which is so venomous that
it produces a fever; a quantity of the strongest Indian pepper
(_Capsicum_), and the pounded fangs of two kinds of serpents.

[211] Tulpius, _Obs. Med._ l. ii. c. 51. t. 7. f. 3. _Edinb. Med. and
Surg. Journ._ n. 35. 42-48. Derham, _Physic. Theol._ 378. note _b._
Lowthorp, _Philos. Trans._ iii. 135.

[212] _Philos. Trans._ 1665. x. 391. Shaw's _Abridg._ ii. 224.

[213] Mead, _Med. Sacr._ 105.

[214] _London Medical Review_, v. 340.

[215] _Philos. Trans._ ubi supra.

[216] Fulvius Angelinus et Vincentius Alsarius _De verme admirando
per nares egresso_. Ravennae 1610.

[217] Azara, 217. I cannot help suspecting this to be synonymous with
the _Oestrus Hominis_ next mentioned.

[218] From Pallas _N. Nord. Beytr._ i. 157.

[219] _Essai sur la Geograph. des Plantes_, 136.

[220] Clark in _Linn. Trans._ iii. 323, note.

[221] Leeuw. _Epist._ Oct. 17, 1687.

[222] _Edinb. Med. and Surg. Journ._ ubi supra. De Geer, vi. 26, 27.

[223] 216.

[224] Lempriere _On the Diseases of the Army in Jamaica_, ii. 182.

[225] In passing through this parish last spring, I inquired of the
mail-coachman whether he had heard of this story; and he said the
fact was well known.

[226] _Philos. Mag._ ix. 366.

[227] Bonnet, v. 144.

[228] _Mem. Apterolog._ 79.

[229] _Universal History_, iv. 70. Ed. 1779.

[230] Wisd. xvii. 12.




                               LETTER V.

                     _INJURIES CAUSED BY INSECTS._

                           INDIRECT INJURIES.


Having detailed to you the _direct_ injuries which we suffer from
insects, I am now to call your attention to their _indirect_ attacks
upon us, or the injury which they do our property; and under this
view also you will own, with the fullest conviction, that they
are not beings that can with prudence or safety be disregarded or
despised. Our property, at least that part exposed to the annoyance
of these creatures, may be regarded as consisting of animal and
vegetable productions, and that in two states; when they are living,
namely, and after they are dead. I shall therefore endeavour to
give you a sketch of the mischief which they occasion, first to our
_living animal_ property, then to our _living vegetable_ property;
and lastly to our _dead stock_, whether animal or vegetable.

Next to our own persons, the _animals_ which we employ in our
business or pleasures, or fatten for food, individually considered,
are the most valuable part of our possessions--and at certain
seasons, hosts of insects of various kinds are incessant in their
assaults upon most of them.--To begin with that noble animal the
_horse_.--See him, when turned out to his pasture, unable to touch
a morsel of the food he has earned by his labours. He flies to the
shade, evidently in great uneasiness, where he stands continually
stamping from the pain produced by the insertion of the weapons
sheathed in the proboscis of a little fly (_Stomoxys calcitrans_)
before noticed as attacking ourselves[231]. This alights upon him
sometimes in one place and sometimes in another, and never lets
him rest while the day lasts.--See him again when in harness and
travelling. He is bathed in blood flowing from innumerable wounds
made by the knives and lancets of various horse-flies (_Tabanus_,
L.), which assail him as he goes, and allow him no respite[232];
and consider that even this is nothing to what he suffers in other
climates from the same pest. In North America, vast clouds of
different species--so abundant as to obscure every distant object,
and so severe in their bite as to merit the appellation of burning
flies--cover and torment the horses to such a degree as to excite
compassion even in the hearts of the pack-horsemen. Some of them are
nearly as big as humble-bees; and, when they pierce the skin and
veins of the unhappy beast, make so large an orifice that, besides
what they suck, the blood flows down its neck, sides, and shoulders
in large drops like tears, till, to use Bartram's expression, "they
are all in a gore of blood." Both the dog-tick and the American tick
before mentioned, especially the latter, also infest the horse. Kalm
affirms, that he has seen the under parts of the belly, and other
places of the body, so covered by them, that he could not introduce
the point of a knife between them. They were deeply buried in the
flesh; and in one instance that he witnessed, the miserable creature
was so exhausted by continual suction, that it fell, and afterwards
died in great agonies[233].

No quadruped is more infested by the gad-fly, sometimes also
improperly called the breese[234], than the horse. In this country
no fewer than three species attack it. The most common sort, known
by the name of the horse-bee (_Gasterophilus Equi_), deposits its
eggs (which being covered with a slimy substance adhere to the hairs)
on such parts of the body as the animal can reach with its tongue;
and thus, unconscious of what it is doing, it unwarily introduces
into its own citadel the troops of its enemy.--Another species (_G.
haemorrhoidalis_) is still more troublesome to it, ovipositing upon
the lips; and in its endeavours to effect this, from the excessive
titillation it occasions, giving the poor beast the most distressing
uneasiness. At the sight of this fly horses are always much agitated,
tossing their heads about in the air to drive it away; and, if this
does not answer, galloping off to a distant part of their pasture,
and, as their last resource, taking refuge in the water, where the
gad-flies never follow them. We learn from Reaumur, that in France
the grooms, when they observe any bots (which is the vulgar name for
the larvae and pupae of these flies) about the anus of a horse or in
its dung, thrust their hand into the passage to search for more; but
this seems a useless precaution, which must occasion the animal great
pain to answer no good end: for when the bots are passing through
the body, having ceased feeding, they can do no further injury. In
Sweden, as De Geer informs us, they act much more sensibly: those
that have the care of horses are accustomed to clean their mouths
and throats with a particular kind of brush, by which method they
free them from these disagreeable inmates before they have got into
the stomach, or can be at all prejudicial to them[235].

Providence has doubtless created these animals to answer some
beneficial purpose; and Mr. Clark's judicious conjectures are an
index which points to the very kind of good our cattle may derive
from them, as acting the part of perpetual stimuli or blisters: yet
when they exceed certain limits, as is often the case with similar
animals employed for purposes equally beneficial, they become
certainly the causes of disease, and sometimes of death.

How troublesome and teasing is that cloud of flies (_Anthomyia
meteorica_) which you must often have noticed in your summer rides,
hovering round the head and neck of your horse, accompanying him as he
goes, and causing a perpetual tossing of the former[236]!--And still
more annoying in Lapland, as we learn from Linne[237], is the furious
assault of the minute horse-gnat, (_Culex equinus_, L.) which infests
these beasts in infinite numbers, running under the mane and amongst
the hair, and piercing the skin to suck their blood.--An insect of the
same genus is related to attack them in a particular district in India
in so tremendous a manner as to cause incurable cancers, which finally
destroy them[238].--But of all the insect tormentors of these useful
creatures, there is none more trying to them than the forest-fly
(_Hippobosca equina_). Attaching themselves to the parts least covered
with hair, particularly under the belly between the hind legs, they
irritate the quietest horse, and make him kick so as often to hazard
the safety of his rider or driver. This singular animal runs sideways
or backwards like a crab; and, being furnished with an unusual number
of claws, it adheres so firmly that it is not easy to take it off;
and even if you succeed in this, its substance is so hard, that by
the utmost pressure of your finger and thumb it is difficult to kill
it; and if you let it go with life, it will immediately return to the
charge.--Amongst the insect plagues of horses, I should also have
enumerated the larva of _Lixus paraplecticus_, which Linne considers
as the cause of the equine disease, called in Sweden, after the
_Phellandrium aquaticum_, "_Stakra_," had not the observations of the
accurate De Geer rendered it doubtful whether the insect be at all
connected with this malady[239].

Another quadruped contributing greatly to our domestic comfort, from
which we derive a considerable portion of our animal food, and which,
on account of its patient and laborious character when employed in
agriculture, is an excellent substitute for the horse, (you will
directly perceive I am speaking of the _ox_, whether male or female,)
is also not exempt from insect domination. At certain seasons the whole
terrified herd, with their tails in the air, or turned upon their
backs, or stiffly stretched out in the direction of the spine, gallop
about their pastures, making the country re-echo with their lowings,
and finding no rest till they get into the water. Their appearance and
motions are at this time so grotesque, clumsy, and seemingly unnatural,
that we are tempted rather to laugh at the poor beasts than to pity
them, though evidently in a situation of great terror and distress. The
cause of all this agitation and restlessness is a small gad-fly (_Oe.
Bovis_), less than the horse-bee, the object of which, though it be not
to bite them, but merely to oviposit in their hides, is not put into
execution without giving them considerable pain.

When oxen are employed in agriculture, the attack of this fly is
often attended with great danger, since they then become perfectly
unmanageable; and, whether in harness or yoked to the plough, will
run directly forward. At the season when the Oestrus infests them,
close attention should be paid, and their harness so constructed that
they may easily be let loose.

Reaumur has minutely described the ovipositor, or singular organ by
which these insects are enabled to bore a round hole in the skin of
the animal and deposit their eggs in the wound. The anus of the female
is furnished with a tube of a corneous substance, consisting of four
pieces, which, like the pieces of a telescope, are retractile within
each other. The last of these terminates in five points, three of which
are longer than the others, and hooked: when united together they form
an instrument very much like an auger or gimlet; only, having these
points, it can bite with more effect[240]. He thinks the infliction
of the wound is not attended by much pain, except where very sensible
nerves are injured, when the animal, appearing to be seized with a
kind of phrensy, begins to gambol, and run with such swiftness that
nothing can stop it. From this semblance of temporary madness in oxen
when pursued and bored by the Oestrus, the Greeks applied the term
to any sudden fit of fury or violent impulse in the human species,
calling such ebullitions an _Oestrus_. The female fly is observed to
be very expeditious in oviposition, not more than a few seconds; and
while she is performing the operation, the animal attempts to lash her
off, as it does other flies, with its tail. The circular hole, made
by the auger just described, always continues open, and increases in
diameter as the larva increases in size; thus enabling it to receive a
sufficient supply of air by means of its anal respiratory plates, which
are usually near the orifice.--But though these insects thus torment
and terrify our cattle, they do them no material injury. Indeed they
occasion considerable tumours under the skin, where the bots reside,
varying in number from three or four to thirty or forty; but these seem
unattended by any pain, and are so far from being injurious, that they
are rather regarded as proofs of the goodness of the animal, since
these flies only attack young and healthy subjects. The tanners also
prefer those hides that have the greatest number of bot-holes in them,
which are always the best and strongest[241].

The Stomoxys, and several of the other flies before enumerated, as
well as the dog and American ticks, are as prejudicial to the ox as
to the horse. One species of Hippobosca I have reason to believe is
appropriated to them; yet, since a single specimen only has hitherto
been taken[242], little can be said with respect to it.--A worse
pest than any hitherto enumerated, is a minute fly, concerning the
genus of which there is some doubt, Fabricius considering it as a
Rhagio, (_R. columbaschensis_,) and Latreille as a Simulium[243]; but
to whatever genus it may belong, it is certainly a most destructive
little creature. In Servia and the Bannat it attacks the cattle in
infinite numbers, penetrates, according to Fabricius, their generative
organs, but according to other accounts their nose and ears, and by its
poisonous bite destroys them in the short space of four or five hours.
Much injury was sustained in 1813 from this insect in the palatinate
of Arad in Hungary and in the Bannat; in Banlack not fewer than two
hundred horned cattle perishing from its attacks, and in Versetz, five
hundred. It appears towards the latter end of April or beginning of May
in such indescribable swarms as to resemble clouds, proceeding as some
think from the region of Mehadia, but according to others from Turkey.
Its approach is the signal for universal alarm. The cattle fly from
their pastures; and the herdsman hastens to shut up his cows in the
house, or, when at a distance from home, to kindle fires, the smoke of
which is found to drive off this terrible assailant. Of this the cattle
are sensible, and as soon as attacked run towards the smoke, and are
generally preserved by it[244].

Tabani in this country do not seem to annoy our oxen so much as they
do our horses: perhaps for this immunity they may be indebted to the
thickness of their hides; but Virgil's beautiful description of the
annoyance that the Grecian Oestrus, called by the Romans Asilus,
belongs evidently to one of the _Tabanidae_. As the passage has not
been very correctly translated, I shall turn poet on the occasion,
and attempt to give it you in a new dress.

          Through waving groves where Selo's torrent flows,
          And where, Alborno, thy green Ilex grows,
          Myriads of insects flutter in the gloom,
          (Oestrus in Greece, Asilus named at Rome,)
          Fierce and of cruel hum. By the dire sound
          Driven from the woods and shady glens around
          The universal herds in terror fly;
          Their lowings shake the woods and shake the sky,
          And <DW64>'s arid shore----

In some parts of Africa also insects of this tribe do incredible
mischief. What would you think, should you be told that one species
of fly drives both inhabitants and their cattle from a whole
district? Yet the terrible _Tsaltsalya_ or _Zimb_ of Bruce (and the
world seems now disposed to give more credit to the accounts of that
traveller) has power to produce such an effect. This fly, which is
a native of Abyssinia, both from its habits and the figure, appears
to belong to the _Tabanidae_, and perhaps is congenerous with the
_Oestrus_ of the Greeks[245].

Small as this insect is, we must acknowledge the elephant,
rhinoceros, lion and tiger vastly his inferior. The appearance,
nay the very sound of it occasions more trepidation, movements and
disorder both in the human and brute creation, than whole herds of
the most ferocious wild beasts in tenfold greater numbers than they
ever are would produce. As soon as this plague appears, and their
buzzing is heard, all the cattle forsake their food, and run wildly
about the plain till they die worn out with fatigue, fright, and
hunger. No remedy remains for the residents on such spots but to
leave the black earth and hasten down to the sands of Atbara, and
there they remain while the rains last. Camels, and even elephants
and rhinoceroses, though the two last coat themselves with an armour
of mud, are attacked by this winged assassin and afflicted with
numerous tumours. All the inhabitants of the sea-coast of Melinda
down to Cape Gardefui, to Saba and the south of the Red Sea, are
obliged in the beginning of the rainy season to remove to the next
sand to prevent all their stock of cattle from being destroyed. This
is no partial emigration--the inhabitants of all the countries from
the mountains of Abyssinia northward, to the confluence of the Nile
and Astaboras, are once a year obliged to change their abode and seek
protection in the sands of Beja; nor is there any alternative or
means of avoiding this, though a hostile band were in the way capable
of spoiling them of half their substance[246]. This fly is truly a
Beelzebub[247]: and perhaps it was this, or some species related to
it, that was the prototype of the Philistine idol worshiped under
that name and in the form of a fly.

I must not conclude this subject of insects hurtful to our cattle,
without noticing a beetle much talked of by the ancients for its
mischievous properties in this respect. You will soon and rightly
conjecture that I am speaking of the Buprestis[248], so called from
the injury which it has been supposed to occasion to oxen or kine.

Modern writers have been much divided in their opinion to what genus
this celebrated insect belongs. All indeed have regarded it as of the
_Coleoptera_ order; but here their agreement ceases. Linne should
seem to have looked upon it as a species of the genus to which he has
given its name; but these, being timber insects, are not very likely
to be swallowed by cattle with their food. Geoffroy thinks it to be a
_Carabus_ or _Cicindela_, but with as little reason, since the species
of these genera do not feed amongst the herbage; and though they are
sometimes found running there, yet their motions are so rapid, that it
is not very likely that cattle would often swallow them while feeding.

M. Latreille, in an ingenious essay on this insect[249], suspects
it to belong to the genus _Meloee_, and as this feeds upon herbs,
(_M. Proscarabaeus_ and _M. violaceus_, upon the Ranunculi, so widely
disseminated in our pastures,) his opinion seems to rest upon more
solid grounds than that of his predecessors; but yet I think the insect
in question rather belongs to _Mylabris_, and for the following reason.

In order rightly to ascertain what insect this really was, we must
endeavour to trace it in the country in which it received its name
and character. This country was certainly Greece; and there such
an animal, retaining nearly its old name, and accused of being the
cause of the same injury to cattle, still exists. For Belon informs
us that on Mount Athos there is found a winged insect like the
blister-beetle, but yellow, larger, and of a very offensive smell,
which feeds upon various plants, and is called _Voupristi_ by the
Caloyers or Monks, who assert that when horses or other cattle even
feed upon the herbs which the animals have touched, they die from
inflammation, and that it is an immediate poison to oxen[250]. This
therefore most probably was the Buprestis of the Greek writers;
and as Pliny usually compiled from them, it may be regarded as
his also, which he tells us was a caustic insect and prepared in
the same manner as the blister-beetle[251]. He further observes
that it was scarce in Italy. The Greek insect of Mount Athos M.
Latreille supposes to be a Mylabris, and in this I agree with him;
and therefore this is the proper genus to which the original Greek
Buprestis, the true type of the insect in question, ought to be
referred, and not Meloee.

Whether this animal be really guilty to the extent of which it is
accused, admits of considerable doubt; but as I have not the means
of ascertaining this, I shall leave the question for others who are
better informed to decide.

But, of all our cattle none are more valuable and important to us than
our _flocks_; to them we look not only for a principal part of our
food, but also for clothing and even light. Thick as is their coat of
wool, it does not shield them from the attack of all-subduing insects:
on the contrary it affords a comfortable shelter to one of their
enemies of this class, regarded by Linne as a species of _Hippobosca_,
but properly separated from that genus by Latreille under the name of
_Melophagus_[252]. This is commonly called the sheep-louse, and is so
tenacious of life, that we are told by Ray it will exist in a fleece
twelve months after it is shorn, and its excrements are said to give
a green tinge to the wool very difficult to be discharged.--You have
doubtless often observed in the heat of the day the sheep shaking
their heads and striking the ground violently with their fore feet; or
running away and getting into ruts, dry dusty spots or gravel pits,
where crowding together they hold their noses close to the ground.
The object of all these actions and movements is to keep the gad-fly
appropriated to them (_Oe. Ovis_) from getting at their nostrils, on
the inner margin of which they lay their eggs, from whence the maggots
make their way into the head, feeding in the maxillary and frontal
sinuses on the mucilage there produced. When full-grown, they fall
through the nostrils to the ground and assume the pupa. Whether the
animal suffers much pain from these troublesome assailants is not
ascertained. Sometimes the maggots make their way even into the brain.
I have been informed by a very accurate and intelligent friend, that,
on opening the head of one of his sheep which died in consequence of
a vertigo, three maggots were found in it in a line just above the
eyes, and that behind them there was a bladder of water.--Perhaps you
are not aware that the bots we are speaking of, or rather those in the
head of goats, have been prescribed as a remedy for the epilepsy, and
that from the tripod of Delphos. Yet so we are told on the authority of
Alexander Trallien. Whether Democrates, who consulted the oracle, was
cured by this remedy does not appear; the story shows however that the
ancients were aware of the station of these larvae.--The common saying
that a whimsical person is _maggoty_, or has got _maggots in his head_,
perhaps arose from the freaks the sheep have been observed to exhibit
when infested by their bots.--The flesh-fly is also a great annoyance
to the fleecy tribe, especially in fenny countries; and if constant
attention be not paid them, they are soon devoured by its insatiable
larvae. In Lincolnshire, the principal profit of the druggists is
derived from the sale of a mercurial ointment used to destroy them.--In
tropical countries the sheep frequently suffer from the ants. Bosman
relates that when in Guinea, if one of his was attacked by them in the
night, which often happened, it was invariably destroyed, and was so
expeditiously devoured that in the morning only the skeleton would be
left.

Of our domestic animals the least infested by insects, I mean as
to the number of species that attack it, is the _swine_. With the
exception of its louse, which seems to annoy it principally by
exciting a violent itching, it is exposed to scarcely any other
plague of this class, unless we may suppose that it is the biting of
flies, which in hot weather drives it to "its wallowing in the mire."

Under this head we may include the _deer_ tribe, for, though often
wild, those kept in parks may strictly be deemed domestic; and the
rein-deer is quite as much so to the Laplander, as our oxen and kine
are to us. We learn from Reaumur that the fallow-deer is subject to
the attack of two species of gad-fly[253]: one, which, like that
of the ox, deposits its eggs in an orifice it makes in the skin of
the animal, and so produces tumours; and another in imitation of
that of the sheep, ovipositing in such a manner that its larvae when
hatched can make their way into the head, where they take their
station in a cavity near the pharynx. He relates a curious notion
of the hunters with respect to these two species. Conceiving them
both to be the same, they imagine that they mine for themselves a
painful path under the skin to the root of the horns; which is their
common rendezvous from all parts of the body; where, by uniting
their labours and gnawing indefatigably, they occasion the annual
casting of these ornamental as well as powerful arms. This fable,
improbable and ridiculous as it is, has had the sanction of grave
authorities[254].--The Oestri last mentioned inhabit, in considerable
numbers, two fleshy bags as big as a hen's egg, and of a similar
shape, near the root of the tongue. Reaumur took between sixty and
seventy bots from one of them, and even then some had escaped. What
other purpose these two remarkable purses are intended to answer, it
is not easy to conjecture. He supposes that the parent fly must enter
the nostrils of the deer, and pass down the air passages to oviposit
in them: but probably such a manoeuvre is unnecessary, since there
seems no reason, supposing the eggs to be laid in the nostrils, why
the larva when hatched cannot itself make its way down to the above
station, as easily as that of the sheep into the maxillary sinuses.
Or, which perhaps is more likely, when the animal draws in the air,
the eggs or larvae may be carried down with it, in both cases, to the
place assigned to them by Providence[255].

No animal, however, is so cruelly tormented by Oestri as the
_rein-deer_; for besides one synonymous apparently with this of the
deer (_Oe. nasalis_) from which they endeavour to relieve themselves
by snorting and blowing[256], they have a second which produces bots
under their skin; not improbably the same species that in a similar
way attacks the latter, as I have stated above. We have heard that
the vaccine disease is derived from the cow and the horse, and the
small-pox is said to have originated in the heels of the camel: but
neither the ingenious Dr. Jenner nor any other writer on this subject
has informed us that the rein-deer is subject to the distemper last
named; yet Linne quotes the learned work of a Swedish physician on
_Syphilis_, who gravely gives this as a fact[257]!! The inoculator,
in truth, is the gad-fly, the tumours it causes are the pustules,
and its larvae are the pus.--It is astonishing how dreadfully these
poor animals in hot weather are terrified and injured by them: ten
of these flies will put a herd of five hundred into the greatest
agitation. They cannot stand still a minute, no not a moment, without
changing their posture, puffing and blowing, sneezing and snorting,
stamping and tossing continually; every individual trembling and
pushing its neighbour about. The ovipositor of this fly is similar
to that of the ox-breese, consisting of several tubular joints which
slip into each other; and therefore Linne was probably mistaken in
supposing that it lays its eggs _upon_ the skin of the animal, and
that the bot, when it appears, eats its way through it[258]: there
can be little doubt (or else what is the use of such an apparatus)
that it bores a hole in the skin and there deposits the eggs. About
the beginning of July the rein-deer sheds its hair, which then
stands erect--at this time the fly is always fluttering about it, and
takes its opportunity to oviposit. The bots remain under the skin
through the whole winter, and grow to the size of an acorn. Six or
eight of these are often to be found in a single rein-deer that has
only seen one winter; and these so emaciate them, that frequently one
third of their number perish in consequence. Even those that are full
grown suffer greatly from this insect. The fly follows the animals
over precipices, valleys, the snow-covered mountains, and even the
highest alps; to which in order to avoid it they often fly with great
swiftness in a direction contrary to the wind. By this constant
agitation and endeavour to escape from the attack of their enemy they
are kept from eating during the day, standing always upon the watch,
with erect ears and attentive eyes, that they may observe whether it
comes near them[259]. The rein-deer are teased also by a peculiar
species of Tabanus (_T. tarandinus_) which, by a singular instinct,
instead of their skin, makes its incision in their horns when tender.

Our _dogs_, the faithful guardians of our other domestic animals and
possessions, the attached companions of our walks, and instruments of
many of our pleasures and amusements, cannot defend themselves from
insect annoyance. They have their peculiar louse, and the flea sucks
their blood in common with that of their master: you must also often
have noticed how much they suffer from the dog-tick, which, when once
it has fixed itself in their flesh, will in a short time, from the
size of a pin's head, so swell itself out by gorging their blood,
that it will equal in dimensions what is called the tick-bean. In
the West Indies these ticks, or one like them, get into the ears
and head of the dogs, and so annoy them and wear them out that they
either die or are obliged to be killed[260].

Some of the most esteemed dainties of our tables are supplied from
such of the winged part of the creation as we have domesticated.
These also have a louse (_Nirmus_) appropriated to them, and the
gorgeous peacock is infested by one of extraordinary dimensions
and singular form[261]. Pigeons, in addition, often swarm with the
bed-bug, which makes it advisable never to have their lockers fixed
to a dwelling-house. In their young, if your curiosity urges you
to examine them, you may find the larva of the flea, which in its
perfect state often swarms in poultry.

Amongst our most valuable domestic animals I shall be very unjust
and ungrateful, if I do not enumerate those industrious little
creatures the _bees_, from whose incessant labours and heaven-taught
art we derive the two precious productions of honey and wax.
They also are infested by numerous insect-enemies, some of which
attack the bees themselves, while others despoil them of their
treasures.--They have parasites of a peculiar genus, although at
present regarded as belonging to Pediculus[262], and mites (_Gamasus
gymnopterorum_) are frequently injurious to them. That universal
plunderer the wasp, and his formidable congener the hornet, often
seize and devour them, sometimes ripping open their body to come
at the honey, and at others carrying off that part in which it is
situated. The former frequently takes possession of a hive, having
either destroyed or driven away its inhabitants, and consumes all
the honey it contains. Nay there are certain idlers of their own
species, called by apiarists corsair-bees, which plunder the hives
of the industrious.--From the curious account which Latreille has
given us of _Philanthus apivorus_, a wasp-like insect, it appears
that great havoc is made by it of the unsuspecting workers, which it
seizes while intent upon their daily labours, and carries off to feed
its young[263]. Another insect, which one would not have suspected
of marauding propensities, must here be introduced. Kuhn informs us,
that long ago (in 1799) some monks who kept bees, observing that
they made an unusual noise, lifted up the hive, when an animal flew
out, which to their great surprise no doubt, for they at first took
it for a bat, proved to be the death's-head hawk-moth (_Acherontia
Atropos_), already celebrated as the innocent cause of alarm[264];
and he remembers that several, some years before, had been found dead
in the bee-houses[265]. M. Huber, also, in 1804 discovered that it
had made its way into his hives and those of his vicinity, and had
robbed them of their honey. In Africa we are told it has the same
propensity; which the Hottentots observing, in order to monopolize
the honey of the wild bees, have persuaded the colonists that it
inflicts a mortal wound[266]. This moth has the faculty of emitting
a remarkable sound, which he supposes may produce an effect upon the
bees of a hive somewhat similar to that caused by the voice of their
queen, which as soon as uttered strikes them motionless, and thus it
may be enabled to commit with impunity such devastation in the midst
of myriads of armed bands[267]. The larvae of two species of moth
(_Galleria Cereana_, and _Mellonella_) exhibit equal hardihood with
equal impunity. They indeed pass the whole of their initiatory state
in the midst of the combs. Yet in spite of the stings of the bees
of a whole republic, they continue their depredations unmolested,
sheltering themselves in tubes made of grains of wax, and lined with
silken tapestry, spun and wove by themselves, which the bees (however
disposed they may be to revenge the mischief which they do them, by
devouring, what to all other animals would be indigestible, their
wax,) are unable to penetrate. These larvae are sometimes so numerous
in a hive, and commit such extensive ravages, as to force the poor
bees to desert it and seek another habitation.

I shall not delay you longer upon this subject by detailing what
_wild animals_ suffer from insects, further than by observing
that the two creatures of this description in which we are rather
interested, the _hare_ and the _rabbit_, do not escape their attack.
The hare in Lapland is more tormented by the gnats than any other
quadruped. To avoid this pest it is obliged to leave the cover of
the woods in full day, and seek the plains: hence the hunters say,
that of three litters which a hare produces in a year, the first
dies by the cold, the second by gnats, and only the third escapes
and comes to maturity[268].--We learn from the ingenious Mr. Clark,
that the American rabbit and hare are infested by the largest species
of Oestrus[269] yet discovered; and our domestic rabbits sometimes
swarm with the bed-bug. This was the case with some kept by two young
gentlemen at my house last summer to such a degree, that I found it
necessary to have them killed.

Nor are the _inhabitants of the waters_ sheltered by their peculiar
element from these universal assailants. The larvae of Dytisci fixing
themselves by their suctorious mandibles to the body of _fish_,
doubtless destroy an infinite number of the young fry of our ponds.
Some species of salmon (_Salmo Fario_, L.) are the food of an animal
which Linne has arranged under Pediculus; and probably many others of
the finny tribes may, like the birds, have their peculiar parasites.
Even _shell-fish_ do not escape, for the _Nymphon grossipes_ enters
the shell of the muscle and devours its inhabitant.

                                                  I am, &c.

FOOTNOTES:

[231] See above, p. 110.

[232] Once travelling through Cambridgeshire with a brother
entomologist in a gig, our horse was in the condition here described,
from the attack of _Tabanus rusticus_.

[233] De Geer, vii. 158.

[234] See Mr. W. S. MacLeay in _Linn. Trans._ xiv. 355--.

[235] De Geer, vi. 295.

[236] _Amoen. Acad._ iii. 358.

[237] Linn. _Flor. Lapp._ 376. _Lach. Lapp._ i. 233, 234. This insect
from Linne's description is probably no _Culex_, but perhaps a
_Simulium_, Latr. (_Simulia_, Meig.).

[238] _Life of General Thomas_, 186.

[239] Linn. _It. Scand._ 182. De Geer, v. 227-30.

[240] PLATE XVI. FIG. 3. Mr. Clark, however, is of opinion that the
Oestrus does not pierce the skin of the animal, but only glues its
eggs to it. _Essay on the Bots of Horses and other Animals_, p. 47.

[241] Much of the information here collected is taken from Reaum. iv.
_Mem._ 12; and Clark in _Linn. Trans._ iii. 289.

[242] The writer of the present letter is possessor of this specimen,
which he took on himself in a field where oxen were feeding. PLATE V.
FIG. 1.

[243] In the _Systema Antliatorum_ (p. 56) Fabricius most strangely
considers this insect as synonymous with _Culex reptans_, L. calling
it _Scatopse reptans_, and dropping his former reference to Pallas,
and account of its injurious properties. Meigen (_Dipt._ i. 294)
makes this insect a _Simulia_ under the name of _S. maculata_.

[244] Fabr. _Ent. Syst. Em._ iv. 276. 22. Latr. _Hist. Nat._ &c. xiv.
283. _Leipz. Zeit._ Jul. 5, 1813, quoted in Germar's _Mag. der Ent._
ii. 185.

[245] It is by no means clear that the _Oestrus_ of modern
entomologists is synonymous with the insects which the Greeks
distinguish by that name. Aristotle not only describes these as
_blood-suckers_ (_Hist. Animal._ l. viii. c. 11.) but also as furnished
with a _strong proboscis_ (l. iv. c. 7.). He observes likewise that
they are produced from an animal inhabiting the _waters_, in the
vicinity of which they most abound (l. viii. c. 7.). And AElian (_Hist._
l. vi. c. 38.) gives nearly the same account. Comparing the Oestrus
with the Myops (synonymous perhaps with _Tabanus_, Latr., except that
Aristotle affirms that its larvae live in wood, l. v. c. 19,) he says,
the Oestrus for a fly is one of the largest; it has a stiff and large
sting, (meaning a proboscis,) and emits a certain humming and harsh
sound--but the Myops is like the Cynomyia--it hums more loudly than the
Oestrus, though it has a smaller sting.

These characters and circumstances do not at all agree with the
modern Oestrus, which, so far from being a blood-sucker furnished
with a strong proboscis, has scarcely any mouth. It shuns also the
vicinity of water, to which our cattle generally fly as a refuge
from it. It seems more probable that the Oestrus of Greece was
related to Bruce's _Zimb_, represented in his figure with a long
proboscis, which makes its appearance in the neighbourhood of rivers,
and belongs to the _Tabanidae_. For further information the reader
should consult Mr. W. S. MacLeay's learned paper on the insect called
_Oistros_ and _Asilus_ by the ancients. _Linn. Trans._ xiv. 353--.

[246] Bruce's _Travels_, 8vo. ii. 315.

[247] Heb. [Hebrew: zvvv v'l] literally "Lord-Fly." See 2 Kings, i.
2; and Bochart. _Hierozoic._ ps. ii. l. 4. c. 9. p. 490.

[248] _Burn-Cow_ or _Ox_, from [Greek: boys] bos, and [Greek: pretho]
inflammo. M. Latreille translates it _Creve-boeuf_, but improperly.

[249] _Annales du Museum_.--X^e Ann. N^o xi. p. 129.

[250] _Observations de plusieurs Singularites, &c._ l. i. c. 45. p.
73 of the Edition in Sir Joseph Banks's Library.

[251] _Hist. Nat._ l. xxix. c. 4.

[252] See Curtis, _Brit. Ent._ t. 142.

[253] Mr. Curtis (_Brit. Ent._ t. 106) under the name of _Oestrus
pictus_ has figured a fine species of Gad-fly taken in the New
Forest, which he conjectures may be bred from the Deer. It may
probably be one of the species here alluded to.

[254] Reaum. v. 69. _Dictionnaire de Trevoux_, article _Cerf_.

[255] For the account of the Oestrus, of the deer, see Reaum. v. 67-77.

[256] Linn. _Lach. Lapp._ ii. 45. In the passage here referred to,
Linne speaks of two species of Oestrus, though the mode of expression
indicates that he considered them as the same. One was _Oe. nasalis_
from which they freed themselves by snorting, &c., the other _Oe.
Tarandi_ which formed the pustules in their backs. In _Syst. Nat._
969. 3. he strangely observes under the former species, "_Habitat
in equorum_ fauce, per nares intrans!" confounding probably _Oe.
veterinus_ of Mr. Clark with the true _Oe. nasalis_.

[257] _Lach. Lapp._ i. 280.

[258] _Flor. Lapp._ 79.

[259] Linn. _Flor. Lapp._ 379.

[260] Mr. Kittoe.

[261] PLATE V. FIG. 3.

[262] _Melittophagus_, Mus. Kirby. See _Mon. Ap. Angl._ ii. 168.
I copy the following memorandum respecting _M. Melittae_ from my
common-place-book, May 7, 1812. On the flowers of Ficaria, Taraxacum
and Bellis, I found a great number of this insect, which seemed
extremely restless, running here and there over the flowers, and over
each other, with great swiftness mounting the anthers, and sometimes
lifting themselves up above them, as if looking for something. One or
two of them leaped upon my hand. Near one of these flowers I found
a small _Andrena_ or _Halictus_, upon which some of these creatures
were busy sucking the poor animal, so that it seemed unable to fly
away. When disclosed from the egg, I imagine they get on the top of
these flowers to attach themselves to any of the _Andrenidae_ that may
alight on them, or come sufficiently near for them to leap on it.--K.

[263] Latreille, _Hist. des Fourmis_, 307-20.

[264] See above, p. 34.

[265] _Naturforscher_ Stk. xvi. 74.

[266] Quoted from Campbell's _Travels in South Africa_, in the
_Quarterly Review for July_ 1815. 315.

[267] Huber. _Pref._ xi-xiii.

[268] De Geer, ii. 83.

[269] Considered by Mr. Clark as a new genus, which he has named
_Cuterebra_, and of which he has described three species. _Essay on
the Bots of Horses, &c._ _p._ 63. _t._ 2. _f._ 24-29.




                               LETTER VI.

                     _INJURIES CAUSED BY INSECTS._

                      INDIRECT INJURIES CONTINUED.


Having endeavoured to give you some idea of the mode in which
insects establish and maintain their empire over man and his train
of dependent animals, I shall next call your attention to his
_living vegetable_ possessions, whether the produce of the forest,
the field, or the garden; whether necessary to him for his support,
convenient for his use, or ministering to his comfort, pleasure
and delight:--and here you will find these little creatures as
busily engaged in the work of mischief as ever, destroying what is
necessary, deranging what is convenient, marring what is beautiful,
and turning what should give us pleasure into an object of disgust.

Let us begin with the produce of our _fields_.--Bread is called "the
staff of life:" yet should divine Providence in anger be pleased to
give the rein to the various insects which, in the different stages
of its growth, attack the plant producing it, how quickly would
this staff be broken! From the moment that _wheat_ begins to emerge
from the soil, to the time when it is carried into the barn, it is
exposed to their ravages. One of its earliest assailants in this
country is that of which Mr. Walford has given an account in the
_Linnean Transactions_, taking it for the wire-worm; but, as Mr.
Marsham observed, not correctly; it being probably the larva of
some coleopterous insect, perhaps of one of the numerous tribe of
_Brachyptera_ or rove-beetles which are not universally carnivorous.
This animal was discovered to infest the wheat in its earliest stage
of growth after vegetation had commenced; and there was reason to
believe that it began even with the grain itself. It eats into the
young plant about an inch below the surface, devouring the central
part; and thus, vegetation being stopped, it dies. Out of fifty acres
sown with this grain in 1802, ten had been destroyed by the grub in
question so early as October[270].--Other predaceous _Coleoptera_
will also attack young corn. This is done by the larva of _Zabrus
gibbus_, particularly with respect to wheat. In the spring of 1813
not less than twelve German hides (_Hufen_), equal to two hundred and
thirty English acres, were destroyed by it in the canton of Seeburg,
near Halle in Germany; and Germar (who with other members of the
Society of Natural History, at that place, ascertained the fact,)
suspects that it was the same insect, described by Cooti, an Italian
author, which caused great destruction in Upper Italy in 1776.--Not
only is the larva, which probably lives in that state three years,
thus injurious; but, what one would not have expected, the perfect
beetle itself attacks the grain when in the ear, clambering up the
stems at night in vast numbers to get at it.--Along with the larvae
of this insect were found, in the proportion of about one fourth,
those of another beetle (_Melolontha ruficornis_), which seemed to
contribute to the mischief[271].

Mr. Markwick has given us the history of a fly that attacks wheat
in a later period of its growth, which, if it be not indeed the
same, appears to be nearly related to the _Musca Pumilionis_ of
Bierkander[272], (_Oscinis_ F.) accused by him of being extremely
injurious to rye in the spring. Our insect was discovered on the
first sown wheats early in that season, making its lodgement in the
very heart of the principal stem just above the root, which stem it
invariably destroyed, giving the crop at first a most unpromising
appearance, so that there seemed scarcely a hope of any produce.
But it proved in this and other instances that year (1791) that
the plant, instead of being injured, derived great benefit from
this circumstance; for, the main stem perishing, the root (which
was not hurt) threw out fresh shoots on every side, so as to yield
a more abundant crop than in other fields where the insect had
not been busy. These flies therefore seem to belong to our insect
benefactors; and I should not have introduced them here, had it not
been probable that in some instances later in the spring they may
attack the lateral shoots of the wheat, and so be injurious. It
is also not unlikely that the new progeny, which is disclosed in
May, may oviposit in barley or some other spring corn, which would
bring the next generation out in time for the wheat sown in the
autumn.--These flies are amongst the last, and, in some seasons, the
most numerous, that take shelter in the windows of our apartments
when the first frosts indicate the approach of winter, previous to
their becoming torpid during that season. When this little animal
was first observed in England, it created no small alarm amongst
agriculturists lest it should prove to be the _Hessian fly_, so
notorious for its depredations in North America; but Mr. Marsham, by
tracing out the species, proved the alarm to be unfounded[273]. That
there was sufficient cause for apprehension should it have so turned
out, what I have formerly stated concerning the latter insect, and
the additional facts which I shall now adduce, will amply show.

The ravages of the animal just alluded to, which was first noticed in
1776, and received its name from an erroneous idea that it was carried
by the Hessian troops in their straw from Germany, were at one time so
universal as to threaten, where it appeared, the total abolition of the
culture of wheat; though, by recent accounts, the injury which it now
occasions is much less than at first. It commences its depredations
in autumn, as soon as the plant begins to appear above ground, when
it devours the leaf and stem with equal voracity until stopped by the
frost. When the return of spring brings a milder temperature the fly
appears again, and deposits its eggs in the heart of the main stems,
which it perforates and so weakens, that when the ear begins to grow
heavy, and is about to go into the milky state, they break down and
perish. All the crops, as far as it extended its flight, fell before
this ravager. It first showed itself in Long Island, from whence it
proceeded inland at about the rate of fifteen or twenty miles annually,
and by the year 1789 had reached 200 miles from its original station.
I must observe, however, that some accounts state its progress at first
to have been very slow, at the rate only of seven miles per annum, and
the damage inconsiderable; and that the wheat crops were not materially
injured by it before the year 1788. Though these insect hordes traverse
such a tract of country in the course of the year, their flights are
not more than five or six feet at a time. Nothing intercepts them in
their destructive career, neither mountains nor the broadest rivers.
They were seen to cross the Delaware like a cloud. The numbers of this
fly were so great, that in wheat-harvest the houses swarmed with them
to the extreme annoyance of the inhabitants. They filled every plate or
vessel that was in use; and five hundred were counted in a single glass
tumbler exposed to them a few minutes with a little beer in it[274].

America suffers also in its wheat and maize from the attack of an
insect of a different order; which, for what reason I know not, is
called the chintz-bug-fly. It appears to be apterous, and is said
in scent and colour to resemble the bed-bug. They travel in immense
columns from field to field, like locusts destroying every thing as
they proceed: but their injuries are confined to the states south
of the 40th degree of north latitude[275]. From this account the
depredator here noticed should belong to the tribe of _Geocorisae_,
Latr.; but it seems very difficult to conceive how an insect that lives
by suction, and has no mandibles, could destroy these plants so totally.

When the wheat blossoms, another marauder, to which Mr. Marsham first
called the attention of the public, takes its turn to make an attack
upon it, under the form of an orange- gnat, which introducing
its long retractile ovipositor into the centre of the corolla, there
deposits its eggs. These being hatched, the larvae, perhaps by eating
the pollen, prevent the impregnation of the grain, and so in some
seasons destroy the twentieth part of the crop[276].

One would think, when laid up in the barn or in the granary, that
wheat would be secure from injury; but even there the weevil
(_Calandra granaria_), in its imago as well as in its larva state,
devours it; and sometimes this pest becomes so infinitely numerous,
that a sensible man, engaged in the brewing trade, once told me,
speaking perhaps rather hyperbolically, that they collected and
destroyed them by bushels; and no wonder, for a single pair of these
destroyers may produce in one year above 6000 descendants.--There
are three other insects that attack the stored wheat, which are more
injurious to it than even the weevil. One is a minute species of moth
(_Tinea granella_), happily not much if at all known in this country;
of which Leeuwenhoek has given us a full history under the name of
the wolf. Another is a species of the same genus, at present not
named, which, as we are informed by Du Hamel, at one time committed
dreadful ravages in the province of Angoumois in France. The third is
_Trogosita caraboides_, a kind of beetle, the grub of which called
_Cadelle_, Olivier tells us, did more damage to the housed grain
in the southern provinces of France than either the weevil or the
wolf[277].--Here I may just mention a few other insects which devour
grains that are the food of man, concerning which I have collected
no other facts. The rice-weevil (_Calandra Oryzae_) is very injurious
to the useful grain after which it is named, as is likewise another
small beetle, _Lyctus dentatus_, F. (_Sylvanus_, Latr.): and an
Indian grain called in the country _Joharre_, which appears to be
a species of Holcus or Milium, is the appropriate food of another
species of Calandra[278], which I found abundant in it.

_Rye_, in this island, is an article of less importance than wheat;
but in some parts of the continent it forms a principal portion of
the bread-corn. Providence has also appointed the insect means of
causing a scarcity of this species of food. The fly before noticed
(_Oscinis Pumilionis_) introduces its eggs into the heart of the
shoots of rye, and occasions so many to perish, that from eight
to fourteen are lost in a square of two feet.--A small moth also
(_Margaritia Secalis_) which eats the culm of this plant within the
vagina, thus destroys many ears[279]. In common with wheat and barley
it also suffers from Leeuwenhoek's wolf and the weevil.

_Barley_ likewise, another of our most valuable grains, has several
insect foes. The gelatinous larva of a saw-fly (_Tenthredo_, L.)
preys upon the upper surface of the leaves, and so occasions them
to wither. _Musca Hordei_ of Bierkander also assails the plant. A
tenth part of the produce of this grain, Linne affirms, is annually
destroyed in Sweden by another fly, not yet discovered in Britain,
(_Oscinis Frit_,) which does the mischief by getting into the ear,
as does likewise _O. lineata_, F.--A small species of moth described
by Reaumur, though not named by Linne, which may be called _Tinea
Hordei_, (_Ypsolophus granellus?_) devours the grain when laid up in
the granary. This fly deposits several eggs, perhaps twenty or thirty,
on a single grain; but as one grain only is to be the portion of one
larva, they disperse when hatched, each selecting one for itself, which
it enters from without at a place more tender than the rest;--and this
single grain furnishes a sufficient supply of food to support the
caterpillar till it is ready to assume the pupa. Concealed within this
contracted habitation, the little animal does nothing that may betray
it to the watchful eye of man, not even ejecting its excrements from
its habitation; so that there may be millions within a heap of corn,
where you would not suspect there was one[280].

I have not observed that _oats_ suffer from insects, except from
the universal subterranean destroyer of the grasses, the wire-worm,
of which I shall give you a more full account hereafter; and
occasionally from an Aphis. The only important grain that now remains
unnoticed is the _maize_ or Indian corn. Besides the chintz-bug-fly,
a little beetle[281] (_Phaleria cornuta_) appears to devour it; and
it has probably other unrecorded enemies. The Guinea corn of America
(_Holcus bicolor_), as well as other kinds of grain, is, according
to Abbott, often much injured by the larva of a moth (_Noctua
frugiperda_, Smith), which feeds upon the main shoot[282].

Next to grain _pulse_ is useful to us both when cultivated in our
gardens and in our fields. Peas and beans, which form so material
a part of the produce of the farm, are exposed to the attack of a
numerous host of insect depredators; indeed the former, on account
of their ravages, is one of the most uncertain of our crops. The
animals from which in this country both these plants suffer most are
the _Aphides_, commonly called leaf-lice, but which properly should
be denominated plant-lice.--As almost every animal has its peculiar
_louse_, so has almost every plant its peculiar _plant-louse_; and,
next to locusts, these are the greatest enemies of the vegetable
world, and like them are sometimes so numerous as to darken the
air[283]. The multiplication of these little creatures is infinite
and almost incredible. Providence has endued them with privileges
promoting fecundity, which no other insects possess: at one time
of the year they are viviparous, at another oviparous; and, what
is most remarkable and without parallel, the sexual intercourse of
one original pair serves for all the generations which proceed from
the female for a whole succeeding year. Reaumur has proved that in
five generations one Aphis may be the progenitor of 5,904,900,000
descendants; and it is supposed that in one year there may be twenty
generations[284]. This astonishing fecundity exceeds that of any
known animal; and we cannot wonder that a creature so prolific
should be proportionably injurious; some species, however, seem
more so than others. Those that attack wheat, oats, and barley, of
which there are more kinds than one, seldom multiply so fast as
to be very noxious to those plants; while those which attack pulse
spread so rapidly, and take such entire possession, that the crop
is greatly injured, and sometimes destroyed by them. This was the
case with respect to peas in the year 1810, when the produce was
not much more than the seed sown; and many farmers turned their
swine into their pea-fields, not thinking them worth harvesting.
The damage in this instance was caused solely by the Aphis, and was
universal throughout the kingdom, so that a sufficient supply for the
navy could not be obtained. The earlier peas are sown, the better
chance they stand of escaping, at least in part, the effects of this
vegetable Phthiriasis.--Beans are also often great sufferers from
another species of plant-louse, in some districts from its black
colour called the _Collier_, which begins at the top of the plant,
and so keeps multiplying downwards. The best remedy in this case,
which also tends to set the beans well, and improves both their
quality and quantity, is to top them as soon as the Aphides begin to
appear, and carrying away the tops to burn or bury them.--In a late
stage of growth great havoc is often made in peas by the grub of a
small beetle (_Bruchus granarius_), which will sometimes lay an egg
in every pea of a pod, and thus destroy it.--Something similar I
have been told (I suspect it is a short-snouted weevil) occasionally
injures beans. In this country, however, the mischief caused by the
Bruchus is seldom very serious; but in North America another species
(_B. Pisi_) is most alarmingly destructive, its ravages being at one
time so universal as to put an end in some places to the cultivation
of that favourite pulse. No wonder then that Kalm should have been
thrown into such a trepidation upon discovering some of these
pestilent insects just disclosed in a parcel of peas he had brought
from that country, lest he should be the instrument of introducing so
fatal an evil into his beloved Sweden[285]. In the year 1780 an alarm
was spread in some parts of France, that people had been poisoned
by eating worm-eaten peas; and they were forbidden by authority to
be exposed for sale in the market: but the fears of the public were
soon removed by the examination of some scientific men, who found the
cause of the injury to be the insect of which I am now speaking[286].
Another species of Bruchus (_B. pectinicornis_) devours the peas in
China and Barbary. A leguminous seed, much used when boiled as food
for horses in India, known to Europeans by the name of _Gram_, but
in the Tamul dialect called _Koloo_, and by the Moors _Cooltee_, is
the appropriate food of a fourth kind of Bruchus, related to the
last, but having the antennae, which in the male are pectinated, much
shorter than the body. It is, perhaps, _B. scutellaris_. A parcel of
this seed[287] given me by Captain Green was full of this insect,
several grains containing two. Molina, in his History of Chili, tells
us of a beetle, which he names _Lucanus Pilmus_, that infests the
beans in that country;--a circumstance quite at variance with the
habits of the _Lucanidae_, which all prey upon timber. This insect was
probably a _Phaleria_, in which genus the mandibles are protruded
from the head like those of _Lucanus_; and one species, as we have
seen above, feeds upon maize.

Great profits are sometimes derived by farmers from their crops
of _clover-seed_: but this does not happen very often; for a small
weevil, (_Apion flavifemoratum_,) which abounds every where at almost
all times of the year, feeds upon the seed of the purple clover, and
in most seasons does the crop considerable damage; so that a plant of
the fairest appearance will, in consequence of the voracity of this
little enemy, produce scarcely any thing. Another species (_Apion
flavipes_) infests the Dutch or white clover[288]. The young plants
of purple clover, when just sprung, are often, as Mr. Joseph Stickney
pointed out to me, much injured by the same little jumping beetles
(_Haltica_) that attack the turnips.

But not only, if let loose to the work of destruction, might insects
annihilate our grain and pulse; they would also deprive the earth of
that beautiful green carpet which now covers it, and is so agreeable
and so refreshing to the sight. When you see a large tract of land
lying fallow, as is sometimes the case in open districts, with no
intervening patches of verdure, how unpleasant and uncomfortable is
it to your eye! What then would be your sensations, were the whole
face of the earth bare, and not dressed by Flora? But such a state
of things would soon take place, if to punish us, or to teach us
thankfulness to the great Arbiter of our fate, the insects that
feed upon the _grass_ of our pastures were to become as generally
numerous as they are occasionally permitted to do. One of the worst
of these ravagers is the grub of the common cock-chafer (_Melolontha
vulgaris_.)[289] This insect, which is found to remain in the
_larva_ state four years, sometimes destroys whole acres of grass,
as I can aver from my own observation. It undermines the richest
meadows, and so loosens the turf that it will roll up as if cut with
a turfing-spade. These grubs did so much injury about seventy years
ago to a poor farmer near Norwich, that the court of that city,
out of compassion, allowed him 25_l._, and the man and his servant
declared that he had gathered eighty bushels of the beetle[290].
In the year 1785 many provinces of France were so ravaged by them,
that a premium was offered by the government for the best mode of
destroying them. They do not confine themselves to grass, but eat
also the roots of corn; and it is to feast upon this grub more
particularly that the rooks follow the plough.

The larva also of another species of a cognate genus (_Hoplia
pulverulenta_) is extremely destructive in moist meadows, rooting
under the herbage, so that, the soil becoming loose, the grass soon
withers and dies. Swine are very fond of these grubs, and will devour
vast numbers of them, and the rooks lend their assistance.

Amongst the _Lepidoptera_, the greatest enemy of our pastures is the
_Charaeas Graminis_, which, however, is said not to touch the foxtail
grass. In the years 1740, 1741, 1742, 1748, 1749, they multiplied
so prodigiously and committed such ravages in many provinces of
Sweden, that the meadows became quite white and dry as if a fire had
passed over them[291]. This destructive insect, though found in this
country, is luckily scarce amongst us; but our northern neighbours
appear occasionally to have suffered greatly from it. In 1759, and
again in 1802, the high sheep farms in Tweedale were dreadfully
infested by a caterpillar, which was probably the larva of this moth;
spots of a mile square were totally covered by them, and the grass
devoured to the root[292].

Most of the insects I have hitherto mentioned attack our crops
partially, confining themselves to one or two kinds only; but there
are some species which extend their ravages indifferently to _all_.
Of this description is the _Pyralis? frumentalis_, which moth, Pallas
tells us, is an almost universal pest in the government of Kasan
in Russia, often eating the greater part of the spring corn to the
root[293]. To this we are fortunately strangers; but another, well
known by the name of the wire-worm, causes annually a large diminution
of the produce of our fields, destroying indiscriminately wheat, rye,
oats, and grass[294]. This insect, which has its name apparently from
its slender form, and uncommon hardness and toughness, is the grub of
one of the elastic beetles termed by Linne _Elater lineatus_, but by
Bierkander, to whom we are indebted for its history, _E. Segetis_[295],
which name is now generally adopted. The late ingenious Mr. Paul of
Starston in Norfolk, (well known as the inventor of a machine[296]
to entrap the turnip-beetle, which may be applied by collectors with
great advantage to general purposes,) has also succeeded in tracing
this insect from the larva to the imago state. His grubs produced
_Elater obscurus_ of Mr. Marsham, which however comes so near to _E.
Segetis_ that it is doubtful whether it be more than a variety. The
other species, however, of the genus have similar grubs, many of which
probably contribute to the mischief. When told that it lives in its
first (or feeding) state not less than five years, during the greatest
part of which time it is supported by devouring the roots of grain, you
will not wonder that its ravages should be so extensive, and that whole
crops should sometimes be cut off by it. As it abounds chiefly in newly
broken-up land, though the roots of the grasses supply it with food, it
probably does not do any great injury to our meadows and pastures[297].

Here also may be included the larva of the long-legged gnat (_Tipula
oleracea_), known in many parts by the name of _the grub_, which
is sometimes very prejudicial to the grass in marshy lands, and at
others not less so to corn. Reaumur informs us, that in Poitou, in
certain years, the grass of whole districts has been so destroyed by
it, as not to produce the food necessary for the sustenance of the
cattle[298]. In many parts of England, in Holderness particularly, it
cuts off a large proportion of the wheat crops, especially if sown upon
clover-lays[299]. Reaumur concludes from the observations he made that
it lives solely upon earth, and consequently that the injury which it
occasions, arises from its loosening the roots of corn and grass by
burrowing amongst them: but my friend Mr. Stickney, the intelligent
author of a treatise upon this insect, is inclined to think from his
experiments that it feeds on the roots themselves. However this may be,
the evil produced is evident; and it appears too from the observations
of the gentleman last mentioned, that this animal is not killed by lime
applied in much larger doses than usual[300].

Our national beverage ale, so valuable and heartening to the lower
orders, and so infinitely preferable to ardent spirits and tea,
is indebted to another vegetable, the _hop_, for its agreeable
conservative bitter. This plant so precious has numberless enemies
in the Lilliputian world to which I am introducing you. Its roots
are subject to the attack of the caterpillar of a singular species
of moth (_Hepiolus Humuli_), known to collectors by the name of the
ghost, that sometimes does them considerable injury[301].--A small
beetle also (_Haltica concinna_) is particularly destructive to the
tender shoots early in the year; and upon the presence or absence of
Aphides, known by the name of _the fly_, as in the case of peas, the
crop of every year depends; so that the hop-grower is wholly at the
mercy of insects. They are the barometer that indicates the rise and
fall of his wealth.

If the beer-drinker be thus interested in the history of these
animals, equally so is the drinker of tea. Indeed _sugar_ is an
article so universally useful and agreeable, that what concerns the
cane that produces it seems to concern every one. This also affords
a tempting food to insects. The caterpillar of a white moth, called
the borer, for destroying which a reward of fifty guineas is offered
by the Society of Arts, is in this respect a great nuisance, as is an
unknown species of horned beetle[302]. An ant also (_Formica analis_)
makes a lodgement in the interior of the sugar-cane in Guinea, and
destroys it.--But the creature of this class most destructive to the
sugar-cane, is one of the latter genus that does not devour it, and
is therefore improperly called _Formica saccharivora_ by Linne;
but, by making its nest for shelter under the roots, so injures the
plants that they become unhealthy and unproductive. These insects
about seventy years ago appeared in such infinite hosts in the island
of Granada, as to put a stop to the cultivation of this plant; and a
reward of 20,000_l._ was offered to any one who should discover an
effectual mode of destroying them. Their numbers were incredible.
They descended from the hills like torrents, and the plantations, as
well as every path and road for miles, were filled with them. Many
domestic quadrupeds perished in consequence of this plague. Rats,
mice, and reptiles of every kind became an easy prey to them; and
even the birds, which they attacked whenever they alighted on the
ground in search of food, were so harassed as to be at length unable
to resist them. Streams of water opposed only a temporary obstacle
to their progress, the foremost rushing blindly on to certain death,
and fresh armies instantly following, till a bank was formed of
the carcases of those that were drowned sufficient to dam up the
waters, and allow the main body to pass over in safety below. Even
the all-devouring element of fire was tried in vain. When lighted
to arrest their route, they rushed into the blaze in such myriads
of millions as to extinguish it. Those that thus patriotically
devoted themselves to certain death for the common good, were but as
the pioneers or advanced guard of a countless army, which by their
self-sacrifice was enabled to pass unimpeded and unhurt. The intire
crops of standing canes were burnt down, and the earth dug up in
every part of the plantations. But vain was every attempt of man to
effect their destruction, till in 1780 it pleased Providence at
length to annihilate them by the torrents of rain which accompanied a
hurricane most fatal to the other West India Islands. This dreadful
pest was thought to have been imported[303]. Besides these enemies,
the sugar-cane has also its Aphis, which sometimes destroys the
whole crop[304]; and according to Humboldt and Bonpland the larva of
_Elater noctilucus_ feeds in it[305].

Two other vegetable productions of the New World, _cotton_ and
_tobacco_, which are also valuable articles of commerce, receive
great injury from the depredations of insects. M'Kinnen, in his Tour
through the West Indies, states that in 1788 and 1794 two-thirds
of the crop of cotton in Crooked Island, one of the Bahamas, was
destroyed by the _chenille_ (probably a lepidopterous larva); and
the _red bug_, an insect equally noxious, stained it so much in
some places as to render it of little or no value. Browne relates
that in Jamaica a bug destroys whole fields of this plant, and the
caterpillar of that beautiful butterfly _Helicopis Cupido_ also feeds
upon it[306]. That of a hawk-moth, _Sphinx Carolina_, is the great
pest of Tobacco; and it is attacked likewise by the larva of a moth,
_Phalaena Rhexiae_, Smith[307], and by other insects of the names and
kind of which I am ignorant.

_Roots_ are another important object of agriculture, which, however,
as to many of them, they may seem to be defended by the earth that
covers them, do not escape the attack of insect enemies.--The carrot,
which forms a valuable part of the crop of the sand-land farms in
Suffolk, is often very much injured, as is also the parsnip, by
a small centipede (_Geophilus electricus_), and another polypod
(_Polydesmus complanatus_), which eat into various labyrinths the
upper part of their roots; and they are both sometimes totally
destroyed by the maggot of some dipterous insect, probably one of
the _Muscidae_. I had an opportunity of noticing this in the month of
July, in the year 1812, in the garden of our valued friend the Rev.
Revett Sheppard of Offton in Suffolk. The plants appeared many of
them in a dying state; and upon drawing them out of the ground to
ascertain the cause, these larvae were found with their head and half
of their body immersed in the root in an oblique direction, and in
many instances they had eaten off the end of it.

America has made us no present more extensively beneficial, compared
with which the mines of Potosi are worthless, than the _potato_.
This invaluable root, which is now so universally cultivated, is
often, in this country, considerably injured by the two insects
first mentioned as attacking the carrot. The Death's-head-hawk-moth
(_Acherontia Atropos_) in its larva state feeds upon its leaves,
though without much injury. In America it is said to suffer much from
two beetles (_Cantharis cinerea_ and _vittata_), of the same genus
with the blister-beetle[308]; and in the island of Barbadoes some
hemipterous insect, supposed to be a Tettigonia, occasionally attacks
them. In 1734 and 1735 vast swarms of them devoured almost every
vegetable production of that island, particularly the potato, and
thus occasioned such a failure of this excellent esculent, especially
in one parish, that a collection was made throughout the island for
the relief of the poor, whose principal food it forms.

The chief dependence of our farmers for the sustenance of their
cattle in the winter is another most useful root, the _turnip_.
And they have often to lament the distress occasioned by a failure
in this crop, of which these minor animals are the cause. On its
first coming up, as soon as the cotyledon leaves are unfolded, a
whole host of little jumping beetles, composed chiefly of _Haltica
Nemorum_, called by farmers the _fly_[309] and _black jack_, attack
and devour them; so that on account of their ravages the land is
often obliged to be resown, and frequently with no better success.
It has been calculated by an eminent agriculturist, that from this
cause alone the loss sustained in the turnip crops in Devonshire in
1786 was not less than 100,000_l._[310] Almost as much damage is
sometimes occasioned by a little weevil (_Ceutorhynchus contractus_)
which in the same manner pierces a hole in the cuticle. When the
plant is more advanced, and out of danger from these pygmy foes, the
black larva of a saw-fly takes their place, and occasionally does
no little mischief, whole districts being sometimes nearly stripped
by them; so that in 1783 many thousand acres were on this account
ploughed up[311].--The caterpillar of the cabbage-butterfly (_Pontia
Brassicae_) is also sometimes found upon the turnip in great numbers;
and Sir Joseph Banks informs me that forty or fifty of the insects
before mentioned[312], called by Mr. Walford the wire-worm, have
been discovered in October just below the leaves in a single bulb of
this plant.--The small knob or tubercle often observable on these
roots is inhabited by a _grub_, which, from its resemblance to one
found in similar knobs on the roots of _Sinapis arvensis_, from which
I have bred _Ceutorhynchus contractus_ (_Curculio_ Marsh) and _C.
assimilis_, small weevils nearly related to each other[313]. This,
however, does not seem to affect their growth. Great mischief is
occasionally done to the young plants by the wire-worm. I was shown a
field last summer in which they had destroyed one-fourth of the crop,
and the gentleman who showed them to me calculated that his loss by
them would be 100_l._ One year he sowed a field thrice with turnips,
which were twice wholly, and the third time in great part, cut off
by this insect.--Whether the disease to which turnips are subject,
in some parts of the kingdom, from the form of the excrescences into
which the bulb shoots, called _fingers and toes_, be occasioned by
insects, is not certainly known[314].

       *       *       *       *       *

We have wandered long enough about the fields to observe the progress
of insect devastation; let us now return home to visit the domains of
Flora and Pomona, that we may see whether their subjects are exposed
to equal maltreatment. If we begin with the _kitchen-garden_, we
shall find that its various productions, ministering so materially to
our daily comfort and enjoyment, almost all suffer more or less from
the attack of the animals we are considering.--Thus, the earliest
of our table dainties, radishes, are devoured by the maggot of a
fly (_Anthomyia Radicum_), and our lettuces by the caterpillars of
several species of moth; one of which is the beautiful tiger-moth
(_Euprepia Caja_), another the pot-herb-moth (_Mamestra oleracea_), a
third anonymous, described by Reaumur as beginning at the root, eating
itself a mansion in the stem, and so destroying the plant before it
cabbages[315]. And when they are come to their perfection and appear
fit for the table, their beauty and delicacy are often marred by the
troublesome earwig, which, insinuating itself into them, defiles them
with its excrements.--What more acceptable vegetable in the spring
than broccoli? Yet how dreadfully is its foliage often ravaged in
the autumn by numerous hordes of the cabbage-butterfly! so that,
in an extensive garden, you will sometimes see nothing left of the
leaves except the veins and stalks.--What more useful, again, than
the cabbage? Besides the same insect, which injures them in a similar
way, in some countries they are infested by the caterpillar of a most
destructive moth (_Mamestra Brassicae_), to which indeed I have before
alluded[316]; which, not content with the leaves, penetrates into the
very heart of the plant[317].--One of the most delicate and admired of
all table vegetables, concerning which gardeners are most apt to pride
themselves, and bestow much pains to produce in perfection, I mean the
cauliflower, is often attacked by a fly, which ovipositing in that part
of the stalk covered by the earth, the maggots when hatched occasion
the plant to wither and die, or to produce a worthless head[318]. Even
when the head is good and handsome, if not carefully examined previous
to being cooked, it is often rendered disgusting by earwigs that have
crept into it, or the green caterpillar of _Pontia Rapae_.

Our peas, beans, carrots, parsnips, turnips, and potatos are
attacked in the garden by the same enemies that injure them in the
fields[319]; I shall therefore dismiss them without further notice,
and point out those which infest another of our most esteemed kinds
of pulse, kidney beans. These are principally Aphides, which in
dry seasons are extremely injurious to them. The fluid which they
secrete, falling upon the leaves, causes them to turn black as if
sprinkled with soot; and the nutriment being subtracted from the pods
by their constant suction, they are prevented from coming to their
proper size or perfection. The beans also which they contain are
sometimes devoured by the caterpillar of a small moth[320].--Onions,
which add a relish to the poor man's crusts and cheese, and form
so material an ingredient in the most savory dishes of the rich,
are also the favourite food of the maggot of a fly, that often
does considerable damage to the crop.--From this maggot (for a
supply of onions containing which I have to thank my friend Mr.
Campbell, surgeon, of Hedon near Hull, where it is very injurious,
particularly in light soils,) I have succeeded in breeding the fly,
which proves of that tribe of the Linnean genus _Musca_, now called
_Scatophaga_. Being apparently undescribed, and new to my valued
correspondent Count Hoffmansegg to whom I sent it, I call it _S.
Ceparum_[321].--The diuretic asparagus, towards the close of the
season, is sometimes rendered unpalatable by the numerous eggs of
the asparagus beetle (_Lema Asparagi_), and its larvae feed upon the
foliage after the heads branch out.--Cucumbers with us enjoy an
immunity from insect assailants; but in America they are deprived
of this privilege, an unascertained species, called there the
cucumber-fly, doing them great injury[322].--And, to name no more,
mushrooms, which are frequently cultivated and much in request, often
swarm with the maggots of various _Diptera_ and _Coleoptera_.

The insects just enumerated are partial in their attacks, confining
themselves to one or two kinds of our pulse or other vegetables. But
there are others that devour more indiscriminately the produce of
our gardens; and of these in certain seasons and countries we have
no greater and more universal enemy than the caterpillar of a moth
called by entomologists _Plusia Gamma_, from its having a character
inscribed in gold on its primary wings, which resembles that Greek
letter. This creature affords a pregnant instance of the power of
Providence to let loose an animal to the work of destruction and
punishment. Though common with us, it is seldom the cause of more
than trivial injury; but in the year 1735 it was so incredibly
multiplied in France as to infest the whole country. On the great
roads, whereever you cast your eyes, you might see vast numbers
traversing them in all directions to pass from field to field; but
their ravages were particularly felt in the kitchen-gardens, where
they devoured every thing, whether pulse or pot-herbs, so that
nothing was left besides the stalks and veins of the leaves. The
credulous multitude thought they were poisonous, report affirming
that in some instances the eating of them had been followed by
fatal effects. In consequence of this alarming idea, herbs were
banished for several weeks from the soups of Paris. Fortunately
these destroyers did not meddle with the corn, or famine would have
followed in their train. Reaumur has proved that a single pair of
these insects might in one season produce 80,000; so that, were the
friendly Ichneumons removed, to which the mercy of Heaven has given
it in charge to keep their numbers within due limits, we should no
longer enjoy the comfort of vegetables with our animal food, and
probably soon become the prey of scorbutic diseases[323].--I must
not overlook that singular animal the mole-cricket, (_Gryllotalpa
vulgaris_,) which is a terrible devastator of the produce of the
kitchen-garden. It burrows under ground, and devouring the roots of
plants thus occasions them to wither, and even gets into hot-beds.
It does so much mischief in Germany, that the author of an old book
of gardening, after giving a figure of it, exclaims, "Happy are the
places where this pest is unknown!"

