



Produced by Barbara Tozier, Bill Tozier and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net






THE GALAXY.

VOL. XXIII.--MAY, 1877.--No. 5.

Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1877, by SHELDON &
CO., in the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.




A PROGRESSIVE BABY.


OBER LAHNSTEIN, Jan. 16, 1875.

So much, Susie dear, for our small miseries between Blackwall and
Rotterdam. Nurse's sickness and the crowd of Cook's tourists (Cook-oos!)
aggravated matters; but it is always a tedious bit of way, though I
never minded it in my solitary artist days, when either Dresden and
happy work or home and happy rest were at end of the hard journey. What
it is to be young, gay, and heart-free! For then I went always second
class--when I didn't go third!--(except of course on the steamers, where
the cheaper accommodation is too rude, and rough companionship too
intimate)--and once managed the entire distance from Dresden to London
for fifty thalers!--taking it leisurely too; stopping en route to "do"
Frankfort, Weimar, Heidelberg, Lourain, Bruges, and Antwerp, and to pay
two or three visits at grand houses, where they didn't dream I was fresh
from the peasants' compartments!

And I'd no shillings and sixpences then to fee guards and porters, so
had to dodge them, look at them as if I didn't see them, lug about my
own parcels, and freeze without a foot-warmer!

Now the way is all padded. I always go first-class if Ronayne's along,
haven't to lift so much as a hand satchel, am fairly smothered in
comforts, as beseems the true English Philistine I'm become. I've the
delightfullest husband and baby the round world can show; a nurse fit to
command the channel fleet (if that meant wisdom in babies, and she
weren't such an outrageously bad sailor!); and I've about as much vim as
a syllabub; am so nervous that I weep if Ronayne gets out of my sight
when we go for a stroll, if too little toast comes up for my breakfast,
or the chocolate isn't frothed, or the trunk won't lock, and have
aphasia to that degree that I say cancel when I mean endorse, hair-brush
when I want a biscuit, and go stumping down to dinner in a boot and a
slipper, being incapable of the connected effort of memory and will that
would get both feet into fellow shoes.

But I'm blissfully happy all the same, and we've beheld a spectacle
lately that reconciles me perfectly with my own absurdity, and my
awkwardness with my precious tot.

Coming up the Rhine we had a pair of fellow voyagers, circumstanced
somewhat like ourselves: first baby, not over young (the couple, not the
baby, which was only six weeks old!), but travelling without a nurse.
This mighty functionary had struck almost at the moment of their
departure from London, and a charitable but inexperienced friend came to
their aid and set forth with them in charge of the baby.

We missed them on the Batavier, which wasn't strange, and first had our
attention drawn to them by the slow Dutch landlord's asking Ronayne, as
we stood looking idly out into the formal little garden of the new Bath
hotel at Rotterdam, if that was _his_ baby a young woman seated on one
of the garden benches was jerking up and down so violently? "Because it
was shaken about too much. Young babies couldn't be kept too quiet."
This young woman was the benevolent friend, and I suppose the parents
were off sight-seeing in the town; for every now and then the whole day
through one or another of us reported encountering the young woman
alone somewhere, always tossing the baby more or less about.

But next day, after we had embarked on the Rhine boat, and I had helped
nurse turn our tiny state-room into a tolerable nursery (that folding
bassinnette is just _invaluable_, and lulled by the motion and the
breezy air, my lammie slept better in it than in her own quarters at
home), I went upon deck to find Ronayne, and on the way came upon a
most piteous, persistent wail, and the wail's father and mother in
abject, helpless tendance upon it.

Of course my newly-found mother's heart took me straight to the
miserable group; and after a few sympathetic inquiries, I sat down
beside the mother, and took the querulous little creature in my arms,
where presently it hushed off to sleep. How proud I felt! for that's
more than my own baby often condescends to do for my clumsy soothing!
The father skulked away with an immensely relieved look, soon after I
sat down, and the mother grew quite confidential. She told me of the
perfidious nurse's behavior, of the friend's heroic offer, and that they
had not had a wink of sleep the night before at the hotel, for nursing
the baby had made the friend so ill that they had had to send her back
to London that morning. She didn't know but it would have been better if
she and baby had turned back with the overdone friend; but it was her
husband's holiday--six weeks he had--and he worked so hard the rest of
the year--her husband was an author, a journalist (at sight I had
guessed him a literary cus--tomer!--hair parted in the middle, crease--y
clothes, spectacles, a sparse, pointed beard, and narrow, sloping
shoulders, with a stoop in 'em)--and she thought his vacation oughtn't
to be spoiled or deferred by the child; and as he would enjoy it all a
great deal more with her than alone, she had "trusted to luck," and was
going off up the Rhine with him to make a long excursion, before
proceeding to some quiet little town on the Moselle, where another nurse
was in waiting for her. It was their first baby--yes; they had not been
married much over a year. She was fond of it, poor baby! but it was such
a pity it had come! They had not wanted children--children would utterly
interfere with their plan of life. Both its father and herself were busy
people. Oh, there was so much work to be done! and they had married to
help each other in toil for the world, and babies were a sad hindrance.

I suggested that the work of moulding an immortal soul, fashioning the
character and destinies of a little human creature, seemed to me labor
mighty enough for any one's energies and ambition. But she answered me a
little sharply, that there were souls enough in the world already; she
wanted to be responsible for no more mistakes and wretchedness. However,
she fortunately was well and strong, and if she got a good nurse, she
would be able to devote herself to work, and to help her husband as she
had done before the child came. Was I interested in the woman question?
I answered somewhat tamely, that I was very much interested in whatever
made women better; that I believed in women, and that this rather
wearisome planet wouldn't even be worth condemning without them.

Ah! Then she supposed I had attended the suffrage meetings in London?
Her marriage had brought her to London. Before that she had lived in
B----, and was secretary of the Woman's Suffrage Association there.
Perhaps I had seen her name--Alice Thorpe? Now it was Malise. Her
husband was Clement Malise of "The Aurora."

This was said a little proudly, but with the pretty pride a wife has a
right to show when she believes she has a clever husband. And a good
woman I am sure she was beside whom I sat--kindly, conscientious,
earnest, spirited, full of aspiration and zeal gone astray. Pleasant to
look upon, too, when I came to separate her from her disfiguring and
thoroughly British travelling costume--a hat like an inverted basin,
with a long white ostrich feather, dingy, uncurled, and forlornly
drooping; a violet stuff gown all bunchy and tormented with woollen
ruffles, ruches, and knobby rosettes, and a dark blue bag of a
waterproof garment which I took to be the feminine correspondent of that
masculine wrap, the Ulster coat--a covering that would turn Apollo
himself into a bagman. Not very tall, solidly rather than gracefully
made, with a rather driven-together face, the excessively bulging
forehead crowding down upon a nose curved like a bird's beak, and a pair
of deep-set eyes of wonderful beauty--clear, gray, intense, brilliant,
and shaded by long dark lashes. Add a delicate, rather sarcastic mouth,
a complexion of exquisite fairness, dark brown hair without any warmth
in its color, hanging in slender short curls down her neck, and that is
Mrs. Malise.

We had a great many conversations after this initial one, and I believe
I have promised to look them up this winter in London. They're not so
very far from us--going by the underground; Notting Hill Gate's their
station, and I really feel a call to look after that baby. He's a fine
child, but was generally so miserable and cross that almost nobody took
other than offensive notice of him. At first I pitied his poor mother
when passengers and crew, even, made much of my baby when she came up
all placid, white as a snowdrop, daintily fresh, and feathery, and soft,
with her lace frills, like a little queen in nurse's arms; but my pity
was thrown away, for Mrs. Malise only said, "I cannot spare the time to
keep my baby in white, so made that gray flannel dressing gown for him
to travel in. It's capital, and not showing the dirt, will last the
whole journey." And the little thing was so untidy! For he was treated
exactly like a parcel; his parents handled him like one, a rather
dangerous one, at arm's length, and like a parcel he was deposited
about, sometimes among rolls of carpeting on the deck, or on beer casks,
while his father and mother were hanging over the boat's rail staring at
castles and ruins, or reading up in the guide-book; sometimes happed up
in a shawl on the floor, or on a bed made up on chairs, his head on the
lowest one, his mother craning her head out at window to lose no bit of
river scenery. One day I nearly sat down upon him, as he was left, quite
by himself, lying across a camp-chair; wherever, in unexpected,
impossible corners, one stumbled upon a solitary gray object, it was
sure to be this poor mite, bemoaning himself for having come into a
place so full of cold, wet, sour smells and stomach-ache--a place where
he wasn't wanted, and nobody had time to look after him.

"Name's Malise, eh?" said Ronayne. "_Malaise_, if that poor little
beggar knows anything about it"; and "little Malaise" we always call
the child.

"Cries? What's he to do but cry?" burst out nurse one day in high
indignation. "There's that silly woman as thinks a young baby must only
have three meals a day like grown folks; and so she's off a-tramping
about the deck, and leaving him here a-sucking at an empty bottle, and
filling himself as full of wind as he can hold! And there's _them
things_ (nurse's favorite euphuism for an article of attire she
detests) as is hardly ever changed, and him sopping wet most of the
time! I should like to whip her!"

I think Mrs. Malise is a good deal drawn toward me for two or three
reasons. She has found out that I've been an artist--lived by myself,
had my studio, paid my way--and she accordingly respects me as a member
of the sisterhood who's at least tried to do something. Then I agree far
too closely with St. Paul, and she "don't altogether hold with Paul,"
and wants to convert me to whatever form of kaleidoscopic non-belief she
cherishes. Then I'm too luke-warm about the suffrage. I admit that I see
no reason why I shouldn't have it, but I don't and can't see in my
having it the panacea for all social ills. I'm asked what I think of
Hodge in England, and Terence and Scip in the United States getting
rights withheld educated women citizens; and I can only plead pitifully
that while Hodge and Terence and Scip are ignorant and boorish, I,
having already roughed it a good deal, would rather individually not
contest anything very closely with them--a plea which is most justly
scouted as a mere get-off--a bit of heartless fine-ladyism. Have I read
Mill? No. From the time my school days ended, at seventeen, for ten--no,
twelve years, until I married, two years ago, I had neither time nor
eyes for reading. Why, I could almost count upon my fingers the books I
had read--"after school-books, of course, and then some anatomical
reading which don't count; there's--let me see--'The Improvisatore,'
Vasari's 'Lives of Painters,' 'Charles Auchester,' Rio's 'Lectures on
Christian Art,' 'Christie Johnstone,' 'La Mare au Diable,' two or three
of Balzac's novels, and all of poetry and of Ruskin I could ever lay
hands on!"

She looked astonished for a moment; then her face brightened. "Here's
richness!" I'm sure her thought might have been translated. "Here's a
virgin soil with nothing to dispute the growth of good seed." And I feel
I'm to be taken in hand. I'm quite ready. It is even something to look
forward to in the horrible London winter. She told me "little Malaise"
is to be brought up after the most recently approved scientific manner,
by weight, measure, and clockwork. His birth, even, was a triumph of
principle, for on that occasion Mrs. Malise was attended by a young
woman who had been unsuccessful in her medical studies, and failed to
obtain her degree--"Because I believed it jealousy, you know, and I
wished to encourage her!"

When he is three or four years old (certainly as early as they take
them!) he is to be put in the kindergarten at Geneva, and left there for
some years. It's a consolation to think that he can't be anywhere more
desolate than he's sure to be at home.

Meanwhile, work for papa and mamma, and bouts of colic for him, poor
little chap!

Last night I assisted at a distance at his nightly bath. The combined
forces of father and mother were required for this process, and the
ceremony was so utterly whimsical that I should have enjoyed it without
a pang if the small object most concerned had only been a dog. The pair
had stationed themselves in a strong draught, and the child, cold,
unhappy, lay stripped and squirming on his mother's lap, while from a
cup full of water in a tiny basin she _dabbed_ him with a bit of
flannel precisely as if he were an ink splash which she was essaying to
soak up with blotting paper before it should spread about much!

The father's part was to try and present an available surface for the
dabbing, which he did by drawing out first an arm, then a leg of the
child at full length, just as one pulls an elastic cord to find how far
it will stretch, letting it go with a snap when at full tension--as he
dropped arm or leg when little Malaise resented such unwarrantable
experiments on his ductility by a sudden, louder-than-usual roar. It was
piteous! But to see that father and mother--he lanky, spectacled, grave
as an owl, she serious, abstracted, revolving doubtless some scheme of
work, mechanically getting through this piece of business, recognized as
necessary by their conscientiousness, but perplexing in its nature, and
unaccountable as having fallen to their lot--no propriety, no indignant
sympathy for the baby, could quite withstand the drollery of the scene.

But nothing could pacify nurse! "The idiots!" she almost screamed. "The
child will die, and I hope it will, for she's not fit to have it. I hope
it will die!"


BIEBRICH, 21st.

I have kept this open, thinking I could tell you definitely when we
shall get into our quarters at Schwalbach, but nothing is settled yet,
and we've been pottering about in these river towns. As Schlangenbad and
Wiesbaden are very full, I counsel my lord to stop here where we are
well off; for this is a very comfortable hotel, and I don't want to do
any more unpacking till we are finally bestowed in our rooms at the
Villa Authes.

There is an abandoned palace of the Grand Duke of Nassau here--one of
the ruins in King William's track of '66. It is so melancholy to see
these ruined principalities. Union's a very nice word, but forced union,
matrimonial or political, is not comfortable either to see or endure.
However, here's the palace, with its lovely neglected gardens, grass
uncut, wild flowers flaunting where should be trim velvet turf only,
fountains plashing in weedy ponds--and an admirable resort we find the
shaded avenues and deserted parterres for ourselves and our small queen.
We could scarce be better provided for.

To-day, watching from our windows the steamer coming down the river, we
spied, on its deck, our travelling companions again--Mr. and Mrs.
Malise--and, sure enough, the little gray parcel on the bench not far
from mamma! Going at last, I hope, toward that nurse on the Moselle.
Poor little Malaise!

Address your next as last year. And with fond love to the whole
household,

Your Lil.

                     *      *      *      *      *

18 STANFIELD GARDENS,     }
    SOUTH KENSINGTON,     }
        February 10, 1875 }

At last I've seen my "poor little Malaise" again. Your questions would
have kept him in my memory if there had been a chance of my forgetting
the woful baby; and so soon as we were warmly settled into house, home
habits, and friendly circle again (and O how charming even London in
winter is after seven mortal weeks in Ireland, where scarce anybody has
two pence, and everybody is lazy, and everything above the peasant rank
is saturated with conventionality and the poorest pride! For the Great
Mogul approves of his grandchild, and was pleased to insist on the
prolongation of our visit till I was nearly wild with having to behave
myself, and during the last week was a dozen times on the very brink of
"breaking out." Oh, that horrid life of buckram, inanity, and
do-nothing-ism! Even Ronayne, who knows pretty much the worst of me,
thought I had gone crazy when we were once fairly off in the train--a
carriage all to ourselves. I sang, I whistled, I gnawed chicken-bones, I
talked all the slang I could remember, I smoked a cigarette--I went
generally to the mischief. And when we had really got back to dear No.
18, and were cosy in the dining-room over our dessert, no speering
servant by, I put my elbows on the table; I made a tipsy after-dinner
speech, Ronayne applauding, and calling, "Hear! hear!" I rushed around
to his end of the table and hugged him, making a "cheese" on my way
back--in short, the Bohemian Lil Graham avenged liberally the
suffocations the Great Mogul's daughter-in-law had nearly died of. If
ever I stop one hour over a fortnight in the home of my husband's
fathers again! A fortnight is just supportable)--and to go back to my
first-page sentence, I set forth one morning to hunt up the little man.
I found my people easily enough--a good house in a good street--"A large
house, that must require much thought and care," I said to Mrs. Malise;
whereupon she told me the care did not fall upon her, as the house was,
after an imperfect fashion, conducted as a cooeperative boarding-house--a
germ, she hoped, of a cooeperative hotel or family club. Half a dozen or
so of their friends occupied the house with them, and they paid an
admirable housekeeper to manage for them. It was only a make-shift--not
what one liked to mention when speaking of future possibilities of
confederated homes--had I read the article in a late number of the
"Victoria Magazine" containing a magnificent picture of cooeperative
living?--but better than dreary lodgings or isolated homes, especially
when a woman devoted her life to other than household duties. I replied
that I believed every ardent spirit at some time or another was
discontented with the beaten way, and dreamed of glorious possibilities
of associate life and labor, wherein all selfishness should be
suppressed, justice and all the beatitudes reign, and souls develop all
their capabilities scarce conscious of even the body's hampering; but
that practically the only successful lay experiment in communism I had
ever heard of was that early one of the Indians in Paraguay under the
care of the Jesuit missionaries--Phalansterians who wore their rosaries
around their necks because they had no pockets in which to carry them!

And I thought that people without bonds of kinship or close sympathy
would not happily bear being forced into incessant, intimate
companionship unless they were either saints or prodigies of
imperturbable courtesy.

Well, life was a choice of evils, she answered me, and their experiment
had so far succeeded very well. But I might judge for myself a little:
would I, with my husband, dine with them on either one of such and such
days the next week, to meet this confederate household assembled? This
was an advance I had not counted on. My especial interest was in the
child, and though I liked well enough for myself accepting an invitation
that promised to be something out of the common way in dinners, I was
hardly prepared to pledge Ronayne. He not only likes a good dinner, and
feels injured when he doesn't get it, but he is very particular as to
the society in which he eats it. He can be gloriously jolly and informal
when he likes; but he wouldn't be his father's son if he weren't what I
call just a bit snobbish about the people he will know in
England--London especially.

But if he was going in for the correct thing, why on earth did he
insist upon marrying me? Because I never was the correct thing, and
he fell it love with me when he was quite old enough to know better;
and after his friends had for years reckoned him as a fastidious,
foreordained bachelor; _he_ says because I was so wholly unlike the
young ladies of his generation that he was surprised out of himself.
And mamma told him all my faults that he didn't know already, and how
people had insisted before upon marrying me, and two or three times I
had been silly enough to half think I would let them, and then backed
out and vowed I would have no husband but Art--and was generally so
impressed with the risks he ran that I believe she even wept over
 his prospective unhappiness. But he would have his way; he didn't
want a housekeeper; he didn't want a well informed young lady; his
shirt-buttons and stocking-darning weren't likely to depend upon his
wife; he should hate a patient Grizzle; he didn't marry for his
friends--you can imagine the rash arguments. But I gave him a last
chance of escape, for the night before we were married; when I'd given
away all my old clothes, and the license was bought, the ring in his
breast-pocket, and the wedding breakfast being laid in the next room, I
said to him before all of them in papa's study:

"Ronayne, don't you want one more chance of freedom? Are you frightened
about to-morrow morning, and the pell-mell household mamma promises you?
Because if you are, I'll let you off now. You may run away in the night.
I'll be a forsaken maiden, and papa shan't have the loch dragged, or
advertise a 'Mysterious and Heart-Rending Disappearance.'"

"Too late. It's a hopeless case. I'm much too far gone for that. And I'm
not going to help you to get rid of me, Mistress Lil."

I _was_ frightened rather, and then and there I made papa give me a
five-pound note to run away from Ronayne with in case I found, during
our wedding journey, that I'd made a mistake and Art was my only true
husband after all. Ronayne added five pounds more so that I could run
away first-class, and have something with which to bribe accomplices!
And that ten pounds is in my jewel-case now, and I think I shall keep it
for my daughter, and give it her on her wedding-day as a reserve fund,
in case she needs it as her mother once pretended to fear she herself
might do.

However, for once I was discreet, and answered Mrs. Malise that I should
like to come, but must see my husband before promising ourselves. Then I
asked to see my small friend; but his mother, consulting her watch,
begged me to excuse his non-appearance to-day, for this was just the
moment when his nurse would be laying him down for his nap; and though
often he would not sleep at all, yet system was everything, and he had
to lie in his little bed two hours, though his eyes were broad open all
the while.

"But will he lie there so long without crying?"

"Oh, two or three times he nearly cried himself into spasms because he
was not taken up; but once he found he could not conquer Johanna he
gave up trying, and now lies peaceably enough. He had to learn early
that there are things more important in the world than his little self.
Nothing do I object to more than a household revolving around children
as a centre. Marriage _ought_ to double powers--make people unselfish;
while, as a rule, it only enlarges the sphere of egotistic
concentration and absorption. If I gave up my time and thoughts to Mill
(we've named him for this generation's great English apostle of
liberty), as ordinary mothers do, it would seem to me a wickedness. But
I scarcely find him the least hindrance. I have begun to speak a little
in our suffrage meetings this winter, and have been away a good deal
from home for that purpose--once for three weeks at Liverpool and in
the north of Ireland."

"But you do not mean without your baby?"

"Oh, certainly. He is only a little animal as yet, requiring animal
cares which I can provide without making the sacrifice of ability for
higher work. Johanna attends to him far better than I could, and is not
above such uses. I believe in economizing forces. By and by, when his
intellect begins to develop, he will be far more interesting to me, and
I shall be of use to him."

"You weaned him, then, very early?"

"Oh, dear, yes. Since he was three months old, he's been brought up as
Pip was. But perhaps 'Great Expectations' was not among your books
read."

"No; but I suppose you mean your baby's brought up by hand? But I can't
think how you could bear to put him away from you if it wasn't actually
needful. Why, my heart's broken only to think that in a month or so more
my baby will not depend upon me, humanly, for all her little life."

"Ah, plainly you have a vocation to be a mother. I haven't; and if I had
to care for Mill in all things, it would be simple slavery to me. But it
must be a great step from art to the nursery too."

"That means a step _down_. I suppose I should have thought so once, but
never since I held my baby in my arms, and she's a far more wonderful
creation to me than any old master's cherub I ever copied. And not my
baby alone, but all babies. I never pass one in the street now, ever so
ugly or dirty, without a warm feeling for it, and no charity opens my
purse so quickly as a _creche_, or a foundling, or orphan asylum. I
could have been very happy as an artist always. Art is full of the
noblest strength and compensations, and I own that the ordinary life of
the English Philistine is irksome to me to the last degree; but what
should I do now without a husband and child? And what would I not give
up or bear for them? You see I'm only a very humdrum woman, Mrs.
Malise."

"Whatever I see, I don't despair of winning you over to our side. I
think it only needs that this great movement for woman's freedom and
enlightenment, all that underlies it, all it implies, be fairly brought
before you, to receive your assent and cooeperation. And, to be unwisely
frank, perhaps, it is such women as you we ought to gain, must
gain--women of sentiment, tenderness, tact, suave manner--sympathetic
women, to bring a gracious element into the contest. The workers already
in the field have fought so long, against such odds and obloquy, that it
is no wonder all the softness, conciliation are gone out of them, and
that their aspect and address suggest only warfare, aggressive and
unsparing."

And so on during the call. I wish I could photograph for you Mrs.
Malise's drawing-room. You will not suppose it cumbered with the
ordinary pretty feminine litter; but I can tell you Aunt Janet's
sewing-room couldn't begin to rival it in grim dead-in-earnestness:
straight up and down chairs that mean work; a writing-table big enough
for a board-room, and fitted with suitably mighty writing implements; a
slippery green leather couch upon which no laziness could be so
desperate as to court repose; books lining one wall, and papers, stacks
of papers everywhere--manuscripts and newspapers; no ornaments, unless a
clock, a Cleopatra's needle in black marble, a skull, a wild-eyed,
shock-headed oil portrait of a man I guessed to be the father of my
hostess, and photographs of Mill, Mazzini, and Swinbourne be considered
decorative.

Once at home again, I flew up stairs to Ronayne's dressing-room to run
over his engagement tablet. One of the days named by Mrs. Malise was
clear, so I said quietly at dinner, "Oh, Ronayne, don't make any
engagement for Friday, for we are to dine at the Coming Events New Era
Peep o'Day Associate Club."

"_Plait-il, madame?_"

So I told him all about it. He groaned, made two or three pathetic
observations about grocer's wine, raw meat, greasy, peppered _entrees_,
and the cantankerous woman who would fall to his share at dinner, but
resigned himself like a lamb--or a well-trained husband, which is much
the same thing.

And once I had fairly sent off our acceptance to Mrs. Malise, I didn't
spare him one bit. I told him that for once in his life he was to part
company with his fossil world, and find himself in the vanguard of
civilization, breathing another atmosphere in the high fellowship of
the evangels of religious and social liberty. I besought him not to
mortify me by any expression of his limited ideas and convictions upon
the topics we should probably hear discussed, and above all not to
betray horror at any enunciation that seemed to his feeble apprehension
to strike at the root of all possible or endurable tarrying on this
planet. "Don't let it be known," I entreated, "what a clog you are upon
my soarings after the illimitable. I _am_ a victim, but the anguish and
humiliation of my lot are too recent and painful for publicity--as yet!

"Let them think you idiotic, dear--that goes without saying because
you're a man--but not that you're a tyrant to whom a poor-spirited wife
must succumb.

"And you'll see Americans, dear, who've come over to find out why these
effete regions and peoples still linger on the earth, and to them
you'll only be a 'blarsted Britisher,' and you're not to resent it if
they treat you accordin'. And there'll be Internationalists, to whom
you're a 'bloated aristocrat,' and they won't have, to say nice
manners. Then if you don't take Mrs. Malise down, you'll may be squire
some grand new light. I can't tell you how to behave, for I don't know
if the men of the future are to be deferential, or free and easy; but
you must take a hint from the behavior of the other men. She'll wear a
garnet-silk gown trimmed with white Yak lace, a pea-green ostrich
feather, and ribbons in her hair, and a profusion of jingling Berlin
steel ornaments, and she'll either trample you under foot and heap you
over with wisdom, or she'll find you're her affinity. And if that
happens, never mind me, love. If you _wish_ to go after affinities, go!
_I_ shall always be the same--the meek, forgiving woman who knows that
a wife's duty is to smile always--to upbraid never. Leave me and your
poor angel child if you will! We both believed in indissoluble marriage
once, but that needn't hinder you. Renounce----"

And about here, I think it was, my eloquence and pathos were suddenly
checked in their flow. Men, husbands especially, take such mean
advantages! And reasoning, and calm, intellectual conversation have,
somehow, so little charm for them! I tell you painful truths, my Susie,
but they're for your good and guidance. I know that long-legged,
yellow-haired laddie out in New Zealand is a demi-god. Of course he
is--they all are--but it's best not to marry 'em--if one can help it!

But the dinner. I was dreadfully puzzled what to wear--whether to get
myself up as a severe matron, or appear in the costume suited to me--a
frivolous woman, _jeune encore_, and with a mind not above
millinery--when a little note from Mrs. Malise, felicitating herself
and me that the day of our dinner was also their reception evening,
turned the scale against the brown silk in favor of a quite celestial
palest green-blue Irish poplin I got in Dublin this last visit. The
tint suits my pale dark face admirably, and with rather a profusion of
white lace, and pink coral ornaments that Ronayne's brother Gus, the
major, just home from India, gave me at Christmas--exquisite swinging
fuchsias, with golden stamens and leaves--the toilette was so effective
that I was quite ready to hear Ronayne's, "Oh, what a gorgeous swell!"
when I exhibited myself just before starting. And, "Ould Ireland for
ever!" as his eye fell on the gown he helped me to choose. "And are
these the laces my father gave you?" taking hold of one of my frills.
"Do they look like antimacassars? Because if they don't, they never
were fabricated in your tight little island, my Paddy. I'd do a deal
for you. You couldn't help being born there, poor boy; _mais toute
chose a son terme_, and even my devotion won't stretch to the
wearing Irish lace."

Our host and hostess received us in the confederate drawing-room, where
were three or four other guests already, and the greater number of the
associate household and the lacking members presented themselves before
dinner was announced. Fourteen or fifteen people in all, and not, to the
casual glance, differing strikingly from unassociate dwellers in
"isolate homes and dreary lodgings."

There were, first, a brusque-mannered but uncommonly handsome Lady ----
----. If there's a lord, or plain mister ---- ----, I don't know, but
certainly he's not _en evidence_. Lady ---- ---- is an authoress on the
woman question and on marriage, and is generally given to the most
forward of "advanced" opinions and ideas. Ronayne insultingly says they
won't harm me, for I should never get a notion of what they really
are--a speech which I treated with the oblivious contempt it deserved,
though inwardly tickled at the lucky shot; for it's quite true that,
attracted by her great beauty--the most singular combination you can
fancy--boldly cut features, softened by babyish roundness of curves,
and enchanting dimples, not a wrinkle or crow-foot to be traced, an
infantine complexion, all transparent and softly pink, and this grownup
baby's face surmounted by a mass of crisp-waved, snowy, but
glitteringly snowy hair!--I hovered around her for awhile during the
evening, and could make nothing whatsoever of the oracular sentences
she let fall. With her her son, a man of twenty-six to thirty,
priggish, argumentative, contrary-minded--altogether the most cub-like
young Briton I have lately encountered. Next, a widow with two
daughters--the mother what, of all things, but a Plymouth
sister!--given to hospital and prison work, tract distribution, and
mothers' meetings--a tall, spare, gentle-faced woman, dressed with
almost Quakerish simplicity. And run over and away with by her
daughters, no question--two monstrous girls of thirty, if a day; real
grenadiers, nearly six feet high; one painfully thin and large-eyed,
the other as stout as tall, and both overpowering in spirits and
flippant or cynic smartness of talk. One, the thin one, whom I liked
best, amused me during the evening by telling me how she got rid of
bores--young, feeble little society men, brief of stature and of wit.
"I endure the little creature as long as I can, and when he has buzzed
all his little buzzes about the weather, and subjects suited to his
size, there comes a pause--a long pause, for I don't help him. Then, if
he is too young to know that he should take himself off, and he begins
desperately upon some other threadbare topic, then I act. I am seated
on a low lounge or ottoman; I begin to rise as if I caught sight of
some one I knew at a distance; and I rise, rise, slowly, slowly, but
up, up, up I go, till sometimes I stand on tiptoe, or on a hassock, my
long skirts hiding all that, and the little man, who has watched me
first idly, then curiously, gradually gets horror-struck, and finally
bursts desperately away, absolutely tongue-tied with fright."

"And no wonder!" I couldn't help saying, for she had mounted and mounted
as she described the scene, until there really was something
supernatural and alarming in the slim, white-draped length of lady, and
the height from which the big blue eyes in their hollow orbits shone
down upon me.

Then an editor and his wife--the editor of "The Food Regenerator," if
you please--and a dark, unwholesome looking, wizened little man, who I
am sure would have been the better for a good rubbing with sand-paper
and emery powder. His wife was a plaintive, helpless, hapless,
washed-out woman, who, sidling apologetically about in a frowsy costume
of some yellow-white woollen stuff, made me think of a dirty white
cat--a likeness I was sorry to have forced on me when I had heard a bit
of her history; for the only wonder is how she's kept courage enough to
go on dressing or living at all. It seems that _M. le mari_ is by way
of being a social as well as dietetic regenerator, and is as full of
uncomfortable fads as man can be. They have no fortune, unless you
reckon as such seven small children, and over and over again he's
thrown up a good appointment or salary because he "must be free to
write his convictions--great truths the world needs." And to lighten
matters still further, he believes that service should be bartered, not
paid for in coin; so they could almost never have a servant, and when
they did get one it was of course some poor wretch who was glad to
shelter herself on any terms for the moment, but who could be trusted
no more than puss in the dairy. Besides carrying her own fardel, this
poor wife was expected to fold and direct wrappers for her husband's
precious journal, he finding "mechanical writing too exhausting and
stultifying."