The _flowers_ and _shrubs_, that form the ornament of our parterres
and pleasure-grounds, seem less exposed to insect depredation than
the produce of the kitchen-garden; yet still there are not a few
that suffer from it. The foliage of one of our greatest favourites,
the _rose_, often loses all its loveliness and lustre from the
excrements of the Aphides that prey upon it. The leaf-cutter bee
also (_Megachile[324] centuncularis_), by cutting pieces out to
form for its young its cells of curious construction, disfigures it
considerably; and the froth frog-hopper (_Cercopis spumaria_) aided
by the saw-fly of the rose (_Hylotoma Rosae_) contributes to check
the luxuriance of its growth, and to diminish the splendour of its
beauty.--Reaumur has given the history of a fly (_Merodon Narcissi_)
whose larva feeds in safety within the bulbs of the Narcissus, and
destroys them; and also of another, though he neglects to describe
the species, which tarnishes the gay parterre of the florist, whose
delight is to observe the freaks of nature exhibited in the various
many- streaks which diversify the blossom of the tulip,
by devouring its bulbs[325].--Ray notices another mentioned by
Swammerdam, probably _Bibio hortulana_, which he calls the deadliest
enemy of the flowers of the spring. He accuses it of despoiling the
gardens and fields of every blossom, and so extinguishing the hope
of the year[326]. But you must not take up a prejudice against an
innocent creature, even under the warrant of such weighty authority;
for the insect which our great naturalist has arraigned as the author
of such devastation is scarcely guilty, if it be at all a culprit, in
the degree here alleged against it. As it is very numerous early in
the year, it may perhaps discolour the vernal blossoms, but its mouth
is furnished with no instrument to enable it to devour them.

In our _stoves_ and _greenhouses_ the Aphides often reign triumphant;
for, if they be not discovered and destroyed when their numbers
are small, their increase becomes so rapid and their attack so
indiscriminate, that every plant is covered and contaminated by
them, beauty being converted into deformity, and objects before the
most attractive now exciting only nausea and disgust. The Coccus
(_C. Hesperidum_) also, which looks like an inanimate scale upon the
bark, does considerable injury to the two prime ornaments of our
conservatories, the orange and the myrtle; drawing off the sap by its
pectoral rostrum, and thus depriving the plant of a portion of its
nutriment, at the same time that it causes unpleasant sensations in the
beholder from its resemblance to the pustule of some cutaneous disease.

I must next conduct you from the garden into the _orchard_ and
_fruitery_; and here you will find the same enemies still more busy
and successful in their attempts to do us hurt.--The strawberry,
which is the earliest and at the same time most grateful of our
fruits, enjoys also the privilege of being almost exempt from insect
injury. A jumping weevil (_Orchestes Fragariae_) is said by Fabricius
to inhabit this plant; but as the same species is abundant in this
country upon the beech, the beauty of which it materially injures
by the numberless holes which it pierces in the leaves, and has I
believe never been taken upon the strawberry, it seems probable
that Smidt's specimens might have fallen upon the latter from that
tree[327]. The only insect I have observed feeding upon this fruit is
the ant, and the injury that it does is not material.--The raspberry,
the fruit of which arrives later at maturity, has more than one
species of these animals for its foes. Its foliage sometimes suffers
much from the attack of _Melolontha horticola_[328], a little beetle
related to the cockchafer: when in flower the footstalks of the
blossom are occasionally eaten through by a more minute animal of
the same order, _Byturus tomentosus_, which I once saw prove fatal
to a whole crop; and bees frequently anticipate us, and by sucking
the fruit with their proboscis spoil it for the table.--Gooseberries
and currants, those agreeable and useful fruits, a common object
of cultivation both to poor and rich, have their share of enemies
in this class. The all-attacking Aphides do not pass over them,
and the former especially are sometimes greatly injured by them;
their excrement falling upon the berries renders them clammy and
disgusting, and they soon turn quite black from it. In July 1812 I
saw a currant-bush miserably ravaged by a species of Coccus, very
much resembling the Coccus of the vine. The eggs were of a beautiful
pink, and enveloped in a large mass of cotton-like web, which could
be drawn out to a considerable length. Sir Joseph Banks lately showed
me a branch of the same shrub perforated down to the pith by the
caterpillar of _AEegeria tipuliformis_: the diminished size of the
fruit points out, he observes, where this enemy has been at work.
In Germany, where perhaps this insect is more numerous, it is said
to destroy not seldom the larger bushes of the red currant[329].
The foliage of these fruits often suffers much from the black and
white caterpillar of _Abraxas grossulariata_; (this was the case
last spring at Hull;) but their worst and most destructive enemy,
particularly of the gooseberry, is that of a small saw-fly. This
larva is of a green colour, shagreened as it were with minute black
tubercles, which it loses at its last moult. The fly attaches its
eggs in rows to the underside of the leaves. When first hatched,
the little animals feed in society; but having consumed the leaf on
which they were born, they separate from each other, and the work of
devastation proceeds with such rapidity, that frequently, where many
families are produced on the same bush, nothing of the leaves is left
but the veins, and all the fruit for that year is spoiled[330].

Upon the leaves of the cherry, which usually succeeds the gooseberry,
in common with those of the pear and several other fruit-trees, the
slimy larva of another saw-fly (_Tenthredo Cerasi_) makes its repast,
yet without being the cause of any very material injury. But in
North America a second species nearly related to it, known there by
the name of the _slug-worm_, has become prevalent to such a degree
as to threaten the destruction not only of the cherry, but also of
the pear, quince, and plum. In 1797 they were so numerous that the
smaller trees were covered by them; and a breeze of air passing through
those on which they abounded became charged with a very disagreeable
and sickening odour. Twenty or thirty were to be seen on a single
leaf; and many trees, being quite stripped, were obliged to put forth
fresh foliage, thus anticipating the supply of the succeeding year
and cutting off the prospect of fruit[331].--In some parts of Germany
the cherry-tree has an enemy equally injurious. A splendid beetle of
the weevil tribe (_Rynchites Bacchus_) bores with its rostrum through
the half-grown fruit into the soft stone, and there deposits an egg.
The grub produced from it feeds upon the kernel, and, when about to
become a pupa, gnaws its way through the cherry, and sometimes not one
in a thousand escapes[332]. This insect is fortunately rare with us,
and has usually been found upon the black-thorn. The cherry-fly also
(_Tephritis Cerasi_) provides a habitation for its maggot in the same
fruit, which it invariably spoils[333].

The different varieties of the plum are every year more or less
injured by Aphides; and a Coccus (_C. Persicae?_) sometimes so abounds
upon them that every twig is thickly beaded with the red semiglobose
bodies of the gravid females, whose progeny in spring exhaust the
trees by pumping out the sap.

The blossoms of our pear-trees, as we learn from Mr. Knight, are often
rendered abortive by the grub of a brown beetle: and a considerable
quantity of its fruit is destroyed by that of a small four-winged fly,
which occasions it to drop off prematurely[334]. This would seem to
be a saw-fly, and is probably the species which Reaumur saw enter the
blossom of a pear before it was quite open, doubtless to deposit its
eggs in the embryo fruit. He often found in young pears, on opening
them, a larva of this genus[335].--A little moth likewise is mentioned
by Mr. Forsyth as very injurious to this tree[336].

But of all our fruits none is so useful and important as the
apple, and none suffers more from insects, which according to Mr.
Knight[337] are a more frequent cause of the crops failing than
frost. The figure-of-eight moth (_Episema caeruleocephala_), Linne
denominates the pest of Pomona and the destroyer of the blossoms
of the apple, pear, and cherry.--He also mentions another (_Tinea
Corticella_) as inhabiting apple-bearing trees under the bark.--And
Reaumur has given us the history of a species common in this
country, and producing the same effect, often to the destruction
of the crop, the caterpillar of which feeds in the centre of our
apples, thus occasioning them to fall[338]. Even the young grafts, I
am informed by an intelligent friend[339], are frequently destroyed,
sometimes many hundreds in one night, in the nurseries about London,
by _Curculio Vastator_, Marsh., (_Otiorhynchus? picipes_) one of the
short-snouted weevils; and the foundation of canker in full-grown
trees is often laid by the larvae of _Semasia Woeberana_[340]. The
sap too is often injuriously drawn off by a minute Coccus, of which
the female has the exact shape of a muscle-shell (_C. arborum
linearis_, Geoffr.), and which Reaumur has accurately described and
figured[341]. This species so abounded in 1816 on an apple-tree in
my garden, that the whole bark was covered with it in every part;
and I have since been informed by Joshua Haworth, jun. Esq. of Hull,
that it equally infests other trees in the neighbourhood. Even the
fruit of a golden pippin which he sent me were thickly beset with
it.--But the greatest enemy of this tree, and which has been known
in this country only since the year 1787, is the apple-aphis, called
by some the _Coccus_, and by others the _American blight_. This is
a minute insect, covered with a long cotton-like wool transpiring
from the pores of its body, which takes its station in the chinks
and rugosities of the bark, where it increases abundantly, and by
constantly drawing off the sap causes ultimately the destruction of
the tree. Whence this pest was first introduced is not certainly
known. Sir Joseph Banks traced its origin to a nursery in Sloane
Street; and at first he was led to conclude that it had been imported
with some apple-trees from France. On writing, however, to gardeners
in that country, he found it to be wholly unknown there. It was
therefore, if not a native insect, most probably derived from North
America, from whence apple-trees had also been imported by the
proprietor of that nursery. Whatever its origin, it spread rapidly.
At first it was confined to the vicinity of the metropolis, where
it destroyed thousands of trees. But it has now found its way into
other parts of the kingdom, particularly into the cyder counties;
and in 1810 so many perished from it in Gloucestershire, that, if
some mode of destroying it were not discovered, it was feared the
making of cyder must be abandoned. This valuable discovery, it is
said, has since been made; the application of the spirit of tar to
the bark being recommended as effectual[342]. Sir Joseph Banks long
ago extirpated it from his own apple-trees, by the simple method of
taking off all the rugged and dead old bark, and then scrubbing the
trunk and branches with a hard brush[343].

Our more dainty and delicate fruits, at least such as are usually so
accounted, the apricot, the peach, and the nectarine, originally of
Asiatic origin, are not less subject to the empire of insects than
the homelier natives of Europe. Certain Aphides form a convenient
and sheltered habitation for themselves, by causing portions of the
leaves to rise into hollow red convexities; in these they reside,
and, with their rostrum pumping out the sap, in time occasion them to
curl up, and thus deform the tree and injure the produce. The fruit
is attacked by various other enemies of this class, against which we
find it not easy to secure it: wasps, earwigs, flies, wood-lice, and
ants, which last communicate to it a disagreeable flavour, all share
with us these ambrosial treasures; the first of them as it were opening
the door, by making an incision in the rind, and letting in all the
rest.--The nucleus of the apricot is also sometimes inhabited by the
caterpillar of a moth, which devouring the kernel causes the fruit to
fall prematurely[344].--In this country, however, these fruits may
be regarded as mere luxuries, and therefore are of less consequence;
but in North America they constitute an important part of the general
produce, at least the peach, serving both as food for swine, and
furnishing by distillation a useful spirit. The ravages committed upon
them there by insects are so serious, that premiums have been offered
for extirpating them. A species of weevil, perhaps a _Rynchites_,
enters the fruit when unripe, probably laying its eggs within the
stone, and so destroys them. And two kinds of _Zygaena_, by attacking
the roots do a still greater injury to the trees[345].--A Coccus, as it
should seem from the description, imported about thirty years ago from
the Mauritius, or else with the Constantia vine from the Cape of Good
Hope, has destroyed nearly nine-tenths of the peach-trees in the Island
of St. Helena, where formerly they were so abundant, that, as in North
America, the swine were fed with them. Various means have been employed
to destroy this plague, but hitherto without success[346].--The
imperial pine-apple, the glory of our stoves, and the most esteemed
of the gifts of Pomona, cannot, however precious, be defended from
the injuries of a singular species of mite, the _red Spider_[347] of
gardeners, (_Erythraeus telarius_) which covers them, and other stove
plants, with a most delicate but at the same time very pernicious
web.--The olive-tree, so valuable to the inhabitants of the warmer
regions of Europe, often nourishes in its berries the destructive
maggot of a fly (_Oscinis Oleae_); and the caterpillar of a little
moth (_Tinea Oleella_), which preys upon the kernel of the nucleus,
occasions them to fall before they are ripe.--Every one who eats nuts
knows that they are very often inhabited by a small white grub; this
is the offspring of a weevil (_Balaninus Nucum_) remarkable for its
long and slender rostrum, with which it perforates the shell when young
and soft, and deposits an egg in the orifice.--In France it sometimes
happens, when the chestnuts promise an abundant crop, that the fruit
falls before it comes to maturity, scarcely any remaining upon the
trees. The caterpillar of a moth which eats into its interior is the
cause of this disappointment[348].--Of fruits the date has the hardest
nucleus; yet an insect of the same tribe with the above, that feeds
upon its kernel, is armed with jaws sufficiently strong to perforate
it, that it may make its escape when the time of its change is arrived,
and assume the pupa between the stone and the flesh. The date is eaten
also by a beetle which Hasselquist calls a _Dermestes_[349].

One of the most delicious, and at the same time most useful, of all
our fruits is the grape: to this, as you know, we are indebted for
our raisins, for our currants, for our wine, and for our brandy; you
cannot therefore but feel interested in its history, and desire to
be informed, whether, like those before enumerated, this choice gift
of Heaven, whose produce "cheereth God and man[350]," must also be
the prey of insects. There is a singular beetle, common in Hungary,
(_Lethrus cephalotes_) which gnaws off the young shoots of the vine,
and drags them backward into its burrow, where it feeds upon them:
on this account the country people wage continual war with it,
destroying vast numbers[351].--Three other beetles also attack this
noble plant: two of them, mentioned by French authors, (_Rynchites
Bacchus_ and _Eumolpus Vitis_,) devour the young shoots, the foliage
and the footstalks of the fruit, so that the latter is prevented
from coming to maturity[352]; and a third (_C. Corruptor_, Host,)
by a German, which seems closely allied to _Otiorhynchus? picipes_
before mentioned, if it be not the same insect. This destroys the
young vines, often killing them the first year; and is accounted so
terrible an enemy to them, that not only the animals but even their
eggs are searched for and destroyed, and to forward this work people
often call in the assistance of their neighbours[353].--In the Crimea
the small caterpillar of a _Procris_ or _Ino_ (lepidopterous genera
separated from _Sphinx_, L.) related to _I. Statices_, is a still
more destructive enemy. As soon as the buds open in the spring,
it eats its way into them, especially the fruit buds, and devours
the germ of the grape. Two or three of these caterpillars will so
injure a vine, by creeping from one germ to another, that it will
bear no fruit nor produce a single regular shoot the succeeding
year[354].--Vine leaves in France are also frequently destroyed by
the larva of a moth (_Tortrix vitana_); in Germany another species
does great injury to the young bunches, preventing their expansion
by the webs in which it involves them[355]; and a third (_Tortrix
fasciana_) makes the grapes themselves its food: a similar insect is
alluded to in the threat contained in Deuteronomy[356].--The worst
pest of the vine in this country is its Coccus (_C. Vitis_). This
animal, which fortunately is not sufficiently hardy to endure the
common temperature of our atmosphere, sometimes so abounds upon those
that are cultivated in stoves and greenhouses, that their stems seem
quite covered with little locks of white cotton; which appearance is
caused by a filamentous secretion transpiring through the skin of the
animal, in which they envelop their eggs. Where they prevail they
do great injury to the plant by subtracting the sap from its foliage
and fruit, and causing it to bleed.--And to close the list, you are
perfectly aware of the eagerness with which wasps, flies, and other
insects, attack the grapes when ripe, often leaving nothing but the
mere skin for their lordly proprietor.

There are some of these creatures that attack indiscriminately all
fruit-trees. One of these is the _Cicada septendecim_, (so called
because, according to Kalm, it appears only once in seventeen
years[357].) The female oviposits in the pith of the twigs of
trees, where the grubs are hatched, and do infinite damage both
to fruit- and forest-trees[358].--Another, the caterpillar of the
butterfly of the hawthorn, (_Pieris Crataegi_) which in 1791, in
some parts of Germany, stripped the fruit-trees in general of their
foliage[359].--In France also in 1731 and 1732 that of a moth which
seems related to the brown-tail moth (_Arctia phaeorhoea_), whose
history has been given by the late Mr. Curtis, was so numerous as
to occasion a general alarm. The oaks, elms, and white-thorn hedges
looked as if some burning wind had passed over them and dried up
their leaves; for, the insect devouring only one surface of them,
that which is left becomes brown and dry. They also laid waste the
fruit-trees, and even devoured the fruit; so that the parliament
published an edict to compel people to collect and destroy them; but
this would in a great measure have been ineffectual, had not some
cold rains fallen, which so completely annihilated them, that it was
difficult to meet with a single individual[360].

If we quit the orchard and fruit-garden for a walk in our
_plantations_ and _groves_, we shall still be forced to witness the
sad effects of insect devastation; and when we see, as sometimes
happens, the hedges and trees entirely deprived of their foliage,
and ourselves of the shade we love from the fervid beam of the
noon-day sun; when the singing birds have deserted them; and all
their music, which has so often enchanted us by its melody, variety,
and sweetness, has ceased--we shall be tempted in our hearts to
wish the whole insect race was blotted from the page of creation.
Numerous are the agents employed in this work of destruction.
Amongst the beetles, various cockchafers (_Melolontha vulgaris_,
_Amphimalla solstitialis_, and _Phyllopertha horticola_) in their
perfect state act as conspicuous a part in injuring the trees, as
their grubs do in destroying the herbage. Besides the leaves of
fruit-trees, they devour those of the sycamore, the lime, the beech,
the willow, and the elm. They are sometimes, especially the common
one, astonishingly numerous. Mouffet relates (but one would think
that there must be some mistake in the date, since they are never so
early in their appearance,) that on the 24th of February 1574 such
a number of them fell into the river Severn as to stop the wheels
of the water-mills[361]. It is also recorded in the _Philosophical
Transactions_, that in 1688 they filled the hedges and trees of part
of the county of Galway in such infinite numbers, as to cling to
each other in clusters like bees when they swarm; on the wing they
darkened the air, and produced a sound like that of distant drums.
When they were feeding, the noise of their jaws might be mistaken
for the sawing of timber. Travellers and people abroad were very
much annoyed by their continual flying in their faces; and in a short
time the leaves of all the trees for some miles round were so totally
consumed by them, that at Midsummer the country wore the aspect of
the depth of winter[362].

But the criminals to whom it is principally owing that our groves
are sometimes stripped of the green robe of summer, are the various
tribes of _Lepidoptera_, especially the night-fliers or moths, myriads
of whose caterpillars, in certain seasons, despoil whole districts
of their beauty, and our walks of all their pleasure. In 1731 the
oaks in France were terribly devastated by the larva of _Hypogymna
dispar_[363], and in 1797 many of the pine forests about Bayreuth
suffered a similar injury from that of _H. Monacha_[364]. Those
of Germany are also sometimes laid waste by the caterpillar of a
beautiful moth belonging to the _Noctuidae_ (_Achatea spreta_[365]),
which has been taken in England. _Cheimatobia brumata_ is likewise
a fearful enemy to the foliage of almost every kind of tree[366].
The woods in certain provinces of North America are in some years
entirely stripped by that of another moth, which eats all kinds of
leaves. This happening at a time of the year when the heat is most
excessive is attended by fatal consequences. For, being deprived of
the shelter of their foliage, whole forests are sometimes entirely
dried up and ruined[367].--The brown-tail moth, before alluded to,
which occasionally bares our hawthorn hedges, has been rendered
famous by the alarm it caused to the inhabitants of the vicinity of
the metropolis in 1782, when rewards were offered for collecting the
caterpillars, and the churchwardens and overseers of the parishes
attended to see them burnt by bushels.--You may have observed perhaps
in some cabinets of foreign insects an ant, the head of which is very
large in proportion to the size of its body, with a piece of leaf in
its mouth many times bigger than itself. These ants, called in Tobago
parasol ants (_Oecodoma cephalotes_), cut circular pieces out of the
leaves of various trees and plants, which they carry in their jaws to
their nests, and they will strip a tree of its leaves in a night, a
circumstance which has been confirmed to me by Captain Hancock[368].
Stedman mentions another very large ant, being at least an inch in
length, which has the same instinct. It was a pleasant spectacle,
he observes, to behold this army of ants marching constantly in the
same direction, and each individual with its bit of green leaf in its
mouth[369]. The injury thus caused to trees by insects is not confined
to the mere loss of their leaves for one season; for it occasions them
to draw upon the funds of another, by sending forth premature shoots
and making gems unfold, that, in the ordinary course, would not have
put forth their foliage till the following year.

Other insects, though they do not entirely devour the leaves of trees
and plants, yet considerably diminish their beauty. Thus, for instance,
sometimes the subcutaneous larvae undermine them, when the leaf exhibits
the whole course of their labyrinth in a pallid, tortuous, gradually
dilating line--at others the Tortrices disfigure them by rolling them
up, or the leaf-cutter bees by taking a piece out of them, or certain
Tineae again by eating their under surface, and so causing them to
wither either partially or totally. You have doubtless observed what
is called the honey-dew upon the maple and other trees, concerning
which the learned Roman naturalist Pliny gravely hesitates whether he
shall call it the sweat of the heavens, the saliva of the stars, or a
liquid produced by the purgation of the air[370]!! Perhaps you may
not be aware that it is a secretion of Aphides, whose excrement has
the privilege of emulating sugar and honey in sweetness and purity.
It however often tarnishes the lustre of those trees in which these
insects are numerous, and is the lure that attracts the swarms of
ants which you may often see travelling up and down the trunk of
the oak and other trees. The larch in particular is inhabited by an
Aphis transpiring a waxy substance like filaments of cotton: this is
sometimes so infinitely multiplied upon it as to whiten the whole
tree, which often perishes in consequence of its attack. The beech is
infested by a similar one. Some animals also of this genus inhabiting
the poplar, elm, lime, and willow, reside in galls they have produced,
that disfigure the leaves or their footstalks. Perhaps those resembling
fruit, or flowers, or moss, produced by the Aphis of the fir (_Aphis
Abietis_), the different species of gall-gnats (_Cecidomyia_), or
occasioned by the puncture and oviposition of the various kinds of
gall-flies (_Cynips_), may be regarded rather as an ornament than as
an injury to a tree or shrub; yet when too numerous they must deprive
it of its proper nutriment, and so occasion some defect. And probably
the enormous wens, and other monstrosities and deformities observable
in trees, may have been originally produced by the bite or incision of
insects.

Besides exterior insect enemies, living trees are liable to the
ravages of many that are _interior_. The caterpillar of the great
goat-moth (_Cossus ligniperda_[371]), of the hornet hawk-moth (_Sesia
crabroniformis_, F.), and of two beetles (_Nitidula grisea_, and
_Cryptorhynchus Lapathi_), devour the wood of the willow and sallow,
which thus in time often become so hollow as to be easily blown down.
The bee hawk-moth (_Sesia apiformis_[372]), and probably _Rynchites
Populi_, a brilliant green weevil, feeds upon the poplar--_Prionus
coriarius_ is sometimes found in the oak and sometimes in the elm,
and _Hylurgus piniperda_[373], in the Scotch fir. Mr. Stephens
informs me that the fir-trees in a plantation of Mr. Foljambe's in
Yorkshire were destroyed by a hymenopterous insect (_Sirex Gigas_),
while those of another belonging to the same gentleman in Wiltshire
met with a similar fate from the attack of _Sirex Juvencus_. The elm
also suffers dreadfully from the attack of another minute beetle
(_Scolytus destructor_), related to the last[374].--When the sap
flows from wounds in a tree it is attended by various other beetles,
(I have observed _Cetonia aurata_, and several _Nitidulae_ and
_Brachyptera_ busy in this way,) which prevent it from healing so
soon as it would otherwise do; and if the bark be any where separated
from the wood, a numerous army of wood-lice, earwigs, spiders,
field-bugs, and similar _subcortical_ insects take their station
there and prevent a re-union.

The mischief however produced by any or all of these, is not to be
compared with that sometimes sustained in Germany from the attacks of
a small beetle, (_Bostrichus Typographus_) so called on account of a
fancied resemblance between the paths it erodes and letters, which
bores into the fir. This insect, in its preparatory state, feeds upon
the soft inner bark only: but it attacks this important part in such
vast numbers, 80,000 being sometimes found in a single tree, that it
is infinitely more noxious than any of those that bore into the wood:
and such is its vitality, that though the bark be battered and the
tree plunged into water, or laid upon the ice or snow, it remains
alive and unhurt. The leaves of the trees infested by these insects
first become yellow, the trees themselves then die at the top, and
soon entirely perish. Their ravages have long been known in Germany
under the name of _Wurm troekniss_ (decay caused by worms); and in the
old liturgies of that country the animal itself is formally mentioned
under its vulgar appellation, "The Turk." This pest was particularly
prevalent and caused incalculable mischief about the year 1665. In
the beginning of the last century it again showed itself in the Hartz
forests--it reappeared in 1757, redoubled its injuries in 1769, and
arrived at its height in 1783, when the number of trees destroyed
by it in the above forests alone, was calculated at a million and a
half, and the inhabitants were threatened with a total suspension
of the working of their mines, and consequent ruin. At this period
these Bostrichi, when arrived at their perfect state, migrated in
swarms like bees into Suabia and Franconia. At length, between the
years 1784 and 1789, in consequence of a succession of cold and moist
seasons, the numbers of this scourge were sensibly diminished. It
appeared again however in 1790, and so late as 1796 there was great
reason to fear for the few fir-trees that were left[375].

The seeds of forest- as well as of fruit-trees are doubtless subject
to injuries from the same quarter, but these being more out of the
reach of observation, have not been much noticed. Acorns, however, a
considerable article with nurserymen, are said to have both a moth
and a beetle that prey upon them; and what is remarkable, though
sometimes one larva of each is found in the same acorn, yet two of
either kind are never to be met with together[376]. The beetle is
probably the _Curculio Glandium_ (_Balaninus_) of Mr. Marsham, and is
nearly related to the species whose grub inhabits the nut.

Having now conducted you round and exhibited to you the melancholy
proofs of the universal dominion of insects over our vegetable
treasures, while growing or endued with the principle of vitality,
in their separate departments,--I must next introduce you to a pest
worse than all put together, which indiscriminately attacks and
destroys every vegetable substance that the earth produces, and
which, wherever it prevails, carries famine, pestilence and death in
its train. Happily for this country--and we cannot be too thankful
for the privilege, we know this scourge of nations only by report.
The name of _Locust_, which has been such a sound of horror in other
countries, here only suggests an object of interesting inquiry. But
the ravages of locusts are so copious a theme that they merit to be
considered in a separate letter.

                                                  I am, &c.


FOOTNOTES:

[270] _Linn. Trans._ ix. 156-61.

[271] Germar's _Mag. der Ent._ i. 1-10. Mr. Stephens, in his
_Illustrations of British Entomology_ (No. I. p. 4.), very
judiciously asks, "May not these herbivorous larvae have been the
principal cause of the mischief to the wheat, while those of the
_Zabrus_ contributed rather to lessen their numbers than to destroy
the corn." But this query does not account for their being found,
when in the perfect state, attacking the ear. I have seen cognate
beetles devouring the seeds of umbelliferous plants.

[272] _Act. Stockh._ 1778. 3. n. 11. and 4. n. 4. Marsham in _Linn.
Trans._ ii. 79.

[273] _Linn. Trans._ ii. 76-80.

[274] _Encyclopaed. Britann._ viii. 480-95.

[275] Young's _Annals of Agriculture_, xi. 471.

[276] _Tipula Tritici_, K., belonging to Latreille's genus
_Cecidomyia_. (See above, p. 28. note^a.) Marsham and Kirby in _Linn.
Trans._ iii. 242-5. iv. 225-39. v. 96-110.

[277] Oliv. ii. n. 19. 3-4.

[278] _Curculio testaceus_, _Ent. Brit._

[279] Marsham in _Linn. Trans._ ii. 80. De Geer notices the injury
done by this fly to rye, and observes that before it had been
attributed to frost. ii. 68.

[280] _Act. Stockh._ 1750. 128. Reaum. ii. 480, &c.

[281] This insect was taken in maize by Mr. Sparshall of Norwich.

[282] Smith's Abbott's _Insects of Georgia_, 191.

[283] I say this upon the authority of Mr. Wolnough of Hollesley
(late of Boyton) in Suffolk, an intelligent agriculturist, and a most
acute and accurate observer of nature.

[284] Reaum. vi. 566.

[285] Kalm's _Travels_, i. 173.

[286] Amoreux, 288.

[287] I have raised plants from this seed, which appear from the
foliage to belong either to _Phaseolus_ or _Dolichos_.

[288] Markwick, Marsham and Lehmann in _Linn. Trans._ vi. 142-. and
Kirby in ditto, ix. 37. 42. n. 19. 23.

[289] PLATE XVII. FIG. 12.

[290] _Philos. Trans._ 1741. 581.

[291] De Geer, ii. 341. _Amoen. Acad._ iii. 355.

[292] _Farmer's Mag._ iii. 487.

[293] Pallas's _Travels in South Russia_, i. 30.

[294] PLATE XVIII. FIG. 4.

[295] Marsham in _Communications to the Board of Agriculture_, iv.
412. _Plate_ xviii. _fig_. 4. and _Linn. Trans._ ix. 60.

[296] PLATE XXIV. FIG. 3.

[297] The wire-worm is particularly destructive for a few years in
gardens recently converted from pasture ground. In the Botanic Garden
at Hull thus circumstanced a great proportion of the annuals sown in
1813 were destroyed by it. A very simple and effectual remedy in such
cases was mentioned to me by Sir Joseph Banks. He recommended that
slices of potato stuck upon skewers should be buried near the seeds
sown, examined every day, and the wire-worms which collect upon them
in great numbers destroyed.

This plan of decoying destructive animals from our crops by offering
them more tempting food, is excellent, and deserves to be pursued
in other instances. It was very successfully employed in 1813 by
J. M. Rodwell, Esq. of Barham Hall near Ipswich, one of the most
skilful and best informed agriculturists in the county of Suffolk,
to preserve some of his wheat-fields from the ravages of a small
gray slug, which threatened to demolish the plant. Having heard that
turnips had been used with success to entice the slugs from wheat, he
caused a sufficient quantity to dress eight acres to be got together;
and then, the tops being divided and the apples sliced, he directed
the pieces to be laid separately, dressing two stetches with them and
omitting two alternately, till the whole field of eight acres was
gone over. On the following morning he employed two women to examine
and free from the slugs, which they did into a measure, the tops and
slices; and when cleared they were laid upon those stetches that
had been omitted the day before. It was observed invariably, that
in the stetches dressed with the turnips no slugs were to be found
upon the wheat or crawling upon the land, though they abounded upon
the turnips; while on the undressed stetches they were to be seen
in great numbers both on the wheat and on the land. The quantity of
slugs thus collected was near a bushel.--Mr. Rodwell is persuaded
that by this plan he saved his wheat from essential injury.

[298] Reaum. v. 11.

[299] Two species are confounded under the appellation of _the grub_,
the larvae namely of _Tipula oleracea_ and _cornicina_, which last is
very injurious, though not equally with the first. In the rich district
of _Sunk Island_ in Holderness, in the spring of 1813, hundreds of
acres of pasture have been entirely destroyed by them, being rendered
as completely brown as if they had suffered a three months drought, and
destitute of all vegetation except that of a few thistles. A square
foot of the dead turf being dug up, 210 grubs were counted in it!
and, what furnishes a striking proof of the prolific powers of these
insects, the next year it was difficult to find a single one.

[300] Stickney's _Observations on the Grub_.

[301] De Geer, i. 487.

[302] I owe this information to the late Robinson Kittoe, Esq.

[303] Castle in _Philos. Trans._ xxx. 346.

[304] Browne's _Civil and Nat. Hist. of Jamaica_, 430.

[305] _Essai sur la Geographie des Plantes_, 136.

[306] M'Kinnen, 171. Browne _ubi supr._ Merian, _Ins. Sur._ 10.

[307] Smith's Abbott's _Insects of Georgia_, 199.

[308] Illiger, _Mag._ i. 256.

[309] The farmers would do well to change the name of this insect
from _turnip-fly_ to _turnip-flea_, since from its diminutive size
and activity in leaping the latter name is much the most proper. The
term, _the fly_, might with propriety be restricted to the Hop-aphis.

[310] Young's _Annals of Agriculture_, vii. 102.

[311] Marshall in _Philos. Trans._ lxxiii. 1783.

[312] See above, p. 167-168.

[313] Swamm. ii. 81. _col._ b.--Gyllenhal in describing the last-named
species, so common on the flowers of siliquose plants (_Insecta
Suecica_, iii. 142.), asks if his _R. sulcicollis_ (_C. Pleurostigma_,
E. B.), which agrees with it in most respects, except in having toothed
thighs, be not the other sex? This query I can solve in the negative,
having taken the sexes of _R. assimilis_ in coitu, which do not differ,
save that the male has a somewhat shorter rostrum.

[314] Spence's _Observations on the Disease in Turnips called Fingers
and Toes._ Hull 1812. 8vo.

[315] Reaum. ii. 471.

[316] See above, p. 29.

[317] De Geer, ii. 440. In the summer of 1826 when at Brussels, I
observed that delicious vegetable of the _cabbage_ tribe so largely
cultivated there under the name of _Jets de choux_, and which in
England we call _Brussels sprouts_, to be materially injured in the
later stages of its growth by the attacks of the _turnip-flea_, and
other little beetles of the same genus (_Haltica_), which were so
numerous and so universally prevalent, that I scarcely ever examined
a full-grown plant from which a vast number might not have been
collected. Some plants were almost black with them, the species most
abundant being of a dark aeneous tinge. They had not merely eroded the
cuticle in various parts, so as to give the leaves a brown blistered
appearance, but had also eaten them into large holes, at the margin
of which I often saw them in the act of gnawing; and the stunted
and unhealthy appearance of the plants sufficiently indicated the
injurious effect of this interruption of the proper office of the
sap. What was particularly remarkable, considering the locomotive
powers of these insects, was that the young turnips, sown in August
after the wheat and rye, close to acres of Brussels sprouts, (which
all round Brussels are planted in the open fields among other crops,)
infested by myriads of these insects, were not more eaten by them
than they usually are in England, and produced good average crops.
It would seem, agreeably to a fact already mentioned, (see Vol. I.
4th Edit. p. 389,) that they prefer the taste of leaves to which they
have been accustomed, to younger plants of the same natural family;
and hence perhaps the previous sowing of a crop of cabbage-plants in
the corner of a field meant for turnips, might allure and keep there
the great bulk of these insects present in the vicinity, until the
turnips were out of danger.

[318] Perhaps this fly is the same which Linne confounded with
_Tachina Larvarum_, which he says he had found in the roots of the
cabbage (_Syst. Nat._ 992. 78.) I say "_confounded_," because it is
not likely that the same species should be parasitic in an insect,
and also inhabit a vegetable.

[319] In lately examining, however, some young garden peas and beans
about four inches high, I observed the margins of the leaves to be
gnawed into deep scollops by a little weevil (_Sitona lineata_), of
which I found from two to eight on each pea and bean, and many in the
act of eating. Not only were the larger leaves of every plant thus
eroded, but in many cases the terminal young shoots and leaves were
apparently irreparably injured. I have often noticed this and another
of the short-snouted Curculios (_S. tibialis_) in great abundance in
pea and bean fields, but was not aware till now that either of them
was injurious to these plants. Probably both are so, but whether the
crop is materially affected by them must be left to further inquiry.

[320] Reaum. ii. 479.

[321] Description of _S. Ceparum_.--Cinereous, clothed with distant
black hairs, proceeding, particularly on the thorax, from a black
point. Legs nigrescent. Back of the abdomen of the male with an
interrupted black vitta down the middle. Wings immaculate. Poisers
and alulae pale yellow. Length 3-1/2 lines.

[322] Barton in _Philos. Magaz._ ix. 62.

[323] Reaum. ii. 337.

[324] _Apis._ **. c. 2. [Greek: a]. K.

[325] Reaum. iv. 499.

[326] Rai. _Hist. Ins._ Prolegom. xi.

[327] This kind of misnomer frequently occurs in entomological
authors.--Thus, for instance, the _Curculio (Rynchites) Alliariae_ of
Linne feeds upon the hawthorn, and _Curculio (Cryptorhynchus) Lapathi_
upon the willow (Curtis in _Linn. Trans._ i. 86.); but as _Alliaria_
is common in hawthorn hedges, and docks often grow under willows, the
mistake in question easily happened: when, however, such mistakes are
discovered, the _Trivial Name_ ought certainly to be altered.

[328] I consider this insect as the type of a new subgenus
(_Phyllopertha_, K. MS.), which connects those tribes of
_Melolontha_, F. that have a mesosternal prominence with those that
have not. Of this subgenus I possess six species. It is clearly
distinct from _Anisoplia_, under which DeJean arranges it.

[329] _Wiener Verzeich._ 8vo. 29.

[330] Fabricius seems to have regarded the saw-fly that feeds upon
the _sallow_ (_Nematus Capreae_), not only as synonymous with that
which feeds upon the _osier_, but also with our little assailant
of the _gooseberry_ and _currant_. Yet it is very evident from
Reaumur's account, whose accuracy may be depended upon, that they are
all distinct species. Fabricius's description of the _fly_ agrees
with the insect of the gooseberry, but that which he has given of
the _larva_ belongs to the animal inhabiting the sallow. Probably,
confounding the two species, he described the imago from the insect
of the former, and the larva (if he did not copy from Reaumur or
Linne) from that of the latter. Linne was correct in regarding
Reaumur's three insects as distinct species, though he appears to be
mistaken in referring to him under _N. flavus_, as the saw-fly of the
currant and gooseberry is not wholly yellow.

[331] Peck's _Nat. Hist. of the Slug-worm_, 9.

[332] _Trost Kleiner Beytrag_. 38.

[333] Reaum. ii. 477.

[334] _On the Apple and Pear_, 158. The beetle Mr. Knight alludes to
is probably the _Polydrosus oblongus_, which answers his description,
and is common on pear-trees.--In Holland, it is stated in a little
tract on this subject (_Verhandeling ten bewijze &c. door_ F. H. van
Berck. 8vo. Haarlem 1807), that the great destroyer of the blossoms
of their apple- and pear-trees is the larva of another weevil,
_Anthonomus Pomorum_, which from the name and Gyllenhal's addition
to the habitat given by Linne--"quas destruit"--should seem to be
injurious in Sweden also.

[335] Reaum. _ubi supr._ 475.

[336] _On Fruit Trees_, 271.

[337] _On the Apple and Pear_, 45.

[338] Reaum. ii. 499.

[339] Mr. Scales.

[340] See Observations on this Insect in the 2nd volume of the
_Horticultural Society's Transactions_, p. 25. By W. Spence.

[341] Reaum. iv. 69. _t._ 5. _f._ 6, 7.

[342] A solution of quick-lime is recommended in the _Gardener's
Magazine for January_ 1828, a periodical work which every friend of
Horticulture ought to possess.

[343] This Aphis is evidently the insect described in Illiger's
_Magazin_, i. 450. under the name of _A. lanigera_, as having done
great injury to the apple-trees in the neighbourhood of Bremen in 1801.
That it is an Aphis and no Coccus is clear from its _oral_ rostrum and
the wings of the male, of which Sir Joseph Banks possesses an admirable
drawing by Mr. Bauer. On this Aphis see Forsyth, 265; _Monthly Mag._
xxxii. 320; and also for August 1811; and Sir Joseph Banks in the
_Horticultural Society's Transactions_, ii. 162. Those Aphides that
transpire a cottony excretion are now considered as belonging to a
distinct genus, under the name of _Myzoxyla_.

[344] M. de la Hire in Reaum. ii. 478.

[345] Dr. Smith Barton's Letter in _Philos. Magaz._ xxii. 210.
William Davy, Esq. American Consul of the Port of Hull, long resident
in the United States, informed me that though he had abundance of
peaches at his country-house, German Town near Philadelphia, he could
never succeed with the nectarine, the fruit constantly falling off
perforated by the grub of some insect.

[346] _Descr. of the I. of St. Helena_, 147.

[347] A mode of destroying this hurtful insect is given in a Number
of that useful and interesting work, the _Gardener's Magazine_, just
quoted.

[348] Reaum. ii. 505.

[349] Ibid. ii. 507. and Hasselquist's _Travels in the Levant_, 428.

[350] That is "High and Low," Judges ix. 13.

[351] Sturm _Deutschlands Fauna_, i. 5.

[352] Latreille, _Hist. Nat._ xi. 66. 331.

[353] Host in Jacquin. _Collect._ iii. 297.

[354] Pallas's _Travels in S. Russia_, ii. 241.

[355] Jacquin. _Collect._ ii. 97.

[356] Deut. xxviii. 39.

[357] _Travels_, ii. 6.

[358] Collinson in _Philos. Trans._ liv. x. 65.

[359] Roesel, I. ii. 15.

[360] Reaum. ii. 122.

[361] Mouffet, 160.

[362] _Philos. Trans._ xix. 741.

[363] Reaum. i. 387. These larvae were so extremely numerous in 1826
on the limes of the _Allee Verte_ at Brussels, that many of the trees
of that noble avenue, though of great age, were nearly deprived of
their leaves, and afforded little of the shade which the unusual
heat of the summer so urgently required. The moths which in autumn
proceeded from them, when in motion towards night, swarmed like
bees, and subsequently on the trunk of every tree might be seen
scores of females depositing their down-covered patch of eggs. In the
_Park_ they were also very abundant; and it may be safely asserted
that if one half of the eggs deposited were to be hatched, in 1827
scarcely a leaf would remain in either of these favourite places
of public resort. Happily, however, this calamity seems likely to
be prevented. Of the vast number of patches of eggs which I saw on
almost every tree in the park about the end of September, I could
two months afterwards to my no small surprise, discover scarcely
one, though the singularity of the fact made me examine closely.
For their disappearance I have no doubt the inhabitants of Brussels
are indebted to the tit-mouse (_Parus_), the tree-creeper (_Certhia
familiaris_), and other small birds known to derive part of their
food from the eggs of insects, and which abound in the park, where
they may be often seen running up and down the trunks of the trees,
at once providing their own food and rendering a service to man,
which all his powers would be inadequate completely to effect.

Reaumur (ii. 106) in certain seasons found these patches of eggs so
numerous, that in the _Bois de Boulogne_ there was scarcely an oak,
the under side of the branches of which were not covered by them for
an extent of seven or eight feet. He informs us that the eggs are not
hatched till the following spring.

[364] _Wiener Verzeich._ 8vo. 75.

[365] Curtis _Brit. Ent._ _t_. 117.

[366] De Geer, ii. 452.

[367] Kalm's _Travels_, ii. 7.

[368] The same intelligent gentleman related to me, that a person
having taken some land at Bahia in the Brazils, he was compelled by
these ants, which were so numerous as to render every effort to destroy
them ineffectual, to relinquish the occupation of it. Their nests were
excavated to the astonishing depth of fourteen feet. Merian _Insect.
Sur._ 18. Smeathman on _Termites, Phil. Trans._ lxxi. 39. note 35.

[369] Stedman, ii. 142.

[370] _Hist. Nat._ l. xi. c. 12.

[371] Curtis _Brit. Ent._ t. 60.

[372] Lewin in _Linn. Trans._ iii. 1.--Curtis in do. i. 86.

[373] Curtis _Brit. Ent._ _t._ 104.

[374] MacLeay in _Edinburgh Philos. Journ._ n. xxi. 123. Curtis
_Brit. Ent._ _t._ 43.

[375] Wilhelm's _Recreations from Nat. Hist._ quoted by Latreille
_Hist. Nat._ xi. 194.

[376] Reaum. ii. 502.




                              LETTER VII.

                     _INJURIES CAUSED BY INSECTS._

                      INDIRECT INJURIES CONTINUED.


To look at a _locust_ in a cabinet of insects, you would not, at first
sight, deem it capable of being the source of so much evil to mankind
as stands on record against it. "This is but a small creature," you
would say, "and the mischief which it causes cannot be far beyond the
proportion of its bulk. The locusts so celebrated in history must
surely be of the Indian kind mentioned by Pliny, which were three
feet in length, with legs so strong that the women used them as saws.
I see indeed some resemblance to the horse's head, but where are the
eyes of the elephant, the neck of the bull, the horns of the stag, the
chest of the lion, the belly of the scorpion, the wings of the eagle,
the thighs of the camel, the legs of the ostrich, and the tail of the
serpent, all of which the Arabians mention as attributes of this widely
dreaded insect destroyer[377]; but of which in the insect before me I
discern little or no likeness?" Yet, although this animal be not very
tremendous for its size, nor very terrific in its appearance, it is
the very same whose ravages have been the theme of naturalists and
historians in all ages, and upon a close examination you will find it
to be peculiarly fitted and furnished for the execution of its office.
It is armed with two pair of very strong jaws, the upper terminating
in short and the lower in long teeth, by which it can both lacerate
and grind its food--its stomach is of extraordinary capacity and
powers--its hind legs enable it to leap to a considerable distance,
and its ample vans are calculated to catch the wind as sails, and so
to carry it sometimes over the sea; and although a single individual
can effect but little evil, yet when the entire surface of a country
is covered by them, and every one makes bare the spot on which it
stands, the mischief produced may be as infinite as their numbers. So
well do the Arabians know their power, that they make a locust say to
Mahomet--"We are the army of the Great God; we produce ninety-nine
eggs; if the hundred were completed, we should consume the whole earth
and all that is in it[378]."

Since it is possible you may not have paid particular attention to
the accounts given by various authors both ancient and modern, of the
almost incredible injury done to the human race by these creatures,
I shall now lay before you some of the most striking particulars of
their devastations that I have been able to collect.

The earliest plague of this kind which has been recorded, appears
also to have been the most direful in its immediate effects that
ever was inflicted upon any nation. I am speaking, as you may well
suppose, of the locusts with which the Egyptian tyrant and his people
were visited for their oppression of the Israelites. Only conceive to
yourself a country so covered by them that no one can see the face of
the ground--a whole land darkened, and all its produce, whether herb
or tree, so devoured that not the least vestige of green is left in
either[379].--But it is not necessary for me to enlarge further upon
a history the circumstances of which are so well known to you.

To this species of devastation Africa in general seems always to
have been peculiarly subject. This may be gathered from the law
in Cyrenaica mentioned by Pliny, by which the inhabitants were
enjoined to destroy the locusts in three different states, three
times in the year--first their eggs, then their young, and lastly
the perfect insect[380]. And not without reason was such a law
enacted; for Orosius tells us that in the year of the world 3800,
Africa was infested by such infinite myriads of these animals, that
having devoured every green thing, after flying off to sea they were
drowned, and being cast upon the shore they emitted a stench greater
than could have been produced by the carcases of 100,000 men[381].
St. Augustine also mentions a plague to have arisen in that country
from the same cause, which destroyed no less than 800,000 persons
(_octingenta hominum millia_) in the kingdom of Masanissa alone, and
many more in the territories bordering upon the sea[382].

From Africa this plague was occasionally imported into Italy and
Spain; and a historian quoted in Mouffet relates that in the year 591
an infinite army of locusts of a size unusually large, grievously
ravaged part of Italy; and being at last cast into the sea, from
their stench arose a pestilence which carried off near a million of
men and beasts. In the Venetian territory, also, in 1478 more than
30,000 persons are said to have perished in a famine occasioned by
these terrific scourges. Many other instances of their devastations
in Europe, in France, Spain, Italy, Germany, &c.[383], are recorded
by the same author. In 1650 a cloud of them was seen to enter Russia
in three different places, which from thence passed over into Poland
and Lithuania, where the air was darkened by their numbers. In some
places they were seen lying dead heaped one upon another to the
depth of four feet; in others they covered the surface like a black
cloth, the trees bent with their weight, and the damage they did
exceeded all computation[384]. At a later period in Languedoc when
the sun became hot they took wing and fell upon the corn, devouring
both leaf and ear, and that with such expedition that in three hours
they would consume a whole field. After having eaten up the corn
they attacked the vines, the pulse, the willows, and lastly the hemp
notwithstanding its bitterness[385]. Sir H. Davy informs us[386] that
the French government in 1813 issued a decree with a view to occasion
the destruction of grasshoppers.

Even this happy island, so remarkably distinguished by its exemption
from most of those scourges to which other nations are exposed, was
once alarmed by the appearance of locusts. In 1748 they were observed
here in considerable numbers, but providentially they soon perished
without propagating. These were evidently stragglers from the vast
swarms which in the preceding year did such infinite damage in
Wallachia, Moldavia, Transylvania, Hungary, and Poland. One of these
swarms, which entered Transylvania in August, was several hundred
fathoms in width, (at Vienna the breadth of one of them was three
miles,) and extended to so great a length as to be four hours in
passing over the Red Tower; and such was its density that it totally
intercepted the solar light, so that when they flew low one person
could not see another at the distance of twenty paces[387]. A similar
account has been given me by a friend of mine[388] long resident in
India. He relates that when at Poonah he was witness to an immense
army of locusts which ravaged the Mahratta country, and was supposed
to come from Arabia (this, if correct, is a strong proof of their
power to pass the sea under favourable circumstances). The column
they composed, my friend was informed, extended five hundred miles;
and so compact was it, when on the wing, that like an eclipse it
completely hid the sun, so that no shadow was cast by any object, and
some lofty tombs distant from his residence not more than two hundred
yards were rendered quite invisible. This was not the _Locusta
migratoria_, but a red species; which circumstance much increased the
horror of the scene; for, clustering upon the trees after they had
stripped them of their foliage, they imparted to them a sanguine hue.
The peach was the last tree that they touched.

Dr. Clarke, to give some idea of the infinite numbers of these
animals, compares them to a flight of snow when the flakes are
carried obliquely by the wind. They covered his carriage and horses,
and the Tartars assert that people are sometimes suffocated by them.
The whole face of nature might have been described as covered by
a living veil. They consisted of two species, _L. tatarica_ and
_migratoria_; the first is almost twice the size of the second,
and, because it precedes it, is called by the Tartars the herald or
messenger[389].--The account of another traveller, Mr. Barrow, of
their ravages in the southern parts of Africa (in 1784 and 1797) is
still more striking: an area of nearly two thousand square miles
might be said literally to be covered by them. When driven into the
sea by a N. W. wind, they formed upon the shore for fifty miles a
bank three or four feet high, and when the wind was S. E. the stench
was so powerful as to be smelt at the distance of 150 miles[390].

From 1778 to 1780 the empire of Marocco was terribly devastated by
them, every green thing was eaten up, not even the bitter bark of the
orange and pomegranate escaping--a most dreadful famine ensued.--The
poor were seen to wander over the country deriving a miserable
subsistence from the roots of plants; and women and children followed
the camels, from whose dung they picked the indigested grains of
barley, which they devoured with avidity: in consequence of this,
vast numbers perished, and the roads and streets exhibited the
unburied carcases of the dead. On this sad occasion, fathers sold
their children, and husbands their wives[391]. When they visit a
country, says Mr. Jackson, speaking of the same empire, it behoves
every one to lay in provision for a famine, for they stay from three
to seven years. When they have devoured all other vegetables, they
attack the trees, consuming first the leaves and then the bark. From
Mogador to Tangier, before the plague in 1799, the face of the earth
was covered by them--at that time a singular incident occurred at El
Araiche. The whole region from the confines of the Sahara was ravaged
by them: but on the other side of the river El Kos not one of them
was to be seen, though there was nothing to prevent their flying over
it. Till then they had proceeded northward; but upon arriving at
its banks they turned to the east, so that all the country north of
El Araiche was full of pulse, fruits and grain,--exhibiting a most
striking contrast to the desolation of the adjoining district. At
length they were all carried by a violent hurricane into the Western
Ocean; the shore, as in former instances, was covered by their
carcases, and a pestilence was caused by the horrid stench which they
emitted:--but when this evil ceased, their devastations were followed
by a most abundant crop. The Arabs of the Desert, "whose hands are
against every man[392]," and who rejoice in the evil that befalls
other nations, when they behold the clouds of locusts proceeding from
the north are filled with gladness, anticipating a general mortality,
which they call _El-Khere_ (the benediction); for, when a country is
thus laid waste, they emerge from their arid deserts and pitch their
tents in the desolated plains[393].

The noise the locusts make when engaged in the work of destruction
has been compared to the sound of a flame of fire driven by the wind,
and the effect of their bite to that of fire[394]. A wild poet of our
day has very strikingly described the noise produced by their flight
and approach:

          "Onward they came a dark continuous cloud
           Of congregated myriads numberless,
           The rushing of whose wings was as the sound
           Of a broad river headlong in its course
           Plunged from a mountain summit, or the roar
           Of a wild ocean in the autumn storm
           Shattering its billows on a shore of rocks[395]!"

But no account of the appearance and ravages of these terrific
insects, for correctness and sublimity, comes near that of the
prophet Joel, "A day of darkness and of gloominess, a day of clouds
and of thick darkness, as the morning spread upon the mountains: a
great people and a strong: there hath not been ever the like, neither
shall be any more after it, even to the years of many generations.
A fire devoureth before them; and behind them a flame burneth: the
land is as the garden of Eden before them, and behind them a desolate
wilderness; yea, and nothing shall escape them. Like the noise of
chariots[396] on the tops of mountains shall they leap, like the
noise of a flame of fire that devoureth the stubble, as a strong
people set in battle array. Before their faces the people shall be
much pained: all faces shall gather blackness. They shall run like
mighty men; they shall climb the wall like men of war, and they
shall march every one on his ways, and they shall not break their
ranks; neither shall one thrust another, they shall walk every one
in his path: and when they fall upon the sword they shall not be
wounded. They shall run to and fro in the city; they shall run upon
the wall, they shall climb up upon the houses; they shall enter in
at the windows like a thief. The earth shall quake before them, the
heavens shall tremble: the sun and the moon shall be dark, and the
stars shall withdraw their shining!" The usual way in which they are
destroyed is also noticed by the prophet. "I will remove far off
from you the northern army, and will drive him into a land barren
and desolate, with his face toward the east sea, and his hinder part
toward the utmost sea, and his stink shall come up, and his ill
savour shall come up, because he hath done great things[397]!"

I think, after a serious consideration of all these well attested
facts, when locusts contend with the two-legged destroyers of the
human race for proud pre-eminence in mischief, you will find it
difficult to determine to which the palm should be decreed; and you
will admire the propriety with which, in the above and other passages
of Holy Writ, they are selected as symbols of the great ravagers of
the earth of our own species.

In many of the above instances these devastators appear to have crossed
the seas, but Hasselquist asserts that they are not formed for such
extensive flights. "The grasshopper or locust," says he, "is not formed
for travelling over the sea,--it cannot fly far, but must alight as
soon as it rises;--for one that came on board us a hundred certainly
were drowned. We observe in the months of May and June a number of
these insects coming from the south, and directing their course to the
northern shore; they darken the sky like a thick cloud; but scarcely
have they quitted the shore, when they, who a moment before ravaged
and ruined the country, cover the surface of the sea with their dead
bodies.--By what instinct do these creatures undertake this dangerous
flight? Is it not the wise institution of the Creator to destroy a
dreadful plague to the country[398]?" Locusts however, as we have seen,
take much longer flights than this author supposes them able to do. It
is probable that their ability in this respect may depend a good deal
upon their species, their age, and the state and direction of the wind;
for, as was the case with the Egyptian plague,

                      "---- a pitchy cloud
          Of locusts warping on the eastern wind"

may by a powerful blast be carried over a broad river, or even the sea,
from one country to another. This idea is strongly confirmed by an
account, exhibiting internal marks of authenticity, which appeared in
the _Alexandria Herald_, an American newspaper; in which it is stated,
that at the distance of 200 miles from the Canary Islands, the nearest
land, the ship Georgia, Capt. Stokes, from Lisbon to Savannah, while
sailing with a fine breeze from the south-east, was, on the 21st of
Nov. 1811, all at once becalmed. "A light air afterwards sprang up from
the north-east, at which time there fell from the cloud an innumerable
quantity of large grasshoppers, so as to cover the deck, the tops and
every part of the ship they could alight upon. They did not appear in
the least exhausted; on the contrary, when an attempt was made to take
hold of them, they instantly jumped, and endeavoured to elude being
taken. The calm, or a very light air, lasted fully an hour, and during
the whole of the time these insects continued to fall upon the ship
and surround her: such as were within reach of the vessel alighted
upon her; but immense numbers fell into the sea, and were seen
floating in masses by the sides." Two bottles of them were preserved
for inspection; the insects were of a reddish hue, with red and gray
speckled wings. It is clear from this account, if it be admitted as
authentic, that locusts can go far from land when the wind is strong,
and likewise it seems equally clear that in a calm they cannot support
themselves in the air. The principal difficulty is, how these locusts
could make their way against the wind, which they must have done if
they came with the black cloud, as the words seem to intimate. Perhaps
this cloud was brought by a different current of air from that which
impelled the ship.

With respect to the course which the locusts pursue, Hasselquist has
observed that they migrate in a direct meridian line from south to
north, passing from the deserts of Arabia, which is the great cradle of
them, to Palestine, Syria, Carmania, Natolia, Bithynia, Constantinople,
Poland, &c.--they never turn either to the east or to the west[399].
But this must be a mistaken notion; for those which Major Moor saw at
Poonah, of which I have given an account above[400], must have come due
east. Mr. Jackson also noticed their course north of the line to be
towards the south[401]; and Sparrman tells us, that those south of the
line migrate in the same direction[402].

I fear that Hasselquist's question, Could they not by fright, or some
other method, be turned from their dreadful course, to steer for
some river, and by that means be obliged to destroy themselves[403]?
must be answered in the negative. All such experiments, it is to be
apprehended, would be about as effectual as sending an army, with
all the apparatus of war, to take the field against them, as this
author says is done in Syria, where the Bashaw of Tripoli once raised
a force of 4000 soldiers to fight the locusts, and very summarily
ordered all to be hanged who thinking it beneath them to waste their
valour upon such pygmy foes, refused to join the party[404].

                                                  I am, &c.


FOOTNOTES:

[377] Bochart, _Hierozoic._ P. ii. l. iv. c. 5. 475.

[378] Bochart, _ubi supr._ c. 6. 485.

[379] Exod. x. 5. 14, 15.

[380] _Hist. Nat._ l. xi. c. 29. A similar law was enacted in Lemnos,
by which every one was compelled to bring a certain measure of
locusts annually to the magistrates. Plin. _ibid._

[381] Oros. _contra Pag._ l. v. c. 2.

[382] Lesser, _L._ 247. note 46.

[383] Mouffet, 123.

[384] Bingley, iii. 258.

[385] _Philos. Trans._ 1686.

[386] _Elements of Agricultural Chemistry_, 233.

[387] _Philos. Trans._ xlvi. 30.

[388] Major Moor, author of _The Narrative of Captain Little's
Detachment_, _The Hindu Pantheon_, &c.

[389] _Travels_, i. 348.

[390] _Travels_, &c. 257.

[391] Southey's _Thalaba_, i. 171.

[392] Genes. xvi. 12.

[393] Jackson's _Travels in Marocco_, 54.

[394] See Bochart, _Hierozoic_. P. l. iv. c. 5. 474-5.

[395] Southey's _Thalaba_, i. 169.

[396] Of the symbolical locusts in the Apocalypse it is said--"And
the sound of their wings was as the sound of chariots, of many horses
running to battle." ix. 9.

[397] Joel ii. 2-10. 20.

[398] _Voyage to the Levant_, 444.

[399] _Voyage to the Levant_, p. 446-7.

[400] See p. 219.

[401] _Travels_, 54.

[402] _Travels_, i. 366.

[403] _Travels_, 455.

[404] _Travels_, 447.




                              LETTER VIII.

                     _INJURIES CAUSED BY INSECTS._

                      INDIRECT INJURIES CONCLUDED.


I have not yet arrived at the end of my catalogue of noxious insects.
I have introduced you, indeed, to those that annoy man in his own
person, in his domestic animals, in the produce of his fields,
gardens, orchards, and forests; in a word, in every thing that is
endued with the vital principle: but I have as yet said nothing
of the injuries which he receives from them in that part of his
property, consisting either of animal or vegetable matter, _from
which that principle is departed_. And with these I shall conclude
this melancholy detail of evils inflicted upon us by the very animals
I am enticing you to study. The rest of my correspondence, I flatter
myself, will paint them in more inviting colours.

The insects to which I now allude may be divided into those that
attack and injure our food, our drugs and medicines, our clothes, our
houses and furniture, our timber, and even the objects of our studies
and amusements.

Various are those that attempt to share our _food_ with us. Flour and
meal are eaten by the grub of _Tenebrio Molitor_, best known by the
name of the meal-worm, which will remain in it two years before it goes
into its state of inactivity:--its ravages however are not confined to
flour alone, for it will eat any thing made of that article, such as
bread, cakes, and the like. Old flour is also very apt to be infested
by a mite (_Acarus Farinae_)[405]. In long voyages the biscuit sometimes
so swarms with the weevil and another beetle (_Dermestes paniceus_,
L.) that they are swallowed with every mouthful; and even the ground
peas so abound with these little vermin, that a spoonful of soup cannot
be taken free from them[406]. Bread is also devoured by _Trogosita
caraboides_, a larger beetle before alluded to[407].

Every one is aware that our animal food suffers still more than our
farinaceous from insects; but perhaps you would not expect that our
hams, bacon, and dried meats should have their peculiar beetle. Yet
so it is; and this beetle, (_Dermestes lardarius_,) when a grub,
sometimes commits great devastation in them; as does that of another
described by De Geer under the name of _Tenebrio lardarius_[408].
How much our fresh meat of all kinds, our poultry and fish, are
exposed to the flesh-fly, whose maggots will turn us disgusted
from our tables, if we do not carefully guard these articles from
being blown by them, you well know;--and assailants more violent,
hornets, wasps, and the great rove-beetle, (_Creophilus maxillosus_)
if butchers do not protect their shambles, will carry off no
inconsiderable portion of their meat. A small cock-roach (_Blatta
lapponica_) which I have taken upon our eastern coast, swarms in the
huts of the Laplanders, and will sometimes annihilate in a single
day, a work in which a carrion-beetle (_Silpha lapponica_) joins,
their whole stock of dried fish[409]. The quantity of sugar that
flies and wasps will devour, if they can come at it, especially
the latter, the diminutive size of the creatures considered, is
astonishing:--in one year long ago, when sugar was much cheaper
than it is now, a tradesman told me he calculated his loss, by the
wasps alone, at twenty pounds. A singular spectacle is exhibited in
India (so Captain Green relates) by a small red ant with a black
head. They march in long files, about three abreast, to any place
where sugar is kept; and when they are saturated, return in the
same order, but by a different route. If the sugar, upon which they
are busy, be carried into the sun, they immediately desert it. What
is very extraordinary, these ants are also fond of oil. Sweetmeats
and preserves are very subject to be attacked by a minute oblong
transparent mite with very short legs and without any hair upon its
body. Our butter and lard are stated to be eaten by the caterpillar
of a moth (_Aglossa pinguinalis_). _Tyrophaga_[410] _Casei_, the
parent fly of the jumping cheese-maggot, loses no opportunity, we
know, of laying its eggs in our fresh cheeses, and when they get
dry and old the mite (_Acarus Siro_) settles her colonies in them,
which multiply incredibly. Other substances, more unlikely, do not
escape from our pygmy depredators. Thus Reaumur tells us of a little
moth whose larva feeds upon chocolate, observing very justly that
this could not have been its original food[411]. Both a moth and
a beetle (_Sylvanus frumentarius?_) were detected by Leeuwenhoek
preying upon two of our spices, the mace and the nutmeg[412]. The
maggots of a fly (_Oscinis cellaris_) are found in vinegar, in the
manufactories of which the perfect insects swarm in incredible
numbers; others I have found in wine, which turned to a minute fly,
of a yellow colour, with dark eyes and abdomen, which though near
_Anthomyia_ as to its wings, appears to belong to a distinct genus
not published by Meigen, which in my MS. stands under the name of
_Oinopota ventralis_; and sometimes even water in the casks of ships,
in long voyages, so abounds with larvae of this tribe as to render it
extremely disgusting. Browne, in his History of Jamaica, mentions
an ant (_Formica omnivora_, L.) probably belonging to _Myrmica_,
that consumes or spoils all kinds of food; which perhaps may be
the same species that has been observed in Ceylon by Percival, and
is described by him as inhabiting dwelling-houses, and speedily
devouring every thing it can meet with. If at table any one drops a
piece of bread, or of other food, it instantly appears in motion as
if animated, from the vast number of these creatures that fasten upon
it in order to carry it off. They can be kept, he tells us, by no
contrivance from invading the table, and settling in swarms on the
bread, sugar, and such things as they like. It is not uncommon to see
a cup of tea, upon being poured out, completely covered with these
creatures, and floating dead upon it like a scum[413].

In some countries the number of flies and other insects that enter the
house in search of food, or allured by the light, is so great as to
spoil the comfort of almost every meal. We are told that during the
rainy season in India, insects of all descriptions are so incredibly
numerous, and so busy every where, that it is often absolutely
necessary to remove the lights from the supper-table:--were this not
done, moths, flies, bugs, beetles, and the like, would be attracted
in such numbers as to extinguish them entirely. When the lights
are retained on the table, in some places they are put into glass
cylinders, which St. Pierre tells us is the custom in the Island of
Mauritius[414]; in others the candlesticks are placed in soup-plates,
into which the insects are precipitated and drowned. Nothing can exceed
the irritation caused by the stinking bugs when they get into the hair
or between the linen and the body; and if they be bruised upon it the
skin comes off[415]. To use the language of a poet of the Indies, from
whom some of the above facts are selected,

          "On every dish the booming beetle falls,
           The cock-roach plays, or caterpillar crawls:
           A thousand shapes of variegated hues
           Parade the table and inspect the stews.
           To living walls the swarming hundreds stick,
           Or court, a dainty meal, the oily wick;
           Heaps over heaps their slimy bodies drench,
           Out go the lamps with suffocating stench.
           When hideous insects every plate defile,
           The laugh how empty, and how forced the smile[416]!"

Drugs and medicines also, though often so nauseous to us,
form occasionally part of the food of insects. A small beetle
(_Sinodendrum pusillum_[417]) eats the roots of rhubarb, in which I
detected it in the East India Company's warehouses. Opium is a dainty
_morceau_ to the white ants[418];--and, what is more extraordinary,
_Anobium paniceum_[419] (a coleopterous insect that preys naturally
upon wood) has been known to devour the blister-beetle.--Swammerdam
amongst his treasures mentions "a detestable beetle," produced from a
worm that eats the roots of ginseng; and he likewise notices another,
the larva of which devours the bag of the musk[420].--The cochineal
at Rio de Janeiro is the prey of an insect resembling an Ichneumon,
but furnished with only two wings; its station is in the cotton that
envelops the Coccus. Previous to its assumption of the pupa it ejects
a large globule of pure red colouring matter[421]. And lastly, the
Coccus that produces the lac (_C. Lacca_) is, we are told, devoured
by various insects[422].

Perhaps you imagine that these universal destroyers spare at least
our garments, in which you may at first conceive there can be
nothing very tempting to excite even the appetite of an insect. Your
housekeeper, however, would probably tell you a different story, and
enlarge upon the trouble and pains it costs her to guard those under
her care against the ravages of the moths. Upon further inquiry you
would find that nothing made of wool, whether cloth or stuff, comes
amiss to them. There are five species described by Linne, which are
more or less engaged in this work: _Tinea vestianella_, _tapetzella_,
_pellionella_, _Recurvaria sarcitella_, and _Galleria Mellonella_.
Of the first we have no particular history, except that it destroys
garments in the summer; but of the others Reaumur has given a
complete one. _T. tapetzella_, or the tapestry moth, not uncommon in
our houses, is most injurious to the lining of carriages, which are
more exposed to the air than the furniture of our apartments. These
do not construct a moveable habitation like the common species, but,
eating their way in the thickness of the cloth, weave themselves
silken galleries in which they reside, and which they render close
and warm by covering them with some of the eroded wool[423]. _T.
pellionella_ is a most destructive insect, and ladies have often to
deplore the ravages which it commits in their valuable furs, whether
made up into muffs or tippets--it pays no more respect to the regal
ermine than to the woollen habiliments of the poor; its proper
food, indeed, being hair, though it devours both wool and fur. This
species, if hard pressed by hunger, will even eat horsehair, and make
its habitation, a moveable house or case, in which it travels from
place to place, of this untractable material. These little creatures
will shave the hair from a skin as neatly and closely as if a razor
had been employed[424].--The most natural food of the next species,
_R. sarcitella_, is wool; but in case of necessity it will eat fur
and hair. To woollen cloths or stuffs it often does incredible
injury, especially if they are not kept dry and well aired[425]. Of
the devastation committed by _Galleria Mellonella_ in our bee-hives
I have before given you an account: to this I must here add, that if
it cannot come at wax, it will content itself with woollen cloth,
leather, or even paper[426]. Mr. Curtis found the grub of a beetle
(_Ptinus Fur_) in an old coat, which it devoured, making holes and
channels in it; and another insect of the same order (_Megatoma
Pellio_), Linne tells us, will sometimes entirely strip a fur garment
of its hair[427]. A small beetle of the Capricorn tribe (_Callidium
pygmaeum_) I have good reason to believe devours leather, since I have
found it abundant in old shoes.

Next to our garments our houses and buildings, which shelter us and
our property from the inclemency and injuries of the atmosphere,
are of consequence to us: yet these, solid and substantial as they
appear, are not secure from the attack of insects; and even our
furniture often suffers from them. A great part of our comfort
within doors depends upon our apartments being kept clean and neat.
Spiders by their webs, which they suspend in every angle, and flies
by their excrements, which they scatter indiscriminately upon every
thing, interfere with this comfort, and add much to the business
of our servants. Even ants will sometimes plant their colonies
in our kitchens, (I have known the horse-ant, _Formica rufa_, do
this,) and are not easily expelled. Those of Sierra Leone, as I was
once informed by the learned Professor Afzelius, make their way
by millions through the houses. They resolutely pursue a straight
course; and neither buildings nor rivers, even though myriads
perish in the attempt, can divert them from it. Numerous are the
tribes of insects that seek their food in our timber, whether laid
up in store for our future use, employed in our houses, buildings,
gates or fences, or made up into furniture. The several species
of Mr. Marsham's genus _Ips_ (which includes the coleopterous
genera _Apate_, _Bostrichus_, _Hylessinus_, _Hylurgus_, _Tomicus_,
_Platypus_, _Scolytus_, and _Phloiotribus_ of modern systematists)
all prey upon timber, feeding between the bark and the wood, and many
of them excavating curious pinnated labyrinths. Almost every kind of
tree has a species of this genus appropriated to it, and some have
more than one[428]. The Stag-beetle tribe, or _Lucanidae_, and several
of the weevils[429], have a similar appetite, but penetrate deeper
into the wood. The most extensive family, however, of timber-borers
are the capricorn beetles, including the Fabrician genera of
_Prionus_, _Cerambyx_, _Lamia_[430], _Stenocorus_, _Calopus_,
_Rhagium_, _Gnoma_, _Saperda_, _Callidium_, and _Clytus_. The larva
of these, as soon as hatched, leaves its first station between the
bark and wood, and begins to make its way into the solid timber,
(some of them plunging even into the iron heart of the oak, and one
even perforating lead[431],) where it eats for itself tortuous
paths, at its first starting perhaps not bigger than a pin's head,
but gradually increasing in dimensions as the animal increases in
magnitude, till it attains in some instances to a diameter of one or
two inches. Only conceive what havoc the grub of the vast _Prionus
giganteus_ must make in a beam! Percival is probably speaking of this
beetle, when, in his account of Ceylon, he tells us, "There is an
insect found here which resembles an immense over-grown beetle. It
is called by us a carpenter, from its boring large holes in timber,
of a regular form, and to the depth of several feet, in which, when
finished, it takes up its habitation[432]." Seeing the perfect insect
come out of these holes, an unentomological observer would naturally
conclude that the beetle he saw had formed it, and lived in it; but,
doubtless, the whole was the work of the grub[433].--Of all the
coleopterous genera there is none the species of which are generally
so rich, resplendent and beautiful as those of _Buprestis_: these
likewise, in their first state, there is abundant reason to believe,
derive their nutriment from the produce of the forest, in which they
sometimes remain for many years before they assume their perfect
state, and appear in their full splendour, as if nature required
more time than usual to decorate these lovely insects. We learn from
Mr. Marsham, that the grub of _B. splendida_ was ascertained to have
existed in the wood of a deal table more than twenty years[434].--In
this enumeration of timber-eating beetles, I must not forget the
Fabrician genera, _Anobium_ and _Ptilinus_, because of one of them
(_Anobium pertinax_) Linne complains "_terebravit et destruxit
sedilia mea_[435];" and I can renew the same complaint against
_A. striatum_, which not only has destroyed my chairs, but also
picture-frames, and has perforated in every direction the deal floor
of my chamber, from which it annually emerges through little round
apertures in great numbers.--The utility of entomological knowledge
in economics was strikingly exemplified, when the great naturalist
just mentioned, at the desire of the king of Sweden, traced out the
cause of the destruction of the oak-timber in the royal dock-yards;
and, having detected the lurking culprit under the form of a beetle,
(_Lymexylon navale_) by directing the timber to be immersed during
the time of the metamorphosis of that insect and its season of
oviposition, furnished a remedy which effectually secured it from
its future attacks[436].--No coleopterous insects are more singular
than those that belong to the genus _Pausus_, L.; and one of them at
least, remarkable for emitting a phosphoric light from the globes of
its antennae, is also a timber-feeder[437].--Amongst the _Hymenoptera_
there are many insects that injure us in this department. The species
of the genus _Sirex_, probably all of them in their _larva_ state,
have no appetite but for ligneous food. Linne has observed this
with respect to _S. Spectrum_ and _Camelus_; and Mr. Marsham, on
the authority of Sir Joseph Banks, relates that several specimens
of _S. Gigas_ were seen to come out of the floor of a nursery in a
gentleman's house, to the no small alarm and discomfiture of both
nurse and children[438].--The genus _Trypoxylon_, many species
of _Crabro_, _Eumenes Parietum_, Latreille's genera _Xylocopa_,
_Chelostoma_, _Heriades_, _Megachile_ and _Anthophora_, (all
separated from _Apis_, L.,) perforate posts and rails and other
timber, to form cells for their young[439].

The Linnean order _Aptera_ furnishes another timber-eating insect,
a kind of wood-louse, though scarcely an eighth of the size of the
common one, (_Limnoria terebrans_ of Dr. Leach,) which in point of
rapidity of execution seems to surpass all its European brethren, and
in many cases may be productive of more serious injury than any of
them, since it attacks the wood-work of piers and jetties constructed
in salt-water, and so effectually, as to threaten the rapid
destruction of those in which it has established itself. In December
1815 I was favoured by Charles Lutwidge, esq. of Hull, with specimens
of wood from the piers at Bridlington Quay which wofully confirm the
fears entertained of their total ruin by the hosts of these pygmy
assailants that have made good a lodgement in them, and which, though
not so big as a grain of rice, ply their masticatory organs with such
assiduity as to have reduced great part of the wood-work into a state
resembling honey-comb. One specimen was a portion of a three-inch
fir plank nailed to the North Pier about three years since, which
is now crumbled away to less than an inch in thickness--in fact,
deducting the space occupied by the cells which cover both surfaces
as closely as possible, barely half an inch of solid wood is left;
and though its progress is slower in oak, that wood is equally liable
to be attacked by it.--If this insect were easily introduced to new
stations, it might soon prove as destructive to our jetties as the
_Teredo navalis_ to those of Holland, and induce the necessity of
substituting stone for wood universally, whatever the expense: but
happily it seems endowed with very limited powers of migration;
for, though it has spread along both the South and East Piers of
Bridlington harbour, it has not yet, as Mr. Lutwidge informs me,
reached the dolphin nor an insulated jetty within the harbour.--No
other remedy against its attacks is known than that of keeping the
wood free from salt-water for three or four days, in which case it
dies; but this method it is obvious can be rarely applicable[440].

How dear are their books, their cabinets of the various productions
of nature, and their collections of prints and other works of art and
science, to the learned, the scientific, and the virtuosi! Even these
precious treasures have their insect enemies. The larva of _Aglossa
pinguinalis_, whose ravages in another quarter I have noticed
before[441], will establish itself upon the binding of a book, and
spinning a robe, which it covers with its own excrement[442], will
do it no little injury. A mite (_Cheyletus eruditus_) eats the paste
that fastens the paper over the edges of the binding, and so loosens
it[443]. I have also often observed the caterpillar of another little
moth, of which I have not ascertained the species, that takes its
station in damp old books, between the leaves, and there commits
great ravages; and many a black-letter rarity, which in these days
of Bibliomania would have been valued at its weight in gold, has
been snatched by these destroyers from the hands of book-collectors.
The little wood-boring beetles before mentioned (_Anobium pertinax_
and _striatum_) also attack books, and will even bore through
several volumes. M. Peignot mentions an instance where, in a public
library but little frequented, _twenty-seven_ folio volumes were
perforated in a straight line by the same insect, (probably one of
these species,) in such a manner that on passing a cord through the
perfectly round hole made by it, these twenty-seven volumes could be
raised at once[444]. The animals last mentioned also destroy prints
and drawings, whether framed, or preserved in a porte-feuille. Our
collections of quadrupeds, birds, insects and plants have likewise
several terrible insect enemies, which without pity or remorse often
destroy or mutilate our most highly prized specimens. _Ptinus Fur_
and _Anthrenus Musaeorum_, two minute beetles, are amongst the worst,
especially the latter, whose singular gliding larva, when once it
gets amongst them, makes astonishing havoc, the birds soon shedding
their feathers, and the insects falling to pieces. Mr. W. S. MacLeay
informs me that at the Havana it is exceedingly difficult to preserve
insects, &c., as the _ants_ devour every thing.--One of the worst
plagues of the entomologist is a mite (_Acarus Destructor_, Schrank):
this, if his specimens be at all damp, eats up all the muscular
parts, (_Cantharis vesicatoria_ being almost the only insect that is
not to its taste,) and thus entirely destroys them.--If spiders by
any means get amongst them, they will do no little mischief.--Some
I have observed to be devoured by a minute moth, perhaps _Tinea
Insectella_; and in the posterior thighs of a species of _Locusta_
from China, I once found, one in each thigh, a small beetle
congenerous with _Antherophagus pallens_, that had devoured the
interior. It is, I believe, either _Acarus Destructor_ or _Cheyletus
eruditus_ that eats the gum employed to fasten down dried plants.

There are other insects which do not confine themselves to one or two
articles, but make a general and indiscriminate attack upon our dead
stock. Ulloa mentions one peculiar to Carthagena, called there the
_comegen_, which he describes as a kind of moth or maggot so minute
as to be scarcely visible to the naked eye[445]. This destroys, says
he, the furniture of houses, particularly all kinds of hangings,
whether of cloth, linen, or silk, gold or silver stuffs or lace; in
short, every thing except solid metal. It will in a single night ruin
all the goods of a warehouse in which it has got footing, reducing
bales of merchandize to dust without altering their appearance, so
that the mischief is not perceived till they come to be handled[446].
If we make some deduction from this account for exaggeration, still
the amount of damage will be very considerable.

There are three kinds of insects better known, to whose ravages, as
most prominent and celebrated, I shall last call your attention.
The insects I mean are the cock-roach (_Blatta orientalis_), the
house-cricket (_Gryllus domesticus_), and the various species of
white ants (_Termes_). The last of these, most fortunately for us,
are not yet naturalized.

The cock-roaches hate the light, at least the kind that is most
abundant in Britain, (for _B. germanica_, which abounds in some
houses, is bolder, making its appearance in the day, and running
up the walls and over the tables, to the great annoyance of the
inhabitants,) and never come forth from their hiding-places till the
lights are removed or extinguished. In the London houses, especially
on the ground-floor, they are most abundant, and consume every thing
they can find, flour, bread, meat, clothes, and even shoes[447]. As
soon as light, natural or artificial, re-appears, they all scamper
off as fast as they can, and vanish in an instant. These pests are
not indigenous here, and perhaps no where in Europe, but are one of
the evils which commerce has imported: and we may think ourselves
well off that others of the larger species of the genus have not been
introduced in the same way--as, for instance, _Blatta gigantea_,
a native of Asia, Africa, and America, many times the size of the
common one,--which, not content with devouring meat, clothes and
books, even attacks persons in their sleep, and the extremities of
the dead and dying[448].

The house-cricket may perhaps be deemed a still more annoying insect
than the common cock-roach, adding an incessant noise to its ravages;
since, although, for a short time, it may not be unpleasant to hear

          "the cricket chirrup in the hearth,"

so constant a din every evening must very much interrupt comfort
and conversation. These garrulous animals, which live in a kind of
artificial torrid zone, are very thirsty souls, and are frequently
found drowned in pans of water, milk, broth, and the like. Whatever
is moist, even stockings or linen hung out to dry, is to them a
_bonne bouche_; they will eat the scummings of pots, yeast, crumbs of
bread, and even salt, or any thing within their reach. Sometimes they
are so abundant in houses as to become absolute pests, flying into
the candles and into people's faces.

At Cuddapa, in the ceded districts to the northward of Mysore,
Captain Green was much annoyed by a jumping insect, which from his
description I should take for the larva of a species of cricket. They
were of a dun colour, and from half to three-fourths of an inch in
length. They abounded at night, and were very injurious to papers
and books, which they both discoloured and devoured; leather also
was eaten by them. Such was their boldness and avidity, that they
attacked the exposed parts of the body when you were asleep, nibbling
the ends of the fingers, particularly the skin under the nails, which
was only discoverable by a slight soreness that succeeded. So great
was their agility that they could seldom be caught or crushed. They
were a mute insect, but probably the imago would make noise enough.

But the _white ants_, wherever they prevail, are a still worse plague
than either of these insects--they are the great calamity, as Linne
terms them, of both the Indies. When they find their way into houses
or warehouses, nothing less hard than metal or glass escapes their
ravages. Their favourite food, however, is wood of all kinds, except
the teak (_Tectona grandis_) and iron-wood (_Sideroxylon_), which are
the only sorts known that they will not touch[449]; and so infinite
are the multitudes of the assailants, and such is the excellence of
their tools, that all the timber-work of a spacious apartment is
often destroyed by them in a few nights. Exteriorly, however, every
thing appears as if untouched; for these wary depredators, and this
is what constitutes the greatest singularity of their history, carry
on all their operations by sap and mine, destroying first the inside
of solid substances, and scarcely ever attacking their outside, until
first they have concealed it and their operations with a coat of
clay. A general similarity runs through the proceedings of the whole
tribe; but the large African species, (called by Smeathman _Termes
bellicosus_,) _T. fatalis_ is the most formidable. These insects
live in large clay nests, from whence they excavate tunnels all
round, often to the extent of several hundred feet; from these they
will descend a considerable depth below the foundation of a house,
and rise again through the floors; or, boring through the posts and
supports of the building, enter the roof, and construct there their
galleries in various directions. If a post be a convenient path to
the roof, or has any weight to support, which how they discover is
not easily conjectured, they will fill it with their mortar, leaving
only a trackway for themselves; and thus, as it were, convert it from
wood into stone as hard as many kinds of free-stone. In this manner
they soon destroy houses, and sometimes even whole villages when
deserted by their inhabitants, so that in two or three years not a
vestige of them will remain.

These insidious insects are not less expeditious in destroying the
wainscoting, shelves, and other fixtures of a house than the house
itself. With the most consummate art and skill they eat away all the
inside of what they attack, except a few fibres here and there which
exactly suffice to keep the two sides, or top and bottom, connected,
so as to retain the appearance of solidity after the reality is gone;
and all the while they carefully avoid perforating the surface,
unless a book or any other thing that tempts them should be standing
upon it. Kaempfer, speaking of the white ants of Japan, gives a
remarkable instance of the rapidity with which these miners proceed.
Upon rising one morning he observed that one of their galleries of
the thickness of his little finger had been formed across his table;
and, upon a further examination, he found that they had bored a
passage of that thickness up one foot of the table, formed a gallery
across it, and then pierced down another foot into the floor: all
this was done in the few hours that intervened between his retiring
to rest and his rising[450]. They make their way also with the
greatest ease into trunks and boxes, even though made of mahogany,
and destroy papers and every thing they contain, constructing their
galleries and sometimes taking up their abode in them. Hence, as
Humboldt informs us, throughout all the warmer parts of equinoctial
America, where these and other destructive insects abound, it
is infinitely rare to find papers which go fifty or sixty years
back[451]. In one night they will devour all the boots and shoes that
are left in their way; cloth, linen, or books are equally to their
taste; but they will not eat cotton, as Captain Green informs me.
I myself have to deplore that they entirely consumed a collection
of insects made for me by a friend in India, more especially as it
sickened him of the employment. In a word, scarcely any thing, as I
said before, but metal or stone comes amiss to them. Mr. Smeathman
relates, that a party of them once took a fancy to a pipe of fine old
Madeira, not for the sake of the wine, almost the whole of which they
let out, but of the staves, which however I suppose were strongly
imbued with it, and perhaps on that account were not less to the
taste of our epicure Termites. Having left a compound microscope in
a warehouse at Tobago for a few months, on his return he found that
a colony of a small species of white ant had established themselves
in it, and had devoured most of the wood-work, leaving little
besides the metal and glasses[452]. A shorter period sufficed for
their demolition of some of Mr. Forbes's furniture. On surveying a
room which had been locked up during an absence of a few weeks, he
observed a number of advanced works in various directions towards
some prints and drawings in English frames; the glasses appeared
to be uncommonly dull, and the frames covered with dust. "On
attempting," says he, "to wipe it off, I was astonished to find the
glasses fixed to the wall, not suspended in frames as I left them,
but completely surrounded by an incrustation cemented by the white
ants, who had actually eaten up the deal frames and back-boards, and
the greater part of the paper, and left the glasses upheld by the
incrustation, or covered way, which they had formed during their
depredation[453]." It is even asserted that the superb residence of
the Governor-General at Calcutta, which cost the East India Company
such immense sums, is now rapidly going to decay in consequence
of the attacks of these insects[454].--But not content with the
dominions they have acquired, and the cities they have laid low on
Terra Firma, encouraged by success the white ants have also aimed at
the sovereignty of the ocean, and once had the hardihood to attack
even a British ship of the line; and, in spite of the efforts of her
commander and his valiant crew, having boarded they got possession of
her, and handled her so roughly, that when brought into port, being
no longer fit for service, she was obliged to be broken up[455].

And here, I think, I see you throw aside my papers, and hear you
exclaim--"Will this enumeration of scourges, plagues, and torments
never be finished? Was the whole insect race created merely with
punitive views, and to mar the fair face of universal nature?
Are they all, as our Saviour said figuratively of one genus, the
scorpion, the powerful agents and instruments of the great enemy
of mankind[456]?" If you view the subject in another light, you
will soon, my friend, be convinced that, instead of this, insects
generally answer the most beneficial ends, and promote in various
ways, and in an extraordinary degree, the welfare of man and animals;
and that the series of evils I have been engaged in enumerating
mostly occur partially, and where they exceed their natural limits;
God permitting this occasionally to take place, not merely with
punitive views, but also to show us what mighty effects he can
produce by instruments seemingly the most insignificant: thus calling
upon us to glorify his power, wisdom, and goodness, so evidently
manifested whether he relaxes or draws tight the reins by which
he guides insects in their course, and regulates their progress;
and more particularly to acknowledge his overruling Providence
so conspicuously exhibited by his measuring them, as it were, and
weighing them, and telling them out, so that, their numbers, forces
and powers being annually proportioned to the work he has prescribed
to them, they may neither exceed his purpose nor fall short of it.

From the picture I have drawn, and I assure you it is not
overcharged, you will be disposed to admit, however, the empire of
insects over the works of creation, and to own that our prosperity,
comfort and happiness are intimately connected with them; and
consequently that the knowledge and study of them may be extremely
useful and necessary to promote these desirable ends, since the
knowledge of the cause of any evil is always a principal, if not an
indispensable, step towards a remedy.

I shall now bid adieu to this unpromising subject, which has so long
occupied my pen, and I fear wearied your attention, and in my next
bring before you a more agreeable scene, in which you will behold the
_benefits_ we receive by the ministry of insects.

                                                  I am, &c.

FOOTNOTES:

[405] _Amoen. Acad._ iii. 345.

[406] Sparrman, i. 103. This insect, by Swedish entomologists, is
supposed to be a species of _Anobium_, F., (_Ptinus_, L.,) but the
specimen preserved in the Linnean cabinet is _Silpha rosea_ of Mr.
Marsham (_Cacidula pectoralis_, Meg.). A small beetle of the first
family of _Cryptophagus_ of Major Gyllenhal swarms often in the ship
biscuit, and may probably be the insect Sparrman here complains of
under the name of _Dermestes paniceus_.

[407] See above, p. 172.

[408] De Geer, v. 46. This insect appears nearly related to Mr.
Marsham's _Corticaria pulla_ (_E. B._ i. 11. 14. _Latridius
porcatus_, Herbst), if it be not the same insect.

[409] _Amoen. Acad._ iii. 345.

[410] This name has long been given to this insect, and the
Characters of the genus were drawn by Mr. Curtis before the
publication of Meigen's fifth volume (in which the genus is called
_Piophila_); it is therefore retained. See Curtis _Brit. Ent. t._ 126.

[411] Reaum. iii. 276.

[412] Leeuwenh. _Epist._ 99.

[413] _Ceylon_, 307.

[414] _Voyage_, &c. 72.

[415] Williamson's _East India Vade Mecum_.

[416] _Calcutta, a Poem_, 85.

[417] _Ptinus piceus_, Marsh.

[418] On examining ninety-two chests of _opium_, part of the
cargo saved from the Charlton, previously to reshipping them from
Chittagong for China, thirteen were found to be full of white ants,
which had almost wholly devoured the opium. _Article from Chittagong,
Nov._ 1812, _in one of the Newspapers, July_ 31, 1813.

[419] _Ptinus rubellus_, Marsh.

[420] _Bibl. Nat._ i. 125. b. 126. a.

[421] Sir Geo. Staunton's _Voy._ 8vo. 189.

[422] Kerr in _Philos. Trans._ 1781.

[423] Reaum. iii. 266.

[424] Ibid. 59.

[425] Reaum. iii. 42.

[426] Ibid. 257.

[427] _Amoen. Acad._ iii. 346.

[428] Kirby in _Linn. Trans._ v. 250.

[429] _Curculio lignarius_, Marsh. _Rhinosimus ruficollis_, Latr.

[430] The species of the genus _Dorcadion_ separated from _Lamia_ are
discovered to live upon the roots of grass.

[431] The _larva_ of a _Callidium_ (which Dr. Leach has discovered
to be _C. Bajulus_) sometimes does material injury to the wood-work
of the roofs of houses in London, piercing in every direction the
fir-rafters, and, when arrived at the perfect state, making its way
out even through sheets of lead one-sixth of an inch thick, when they
happen to have been nailed upon the rafter in which it has assumed its
final metamorphosis. I am indebted to the kindness of Sir Joseph Banks
for a specimen of such a sheet of lead, which, though only eight inches
long and four broad, is thus pierced with twelve oval holes, of some of
which the longest diameter is a quarter of an inch! Mr. Charles Miller
first discovered lead in the stomach of the larva of this insect.

[432] P. 310.

[433] See Kirby, _ubi supr._ 253.--More than a hundred species of the
Capricorn tribe, many of them nondescripts, were collected in the
neighbourhood of Rio de Janeiro by Captain Hancock, of the Foudroyant.

[434] In _Linn. Trans._ x. 399.

[435] _Syst. Nat._ 565. 2.

[436] Smith's _Introduction to Botany_, Pref. xv.

[437] Afzelius in _Linn. Trans._ iv. 261.

[438] _Linn. Trans._ x. 403.

[439] Kirby, _Mon. Ap. Ang._ i. 152-194. Latreille, _Gen._ iv. 161--.

[440] In order to ascertain how far _pure_ sea water is essential
to this insect, and consequently what danger exists of its being
introduced into the woodwork of our docks and piers communicating with
our salt-water rivers, as at Hull, Liverpool, Bristol, Ipswich, &c.,
where it might be far more injurious than even on the coast, I have,
since December 15th 1815, when Mr. Lutwidge was so kind as to furnish
me with a piece of oak full of the insects in a living state, poured
a not very strong solution of common salt over the wood, every other
day, so as to keep the insects constantly wet. On examining it this day
(Feb. 5th 1816) I found them alive; and, what seems to prove them in
as good health as in their natural habitat, numbers have established
themselves in a piece of fir-wood which I nailed to the oak, and have
in this short interval, and in winter too, bored many cells in it.

[441] See p. 226.

[442] Reaum. iii. 270.

[443] Schrank _Enum. Ins. Austr._ 513. 1058.

[444] Horne's _Introd. to Bibliography_, i. 311.

[445] It appears from Humboldt (_Personal Narrative_, E. T. v. 116.)
that the destructive insects called by this name, are _Termites_.

[446] Ulloa, i. 67.

[447] _Amoen. Acad._ iii. 345.

[448] Drury's _Insects_, iii. Preface.

[449] It is not its hardness that protects the teak, as the Asiatic
Termites attack Lignum Vitae, but probably some essential oil
disagreeable to them with which it is impregnated. This is the
more likely, since they will eat it when it is old and has been
long exposed to the air. _Tannin_ has been conjectured to be the
protecting substance, but erroneously, as leather of every kind is
devoured by them. Williamson's _East India Vade Mecum_, ii. 56. It is
its hardness probably that protects the iron-wood from the African
Termites. Smeathman in _Philos. Trans._ 1781. 11. 47.

[450] _Japan_, ii. 127.

[451] _Political Essay on New Spain_, iv. 135.

[452] This account of the _Termites_ is chiefly taken from Smeathman
in _Philos. Trans._ 1781, and Percival's _Ceylon_, 307--.

[453] _Oriental Memoirs_, i. 362.

[454] _Morning Herald_, Dec. 31st, 1814.

[455] The ship here alluded to was the Albion, which was in such a
condition from the attack of insects, supposed to be white ants, that,
had not the ship been firmly lashed together, it was thought she would
have foundered on her voyage home.--The late Mr. Kittoe informed me
that the _Droguers_ or _Draguers_, a kind of lighter employed in the
West Indies in collecting the sugar, sometimes so swarm with ants, of
the common kind, that they have no other way of getting rid of these
troublesome insects than by sinking the vessel in shallow water.

[456] Luke x. 19.




                               LETTER IX.

                    _BENEFITS DERIVED FROM INSECTS._

                           INDIRECT BENEFITS.


My last letters contained, I must own, a most melancholy though not
an overcharged picture of the injuries and devastation which man, in
various ways, experiences through the instrumentality of the insect
world. In this and the following I hope to place before you a more
agreeable scene, since in them I shall endeavour to point out in
what respects these minute animals are made to benefit us, and what
advantages we reap from their extensive agency.

God, in all the evil which he permits to take place, whether spiritual,
moral, or natural, has the ultimate good of his creatures in view. The
evil that we suffer is often a countercheck which restrains us from
greater evil, or a spur to stimulate us to good: we should therefore
consider every thing, not according to the present sensations of pain,
or the present loss or injury that it occasions, but according to its
more general, remote, and permanent effects and bearings;--whether
by it we are not impelled to the practice of many virtues which
otherwise might lie dormant in us--whether our moral habits are not
improved--whether we are not rendered by it more prudent, cautious,
and wary, more watchful to prevent evil, more ingenious and skilful to
remedy it--and whether our higher faculties are not brought more into
play, and our mental powers more invigorated, by the meditation and
experiments necessary to secure ourselves. Viewed in these lights, what
was at first regarded as wholly made up of evil, may be discovered to
contain a considerable proportion of good.

This reasoning is here particularly applicable: and if the ultimate
benefit to man seems in any case problematical, it is merely because
to discover it requires more extended and remote views than we are
enabled by our limited faculties to take, and a knowledge of distant or
concealed results which we are incompetent to calculate or discover.
The common good of this terraqueous globe requires that all things
endowed with vegetable or animal life should bear certain proportions
to each other; and if any individual species exceeds that proportion,
from beneficial it becomes noxious, and interferes with the general
welfare. It was requisite therefore for the benefit of the whole system
that certain means should be provided, by which this hurtful luxuriance
might be checked, and all things taught to keep within their proper
limits: hence it became necessary that some should prey upon others,
and a part be sacrificed for the good of the whole.

Of the counterchecks thus provided, none act a more important part
than insects, particularly in the vegetable kingdom, every plant
having its insect enemies. Man, when he takes any plant from its
natural state and makes it an object of cultivation, must expect
that these agents will follow it into the artificial state in which
he has placed it, and still prey upon it; and it is his business
to exert his faculties in inventing means to guard against their
attacks. It is a wise provision that there should exist a race of
beings empowered to remove all her superfluous productions from the
face of nature; and in effecting this, whatever individual injury may
arise, insects must be deemed general benefactors. Even the locusts
which lay waste whole countries clear the way for the renovation
of their vegetable productions, which were in danger of being
destroyed by the exuberance of some individual species, and thus are
fulfilling the great law of the Creator, that of all which he has
made nothing should be lost. A region, Sparrman tells us, which had
been choked up by shrubs, perennial plants, and hard half-withered
and unpalatable grasses, after being made bare by these scourges,
soon appears in a far more beautiful dress, clothed with new herbs,
superb lilies, and fresh annual grasses, and young and juicy shoots
of the perennial kinds, affording delicious herbage for the wild
cattle and game[457]. And though the interest of individual man is
often sacrificed to the general good, in many cases the insect pests
which he most execrates will be found to be positively beneficial to
him, unless when suffered to increase beyond their due bounds. Thus
the insects that attack the roots of the grasses, and, as has been
before observed, so materially injure our herbage, the wire-worm, the
larvae of _Melolontha vulgaris_, _Tipula oleracea_, &c., in ordinary
seasons only devour so much as is necessary to make room for fresh
shoots, and the production of new herbage; in this manner maintaining
a constant succession of young plants, and causing an annual though
partial renovation of our meadows and pastures. In the rich fields
near Rye in Sussex I particularly observed this effect; and I have
since at home remarked, that at certain times of the year dead plants
may be every where observed, pulled up by the cattle as they feed,
whose place is supplied by new offsets. So that, when in moderate
numbers, these insects do no more harm to the grass than would the
sharp-toothed harrows which it has been sometimes advised to apply
to hide-bound pastures, and the beneficial operation of which in
loosening the sub-soil these insect-borers closely imitate.

Nor would it be difficult to show that the ordinary good effects
of some of those insects, which torment ourselves and our cattle,
preponderate over their evil ones. Mr. Clark is inclined to think
that the gentle irritation of _Gasterophilus Equi_ is advantageous
to the stomach of the horse rather than the contrary. On the same
principle it is not improbable that the Tabani often act as useful
phlebotomists to our full-fed animals; and that the constant motion
in which they are kept in summer by the attacks of the Stomoxys
and other flies, may prevent diseases that would be brought on by
indolence and repletion. And in the case of man himself, if I do not
go so far as with Linne to give the louse the credit of preserving
full-fed boys from coughs, epilepsy, &c., we may safely regard as
no small good, the stimulus which these, and others of the insect
assailants of the persons of the dirty and the vicious, afford to
personal cleanliness and purity.

I might enlarge greatly upon the foregoing view of the subject: but
this is unnecessary, as numerous facts will occur in subsequent
letters which you will readily perceive have an intimate bearing
upon it; and I shall therefore proceed to point out the more evident
benefits which we derive from insects, arranging them under the two
great heads of _direct_ benefits, and those which are _indirect_;
beginning with the latter.

The insects which are _indirectly_ beneficial to us, may be
considered under three points of view: First, as removing various
nuisances and deformities from the face of nature: Secondly, as
destroying other insects, that but for their agency would multiply so
as greatly to injure and annoy us: and Thirdly, as supplying food to
useful animals, particularly to fish and birds.

To advert in the _first_ place to the former. All substances must be
regarded as nuisances and deformities, when considered with relation
to the whole, which are deprived of the principle of animation.
In this relation stand a dead carcase, a dead tree, or a mass of
excrement, which are clearly incumbrances that it is desirable to
have removed; and the office of effecting this removal is chiefly
assigned to insects, which have been justly called the great
scavengers of nature. Let us consider their little but effective
operations in each of their vocations.

How disgusting to the eye, how offensive to the smell, would be the
whole face of nature, were the vast quantity of _excrement_ daily
falling to the earth from the various animals which inhabit it,
suffered to remain until gradually dissolved by the rain or decomposed
by the elements! That it does not thus offend us, we are indebted to
an inconceivable host of insects which attack it the moment it falls;
some immediately beginning to devour it, others depositing in it eggs
from which are soon hatched larvae that concur in the same office with
tenfold voracity: and thus every particle of dung, at least of the most
offensive kinds, speedily swarms with inhabitants which consume all
the liquid and noisome particles, leaving nothing but the undigested
remains, that soon dry and are scattered by the winds, while the grass
upon which it rested, no longer smothered by an impenetrable mass,
springs up with increased vigour.

Numerous are the tribes of insects to which this office is assigned,
though chiefly if not entirely selected from the two orders
_Coleoptera_ and _Diptera_. A large proportion of the genera formed,
by different authors, from Scarabaeus of Linne, viz. _Scarabaeus_,
_Copris_, _Ateuchus_, _Sisyphus_, _Onitis_, _Onthophagus_,
_Aphodius_, and _Psammodius_; also _Hister_, _Sphaeridium_; and
amongst the _Brachyptera_, the majority of the _Staphylinidae_,
many _Aleocharae_, especially of Gravenhorst's third family, many
_Oxyteli_ and some _Omalia_, _Tachini_ and _Tachypori_, of that
author, including in the whole many hundred species of beetles--unite
their labours to effect this useful purpose: and what is remarkable,
though they all work their way in these filthy masses, and at
first can have no paths, yet their bodies are never soiled by the
ordure they inhabit. Many of these insects content themselves
with burrowing in the dung alone; but _Ateuchus pilularius_[458],
a species called in America the _Tumble-dung_, whose singular
manoeuvres I shall subsequently have to advert to, _Copris lunaris_,
_Geotrupes stercorarius_ and many other lamellicorn beetles, make
large cylindrical holes, often of great depth, under the heap, and
there deposit their eggs surrounded by a mass of dung in which they
have previously enveloped them; thus not only dispersing the dung,
but actually burying it at the roots of the adjoining plants, and
by these means contributing considerably to the fertility of our
pastures, supplying the constant waste by an annual conveyance of
fresh dung laid at the very root; by these canals, also, affording a
convenient passage for a portion of it when dissolved to be carried
thither by the rain.

The coleopterous insects found in dung inhabit it in their perfect
as well as imperfect states: but this is not the case with those of
the order _Diptera_, whose larvae alone find their nutriment in it;
the imago, which would be suffocated did it attempt to burrow into a
material so soft, only laying its eggs in the mass. These also are
more select in their choice than the _Coleoptera_--not indeed as to
delicacy,--but they do not indiscriminately oviposit in all kinds,
some preferring horse-dung, others swine's-dung, others cow-dung,
which seems the most favourite pabulum of all the dung-loving
insects, and others that of birds. The most disgusting of all is the
rat-tailed larva that inhabits our privies, which changes to a fly
(_Eristalis tenax_) somewhat resembling a bee.

Still more would our olfactory nerves be offended, and our health
liable to fatal injuries, if the wisdom and goodness of Providence
had not provided for the removal of another nuisance from our
globe--the _dead carcases_ of animals. When these begin to grow
putrid, every one knows what dreadful miasmata exhale from them,
and taint the air we breathe. But no sooner does life depart from
the body of any creature, at least of any which from its size is
likely to become a nuisance, than myriads of different sorts of
insects attack it, and in various ways. First come the Histers and
pierce the skin. Next follow the flesh-flies, some, that no time may
be lost, (as _Sarcophaga carnaria_, &c.) depositing upon it their
young already hatched[459]; others (_Musca Caesar_, &c.) covering it
with millions of eggs, whence in a day or two proceed innumerable
devourers. An idea of the dispatch made by these gourmands may be
gained from the combined consideration of their numbers, voracity and
rapid development. One female of _S. carnaria_ will give birth to
20,000 young; and the larvae of many flesh-flies, as Redi ascertained,
will in twenty-four hours devour so much food, and grow so quickly,
as to increase their weight two hundred fold! In five days after
being hatched they arrive at their full growth and size, which is a
remarkable instance of the care of Providence in fitting them for
the part they are destined to act: for if a longer time was required
for their growth, their food would not be a fit aliment for them, or
they would be too long in removing the nuisance it is given in charge
to them to dissipate. Thus we see there was some ground for Linne's
assertion under _M. vomitoria_, that three of these flies will devour
a dead horse as quickly as would a lion.

As soon as the various tribes of _Muscidae_ have opened the way, and
devoured the softer parts, a whole host of beetles, _Necrophori_,
_Silphae_, _Dermestes_, _Cholevae_, and _Staphylinidae_, actively second
their labours. Wasps and hornets also come in for their portion of
the spoil; and even ants, which prowl every where, rival their giant
competitors in the quantity consumed by them; so that in no very
long time, especially in warm climates, the muscular covering is
removed from the skeleton, which is then cleansed from all remains
of it by the little _Corynetes caeruleus_ and _ruficollis_, (which
last is so interesting, as having been the means of saving the life
of Latreille[460],) and several _Nitidulae_[461]. Even the horns of
animals have an appropriate genus (_Trox_) which inhabits them, and
feeds upon their contents. And not only are large animals thus disposed
of, even the smallest are not suffered long to annoy us. The burying
beetle (_Necrophorus Vespillo_) inters the bodies of small animals,
such as mice, several assisting each other in the work; and those to
which they commit their eggs afford an ample supply of food to their
larvae[462]. Ants also in some degree emulate these burying insects, at
least they will carry off the carcases of insects into their nests;
and I once saw some of the horse-ants dragging away a half-dead snake
of about the size of a goose-quill[463]. Some insects will even attack
living animals and make them their prey, thus contributing to keep them
within due limits. The common earth-worm is attacked and devoured by a
centipede (_Geophilus electricus_). Mr. Sheppard saw one attack a worm
ten times its own size, round which it twisted itself like a serpent,
and which it finally mastered and devoured.

But insects are not only useful in removing and dissipating dead
animal matter; they are also intrusted with a similar office with
respect to the _vegetable_ kingdom. The interior of rotten trees
is inhabited by the larvae of a particular kind of crane-fly with
pectinated antennae (_Ctenophora_[464]), and other insects, which there
find an appropriate nutriment; and a similar diet is furnished to
the grubs of the rose-beetle (_Cetonia aurata_) by the dead leaves
and stalks usually to be found in an ant's nest. _Staphylinidae_,
_Sphaeridia_, and other _Coleoptera_, are always found under heaps of
putrescent vegetables; and an infinite number are to be met with in
decomposing fungi, which seem to be a kind of substance intermediate
between animal and vegetable. The Boleti in particular have a genus of
coleopterous insects appropriated to them[465], and the Lycoperdons
another.--Stagnant waters, which would otherwise exhale putrid
miasmata and be often the cause of fatal disorders, are purified by
the innumerable larvae of gnats, Ephemerae, and other insects which
live in them and abstract from them all the unwholesome part of their
contents. This, Linne says, will easily appear if any one will make the
experiment by filling two vessels with putrid water, leaving the larvae
in one and taking them out of the other. For then he will soon find
the water that is full of larvae pure and without any stench, while
that which is deprived of them will continue stinking[466].

Benefits equally great are rendered by the wood-destroying insects.
We indeed, in this country, who find use for ten times more timber
than we produce, could dispense with their services; but to estimate
them at their proper value, as affecting the great system of nature,
we should transport ourselves to tropical climes, or to those under
the temperate zones, where millions of acres are covered by one
interminable forest. How is it that these untrodden regions, where
thousands of their giant inhabitants fall victims to the slow ravages
of time, or the more sudden operations of lightning and hurricanes,
should yet exhibit none of those scenes of ruin and desolation that
might have been expected, but are always found with the verdant
characters of youth and beauty? It is to the insect world that this
great charge of keeping the habitations of the Dryads in perpetual
freshness has been committed. A century almost would elapse before
the removal from the face of nature of the mighty ruins of one
of the hard-wooded tropical trees, by the mere influence of the
elements. But how speedy its decomposition when their operations are
assisted by insects! As soon as a tree is fallen, one tribe attack
its bark[467], which is often the most indestructible part of it;
and thousands of orifices into the solid trunk are bored by others.
The rain thus insinuates itself into every part, and the action of
heat promotes the decomposition. Various fungi now take possession
and assist in the process, which is followed up by the incessant
attacks of other insects, that feed only upon wood in an incipient
state of decay. And thus in a few months a mighty mass, which seemed
inferior in hardness only to iron, is mouldered into dust, and its
place occupied by younger trees full of life and vigour. The insects
to which this duty is intrusted have been already mentioned in a
former letter (p. 235--); but none of them do their business so
expeditiously or effectually as the Termites, which ply themselves in
such numbers and so unremittingly, that Mr. Smeathman assures us they
will in a few weeks destroy and carry away the trunks of large trees,
without leaving a particle behind; and in places where, two or three
years before, there has been a populous town, if the inhabitants, as
is frequently the case, have chosen to abandon it, there shall be a
very thick wood, and not the vestige of a post to be seen.

       *       *       *       *       *

I observed in a former letter, that the devastations of insects are
not the same in every season, their power of mischief being evident
only at certain times, when Providence, by permitting an unusual
increase of their numbers, gives them a commission to lay waste any
particular country or district. The great agents in preventing this
increase, and keeping the noxious species within proper limits, are
other insects; and to these I shall now call your attention.

Numerous are the tribes upon which this important task devolves, and
incalculable are the benefits which they are the means of bestowing
upon us; for to them we are indebted, or rather to Providence who
created them for this purpose, that our crops and grain, our cattle,
our fruit- and forest-trees, our pulse and flowers, and even the
verdant covering of the earth, are not totally destroyed. Of these
insects, so friendly to man, some exercise their destructive agency
solely while in the larva state; others in the perfect state only;
others in both these states; and lastly, others again in all the
three states of larva, pupa, and imago. For order's sake, and to give
you a more distinct view of the subject, I shall say something on
each separately.

The first, those which are insectivorous only in their _larva_ state,
maybe further subdivided into _parasites_ and _imparasites_, meaning
by the former term those that feed upon a _living_ insect, and only
destroy it when they have attained their full growth; and by the
latter, those that prey upon insects already dead, or that kill them
in the act of devouring them.

The _imparasitic_ insect devourers chiefly belong to the
_Hymenoptera_ order; and though it is in the larva state that their
prowess is exhibited, the task of providing the prey is usually left
to the female, of which each species for the most part selects a
particular kind of insect. Thus many species of _Cerceris_ and the
splendid _Chrysidae_ or golden wasps feed upon insects of their own
order. One of the latter (_Parnopes incarnata_) commits her eggs
to the progeny of _Bembex rostrata_: another (_Chrysis bidentata_)
attacks the young of _Epipone spinipes_.

_Bembex_ and _Mellinus_ confine themselves to _Diptera_, the former
preying upon _Eristalis tenax_, _Bombylii_, and the like[468];
the latter amongst others ridding us of the troublesome _Stomoxys
calcitrans_. One of these last I have observed stationed on dung
watching for flies, which when seized, she carried to her burrow.

_Epipone spinipes_, belonging to the family of Wasps, feeds upon
certain green apod larvae, of which the female deposits ten or twelve
with each egg. _Ammophila vulgaris_ destroys caterpillars of a larger
size, and it is probable that most of the other Vespoid and Sphecoid
_Hymenoptera_, viz. _Trypoxylon_, _Philanthus_, _Larra_, _Crabro_,
&c. assist in this great work.

_Pompilus_, to which genus probably several species mentioned by
Reaumur as preying on these insects should be referred, has it in
charge to keep the number of spiders within due bounds: and some
Sand-wasps lend their aid. One of these last, mentioned by Catesby
(_Pronaeus caeruleus_), has been known to seize a spider eight times
its own weight[469]. Another species of this genus, which is common
in the Isle of France, attacks an insect still more difficult, one
would think, to turn to its purpose, the all-devouring _Blatta_ or
cock-roach, and is therefore one of the great benefactors to mankind.
When this insect perceives a Blatta (called there Kakerlac and
Cancrelas) it stops immediately: both animals eye each other; but in
an instant the sand-wasp darts upon its prey, seizes it by the muzzle
with its strong jaws, and bending its abdomen underneath it, pierces
it with its fatal sting. Sure of its victim, it now walks or flies
away, leaving the poison to work its effect; but in a short time
returns, and, finding it deprived of power to make resistance, seizes
it again by the head, and drags it away, walking backwards to deposit
it in a hole or chink of a wall[470].

Grasshoppers are the prey of another sand-wasp, supposed to be the
_Sphex pensylvanica_ of Linne, a native of North America, each of
which in its larva state devours three of a large green species with
which its mother has provided it[471].

From none of the imparasitic insectivorous larvae do we derive more
advantage than from those which devour the destructive Aphides,
whose ravages, as we have seen above, are more detrimental to us
in this island than those of any other insect. A great variety of
species, of different orders and genera, are employed to keep them
within due limits. There is a beautiful genus of four-winged flies,
whose wings resemble the finest lace, and whose eyes are often as
brilliant as burnished metals (_Hemerobius_), the larvae of which,
Reaumur, from their being insatiable devourers of them, has named
the lions of the Aphides. The singular pedunculated eggs from which
these larvae proceed I shall describe when we come to treat upon the
eggs of insects; the larvae themselves are furnished with a pair of
long crooked mandibles resembling horns, which terminate in a sharp
point, and like those of the ant-lion are perforated, serving the
insect instead of a mouth; for through this orifice the nutriment
passes down into the stomach. When amongst the Aphides, like wolves
in a sheep-fold, they make dreadful havoc: half a minute suffices
them to suck the largest; and the individuals of one species clothe
themselves, like Hercules, with the spoils of their hapless victims.

Next in importance to these come the aphidivorous flies (many species
of _Syrphidae_), whose grubs are armed with a singular mandible,
furnished like a trident with three points, with which they transfix
their prey. They may often be seen laid at their ease under a leaf or
upon a twig, environed by such hosts of Aphides, that they can devour
hundreds without changing their station; and their silly helpless
prey, who are provided with no means of defence, so far from thinking
of escaping, frequently walk over the back of their enemy, and put
themselves in his way. When disposed to feed, he fixes himself by his
tail, and, being blind, gropes about on every side, as the Cyclops
did for Ulysses and his companions, till he touches one, which he
immediately transfixes with his trident, elevates into the air, that
he may not be disturbed by its struggles, and soon devours. The havoc
which these grubs make amongst the Aphides is astonishing. It was
but last week that I observed the top of every young shoot of the
currant-trees in my garden curled up by myriads of these insects. On
examining them this day, not an individual remained; but beneath each
leaf are three or four full-fed larvae of aphidivorous flies, surrounded
with heaps of the skins of the slain, the trophies of their successful
warfare; and the young shoots, whose progress had been entirely checked
by the abstraction of sap, are again expanding vigorously.

But even these serviceable insects must yield the palm to the lady-bird
or lady-cow (_Coccinella_), the favourite of our childhood, which, as
well as most of its congeners, in the larva state feeds entirely on
Aphides[472]; and the havoc made amongst them may be conceived from
the myriads upon myriads of these little interesting animals, which
are often to be seen in years when the plant-louse abounds. In 1807
the shore at Brighton and all the watering-places on the south coast
was literally covered with them, to the great surprise and even alarm
of the inhabitants, who were ignorant that their little visitors were
emigrants from the neighbouring hop-grounds, where in their larva
state each had slain his thousands and tens of thousands of the Aphis,
which under the name of the _Fly_ so frequently blasts the hopes of
the hop-grower. It is fortunate that in most countries the children
have taken these friendly Coccinellae under their protection. In France
they regard them as sacred to the Virgin, and call them _Vaches a
Dieu_, _Betes de la Vierge_, &c.; and with us, commiseration for the
hard fate of a mother, whose "house is on fire and children at home,"
ensures them kind treatment and liberty. Even the hop-growers are
becoming sensible of their services, and, as I am informed, hire boys
to prevent birds from destroying them.--If we could but discover a
mode of increasing these insects at will, we might not only, as Dr.
Darwin has suggested, clear our hot-houses of Aphides by their means,
but render our crops of hops much more certain than they now are. Even
without this knowledge, nothing is more easy, as I have experienced,
than to clear a plant or small tree by placing upon it several larvae
of Coccinellae or of aphidivorous flies collected from less valuable
vegetables.

Lastly, to close this list of imparasitic insectivorous larvae, I
may mention those of Geoffroy's genus _Volucella_ so remarkable for
their radiated anus, which live in the nests of humble-bees, braving
the fury of their stings and devouring their young; and the ant-lion
(_Myrmeleon_) and Reaumur's improperly named worm-lion (_Leptis_),
whose singular stratagems will be detailed in a subsequent letter,
both of which destroy great numbers of insects that are so
unfortunate as to fall into their toils.

The _parasitic_ larvae, an extremely numerous tribe, must next be
considered. These, with the exception of a very few individuals,
belong to the order _Hymenoptera_, and were included by Linne under
his vast genus _Ichneumon_, so named from the analogy between their
services and those of the Egyptian Ichneumons (_Viverra Ichneumon_),
the former as destroyers of insects, being equally important with the
latter as devourers of serpents, the eggs of crocodiles, &c.

The habits of the whole of this tribe[473], which properly includes
a great number of distinct genera, are similar. They all oviposit in
living insects, chiefly while in the larva state, sometimes while
pupae (_Misocampus Puparum_); and even while in the egg state (_Ich.
Ovulorum_, L[474].); but not, as far as is known, in perfect insects.
The eggs thus deposited soon hatch into grubs, which immediately
attack their victim, and in the end ensure its destruction. The
number of eggs committed to each individual varies according to its
size, and that of the grubs which are to spring from them; being in
most cases one only, but in others amounting to some hundreds.

From the observations hitherto made by entomologists, the great body
of the Ichneumon tribe is principally employed in keeping within
their proper limits the infinite host of _lepidopterous_ larvae,
destroying, however, many insects of other orders; and perhaps if
the larvae of these last fell equally under our observation with
those of the former, we might discover that few exist uninfested
by their appropriate parasite. Such is the activity and address
of the Ichneumonidans, and their _minute_ allies (_Pupivora_,
Latr.), that scarcely any concealment, except perhaps the waters,
can secure their prey from them; and neither bulk, courage, nor
ferocity avail to terrify them from effecting their purpose. They
attack the ruthless spider in his toils; they discover the retreat
of the little bee, that for safety bores deep into timber; and
though its enemy Ichneumon cannot enter its cell, by means of her
long ovipositor[475] she reaches the helpless grub, which its parent
vainly thought secured from every foe, and deposits in it an egg,
which produces a larva that destroys it[476]. In vain does the
destructive _Cecidomyia_ of the wheat conceal its larvae within the
glumes that so closely cover the grain; three species of these
minute benefactors of our race, sent in mercy by Heaven, know how to
introduce their eggs into them, thus preventing the mischief they
would otherwise occasion, and saving mankind from the horrors of
famine[477]. In vain also the _Cynips_ by its magic touch produces
the curious excrescences on various trees and plants, called galls,
for the nutriment and defence of its progeny: the parasite species
attached to it discovers its secret chamber, pierces its wall however
thick, and commits the destroying egg to its offspring. Even the
clover-weevil is not secure within the legumen of that plant; nor
the wire-worm in the earth, from their ichneumonidan foes. I have
received from the late Mr. Markwick that of the former, and Mr.
Paul has shown me the destroyer of the latter, which belongs to
Latreille's genus _Proctotrupes_. Others are not more secured by
the repulsive nature of the substance they inhabit; for two species
at least of Ichneumon[478] know how to oviposit it in stercorarious
larvae without soiling their wings or bodies.

The ichneumonidan parasites are either external or internal. Thus the
species above alluded to, which attacks spiders, does not live within
their bodies, but remains on the outside[479]; and the larva of _Ophion
luteum_, which adheres by one end to the shell of the bulbiferous egg
that produced it, does not enter the caterpillar of _Euprepia villica_,
the moth upon which it feeds[480]. But the great majority of these
animals oviposit within the body of the insect to which they are
assigned, from whence, after having consumed the interior and become
pupae, they emerge in their perfect state. An idea of the services
rendered to us by those Ichneumons which prey upon noxious larvae may
be formed from the fact, that out of thirty individuals of the common
cabbage caterpillar (the larvae of _Pontia Brassicae_) which Reaumur put
into a glass to feed, twenty-five were fatally pierced by an Ichneumon
(_Microgaster globatus_[481]). And if we compare the myriads of
caterpillars that often attack our cabbages and broccoli with the small
number of butterflies of this species which usually appear, we may
conjecture that they are commonly destroyed in some such proportion--a
circumstance that will lead us thankfully to acknowledge the goodness
of Providence, which by providing such a check has prevented the utter
destruction of the Brassica genus, including some of our most esteemed
and useful vegetables.

The parasites are not wholly confined to the order _Hymenoptera_:
some insects of other orders, though comparatively very few, destroy
our little enemies in the same way. _Tachina Larvarum_, and another
like it described by De Geer, lay their eggs in caterpillars and
other larvae[482]; and Reaumur describes several other flies of
similar habits[483]. The order also of _Strepsiptera_, lately
established[484], appears to be altogether parasitic; but with this
difference from the _Pupivora_, that these extraordinary animals are
found only upon _Hymenoptera_ in their perfect state, and do not
appear to destroy the insects upon which they prey, but probably
prevent their breeding. The species at present known are formed
into two genera, _Xenos_ and _Stylops_, which are confined to
_Melitta_[485] and _Vespa_[486].

The next description of insect destroyers are those which devour them
in their _first_ and _last_ states.--No beetles are more common after
the summer is confirmed, than the species of the genus _Telephorus_.
Preysler informs us that the grub of _T. fuscus_ destroys a great
many other larvae[487], and I have observed the imago devour these and
also _Diptera_.--Linne has with justice denominated the _Cicindelae_
the tigers of insects. Though decorated with brilliant colours, they
prey upon the whole insect race; their formidable jaws which cross
each other are armed with fearful fangs, showing to what use they
are applicable; and the extreme velocity with which they can either
run or fly, renders hopeless any attempt to elude their pursuit.
Their larvae are also equally tremendous with the imago, having
eight eyes, four on each side, seated on a lateral elevation of the
head, two above and two very minute below, which look like those
of spiders, and besides their threatening jaws armed with a strong
internal tooth, being furnished with a pair of spines resembling
somewhat the sting of a scorpion, which stand erect upon the back
of the abdomen, and give them a most ferocious aspect[488]. This
last apparatus, according to Clairville, serves the purpose of an
anchor for retaining them at any height in their deep cells[489].
Most of the aquatic beetles, at least the Gyrini and Dytisci, prey
upon other insects both in their first and final state. The larvae
of the latter have long been observed and described under the name
of _Squillae_, and are remarkable for having their mandibles adapted
for suction like those of Hemerobius and Myrmeleon; but they are not
like them deprived of a mouth, being able to devour by mastication
as well as by suction.--Another tribe of this order which abounds
in species, those predaceous beetles which form Linne's great genus
_Carabus_ (_Eutrechina_[490]), is universally insectivorous. One
of the most destructive is the grub of a very beautiful species,
an English specimen of which would be a great acquisition to your
cabinet, it being one of our rarest insects[491], I mean _Calosoma
Sycophanta_. This animal takes up its station in the nests of
_Lasiocampa processionea_ and other moths, and sometimes fills
itself so full with these caterpillars, which we cannot handle or
even approach without injury, as to be rendered incapable of motion
and appear ready to burst. Another beautiful insect of this tribe,
_Carabus auratus_, known in France by the name of _Vinaigrier_, is
supposed to destroy more cockchafers than all their other enemies,
attacking and killing the females at the moment of oviposition, and
thus preventing the birth of thousands of young grubs[492]. Lastly
come the _Brachyptera_, many of which prey upon insects as well as on
putrescent substances. Mr. Lehmann tells us that some of them are
very useful in destroying a weevil, _Apion flavifemoratum_[493], the
great enemy of our crops of clover seed.

Amongst the devourers of insects in their _perfect_ state only, must
be ranked a few of the social tribes, ants, wasps, and hornets. The
first-mentioned indefatigable and industrious creatures kill and carry
off great numbers of insects of every description to their nests, and
prodigious are their efforts in this work. I have seen an ant dragging
a wild bee many times bigger than itself; and there was brought to me
this very morning while writing this letter, an _Elater_ quite alive
and active, which three or four ants in spite of its struggles were
carrying off. An observing friend of mine[494], who was some time in
Antigua, informed me that in that island, a kind of ant which construct
their nests in the roofs of houses, when they meet with any animal
larger than they can carry off alive, such as a cock-roach, &c., will
hold it by the legs so that it cannot move, till some of them get
upon it and dispatch it, and then with incredible labour carry it up
to their nest. Madam Merian, in her account of the periodical ants
mentioned to you before[495], and which is confirmed by Azara[496],
notices their clearing the houses of cock-roaches and similar animals;
and _Myrmica omnivora_ is very useful in Ceylon in destroying the
former insect, the larger ant, and the white ant[497].

You are not perhaps accustomed to regard wasps and hornets as of
any use to us; but they certainly destroy an infinite number of
flies and other annoying insects. The year 1811 was remarkable for
the small number of wasps, though many females appeared in the
spring, scarcely any neuters being to be seen in the autumn[498]; and
probably in consequence of this circumstance, flies in many places
were so extremely numerous as to be quite a nuisance. Reaumur has
observed that in France the butchers are very glad to have wasps
attend their stalls, for the sake of their services in driving away
the flesh-fly; and if we may believe the author of Hector St. John's
_American Letters_, the farmers in some parts of the United States
are so well aware of their utility in this respect, as to suspend in
their sitting-rooms a hornet's nest, the occupants of which prey upon
the flies without molesting the family.

There are other devourers of insects in their perfect state, the
manners and food of whose larvae we are unacquainted with. St.
Pierre speaks of a lady-bird, but it probably belonged to some
other genus, of a fine violet colour, with a head like a ruby,
which he saw carry off a butterfly[499]. Linne informs us that
_Clerus formicarius_ devours _Anobium pertinax_. A fly related
to the _Panorpa communis_ appears created to instill terror into
the pitiless hearts of the tyrants of our lakes and pools,--the
all-devouring _Libellulina_[500]. The _Asili_ also, which are always
upon the chase, seize insects with their anterior legs and suck them
with their haustellum. The cognate genus _Dioctria_, particularly
_D. oelandica_, prey upon _Hymenoptera_, by some unknown means
instantaneously killing the insect they seize. Many species also of
_Empis_, whose haustellum resembles the beak of a bird, carry off in
it _Tipulariae_ and other small _Diptera_; and what is remarkable, you
can seldom take these insects in coitu, but the female has a gnat,
some fly, or sometimes beetle, in her mouth. Can this be to deposit
her eggs in, as soon as they are impregnated by the male? or is it
designed for the nuptial feast? Even _Scatophaga stercoraria_ and
_scybalaria_, and probably many others of the same tribe, feed upon
small flies, though their proboscis does not seem so well adapted for
animal as for vegetable food.

The most unrelenting devourers of insects appear to be those
belonging to my fourth division, which attack them under _every_
form. These begin the work of destruction when they are larvae,
and continue it during the whole of their existence.--The earwig
that haunts every close place in our gardens, and defiles whatever
it enters, probably in some degree makes up for its ravages by
diminishing the number of other insects. The cowardly and cruel
_Mantis_, which runs away from an ant, will destroy in abundance
helpless flies, using its anterior tibiae, which with the thigh form
a kind of forceps, to seize its prey. The water-scorpions (_Nepa_,
_Ranatra_, and _Naucoris_), whose fore legs are made like those of
the _Mantis_, the water-boatman (_Notonecta_), which always swims
upon its back, and _Sigara_, all live by rapine, and prey upon
aquatic insects. Some of this tribe are so savage that they seem to
love destruction for its own sake. One (_Nepa cinerea_) which was put
into a basin of water with several young tadpoles, killed them all
without attempting to eat one.

Those remarkable genera of the tribe of water-bugs (_Hydrocorisae_
Latr.), which glide over the surface of every pool with such
rapidity, being gifted with the faculty of walking upon the water,
_Hydrometra_, _Velia_, and _Gerris_, subsist also upon aquatic
insects. A large number of the land-bugs (_Geocorisae_ Latr.) plunge
their rostrum into the larvae of _Lepidoptera_, and suck the contents
of their bodies; and _Reduvius personatus_, which ought on that
account to be encouraged, is particularly fond of the bed-bug.

But of all the insects that are locomotive and pursue their prey in
every state, none are greater enemies of their fellow tribes than
the _Libellulina_, and none are provided with more powerful and
singular instruments of assault. In the larva and pupa states, during
which they live in the water and prey upon aquatic insects, they are
furnished with two pair of strong jaws, covered by a kind of mask
armed with a pair of forceps or claws, which the animal has the power
of pushing from it to catch any thing at a distance[501]. When an
aquatic insect passes within its reach, it suddenly darts forth the
mask, opens the forceps, seizes the unfortunate victim, and brings it
within the action of its jaws.

When they assume the imago state, their habits do not, like those
of the white ants, become more mild and gentle, but on the contrary
are more sanguinary and rapacious than ever; so that the name given
to them in England, "Dragon-flies," seems much more applicable than
"Demoiselles," by which the French distinguish them. Their motions
it is true are light and airy; their dress is silky, brilliant and
variegated, and trimmed with the finest lace:--so far the resemblance
holds; but their purpose, except at the time of love, is always
destruction, in which surely they have no resemblance to the ladies.
I have been much amused by observing the proceedings of a species not
uncommon here, _Anax Imperator_ of Dr. Leach. It keeps wheeling round
and round, and backwards and forwards, over a considerable portion of
the pool it frequents. If one of the same species comes in its way, a
battle ensues; if other species of _Libellulina_ presume to approach,
it drives them away, and it is continually engaged in catching
case-worm flies and other insects (for the species of this tribe all
catch their prey when on the wing, and their large eyes seem given
them to enable them the more readily to do this,) that fly over the
water, pulling off their wings with great adroitness and devouring in
an instant the contents of the body. From the number of insects of
this tribe which are every where to be observed, we may conjecture
how useful they must be in preventing too great a multiplication of
the other species of the class to which they belong.

Lastly, under this head, not to dwell upon some other apterous
genera, devourers of insects, as the scorpion and centipede,
_Phalangium_ and _Galeodes_, must be enumerated the whole world of
Spiders, extremely numerous both in species and individuals, which
subsist entirely upon insects, spreading with infinite art and skill
their nets and webs to arrest the flight of the heedless and unwary
summer tribes that fill the air, which are hourly caught by thousands
in their toils; one of them (_Theridium_ 13-_guttatum_ Rossi), we are
told, even attacking the redoubted Scorpion[502].

So much for the insect benefactors to whom it is given in charge
to keep the animals of their own class within their proper limits;
and I cannot doubt that you will recognise the goodness of the Great
Parent in providing such an army of counterchecks to the natural
tendency of almost all insects to incalculable increase. But before
I quit this subject I must call your attention to what may be
denominated _cannibal insects_, since in spite of those declaimers
who would persuade us that man is the only animal that preys upon his
own species[503], a large number of insects are guilty of the same
offence. Reaumur tells us, that having put into a glass vessel twenty
caterpillars of the same species, which he was careful to supply
with their appropriate food, they nevertheless devoured each other
until one only survived[504]; and De Geer relates several similar
instances[505]. The younger larvae of _Calosoma Sycophanta_ often
take advantage of the helpless inactivity into which the gluttony of
their maturer comrades has thrown them, and from mere wantonness it
should seem, when in no need of other food, pierce and devour them. A
ferocity not less savage exists amongst the _Mantes_. These insects
have their fore legs of a construction not unlike that of a sabre;
and they can as dexterously cleave their antagonist in two, or cut
off his head at a stroke, as the most expert hussar. In this way
they often treat each other, even the sexes fighting with the most
savage animosity. Roesel endeavoured to rear several specimens of _M.
religiosa_, but always failed, the stronger constantly devouring
the weaker[506]. This ferocious propensity the Chinese children
have, according to Mr. Barrow, employed as a source of barbarous
amusement, selling to their comrades bamboo cages containing each a
_Mantis_, which are put together to fight. You will think it singular
that both in Europe and Africa these cruel insects have obtained a
character for gentleness of disposition, and even sanctity. This
has arisen from the upright or sitting position, with the fore legs
bent, assumed in watching for their prey, which the vulgar have
supposed to be a praying posture, and hence adopted the belief that a
child or traveller that had lost his road would be guided by taking
one of these pious insects in his hands and observing what way it
pointed. _Mantis fausta_, though not as some suppose worshiped by
the Hottentots, is yet greatly esteemed by them, and they regard
the person upon whom it alights as highly fortunate[507]. A similar
unnatural ferocity is exhibited by _Gryllus campestris_, of which
having put the sexes into a box, I found on examining them that the
female had begun to make her meal off her companion.--The malign
aspect of the scorpion leads us to expect from it unnatural cruelty,
and its manners fulfill this expectation. Maupertuis put a hundred
scorpions together, and a general and murderous battle immediately
began. Almost all were massacred in the space of a few days without
distinction of age or sex, and devoured by the survivors. He informs
us also that they often devour their own offspring as soon as they
are born[508]. Spiders are equally ferocious in their habits,
fighting sanguinary battles, which sometimes end in the death of
both combatants; and the females do not yield to the Mantes in their
unnatural cruelty to their mates. Woe be to the male spider that
after an union does not with all speed make his escape from the
fangs of his partner! Nay, De Geer saw one that, in the midst of his
preparatory caresses, was seized by the object of his attentions,
enveloped by her in a web, and then devoured--a sight which, he
observes, filled him with horror and indignation[509].

       *       *       *       *       *

Such are the benefits which we derive from the insects that keep each
other in check. Here they are the _destroyers_ to which we are chiefly
indebted: but we are in another point of view under nearly equal
obligations to the _destroyed_; for they are insects, either wholly or
in part, that form the food of some of our most esteemed fishes, and
of birds that are not more valuable to us as articles for the table,
than as the songsters that enliven our groves. But before proceeding
to the details which this view of the subject involves, I ought not to
omit pointing out to you that many quadrupeds, which though not all of
direct utility to us are doubtless of importance in the scale of being,
derive a considerable part of their subsistence from insects.

The harmless hedgehog and the mole, to begin at the lower end of the
series, are both said to be insectivorous[510]; the latter devouring
large quantities of the wire-worms. The greedy swine will root up
whole acres in search of the grubs of cockchafers, of which they are
very fond; and perhaps the good they do is greater than the harm,
if their attack be confined to grass that having been undermined
by these grubs would soon die: they also dig up the larvae of the
destructive _Cicada septendecim_, called the American locust[511], on
which, when in their perfect state, the squirrels are said to grow
fat[512]. The badger, Lesser informs us, will eat beetles: and its
kinsman the bear has the character of being very fond of ants and of
honey; which last is also said to be a favourite article with the
fox, who has sometimes the audacity to overturn bee-hives, and even
to attack wasps' nests in search of it. He will also eat beetles.