Next--let me see--two gentlemen, bachelors, one a pugnacious
fellow-countryman to whose tremendous r-r's my heart warmed in this
lisping land of Cockaigne--a proof-reader at one of the great publishing
houses; the other as curious a specimen as I've encountered--a man of
sixty or so, of courtly manners, an ex-Anglican parson, an ex-Catholic
convert, a present "seeker after truth"--a man who knows something about
everything and believes the last thing--but sure of nothing save that
this world's a comfortable place, and loving nothing, one would swear,
but his pug dog, a superb creature, fairly uncanny for wisdom, but a
vilely ill-tempered beast, gurr-ing if one but looked at it.

And three ladies make up, I believe, the tale of the household: a
rather young widow, charming in an unearthly, seeress-like
fashion--finest porcelain to her finger-tips, but frail as a breath; a
handsome, solid blonde girl, with cold blue eyes, and no gold in her
fair hair, studying to be what she calls "a healer"--an earnest
advocate of the food-regenerating editor's views upon diet, but quite
out-Heroding Herod in her practice, for her fare seems only to lag a
pace behind Nebuchadnezzar's in simplicity; and last a witty
_Americaine_, an art student at the South Kensington school, with whom
I fraternized directly, and from whom I had all the information my own
eyes didn't glean. A girl twenty-four or five years old, I fancy, and
oh, so satisfyingly handsome--not tall, but majestic in proportions and
pose: a beautifully shaped head whose outlines were only revealed by
closely-pinned braids of fine dark hair, and a face like a lily for
calm and purity--too pale, indeed, for brilliant health, but the faint
shadows under the eyes, about the temples and mouth that she owes to
months in dimly-lighted rooms are really most effective aids to her
peculiar beauty. She captivated me quite; Ronayne, too, who is a great
conquest, for usually he dislikes Americans, finding them, he says, so
shallow and yet so cockahoop. And the other guests at dinner were a
lady lecturer, American, too, young, decidedly pretty, but pert as a
pigeon, an Englishwoman who's doing something very notable in
reformatories and kindergartens, a Liberal M.P. dancing attendance on
the young lady lecturer, and a grand old white-headed lion of a man, a
famous literary M.D.--heterodox to a frightful degree, I'm told, but
certainly one of the most delightful neighbors I ever had at a dinner
table.

And a very enjoyable dinner-party it was, altogether: a simple but
carefully arranged menu, the dishes thoroughly well cooked--two or
three foreign touches, _maccaroni aux tomates_, American-trimmed
peaches with cream, and little fairy cakes--cat tongues--do you know
them?--and roasted almonds in Spanish fashion, and as good claret
Sauterne and sparkling Mosel (for I know a good glass of wine when I
get it) as one need wish for.

The food-regenerator and his wife and the blonde "healer" had seats
together, and were helped only to vegetables and fruits--the girl,
indeed, taking only unbolted bread, of which an enormous supply in the
shape of hard little cakes was placed before her, together with a large
vegetable-dish full of stewed prunes; and the two mountains of bread and
fruit had disappeared when the meal was ended--how many pounds I don't
know, but then dinner is her sole meal in the twenty-four hours.

"Did you see that young woman's dinner?" burst out my liege that night
when we were discussing our late experiences. "Disgusting! It ought to
have been served in a trough! I looked every instant to see her fall
from her chair and have to be carried out. If one is to gorge oneself
like an anaconda once a day upon fruit and chopped straw in order to
live to a good old age, I think we'll elect to be cut off in our
youthful bloom."

But the talk at table was clever and gay, and thoroughly un-English in
that it was general instead of being broken up into a dozen depressing
_sotto-voce_ dialogues. The "healer," indeed, was too busy eating to
open her mouth much uselessly, and the white cat was too timid for
speech. But her editor made amends. He talked for three; not ill, but
with a flavor of bitterness, and not enough in the third person.

"Oh, women are the stronghold of superstition," he exclaimed apropos of
some passage between himself and the American art-student--"fettered
hard and fast by hoary prejudices," he went on with rather a confusion
of metaphors, "else the world might move."

"But we bind you, upon a man's testimony, but by a single hair,"
answered his opponent: "why not burst so slight a shackle?"

"And you to talk of freedom!" he went on as if unhearing. "Why do you
wear that emblem at your throat?" (A plain gold cross which came into
bold relief against her black velvet bodice.)

"Possibly because I'm a Christian." She answered without change of
voice, but stopping the conversation by addressing some one nearer her.
But the little porcelain widow, with a pretty upward movement, like the
flutter of a bird on her nest, caught at a floating thread, and said in
her tiny flute voice.

"But, Mr. Ridley, if he is interested in symbolism, will remember that
the cross is a very ancient symbol, typifying the active and passive
forces in nature--good and evil, light and darkness. And is it not very
curious how everywhere the sign is impressed on external nature--in the
heavens, in crystals, in flowers, in a bird's flight? In the arts too."

"And the legends, fables, and touching or droll superstitions concerning
it are endless," said the white-headed doctor beside me. "And yet I'm
often struck with the comparative newness of what may be termed
literature of the cross. This dwelling on apparition in so many forms of
the Story of the Cross is quite modern, and I fancy that a Good Friday
service, a following through the Three Hours' Agony with a colloquial
soliloquy, if one may use such an expression, upon the Seven Last Words,
would have seemed as novel to the early Christians as it does now to the
Low Church portion of our beautifully consistent Establishment."

"Though the symbol was always probably in private use among the early
Christians," struck in the truth-seeker, "I believe its first public
appearance would not date further back than its triumphant one upon the
Roman eagles. In the Catacombs, I'm told, the Virgin and Child appear in
the oldest work, or symbolism--the Cross never save as executed by late
hands."

"May there not be subjective reasons for that?" asked my porcelain
widow. "I mean for the modern adoration of the Cross? Do you not think
we are much softer hearted, much more keenly susceptible of all the
finer emotions than were those old Greek, Roman, and Jewish converts?
One feels the same thing, it seems to me, in mystic reading. The old
visions were triumphant, simple, or, so to say, material--the very A B C
of mysticism; while the visions of later mystics are complicated,
involved, like the soul-life of this time, often agonizing beyond
natural power of endurance. And the stigmatized saints are of these
later times."

"And then," said the art-student, "I think they didn't realize in those
early days how long time was going to be, and how tough and many-headed,
evil. The faith was but young then. Perhaps they couldn't have borne to
know the length and fluctuations of the fight--and they felt so sure of
speedy victory, that our Lord's resurrection and ascension appealed to
them more keenly than His passion."

"All reasonable theories," replied my neighbor. "But, apropos of some of
the legends concerning the Tragedy of the Cross, the weeping willow, the
trembling aspen, the robin redbreast, the red crossbill, the passion
flower, and so many more, I hardly know a more naive example of the way
in which our forefathers pressed the exterior world into testimony for
their belief than occurs in an old picture in an Augustinian monastery
in Sussex.

"It is a fresco on the wall of a chamber--subject, the Nativity--and the
animals therein are made to publish the event in words supposed to
resemble their characteristic sounds and cries. A cock, crowing, is
perched at the top, and a label from out his mouth has the words,
'Christus natus est!' 'Quando, quando?' quacks the duck. Hoarsely the
raven, 'In hae nocte.' 'Ubi? ubi?' inquires the cow. And, 'Bethlehem,'
bleats out the lamb."

"Oh, Mrs. Stainton, I beg your pardon," suddenly called out the
ex-Anglican parson from the foot of the table, and despatching a servant
with a plate to the little widow. "I quite forgot your predilection."

"But somebody else may like the _inner consciousness_ too," returned
she, transferring to her own plate the fowl's gizzard sent. "You make
me feel like a terrible old French aunt of mine--a _gourmande_ who
spent two or three hours every day in consultation with her cook, a
man, concerning her for the most part solitary dinner, and who was at
the last found dead with her cook-book lying open on her knee! My
oldest brother, when a little fellow, dined with her one day. In his
helping of fowl was included the inner consciousness. Childlike, he put
this tid-bit carefully aside as a delicious last morsel. But the old
lady eyed his plate with great discontent, growing every moment more
grim. Finally she could bear it no longer, and, poising her fork, she
dexterously harpooned the _bonne-bouche_, and triumphantly transferred
it to her own plate, remarking to the dreadfully disappointed child, 'I
see, my nephew, that you don't love this little portion. Now _I_ do, so
it is best I should have it.' We none of us could tolerate this aunt,
but my brother's feeling toward her ever after was really venomous in
its spitefulness."

"That reminds me," said the Scotchman, "that I saw a photograph of
Dixblanc to-day, and was astonished to find her not at all an
evil-looking person. I quite believe now that she murdered her mistress
in a fit of passion, as she says, and not at all for robbery. And there
must have been awful provocation. Fancy living with a disreputable,
avaricious, nagging old Frenchwoman!"

"But how worse than with an old Englishwoman of like characteristics?"
asked somebody.

"Oh, because the _Francaise_ is more _fine_, exasperating, and utterly
unrestrained by terrors of Mrs. Grundy and the _decent_," replied the
ex-Anglican, ex-things-in-general truth-seeker.

You will easily imagine that the talk, as it ran from one thing to
another, was now and then upon topics of which I haven't the faintest
gleam of knowledge--the doctrines of Swedenborg, the philosophizings of
Spinoza and Vaurenargues. (Ronayne as usual spells the hard names for
me, but you, as a wise and much-reading damsel, will know who was meant
and all about it.)

After the ladies had returned to the drawing-room (for even in this New
Light house the stupid fashion remains of gentlemen lingering alone, or
together, or however you like it--you know what I mean--over their
wine) I made a little tour of inspection of the public parts of the
establishment with Mrs. Malise. They've a common library and
reading-room, and most of the associates have their individual
sitting-rooms. Dinner is a fixed meal, and all the members meet
thereat, but breakfast and lunch may be taken at any time within
certain hours, to suit the convenience of each member. "We are too
small in number to make it possible to order our meals _a la carte_,
or to economize in general living expenses as it might suit us
individually to do. We can only reduce household costs in the mass, and
then share these pretty equally. But this is only a beginning. By and
by we shall have splendid confederate homes, under whose roofs the
simplest and the costliest fashions of living may go on side by side.
But to prove so much as we have done is a gain, and in separate homes
the same amount of comfort we have here would cost us at least double,
and would be, for some of us who have neither time nor talent for
domesticity, quite unattainable at any price. What, under my
administration, a little home would be upon our income of L500 a year,
I shouldn't like to experience. And Mrs. Stainton! (The little widow.)
Why, she comes of one of the oldest of the county families in Somerset;
was reared like an exotic, lived chiefly upon cream and forced fruit,
though now and then she trifled with something solid--an almond soup, a
clear jelly, a bit of game, or an intricate _entree_! Never dreamed of
going beyond their pleasure gardens on her own feet, and knew how to do
no earthly thing save to read, write, talk. She read 'Alton Locke,' and
by way of comment married a national schoolmaster, the son of a
brickmaker on her father's estate! There was a grand hubbub, and before
she'd had time to be too much disgusted with her martyr role--martyrdom
to break down the barriers of caste--her husband left her a penniless
widow, and since then her father allows her a small income, but
sentences her to banishment from that decorous household whose
proprieties she outraged. She can endure nothing, knows nothing of any
practical matters. What would she do with L150 a year, in a dingy
parlor 'let,' with a flock bed, a burnt chop, a long-brewed cup of tea,
and a frowsy-haired, smutty-faced 'slavey' to open the door and attend
grudgingly and slatternly upon her?

"But we are not all chiefly moved by economic considerations. Some of
our members have very considerable incomes, and might live where and how
they pleased, but they seem not less satisfied with our experiment than
are the poorer associates. There is such relief from care, and we may
see as much or as little society as we choose without offence or
burden."

Something interrupted Mrs. Malise's argument here, and I asked to see
baby.

"Mill? Oh, certainly, if you like; but we shall find him asleep."

And asleep he was in one of those dreary back rooms that are sure to be
sunless--a room that is both day and night nursery, I suppose, for there
was a hot fire, a close smell, and the German nurse sat making lace
under a gas jet flaming away unshaded.

He was very pale, poor little man! and has grown very fat--a soft,
sagging flesh! I remarked upon his pallor to his mother, and she
answered that he had measles about the time he was weaned, and that he
had never had much color since. But he seemed well, and was he not a
great stout fellow?

What treatment had he in measles? I asked. Oh, none! They didn't believe
in doctors over much, and thought nature managed best unhindered. Mill
was scrubbed with carbolic soap, and that was all the special treatment
he had.

Returning to the drawing-rooms, we found them rapidly filling with the
evening guests, and a busy hum of conversation going on. A slender,
graceful, feeble-looking young man entered just before us. "That is
Dodge, the famous medium," whispered my companion; but the words were
hardly uttered before the young man gave a sharp cry, flung his arms
wildly out, then sank as if prostrated on a near-by lounge. "Oh, what is
it? what is it, Mr. Dodge?" cried several persons, rushing to him.

"She! she!" was the answer, with difficulty, and then he languidly
pointed to a group of eager talkers under the chandelier. At the moment
Lady ----, one of the group, her white hair startlingly gleaming under
the full blaze of light, turned, with some sense of the commotion, and
as she did so called out, "Why, Dodge! Is it my old friend Dodge?" and
came toward him. The young man rallied, rose, and gave her his hand. "It
was so sudden," he explained. "Four years ago Lady ----'s hair had not a
white thread in it; and when I first caught sight of her, crowned by
that mass of snow, I quite believed it was her spirit I saw."

"A great deal may happen in four years," answered Lady ----. "But how
are you in these days, Mr. Dodge?"

"Oh, wretchedly ill, as usual," he replied. "The Duc de ---- insisted
upon it that I must come over to England and try cold water again, and
the Emperor, when I left, engaged me to meet him next season at Ems on
condition that I had a more respectable body for my spirit to travel
about in. Here's a little souvenir he gave me at parting," showing a
magnificent diamond on his finger; and I moved on and lost the gorgeous
reminiscences. There was a crowd before the evening was over, and I was
introduced to a score or so of notables in the unorthodox world. But I
seemed destined to funny little dramatic surprises. I had drawn near the
piano to listen to Miss Hedges's "Drink to Me Only," etc., and was
sitting quietly when the song was ended, speaking to no one, not
consciously looking at any one, when a voice near me said, "That is my
wife!" and I woke up to find a roly-poly, little old fellow, all smiles,
insinuation, and plausibility, with a fringe of venerable white hair
around a head round as an apple, bald and shining, smooth, evidently
addressing himself to me. "Yes, that is my wife," he went on, and I
looked with some bewilderment at a young woman his gaze indicated--a
very young woman in a brilliant pink evening dress, the young woman
brilliantly  herself in solid white and red, with black eyes,
black hair in rebellious tight curls, and a face with about as much
expression as a plate. "Looks rather young for me, don't she? But it's
all right, for the spirits give her to me!"

"And pray, Mr. Wardle, what did the spirits do for the old wife you left
in Terre Haute?" inquired Miss Hedges, wheeling about toward us. "I am
Anna Hedges, and two years ago I painted a portrait of your grandchild,
Benny Davis, for Mrs. Wardle in New York."

"Er--er--I was not aware--er--I remember, that is--er--I think I have
seen--er, er--yes! yes! A very worthy woman, the first Mrs. Wardle--very
worthy. But narrer, narrer! too undeveloped, in fact, to--er--receive
the new gospel, or to--er--make any use of the freedom I gave her to
find a more harmonious partner, as I have done," and the old creature
having floundered into a little more self-possession, smiled amiably,
and retreated in tolerable order.

"I _do_ beg your pardon," went on Miss Hedges to me impulsively; "but
that sleek old villain! I really couldn't help my outburst. His real
wife is one of the nicest, gentlest of simple old women, and dying of
shame, I heard the other day, for what has befallen herself and her
children through the delusions and misconduct of an infatuated man who
has grandchildren older than this 'harmonious partner' he introduces as
his wife here abroad. The 'first Mrs. Wardle!' It made me think of one
of our Jerseymen who begged that a certain hymn might be sung at his
wife's funeral 'because the corpse was particular fond of that hymn!'"

When I could speak for laughter, I inquired, "But is this then a
spiritualistic headquarters? Because Mrs. Malise pointed out Dodge, the
medium, to me early in the evening?"

"No, not more than of all other insanities, crudities, and
unconventionalities--conventionalities too; for with perhaps one
exception, all the members of the household, whatever their opinions,
are to the last degree rigid as to the proprieties. But at one time or
another one meets here all shades of belief and non-belief--much of the
orthodox and I should say all the heterodox London. Very curious I find
it, and though sometimes outraged, as to-night, I'm oftener amused with
my 'proper study of mankind.' But you, as an Englishwoman, would hardly
conceive how droll to me was my first experience of one of these
receptions. You know, of course, at once, as everybody does, that I'm a
Yankee? I came in rather late one evening with an English artist friend,
and found, enthroned in the other room, the centre of a throng of bowing
gentlemen, a woman as black as the chimney back, her neck and arms bare,
white gloves, a gilt comb and white ostrich feather in her woolly
hair--a genuine darkey! and Mme. V.--the artist, Mme. V.--hurried up to
me. 'Oh, do you know your accomplished countrywoman, Miss Symonds? No?
Then pray let me introduce you to her, we find her so charming!' And I
dare say she was charming, only it was very queer at first to encounter
Chloe _en reme_!"

Then we had a long talk, getting speedily away from persons and things
to the old familiar subject--art. How the girl is working! And how happy
and absorbed in her work she is.

"Oh, Ronayne," I said, as we settled back in the carriage for our drive
home, "do I smell of turpentine and paint rags? I had such a good time!
Miss Hedges and I talked shop for a whole hour."

And then, and later, we compared notes. He was critical, but had been
amused, and, trust me, I had the wit to hold my tongue about "the first
Mrs. Wardle!"

For over and above my interest in that poor baby, several things draw
me toward this associate household, and I should not like to pursue an
acquaintance there if Ronayne manifested any decided contempt or
hostility. He bursts out about the food-reforming trio, and the young
lady-lecturer's manners are not to his fancy--too free and easy. She
boasts of her superiority to hampered Englishwomen. _She_ lives here by
herself in lodgings, and has gentlemen visiting and dining with her
alone, or goes alone, in full dress, to dine, at 7 or 8 o'clock, with a
gentleman friend stopping at the Langham Hotel. These are American
fashions--innocent permitted freedoms of our republican sisters, she
says. She is a pretty little boaster, with ready wit and a sharp
tongue; but there are Americans and Americans, and I hardly think it
would occur to an English gentleman to stand flicking a heavy
curtain-tassel playfully into Miss Hedges's face while chatting with
her at a public reception, even if he were an _epris_ Liberal, M.P.--as
Ronayne says Mr. Vane did in the little orator's the other night.

                     *      *      *      *      *

But there! there! With love from each to all, not another word this time
of my little New Light baby or his expansive household, from

Your own Lil.

(To be continued.)




THE CLIMBING ROSE.


    Climb, oh! climb the golden ladder,
        Song of mine:
    Climb till thou dost reach her heart
        For whom I pine.

    Cease not, lest thou lose the bliss
        For which I sigh:
    Climb till thou dost touch her heart--
        Ah! why not I?

D. N. R.




MISS MISANTHROPE.

By JUSTIN MCCARTHY.




CHAPTER X.

"THE POET IN A GOLDEN AGE WAS BORN."


Victor Heron did not leave Mrs. Money's quite as soon as he had
intended. He had made a sort of engagement to meet some men in the
smoking-room of his club; men with whom he was to have had some talk
about the St. Xavier's Settlements. But he remained talking with Minola
for some time; and he talked with Lucy and with other women, young and
old, and asked many questions, and made himself very agreeable, and, as
was his wont, thought every one delightful, and enjoyed himself very
much. Then Mr. Money chanced to look in, and seeing Heron, bore him away
for a while to his study, to talk with him about something very, very
particular. Mr. Money saw Herbert Blanchet, and only performed with him
the ceremony which Hajja Baba describes as "the shake-elbows and the
fine weather," and then made no further account of him. Mr. Blanchet,
seeing Heron invited to the study, and knowing from his acquaintance
with the household what that meant, conceived himself slighted, and was
angry. Mr. Money always looked upon Blanchet as a sort of young man whom
only women were ever supposed to care about, and who would be as much
out of place in the private study of a politician and man of business as
a trimmed petticoat.

There was, however, some consolation for the poet in the fact that he
had Minola Grey nearly all to himself. He secured this advantage by a
dexterous stroke of policy, for he attached himself to his sister and
did his best to show and describe to her all the celebrities; and
Minola, only too glad, came and sat by Mary, and they made a very happy
trio. Herbert was inclined to look down upon his sister as a harmless,
old-fashioned little spinster, who would be much better if she did not
try to write poetry. He felt convinced for a while that Minola must have
the same opinion of her in her secret heart, and would not think the
less of him for showing it just a little. But when he found that Miss
Grey took the poetess quite seriously, and had a genuine affection for
her, his sister's value rose immensely in his eyes; he paid her great
attention, and, as has been said, he had his reward.

It grew late; the rooms were rapidly thinning. Minola and Miss Blanchet
were to remain at Mrs. Money's for the night. Blanchet could not stay
much longer, and had risen to go away, when Victor Heron entered. He
came up to speak to Minola, and Minola introduced him to her particular
friend and _camarade_, Miss Blanchet; and he sat beside Miss Blanchet
and talked to her for a few moments, while Blanchet took advantage of
the opportunity to talk again with Minola. Then Mr. Heron rose, and
Herbert rose, and Mary Blanchet, growing courageous, told Heron that
that was her brother and a great poet, and in a very formal,
old-fashioned way, begged permission to make them acquainted. Mr. Heron
was a passionate admirer of poetry, and occasionally, perhaps, tried
the patience of his friends by too lengthened citations from
Shakespeare and Milton; but in modern poetry he had not got much later
than "The Arab physician Karshish," which he could recite from end to
end; and "In Memoriam," of which he knew the greater part. He was,
however, modestly conscious that his administrative engagements in the
colonies had kept him a little behind the rest of the world in the
matter of poetry, and it did not surprise him in the least that a very
great poet, whose name had never before reached his ears, should be
there beside him in Mrs. Money's drawing-room. He felt delighted and
proud at meeting a poet and a poet's sister.

It so happened that after saying his friendly good night to his
hostess--a ceremony which, even had the rooms been crowded, Mr. Heron
would have thought it highly rude and unbecoming to omit--our fallen
ruler of men found himself in Victoria street with Mr. Blanchet.

"Are you going my way?" Heron asked him with irrepressible sociability.
"I am going up Pall Mall and into Piccadilly, and I shall be glad if you
are coming the same way. Are you going to walk? I always walk when I
can. May I offer you a cigar? I think you will find these good."

Herbert took a cigar, and agreed to walk Heron's way; which was, indeed,
so far as it went, his own. Heron was very proud to walk with a poet.

"Yours is a delightful calling, sir," he said. "Excuse me if I speak of
it. I remember reading somewhere that one should never talk to an author
about his works. But I couldn't help it; we don't meet poets in some of
our colonies; and your sister was kind enough to enlighten my ignorance,
and tell me that you were a poet. I always thought that a charming
anecdote of Wolfe reciting Gray's 'Elegy,' and telling his officers he
would rather have written that than take Quebec. Ay, by Jove, and so
would I!"

Mr. Blanchet had never heard of the anecdote, and had by no means any
clear idea as to the identity or exploits of Wolfe. But he was anxious
to know something about Heron, and therefore he was determined to be as
companionable as possible.

"You must not believe all my sister says about me. She has an
extravagant notion of my merits in every way."

"It must be delightful to have a sister!" Victor Heron said
enthusiastically. "Do you know that I can't imagine any greater
happiness for a man than to have a sister? I envy you, Mr. Blanchet."

Heron was in the peculiar position of one to whom all the family
relationships present themselves in idealized form. He had never had
sister or brother; and a sister now rose up in his imagination as a sort
of creature compounded of a simplified Flora MacIvor and a glorified
Ruth Pinch. His novel-reading in the colonies was a little
old-fashioned, like many of his ideas, and his habit of frequently using
the word "sir" in talking with men whom he did not know very familiarly.

Mr. Blanchet was not disposed, from his knowledge of Mary Blanchet, to
hold the possession of a sister as a gift of romantic or inestimable
value. To say the truth, when Victor spoke so warmly of the delight of
having a sister, he too was not setting up the poetess as an ideal. He
was thinking rather of Miss Grey, and what a sister she would be for a
man to confide in and have always with him.

Meanwhile Herbert, with all his self-conceit, had common sense enough to
know that it would not do to leave Heron to find out from others that
the great poet Blanchet had yet to make his fame.

"My sister and I have been a long time separated," he said. "She lived
in the country for the most part, and I had to come to London."

"Of course--the only place for a man of genius. A grand stage, Mr.
Blanchet--a grand stage."

"So of course Mary is all the more inclined to make a sort of hero of
me. You must not take her estimate of me, Mr. Heron. She fancies the
outer world must think just as she does of everything I do. I am not a
famous poet, Mr. Heron, and probably never shall be. I belong to a
school which does not cultivate fame, or even popularity."

"I admire you all the more for that. It always seems to me that the poet
degrades his art who hunts for popularity--the poet or anybody else for
that matter," added Victor, thinking of his own unpopular performances
in St. Xavier's Settlements. "I am delighted to meet you, Mr. Blanchet.
I have seen so much hunting after popularity in England that I honor any
man of genius who has the courage to set his face against it."

"My latest volume of poems," Blanchet said firmly, "I do not even mean
to publish. They shall be printed, I hope, and got out in a manner
becoming of them--becoming, at least, of what I think of them; but they
shall not be hawked about book shops and reviewed by self-conceited,
ignorant prigs."

"Quite right, Mr. Blanchet; just what I should like to do myself if I
could possibly imagine myself gifted like you. But still you must admit
that it is little to the credit of the age that a poet should be forced
thus to keep his treasures from the public eye. Besides, it may be all
very well, you know, in your case or mine; but think of a man of genius
who has to live by his poems! It's easy talking for men who have
enough--my enough, I confess, is a pretty modest sort of thing--but you
must know better than I that there are young men of genius--ay, of real
genius--trying to make a living in London by writings that perhaps their
own generation will never understand. There is what seems to me the hard
thing." Mr. Heron grew quite animated.

The words sent a keen pang through Blanchet's heart. His new
acquaintance, whom Blanchet assumed to be confoundedly wealthy,
evidently regarded him as a person equally favored by fortune, and
therefore only writing poetry to indulge the whim of his genius. Herbert
Blanchet had heard from the Money women, in a vague sort of way, that
Mr. Heron had been a governor of some place; it might have been Canada
or India for aught he knew to the contrary; and he assumed that he must
be a very aristocratic and self-conceited person. Blanchet would not for
the world have admitted at that moment that he was poor; and he
shuddered at the idea that Heron might somehow learn all about Mary
Blanchet's official position in the court-house of Duke's Keeton. For
all the dignity of poetry and high art, Mr. Blanchet was impressed with
a painful consciousness of being small somehow in the company of Mr.
Heron. It was not merely because he supposed Heron to be wealthy, for he
knew Mrs. Money was rich, and that Lucy would be an heiress; and yet he
was always quite at his ease with them, and accustomed to give himself
airs and to be made much of; but it occurred to him that Mr. Heron's
family, friends, and familiar surroundings would probably be very
different from his; and he always found himself at home in the society
of women, whom he knew that he could impress and impose on by his
handsome presence. Yes, he felt himself rather small in the society of
this pleasant, simple, unpretending young man, who was all the time
looking up to him as a poet and a child of genius.

Greatly pleased was the poet and child of genius when Victor Heron asked
him to come into his rooms and smoke a cigar before going to bed.

"You don't sleep much or keep early hours, I dare say, Mr. Blanchet;
literary men don't, I suppose; and I only sleep when I can't help it.
Let us smoke and have a talk for an hour or two."

"Night is my day," said Blanchet. "I don't think people who have minds
can talk well in the hours before midnight. When I have to work in the
day I sometimes close my shutters, light my gas, and fancy I am under
the influences of night."

"I got the way of sitting up half the night," said Victor simply, "from
living in places where one had best sleep in the day; but I am sure if I
were a poet, I should delight in the night for its own sake."

There was something curious in the feeling of deference with which Heron
regarded the young poet. He considered Blanchet as something not quite
mortal, or at all events, masculine; something entitled to the homage
one gives to a woman and the enthusiasm we feel to a spiritual teacher.
Blanchet did not seem to him exactly like a man; rather like one of
those creatures compounded of fire and dew whom we read of in legend and
mythology. The feeling was not that of awe, because Blanchet was young
and good-looking, and wore a dress coat and white tie, and it is
impossible to have a feeling of awe for a man with a white tie. It was a
feeling of delicate consideration and devotion. Had some rude person
jostled against or otherwise insulted the poet as they passed along,
Victor would have felt it his duty to interpose and resent the affront
as promptly as if Minola Grey or Lucy Money were the object of the
insult. To his unsophisticated colonial mind the poet was the sweet
feminine voice of the literary grammar.

Heron occupied two or three rooms on the drawing-room floor of one of
the streets running out of Piccadilly. He paid, perhaps, more for his
accommodation than a prudent young man beginning the world all over
again would have thought necessary; but Heron could not come down all at
one step from his dignity as a sort of colonial governor, and he
considered it, in a manner, due to the honor of England's administrative
system, that he should maintain a gentlemanlike appearance in London
while still engaged in fighting his battle--the battle which had not
begun yet. Besides, as he had himself told Minola Grey, his troubles
thus far were not money troubles. He had means enough to live like a
modest gentleman even in London, provided he did not run into
extravagant tastes of any kind, and he had saved, because he had had no
means of spending it, a good deal of his salary while in the St.
Xavier's his lodgings; and his condition seemed to Blanchet, when they
entered the drawing-room together, and the servant was seen to be
quietly busy in anticipating his master's wants, to be that of an easy
opulence whereof, in the case of young bachelors, he had little personal
knowledge. It was very impressive for the moment. Genius, and
originality, and the school quailed at first before respectability, West
End rooms, and a man servant.

The adornments of the rooms were, to Mr. Blanchet's thinking, atrocious.
They were, indeed, only of the better class London lodgings style:
mirrors, and gilt, and white, and damask. There were doors where there
ought to have been curtains, carpets where artistic feeling would have
prescribed mats or rugs; there were no fans, not to say on the ceiling,
but even on the walls. The only suggestion of art in the place was a
plaster cast of the Venus of the Louvre which Heron himself had bought,
and which in all simplicity he adored. Mr. Blanchet held, first, that
all casts were nefarious, and next, that the Venus of Milo as a work of
art was beneath contempt. One of the divinities of his school had done
the only Venus which art could acknowledge as her own. This was, to be
sure, a picture, not a statue; but in Mr. Blanchet's mind it had settled
the Venus question for ever. The Lady Venus was draped from chin to toes
in a snuff- gown, and was represented as seated on a rock biting
the nails of a lank, greenish hand; and she had sunken cheeks, livid
eyes, and a complexion like that of the prairie sage grass. Any other
Venus made Herbert Blanchet shudder.