Sparrman has given an amusing account of the honey-ratel, (_Viverra
mellivora_,) which has a particular instinct enabling it to discover
bees, and attack them in their entrenchments. Near sun-set the
ratel will sit and hold one of his paws before his eyes, in order
to get a distinct view of the object of his pursuit; and when, in
consequence of his peering about in this manner, he sees any bees
flying, he knows that at this time of the day they are making for
their habitations, whither he follows them, and so attains his
end[513]. Another species of Viverra (_V. prehensilis_) is also
reputed to be an eager insect-hunter. The young armadillos feed on a
species of locust; but no quadruped can with more propriety be called
insectivorous than the ant-eaters (_Myrmecophaga_), which, as their
name imports, live upon ants. The great ant-eater, when he comes to
an ant-hill, scratches it up with his long claws, and then unfolds
his slender worm-like tongue, (which is more than two feet long, and
wet with saliva,) and when covered with ants draws it back into his
mouth and swallows thousands of them alive, renewing the operation
till no more are to be found. He also climbs trees in search of
wood-lice and wild-honey. Bats, as every one knows, are always
flitting about in summer evenings, hawking for insects: and the Lemur
and monkeys will also eat them.

Insects likewise afford a favourite kind of food to many reptiles:
the tortoise; frogs and toads; and lizards too of different kinds.
St. Pierre mentions a small and very handsome species in the island
of Mauritius, that pursues them into the houses, climbs up the walls,
and even walks over glass, watching with great patience for an
opportunity of catching them[514]. The common snake also is said to
receive part of its nutriment from them.

But to revert to insects as indirectly advantageous to us, by
furnishing food to fishes and birds, beginning with the former.

Our rivers abound with _fish_ of various kinds, which at particular
seasons derive a principal part of their food from insects, as the
numerous species of the salmon and carp genus. These chiefly prey
upon the various kinds of _Trichoptera_, in their larva state called
case- or caddis-worms, and in their imago may-flies (though this last
denomination properly belongs only to the _Sialis lutaria_, which
generally appears in that month,) and _Ephemerae_. Besides these, the
waters swarm with insects of every order, as numerous in proportion
to the space they inhabit, as those that fill the air, which form the
sole nutriment of multitudes of our fish, and the partial support of
almost all.

Reaumur has given us a very entertaining account of the infinite
hosts of Ephemerae that by myriads of millions emerge at a certain
season of the year from some of the rivers in France, which, as it is
well worth your attention, I shall abridge for you.

These insects in their first and intermediate state are aquatic:
they either live in holes in the banks of rivers or brooks below the
water, so that it enters into their habitations, which they seldom
quit; or they swim about and walk upon the bed of the stream, or
conceal themselves under stones or upon pieces of stick. Though their
life, when they assume the perfect state, is usually extremely short,
some being disclosed after sun-set, laying their eggs and dying
before sun-rise; and many not living more than three hours; yet in
their preparatory state their existence is much longer, in some one,
in others two, in others even three years.

The different species assume the imago at different times of the
year; but the same species appear regularly at nearly the same
period annually, and for a certain number of days fill the air in
the neighbourhood of the rivers, emerging also from the water at
a certain hour of the day. Those which Swammerdam observed, began
to fly about six o'clock in the evening, or about two hours before
sun-set; but the great body of those noticed by Reaumur did not
appear till after that time; so that the season of different harvests
is not better known to the farmer, than that in which the Ephemerae
of a particular river are to emerge, is to the fishermen. Yet a
greater degree of heat or cold, the rise or fall of the water, and
other circumstances we are not aware of, may accelerate or <DW44>
their appearance. Between the 10th and 15th of August is the time
when those of the Seine and Marne, which Reaumur described, are
expected by the fishermen, who call them _manna_: and when their
season is come, they say "the manna begins to appear, the manna fell
abundantly such a night;"--alluding, by this expression, either to
the astonishing quantity of food which the Ephemerae afford the fish,
or to the large quantity of fish which they then take.

Reaumur first observed these insects in the year 1738, when they did
not begin to show themselves in numbers till the 18th of August. On
the 19th, having received notice from his fisherman that the flies had
appeared, he got into his boat about three hours before sun-set, and
detached from the banks of the river several masses of earth filled
with pupae, which he put into a large tub full of water. This tub,
after staying in the boat till about eight o'clock, without seeing any
remarkable number of the flies, and being threatened with a storm, he
caused to be landed and placed in his garden, at the foot of which
ran the Marne. Before the people had landed it, an astonishing number
of Ephemerae emerged from it. Every piece of earth that was above the
surface of the water was covered by them, some beginning to quit their
slough, others prepared to fly, and others already on the wing; and
every where under the water they were to be seen in a greater or less
degree of forwardness. The storm coming on, he was obliged to quit the
amusing scene; but when the rain ceased to fall he returned to it. As
soon as the cloth with which he had ordered the tub to be covered was
removed, the number of flies appeared to be greatly augmented, and kept
continually increasing: many flew away, but more were drowned. Those
already transformed, and continually transforming, would have been
sufficient of themselves to have made the tub seem full; but their
number was soon very much enlarged by others attracted by the light. To
prevent their being drowned, he caused the tub to be again covered with
the cloth, and over it he held the light, which was soon concealed by a
layer of these flies, that might have been taken by handfulls from the
candlestick.

But the scene round the tub was nothing to be compared with the
wonderful spectacle exhibited on the banks of the river. The
exclamations of his gardener drew the illustrious naturalist thither:
and such a sight he had never witnessed, and could scarcely find
words to describe. "The myriads of Ephemerae," says he, "which filled
the air over the current of the river, and over the bank on which I
stood, are neither to be expressed nor conceived. When the snow falls
with the largest flakes, and with the least interval between them,
the air is not so full of them as that which surrounded us was of
Ephemerae. Scarcely had I remained in one place a few minutes, when
the step on which I stood was quite concealed with a layer of them
from two to four inches in depth. Near the lowest step a surface
of water of five or six feet dimensions every way was entirely
and thickly covered by them: and what the current carried off was
continually replaced. Many times I was obliged to abandon my station,
not being able to bear the shower of Ephemerae, which, falling with
an obliquity less constant than that of an ordinary shower, struck
continually, and in a manner extremely uncomfortable, every part of
my face:--eyes, mouth and nostrils were filled with them." To hold
the flambeau on this occasion was no pleasant office. The person who
filled it had his clothes covered in a few moments with these flies,
which came from all parts to overwhelm him.--Before ten o'clock this
interesting spectacle had vanished. It was renewed for some nights
afterwards, but the flies were never in such prodigious numbers. The
fishermen allow only three successive days for the great fall of the
manna: but a few flies appear both before and after, their number
increasing in one case, in the other diminishing. Whatever be the
temperature of the atmosphere, whether it be cold or hot, these flies
invariably appear at the same hour in the evening, that is, between
a quarter and half-past eight: towards nine they begin to fill the
air; in the following half-hour they are in the greatest numbers; and
at ten there are scarcely any to be seen. So that in less than two
hours this infinite host of flies emerge from their parent stream,
fill the air, perform their appointed work, and vanish. A very large
proportion of them falls into the river, when the fish have their
grand festival and the fishermen a good harvest[515].

Under this head I may observe how much the patient angler is
indebted to insects for some of his choicest baits, for the best
opportunities of showing his skill, and for the most gratifying part
of his diversion. The case-worm and several other larvae are the best
standing bait for many fish. The larva of the Ephemera, there called
bait and bank-bait[516], is much used in some parts of Holland. The
case-worms, and grubs (I suppose of flies) from the tallow-chandlers
are in request with us for roach and dace; and I am told by an acute
observer of these things, the Rev. R. Sheppard, that the _Geotrupes_
and _Melolonthae_ are good baits for chub[517]. But to be an adept
in fly-fishing, which requires the most skill and furnishes the
best diversion, the angler ought to be conversant in Entomology,
at least sufficiently so to distinguish the different species of
_Phryganea_ and other _Trichoptera_, and to know the time of their
appearance.--The angler is not only indebted to insects for some of
his best baits, but also for the best material to fasten his hooks
to, and even for making his lines for smaller fish--the Indian grass
or gut as it is called, (termed in France _Cheveux de Florence_,)
which is said to be prepared in China from the matter contained in
the silk reservoirs of the silk-worm, but according to Latreille is
the silk vessel itself when dried[518].

       *       *       *       *       *

One of the most important ends for which insects were gifted with
such powers of multiplication, giving birth to myriads of myriads of
individuals, was to furnish the feathered part of the creation with
a sufficient supply of food. The number of birds that derive the
whole or a principal part of their subsistence from insects is, as is
universally known, very great, and includes species of almost every
order.

Amongst the _Accipitres_ the kestril (_Falco Tinnunculus_, L.)
devours abundance of insects. A friend of mine, upon opening one
found its stomach full of the remains of grasshoppers and beetles,
particularly the former, which he suspects constitute great part of
the food of this species. One of the shrikes, also, or butcher-birds
(_Lanius Collurio_)--and it is probable that other species of this
numerous genus may have the same habits--is known to feed upon
insects, which it first impales alive on the thorns of the sloe and
other spinous plants, and then devours. If meat be given it, when
kept in a cage, it will fix it upon the wires before it eats it.
_Lanius Excubitor_ also impales insects, but Heckewelder denies that
it feeds upon them. If he be correct, the object of this singular
procedure with that species, may be to allure the birds, which it
preys upon, to a particular spot[519].

Amongst the _Picae_ or Pies the _Crotophaga_, called the Ani, which
is a native of Africa and America, lives upon the locust and _Ixodes
Ricinus_, which it picks in great numbers from the backs of cattle;
but none are greater devourers of insects in this order than rooks.
It is for the grubs of _Melolontha_, _Tipula_, &c., that they follow
the plough; and they always frequent the meadows in which these
larvae abound, destroying them in vast numbers. Kalm tells us, that
when the little crow was extirpated from Virginia at an enormous
expense, the inhabitants would willingly have brought them back
again at double the price[520]. The icteric oriole is kept by the
Americans in their houses for the sake of clearing them of insects;
and the purple grackle is so useful in this respect, that when, on
account of their consuming grain, the American farmers in New England
offered a reward of threepence a head for them, and they were in
consequence nearly extirpated, insects increased to such a degree
as to cause a total loss of the herbage, and the inhabitants were
obliged to obtain hay for their cattle not only from Pennsylvania but
even from Great Britain[521]. Of this order also is the bee-cuckoo
(_Cuculus Indicator_) so celebrated for its instinct, by which
it serves as a guide to the wild bees' nests in Africa. Sparrman
describes this bird, which is somewhat larger than a common sparrow,
as giving this information in a singular manner. In the evening
and morning, which are its meal-times, it excites the attention of
the Hottentots, colonists, and honey-ratel, by the cry of _cherr,
cherr, cherr_, and conducts them to the tree or spot in which the
bees' nest is concealed, continually repeating this cry. When
arrived at the spot, it hovers over it, and then alighting on some
neighbouring tree or bush, sits in silence, expecting to come in for
its share of the spoil, which is that part of the comb containing
the brood[522].--The wryneck and the woodpeckers, the nut-hatch and
tree-creeper, live entirely upon insects and their eggs[523], which
they pick out of decayed trees and out of the bark of living ones.
The former also frequents grass-plats and ant-hills, into which
it darts its long flexible tongue and so draws out its prey. The
woodpecker likewise draws insects out of their holes by means of the
same organ, which for this purpose is bony at the end and barbed,
and furnished with a curious apparatus of muscles to enable them to
throw it forwards with great force. Some species spit the insects on
their tongue, and thus bring them into their mouth. In America, the
tree-creeper is furnished with a box at the end of a long pole to
entice it to build in gardens, which it is found to be particularly
useful in clearing from noxious insects.

Amongst the _Grallae_ or Waders, many of the long-billed birds eat the
larvae of insects as well as worms: and they form also no inconsiderable
part of the food of our domestic poultry, especially turkeys, which
may be daily seen busily engaged in hunting for them, and, as well as
ducks, will greedily devour the larger insects, as cockchafers, and
in North America _Cicadae_. Mr. Sheppard was much amused one day in
July last year with observing a cow which had taken refuge in a pond,
probably from the gad-fly, and was standing nearly up to its belly in
water. A fleet of ducks surrounded it, which kept continually jumping
at the flies that alighted upon it. The cow, as if sensible of the
service they were rendering her, stood perfectly still though assailed
and pecked on all sides by them. The partridge takes her young brood to
an ant-hill, where they feast upon the larvae and pupae, which Swammerdam
informs us were sold at market in his time to feed various kinds of
birds[524]. Dr. Clarke also mentions having seen them, as well as the
ants themselves, exposed to sale in the market at Moscow as a food for
nightingales[525]. Latreille tells us that singing birds are fed in
France with the larvae of the horse-ant (_Formica rufa_).

But the Linnean order of _Passeres_ affords the greatest number of
insectivorous birds; indeed almost all the species of this order,
except perhaps the pigeon-tribe, and the cross-bill and other Loxiae,
more or less eat insects. Amongst the thrush tribe, the blackbird,
though he will have his share of our gooseberries and currants, assists
greatly in clearing our gardens of caterpillars; and the locust-eating
thrush is still more useful in the countries subject to that dreadful
pest: these birds never appear but with the locusts, and then accompany
them in astonishing numbers, preying upon them in their larva state.
The common sparrow, though proscribed as a most mischievous bird,
destroys a vast number of insects. Bradley has calculated that a single
pair having young to maintain, will destroy 3360 caterpillars in a
week[526]. They also prey upon butterflies and other winged insects.
The fly-catchers (_Muscicapa_) and the warblers (_Motacilla_), which
include our sweetest songsters, are almost entirely supported by
insects; so that were it not for these despised creatures we should
be deprived of some of our greatest pleasures, and half the interest
and delight of our vernal walks would be done away. Our groves would
no longer be vocal; our little domestic favourites the red-breast and
the wren would desert us; and the heavens would be depopulated.--We
should lose too some of the most esteemed dainties of our tables, one
of which, the wheat-ear, is said to be attracted to our downs by a
particular insect[527]. Lastly, insects are the sole food of swallows,
which are always on the wing hawking for them, and their flight is
regulated by that of their prey. When the atmosphere is dry and clear
and their small game flies high, they seek the skies; when moist and
the insects are low or upon the ground, they descend and just skim
the surface of the earth and waters; and thus by their flight are
regarded as prognosticating fair or wet weather. I was last summer
much interested and amused by observing the tender care and assiduity
with which an old swallow supplied her young with this kind of food.
My attention was called to a young brood, that having left their nest
before they were strong enough to take wing, were stationed on the lead
which covers a bow window in my house. The mother was perpetually going
and returning, putting an insect into the mouth first of one and then
of the others in succession, all fluttering and opening their mouths
to receive her gift. She was scarcely ever more than a minute away,
and continued her excursions as long as we had time to observe her.
When the little ones were satisfied, they put their head under their
wing and went to sleep. The number of insects caught by this tribe is
inconceivable. But it is not in summer only that birds derive their
food from the insect tribes: even in winter the pupae of _Lepidoptera_,
as Mr. White tells us, are the grand support of those that have a soft
bill[528].

       *       *       *       *       *

I shall close my list of the indirect benefits derived from insects,
by adverting to the very singular apparent subserviency of some of
them to the functions of certain vegetables.

You well know that some plants are gifted with the faculty of catching
flies. These vegetable Muscicapae, which have been enumerated by Dr.
Barton of Philadelphia, who has published an ingenious paper on the
subject[529], may be divided into three classes: First, those that
entrap insects by the irritability of their stamina, which close upon
them when touched. Under this head come _Apocynum androsaemifolium_,
_Asclepias syriaca_ and _curassavica_, _Nerium Oleander_, and a grass
described by Michaux under the name of _Leersia lenticularis_. The
second class includes those which entrap them by some viscosity of
the plant, as many species of _Rhododendron_, _Kalmia_, _Robinia_,
_Silene_, _Lythrum_, _Populus balsamifera_, &c.[530] And under the
third class will arrange those which ensnare by their leaves, whether
from some irritability in them, as in _Dionaea_, _Drosera_, &c., or
merely from their forming hollow vessels containing water, into which
the flies are enticed either by their carrion-like odour, or the sweet
fluid which many of them secrete near the faux, as in _Sarracenia_,
_Nepenthes_, _Aquarium_, _Cephalotus_, &c., the tubular leaves of which
are usually found stored with putrefying insects. In this last class
may be placed the common _Dipsacus_ of this country, the connate leaves
of which form a kind of basin round the stem, that retains rain-water
in which many insects are drowned. To these a fourth class might be
added, consisting of those plants whose flowers smelling like carrion
(_Stapelia hirsuta_, &c.) entice flies to lay their eggs upon them,
which thus perish.

The number of insects thus destroyed is prodigious. It is scarcely
possible to find a flower of the _Muscicapae Asclepiadeae_ that has not
entrapped its victim, and some of them in the United States closely
cover hundreds of acres together.

What may be the precise use of this faculty is not so apparent. Dr.
Barton doubts whether the flowers that catch insects, being only
temporary organs, can derive any nutriment from them; and he does not
think it probable that the leaves of _Dionaea_, &c., which are usually
found in rich boggy soil, can have any need of additional stimulus.
As nothing however is made in vain, there can be little doubt that
these ensnared insects are subservient to some important purpose
in the economy of the plants which are endowed with the faculty of
taking them, though we may be ignorant what that purpose is; and an
experiment of Mr. Knight's, nurseryman in King's Road, London, seems
to prove that in the case of Dionaea, at least, the very end in view,
contrary to Dr. Barton's supposition, is the supplying the leaves
with animal manure; for he found that a plant upon whose leaves he
laid fine filaments of raw beef, was much more luxuriant in its
growth than others not so treated[531]. Possibly the air evolved from
the putrefying insects with which _Sarracenia purpurea_ is sometimes
so filled as to scent the atmosphere round it, may be in a similar
manner favourable to its vegetation.

Most of the insects which are found in the tubular leaves of this
and similar plants enter into them voluntarily; but Sir James Smith
mentions a curious fact, from which it appears that in some cases
they are deposited by other species. One of the gardeners of the
Liverpool Botanic Garden observed an insect, from the description
one of the _Crabronidae_, which dragged several large flies to the
_Sarracenia adunca_, and, having with some difficulty forced them
under the lid or cover of its leaf, deposited them in its tubular
part which was half filled with water: and on examination all the
leaves were found crowded with dead or drowning flies[532]. What was
the object of this singular manoeuvre does not seem very obvious. At
the first glance one might suppose that, having deposited an egg in
the fly, it intended to avail itself of the tube of the leaf instead
of a burrow. Yet we know of no such strange deviation from natural
instinct, which would be the more remarkable because the insect was
_European_, while the plant was American and growing in a hot-house.
And at any rate it does not seem very likely that the insect would
commit her egg to the tube without having previously examined it;
in which case she must have discovered it to be half full of water,
and consequently unfit for her purpose.--It is not so wonderful that
many large flies should, as Professor Barton informs us, drop their
eggs into the Ascidia furnished with dead carcases: and it seems
very probable that Dytisci oviposit in them; for the Squilla which
Rumphius found there was probably one of their larvae, this being the
old name for them[533].

However problematical the agency of insects caught by plants as to
their _nutriment_, there can be no doubt that many species perform
an important function with regard to their _impregnation_, which
indeed without their aid would in some cases never take place at all.
Thus, for the due fertilization of the common Barberry (_Berberis
vulgaris_) it is necessary that the irritable stamens should be
brought into contact with the pistil by the application of some
stimulus to the base of the filament; but this would never take place
were not insects attracted by the melliferous glands of the flower to
insinuate themselves amongst the filaments, and thus, while seeking
their own food, unknowingly fulfill the intentions of nature in
another department[534].

The agency of these little operators is not less indispensable in the
beautiful tribe of _Iris_. In these, as appears from the observations
of Koelreuter, the true stigma is situated on the upper side of a
transverse membrane (_arcus eminens_ of Haller) which is stretched
across the middle of the under surface of the petal-like expansion or
style-flag, the whole of which has been often improperly regarded as
fulfilling the office of a stigma. Now as the anther is situated at the
base of the style-flag which covers it, at a considerable distance from
the stigma, and at the same time cut off from all access to it, by the
intervening barrier formed by the _arcus eminens_, it is clear that
but for some extraneous agency the pollen could never possibly arrive
at the place of its destination. In this case the _humble-bee_ is the
operator. Led by instinct, or, as the ingenious Sprengel supposes, by
one of those honey marks (_Saftmaal_) or spots of a different colour
from the rest of the corolla, which, according to him, are placed in
many flowers expressly to guide insects to the nectaries, she pushes
herself between the stiff style-flag and elastic petal, which last,
while she is in the interior, presses her close to the anther, and
thus causes her to brush off the pollen with her hairy back, which
ultimately, though not at once, conveys it to the stigma. Having
exhausted the nectar she retreats backwards; and in doing this, is
indeed pressed by the petal to the _arcus eminens_; but it is only to
its lower or negative surface, which cannot influence impregnation. She
now takes her way to the second petal, and insinuating herself under
its style-flag, her back comes into close contact with the true stigma,
which is thus impregnated with the pollen of the first visited anther:
and in this manner migrating from one part of the corolla to another,
and from flower to flower, she fructifies one with pollen gathered
in her search after honey in another.--Mr. Sprengel found, that not
only are insects indispensable in fructifying the different species of
Iris, but that some of them, as _I. Xiphium_, require the agency of
the larger humble-bees, which alone are strong enough to force their
way beneath the style-flag: and hence, as these insects are not so
common as many others, this Iris is often barren, or bears imperfect
seeds[535].

_Aristolochia Clematitis_, according to Professor Willdenow, is so
formed, that the anthers of themselves cannot impregnate the stigma;
but this important affair is devolved upon a particular species of
gnat (_Cecidomyia pennicornis_). The throat of the flower is lined
with dense hair, pointing downward so as to form a kind of funnel
or entrance like that of some kinds of mouse-traps, through which
the insects may easily enter but not return: several creep in, and,
uneasy at their confinement, are constantly moving to and fro, and so
deposit the pollen upon the stigma: but when the work entrusted to
them is completed, and impregnation has taken place, the hair which
prevented their escape shrinks, and adheres closely to the sides of
the flower, and these little go-betweens of Flora at length leave
their prison[536]. Sir James Smith supposes that it is for want of
some insect of this kind that _Aristolochia Sipho_ never forms fruit
in this country.

Equally important is the agency of insects in fructifying the plants
of the Linnean classes _Monoecia_, _Dioecia_ and _Polygamia_, in
which the stamens are in one blossom and the pistil in another. In
exploring these for honey and pollen, which last is the food of
several insects besides bees[537], it becomes involved in the hair,
with which in many cases their bodies seem provided for this express
purpose, and is conveyed to the germen requiring its fertilizing
influence. Sprengel supposes that with this view some plants have
particular insects appropriated to them, as to the dioecious nettle
_Catheretes Urticae_, to the toad-flax _Catheretes gravidus_, both
minute beetles, &c. Whether the operations of _Cynips Psenes_ be
of that advantage in fertilizing the fig, which the cultivators of
that fruit in the East have long supposed, is doubted by Hasselquist
and Olivier[538], both competent observers, who have been on the
spot. Our own gardeners, however, will admit their obligations to
bees in _setting_ their cucumbers and melons, to which they find the
necessity of themselves conveying pollen from a male flower, when
the early season of the year precludes the assistance of insects.
Sprengel asserts, that apparently with a view to prevent hybrid
mixtures, insects which derive their honey or pollen from different
plants indiscriminately, will during a whole day confine their visits
to that species on which they first fixed in the morning, provided
there be a sufficient supply of it[539]; and the same observation was
long since made with respect to bees by our countryman Dobbs[540].

Thus we see that the flowers which we vainly think are

            "... born to blush unseen,
          And waste their fragrance on the desert air,"

though unvisited by the lord of the creation, who boasts that they
were made for him, have nevertheless myriads of insect visitants and
admirers, which, though they pilfer their sweets, contribute to their
fertility.

                                                  I am, &c.

FOOTNOTES:

[457] Sparrman's _Voyage_, i. 367.

[458] The _Coprion_, _Cantharus_, and _Heliocantharus_ of the
ancients was evidently this beetle, or one nearly related to it,
which is described as rolling backwards large masses of dung, and
attracted such general attention as to give rise to the proverb
_Cantharus pilulam_. It should seem from the name, derived from
a word signifying an ass, that the Grecian beetle made its pills
of asses' dung; and this is confirmed by a passage in one of the
plays of Aristophanes, the _Irene_, where a beetle of this kind
is introduced, on which one of the characters rides to heaven to
petition Jupiter for peace. The play begins with one domestic
desiring another to feed the Cantharus with some bread, who
afterwards orders his companion to give him another kind of bread
made of _asses'_ dung.

[459] PLATE XXII. FIG. 4, 5.

[460] See Latr. _Gen._ i. 275.

[461] This property in the carrion insects may be turned to a good
account by the comparative anatomist, who has only to flay the body
of one of the smaller animals, anoint it with honey, and bury it in
an ant-hill; and in a short time he will obtain a perfect skeleton,
denudated of every fibril of muscle, though with the ligaments and
cartilages untouched.

[462] Gleditsch, _Abhandlungen_, iii. 200.

[463] It is to be observed that in our cold climates, during the
winter months, when excrement and putrescent animal matter are not so
offensive, they are left to the action of the elements, insects being
then torpid.

[464] Curtis _Brit. Ent. t._ 5.

[465] Surely Mr. Marsham's name for this genus, _Boletaria_, is much
more proper than that of Fabricius, _Mycetophagus_ (Agaric-eater),
since these insects seldom eat agarics.

[466] _Oecon. Nat. Amoen. Ac._ ii. 50. Stillingfleet's _Tracts_, 122.

[467] Maupertuis observes, that in Lapland he saw many birch-trees
lying on the ground, which had probably been there for a very long
time, with the bark entire, though the wood was decayed. Hence we may
probably infer, that in that country there are few or none of the
bark-boring insects.

[468] Latreille, _Observations nouvelles sur les Hymenopteres_.
_Annal. de Mus._ 11.

[469] _Nat. Hist. of Carolina_, ii. 105.

[470] Reaum. vi. 282. St. Pierre's _Voyage_, 72.

[471] Bartram in _Philos. Trans._ xlvi. 126.

[472] The larvae of some species of Coccinellae feed, according to
Prof. D. Reich, solely on the leaves of plants; as that of _C.
hieroglyphica_, which eats the leaves of common heath (_Erica
vulgaris_) after the manner of the larvae of _Lepidoptera_. I
suspect, however, that there is some mistake in this statement. _Der
Gesellschaft naturf. Fr. in Berlin Mag._ &c. iii. 294.

[473] Latreille denominates this family, as he calls it, _Pupivora_:
if by this he alludes to their devouring the young of insects, from
the _classical_ meaning of the word _pupa_, the term is very proper;
but this should be borne in mind, as the majority of readers would
imagine it to refer to the _pupa state_ of _insects_, in which they
are not so generally devoured by their parasites.

[474] Not having had it in my power to consult Dalman's work on the
_Chalcidites_ of Latreille, referred to by that learned Entomologist
in his _Familles Naturelles du Regne Animal_, I am not able to refer
them to their proper genera.

[475] PLATE XVI. FIG. 1.

[476] Marsham in _Linn. Trans._ iii. 26.

[477] See above, p. 169-170.

[478] _Alysia Manducator_; and another species allied to _Alomyia
Debellator_, which I have named _A. Stercorator_.

[479] De Geer, ii. 863.

[480] Ibid. 851-5.

[481] Reaum. ii. 419.

[482] De Geer, i. 196. vi. 14. 24.

[483] Reaum. ii. 440-4.

[484] _Linn. Trans._ xi. 86.

[485] Kirby's _Mon. Ap. Ang._ ii. 110-113.

[486] Rossi _Fn. Etrusc. Mant._

[487] Preys. _Boemisch. Insekt._ 59. 61.

[488] PLATE XVII. FIG. 13.

[489] _Entom. Helvetique_, ii. 158.

[490] In the former edition of this work (Vol. IV. p. 392), this
tribe is denominated _Eupodina_; but as this seems too near to M.
Latreille's _Eupoda_, belonging to a different tribe of beetles, we
have substituted the above name, which means the same.

[491] One was taken at Aldeburgh in Suffolk by Dr. Crabbe, the
celebrated poet; another by a young lady at Southwold, which is now in
the cabinet of W. J. Hooker, esq.; and a third by a boy at Norwich,
crawling up a wall, which was purchased of him by S. Wilkin, esq.

[492] Latr. _Hist. Nat._ x. 181.

[493] _Linn. Trans._ vi. 149. Kirby, _Ibid._ ix. 42. 23.

[494] The late R. Kittoe, Esq.

[495] p. 123.

[496] _Voyages_, i. 185.

[497] Percival's _Ceylon_, 307.

[498] Mr. Knight made the same observation in 1806, and supposes the
scarcity of neuters arose from the want of males to impregnate the
females. _Philos. Trans._ 1807, p. 243.

[499] St. Pierre, _Voy._ 72.

[500] Lesser, _L._ i. 263, note.

[501] Reaum. vi. 400. _t._ 36-38. PLATE XVI. FIG. 5. _a._

[502] Thiebaut de Berneaud's _Voyage to Elba_, p. 31.

[503]

          "Even Tiger fell and sullen Bear
           Their likeness and their lineage spare.
           Man only mars kind nature's plan,
           And turns the fierce pursuit on Man!"
                                   Scott's _Rokeby_, canto iii. 1.

[504] Reaumur, ii. 413.

[505] De Geer, i. 533. iii. 361. v. 400. vi. 91.

[506] Roesel, iv. 96.

[507] Thunberg's _Travels_, ii. 66.

[508] De Geer, vii. 335.

[509] De Geer, vii. 180.

[510] Bingley, ii. 374.

[511] Bingley, iii. 27.

[512] Collinson in _Philos. Trans._ 1763.

[513] Sparrman, ii. 180.

[514] St. Pierre, _Voy._ 73.

[515] Reaum. vi. 479-487.

[516] Swamm. _Bib. Nat._ i. c. 4. 106. b.

[517] In Col. Venable's _Experienced Angler_, a vast number of
insects are enumerated as good baits for fish, under the names of
_Bob_, _Cadbait_, _Cankers_, _Caterpillars_, _Palmers_, _Gentles_,
_Bark-worms_, _Oak-worms_, _Colewort-worms_, _Flag-worms_,
_Green-flies_, _Ant-flies_, _Butterflies_, _Wasps_, _Hornets_,
_Bees_, _Humble-bees_, _Grasshoppers_, _Dors_, _Beetles_, _a great
brown fly_ that lives upon the oak like a _Scarabee_--(_Melolontha
vulgaris_ or _Amphimalla solstitialis_?) and _flies_ (_i. e._
may-flies) of various sorts.

[518] Anderson's _Recreations in Agricult. &c._, iv. 478. Latr.
_Hist. Nat._ xiv. 154.

[519] According to Mr. Heckewelder (_Trans. Am. Phil. Soc._ iv. 124.)
_L. Excubitor_, called in America the nine-killer, from an idea
that it transfixes nine individuals daily, treats in this manner
_Grasshoppers_ only; while _L. Collurio_ would seem to restrict
itself chiefly to _Geotrupes_, two of which Mr. Sheppard once
observed transfixed in a hedge that he knew to be the residence of
this bird. Kugellan even thinks that it impales only _G. vernalis_,
which he has often found transfixed, but never _G. stercorarius_.
(Schneid. _Mag._ 259.) I must remark, however, that I last summer
observed two _humble-bees_ quite alive, impaled on the thorns of a
hedge near my house, which had most probably been so placed by this
species, _L. Excubitor_ being rarely found except in mountainous
wilds. (Bewick's _Birds_, i. 61.) And Prof. Sander states that on
opening this bird (_L. Collurio_) he has sometimes found in its
stomach nothing but grasshoppers, and at others small beetles and
other insects. _Naturforscher_ Stk. xviii. 234.

[520] Stillingfl. _Tracts_, 175. _Linn. Trans._ v. 105. note^b.

[521] Bingley, ii. 287-290.

[522] Sparrman, ii. 186.

[523] See above p. 208. note^b. and Bewick's _Birds._ i. Pref. xxii.
130.

[524] _Bib. Nat._ i. 126. b.

[525] _Travels_, i. 110.

[526] Reaum. ii. 408.

[527] Bingley, ii. 374.

[528] White's _Selborne_, i. 181.

[529] _Philos. Mag._ xxxix. 107.

[530] Small flies are sometimes found sticking to the glutinous
stigma of some of the Orchideae like birds on a limed twig: (Sprengel
_Entdecktes Geheimniss_, 21--) and ants are not unfrequently detained
in the milky juice which the touch of even their light feet causes to
exude from the calyxes of the common garden lettuce. _Ann. of Bot._
ii. 590.

[531] _Elements of the Science of Botany_, 62.

[532] Smith's _Introduction to Botany_, 195.

[533] Mouffet, 319.

[534] Smith's _Tracts_, 165. Koelreuter, _Ann. of Bot._ ii. 9.

[535] Chr. Conr. Sprengel _Entdecktes Geheimniss, &c._ Berlin 1793,
4to. quoted in _Ann. of Bot._ i. 414.

[536] _Grundriss der Kraeuterkunde_, 353. A writer however in the
_Annual Medical Review_ (ii. 400.) doubts the accuracy of this fact,
on the ground that he could never find _C. pennicornis_, though _A.
Clematitis_ has produced fruit two years at Brompton. Meigen (Dipt.
i. 100. e.) places this amongst his doubtful _Cecidomyiae_. Fabricius
considers it as a _Chironomus_.

[537] I have frequently observed _Dermestes flavescens_, Ent. Brit.
(_Byturus_) eat both the petals and stamens of _Stellaria Holosteum_;
and _Mordellae_ will open the anthers with the securiform joints of
their palpi to get at the pollen.

[538] Hasselquist's _Travels_, 253. Latr. _Hist. Nat._ xiii. 204.

[539] Willd. _Grundriss_, 352.

[540] _Phil. Trans._ xlvi. 536.




                               LETTER X.

                    _BENEFITS DERIVED FROM INSECTS._

                            DIRECT BENEFITS.


My last letter was devoted to the indirect advantages which we derive
from insects; in the present I shall enumerate those of a more
_direct_ nature for which we are indebted to them, beginning with
their use as the _food_ of man, in which respect they are of more
importance than you may have conceived.

       *       *       *       *       *

One class of animals which, till very lately, have been regarded
as belonging to the entomological world, I mean the _Crustacea_,
consisting principally of the genus _Cancer_ of Linne, are universally
reckoned amongst our greatest dainties; and they who would turn with
disgust from a locust or the grub of a beetle, feel no symptoms of
nausea when a lobster, crab, or shrimp is set before them. The fact is,
that habit has reconciled us to the eating of these last, which, viewed
in themselves with their threatening claws and many feet, are really
more disgusting than the former. Had the habit been reversed, we should
have viewed the former with appetite and the latter with abhorrence,
as do the Arabs, "who are as much astonished at our eating crabs,
lobsters, and oysters, as we are at their eating locusts[541]." That
this would have been the case is clear, at least as far as regards the
former position, from the practice in other parts of the world, both
in ancient and modern times, to which, begging you to lay aside your
English prejudices, I shall now call your attention; first observing
by the way, that the insects used as food, generally speaking, live on
vegetable substances, and are consequently much more select and cleanly
in their diet than the swine or the duck, which form a favourite part
of ours.

Many larvae[542] that belong to the order _Coleoptera_ are eaten
in different parts of the world. The grub of the palm-weevil
(_Cordylia_[543] _Palmarum_), which is the size of the thumb, has been
long in request in both the Indies. AElian speaks of an Indian king,
who, for a dessert, instead of fruit set before his Grecian guests a
roasted worm taken from a plant, probably the larva of this insect,
which he says the Indians esteem very delicious--a character that was
confirmed by some of the Greeks who tasted it[544]. Madam Merian has
figured one of these larvae, and says that the natives of Surinam roast
and eat them as something very exquisite[545]. A friend of mine, who
has resided a good deal in the West Indies, where the palm-grub is
called _Grugru_, informs me that the late Sir John La Forey, who was
somewhat of an epicure, was extremely fond of it when properly cooked.

The larvae also of the larger species of the capricorn tribe
(_Cerambyx_, L. _Longicornes_, Latr.) are accounted very great
delicacies in many countries; and the Cossus of Pliny, which he
tells us the Roman epicures fattened with flour[546], most probably
belonged to this tribe. Linne indeed, following the opinion of
Ray[547], supposes the caterpillar of the great goat-moth, the
anatomy of which has been so wonderfully traced by the eye and
pencil of the incomparable Lyonet, to be the Cossus. But there seems
a strong reason against this opinion; for Linne's Cossus lives
most commonly in the willow, Pliny's in the oak; and the former
is a very disagreeable, ugly and fetid larva, not very likely to
attract the Roman epicures. Probably they were the larvae of _Prionus
coriarius_, which I have myself extracted from the oak, or of one
of its congeners[548]. The grub of _P. damicornis_, which is of
the thickness of a man's finger, is eaten at Surinam, in America,
and in the West Indies, both by whites and blacks, who empty, wash,
and roast them, and find them delicious[549]. Mr. Hall informs me,
that in Jamaica this grub is called _Macauco_, and is in request
at the principal tables. A similar insect is dressed at Mauritius
under the name of _Moutac_, which the whites as well as <DW64>s eat
greedily[550]. The larva of _P. cervicornis_ is, according to Linne,
held in equal estimation, and that of _Acanthocinus Tribulus_ when
roasted forms an article of food in Africa[551]. It is probable that
all the species of this genus might be safely eaten, as well as many
other grubs of _Coleoptera_; and although I do not feel disposed to
recommend with Reaumur[552], that the larvae of _Oryctes nasicornis_
should be sought for "_dans les couches de fumier_," yet I think with
Dr. Darwin[553], that those of the cockchafer which feed upon the
roots of grass, or the perfect insects themselves, which, if we may
judge from the eagerness with which cats, and turkeys and other birds
devour them, are no despicable _bonne bouche_, might be added to our
_entremets_. This would be one means of keeping down the numbers of
these occasionally destructive animals.

In the next order of insects, the _Orthoptera_, the gryllus, or
locust tribe, as they are the greatest destroyers of food, so as
some recompense they furnish a considerable supply of it to numerous
nations. They are recorded to have done this from the most remote
antiquity, some Ethiopian tribes having been named from this
circumstance _Acridophagi_ (locust-eaters)[554]. Pliny also relates
that they were in high esteem as meat amongst the Parthians[555].
Hasselquist, in reply to some inquiries which he made on this subject
with respect to the Arabs, was informed that at Mecca, when there was
a scarcity of corn, as a substitute for flour they would grind locusts
in their hand-mills, or pound them in stone mortars; that they mixed
this flour with water into a dough, and made their cakes of it, which
they baked like their other bread. He adds, that it is not unusual for
them to eat locusts when there is no famine; but then they boil them
first a good while in water, and afterwards stew them with butter into
a kind of fricassee of no bad flavour[556]. Leo Africanus, as quoted
by Bochart, gives a similar account[557]. Sparrman informs us that the
Hottentots are highly rejoiced at the arrival of the locusts in their
country, although they destroy all its verdure, eating them in such
quantities as to get visibly fatter than before, and making of their
eggs a brown or coffee- soup. He also relates a curious notion
which they have with respect to the origin of the locusts--that they
proceed from the good will of a great master-conjuror a long way to the
north, who, having removed the stone from the mouth of a certain deep
pit, lets loose these animals to be food for them[558]. This is not
unlike the account given by the author of the Apocalypse, of the origin
of the symbolical locusts, which are said to ascend upon an angel's
opening the pit of the abyss[559]. Clenard, in his letters quoted by
Bochart, says that they bring waggon-loads of locusts to Fez, as a
usual article of food[560]. Major Moor informs me, that when the cloud
of locusts noticed in a former letter visited the Mahratta country,
the common people salted and ate them. This was anciently the custom
with many of the African nations, some of whom also smoked them[561].
They appear even to have been an article of food offered for sale in
the markets of Greece[562]; and on a subject so well known, to quote no
other writers, Jackson observes that, when he was in Barbary in 1799,
dishes of locusts were generally served up at the principal tables and
esteemed a great delicacy. They are preferred by the Moors to pigeons;
and a person may eat a platefull of two or three hundred without
feeling any ill effects. They usually boil them in water half an hour,
(having thrown away the head, wings and legs,) then sprinkle them with
salt and pepper, and fry them, adding a little vinegar[563].--From this
string of authorities you will readily see how idle was the controversy
concerning the locusts which formed part of the sustenance of John the
Baptist, agreeing with Hasselquist[564], that they could be nothing
but the animal locust, so common a food in the East; and how apt even
learned men are to perplex a plain question, from ignorance of the
customs of other countries.

In the _hemipterous_ order of insects, none are more widely
dispersed, or (if you will forgive me a pun) have made more noise
in the world, than the _Cicada_ tribe. From the time of Homer, who
compares the garrulity of age to the chirping of these insects[565],
they have been celebrated by the poets; and Anacreon, as you well
know, has inscribed a very beautiful little ode to them. We learn
from Aristotle, that these insects were eaten by the polished Greeks,
and accounted very delicious. The worm (_larva_), he says, lives
in the earth where it takes its growth; that it then becomes a
_Tettigometra_ (_pupa_), when he observes they are most delicious,
just before they burst from their covering. From this state they
change to the _Tettix_ or _Cicada_, when the males at first have
the best flavour; but after impregnation the females are preferred
on account of their white eggs[566]. Athenaeus also and Aristophanes
mention their being eaten; and AElian is extremely angry with the
men of his age that an animal sacred to the Muses should be strung,
sold, and greedily devoured[567]. Pliny tells us that the nations of
the East, even the Parthians, whose wealth was abundant, use them as
food[568]. The imago of the _Cicada septemdecim_ is still eaten by
the Indians in America, who pluck off the wings and boil them[569].
This ancient Greek taste for _Cicadae_ seems now gone out of fashion,
at least travellers do not notice it: but perhaps if it were revived
in those countries where the insects are to be found, for they
inhabit only warm climates[570], it would be ascertained that so
polished a people did not relish them without reason.

No insects are more numerous in this island than the caterpillars of
_Lepidoptera_: if these could be used in aid of the stock of food in
times of scarcity, it might subserve the double purpose of ridding us
of a nuisance, and relieving the public pressure. Reaumur suggests
this mode of diminishing the numbers of destructive caterpillars,
speaking of that of _Plusia Gamma_, a moth which did such infinite
mischief in France in the year 1735[571]. If however we were to take
to eating caterpillars, I should, for my own part, be of the mind of
the red-breasts, and eat only the naked ones[572]. But you will see
that there is some encouragement from precedent to make a meal of
the caterpillars which infest our cabbages and cauliflowers. Amongst
the delicacies of a Boshies-man's table, Sparrman reckons those
caterpillars from which butterflies proceed[573]. The Chinese, who
waste nothing, after they have unwound the silk from the cocoons of
the silkworm, send the chrysalis to table: they also eat the larva
of a hawk-moth (_Sphinx_[574]), some of which tribe, Dr. Darwin
tells us, are, in his opinion, very delicious[575]: and lastly, the
natives of New Holland eat the caterpillars of a species of moth of a
singular new genus, to which my friend Alexander MacLeay, Esq., has
assigned characters, and, from the circumstance of its larva coming
out only in the night to feed, has called it _Nycterobius_.

The next order, the _Neuroptera_, will make us some amends for the
meagerness of the last, as it contains the white ant tribe (_Termes_),
which, in return for the mischief it does at certain times, affords an
abundant supply of food to some of the African nations. The Hottentots
eat them boiled and raw, and soon get into good condition upon this
food[576]. Koenig, quoted by Smeathman, says that in some parts of the
East Indies the natives make two holes in the nests of the white ants,
one to the windward and the other to the leeward, placing at the latter
opening a pot rubbed with an aromatic herb, to receive the insects
driven out of their nest by a fire of stinking materials made at the
former[577]. Thus they catch great quantities, of which they make with
flour a variety of pastry, that they can afford to sell cheap to the
poorer people. Mr. Smeathman says he has not found the Africans so
ingenious in procuring or dressing them. They are content with a very
small part of those that fall into the waters at the time of swarming,
which they skim off with calabashes, bring large kettles full of them
to their habitations, and parch them in iron pots over a gentle fire,
stirring them about as is done in roasting coffee. In that state
without sauce or other addition they serve them up as delicious food,
and eat them by handfulls as we do comfits. He has eaten them dressed
in this way several times, and thought them delicate, nourishing and
wholesome, being sweeter than the grub of the weevil of the palms,
(_Cordylia Palmarum_,) and resembling in taste sugared cream or sweet
almond paste[578]. The female ant, in particular, is supposed by the
Hindoos to be endowed with highly nutritive properties, and, we are
told by Mr. Broughton, was carefully sought after and preserved for
the use of the debilitated Surjee Rao, prime-minister of Scindia chief
of the Mahrattas[579].

The _Hymenoptera_ order also furnishes a few articles to add to
this head. I do not allude to the nectar which the bees collect for
us. But perhaps you do not suspect that bees themselves in some
places serve for food, yet Knox tells us that they are eaten in
Ceylon[580]:--an ungrateful return for their honey and wax which I
would on no account recommend. Piso speaks of yellow ants called
_Cupia_ inhabiting Brazil, the abdomen of which many used for food,
as well as a larger species under the name of _Tama-joura_[581];
which account is confirmed by Humboldt, who informs us that ants are
eaten by the Marivatanos and Margueritares, mixed with resin for
sauce. Ants, I speak from experience, have no unpleasant flavour;
they are very agreeably acid, and the taste of the trunk and abdomen
is different; so that I am not so much surprised as Mr. Consett seems
to have been at the avidity with which the young Swede mentioned
by him sat down to the siege of an ants' nest[582]. This author
states, that in some parts of Sweden ants are distilled along with
rye, to give a flavour to the inferior kinds of brandy[583].--Under
this head may not improperly be mentioned several galls the product
of different species of gall-flies (_Cynips_), particularly those
found on some kind of Sage, viz. _Salvia pomifera_, _S. triloba_,
and _S. officinalis_, which are very juicy like apples, and crowned
with rudiments of leaves resembling the calyx of that fruit. They
are esteemed in the Levant for their aromatic and acid flavour,
especially when prepared with sugar, and form a considerable article
of commerce from Scio to Constantinople, where they are regularly
exposed in the market[584]. The galls of ground-ivy have also been
eaten in France; but Reaumur, who tasted them, is doubtful whether
they will ever rank with good fruits[585].

To the _Diptera_ order, as a source of food, man can scarcely be said
to be under any obligation; the larva of _Tyrophaga Casei_, which is
so commonly found in cheese, being the only one ever eaten--a dainty
as some think it, of whom you will perhaps say with Scopoli, "_quibus
has delicias non invideo_[586]."

The order _Aptera_, now that the Crustacea are excluded, does not
much more abound in esculent insects than the Diptera. The only
species which have tempted the appetite of man in this order are the
cheese-mite (_Acarus Siro_)--lice, which are eaten by the Hottentots
and natives of the western coast of Africa, who from their love of
this game, which they not only collect themselves from their well
stored _capital_ pasture, but employ their wives in the chase,
have been sometimes called Phthirophagi[587]. Insects of the class
_Arachnida_, which you will think still more repulsive than the
last tribe, form an article in Sparrman's list of the Boshies-man's
dainties[588]; and Labillardiere tells us that the inhabitants of
New Caledonia seek for and eat with avidity large quantities of a
spider nearly an inch long (which he calls _Aranea edulis_), and
which they roast over the fire[589]. Even individuals amongst the
more polished nations of Europe are recorded as having a similar
taste; so that, if you could rise above vulgar prejudices, you would
in all probability find them a most delicious morsel. If you require
precedents, Reaumur tells us of a young lady who when she walked in
her grounds never saw a spider that she did not take and crack upon
the spot[590]. Another female, the celebrated Anna Maria Schurman,
used to eat them like nuts, which she affirmed they much resembled
in taste, excusing her propensity by saying that she was born
under the sign Scorpio[591]. If you wish for the authority of the
learned, Lalande the celebrated French astronomer was, as Latreille
witnessed[592], equally fond of these delicacies. And lastly, if not
content with taking them seriatim you should feel desirous of eating
them by handfulls, you may shelter yourself under the authority of
the German immortalized by Roesel[593], who used to spread them upon
his bread like butter, observing that he found them very useful, "_um
sich auszulaxiren_."--These edible _Aptera_ and _Arachnida_ are all
sufficiently disgusting: but we feel our nausea quite turned into
horror when we read in Humboldt, that he has seen the Indian children
drag out of the earth centipedes eighteen inches long and more than
half an inch broad, and devour them[594].

       *       *       *       *       *

After all I have said, you may perhaps still feel a prejudice against
insects as food; but I think, when you recollect that Oberon
and his queen Titania, that renowned personage Robin Goodfellow,
"with all the fairy elves that be," number insects amongst their
choicest cates, you will no longer be heretical in this article, but
yield with a good grace; and as a reward I will copy out for you a
beautiful poetical description of Oberon's feast, which was lately
pointed out to me by a learned bibliographical friend, John Crosse,
Esq. of Hull, in Herrick's _Hesperides_, 1658.

          Shapcot, to thee the fairy state
          I with discretion dedicate;
          Because thou prizest things that are
          Curious and unfamiliar.
          Take first the feast: these dishes gone,
          We'll see the fairy court anon.
          A little mushroom table spread;
          After short prayers, they set on bread,
          A moon-parch'd grain of purest wheat,
          With some small glitt'ring grit to eat
          His choicest bits with: then in a trice
          They make a feast less great than nice.
          But all this while his eye is serv'd,
          We must not think his ear was starv'd;
          But that there was in place to stir
          His spleen, the chirring grasshopper,
          The merry cricket, puling fly,
          The piping gnat for minstrelsy:
          And now we must imagine first
          The elves present, to quench his thirst,
          A pure seed pearl of infant dew,
          Brought and besweeten'd in a blue
          And pregnant violet; which done,
          His kitling eyes begin to run
          Quite through the table, where he spies
          The horns of papery butterflies,
          Of which he eats, and tastes a little
          Of what we call the cuckoo's spittle:
          A little furze-ball pudding stands
          By, yet not blessed by his hands,
          That was too coarse: but then forthwith
          He ventures boldly on the pith
          Of sugar'd rush, and eats the sag
          And well be-strutted bee's sweet bag;
          Gladding his palate with some store
          Of emmet's eggs: what would he more?
          But beards of mice, a newt's stew'd thigh,
          A bloated earwig and a fly;
          With the red-capp'd worm that's shut
          Within the concave of a nut,
          Brown as his tooth: a little moth
          Late fatten'd in a piece of cloth;
          With wither'd cherries; mandrakes' ears;
          Moles' eyes; to these the slain stag's tears;
          The unctuous dewlaps of a snail;
          The broke heart of a nightingale
          O'ercome in music;----

          ----This done, commended
          Grace by his priest, the feast is ended.--

Having considered insects as adding to the general stock of food, I
shall next request your attention while I detail to you how far the
medical science is indebted to them. Had I addressed you a century
ago, I could have made this an ample history. Amongst scores of
infallible panaceas, I should have recommended the woodlouse as a
solvent and aperient; powder of silkworm for vertigo and convulsions;
millepedes against the jaundice; earwigs to strengthen the nerves;
powdered scorpion for the stone and gravel; fly-water for disorders
in the eyes; and the tick for erysipelas. I should have prescribed
five gnats as an excellent purge; wasps as diuretics; lady-birds for
the colic and measles; the cockchafer for the bite of a mad dog and
the plague; and ants and their acid I should have loudly praised
as incomparable against leprosy and deafness, as strengthening
the memory, and giving vigour and animation to the whole bodily
frame[595]. In short, I could have easily added to the miserably
meager list of modern pharmacopoeias, a catalogue of approved
insect-remedies for every disease and evil

          "that flesh is heir to!"

But these good times are long gone by. You would, I fear, laugh at my
prescriptions notwithstanding the great authorities I could cite in
their favour; and even doubt the efficacy of a more modern specific
for tooth-ache, promulgated by a learned Italian professor[596], who
assures us that a finger once imbued with the juices of _Rhinobatus
antiodontalgicus_ (a name enough to give one the tooth-ache to
pronounce it) will retain its power of curing this disease for a
twelvemonth! I must content myself, therefore, with expatiating on
the virtues of the very few insects to which the sons of Hippocrates
and Galen now deign to have recourse. At the same time I cannot help
observing that their proscription of the remainder may have been too
indiscriminate. Mankind are apt to run from one extreme to the other.
From having ascribed too much efficacy to insect-remedies, we may
now ascribe too little. Many insects emit very powerful odours, and
some produce extraordinary effects upon the human frame; and it is an
idea not altogether to be rejected, that they may concentrate into a
smaller compass the properties and virtues of the plants upon which
they feed, and thus afford medicines more powerful in operation than
the plants themselves. It is at least worth while to institute a set
of experiments with this view.

Medicine at the present day is indebted to an ant (_Formica bispinosa_,
Oliv. _fungosa_, F.) for a kind of lint collected by that insect from
the Bombax or silk cotton-tree, which as a styptic is preferable to
the puff-ball, and at Cayenne is successfully used to stop the blood
in the most violent haemorrhages[597]; and gum ammoniac, according to
Mr. Jackson[598], oozes out of a plant like fennel, from incisions made
in the bark by a beetle with a large horn. But with these exceptions,
(in which the remedy is rather collected than produced by insects,)
and that of spiders' webs, which are said to have been recently
administered with success in ague, the only insects which directly
supply us with medicine are some species of _Cantharis_ and _Mylabris_.
These beetles however amply make up in efficacy for their numerical
insignificance; and almost any article could be better spared from the
Materia Medica than one of the former usually known under the name
of _Cantharides_, which is not only of incalculable importance as a
vesicatory, but is now administered internally in many cases with very
good effect. In Europe, the only insect used with this view is the
_Cantharis vesicatoria_; but in America the _C. cinerea_ and _vittata_
(which are extremely common and noxious insects, while the _C.
vesicatoria_ is sold there at sixteen dollars the pound,) have been
substituted with great success, and are said to vesicate more speedily,
and with less pain, at the same time that they cause no strangury[599]:
and in China they have long employed the _Mylabris Cichorei_, which
seems to have been considered the most powerful vesicatory amongst the
ancients, who however appear to have been acquainted with the common
_Cantharis vesicatoria_ also, and to have made use of it, as well as
of _Cetonia aurata_ and some other insects mentioned by Pliny[600].
Another species of _Mylabris_ has been described by Major-general
Hardwicke in the _Asiatic Transactions_[601], plentiful in all parts of
Bengal, Bahar, and Oude, which is fully as efficacious as the common
Spanish fly.

       *       *       *       *       *

But it is as supplying products valuable in the arts and manufactures,
that we are chiefly indebted to insects. In adverting to them in this
view, I shall not dwell upon the articles derived from a few species
in particular districts, and confined to these alone, such as the soap
which in some parts of Africa is manufactured from a beetle (_Chlaenius
saponarius_[602]); the oil which Molina tells us is obtained in Chili
from large globular cellules found upon the wild rosemary, and supposed
to be produced by a kind of gall-fly[603]; and the manure for which
Scopoli informs us the hosts of Ephemerae that annually emerge in the
month of June from the Laz, a river in Carniola, are employed by the
husbandmen, who think they have had a bad harvest unless every one has
collected at least twenty loads[604].

Still less is it my intention to detain you in considering the
purpose to which in the West Indies and South America the fire-flies
are put by the natives, who employ them as lanterns in their
journeys, and lamps in their houses[605];--or the use as ornaments
to which some insects are ingeniously applied by the ladies, who
in China embroider their dresses with the elytra and crust of a
brilliant species of beetle (_Buprestis vittata_); in Chili and the
Brazils form splendid necklaces of the golden _Chrysomelidae_ and
brilliant diamond beetles, &c.[606]; in some parts of the continent
string together for the same purpose the burnished violet-
thighs of _Geotrupes stercorarius_, &c.[607]; and in India, as I
am informed by Major Moor and Captain Green, even have recourse
to fire-flies, which they inclose in gauze and use as ornaments
for their hair when they take their evening walks. I shall confine
my details to the more important and general products which they
supply to the arts, beginning with one indispensable to our present
correspondence, and adverting in succession to the insects affording
_dyes_, _lac_, _wax_, _honey_, and _silk_.

No present that insects have made to the arts is equal in utility and
universal interest, comes more home to our best affections, or is
the instrument of producing more valuable fruits of human wisdom and
genius, than the product of the animal to which I have just alluded.
You will readily conjecture I mean the fly that gives birth to the
_gall-nut_, from which ink is made,--How infinitely are we indebted to
this little creature, which at once enables us to converse with our
absent friends and connexions be their distance from us ever so great,
and supplies the means by which, to use the poet's language we can

              "----give to airy nothing
          A local habitation and a name!"

enabling the poet, the philosopher, the politician, the moralist, and
the divine, to embody their thoughts for the amusement, instruction,
direction and reformation of mankind.--The insect which produces the
gall-nut is of the genus _Cynips_ of Linne, but was not known to him or
to Fabricius. Olivier first described it under the name of _Diplolepis
gallae tinctoriae_[608]. The galls originate on the leaves of a species
of oak (_Quercus infectoria_,) very common throughout Asia Minor, in
many parts of which they are collected by the poorer inhabitants and
exported from Smyrna, Aleppo, and other ports in the Levant, as well
as from the East Indies, whither a part of those collected are now
carried. The galls most esteemed are those known in commerce under the
name of _blue galls_, being the produce of the first gathering before
the fly has issued from the gall. It will not be uninteresting to you
to know, that from these when bruised may occasionally be obtained
perfect specimens of the insect, one of which I lately procured in this
way. The galls which have escaped the first searches, and from most
of which the fly has emerged, are called _white galls_, and are of a
very inferior quality, containing less of the astringent principle than
the blue galls in the proportion of two to three[609]. The white and
blue galls are usually imported mixed in about equal proportions, and
are then called galls in sorts. If no substitute equal to galls as a
constituent part of ink has been discovered, the same may be said of
these productions as one of the most important of our dyeing materials
constantly employed in dyeing black. It is true that this colour may be
communicated without galls, but not at once so cheaply and effectually,
as is found by their continued large consumption notwithstanding all
the improvements in the art of dyeing. Other dyeing drugs are afforded
by insects, the principal of which are _Chermes_, _the Scarlet Grain
of Poland_, _Cochineal_, _Lac-lake_, and _Lac-dye_, all of which are
furnished by different species of _Coccus_.

The first of these, the _Coccus Ilicis_, found abundantly upon a
small species of evergreen oak (_Quercus coccifera_) common in the
south of France, and many other parts of the world, has been employed
to impart a blood red or crimson dye to cloth from the earliest ages,
and was known to the Phoenicians before the time of Moses under the
name of _Tola_ or _Thola_ ([Hebrew: tvl']), to the Greeks under that
of _Coccus_ ([Greek: Kokkos]), and to the Arabians and Persians under
that of _Kermes_ or _Alkermes_; whence, as Beckmann has shown, and
from the epithet _vermiculatum_ given to it in the middle ages, when
it was ascertained to be the produce of a worm, have sprung the Latin
_coccineus_, the French _cramoisi_ and _vermeil_, and our _crimson_
and _vermilion_. It was most probably with this substance that the
curtains of the tabernacle (Exod. xxvi. &c.) were dyed deep red
(which the word scarlet, as our translators have rendered [Hebrew:
shn tvl't], then implied, not the colour now so called, which was not
known in James the First's reign when the Bible was translated)--it
was with this that the Grecians and Romans produced their crimson;
and from the same source were derived the imperishable reds of the
Brussels and other Flemish tapestries. In short, previous to the
discovery of cochineal, this was the material universally used for
dyeing the most brilliant red then known; and though that production
of the New World has, in some respects undeservedly[610], supplanted
it in Europe, where it is little attended to except by the peasantry
of the provinces in which it is found, it still continues to be
employed in a great part of India and Persia[611].

The scarlet grain of Poland (_Coccus polonicus_) is found on the
roots of the perennial knawel (_Scleranthus perennis_, a scarce
plant in this country, but abundant in the neighbourhood of Elvedon
in Suffolk), and was at one time collected in large quantities for
dyeing red in the Ukraine, Lithuania, &c. But though still employed
by the Turks and Armenians for dyeing wool, silk and hair, as well as
for staining the nails of women's fingers, it is now rarely used in
Europe except by the Polish peasantry. A similar neglect has attended
the Coccus found on the roots of _Poterium Sanguisorba_[612], which
was used by the Moors for dyeing silk and wool a rose colour; and
the _Coccus Uva-ursi_, which with alum affords a crimson dye[613].

Cochineal, the _Coccus Cacti_, is doubtless the most valuable product
for which the dyer is indebted to insects, and with the exception
perhaps of indigo the most important of dyeing materials. Though the
Spaniards found it employed by the natives of Mexico, where alone
it is cultivated, on their arrival in that country in 1518, its
true nature was not accurately ascertained for nearly two centuries
afterwards. Acosta indeed as early as 1530, and Herrara and Hernandez
subsequently, had stated it to be an insect. But led apparently by
its external appearance, notwithstanding the conjectures of Lister
and assertions of Pere Plumier to the contrary, it was believed by
Europeans in general to be the seed of a plant, until Hartsoeker in
1694, Leeuwenhoek and De la Hire in 1704, and Geoffroy, ten years
later, by dissections and microscopical observations incontrovertibly
proved its real origin[614].

This insect, which comes to us in the form of a reddish shrivelled
grain covered with a white powder or bloom, feeds on a particular
kind of Indian fig, called in Mexico, where alone cochineal is
produced in any quantity, Nopal, which has always been supposed
to be the _Cactus cochinilifer_, but according to Humboldt is
unquestionably a distinct species, which bears fruit internally white.

Cochineal is chiefly cultivated in the Intendency of Oaxaca; and some
plantations contain 50 or 60,000 nopals in lines, each being kept
about four feet high for more easy access in collecting the dye.
The cultivators prefer the most prickly varieties of the plant, as
affording protection to the cochineal from insects; to prevent which
from depositing their eggs in the flower or fruit, both are carefully
cut off. The greatest quantity, however, of cochineal employed in
commerce, is produced in small nopaleries belonging to Indians of
extreme poverty, called _Nopaleros_. They plant their nopaleries in
cleared ground on the <DW72>s of mountains or ravines two or three
leagues distant from their villages; and when properly cleaned, the
plants are in a condition to maintain the cochineal in the third
year. As a stock, the proprietor in April or May purchases branches
or joints of the _Tuna de Castilla_, laden with small cochineal
insects recently hatched (_Semilla_). These branches, which may be
bought in the market of Oaxaca for about three francs (2_s._ 6_d._)
the hundred, are kept for twenty days in the interior of their huts,
and then exposed to the open air under a shed, where from their
succulency they continue to live for several months. In August and
September the mother cochineal insects, now big with young, are
placed in nests made of a species of _Tillandsia_ called _Paxtle_,
which are distributed upon the nopals. In about four months the
first gathering, yielding twelve for one, may be made, which in the
course of the year is succeeded by two more profitable harvests.
This period of sowing and harvest refers chiefly to the districts
of Sola and Zimatlan. In colder climates the semilla is not placed
upon the nopals until October or even December, when it is necessary
to shelter the young insects by covering the nopals with rush mats,
and the harvests are proportionably later and unproductive. In
the immediate vicinity of the town of Oaxaca the Nopaleros feed
their cochineal insects in the plains from October to April, and
at the beginning of the remaining months, during which it rains in
the plains, transport them to their plantations of nopals in the
neighbouring mountains, where the weather is more favourable.

Much care is necessary in the tedious operation of gathering the
cochineal from the nopals, which is performed with a squirrel or
stag's tail by the Indian women, who for this purpose squat down for
hours together beside one plant; and notwithstanding the high price
of the cochineal, it is to be doubted if the cultivation would be
profitable were the value of labour more considerable.

The cochineal insects are killed either by throwing them into
boiling water; by exposing them in heaps to the sun; or by placing
them in the ovens (_Temazealli_) used for vapour baths. The last of
these methods, which is least in use, preserves the whitish powder
on the body of the cochineal, which being thus less subject to the
adulterations so often practised by the Indians, bears a higher price
both in America and Europe[615].

The quantity at present annually exported from South America is
said by Humboldt to be 32,000 arrobas, there worth 500,040_l._
sterling[616]--a vast amount to arise from so small an insect, and
well calculated to show us the absurdity of despising any animals
on account of their minuteness. So important is the acquisition of
this insect (of which the Spanish government is extremely jealous)
regarded, that the Court of Directors of the East India Company have
offered a reward of 6000_l._ to any one who shall introduce it into
India, where hitherto the Company have only succeeded in procuring
from Brazil the wild kind producing the _sylvestre_ cochineal, which
is of very inferior value.

_Lac_, is the produce of an insect formerly supposed to be a kind of
ant or bee[617], but now ascertained to be a species of _Coccus_,
whose history will be adverted to when I come to speak of the
secretions of insects; and it is collected from various trees in
India, where it is found so abundantly, that, were the consumption
ten times greater than it is, it could be readily supplied. This
substance is made use of in that country in the manufacture of
beads, rings, and other female ornaments. Mixed with sand it forms
grind-stones; and added to lamp- or ivory-black, being first
dissolved in water with the addition of a little borax, it composes
an ink not easily acted upon when dry by damp or water. In this
country, where it is distinguished by the names _stick-lac_ when in
its native state unseparated from the twigs to which it adheres;
_seed-lac_ when separated, pounded, and the greater part of the
colouring matter extracted by water; _lump-lac_ when melted and made
into cakes; and _shell-lac_ when strained and formed into transparent
laminae;--it has hitherto been chiefly employed in the composition
of varnishes, japanned ware, and sealing-wax: but within these
few years it has been applied to a still more important purpose,
originally suggested by Dr. Roxburgh--that of a substitute for
cochineal in dyeing scarlet. The first preparations from it with
this view were made in consequence of a hint from Dr. Bancroft,
and large quantities of a substance termed _lac-lake_, consisting
of the colouring matter of stick-lac precipitated from an alkaline
lixivium by alum, were manufactured at Calcutta and sent to this
country, where at first the consumption was so considerable, that in
the three years previous to 1810 Dr. Bancroft states that the sales
of it at the India House equalled in point of colouring matter half
a million of pounds weight of cochineal. More recently, however, a
new preparation of lac colour, under the name of _lac-dye_, has been
imported from India, which has been substituted for the lac-lake, and
with such advantage, that the East India Company are said to have
saved in a few months 14,000_l._ in the purchase of scarlet cloths
dyed with this colour and cochineal conjointly, and without any
inferiority in the colour obtained[618].

Some other insects besides the Cocci afford dyes. Reaumur tells
us, that in the Levant, Persia, and China, they use the galls of a
particular species of _Aphis_ for dyeing silk crimson, which he thinks
might lead us to try experiments with those of our own country[619].
That dyes might be thus obtained seems probable from an observation
of Linne's, in his Lapland Tour, upon the galls produced by _Aphis
Pini_ on the extremities of the leaves of the spruce-fir, which, he
informs us, when arrived at maturity burst asunder, and discharge
an orange- powder which stains the clothes[620]; and Mr.
Sheppard confirms this observation, the galls of this Aphis abounding
upon fir-trees in his garden. In fact, we are told that _Terminalia
citrina_, a tree common in India, yields a species of gall, the
product of an insect, which is sold in every market, being one of the
most useful dyeing drugs known to the natives, who dye their best
and most durable yellow with it[621]. A species of mite (_Trombidium
tinctorium_), a native of Guinea and Surinam, is also employed as a
dye; and it would be worth while to try whether our _T. holosericeum_,
so remarkable for the dazzling brilliancy of its crimson and the
beautiful velvet texture of its down, which seems nearly related to
_T. tinctorium_, would not also afford a valuable tincture. It is
not likely, perhaps, that many better and cheaper dyes than we now
possess can be obtained from insects; but Reaumur has suggested that
water-colours of beautiful tints, not otherwise easily obtainable,
might be procured from the excrements of the larvae of the common
clothes-moth, which retain the colour of the wool they have eaten
unimpaired in its lustre, and mix very well with water. To get a fine
red, yellow, blue, green, or any other colour or shade of colour, we
should merely have to feed our larvae with cloth of that tint[622].

_Wax_, so valuable for many minor purposes, and deemed with us
so indispensable to the comfort of the great, is of still more
importance in those parts of Europe and America in which it forms
a considerable branch of trade and manufacture, as an article of
extensive use in the religious ceremonies of the inhabitants.
Humboldt informs us, that not fewer than 25,000 arrobas, value
upwards of 83,000_l._, are annually exported from Cuba to New Spain,
where the quantity consumed in the festivals of the Church is immense
even in the smallest villages; and that the total export of the same
island in 1803 was not less than 42,670 arrobas, worth upwards of
130,000_l._[623] Nearly the whole of the wax employed in Europe, and
by far the greater part of that consumed in America, is the produce
of the common hive-bee; but in the latter quarter of the globe a
quantity by no means trifling is obtained from various wild species.
According to Don F. de Azara, the inhabitants of Santiago del Estero
gather every year not less than 14,000 pounds of a whitish wax from
the trees of Chaco[624].

In China wax is also produced by another insect, which from the
description of it by the Abbe Grosier seems to be a species of
_Coccus_. With this insect the Chinese stock the two kinds of tree
(_Kan-la-chu_ and _Choni-la-chu_) on which alone it is found, and which
always afterwards retain it. Towards the beginning of winter small
tumours are perceived, which increase until as big as a walnut. These
are the nests (abdomens of the females) filled with the eggs that are
to give birth to the _Cocci_, which when hatched disperse themselves
over the leaves, and perforate the bark under which they retire. The
wax (called _Pe-la_, white wax, because so by nature,) begins to appear
about the middle of June. At first a few filaments like fine soft wool
are perceived, rising from the bark round the body of the insect, and
these increase more and more until the gathering, which takes place
before the first hoar frosts in September. The wax is carried to court,
and reserved for the emperor, the princes, and chief mandarins. If an
ounce of it be added to a pound of oil, it forms a wax little inferior
to that made by bees. The physicians employ it in several diseases; and
the Chinese, when about to speak in public and assurance is necessary,
previously eat an ounce of it to prevent swoonings[625]; a use of it
for which happily our less diffident orators have no call. This account
is in the main confirmed by Geomelli Careri, except that he calls the
wax-insect a _worm_ which bores to the pith of certain trees; and
says that it produces a sufficient supply for the whole empire, the
different provinces of which are furnished from Xantung, where it is
bred in the greatest perfection, with a stock of eggs[626]. A very
different origin, however, is assigned to the _Pe-la_ by Sir George
Staunton, who informs us that it is produced by a species of Cicada
(_Flata limbata_), which in its larva state feeds upon a plant like the
privet, strewing upon the stem a powder, which when collected forms the
wax[627]. But as he merely states that this powder was "_supposed_"
to form it, and does not himself appear to have made the experiment
of dissolving it in oil, it is most probable that his information was
incorrect, and that Grosier's statement is the true one.

This probability is nearly converted into certainty by the fact that
many Aphides and Cocci secrete a wax-like substance, and that a kind
of wax very analogous to the _Pe-la_, and of the same class with
bees-wax, only containing more carbon, is actually produced in India
by a nondescript species of Coccus remarkable for providing itself
with a small quantity of honey like our bees. This substance, for
specimens of which I am indebted to the kindness of Sir Joseph Banks,
was first noticed by Dr. Anderson, and called by him _white-lac_. It
could be obtained in any quantity from the neighbourhood of Madras,
and at a much cheaper rate than bees-wax: but the experiments of
Dr. Pearson do not afford much ground for supposing that it can be
advantageously employed in making candles[628]. De Azara speaks of a
firm white wax apparently similar, and the produce of an insect of
the same tribe, which is collected in South America in the form of
pearl-like globules from the small branches of the _Quabiramy_, a
small shrub two or three feet high[629].

Insects in some countries not only furnish the natives with wax but
with _resin_, which is used instead of tar for their ships. Molina
informs us that, at Coquimbo in Chili, resin, either the product of
an insect or the consequence of an insect's biting off the buds of
a particular species of Origanum, is collected in large quantities.
The insect in question is a small smooth red caterpillar about half
an inch long, which changes into a yellowish moth with black stripes
upon the wings (_Phal. ceraria_, Molina). Early in the spring vast
numbers of these caterpillars collect on the branches of the _Chila_,
where they form their cells of a kind of soft white wax or resin,
in which they undergo their transformations. This wax, which is at
first very white, but by degrees becomes yellow and finally brown,
is collected in autumn by the inhabitants, who boil it in water, and
make it up into little cakes for market[630].

_Honey_, another well-known product of insects, has lost much of its
importance since the discovery of sugar; yet at the present day,
whether considered as a delicious article of food, or the base of a
wholesome vinous beverage of home manufacture, it is of no mean value
even in this country; and in many inland parts of Europe, where its
saccharine substitute is much dearer than with us, few articles of
rural economy, not of primary importance, would be dispensed with
more reluctantly. In the Ukraine some of the peasants have 4 or 500
bee-hives, and make more profit of their bees than of corn[631]; and
in Spain the number of bee-hives is said to be incredible; a single
parish priest was known to possess 5000[632].

The domesticated or hive-bee, to which we are indebted for this
article, is the same according to Latreille in every part of Europe,
except in some districts of Italy, where a different species (_Apis
ligustica_ of Spinola) is kept--the same probably that is cultivated
in the Morea and the isles of the Archipelago[633]. Honey is obtained,
however, from many other species both wild and domestic. What is called
rock honey in some parts of America, which is as clear as water and
very thin, is the produce of wild bees, which suspend their clusters
of thirty or forty waxen cells, resembling a bunch of grapes, to a
rock[634]: and in South America large quantities are collected from the
nests built in trees by _Trigona Amalthea_, and other species of this
genus recently separated from Apis[635]; under which probably should
be included the _Bamburos_, whose honey, honest Robert Knox informs
us, whole towns in Ceylon go into the woods to gather[636]. According
to Azara, one of the chief articles of food of the Indians who live
in the woods of Paraguay is wild honey[637]. Captain Green observes
that, in the island of Bourbon, where he was stationed for some time,
there is a bee which produces a kind of honey much esteemed there. It
is quite of a green colour, of the consistency of oil, and to the usual
sweetness of honey superadds a certain fragrance. It is called green
honey, and is exported to India, where it bears a high price[638].
One of the species that has probably been attended to ages before
our hive-bee, is _Apis fasciata_ of Latreille, a kind so extensively
cultivated in Egypt, that Niebuhr states he fell in upon the Nile,
between Cairo and Damietta, with a convoy of 4000 hives, which were
transporting from a region where the season for flowers had passed, to
one where the spring was later[639]. Columella says that the Greeks in
like manner sent their bee-hives every year from Achaia into Attica;
and a similar custom is not unknown in Italy, and even in this country
in the neighbourhood of heaths. In Madagascar, according to Latreille,
the inhabitants have domesticated _Apis unicolor_; _A. indica_ is
cultivated in India at Pondicherry and in Bengal; _A. Adansonii_, Latr.
at Senegal[640]; and Fabricius thinks that _A. acraensis_ (_Centris_,
Syst. Piez.) _laboriosa_, and others in the East and West Indies, might
be domesticated with greater advantage than even _A. mellifica_[641].

The last, and doubtless the most valuable, product of insects to
which I have to advert is _Silk_. To estimate justly the importance
of this article, it is not sufficient to view it as an appendage of
luxury unrivalled for richness, lustre, and beauty; and without which
courts would lose half their splendour. We must consider it, what
it actually is, as the staple article of cultivation in many large
provinces in the South of Europe, amongst the inhabitants of which
the prospect of a deficient crop causes as great alarm as a scanty
harvest of grain with us; and after giving employment to tens of
thousands in its first production and transportation, as furnishing
subsistence to hundreds of thousands more in its final manufacture;
and thus becoming one of the most important wheels that give
circulation to national wealth.

But we must not confine our view to Europe. When silk was so scarce in
this country, that James the First, while king of Scotland, was forced
to beg of the Earl of Mar the loan of a pair of silk stockings to
appear in before the English ambassador, enforcing his request with the
cogent appeal, "For ye would not, sure, that your king should appear as
a scrub before strangers--" Nay, long before this period, even prior
to the time that silk was valued at its weight of gold at Rome, and
the Emperor Aurelian refused his empress a robe of silk because of its
dearness--the Chinese peasantry in some of the provinces, millions in
number, were clothed with this material; and for some thousand years to
the present time, it has been both there and in India, (where a class
whose occupation was to attend silk-worms appears to have existed from
time immemorial, being mentioned in the oldest Sanscrit books[642],)
one of the chief objects of cultivation and manufacture. You will
admit, therefore, that when nature

          "--set to work millions of spinning worms,
           That in their green shops weave the smooth-hair'd silk
           To deck her sons[643],"

she was conferring upon them a benefit scarcely inferior to that
consequent upon the gift of wool to the fleecy race, or a fibrous
rind to the flax or hemp plants; and that mankind is not under much
less obligation to Pamphila, who, according to Aristotle, was the
discoverer of the art of unwinding and weaving silk, than to the
inventors of the spinning of those products[644].

It seems to have been in Asia that silk was first manufactured;
and it was from thence that the ancients obtained it, calling it,
from the name of the country whence it was supposed to be brought,
Sericum. Of its origin they were in a great measure ignorant, some
supposing it to be the entrails of a spider-like insect with eight
legs, which was fed for four years upon a kind of paste, and then
with the leaves of the green willow, until it burst with fat[645];
others, that it was the produce of a worm which built clay nests and
collected wax[646]; Aristotle, with more truth, that it was unwound
from the _pupa_ of a large horned caterpillar[647]. Nor was the mode
of producing and manufacturing this precious material known to
Europe until long after the Christian aera, being first learnt about
the year 550 by two monks, who procured in India the eggs of the
silk-worm moth, with which, concealing them in hollow canes, they
hastened to Constantinople, where they speedily multiplied, and were
subsequently introduced into Italy, of which country silk was long a
peculiar and staple commodity. It was not cultivated in France until
the time of Henry the Fourth, who, considering that mulberries grew
in his kingdom as well as in Italy, resolved, in opposition to the
opinion of Sully, to attempt introducing it, and fully succeeded.

The whole of the silk produced in Europe, and the greater proportion
of that manufactured in China, is obtained from the common silk-worm;
but in India considerable quantities are procured from the cocoons of
the larvae of other moths. Of these the most important species known
are the Tusseh and Arindy silk-worms, of which an interesting history
is given by Dr. Roxburgh in the _Linnean Transactions_[648]. These
insects are both natives of Bengal. The first (_Attacus Paphia_,)
feeds upon the leaves of the _Jugube tree_ (_Rhamnus Jujuba_) or
_Byer_ of the Hindoos, and of the _Terminalia alata glabra_, Roxburgh,
the _Asseen_ of the Hindoos, and is found in such abundance as from
time immemorial to have afforded a constant supply of a very durable,
coarse, dark- silk, which is woven into a cloth called
_Tusseh-doot'hies_, much worn by the Brahmins and other sects; and
would doubtless be highly useful to the inhabitants of many parts of
America and of the South of Europe, where a light and cool, and at
the same time cheap and durable dress, such as this silk furnishes,
is much wanted. The durability of this silk is indeed astonishing.
After constant use for nine or ten years it does not show any signs of
decay. These insects are thought by the natives of so much consequence,
that they guard them by day to preserve them from crows and other
birds, and by night from the bats.--The Arindy silk-worm (_Attacus?
Cynthia_, Drury), which feeds solely on the leaves of the _Palma
Christi_, produces remarkably soft cocoons, the silk of which is so
delicate and flossy, that it is impracticable to wind it off: it is
therefore spun like cotton; and the thread thus manufactured is woven
into a coarse kind of white cloth of a loose texture, but of still
more incredible durability than the last, the life of one person being
seldom sufficient to wear out a garment made of it. It is used not only
for clothing, but for packing fine cloths, &c. Some manufacturers in
England to whom the silk was shown, seemed to think that it could be
made here into shawls equal to any received from India.

Other species, as may be inferred from an extract of a letter given in
Young's _Annals of Agriculture_[649], are known in China, and have been
recently introduced into India. "We have obtained," says the writer, "a
monthly silk-worm from China, which I have reared with my own hands,
and in twenty-five days have had the cocoons in my basins, and by the
twenty-ninth or thirty-first day a new progeny feeding in my trays.
This makes it a mine to whoever would undertake the cultivation of it."

Whether it will ever be expedient to attempt the breeding of the
larvae of any European moths, as _Catocala pacta_, _Sponsa_, &c.
proposed with this view by Fabricius[650], seems doubtful, though
certainly many of them afford a very strong silk, and might be
readily propagated; and I have now in my possession some thread more
like cotton than silk spun by the larva of a moth, which when I was
a very young entomologist I observed (if my memory does not deceive
me) upon the Euonymus, and from the twigs of which (not the cocoon)
I unwound it. It is even asserted that in Germany a manufacture of
silk from the cocoons of the emperor moth (_Saturnia Pyri?_) has
been established[651]. There seems no question, however, that silk
might be advantageously derived from many native silk-worms in
America. An account is given in the _Philosophical Transactions_
of one found there, whose cocoon is not only heavier and more
productive of silk than that of the common kind, but is so much
stronger that twenty threads will carry an ounce more[652]. Don Luis
Nee observed on _Psidium pomiferum_ and _pyriferum_ ovate nests of
caterpillars eight inches long, of gray silk, which the inhabitants
of Chilpancingo, Tixtala, &c. in America, manufacture into stockings
and handkerchiefs[653]. Great numbers of similar nests of a dense
tissue, resembling Chinese paper, of a brilliant whiteness, and
formed of distinct and separable layers, the interior being the
thinnest and extraordinarily transparent, were observed by Humboldt
in the provinces of Mechoacan and the mountains of Santarosa at a
height of 10,500 feet above the level of the sea, upon the _Arbutus
Madrono_ and other trees. The silk of these nests, which are the work
of the social caterpillars of a Bombyx (_B. Madrono_), was an object
of commerce even in the time of Montezuma, and the ancient Mexicans
pasted together the interior layers, which may be written upon
without preparation, to form a white glossy pasteboard. Handkerchiefs
are still manufactured of it in the Intendency of Oaxaca[654]. De
Azara states that in Paraguay a spider, which is found to near the
thirtieth degree of latitude, forms a spherical cocoon (for its eggs)
an inch in diameter, of a yellow silk, which the inhabitants spin on
account of the permanency of the colour[655]. And according to M. B.
de Lozieres, large quantities of a very beautiful silk, of dazzling
whiteness, may be collected from the cocoons even of the Ichneumons
that destroy the larvae of some moth in the West Indies which feed
upon the indigo and cassada[656].

It is probable, too, that other articles besides silk might be
obtained from the larvae which usually produce it, particularly
cements and varnishes of different kinds, some hard, others elastic,
from their gum and silk reservoirs, from which it is said the Chinese
procure a fine varnish, and fabricate what is called by anglers
Indian grass[657]. The diminutive size of the animal will be thought
no objection, when we recollect that the very small quantity of
purple dye afforded by the _Purpura_ of the ancients did not prevent
them from collecting it.

       *       *       *       *       *

I now conclude this long series of letters on the injuries caused
by insects to man, and the benefits which he derives from them; and
I think you will readily admit that I have sufficiently made good
my position, that the study of agents which perform such important
functions in the economy of nature must be worthy of attention. Our
subsequent correspondence will be devoted to the most interesting
traits in their history,--as their affection to their young, their
food and modes of procuring it, habitations, societies, &c.

                                                  I am, &c.

FOOTNOTES:

[541] Walpole in Clarke's _Travels_, ii. 187. Even Mr. Boyle speaks
with abhorrence of eating raw oysters. Walton's _Angler_, Life, p. 12.

[542] Baron Humboldt asks (_Person. Narr._ VI. i. 8. note)--"What
are those worms (_Loul_ in Arabic) which Captain Lyon, the fellow
traveller of my brave and unfortunate friend Mr. Ritchie, found in
the pools of the desert of Fezzan, which served the Arabs for food,
and which have the taste of _Caviare_? Are they not insects' eggs
resembling the _Aguautle_, which I saw sold in the markets of Mexico,
and which are collected on the surface of the lakes of Texcuco?"
For this latter fact he refers to the _Gazeta de Litteratura de
Mexico_. 1794. iii. No. 26. p. 201. It appears from this note of the
illustrious traveller that insects are used as food in their _egg_ as
well as their other states.

[543] Herbst and Schoenherr call this distinct genus _Rhyncophorus_;
but as this is too near the name of the tribe (_Rhyncophora_), we
have adopted Thunberg's name, altering the termination to distinguish
it from _Cordyle_ a genus of Lizards.

[544] AElian. _Hist._ l. xiv. c. 13. quoted in Reaum. ii. 343.

[545] _Ins. Sur._ 48.

[546] _Hist. Nat._ l. xvii. c. 24.

[547] _Wisdom of God_, 9th ed. 307. Ray first adopted the opinion
here maintained, that the Cossi were the larvae of some beetle; but
afterwards, from observing in the caterpillar of _Cossus ligniperda_
a power of retracting its prolegs within the body, he conjectured
that the hexapod larva from Jamaica, (_Prionus damicornis?_) given
him by Sir Hans Sloane, might have the same faculty, and so be the
caterpillar of a Bombyx.

[548] Amoreux has collected the different opinions of entomologists
on the subject of Pliny's Cossus, which has been supposed the larva
of _Cordylia Palmarum_ by Geoffroy; of _Lucanus Cervus_ by Scopoli;
and of _Prionus damicornis_ by Drury. The first and last, being
neither natives of Italy nor inhabiting the oak, are out of the
question. The larvae of _Lucanus Cervus_ and _Prionus coriarius_,
which are found in the oak as well as in other trees, may each
have been eaten under this name, as their difference would not be
discernible either to collectors or cooks. Amoreux, 154.

[549] Merian _Ins. Sur._ 24.

[550] St. Pierre, _Voy._ 72.

[551] Smeathman, 32.

[552] Reaum. ii. 344.

[553] _Phytol._ 364.

[554] Diod. Sic. l. iii. c. 29. Strabonis _Geog._ l. xvi. &c.

[555] _Hist. Nat._ l. xi. c. 29.

[556] _Travels_, 232.

[557] _Hieroz._ ii. l. 14. c. 7.

[558] Sparrman, i. 367.

[559] _Rev._ ix. 2, 3.

[560] _Hieroz._ ii. l. 4. c. 7. 492.

[561] Pliny, _Hist. Nat._ l. vi. c. 30.

[562] Id. ibid.

[563] Jackson's _Travels in Marocco_, 53. The Rev. R. Sheppard caused
some of our large English grasshopper (_Acrida viridissima_) to be
cooked in the way here recommended, only substituting butter for
vinegar, and found them excellent.

[564] _Travels_, 230.

[565] Hom. _Il._ [Greek: g]. 150-4.

[566] Arist. _Hist. An._ l. v. c. 30.

[567] Vide Bochart, _Hieroz._ ii. l. 4. c. 7. 491.

[568] _Hist. Nat._ l. xi. c. 26.

[569] P. Collinson in _Phil. Trans._ 1763. n. x.

[570] One species however has been found in Hampshire in the New
Forest. See Samouelle's _Entomologist's Useful Compendium_, _t._ v.
_f._ 2.

[571] Reaum. ii. 341.

[572] Ray's _Letters_, 135.

[573] Sparrman, i. 201.

[574] Sir G. Staunton's _Voy._ iii. 246.

[575] _Phytol._ 364.

[576] Sparrman, i. 363.

[577] Captain Green relates that, in the ceded districts in India,
they place the branches of trees over the nests, and then by means of
smoke drive out the insects; which attempting to fly, their wings are
broken off by the mere touch of the branches.

[578] Smeathman, 31.

[579] _Letters written in a Mahratta Camp in_ 1809.

[580] Knox's _Ceylon_, 25.

[581] Piso, _Ind._ l. v. c. 13. 291.

[582] _Travels in Sweden_, 118.

[583] _Ibid._

[584] Smith's _Introd. to Bot._ 346. Olivier's _Travels_, i. 139.

[585] Reaum. iii. 416.

[586] Scop. _Carniol._ 337. See above, p. 229. note^b.

[587] Lat. _Hist. Nat._ viii. 93.

[588] Sparrman, i. 201.

[589] _Voyage a la recherche de la Perouse_, ii. 240.

[590] Reaum. ii. 342.

[591] Shaw, _Nat. Misc._

[592] _Hist. Nat._ vii. 227.

[593] Roesel, iv. 257.

[594] _Personal Travels_, ii. 205.

[595] For this list of remedies, see Lesser, _L._ ii. 171-3.

[596] Gerbi. The same virtues have been ascribed to _Coccinella
septempunctata_, L.

[597] Latr. _Hist. Nat. des Fourmis_, 48. 134.

[598] Jackson's _Marocco_, 83. Some doubt however attaches to this
statement, from the circumstance of the figure which Mr. Jackson
gives of his beetle (_Dibben Fashook_) being clearly a mere copy of
that of Mr. Bruce's _Zimb_!

[599] Illiger _Mag._ i. 256.

[600] _Hist. Nat._ l. xix. c. 4.

[601] Vol. v. 213.

[602] _Carabus_, Oliv. _Entom._ iii. 69. _t._ iii. _f._ 26. Compare
_Philanthropist_, ii. 210.

[603] Molina's _Chili_, i. 174.

[604] _Ent. Carniol._ 264.

[605] Captain Green was accustomed to put a fire-fly under the glass
of his watch, when he had occasion to rise very early for a march,
which enabled him, without difficulty, to distinguish the hour.

[606] Molina, i. 171, 285.

[607] Latr. _Hist. Nat._ x. 143.

[608] _Encyclop. Insect._ vi. 281. It had better, perhaps, as
compound Trivial Names are bad, be called _Cynips Scriptorum_.

[609] Olivier's _Travels in Egypt_, &c. ii. 64.

[610] The colour communicated by Kermes with alum, the only mordant
formerly employed, is blood red: but Dr. Bancroft found (i. 404.)
that with the solution of tin used with cochineal it is capable of
imparting a scarlet quite as brilliant as that dye, and perhaps more
permanent. At the same time, however, as ten or twelve pounds contain
only as much colouring matter as one of cochineal, the latter at its
ordinary price is the cheapest.

[611] Bochart, _Hierozoic._ ii. l. iv. c. 27. Beckmann's _History
of Inventions_, Engl. Trans. ii. 171-205. Brancroft _on permanent
Colours_. i. 393. See also Parkhurst's _Heb. Lexicon_ under [Hebrew:
tl'] and [Hebrew: shnh].

[612] Rai. _Hist. Plant._ i. 401.

[613] Bancroft, i. 401.

[614] Bancroft, i. 413. Reaum. iv. 88.

[615] Humboldt's _Political Essay on New Spain_, iii. 72-9.

[616] Ibid. iii. 64.--Dr. Bancroft estimates the present annual
consumption of cochineal in Great Britain at about 750 bags, or
150,000 lbs.--worth at the present price 375,000_l._

[617] Lesser, _L._ ii. 165.

[618] Bancroft _on permanent Colours_, ii. 20. 49.

[619] Reaum. iii. _Preface_, xxxi.

[620] _Lach. Lapp._ i. 258.

[621] _Trans. of the Soc. of Arts_, xxiii. 411.

[622] Reaum. iii. 95.

[623] _Political Essay_, iii. 62.

[624] _Voyage dans l'Amer. Merid._ i. 162.

[625] Grosier's _China_, i. 439.

[626] Quoted in Southey's _Thalaba_, ii. 166.

[627] _Embassy to China_, i. 400.

[628] _Phil. Trans._ 1794. xxi.

[629] _Voyage dans l'Amer. Merid._ i. 164.

[630] Molina's _Chili_, i. 174.

[631] _Communications to the Board of Agricult._ vii. 286.

[632] Mills _on Bees_, 77.

[633] Latr. in Humboldt and Bonpland, _Recueil d'Observ. de
Zoologie_, &c. (Paris, 1805) 300.

[634] Hill in _Swammerdam_, i. 181, note.

[635] Latr. _ubi supr._ 300.

[636] Knox's _Ceylon_, 25.

[637] _Voy. dans l'Amer. Merid._ i. 162.

[638] M. Latreille appears to have described this bee under the name
of _Apis unicolor_. _Mem. sur les Abeilles_, 8. 39.

[639] Latr. _Hist. Nat._ xiv. 20.

[640] Latr. in Humboldt and Bonpland, _Recueil_, &c. 302.

[641] _Vorlesungen_, 324. I have read somewhere, but neglecting to
make a memorandum I cannot refer to the author, (Latreille?) that a
species of wasp in South America collects and stores up _honey_.

[642] Colebrook in _Asiatic Researches_, v. 61.

[643] Milton's _Comus_.

[644] _Hist. Animal._ l. v. c. 19. A French gentleman, M. Vaucanson,
has invented a mill for unwinding the cocoons of the silkworm.
Scott's _Visit to Paris_, 4th ed. 304.

[645] Pausanias, quoted by Goldsmith, vi. 80.

[646] Pliny _Hist. Nat._ l. xi. c. 22.

[647] Aristot. _ubi supr._ He does not expressly say the _pupa_, but
this we must suppose. The _larva_ he means could not be the common
silk-worm, since he describes it as large, and having as it were horns.

[648] vii. 33-48. Compare Lord Valentia's _Travels_, i. 78.

[649] xxiii. 235.

[650] _Vorlesungen_, 325.

[651] Latr. _Hist. Nat._ xiv. 150. Three modern species of _Saturnia_
were formerly considered as varieties only, and distinguished by the
trivial name of _Pavonia major_, _media_, and _minor_; these are now
called _S. Pyri_, _Spini_, and _Carpini_. Ochsenh.

[652] Pullein in _Phil. Trans._ 1759. 54.

[653] _Annals of Botany_, ii. 104.

[654] _Political Essay on N. Spain_, iii. 59.

[655] _Voyage dans l'Amer. Merid._ i. 212. It may here be observed
as a benefit derived by the higher walks of philosophy from
insects--that astronomers employ the strongest thread of spiders,
the one namely that supports the web, for the divisions of the
micrometer. By its ductility this thread acquires about a fifth of
its ordinary length. _Nouv. Dict. d'Hist. Nat._ ii. 280.

[656] _American Phil. Trans._ v. 325.

[657] Anderson's _Recreations in Agriculture_, &c. iv. 399.




                               LETTER XI.

                    _ON THE AFFECTION OF INSECTS FOR
                             THEIR YOUNG._


Amongst the larger animals, every observer of nature has witnessed,
with admiration, that love of their offspring which the beneficent
Creator, with equal regard to the happiness of the parent and the
progeny, has interwoven in the constitution of his creatures.
Who that has any sensibility, has not felt his heart dilate with
gratitude to the Giver of all good, in observing amongst the domestic
animals which surround him, the effects of this divine _storge_,
so fruitful of the most delightful sensations? Who that is not a
stock or a stone has read unmoved the anecdote recorded in books of
Natural History, of the poor bitch, which in the agonies of a cruel
dissection licked with parental fondness her new-born offspring; or
the affecting account of the she-bear related in Phipps's _Voyage to
the North Pole_, which, herself severely wounded by the same shot
that killed her cubs, spent her last moments in tearing and laying
before them the food she had collected, and died licking their wounds?

These feelings you must have experienced, but it has scarcely
occurred to you that you would have any room for exercising them
in your new pursuit. You have not, I dare say, suspected that any
similar example could have been adduced amongst _insects_, to which
at the first glance there seems even something absurd in attributing
any thing like parental affection. An animal not so big perhaps as
a grain of wheat, feel love for its offspring--how preposterous!
we are ready to exclaim. Yet the exclamation would be very much
misplaced. Nothing is more certain than that insects are capable of
feeling quite as much attachment to their offspring as the largest
quadrupeds. They undergo as severe privations in nourishing them;
expose themselves to as great risk in defending them; and in the very
article of death exhibit as much anxiety for their preservation.
Not that this can be said of all insects. A very large proportion
of them are doomed to die before their young come into existence.
But in these the passion is not extinguished. It is merely modified,
and its direction changed. And when you witness the solicitude with
which they provide for the security and sustenance of their future
young, you can scarcely deny to them love for a progeny they are
never destined to behold. Like affectionate parents in similar
circumstances, their last efforts are employed in providing for the
children that are to succeed them.


I. Observe the motions of that common white butterfly which you see
flying from herb to herb. You perceive that it is not food she is in
pursuit of; for flowers have no attraction for her. Her object is the
discovery of a plant that will supply the sustenance appropriated by
Providence to her young, upon which to deposit her eggs. Her own food
has been honey drawn from the nectary of a flower. This, therefore, or
its neighbourhood, we might expect would be the situation she would
select for them. But no: as if aware that this food would be to them
poison, she is in search of some plant of the cabbage tribe. But how is
she to distinguish it from the surrounding vegetables? She is taught of
God! Led by an instinct far more unerring than the practised eye of the
botanist, she recognises the desired plant the moment she approaches
it, and upon this she places her precious burthen; yet not without
the further precaution of ascertaining that it is not preoccupied by
the eggs of some other butterfly! Having fulfilled this duty, from
which no obstacle short of absolute impossibility, no danger however
threatening, can divert her, the affectionate mother dies.

This may serve as one instance of the solicitude of insects for
their future progeny. But almost every species will supply examples
similar in principle, and in their particular circumstances even more
extraordinary. In every case (except in some remarkable instances
of mistakes of instinct, as they may be termed, which will be
subsequently adverted to) the parent unerringly distinguishes the
food suitable for her offspring, however dissimilar to her own; or at
least invariably places her eggs, often defended from external injury
by a variety of admirable contrivances, in the exact spot where,
when hatched, the larvae can have access to it.--The dragon-fly is
an inhabitant of the air, and could not exist in water: yet in this
element, which is alone adapted for her young, she ever carefully
drops her eggs. The larvae of the gad-fly (_Gasterophilus Equi_),
whose history has been before described to you[658], are destined to
live in the stomach of the horse. How shall the parent, a two-winged
fly, convey them thither? By a mode truly extraordinary. Flying
round the animal, she curiously poises her body for an instant while
she glues a single egg to one of the hairs of his skin, and repeats
this process until she has fixed in a similar way many hundred
eggs. These, after a few days, on the application of the slightest
moisture attended by warmth, hatch into little grubs. Whenever,
therefore, the horse chances to lick any part of his body to which
they are attached, the moisture of the tongue discloses one or more
grubs, which adhering to it by means of the saliva are conveyed into
the mouth, and thence find their way into the stomach. But here a
question occurs to you. It is but a small portion of the horse's
body which he can reach with his tongue: what, you ask, becomes of
the eggs deposited on other parts? I will tell you how the gad-fly
avoids this dilemma; and I will then ask you if she does not discover
a provident forethought, a depth of instinct, which almost casts
into shade the boasted reason of man? She places her eggs only on
those parts of the skin which the horse is able to reach with his
tongue; nay, she confines them almost exclusively to the knee or
the shoulder, which he is sure to lick. What could the most refined
reason, the most precise adaptation of means to an end, do more[659]?

Not less admirable is the parental instinct of that vast tribe of
insects already introduced to you by the name of _Ichneumons_,
whose young are destined to feed upon the living bodies of other
insects. These, as you know, are so numerous, that scarcely an insect
exists, which in its larva state is not exposed to the attacks of
one or other of them; and even the pupae, nay the very eggs of these
animals, are not safe from their insidious manoeuvres. The size of
the different species varies in proportion to that of the bodies
which are to be their food; some being so inconceivably small, that
the egg of a butterfly not bigger than a pin's head is of sufficient
magnitude to nourish two of them to maturity[660]; others so large,
that the body of a full-grown caterpillar is not more than enough for
one. They are the larvae of these Ichneumons which make such havoc
of our pygmy tribes: the perfect insect is a four-winged fly, which
takes no other food than a little honey; and the great object of
the female is to discover a proper nidus for her eggs. In search of
this she is in constant motion. Is the caterpillar of a butterfly
or moth the appropriate food for her young? You see her alight upon
the plants where they are most usually to be met with, run quickly
over them, carefully examining every leaf, and, having found the
unfortunate object of her search, insert her sting into its flesh
and there deposit an egg. In vain her victim, as if conscious of
its fate, writhes its body, spits out an acid fluid, menaces with
its tentacula, or brings into action the other organs of defence
with which it is provided. The active Ichneumon braves every danger,
and does not desist until her courage and address have ensured
subsistence for one of her future progeny. Perhaps, however, she
discovers, by a sense the existence of which we perceive, though
we have no conception of its nature, that she has been forestalled
by some precursor of her own tribe, that has already buried an
egg in the caterpillar she is examining. In this case she leaves
it, aware that it would not suffice for the support of two, and
proceeds in search of some other yet unoccupied.--The process is of
course varied in the case of those minute species of which several,
sometimes as many as 150, can subsist in a single caterpillar. The
little Ichneumon then repeats her operations until she has darted
into her victim the requisite number of eggs.

The larvae hatched from the eggs thus ingeniously deposited, find
a delicious banquet in the body of the caterpillar, which is sure
eventually to fall a victim to their ravages. So accurately,
however, is the supply of food proportioned to the demand, that this
event does not take place until the young Ichneumons have attained
their full growth: when the caterpillar either dies, or, retaining
just vitality enough to assume the pupa state, then finishes its
existence; the pupa disclosing not a moth or a butterfly, but one or
more full-grown Ichneumons.

In this strange and apparently cruel operation one circumstance is
truly remarkable. The larva of the Ichneumon, though every day,
perhaps for months, it gnaws the inside of the caterpillar, and
though at last it has devoured almost every part of it except the
skin and intestines, carefully all this time _avoids injuring the
vital organs_, as if aware that its own existence depends on that of
the insect on which it preys! Thus the caterpillar continues to eat,
to digest, and to move, apparently little injured, to the last, and
only perishes when the parasitic grub within it no longer requires
its aid. What would be the impression which a similar instance
amongst the race of quadrupeds would make upon us?--If, for example,
an animal--such as some impostors have pretended to carry within
them--should be found to feed upon the inside of a dog; devouring
only those parts not essential to life, while it cautiously left
uninjured the heart, arteries, lungs, and intestines,--should we
not regard such an instance as a perfect prodigy, as an example of
instinctive forbearance almost miraculous?

Some Ichneumons, instead of burying their eggs in the body of the larvae
that are to serve their young for food, content themselves with gluing
them to the skin of their prey, which the young grubs pierce as soon
as hatched. Another tribe, whose activity and perseverance are equally
conspicuous, which includes the beautiful genus _Chrysis_ and many
other hymenopterous insects, imitating the insidious cuckoo, contrive
to introduce their eggs into the nests in which bees and other insects
have deposited theirs. With this view they are constantly on the watch,
and, the moment the unsuspecting mother has quitted her cell for the
purpose of collecting a store of food or materials, glide into it and
leave an egg, the germe of a future assassin of the larva that is to
spring from that deposited by its side.

The females of the insects of which we have been speaking, in providing
for their offspring, are saved the trouble of furnishing them with
any habitation. Either they occupy that of another insect, or find a
convenient abode within the body of that on which they feed. But upon
the maternal affection of another large hymenopterous tribe, belonging
to Latreille's Family of Burrowers (_Fossores_), whose young in like
manner feed on other insects, is imposed the arduous task not merely of
collecting a supply of food, but of inclosing it along with their eggs
in cells or burrows often of considerable depth, and dug with great
labour in sand or the solid earth.

The general economy of these insects is similar. Having first dug a
cylindrical cavity of the requisite dimensions, and deposited an egg
at the bottom, they inclose along with it one or more caterpillars,
spiders, or other insects, each particular species for the most part
selecting a distinct kind, as a provision for the young one when
hatched, and sufficiently abundant to nourish it until it becomes
a pupa. Many thus furnish several cells. This process, however, is
varied by different species, some of whose operations are worthy of a
more detailed description.

One of the most early histories of the procedure of an insect of this
kind, probably the common sand-wasp (_Ammophila vulgaris_), is left us
by the excellent Ray, who observed it along with his friend Willughby.
On the 22d of June 1667, he tells us, they noticed this insect dragging
a green caterpillar thrice as big as itself, which after thus conveying
about fifteen feet, it deposited at the entrance of a hole previously
dug in the sand. Then removing a pellet of earth from its mouth, it
descended into the cavity, and, presently returning, dragged along with
it the caterpillar. After staying awhile it again ascended, then rolled
pieces of earth into the hole, at intervals scratching the dust into
it like a dog with its fore feet, and entering it as if to press down
and consolidate the mass: flying also once or twice to an adjoining
fir-tree, possibly to procure resin for agglutinating the whole. Having
filled the burrow to a level with the surrounding earth so as to
conceal the entrance, it took two fir-leaves lying at hand, and placed
them near the orifice as if to mark the place.--Such is the anecdote
left on record by our illustrious countryman, of whose accuracy of
observation there can be no doubt[661]. Who that reads it can refrain
from joining in the reflection which it calls from him, "_Quis haec
non mihi miretur et stupeat? Quis hujusmodi opera merae machinae possit
attribuere_[662]_?_"

I myself, when walking with a friend some months ago, observed
nearly similar manoeuvres performed by another hymenopterous insect
which may be called a spider-wasp (_Pompilus_), which attracted our
attention as it was dragging a spider to its cell. The attitude in
which it carried its prey, namely with its feet constantly upwards;
its singular mode of walking, which was backwards, except for a foot
or two when it went forwards, moving by jerks and making a sort
of pause every few steps; and the astonishing agility with which,
notwithstanding its heavy burthen, it glided over or between the
grass, weeds, and other numerous impediments in the rough path along
which it passed--together formed a spectacle which we contemplated
with admiration. The distance which we thus observed it to traverse
was not less than twenty-seven feet, and great part of its journey
had probably been performed before we saw it. Once or twice, when
we first noticed it, it laid down the spider, and making a small
circuit returned and took it up again. But for the ensuing twenty or
twenty-five feet it never stopped, but proceeded in a direct line for
its burrow with the utmost speed. When opposite the hole, which was
in a sand bank by the way side, it made a sharp turn, as evidently
aware of being in the neighbourhood of its abode, but when advanced
a little further laid down its burthen and went to reconnoitre.
At first it climbed up the bank, but, as if discovering that this
was not the direction, soon returned, and, after another survey
perceiving the hole, took up the spider and dragged it in after it.

In the two instances above given, one dead caterpillar or spider
only was deposited in each hole. But an insect described by Reaumur
under the name of the mason-wasp (_Epipone spinipes_), very common
in some parts of England, after having excavated a burrow, with an
ingenuity to which on a future occasion I shall draw your attention,
places along with its egg as food for the future young, about twelve
little green grubs without feet, which it has carefully selected full
grown and conveyed without injuring them. You will inquire, Why this
difference of procedure? With regard to the choice of a number of
small grubs rather than of one large caterpillar, what I have said
in a former letter on the subject of different species of this tribe
being appointed to prey upon and thus keep within due limits the
larvae of different kinds of insects, will be a sufficient answer.
But one circumstance creditable to the talents of the mason-wasp as
a skilful purveyor should not be omitted, namely, that the number of
grubs laid up is not always the same, but is exactly proportioned
to their size, eleven or twelve being stored when they are small,
but only eight or nine when larger. With respect however to the
caution of the wasp in selecting full grown grubs and conveying them
uninjured to her hole, a satisfactory explanation may be given.
If those that are but partly grown were chosen, they would die in
a short time for want of food, and putrefying would destroy the
inclosed egg, or the young one which springs from it. But when larvae
of any kind have attained their full size, and are about to pass into
the pupa state, they can exist for a long period without any further
supply. By selecting these, therefore, and placing them uninjured
in the hole, however long the interval before the egg hatches, the
disclosed larva is sure of a sufficiency of fresh and wholesome
nutriment.--To prevent the possibility of any injury to its egg from
the motions or voracity of this living prey, the wasp is careful to
pack the whole so closely, each grub being coiled above the other in
a series of rings, and to consolidate the earth so firmly above them,
that they have not the slightest power of motion[663].--Those which
select more powerful caterpillars, or revenge the injuries of their
insect brethren by devoting spiders to the destruction they have so
often caused, take care to sting them in such a manner as, without
killing them outright, will incapacitate them from doing any injury.

Zeal and activity in providing for the well-being of their future
progeny, not inferior to what are exhibited by the tribe of
Ichneumons, _Sphecina_[664], and mason-wasps, though less cruelly
exerted, are also shown by various species of wild bees, of which we
have in this country a vast number. Having first excavated a proper
cell with a dexterity and persevering labour never enough to be
admired, they next deposit in it an egg, which they cover with a mass
of pollen or honey collected with unwearied assiduity from a thousand
flowers. As soon as the grub is hatched, it finds itself enveloped in
this delicious banquet provided for it by the cares of a mother it is
doomed never to behold; and so accurately is the repast proportioned
to its appetite and its wants, that as soon as the whole is consumed
it has no longer need of food; it clothes itself in a silken cocoon,
becomes a pupa, and after a deep sleep of a few days bursts from its
cell an active bee.

No circumstance connected with the _storge_ of insects, is more
striking than the herculean and incessant labour which it leads
them cheerfully to undergo. Some of these exertions are so
disproportionate to the size of the insect, that nothing short of
ocular conviction could attribute them to such an agent. A wild bee
or a Sphex, for instance, will dig a hole in a hard bank of earth
some inches deep and five or six times its own size, and labour
unremittingly at this arduous undertaking for several days, scarcely
allowing itself a moment for eating or repose. It will then occupy
as much time in searching for a store of food; and no sooner is this
task finished, than it will set about repeating the process, and
before it dies will have completed five or six similar cells or even
more. If you would estimate this industry at its proper value, you
should reflect what kind of exertion it would require in a man to dig
in a few days out of hard clay or sand, with no other tools than his
nails and teeth, five or six caverns twenty feet deep and four or
five wide--for such an undertaking would not be comparatively greater
than that of the insects in question.

Similar laborious exertions are not confined to the bee or Sphex
tribe. Several beetles in depositing their eggs exhibit examples of
industry equally extraordinary. The common dor or clock (_Geotrupes
stercorarius_), which may be found beneath every heap of dung, digs
a deep cylindrical hole, and, carrying down a mass of the dung to
the bottom, in it deposits its eggs. And many of the species of the
_Scarabaeidae_[665] roll together wet dung into round pellets, deposit
an egg in the midst of each, and when dry push them backwards by
their hind feet into holes of the surprising depth of three feet,
which they have previously dug for their reception, and which are
often several yards distant. Frequently the road lies across a
depression in the surface, and the pellet when nearly pushed to the
summit rolls back again. But our patient Sisyphi are not easily
discouraged. They repeat their efforts again and again, and in the
end their perseverance is rewarded by success. The attention of
these insects to their eggs is so remarkable, that it was observed
in the earliest ages, and is mentioned by ancient writers, but with
the addition of many fables, as that they were all of the male
sex, that they became young again every year, that they rolled the
pellets containing their eggs from sun-rise to sun-set every day,
for twenty-eight days without intermission[666], &c. It is one of
this tribe of beetles (_S. sacer_) whose image is so often met with
amongst the hieroglyphics of the Egyptians, with whom it was a symbol
of the world, of the sun, and of a courageous warrior. Of the world,
as P. Valerianus supposes, on account of the orbicular form of its
pellets of dung, and the notion of their being rolled from sun-rise
to sun-set; of the sun, because of the angular projections from its
head resembling rays, and the thirty joints of the six tarsi of its
feet answering to the days of the month; and of a warrior, from the
idea of manly courage being connected with its supposed birth from a
male only[667]. It was as symbolical of this last that its image was
worn upon the signets of the Roman soldiers; and as typical of the
sun, the source of fertility, it is yet, as Dr. Clarke informs us,
eaten by the women to render them prolific[668].

These beetles, however, in point of industry must yield the palm
to one (_Necrophorus Vespillo_) whose singular history was first
detailed by M. Gleditsch in _the Acts of the Berlin Society_ for
1752. He begins by informing us that he had often remarked that dead
moles when laid upon the ground, especially if upon loose earth, were
almost sure to disappear in the course of two or three days, often
of twelve hours. To ascertain the cause, he placed a mole upon one
of the beds in his garden. It had vanished by the third morning; and
on digging where it had been laid, he found it buried to the depth
of three inches, and under it four beetles which seemed to have been
the agents in this singular inhumation. Not perceiving any thing
particular in the mole, he buried it again; and on examining it at
the end of six days he found it swarming with maggots apparently the
issue of the beetles, which M. Gleditsch now naturally concluded had
buried the carcase for the food of their future young. To determine
these points more clearly, he put four of these insects into a glass
vessel half filled with earth and properly secured, and upon the
surface of the earth two frogs. In less than twelve hours one of
the frogs was interred by two of the beetles: the other two ran
about the whole day as if busied in measuring the dimensions of the
remaining corpse, which on the third day was also found buried.
He then introduced a dead linnet. A pair of the beetles were soon
engaged upon the bird. They began their operations by pushing out the
earth from under the body so as to form a cavity for its reception;
and it was curious to see the efforts which the beetles made by
dragging at the feathers of the bird from below to pull it into its
grave. The male having driven the female away continued the work
alone for five hours. He lifted up the bird, changed its place,
turned it and arranged it in the grave, and from time to time came
out of the hole, mounted upon it and trod it under foot, and then
retired below and pulled it down. At length, apparently wearied with
this uninterrupted labour, it came forth and leaned its head upon
the earth beside the bird without the smallest motion as if to rest
itself, for a full hour, when it again crept under the earth. The
next day in the morning the bird was an inch and a half under ground,
and the trench remained open the whole day, the corpse seeming as
if laid out upon a bier, surrounded with a rampart of mould. In the
evening it had sunk half an inch lower, and in another day the work
was completed and the bird covered.--M. Gleditsch continued to add
other small dead animals, which were all sooner or later buried; and
the result of his experiment was, that in fifty days four beetles had
interred in the very small space of earth allotted to them, twelve
carcases: viz. four frogs, three small birds, two fishes, one mole,
and two grasshoppers, besides the entrails of a fish, and two morsels
of the lungs of an ox. In another experiment a single beetle buried
a mole forty times its own bulk and weight in two days[669]. It is
plain that all this labour is incurred for the sake of placing in
security the future young of these industrious insects along with
a necessary provision of food. One mole would have sufficed a long
time for the repast of the beetles themselves, and they could have
more conveniently fed upon it above ground than below. But if they
had left thus exposed the carcase in which their eggs were deposited,
both would have been exposed to the imminent risk of being destroyed
at a mouthful by the first fox or kite that chanced to espy them.

At the first view I dare say you feel almost inclined to pity the
little animals doomed to exertions apparently so disproportioned
to their size. You are ready to exclaim that the pains of so short
an existence, engrossed with such arduous and incessant toil, must
far outweigh the pleasures. Yet the inference would be altogether
erroneous. What strikes us as wearisome toil, is to the little agents
delightful occupation. The kind Author of their being has associated
the performance of an essential duty with feelings evidently of the
most pleasurable description; and, like the affectionate father
whose love for his children sweetens the most painful labours, these
little insects are never more happy than when thus actively engaged.
"A bee," as Dr. Paley has well observed, "amongst the flowers in
spring, (when it is occupied without intermission in collecting
farina for its young or honey for its associates,) is one of the
cheerfullest objects that can be looked upon. Its life appears to be
all enjoyment: so busy and so pleased[670]."

Of the sources of exquisite gratification which every rural walk will
open to you, while witnessing in the animals themselves those marks of
affection for their unseen progeny of which I have endeavoured to give
you a slight sketch, it will be none of the least fertile to examine
the various and appropriate instruments with which insects have been
furnished for the effective execution of their labours. The young of
the saw-fly tribe (_Serrifera_[671]) are destined to feed upon the
leaves of rose-trees and various other plants. Upon the branches of
these the parent fly deposits her eggs in cells symmetrically arranged;
and the instrument with which she forms them is a saw, somewhat like
ours but far more ingenious and perfect, being toothed on each side,
or rather consisting of two distinct saws, with their backs (the teeth
or serratures of which are themselves often serrated, and the exterior
flat sides scored and toothed), which play alternately; and, while
their vertical effect is that of a saw, act laterally as a rasp. When
by this alternate motion the incision, or cell, is made, the two saws,
receding from each other, conduct the egg between them into it[672].
The _Cicada_, so celebrated by the poets of antiquity, which lays
its eggs in dry wood, requires a stronger instrument of a different
construction. Accordingly it is provided with an excellent double
auger, the sides of which play alternately and parallel to each other,
and bore a hole of the requisite depth in very hard substances without
ever being displaced.

The construction of the sting or ovipositor with which the different
species of Ichneumon are provided, is not less nicely adapted to its
various purposes. In those which lay their eggs in the bodies of
caterpillars that feed exposed on the leaves of plants it is short,
often in very large species not the eighth of an inch long: having
free access to their victims, a longer sting would have been useless.
But a considerable number oviposit in larvae which lie concealed where
so short an instrument could not possibly approach them. In these,
therefore, the sting is proportionably elongated, so much so that in
some small species it is three or four times the length of the body.
Thus in _Pimpla Manifestator_, whose economy has been so pleasingly
illustrated by Mr. Marsham[673], and which attacks the larva of a
wild bee (_Chelostoma[674] maxillosa_) lying at the bottom of deep
holes in old wood, the sting is nearly two inches long[675]: and it
is not much shorter in the more minute _I. Strobilellae_ L., which
lays its eggs in larvae concealed in the interior of fir cones, which
without such an apparatus it would never be able to reach.

The tail of the females of many moths whose eggs require to be
protected from too severe a cold and too strong a light, is
furnished, evidently for application to this very purpose, with a
thick tuft of hair. But how shall the moth detach this non-conducting
material and arrange it upon her eggs? Her ovipositor is provided
at the end with an instrument resembling a pair of pincers, which
for this purpose are as good as hands. With these, having previously
deposited her eggs upon a leaf she pulls off her tuft of hairs, with
which she so closely envelops them as effectually to preserve them
of the required temperature: and having performed this last duty to
her progeny she expires.

The ovipositor of the capricorn beetles, an infinite host, is a
flattened retractile tube, of a hard substance, by means of which it
can introduce its eggs under the bark of timber, and so place them
where its progeny will find their appropriate food[676]. The auger
used by certain species of Oestrus, to enable them to penetrate the
hides of oxen or deer and form a nidus for their eggs, has been
before described[677].--But to enumerate all the varieties of these
instruments would be endless.

The purpose which in the insects above mentioned is answered by their
anal apparatus, is fulfilled in the numerous tribes of weevils by the
long slender snout with which their head is provided. It is with this
that _Balaninus Nucum_ pierces the shell of the nut, and the weevil
(_Calandra granaria_) the skin of the grains of wheat, in which they
respectively deposit their eggs, prudently introducing one only into
each nut or grain, which is sufficient, but not more than sufficient,
for the nourishment of the grub that will inhabit it.


II. Hitherto I have adverted to those insects only which perish
before their young come into existence, and can therefore evince
their affection for them in no other way than by placing the eggs
whence they are to spring in secure situations stored with food;
and these include by far the largest portion of the race. A very
considerable number, however, extend their cares much further: they
not only watch over their eggs after depositing them, but attend
upon their young, when excluded, with an affectionate assiduity equal
to any thing exhibited amongst the larger animals, and in the highest
degree interesting. Of this description are some solitary insects,
as several species of the Linnean genus Sphex, earwigs, field-bugs,
and spiders: and those insects which live in societies, namely, ants,
bees, wasps, and termites: the most striking traits of whose history
in these respects I shall endeavour to lay before you.

You have seen that the greater number of the _Sphecina_ after
depositing their eggs in cells stored with a supply of food,
take no further care of them. Some, however, adopt a different
procedure. One of these, called by Bonnet the _Mason-wasp_, but
different from Reaumur's, not only incloses a living caterpillar
along with its egg in the cell, which it carefully closes, but at
the expiration of a few days, when the young grub has appeared and
has consumed its provision, re-opens the nest, incloses a second
caterpillar, and again shuts the mouth: and this operation it repeats
until the young one has attained its full growth[678]. A similar
mode, according to Rolander, is followed by _Ammophila vulgaris_
as well as by the yellowish wasp of Pennsylvania, described by
Bartram in the _Philosophical Transactions_[679], and by another
related to _Mellinus arvensis_, observed by Duhamel[680]; both of
which, however, instead of caterpillars, supply their larvae with a
periodical provision of living flies.

What a crowd of interesting reflections are these most singular
facts calculated to excite! With what foresight must the parent
insect be endowed, thus to be aware at what period her eggs will
be hatched into grubs, and how long the provision she has laid up
will suffice for their support! What an extent of judgement, thus
in the midst of various other occupations to know the precise day
when a repetition of her cares will be required! What an accuracy of
memory, to recollect with such precision the entrance to her cell,
which the most acute eye could not discover; and without compass
or direction unerringly to fly to it, often from a great distance
and after the most intricate and varied wanderings! If we refer the
whole to instinct, and to instinct doubtless it must in the main if
not wholly be referred, our admiration is not lessened. Instinct,
when simple and directed to one object, is less astonishing; but
such a complication of instincts, applied to actions so varied and
dissimilar, is beyond our conception. We can but wonder and adore!

We are indebted to De Geer for the history of a field-bug
(_Pentatoma grisea_), a species found in this country, which shows
marks of affection for her young such as I trust will lead you,
notwithstanding any repugnant association that the name may call up,
to search upon the birch tree, which it inhabits, for so interesting
an insect. The family of this field-bug consists of thirty or
forty young ones, which she conducts as a hen does her chickens.
She never leaves them; and as soon as she begins to move, all the
little ones closely follow, and whenever she stops assemble in a
cluster round her. De Geer having had occasion to cut a branch of
birch peopled with one of those families, the mother showed every
symptom of excessive uneasiness. In other circumstances such an alarm
would have caused her immediate flight; but now she never stirred
from her young, but kept beating her wings incessantly with a very
rapid motion, evidently for the purpose of protecting them from the
apprehended danger[681].--As far as our knowledge of the economy
of this tribe of insects extends, there is no other species that
manifests a similar attachment to its progeny; but such may probably
be discovered by future observers.

It is De Geer also that we have to thank for a series of interesting
observations on the maternal affection exhibited by the common earwig.
This curious insect so unjustly traduced by a vulgar prejudice,--as
if the Creator had willed that the insect world should combine
within itself examples of all that is most remarkable in every other
department of nature,--still more nearly approaches the habits of the
hen in her care of her family. She absolutely sits upon her eggs as if
to hatch them--a fact which Frisch appears first to have noticed--and
guards them with the greatest care. De Geer, having found an earwig
thus occupied, removed her into a box where was some earth, and
scattered the eggs in all directions. She soon, however, collected them
one by one with her jaws into a heap, and assiduously sat upon them as
before. The young ones, which resemble the parent except in wanting
elytra and wings, and, strange to say, are as soon as born larger
than the eggs which contained them, immediately upon being hatched
creep like a brood of chickens under the belly of the mother, who very
quietly suffers them to push between her feet, and will often, as De
Geer found, sit over them in this posture for some hours[682]. This
remarkable fact I have myself witnessed, having found an earwig under
a stone which I accidentally turned over, sitting upon a cluster of
young ones just as this celebrated naturalist has described.

We are so accustomed to associate the ideas of cruelty and ferocity
with the name of spider, that to attribute parental affection to any
of the tribe seems at first view almost preposterous. Who indeed
could suspect that animals which greedily devour their own species
whenever they have opportunity, should be susceptible of the finer
feelings? Yet such is the fact. There is a spider common under clods
of earth (_Lycosa saccata_) which may at once be distinguished by a
white globular silken bag about the size of a pea, in which she has
deposited her eggs, attached to the extremity of her body. Never
miser clung to his treasure with more tenacious solicitude than this
spider to her bag. Though apparently a considerable incumbrance, she
carries it with her every where. If you deprive her of it, she makes
the most strenuous efforts for its recovery; and no personal danger
can force her to quit the precious load. Are her efforts ineffectual?
A stupefying melancholy seems to seize her, and when deprived of this
first object of her cares, existence itself appears to have lost
its charms. If she succeeds in regaining her bag, or you restore it
to her, her actions demonstrate the excess of her joy. She eagerly
seizes it, and with the utmost agility runs off with it to a place
of security. Bonnet put this wonderful attachment to an affecting
and decisive test. He threw a spider with her bag into the cavern of
a large ant-lion, a ferocious insect which conceals itself at the
bottom of a conical hole constructed in the sand for the purpose
of catching any unfortunate victim that may chance to fall in. The
spider endeavoured to run away, but was not sufficiently active to
prevent the ant-lion from seizing her bag of eggs, which it attempted
to pull under the sand. She made the most violent efforts to defeat
the aim of her invisible foe, and on her part struggled with all her
might. The gluten, however, which fastened her bag, at length gave
way, and it separated: but the spider instantly regained it with
her jaws, and redoubled her efforts to rescue the prize from her
opponent. It was in vain: the ant-lion was the stronger of the two,
and in spite of all her struggles dragged the object of contestation
under the sand. The unfortunate mother might have preserved her own
life from the enemy: she had but to relinquish the bag, and escape
out of the pit. But, wonderful example of maternal affection! she
preferred allowing herself to be buried alive along with the treasure
dearer to her than her existence; and it was only by force that
Bonnet at length withdrew her from the unequal conflict. But the
bag of eggs remained with the assassin: and though he pushed her
repeatedly with a twig of wood, she still persisted in continuing on
the spot. Life seemed to have become a burthen to her, and all her
pleasures to have been buried in the grave which contained the germe
of her progeny[683]! The attachment of this affectionate mother is
not confined to her eggs. After the young spiders are hatched, they
make their way out of the bag by an orifice, which she is careful to
open for them, and without which they could never escape[684]; and
then, like the young of the Surinam toad (_Rana pipa_), they attach
themselves in clusters upon her back, belly, head, and even legs; and
in this situation, where they present a very singular appearance,
she carries them about with her and feeds them until their first
moult, when they are big enough to provide their own subsistence. I
have more than once been gratified by a sight of this interesting
spectacle; and when I nearly touched the mother, thus covered by
hundreds of her progeny, it was most amusing to see them all leap
from her back and run away in every direction.

A similar attachment to their eggs and young is manifested by many
other species of the same tribe, particularly of the genera _Lycosa_
and _Dolomeda_. _Clubiona holosericea_ was found by De Geer in her nest
with fifty or sixty young ones, when manifesting nothing of her usual
timidity, so obstinately did she persist in remaining with them, that
to drive her away it was necessary to cut her whole nest in pieces[685].

       *       *       *       *       *

I must now conduct you to a hasty survey of those insects which live
together in societies and fabricate dwellings for the community,
such as _ants_, _wasps_, _bees_, _humble-bees_, and _termites_,
whose great object (sometimes combined indeed with the storing up of
a stock of winter provisions for themselves) is the nutrition and
education of their young. Of the proceedings of many of these insects
we know comparatively nothing. There are, it is likely, some hundreds
of distinct species of bees which live in societies, and form nests
of a different and peculiar construction. The constitution of these
societies is probably as various as the exterior forms of their
nests, and their habits possibly curious in the highest degree; yet
our knowledge is almost confined to the economy of the hive-bee and
of some species of humble-bees. The same may be said of wasps, ants,
and termites, of which, though there is a vast variety of different
kinds, we are acquainted with the history of but a very few. You
will not therefore expect more than a sketch of the most interesting
traits of affection for their young, manifested by the common species
of each genus.

One circumstance must be premised with regard to the education
of the young of most of those insects which live in society,
truly extraordinary, and without parallel in any other department
of nature: namely, that this office, except under particular
circumstances, is not undertaken by the female which has given birth
to them, but by the workers, or neuters as they are sometimes called,
which, though bound to the offspring of the common mother of the
society by no other than fraternal ties, exhibit towards them all the
marks of the most ardent parental affection, building habitations
for their use, feeding them and tending them with incessant
solicitude, and willingly sacrificing their lives in defence of
the precious charge. Thus sterility itself is made an instrument
of the preservation and multiplication of species; and females too
fruitful to educate all their young, are indulged by Providence with
a privilege without which nine tenths of their progeny must perish.

The most determined despiser of insects and their concerns--he who
never deigned to open his eyes to any other part of their economy--must
yet have observed, even in spite of himself, the remarkable attachment
which the inhabitants of a disturbed nest of _ants_ manifest towards
certain small white oblong bodies with which it is usually stored.
He must have perceived that the ants are much less intently occupied
with providing for their own safety, than in carrying off these
little bodies to a place of security. To effect this purpose the whole
community is in motion, and no danger can divert them from attempting
its accomplishment. An observer having cut an ant in two, the poor
mutilated animal did not relax in its affectionate exertions. With that
half of the body to which the head remained attached, it contrived
previously to expiring to carry off ten of these white masses into the
interior of the nest! You will readily divine that these attractive
objects are the young of the ants in one of the first or imperfect
states. They are in fact not the eggs, as they are vulgarly called, but
the pupae, which the working ants tend with the most patient assiduity.
But I must give you a more detailed account of their operations,
beginning with the actual eggs.

These, which are so small as to be scarcely visible to the naked eye,
as soon as deposited by the queen ant, who drops them at random in
her progress through the nest, are taken charge of by the workers,
who immediately seize them and carry them in their mouths, in small
parcels, incessantly turning them backwards and forwards with their
tongue for the purpose of moistening them, without which they would
come to nothing. They then lay them in heaps, which they place in
separate apartments[686], and constantly tend until hatched into larvae;
frequently in the course of the day removing them from one quarter of
the nest to another, as they require a warmer or cooler, a moister or
drier atmosphere; and at intervals brooding over them as if to impart
a genial warmth[687]. Experiments have been made to ascertain whether
these assiduous nurses could distinguish their eggs if intermixed with
particles of salt and sugar, which to an ordinary observer they very
much resemble; but the result was constantly in favour of the sagacity
of the ants. They invariably selected the eggs from whatever materials
they were mixed with, and re-arranged them as before[688].

New and more severe labours succeed the birth of the young grubs
which are disclosed from the eggs after a few days. The working ants
are now almost without remission engaged in supplying their wants
and forwarding their growth. Every evening an hour before sunset
they regularly remove the whole brood, as well as the eggs and pupae,
which in an old nest all require attention at the same time, to cells
situated lower down in the earth, where they will be safe from the
cold; and in the morning they as constantly remove them again towards
the surface of the nest. If, however, there is a prospect of cold
or wet weather, the provident ants forbear on that day transporting
their young from the inner cells, aware that their tender frames are
unable to withstand an inclement sky. What is particularly worthy
of notice in this herculean task, the ants constantly regulate
their proceedings by the sun, removing their young according to the
earlier or later rising and setting of that luminary. As soon as his
first rays begin to shine on the exterior of the nest, the ants that
are at the top go below in great haste to rouse their companions,
whom they strike with their antennae, or, when they do not seem to
comprehend them, drag with their jaws to the summit till a swarm of
busy labourers fill every passage. These take up the larvae and pupae,
which they hastily transport to the upper part of their habitation,
where they leave them a quarter of an hour, and then carry them into
apartments where they are sheltered from the sun's direct rays[689].

Severe as this constant and unremitted daily labour seems, it is but
a small part of what the affection of the working ants leads them
readily to undertake. The _feeding_ of the young brood, which rests
solely upon them, is a more serious charge. The nest is constantly
stored with larvae the year round, during all which time, except
in winter when the whole society is torpid, they require feeding
several times a day with a viscid half-digested fluid that the
workers disgorge into their mouths, which when hungry they stretch
out to meet those of their nurses. Add to which, that in an old nest
there are generally two distinct broods of different ages requiring
separate attention; and that the observations of Huber make it
probable that at one period they require a more substantial food
than at another. It is true that the youngest brood at first want
but little nutriment: but still, when we consider that they must not
be neglected, that the older brood demand incessant supplies, and
in a well stocked nest amount to 7 or 8000; and that the task of
satisfying all these cravings, as well as providing for their own
subsistence, falls to the lot of the working ants, we are almost
ready to regard the burthen as greater than can be borne by such
minute agents; and we shall not wonder at the incessant activity with
which we see them foraging on every side.

Their labour does not end here. It is necessary that the larvae should
be kept extremely clean; and for this purpose the ants are perpetually
passing their tongue and mandibles over their body, rendering them by
this means perfectly white[690]. After the young grubs have attained
their full growth, they surround themselves with a silken cocoon and
become pupae, which, food excepted, require as much attention as in the
larva state. Every morning they are transported from the bottom of
the nest to the surface, and every evening returned to their former
quarters. And if, as is often the case, the nest be thrown into ruins
by the unlucky foot of a passing animal, in addition to all these
daily and hourly avocations, is superadded the immediate necessity of
collecting the pupae from the earth with which they have been mixed, and
of restoring the nest to its pristine state[691].

Nothing can be more curious than the view of the interior of a fully
peopled ants' nest in summer. In one part are stored the eggs; in
another the pupae are heaped up by hundreds in spacious apartments;
and in a third we see the larvae surrounded by the workers, some of
which feed them, while others keep guard, standing erect upon their
hind legs with their abdomen elevated in the position for ejaculating
their acid, than which, gunpowder would not be more formidable to
the majority of their foes. Some again are occupied in cleaning the
alleys from obstructions of various kinds; and others rest in perfect
repose recruiting their strength for new labours.

Contrary to what is observed amongst other insects, even the
extrication of the young ants from the silken cocoon which incloses
them is imposed upon the workers, who are taught by some sensation to
us incomprehensible, that the perfect insect is now ready to burst
from the shroud, but too weak to effect its purpose unaided. When
the workers discover that this period has arrived, a great bustle
prevails in their apartment. Three or four mount upon one cocoon,
and with their mandibles begin to open it where the head lies.
First they pull off a few threads to render the place thinner; they
then make several small openings, and with great patience cut the
threads which separate them one by one, till an orifice is formed
sufficiently large for extracting the prisoner; which operation they
perform with the utmost gentleness. The ant is still enveloped in
its pellicle; this the workers also pull off, carefully disengaging
every member from its case, and nicely expanding the wings of such
as are furnished with them. After thus liberating and afterwards
feeding the new-born insects, they still for several days watch and
follow them every where, teaching them to unravel the paths and
winding labyrinths of the common habitation[692]; and when the males
and females at length take flight, these affectionate stepmothers
accompany them, mounting with them to the summit of the highest
herbs, showing the most tender solicitude for them, (some even
endeavour to retain them,) feeding them for the last time, caressing
them; and at length, when they rise into the air and disappear,
seeming to linger for some seconds over the footsteps of these
favoured beings, of whom they have taken such exemplary care, and
whom they will never behold again[693].

In the above account, exclusive of the bare fact of their laying the
eggs, no mention is made of the female ants, the real parents of the
republic. You are not from this to suppose that they never feel the
influence of this divine principle of love for their offspring. When,
indeed, a colony is established and peopled, they have enough to do
to furnish it with eggs to produce its necessary supply of future
females, males and workers; which, according to Gould, are laid at
three different seasons[694]. This is the ordinary duty assigned to
them by Providence. Yet at the first formation of a nest, the female
acts the kind part, and performs all the maternal offices which I
have just described as peculiar to the workers; and it is only when
these become sufficiently numerous to relieve her, that she resigns
this charge and devotes herself exclusively to oviposition[695].