The books scattered about were dispiriting. There were Shakespeare,
Byron, and Browning. Mr. Blanchet had never read Shakespeare, considered
Byron below criticism, and could hardly restrain himself on the subject
of Browning. There were histories, and Mr. Blanchet scorned history;
there were blue books, and the very shade of blue which their covers
displayed would have made his soul sicken. It will be seen, therefore,
how awful is the impressiveness of respectability when, with all these
evidences of the lack of artistic taste around him, Mr. Blanchet still
felt himself dwarfed somehow in the presence of the occupier of the
rooms. It ought to be said in vindication of Mr. Heron, that that poor
youth was in nowise responsible for the adornments of the rooms, except
in so far as his plaster cast and his books were concerned. He had
never, up to this moment, noticed anything about the lodgings, except
that the rooms were pretty large, and that the locality was convenient
for his purposes and pursuits.

The two young men had some soda and brandy, and smoked and talked.
Blanchet was the poorest hand possible at smoking and drinking; but he
swallowed soda and brandy in repeated doses, while his host's glass lay
still hardly touched before him. One consequence was that his humbled
feeling soon wore off, and he became eloquent on his own account, and
patronizing to Heron. He set our hero right upon every point connected
with modern literature and art, whereon it appeared that Heron had
hitherto possessed the crudest and most old-fashioned notions. Then he
declaimed some of his own shorter poems, and explained to Heron that
there was a conspiracy among all the popular and successful poets of the
day to shut him out from public notice, until Heron felt compelled, by a
sheer sense of fellow-feeling in grievance, to start up and grasp his
hand, and vow that his position was enviable in comparison with that of
those who had leagued themselves against him.

"But you must hear my last poem--you _shall_ hear it," Herbert said
magnanimously.

"I shall be delighted; I shall feel truly honored," murmured Victor in
perfect sincerity. "Only tell me when."

"The first reading--let me see; yes, the _first_ reading is pledged to
Miss Grey. No one," the poet grandly went on, "can hear it before she
hears it."

"Of course not--certainly not; I shouldn't think of it," the dethroned
ruler of St. Xavier's Settlements hastened to interpose. "What a noble
girl Miss Grey is! You know her very well, I suppose?"

"I look upon her," said the poet gravely, "as my patron saint." He threw
himself back in his chair, raised his eyes to the ceiling, murmured to
himself some words which sounded like a poetic prayer, and swallowed his
brandy and soda.

Victor thought he understood, and remained silent. His heart swelled
with admiration, sympathy, and an entirely innocent, unselfish envy.

"Still," the poet said, rising in his chair again, "there is no reason
why you should not hear the poem at the same time. I am going to-morrow
to read the poem to Minola--to Miss Grey and Mary. I am sure they will
both be delighted if you will come with me and hear it."

"I should like it of all things, of course; but I don't know whether I
ought to intrude on Miss Grey. I understood from her that she rather
prefers to live to herself--with her friends of course--and that she
does not desire to have visitors."

"You may safely come with me," the poet proudly said. "I'll call for you
to-morrow, if you like."

Victor assumed that he safely might accept the introduction of his new
acquaintance, and the appointment was made.

If Mr. Heron could, under any possible circumstances, be brought to
admit to himself that the society of a poet was a little tiresome, he
might perhaps have acknowledged it in the present instance. The
good-natured young man was quite content for the present to sink and
even to forget his own grievance in presence of the grievances of his
new acquaintance. His own trouble seemed to him but small in comparison.
What, after all, was the misprizing of the political services of an
individual in the face of a malign or stupid lack of appreciation, which
might deprive the world and all time of the outcome of a poet's genius?
Heron began now to infer that his new friend was poor, and the
conviction made him more and more devotedly sympathetic. He was already
dimly revolving in his mind a project for the publication of Blanchet's
poems at the risk or expense of a few private friends, of whom he was to
be the foremost. Some persons have a genius, a heaven-bestowed faculty,
for the transfer of their own responsibilities and cares to other minds
and shoulders. Already two sympathetic friends of a few hours' standing
are separately taking thought about the publication of Mr. Blanchet's
poems without risk or loss to Mr. Blanchet. Still, it must be owned that
Mr. Blanchet's company was growing a little of a strain on the attention
of his present host. Blanchet knew absolutely nothing of politics or
passing events of any kind in the outer world, and did not affect or
pretend to care anything about them. Indeed, had he been a man of large
and liberal information in contemporary history, he would in all
probability have concealed his treasures of knowledge, and affected an
absolute and complacent ignorance. Outside the realms of what he called
art, Mr. Blanchet thought it utterly beneath him to know anything; and
within his own realm he knew so much, and bore down with such a terrible
dogmatism, that the ordinary listener sank oppressed beneath it. Warmed
and animated by his own discourse, the poet poured out the streams of
his dogmatic eloquence over the patient Heron, who strained every nerve
in the effort to appreciate, and in the honest desire to acquire,
exalted information.

At last the talk came to an end, and even Blanchet got somehow the idea
that it was time to be going away. Victor accompanied him as far as the
doorway, and they stood for a moment looking into the silent street.

"You haven't far to go, I hope?"

"No, not far; not exactly far," the poet answered. "I'll find a cab, I
dare say. To-morrow, then, you'll come with me to Miss Grey's. You
needn't have any hesitation; you will be quite welcome, I assure you.
I'll call for you."

"Come to breakfast then at twelve."

"All right," the complacent Blanchet answered, his earlier awe having
given place to an easy familiarity; "I'll come."

He nodded and went his way. Victor Heron looked for a while after his
tall, slender, and graceful figure.

"He's a handsome fellow," Heron said to himself, "and a poet, and I can
easily imagine a girl being in love with him, or any number of girls.
She is a very fine girl, quite out of the common track. She must be very
happy. I almost envy him. No, I don't. What on earth have I to do with
such nonsense?"

He returned to his room and sat thinking for a while. All his political
worrying and grievance-mongering seemed to have lost character somehow,
and become prosaic, and unsatisfying, and vapid. It did not seem much to
look forward to, that sort of thing going on for ever.




CHAPTER XI.

THE GAY SCIENCE IN A NEW ILLUSTRATION.


Mary Blanchet was, for the time, one of the happiest women on the earth
when she had to bestir herself, on their returning home next day, to
make preparations for the test-reading of her brother's poems. To hear
Herbert's poems read was a delight which could only be excelled by the
pride and joy of having them read to such an audience. She had so long
looked up to Minola as a leader and a princess that she at last came to
regard her as the natural arbitress of the destiny of any one belonging
to the Blanchet family. In some vague way she had made up her mind that
if Miss Grey only gave the word of command, the young poet's works must
go forth to the world, and going forth must of course be estimated at
their proper worth. Her pride was double-edged. On this side there was
the poet-brother to show to her friends; on that side the friend who was
to be the poet-brother's patroness. Her "animula vagula, blandula"
floated all that day on the saffron and rose clouds of rising joy and
fame.

Nor was her gratification at all diminished when Herbert Blanchet called
very early to crave permission to bring Mr. Heron with him, and when he
obtained it Blanchet had thought it prudent not to rely merely on the
close friendship with Miss Grey, of which he had spoken a little too
vauntingly to Victor the night before, and it seemed to him a very
necessary precaution to call and ask permission to introduce his friend.
He was fortunate enough to find Minola not only willing, but even what
Mary might have thought, if she had considered the matter, suspiciously
willing, to receive Mr. Heron. In truth, Minola had in her mind a little
plot to do a service to Mary Blanchet and her brother in the matter of
the poems, and she had thought of Mr. Heron as the kindliest and
likeliest person she knew to give her a helping hand in the carrying out
of her project. Mary, not thinking anything of this, was yet made more
happy than before by the prospect of having a handsome young man for one
of the audience. As has been said already, she had the kindliest
feelings to handsome young men. Then the presence of another listener
would make the thing quite an assembly; almost, as she observed in
gentle ecstasy more than once to Minola, as if it were one of the poetic
contests of the middle ages, in which minstrels sang and peerless ladies
awarded the prize of song.

So she busied herself all the morning to adorn the rooms and make them
fit for the scene of a poet's triumph. She started away to Covent
Garden, and got pots of growing flowers and handfuls of "cut flowers,"
to scatter here and there. She had an old guitar which she disposed on
the sofa with a delightfully artistic carelessness, having tried it in
all manner of positions before she decided on the final one, in which
the forgetful hand of the musician was supposed to have heedlessly
dropped it. All the books in the prettiest bindings--especially
poems--she laid about in conspicuous places. Any articles of
apparel--bonnets, wraps, and such like, that might upon an ordinary
occasion have been seen on tables or chairs--were carefully stowed away
in their proper receptacles--except, indeed, for a bright- shawl,
which, thrown gracefully across an arm of the sofa, made, in conjunction
with the guitar, quite an artistic picture in itself. Near the guitar,
too, in a moment of sudden inspiration, she arranged a glove of
Nola's--a glove only once worn, and therefore for all pictorial effect
as good as new, while having still the pretty shape of the owner's hand
expressed in it. What can there be, Mary Blanchet thought, more winsome
to look at, more suggestive of all poetic thought, than the
carelessly-lying glove of a beautiful girl? But she took good care not
to consult the owner of the glove on any such point, dreading with good
reason Minola's ruthless scorn of all shams and prearranged
affectations.

Mary was a little puzzled about the art fixtures, if such an expression
may be used, of the room--the framed engravings, which belonged to the
owner of the house and were let with the lodgings, of which they were
understood to count among the special attractions. She had a strong
conviction that her brother would not admire them--would think meanly of
them, and say so; and although Minola herself now and then made fun of
them, yet it did not by any means follow that she should be pleased to
hear them disparaged by a stranger. About the wall paper she was also a
little timorous, not feeling sure as to the expression which its study
might call into her brother's critical eye. She could not, however,
remove the engravings, and doing anything with the paper was still more
completely out of the question. There was nothing for it, therefore, but
to hope that his poetry and his audience would so engross the poet as to
deprive his eyes of perception for cheap art and ill-disciplined colors.

There was to be tea, delightfully served in dainty little cups, and Mary
could already form in her mind an idea of the graceful figure which
Minola would make as she offered her hospitality to the poet. An alarm,
however, began to possess her as the day went on, about the possibility
of Minola not being home in time for the reception of the strangers. In
order that she might have the place quite to herself to carry out her
little schemes of decoration, the artful poetess had persuaded Minola
not to give up her usual walk in the park, and now suppose Minola forgot
the hour, or lost her way, or was late from any cause, and had not time
to make any change in her walking dress, or actually did not come in
until long after the visitors had arrived! What on earth was she, Mary,
to do with them?

This alarm, however, proved unfounded. Minola came back in very good
time, looking healthy and bright, with some raindrops on her hair, and
putting away with good-humored contempt all suggestions about an
elaborate change of dress. Miss Blanchet would have liked her leader to
array herself in some sort of way that should suggest a queen of beauty,
or princess of culture, or other such imposing creature. At all events
she would have liked trailing skirts and much perfume. She only sighed
when Minola persisted in showing herself in very quiet costume.

The rattle of a hansom cab was heard at last--at last, Mary thought--in
reality a few minutes before the time appointed; and the poet and Mr.
Heron entered. The poet was somewhat pale, and a little preoccupied. He
had a considerable bulk of manuscript in his hand. The manuscript was in
itself a work of art, as he had already explained to Victor. Each page
was a large leaf of elaborately rough and expensive paper, and the lines
of poetry, written out with exquisitely careful penmanship, occupied but
a small central plot, so to speak, of the field of white. The margins
were rich in quaint fantasies of drawing, by the poet himself, and
various artists of his brotherhood. Sometimes a thought, or incident, or
phrase of the text was illustrated on the margin, in a few odd, rapid
strokes. Sometimes the artist, without having read the text, contributed
some fancy or whimsy of his own; sometimes it was a mere monogram,
sometimes a curious, perplexed, pictorial conceit; now merely the face
of a pretty woman, and again some bewildering piece of eccentric
symbolism, about the meaning whereof all observers differed. It must be
owned that as Minola looked at these ornaments of the manuscript, she
could not help feeling a secret throb of satisfaction at the evidence
they gave that the reading would not be quite so long as the first sight
of the mass of paper had led her to expect.

Mr. Blanchet did not do much in the way of preliminary conversation. He
left all that to Minola and Victor; and the latter was seldom wanting in
talk when he believed himself to have sympathetic listeners. It should
be said that the well-ordered guitar effect proved a failure; for Mr.
Blanchet soon after entering the room flung himself into what was to
have been a poetic attitude on the sofa, and came rather awkwardly on
the guitar, and was a little vexed at the thought of being made to seem
ridiculous.

Every one was anxious that a beginning of the reading should be made,
and no one seemed to know exactly how to start it. Suddenly Mr. Blanchet
arose, as one awakened from a dream.

"May I beg, Miss Grey, for three favors?"

Minola bowed and waited.

"First, I cannot read by daylight. My poems are not made for day. They
need a peculiar setting. May I ask that the windows be closed and the
lamps lighted? I see you have lamps."

"Certainly, if you wish," and Minola promptly rang the bell.

"Thank you very much. In the second place I would ask that no sign of
approval or otherwise be given as I read. The whole must be the
impression, not any part. It must be felt as a whole, or it is not felt
at all. Until the last line is read no judgment can be formed."

This was discouraging and even depressing, but everybody promised.
Minola in particular began to fear that poets were not so much less
objectionable than other men as she had hoped. She could not tell why,
but as she listened to the child of genius she was filled with a strange
memory of Mr. Augustus Sheppard. Everything that seemed formal and
egotistic reminded her of Mr. Augustus Sheppard.

"Then," continued Herbert, "when I have finished the last line, you will
perhaps allow me to leave you at once, without formality, and without
even speaking? I ask for no sudden judgment; that I shall hear another
time; too soon, perhaps," and he indulged in a faint smile. "But I
prefer to go at once, when I have read a poem; it is a peculiarity of
mine," and he passed his hand through his hair. "Reading excites me, and
I am overwrought. It may not be so with others, but it is so with me."

"I can quite understand," the good-natured Victor hastened to say.
"Quite natural--quite so. I have often worked myself into such a state
of excitement, thinking of things--not poetry, of course, but colonial
affairs, and such dry stuff--that I have to go out at night, perhaps,
and walk in the cool air, and recover myself. Don't you feel so
sometimes, Miss Grey?"

"Oh, no; I am neither poet nor politician, and I have nothing to think
about." At the moment she thought Blanchet a sham, and Heron rather a
weak and foolish person for encouraging him. What would you have of men?

"I have felt so often," Mary Blanchet said with a gentle sigh.

Miss Grey did not doubt that people felt so; that everybody might feel
so under appropriate conditions. It was the deliberate arranging of
preliminaries by Mr. Blanchet that vexed her; it seemed so like
affectation and play-acting. She was prepared to think his poetry
rubbish.

It was not rubbish, however; not mere rubbish, by any means. Mr.
Blanchet had a considerable mastery of the art of arranging together
melodious and penetrating words, and he caught up cleverly and adopted
the prevailing idea and purpose of the small new group of yet hardly
known artists in verse and color, to whom it was his pride to belong.
His poems belonged to what might be called the literature of disease. In
principle, they said to corruption, "Thou art my father," and to the
worm, "Thou art my mother and my sister." They dealt largely in graves
and corpses, and the loves of skeletons, and the sweet virtues of sin,
and the joys of despair and dyspepsia. They taught that there is no
truth but paradox. Mr. Blanchet read his contributions with great
effect: in a voice now wailing, now threatening, now storming fiercely,
now creeping along in tones of the lowest hoarseness. What amazed Minola
was, to find that any man could have so little sense of the ridiculous
as to be able to go through such a performance in a small room before
three people. In a crowd there might be courage; but before three! It
was wonderful. She felt horribly inclined to laugh; but the gleaming
eyes of the poet alighted on hers and fastened them every now and then;
and poor Mary too, she knew, was watching her.

It was very trying to her. She endeavored to fill her mind with serious
and sad thoughts; and she could not keep herself from thinking of the
scene in Richter's "Flegeljahre" where the kin of the eccentric testator
are trying in fierce rivalry who shall be the first to shed a tear for
his loss, in presence of the notary and the witnesses, and thereby earn
the legacy to which that exasperating condition was attached. After all
it is probably easier to restrain a laugh than to pump up a tear,
especially when the coming of the tear must bring the drying glow of a
glad success with it. Minola's condition was bearable; and indeed, when
she saw the genuine earnestness of the poet, her inclination to laugh
all died away, and she became filled with pity and pain. Then she tried
hard to admire the verses, and could not. At first the conceits and
paradoxes were a little startling, and even shocking, and they made one
listen. But the mind soon became attuned to them and settled down, and
was stirred no more. Once you knew that Mr. Blanchet liked corpses, his
peculiarity became of no greater interest than if his liking had been
for babies. When it was made clear that what other people called
hideousness he called beauty, it did not seem to matter much more than
honest Faulconbridge's determination, if a man's name be John, to call
him Peter.

The poet sometimes closed his eyes for a minute together, and pressed
his hand upon his brow, while drops of perspiration stood distinctly on
his livid forehead. But he took breath again, and went on. He evidently
thought his audience could not have enough of it. The poem was, in fact,
a chaplet of short poem-beads. Many of its passages had the peculiarity
that they came to a sudden end exactly when the listeners supposed that
the interest of the thing was only going to begin. When a page was ended
the poet lifted it, so to speak, with the sudden effort of one hand and
arm, as though it were something heavy like a shield, and then flung it
from him, looking fixedly into the eyes of some one of the three
listeners the while. This formality impressed Mary Blanchet immediately.
It seemed the very passion and wrestling of poetic inspiration; the
prophetic fury rushing into action through the prophet.

Minola once or twice glanced at the face of Victor Heron. At first it
was full of respectful and anxious attention, animated now and then by a
sudden flicker of surprise. Of late these feelings and moods had
gradually changed, and after a while the settling-down condition had
clearly arrived. At length Miss Grey could see that while Mr. Heron
still maintained an attitude of the most courteous attention, his ears
were decidedly with his heart, and that was far away--with his own
grievance and the St. Xavier's Settlements.

At last it was over. The close, for all their previous preparation, took
the small audience by surprise. It came thus:

    I asked of my soul--What is death?
    I asked of my love--What is hate?
    I asked of decay--Art thou life?
    And of night--Art thou day?
            Did they answer?

The poet looked up with eyes of keen and almost fierce inquiry. The
audience quailed a little, but, not feeling the burden of response
thrown upon them, resumed their expectant attitudes, waiting to hear
what the various oracles had said to their poetic questioner. But they
were taken in, if one might use so homely an expression. The poem was
all over. That was the beginning and the end of it. The poet flung away
his last page, and sank dreamy, exhausted, back into his chair. A moment
of awful silence succeeded. Then he gathered up his illuminated scrolls,
rose from his chair, bowed gravely, and left the room, Mary Blanchet
hurried after him.

Minola was perplexed, depressed, and remorseful. She thought there must
be something in the productions which made their author so much in
earnest, and she was afraid she had not seemed attentive enough, or that
Blanchet had detected her in her early inclination to smile. There was
an embarrassed pause when Victor and she were left together.

"He reads very well," Heron said at last. "A capital reader, I think.
Don't you? He throws his soul into it. That's the great thing."

"It is," said Minola, "if it's much to throw--oh, I don't know what I
mean by that. But how do you like the poems?"

"Well, I am sure they must be very fine. I should rather hear the
judgment of some one else. I should like to hear you speak first. You
tell me what you think of them and then I'll tell you, as the children
say."

"I don't care about them," said Minola, shaking her head sadly. "I have
tried, Mr. Heron; but I can't admire them. I can't see any originality,
or poetry, or anything in them. I could not admire them--unless a
command came express from the Queen to tell me to think them good."

"So you read the 'Misanthrope'--Moliere's 'Misanthrope?'" Victor said
eagerly, and having caught in a moment Minola's whimsical allusion to
the duty of a loyal critic when under royal command.

"Yes, I used to pass half my time reading it; I have almost grown into
thinking that I have a sort of copyright in it. Alceste is my chief
hero, Mr. Heron."

"I wish I were like him," said Mr. Heron.

"I wish you were," she answered gravely.

"But I am not--unfortunately."

"Unfortunately," she repeated, determined to pay no compliment.

"You must let me come some day and have a long talk with you about
Moliere," Victor said, nothing discouraged, having wanted no compliment,
nor thought of any.

"I shall be delighted; you shall talk and I will listen. I am so glad to
find a companion in Moliere. But I wish I could have admired Mr.
Blanchet's poems. I prefer my own ever so much."

"Your own!" The audacious self-complacency of the announcement
astonished him, and seemed out of keeping with Miss Grey's character and
ways. Do you write poems?"

"Oh, no; if I did, I don't think I could admire them."

"But how then--what do you mean?"

"Well--one can feel such poetry in every blink of sunshine even in this
West Centre, and every breath of wind, and every stray recollection of
some great book that one has read, when we were young, you know. That
poetry never is brought to the awful test of being written down and read
out. I do so feel for Mr. Blanchet; I suppose his poems seemed glorious
before they were written out."

"But I think they seem glorious to him even still."

"They do--and to Mary. Mr. Heron, tell me honestly and without
affectation--are you really a judge of poetry?"

"Not I," said Heron. "I adore a few old poets and one or two new ones,
but I couldn't tell why--and those that I admire everybody else admires
too, so that I can't pretend to myself that I have any original
judgment. My opinion, Miss Grey, isn't worth a rush."

"I am very glad to hear it--very. Neither is mine. So you see we may be
both of us quite mistaken about Mr. Blanchet's poems."

"Of course we may--I dare say we are; in fact I am quite sure we are,"
said Heron, growing enthusiastic.

"Anyhow it is possible. Now I have been thinking----"

"Yes, you have been thinking?"

"I don't know whether I am only going to prove myself a busybody; but I
am so fond of Mary Blanchet."

"Yes: quite right; so am I--I mean I like her very much. But what do you
think of doing?"

"Well, if one could do anything to get these poems published, or brought
out in some way--if it could be done without Mr. Blanchet's knowledge,
or if he could be got to approve of it, and was not too proud."

"All that I have been thinking of already," Victor said. "I do think
it's a shame that a fellow shouldn't have a chance of fighting his
battle for the want of a few wretched pounds."

"How glad I am now that I spoke of this to you! Then if I get up a
little plot, you'll help me in it."

"I'll do everything--delighted."

"But first you must understand me. This is for my dear old friend, Mary
Blanchet--not for Mr. Blanchet; I don't particularly care about him, in
that sort of way, and I fancy that men generally can take care of
themselves; but I can't bear to have Mary Blanchet disappointed, and
that is why I want to do something. Now will you help me? I mean will
you help me in my way?"

"I will help in anyway you like, so long as I am allowed to help at all.
But I don't quite understand what you mean."

"Don't you? I wish you did without being told so very, very clearly.
Well, my Mary Blanchet is proud; and though she might accept for her
brother a helping hand from me, it would be quite a different thing
where a stranger was concerned. In plain English, Mr. Heron, whatever
money is to be paid must be paid by me; or there shall be no plot. Now
you understand."

"Yes, certainly; I quite understand your feelings. I should have
liked----"

"No doubt; but there are so many things one could have liked. The thing
is now, will you help me--on my conditions?"

"Of course I will; but what help can I give, as you have ordered
things?"

"There are ever so many things to do which I couldn't do, and shouldn't
even know how to go about: seeing publishers and printers, and all that
kind of work."

"All that I'll do with pleasure; and I am only sorry that you limit me
to that. May I ask, Miss Grey, how old are you?"

"What on earth has that to do with the matter? Shall you have to give
the publishers a certificate of my birth?"

"No, it's not for that. But you seem to me a very young woman, and yet
you order people and things as if you were a matron."

Minola smiled and  a little. "I have lived an odd and lonely sort
of life," she said, "and never learned manners; perhaps that is the
reason. If I don't please you, Mr. Heron--frankly, I shan't try."

There was something at once constrained and sharp in her manner, such as
Heron had not observed before. She seemed changed somehow as she spoke
these unpropitiatory words.

"Oh, you do please me," he said; "sincere people always please me.
Remember that I too admire the 'Misanthrope.'"

"Yes, very well; I am glad that you agree to my terms--and we are
fellow-conspirators?"

"We are--and----"

"Stop! Here comes Mary."

Mary Blanchet came back. Her face had a curiously deprecating
expression. She herself had been filled with wonder and delight by the
reading of her brother's poems; but she had known Minola long enough to
be as sensitive to her moods and half-implied meanings as the dog who
catches from one glance at his master's face the knowledge of whether
the master is or is not in a temper suited for play. Mary had done her
very best to reassure her brother; but she had not herself felt quite
satisfied about Minola's admiration.

"Well?" Mary said, looking beseechingly at Minola, and then appealingly
at Victor, as if to ask whether he would not come to the rescue. "Well?"

"We have been talking," Minola said, with a resolute effort--"we have
been talking--Mr. Heron and I--about your brother's poems, Mary; and we
think that the public ought to have a chance of judging of them."

"Oh, thank you!" Mary exclaimed, and she clasped her hands fervently.

"Yes, Mr. Heron says he is clear about that."

"I was sure Mr. Heron would be," said Mary with becoming pride in her
brother. She was not eager to ask any more questions, for she felt
convinced that when Minola Grey said the poems ought to go before the
public, they would somehow go; and she saw fame for her brother in the
near distance. She thought she saw something else, too, as well as fame.
The interest which Minola took in Herbert's poems must surely betoken
some interest in Herbert himself. She knew well enough, too, that there
is nothing which so disposes some women to love men as the knowledge
that they are serving and helping the men. This subject of love the
little poetess had long and quaintly studied. She had followed it
through no end of poems and romances, and lain awake through long hours
of many nights considering it. She had subjected it to severe analysis,
bringing to the aid of the analyzing process that gift of imagination
which it is rarely permitted to the hard scientific inquirer to employ
to any purpose. She had pictured herself as the object of all manner of
wooings, under every conceivable variety of circumstances. Love by
surprise; love by the slow degrees of steady growth; love pressed upon
her by ardent youth; gravely tendered by a dignified maturity which,
until her coming, had never known such passion; love bending down to her
from a castle, looking up to her from the cottage of the peasant--love
in every form had tried her in fancy, and she had pleased and vexed
herself into conjuring up its various effects upon her susceptibility.
But the general result of the poetess's self-examination was to show
that the love which would most keenly touch her heart would be that
which was born of passion and compassion united. He, that is to say,
whom she had helped and patronized, and saved, would be the man she best
could love. Perhaps Mary Blanchet's years had something to do with this
turn of feeling. The unused emotions of the maternal went, in her
breast, to blend with and make up the equally unsatisfied sentiments of
love; and her vague idea of a lover was that of somebody who should be
husband and child in one.

Anyhow the result of all this, in the present instance, was that Mary
felt a sudden and strong conviction that to allow Minola Grey to do
Herbert a kindly service was a grand thing gained toward inducing Minola
to fall in love with him.

So the three conspirators fell to making their arrangements. The parts
were easily divided. Mr. Heron was to undertake the business of the
affair, to see publishers, and printers, and so forth; Mary Blanchet was
to undertake, or at least endeavor, to obtain the consent of her
brother, whose proud spirit might perhaps revolt against such patronage,
even from friendly hands. Miss Grey was to bear the cost. It was soon a
very gratifying thing to the conspirators to know that no objection
whatever was likely to come from Mr. Blanchet. The poet accepted the
proffered favor not only with readiness, but with joy, and was
particularly delighted and flattered when he learned from Mary--what
Mary was specially ordered not to tell him--that Miss Grey was his
lady-patroness. He was to have been allowed vaguely to understand that
friends and admirers--whose name might have been legion--were combined
to secure justice for him. But Mary, in the pride of her heart, told him
all the truth, and her brother was greatly pleased and very proud. The
only stipulation he made was that the poems should be brought out in a
certain style, with such paper, such margins, such binding, and so on;
according to the pattern of another poet's works, whereof he was to
furnish a copy.

"She will be rich one day, Mary," he said, "and she can afford to do
something for art."

"Will she be rich?" Mary asked, eagerly. "Oh, I am so glad! She ought to
be a princess; she should be, if I were a queen."

"Yes, she'll be rich--what you and I would call rich," he said
carelessly. "Everything is to be hers when the stepmother dies; and I
believe she is in a galloping consumption."

"How do you know, Herbert?"

"You asked me to inquire, you know," he said, "and I did inquire. It was
easily done. Her father left his money and things to his second wife
only for her life. When she dies everything comes to your friend; and I
hear the woman can't live long. Keep all that to yourself, Mary."

"I am sure Minola doesn't know anything about it. I know she never asked
nor thought of it."

"Very likely, and the old people would not tell her. But it's true for
all that. So you see, Mary, we can afford to have justice done to these
poems of mine. If they are stones of any value, let them be put in
proper setting or not set at all. I am entitled to ask that much."




CHAPTER XII.

"LOVE, THE MESSENGER OF DEATH."


Victor Heron seemed to Minola about this time in a fair way to let his
great grievance go by altogether. He was filled with it personally when
he had time to think about it, but the grievances of somebody else were
always coming across his path, and drawing away his attention from his
own affairs. Minola very soon noticed this peculiarity in him, and at
first could hardly believe in its genuineness; it so conflicted with all
her accepted theories about the ingrained selfishness of man. But by
watching and studying his ways, which she did with some interest, she
found that he really had that unusual weakness; and she was partly
amused and partly annoyed by it. She felt angry with him now and then
for neglecting his own task, like another Hylas, to pick up every little
blossom of alien grievance flung in his way. She pressed on him with an
earnestness which their growing friendship seemed to warrant the
necessity of his doing something to set his cause right, or ceasing to
tell himself that he had a cause which called for justice.

It would not be easy to find a more singular friendship than that which
was growing up between Miss Grey and Victor. She received him whenever
he chose to come and see her. Many a night, when Mary Blanchet and she
sat together, he would look in upon them as he went to some
dinner-party, or even as he came home from one, if he had got away
early, and have a few minutes' talk with them. He came often in the
afternoon, and if Minola did not happen to be at home, he would
nevertheless remain and have a long chat with Mary Blanchet. He seemed
always in good humor with himself and everybody else, except in so far
as his grievance was concerned, and always perfectly happy. It has been
already shown that although quite a young man, he considered himself, by
virtue of his experience and his public career, ever so much older than
Minola. Once or twice he sent a throb of keen delight through Mary
Blanchet's heart by speaking of something that "I can remember, Miss
Blanchet, and perhaps you may remember it--but Miss Grey couldn't of
course." To be put on anything like equal ground with him as to years
was a delightful experience to the poetess. It was all the more
delicious because there was such an evident genuineness in his
suggestion. Of course, if he had meant to pay her a compliment--such as
a foolish person might be pleased with, but not she, thank goodness--he
would have pretended to think her as young as Minola. But he had done
nothing of the kind; and he evidently thought that she was about the
same age as himself.

At all events, and it was more to the purpose, he set down Miss Grey as
belonging to quite a different stage of growth from that to which he had
attained. He thought her a handsome and very clever girl, who had the
additional advantage over most other girls that she was rather tall, and
that he therefore was not compelled to stoop much when speaking to her.
He liked women and girls generally. He hardly ever saw the woman or girl
he did not like. If he knew that a woman was insincere or affected, he
would not have liked her; but then he never knew it; he never saw it; it
never occurred to him. Anybody could have seen that he was a man who had
no sisters or girl-cousins. The most innocent and natural affectations
of womanhood were too deep for him to see. There really was a great deal
of truth in what he had said to Minola about his goddess theory as
regarded women. He made no secret about his greatly admiring
her--thinking her very clever and fresh and handsome. He would without
any hesitation have told her that he liked her best of all the women he
knew, but then he had often told her that he liked other women very
much. He seemed, therefore, the man whom a pure and fearless woman, even
though living in Minola's odd condition of semi-isolation, might frankly
accept as a friend without the slightest fear for the tranquillity of
his heart or of hers. Minola, too, had always in her own breast resented
with anger and contempt the idea that a man and woman can never be
brought together and allowed to walk in the beaten way of friendship
without their forthwith wandering off into the thickets and thorny
places of love. All such ideas she looked upon as imbecility, and
scorned. "I don't like men," she used to say to herself and even to
others pretty freely. "I never saw a man fit to hold a candle to my
Alceste. I never saw the man who seemed to me worth a woman's troubling
her heart about." She began to say this of late more than ever--and to
say it to herself, especially when the day and the evening had closed
and she was alone in her own room. She said it over almost as if it were
a sort of charm.

The business of the poems now gave him many occasions to call, and one
particular afternoon Victor called when, by a rare chance, Mary Blanchet
happened to be out of doors. Minola had had it on her mind that he was
not pushing his cause very earnestly, and was glad of the opportunity of
telling him so. He listened with great good humor. It is nearly as
agreeable to be lectured as to be praised by a handsome young woman who
is unaffectedly interested in one's welfare.

"I shall lose my good opinion of you if you don't keep more steadily to
your purpose."

"But I do keep steadily to it. I am always thinking of it."

"No; you allow anything and everything to interfere with you. Anybody's
affairs seem more to you than your own."

Victor shook his head.

"That isn't the reason," he said. "I wish it were, or anything half so
good. No; the truth is that I get ashamed of the cursed work of trying
to interest people in my affairs who don't want to take any interest in
them. I am a restless sort of person and must be doing something, and my
own business is now in that awful stage when there is nothing practical
or active to be done with it. I find it easier to get up an appearance
of prodigious activity about some other person's affairs. And then, Miss
Grey, I don't mind confessing that I am rather sensitive and
morbid--egotistic, I suppose--and if any one looks coldly on me when I
endeavor to interest him in my own affairs, I take it to heart more than
if it were the business of somebody else I had in hand."

"But you talked at one time of appealing to the public. Why don't you do
that?"

"Get people to bring my case on in the House of Commons?"

"Yes; why not?"

"It looks like being patronized and protected and made a client of."

"Well, why don't you try and get the chance of doing it yourself?"

He smiled.

"I still do hold to that idea--or that dream. I should like it very much
if one only had a chance. But no chance seems to turn up; and one loses
heart sometimes."

"Oh, no," Minola said earnestly, "don't do that."

"Don't do what?"

He had hardly been thinking of his own words, and he seemed a little
surprised at the earnestness of her tone.

"Don't lose heart. Don't give way. Don't fall into the track of the
commonplace, and become like every one else. Keep to your purpose, Mr.
Heron, and don't be beaten out of it."

"No; I haven't the least idea of that, I can assure you. Quite the
contrary. But it is so hard to get a chance, or to do anything all at
once. Everything moves so slowly in England. But I have a plan--we are
doing something."

"I am very glad. You seem to me to be doing nothing for yourself."

"Do I? I can assure you I am much less Quixotic than you imagine. Now, I
am so glad to hear that you still like the Parliamentary scheme, because
that is the idea that I have particularly at heart; and if the idea
comes to anything, there are some reasons why you should take a special
interest in it."

"Are there really? May I be told what they are?"

"Well, the whole thing is only in prospect and uncertainty just yet. The
idea is Money's, not mine; he has found out that there is going to be a
vacancy in a certain borough," and Victor smiled and looked at her,
"before long; and his idea is that I should become a candidate, and tell
the people my whole story right out, and ask them to give me a chance of
defending myself in the House. But the thing is not yet in shape enough
to talk much about it. Only I thought you would be glad to know that I
haven't thrown up the sponge all at once."

Minola did not very clearly follow all that he had been saying; partly
because she was beginning to be afraid that to put herself into the
position of adviser and confidante to this young man was a scarcely
becoming performance on her part. Her mind was a little perturbed, and
she was not a very good listener then. Some people say that women seldom
are good listeners; that while they are playing the part of audience
they are still thinking how they look as performers. Anyhow, Minola was
now growing anxious to escape from her position.

"I am so glad," she said vaguely, "that you are doing something, and
that you don't mean to allow yourself to be beaten."

"I don't mean to be, I assure you," he said, a little surprised at her
sudden coolness. "I shouldn't like to be. That isn't my way, I hope."

"I hope not too, and I think not; I wish I had such a purpose. Life
seems to me such a pitiful thing--and in a man especially--when there is
no great clear purpose in it."

"But is a man's trying to get himself a new appointment a great clear
purpose?" he asked with a smile. He was now trying to draw her out again
on the subject, having been much pleased with the interest she seemed to
take in him, and a little amused by the gravity with which she tendered
her advice.

"No, but yours is not merely trying to get an appointment. You are
trying to have justice done to your past career and to get an
opportunity of being useful again in the same sort of way. You don't
want to lead an idle life lounging about London. Mr. Blanchet has his
poems; Mr. Money has--well, he has his business, whatever it is, and he
is in Parliament."

At this moment the servant entered and handed a card to Minola. A
gentleman, she said, particularly wished to see Miss Grey, but he would
call any time she pleased to name if she could not see him at present.
Minola's cheek grew red as she glanced at the card, for it bore the name
of Mr. Augustus Sheppard, and it had the words pencilled on it, "Wishes
particularly to see you--has important business." Her lips trembled.
Nothing could be more embarrassing and painful than such a visitation.
The disagreeable memory of Mr. Sheppard and of the part of her life to
which he belonged had been banished from her thoughts, at least except
for occasional returning glimpses, and now here was Mr. Sheppard himself
in London and asserting a right to see her. She could not refuse him,
for he did, perhaps, come to her with some message from those in Keeton
who still would have called themselves her family. Mary Blanchet had
only just gone out, and Minola was left to talk with Mr. Sheppard alone.
For a moment she had a wild idea of begging Victor Heron to stay and
bear her company during the interview. But she put this thought away
instantly, and made up her mind that she had better hear what Mr.
Sheppard had to say alone.

"Show the gentleman in, Jane," she said, as composedly as she could. "A
friend--at least a friend of my people, from my old place, Mr. Heron."

Heron was looking at her, she thought, in a manner that showed he had
noticed her embarrassment.

"Well, I must wish you a good morning," Mr. Heron said. "Be sure I
shan't forget what you were saying."

"Thank you--yes; what was I saying?"

"Oh, the very good advice you were giving me; and I propose to hear it
all out another time. Good morning."

"Don't go for a moment--pray don't?" she asked, with an earnestness
which surprised Victor. "Only a moment--I would rather you didn't go
just yet."

The thought suddenly went through her that Mr. Sheppard was the very man
to put an exaggerated meaning on the slightest thing that seemed to hint
at secrecy of any kind, and that she had better take care to let him
see, face to face, what sort of visitor was with her when he came.
Victor was glad in any case of the chance of remaining a few moments
longer, and was in no particular hurry to go so long as he could think
he was not in anybody's way.

Victor Heron stood, hat in hand, on the hearth-rug near the
chimney-piece. As Mr. Sheppard entered, Heron was the first person he
happened to see, and the entirely unexpected sight surprised him. He
glanced confusedly from Heron to Minola before he spoke a word, and his
manner, always stiff and formal, seemed to acquire in a moment an
additional incubus of constraint. Victor Heron had something about him
which did not seem exactly English, and which, to a provincial mind,
might well suggest the appearance of a foreigner--a Frenchman. Mr.
Sheppard had never felt quite satisfied in his own mind about that
mysterious rival of whom Minola spoke to him on the memorable day when
he saw her last. She had told him that her Alceste was only "a man who
lived in a book, Mr. Sheppard--in what you would call a play." How well
he remembered the very words she used, and the expression of contempt on
her lips as she used them. And he had got the book--the play--and read
it--toiled through it--and found that there was an Alceste in it. So far
she had told the truth, no doubt; but might not the Alceste have a
living embodiment, or might she not have found since that time a
supposed realization of her Alceste, and might not this be he--this
handsome, foreign-looking young man, who was lounging there as coolly
and easily as if the place belonged to him? For a moment an awful doubt
filled his mind. Could she be married? Was that her husband?

"Miss Grey?" he said in hesitating and questioning tone, as that of one
who is not quite clear about the identity of the person he is
addressing; but Mr. Sheppard was only giving form unconsciously to the
doubt in his own mind, Are you still Miss Grey?

The words and their tone were rather fortunate for Minola. They amused
her and seemed ridiculous, although she did not guess at Mr. Sheppard's
real meaning, and they enabled her to get back at once to her easy
contempt for him.

"You must have forgotten my appearance very soon, Mr. Sheppard," she
said in a tone which carried the contempt so lightly and easily that he
probably did not perceive it, "or I must have changed very much, if you
are not quite certain whether I am Miss Grey. You have not changed at
all. I should have known you anywhere."

"It is not that," Mr. Sheppard said with a little renewal of
cheerfulness. "I should have known you anywhere, Miss Grey. You have not
changed, except indeed that you have, if that were possible, improved.
Indeed, I would venture to say that you have decidedly improved."

"Thank you: you are very kind."

"It would be less surprising, if you, Miss Grey, had had some difficulty
in recognizing me. Fortune, perhaps, has withdrawn some of her blessings
from others only to pour them more lavishly on you."

"I feel very well, thank you; but I hope fortune has not been robbing
any Peter to pay Paul in my case. You, at least, don't seem to have been
cheated out of any of your good health, Mr. Sheppard."

While he made his little formal speeches Mr. Sheppard continued to
glance sidelong at Victor Heron. Mr. Heron now left his place at the
chimney-piece and came forward to take his leave.

"Must you go?" Minola asked, with as easy a manner as she could assume.
She dreaded a _tete-a-tete_ with Sheppard, and she also dreaded to let
it be seen that she dreaded it. If Mary Blanchet would only come!

An expedient occurred to her for putting off the dreaded conversation
yet a moment, and giving Mary Blanchet another chance.

"I should like my friends to know each other," Minola said, with a
gayety of manner which was hardly in keeping with her natural ways.
"People are not introduced to each other now, I believe, when they meet
by chance in London, but we are none of us Londoners. Mr. Sheppard comes
from Keeton, Mr. Heron, and is one of the oldest friends of my family."

Mr. Heron held out his hand with eyes of beaming friendliness.

"Mr. Heron?" Sheppard asked slowly. "Mr. Victor Heron?"

"Victor Heron, indeed!"

"Mr. Victor Heron, formerly of the St. Xavier's Settlements?"

Heron only nodded this time, finding Mr. Sheppard's manner not
agreeable. Minola wondered what her townsman was thinking of, and how he
came to know Heron's name and history.

"Then my name must surely be known to you, Mr. Heron. The name of
Augustus Sheppard, of Duke's-Keeton?"

"No, sir," Heron replied. "I am sorry to say that I don't remember to
have heard the name before."

"Indeed," Mr. Sheppard said with a formal smile, intended to be
incredulous and yet not to seem too plainly so. "Yet we are rivals, Mr.
Heron."

Minola started and .

"At least we are to be," Mr. Sheppard went on--"if rumor in
Duke's-Keeton speaks the truth. I am not wrong in assuming that I have
the honor of addressing the future Radical--I mean Liberal--candidate
for that borough?"

"Oh, that's it," Heron said carelessly. "Yes, yes: I didn't know that
rumor had yet troubled herself about the matter so much as to speak of
it truly or falsely. But of course, since you have heard it, Mr.
Sheppard, it's no secret. I have some ideas that way, Miss Grey. I
intend to try whether I can impress your townspeople. This gentleman, I
suppose, is on the other side."

"I am the other side," Mr. Sheppard said gravely. "I am to be the
Conservative candidate--I was accepted by the party as the Conservative
candidate, no matter who the Radical may be."

"Well, Mr. Sheppard, we shall not be the less good friends I hope,"
Heron said cheerily. "I can't be expected to wish that the best man may
win, for that would be to wish failure for myself; but I wish the better
cause may win, and in that you will join me. Good morning, Miss Grey!"

The room seemed to grow very chilly to Minola when his bright smile and
sweet courteous tones were withdrawn and she was left with her old
lover.

There was not much in Sheppard's appearance to win her back to any
interest in him. He did not compare advantageously with Victor Heron.
When Heron left the room, the light seemed to have gone out; Heron was
so fresh, so free, so sweet, and yet so strong, full of youth, and
spirit, and manhood--a natural gentleman without the insipidity of the
manners of society. Poor Augustus Sheppard was formal, constrained, and
prosaic; he had not even the dignity of austerity. He was not
self-sufficing: he was only self-sufficient. As he stood there he was
awkward, and almost cowed. He seemed as if he were afraid of the girl,
and Minola was woman enough to be angry with him because he seemed
afraid of her. He was handsome, but in that commonplace sort of way
which in a woman's eye is often worse than being ugly. Minola felt
almost pitiless toward him, although the girl's whole nature was usually
full of pity, for, as has already been said, she did not believe in his
affection, and thought him a thorough sham. He stood awkwardly there,
and she would not relieve him from his embarrassment by saying a word.

"Well, Miss Grey," he began at last, "I suppose you hardly expected to
see me."

"I did not know you were in town, Mr. Sheppard."

"I fear I am not very welcome," he said, with an uncomfortable smile;
"but your mother particularly wished me to see you."

"My mother, Mr. Sheppard?" Minola grew red with pain and anger.

"I mean your stepmother, of course--the wife of your father."

"Once the wife of my father; now the wife of somebody else."

"Well, well, at all events the person who might be naturally supposed to
have the best claim to some authority--or influence--influence let us
say--over you."

"Has Mrs. Saulsbury sent you to say that she thinks she ought to have
some influence over me?"

"Oh, no," he answered with that gentle deprecation of anger which is
usually such fuel to anger's fire. "Mrs. Saulsbury has given up any idea
of the kind long since--quite long since, I assure you. I think, if you
will permit me to say it, that you were always a little unjust in your
judgment of Mrs. Saulsbury. She is a true-hearted and excellent woman."

Minola said nothing. Perhaps she felt that she never had been quite in a
position to do impartial justice to the excellence and the
true-heartedness of Mrs. Saulsbury.

"But," Mr. Sheppard resumed, with a gentle motion of his hands, as if he
would wave away now all superfluous and hopeless controversy, "that was
not what I came to say."

Minola bowed slightly to signify that she was glad to know he was coming
to the point at last.

"Mrs. Saulsbury is in very weak health, Miss Grey; something wrong with
the lungs, I fear."

Minola was not much impressed at first. It was one of Mrs. Saulsbury's
ways to cry "wolf" very often, as regarded the condition of her lungs,
and up to the time of Minola's leaving, people had not been in serious
expectation of the wolf's really putting his head in at the door.

Mr. Sheppard saw in Minola's face what she did not say.

"It is something really serious," he said. "Mr. Saulsbury knows it and
every one. You have not been in correspondence with them for some time,
Miss Grey."

"No," said Miss Grey. "I wrote, and nobody answered my letter."

"I am afraid it was regarded as--as----"

"Undutiful perhaps?"

"Well--unfriendly. But Mrs. Saulsbury now fears--or rather knows, for
she is too good a woman to fear--that the end is nigh, and she wishes to
be in fullest reconciliation with every one."

"Oh, has she sent for me?" Minola said, with something like a cry, all
her coldness and formality vanishing with her contempt. "I'll go, Mr.
Sheppard--oh, yes, at once! I did not know--I never thought that she was
really in any danger."

Poor Minola! With all her wild-bird freedom and her pride in her lonely
independence and her love of London, there yet remained in her that
instinct of home, that devotion to the principle of family and
authority, that she would have done homage at such a moment, and with
something like enthusiasm, to even such a simulacrum of the genius of
home as she had lately known. Something had passed through her mind that
very day as she talked with Heron, and feared she had talked too freely:
something that had made her think with vague pain of yearning on the
sweetness of a sheltered home. Her heart beat as she thought, "I will go
to her--I will go home; I will try to love her."

Mr. Sheppard dispelled her enthusiasm. "Mrs. Saulsbury did not exactly
express a wish to see you."

"Oh!"

"In fact, when that was suggested to her--I am sure I need hardly say
that I at once suggested it--she thought, and perhaps wisely, that it
would be better you should not meet."

Minola drew back, and stood as Mr. Heron had been standing near the
chimney-piece. She did not speak.

"But Mrs. Saulsbury begged me to convey to you the assurance of her
entire and cordial forgiveness."

Minola bowed gravely.

"And her hope that you will be happy in life and be guided toward true
ends, and find that peace which it has been her privilege to find."

Minola bore all this without a word.

"What shall I say to her from you?" he asked. "Miss Grey, remember that
she is dying."

The caution was not needed.

"Say that I thank her," said Minola in a low, subdued tone. "Say that,
after what flourish your nature will, Mr. Sheppard. I suppose I was
wrong as much as she. I suppose it was often my fault that we did not
get on better. Say that I am deeply grieved to hear that she is so
dangerously ill, but that I hope--oh, so sincerely!--that she may yet
recover."

Mr. Sheppard looked into her eyes with puzzled wonder. Was she speaking
in affected meekness, or in irony, as was her wont? Was the proud,
rebellious girl really so gentle and subdued? Could it be that she took
thus humbly Mrs. Saulsbury's pardon? Yes, it seemed all genuine. There
was no constraint on the lines of her lips; no scorn in her eyes. In
truth, the sympathetic and generous heart of the girl was touched to the
quick. The prospect of death sanctified the woman who had been so hard
to her, and turned her cold, self-complacent pardon into a blessing. If
the dying are often the most egotistic and self-complacent of all human
creatures, and are apt to make of their very condition a fresh title to
lord it for the moment over the living--as if none had ever died before,
and none would die after them, and therefore the world must pay special
attention and homage to them--if this is so, Minola did not then know it
or think about it.

The one thing on earth which Mr. Sheppard most loved to see was woman
amenable to authority. He longed more passionately than ever to make
Minola his wife.

"There is something else on which I should like to have your permission
to speak," he said; and his thin lips grew a little tremulous. "But I
could come another time, if you preferred."

"I would rather you said now, Mr. Sheppard, whatever you wish to say to
me."

"It is only the old story. Have you reconsidered your determination--you
remember that last day--in Keeton? I am still the same."

"So am I, Mr. Sheppard."

"But things have changed--many things; and you may want a home; and you
may grow tired of this kind of life--and I shan't be a person to be
ashamed of, Minola! I am going to be in Parliament, and you shall hear
me speak--and I know I shall get on. I have great patience. I succeed in
everything--I really do."

She smiled sadly and shook her head.

"In everything else I do assure you, so far--and I may even in that; I
must, for I have set my heart upon it."

She turned to him with a glance of scorn and anger. But his face was so
full of genuine emotion, of anxiety and passion and pain, that its
handsome commonplace character became almost poetic. His lips were
quivering; and she could see drops of moisture on his shining forehead,
and his eyes were positively glittering as if in tears.

"Don't speak harshly to me," he pleaded; "for I don't deserve it. I love
you with all my heart, and today more than ever--a thousand times
more--for you have shown yourself so generous and forgiving--and--and
like a Christian."

Then for the first time the thought came, a conviction, into her
mind--"He really is sincere!" A great wave of new compassion swept away
all other emotions.

"Mr. Sheppard," she said in softened tones, "I do ask of you not to say
any more of this. I couldn't love you even if I tried, and why should
you wish me to try? I am not worth all this--I tell you with all my
heart that I am not worth it, and that you would think so one day if I
were foolish enough to--to listen to you. Oh! indeed you are better
without me! I wish you every success and happiness. I don't want to
marry."

"Once," he said, "you told me there was no one you cared for but a man
in a book. I wonder is that so now?"

In spite of herself the color rushed into Minola's face. It was a lucky
question for her, however unlucky for him, because it recalled her from
her softer mood to natural anger.

"You can believe me in love with any one you please to select in or out
of a book, Mr. Sheppard, so long as it gives you a reason for not
persecuting me with your own attentions. I like a man in a book better
than one out of it; it is so easy to close the book and be free of his
company when he grows disagreeable."

She did not look particularly like a Christian then, probably, in his
eyes. He left her, his heart bursting with love and anger. When Mary
Blanchet returned she found Minola pale and haggard, her eyes wasted
with tears.




CHAPTER XIII.

A MAN OF THE TIME.


Several days passed away, and Minola heard no more from Mr. Sheppard.
She continued in a state of much agitation; her nerves, highly strung,
were sharply jarred by the news of the approaching death of Mrs.
Saulsbury. It was almost like watching outside a door, and counting the
slow, painful hours of some lingering life within, while yet one may not
enter and look upon the pale face, and mingle with the friends or the
mourners, but is shut out and left to ask and wait; it was like this,
the time of suspense which Minola passed, not knowing whether the wife
of her father was alive or dead. As is the way of all generous natures,
it was now Minola's impulse to accuse and blame herself because there
had been so little of mutual forbearance in her old home at Keeton. She
kept wondering whether things might not have gone better, if she had
said and done this or that; or, if she had not said and done something
else. Full of this feeling, she wrote a long emotional letter to Mr.
Saulsbury, which, she begged of him to read to his wife, if she were in
a condition to hear it. The letter was suffused with generous penitence
and self-humiliation. It was a letter which perhaps no impartial person
could have read without becoming convinced that its writer must have
been in the right in most of the controversies of the past.

The letter did not reach the eyes or ears for which it was particularly
intended. Minola received a coldly forgiving answer from Mr.
Saulsbury--forgiving her upon his own account, which was more than
Minola had sought--but adding, that he had not thought it desirable to
withdraw, for a moment, by the memory of earthly controversies, the mind
of his wife from the contemplation of that well-merited heaven which was
opening upon her. Great goodness has one other advantage in addition to
all the rest over unconverted error; it can, out of its own
beatification, find a means of rebuking those with whom it is not on
terms of friendship. The expected ascent of Mrs. Saulsbury into heaven
became another means of showing poor Minola her own unworthiness. Mr.
Saulsbury closed by saying that Mrs. Saulsbury might linger yet a
little, but that her apotheosis (this, however, was not his word) was
only a question of days.

There was nothing left for Minola but to wait, and now accuse and now
try to justify herself. Many a time there came back to her mind the
three faces on the mausoleum in Keeton, the symbols of life, death, and
eternity; and she could not help wondering whether the mere passing
through the portal of death could all at once transfigure a cold,
narrow-minded, peevish, egotistical human creature into the soul of
lofty calmness and ineffable sweetness, all peace and love, which the
sculptor had set out in his illustration of humanity's closing state.

Meantime, she kept generally at home, except for her familiar walks in
the park and her now less frequent visits to the British Museum and to
South Kensington. Lucy Money, surprised at her absence, hunted her up,
to use Lucy's own expression, and declared that she was looking pale
and wretched, and that she must come over to Victoria street, and pass
a day or two there, for companionship and change. Mary Blanchet, too,
pressed Minola to go; and at last she consented, not unwilling to be
taken forcibly out of her self-inquisition and her anxieties for the
moment. She had made no other acquaintances, and seemed resolute not to
make any, but there was always something peculiarly friendly and genial
to her in the atmosphere of the Moneys' home. The whole family had been
singularly kind to her, and their kindness was absolutely
disinterested. Minola could not but love Mrs. Money, and could not but
be a little amused by her; and there was something very pleasing to her
in Mr. Money's strong common sense and blunt originality. Minola liked,
too, the curious little peeps at odd groupings of human life which she
could obtain by sitting for a few hours in Mrs. Money's drawing-room.
All the _schwaermerei_ of letters, politics, art, and social life seemed
to illustrate itself "in little" there.

Minola, when she accompanied Lucy to her home, was taken by the girl up
and down to this room and that to see various new things that had been
bought, and the two young women entered Mrs. Money's drawing-room a
little after the hour when she usually began to receive visitors. A
large lady, who spoke with a very deep voice, was seated in earnest
conversation with Mrs. Money.

"This is my darling, sweet Lucy, I perceive," the lady said in tones of
soft rolling thunder as the young women came in.

"Oh--Lady Limpenny!"

"Come here, child, and embrace me! But this is not your sister? My sight
begins to fail me so terribly; we must expect it, Mrs. Money, at our
time of life."

Lucy tossed her head at this, and could hardly be civil. She was always
putting in little protests, more or less distinctly expressed, against
Lady Limpenny's classification of Mrs. Money and herself as on the same
platform in the matter of age, and talking so openly of "their time of
life." In truth, Mrs. Money was still quite a young-looking woman, while
Lady Limpenny herself was a remarkably well-preserved and even handsome
matron; a little perhaps too full-blown, and who might at the worst have
sat fairly enough for a portrait of Hamlet's mother, according to the
popular dramatic rendering of Queen Gertrude.

"No; this young lady is taller than Theresa. I can see that, although I
have forgotten my glass. I always forget or mislay my glass."

"This is Miss Grey--Miss Minola Grey," said Mrs. Money. "Lady Limpenny,
allow me to introduce my dear young friend, Miss Minola Grey."

"Dear child, what a sweet, pretty name! Now tell me, dearest, where did
your people find out that name? I should so like to know."

"I think it was found in Shakespeare," Minola answered. "It was my
mother's choice, I believe."

"A name in the family, no doubt. Some names run in families. I dare say
you have had a--what is it?--Minola in your family in every generation.
One cannot tell the origin of these things. I have often thought of
making a study of family names. Now my name--Laura. There never was a
generation of our family--we are the Atomleys--there never was a
generation of the Atomleys without a Laura. Now, how curious, in my
husband's family--Sir James Limpenny--in every generation one of the
girls was always called by the pet name of Chat. Up to the days of the
Conquest, I do believe--or is it the Confessor perhaps?--you would find
a Chat Limpenny."

"There is a Chat Moss somewhere near Manchester," said Lucy saucily,
still not forgiving the remark about the time of life. "We crossed it
once in a railway."

"Oh, but that has nothing to do with it, Lucy darling--nothing at all. I
am speaking of girls, you know--girls called by a pet name. I dare say
that name was in my husband's family--oh, long before the place you
speak of was ever discovered. But now, Miss Grey, do pray excuse me
again--such a very charming name--Minola! But pray do excuse me: may I
ask is that hair all your own? One is curious, you know, when one sees
such wonderful hair."

"Yes, Lady Limpenny," Minola said imperturbably. "My hair is all my
own."

"I should think Nola's hair was all her own indeed," Lucy struck in. "I
have seen her doing it a dozen times. Not likely that she would put on
false hair."

"But, my sweet child, I do assure you that's nothing now," the
indomitable Lady Limpenny went on. "Almost everybody wears it now--it's
hardly any pretence any more. That's why I asked Miss Grey--because I
thought she perhaps wouldn't mind, seeing that we are only women, we
here. And it is such wonderful hair--and it is all her own!"

"Yes," murmured Lucy, "all her own; and her teeth are her own too; and
even her eyes."

"She has beautiful eyes indeed. You have, my dear," the good-natured
Lady Limpenny went on, having only caught the last part of Lucy's
interjected sentence. "But that does not surprise one--at least, I mean,
when we see lovely eyes, we don't fancy that the wearer of them has
bought them in a shop. But hair is very different--and that is why I
took the liberty of asking this young lady. But now, my darling Theresa
Money, may I ask again about your husband? Do you know that it was to
see him particularly I came to-day--not you. Yes indeed! But you are not
angry with me--I know you don't mind. I do so want to have his advice on
this very, very important matter."

"Lucy, dear, will you ask your papa if he will come down for a few
moments--I know he will--to see Lady Limpenny?"

Mr. Money's ways were well known to Lady Limpenny. He grumbled if
disturbed by a servant, unless there was the most satisfactory and
sufficient reason, but he would put up with a great deal of intrusion
from Lucelet. The very worst that could happen to Lucelet was to have
one of her pretty ears gently pulled. So Lucy went to disturb him
unabashed, although she knew he was always disposed to chaff Lady
Limpenny.

"But you really don't mean to say that you are going to part with all
your china--with your uncle's wonderful china?" Mrs. Money asked with
eyes of almost tearful sympathy, resuming the talk which Minola's
entrance had disturbed.

"My darling, yes! I must do it! It is unavoidable."

Minola assumed that this was some story of sudden impoverishment, and
she could not help looking up at the lady with wondering and regretful
eyes, although not knowing whether she ought to have heard the remark,
or whether she was not a little in the way.

Lady Limpenny caught the look.

"This dear young lady is sympathetic, I know, and I am sure she loves
china, and can appreciate my sacrifice. But it ought not to be a
sacrifice. It is a duty--a sacred duty."

"But is it?" Mrs. Money pleaded.

"Dearest, yes! My soul was in danger. I was in danger every hour of
breaking the first Commandment! My china was becoming my idolatry! There
was a blue set which was coming between me and heaven. I was in danger
of going on my knees to it every day. I found that my whole heart was
becoming absorbed in it! One day it was borne in upon me; it came on me
like a flash. It was the day I had been to hear Christie and Manson----"

"To hear what?" Mrs. Money asked in utter amazement.

"Oh, what have I been saying? Christie and Manson! My dear, that only
shows you the turn one's wandering sinful thoughts will take! I mean, of
course, Moody and Sankey. What a shame to confuse such names!"

"Oh, Moody and Sankey," Mrs. Money said again, becoming clear in her
mind.

"Well, it flashed upon me there that I was in danger; and I saw where
the danger lay. Darling, I made up my mind that moment! When I came home
I rushed--positively rushed--into Sir James's study. 'James,' I said,
'don't remonstrate--pray don't. My mind is made up; I'll part with all
my china.'"

"Dear me!" Mrs. Money gently observed. "And Sir James--what did he say?"

"Well," Lady Limpenny went on, with an air of disappointment, "he only
said, 'All right,' or something of that kind. He was writing, and he
hardly looked up. He doesn't care." And she sighed.

"But how good he is not to make any objection!"

"Yes--oh, yes; he is the best of men. But he thinks I won't do it after
all."

Mrs. Money smiled.

"Now, Theresa Money, I wonder at you! I do really. Of course I know what
you are smiling at. You too believe I won't do it. Do you think I would
sacrifice my soul--deliberately sacrifice my soul--even for china? You,
dearest, might have known me better."

"But would one sacrifice one's soul?"