There is one circumstance occurring at this period of their history,
which affords a very affecting example of the self-denial and
self-devotion of these admirable creatures. If you have paid any
attention to what is going forward in an ant-hill, you will have
observed some larger than the rest, which at first sight appear,
as well as the workers, to have no wings, but which upon a closer
examination exhibit a small portion of their base, or the sockets
in which they were inserted. These are females that have cast their
wings, not accidentally but by a _voluntary_ act. When an ant of
this sex first emerges from the pupa, she is adorned with two pair
of wings, the upper or outer pair being larger than her body. With
these, when a virgin, she is enabled to traverse the fields of ether,
surrounded by myriads of the other sex, who are candidates for her
favour. But when once connubial rites are celebrated the unhappy
husband dies, and the widowed bride seeks only how she may provide
for their mutual offspring. Panting no more to join the choir of
aerial dancers, her only thought is to construct a subterranean
abode in which she may deposit and attend to her eggs, and cherish
her embryo young, till, having passed through their various changes,
they arrive at their perfect state, and she can devolve upon them a
portion of her maternal cares. Her ample wings, which before were
her chief ornament and the instruments of her pleasure, are now an
incumbrance which incommode her in the fulfilment of the great duty
uppermost in her mind; she therefore, without a moment's hesitation,
plucks them from her shoulders. Might we not then address females who
have families, in words like those of Solomon, "Go to the ant, ye
_mothers_, consider her ways and be wise"?

M. P. Huber was more than once witness to this proceeding. He saw one
female stretch her wings with a strong effort so as to bring them
before her head--she then crossed them in all directions--next she
reversed them alternately on each side--at last, in consequence of
some violent contortions, the four wings fell at the same moment in
his presence. Another, in addition to these motions, used her legs to
assist in the work[696].

Thus, from the very moment of the extrusion of the egg to the
maturity of the perfect insect, are the ants unremittingly occupied
in the care of the young of the society, and that with an ardour of
affectionate attachment to which, when its intensity and duration are
taken into the account, we may fairly say there is nothing parallel
in the whole animal world[697]. Amongst birds and quadrupeds we have
instances of affection as strong perhaps while it lasts, but how much
shorter the period during which it is exerted! In a month or two
the young of the former require no further attention; and if in a
state of nature some of the latter give suck to their offspring for
a longer period, it is on their parts without effort or labour; and
in both cases the time given up to their young forms a very small
part of the life of the animal. But the little insects in question
not only spend a greater portion of time in the education of their
progeny, but devote even the whole of their existence, from their
birth to their death, to this one occupation!

The common hive-bee and the wasp in their attention to their young
exhibit the same general features. Both build for their reception
hexagonal cells, differing in size according to the future sex of the
included grubs, which as soon as hatched they both feed and assiduously
tend until their transformation into pupae. There are peculiarities,
however, in their modes of procedure, which require a distinct notice.

The economy of a nest of _wasps_ differs from that of bees, in that
the eggs are laid not by a single mother or queen, but by several;
and that these mothers take the same care as the workers in feeding
the young grubs: indeed those first hatched are fed entirely by the
female which produced them, the solitary founder of the colony. The
sole survivor probably of a last year's swarm of many thousands,
this female, as soon as revived by the warmth of spring, proceeds
to construct a few cells, and deposits in them the eggs of working
wasps. The eggs are covered with a gluten, which fixes them so
strongly against the sides of the cells, that it is not easy to
separate them unbroken. These eggs seem to require care from the time
they are laid, for the wasps many times in a day put their heads into
the cells which contain them. When they are hatched, it is amusing to
witness the activity with which the female runs from cell to cell,
putting her head into those in which the grubs are very young, while
those that are more advanced in age thrust their heads out of their
cells, and by little movements seem to be asking for their food. As
soon as they receive their portion, they draw them back and remain
quiet. These she feeds until they become pupae; and within twelve
hours after being excluded in their perfect state, they eagerly set
to work in constructing fresh cells, and in lightening the burthen of
their parent by assisting her in feeding the grubs of other workers
and females which are by this time born. In a few weeks the society
will have received an accession of several hundred workers and many
females, which without distinction apply themselves to provide food
for the growing grubs, now become exceedingly numerous. With this
object in view, as they collect little or no honey from flowers,
they are constantly engaged in predatory expeditions. One party will
attack a hive of bees, a grocer's sugar hogshead, or other saccharine
repository; or, if these fail, the juice of a ripe peach or pear. You
will be less indignant than formerly, at these audacious robbers now
you know that self is little considered in their attacks, and that
your ravaged fruit has supplied an exquisite banquet to the most
tender grubs of the nest, into whose extended mouths the successful
marauders, running with astonishing agility from one cell to another,
disgorge successively a small portion of their booty in the same way
that a bird supplies her young[698]. Another party is charged with
providing more substantial aliment for the grubs of maturer growth.
These wage war upon bees, flies, and even the meat of a butcher's
stall, and joyfully return to the nest laden with the well-filled
bodies of the former, or pieces of the latter as large as they can
carry. This solid food they distribute in like manner to the larger
grubs, which may be seen eagerly protruding their heads out of the
cells to receive the welcome meal. As wasps lay up no store of food,
these exertions are the task of every day during the summer, fresh
broods of grubs constantly succeeding to those which have become pupae
or perfect insects; and in autumn, when the colony is augmented to 20
or 30,000, and the grubs in proportion, the scene of bustle which it
presents may be readily conceived.

Though such is the love of wasps for their young, that if their nest
be broken almost entirely in pieces they will not abandon it[699],
yet when the cold weather approaches, a melancholy change ensues,
followed by a cruel catastrophe, which at first you will be apt to
regard as ill comporting with this affectionate character. As soon
as the first sharp frost of October has been felt, the exterior
of a wasp's nest becomes a perfect scene of horror. The old wasps
drag out of the cells all the grubs and unrelentingly destroy
them, strewing their dead carcases around the door of their now
desolate habitation. "What monsters of cruelty!" I hear you exclaim,
"what detestable barbarians!" But be not too hasty. When you have
coolly considered the circumstances of the case, you will view this
seemingly cruel sacrifice in a different light. The old wasps have
no stock of provisions: the benumbing hand of Winter is about to
incapacitate them from exertion; while the season itself affords
no supply. What resource then is left? Their young must linger on
a short period, suffering all the agonies of hunger, and at length
expire. They have it in their power at least to shorten the term of
this misery--to cut off its bitterest moments. A sudden death by
their own hands is comparatively a merciful stroke. This is the only
alternative; and thus, in fact, this apparent ferocity is the last
effort of tender affection, active even to the end of life. I do not
mean to say that this train of reasoning actually passes through the
mind of the wasps. It is more correct to regard it as having actuated
the benevolent Author of the instinct so singularly, and without
doubt so wisely, excited. Were a nest of wasps to survive the winter,
they would increase so rapidly, that not only would all the bees,
flies, and other animals on which they prey, be extirpated, but man
himself find them a grievous pest. It is necessary, therefore, that
the great mass should annually perish; but that they may suffer as
little as possible, the Creator, mindful of the happiness of the
smallest of his creatures, has endowed a part of the society, at the
destined time, with the wonderful instinct which, previously to their
own death, makes them the executioners of the rest.

Wasps in the construction of their nests have solely in view the
accommodation of their young ones; and to these their cells are
exclusively devoted. _Bees_, on the contrary, (I am speaking of the
common hive-bee,) appropriate a considerable number of their cells to
the reception of honey intended for the use of the society. Yet the
education of the young brood is their chief object, and to this they
constantly sacrifice all personal and selfish considerations. In a
new swarm the first care is to build a series of cells to serve as
cradles; and little or no honey is collected until an ample store of
_bee-bread_, as it is called, has been laid up for their food. This
bee-bread is composed of the pollen of flowers, which the workers
are incessantly employed in gathering, flying from flower to flower,
brushing from the stamens their yellow treasure, and collecting it
in the little baskets with which their hind legs are so admirably
provided; then hastening to the hive, and having deposited their
booty, returning for a new load. The provision thus furnished by
one set of labourers is carefully stored up by another, until the
eggs which the queen-bee has laid, and which adhering by a glutinous
covering she places nearly upright in the bottom of the cell, are
hatched. With this bee-bread after it has undergone a conversion into
a sort of whitish jelly by being received into the bee's stomach,
where it is probably mixed with honey[700] and regurgitated, the
young brood immediately upon their exclusion, and until their change
into nymphs, are diligently fed by other bees, which anxiously attend
upon them and several times a day afford a fresh supply. Different
bees are seen successively to introduce their heads into the cells
containing them, and after remaining in that position some moments,
during which they replace the expended provision, pass on to those
in the neighbourhood. Others often immediately succeed, and in like
manner put in their heads as if to see that the young ones have
every thing necessary; which being ascertained by a glance, they
immediately proceed, and stop only when they find a cell almost
exhausted of food. That the office of these purveyors is no very
simple affair will be admitted, when it is understood that the food
of all the grubs is not the same, but that it varies according to
their age, being insipid when they are young, and, when they have
nearly attained maturity, more sugary and somewhat acid. The larvae
destined for queen-bees, too, require a food altogether different
from that appropriated to those of drones and workers. It may be
recognised by its sharp and pungent taste.

So accurately is the supply of food proportioned to the wants of the
larvae, that when they have attained their full growth and are ready
to become nymphs, not an atom is left unconsumed. At this period,
intuitively known to their assiduous foster-parents, they terminate
their cares by sealing up each cell with a lid of wax, convex in
those containing the larvae of drones, and nearly flat in those
containing the larvae of workers, beneath which the inclosed tenants
spin in security their cocoon.--In all these labours neither the
queen nor the drones take the slightest share. They fall exclusively
upon the workers, who, constantly called upon to tend fresh broods,
as those brought to maturity are disposed of, devote nearly the whole
of their existence to these maternal offices.

_Humble-bees_[701], which in respect of their general policy must,
when compared with bees and wasps, be regarded as rude and untutored
villagers, exhibit nevertheless marks of affection to their young
quite as strong as their more polished neighbours. The females, like
those of wasps, take a considerable share in their education. When
one of them has with great labour constructed a commodious waxen
cell, she next furnishes it with a store of pollen moistened with
honey; and then having deposited six or seven eggs, carefully closes
the orifice and minutest interstices with wax. But this is not the
whole of her task. By a strange instinct, which, however, may be
necessary to keep the population within due bounds, the workers,
while she is occupied in laying her eggs, endeavour to seize them
from her, and, if they succeed, greedily devour them. To prevent this
violence, her utmost activity is scarcely adequate; and it is only
after she has again and again beat off the murderous intruders and
pursued them to the furthest verge of the nest, that she succeeds
in her operation. When finished, she is still under the necessity
of closely guarding the cell, which the gluttonous workers would
otherwise tear open, and devour the eggs. This duty she performs for
six or eight hours with the vigilance of an Argus, at the end of
which time they lose their taste for this food, and will not touch it
even when presented to them. Here the labours of the mother cease,
and are succeeded by those of the workers. These know the precise
hour when the grubs have consumed their stock of food, and from
that time to their maturity regularly feed them with either honey or
pollen, introduced in their proboscis through a small hole in the
cover of the cell opened for the occasion and then carefully closed.

They are equally assiduous in another operation. As the grubs
increase in size the cell which contained them becomes too small,
and in their exertions to be more at ease they split its thin sides.
To fill up these breaches as fast as they occur with a patch of wax,
is the office of the workers, who are constantly on the watch to
discover when their services are wanted; and thus the cells daily
increase in size, in a way which to an observer ignorant of the
process seems very extraordinary.

The last duty of these affectionate foster-parents is to assist the
young bees in cutting open the cocoons which have inclosed them in
the state of _pupae_. A previous labour however must not be omitted.
The workers adopt similar measures with the hive-bee for maintaining
the young pupae concealed in these cocoons in a genial temperature. In
cold weather and at night they get upon them and impart the necessary
warmth by brooding over them in clusters. Connected with this part of
their domestic economy, M. P. Huber, a worthy scion of a celebrated
stock, and an inheritor of the science and merits of the great Huber
as well as of his name, in his excellent paper on these insects in
the sixth volume of the Linnean Transactions, from which most of
these facts are drawn, relates a singularly curious anecdote.

In the course of his ingenious and numerous experiments, M. Huber
put under a bell-glass about a dozen humble-bees without any store
of wax, along with a comb of about ten silken cocoons so unequal in
height that it was impossible the mass should stand firmly. Its
unsteadiness disquieted the humble-bees extremely. Their affection
for their young led them to mount upon the cocoons for the sake of
imparting warmth to the inclosed little ones, but in attempting
this the comb tottered so violently that the scheme was almost
impracticable. To remedy this inconvenience, and to make the comb
steady, they had recourse to a most ingenious expedient. Two or three
bees got upon the comb, stretched themselves over its edge, and with
their heads downwards fixed their fore feet on the table upon which
it stood, whilst with their hind feet they kept it from falling. In
this constrained and painful posture, fresh bees relieving their
comrades when weary, did these affectionate little insects support
the comb for nearly three days! At the end of this period they had
prepared a sufficiency of wax with which they built pillars that kept
it in a firm position: but by some accident afterwards these got
displaced, when they had again recourse to their former manoeuvre
for supplying their place, and this operation they perseveringly
continued until M. Huber, pitying their hard case, relieved them by
fixing the object of their attention firmly on the table[702].

It is impossible not to be struck with the reflection that this most
singular fact is inexplicable on the supposition that insects are
impelled to their operations by a blind instinct alone. How could
mere machines have thus provided for a case which in a state of
nature has probably never occurred to ten nests of humble-bees since
the creation? If in this instance these little animals were not
guided by a process of reasoning, what is the distinction between
reason and instinct? How could the most profound architect have
better adapted the means to the end--how more dexterously _shored_ up
a tottering edifice, until his beams and his props were in readiness?

With respect to the operations of the _termites_ in rearing their
young I have not much to observe. All that is known is, that they
build commodious cells for their reception, into which the eggs of
the queen are conveyed by the workers as soon as laid, and where
when hatched they are assiduously fed by them until they are able to
provide for themselves.

In concluding this subject, it may not be superfluous to advert to
an objection which is sometimes thrown out against regarding with
any particular sympathy the affection of the lower animals to their
young, on the ground that this feeling is in them the result of
corporeal sensation only, and wholly different from that love which
human parents feel for their offspring. It is true that the latter
involves moral considerations which cannot have place in the brute
creation; but it would puzzle such objectors to explain in what
respect the affection which a mother feels for her new-born infant
the moment it has seen the light, differs from that of an insect
for its progeny. The affection of both is purely physical, and in
each case springs from sensations interwoven by the Creator in the
constitution of his creatures. If the parental love of the former
is worthy of our tenderest sympathies, that of the latter cannot be
undeserving of some portion of similar feeling.

                                                  I am, &c.

FOOTNOTES:

[658] P. 147, &c.

[659] Clark in _Linn. Trans._ iii. 304.

[660] Bonnet, ii. 344.

[661] The Rev. Dr. Sutton of Norwich made similar observations upon the
proceedings of this insect in his garden for two successive seasons.

[662] Rai. _Hist. Ins._ 254.

[663] Reaum. vi. 252.

[664] By this term I would distinguish the tribe of _Fossores_
of Latreille, which the French call _Wasp-Ichneumons_, and which
form the Linnean genus _Sphex_, divisible into several families as
_Sphecidae_, _Pompilidae_, _Bembecidae_, &c.

[665] Mr. W. S. MacLeay in his very remarkable and learned work
(_Horae Entomologicae_) has very properly restored its name to the true
_Scarabaeus_ of the ancients, which gives its name to this group.

[666] Mouffet, 153.

[667] J. Pierii Valeriani _Hieroglyphica_, 93-5. Mouffet, 156.

[668] _Travels_, ii. 306. Compare M. Latreille's learned Memoir
entitled _Des Insectes peints ou sculptes sur les Monumens antiques
de l'Egypte_. _Ann. du Mus._ 1819.

[669] Gleditsch _Physic. Bot. Oecon. Abhandl._ iii. 200-227.

[670] _Natural Theology_, 497.

[671] Latreille denominates this tribe _Securifera_; but as the tool
of these insects resembles a _saw_ and not a _hatchet_, we have
ventured to change it to _Serrifera_, which is more appropriate.

[672] Prof. Peck's _Nat. Hist. of the Slug-worm_, _t._ 12. _f._
12-14. PLATE XV. FIG. 21.

[673] _Linn. Trans._ iii. 23.

[674] _Apis._ **. _c._ 2. [Greek: g]. K.

[675] PLATE XVI. FIG. 1.

[676] See Kirby in _Linn. Trans._ v. 254. _t._ 12. _f._ 15.

[677] See above, 150.

[678] Bonnet, ix. 398.

[679] liii. 37. _Pelopaeus spirifex?_

[680] Reaum. vi. 269.

[681] De Geer, iii. 262.

[682] De Geer, iii. 548.

[683] Bonnet, ii. 435.

[684] De Geer, vii. 194.

[685] De Geer, vii. 268.

[686] Huber, 69.

[687] De Geer, ii. 1099.

[688] Gould, 37.

[689] Huber, 74.

[690] Huber, 78.

[691] The Russian shepherds ingeniously avail themselves of the
attachment of ants to their young, for obtaining with little trouble
a collection of the pupae, which they sell as a dainty food for
nightingales. They scatter an ants' nest upon a dry plot of ground,
surrounded with a shallow trench of water, and place on one side
of it a few fir branches. Under these the ants, having no other
alternative, carefully arrange all their pupae, and in an hour or
two the shepherd finds a large heap clean and ready for market.
Anderson's _Recreations in Agriculture, &c._ iv. 158.

[692] Huber, 83.

[693] Ibid. 93.

[694] p. 35.

[695] Huber, 110.

[696] Huber, 109.--Gould had, long before Huber, observed that female
ants cast their wings, pp. 59, 62, 64. I have frequently observed
them, sometimes with only one wing, at others with only fragments of
the wings; and again, at others they were so completely pulled off,
that it could not be known that they formerly had them, only by the
sockets in which they were inserted.

[697] Huber, 93.

[698] See Willughby in Rai. _Hist. Ins._ 251. and Reaum.

[699] Reaum. vi. 174.

[700] It is not unlikely that it may undergo some other alteration
in the bee's stomach, which may possibly secrete some peculiar
substance, as John Hunter discovered that the crop of the pigeon does.

[701] Dr. Johnson was ignorant of the etymology of this word. It is
clearly derived from the German _Hummel_ or _Hummel Biene_, a name
probably given it from its sound. Our English name would be more
significant were it altered to _Humming-bee_ or _Booming-bee_.

[702] _Linn. Trans._ vi. 247 &c.




                              LETTER XII.

                       _ON THE FOOD OF INSECTS._


Insects like other animals draw their _food_ from the vegetable and
animal kingdoms; but a very slight survey will suffice to show that
they enjoy a range over far more extensive territories.

To begin with the vegetable kingdom.--Of this vast field the larger
animals are confined to a comparatively small portion. Of the
thousands of plants which clothe the face of the earth, when we have
separated the grasses and a trifling number of herbs and shrubs,
the rest are disgusting to them, if not absolute poisons. But how
infinitely more plenteous is the feast to which Flora invites the
insect tribes! From the gigantic banyan which covers acres with its
shade, to the tiny fungus scarcely visible to the naked eye, the
vegetable creation is one vast banquet at which her insect guests
sit down. Perhaps not a single plant exists which does not afford a
delicious food to some insect, not excluding even those most nauseous
and poisonous to other animals--the acrid euphorbias, and the lurid
henbane and nightshade. Nor is it a presumptuous supposition that a
considerable proportion of these vegetables were created expressly
for their entertainment and support. The common nettle is of little
use either to mankind or the larger animals, but you will not doubt
its importance to the class of insects, when told that at least
thirty distinct species feed upon it. But this is not all. The larger
herbivorous animals are confined to a foliaceous or farinaceous diet.
They can subsist on no other part of a plant than its leaves and
seeds, either in a recent or dried state, with the addition sometimes
of the tender twigs or bark. Not so the insect race; to different
tribes of which every part of a plant supplies appropriate food. Some
attack its roots; others select the trunk and branches; a third class
feed upon the leaves; a fourth with yet more delicate appetite prefer
the flowers; and a fifth the fruit or seeds. Even still further
selection takes place. Of those which feed upon the roots, stem,
and branches, of vegetables, some larvae eat only the bark (_Sesia
apiformis_, &c.), others the alburnum (_Semasia Woeberana_), others
the exuding resinous or other excretions (_Scoparia Resinella_), a
third class the pith (_Xanthia Ochraceago_), and a fourth penetrate
into the heart of the solid wood (_Prionus_, _Lamia_, _Cerambyx_,
&c.). Of those which prefer the leaves, some taste nothing but the
sap which fills their veins (_Aphides_ in all their states), others
eat only the parenchyma, never touching the cuticle (subcutaneous
_Tineae_, _Gracillaria?_) others only the lower surface of the
leaf (many _Tortrices_), while a fourth description devour the
whole substance of the leaf (most _Lepidoptera_). And of the
flower-feeders, while some eat the very petals (_Cucullia Verbasci_,
_Xylina Linariae_, &c.), others in their perfect state select the
pollen which swells the anthers (bees, _Lepturae_, and _Mordellae_),
and a still larger class of these the honey secreted in the nectaries
(most of the _Lepidoptera_, _Hymenoptera_, and _Diptera_).

Nor are insects confined to vegetables in their recent or
unmanufactured state. A beam of oak when it has supported the roof
of a castle five hundred years, is as much to the taste of some,
(_Anobia_,) as the same tree was in its growing state to that of
others; another class (_Ptini_) would sooner feast on the herbarium
of Brunfelsius, than on the greenest herbs that grow; and a third
(_Tineae_, _Termites_), to whom

          "... a river and a sea
           Are a dish of tea,
           And a kingdom bread and butter,"

would prefer the geographical treasures of Saxton or Speed, in spite
of their ink and alum, to the freshest rind of the flax plant.--The
larva of a little fly (_Oscinis cellaris_), whose economy, as I
can witness from my own observations, is admirably described by
Mentzelius[703], disdains to feed on any thing but wine or beer,
which like Boniface in the play it may be said both to eat and drink,
though, unlike its toping counterpart, indifferent to the age of its
liquor, which whether sweet or sour is equally acceptable.

A diversity of food almost as great may be boasted by the insects which
feed on animal substances. Some (flesh-flies, carrion-beetles, &c.)
devour dead carcases only, which they will not touch until imbued with
the _haut gout_ of putridity. Others, like Mr. Bruce's Abyssinians,
preferring their meat before it has passed through the hands of the
butcher, select it from living victims, and may with justice pride
themselves upon the peculiar freshness of their diet. Of these last,
different tribes follow different procedures. The Ichneumons devour
the flesh of the insects into which they have insinuated themselves.
Some of the Oestri, fixed in a spacious apartment beneath the skin of
an ox or deer, regale themselves on a purulent secretion with which
they are surrounded. Others of the same tribe, partial to a higher
temperature, attach themselves to the interior of the stomach of a
horse, and in a bath of chyme of 102 degrees of Fahrenheit revel
on its juices. The various species of horse-flies dart their sharp
lancets into the veins of quadrupeds, and satiate themselves in living
streams; while the gnat, the flea, the bug, and the louse, plunge their
proboscis even into those of us lords of the creation, and banquet
on "the ruddy drops which warm our hearts." Some make their repast
upon birds only, as the fly of the swallow, and other _Ornithomyiae_,
and the bird-louse; insects nearly allied, though one is dipterous
and the other apterous. And a most singular animal belonging to the
latter tribe (_Nycteribia Vespertilionis_) revenges upon the bat its
ravages of the insect world[704]. Another numerous class kill their
prey outright, either devouring its solid parts, as the predaceous
and rove-beetles, &c., or imbibing its juices only, as the infinite
hordes of the field-bug tribe. And the larvae of the gnat, chameleon
(_Stratyomis_), and other flies aquatic in that state, the leviathans
of the world of animalcules, swallow whole hosts of these minute
inhabitants of pools and ponds at a gulp, causing with their oral
apparatus a vortex in the water, down which myriads of victims are
incessantly hurried into their destructive maw.

But not only animals themselves, almost every animal substance that can
be named is the appropriate food of some insect. Multitudes find a
delicious nutriment in excrements of various kinds. Matters apparently
so indigestible as hair, wool, and leather, are the sole food of many
moths in the larva state (_Tinea tapetzella_, _pellionella_, &c.).
Even feathers are not rejected by others; and the grub of a beetle
(_Anthrenus Musaeorum_), with powers of stomach which the dyspeptic
sufferer may envy, will live luxuriously upon horn[705].

For the most part, insects feeding upon animal substances will not
touch vegetables, and _vice versa_. You must not however take the
rule without exceptions. Many caterpillars (as those of _Thyatira
derasa_, _Chariclea Delphinii_, &c.), though plants are their proper
food, will occasionally devour other caterpillars, and sometimes
even their own species. The large green grasshopper (_Acrida
viridissima_), and probably others of the order, will eat smaller
insects as well as its usual vegetable food[706]; so also will the
larvae of many _Phryganeae_. _Allantus marginellus_, as I was last
summer amused by witnessing, like many _Scatophagae_, sips the nectar
of umbelliferous plants only till a fly comes within its reach,
pouncing upon which it gladly quits its vegetable for an animal
repast. _Anobium paniceum_, which ordinarily feeds upon wood, was,
as I before mentioned, once found by Mr. Sheppard in great abundance
living upon the dried Cantharides (_Cantharis vesicatoria_) of the
shops. On the other hand, _Necrophorus mortuorum_, which subsists on
carcases, and many other carnivorous species, will make a hearty meal
of a putrid fungus; _Ptinus Fur_ devours indifferently dried birds or
plants, not refusing even tobacco; and from the impossibility that
one of a million of the innumerable swarms of gnats which abound in
swampy places, particularly in regions which but for them would be
lost to sensitive existence, should ever taste blood, it seems clear
that they are usually contented with vegetable aliment. Indeed the
males, as well as those of the horse-fly of which even the females
readily imbibed the sugared fluid offered to them by Reaumur[707],
never suck blood at all; so that they must either feed on vegetable
matter, which in fact I have observed them to do, or fast during
their whole existence in the perfect state.

Though insects, generally considered, have thus a much more extensive
bill of fare than the larger animals, each individual species is
commonly limited to a more restricted diet. Many both of animal and
vegetable feeders are absolutely confined to one kind of food, and
cannot exist upon any other. The larva of _Gasterophilus Equi_ can
subsist no where but in the stomach of the horse or ass, which animals
therefore this insect might boast with some show of reason to have been
created for its use rather than for ours, being to us useful only,
but to it indispensable. The larvae of _Syrphus Pyrastri_ according to
De Geer eat no other Aphis but that of the rose[708]. Most Ichneumons
and _Sphecina_ prey each upon a single species of insect only, which
therefore they would seem to have been formed for the express purpose
of keeping within due limits. Reaumur mentions having once found in a
parcel of decaying wood the nests of six different kinds of the latter
tribe, each of which was filled with flies of a distinct species[709].
_Cerceris auritus_ and _Philanthus laetus_ in the larva state feed
solely on the weevil tribe of _Coleoptera_, the latter being restricted
even to the short-rostrum'd family, as _Otiorhynchus raucus_,
&c.[710], while _Bembex rostrata_, another hymenopterous insect,
selects flies, as _Musca Caesar_, &c.[711]

A very large proportion of species, however, are able to subsist
on several kinds of food. Amongst the carnivorous tribes, it is
indifferent to most of those which prey upon putrid substances from
what source they have been derived: and the predaceous insects, such
as the _Libellulina_, _Telephorus_, _Empis_, the _Araneidae_, &c.
will attack most smaller insects inferior to them in strength, not
excepting in many instances their own species. The wax-moth larva
(_Galleria Cereana_) will for want of wax eat paper, wafers, wool,
&c.[712]: another Tinea described by Reaumur, and before adverted
to, attacks chocolate[713], which cannot have been its natural
food, even selecting that most highly perfumed; and the Tineae which
devour dressed wool, but happily for the farmer and wool-stapler
refuse it when unwashed, must have existed when no manufactured
wool was accessible.--The vegetable feeders are under greater
restrictions, yet probably the majority can subsist on different
kinds of food. This is certainly true of most lepidopterous larvae,
several of which as well as many _Coleoptera_ (_Haltica oleracea_,
&c.) are polyphagous, eating almost every plant. It is worthy of
remark, however, that when some of these have fed for a time on one
plant they will die rather than eat another, which would have been
perfectly acceptable to them if accustomed to it from the first[714].
Here too it must be borne in mind, that by far the greater part of
insects feed upon different substances in their different states of
existence, eating one kind of food in the larva and another in the
imago state. This is the case with the whole Order _Lepidoptera_,
which in the former eat plants chiefly, in the latter nothing but
honey or the sweet juices of fruit, which they have often been
observed to imbibe; and the same rule obtains also in regard to most
dipterous and hymenopterous insects. Those which eat one kind of food
in both states, are chiefly of the remaining orders.

I have said that insects, like other animals, draw their subsistence
from the vegetable or animal kingdoms. But I ought not to omit
noticing that some authors have conceived that several species feed
upon mineral substances[715]. Not to dwell upon Barchewitz's idle
tale of East Indian ants which eat iron[716], or on the stone-eating
caterpillars recorded in the Memoirs of the French Academy[717],
which are now known to erode the walls on which they are found,
solely for the purpose of forming their cocoons; Reaumur and
Swammerdam have both stated the food of the larvae of _Ephemerae_ to
be earth, that being the only substance ever found in their stomachs
and intestines, which are filled with it. This supposition, which
if correct renders invalid the definition by which Mirbel (and my
friend Dr. Alderson of Hull long before him) proposed to distinguish
the animal and vegetable kingdoms, is certainly not inadmissible;
for, though we might not be inclined to give much weight to
Father Paulian's history of a flint-eater who digested flints and
stone[718], the testimony of Humboldt seems to prove that the human
race is capable of drawing nutriment from earth, which, if the
odious Ottomaques can digest and assimilate, may doubtless afford
support to the larvae of Ephemerae. Yet after all it is perhaps more
probable that these insects feed on the decaying vegetable matter
intermixed with the earth in which they reside, from which after
being swallowed it is extracted by the action of the stomach: like
the sand that, from being found in a similar situation, Borelli
erroneously supposed to be the food of many _Testacea_, though in
fact a mere extraneous substance.

The majority of insects, either imbibing their food in a liquid
state, or feeding on succulent substances, require no aqueous fluid
for diluting it. Water, however, is essential to bees, ants, and
some other tribes, which drink it with avidity; as well as in warm
climates to many _Lepidoptera_, which are there chiefly taken in
court yards, near the margins of drains, &c. Even some larvae which
feed upon juicy leaves have been observed to swallow drops of dew;
and one of them (_Odenestis potatoria_), which (according to Goedart)
after drinking lifts up its head like a hen, has received its name
from this circumstance. That it is not the mere want of succulency in
the food which induces the necessity of drink, is plain from those
larvae which live entirely on substances so dry that it is almost
unaccountable whence the juices of their body are derived. The grub
of an Anobium will feed for months upon a chair that has been baking
before the fire for half a century, and from which even the chemist's
retort could scarcely extract a drop of moisture; and will yet have
its body as well filled with fluids as that of a leaf-fed caterpillar.

By far the greater part of insects always feed themselves. The
young however of those which live in societies, as the hive- and
humble-bees, wasps, ants, &c. are fed by the older inhabitants of the
community, which also frequently feed each other. Many of these last
insects are distinguished from the majority of their race, which live
from day to day and take no thought for the morrow, by the circumstance
of storing up food. Of those which feed themselves, the larger
proportion have imposed upon them the task of providing for their
own wants; but the tribe of Spheges, wild bees, and some others, are
furnished in the larva state by the parent insect with a supply of food
sufficient for their consumption until they have attained maturity.

As to their _time_ of feeding, insects may be divided into three
great classes: the day-feeders, the night-feeders, and those which
feed indifferently at all times. You have been apt to think, I dare
say, that when the sun's warmer beams have waked the insect youth, and

          "Ten thousand forms, ten thousand different tribes,
           People the blaze,"

you see before you the whole insect world. You are not aware that a
host as numerous shun the glare of day, and, like the votaries of
fashion, rise not from their couch until their more vulgar brethren
have retired to rest. While the painted butterfly, the "fervent
bees," and the quivering nations of flies, which sport

          "Thick in yon stream of light, a thousand ways,
           Upward and downward thwarting and convolved,"

love to bask in the sun's brightest rays, and search for their food
amidst his noon-tide fervor, an immense multitude stir not before the
sober time of twilight, and eat only when night has overshadowed the
earth. Then only, the vast tribe of moths quit their hiding-places;
"the shard-born[719] beetle with his drowsy hum," accompanied by
numerous others of his order, sallies forth; the airy gnat-flies
institute their dances; and the solitary spider stretches his net.
All these retire into concealment at the approach of light.--Some
few larvae (_Agrotis exclamationis_, &c.) have similar habits, and
those of one singular genus before adverted to (_Nycterobius_) are
remarkable for providing in the night a store of food which they
consume in the day; but to the generality of these the period of
feeding is indifferent, and most of them seem to eat with little
intermission night and day.

Insects like other animals take in their food by the mouth (in
_Chermes_ and _Coccus_, indeed, the rostrum seems to be, but really
is not, inserted in the breast, between the fore-legs), but there is
one exception to this rule. The singular _Uropoda vegetans_, which
is such a plague to some beetles, derives its nutriment from them by
means of a filiform pedicle or umbilical cord attached to its anus;
and what increases the singularity, sometimes several of these mites
form a kind of chain, of which the first only is fixed by its pedicle
to the beetle, each of the remainder being similarly connected with
the one that precedes it; so that the nutriment drawn from the beetle
passes to the last through the bodies and umbilical cords of the
individuals which are intermediate[721]. Some have regarded these
bodies as true eggs; and their analogy with the pedunculated eggs of
_Trombidium aquaticum_, which also seem to derive nourishment from
the water-boatmen, &c. to which they are fixed, and still more the
circumstance of their ultimately losing their pedicle and detaching
themselves from the infested beetles, give plausibility to the
idea. Yet these animals are certainly furnished with feet, and have
according to De Geer[722] a part resembling a mouth--characters which
cannot be attributed to any egg.

In the variety of their instruments of nutrition, which you must
bear in mind are often quite different in the larva and perfect
states, insects leave all other animals far behind. In common with
them, a vast number (the orders _Coleoptera_, _Hymenoptera_, and
_Orthoptera_, and the larvae of _Lepidoptera_, some _Diptera_, &c.)
are furnished with jaws, but of very different constructions, and
all admirably adapted for their intended services; some sharp, and
armed with spines and branches for tearing flesh; others hooked for
seizing, and at the same time hollow for suction; some calculated
like shears for gnawing leaves; others more resembling grindstones,
of a strength and solidity sufficient to reduce the hardest wood
to powder: and this singularity attends the major part of these
insects, that they possess in fact two pairs of jaws, an upper and
an under pair, both placed horizontally, not vertically, the former
apparently in most cases for the seizure and mastication of their
prey; the latter, when hooked, for retaining and tearing, while the
upper comminute it previously to its being swallowed[723].

To the remainder of the class of insects, a mighty host, jaws would
have been useless. Their refined liquid food requires instruments
of a different construction, and with these they are profusely
furnished. The innumerable tribes of moths and butterflies eat
nothing but the honey secreted in the nectaries of flowers, which are
frequently situated at the bottom of a tube of great length. They
are accordingly provided with an organ exquisitely fitted for its
office--a slender tubular tongue, more or less long, sometimes not
shorter than three inches, but spirally convoluted when at rest, like
the main spring of a watch, into a convenient compass. This tongue,
which they have the power of instantly unrolling, they dart into the
bottom of a flower, and, as through a siphon, draw up a supply of the
delicious nectar on which they feed. A letter would scarcely suffice
for describing fully the admirable structure of this organ. I must
content myself therefore with here briefly observing that it is of
a cartilaginous substance, and apparently composed of a series of
innumerable rings, which, to be capable of such rapid convolution,
must be moved by an equal number of distinct muscles; and that,
though seemingly simple, it is in fact composed of three distinct
tubes, the two lateral ones cylindrical and entire, intended, as
Reaumur thinks, for the reception of air; and the intermediate one,
through which alone the honey is conveyed, nearly square, and formed
of two separate grooves projecting from the lateral tubes; which
grooves, by means of a most curious apparatus of hooks like those
in the laminae of a feather, inosculate into each other, and can be
either united into an air-tight canal, or be instantly separated, at
the pleasure of the insect[724].

Another numerous race, the whole of the order _Hemiptera_, abstract
the juices of plants or of animals by means of an instrument of a
construction altogether different--a hollow grooved beak, often
jointed, and containing three bristle-formed lancets, which, at
the same time that they pierce the food, apply to each other so
accurately as to form one air-tight tube, through which the little
animals suck up[725] their repast; thus, forming a pump, which, more
effective than ours, digs the well from which it draws the fluid[726].

A third description of insects, those of the order _Diptera_,
comprising the whole tribe of flies, have a sucker formed on the same
general plan as that last described, but of a much more complicated
and varied structure. It is in like manner composed of a grooved case
and several included lancets; but the case, although horny, rigid and
beak-like in some, is in others fleshy, flexible, and more resembling
the proboscis of an elephant, and terminates in two turgid liplets: and
the accompanying lancets are themselves included in an upper hollow
case, in connexion with which they probably compose an air-tight tube
for suction. The number and form of these instruments is extremely
various. In some genera (_Musca_) there is but one, which resembles a
sharp lancet. Others (_Empis_, _Asilus_,) have three, the two lateral
ones needle-shaped, that in the middle like a scymetar; together
forming so keen an apparatus, that De Geer has seen an Asilus pierce
with it the elytra of a lady-bird; and I have myself caught them with
not only an _Elater_ and weevil, but even a _Hister_ in their mouths.
In many horse-flies we find four; two precisely resembling lancets,
and two, even to the very handles, buck-hafted carving-knives[727].
The blood-thirsty gnat has five, some acutely lanced at the extremity,
and others serrated on one side. The flea, the spider, the scorpion
have all instruments for taking their food of a construction altogether
different[728]. But it is impossible here to attempt even a sketch of
the variations in these organs which take place in the apterous genera,
and in many of the dipterous larvae. Suffice it to say that they all
manifest the most consummate skill in their adaptation to the purposes
of the insects which are provided with them, and which can often employ
them not only as instruments for preparing food, but as weapons of
offence and defence, as tools in the building of their nests, and even
as feet.

Some insects in their perfect state, though furnished with organs of
feeding, make no use of them, and consume no food whatever. Of this
description are the moth which proceeds from the silk-worm, and
several others of the same order; the different species of gad-flies,
and the Ephemerae, insects whose history is so well known as to afford
a moral or a simile to those most ignorant of natural history. All
these live so short a time in the perfect state as to need no food.
Indeed it may be laid down as a general rule, that almost all insects
in this state eat much less than in that of larvae. The voracious
caterpillar when transformed into a butterfly needs only a small
quantity of honey; and the gluttonous maggot, when become a fly,
contents itself with a drop or two of any sweet liquid.

While in the state of larvae the quantity of food consumed by insects
is vastly greater in proportion to their bulk than that required by
larger animals. Many caterpillars eat daily twice their weight of
leaves, which is as if an ox, weighing sixty stone, were to devour
every twenty-four hours three quarters of a ton of grass--a power
of stomach which our graziers may thank their stars that their oxen
are not endowed with. A probable proximate cause for this voracity
in the case of herbivorous larvae has been assigned by John Hunter,
who attributes it to the circumstance of their stomach not having
the power of dissolving the vegetable matters received into it, but
merely of extracting from them a juice[729]. This is proved both by
their excrement, which consists of coiled-up and hardened particles
of leaf, that being put into water expand like tea; and by the
great proportion which the excrement bears to the quantity of food
consumed. From experiments, with a detail of which he has favoured
me, made by Colonel Machell on the caterpillars of _Euprepia Caja_,
he ascertained that, though a larva weighing thirty-six grains
voided every twelve hours from fifteen to eighteen grains weight of
excrement, it did not increase in weight in the same period more than
one or two grains. On the other hand, many carnivorous larvae increase
in weight in full proportion to the food consumed, and that in an
astonishing degree. Redi found that the maggots of flesh-flies, of
which one day, twenty-five or thirty did not weigh above a grain,
the next weighed seven grains each; having thus in twenty-four hours
become about two hundred times heavier than before[730].

Some insects have the faculty of sustaining a long abstinence from all
kinds of food. This seems to depend upon the nature of their habits. If
the insect feeds on a substance of a deficiency of which there is not
much probability, as on vegetables, &c. it commonly requires a frequent
supply. If, on the contrary, it is an insect of prey, and exposed to
the danger of being long deprived of its food, it is often endowed with
a power of fasting, which would be incredible but for the numerous
facts by which it is authenticated. The ant-lion will exist without the
smallest supply of food, apparently uninjured, for six months; though,
when it can get it, it will devour daily an insect of its own size.
Vaillant, whose authority may be here taken, assures us that he kept
a spider without food under a sealed glass for ten months, at the end
of which time, though shrunk in size, it was as vigorous as ever[731].
And Mr. Baker, so well known for his microscopical discoveries, states
that he kept a darkling beetle (_Blaps mortisaga_) alive for three
years without food of any kind[732]. Some insects, not of a predaceous
description, are gifted with a similar power of abstinence. Leeuwenhoek
tells us that a mite, which he had gummed alive to the point of a
needle and placed before his microscope, lived in that situation eleven
weeks[733].

In some cases the very want of food, however paradoxical the
proposition, seems actually to be a mean of prolonging the life
of insects. At least one such instance has fallen under my own
observation. The aphidivorous flies, such as _Syrphus Pyrastri_, &c.
live in the larva state ten or twelve days, in the pupa state about a
fortnight, and as perfect insects sometimes possibly as long--the whole
term of their existence in summer not exceeding at the very utmost
six weeks. But one[734], which I put under a glass on the 2d of June,
1811, when about half grown, and, after supplying it with Aphides once
or twice, by accident forgot, I found to my great astonishment alive
three months after; and it actually lived until the June following
without a particle of food. It had therefore existed in the larva
state more than eight times as long as it would have lived in all its
states, if it had regularly undergone its metamorphoses--which is as
extraordinary a prolongation of life as if a man were to live 560
years. It is true that its existence was not worth having even to the
larva of a fly. For the last eight months it remained without motion,
attached by its posterior pair of tubercles to the paper on which it
was placed, manifesting no other symptoms of life than by moving the
fore part of the body when touched, and replacing itself on its belly
if turned upon its back. But this was quite enough to prove it still
alive.--I can attribute this singular result to no other circumstance
than its having been deprived of a sufficient quantity of food to bring
it into the pupa state, though provided with enough for the attainment
of nearly its full growth as larva. Possibly the same remote cause
might act in this case, as operates to prolong the term of existence of
annual plants that have been prevented from perfecting their seed; and
it would almost seem to favour the hypothesis of some physiologists,
who contend that every organised being has a certain portion of
irritability originally imparted to it, and that its life will be long
or short as this is slowly or rapidly excited--no great consolation
this for the advocates for fast-living, unless they are in good earnest
in their affected preference of a "short life and a merry one:" though
it must be admitted that they would have the best of the argument were
the alternative such a state of torpid insensibility as that with which
our larva purchased the prolongation of its existence.

       *       *       *       *       *

After this general view of the food of insects, and of circumstances
connected with it, I proceed to give you an account of some
peculiarities in their modes of procuring it.

The vegetable feeders have for the most part but little difficulty
in supplying their wants. In the larva state they generally find
themselves placed by the parent insect upon the very plant or
substance which is to nourish them: and in their perfect state their
wings or feet afford a ready conveyance to the banquet to which by an
unerring sense they are directed. All nature lies before them, and
it is only when their numbers are extraordinarily increased, or in
consequence of some unusual destruction of their appropriate aliment,
that they perish for want. The description of their food renders
unnecessary those artifices to which many of the carnivorous insects
are obliged to have recourse: and none of them, if we except the
white-ants, whose cunning mode of insinuating themselves into houses
in tropical climates has been detailed in a former letter, can be
said to use stratagem in obtaining their food.

Of the carnivorous species, the greater proportion attack their prey
by open violence, such as the predaceous beetles, the Ichneumons,
burrowing wasps, and true wasps; the praying insects (_Mantis_);
the bugs (_Geocorisae_ Latr.); dragon-flies (_Libellulina_), &c.;
which have been before adverted to. But a very considerable number,
chiefly, however, of one tribe, that of spiders, provide their
sustenance solely by artifice and stratagem, the singularity of
which, and the admirable adaptation of the instruments by which they
take their prey to the end in view, afford a most wonderful instance
of the power and wisdom of the Creator, and have attracted admiration
in all ages. A description of these, however, which will require a
detailed survey, I must refer to another letter.

                                                  I am, &c.

FOOTNOTES:

[703] _Ephem. German. An._ xii. _Obs._ 58. Rai. _Hist. Ins._ 261.

[704] _Linn. Trans._ xi. 11. _t._ 3. _f._ 5-7.

[705] De Geer, iv. 210.

[706] Brahm, _Insekten Kalender_, i. 190.

[707] Reaum. iv. 280.

[708] De Geer, vi. 112.

[709] Reaum. vi. 271.

[710] _Entomologische Bemerkungen_ (Braunschweig 1799), p. 6.

[711] Latreille, _Obs. sur les Hymenopteres_. _Ann. de Mus._ xiv. 412.

[712] Reaum. iii. 257.

[713] Ibid. iii. 277.

[714] Ibid. ii. 324.

[715] For an instance in which an insect, usually subsisting upon
animal food, derived nutriment from a mineral substance, see _Philos.
Magaz._ &c. for January 1823. 2--.

[716] Lesser, _L._ i. 259.

[717] x. 458.

[718] _Dictionnaire Physique._

[719] In the controversy between the commentators on Shakespeare,
as to whether _shard_[720] means wing-cases, dung, or a fragment of
earthenware, and whether _born_ should be spelled with or without
the _e_, it might have thrown some weight into the scale of those
who contend for the orthography adopted above, and that the meaning
of _shard_ in this place is dung, if they had been aware that the
beetle (_Geotrupes stercorarius_) is actually _born_ amongst dung,
and no where else; and that no beetle which makes a hum in flying can
with propriety be said, as Dr. Johnson has interpreted the epithet
in his Dictionary, "to be born amongst broken stones or pots."
That Shakespeare alluded to the Beetle, and not to the Cockchafer
(_Melolontha vulgaris_), seems clear from the fact of the former
being to be heard in all places almost every fine evening in the
summer, while the latter is common only in particular districts, and
at one period of the year. S.

[720] _Sharn_ is the common name of cow-dung in the North: therefore
Shakespeare probably wrote _sharn_-born. _Mr. MacLeay._

[721] De Geer, vii. 123.

[722] Id. ibid. 126.

[723] PLATE VI. FIG. 4, 5. 10, 11. 24-26.

[724] For a full description of this instrument see Reaum. i. 125,
&c. PLATE VI. FIG. 13.

[725] The mode, however, in which this is effected in all insects
furnished with a proboscis, can scarcely be by suction, strictly so
called, or the abstraction of air, since the air-vessels of insects
do not communicate with their mouths: it is more probably performed
in part by capillary attraction; and, as Lamarck has suggested,
(_Syst. des Anim. sans Vertebres_, p. 193.) in part by a succession
of undulations and contractions of the sides of the organ.

[726] PLATE VI. FIG. 16-19.

[727] PLATE VII. FIG. 5.

[728] PLATE VII. FIG. 8. 10.

[729] _Obs. on the Animal Oeconomy_, p. 221. Compare Reaum. ii. 167.

[730] Redi _de Insectis_, 39.

[731] _New Travels_, i. xxxix.

[732] _Phil. Trans._ 1740, p. 441. I confess, notwithstanding Mr.
Baker's general accuracy, that I suspect some mistake here.

[733] Leeuw. _Op._ ii. 363.

[734] Not having ever met with another specimen, I am unable to say
of what precise species of aphidivorous fly it is the larva, nor can
I find a figure of it, though it approaches near to one given by De
Geer (vi. _t._ 7. _f._ 1-3). Its shape is oblong-oval, length about
four lines, and colour pale red speckled with black. Each of the
seven or eight segments which compose the body projects on each side
into three serrated flat aculei or teeth; three or four similar but
smaller aculei arm the head: and two, much larger than the rest, the
anus, one on each side of the usual bifid protuberance which bears
the respiratory plates. A bifid tubercular elevation is also placed
in the middle of the back of each segment.




                              LETTER XIII.

                      _FOOD OF INSECTS CONTINUED._

                  STRATAGEMS EMPLOYED IN PROCURING IT.


The _stratagems_ of insects in obtaining their food are now to engage
our attention. I shall not dwell on those inartificial modes of
surprising their prey, of which examples may be found amongst almost
every order of insects, such as watching behind a leaf or other
object affording concealment until its approach; but shall proceed to
describe the various artifices of the race of spiders, of which there
are several hundred distinct species differing essentially from each
other both in characters and manners.

Many of these are constantly under our eyes; and were it not that we
are accustomed to neglect what is the subject of daily occurrence,
we should never behold a spider's web without astonishment. What,
if we had not witnessed it, would seem more incredible than that
any animal should spin threads; weave these threads into nets more
admirable than ever fowler or fisherman fabricated; suspend them with
the nicest judgement in the place most abounding in the wished-for
prey; and there concealed watch patiently its approach? In this case,
as in so many others, we neglect actions in minute animals, which
in the larger would excite our endless admiration. How would the
world crowd to see a fox which should spin ropes, weave them into
an accurately-meshed net, and extend this net between two trees for
the purpose of entangling a flight of birds? Or should we think we
had ever expressed sufficient wonder at seeing a fish which obtained
its prey by a similar contrivance? Yet there would, in reality, be
nothing more marvellous in their procedures than in those of spiders,
which, indeed, the minuteness of the agent renders more wonderful.

All spiders do not spin webs. A considerable number adopt other
means for catching insects. Of these I shall speak hereafter. At
present I shall endeavour to give you a clear idea of the operations
of the _weavers_, explaining successively the instruments by which
they spin--the mode of forming their nets, together with the various
descriptions of them--and the manner in which they entrap and secure
their prey.

The thread spun by spiders is in substance similar to the silk of
the silk-worm and other caterpillars, but of a much finer quality.
As in them, it proceeds from reservoirs, into which it is secreted
in the form of a viscid gum: but in the mode of its extrication is
very dissimilar, issuing not from the mouth but the hinder part of
the abdomen. If you examine a spider, you will perceive in this part
four or six little teat-like protuberances or spinners. These are
the machinery through which, by a process more singular than that
of rope-spinning, the thread is drawn. Each spinner is furnished
with a multitude of tubes, so numerous and so exquisitely fine,
that a space often not much bigger than the pointed end of a pin,
is furnished, according to Reaumur[735], with a thousand of them.
From each of these tubes, consisting of two pieces, the last of
which terminates in a point infinitely fine, proceeds a thread of
inconceivable tenuity, which, immediately after issuing from it,
unites with all the other threads into one. Hence from each spinner
proceeds a compound thread; and these four threads, at the distance
of about one-tenth of an inch from the apex of the spinners, again
unite, and form the thread we are accustomed to see, which the spider
uses in forming its web. The threads, however, are not all of the
same thickness, for Leeuwenhoek observed that some of the tubes were
larger than others, and furnished a larger thread. Thus a spider's
thread, even spun by the smallest species, and when so fine that
it is almost imperceptible to our senses, is not, as we suppose, a
single line, but a rope composed of at least four thousand strands.
How astonishing! But to feel all the wonder of this fact we must
follow Leeuwenhoek in one of his calculations on the subject. This
renowned microscopic observer found by an accurate estimation that
the threads of the minutest spiders, some of which are not larger
than a grain of sand, are so fine that four millions of them would
not equal in thickness one of the hairs of his beard. Of such tenuity
it is utterly beyond the power of the imagination to conceive: the
very idea overwhelms our faculties, and humbles us under a sense of
their imperfection.--Of the probable accuracy of this calculation
you may any day in summer convince yourself, by taking one of the
large field spiders (_Epeira Diadema_), and after pressing its
abdomen against a leaf or other substance, so as to attach the
threads to the surface--the same preliminary step which the spider
adopts in spinning--drawing it gradually to a small distance. You
will plainly perceive that the proper thread of the spider is formed
of four smaller threads, and these again of threads so fine and
numerous, that there cannot be fewer than a thousand issue from each
spinner; and if you pursue your researches with the microscope, you
will find that precisely the same takes place in the minutest species
that spins.--You will inquire what can be the end of machinery so
complex? One probable reason is, that it was necessary for drying the
gum sufficiently to form a tenacious line, that an extensive surface
should be exposed to the air; which is admirably effected by dividing
it at its exit from the abdomen into such numerous threads. But the
chief cause, perhaps, is the occasion (hereafter to be adverted to)
which the spider sometimes has to employ its threads in their finer
and unconnected state before they unite to form a single one.--The
spider is gifted by her Creator with the power of closing the
orifices of the spinners at pleasure, and can thus, in dropping from
a height by her line, stop her progress at any point of her descent:
and, according to Lister[736], she is also able to retract her
threads within the abdomen; but this is doubted, and with apparent
reason, by De Geer[737].

The only other instruments employed by the spider in weaving are her
feet, with the claws of which she usually guides, or keeps separated
into two or more, the line from behind; and in many species these
are admirably adapted for the purpose, two of them being furnished
underneath with teeth like those of a comb, by means of which the
threads are kept asunder. But another instrument was wanting. The
spider in ascending the line by which she has dropped herself from an
eminence, winds up the superfluous cord into a ball. In performing
this the pectinated claws would not have been suitable. She is
therefore furnished with a _third_ claw between the other two[738],
and is thus provided for every occasion.

The situations in which spiders place their nets are as various as
their construction. Some prefer the open air, and suspend them in
the midst of shrubs or plants most frequented by flies and other
small insects, fixing them in a horizontal, a vertical, or an oblique
direction. Others select the corners of windows and of rooms, where
prey always abounds; while many establish themselves in stables and
neglected out-houses, and even in cellars and desolate places in
which one would scarcely expect a fly to be caught in a month. It is
with the operations of these last especially, that we are accustomed
to associate the ideas of neglect and desertion by man--associations
which both in painting and allegory have been often happily
applied. Hogarth, when he wished to produce a speaking picture of
neglected charity, clothed the poor's box in one of his pieces with
a spider's web: and the Jews, in one of the fables with which they
have disfigured the records of holy writ, have not less ingeniously
availed themselves of the same idea. They relate that the reason why
Saul did not discover David and his men in the cave of Adullam[739]
was, that God had sent a spider which had quickly woven a web across
the entrance of the cave in which they were concealed; which being
observed by Saul, he thought it useless to investigate further a spot
bearing such evident proofs of the absence of any human being[740].

The most incurious observer must have remarked the great difference
which exists in the construction of spiders' webs. Those which we
most commonly see in houses are of a woven texture similar to fine
gauze, and are appropriately termed webs; while those most frequently
met with in the fields are composed of a series of concentric circles
united by _radii_ diverging from the centre, the threads being remote
from each other. These last, which in their simple state, or still
more when studded with dew drops, you must have a thousand times
admired, are with greater propriety termed _nets_; and the insects
which form them proceeding on geometrical principles may be called
_geometricians_, while the former can aspire only to the humbler
denomination of _weavers_. I shall endeavour to describe the process
followed in the construction of both, beginning with the latter.

The weaving spider which is found in houses, having selected some
corner for the site of her web, and determined its extent, presses
her spinners against one of the walls, and thus glues to it one end
of her thread. She then walks along the wall to the opposite side,
and there in like manner fastens the other end. This thread, which
is to form the outer margin or selvage of her web, and requires
strength, she triples or quadruples by a repetition of the operation
just described; and from it she draws other threads in various
directions, the interstices of which she fills up by running from
one to the other, and connecting them by new threads until the whole
has assumed the gauze-like texture which we see. Books of natural
history, all copying from one another, have described these kinds
of web as fabricated of a regular warp and woof, or of parallel
longitudinal lines crossed at right angles by transverse ones glued
to them at the points of intersection. This, however, is clearly
erroneous, as you will see by the slightest examination of a web of
this kind, in which no such regularity of texture can be discovered.

The webs just described present merely a simple horizontal surface,
but others more frequently seen in outhouses and amongst bushes
possess a very artificial appendage. Besides the main web, the spider
carries up from its edges and surface a number of single threads
often to the height of many feet, joining and crossing each other
in various directions. Across these lines, which may be compared to
the tackling of a ship, flies seem unable to avoid directing their
flight. The certain consequence is, that in striking against these
ropes they become slightly entangled, and, in their endeavours to
disengage themselves, rarely escape being precipitated into the net
spread underneath for their reception, where their doom is inevitable.

But the net is still incomplete. It is necessary that our hunter
should conceal her grim visage from the game for which she lies in
wait. She does not therefore station herself upon the surface of
her net, but in a small silken apartment constructed below it, and
completely hidden from view. "In this corner," to use the quaint
translation of Pliny by Philemon Holland, Doctor in Physic[741],
"with what subtiltie doth she retire making semblance as though she
meant nothing less than that she doth, and as if she went about some
other business! nay, how close lieth she, that it is impossible to
see whether any one be within or no!" But thus removed to a distance
from her net and entirely out of sight of it, how is she to know when
her prey is entrapped? For this difficulty our ingenious weaver has
provided. She has taken care to spin several threads from the edge
of the net to that of her hole, which at once inform her by their
vibrations of the capture of a fly, and serve as a bridge on which in
an instant she can run to secure it.

You will readily conceive that the _geometrical_ spiders, in forming
their concentric circled nets, follow a process very different from
that just described, than which indeed it is in many respects more
curious. As the net is usually fixed in a perpendicular or somewhat
oblique direction, in an opening between the leaves of some shrub or
plant, it is obvious that round its whole extent will be required lines
to which can be attached those ends of the _radii_ that are furthest
from the centre. Accordingly the construction of these exterior lines
is the spider's first operation. She seems careless about the shape
of the area which they inclose, well aware that she can as readily
inscribe a circle in a triangle as in a square, and in this respect
she is guided by the distance or proximity of the points to which she
can attach them. She spares no pains, however, to strengthen and keep
them in a proper degree of tension. With the former view she composes
each line of five or six or even more threads glued together; and
with the latter she fixes to them from different points a numerous
and intricate apparatus of smaller threads. Having thus completed the
foundations of her snare[742], she proceeds to fill up the outline.
Attaching a thread to one of the main lines, she walks along it,
guiding it with one of her hind feet that it may not touch in any part
and be prematurely glued, and crosses over to the opposite side, where
by applying her spinners she firmly fixes it. To the middle of this
diagonal thread, which is to form the centre of her net, she fixes a
second, which in like manner she conveys and fastens to another part of
the lines encircling the area. Her work now proceeds rapidly. During
the preliminary operations she sometimes rests, as though her plan
required meditation. But no sooner are the marginal lines of her net
firmly stretched, and two or three radii spun from its centre, than
she continues her labour so quickly and unremittingly that the eye can
scarcely follow her progress. The radii to the number of about twenty,
giving the net the appearance of a wheel, are speedily finished. She
then proceeds to the centre, quickly turns herself round, and pulls
each thread with her feet to ascertain its strength, breaking any one
that seems defective and replacing it by another. Next, she glues
immediately round the centre five or six small concentric circles,
distant about half a line from each other, and then four or five larger
ones, each separated by a space of half an inch or more. These last
serve as a sort of temporary scaffolding to walk over, and to keep
the radii properly stretched while she glues to them the concentric
circles that are to remain, which she now proceeds to construct.
Placing herself at the circumference, and fastening her thread to the
end of one of the radii, she walks up that one, towards the centre, to
such a distance as to draw the thread from her body of a sufficient
length to reach to the next. Then stepping across and conducting the
thread with one of her hind feet, she glues it with her spinners to the
point in the adjoining radius to which it is to be fixed. This process
she repeats until she has filled up nearly the whole space from the
circumference to the centre with concentric circles distant from each
other about two lines. She always, however, leaves a vacant interval
around the smallest first spun circles that are nearest to the centre,
but for what end I am unable to conjecture. Lastly, she runs to the
centre and bites away the small cotton-like tuft that united all the
radii, which being now held together by the circular threads have
thus probably their elasticity increased; and in the circular opening
resulting from this procedure she takes her station and watches for her
prey.

In the above description, which is from my own observations, I
have supposed the spider to fix the first and main line of her
net to points from one of which she could readily climb to the
other, dragging it after her; and many of these nets are placed in
situations where this is very practicable. They are frequently,
however, stretched in places where it is quite impossible for the
spider thus to convey her main line--between the branches of lofty
trees having no connection with each other; between two distinct and
elevated buildings; and even between plants growing in water. Here
then a difficulty occurs. How does the spider contrive to extend her
main line, which is often many feet in length, across inaccessible
openings of this description?

With the view of deciding this question, to which I could find no very
satisfactory answer in books, I made an experiment, for the idea of
which I am indebted to a similar one recorded by Mr. Knight[743], who
informs us that if a spider be placed upon an upright stick having
its bottom immersed in water, it will, after trying in vain all other
modes of escape, dart out numerous fine threads so light as to float in
the air, some one of which attaching itself to a neighbouring object
furnishes a bridge for its escape. It was clear that if this mode is
pursued by the geometric spiders, it would go considerably towards
furnishing a solution of the difficulty in question. I accordingly
placed the large field spider (_Epeira Diadema_) upon a stick about a
foot long, set upright in a vessel containing water. After fastening
its thread (as all spiders do before they move) at the top of the
stick, it crept down the side until it felt the water with its fore
feet, which seem to serve as antennae: it then immediately swung itself
from the stick (which was slightly bent) and climbed up by the thread
to the top. This it repeated perhaps a score times, sometimes creeping
down a different part of the stick, but more frequently down the very
side it had so often traversed in vain. Wearied with this sameness in
its operations, I left the room for some hours. On my return I was
surprised to find my prisoner escaped, and not a little pleased to
discover, on further examination, a thread extended from the top of
the stick to a cabinet seven or eight inches distant, which thread had
doubtless served as its bridge. Eager to witness the process by which
the line was constructed, I replaced the spider in its former position.
After frequently creeping down and mounting up again as before, at
length it let itself drop from the top of the stick, not as before
by a single thread, but by _two_, each distant from the other about
the twelfth of an inch, guided as usual by one of its hind feet, and
one apparently smaller than the other. When it had suffered itself to
descend nearly to the surface of the water, it stopped short, and,
by some means which I could not distinctly see, broke off close to
the spinners the smallest thread, which still adhering by the other
end to the top of the stick floated in the air, and was so light as
to be carried about by the slightest breath. On approaching a pencil
to the loose end of this line, it did not adhere from mere contact.
I therefore twisted it once or twice round the pencil, and then drew
it tight. The spider, which had previously climbed to the top of the
stick, immediately pulled at it with one of its feet, and, finding it
sufficiently tense, crept along it, strengthening it as it proceeded by
another thread, and thus reached the pencil[744].

That this therefore is one mode by which the geometric spiders
convey the main line of their nets between distant objects, there
can be no doubt, but that it is the _only_ one is not so clear. If
the position of the main line be thus determined by the accidental
influence of the wind, we might expect to see these nets arranged
with great irregularity, and crossing each other in every direction;
yet it is the fact, that however closely crowded they may be, they
constantly appear to be placed not by accident but design, commonly
running parallel with each other at right angles with the points
of support, and never interfering. Another objection too presents
itself. From the experiment related, it is clear that the main line
of the net can never be longer than the height of the object from
which the spider dropped in forming it. But it is no uncommon thing
to see nets in which these lines are a yard or two long, fastened to
twigs of grass not a foot in height, and yet separated by obstacles
effectually precluding the possibility of the spiders having
_dragged_ the lines from one to the other. Here therefore some other
process must have been used.

Both these difficulties would be removed by adopting the explanation
of an anonymous author in the _Journal de Physique_[745], founded
as he asserts on actual observation. He says that he saw a small
spider, which he had forced to suspend itself by its thread from
the point of a feather, shoot out obliquely in opposite directions
other smaller threads, which attached themselves in the still air of
a room, without any influence of the wind, to the objects towards
which they were directed. He therefore infers that spiders have
the power of shooting out threads and directing them at pleasure
towards a determined point, judging of the distance and position of
the object by some sense of which we are ignorant. Something like
this manoeuvre I once myself witnessed in a male of the small garden
spider (_Epeira? reticulata_). It was standing midway on a long
perpendicular fixed thread, and an appearance caught my eye of what
seemed to be the emission of threads from its projected spinners.
I therefore moved my arm in the direction in which they apparently
proceeded, and, as I suspected, a floating thread attached itself to
my coat, along which the spider crept. As this was connected with the
spinners of the spider, it could not have been formed in the same way
with the secondary thread of _E. Diadema_ above described.

Probably in this case, as in so many others, we bewilder ourselves by
attempting to make nature bend to generalities to which she disdains
to submit. Different spiders may lay the foundations of their net in a
different manner; some on the plan adopted by _E. Diadema_; others, as
Lister long ago conjectured[746], by shooting out threads in the mode
of the flying species, as in the instances recorded by the anonymous
observer, and Mr. Knight. Nor is it improbable that the same species
has the power of varying its procedures according to circumstances.

How far these suppositions are correct it is impossible to determine
without further experiments, which it is somewhat strange should
not before now have been instituted. Pliny thought it nothing to
the credit of the philosophers of his day, that while they were
disputing about the number of heroes of the name of Hercules, and
the site of the sepulchre of Bacchus, they should not have decided
whether the queen bee had a sting or not[747]; but it seems much more
discreditable to the entomologists of ours, that they should yet be
ignorant how the geometric spiders fix their nets. One excuse for
them is, that these insects generally begin their operations in the
night, so that, though it is very easy to see them spinning their
concentric circles, it is seldom that they can be caught laying the
foundations of their snares. Yet doubtless the lucky moment might
be hit by an attentive observer, and I shall be glad if my attempt
to describe their more ordinary operations should induce you to aim
at signalizing yourself by the discovery. If you failed in solving
every difficulty, you would at least be rewarded by witnessing their
industry, ingenuity, and patience.

For the latter virtue they have no small occasion. Incapable of
actively pursuing their prey, they are dependent upon what chance
conducts into their toils, which, especially those spread in
neglected buildings, often remain for a long period empty. Even
the geometrical spiders, which fix themselves in the midst of a
well-peopled district in the open air, have frequently to sustain
a protracted abstinence. A continued storm of wind and rain will
demolish their nets, and preclude the possibility of reconstructing
them for many days or sometimes weeks, during which not a single
gnat regales their sharp-set appetites. And when at length formed
anew or repaired, an unlucky bee or wasp, or an overgrown fly, will
perversely entangle itself in toils not intended for insects of its
bulk, and in disengaging itself once more leave the net in ruin.--All
these trials move not our philosophic race. They patiently sit in
their watching-place in the same posture, scarcely ever stirring but
when the expected prey appears. And however repeatedly their nets are
injured or destroyed, as long as their store of silk is unexhausted,
they repair or reconstruct them without loss of time.

The web of a house spider will, with occasional repairs, serve for
a considerable period; but the nets of the geometric spiders are
in favourable weather renewed either wholly, or at least their
concentric circles, every twenty-four hours, even when not apparently
injured. This difference in the operations of the two tribes depends
upon a very remarkable peculiarity in the conformation of their
snares. The threads of the house spider's web are all of the same
kind of silk, and flies are caught in them from their claws becoming
entangled in the fine meshes which form the texture. On the other
hand the net of the garden spider is composed of two distinct
kinds of silk; that of the radii not adhesive, that of the circles
extremely viscid[748]. The cause of this difference, which, when
it is considered that both sorts of silk proceed from the same
instrument, is truly wonderful, may be readily perceived. If you
examine a newly formed net with a microscope, you will find that the
threads composing the outline and the radii are simple, those of the
circles closely studded with minute dew-like globules, which from the
elasticity of the thread are easily separable from each other. That
these are in fact globules of viscid gum, is proved by their adhering
to the finger and retaining dust thrown upon the net, while the
unadhesive radii and exterior threads remain unsoiled. It is these
gummed threads alone which retain the insects that fly into the net;
and as they lose their viscid properties by the action of the air, it
is necessary that they should be frequently renewed.