"Darling, with my temperament, yes! Alas, yes! I know it; and therefore
I am resolved. Oh, here is Mr. Money. But not alone!"

Mr. Money entered the room, but not alone indeed, for there came with
him a very tall man, whom Minola did not know; and then, a little behind
them, Lucy Money and Victor Heron. Mr. Money spoke to Lady Limpenny, and
then, with his usual friendly warmth, to Minola; and then he presented
the new-comer, Mr. St. Paul, to his wife.

Mr. St. Paul attracted Minola's attention from the first. He was very
tall, as has been said, but somewhat stooped in the shoulders. He had a
perfectly bloodless face, with keen, bold blue eyes; his square, rather
receding forehead showed deep horizontal lines when he talked as if he
were an old man; and he was nearly bald. His square chin and his full,
firm lips were bare of beard or moustache. He might at times have seemed
an elderly man, and yet one soon came to the conclusion that he was a
young man looking prematurely old. There was a curious hardihood about
him, which was not swagger, and which had little of carelessness, or at
all events of joyousness, about it. He was evidently what would be
called a gentleman, but the gentleman seemed somehow to have got mixed
up with the rowdy. Minola promptly decided that she did not like him.
She could hear Mr. St. Paul talking in a loud, rapid, and strident voice
to Mrs. Money, apparently telling her, offhand, of travel and adventure.

Lady Limpenny had seized possession of Mr. Money, and was endeavoring to
get his advice about the sale of her china, and impress him with a sense
of the importance of saving her soul. Minola was near Mrs. Money, and
had just bowed to Victor Heron, when Mr. St. Paul turned his blue eyes
upon her.

"This is your elder daughter, I presume," he said. "May I be introduced,
Mrs. Money? Your husband told me she was not so handsome as her sister,
but I really can't admit that."

Mrs. Money was not certain for a moment whether her daughter Theresa
might not have come into the room; but when she saw that he was looking
at Miss Grey, she said, in her deep tone of melancholy kindness--

"No, this is not my daughter, Mr. St. Paul; and even with all a mother's
partiality, I have to own that Theresa is not nearly so handsome as this
young lady. Miss Grey, may I introduce Mr. St. Paul? Miss Grey comes
from Duke's-Keeton. Mr. St. Paul and you ought to be acquaintances."

"Oh, you come from Duke's-Keeton, Miss Grey"; and he dropped Mrs. Money,
and drew himself a chair next to Minola. "So do I--I believe I was born
there. Do you like the old place?"

"No; I don't think I like it."

"Nor I; in fact I hate it. Do you live there now?"

She explained that she had now left Keeton for good, and was living in
London. He laughed.

"I left it for good long ago, or for bad. I have been about the world
for ever so many years; I've only just got back to town. I've been
hunting in Texas, and rearing cattle in Kansas--that sort of thing. I
left Keeton because I didn't get on with my people."

Minola could not help smiling at what seemed the odd similarity in their
history.

"You smile because you think it was no wonder they didn't get on with
me, I suppose? I left long ago--cut and run long before you were born.
My brother and I don't get on; never shall, I dare say. I am generally
considered to have disgraced the family. He's going back to Keeton,
where he hasn't been for years; and so am I, for a while. He's been
travelling in the East and living in Italy, and all that sort of thing,
while I've been hunting buffaloes and growing cattle out West."

"Are you going to settle in Keeton now?" Miss Grey asked, for lack of
anything else to say.

"Not I; oh, no! I don't suppose I could settle anywhere now. You can't,
I think, when you've got into the way of knocking about the world. I
don't know a soul down there now, I suppose. I'm going to Keeton now
chiefly to annoy my brother." And he laughed a laugh of half-cynical
good humor, and thrust his hands deep into his pockets.

"A Christian purpose," Miss Grey said.

"Yes, isn't it? We were always like that, I assure you; the elders and
the youngers never could hit off--always quarrelling. I'm one of the
youngers, though you wouldn't think so to look at me, Miss Grey? Do look
at me."

Miss Grey looked at him very composedly. He gazed into her bright eyes
with undisguised admiration.

"Well, I'm going to thwart my good brother in Keeton. He's coming home,
and going to do all his duties awfully regular and well, don't you know;
and first of all, he's going to have a regular, good, obedient
Conservative member--a warming-pan. Do you understand that sort of
thing? I believe the son of some honest poor-rate collector, or
something of that sort--a fellow named Sheppard. Did you ever hear of
any fellow in Keeton named Sheppard?--Jack Sheppard, I shouldn't
wonder."

"I know Mr. Augustus Sheppard, and he is a very respectable man."

"Deuce he is; but not a lively sort of man, I should think."

"No; not exactly lively."

"No; he wouldn't suit my brother if he was. Hope he isn't a friend of
yours? Well, we're going to oppose him for the fun of the thing. How
very glad my brother will be to see me. I am afraid I pass for a regular
scamp in the memories of you Keeton people. You must have heard of me,
Miss Grey. No? Before your time, I suppose. Besides, I didn't call
myself St. Paul then; I took on that name in America; it's my mother's
family name; that's how you wouldn't remember about me, even if you had
heard. You know the mausoleum in the park, I dare say?"

"Very well indeed. It used to be a favorite place with me."

"Ah, yes. My last offence was shooting off pistols there--aiming at the
heads over the entrance, you know. One of them will carry my mark to his
last day, I believe."

"Yes; I remember noticing that the face of Death has a mark on it--a
small hole."

He laughed again.

"Just so. That's my mark. Poor father! It was the great whim of his life
to build that confounded thing, and he didn't enjoy it after all. My
brother, I am told, proposes to occupy part of it in good time. They
won't put me there, you may be sure."

"Your brother is the Duke?" Minola said, a faint memory returning to her
about a wild youth of the family who had had to leave the army in some
disgrace, and went away somewhere beyond seas.

"Yes; I thought I told you, or that Money had mentioned it. Yes; I was
the good-for-nothing of the family. You can't imagine, though, what a
number of good-for-nothings are doing well out Denver City way, out in
Colorado. When I was there, there were three fellows from the Guards,
and some fellows I knew at Eton, all growing cattle, and making money,
and hunting buffalo, and potting Indians, and making themselves
generally as happy as sandboys. I've made money myself, and might have
made a lot more, I dare say."

Mr. St. Paul evidently delighted to hear himself talk.

"It must be a very dangerous place to live in," Minola said, wishing he
would talk to somebody else.

"Well, there's the chance of getting your hair raised by the Indians. Do
you know what that means--having your hair raised?"

"I suppose being scalped."

"Exactly. Well, that's a danger. But it isn't so much a danger if you
don't go about in gangs. That's the mistake fellows make; they think
it's the safe thing to do, but it isn't. Go about in parties of two, and
the Indians never will see you--never will notice you."

Minola's eyes happened at this moment to meet those of Heron.

"You know Heron?"

"Oh, yes; very well."

"A good fellow--very good fellow, though he has such odd philanthropic
fads about <DW65>s and man and a brother, and all that sort of thing.
Got into a nice mess out there in St. Xavier's, didn't he?"

"I heard that his conduct did him great honor," Minola said warmly.

"Yes, yes--of course, yes; if you look at it in that sort of way. But
these black fellows, you know--it really isn't worth a man's while
bothering about them. They're just as well off in slavery as not--deuced
deal better, I think; I dare say some of their kings and chiefs think
they have a right to sell them if they like. I told Heron at the time I
wouldn't bother if I was he. Where's the use, you know?"

"Were you there at the time?" Minola asked, with some curiosity.

"Yes, I was there. I'd been in the Oregon country, and I met with an
accident, and got a fever, and all that; and I wanted a little rest and
a mild climate, you know; and I made for San Francisco, and some fellows
there told me to go to these Settlements of ours in the Pacific, and I
went. I saw a good deal of Heron--he was very hospitable and that, and
then this row came on. He behaved like a deuced young fool, and that's a
fact."

"He was not understood," said Minola, "and he has been treated very
badly by the Government."

"Of course he has. I told him they would treat him badly. They wouldn't
understand all his concern about black fellows--how could they
understand it? Why didn't he let it alone? The fellow who's out there
now--you won't find him bothering about such things, you bet--as we say
out West, if you will excuse such a rough expression, Miss Grey. But of
course Heron has been treated very badly, and we are going to run him
for Duke's-Keeton."

Several visitors had now come in, and Mr. Heron contrived to change his
position and cross over to the part of the room where Minola was.

"Look here, Heron," Mr. St. Paul said; "you have got a staunch ally here
already. Miss Grey means to wear your colors, I dare say--do they wear
colors at elections now in England?--I don't know--and you had better
canvass for her influence in Keeton. If I were an elector of Keeton, I'd
vote for the Pope or the Sultan if Miss Grey asked me."

Meanwhile Lady Limpenny was pleading her cause with Mr. Money. It may be
said that Lady Limpenny was the wife of a physician who had been
knighted, and who had no children. Her husband was wholly absorbed in
his professional occupations, and never even thought of going anywhere
with his wife, or concerning himself about what she did. He knew the
Money women professionally, and except professionally, he could not be
said to know anybody. Lady Limpenny, therefore, indulged all her whims
freely. Her most abiding or most often recurring whim was an anxiety for
the salvation of her soul; but she had passionate flirtations meanwhile
with china, poetry, flowers, private theatricals, lady-helps, and other
pastimes and questions of the hour.

"You'll never part with that china," Mr. Money said--"you know you
can't."

"Oh, but my dear Money, you don't understand my feelings. You are not,
you know--an old friend may say so--you are not a religious man. You
have not been penetrated by what I call religion--not yet, I mean."

"Not yet, certainly. Well, why don't you send to Christie and Manson's
at once?"

"But, my dear Money, to part with my china in _that_ way--to have it
sent all about the world perhaps. Oh, no! I want to part with it to
some friend who will let me come and see it now and again."

"Have you thought of this, Lady Limpenny? Suppose, when you have sold
it, you go to see it now and then, and covet it--covet your neighbor's
goods--perhaps long even to steal it. Where is the spiritual improvement
then?"

"Money! You shock me! You horrify me! Could that be possible? Is there
such weakness in human nature?"

"Quite possible, I assure you. You have been yourself describing the
influence of these unregulated likings. How do you know that they may
not get the better of you in another way? Take my advice, and keep your
china. It will do you less harm in your own possession than in that of
anybody else."

"If I could think so, my dear Money."

"Think it over, my dear Lady Limpenny; look at it from this point of
view, and let me know your decision--then we can talk about it again."

Lady Limpenny relapsed for a while into reflection, with a doubtful and
melancholy expression upon her face. Money, however, had gained his
point, or, as he would himself have expressed it, "choked her off" for
the moment.

"I don't like your new friend," said Minola to Victor.

"My new friend? Who's he?"

"Your friend Mr. St. Paul."

"Oh, he isn't a new friend, or a friend at all. He is rather an old
acquaintance, if anything."

"Well, I don't like him."

"Nor I. Don't let yourself be drawn into much talk with him."

"No? Then there _is_ somebody you don't like, Mr. Heron. That's a
healthy sign. I really thought you liked all men and all women, without
exception."

"Well, I am not good at disliking people, but I don't like _him_, and I
didn't like to see him talking to you."

"Indeed? Yet he is a political ally of yours and of Mr. Money now."

"That's a different thing; and I don't know anything very bad of him,
only I had rather you didn't have too much to say to him. He's a
rowdy--that's all. If I had a sister, I shouldn't care to have him for
an acquaintance of hers."

"Is it a vice to know him?"

"Almost, for women," Heron said abruptly; and presently, having left
Minola, interposed, as if without thinking of it, between Lucy Money and
St. Paul, who was engaging her in conversation.




CHAPTER XIV.

A MIDNIGHT CONFIDENCE.


Mr. St. Paul stayed to dinner that day, being invited by Money without
ceremony, and accepting the invitation in the easiest way. Victor
Heron declined to remain. The family and Minola, with Mr. St. Paul,
made up the party. St. Paul was very attentive to Mrs. Money, who
appeared to be delighted with him. He talked all through the
dinner--he hardly ever stopped; he had an adventure in Texas, or in
Mexico, or in the South Sea Islands, _apropos_ of everything; he
seemed equally pleased whether his listeners believed or disbelieved
his stories, and he talked of his own affairs with a cool frankness,
as if he was satisfied that all the world must know everything about
him, and that he might as well speak bluntly out. He could not be
called cynical in manner, for cynicism presupposes a sort of
affectation, a defiance, or a deliberate _pose_ of some kind, and St.
Paul seemed absolutely without affectation--completely self-satisfied
and easy. Victor had spoken of him as "a rowdy--that's all." But that
was not all. He was--if such a phrase could be tolerated--a "gentleman
rowdy." His morals and his code of honor seemed to be those of a
Mexican horse-stealer, and yet anybody must have known that he was by
birth and early education an English gentleman.

"I don't think I know a soul about town," he said. "I looked in at the
club once or twice--always kept up my subscription there during my worst
of times--and I didn't see a creature I could recollect. I dare say the
people who know my brother won't care to know me. I did leave such a
deuce of a reputation behind me; and they'll all be sure to think I
haven't got a red cent--a penny, I mean. There they are mistaken.
Somehow the money-making gift grows on you out West."

"Why don't you settle down?" Money asked. "Get into Parliament, marry,
range yourself, and all that--make up with your brother and be all
right. You have plenty of time before you yet."

"My good fellow, what do you call plenty of time? Look at me--I'm as
bald as if I were a judge."

"Oh, bald! that's nothing. Everybody is bald nowadays."

"But I'm thirty-five! Thirty-five--think of that, young ladies! a
grizzled, grim old fogey--what is it Thackeray says?--all girls know
Thackeray--who on earth would marry me? My brother and his wife have
given me such a shockingly bad character. Some of it I deserved,
perhaps; some of it I didn't. They think I have disgraced the family
name, I dare say. What did the family name do for me I should like to
know? Out in Texas we didn't care much about family names."

"I entirely agree with your view of things, Mr. St. Paul," Mrs. Money
said in her soft melancholy tone. "England is destroyed by caste and
class. I honor a man of family who has the spirit to put away such
ideas."

"Oh, it would be all well enough if one were the eldest brother, and had
the money, and all that. I should like to be the Duke, I dare say, well
enough. But I can't be that, and I've been very happy hunting buffaloes
for months together, and no one but an old Indian to speak to. I don't
disgrace the Duke's family name, for I've dropped it, nor any courtesy
title, for I don't use any. I believe they have forgotten me altogether
in Keeton. Miss Grey tells me so."

"Excuse me," Minola said. "I didn't say that, for I didn't know. I only
said I didn't remember hearing of you by your present name; but I didn't
know any of the family at the Castle. We belonged to the townspeople,
and were not likely to have much acquaintance with the Castle."

"Except at election time--I know," St. Paul said with a laugh. "Well,
I'm worse off now, for they won't know _me_ even at election time."

Then the talk went off again under St. Paul's leadership, and almost by
his sole effort, to his adventurous life, and he told many stories of
fights with Indians, of vigilance committees, of men hanged for
horse-stealing, and of broken-down English scamps, who either got killed
or made their fortune out West. A cool contempt for human life was made
specially evident. "I like a place," the narrator more than once
observed, "where you can kill a man if you want to and no bother about
it." Perhaps still more evident was the contempt for every principle but
that of comradeship.

After dinner Mr. St. Paul only showed himself in the drawing-room for a
moment or two, and then took his leave.

"Papa," Lucy said instantly, "do tell us all about Mr. St. Paul."

"Are you curious to know something about him, Miss Grey?" Money asked.

"Well, he certainly seems to be an odd sort of person. He is so little
like what I should imagine a pirate of romance."

"Not a bad hit. He is a sort of pirate out of date. But he represents,
with a little exaggeration, a certain tendency among younger sons
to-day. Some younger sons, you know, are going into trade; some are
working at the bar, or becoming professional journalists; some are
rearing sheep in Australia, and cattle in Kansas and Texas. It's a phase
of civilization worth observing, Miss Grey, to you who go in for being a
sort of little philosopher."

"Dear papa, how can you say so? Nola does not go in for being anything
so dry and dreadful."

"The tendencies of an aristocracy must always interest a thoughtful mind
like Miss Grey's, Lucy," Mrs. Money said gravely. "There is at least
something hopeful in the mingling of classes."

"In young swells becoming drovers and rowdies?" Money observed. "Hum!
Well, as to that----" and he stopped.

"I think I am a little interested in him," Minola said; "but only
personally, not philosophically."

"Well, that's nearly all about him. He was a scamp, and he knocked about
the world, and settled, if that can be called settling, out West for a
while; and he has made money, and I hope he has sown his wild oats; and
he has come home for variety, and, I think, to annoy his brother. I met
him in Egypt, and I knew him in England too; and so he came to see me,
and he found a sort of old acquaintance in Heron. That's all. He's a
clever fellow, and not a bad fellow in his way. I dare say he would have
made a very decent follower of Drake or Raleigh if he had been born at
the right time."

Minola's attention was drawn away somewhat from the character,
adventures, and philosophical interest of Mr. St. Paul to observe some
peculiarity in the manner of Lucy Money. Although Lucy had set out by
declaring herself wildly eager to know something about St. Paul, she
very soon dropped out of the conversation, and drew listlessly away.
After a while she sat at the piano, and began slowly playing some soft
and melancholy chords. Minola had been observing something of a change
in Lucy this present visit, something that she had not seen before. Mr.
Money presently went to his study; the women all dispersed, and Minola
sat in her bedroom, and wondered within herself whether anything was
disturbing Lucy's bright little mind.

It was curious to note how Lucy Money's soft ways had won upon Minola.
Lucy twined herself round the affections of the stronger girl, and
clung to her. Mrs. Money was pleased, amused, and touched by the sight.
The calm Theresa was a little annoyed, considering Lucy to show thereby
a lack of the composure and dignity befitting a woman; and Mary
Blanchet was sometimes disposed to be jealous. Minola herself was
filled with affectionate kindness for the overgrown child, not
untempered with a dash of pity and wonder. She was sometimes inclined
to address the girl in certain lines from Joanna Baillie, forgotten now
even of most readers of poetry, and ask her, "Thou sweetest thing that
e'er didst fix its lightly-fibred spray on the rude rock, ah! wouldst
thou cling to _me_?" For whatever the outer world and its lookers-on
may have thought of her, it is certain that Minola did still believe
herself to be cold, unloving, hard to warm toward her fellow-beings.
The unrestrained, unaffected love of Lucy filled her at once with
surprise and a sweeter, softer feeling.

So when she heard the patter of feet at her door she hardly had to wait
for the familiar tap and the familiar voice to know that Lucelet was
there. Minola opened the door, and Lucelet came in with her hair all
loosely around her, and her eyes sparkling.

"May I sit a little and talk?" and without waiting for an answer she
coiled herself on the hearthrug near the chair on which Minola had been
sitting. "You sit there again, Nola. Are you glad to see me?"

"Very, very glad, Lucy dear."

"Do you love me, master? no?" For Minola had, among other things, been
teaching Lucy to read Shakespeare, and Lucy had just become enamored of
Ariel's tender question, and was delighted to turn it to her own
account.

"Dearly, my delicate Ariel," said Minola, carrying on the quotation; and
Lucy positively crimsoned with a double delight, having her quotation
understood and answered, and an assurance of affection given.

"Why don't you let down your hair, Nola? Do let me see it now completely
down. I'll do it--allow me." And she sprang up, came behind Minola, and
"undid" all her hair, so that it fell around her back and shoulders.
Minola could hardly keep from blushing to be thus made a picture of and
openly admired. "There, that is perfectly beautiful! You look like Lady
Godiva, or like the Fair One with Locks of Gold, if you prefer that. Did
you ever read the story of 'The Fair One with Locks of Gold,' when you
were a little girl? Oh, please leave your hair just as it is, and let me
look at it for awhile. Do you remember Lady Limpenny's nonsense to-day?"

Minola allowed her to please herself, and they began to talk; but after
the first joy of coming in, Lucy seemed a little _distraite_, and not
quite like herself. She fell into little moments of silence every now
and then, and sometimes looked up into Minola's face as if she were
going to say something, and then stopped.

Minola saw that her friend had something on her mind, but thought it
best not to ask her any questions, feeling sure that if Lucy had
anything she wished to say, Lucy would not keep it long unsaid.

After a moment's pause, "Nola!"

"Yes, dear."

"You don't much like men in general?"

"Well, Lucy dear, I don't know that anybody much likes men in general,
or women either. Good Christians say that they love all their brothers
and sisters, but I don't suppose it's with a very ardent love."

"But you rather go in for not liking men as a rule, don't you?"

Minola was a little amused by the words, "go in for not liking men."
They seemed to be what she knew Lucy never meant them for--a sort of
rebuke to the affectation which would formally pose itself as
misanthropic. Minola had of late begun to entertain doubts as to whether
a certain amount of half-conscious egotism and affectation did not
mingle in her old-time proclamations of a dislike to men.

"I think I rather did go in for not liking men, Lucy; but I think I am
beginning to be a little penitent. Perhaps I was rather general in my
ideas; perhaps the men I knew best were not very fair specimens of the
human race; perhaps men in general don't very much care what I think of
them."

"Any man would care if he knew you, especially if he saw you with your
hair down like that. But, anyhow, you don't dislike _all_ men?"

"Oh, no, dear. How could I dislike your father, Lucelet?"

"No," Lucy said, looking round with earnest eyes; "who could dislike
him, Nola? I am so fond of him; I could say almost anything to him. If
you knew what I have lately been talking to him about, you would wonder.
Well, but he is not the only man you don't dislike; I am sure you don't
dislike Mr. Heron." Her eyes grew more inquiring and eager than before.

"No, indeed, Lucy; I don't think any one could dislike him either."

"I am delighted to hear you say so; but I want you to say some more.
Tell me what you think of Mr. Heron; I am curious to know. You are so
much more clever than I, and you can understand people and see into
them. Tell me exactly what you see in Mr. Heron."

"Why do you want to know all this, Lucy?"

"Because I want to hear your opinion very particularly, for you are not
a hero-worshipper, and you don't admire men in general. Some girls are
such enthusiastic fools that they make a hero out of every good-looking
young man they meet. But you are not like that, Nola."

"Oh, no! I am not like that," Nola echoed, not without a thought that
now, perhaps, there were moments when she almost wished she were.

"Well, then, tell me. First, do you think Mr. Heron handsome?"

"Yes, Lucy, I think he is handsome."

"Then do you like him? Do tell me what you think of him."

"In the name of heaven," Minola asked herself, "why should I not speak
the truth in answer to so plain and innocent a question?" She answered
quietly, and looking straightforward at the fire:

"I like Mr. Heron very much, Lucy. I don't know many men--young men
especially--but I like him better than any young man I have met as yet."

"As yet. Yes, yes. I am glad to hear you say that," Lucy said with
beaming eyes, and growing good-humoredly saucy in her very delight. "As
yet. Yes, you put that in well, Nola."

"How so, dear?"

"Oh, you know. Because of the one yet to present himself; the not
impossible He--nearly impossible though--who is to be fit for my Nola. I
tell you I shall scrutinize him before I allow his pretensions to pass.
Well, now, about Mr. Heron?"

"I think him a very brave, generous, and noble-hearted young man. I
think he has not a selfish thought or a mean purpose about him, and I
think he has spirit and talent; and I hope one day to hear that he has
made himself an honorable name."

Lucy turned now to Minola a pair of eyes that were moist with tears.

"Tell me, Nola"--and her voice grew a little tremulous--"don't you think
he's a man a woman might fall in love with?"

There was a moment's silence, and Lucy leaned upon Nola's knees, eagerly
looking into her face. Then Nola answered, in a quiet, measured
undertone,

"Oh, yes, Lucy; I do indeed. I think he is a man a woman might fall in
love with."

"Thank you, Nola. That is all I wanted to ask you."

There was another pause.

"Nola!"

"Yes, Lucy."

"You don't ask me anything."

"Perhaps, dear, because there is nothing I want to know."

"Then you _do_ guess?"

"Oh, yes, dear, I do guess."

"Well--but what?"

"I suppose--that you are--engaged to Mr. Heron."

Lucy started up with her face all on fire.

"Oh, no, Nola, dear darling! you have guessed too much. I wish I had
told you, and not asked you to guess at all. We're not engaged. Oh, no.
It's only--well, it's only--it's only that I am in love with him,
Nola--oh, yes, so much in love with him that I should not like to live
if he didn't care about me--no, not one day!" Then Lucy hid her head in
Minola's lap and sobbed like a little child.

Perhaps the breakdown was of service to both the girls. It allowed poor
Lucy to relieve her long pent-up feelings, and it gave Minola time to
consider the meaning of the revelation as composedly as she could, and
to think of what she ought to say and do.

Lucy presently looked up, with a gleam of April brightness in her eyes.

"Do you think me foolish, Nola, for telling you this?"

"Well, dear, I don't know whether you ought to have told it to me."

"I couldn't do without telling it to somebody, Nola. I think I must be
like that king I read about somewhere--I forget his name; no, I believe
it was not the king, but his servant--who had to tell the secret to some
listener, and so told it to the reeds on the seashore. If I had not told
this to somebody, I must have told it to the reeds."

Minola almost wished she had told it to the reeds. There were reeds
enough beneath the little bridge which Nola loved in Regent's Park, and
had they been possessed of the secret she might have looked over the
bridge for ever, and dreamed dreams as the lazy water flowed on beneath,
and even noted and admired the whispering reeds, and they would never
have whispered that secret to her.

"I think papa guesses it," Lucy said. "I am sure he does, because he
talked to me of--oh, well, of a different person, and asked me if I
cared about him, and I told him that I didn't. He said he was glad, for
he didn't much like him; but that I should marry any one I liked--always
provided, Nola, that he happened to like me, which doesn't at all
follow. I know papa likes Mr. Heron."

"Then, Lucy, would it not be better to tell Mr. Money?"

"Oh, Nola! I couldn't tell him that--I could tell him almost anything,
but I couldn't tell him that. Are you not sorry for me, Nola? Oh, say
you are sorry for me! The other day--it only seems the other day--I was
just as happy as a bird. Do say you are sorry for me."

"But, my dear, I don't know why there should be any sorrow about it. Why
should not everything prove to be perfectly happy?"

"Do you think so, Nola?"

She looked up to Nola with an expression of childlike anxiety.

"Why should it not be so, Lucy? If I were a man, I should be very much
in love with you, dear. You are the girl that men ought to be in love
with."

There was a certain tone of coldness or constraint in Minola's voice
which could not escape even Lucy's observation.

"You think me weak and foolish, I know very well, Nola, because I have
made such a confession as this. For all your kindness and your good
heart, I know that you despise any girl who allows herself to fall in
love with a man. You don't care about men, and you think we ought to
have more dignity, and not to prostrate ourselves before them; and you
are quite right. Only some of us can't help it."

"No," said Minola sadly; "I suppose not."

"There! You look all manner of contempt at me. I should like to have you
painted as the Queen of the Amazons--you would look splendid. But I may
trust to your friendly heart and your sympathy all the same, I know. You
will pity us weaker girls, and you won't be too hard on us. I want you
to help me."

"Can I help you, Lucy? Shall I ask Mr. Heron if he is in love with you?
I will if you like."

"Oh, Nola, what nonsense! That only shows how ridiculous you think me.
No, I only mean that you should give me your sympathy, and let me talk
to you. And--you observe things so well--just to use your eyes for my
sake. Oh, there is so much a friend may do! And he thinks so much of
you, and always talks to you so freely."

Yes, Minola thought to herself; he always talks to me very freely--we
are good friends. If he were in love with Lucy, I dare say he would tell
me. Why should he not? She tells me that she is in love with him--that
is a proof of her friendship.

We can think in irony as well as speak in it, and Minola was disposed at
present to be a little sarcastic. She did not love such disclosures as
Lucy had been making. There seemed to be a lack of that instinctive
delicacy in them, which, as she fancied, might be the possession of a
girl were she brought up naked in a south sea islet. Fresh and innocent
as Lucy was, yet this revelation seemed wanting in pure self-respect.
Perhaps, too, it was in keeping with Minola's old creed to believe that
this was just the sort of girl whom most men would be sure to love. At
any rate, she was for the moment in a somewhat bitter mood. Something of
this must have shown itself in her expression, for Lucy said, in a tone
of frightened remonstrance--

"Now, Nola, I have told you all. I have betrayed myself to you, and if
you only despise me and feel angry with me, oh, what shall I do? Isn't
it strange--you both came the same day here--you and he, for the first
time--I mean the first time since I saw you at school. Am I to lose you
too?"

There was something so simple and helpless in this piteous appeal, with
its implied dread of a love proving hopeless, that no irony or anger
could have prevailed against it in Minola's breast. She threw her arm
round the child's neck and petted and soothed her.

"Why should you lose both--why should you lose either?" Minola said. "I
can promise you for one, Lucy dear; and if I could promise you for the
other too, you might be sure of him. He must be a very insensible
person, Lucy, who fails to appreciate you. Only don't make it too plain,
dear, to any one but me. They say that men like to do the love-making
for themselves--and you have not the slightest need to go out of your
way. Tell me--does he know anything of this?"

"Oh, no, Nola."

"Nor guess anything at all?"

"Oh, no--I am sure not--I don't think so. You didn't guess
anything--now, did you?--and how could he?"

Minola felt a little glad to hear of this--for the dignity of womanhood,
she said to herself. But she did not know how long it would last, for
Lucy was not a person likely to accomplish great efforts of
self-control, for the mere sake of the abstract dignity of womanhood.
For the moment, all Minola could do was to express full sympathy with
her friend, and at the same time to counsel her gently not to betray her
secret. Lucy went to her bedroom at last, much fluttering and quivering,
but also relieved and encouraged, and she fell asleep, for all her love
pains, long before Minola did.

"She will be very happy," Minola sat thinking, when she was alone. "She
has a great deal already: a loving father, and mother, and sister; a
happy home, where she is sheltered against everything; a future all full
of brightness. He will love her--I suppose. She's very pretty, and
sweet, and obliging; and he is simple and manly, and would be drawn by
her pure, winning ways; and men like him are fond of women who don't
profess to be strong. Well, if I can help her, I will do so--it will be
something to see her completely happy, and him too."

Whereupon, for no apparent reason, the tears sprang into Minola's eyes,
and she found a vain wish arising in her heart that she had never
renewed her acquaintance with Lucy Money, never been persuaded by Mary
Blanchet to visit her, never stood upon her threshold and met Victor
Heron there.

"Why not wish at once that I had never been born?" she said, half
tearful, half scornful of her tears. "One thing is as easy now as the
other, and as useful, and not to have been born would have saved many
idle hours and much heartache."




CHAPTER XV.

A MORNING CONFIDENCE.


Minola rose next morning with a bewildering and oppressed sense of
disappointment and defeat. The whole of her scheme of life had broken
down. Her little bubble world had burst. All her plans of bold
independence and of contented life, of isolation from social trammels,
and freedom from woman's weaknesses, had broken down. She had always
thought scorn of those who said that women could not feel friendship for
men without danger of feeling love--and now, what was she but a cruel,
mocking evidence of the folly of her confidence? Alas, no romantic
schoolgirl could have fallen more suddenly into love than Minola had
done. There was but one man whom she had ever seen with whom she had
coveted a friendship, and she now knew, only too well, that in her
breast the friendship had already caught fire and blazed into love.
Where was Alceste now, and the Alceste standard by which she had
proposed to test all men and women, well convinced beforehand that she
would find them wanting? She could not even flatter herself that she had
been faithful to her faith, and that if she had succumbed at the very
outset, it was because the first comer actually proved to be an Alceste.
No, she could not cram this complacent conviction into her mind. Victor
Heron was a generous and noble-hearted young man, she felt assured; but
she had not fallen in love with him because of any assurance that he was
like the hero of her girlhood. She made no attempt to deceive herself in
this way. In her proud resentment of her weakness she even trampled upon
it with undeserved scorn. "I fell in love with him," she said to
herself, "just as the silliest girl falls in love--because he was there,
and I couldn't help it."

It was not merely Lucy's revelation which had forced upon Minola a
knowledge of her own feelings. This had perhaps so sent conviction home
as to render illusion or self-deception impossible any longer, but it
was not that which first told her of her weakness. That had long been
more and more making itself known to her. It was plain to her now that
since the first day when she stood upon the bridge with him in the park,
and looked into the canal, she had loved him. "Oh, why did I not know it
then?" she asked wearily of herself. "I could have avoided him--have
never seen him again--and it might so have come to nothing, and at least
we should not have to meet."

Amid all her pain of the night and the morning, one question was ever
repeating itself, "Will this last?" That the fever which burned her was
love--genuine love--the regular old love of the romances and the
poets--she could not doubt. She knew it because it was so new a
feeling. Had she walked among a fever-stricken population, refusing to
believe in the danger of infection, and satisfied that the fearless and
the wise were safe, and had she suddenly felt the strange pains and
unfamiliar heats, and found the senses beginning to wander, she would
have known that this was fever. The pangs of death are new to all alike
when they come, but those who are about to die are conscious--even in
their last moments of consciousness--that this new summons has the one
awful meaning. So did Minola know only too well what the meaning was of
this new pain. "Will it last?" was her cry to herself. "Shall I have to
go through life with this torture always to bear? Is it true that women
have to bear this for years and years--that some of them never get over
it? Oh, I shall never get over it--never, never!" she cried out in
bitterness. She was very bitter now against herself and fate. She did
not feel that it is better to love vainly than not at all. Indeed, such
consoling conviction belongs to the poet who philosophizes on love, or
to the disappointed lover who is already beginning to be consoled. It
does not do much good to any one in the actual hour of pain. Minola
cordially and passionately wished that she had not loved, or seen any
one whom she could love. She was full of wrath and scorn for herself,
and believed herself humbled and shamed. Her whole life was crossed;
her quiet was all gone; she was now doomed to an existence of perpetual
self-constraint and renunciation, and even deception. She had a secret
which she must conceal from the world as if it was a murder. She must
watch her words, her movements, her very glances, lest any sudden
utterance, or gesture, or blush should betray her. She would wake in
the night in terror, lest in some dream she might have called out some
word or name which had roused Mary Blanchet in the next room, and
betrayed her. She must meet Victor Heron, heaven knows how often, and
talk with him as a friend, and never let one gleam of the truth appear.
She must hear Lucy Money tell of her love, and be the _confidante_ of
her childlike emotions. Not often, perhaps, has a proud and sensitive
girl been tried so strangely. "I thought I hated men before," she kept
saying to herself. "I _do_ hate them now; and women and all. I hate him
most of all because I know that I so love him."

All this poor Minola kept saying or thinking to herself that morning as
she listlessly dressed. It is not too much to say that the very air
seemed changed for her. She had only one resolve to sustain her, but
that was at least as strong as her love, or as death--the resolve that,
come what would, she must keep her secret. Victor Heron believed himself
her friend, and desired to be nothing more. No human soul but her own
must know that her feeling to him was not the same. She would have known
the need of that resolve even if she had never been entrusted with poor
dear little Lucy's secret. But the more calmly she thought over that
little story the more she thought it likely that Lucy's dream might come
to be fulfilled.

The world--that is to say, the breakfast room and the Money family--had
to be faced. The family were as pleasant as ever, except Lucy, who
looked pale and troubled, and at whom her father looked once or twice
keenly, but without making any remark.

"I have had a letter from Lady Limpenny already this morning," Mr. Money
observed.

All professed an interest in the contents of the letter, even Theresa.

Mr. Money began to read:

    "Thank you a thousand times, my dear Money----"

"We are very friendly, you see, Miss Grey," he said, breaking off. "But
it's not any peculiar friendship for me. She always calls men by their
names after the first interview."

"She generally addressed papa as 'my dear,' without any proper name
appended," said Lucy, who did not much like Lady Limpenny. "She always
likes the men of a family and always hates the women."

"Lucy, my dear," her mother pleaded, "how can you say so? Laura Limpenny
and I are true friends."

"She is giving us good help with our schools and our church," Theresa
Money said; "and Reginald" (Theresa's engaged lover) "thinks very highly
of her."

"She always praises men, and they all think highly of her," Lucy
persisted; "and it is something to be Lady Anything."

"I assure you, Miss Grey," Mrs. Money said, "that Lady Limpenny is the
most sincere and unpretending creature. She is not an aristocrat--she
has nothing to do with aristocracy; if she had, there could be little
sympathy, as you may well believe, between her and me, for you know my
convictions. The aristocracies of this country are its ruin! When
England falls--and the hour of her fall is near--it will not be due to
beings like Laura Limpenny."

"There I agree with you, dear," Mr. Money gravely said. "Shall I go on?"

He went on:

    "Thank you a thousand times, my dear Money, for your wise and
    Christianlike advice. I will keep my china. I am convinced now that
    my ideas of yesterday were wrong, and even sinful. I had a charming
    talk with a dear aesthetic man last evening, after I saw you, and he
    assures me that my china is a collection absolutely unique; and
    that, if I were to part with it, Mrs. De Vallancey would manage, at
    any cost, or by any contrivance, to get hold of it; and your darling
    wife knows how I hate Mrs. De Vallancey. I now feel that it is my
    duty to keep the china, and that a love for the treasures of art is
    in itself an act of homage to the Great Creator of all.

    "My sweetest love to your darling wife and angel girls. Kind regards
    to the young lady with the hair; and when you see our dear friend
    Heron do tell him that I expect him to call on me _very soon_.

    "Ever yours,

    "LAURA LIMPENNY."

"'Our dear friend Heron,'" exclaimed Lucy in surprise and anger. "Does
she know Mr. Heron so well as that?"

"She met him here yesterday for the first time," Mr. Money said; "but
that's quite enough for Lady Limpenny. She has taken a violent liking to
him already, and enrolls him among her dear friends. Seriously, she
would be rather a useful person for Heron to know. She knows every one,
and will do anything. Her husband attends all the old women of quality,
and a good many of the young women too. I shouldn't be surprised if Sir
James Limpenny--or his wife--could get Heron a hearing from some great
personage."

"I am sure he won't do that," said Lucy warmly. "I don't believe Mr.
Heron would condescend to be helped on in that sort of way."

"Why not?" Minola asked. "I think Lady Limpenny is a more creditable
ally than a person like Mr. St. Paul. If a man wants to succeed in life,
I suppose he must try all the usual arts."

"I didn't think you would have said that of Mr. Heron, Nola," said Lucy,
hurt and wondering.

Nola did not think she would have said it herself twelve hours ago. Why
she said it now she could not tell. Perhaps she was womanish enough to
feel annoyed at the manner in which Lucy seemed to appropriate Victor
Heron's cause, and womanish enough too to relieve her mind by saying
disparaging things of him.

Mr. Money's eyes twinkled with an amused smile.

"See how you wrong a man sometimes, you ladies--even the most reasonable
among you. Heron is more Quixotic than you think, Miss Grey. I have had
a letter from him this very morning about St. Paul. I'll read it if you
like--it need not be kept secret from anybody here."

Mrs. Money and Lucy earnestly asked to have the letter read, and Mr.
Money read it accordingly:

    "MY DEAR MONEY: I don't like St. Paul, and I won't march through
    Coventry with him. I think he is unprincipled and discreditable,
    and if I can't get in for Keeton without his helping hand, I'll
    stay out of Keeton, and that's all about _that_. I know you will
    agree with me when you think this over. Excuse haste and
    abruptness. I want to make my position clear to you without any
    loss of time.

    "Yours faithfully,

    "VICTOR HERON."

"Now, Nola, you see you were wrong," the triumphant Lucy exclaimed.

"I do not like Mr. St. Paul," the quiet Theresa observed. "He seems to
me godless and demoralized. He spake in the lightest and most scoffing
way of the labors of the Church among the heathen populations."

"I liked him," Mrs. Money sighed. "I liked him because he had the spirit
to resign his rank and fling away his title."

"I think his rank rather resigned him," Mr. Money observed. "Anyhow, one
must in the ordinary world consent to take up with a scamp now and then.
Heron says he won't have anything to do with St. Paul, and Lucy
undertakes to say for him that he won't be patronized by Lady Limpenny.
I ask you all calmly, as civilized and Christian beings, how is a young
fellow to get on in London who won't consent to be helped by scamps and
old women."

"Mr. Heron represents a political cause," the eager Lucy began.

Her father looked quietly round at her.

"Why, Lucelet, my dear, when did you come to know anything about
political causes, or to care about them? I thought you only cared for
the renascence of art--isn't it renascence you call it? I understood
that politics were entirely beneath the notice of all your school. Pray
tell me, Mistress Politician, to which side of politics your father
belongs?"

"Oh, papa, for shame! What nonsense! As if I didn't know. Of course you
are a Liberal--an advanced Liberal."

"Good; and our friend Heron?"

"An advanced Liberal too. Of course I know that you are on his side."

"That I am on his side? That he is on my side wouldn't do, I suppose,
although I am somewhat the elder, and I am in Parliament while he is not
in, and is not particularly likely to be if he continues to be so
squeamish. What are the political views of our young friend the artist,
the poet, the bard, or whatever you please to call him?"

"Mr. Blanchet?" Lucy slightly .

"Mr. Blanchet, yes. Am I on his side?"

"Oh, he has no side. He knows nothing of politics," Lucy said
contemptuously.

"Stupid of him, isn't it?"

"Very stupid. At least, I suppose so; I don't know. Oh, yes; I think
every man ought to understand politics."

Mr. Money smiled, and let the subject drop.

When breakfast was over, Mr. Money suddenly said,

"Miss Grey, you always profess to know something about politics. Anyhow,
you know something about Keeton folks, and you can give me some useful
hints about their ways with which I can instruct our dear friend Heron,
as Lady Limpenny calls him. Would you mind coming to my study for a
quarter of an hour, away from all this womankind, and answering me a few
questions?"

Minola was a little surprised, but showed no surprise, and only said
that she would be delighted, of course. Mr. Money offered her his arm
with a somewhat old-fashioned courtesy which contrasted not unbecomingly
with his usual cheery bluntness of manner to women and men alike.

"Not many ladies come here, Miss Grey," Money said, offering her a chair
when they were in the study. "Lucelet looks in very often, to be sure,
but only as a messenger; she doesn't come into council."

"Do I come into council?" Minola asked with a smile and a little of
heightened color. "I shall feel myself of great importance."

"Well, yes, into council. First about yourself. I have been looking into
your affairs a little, Miss Grey--don't be angry; we are all fond of you
in this house, and you don't seem to have any one in particular to look
after your interests."

"It was very kind and good of you. I have not many friends, Mr. Money;
but I am afraid the word 'interests' is rather too large for any affairs
of mine. Have I any interests? Mary Blanchet understands all my affairs
much better than I do."

"Yes, they may be called interests, I think. You know that anybody who
likes can find out everything about people's wills, and all that. Do you
know anything about your father's will?"

"No," Minola said, with a start, and feeling the tears coming to her
eyes. "I don't, Mr. Money. At least, not much. I know that he left me
some money--so much every year; not much--it would not be much for
Lucy--but enough for me and Mary Blanchet. Mary Blanchet manages it for
me, and makes it go twice as far as I could. We never spend it all--I
mean, we haven't spent it all this year. I should never be able to
manage or to get on at all only for her."

Minola spoke with eagerness now, for she was afraid that she was about
to receive some of the advice which worldly people call wise, and to be
admonished of the improvidence of sharing her little purse with Mary
Blanchet.

"And, indeed, I ought to do something for her--something particular,"
she hastened to add, for she was seized with a sudden fear that Mr.
Money might have heard somewhere of her resolve to have Mr. Blanchet's
poems printed at her own expense, and might proceed to remonstrate with
her.

Mr. Money smiled, seeing completely through her, and only thinking to
himself that she was a remarkably good girl, and that he much wished he
had a son to marry her.

"Do you know what I was thinking of?" he asked bluntly.

"I am sure you were thinking about me, for you laughed--at my ignorance
of business ways, I suppose?"

"Not at all; I was thinking that I should like to have a son, and that I
should like you to marry him."

Minola laughed and , but took his words as they were meant, in
all good humor and kindness.

"If you had a son, Mr. Money, I am sure I would marry him if you asked
me, and he----"

"Thank you. Well, I am only sorry I can't take you at your word. But
that wasn't exactly what I brought you here to tell you. What I want to
tell you is this. You are likely to have a good deal of property of one
kind and another, Miss Grey. Your father, I find, made a good deal of
money in his time, and saved it; bought houses and built houses; bought
up annuities, insurances, shares in companies--all manner of things. He
only left his property to his present wife for her use of what it brings
every year during her life. At her death it all comes to you, and I'm
told she can't live long."

"Oh, but she may. I hope and pray that she may," Minola exclaimed. "It
seems shocking to watch for a woman's death, especially when we were not
very friendly to each other. I don't want the money; I have
enough--quite enough. I shouldn't know what to do with it. I don't care
much about new dresses, and bonnets, and the fashions, and all that; and
what could I do with money, living alone in my quiet way? I think a girl
of my age, living all to herself, and having much money, would be
perfectly ridiculous. Why could not her husband get it, if the poor
creature dies? That would be only right. I am sure he may have it for
me."

"He mayn't have it for me though," Mr. Money said. "You have no one, it
seems to me, to look after your interests, and I'll take the liberty to
do so, for lack of a better, whether you like it or not. However, we can
talk about that when the time comes."

Minola gave a sort of shudder.

"When the time comes. That seems so dreadful; as if we were only waiting
for the poor woman to be dead to snatch at whatever she left behind her.
Mr. Money, is there really no other way? must I have this property?"

"If she dies before you, yes--it will come to you. Of course you know
that it isn't great wealth in the London sense. It won't constitute you
an heiress in the Berkeley Square sense, but it will give you a good
deal of miscellaneous property for a young woman. Well, as to that, I'll
see that you get your rights; and the only thing I have to ask is just
that you will not do anything decided, or anything at all, in this
business, without consulting me."

"Oh, indeed, I can faithfully promise you that. I have no other friend
whom I could possibly consult, or who would take any interest in me."

"Come, now, I can't believe that. If you wish, you can be like the young
lady in Sheridan's song--friends in all the aged you'll meet, and lovers
in the young."

"I don't want to be like her in that."

"In having friends in all the aged?"

"Oh, I don't know; in anything. I am well content with the friends I
have."

"Well, some of them, at least, are well content with you. Now, Miss
Grey, I want to speak to you of something that concerns me. You and my
daughter Lucy are great friends?"

Minola almost started.

"I am very fond of Lucy."

"And she is very fond of you. We all are for that matter. Did you ever
hear of an old Scottish saying about a person having a face like a
fiddle--not in shape, you know, but in power of attracting people, and
rousing sympathy?"

"Yes. I think I remember it in some of Scott's novels."

"Very well. I think you have a face like a fiddle; all our sympathies
are drawn to you. Now that is why I speak to you of something which I
wouldn't talk about to any other woman of your age--not even to my own
daughter Theresa, an excellent creature, but not over sympathetic. I
am very fond of my Lucelet. She isn't strong; she hasn't great
intelligence. I know my little goose is not a swan, but she is very
sweet, and sensitive, and loving: the most affectionate little creature
that ever was made happy or unhappy by a man. I am morbidly anxious
about her happiness. Now, you are her friend, and a thousand times
cleverer and stronger than she, and she looks up to you. She would tell
you anything. _Has_ she told you anything lately?"

Minola hesitated.

"Oh, you needn't hesitate, or think of any breach of confidence. You may
tell me. I could get it all from herself in a moment. It isn't about
that I want to ask you. Well, I'll save you all trouble. She has told
you something."

"She has."

"She is in love!"

Minola assented.

Mr. Money ran his hand through his hair, got up and walked a turn or two
up and down the study.

"The other day she was a child, and cared for nobody in the world but
her mother and me! Now a young fellow comes along, and, like the Earl of
Lowgave's lassie in the old song, she does not love her mammy nor she
does not love her daddy."

"Oh, but I don't think that at all," Miss Grey said earnestly. "No girl
could be fonder of her father and mother."

Mr. Money smiled good-humoredly, but with a look of pity, as one who
corrects an odd mistake.

"I know that very well, Miss Grey, and I was not speaking seriously, or
grumbling at my little lassie. But it does astonish us elderly parents,
when we find out all of a sudden that there are other persons more
important than we in the eyes of our little maidens, and we may as well
relieve our minds by putting the feeling into words. Well, you know the
hero of this little romance?"

Minola was looking steadily at the fire, and away from Mr. Money. She
did not answer at once, and there was a pause. The suddenness of the
silence aroused her.

"Oh, yes, Mr. Money. I know who he is," she said, without looking round.

"Very well. Now comes the delicate part of my questioning. Of course you
can't be expected to read the secrets of other people's hearts, and I
suppose you are not in _his_ confidence."

"No, indeed," she said very quietly.

"No--you couldn't tell how he feels toward my Lucelet?"

Minola shook her head.

"If I were a man, I am sure I should be in love with her," she said.

"You think so? Yes, perhaps so; but in this case, somehow----. Well,
Miss Grey, another question, and then I'll release you, and speak to me
frankly, like a true girl to a plain man, who treats her as such. Is
there any woman, as far as you know, who is more to him than Lucelet?"

Mr. Money had now come near to where Minola was sitting. He stood
leaning against the chimney-piece, and looking fixedly into her face. At
first she did not even understand the meaning of his question. Then
suddenly she felt that her cheeks began to burn and her heart to beat.
She looked up in wonder and pain, but she saw so much of earnestness and
anxiety in Mr. Money's face that it would have been impossible not to
understand and respect his purpose. In his anxiety for his daughter's
happiness his whole soul was absorbed. Minola's heart forgot its own
pain for the moment. Her own memory of a father was not of one thus
unselfishly absorbed. She answered without hesitation, and with quiet
self-possession.

"Oh, no, Mr. Money. I know of no such woman. So far as I can guess, none
such exists."

Mr. Money drew a deep breath, and his eyes brightened.

"Miss Grey," he said, "I think any other woman in the world would have
told me she wasn't in Mr.--in _his_ secrets, or given me some evasive
or petulant answer. I thank you a thousand times. We may then--I
may--pursue without compunction my matchmaking schemes. They are not
very selfish; they are only for Lucelet's happiness. I would ask one of
my office clerks to marry her if she loved him and he was likely to
make her happy; and I would set them up in life. You may guess, then,
whether this idea pleases me. But I confess I didn't think--well, of
course, your assurance is enough, but I began to think of something
different."

Minola rose to go away.

"One word, Miss Grey. Pray don't say anything to my wife about this. She
is the truest and kindest of women, as you know, but she can't
understand keeping anything a secret, and she always begs of us to leave
her out of the smallest plot of the most innocent kind, because she must
let it all out prematurely. Now I'll release you, and you have, at all
events, one friend in life to be going on with--friend among the aged I
mean; the rest will come fast enough."

With a bewildered head and a bursting heart, Minola found her way to her
own room.




MOHEGAN-HUDSON.


    Where the northern forest flings
      Its shadows over weeping hills,
    Rivulets rise in myriad springs
      And run to meet in roaring kills.
    Soon from these a great stream grows;
      Grows--and grows more strong and free,
    Till a noble river flows;
      Flows majestic to the sea.

    Born of Adirondac tears,
      Nursed by storms of Katterskill,
    Yet a smiling face it wears,
      Rolls in tranquil silence still.
    Gliding first o'er sands of glass,
      Then 'midst grassy meads estray,
    Now it shoots the highland pass,
      Hurrying southward on its way.

    River, but the sea as well;
      Steady drift and changing tide;
    Here may float a cockle-shell,
      Or the ocean navies ride.
    'T is the sea in landscape set;
      'T is the sea, by limits bound;
    But it is the river yet,
      Flowing through enchanted ground.

    Countless wealth its currents bear,
      Wrought from forest, field, and mine;
    Giant steamships o'er it fare,
      Clouds of sails in sunlight shine.
    Through the darkness, as in light,
      Sail the constant fleets the same;
    While along the shores at night
      Furnace fires perpetual flame.

    In the bright October days,
      While I float upon the stream,
    Mellowed by transfiguring haze,
      All is like a fairy dream:
    Groves and gardens, towns and towers,
      Mountain tops and vales between,
    As the gods had builded bowers
      Scarce concealed and scarcely seen.

    Thine no borrowed glories! thine,
      Matchless river! are thy own!
    O'er thy scenes no false lights shine
      From the ages dead and gone.
    Round no castles' crumbling walls
      Troops of knightly spectres throng,
    And within no ruined halls
      Thrills the spectre maiden's song;

    Save when dusky phantoms glide,
      Still intent on savage rites,
    Or when he of Sunnyside
      Marshals his fantastic sprites:
    Then we seem again to hear
      War-whoops echoing 'midst the hills,
    And old Hendrick's lusty cheer
      As the wind his canvas fills.

    As Mohegan, ages old,
      Though for ever self-renewed,
    Through unbroken forests rolled
      All thy floods in solitude:
    But as Hudson, now and ever,
      Distant lands repeat thy name,
    And the world, O glorious river!
      Stands the guardian of thy fame.

JAMES MANNING WINCHELL.




PUBLIC LIBRARIES IN THE UNITED STATES.


Many a mickle makes a muckle, says the proverb, and whoever looks into
the operations of society on the great scale will find how true the
saying is. A national debt, a national crop, the cattle feeding on the
hills of a broad continent, the school-going children of a populous
commonwealth, the number of its vagabonds and criminals at large or in
jail, all need such an array of figures for their expression that the
amounts really convey no impression to the mind. The number of books
collected in public libraries does not reach such unwieldy proportions
as these, but it is still very large. The information gathered by the
Bureau of Education for the purpose of exhibiting the condition of
American society at the end of the first century of our independence
shows that the libraries which are classed as "public" number 3,682 in
the United States, and contain 12,276,964 volumes and 1,500,000
pamphlets.

Of our private libraries little is known. In 1870 the census-takers
reported 107,673 collections of this class, containing in all 25,571,503
volumes, but these numbers are known to be much below the truth. The
acute and practical superintendent of the ninth census declared that
this part of his work had no value, and even said that "the statistics
of private libraries are not, from any proper point of view, among the
desirable inquiries of the census." What a commentary upon the progress
of society is contained in this opinion of the most accomplished
statistician ever engaged in studying our social movements! It is but a
short time since the owning of books was a mark of superior station in
the world. What has produced the change?

We can perhaps learn the cause of it better by a comparison than by
direct study of bibliographical history. In Voltaire's time thermometers
were so great a rarity that the owner of one of them was considered to
be a savant. Time and social progress have so completely altered this
state of things that thermometers are now made in factories, are owned
by all classes, and applied to the commonest uses. The thermometers
hanging on our walls no longer indicate familiarity with science, but
merely that a new tool has been added to household appliances. So in
book-making. The art which once served chiefly to record discoveries in
knowledge, conduct controversies in polemics, philosophy, and politics,
and for other grave and important purposes now adds to these a multitude
of common uses. A library may contain scores and even hundreds of
volumes, and yet have nothing but those books which have served in the
education and amusement of the children in an ordinary family. Or it may
be the result of a chance aggregation of "railway literature," bought to
relieve the tediousness of travel. Or it may consist, as is sometimes
the case, of the small and precious collections in frontier log huts, of
the gratuitous contributions of the patent medicine vender, the
plough-maker, and the lightning-rod man, mingled with the dear-bought
subscription books of the wandering peddler! Books are so common that
the possession of them is no longer an indication of the intellectual
tendency of their possessors.

With libraries open to the public the case is different. Their condition
affords one standard by which the character and tastes of the people may
be measured.

The United States are considered to be far behind foreign countries in
their book collections. We have nothing to compare with Dresden, Berlin,
and Paris, with their 500,000, 700,000, and 2,000,000 volumes. We do not
reach the wealth of even such second-rate places as Wolfenbuettel,
Breslau, and Goettingen, if their collections are correctly reported at
300,000, 340,000, and 400,000 volumes. And yet each year witnesses the
purchase of more than 400,000 volumes for our public libraries, taken
collectively, a number that is larger than any one collection in this
country! The permanent fund of our libraries, so far as known, amounts
to $6,105,581 and their annual income to $1,398,756. These figures do
not, in fact, represent anything like the truth, for not half the
libraries reported their permanent fund, or their yearly purchases, and
only one-quarter reported their yearly income. About one-fifth of the
whole number (769 exactly) report their expenditures for new books at
$562,407, and in 742 libraries the use of books amounts to 8,879,869
volumes yearly. In these figures Sunday-school libraries, one of the
most constantly used kinds, are not included. Looking at the magnitude
of the numbers reported, and considering all that is omitted, we obtain
an inkling of the immense exchange of books among the people from these
public distribution points.

The existing public libraries, excluding all under 300 volumes, and all
in Sunday-schools of whatever size, may be considered as belonging to
six principal divisions. These, with the number of libraries and the
volumes in each, are as follows:

      _Class._          _No. libraries._            _No. Volumes._

    Educational              1,577                    3,442,799
    Professional               360                    1,406,759
    Historical                  51                      421,794
    Government                 122                    1,562,597
    Proprietary Public       1,109                    3,228,555
    Free Public                342                    1,909,444
    Miscellaneous              121                      305,016
                             -----                   ----------
                             3,682                   12,276,964

The "miscellaneous" class contains the libraries of secret and
benevolent societies, and some others difficult to arrange. On the whole
it might be better to class them with the proprietary public libraries.

Educational libraries are the oldest in the country, and the most
venerable of them is naturally that of the oldest educational
institution, Harvard University, which dates from 1638. Before the end
of that century three others had been started, and singularly enough,
all at about the same time: King William school at Annapolis, 1697,
King's Chapel Library at Boston, 1698, and Christ church at
Philadelphia, 1698. Yale and William and Mary Colleges began their
collections in 1700, and then proprietary libraries began their
existence. The Proprietors' Library in Pomfret, Conn., was founded in
1737, Redwood, in Newport, 1747, and the Library Society, Charleston, S.
C, 1748. Philadelphia was especially active at that early period,
establishing no less than five, the Library Company in 1731,
Carpenters', 1736, Four Monthly Meetings of Friends, 1742, Philosophical
Society, 1743, and Loganian, 1745. Fifty-one of these enterprises were
begun in the second half of the eighteenth century, but failure and
consolidation brought the number of living libraries in 1800 down to
forty-nine. In 1776 twenty-nine were in existence, and from that time
the growth has been as follows:

    _Libraries formed._         _Number._       _Present size._

    From 1775 to 1800               30             242,171 vols.
     "   1800 to 1825              179           2,056,113   "
     "   1825 to 1850              551           2,807,218   "
    "    1850 to 1876            2,240           5,481,068   "

This little table brings out very strikingly the distinctive peculiarity
of libraries in this country. Their strength does not lie so much in the
importance of individual collections as in the existence of a large
number of young, active, and growing institutions which are unitedly
advancing to a future that must evidently be tremendous. More than
seventy per cent. of our existing libraries have been formed within the
last twenty-five years, and contain about 2,500 volumes each. Of the
older libraries those which were founded in the last quarter of last
century have an average of about 8,000 volumes, those of the following
quarter about 11,500 volumes, and those of the third quarter about 5,000
volumes each. It is plain that library work has been remarkably active
since 1850. In fact it has been so active as to open a new profession to
the educated classes of this country. A large number of highly trained
men are engaged in library work, and the discussion of library science
is carried on with energy. It is quite probable that a few more years
will see the introduction of this study into American colleges, as a
preparation for a promising branch of industry. But let us return to our
classification, which covers some interesting points.

_Educational_ libraries are of three kinds:

    1. Academy and school      1,059, with 1,270,497 vols.
    2. College                   312   "   1,949,105   "
    3. Asylum and Reformatory    206   "     223,197   "

District school libraries form a very modern part of the general system,
having been first suggested by Governor Clinton of New York in 1827, and
introduced by law in 1835. Since then twenty other States have adopted
the plan, but some, like Massachusetts, have abandoned it for that of
town libraries. The greatest difficulties it labors under are found in
country districts, where the funds are applied to other purposes, and
the books are recklessly lent out and lost, both evils being due to the
fact that few persons can be found who are able and willing to keep the
work in good order. In cities the success of these district libraries is
much greater. They now report an aggregate of 1,270,497 books, but their
statistics are very incomplete. College libraries are among the most
important in the country, that of Harvard being the largest we have,
after the Congressional library in Washington. As to asylum and
reformatory libraries, it would be hard to find circumstances under
which books could be more usefully collected than in those institutions,
where in 1870 32,901 prisoners were confined, and 116,102 paupers housed
habitually or at times. If we consider that only one-fifth of the
criminals are in jail, and allow for the natural increase of criminals
and paupers, it will be apparent that the population which may derive
benefit from these libraries must now number at least 300,000 persons.
To meet their wants there are 206 libraries, with 223,197 volumes. The
Pennsylvania State Penitentiary has the largest collection, 9,000
volumes, besides 1,000 school books. The other end of the line is
occupied by Florida, which maintains 40 volumes in its Penitentiary.

Some interesting information has been gathered concerning the literary
taste of convicts. Story books, magazines, and light literature
generally are the favorite choice, but history, biography, and travels
are also well patronized. In the Massachusetts State prison Humboldt's
"Cosmos" and other philosophical works are called for. In fact the value
of prison libraries is vouched for by all authorities, and one says that
no convicts, except those really idiotic, leave a prison where there is
a library without having gained some advantage. The greatest defects in
the system are the lack of books and of light to read them by at night.
There are but forty prison libraries, with 61,095 volumes, and in
American prisons the cells are not lighted. Lights are placed in the
corridors so that only a small number of the inmates have light enough
to read by. The Joliet (Ill.) prison is a cheering exception to this
gloomy state of things. Each cell has its own catalogue, and lights are
allowed up to nine o'clock. Public charities of several kinds have
lately suffered from exposures that prevent charitably disposed persons
from giving aid which they would otherwise gladly contribute. It may be
useful to suggest that money sent to any prison for the benefit of its
library could hardly fail to be helpful.

In reformatories, where the effort is to cultivate the moral faculties,
the library is an essential part of the system. Forty-nine of them have
collections containing 51,466 books. In these institutions we have an
indication of what the library, and other moral forces like it, is worth
as an educator. Mr. Sanborn thinks that the proportion "of worthy
citizens trained up among the whole 24,000 in preventive and reformatory
schools would be as high as seventy-five per cent."