In this renewal, as above hinted, the geometrical spiders are
constantly regulated by the future probable state of the atmosphere,
of which they have such a nice perception, that M. Q. D'Isjonval,
to whom we are indebted for the fact, has proposed them as most
accurate barometers. He asserts that if the weather be about to
be variable, wet and stormy, the main threads which support the
net will be certainly short; but if fine settled weather be on
the point of commencing, these threads will be as invariably very
long[749]. Without going the length with M. D'Isjonval of deeming his
discoveries important enough to regulate the march of armies, or the
sailing of fleets, or of proposing that the first appearance of these
barometrical spiders in spring should be announced by the sound of
trumpet, I have reason to suppose from my own observations that his
statements are in the main accurate, and that a very good idea of
the weather may be formed from attending to these insects.

The spiders which form geometrical nets differ from the weavers also
with respect to the situation in which they watch for their prey.
They do not conceal themselves under their net, but are placed in the
centre with their head downwards, and retire to a little apartment
formed on one side under some leaf of a plant, only when obliged by
danger or the state of the weather. The moment an unfortunate fly or
other insect touches the net, the spider rushes towards it, seizes
it with her fangs, and if it be a small species at once carries it
to her little cell, and, having there at leisure sucked its juices,
throws out the carcase. If the insect be larger and struggle to
escape, with surprising address she envelops it with threads in
various directions, until both its wings and legs being effectually
fastened, she carries it off to her den. If the captured insect be a
bee or a large fly so strong that the spider is sensible it is more
than a match for her, she never attempts to seize or even entangle
it, but on the contrary assists it to disengage itself, and often
breaks off that part of the net to which it hangs, content to be rid
of such an unmanageable intruder at any price.--When larger booty
is plentiful, these spiders seem not to regard smaller insects. I
have observed them in autumn, when their nets were almost covered
with the Aphides which filled the air, impatiently pulling them off
and dropping them untouched over the sides, as though irritated that
their meshes should be occupied with such insignificant game.--A
species of spider described by Lister, (_Epeira conica_,) more
provident than its brethren, suspends its prey in the meshes above
and below the centre, and it is not uncommon to see its larder thus
stored with several flies[750].

You must not infer that the toils of spiders are in every part of the
world formed of such fragile materials as those which we are accustomed
to see, or that they are every where contented with small insects for
their food. An author in the _Philosophical Transactions_ asserts,
that the spiders of Bermudas spin webs between trees seven and eight
fathoms distant, which are strong enough to ensnare a bird as large as
a thrush[751]. And Sir G. Staunton informs us, that in the forests of
Java, spiders' webs are met with of so strong a texture as to require a
sharp-cutting instrument to make way through them[752].

Nor must you suppose that all the spiders of this country which
catch their prey by means of snares, follow the same plan in
constructing them as the weavers and geometricians whose operations
I have endeavoured to describe. The form of their snares and the
situation in which they place them are so various, that it is
impossible to enumerate more than a few of the most remarkable.
_Agelene labyrinthica_ extends over the blades of grass a large white
horizontal net having at its margin a cylindrical cell, in the bottom
of which, secure from birds and defended from the rays of the sun,
the spider lies concealed, whence on the slightest movement of her
net she rushes out upon her prey. _Aranea latens_, F. conceals itself
under a small net spun upon the upper surface of a leaf, and thence
seizes upon any insect that chances to pass over it. _Theridium_
13-_guttatum_ forms under stones and in slight furrows in the
ground a net consisting of threads spun without any regularity in
all directions, but so strong as to entrap grasshoppers, which are
said to be its principal food; and a similar inartificial snare of
simple threads is often spun in windows by _Theridium bipunctatum_
and several other species. _Segestria senoculata_ and its affinities
conceal themselves in a long cylindrical straight silken tube, from
the mouth of which they stretch out their six anterior feet, whose
extremities rest upon as many diverging threads: thus, as soon as an
insect walks across any of the threads (which are eight or ten inches
long) the insect's toes give it warning of prey being at hand, when
it rushes out and seldom fails to secure its victim.

          "The spider's touch how exquisitely fine!
           Feels at each thread, and lives along the line."

M. Homberg tells us that he has seen a vigorous wasp carried off and
destroyed by one of these species.

       *       *       *       *       *

The spiders, to which I have hitherto adverted, seize their prey by
means of webs or nets; but a very large number, though, like the
former, they spin silken cocoons for containing their eggs, never
employ the same material in constructing similar snares, of which
they make no use.

These may be separated into two grand divisions: the first comprising
those which conceal themselves and lie in ambuscade for their prey,
and sometimes run after it to a short distance; the second, those
which are constantly roaming about in every direction in search of
it, and seize it by open violence. The former Walckenaer, in his
admirable work on spiders, has designated by the name of _Vagrants_,
the latter by that of _Hunters_; terming those already mentioned
which spin webs and nets, _Sedentaries_: if to these you add the
_Swimmers_, or those species which catch their prey in the water, you
will have an idea of the general manners of the whole race of spiders.

The artifices of that tribe which Walckenaer has named vagrants are
various and singular. _Clubiona holosericea_ and many other species
conceal themselves in a little cell formed of the rolled-up leaf of a
plant, and thence dart upon any insect which chances to pass; while
_C. atrox_ and its affinities select for their place of ambush a hole
in a wall, or lurk behind a stone, or in the bark of a tree. _Aranea
calycina_, L. more ingeniously places herself at the bottom of the
calyx of a dead flower, and pounces upon the unwary flies that come
in search of honey; and _A. arundinacea_ buries herself in the thick
panicle of a reed, and seizes the luckless visitors enticed to rest
upon her silvery concealment. Many of this tribe at times quit their
habitations, and by various stratagems contrive to come within reach of
their prey, as by pretending to be dead, hiding themselves behind any
slight projection, &c. A white species I have often observed squatted
in the blossom of the hawthorn or on the flowers of umbelliferous
plants, and is thus effectually concealed by the similarity of colour.

Foremost amongst the spiders comprehended by Walckenaer under the
general name of hunters, which search after and openly seize their
prey, must be enumerated the monstrous _Mygale avicularia_, at least
two inches long, which takes up its abode in the woods of South
America, and has been reputed to seize and devour even small birds;
but this is wholly denied by Langsdorf, who declares that it eats only
insects[753]. This species, as well as another tropical one, _Thomisus
venatorius_, the European _Cteniza cementaria_, and many others,
construct in the ground very singular cylindrical cavities, and therein
carry and devour their prey. These, being rather the habitations of
insects than snares, I shall describe in a subsequent letter. _Lycosa
saccata_, the species whose affection for its young I have before
detailed, and not a few others of the same family, common in this
country, in like manner seize their prey openly, and when caught
carry it to little inartificial cavities under stones. _Dolomedes
fimbriatus_ hunts along the margins of pools; and _Lycosa piratica_ and
its congeners not only chase their prey in the same situation, but,
venturing to skate upon the surface of the water itself,

          "... bathe unwet their oily forms, and dwell
           With feet repulsive on the dimpling well."

The Rev. R. Sheppard has often noticed in the fen ditches of Norfolk
a very large spider which actually forms a _raft_ for the purpose of
obtaining its prey with more facility. Keeping its station upon a
ball of weeds about three inches in diameter, probably held together
by slight silken cords, it is wafted along the surface of the water
upon this floating island, which it quits the moment it sees a
drowning insect,--not, as you may conceive, for the sake of applying
to it the process of the Humane Society, but of hastening its exit by
a more speedy engine of destruction. The booty thus seized it devours
at leisure upon its raft, under which it retires when alarmed by any
danger.

The last of the tribe of hunters that it is necessary to
particularize, are those which, like the tigers amongst the larger
animals, seize their victims by leaping upon them. To this division
belongs a very pretty small banded species, _Salticus scenicus_,
which in summer may be seen running on every wall.

To Walckenaer's _swimmers_, the last of his grand tribes of spiders,
including _Argyroneta aquatica_, &c., the first line of the above
quotation from Dr. Darwin is particularly applicable; for these
actually seize their food by diving under the water, their bodies
being kept unwet by a coating of air which constantly surrounds
them.--Thus one single race of insects exemplify in miniature almost
all the modes of obtaining food which prevail amongst predaceous
quadrupeds--the audacious attack of the lion; the wily spring of
the tiger; the sedentary cunning of the lynx; and the amphibious
dexterity of the otter.

This general view of the stratagems by which the spider tribe obtain
their food, imperfect as it is, will, I trust, have interested you
sufficiently to drive away the associations of disgust with which
you, like almost every one else, have probably been accustomed to
regard these insects. Instead of considering them as repulsive
compounds of cruelty and ferocity, you will henceforward see in their
procedures only the ingenious contrivance of patient and industrious
hunters, who while obeying the great law of nature in procuring their
sustenance, are actively serviceable to the human race in destroying
noxious insects. You will allow the poet to stigmatize them as

          "... cunning and fierce,
           Mixture abhorred!"

but you will see that these epithets are in reality as unjustly
applied to them (at least with reference to the mode in which they
procure their necessary subsistence) as to the patient sportsman who
lays snares for the birds that are to serve for the dinner of his
family; and when you hear

          "... the fluttering wing
           And shriller sound declare extreme distress,"

you will as little think it the part of true mercy to stretch forth
"the helping hospitable hand" to the entrapped fly as to the captive
birds. The spider requires his meal as well as the Indian: and,
however to our weak capacity the great law of creation "eat or be
eaten" may seem cruel or unnecessary, knowing as we do that it is
the ordinance of a beneficent Being, who does all things well, and
that in fact the sum of happiness is greatly augmented by it, no
man, who does not let a morbid sensibility get the better of his
judgement, will, on account of their subjection to this rule, look
upon predaceous animals with abhorrence.

       *       *       *       *       *

One more instance of the stratagems of insects in procuring their prey
shall conclude this letter. Other examples might be adduced, but the
enumeration would be tedious. This, from an order of insects widely
differing from that which includes the race of spiders, is perhaps more
curious and interesting than any of those hitherto recited. The insect
to which I allude, an inhabitant of the south of Europe, is the larva
of a species of ant-lion (_Myrmeleon_), so called from its singular
manners in this state. It belongs to a genus between the dragon-fly and
the Hemerobius. When full grown its length is about half an inch: in
shape it has a slight resemblance to a wood-louse, but the outline of
the body is more triangular, the anterior part being considerably wider
than the posterior: it has six legs, and the mouth is furnished with
a forceps consisting of two incurved jaws, which give it a formidable
appearance[754]. If we looked only at its external conformation and
habits, we should be apt to conclude it one of the most helpless
animals in the creation. Its sole food is the juices of other insects,
particularly ants, but at the first view it seems impossible that
it should ever secure a single meal. Not only is its pace slow, but
it can walk in no other direction than _backwards_; you may judge,
therefore, what would be such a hunter's chance of seizing an active
ant. Nor would a stationary posture be more favourable; for its grim
aspect would infallibly impress upon all wanderers the prudence of
keeping at a respectful distance. What then is to become of our poor
ant-lion? In its appetite it is a perfect epicure, never, however
great may be its hunger, deigning to taste of a carcase unless it has
previously had the enjoyment of killing it; and then extracting only
the finer juices. In what possible way can it contrive to supply such a
succession of delicacies, when its ordinary habits seem to unfit it for
obtaining even the coarsest provision? You shall hear. It accomplishes
by artifice what all its open efforts would have been unequal to. It
digs in loose sand a conical pit, in the bottom of which it conceals
itself, and there seizes upon the insects which, chancing to stumble
over the margin, are precipitated down the sides to the centre. "How
wonderful!" you exclaim: but you will be still more surprised when I
have described the whole process by which it excavates its trap, and
the ingenious contrivances to which it has recourse.

Its first concern is to find a soil of loose dry sand, in the
neighbourhood of which, indeed, its provident mother has previously
taken care to place it, and in a sheltered spot near an old wall,
or at the foot of a tree. This is necessary on two accounts: the
prey most acceptable to it abounds there, and no other soil would
suit for the construction of its snare. Its next step is to trace in
the sand a circle, which, like the furrow with which Romulus marked
out the limits of his new city, is to determine the extent of its
future abode. This being done, it proceeds to excavate the cavity by
throwing out the sand in a mode not less singular than effective.
Placing itself in the inside of the circle which it has traced, it
thrusts the hind part of its body under the sand, and with one of
its fore-legs, serving as a shovel, it charges its flat and square
head with a load, which it immediately throws over the outside of
the circle with a jerk strong enough to carry it to the distance of
several inches. This little manoeuvre is executed with surprising
promptitude and address. A gardener does not operate so quickly or
so well with his spade and his foot, as the ant-lion with its head
and leg.--Walking backwards, and constantly repeating the process, it
soon arrives at the part of the circle from which it set out. It then
traces a new one, excavates another furrow in a similar manner, and
by a repetition of these operations at length arrives at the centre
of its cavity. One circumstance deserves remark--that it never loads
its head with the sand lying on the _outside_ of the circle, though
it would be as easy to do this with the outward leg, as to remove
the sand within the circle by the inner leg. But it knows that it is
the sand in the interior of the circle only that is to be excavated,
and it therefore constantly uses the leg next the centre. It will
readily occur, however, that to use one leg as a shovel exclusively
throughout the whole of such a toilsome operation, would be extremely
wearisome and painful. For this difficulty our ingenious pioneer has
a resource. After finishing the excavation of one circular furrow,
it traces the next in an opposite direction; and thus alternately
exercises each of its legs without tiring either.

In the course of its labours it frequently meets with small stones:
these it places upon its head one by one, and jerks over the margin
of the pit. But sometimes, when near the bottom, a pebble presents
itself of a size so large that this process is impossible, its head
not being sufficiently broad and strong to bear so great a weight,
and the height being too considerable to admit of projecting so large
a body to the top. A more impatient labourer would despair, but not
so our insect. A new plan is adopted. By a manoeuvre, not easily
described, it lifts the stone upon its back, keeps it in a steady
position by an alternate motion of the segments which compose that
part; and carefully walking up the ascent with the burthen, deposits
it on the outside of the margin. When, as occasionally happens, the
stone is round, the labour becomes most difficult and painful. A
spectator watching the motions of the ant-lion feels an inexpressible
interest in its behalf. He sees it with vast exertion elevate the
stone, and begin its arduous retrograde ascent: at every moment the
burthen totters to one side or the other: the adroit porter lifts
up the segments of its back to balance it, and has already nearly
reached the top of the pit, when a stumble or a jolt mocks all its
efforts, and the stone tumbles headlong to the bottom. Mortified, but
not despairing, the ant-lion returns to the charge; again replaces
the stone, on its back; again ascends the side, and artfully avails
himself, for a road, of the channel formed by the falling stone,
against the sides of which he can support his load. This time
possibly he succeeds; or it may be, as is often the case, the stone
again rolls down. When thus unfortunate, our little Sisyphus has
been seen six times patiently to renew his attempt, and was at last,
as such heroic resolution deserved, successful. It is only after a
series of trials have demonstrated the impossibility of succeeding
that our engineer yields to fate, and, quitting his half-excavated
pit, begins the formation of another.

When all obstacles are overcome, and the pit is finished, it presents
itself as a conical hole rather more than two inches deep, gradually
contracting to a point at the bottom, and about three inches wide at
the top[755]. The ant-lion now takes its station at the bottom of the
pit, and, that its gruff appearance may not scare the passengers which
approach its den, covers itself with sand all except the points of its
expanded forceps. It is not long before an ant on its travels, fearing
no harm, steps upon the margin of the pit, either accidentally or for
the purpose of exploring the depth below. Alas! its curiosity is dearly
gratified. The faithless sand slides from under its feet; its struggles
but hasten its descent; and it is precipitated headlong into the jaws
of the concealed devourer. Sometimes, however, it chances that the ant
is able to stop itself midway, and with all haste scrambles up again.
No sooner does the ant-lion perceive this, (for, being furnished with
six eyes on each side of his head, he is sufficiently sharp-sighted,)
than, shaking off his inactivity, he hastily shovels loads of sand upon
his head, and vigorously throws them up in quick succession upon the
escaping insect, which, attacked by such a heavy shower from below and
treading on so unstable a path, is almost inevitably carried to the
bottom. The instant his victim is fairly within reach, the ant-lion
seizes him between his jaws, which are admirable instruments, at the
same time hooked for holding, and hollow, furnished with a lateral
piston, for sucking, and at his leisure extracting all the juices of
the body, regales upon formic acid. The dry carcase he subsequently
jerks out of his den, that it may not encumber him in his future
contests, or betray the "horrid secrets of his prison-house:" and
if the sides of the pit have received any damage, he leaves his
concealment for awhile to repair it: which having done, he resumes his
station.

In this manner in its larva state this insect lives nearly two years,
during all which time it receives no food but what has been caught
through the artifice above described. Though all living insects, for
I have fed it with flies, are equally acceptable to it, as the winged
tribe can easily take flight from its pit should they chance to fall
into it, its prey consists chiefly of apterous species, of which ants
form by far the largest portion, with occasionally an unwary spider
or wood-louse. When the full period of its growth is attained it
retires under the sand; spins with its anus a silken cocoon; remains
a chrysalis a few weeks; and then breaks forth a four-winged insect
resembling, as before observed, the dragon-fly both in appearance and
manners, and preying in like manner on moths, butterflies, and other
insects[756].

The larva of _Myrmeleon Formicaleo_ is not the only insect which
avails itself of a trap for obtaining its prey. A plan in most
respects similar is adopted by that of a fly (_Leptis Vermileo_) in
form somewhat resembling the common flesh maggot. This also digs a
funnel-shaped cavity in loose earth or sand, but deeper in proportion
to its width than that of _M. Formicaleo_, and excavated not by regular
circles, but by throwing out the earth obliquely on all sides. When its
trap is finished, it stretches itself near the bottom, remaining stiff
and without motion like a piece of wood, and the last segment bent at
an angle with the rest, so as to form a strong point of support in the
struggles which it often necessarily has with vigorous prey. The moment
an insect falls into the pitfall, the larva writhes itself round it
like a serpent, transfixes it with its mandibles, and sucks its juices
at its ease. If the insect escapes, the larva casts above it jets of
sand with surprising rapidity[757].

                                                  I am, &c.

FOOTNOTES:

[735] Reaum. _Mem. de l'Acad. de Paris_, An. 1713.211.--De Geer, vii.
187. See also Hoole's _Leeuwenhoek_, i. 41.--_t._ 2. _f._ 20-22.
Leeuwenhoek examined a spinner that was not so big as a common grain
of sand, and the number of tubes issuing from it was more than a
hundred. He affirms that, besides the larger spinners, in the space
between them there are four smaller ones, each furnished with organs
for spinning threads, but smaller and fewer in number. Latreille
speaks only of a thousand spinners from each teat, and of six
thousand threads from the whole--but he does not enter further into
the subject. _Nouv. Dict. d'Hist. Nat._ ii. 278.

[736] _Hist. Anim. Ang._ p. 8.

[737] De Geer, vii. 189.

[738] Leeuw. _Opusc._ iii. 317. f. 1.

[739] 1 Sam. xxiv. 4.

[740] Lesser, _L._ ii. 291.

[741] L. xi. c. 24.

[742] I am not certain whether the garden spider does not more
frequently form one or two of the principal radii of the net, before
she spins the exterior lines.

[743] _Treatise on the Apple and Pear_, p. 97.

[744] Some time after making this experiment I stumbled upon a
passage in Redi (_De Insectis_, p. 119.) from which it appears that
Blancanus, in his _Commentaries upon Aristotle_, has related a series
of observations which led him to precisely the same result. Lehmann,
too, in a paper in the _Transactions of the Society of Naturalists at
Berlin_ (translated in the _Philosophical Magazine_, xi. 323.) has
given an explanation somewhat similar of the operations of this very
spider, but I am inclined to think erroneous in some particulars.
He describes it as emitting _numerous_ floating threads at the
_commencement_ of its descent. That he is mistaken in supposing these
threads to be more than one, is proved by the fact which I have
observed--that even that one sometimes breaks by the weight of the
spider. How then could an insect almost as big as a gooseberry be
supported by a line of the tenuity here attributed to it?

[745] _An._ vii. _Vindemiaire_. Translated in _Phil. Mag._ ii. 275.

[746] _Hist. Anim. Ang._ p. 7.

[747] Plin. _Hist. Nat._ l. xi. c. 17.

[748] May not the spinners mentioned by Leeuwenhoek (see above p.
404, note) be peculiar to the retiary spiders, and furnish this
viscid thread?

[749] Brez, _La Flore des Insectophiles_, 129.

[750] Lister, _Hist. Anim. Ang._ 32, tit. 4.

[751] _Phil. Tr._ 1668, p. 792.

[752] _Embassy to China_, i. 343.

[753] _Bemerkungen auf einer Reise um die Welt._ i. 63.

[754] PLATE XIX. FIG. 8.

[755] The nests of this animal which I saw at Fontainebleau (in
the pit producing the fossil named after that place) were scarcely
half the dimensions here given, but they might probably be younger
insects. I kept one in a box of sand several days, in which it
regularly formed its pit, whenever obliterated by shaking. The bottom
of the box unfortunately came out as I was upon my return to England,
and the animal was killed.

[756] Reaum. vi. 333-78. Bonnet, ii. 380.

[757] Bonnet, ix. 414. De Geer, vi. 168. _t._ 10.




                              LETTER XIV.

                       _HABITATIONS OF INSECTS._


In forming an estimate of the civilization and intellectual progress
of a newly discovered people, we usually pay attention to their
buildings, and other proofs of architectural skill. If we find
them, like the wretched inhabitants of Van Diemen's Land, without
other abodes than natural caverns or miserable penthouses of bark,
we at once regard them as the most ignorant and unhumanized of
their race. If, like the natives of the South Sea Isles, they have
advanced a step further, and enjoy houses formed of timber, thatched
with leaves, and furnished with utensils of different kinds, we
are inclined to place them considerably higher in the scale. When,
as in the case of ancient Mexico, we discover a nation inhabiting
towns containing stone houses, regularly disposed into streets, we
do not hesitate without other inquiry to decide that it must have
been civilized in no ordinary degree. And if it were to chance that
some future Park in Africa should stumble upon the ruins of a large
city, where, in addition to these proofs of science, every building
was constructed on just geometrical and architectural principles;
where the materials were so employed as to unite strength with
lightness, and a confined site so artfully occupied as to obtain
spacious symmetrical apartments, we should eagerly inquire into the
history of the inhabitants, and sigh over the remains of a race
whose intellectual advances we should infer with certainty were not
inferior to our own.

Were we by the same test to estimate the sagacity of the different
classes of animals, we should beyond all doubt assign the highest
place to insects, which in the construction of their habitations
leave all the rest far behind. The nests of birds, from the
rook's rude assemblage of sticks to the pensile dwellings of the
tailor-bird, wonderful as they doubtless are, are indisputably
eclipsed by the structures formed by many insects; and the regular
villages of the beaver, by far the most sagacious architect amongst
quadrupeds, must yield the palm to a wasp's nest. You will think me
here guilty of exaggeration, and that, blinded by my attachment to a
favourite pursuit, I am elevating the little objects, which I wish to
recommend to your study, to a rank beyond their just claim. So far,
however, am I from being conscious of any such prejudice, that I do
not hesitate to go further, and assert that the pyramids of Egypt, as
the work of man, are not more wonderful for their size and solidity
than are the structures built by some insects.

To describe the most remarkable of these is my present object: and
that some method may be observed, I shall in this letter describe the
habitations of insects living in a state of solitude, and built each by
a single architect; and in a subsequent one, those of insects living in
societies, built by the united labours of many. The former class may be
conveniently subdivided into habitations built by the parent insect,
not for its own use, but for the convenience of its future young; and
those which are formed by the insect that inhabits them for its own
accommodation. To the first I shall now call your attention.

       *       *       *       *       *

The solitary insects which construct habitations for their future
young without any view to their own accommodation, chiefly belong
to the order _Hymenoptera_, and are principally different species
of wild bees. Of these the most simple are built by _Colletes_[758]
_succincta_, _fodiens_, &c. The situation which the parent bee
chooses, is either the dry earth of a bank, or the vacuities of stone
walls cemented with earth instead of mortar. Having excavated a
cylinder about two inches in depth, running usually in a horizontal
direction, the bee occupies it with three or four cells about half
an inch long, and one-sixth broad, shaped like a thimble, the end of
one fitting into the mouth of another. The substance of which these
cells are formed is two or three layers of a silky membrane, composed
of a kind of glue secreted by the animal, resembling gold-beater's
leaf, but much finer, and so thin and transparent that the colour of
an included object may be seen through them. As soon as one cell is
completed, the bee deposits an egg within, and nearly fills it with a
paste composed of pollen and honey; which having done, she proceeds
to form another cell, storing it in like manner until the whole is
finished, when she carefully stops up the mouth of the orifice with
earth. Our countryman Grew seems to have found a series of these
nests in a singular situation--the middle of the pith of an old
elder-branch--in which they were placed lengthwise one after another
with a thin boundary between each[759].

Cells composed of a similar membranaceous substance, but placed in a
different situation, are constructed by _Anthidium manicatum_[760].
This gay insect does not excavate holes for their reception, but places
them in the cavities of old trees, or of any other object that suits
its purpose. Sir Thomas Cullum discovered the nest of one in the inside
of the lock of a garden-gate, in which I have also since twice found
them. It should seem, however, that such situations would be too cold
for the grubs without a coating of some non-conducting substance. The
parent bee, therefore, after having constructed the cells, laid an
egg in each, and filled them with a store of suitable food, plasters
them with a covering of vermiform masses, apparently composed of honey
and pollen; and having done this, aware, long before Count Rumford's
experiments, what materials conduct heat most slowly, she attacks the
woolly leaves of _Stachys lanata_, _Agrostemma coronaria_, and similar
plants, and with her mandibles industriously scrapes off the wool,
which with her fore legs she rolls into a little ball and carries to
her nest. This wool she sticks upon the plaster that covers her cells,
and thus closely envelops them with a warm coating of down impervious
to every change of temperature[761].

The bee last described may be said to exercise the trade of a clothier.
Another numerous family would be more properly compared to carpenters,
boring with incredible labour out of the solid wood long cylindrical
tubes, and dividing them into various cells. Amongst these, one of
the most remarkable is _Xylocopa_[762] _violacea_, a large species, a
native of Southern Europe, distinguished by beautiful wings of a deep
violet colour, and found commonly in gardens, in the upright putrescent
espaliers or vine-props of which, and occasionally in the garden seats,
doors and window-shutters, she makes her nest. In the beginning of
spring, after repeated and careful surveys, she fixes upon a piece of
wood suitable for her purpose, and with her strong mandibles begins
the process of boring. First proceeding obliquely downwards, she soon
points her course in a direction parallel with the sides of the wood,
and at length with unwearied exertion forms a cylindrical hole or
tunnel not less than twelve or fifteen inches long and half an inch
broad. Sometimes, where the diameter will admit of it, three or four
of these pipes, nearly parallel with each other, are bored in the same
piece. Herculean as this task, which is the labour of several days,
appears, it is but a small part of what our industrious bee cheerfully
undertakes. As yet she has completed but the shell of the destined
habitation of her offspring; each of which, to the number of ten or
twelve, will require a separate and distinct apartment. How, you will
ask, is she to form these? With what materials can she construct the
floors and ceilings? Why truly GOD "doth instruct her to discretion
and doth teach her." In excavating her tunnel she has detached a large
quantity of fibres, which lie on the ground like a heap of saw-dust.
This material supplies all her wants. Having deposited an egg at the
bottom of the cylinder along with the requisite store of pollen and
honey, she next, at the height of about three quarters of an inch,
(which is the depth of each cell,) constructs of particles of the
saw-dust glued together, and also to the sides of the tunnel, what may
be called an annular stage or scaffolding. When this is sufficiently
hardened, its interior edge affords support for a second ring of the
same materials, and thus the ceiling is gradually formed of these
concentric circles, till there remains only a small orifice in its
centre, which is also closed with a circular mass of agglutinated
particles of saw-dust. When this partition, which serves as the ceiling
of the first cell and the flooring of the second, is finished, it is
about the thickness of a crown-piece, and exhibits the appearance of as
many concentric circles as the animal has made pauses in her labour.
One cell being finished, she proceeds to another, which she furnishes
and completes in the same manner, and so on until she has divided her
whole tunnel into ten or twelve apartments.

Here, if you have followed me in this detail with the interest which
I wish it to inspire, a query will suggest itself. It will strike you
that such a laborious undertaking as the constructing and furnishing
these cells, cannot be the work of one or even of two days.
Considering that every cell requires a store of honey and pollen, not
to be collected but with long toil, and that a considerable interval
must be spent in agglutinating the floors of each, it will be very
obvious to you that the last egg in the last cell must be laid many
days after the first. We are certain, therefore, that the first egg
will become a grub, and consequently a perfect bee, many days before
the last. What then becomes of it? you will ask. It is impossible
that it should make its escape through eleven superincumbent cells
without destroying the immature tenants; and it seems equally
impossible that it should remain patiently in confinement below
them until they are all disclosed. This dilemma our heaven-taught
architect has provided against. With forethought never enough to be
admired she has not constructed her tunnel with one opening only,
but at the further end has pierced _another_ orifice, a kind of
back-door, through which the insects produced by the first-laid eggs
successively emerge into day. In fact, all the young bees, even the
uppermost, go out by this road; for, by an exquisite instinct, each
grub, when about to become a pupa, places itself in its cell with its
head downwards, and thus is necessitated, when arrived at its last
state, to pierce its cell in this direction[763].

_Ceratina albilabris_ of Spinola, who has given an interesting
account of its manners, forms its cell upon the general plan of the
bee just described, but, more economical of labour, chooses a branch
of briar or bramble, in the pith of which she excavates a canal about
a foot long and one line, or sometimes more, in diameter, with from
eight to twelve cells separated from each other by partitions of
particles of pith glued together[764].

Such are the curious habitations of the carpenter bees. Next I shall
introduce you to the not less interesting structures of another
family which carry on the trade of masons, (_Megachile muraria_,)
building their solid houses solely of artificial stone. The first
step of the mother bee is to fix upon a proper situation for the
future mansion of her offspring. For this she usually selects an
angle, sheltered by any projection, on the south side of a stone
wall. Her next care is to provide materials for the structure. The
chief of these is sand, which she carefully selects grain by grain
from such as contains some mixture of earth. These grains she glues
together with her viscid saliva into masses the size of small shot,
and transports by means of her jaws to the site of her castle[765].
With a number of these masses, which are the artificial stone of
which her building is to be composed, united by a cement preferable
to ours, she first forms the basis or foundation of the whole. Next
she raises the walls of a cell, which is about an inch in length
and half an inch broad, and before its orifice is closed in form
resembles a thimble. This, after depositing an egg and a supply of
honey and pollen, she covers in, and then proceeds to the erection
of a second, which she finishes in the same manner, until the whole
number, which varies from four to eight, is completed. The vacuities
between the cells, which are not placed in any regular order, some
being parallel to the wall, others perpendicular to it, and others
inclined to it at different angles, this laborious architect fills
up with the same material of which the cells are composed, and then
bestows upon the whole group a common covering of coarser grains of
sand. The form of the whole nest, which when finished is a solid mass
of stone so hard as not to be easily penetrated with the blade of a
knife, is an irregular oblong of the same colour as the sand, and to
a casual observer more resembling a splash of mud than an artificial
structure. These bees sometimes are more economical of their labour,
and repair old nests, for the possession of which they have very
desperate combats. One would have supposed that the inhabitants of a
castle so fortified might defy the attacks of every insect marauder.
Yet an Ichneumon and a beetle (_Clerus apiarius_) both contrive to
introduce their eggs into the cells, and the larvae proceeding from
them devour their inhabitants[766].

Other bees of the same family with that last described, use different
materials in the construction of their nests. Some employ fine
earth made into a kind of mortar with gluten. Another (_Osmia_[767]
_caerulescens_), as we learn from De Geer, forms its nest of
argillaceous earth mixed with chalk, upon stone walls, and sometimes
probably nidificates in chalk-pits. _O. bicornis_ selects the hollows
of large stones for the site of its dwelling; while others prefer the
holes in wood.

The works thus far described require in general less genius than
labour and patience: but it is far otherwise with the nests of
the last tribe of artificers amongst wild bees, to which I shall
advert--the hangers of tapestry, or upholsterers--those which line
the holes excavated in the earth for the reception of their young,
with an elegant coating of flowers or of leaves. Amongst the most
interesting of these is _Megachile_[768] _Papaveris_, a species whose
manners have been admirably described by Reaumur. This little bee,
as though fascinated with the colour most attractive to our eyes,
invariably chooses for the hangings of her apartments the most
brilliant scarlet, selecting for its material the petals of the wild
poppy, which she dexterously cuts into the proper form. Her first
process is to excavate in some pathway a burrow, cylindrical at the
entrance but swelled out below, to the depth of about three inches.
Having polished the walls of this little apartment, she next flies
to a neighbouring field, cuts out oval portions of the flowers of
poppies, seizes them between her legs and returns with them to her
cell; and though separated from the wrinkled petal of a half-expanded
flower, she knows how to straighten their folds, and, if too large,
to fit them for her purpose by cutting off the superfluous parts.
Beginning at the bottom, she overlays the walls of her mansion with
this brilliant tapestry, extending it also on the surface of the
ground round the margin of the orifice. The bottom is rendered warm
by three or four coats, and the sides have never less than two. The
little upholsterer, having completed the hangings of her apartment,
next fills it with pollen and honey to the height of about half an
inch; then, after committing an egg to it, she wraps over the poppy
lining so that even the roof may be of this material; and lastly
closes its mouth with a small hillock of earth[769]. The great depth
of the cell compared with the space which the single egg and the
accompanying food deposited in it occupy, deserves particular notice.
This is not more than half an inch at the bottom, the remaining
two inches and a half being subsequently filled with earth.--When
you next favour me with a visit, I can show you the cells of this
interesting insect as yet unknown to British entomologists, for
which I am indebted to the kindness of M. Latreille, who first
scientifically described the species[770].

_Megachile centuncularis_, _M. Willughbiella_, and other species
of the same family, like the preceding, cover the walls of their
cells with a coating of leaves, but are content with a more sober
colour, generally selecting for their hangings the leaves of trees,
especially of the rose, whence they have been known by the name
of the _leaf-cutter_ bees. They differ also from _M. Papaveris_
in excavating longer burrows, and filling them with several
thimble-shaped cells composed of portions of leaves so curiously
convoluted, that, if we were ignorant in what school they have been
taught to construct them, we should never credit their being the
work of an insect. Their entertaining history, so long ago as 1670,
attracted the attention of our countrymen Ray, Lister, Willughby, and
Sir Edward King; but we are indebted for the most complete account of
their procedures to Reaumur.

The mother bee first excavates a cylindrical hole eight or ten inches
long, in a horizontal direction, either in the ground or in the trunk
of a rotten willow-tree, or occasionally in other decaying wood. This
cavity she fills with six or seven cells wholly composed of portions
of leaf, of the shape of a thimble, the convex end of one closely
fitting into the open end of another. Her first process is to form
the exterior coating, which is composed of three or four pieces of
larger dimensions than the rest, and of an oval form. The second
coating is formed of portions of equal size, narrow at one end but
gradually widening towards the other, where the width equals half
the length. One side of these pieces is the serrate margin of the
leaf from which it was taken, which, as the pieces are made to lap
one over the other, is kept on the outside, and that which has been
cut within. The little animal now forms a third coating of similar
materials, the middle of which, as the most skilful workman would do
in similar circumstances, she places over the margins of those that
form the first tube, thus covering and strengthening the junctures.
Repeating the same process, she gives a fourth and sometimes a
fifth coating to her nest, taking care, at the closed end or narrow
extremity of the cell, to bend the leaves so as to form a convex
termination. Having thus finished a cell, her next business is to
fill it to within half a line of the orifice, with a rose-
conserve composed of honey and pollen, usually collected from the
flowers of thistles; and then having deposited her egg, she closes
the orifice with three pieces of leaf so exactly circular, that a
pair of compasses could not define their margin with more truth; and
coinciding so precisely with the walls of the cell, as to be retained
in their situation merely by the nicety of their adaptation. After
this covering is fitted in, there remains still a concavity which
receives the convex end of the succeeding cell; and in this manner
the indefatigable little animal proceeds until she has completed the
six or seven cells which compose her cylinder.

The process which one of these bees employs in cutting the pieces
of leaf that compose her nest is worthy of attention. Nothing can
be more expeditious: she is not longer about it than we should be
with a pair of scissors. After hovering for some moments over a
rose-bush, as if to reconnoitre the ground, the bee alights upon the
leaf which she has selected, usually taking her station upon its
edge so that the margin passes between her legs. With her strong
mandibles she cuts without intermission in a curve line so as to
detach a triangular portion. When this hangs by the last fibre, lest
its weight should carry her to the ground, she balances her little
wings for flight, and the very moment it parts from the leaf flies
off with it in triumph; the detached portion remaining bent between
her legs in a direction perpendicular to her body. Thus without rule
or compasses do these diminutive creatures mete out the materials
of their work into portions of an ellipse, into ovals or circles,
accurately accommodating the dimensions of the several pieces of each
figure to each other. What other architect could carry impressed
upon the tablet of his memory the entire idea of the edifice which
he has to erect, and, destitute of square or plumb-line, cut out his
materials in their exact dimensions without making a single mistake?
Yet this is what our little bee invariably does. So far are human art
and reason excelled by the teaching of the Almighty[771].

Other insects besides bees construct habitations of different kinds
for their young, as various species of burrowing wasps (_Fossores_),
_Geotrupes_, &c., which deposit their eggs in cylindrical excavations
that become the abode of the future larvae. In the procedures of most of
these, nothing worth particularizing occurs; but one species called by
Reaumur the mason-wasp, (_Odynerus muraria_,) referred to in a former
letter, works upon so singular a plan, that it would be improper to
pass it over in silence, especially as these nests may be found in this
country in most sandy banks exposed to the sun. This insect bores a
cylindrical cavity from two to three inches deep, in hard sand which
its mandibles alone would be scarcely capable of penetrating, were it
not provided with a slightly glutinous liquor which it pours out of
its mouth, that, like the vinegar with which Hannibal softened the
Alps, acts upon the cement of the sand, and renders the separation of
the grains easy to the double pickaxe with which our little pioneer is
furnished. But the most remarkable circumstance is the mode in which it
disposes of the excavated materials. Instead of throwing them at random
on a heap, it carefully forms them into little oblong pellets, and
arranges them round the entrance of the hole so as to form a tunnel,
which, when the excavation is completed, is often not less than two or
three inches in length. For the greater part of its height this tunnel
is upright, but towards the top it bends into a curve, always however
retaining its cylindrical form. The little masses are so attached to
each other in this cylinder, as to leave numerous vacuities between
them, which give it the appearance of filagree-work. You will readily
divine that the excavated hole is intended for the reception of an egg,
but for what purpose the external tunnel is meant is not so apparent.
One use, and perhaps the most important, would seem to be to prevent
the incursions of the artful Ichneumons, _Chrysidae_, &c. which are
ever on the watch to insinuate their parasitic young into the nests of
other insects: it may render their access to the nest more difficult;
they may dread to enter into so long and dark a defile. I have seen,
however, more than once a _Chrysis_ come out of these tunnels. That
its use is only temporary, is plain from the circumstance that the
insect employs the whole fabric, when its egg is laid and store of food
procured, in filling up the remaining vacuity of the hole; taking down
the pellets, which are very conveniently at hand, and placing them in
it until the entrance is filled[772].--Latreille informs us, that a
nearly similar tunnel, but composed of grains of earth, is built at the
entrance of its cell by a bee of his family of _pioneers_[773].

Under this head, too, may be most conveniently arranged the very
singular habitations of the larvae of the Linnaean genus _Cynips_,
the gall-fly, though they can with no propriety be said to be
_constructed_ by the mother, who, provided with an instrument as
potent as an enchanter's wand, has but to pierce the site of the
foundation, and commodious apartments, as if by magic, spring up
and surround the germe of her future descendants. I allude to those
vegetable excrescencies termed _galls_, some of which resembling
beautiful berries and others apples, you must have frequently
observed on the leaves of the oak, and of which one species, the
Aleppo gall, as I have before noticed, is of such importance in the
ingenious art "_de peindre la parole et de parler aux yeux_[774]."
All these tumours owe their origin to the deposition of an egg in
the substance out of which they grow. This egg, too small almost for
perception, the parent insect, a little four-winged fly, introduces
into a puncture made by her curious spiral sting, and in a few hours
it becomes surrounded with a fleshy chamber, which not only serves
its young for shelter and defence, but also for food; the future
little hermit feeding upon its interior and there undergoing its
metamorphosis. Nothing can be more varied than these habitations.
Some are of a globular form, a bright red colour, and smooth fleshy
consistence, resembling beautiful fruits, for which indeed, as you
have before been told, they are eaten in the Levant: others, beset
with spines or clothed with hair, are so much like seed-vessels, that
an eminent modern chemist has contended respecting the Aleppo gall,
that it is actually a capsule[775]. Some are exactly round; others
like little mushrooms; others resemble artichokes; while others
again might be taken for flowers: in short, they are of a hundred
different forms, and of all sizes from that of a pin's head to that
of a walnut. Nor is their situation on the plant less diversified.
Some are found upon the leaf itself; others upon the footstalks
only; others upon the roots; and others upon the buds[776]. Some of
them cause the branches upon which they grow to shoot out into such
singular forms, that the plants producing them were esteemed by the
old botanists distinct species. Of this kind is the _Rose-willow_,
which old Gerard figures and describes as "not only making a gallant
shew, but also yeelding a most cooling aire in the heat of summer,
being set up in houses for the decking of the same." This willow
is nothing more than one of the common species, whose twigs, in
consequence of the deposition of the egg of a Cynips in their
summits, there shoot out into numerous leaves totally different
in shape from the other leaves of the tree, and arranged not much
unlike those composing the flower of a rose, adhering to the stem
even after the others fall off. Sir James Smith mentions a similar
_lusus_ on the Provence willows, which at first he took for a tufted
lichen[777]. From the same cause the twigs of the common wild rose
often shoot out into a beautiful tuft of numerous reddish moss-like
fibres wholly dissimilar from the leaves of the plant, deemed by the
old naturalists a very valuable medical substance, to which they
erroneously gave the name of Bedeguar. None of these variations is
accidental or common to several of the tribe, but each peculiar to
the galls formed by a single and distinct species of _Cynips_.

How the mere insertion of an egg into the substance of a leaf or
twig, even if accompanied, as some imagine, by a peculiar fluid,
should cause the growth of such singular protuberances around it,
philosophers are as little able to explain, as why the insertion of
a particle of variolous matter into a child's arm should cover it
with pustules of small pox. In both cases the effects seem to proceed
from some action of the foreign substance upon the secreting vessels
of the animal or vegetable: but of the nature of this action we know
nothing. Thus much is ascertained by the observations of Reaumur
and Malpighi--that the production of the gall, which however large
attains its full size in a day or two[778], is caused by the egg or
some accompanying fluid: not by the larva, which does not appear
until the gall is fully formed[779]; that the galls which spring from
leaves almost constantly take their origin from nerves[780]; and that
the egg, at the same time that it causes the growth of the gall,
itself derives nourishment from the substance that surrounds it,
becoming considerably larger before it is hatched than it was when
first deposited[781].--When chemically analysed, galls are found to
contain only the same principles as the plant from which they spring,
but in a more concentrated state.

No productions of nature seem to have puzzled the ancient
philosophers more than galls. The commentator on Dioscorides,
Mathiolus, who agreeably to the doctrine of those days ascribed their
origin to spontaneous generation, gravely informs us that weighty
prognostications as to the events of the ensuing year may be deduced
from ascertaining whether they contain spiders, worms, or flies.
Other philosophers, who knew that except by rare accident no other
animals are to be found in galls, besides grubs of different kinds
which they rationally conceived to spring from eggs, were chiefly at
a loss to account for the conveyance of these eggs into the middle
of a substance in which they could find no external orifice. They
therefore inferred that they were the eggs of insects deposited in
the earth, which had been drawn up by the roots of trees along with
the sap, and after passing through different vessels had stopped,
some in the leaves, others in the twigs, and had there hatched and
produced galls! Redi's solution of the difficulty was even more
extraordinary. This philosopher, who had so triumphantly combated the
absurdities of spontaneous generation, fell himself into greater.
Not having been able to witness the deposition of eggs by the parent
flies in the plants that produce galls, he took it for granted that
the grubs which he found within them could not spring from eggs:
and he was equally unwilling to admit their origin from spontaneous
generation,--an admission which would have been fatal to his own
most brilliant discoveries. He therefore cut the knot, by supposing
that to the same _vegetative soul_ by which fruits and plants are
produced, is committed the charge of creating the larvae found in
galls[782]! An instance truly humiliating, how little we can infer
from a man's just ideas on one point, that he will not be guilty of
the most pitiable absurdity on another!

Though by far the greater part of the vegetable excrescencies
termed galls, are caused by insects of the genus _Cynips_, they do
not always originate from this tribe. Some are produced by weevils
belonging to Schueppel's genus _Ceutorhynchus_; as those on the roots
of kedlock (_Sinapis arvensis_), which I have ascertained to be
inhabited by the larvae of _Curculio contractus_ Marsh., _Rhynchaenus
assimilis_, F. From the knob-like galls on turnips called in some
places the _anbury_, I have bred another of these weevils, (_Curculio
pleurostigma_, Marsh., _Rhynchaenus sulcicollis_, Gyll.) and I have
little doubt that the same insects, or species allied to them, cause
the clubbing of the roots of cabbages. It seems to be a beetle of the
same family that is figured by Reaumur[783], as causing the galls on
the leaves of the lime-tree. Others owe their origin to moths, as
those resembling a nutmeg which Reaumur received from Cyprus[784];
and others again to two-winged flies, as the woody galls of the
thistle caused by _Trypeta Cardui_[785], and the cottony galls found
on ground ivy, wild thyme, &c. as well as a very singular one on
the juniper resembling a flower, described by De Geer[786], all
which are the work of minute gall-gnats (_Cecidomyiae_, Latr.). Some
of these last convert even the flowers of plants into a kind of
galls, as _T. Loti_ of De Geer[787], which inhabits the blossoms of
_Lotus corniculatus_; and one which I have myself observed to render
the flowers of _Erysimum Barbarea_ like a hop blossom. A similar
monstrous appearance is communicated to the flowers of _Teucrium
supinum_ by a little field-bug, _Tingis Teucrii_ of Host[788],
and to another plant of the same genus by one of the same tribe
described by Reaumur[789]. In these two last instances, however,
the habitations do not seem strictly entitled to the appellation of
galls, as they originate not from the egg, but from the larva, which,
in the operation of extracting the sap, in some way imparts a morbid
action to the juices, causing the flower to expand unnaturally: and
the same remark is applicable to the gall-like swellings formed by
many Aphides, as _A. Pistaciae_, which causes the leaves of different
species of _Pistacia_ to expand into red finger-like cavities; _A.
Abietis_, which converts the buds or young shoots of the fir into a
very beautiful gall, somewhat resembling a fir-cone, or a pine-apple
in miniature; and _A. Bursariae_, which with its brood inhabits
angular utriculi on the leafstalk of the black poplar, numbers of
which I have observed on those trees by the road-side from Hull
to Cottingham.--The majority of galls are what entomologists have
denominated monothalamous, or consisting of only one chamber or cell;
but some are polythalamous, or consisting of several.

       *       *       *       *       *

Having thus described the most remarkable of the habitations
constructed by the parent insects for the accommodation of their
future young, I proceed to the second kind mentioned, namely, those
which are formed by the insect itself for its own use. These may be
again subdivided into such as are the work of the insects in their
larva state; and such as are formed by perfect insects.

Many larvae of all orders need no other habitations than the holes which
they form in seeking for, or eating, the substances upon which they
feed. Of this description are the majority of subterranean larvae, and
those which feed on wood, as the _Bostrichi_ or labyrinth beetles; the
_Anobia_ which excavate the little circular holes frequently met with
in ancient furniture and the wood work of old houses; and many larvae
of other orders, particularly _Lepidoptera_. One of these last, the
larva of _Cossus ligniperda_ differs from its congeners in fabricating
for its residence during winter a habitation of pieces of wood lined
with fine silk[790]. Under this division, too, come the singular
habitations of the subcutaneous larvae, so called from the circumstance
of their feeding upon the parenchyma included between the upper and
under cuticles of the leaves of plants, between which, though the
whole leaf is often not thicker than a sheet of writing-paper, they
find at once food and lodging. You must have been at some time struck
by certain white zigzag or labyrinth-like lines on the leaves of the
dandelion, bramble, and numerous other plants: the next-time you meet
with one of them, if you hold it up to the light you will perceive that
the colour of these lines is owing to the pulpy substance of the leaf
having there been removed; and at the further end you will probably
remark a dark- speck, which, when carefully extricated from
its covering, you will find to be the little miner of the tortuous
galleries which you are admiring. Some of these minute larvae, to which
the parenchyma of a leaf is a vast country, requiring several weeks to
be traversed by the slow process of mining which they adopt--that of
eating the excavated materials as they proceed--are transformed into
beetles (_Cionus Thapsi_, &c.); others into flies; and a still greater
number into very minute moths, as _Gracillaria? Wilkella_, _Clerkella_,
&c. Many of these last are little miracles of nature, which has
lavished on them the most splendid tints tastefully combined with gold,
silver and pearl: so that, were they but formed upon a larger scale,
they would far eclipse all other animals in richness of decoration.

Another tribe of larvae, not very numerous, content themselves
for their habitations with simple holes, into which they retire
occasionally. Many of these are merely cylindrical burrows in the
ground, as those formed by the larvae of field-crickets, Cicindelae
and Ephemerae. But the larvae of the very remarkable lepidopterous
genus (_Nycterobius_ of Mr. MacLeay) before alluded to[791], excavate
for themselves dwellings of a more artificial construction; forming
cylindrical holes in the trees of New Holland, particularly the
different species of _Banksia_, to which they are very destructive,
and defending the entrance against the attacks of the Mantes and
other carnivorous insects by a sort of trap-door composed of silk
interwoven with leaves and pieces of excrement, securely fastened
at the upper end, but left loose at the lower for the free passage
of the occupant. This abode they regularly quit at sun-set, for the
purpose of laying in a store of the leaves on which they feed.
These they drag by one at a time into their cell until the approach
of light, when they retreat precipitately into it, and there remain
closely secluded the whole day, enjoying the booty which their
nocturnal range has provided. One species lifts up the loose end of
its door by its tail, and enters backward, dragging after it a leaf
of _Banksia serrata_, which it holds by the footstalk[792].

A third description of larvae, chiefly of the two lepidopterous
tribes _Tortricidae_ and _Tineidae_, form into convenient habitations
the leaves of the plants on which they feed. Some of these merely
connect together with a few silken threads several leaves so as to
form an irregular packet, in the centre of which the little hermit
lives. Others confine themselves to a single leaf, of which they
simply fold one part over the other. A third description form and
inhabit a sort of roll, by some species made cylindrical, by others
conical, resembling the papers into which grocers put their sugar,
and as accurately constructed, only there is an opening left at the
smaller extremity for the egress of the insect in case of need. If
you were to see one of these rolls, you would immediately ask by
what mechanism it could possibly be made--how an insect without
fingers could contrive to bend a leaf into a roll, and to keep it
in that form until fastened with the silk which holds it together?
The following is the operation. The little caterpillar first fixes a
series of silken cables from one side of the leaf to the other. She
next pulls at these cables with her feet; and when she has forced
the sides to approach, she _fastens_ them together with shorter
threads of silk. If the insect finds that one of the larger nerves
of the leaf is so strong as to resist her efforts, she weakens it
by gnawing it here and there half through. What engineer could act
more sagaciously?--To form one of the conical or horn-shaped rolls,
which are not composed of a whole leaf, but of a long triangular
portion cut out of the edge, some other manoeuvres are requisite.
Placing herself upon the leaf, the caterpillar cuts out with her
jaws the piece which is to compose her roll. She does not however
entirely detach it: it would then want a base. She detaches that
part only which is to form the contour of the horn. This portion is
a triangular strap, which she rolls as she cuts. When the body of
the horn is finished, as it is intended to be fixed upon the leaf
in nearly an upright position, it is necessary to elevate it. To
effect this, she proceeds as we should with an inclined obelisk. She
attaches threads or little cables towards the point of the pyramid,
and raises it by the weight of her body[793].

A still greater degree of dexterity is manifested in fabricating the
habitations of the larvae of some other moths which feed on the leaves
of the rose-tree, apple, elm, and oak, on the under-side of which
they may in summer be often found. These form an oblong cavity in the
interior of a leaf by eating the parenchyma between the two membranes
composing its upper and under side, which, after having detached them
from the surrounding portion, it joins with silk so artfully that the
seams are scarcely discoverable even with a lens, so as to compose
a case or horn, cylindrical in the middle, its anterior orifice
circular, its posterior triangular. Were this dwelling cylindrical in
every part, the form of the two pieces that compose it would be very
simple; but the different shape of the two ends renders it necessary
that each side should have peculiar and dissimilar curvatures; and
Reaumur assures us, that these are as complex and difficult to
imitate as the contours of the pieces of cloth that compose the back
of a coat. Some of this tribe, whose proceedings I had the pleasure
of witnessing a short time since upon the alders in the Hull Botanic
Garden, more ingenious than their brethren, and willing to save the
labour of sewing up two seams in their dwelling, insinuate themselves
near the edge of a leaf instead of in its middle. Here they form
their excavation, mining into the very crenatures between the two
surfaces of the leaf, which, being joined together at the edge, there
form one seam of the case, and from their dentated figure give it
a very singular appearance, not unlike that of some fishes which
have fins upon their backs. The opposite side they are necessarily
forced to cut and sew up, but even in this operation they show an
ingenuity and contrivance worthy of admiration. The moths, which cut
out their suit from the middle of the leaf, wholly detach the two
surfaces that compose it before they proceed to join them together,
the serrated incisions made by their teeth, which, if they do not
cut as fast, in this respect are more effective than any scissors,
interlacing each other so as to support the separated portions until
they are properly joined. But it is obvious that this process cannot
be followed by those moths which cut out their house from the edge
of a leaf. If these were to detach the inner side before they had
joined the two pieces together, the builder as well as his dwelling
would inevitably fall. They therefore, before making any incision,
prudently _run_ (as a sempstress would call it) loosely together
in distant points the two membranes on that side. Then putting out
their heads they cut the intermediate portions, carefully avoiding
the larger nerves of the leaf; afterwards they sew up the detached
sides more closely, and only intersect the nerves when their labour
is completed[794].--The habitation made by a moth, which lives upon a
species of _Astragalus_, is in like manner formed of the epidermis of
the leaves, but in this several corrugated pieces project over each
other, so as to resemble the furbelows once in fashion[795].

Other larvae construct their habitations wholly of silk. Of this
description is that of a moth, whose abode, except as to the
materials which compose it, is formed on the same general plan as
that just described, and the larva in like manner feeds only on the
parenchyma of the leaf. In the beginning of spring, if you examine
the leaves of your pear-trees, you will scarcely fail to meet with
some beset on the under surface with several perpendicular downy
russet- projections, about a quarter of an inch high, and not
much thicker than a pin, of a cylindrical shape, with a protuberance
at the base, and altogether resembling at first sight so many spines
growing out of the leaf. You would never suspect that these could be
the habitations of insects; yet that they are is certain. Detach one
of them, and give it a gentle squeeze, and you will see emerge from
the lower end a minute caterpillar with a yellowish body and black
head. Examine the place from which you have removed it, and you will
perceive a round excavation in the cuticle and parenchyma of the
leaf, the size of the end of the tube by which it was concealed.
This excavation is the work of the above-mentioned caterpillar, which
obtains its food by moving its little tent from one part of the leaf
to the other, and eating away the space immediately under it. It
touches no other part; and when these insects abound, as they often
do to the great injury of pear-trees[796], you will perceive every
leaf bristled with them, and covered with little withered specks, the
vestiges of their former meals. The case in which the caterpillar
resides, and which is quite essential to its existence, is composed
of silk spun from its mouth almost as soon as it is excluded from
the egg. As it increases in size, it enlarges its habitation by
slitting it in two, and introducing a strip of new materials.
But the most curious circumstance in the history of this little
Arab is the mode by which it retains its tent in a perpendicular
posture. This it effects partly by attaching silken threads from the
protuberance at the base to the surrounding surface of the leaf. But
being not merely a mechanician, but a profound natural philosopher
well acquainted with the properties of air, it has another resource
when any extraordinary violence threatens to overturn its slender
turret. It forms a _vacuum_ in the protuberance at the base, and
thus as effectually fastens it to the leaf as if an air-pump had
been employed! This vacuum is caused by the insect's retreating on
the least alarm up its narrow case, which its body completely fills,
and thus leaving the space below free of air. In detaching one of
these cases you may easily convince yourself of the fact. If you
seize it suddenly while the insect is at the bottom, you will find
that it is readily pulled off, the silken cords giving way to a very
slight force; but if, proceeding gently, you give the insect time to
retreat, the case will be held so closely to the leaf as to require a
much stronger effort to loosen it. As if aware that, should the air
get admission from below, and thus render a vacuum impracticable,
the strongest bulwark of its fortress would be destroyed, our little
philosopher carefully avoids gnawing a hole in the leaf, contenting
itself with the pasturage afforded by the parenchyma above the lower
epidermis; and when the produce of this area is consumed, it gnaws
asunder the cords of its tent, and pitches it at a short distance as
before. Having attained its full growth, it assumes the pupa state,
and after a while issues out of its confinement a small brown moth,
with long hind legs, the _Phalaena Tinea serratella_ of Linne[797].

Some larvae, which form their covering of pure silk, are not content
with a single coating, but actually envelop themselves in another,
open on one side and very much resembling a cloak; whence Reaumur
called them "_Teignes a fourreau a manteau_." What is very striking
in the construction of this cloak, is, that the silk, instead of
being woven into one uniform close texture, is formed into numerous
transparent scales over-wrapping each other, and altogether very much
resembling the scales of a fish[798]. These mantle-covered cases, one
of which I once had the pleasure of discovering, are inhabited by
the larva of a little moth apparently first described by Dr. Zincken
genannt Sommer, who calls it _Tinea palliatella_[799].

Various substances besides silk are fabricated into habitations by
other larvae, though usually joined together either with silk or an
analogous gummy material. Thus _Diurnea? Lichenum_ forms of pieces
of lichen a dwelling resembling one of the turreted _Helices_, many
of which I observed in June 1812 on an oak in Barham. The larvae of
another moth, which also feeds upon lichens, instead of employing these
vegetables in forming its habitation, composes it of grains of stone
eroded from the walls of buildings upon which its food is found, and
connected by a silken cement. These insects were the subject of a paper
in the Memoirs of the French Academy[800], by M. de la Voye, who, from
the circumstance of their being found in great abundance on mouldering
walls, attributed to them the power of eating stone, and regarded them
as the authors of injuries proceeding solely from the hand of time:
for the insects themselves are so minute, and the coating of grains
of stone composing their cases is so trifling, that Reaumur observes
they could scarcely make any perceptible impression on a wall from
which they had procured materials for ages[801].--Another lepidopterous
larva, but of a much larger size and different genus, the case of which
is preserved in the cabinet of the President of the Linnean Society,
who pointed it out to me, employs the spines apparently of some species
of _Mimosa_, which are ranged side by side so as to form a very elegant
fluted cylinder. A similar arrangement of pieces of small twigs is
observable in the habitation of the females[802] of the larvae of a moth
referred by Von Scheven to _Bombyx vestita_, F.; which Ochsenheimer
regards as synonymous with _Psyche graminella_, while _P. Viciella_
of the _Wiener Verzeichniss_ covers itself with short portions of the
stems of grasses placed transversely, and united by means of silk into
a five- or six-sided case. The habitation of a third larva of the same
family, described and figured by Reaumur (_P. graminella_, Ochsenh.
just named), is composed of squarish pieces of the _leaves_ of grass
fastened only at one end, and overwrapping each other like the tiles of
a house; and that of another noticed by the same author, of portions
of the smallest twigs of broom arranged on the same plan[803]. Indeed
the larvae of the whole of this tribe of moths, now separated into a
distinct genus (_Psyche_, Schrank, Ochsenh., _Fumea_, Haworth), but
which according to Germar needs further subdivision, reside in cases or
sacks (whence they are called by the Germans _Sacktraeger_) composed of
silk, and fragments of grass, bark, &c.

The larvae of a small beetle (_Clytra longimana_) reside in oviform
cases apparently of a calcareous or earthy substance, joined by
a gummy cement and covered with red hairs, the origin of which,
Huebner, who first discovered them, could not account for: and from
the observations of Amstein and the French translator of Fuessly's
_Archives_, it seems probable that the larvae of all the species
of _Clytra_, and according to Zschorn, at least of one species of
Cryptocephalus, (_C. duodecimpunctatus_) differing in this respect
from all other known _Coleoptera_, live in moveable cases[804]. I
have however found a species of _Limnius_ (_L. aeneus_) inhabiting a
fixed case made of particles of stone or sand.

Wax is the principal substance employed in the habitations of the larvae
before mentioned[805], occasionally so destructive to bee-hives. These
insidious depredators, which are mentioned by Aristotle[806], tying
together, with silk, grains of wax (which, and not honey, forms their
food), construct galleries of a considerable length, and thus concealed
from the sight, and protected from the stings of the armed people
whom they have attacked, push their mines into the very heart of the
fortress, and pursue their robberies in perfect safety[807].

As many of the habitations which I have been describing, fit the
body of the insects as close as a coat, they might perhaps with more
propriety be called _clothes_. This is certainly the most appropriate
designation of the abodes of some species of Tineae (the clothes'
moths), which not only cover themselves with a coat, but employ the
very same material in its composition as we do in ours, forming it
of wool or hair curiously felted together. Like us, they are born
naked, but not like us helpless at that period, scarcely have they
breathed before they begin to clothe themselves; thus contradicting
Dr. Paley's assertion, that "the _human_ animal is the only one
which is naked, and the only one which can clothe itself[808]:" and
wisely inattentive to change of fashion, the same suit serves them
from their birth to mature age. The shape of their dress is adapted
to that of their body--a cylindrical case open at both ends. The
stuff of which it is composed is the manufacture of the larva of the
moth (_Tinea_), which incorporates wool or hair artfully cut from
our clothes or furniture, with silk drawn from its own mouth, into
a warm and thick tissue: and as this would not be soft enough for
its tender skin, it also lines the inside of its coat with a layer
of pure silk. Since this suit of clothes during the earliest age
of the insect accurately fits its body, you will readily conceive
that it will frequently require enlarging. This the little occupant
accomplishes as dexterously as any tailor. If the case merely
requires lengthening, the task is easy. All that is needful is to add
a new ring of hair or wool and silk to each end. But to enlarge it
in width is not so simple an affair. Yet it sets to work precisely
as we should, slitting the case on the two opposite sides, and then
adroitly inserting between them two pieces of the requisite size. It
does not, however, cut open the case from one end to the other at
once: the sides would separate too far asunder, and the insect be
left naked. It therefore first cuts each side about half way down,
and then after having filled up the fissure proceeds to cut the
remaining half: so that, in fact, four enlargements are made, and
four separate pieces inserted.--The colour of the habit is always
the same as that of the stuff from which it is taken. Thus, if its
original colour be blue, and the insect previously to enlarging it be
put upon red cloth, the circles at the end and two stripes down the
middle will be red. If placed alternately upon cloths of different
hues, its dress will be parti- like that of a Harlequin.--The
injury occasioned to us by these insects is not confined to the
quantity of materials consumed in clothing and feeding themselves.
In moving from place to place they seem to be as much incommoded by
the long hairs which surround them, as we are by walking amongst high
grass; and accordingly, marching scythe in hand, with their teeth
they cut out a smooth road, from time to time reposing themselves,
and anchoring their little case with small silken cables.

If, as I hope, you are induced to investigate the manners of
these insects, you have but to leave an old coat for a few months
undisturbed in a dark closet, and you may be pretty certain of
meeting with an abundant colony.

Not merely wool or hair, but another substance analogous to one
employed in our dress, is adopted for their clothing by other insects.
The larva of a fly which lives on the seeds of willows, makes itself a
very beautiful case of their cottony down, not only impervious to wet
and cold, but serving, if accidentally blown into the water, which from
the situation of these trees frequently happens, as a buoyant little
barge which is wafted safely to the shore[809].

The habitations which we have hitherto been considering, are formed
by larvae that live on land, but others equally remarkable are
constructed by aquatic species, the larvae of the various _Phryganeae_
L., a tribe of four-winged insects which an ordinary observer would
call moths, but which are even of a distinct order (_Trichoptera_),
not having their wings covered by the scales which adorn the
lepidopterous race. If you are desirous of examining the insects to
which I am alluding, you have only to place yourself by the side of
a clear and shallow pool of water, and you cannot fail to observe
at the bottom little oblong moving masses resembling pieces of
straw, wood, or even stone. These are the larvae in question, well
known to fishermen by the title of _Caddis-worms_, and which, if you
take them out of the water, you will observe to inhabit cases of
a very singular conformation. Of the larva itself, which somewhat
resembles the caterpillars of many _Lepidoptera_, nothing is to be
seen but the head and six legs by means of which it moves itself
in the water, and drags after it the case in which the rest of the
body is inclosed, and into which on any alarm it wholly retires. The
construction of these habitations is very various. Some select four
or five pieces of the leaves of grass, which they glue together into
a shapely polygonal case; others employ portions of the stems of
rushes, placed side by side so as to form an elegant fluted cylinder;
some arrange round them pieces of leaves like a spirally-rolled
ribband[810]; others inclose themselves in a mass of the leaves of
any aquatic plants united without regularity; and others again form
their abode of minute pieces of wood either fresh or decayed[811].
One, like the _Sabellae_[812], forms a horn-shaped case composed of
grains of sand, so equal in size, and so nicely and regularly gummed
together, the sides throughout being of the thickness of one grain
only, that the first time I viewed it I could scarcely persuade
myself it could be the work of an insect. The case of _Leptocerus
bimaculatus_, which is less artificially constructed of a mixture
of mud and sand, is pyriform, and has its end curiously stopped by
a plate formed of grains of sand, with a central aperture[813].
Other species construct houses which may be called alive, forming
them of the shells of various aquatic snails of different kinds and
sizes even while inhabited, all of which are immoveably fixed to it,
and dragged about at its pleasure--a covering as singular as if a
savage, instead of clothing himself with squirrels' skins, should
sew together into a coat the animals themselves. However various may
be the form of the case externally, within it is usually cylindrical
and lined with silk; and though seldom apparently wider than just to
admit the body of the insect, some species have the power of turning
round in it, and of putting out their head at either end[814]. Some
larvae constantly make their cases of the same materials; others
employ indifferently any that are at hand; and the new ones which
they construct as they increase in size (for they have not the
faculty, like the larva of the moth, of enlarging them) have often an
appearance quite dissimilar to that of the old. Even those that are
most careless about the nature of the materials of their house, are
solicitously attentive to one circumstance respecting them, namely,
their specific gravity. Not having the power of swimming, but only of
walking at the bottom of the water by aid of the six legs attached
to the fore part of the body which is usually protruded out of the
case, and the insect itself being heavier than water, it is of great
importance that its house should be of a specific gravity so nearly
that of the element in which it resides, as while walking neither to
incommode it by its weight, nor by too great buoyancy; and it is as
essential that it should be so equally _ballasted_ in every part as
to be readily moveable in any position. Under these circumstances our
Caddis-worms evince their proficiency in hydrostatics, selecting the
most suitable substances; and, if the cell be too heavy, glueing
to it a bit of leaf or straw; or, if too light, a shell or piece of
gravel. It is from this necessity of regulating the specific gravity,
that to the cases formed with the greatest regularity we often see
attached a seemingly superfluous piece of wood, leaf, or the like.

A larva of one of the aquatic _Tipulariae_ lives in cases somewhat
similar to those of some _Phryganeae_. Several of these of a fusiform
shape and brown colour, composed partly of silk and partly perhaps
of fragments of leaves, and inhabited by a red larva apparently of
a _Chironomus_, were found by Reaumur upon dead leaves in a pool of
water in the Bois de Boulogne[815].