_Professional_ libraries are--

    1. Law           135, with    330,353 volumes
    2. Medical        64   "      159,045    "
    3. Theological    86   "      633,369    "
    4. Scientific     75   "      283,992    "

Here we have two surprises. One is that lawyers, with their interminable
"reports" falling from nearly every court in the country, and never
becoming really obsolete (a peculiarity that hardly any other
professional works enjoy), should have so few and such small libraries.
The reason probably lies in the assiduity with which each lawyer
collects the works needed in his line of practice. The other surprise is
that a profession so old and active as that of medicine should be so
poorly represented in books. The lawyers have an average of about 2,400
books in their libraries, and the largest collections in the list are
that of the Law Institute in New York, 20,000 volumes; Harvard School,
15,000; Social Law Library, Boston, 13,000; and Law Association of San
Francisco, 12,500. No other reaches 10,000 volumes, and in fact the
above deductions leave the others with about 2,000 volumes each. The
medical gentlemen are still worse off. There are in the Surgeon
General's office 40,000 volumes; Philadelphia College of Physicians,
18,753; Pennsylvania College of Physicians, 12,500; and New York
Hospital, 10,000; leaving an average of 1,300 volumes to each of the
other institutions. In these figures we have an indication of the
excellent work done by the Army Bureau at Washington. Its 40,000 bound
volumes are supplemented by 40,000 pamphlets, making a collection which
the profession greatly needed. The theologians seem to have attended as
energetically to the collection as to the making of books. In the last
division of this class belong the engineering, agricultural, mining,
botanical, military, and naval schools and societies, and they appear to
give considerable importance to their libraries. Though they are mostly
young institutions, the average number of books is 3,800. In addition to
the bound volumes mentioned above, the societies own 218,852 pamphlets
and 2,169 manuscripts, the proportion of these two kinds of literary
works being naturally large in scientific collections. The largest
libraries are those of the Essex Institute, Salem, Mass., 30,655
volumes, and 105,408 pamphlets, and "many" MSS.; Philadelphia Academy of
Natural Sciences, 30,000 volumes and 35,000 pamphlets; Wagner Free
Institution of Science, Philadelphia, 15,000 volumes; Museum of
Comparative Zooelogy (Harvard), 13,000; Illinois Industrial University,
10,000; School of Mines, New York, 7,000; Sheffield Scientific School,
5,000.

_Historical societies_ have been much more actively employed in
collecting than the table we have given indicates. Since the adoption
of the Constitution in 1789 no less than one hundred and sixty
societies have been formed, and Dr. Homes of the New York State Library
reports their collections to aggregate more than 482,000 volumes and
568,000 pamphlets. The number of MSS. is 88,771, besides 1,361 bound
volumes of them. The largest accumulations are:

                            _Volumes._      _Pamphlets._        _MSS._

    Am. Antiq. Soc.,
      Worcester              60,497

    New York Historical      60,000           12,000           15,000

    Wisconsin Historical     33,347           31,653              300

    Long Island Historical   26,000           25,000

    Massachusetts Historical 23,000           45,000          1,000 v.

    Congregational Library,
      Boston                 22,895           95,000              550

    Connecticut Historical   16,000           20,000

    Amer. Philosoph.,
      Philadelphia           20,000           15,000            100 v.

    German Society,
      Philadelphia           16,000

    Pennsylvania Historical  16,000           30,000           25,000

It is among these societies that we find the largest average of any
class, excepting the Government. Historical libraries contain about
8,400 bound volumes, 7,000 pamphlets, and 1,000 MSS. to each collection.
In spite of this the public collections are often surpassed in
completeness in special branches by private ones. In this country a
public institution can rarely compete successfully with an eager and
determined private buyer.

_Government_ libraries include others than those for the use of
officials, as the following list shows:

                                 _Libraries._       _Volumes._

    1.  Government                    35             695,633
    2.  State and Territorial         47             834,219
    3.  Garrison                      40              32,745

The official libraries are of several kinds, and as many of them are of
prime importance, we may be permitted to specify them more minutely than
those of any other class:

                                           _Volumes._

    Library of Congress                     300,000
         "     House of Representatives     125,000
         "     Surgeon General               40,000
         "     State Department              29,000
         "     Senate                        25,000
         "     Patent Office                 23,000
         "     War Department                13,000
         "     Attorney General              12,000
         "     Treasury                       8,440
         "     Solicitor of Treasury          6,000
         "     Post Office                    6,301
         "     Hydrographer's Office          7,000
         "     Dep't. Agriculture             7,000
         "     Bureau Statistics              6,000
         "     Naval Observatory              7,000
         "     Coast Survey                   6,000

Many of these are scientific collections and the only large ones of
their kind in the country. Their presence, in conjunction with the
Smithsonian Institution, has made Washington one of the most active
scientific centres in the country. Government publications are
sometimes referred to as mere trash, but aside from the remarkably
thorough and admirable reports which the several public surveys have
produced within a few years, and aside from such notable publications
as the reports of Wilkes, Perry, and Kane, the ordinary issues of the
Government printing office are anything but undeserving documents. They
are in most cases necessary, useful, and interesting to some one. As
special reports, made to cover some field that is narrow, however
necessary it may be, and limited to that range by the law which
authorizes them, they cannot possibly often be publications of general
interest. In fact it is their extremely special character that gives
them value. We are sometimes told that a government may be obliged to
publish its State papers as matter of record, but it is noticeable that
these volumes of documentary history are less inquired for than almost
any others. The surveying, engineering, geological, astronomical, and
other scientific reports published by the Government are in much
greater request, and bring the highest prices in old bookstores. The
explanation is, of course, that the scientific reports are useful to a
larger class than the others. They appeal to "bread-winners" in several
important professions, to students of pure science the world over, and
to the already large and increasing body of teachers. For the
"Smithsonian Contributions" one hundred and fifty dollars, or more than
first cost, is demanded, and the first volume brings twenty dollars, or
two and a half times its original price. The Mining Industry volume of
the Fortieth Parallel Report brought forty dollars in the shops
(whenever it could be found) even while the Engineer Corps was still
gingerly distributing its limited edition _gratis_. Many more examples
could be adduced, but these are sufficient to show that the Government
does bring out works that are sorely wanted. We wish its method of
distribution were better. At present the workers in a profession have
great difficulty in obtaining the most needed publications of
Government, while Congressmen, who are politicians and nothing else,
are flooded with books they cannot understand, and only sneer at. The
distribution of professional reports through members of Congress, who
are not professional men, has never produced anything but
dissatisfaction. There is no part of the country where Government
publications can be found. Even New York city cannot produce them. This
is all wrong. The Government should maintain a collection of all its
publications in at least four States. They could be established either
in connection with existing libraries or with the army headquarters
that are maintained permanently in such places as New York, Chicago,
San Francisco, and New Orleans. Such documentary libraries would not be
deserted, as some may suppose. The Patent Room of the Boston Public
Library was visited last year by 1,765 persons, and a collection of the
engineering, scientific, and official publications of the Government in
New York would be a centre for professional study, and be visited by
thousands yearly. To house the Government publications would require so
much space that an ordinary library could hardly be expected to
undertake the task without aid. The patent specifications alone of
three countries, Great Britain, France, and the United States, with
their increase for ten years to come, require an apartment at least
thirty feet square.

_Proprietary_ public libraries are the second of the six kinds in size,
and would be the first if the "miscellaneous" were counted among them,
as they probably should be. Under this head we have grouped all public
collections the access to which is in any way limited, as by a yearly
payment, by membership in a society, or otherwise. The large total in
the table is made up of:

                          _Number._        _Volumes._

    1. College Society L.   299              474,642
    2. Mercantile            15              543,930
    3. Social               708            2,052,423
    4. Y. M. Christian A.    87              157,557

In this class we first reach the libraries that deal directly with the
"people"; that is, adults of moderate means. These collections have been
well styled the "colleges of the poor," and in them all persons who are
industrious enough to be able to spare a dollar or two yearly may obtain
useful knowledge or innocent amusement. Classes for study of languages,
literature, and the arts, and lectures by prominent persons are
frequently added to the library system, the whole forming one of the
most potent of modern social forces. It seems quite natural that this
democratic system of intellectual improvement should owe its origin to
the people's philosopher, Poor Richard. Benjamin Franklin founded the
first proprietary library in Philadelphia, in 1731, and his plan
included not merely cooeperation for the sake of pecuniary strength, but
also discussion and mutual improvement.

_Free_ public libraries are in character much like the last class, but
are maintained usually by State or town grants, or by private gifts. It
is probably in connection with these institutions that the dream of
some enthusiasts for uniting art museums to the collections of books
will be realized.

Only twelve States have a quarter of a million volumes in their public
libraries, taken together. They are:

                           _Libraries._        _Volumes._

    Massachusetts              454             2,208,304
    New York                   615             2,131,377
    Pennsylvania               364             1,291,665
    District of Columbia        63               761,133
    Ohio                       237               634,939
    Illinois                   177               463,826
    Connecticut                121               414,396
    Maryland                    79               382,250
    California                  85               306,978
    New Jersey                  91               280,931
    Missouri                    85               260,102
    Virginia                    65               248,156

This order will, no doubt, rapidly and constantly change. It will be
observed that in respect to number of libraries the succession is not
the same as for the number of volumes. It can hardly be doubted that
such States as Ohio, Illinois, California, and Missouri will advance up
the line, while others that now do not possess a quarter of a million
volumes, as Indiana, with 137 public libraries, Michigan, with 94, Iowa,
with 80, Tennessee, with 74, and Kentucky, with 71, will soon be in the
list. As a matter of State "rivalry," such summaries are valueless, even
if any rivalry of the kind could be proved. But they do have some
interest and value as social statistics.

More significant, perhaps, are the libraries of ten principal cities, in
which one-quarter of all the books in the country within public reach
are gathered:

                    _Libraries._      _Volumes._   _Pop'tion 1870._

    New York           122             878,665         942,292
    Boston              68             735,900         250,526
    Philadelphia       101             706,447         674,022
    Baltimore           38             237,934          53,180
    Cincinnati          30             200,890         216,239
    St. Louis           32             172,875         310,864
    Brooklyn            21             165,192         396,099
    San Francisco       28             162,716         149,473
    Chicago             24             144,680         298,979
    Charleston           6              26,600          48,956
                       ---           ---------       ---------
                       500           3,431,899       3,340,628

In these ten cities, therefore, are collected 7.3 per cent. of the
public libraries, 28 per cent. of the books, and 8.66 per cent. of the
population in this country. If Washington had been included instead of
Charleston, the concentration of books in cities would have been more
strikingly marked.

A proper conception of American libraries cannot be obtained without
assorting them according to size, which is done in the following table:

                              _Number._     _Volumes_.

        500-  1,000 Volumes    925            592,510
      1,000-  2,000    "       762            983,953
      2,000-  3,000    "       362            816,928
      3,000-  4,000    "       236            765,010
      4,000-  5,000    "       156            667,874
      5,000- 10,000    "       264          1,703,271
     10,000- 20,000    "       152          2,013,660
     20,000- 50,000    "        82          2,329,305
     50,000-100,000    "        10            640,617
    100,000-200,000    "         7            926,727
      Over  200,000    "         2            599,869

What is to be the future of American libraries? The most obvious
discernible facts are that the popular energies are likely to be given
to the support of free town libraries, and that the aggregate of book
accumulations will be enormous, though no individual collection now
presents the likelihood of rising to extreme proportions; the increase
will come by the growth of the numerous small libraries. The mercantile
institutions have done and are continuing a good work, but they have
prepared the way for a step beyond. Free town libraries are quite in
sympathy with American ideas, and will be supported. They are capable of
being made good means of disseminating information. It is fortunate that
in this country novels belong to the cheapest publications, most of the
good ones appearing in fifty-cent and dollar editions. More solid works
are also costlier, so that a popular library can with good reason give
its energies to the collection of really good works, leaving the people
to supply themselves with the cheaper novels.

Numerous as are the views which have been expressed upon the proper
scope and quality of the library of the future, we propose to add one
to the list of suggestions. It is that the next founder of a library
should confine it entirely to _periodicals_. It is through current
literature that every kind of science and every tendency of thought now
finds expression. The profoundest discussions in philosophy,
discoveries in knowledge, keenest studies of life and character, are
now made through the world's weekly and monthly publications. Books are
often no more than summaries of what has been printed before in
separate magazines. We have in fact heard of one gentleman who broke up
the library he had spent years in collecting, and gave his attention to
periodicals, because they were the original sources of knowledge in his
profession. The libraries which we have styled "professional" are
compelled to spend large sums on these issues, which were once styled
"ephemeral," but are now found to be of lasting value.

Under these circumstances, why not have a library of this periodical
literature? Just as some men refuse to read translations, learning a new
language if a book they need is printed in a tongue unknown to them, so
let us reject summaries and accumulate original materials. As to the
cost of such a library, the five thousand important periodicals which
are said to be published will require probably $30,000 a year for their
purchase, and if as much more is added for rent, binding, salaries,
etc., we have an income required which demands a capital of more than a
million dollars, to say nothing of half a million for back numbers!

Some readers may be curious to know what chance there is of making a
collection that shall be fairly representative of the world's
literature. We can safely answer, _none_. Herr Hottinger, who has
issued the prospectus of a universal catalogue of all books published,
thinks there are about three million titles, and his critics say this
estimate is too low. Twenty-five thousand new works are said to be
added each year to this number. Now the largest number of _volumes_
(and therefore a less number of titles) added to libraries in this
country yearly, is: Boston Public Library, 18,000; Philadelphia
Mercantile, 17,004; Congressional, 15,400; Chicago Public, 11,331;
Cincinnati Public, 11,398; New York Mercantile, 8,000; and Harvard,
7,000. The numbers reported by the Mercantile and public libraries are
of little value, since these institutions often buy a dozen or a score
copies of a popular work. It is therefore evident that no library in
this country is even attempting to keep up with the current issue of
books.

It has been found impossible to estimate, with any degree of accuracy,
the amount of money spent on new books by the libraries, as more than
half of them fail to make any report on this point. Permanent funds,
amounting to $6,105,581, are held by 358 libraries, and 1,364 have none;
1,960 make no report. The endowments are divided very unevenly among the
classes, as this table shows:

                    _Number Reporting._        _Amount._

    Educational            54                   $775,801
    Professional           54                    695,610
    Historical             26                    742,572
    Government           none
    Proprietary Public    124                  1,079,359
    Free Public            93                  2,804,964
    Miscellaneous           7                      7,275

This, however, does not show what is spent yearly in buying books, an
item which only one in about twenty-three of the libraries report. The
amount is $562,407, and at $1.25 per volume, which is Mr. Winsor's
estimate of the average cost of books, the yearly acquisitions by
purchase are limited to about 450,000 volumes.

Figures such as we have presented are really no guide to the worth of an
individual library, or of a library system, to the people. That can be
learned only by the comparison of experiences by the men who have charge
of the books and their distribution, but the elements for such an
analysis are wanting. The yearly use of books in 742 libraries in 1875
was 8,879,869 volumes, or from two to two and a half times the number of
volumes on the shelves of the reporting libraries. Great differences
exist in this respect. Few libraries are so eagerly sought as the
military post library on Angel Island, California, which distributed its
772 books so often that its yearly circulation was 4,500! The Chicago
Public Library, with 48,100 volumes, circulated 403,356; Boston
Athenaeum, with 105,000 volumes, circulated 33,000; Boston Public
Library, with 299,869 volumes, circulated 758,493.

These statistics are sufficient. It is probable that the libraries of
the country, costing say $16,000,000 for books, and spending more than
$1,400,000 yearly, afford to the people the use of from twenty-four to
thirty million volumes every year. It cannot be doubted that they form a
very important factor in our social and national economy.

More than a thousand librarians are engaged in the conduct of the public
libraries, many of them men of great ability and culture. There can be
no doubt that their study of this important problem will result in the
establishing of an intelligent and harmonious system of supplying a
nation with the reading matter it requires.

JOHN A. CHURCH.




HOW NATIONAL BANK NOTES ARE REDEEMED.


There are few divisions in the Treasury department of the United States
at Washington less known to the public, and more interesting to
visitors, than that over the entrance to which is displayed the legend
"National Bank Redemption Agency." It is a matter of the most common
knowledge throughout the country, that the various forms of national
currency and securities are by some process, popularly esteemed more or
less miraculous, printed at the Treasury, and that greenbacks are by
some method, presumably more within the laws of nature, redeemed there.
The ordinary money-holder, who has in his pocket his tens or hundreds of
legal tenders, is passably familiar with the history, past and to come,
of each note. But to his national bank notes the average financier is
more of a stranger. Each note, if he can read as well as reckon cash,
tells him whence it cometh, but ten to one he has only the vaguest
notion of whither it goeth. Hence it is that of the thousands of
ejaculatory comments delivered, during the centennial summer and autumn,
through the wire gate opposite to the second assortment teller's desk,
at the agency, so many were of a nature tending to make that industrious
clerk smile with amusement or stare in amazement.

The throngs of centennial visitors who daily passed through the halls of
the Treasury saw various things at the agency to attract their notice.
They saw their entrance barred by the gate above alluded to, put there
for the double purpose of securing ventilation and excluding "the great
unwashed"; they saw a small-sized room converted into a perfect
labyrinth by means of wirework partitions; they saw in each of the
apartments so set off hundreds of thousands, and even millions of
dollars, in the various processes of handling in bulk, piled upon
counters and tables, constructed evidently with a view to use rather
than ornament; and they saw through the entrance to an adjoining room
national bank notes of all denominations, passing with wonderful
rapidity under the deft fingers of counters of both sexes. But what
chiefly imposed upon the imagination of the country visitor were two
massive safes, reaching from the floor to the ceiling. In the interests
of truth, let a revelation be made to a public too prone to believe
their eyes. Those safes, for at least the upper third of their ponderous
height, are of inch pine boards. The crowded condition of the Treasury
building renders space very valuable. A place of storage was needed for
the various forms of stationery in use at the agency. The floor was
already covered with desks, tables, and counters, the intricate passages
between which would have defied the attempts of the Minotaur to escape;
but there were at least a hundred cubic feet of space above each of the
iron safes, absolutely going to waste. The genius of the officials and
the skill of the departmental cabinet makers triumphed over the
difficulties of the situation. As for the inconvenient height, is it not
annihilated by a ladder?

By act of Congress, the Treasurer of the United States is constituted
the agent of the national banks for the redemption of their notes. The
agency, since July 1, 1875, is one of the divisions in his office.
Regular provision is made by Congress in the appropriation bills for the
salaries of the force of this division. Careful accounts are kept of
every item of expense incurred during the year, and at the end of the
twelvemonth the sum disbursed is apportioned among the banks according
to the number of the notes of each that have been handled, and
assessments are made for the several amounts. The circulation of
national banks being redeemable in greenbacks, each bank is required by
law to keep on deposit with the Treasurer legal tenders to the amount of
five per cent. of its outstanding issue as a fund for the redemption of
its notes.

The present law provides for ninety-eight clerks in the agency, ranging
in grade from the messenger to the superintendent. Of this number, those
employed in handling money are divided into two forces, under the
direction, respectively, of the receiving teller and the assorting
teller. The business of the former force is to receive the shipments
coming from the various banks and sub-treasuries for redemption, count
the money, and report the amounts for return remittances; that of the
latter force is to assort the notes and prepare them for delivery to the
Comptroller of the Currency for destruction or to the banks for reissue.
This double process may seem at first sight very simple and easy; but in
fact it is extremely complex and difficult; and the division in which it
is carried on may fairly be counted among the most thoroughly organized
and systematically conducted parts of all the machinery devised by the
Government for the transaction of the manifold public business. And no
wonder, when it is recollected that there are now in circulation nine
denominations of national bank notes, the issue of twenty-three hundred
and forty individual institutions, amounting in the aggregate to three
hundred and twenty millions of dollars; and that every one of these
notes, and every dollar of this total, must ultimately, by those
ninety-eight clerks and their successors, be separated from the mass,
and assigned, under the proper description, with unerring precision,
each to the bank by which that particular unit of this vast volume was
emitted and must be redeemed.

The bulk of the currency sent in for redemption comes through the Adams
Express Company, who have a contract for making all shipments of money
for the Government, and who for convenience have an office in the
basement of the Treasury. The agency occupies four rooms on the main
floor along the west wall, and one on the opposite side of the passage.
Early visitors to that part of the building may have noticed a wooden
box, much resembling a carpenter's tool chest, trundled along upon a
cart by a porter, and followed by a man with a book under his arm. The
box contains the day's delivery of national bank currency for
redemption, ranging ordinarily from half a million to a million and a
half of dollars, and the book contains a receipt for the amount, to be
signed by the receiving clerk of the agency. The money comes in perhaps
a hundred or as high as two hundred and fifty packages, from as many
places throughout the country. On being opened these packages display a
miscellaneous aggregation, of which the following items may be
mentioned: Thousands of notes of all the denominations and all the
banks, perhaps a little soiled, but perfectly sound, and for all the
purposes of currency in as good a condition as when they left the
printers' hands; a somewhat smaller bulk of others in every state of
mutilation and uncleanliness; hundreds, clean, crisp, and unwrinkled,
that have not been counted three times outside of the division of
issues; scores torn, cut, ground, burned, charred, boiled, soaked,
chewed, and digested, until a skilful eye is required to recognize that
they have ever been intended for money; and scattered singly through
this mass, counterfeits, stolen notes, "split" notes, "raised" notes,
and now and then a stray greenback.

The packages, after an entry of them has been made on the books, are
distributed singly among women counters, each of whom gives her receipt.
A counter, upon receiving a package, takes it to her desk, breaks the
seals, and first takes an inventory of the money to see whether the
aggregate of the sums called for by the straps around the various
parcels of notes corresponds with the amount claimed for the whole.
Should she find a discrepancy, she makes a certificate of the difference
for return to the sender. Next she proceeds to count the money,
carefully keeping the notes and straps of each parcel separate. If she
discovers an error of count, she notes upon the strap, over her initials
and the date, the sum which she finds the package to be "over" or
"short." Spurious or other notes, for any reason excluded by the rules,
are thrown out, pinned to the straps in which they came, and returned.
After finishing her count she makes a statement of the amounts of
"overs," "shorts," counterfeits, and other rejected notes, and of the
amount for the credit of the sender, and from this statement return
remittance is made. The next duty of the counter is to assort the notes
into the two classes of such as are unfit for circulation and such as
are fit, and into the various denominations. When a hundred notes of one
denomination and class are counted she surrounds them with a white
strap, on which she pencils her initials and the date. Straps printed
for full packages of a hundred notes of the different denominations are
provided. Less than a hundred notes make a package of "odds." The "odds"
arising from a day's count are delivered to "odd" counters, who mass
them into full packages. Each counter, having finished this portion of
her work, enters, in duplicate, upon a leaf of the blank book furnished
her for this purpose, the various items into which she has divided her
cash, and delivers this with the money to the teller. He takes an
inventory of the amount by straps, and finding the counter's statement
to be correct, tears off the half leaf on which the duplicate account is
made, and signs the original as a receipt. After all the full packages
resulting from the day's count have been delivered in this manner, the
teller makes them up into bundles of ten, or one thousand notes, keeping
each denomination and class separate, and in this shape, on the evening
of the day on which the money was received, they are ready for delivery
to the assorting teller's room. Here the amount is inventoried and
receipted for, and the money is locked up for the night in the iron
portion of one of those wonder-waking safes.

None but the most experienced and skilful counters are employed in this
first process, the responsibility both to the Government and the
employee being too great to be imposed upon any but experts. It will
readily be seen not only that correctness of count is of vital
importance, but also that the knowledge and skill necessary to detect
irredeemable notes are indispensable. A counter, when she puts her
initials upon a package of notes, assumes the responsibility for the
correctness of the amount as shown upon the strap; and any differences,
if against her, will be made good at the end of the month out of her
salary. The degree of accuracy reached by the present force is
surprising considering the bulk of money handled daily. Counterfeits
which, like the fives on the Traders' National Bank of Chicago, the
Hampden of Westfield, Massachusetts, and the Merchants' of New Bedford,
Massachusetts, have passed current all over the country, and become so
worn that some unsuspecting village banker thinks proper to have them
redeemed, are laid aside without a second glance. All the tricks
practised by operators in "queer" are discovered instantly.

Among the means known to these gentry for expanding illegally the value
of genuine currency, that most frequently resorted to is known as
"splitting." Nine notes, for example, of a single denomination, are
taken, and of the first one-tenth is cut off from the upper portion with
a sharp knife by a line parallel to the margin. From the second
two-tenths are cut, and so on, the divisions being made successively
lower by tenths of the width, until from the last note the lower tenth
is cut. The upper portion of the first note is then joined, by pasting,
to the lower portion of the second, the upper portion of the second to
the lower portion of the third, and this plan being carried out with all
the others, the result is the production of ten notes, each of which
lacks one-tenth of its face, but which will pass with little question,
among the inexperienced, at full value. The original notes being,
however, very likely of different banks in several States, one effect of
this operation, in the cases where the lines of division pass through
the titles, is the creation of banks not found on the lists of the
Treasury. When a note of this composition is presented for redemption
the joined portions are separated, and being genuine are treated as
parts of notes, and redeemed accordingly. The rules of the department
applying to national bank currency are that notes lacking less than
two-fifths are redeemed at their face. When more than two-fifths are
missing the amount allowed for is proportionally reduced. The only
exception to this rule is in cases where there is satisfactory evidence
that the missing portion has been destroyed and can never be presented
for redemption.

Another trick of counterfeiters is that of "raising." The original
numerals and letters denoting the value of the note are carefully
scraped off with a sharp instrument. By this means the paper is made
thin, and over the places are pasted the figures and words of a higher
denomination, often so neatly as to defy detection except on critical
examination. Fives are in this way often converted into fifties, and
ones into hundreds. Of course the alteration will readily be discovered
by any one in the habit of handling money. Such notes are redeemed at
the original face value.

But of all irredeemable notes those which appeal most strongly to the
ill feelings of counters are of the description known as "stolen."
Readers of newspapers will doubtless recollect accounts of a heavy
robbery perpetrated not many months ago upon the Northampton National
Bank of Northampton, Massachusetts. Among the booty there secured by the
burglars were one hundred and forty-five new five-dollar notes, of the
issue of that bank, unsigned, which had never been paid over the
counter. The cashier had taken the precaution to make a memorandum of
the numbers printed on the faces, and was therefore enabled to describe
each note as he would his watch taken from his fob by a pickpocket.
Notice was given to the department, and though the notes came in shortly
after by the dozen, it is safe to say that not one has been charged to
the account of the bank. The notes are perfectly genuine, excepting the
signatures; the most skilful expert would hardly discover anything
suspicious in their appearance; the only irregularity connected with
them is the way they were put in circulation. The fact of their
existence renders necessary to every counter who would secure herself
against loss an examination of the numbers printed on every five-dollar
note of that bank passing through her hands; for the bank, never having
issued those stolen, cannot be made to redeem them. Other banks have
currency in circulation upon a similar basis, the number of notes
varying in different instances from one upward. Occasionally a straggler
of this description makes its way some distance into the agency, but it
is sure to be detected sooner or later by some of the many vigilant eyes
under which it must pass--eyes perhaps made all the more vigilant by
costly experience of the consequences of carelessness. Such notes when
discovered to have been redeemed become the property, in exchange for a
like amount in greenbacks, of the person last concerned in their
redemption.

It has been seen that the greater portion of the currency received is
fit for circulation. Out of an aggregate of $176,121,855, assorted
during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1876, $97,478,700 was of this
description, and was returned to the banks for reissue. Originally it
was the expectation that none but worn and mutilated notes would be
offered for redemption, and for a long while all redeemed currency, in
whatever condition, was destroyed, and new issued instead. But the
proportion of sound notes became at length so great that the new plan
was adopted as an evident measure of economy, and now no piece of paper
money is withdrawn from circulation until worn out, unless at the desire
of the bank. Many financial institutions within easy reach of the
capital make a custom of forwarding for redemption all their receipts of
currency for the day, getting in return new notes just from the
printers. This method is pursued as an accommodation to the business
public, who prefer clean and crisp notes; and while a day's deposits of
any large bank must include much currency perhaps just out of the
Treasury, the whole bulk is often shipped off to avoid the labor of
assorting. Besides, remittances for redeemed notes of national banks
being made, if desired, in greenbacks, the agency furnishes a convenient
means to city banks for keeping up their legal tender reserves. Under
the effect of heavy redemptions the condition of the currency of the
country is constantly improving, and the proportion of "fit" notes
received at the agency is gradually increasing.

The next process which the redeemed currency undergoes is that of
assorting, and is carried on in a large room extending through about
one-fourth of the length of the building. Along the walls, on both sides
of an aisle, are arranged three rows of assorters' tills, by means of
which the labor is carried on. These tills are rectangular in shape, and
are divided into fifty-two compartments or "boxes," in four rows of
thirteen each. These boxes are four inches in depth, and a little larger
in length and width than the surface of a note. The tills are mounted at
an inclined angle upon stands, very much like a printer's case. At one
end, attached by a hinged support, is a small table at which the
assorter, seated upon a stool, does his counting and writing, and which,
when not needed for this purpose, is swung underneath the till. A
woven-wire folding screen is fastened to the upper portion of the stand,
and may be locked down over the boxes, or thrown back out of the way.
Padlocks of improved construction are part of the equipment, no two keys
being interchangeable. Below the till is a shelf of the width of the
stand, for the convenience to the assorter next in front. Each till is
supplied with a blank book in duplicate forms for the assorter's
accounts, an array of different  printed straps, a box of bank
pins, and all the appliances necessary for handling money with ease and
rapidity.

For convenience in assorting, the twenty-three hundred and forty banks
are arranged alphabetically, according to the name of their location,
into forty-four groups, which are distinguished numerically, there being
from forty to upward of sixty banks in each group. The operation of
assorting notes into these groups is known as the first assortment; that
of assorting the notes of the groups by individual banks, as the second
assortment. The bundles of redeemed currency, having been passed to the
assorting room, are delivered to the first assortment teller, who
distributes them among the twelve or fifteen first assorters, taking
receipts. Each of these persons carries his money to his till, and after
making an inventory by straps, proceeds to count the notes. He unpins a
package and lays the strap flat on the table before him. If the contents
of that package are found to be correct, he lays the money upon the
strap. The next strap is laid on top of this pile, and so on. By this
method the several packages are kept distinct, and if he afterward finds
an irredeemable note in his money, he may know from whom it comes. All
errors discovered, not only in this process, but in all others, are
required to be reported immediately. Should a package be found "over,"
the assorter makes a memorandum, over his initials and the date, upon
the strap, and returns this with the superfluous note to the teller. The
note is put in the "cash till" to the credit of the counter whose
signature is on the strap. "Short" packages are returned for
verification to the counter, and the deficiency is made good out of the
"cash till" and charged to the counter. Spurious and stolen notes are in
like manner exchanged for genuine. An account is kept of all the
"overs," "shorts," etc., of each person, and on pay day the clerk who
has a preponderance against him will find in the envelope enclosing his
month's salary the superintendent's certificate of the balance "short,"
and any counterfeit or stolen notes found in his straps, reckoned as so
much legal tender. This system is rigidly enforced not only in the
agency, but throughout the department. It seems hard that the penalty of
accident or inexperience should be so summary; but no other means has
yet been devised to secure the Treasury from loss. And after all, the
rule is the same as that enforced in some manner in the outside world of
business, where every one must trust to his own knowledge and skill for
security against loss.