In concluding this head I may observe, that here might have been
described the various abodes which solitary larvae prepare for
themselves previously to assuming the pupa, and intended for their
protection in that defenceless stage of existence; but as I shall
have occasion again to refer to them in speaking of the larva state
of insects, I shall defer their description to that letter, to which
they more strictly belong.

       *       *       *       *       *

From the next division of the habitations of insects--those formed
by solitary _perfect_ insects for their own accommodation--I shall
select for description only two, both the work of spiders, and
alluded to in a former letter, which indeed, with the exception of
the inartificial retreats made by the _Grylli_, _Cicindelae_, and
perhaps a few others, are the only ones properly belonging to it.

The habitation of one of these (_Cteniza caementaria_) is
subterraneous, not a mere shallow cavity, but a tube or gallery
upwards of two feet in length and half an inch broad. This tunnel,
so vast compared with the size of the insect, it digs by means of
its strong jaws in a steep bank of bare clay, so that the rain
may readily run off without penetrating to its dwelling. Its next
operation is to line the whole from top to bottom with a web of fine
silk, which serves the double purpose of preventing the earth that
composes the walls from falling in, and, by its connexion with the
door of the orifice, of giving information to the spider of what
is passing above. You doubtless suppose that in saying _door_ I am
speaking metaphorically. It could never enter into your conception
that any animal, much less an insect, could construct any thing
really deserving of that name--any thing like our doors, turning
upon a hinge, and accurately fitted to the frame of the opening
which it is intended to close. Yet such a door, incredible as it may
seem, is actually framed by this spider. It does not indeed, like
us, compose it of wood, but of several coats of dried earth fastened
to each other with silk. When finished, its outline is as perfectly
circular as if traced with compasses; the inferior surface is convex
and smooth, the superior flat and rough, and so like the adjoining
earth as not to be distinguishable from it. This door the ingenious
artist fixes to the entrance of her gallery by a hinge of silk,
which plays with the greatest freedom, and allows it to be opened
and shut with ease; and as if acquainted with the laws of gravity,
she invariably fixes the hinge at the _highest_ side of the opening,
so that the door when pushed up shuts again by its own weight. She
has not less sagaciously left a little edge or groove just within
the entrance, upon which the door closes, and to which it fits with
such precision, that it seems to make but one surface with it. Such
is the astonishing structure of this little animal's abode; nor
is its defence of its subterraneous cavern less surprising. If an
observer adroitly insinuates the point of a pin under the edge of
the door, and elevates it a little, he immediately perceives a very
strong resistance.--What is its cause?--The spider, warned by the
vibrations of the threads which extend from the door to the bottom
of her gallery, runs with all speed to the door, fastens its legs to
it on one side, and on the other to the walls, and, turning upon its
back, pulls with all its might. Thus the door is alternately shut or
opened, as the exertions of the observer or of the spider prevail.
It is easy to guess which will in the end conquer; and the spider,
when it finds all resistance ineffectual, betakes itself to flight,
and retreats. If, to make a further experiment, the observer fastens
down the door so that it cannot be forced open, the next morning he
will find a new entrance, with a new door formed at a small distance;
or, if he take the door entirely away, another will be constructed in
less than twelve hours.

The habitation thus singularly formed and defended is not at all used
as a snare, but merely as a safe abode for the spider, which hunts
its prey at night only; and, when caught, devours it in security at
the bottom of its den, which is generally strewed with the remains
of coleopterous insects[816].--From some curious observations of
M. Dorthes on this species in the second volume of the _Linnean
Transactions_, it appears that both the male and female spider
and as many as thirty young ones occasionally inhabit one of these
galleries.--_Mygale Sauvagesii_ of Rossi, which is a distinct species
found in Corsica, forms a similar habitation[817].

The galleries just described are the work of an European species not
uncommon in the south of France; but similar ones are fabricated by
_Thomisus venatorius_, an inhabitant of the West India islands, as
well as by many other tropical species. I have seen one of these,
which had been dug out of the earth, in the cabinet of Thomas Hall,
Esq. F.L.S., that was nearly a foot in length, and above an inch in
diameter, forming a cylindrical bag of dark- silk, closed at
the bottom, and accurately fitted at the top by a door or lid.

The habitation of _Argyroneta aquatica_, the other spider to which
I alluded, is chiefly remarkable for the element in which it is
constructed and the materials that compose it. It is built in the
midst of water, and formed, in fact, of air! Spiders are usually
terrestrial, but this is aquatic, or rather amphibious; for though
she resides in the midst of water, in which she swims with great
celerity, sometimes on her belly but more frequently on her back,
and is an admirable diver, she not unfrequently hunts on shore,
and, having caught her prey, plunges with it to the bottom of the
water. Here it is she forms her singular and unique abode. She would
evidently have but a very uncomfortable time were she constantly wet,
but this she is sagacious enough to avoid; and by availing herself of
some well-known philosophical principles, she constructs for herself
an apartment in which, like the mermaids and sea-nymphs of fable,
she resides in comfort and security. The following is her process.
First she spins loose threads in various directions attached to the
leaves of aquatic plants, which may be called the frame-work of her
chamber, and over them she spreads a transparent varnish resembling
liquid glass, which issues from the middle of her spinners, and which
is so elastic that it is capable of great expansion and contraction:
and if a hole be made in it, it immediately closes again. Next she
spreads over her belly a pellicle of the same material, and ascends
to the surface. The precise mode in which she transfers a bubble
of air beneath this pellicle is not accurately known; but from an
observation made by the ingenious author of the little work from
which this account is abstracted, he concludes that she draws the
air into her body by the anus, which she presents to the surface of
the pool, and then pumps it out from an opening at the base of the
belly between the pellicle and that part of the body, the hairs of
which keep it extended. Clothed with this aerial mantle, which to
the spectator seems formed of resplendent quicksilver, she plunges
to the bottom, and, with as much dexterity as a chemist transfers
gas with a gas-holder, introduces her bubble of air beneath the
roof prepared for its reception. This manoeuvre she repeats ten or
twelve times, until at length in about a quarter of an hour she has
transported as much air as suffices to expand her apartment to its
intended extent, and now finds herself in possession of a little
aerial edifice, I had almost said an enchanted palace, affording her
a commodious and dry retreat in the very midst of the water. Here
she reposes unmoved by the storms that agitate the surface of the
pool, and devours her prey at ease and in safety. Both sexes form
these lodgings. At a particular season of the year the male quits his
apartment, approaches that of the female, enters it, and enlarging it
by the bubble of air that he carries with him, it becomes a common
abode for the happy pair[818].--The spider which forms these singular
habitations is one of the largest European species, and in some
countries not uncommon in stagnant pools.

                                                  I am, &c.


FOOTNOTES:

[758] _Melitta._ *. a. K.

[759] Grew's _Rarities of Gresham Colledge_, 154. Kirby, _Mon. Ap.
Angl._ i. 131. _Melitta._ *. a.

[760] Curtis _Brit. Ent. t._ 61.

[761] _Mon. Ap. Angl._ i. 173. _Apis._ **. c. 2. [Greek: a]. From
later observations I am inclined to think that these cells may
possibly, as in the case of the humble-bee, be in fact formed by the
larva previously to becoming a pupa, after having eaten the provision
of pollen and honey with which the parent bee had surrounded it. The
vermicular shape, however, of the masses with which the cases are
surrounded, does not seem easily reconcileable with this supposition,
unless they are considered as the excrement of the larva.

[762] _Apis._ **. d. 2. [Greek: b]. K.

[763] Reaum. vi. 39-50. _Mon. Ap. Angl._ i. 189. _Apis._ **. [Greek:
a]. 2. [Greek: b].

[764] _Ann. du Mus._ x. 236.

[765] Reaumur plausibly supposes that it has been from observing this
bee thus loaded, that the tale mentioned by Aristotle and Pliny, of
the hive-bee's ballasting itself with a bit of stone previously to
flying home in a high wind, has arisen.

[766] Reaum. vi. 57-88. _Mon. Ap. Angl._ i. 179.

[767] _Apis._ **. c. 2. [Greek: d]. K.

[768] _Apis._ **. c. 2. [Greek: a]. K.

[769] Reaum. vi. 139-148.

[770] Latr. _Hist. Nat. des Fourmis_, 297.

[771] Reaum. vi. 971-24. _Mon. Ap. Angl._ i. 157. Apis. **. c. 2.
[Greek: a].

[772] Reaum. vi. 251-7. _t._ xxvi. _f._ 1.

[773] Latr. _Fourmis_, 419.

[774] See above, p. 317--.

[775] Aikin's _Dictionary of Chemistry_, i. 455. What have probably
been taken by Mr. Aikin for "kernels," in the imperforated nuts, are
the cocoons of the inhabitants of these galls in the pupa state,
which often extremely resemble the seeds of a capsule, as Reaumur
(iii. 429.) has remarked.

[776] Reaum. iii. 417, &c.

[777] _Introd. to Botany_, 349.

[778] Reaum. iii. 474.

[779] Ibid. 479.

[780] Ibid. 501.

[781] Ibid. 479.

[782] _De Insectis_, 233 &c.

[783] Reaum. iii. t. 38. f. 2, 3.

[784] Ibid. iii. 448.

[785] Ibid. 455.

[786] De Geer, vi. 409.

[787] De Geer, vi. 421.

[788] Jacquin _Collect._ ii. 255.

[789] Reaum. iii. 427.

[790] Lyonet, _Anat. of Coss._ 9.

[791] P. 307, 392.

[792] Lewin's _Prodromus Entomology_ (sic!), p. 8.

[793] Bonnet, ix. 188.

[794] Reaum. iii. 100-120.

[795] Ibid. 146.

[796] Forsyth _on Fruit Trees_, 4to edit. 271.

[797] Goeze _Natur. Menschenleben und Vorsehung_. Anderson's
_Recreations_, ii. 409. See above p. 16.

[798] Reaum. iii. 206. PLATE XVII. FIG. 9.

[799] Germar's _Mag. fuer Entomologie_, i. 40.

[800] x. 458.

[801] Reaum. iii. 183.

[802] The larvae of the males intermix with the pieces of twigs, which
are less closely and regularly arranged, bits of dried leaves and other
light materials. See the excellent elucidation of the history of this
tribe, whose mode of generation is so singular, by Von Scheven, in the
_Naturforscher_ Stk. xx. 61, &c. also a valuable paper by Dr. Zincken
genannt Sommer, in Germar's _Mag. fuer Ent._ i. 19-40.

[803] Reaum. iii. 148-9. T. 11. f. 10. 11.

[804] Fuessly, _Archiv._ 53. _t._ 31. Germar's _Mag. fuer Ent._ i. 136.

[805] See above, p. 165.

[806] Aristot. _Hist. Anim._ l. viii. c. 27.

[807] Reaum. iii. mem. 8.

[808] _Nat. Theol._ 230.

[809] Reaum. iii. 130.

[810] PLATE XVII. FIG. 10.

[811] Reaum. iii. 156-9.

[812] Sowerby's _Nat. Miscell._ _No._ ix. _t._ 51.

[813] De Geer, ii. 564.

[814] De Geer, ii. 564.

[815] Reaum. iii. 179.

[816] Sauvages _Hist. de l'Acad. des Sc. de Paris_, 1758, p. 26.
Perhaps this, as well as _M. caementaria_, belongs to Latreille's
genus _Cteniza_. _Familles Naturelles du Regne Animal_, 313.

[817] Latr. _Hist. Nat._ vii. 165.

[818] _Memoire pour servir a commencer l'Histoire des Araignees
Aquatiques_, 12mo.




                               LETTER XV.

                        _HABITATIONS OF INSECTS
                              CONTINUED._


The habitations of insects which I shall next proceed to describe,
are those formed by the united labour of several individuals.

The societies which thus combine their operations may be divided into
two kinds: 1st, those of which the object is simply the conservation
of the individuals composing them; and 2dly, those whose object is
also the nurture and education of their young. To the last head
belong bees, wasps, &c.: to the former the larvae of some species of
moths, whose labours being the most simple I shall first describe.

       *       *       *       *       *

You cannot fail to have observed in gardens the fruit-trees
disfigured, as you would probably think them, with what at first view
seem very strong and thick spiders' webs. If you have bestowed upon
these webs the slightest attention, you must have likewise remarked
that they differ very materially in their construction from those
spun by spiders, inclosing on every side an angular space, and being
besides filled with caterpillars. These are the larvae of _Arctia
chrysorrhoea_, and the web which contains them is spun by their
united labour for the protection of the common society. As soon as
the cluster of eggs deposited by the parent moth is hatched, the
young caterpillars, to the number of three or four hundred, commence
their operations. At first they content themselves by forming a
sort of hammock of the single leaf upon which they find themselves
assembled, covering it with a roof composed of a number of silken
threads drawn from one edge to the other; and under one or more
of these temporary habitations they reside for a few days, until
they are become large and strong enough to undertake a more solid
and spacious building sufficient to contain the whole society. In
constructing this new habitation, they spin a close silken web round
the end of two or three adjoining twigs and the leaves attached to
them, so as to include the requisite space. They are not curious in
giving any particular form to the edifice: sometimes it is flat,
often roundish, but always more or less angular. The interior is
divided by partitions of silk into several irregular apartments,
to each of which there is purposely left an appropriate door.
Within these the caterpillars retire at night, or in rainy weather,
quitting the nest on fine days, and dispersing themselves over the
neigbouring leaves, upon which they feed. Here too they repose during
the critical period of the change of their skins. On the approach of
winter the whole community shut themselves up in the nest, which,
by the addition of repeated layers of silk, has at this time become
so thick and strong as to be impervious to the wind and rain. They
remain in a state of torpidity during the cold months, but towards
the beginning of April are awakened to activity by the genial breath
of spring, and begin to feed with greediness upon the young leaves
that surround their habitation, which, as they soon greatly increase
in size, they find it necessary to enlarge. One might fear that a
structure formed of such materials would at this period be sadly
damaged by the growth of the young shoots and leaves of the twigs
which it incloses; but the inhabitants, as if to guard against such
an accident, have gnawed off all the buds within their dwelling, and
thus secured themselves from this inconvenience[819].

The nest of the larvae of another species of moth, the _Lasiocampa
processionea_, unfortunately not a native of this country, to which
on account of their singular manners, that will be detailed to you in
a subsequent letter, Reaumur has given the title of _processionary_
caterpillars, is somewhat different in its construction from
that just described, though formed of the same material. As the
caterpillars which fabricate it feed upon the leaves of the oak, it
is always found upon this tree, attached not to the branches but the
trunk, sometimes at a considerable height from the ground. In shape
it resembles an irregular knob or protuberance, and the silk which
composes it being of a gray colour, at a distance it would be taken
for a mass of lichens. Sometimes this nest is upwards of eighteen
inches long, and six broad, rising in the middle about four inches
from the surface of the tree. Between the trunk and the silken
covering, a single hole is left which serves for the entrance and
exit of the inhabitants. These differ in their manners from those
last mentioned. While very young they have no fixed habitation,
contenting themselves with a succession of different temporary camps
until they have attained two-thirds of their growth. Then it is they
unite their labours in spinning the nest just described; and in this
they continue to reside in harmony until they become perfect insects,
assuming in it even the state of chrysalis[820].

Habitations similar, as to their general structure, to the above,
though differing in several minute circumstances, are formed by
the larvae of several other moths, as of _Arctia phaeorrhoea_ of
Curtis, _Trichoda neustria_, &c. as well as those of _Vanessa Io_,
_Melitaea Cinxia_, and some other butterflies: and even of some
saw-flies (_serrifera_), which, however, have each a separate silken
covering. But as it would be tedious to describe these particularly,
I pass on to the habitations formed by insects in their perfect
state, which have in view the education of their young as well as
self-preservation, describing in succession those of _ants_, _bees_,
_wasps_, and _white-ants_.

       *       *       *       *       *

Of these the most simple in their structure are the nests of different
kinds of _ants_, many of which externally present the appearance of
hillocks more or less conical, formed of earth or other substances.

The nest of the large red or horse ants (_F. rufa_,) which are common
in woods, at the first aspect seems a very confused mass. Exteriorly
it is a conical mount composed of pieces of straw, fragments of wood,
little stones, leaves, grain; in short, of any portable materials
within their reach. But however rude its outward appearance, and the
articles of which it consists, interiorly it presents an arrangement
admirably calculated at once for protection against the excessive
heat of the sun, and yet to retain a due degree of genial warmth. It
is wholly composed of numerous small apartments of different sizes,
communicating with each other by means of galleries and arranged in
separate stories, some very deep in the earth, others a considerable
height above it: the former for the reception of the young in cold
weather and at night, the latter adapted to their use in the day time.
In forming these, the ants mix the earth excavated from the bottom of
the nest with the other materials of which the mount consists, and
thus give solidity to the whole. Besides the avenues which join the
apartments together, other galleries varying in dimensions communicate
with the outside of the nest at the top of the mount. These open doors
would seem ill calculated for precluding the admission of wet or of
nocturnal enemies: but the ants alter their dimensions continually
according to circumstances; and they wholly close them at night, when
all gradually retire to the interior, and a few sentinels only are left
to guard the gates. On rainy days, too, they keep them shut, and when
the sky is cloudy open them partially[821].

The habitations of these ants are much larger than those of any other
species in this country, and sometimes as big as a small haycock;
but they are mere molehills when compared with the enormous mounds
which other species apparently of the same family, but much larger,
construct in warmer climates. Malouet states, that in the forests
of Guiana he once saw ant-hills which, though his companion would
not suffer him to approach nearer than forty paces for fear of his
being devoured, seemed to him to be fifteen or twenty feet high, and
thirty or forty in diameter at the base, assuming the form of a
pyramid, truncated at one-third of its height[822], and Stedman, when
in Surinam, once passed ant-hills six feet high, and at least one
hundred feet in circumference[823].

The nest of _Formica brunnea_ is composed wholly of earth, and
consists of a great number of stories, sometimes not fewer than
forty, twenty below the level of the soil, and as many above,
which last, following the <DW72> of the ant-hill, are concentric.
Each story, separately examined, exhibits cavities in the shape of
saloons, narrower apartments, and long galleries which preserve the
communication between both. The arched roofs of the most spacious
rooms are supported by very thin walls, or occasionally by small
pillars and true buttresses; some having only one entrance from
above, others a second communicating with the lower story. The main
galleries, of which in some places several meet in one large saloon,
communicate with other subterranean passages, which are often carried
to the distance of several feet from the hill.--These insects work
chiefly after sunset.--In building their nest they employ soft clay
only, scraped from its bottom when sufficiently moistened by a
shower, which, far from injuring, consolidates and strengthens their
architecture. Different labourers convey small masses of this ductile
material between their mandibles, and with the same instruments they
spread and mould it to their will, the antennae accompanying every
movement. They render all firm by pressing the surface lightly with
their fore feet; and however numerous the masses of clay composing
these walls, and though connected by no glutinous material, they
appear when finished one single layer well united, consolidated,
and smoothed. Having traced the plan of their structure, by placing
here and there the foundations of the pillars and partition-walls,
they add successively new portions: and when the walls of a gallery
or apartment which are half a line thick are elevated about half
an inch in height, they join them by springing a flattish arch or
roof from one side to the other. Nothing can be a more interesting
spectacle than one of these cities while building. In one place
vertical walls form the outline, which communicate with different
corridors by openings made in the masonry; in another we see a true
saloon whose vaults are supported by numerous pillars; and further on
are the cross ways or squares where several streets meet, and whose
roofs, though often more than two inches across, the ants are under
no difficulty in constructing, beginning the sides of the arch in the
angle formed by two walls, and extending them by successive layers
of clay till they meet; while crowds of masons arrive from all parts
with their particle of mortar, and work with a regularity, harmony,
and activity, which can never enough be admired. So assiduous are
they in their operations, that they will complete a story with all
its saloons, vaulted roofs, partitions and galleries, in seven
or eight hours. If they begin a story, and for want of moisture
are unable to finish it, they pull down again all the crumbling
apartments that are not covered in[824].

Another species of ants (_F. fusca_) are also masons. When they wish to
heighten their habitations, they begin by covering the top with a thick
layer of clay which they transport from the interior. In this layer
they trace out the plan of the new story, first hollowing out little
cavities of almost equal depth at different distances from each other,
and of a size adapted to their purposes. The elevations of earth left
between them serve for bases to the interior walls, which, when they
have removed all the loose earth from the floors of the apartments, and
reduced the foundations to a due thickness, they heighten, and lastly
cover all in. M. Huber saw a single working ant make and cover in a
gallery which was two or three inches long, and of which the interior
was rendered perfectly concave, without assistance[825].

The societies of _F. fuliginosa_ make their habitations in the
trunks of old oaks or willow-trees, gnawing the wood into numberless
stories more or less horizontal, the ceilings and floors of which
are about five or six lines asunder, black, and as thin as card,
sometimes supported by vertical partitions, forming an infinity of
apartments which communicate by small apertures; at others by small
light cylindrical pillars furnished with a base and capital which
are arranged in colonnades, leaving a communication perfectly free
throughout the whole extent of the story[826].

Two other tribes of carpenter ants (_F. aethiops_ and _F. flava_) use
saw-dust in forming their buildings. The former applies this material
only to the building of walls and stopping up chinks: the latter
composes whole stages or stories of it made into a sort of _papier
mache_, with earth and spiders' web[827].

Some ants form their nests of the leaves of trees. One of these was
observed by Sir Joseph Banks in New South Wales, which was formed
by glueing together several leaves as large as a hand. To keep these
leaves in a proper position, thousands of ants united their strength,
and if driven away, the leaves spring back with great violence[828].

       *       *       *       *       *

The most profound philosopher, equally with the most incurious of
mortals, is struck with astonishment on inspecting the interior of a
_bee-hive_. He beholds a city in miniature. He sees this city divided
into regular streets, these streets composed of houses constructed on
the most exact geometrical principles and the most symmetrical plan,
some serving for store-houses for food, others for the habitations of
the citizens, and a few, much more extensive than the rest, destined
for the palaces of the sovereign. He perceives that the substance of
which the whole city is built, is one which man, with all his skill,
is unable to fabricate; and that the edifices in which it is employed
are such, as the most expert artist would find himself incompetent to
erect. And the whole is the work of a society of insects! "_Quel abime_
(he exclaims with Bonnet) _aux yeux du sage qu'une ruche d'Abeilles!
Quelle sagesse profonde se cache dans cet abime! Quel philosophe osera
le fonder!_" Nor have its mysteries yet been fathomed. Philosophers
have in all ages devoted their lives to the subject; from Aristomachus
of Soli in Cilicia, who, we are told by Pliny, for fifty-eight years
attended solely to bees, and Philiscus the Thracian, who spent his
whole time in forests investigating their manners, to Swammerdam,
Reaumur, Hunter, and Huber of modern times. Still the construction of
the combs of a bee-hive is a miracle which overwhelms our faculties.

You are probably aware that the hives with which we provide bees
are not essential to their labours, and that they can equally form
their city in the hollow of a tree or any other cavity. In whatever
situation it is placed, the general plan which they follow is the
same. You have seen a honey-comb, and must have observed that it is a
flattish cake, composed of a vast number of cells, for the most part
hexagonal, regularly applied to each other's sides, and arranged in
two strata or layers placed end to end. The interior of a bee-hive,
consists of several of these combs fixed to its upper part and sides,
arranged _vertically_ at a small distance from each other, so that
the cells composing them are placed in a horizontal position, and
have their openings in opposite directions--not the best position
one would have thought for retaining a fluid like honey, yet the
bees find no inconvenience on this score. The distance of the combs
from each other is about half an inch, that is, sufficient to allow
two bees busied upon the opposite cells to pass each other with
facility. Besides these vacancies, which form the high roads of
their community, the combs are here and there pierced with holes
which serve as posterns for easy communication from one to the other
without losing time by going round.

The arrangement of the combs is well adapted for its purpose, but
it is the construction of the cells which is most admirable and
astonishing. As these are formed of wax, a substance secreted by the
bees in no great abundance, it is important that as little as possible
of such a precious material should be consumed. Bees, therefore,
in the formation of their cells have to solve a problem which would
puzzle some geometers, namely, a quantity of wax being given, to form
of it similar and equal cells of a determinate capacity, but of the
largest size in proportion to the quantity of matter employed, and
disposed in such a manner as to occupy in the hive the least possible
space. Every part of this problem is practically solved by bees. If
their cells had been cylindrical, which form seems best adapted to the
shape of a bee, they could not have been applied to each other without
leaving numberless superfluous vacuities. If the cells were made
square or triangular, this last objection, indeed, would be removed;
but besides that a greater quantity of wax would have been required,
the shape would have been inconvenient to a cylindrical-bodied animal.
All these difficulties are obviated by the adoption of hexagonal
cells, which are admirably fitted to the form of the insect, at the
same time that their sides apply to each other without the smallest
vacant intervals.--Another important saving in materials is gained
by making a common base serve for two strata of cells. Much more wax
as well as room would have been required, had the combs consisted of
a single stratum only. But this is not all. The base of each cell is
not an exact plane, but is usually composed of three rhomboidal or
lozenge-shaped pieces, placed so as to form a pyramidal concavity. From
this form it follows that the base of a cell on one side or stratum of
the comb is composed of portions of the bases of _three_ cells on the
other. You will inquire, Where is the advantage of this arrangement?
First, a greater degree of strength; and secondly, precisely the same
as results from the hexagonal sides--a greater capacity with less
expenditure of wax. Not only has this been indisputably ascertained,
but that the angles of the base of the cell are exactly those which
require the smallest quantity of wax. It is obvious that these angles
might vary infinitely; but by a very accurate admeasurement Maraldi
found, that the great angles were in general 109 deg. 28', the smaller
ones 70 deg. 32'. Reaumur ingeniously suspecting that the object of
choosing these angles from amongst so many was to spare wax, proposed
to M. Koenig, a skilful geometrician, who was ignorant of Maraldi's
experiments, to determine by calculations what ought to be the angle
of a hexagonal cell, with a pyramidal bottom formed of three similar
and equal rhomboid plates, so that the least matter possible might
enter into its construction. For the solution of this problem the
geometrician had recourse to the infinitesimal calculus, and found that
the great angles of the rhombs should be 109 deg. 26', and of the small
angles 70 deg. 34'[829]. What a surprising agreement between the solution
of the problem and the actual admeasurement[830]!

Besides the saving of wax effected by the form of the cells, the
bees adopt another economical plan suited to the same end. They
compose the bottoms and sides of wax of very great tenuity, not
thicker than a sheet of writing-paper. But as walls of this thinness
at the entrance would be perpetually injured by the ingress and
egress of the workers, they prudently make the margin at the opening
of each cell three or four times thicker than the walls. Dr. Barclay
has recently discovered that though of such excessive tenuity, the
sides and bottom of each cell are actually _double_, or, in other
words, that each cell is a distinct, separate, and in some measure an
independent structure, agglutinated only to the neighbouring cells,
and that when the agglutinating substance is destroyed, each cell may
be entirely separated from the rest[831].

You must not imagine that all the cells of a hive are of precisely
similar dimensions. As the society consists of three orders of
insects differing in size, the cells which are to contain the larvae
of each proportionally differ, those built for the males being
considerably larger than those which are intended for the workers.
The abode of the larvae of the queen bee differs still more. It is
not only much larger than any of the rest, but of a quite different
form, being shaped like a pear or Florence flask, and composed of a
material much coarser than common wax, of which above one hundred
times as much is used in its construction as of pure wax in that of
a common cell. The situation, too, of these cells (for there are
generally three or four, and sometimes many more, even up to thirty
or forty, in each hive) is very different from that of the common
cells. Instead of being in a horizontal they are placed in a vertical
direction, with the mouth downwards, and are usually fixed to the
lower edge of the combs, from which they irregularly project like
stalactites from the roof of a cavern.--The cells destined for the
reception of honey and pollen, differ from those which the larvae of
the males and workers inhabit, only, by being deeper, and thus more
capacious; in fact, the very same cells are successively applied to
both purposes. When the honey is collected in great abundance, and
there is not time to construct fresh cells, the bees lengthen the
honey cells by adding a rim to them.

You will be anxious to learn the process which these ingenious
artificers follow in constructing their habitations: and on this head I
am happy that the recent publication of a new edition of the celebrated
Huber's _New Observations on Bees_, in which this subject is for the
first time elucidated, will enable me to gratify your curiosity.

But in the first place you must be told of an important and
unlooked-for discovery of this unrivalled detector of the hidden
mysteries of nature--that the workers or neuters, as they are called,
of a hive, consist of two descriptions of individuals, one of which
he calls _abeilles nourrices_, or _petites abeilles_, the other
_abeilles cirieres_.--The former, or _nurse-bees_, are smaller than
the latter; their stomach is not capable of such distention; and
their office is to build the combs and cells after the foundation
has been laid by the _cirieres_; to collect honey; and to feed the
larvae. The _abeilles cirieres_ are the makers of wax, which substance
Huber has now indisputably ascertained to be secreted, as John Hunter
long ago suspected, beneath the ventral segments, from between which
it is taken by the bees when wanted, in the form of thin scales.
The apparatus in which the wax is secreted consists of four pair
of membranous bags or _wax-pockets_ situated at the base of each
intermediate segment, one on each side, which can only be seen by
pressing the abdomen so as to lengthen it, being usually concealed
by the over-lapping of the preceding segments. It should be observed
that this discovery was nearly made by our countryman Thorley, who
in his _Female Monarchy_ (1744) says that he has taken bees with six
pieces of wax within the plaits of the abdomen, three on each side.
In these pockets the wax is secreted by some unknown process from the
food taken into the stomach, which in the wax-making bees is much
larger than in the nurse-bees, and afterwards transpires through the
membrane of the wax-pocket in thin laminae. The nurse-bees, however,
do secrete wax, but in very small quantities.--When wax is not wanted
in the hive, the wax-makers disgorge their honey into the cells.

The process of building the combs in a bee-hive, as observed by
Huber, is as follows:

The wax-makers having taken a due portion of honey or sugar, from
either of which wax can be elaborated, suspend themselves to each
other, the claws of the fore-legs of the lowermost being attached
to those of the hind pair of the uppermost, and form themselves
into a cluster, the exterior layer of which looks like a kind of
curtain. This cluster consists of a series of festoons or garlands,
which cross each other in all directions, and in which most of
the bees turn their back upon the observer: the curtain has no
other motion than what it receives from the interior layers, the
fluctuations of which are communicated to it.--All this time the
_nurse-bees_ preserve their wonted activity and pursue their usual
employments.--The wax-makers remain immoveable for about twenty-four
hours, during which period the formation of wax takes place, and
thin laminae of this material may be generally perceived under their
abdomen. One of these bees is now seen to detach itself from one
of the central garlands of the cluster, to make a way amongst its
companions to the middle of the vault or top of the hive, and by
turning itself round to form a kind of void, in which it can move
itself freely. It then suspends itself to the centre of the space,
which it has cleared, the diameter of which is about an inch. It next
seizes one of the laminae of wax with a pincer formed by the posterior
metatarsus and tibia[832], and drawing it from beneath the abdominal
segment, one of the anterior legs takes it with its claws and carries
it to the mouth. This leg holds the lamina with its claws vertically,
the tongue rolled up serving for a support, and by elevating or
depressing it at will, causes the whole of its circumference to be
exposed to the action of the mandibles, so that the margin is soon
gnawed into pieces, which drop as they are detached into the double
cavity, bordered with hairs, of the mandibles. These fragments,
pressed by others newly separated, fall on one side of the mouth,
and issue from it in the form of a very narrow ribband. They are
then presented to the tongue, which impregnates them with a frothy
liquor like a _bouillie_. During this operation the tongue assumes
all sorts of forms; sometimes it is flattened like a spatula; then
like a trowel, which applies itself to the ribband of wax; at other
times it resembles a pencil terminating in a point. After having
moistened the whole of the ribband, the tongue pushes it so as to
make it re-enter the mandibles, but in an opposite direction, where
it is worked up anew. The liquor mixed with the wax communicates to
it a whiteness and opacity which it had not before; and the object of
this mixture of _bouillie_, which did not escape the observation of
Reaumur[833], is doubtless to give it that ductility and tenacity,
which it possesses in its perfect state.

The foundress-bee, a name which this first beginner of a comb
deserves, next applies these prepared parcels of wax against the
vault of the hive, disposing them with the point of her mandibles
in the direction which she wishes them to take: and she continues
these manoeuvres until she has employed the whole lamina that she had
separated from her body, when she takes a second, proceeding in the
same manner. She gives herself no care to compress the molecules of
wax which she has heaped together; she is satisfied if they adhere to
each other. At length she leaves her work, and is lost in the crowd
of her companions. Another succeeds, and resumes the employment;
then a third; all follow the same plan of placing their little
masses; and if any by chance gives them a contrary direction, another
coming removes them to their proper place. The result of all these
operations is a mass or little wall of wax with uneven surfaces,
five or six lines long, two lines high, and half a line thick, which
descends perpendicularly below the vault of the hive. In this first
work is no angle nor any trace of the figure of the cells. It is a
simple partition in a right line without any inflection.

The wax-makers having thus laid the foundation of a comb, are
succeeded by the nurse-bees, which are alone competent to model
and perfect the work. The former are the labourers, who convey the
stone and mortar; the latter the masons, who work them up into the
form which the intended structure requires. One of the nurse-bees
now places itself horizontally on the vault of the hive, its head
corresponding to the centre of the mass or wall which the wax-makers
have left, and which is to form the partition of the comb into two
opposite assemblages of cells; and with its mandibles, rapidly moving
its head, it moulds in that side of the wall a cavity which is to
form the base of one of the cells to the diameter of which it is
equal. When it has worked some minutes it departs, and another takes
its place, deepening the cavity, heightening its lateral margins
by heaping up the wax to right and left by means of its teeth and
fore-feet, and giving them a more upright form. More than twenty
bees successively employ themselves in this work. When arrived at a
certain point, other bees begin on the yet untouched and opposite
side of the mass; and commencing the bottom of _two_ cells, are in
turn relieved by others. While still engaged in this labour, the
wax-makers return and add to the mass, augmenting its extent every
way, the nurse-bees again continuing their operations.--After having
worked the bottoms of the cells of the first row into their proper
forms, they polish them and give them their finish, while others
begin the outline of a new series.

The cells themselves, or prisms which result from the re-union and
meeting of the sides, are next constructed. These are engrafted on
the borders of the cavities hollowed in the mass. The bees begin them
by making the contour of the bottoms, which at first is unequal, of
equal height: thus all the margins of the cells offer an uniformly
level surface from their first origin, and until they have acquired
their proper length. The sides are heightened in an order analogous to
that which the insects follow in finishing the bottoms of the cells;
and the length of these tubes is so perfectly proportioned that there
is no observable inequality between them.--It is to be remarked, that
though the general form of the cells is hexagonal, that of those first
begun is _pentagonal_, the side next the top of the hive, and by which
the comb is attached, being much broader than the rest; whence the
comb is more strongly united to the hive than if these cells were of
the ordinary shape. It of course follows that the base of these cells,
instead of being formed like those of the hexagonal cells of three
rhomboids, consists of one rhomboid and two trapeziums.

The form of a new comb is lenticular, its thickness always
diminishing towards the edges. This gradation is constantly
observable while it keeps enlarging in circumference; but as soon as
the bees get sufficient space to lengthen it, it begins to lose this
form and to assume parallel surfaces: it has then received the shape
which it will always preserve.

The bees appear to give the proper forms to the bottoms of the cells by
means of their antennae, which extraordinary organs they seem to employ
as directors by which their other instruments are instructed to execute
a very complex work. They do not remove a single particle of wax until
the antennae have explored the surface that is to be sculptured. By the
use of these organs, which are so flexible and so readily applied to
all parts, however delicate, that they can perform the functions of
compasses in measuring very minute objects, they can work in the dark,
and raise those wonderful combs the first production of insects.

Every part of the work appears a natural consequence of that which
precedes it, so that chance has no share in the admirable results
witnessed. The bees cannot depart from their prescribed route, except
in consequence of particular circumstances which alter the basis of
their labour. The original mass of wax is never augmented but by an
uniform quantity; and what is most astonishing, this augmentation
is made by the wax-makers, who are the depositaries of the primary
matter, and possess not the art of sculpturing the cells.

The bees never begin two masses for combs at the same time; but
scarcely are some rows of cells constructed in the first, when two
other masses, one on each side of it, are established at equal
distances from it and parallel to it, and then again two more
exterior to these. The combs are always enlarged and lengthened in
a progression proportioned to the priority of their origin; the
middle comb being constantly advanced beyond the two adjoining ones
by some rows of cells, and they beyond those that are exterior to
them. Was it permitted to these insects to lay the foundation of all
their combs at the same time, they could not be placed conveniently
or parallel to each other. So with respect to the cells, the first
cavity determines the place of all that succeed it.

A large number of bees work at the same time on the same comb; but
they are not moved to it by a simultaneous but by a successive
impulse. A single bee begins every partial operation, and many others
in succession add their efforts to hers, each appearing to act
individually in a direction impressed either by the workers who have
preceded it, or by the condition in which it finds the work. The whole
population of wax-makers is in a state of the most complete inaction
till one bee goes forth to lay the foundations of the first comb.
Immediately others second her intentions, adding to the height and
length of the mass; and when they cease to act, a bee, if the term may
be used, of another profession, one of the nurse-bees, goes to form the
draught of the first cell, in which she is succeeded by others.

The diameters of the cells intended for the larvae of workers is
always 2-2/5 lines, that of those meant for the larvae of the males
or drones 3-1/3 lines. The male cells are generally in the middle
of the combs, or in their sides; rarely in their upper part. They
are never insulated, but form a corresponding group on both sides
the comb. When the bees form male cells below those of neuters,
they construct many rows of intermediate ones, the diameter of
which augments progressively till it attains that of a male cell;
and they observe the same method when they revert from male cells
to those of neuters. It appears to be the oviposition of the queen
which decides the kind of cells that are to be made: while she lays
the eggs of workers, no male cells are constructed; but when she is
about to lay the eggs of males, the neuters appear to know it and act
accordingly.--When there is a very large harvest of honey, the bees
increase the diameter and even the length of their cells. At this
time many irregular combs may be seen with cells of twelve, fifteen,
and even eighteen lines in length. Sometimes also they have occasion
to shorten the cells. When they wish to lengthen on old comb, the
tubes of which have acquired their full dimensions, they gradually
diminish the thickness of its edges, gnawing down the sides of the
cells till it assumes the lenticular form: they then engraft a mass
of wax round it, and so proceed with new cells.

Variations, as has been already hinted, sometimes take place in the
position and even form of the combs. Occasionally the bees construct
cells of the common shape upon the wood to which the combs are fixed,
without pyramidal bottoms, and from them continue their work as
usual. These cells with a flat bottom, or rather with the wood for
their bottom, are more irregular than the common ones; some of their
orifices are not angular, and their dimensions are not exact, but all
are more or less hexagonal. Once when disturbed, Huber observed them
to begin their combs on one of the vertical sides of the hive instead
of on the roof. When particular circumstances caused it, as, for
instance, when glass was introduced, to which they do not like to fix
their combs, he remarked that they constantly varied their direction;
and by repeating the attempt, he forced them to form their combs
in the most fantastic manner. Yet glass is an artificial substance,
against which instinct merely cannot have provided them: there
is nothing in hollow trees, their natural habitation, resembling
it.--When they change the direction of their combs, they enlarge the
cells of one side to two or three times the diameter of those of the
other, which gives the requisite curve.

To complete the detail of these interesting discoveries of the elder
Huber, I must lay before you the following additional observations of
his son.

The first base of the combs upon which the bees work holds three or
four cells, sometimes more.--The comb continues of the same width for
three or four inches, and then begins to widen for three quarters of
its length. The bees engaged at the bottom lengthen it downwards;
those on the sides widen it to right and left; and those which are
employed above the thickest part extend its dimensions upwards. The
more a comb is enlarged below, the more it is necessary that it
should be enlarged upwards to the top of the hive. The bees that
are engaged in lengthening the comb, work with more celerity than
those which increase its width; and those that ascend or increase
its width upwards, more slowly than the rest. Hence it arises that
it is longer than wide, and narrower towards the top than towards
the middle.--The first formed cells are usually not so deep as those
in the middle; but when the comb is of a certain height, they are in
haste to lengthen these cells so essential to the solidity of the
whole, sometimes even making them longer than the rest.--The cells
are not perfectly horizontal; they are almost always a little higher
towards their mouth than at their base, so that their axis is not
perpendicular to the partition that separates the two assemblages.
They sometimes vary from the horizontal line more than 20 deg., usually
4 deg. or 5 deg. When the bees enlarge the diameter of the cells preparatory
to the formation of male cells, the bottoms often consist of two
rhomboids and two hexagons, the size and form of which vary, and they
correspond with four instead of three opposite cells.--The works of
bees are symmetrical less perhaps in minute details than considered
as a whole. Sometimes, indeed, their combs have a fantastic form;
but this, if traced, will be found to be caused by circumstances:
one irregularity occasions another, and both usually have their
origin in the dispositions which we make them adopt. The inconstancy
of climate, too, occasions frequent interruptions, and injures the
symmetry of the combs; for a work resumed is always less perfect than
one followed up until completed.

At first the substance of the cells is of a dead white,
semitransparent, soft, and though even, not smooth: but in a few days
it loses most of these qualities, or rather acquires new ones; a yellow
tint spreads over the cells, particularly their interior surface: their
edges become thicker, and they have acquired a consistence, which at
first they did not possess. The combs also when finished are heavier
than the unfinished ones: these last are broken by the slightest touch,
whereas the former will bend sooner than break. Their orifices also
have something adhesive, and they melt less readily; whence it is
evident that the finished combs contain something not present in the
unfinished ones. In examining the orifice of the yellow cells, their
contour appeared to the younger Huber to be besmeared with a reddish
varnish, unctuous, strong-scented, and similar to, if not the same as,
_propolis_. Sometimes there were red threads in the interior, which
were also applied round the sides, rhombs, or trapeziums. This solder,
as it may be called, placed at the point of contact of the different
parts, and at the summit of the angles formed by their meeting, seemed
to give solidity to the cells, round the axis of the longest of which
there were sometimes one or two red zones. From subsequent experiments,
M. Huber ascertained that this substance was actually _propolis_,
collected from the buds of the poplar. He saw them with their mandibles
draw a thread from the mass of propolis that was most conveniently
situated, and breaking it by a sudden jerk of the head, take it with
the claws of their fore-legs, and then, entering the cell, place it
at the angles and sides, &c. which they had previously planished. The
yellow colour, however, is not given by the propolis, and it is not
certain to what it is owing.--The bees sometimes mix wax and propolis
and make an amalgam, known to the ancients and called by them _Mitys_
and _Pissoceros_, which they use in rebuilding cells that have been
destroyed, in order to strengthen and support the edifice[834].

We know but little of the proceedings of the species of bees not
indigenous to Europe, which live in societies and construct combs
like that cultivated by us. A traveller in Brazil mentions one there
which builds a kind of natural hive: "On an excursion towards upper
Tapagippe," says he, "and skirting the dreary woods which extend
to the interior, I observed the trees more loaded with bees' nests
than even in the neighbourhood of Porto Seguro. They consist of
a ponderous shell of clay, cemented similarly to martins' nests,
swelling from high trees about a foot thick, and forming an oval mass
full two feet in diameter. When broken, the wax is arranged as in our
hives, and the honey abundant[835]."

       *       *       *       *       *

_Humble-bees_ are the only tribe besides the hive-bee, that in
this part of the world construct nests by the united labour of the
society. The habitations composing them are of a rude construction,
and the streets are arranged with little architectural regularity.
The number of inhabitants, too, is small, rarely exceeding two or
three hundred, and often not more than twenty. The nests of some
species, as of _Bombus_[836] _lapidaria_, _B. terrestris_, &c. are
found under ground at the depth of a foot or more below the surface;
but as the internal structure of these does not essentially differ
from that of the more singular habitations of _B. Muscorum_, and
as some of the subterranean species occasionally adopt the same
situation, I shall confine my description to the latter.

These nests, which do not exceed six or eight inches in diameter,
are generally found in meadows and pastures, and sometimes in
hedge-rows where the soil is entangled with roots. The lower half
occupies a cavity in the soil, either accidentally found ready made,
or excavated with great labour by the bees. The upper part or dome
of the nest is composed of a thick felted covering of moss, having
the interior ceiling coated with a thin roof of coarse wax for
the purpose of keeping out the wet. The entrance is in the lower
part, and is generally through a gallery or covered way, sometimes
more than a foot in length and half an inch in diameter, by means
of which the nest is more effectually concealed from observation.
On removing the coping of moss, the interior presents to our view
a very different scene from that witnessed in a bee-hive. Instead
of numerous vertical combs of wax, we see merely a few irregular
horizontal combs placed one above the other, the uppermost resting
upon the more elevated parts of the lower, and connected together
by small pillars of wax. Each of these combs consists of several
groups of pale-yellow oval bodies of three different sizes, those
in the middle being the largest, closely joined to each other, and
each group connected with those next it by slight joinings of wax.
These oval bodies are not, as you might suppose, the work of the
old bees, but the silken cocoons spun by the young larvae. Some are
closed at the upper extremity; others, which chiefly occupy the lower
combs, have this part open. The former are those which yet include
their immature tenants; the latter are the empty cases from which
the young bees have escaped. On the surface of the upper comb are
seen several masses of wax of a flattened spheroidal shape, and of
very various dimensions: some above an inch and others not a quarter
of an inch in diameter: which on being opened are found to include
a number of larvae surrounded with a supply of pollen moistened with
honey. These, which are the true cells, are chiefly the work of the
female, which after depositing her eggs in them furnishes them with
a store of pollen and honey; and, when this is consumed, supplies
the larvae with a daily provision, as has been described in a former
letter, until they are sufficiently grown to spin the cocoons before
spoken of. Lastly, in all the corners of the combs, and especially
in the middle, we observe a considerable number of small goblet-like
vessels, filled with honey and pollen, which are not, as in the case
of the hive-bee, the fabrication of the workers, but are chiefly the
empty cocoons left by the larvae. It falls to the workers, however, to
cut off the fragments of silk from the orifice of the cocoon, which,
after giving it a regular circular form, they strengthen by a ring or
elevated tube of wax made in a different shape by different species;
and to coat them internally with a lining of the same material. They
even occasionally construct honey-pots entirely of wax[837].

The most curious circumstance in the construction of these nests, is
the mode in which the bees transport the moss employed in forming
the roof. When they have discovered a parcel of this material
conveniently situated upon the ground, five or six insects place
themselves upon it in a file, turning the hinder part of their bodies
towards the quarter to which it is meant to be conveyed. The first
takes a small portion, and with its jaws and fore-legs as it were
felts it together. When the fibres are sufficiently entangled, it
pushes them under its body by means of the first pair of legs; the
intermediate pair receives the moss, and delivers it to the last,
which protrudes it as far as possible beyond the anus. When by this
process the insect has formed behind it a small ball of well-carded
moss, the next bee pushes it to the third, which consigns it in like
manner to that behind it; and thus the balls are conveyed to the
foot of the nest, and from thence elevated to the summit, much in the
same way that a file of labourers transfer a parcel of cheeses from
a vessel or cart to a warehouse[838]. It is easy to perceive that
a vast saving of time must ensue from this well contrived division
of labour; the structure rising much more rapidly than if every
individual had been employed first in carding his materials, and then
in transferring them to the spot.

       *       *       *       *       *

_Wasps_, though ferocious and cruel towards their fellow-insects,
are civilized and polished in their intercourse with each other,
and form a community whose architectural labours will not suffer on
comparison even with those of the peaceful inhabitants of a bee-hive.
Like these, the great object of their industry is the erection of
a structure for their beloved progeny, towards which they discover
the greatest tenderness and affection, and they even in like manner
construct combs consisting of hexagonal cells for their reception;
but the substance which they make use of is very dissimilar to the
wax employed by bees, and the general plan of their city differs in
many respects from that of a bee-hive.

The common wasp's nest, usually situated in a cavity under ground,
is of an oval figure about sixteen or eighteen inches long by twelve
or thirteen broad. Externally it is surrounded by a thick coating of
numerous leaves of a sort of grayish paper, which do not touch each
other, but have a small interval between each, so that if the rain
should chance to penetrate one or two of them, its progress is speedily
arrested. On removing this external covering, we perceive that the
interior consists of from twelve to fifteen circular combs of different
sizes, not ranged vertically as in a bee-hive, but horizontally, so as
to form so many distinct and parallel stories. Each comb is composed of
a numerous assemblage of hexagonal cells formed of the same paper-like
substance as the exterior covering of the nest, and according to a
discovery of Dr. Barclay, each, as in those of bees, a distinct cell,
the partition walls being double[839]. These cells, which, as wasps do
not store up any food, serve merely as the habitations of their young,
are not, like those of the honey-bee, arranged in two opposite layers,
but in one only, their entrance being always downwards: consequently
the upper part of the comb, composed of the bases of the cells, which
are not pyramidal but slightly convex, forms a nearly level floor, on
which the inhabitants can conveniently pass and repass, spaces of about
half an inch high being left between each comb. Although the combs are
fixed to the sides of the nest, they would not be sufficiently strong
without further support. The ingenious builders, therefore, connect
each comb to that below it by a number of strong cylindrical columns
or pillars, having according to the rules of architecture their base
and capital wider than the shaft, and composed of the same paper-like
material used in other parts of the nest, but of a more compact
substance. The middle combs are connected by a rustic colonnade of from
forty to fifty of these pillars; the upper and lower combs by a smaller
number.

The cells, which in a populous nest are not fewer than 16,000, are
of different sizes, corresponding to that of the three orders of
individuals which compose the community; the largest for the grubs of
females, the smallest for those of workers. The last always occupy
an entire comb, while the cells of the males and females are often
intermixed.--Besides openings which are left between the walls of
the combs to admit of access from one to the other, there are at the
bottom of each nest two holes, by one of which the wasps uniformly
enter, and through the other issue from the nest, and thus avoid all
confusion or interruption of their common labours. As the nest is
often a foot and a half under ground, it is requisite that a covered
way should lead to its entrance. This is excavated by the wasps, who
are excellent miners, and is often very long and tortuous, forming a
beaten road to the subterranean city, well known to the inhabitants
though its entrance is concealed from incurious eyes. The cavity
itself which contains the nest is either the abandoned habitation
of moles or field-mice, or a cavern purposely dug out by the wasps,
which exert themselves with such industry as to accomplish the
arduous undertaking in a few days.

When the cavity and entrance to it are completed, the next part of
the process is to lay the foundations of the city to be included in
it, which, contrary to the usual custom of builders, wasps begin
at the top, continuing downwards. I have already told you that the
coatings which compose the dome are a sort of rough but thin paper,
and that the rest of the nest is composed of the same substance
variously applied. "Whence," you will inquire, "do the wasps derive
it?" They are manufacturers of the article, and prepare it from a
material even more singular than any of those which have of late
been proposed for this purpose; namely, the fibres of wood[840].
These they detach by means of their jaws from window-frames, posts
and rails, &c., and, when they have amassed a heap of the filament,
moisten the whole with a few drops of a viscid glue from their mouth,
and, kneading it with their jaws into a sort of paste or _papier
mache_, fly off with it to their nest. This ductile mass they attach
to that part of the building upon which they are at work, walking
backwards and spreading it into laminae of the requisite thinness by
means of their jaws, tongue, and legs. This operation is repeated
several times, until at length, by aid of fresh supplies of the
material and the combined exertions of so many workmen, the proper
number of layers of paper that are to compose the roof is finished.
This paper is as thin as that of the letter which you are reading;
and you may form an idea of the labour which even the exterior of a
wasp's nest requires, on being told that not fewer than fifteen or
sixteen sheets of it are usually placed above each other with slight
intervening spaces, making the whole upwards of an inch and a half
in thickness. When the dome is completed, the uppermost comb is next
begun, in which, as well as all the other parts of the building,
precisely the same material and the same process, with little
variation, are employed. In the structure of the connecting pillars
there seems a greater quantity of glue made use of than in the rest
of the work, doubtless with the view of giving them a superior
solidity.--When the first comb is finished, the continuation of
the roof or walls of the building is brought down lower; a new comb
is erected; and thus the work successively proceeds until the whole
is finished. As a comparatively small proportion of the society is
engaged in constructing the nest, its entire completion is the work
of several months: yet, though the fruit of such severe labour, it
has scarcely been finished a few weeks before winter comes on, when
it merely serves for the abode of a few benumbed females, and is
entirely abandoned at the approach of spring; wasps never using the
same nest for more than one season[841].

The nests of the hornet in their general construction resemble those
of the common wasp, but the paper of which they are composed is of
a much more rough texture; the columns which support the comb are
higher and more massive; and that in the centre larger than the rest.

These last, as well as wasps, conceal their nest, suspending it in
the corners of outhouses, &c.; but there are other species which
construct their habitations in open day-light, affixing them to the
branches of shrubs or trees.

One of these, described by Latreille, the work of _Vespa holsatica_,
a species not uncommon with us, resembles in shape a cone of the
cedar of Lebanon, and is composed of an envelope and the comb, the
former consisting of three partial envelopes, each of the interior of
which is longer than the preceding. The comb comprises about thirty
hexagonal cells circularly arranged, those of the circumference being
lower and smaller[842].

A vespiary somewhat similar to the above, but of a depressed
globular figure, and composed of more numerous envelopes, so as
to assume a considerable resemblance to a half-expanded Provence
rose, is figured by Reaumur[843]: and for a very beautiful specimen
apparently of the same kind (except that it contains but one stage of
cells), which was found in the garden at East-Dale, I am indebted to
the kindness of Henry Thompson, esq. of Hull.

Another species (_Odynerus Parietum_[844]?) attaches its small group
of about twenty inverted crucible-like cells to a piece of wood
without any covering[845].

But all these yield in point of singularity of structure to the
habitation of _Polistes nidulans_, a native of Cayenne, which
constructs its nest of a beautifully polished white and solid
pasteboard, impenetrable by the weather. These are in shape somewhat
like a bell, often a foot and a half long, and fixed by their upper
end to the branch of a tree from which they are securely suspended.
Their interior is composed of numerous concave horizontal combs,
with the openings of the cells turned downwards, fastened to the
sides without any pillars, and having a hole through each to admit of
access to the uppermost[846].

       *       *       *       *       *

I close my account of the habitations of insects with the description
of those constructed by the white ants or _Termites_, a tribe alluded
to in former letters.

The different species, which are numerous, build nests of very
various forms. Some (_T. atrox_ and _mordax_) construct upon the
ground a cylindrical turret of clay about three quarters of a yard
high, surrounded by a projecting conical roof, so as in shape
considerably to resemble a mushroom, and composed interiorly of
innumerable cells of various figures and dimensions. Others (as
_T. Destructor_, _T. Arborum_, Sm.) prefer a more elevated site,
and build their nests, which are of different sizes, from that
of a hat to that of a sugar-cask, and composed of pieces of wood
glued together, amongst the branches of trees often seventy or
eighty feet high. But by far the most curious habitations, and to
which, therefore, I shall confine a minute description, are those
formed by the _Termes fatalis_, a species very common in Guinea and
other parts of the coast of Africa, of whose proceedings we have a
very particular and interesting account in the 71st volume of the
_Philosophical Transactions_, from the pen of Mr. Smeathman.

These nests are formed entirely of clay, and are generally twelve feet
high and broad in proportion, so that when a cluster of them, as is
often the case, are placed together, they may be taken for an Indian
village, and are in fact sometimes larger than the huts which the
natives inhabit. The first process in the erection of these singular
structures, is the elevation of two or three turrets of clay about a
foot high, and in shape like a sugar-loaf. These, which seem to be
the scaffolds of the future building, rapidly increase in number and
height, until at length being widened at the base, joined at the top
into one dome, and consolidated all round into a thick wall of clay,
they form a building of the size above mentioned, and of the shape of
a hay-cock, which when clothed, as it generally soon becomes, with
a coating of grass, it at a distance very much resembles. When the
building has assumed this its final form, the inner turrets, all but
the tops, which project like pinnacles from different parts of it, are
removed, and the clay employed over again in other services.

It is the lower part alone of the building that is occupied by the
inhabitants. The upper portion or dome, which is very strong and
solid, is left empty, serving principally as a defence from the
vicissitudes of the weather and the attacks of natural or accidental
enemies, and to keep up in the lower part a genial warmth and
moisture necessary to the hatching of the eggs and cherishing of the
young ones. The inhabited portion is occupied by the _royal chamber_,
or habitation of the king and queen; the _nurseries_ for the young;
the _store-houses_ for food; and innumerable galleries, passages, and
empty rooms: arranged according to the following plan.

In the centre of the building, just under the apex, and nearly on a
level with the surface of the ground, is placed the royal chamber,
an arched vault of a semi-oval shape, or not unlike a long oven; at
first not above an inch long, but enlarged as the queen increases
in bulk to the length of eight inches or more. In this apartment
the king and queen constantly reside; and from the smallness of
the entrances, which are barely large enough to admit their more
diminutive subjects, can never possibly come out; thus, like many
human potentates, purchasing their sovereignty at the dear rate of
the sacrifice of liberty. Immediately adjoining the royal chamber,
and surrounding it on all sides to the extent of a foot or more,
are placed what Mr. Smeathman calls the _royal apartments_, an
inextricable labyrinth of innumerable arched rooms of different
shapes and sizes, either opening into each other or communicating by
common passages, and intended for the accommodation of the soldiers
and attendants, of whom many thousands are always in waiting on their
royal master and mistress. Next to the royal apartments come the
_nurseries_ and the _magazines_. The former are invariably occupied
by the eggs and young ones, and in the infant state of the nest are
placed close to the royal chamber; but when the queen's augmented
size requires a larger apartment, as well as additional rooms for the
increased number of attendants wanted to remove her eggs, the small
nurseries are taken to pieces, rebuilt at a greater distance a size
bigger, and their number increased at the same time. In substance
they differ from all the other apartments, being formed of particles
of wood apparently joined together with gums. A collection of these
compact, irregular, and small wooden chambers, not one of which
is half an inch in width, is inclosed in a common chamber of clay
sometimes as big as a child's head.--Intermixed with the nurseries
lie the magazines, which are chambers of clay always well stored
with provisions, consisting of particles of wood, gums, and the
inspissated juices of plants.

These magazines and nurseries, separated by small empty chambers and
galleries, which run round them or communicate from one to the other,
are continued on all sides to the outer wall of the building, and
reach up within it two-thirds or three-fourths of its height. They
do not, however, fill up the whole of the lower part of the hill,
but are confined to the sides, leaving an open area in the middle,
under the dome, very much resembling the nave of an old cathedral,
having its roof supported by three or four very large Gothic arches,
of which those in the middle of the area are sometimes two and three
feet high, but as they recede on each side rapidly diminish like the
arches of aisles in perspective. A flattish roof, imperforated in
order to keep out the wet, if the dome should chance to be injured,
covers the top of the assemblage of chambers, nurseries, &c.; and the
area, which is a short height above the royal chamber, has a flattish
floor also water-proof, and so contrived as to let any rain that may
chance to get in run off into the subterraneous passages.

These passages or galleries, which are of an astonishing size, some
being above a foot in diameter and perfectly cylindrical, lined
with the same kind of clay of which the hill is composed, served
originally, like the catacombs of Paris, as the quarries whence
the materials of the building were derived, and afterwards as the
grand outlets by which the Termites carry on their depredations at
a distance from their habitations. They run in a sloping direction
under the bottom of the hill to the depth of three or four feet, and
then branching out horizontally on every side, are carried under
ground, near to the surface, to a vast distance. At their entrance
into the interior they communicate with other smaller galleries,
which ascend the inside of the outer shell in a spiral manner,
and, winding round the whole building to the top, intersect each
other at different heights, opening either immediately into the
dome in various places, and into the lower half of the building,
or communicating with every part of it by other smaller circular
or oval galleries of different diameters. The necessity for the
vast size of the main underground galleries evidently arises
from the circumstance of their being the great thoroughfares for
the inhabitants, by which they fetch their clay, wood, water, or
provision; and their spiral and gradual ascent is requisite for the
easy access of the Termites, which cannot but with great difficulty
ascend a perpendicular. To avoid this inconvenience, in the interior
vertical parts of the building, a flat path-way, half an inch wide,
is often made to wind gradually, like a road cut out of the side
of a mountain, by which they travel with great facility up ascents
otherwise impracticable. The same ingenious propensity to shorten
their labour seems to have given birth to a contrivance still more
extraordinary. This is a kind of bridge of one vast arch, sprung from
the floor of the area to the upper apartments at the side of the
building, which answers the purpose of a flight of stairs, and must
shorten the distance exceedingly in transporting eggs from the royal
chambers to the upper nurseries, which in some hills would be four or
five feet in the straightest line, and much more if carried through
all the winding passages which lead through the inner chambers and
apartments. Mr. Smeathman measured one of these bridges, which was
half an inch broad, a quarter of an inch thick, and ten inches long,
making the side of an elliptic arch of proportionable size, so that
it is wonderful it did not fall over or break by its own weight
before they got it joined to the side of the column above. It was
strengthened by a small arch at the bottom, and had a hollow or
groove all the length of the upper surface, either made purposely
for the greater safety of the passengers, or else worn by frequent
treading. It is not the least surprising circumstance attending
this bridge, the Gothic arches before spoken of, and in general all
the arches of the various galleries and apartments, that, as Mr.
Smeathman saw every reason for believing, the Termites _project_
their arches, and do not, as one would have supposed, excavate them.

Consider what incredible labour and diligence, accompanied by
the most unremitting activity and the most unwearied celerity of
movement, must be necessary to enable these creatures to accomplish,
their size considered, these truly gigantic works. That such
diminutive insects, for they are scarcely the fourth of an inch
in length, however numerous, should, in the space of three or
four years, be able to erect a building twelve feet high and of a
proportionable bulk, covered by a vast dome, adorned without by
numerous pinnacles and turrets, and sheltering under its ample arch
myriads of vaulted apartments of various dimensions, and constructed
of different materials--that they should moreover excavate,
in different directions and at different depths, innumerable
subterranean roads or tunnels, some twelve or thirteen inches in
diameter, or throw an arch of stone over other roads leading from
the metropolis into the adjoining country to the distance of several
hundred feet--that they should project and finish the, for them,
vast interior stair-cases or bridges lately described--and, finally,
that the millions necessary to execute such Herculean labours,
perpetually passing to and fro, should never interrupt or interfere
with each other, is a miracle of nature, or rather of the Author of
nature, far exceeding the most boasted works and structures of man:
for, did these creatures equal him in size, retaining their usual
instincts and activity, their buildings would soar to the astonishing
height of more than half a mile, and their tunnels would expand to
a magnificent cylinder of more than three hundred feet in diameter;
before which the pyramids of Egypt and the aqueducts of Rome would
lose all their celebrity, and dwindle into nothings[847]. So that
when in the commencement of my last letter I promised to introduce
you to insects whose labours produced edifices more astonishing than
those of the mightiest Egyptian monarchs, the pyramids, my promise,
whatever you then thought of it, was the reverse of hyperbolical.

                                                  I am, &c.


                        END OF THE FIRST VOLUME.

                                LONDON:

                       PRINTED BY RICHARD TAYLOR,

                     RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET.

                     [Illustration: ALERE FLAMMAM]

FOOTNOTES:

[819] Reaum. ii. 128.

[820] Reaum. ii. 179.

[821] Huber, _Recherches sur les Moeurs des Fourmis_, p. 21-29.

[822] Huber, _Recherches sur les Moeurs des Fourmis_, p. 168.

[823] Stedman's _Surinam_, i. 169.

[824] Huber, _Recherches_, &c. 30-40.

[825] Huber, _Recherches_, &c. 45.

[826] Ibid. 53.

[827] Ibid. 61.

[828] Hawkesworth's _Cook's Voyages_, iii. 223.

[829] Reaum. v. 390.

[830] Father Boscovich observes, that all the angles that form
the planes which compose the cell are equal, _i. e._ 120 deg.: and he
supposes that this equality of inclination facilitates much the
construction of the cell, which may be a motive for preferring it,
as well as economy. He shows that the bees do not economize the wax
necessary for a flat bottom in the construction of every cell, near
so much as MM. Koenig and Reaumur thought.

MacLaurin says, that the difference of a cell with a pyramidal from
one with a flat bottom, in which is comprised the economy of the
bees, is equal to the fourth part of six triangles, which it would be
necessary to add to the trapeziums, the faces of the cell, in order
to make them right angles.

M. L'Huillier, professor of Geneva, values the economy of the bees
at 1/51 of the whole expense; and he shows that it might have been
one-fifth if the bees had no other circumstances to attend to; but he
concludes, that if it is not very sensible in every cell, it may be
considerable in the whole of a comb, on account of the mutual setting
of the two opposite orders of cells. Huber, _Nouvelles Observations_,
&c. ii. 34.

[831] _Memoirs of the Wernerian Society_, ii. 259. This however has
been denied, and seems inconsistent with the account given by Huber
hereafter detailed.

[832] Vide _Mon. Ap. Ang._ t. 12. * * e. 1. neut. fig. 19.

[833] Reaum. v. 424.

[834] _Nouvelles Observations sur les Abeilles, par_ Francois Huber,
ii. 101-288. I have observed the bees collecting propolis in the
spring from the buds of _Populus balsamifera_.

[835] Lindley in _R. Military Chronicle_, March 1815. 449.

[836] _Apis._ **. e. 2. K.

[837] Huber, _Linn. Tr._ vi. 215-298.

[838] Reaum. vi. 7-10.

[839] _Memoirs of the Wernerian Society_, ii. 260.

[840] Reaumur says decaying wood, vi. 182; but White asserts (and my
own observations confirm his opinion) that wasps obtain their paper
from _sound_ timber; hornets, only from that which is _decayed_.
_White's Nat. Hist._ by Markwick, ii. 228.

[841] Reaum. vi. Mem. 6.

[842] _Annales du Mus. d'Hist. Nat._ i. 289.

[843] vi. t. 19. f. i. 2.

[844] Roesel Vesp. t. 7. f. 8.

[845] Roesel II. viii. 30.

[846] Reaum. vi. 224.

[847] The most elevated of the pyramids of Egypt is not more than
600 feet high, which, setting the average height of man at only five
feet, is not more than 120 times the height of the workmen employed.
Whereas the nests of the Termites being at least twelve feet high,
and the insects themselves not exceeding a quarter of an inch in
stature, their edifice is upwards of 500 times the height of the
builders; which, supposing them of human dimensions, would be more
than half a mile. The shaft of the Roman aqueducts was lofty enough
to permit a man on horseback to travel in them.

[Illustration: Plate II]

[Illustration: Plate III]




                       EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES.

                                VOL. I.


                                PLATE I.

                              COLEOPTERA.

     Fig. 1. Calosoma Sycophanta.

          2. Goerius cyaneus.

          3. Siagonium quadricorne, Nov. Gen. _K._ magnified.

          4. Malthinus.

          5. Molorchus.

          6. Meloe.

                              DERMAPTERA.

          7. Labidura gigantea.

                               PLATE II.

                             STREPSIPTERA.

          1. Xenos Peckii. _Linn. Trans._

                              ORTHOPTERA.

          2. Gryllotalpa vulgaris.

          3. Blatta germanica.

                               HEMIPTERA.

          4. Ledra aurita.

          5. Pentatoma rufipes.

                               PLATE III.

                              LEPIDOPTERA.

          1. Lycaena Hippothoe mas?

          2. Sesia asiliformis.

          3. Euprepia pulchella.

                              TRICHOPTERA.

          4. Phryganea varia?

                              NEUROPTERA.

          5. Libellula cancellata.

          6. Raphidia notata, Fab. _Mantiss._ #/




Transcriber's Notes:


Obvious punctuation and spelling errors have been fixed throughout.

Non-Latin characters have been replaced with the nearest Latin
equivalent for example oe (the oe ligature), was replaced with oe.

Inconsistent hyphenation is as in the original.

Errata listed in Volume III, have already been made.






End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of An Introduction to Entomology: Vol. I
(of 4), by William Kirby and William Spence

*** 