The first assorter having satisfied himself that his money is correct in
amount and passible in character, next proceeds to assort the notes. He
rises from his stool, swings his table out of the way, folds back the
cover of his till, takes up a package and deposits the notes one by one
in the box whose number corresponds to that of the group to which they
severally belong. We will say that long practice has made him familiar
not only with the scheme of the assortment, so that he need not refer to
the printed lists, but also with the face of the notes of every bank in
the country, and that the briefest glance is all that he requires to
recognize a note and determine where it belongs. The rapidity of some of
these assorters is remarkable, being limited only by the rate at which
it is possible to move the hand over the rather large area of a till.
Much, however, depends on the natural aptitudes of the person. Many who
have had no previous experience in handling money never become expert.
They are tried for six months or a year, and then dismissed as
incompetent. Even those by nature well qualified may hope to attain
moderate rapidity only after months of persevering effort.

The manipulations of the beginner often cause much merriment among the
older employees. He has too many fingers, or too few, to fix a secure
grasp upon the "bills." He seizes a note with one or both hands, and
stretching it before him proceeds to read over the face. Then he
resolves himself into a committee of the whole on the state of his till,
to consider where the note is to be put. He refers from the note to the
printed schedule before him, and from the schedule to the note again,
hunts from one side of his till to the other for the box he wants, but
is now uncertain of the number, and recurs once more to the note and the
schedule. At length he cautiously deposits the money in a box.
Presently, after going through this process once or twice more, he is
convinced that he has been wrong. He institutes search throughout his
till to find his note again, and at last this cause of all his
perplexity settles in a box not to be again disturbed until that remote
hour of the day when he shall be ready to "count out." In the evening,
when he is expected to "turn in" his cash, he finds himself from one to
eighty or a hundred notes "over" or "short." His knuckles are more or
less raw from collision with the partitions of his till, his face is
flushed, and his hand trembles. In high excitement, seeing himself
waited for, he takes up a package which he put up for a hundred notes,
but which in his opinion may possibly contain a hundred and eleven or
only ninety-nine. He counts it through with an attempt at aptness, and
as he lays down the last note he whispers "fifty-five." In the end two
or three experts are set to help him, and in a few moments the
inconsiderable number of notes which formed his chaos are reduced to
order. In the later experience of the agency, however, instances of this
extreme bewilderment are rare. Every consideration is shown the
beginner, and the perfect organization of the office enables him to be
led up by the slowest and easiest gradations to the more difficult
labor. Besides, in appointments, which latterly are of infrequent
occurrence, a decided preference is given to bank clerks and others
whose previous training serves in some sort as an education.

When a clerk has finished assorting his cash, he next proceeds to count
out the contents of each box, putting up the notes in packages of even
hundreds of dollars, and pinning round them yellow straps, if he has
unfit money, and pink if fit. On the strap of each package he writes in
pencil the amount, the group number, his initials, and the date. The
notes of all the groups in excess of even hundreds of dollars are thrown
together and finally counted and put up as "odds." This process
complete, the full packages are done up, by means of cardboards and
rubber bands, into bundles of a thousand notes each. The aggregate being
found to correspond with the sum received in the morning, the assorter
enters on his book in duplicate the amount of full packages and of
"odds," and delivers his cash with the book to the first assortment
teller. That clerk makes an inventory of the money by straps, and
finding it to agree with the book, tears off the duplicate entry to
guide him in his own accounts, and puts his initials to the original as
a receipt to the assorter. When all the money put in the hands of the
assorters has been returned in this manner, the total cash is balanced
and locked up until next day. The "odds" arising from the day's work are
kept separate for redistribution among the assorters on the following
morning.

An expert will handle ten thousand notes between the hours of nine and
three, in the manner here described--no light task, for besides the
labor of assorting, every note must be counted twice. Persons of both
sexes are employed at this work, but the physical endurance required
makes it too heavy for women of weak frame.

It will be understood that after passing through the first assorters'
hands the notes are in two lots of "fit" and "unfit," each lot being in
bundles of one thousand notes of one denomination, and each bundle
composed of packages of notes of single groups. The next operation is to
mass all the packages of all denominations composing the day's
assortment by groups. This is done by the first assortment teller, who
distributes the packages on a low table, according to the marks of the
assorters, and straps the packages of each group into a bundle on which
he marks the number of the group and the amount. The distinctions of
"fit" and "unfit" are still maintained. There are then forty-four
bundles of "fit" notes and a like number of "unfit," each bundle
containing all denominations of notes of the banks composing a single
group. In this shape the money is on the day following put in the vault
of the agency. This receptacle is a room whose massive iron walls would
not be likely to tempt burglars even in the most inviting surroundings.
It is situated in the basement of the north wing of the Treasury. The
ponderous double doors are secured by two combination locks of the most
approved construction, one of which is set and can be opened only by the
superintendent and the chief bookkeeper, and the other only by the
assorting teller and his assistant. There is, besides, on the outer door
a chronometer lock which would defy the efforts of all those officials
together, and of all other persons whatsoever until the appointed hour
when the vault is to be opened in the ordinary course of business. Along
the interior of the walls are compartments in which are stored redeemed
notes, those of each group by themselves, until they shall be removed
for assortment by individual banks. The vault usually contains about ten
millions of dollars. The money which we have followed thus far is packed
into a cart and hauled into this place, where it is deposited group by
group with the rest.

It is customary to assort the currency of from one to four groups by
banks each day. Let us follow rapidly one of these groups through the
remainder of the processes. The money of a group accumulated from day to
day in the vault is in the morning transported to the assorting room,
where it is delivered to the second assortment teller. By him the
bundles are opened, the inventory verified, and the packages separated
by denominations, reference being had in this process to the upper note
of each package. The packages of each denomination are then strapped
together by means of cardboards and rubber bands, and the group number,
the denomination, and the amount marked upon each bundle. Next morning
the money is delivered in this shape to the second assorters.

It will be understood that each of these persons thus receives notes of
a single denomination issued by from forty to sixty banks. The second
assorter first counts his money to be sure of the amount, and then
assorts the notes into his till in the manner already described,
putting, however, only the notes of one bank into a box. For his
guidance each assorter is provided with a printed list of the banks
composing his group, the number of the box assigned to each being set
opposite to the title. For convenience of handling about the tills,
these lists are mounted upon thick cardboards. The existence of stolen
notes or counterfeits on a bank is noted upon these lists, and special
directions for assortment are conveyed in the same manner. When a bank
is in liquidation or is withdrawing part of its circulation, an "I,"
denoting "inactive," is set opposite the title. The notes of such banks
are thrown together into box 52, and from this circumstance are known in
the nomenclature of the office as "52's." These are counted together and
put up in packages by means of orange- straps, properly marked
for delivery, through a regular channel, to another division of the
Treasurer's office, where the money is assorted and destroyed and the
amount retired from circulation. At present more than half the banks of
some groups are on the inactive list, and notwithstanding the clamor
from the West for more paper currency, that part of the country is in
the lead in the contraction which is rapidly going on. Of the Chicago
banks, the notes of all but three have been ordered to be destroyed and
withdrawn as they are redeemed, and in St. Louis and St. Paul only a few
banks remain on the active list. Of the eastern cities, New York alone
is pursuing the same line of policy to any considerable extent, more
than half the banks there being either liquidating or reducing their
circulation. The motives which induce this step in the case of solvent
and unembarrassed institutions are diverse; but the effect is always the
same. The amount of currency retired in this manner ranges ordinarily
from twenty thousand to a hundred thousand dollars a day.

The labor of assorting finished, the clerk's next duty is to count up
the money of each bank. In doing this he examines each note to be sure
that they all bear the same title. In some groups great care is
required to ensure correctness in this process. For instance, a clerk
will tell you that there are Springfield banks in every State in the
Union. He exaggerates a little, but group 38 is nevertheless the _bete
noir_ of the assorting room. In the second assortment, as in the first,
even hundreds of dollars make a full package. Notes of active banks are
pinned up, the "fit" in blue straps and the "unfit" in green, each
package marked with the group number, the bank number, the amount, the
assorter's signature, and the date. Notes wrongly grouped are thrown
together and put up in white straps, for return next day to the first
assorter. "Odds" are enveloped in yellow or pink straps, accordingly as
they are "unfit" or "fit," and are ultimately put in the vault until
the group is next brought up for assortment. When the contents of a
till have all been counted out, the assorter's cash is in the four
items of full packages of notes of active banks, "52's," "errors" of
first assortment, and "odds." The money of each of these items is
strapped up in a bundle properly marked, and the amounts entered in the
book. Delivery is made to the second assortment teller in a manner
similar to that already described.

Of course, in a room where one or two millions of dollars are handled
daily, rigid discipline is required to prevent loss through carelessness
or peculation. A clerk on leaving his till must lock up his money. No
assorter is allowed to leave the room during business hours except on a
pass, to be taken up by the doorkeeper. This is obtained from the
superintendent of assorters, who, before issuing it, examines the till
of the applicant to see that everything is in shape. Slips of paper,
perforated by a punch, are the sops which placate the Cerberus of the
agency. Each assorter is provided with a card on which are printed two
sets of numbers, from one to thirty-one, and a certificate that the
holder's cash was properly balanced and his till in order at the close
of business on the day of the month last punched. On this card the
teller, after examining the assorter's money, makes one punch, and the
superintendent of assorters another, after a minute inspection of the
till and its surroundings. Thus the assorter receives the only passport
on which he may leave the office for the day. In the afternoon, when all
the money handled has been deposited in the safes, the superintendent of
the agency makes a tour of all the rooms. The safes are then closed, and
finally the Treasurer tries all the locks.

The work of the second assortment is by most clerks pretty easily
learned, and upon this beginners are usually placed. The mechanical
difficulties are, however, the same as those already noticed in
connection with the first assortment; and speed can be acquired only by
long and diligent practice. The agency offers few attractive positions
to a clerk, whatever his grade. Currency long in circulation becomes so
mutilated as to be difficult to handle. It is soiled and dusty, and
often emits the most disgusting smells. One memorable shipment of
several millions from San Francisco still lingers in the recollection of
the unfortunate clerks, who spit and sneezed over the filthy mass. The
notes were begrimed with every soil of the Pacific <DW72>, and made
odorous by association with every species of vice and uncleanliness to
which human flesh is subject. The labor of the assorter and counter,
even at the best, is severe and unpleasant; while from motives of
economy the task is heaped up to the maximum and the pay cut down to the
minimum.

The next process after assortment is to "make up" all the packages of
all denominations into bundles, each containing only notes of a single
bank. For this purpose the currency of active banks is delivered from
the assorters through the teller to a "maker-up" who takes an inventory.
Next day he assorts the packages of a group in a till similar to those
already described, except that it is laid flat upon a low counter. Then
he takes the contents of a box, ascertains, by examining the upper note
of each package, that the money is all the issue of a single bank, and
writes in ink upon a blank label the title of the bank, the amount of
each denomination, and the total of all, signs and dates this, and
straps it upon the bundle. Having emptied all the boxes of his till in
this manner, he prepares a list of the amount of each bank's money made
up, and verifies his work by comparing the footing with the total
charged to him on the previous evening. This list is delivered to the
bookkeepers, and upon it the accounts of the agency are based. From
motives of saving in express charges, when the total of a bank's
currency in the till is less than five hundred dollars, the money is not
made up, but thrown aside as "odds," together with all excess over even
thousands of dollars, when such excess is less than five hundred. These
"odds" are returned, after account, to the vault. The work of making up
employs from two to four persons constantly. Absolute correctness is of
high importance, and great painstaking is required. Even a moment's
relaxation of attention is likely to produce an error which, if not
discovered, would involve the misplacement of hundreds or thousands of
dollars. Fortunately, the system of checks and proofs is so thorough
that all errors are discovered unfailingly, and the consequences
confined to the agency. The different  straps noticed in use for
packages are but one feature of a general scheme by which currency in
the office is made to indicate, at a glance, its description, proper
place, and future course. The possibility of error or confusion in large
amounts is thus reduced to the last degree. And minute precautions will
hardly be deemed superfluous, when it is considered that all the
processes described in this article are going on simultaneously every
day at the heaped-up tills and counters.

On leaving the hands of the maker-up, the money is taken to the
proving-room. Here the bundles are distributed among a force of women,
who recount all the notes for the purpose of verifying the amount, the
description, and the assortment. If, among the notes of a bank, is found
one of another, the estray is exchanged, through the superintendent of
assorters, for a note of the proper description. The prover, having
ascertained that her money is correct according to the accompanying
label, puts her initials to the latter, as well as upon each package of
notes, wraps and ties the bundle, and carries it to a table, where, in
her presence, the knots are sealed. First, however, the unfit notes are
cancelled by removing a triangular piece from each of the lower corners.
This is done by means of a knife, which is moved by hand with a lever,
which easily cuts through two hundred notes at a time. The sealed
packages are then put in the hands of the delivery clerk. At his counter
the fit parcels are enveloped in a stout outside wrapper and directed to
the various banks whose notes are contained in each. In this shape these
parcels are taken to the office of the Adams Express Company for
shipment. The unfit notes are delivered to the Comptroller of the
Currency, by whose clerks they are again counted. When there is no
longer any possibility of incorrectness either in the amount or the
description, orders are made out for the issue of new currency, and the
redeemed notes are carried to the basement of the Treasury, where they
are put in a machine and reduced to pulp. This product is sold to paper
makers, who, in consideration of its quality, are willing to buy it at a
good price. There is a possibility, therefore, that the banker who
several months ago forwarded his shipment of currency for redemption,
may have the substance of his note return to him in these pages, bearing
this account of the experiences of the journey.

FRANK W. LAUTZ.




UNKNOWN PERSONS.


I was wandering through the Uffizi gallery in Florence one day, with my
guide-book open in my hand, when I met the subjects of this story. They
were by a large window, nine of them, framed in a little gilt frame a
foot or so square. I looked at them, and then, by force of habit, I
looked at the guide-book. "Portraits of nine unknown persons," it said.
I went nearer and looked at them again, and after that I saw the
guide-book no more. They were not portraits or unknown persons, but nine
new friends who told me the story of their lives as I stood by the
window gazing.

There were eight brothers of them, of a noble family, and dwelling in
happy Tuscany. They lived in the country. Their mother was dead--died
when Barnaba first opened his wondering eyes at her. Their father was a
student, and loved his boys, and his books, and nature, and determined
to keep them all together. "If we live in town," he said, "I can't do
this; I am not very rich, so I will remain in my country home, and my
boys and I will have a life of our own." Such a merry, merry life as the
boys had together. Everything was turned to play for them, even their
studies. Their principal delight was acting, and in their little plays,
queer compounds of Grecian dramas and childish dreams, each one had his
regular part. It was Pietro who was always the main figure, made the
grandest speeches, and prayed the longest prayers--for they had
religious dramas sometimes--and strutted around the most. They made
Giuseppe their hero for all that, carried him in on their shoulders from
battle, and crowned him with laurel at the end of the fourth act
regularly. Domenico played the scholar: he had so grave an air, so
learned a mien. Guido was the soldier boy. Let him but throw his cap on
his wavy hair, or toss his coat over his shoulder and strut upon the
mimic stage, and you would have sworn he was armed to the teeth, and
that you could hear the click of his spurs.

How Barnaba loved Guido! How he would twirl his long hair over his
finger secretly, hoping 'twould wave, and try to strut in on the stage
heroically too. But he was sure to blunder a bit, poor Barnaba. He was
the youngest, you see, and had poor parts given him that he didn't suit.
He was not meant for a page, and sometimes, while Pietro would strut
around and puff and declaim, little Barnaba was clenching his nervous
hands tightly behind him, and longing that he might speak out like a man
too. But no one ever dreamed that the stiff little page, with the long
hair and the wondering eyes, had any wishes other than to make a good
page. For Barnaba had a firm mouth, spite of the tremble at the corners,
and it was always readier to shut than to open.

The other three boys, Luigi, Leonardo, and Leone, were good boys and
happy boys, but they were by nature "the populace." They were always
ready to come in on the stage as "the excited crowd" or "the hooting
rabble." They threw up their hats and cried, "Si, si" splendidly, but
then they would cry, "No, no" just as well if it was their part to do
so. So you can see they made a capital populace. Very near them, in a
beautiful villa, there lived for a while in the summer time, once a
little girl. Henrighetta she was called by her friends, but the boys'
father bade them call her la signorina, "because," said he, "it is well
to respect women." "But Henrighetta is only a little girl," said
Barnaba. "Pshaw, she'll be a woman some day," laughed Guido, and twirled
on his toes, "and I'll be a man." And he pulled away at some very
make-believe moustaches, and raised his eyebrows until even his grave
father laughed. For at this time Guido was only eleven and Barnaba
seven. Pietro, the eldest--he was seventeen--very aged indeed, the lads
thought. So Henrighetta became their playmate.

Shortly before she left the villa they had a great play. It was the best
they had ever had. There was a prologue and an epilogue, written and
spoken by Pietro, and ever so much shouting, and a very bloody scene in
which Guido rescued Henrighetta from the ruffians, who were being led by
a traitor page (Barnaba, of course) to kill her for her jewels. "Luigi,"
said Barnaba, "I hate to be mean, even in a play. I wish you would be
the page and let me be a ruffian." Then Luigi laughed hard, and told his
brothers. And they said, "Fancy Barnaba a ruffian," and laughed until
poor Barnaba looked sadder than ever. "Oh, you'll make a real good page,
and you know you have to kiss Henrighetta's long dress," said Guido, as
he whittled a little gun. "So I will," said Barnaba, and was quite
happy.

Now, really Henrighetta was a good deal like other girls, not very
pretty or very wise, but fresh and happy. But with the eight boys she
was a queen indeed--dared even to speak threateningly to Pietro, though
she was but ten years old, and stamped her foot one day at Guido. Oh,
how vexed he was! Yet she was always kind to Barnaba, and on the night
of the play bade him kiss her hand instead of her dress, if he wished.
It was very inappropriate, but Barnaba thought it angelic, and imprinted
just the most serious and tender kiss on Henrighetta's chubby fingers at
the moment when Guido carried her off from her terrible fate. They had
quite an audience that night. Henrighetta's friends were many, and they
all said how beautifully she looked when she was married to Guido at the
close of the play, as she was, of course, with Pietro for a cardinal and
Barnaba as page, to hold up my lady's train.

Well, the boys grew up, and though they wandered off to see the world
and study, they found their way home often and often. Barnaba alone
stayed there all the while. He grew of use to his father in writing,
became his private secretary, and seemed to be as much a part of the
home as the olive grove near by, or the long, shaded walks he loved so
well. Barnaba's hair was as straight as ever, and his white collar grew
crumpled sooner than it ought, and he looked as if he belonged somewhere
else. Observing people wondered sometimes, but only a little, and
Barnaba's brothers would have told you he was a shy, good boy, and his
father would have said the same, and I dare say Barnaba himself might
have replied a little in like manner, had he replied at all. But Barnaba
did not talk much. He read, and dreamed, and walked in the woods.
Sometimes at evening he would take off his cap, and the wind would blow
his hair, and a light would burn in his eyes, and you would have
thought, "Barnaba will do something surely." But he never did.

It was in the summer time, twelve years later than the play time, that
Henrighetta came again to the villa. It was a little dull for her, for
all the boys were away from home but Giuseppe and Barnaba. Giuseppe was
older and angelic. He went to see the poor, and he had written a
beautiful book about the Cross, and he slept in a little room on a hard
bed, and said his prayers a great deal. His brothers would cross
themselves often in speaking of him. "Giuseppe is a holy man," they
would say. There was a verse in Giuseppe's book that Barnaba loved. He
said it often to himself. It was this: "There is a road, and the name of
it is Patience; the flowers that grow by it are few, but they are very
sweet; and if you pluck them and weave them into a crown, the fragrance
shall last for ever."

Barnaba was in the woods one day, saying these words softly to himself,
when the lady Henrighetta approached. She was dressed all in white, and
Barnaba thought her very beautiful and proud. Yet she spoke so sweetly
to him. "Are you not my old friend Barnaba?" she asked. Had he been
patient, and had he plucked one of the rare sweet flowers? It seemed so,
truly. She spoke so sweetly, and she smiled at him, and she seated
herself by him. "I am going to make a wreath for myself," she said,
"while my father talks to your brother near by, and you shall get me
flowers and tell me about your brothers--where you all are and what you
are doing." Such dainty commands! How Barnaba flew for the flowers! How
oddly he looked with his long hair flowing, and his eager hands
clutching up the sweetest herbs, and grasses, and blossoms, all for her.
"May I make your wreath?" he said, for Barnaba knew well what flowers
loved each other.

What a happy Barnaba! How the sun shone, and the trees whispered that
day, and how she talked to him, told him of all the years, of her
travels, for she had seen much, and he sat and listened, and wove the
flowers together, and watched her white hands and her full, soft throat.
And after the lady Henrighetta talked she sang a little. It was such a
fair day, so dreamy, and shady, and restful. She sang scraps of old
Italian songs. When Barnaba had finished the wreath he handed it to her
to place upon her head. "What shall I give you for this?" she said, and
held out her hand. It was only a moment, yet it was a long enough moment
to have placed a kiss upon it, and Barnaba was a man, and Barnaba longed
to do it, but did he dare? While he wondered Giuseppe and her father
joined them, and they all walked home to Henrighetta's together, talking
of the olden times. Then they bade her good-by. She lingered at the
doorway to watch them go. Barnaba looked back once and saw her standing
there, all in white, with the wreath he had made crowning her dark hair.
"And the fragrance shall last for ever," he whispered so softly that
Giuseppe did not hear.

The next day Guido came home. He was a real soldier now, with spurs and
a jaunty cloak, and such a twinkle in his eye and swing in his walk and
laugh in his voice that you longed to see him enter the room, and wished
for him to speak--not that he said so much, but he said it so well. The
quiet home was always changed when Guido arrived. Merry songs were heard
all over the house, horns, and racings, and laughter. And this time
Guido was more than ever gay. He and the lady Henrighetta grew to be
great friends. They would ride and walk, and although there were always
people with them, they seemed to talk for each other all the time, and
to smile for each other all the time. Every one saw it and smiled
too--every one but Barnaba. He was very busy during this while with his
father, correcting proofs for a new book on archaeology.

It was not until twelve long days had gone by that he again saw the lady
Henrighetta. Then he went over one evening to her father's villa, "where
we are to have some plays as we used to do," said Guido. Barnaba's heart
beat hard, and he longed to see the lady Henrighetta again. She was
getting ready for the play. "Barnaba, you are to be page, please," said
Guido, "and hold my lady's train." So Barnaba was page, and the play
began. There were many strange faces and voices in it, and it was a
studied play, each part learned by rote. It did not seem like old times
at all. Barnaba began to feel very far away, when suddenly he was called
to where the lady Henrighetta was, and bidden to follow her as her page.
She greeted him kindly. "All you have to do is to stand by my side," she
said. To stand by her side! And then the curtain rose again, and the
lady Henrighetta, clad in regal robes, sailed forward, and Barnaba, clad
as a page, followed her meekly and stood at her side.

What a little hum there was when she appeared! and when Guido strode
rapidly in toward her and pressed her passionately, how the applause
rang! It was an intense scene, and Guido seemed intensely in earnest.
"How well he plays," thought Barnaba. Then, as Guido looked at
Henrighetta and Henrighetta really blushed a little and dropped her
eyelids, Barnaba's soul rose. It was a strong soul; it was a man's soul;
and it was in a white heat of rage now. If he, the page, had but a sword
to kill him, the lover! Just then he heard a little whisper which the
others did not hear. It was too low. Guido had said, not "Leonora, mia
cara," as the play said, but "Henrighetta, mia cara." There was a sudden
movement on the stage. It was the page who had turned quickly,
frantically. He had nearly reached the door when he turned again and
came back, white but firm, with a strange smile on his lip, and resumed
his place. Guido swore. The pretty tableau was spoiled. I am afraid even
my lady sighed softly, but Barnaba did not know that. She had told him
to stand by her side, and her command must be obeyed.

The scene over, however, Barnaba rushed from the house, out into the
fresh air. He turned and gazed back through the window. There they stood
together, side by side, smiling, happy, Guido and Henrighetta, and here
was poor Barnaba, still in the trappings of livery, with his heart all
torn in his hands. Out in the darkness he dropped his head toward the
earth. Giuseppe saw the face, and came toward him. "What is it,
brother?" asked he softly. "What have you lost?" Barnaba looked up at
him. His brave, firm lips trembled once. "My life," he said; "I have
lost my life." There was a silence. "He that loseth his life shall find
it," said Giuseppe. "These are the words of the Lord." And the two
brothers crossed themselves and walked homeward together in silence.

It was six months after, at the time of the wedding, that the portrait
was painted. Giuseppe is in the centre. The brothers all said 'twas his
place. Pietro has his cowl over his head, you see, but he is fat and
hearty for all that. Domenico leans on a book, as ever, and the populace
smile pleasantly and in a well-bred manner. Guido and his wife are side
by side--the daring, jaunty, happy man and his high-born, full-throated,
soft-eyed wife. And where is Barnaba? Just over her. Below her, even in
the picture, he should have been, he thinks, and beside her, never, but
once, in a play. Dear, poor, brave Barnaba! He has changed in the six
months. His collar is as twisted, his hair as long and straight, and his
eyes as full of wonder; but there are two new turns to his lips--smiling
turns. "I've lost," they seem to say, "and I might have won. Life has
treated me poorly, but I owe her no grudge. Guido and his wife have gone
away. Giuseppe is visiting the poor. Pietro is at his priestly
work--what is it? The others are back in their lives." Barnaba walks in
the grove alone, and repeats to himself: "There is a road, and the name
of it is Patience. The flowers that grow by it are few, but they are
very sweet; and if you pluck them and weave them into a crown, the
fragrance shall last forever." And Barnaba smiles.

MARY MURDOCH MASON.




THE DEAD STAR.


    Yonder in empty dark
      Wanders, somewhere, a wasted sun, whose light,
    Erst breathed abroad with life-creating spark,
      Made hanging gardens of the circling night.

      Through Time's dark emptiness
    Some soul, that genius lit, goes, withered, wan,
    Its flame to blackness fallen, purposeless--
      The dead star wanders with the fire-spent man!

JOHN JAMES PIATT.




THE LONDON THEATRES.


A person taking up his residence in a foreign city is apt, I think, to
become something of a playgoer. In the first place he is usually more
or less isolated, and in the absence of complex social ties the
theatres help him to pass his evenings. But more than this, they offer
him a good deal of interesting evidence upon the manners and customs of
the people among whom he has come to dwell. They testify to the
civilization around him, and throw a great deal of light upon the ways
of thinking, feeling, and behaving of the community. If this exotic
spectator to whom I allude is a person of a really attentive
observation, he may extract such evidence in very large quantities. It
is furnished not by the stage alone, but by the _theatre_ in a larger
sense of the word: by the audience, the attendants, the arrangements,
the very process of getting to the playhouse. The English stage of
to-day, of which I more particularly speak, certainly holds the mirror
as little as possible up to nature--to any nature, at least, usually
recognized in the British islands. Nine-tenths of the plays performed
upon it are French originals, subjected to the mysterious process of
"adaptation"; marred as French pieces and certainly not mended as
English; transplanted from the Gothic soil into a chill and neutral
region where they bloom hardly longer than a handful of cut flowers
stuck into moist sand. They cease to have any representative value as
regards French manners, and they acquire none as regards English; they
belong to an order of things which has not even the merit of being
"conventional," but in which barbarism, chaos, and crudity hold
undisputed sway. The English drama of the last century deserved the
praise, in default of any higher, of being "conventional"; for there
was at least a certain method in its madness; it had its own ideal, its
own foolish logic and consistency. But he would be wise who should be
able to indicate the ideal, artistic and intellectual, of the English
drama of today. It is violently and hopelessly irresponsible. When one
says "English drama" one uses the term for convenience' sake; one means
simply the plays that are acted at the London theatres and transferred
thence to the American. They are neither English nor a drama; they have
not that minimum of ponderable identity at which appreciation finds a
starting-point. As the metaphysicians say, they are simply not
cognizable. And yet in spite of all this, the writer of these lines has
ventured to believe that the London theatres are highly characteristic
of English civilization. The plays testify indirectly if not directly
to the national manners, and the whole system on which play-going is
conducted completes the impression which the pieces make upon the
observer. One can imagine, indeed, nothing more characteristic than
such a fact as that a theatre-going people is hopelessly destitute of a
drama.

I ventured a month ago to record in these pages a few reminiscences of
the Comedie Francaise; and I have a sort of feeling that my readers may,
in the light of my present undertaking, feel prompted to accuse me of a
certain levity. There is a want of delicacy, they may say, in speaking
of the first theatre in the world one day and of the London stage the
next. You must choose, and if you talk about one, you forfeit the right
to talk about the other. But I think there is something to be done in
the way of talking about both, and at all events there are few things it
is not fair to talk about if one does so with a serious desire to
understand. Removing lately from Paris to the British metropolis, I
received a great many impressions--a sort of unbroken chain, in which
the reflections passing through my fancy as I tried the different
orchestra-stalls were the concluding link. The impressions of which I
speak were impressions of outside things--the things with which in a
great city one comes first into contact. I supposed that I had gathered
them once for all in earlier years; but I found that the edge of one's
observation, unlike that of other trenchant instruments, grows again if
one leaves it alone. Remain a long time in any country, and you come to
accept the manners and customs of that country as the standard of
civilization--the normal type. Other manners and customs, even if they
spring from the same soil from which you yourself have sprung, acquire
by contrast an unreasonable, a violent, but often a picturesque relief.
To what one may call a continentalized vision the aspect of English life
seems strange and entertaining; while an Anglicized perception finds,
beyond the narrow channel, even greater matter for wonderment.

The writer of these lines brought with him, at the outset of a dusky
London winter, a continentalized, and perhaps more particularly a
Parisianized, fancy. It was wonderful how many things that I should have
supposed familiar and commonplace seemed strikingly salient and typical,
and how I found, if not sermons in stones and good in everything, at
least examples in porter-pots and reflections in coal-scuttles. In
writing the other day of the Theatre Francais, I spoke of M. Francisque
Sarcey, the esteemed dramatic critic; of the serious and deliberate way
in which he goes to work--of the distance from which he makes his
approaches. During the first weeks I was in London, especially when I
had been to the play the night before, I kept saying to myself that M.
Francisque Sarcey ought to come over and "do" the English theatres.
There are of course excellent reasons why he should not. In the first
place, it is safe to assume that he comprehends not a word of English;
and in the second, it is obligatory to believe that he would, in the
vulgar phrase, not be able to "stand" it. He would probably pronounce
the English stage hopelessly and unmitigably bad and beneath criticism,
and hasten back to Delaunay and Sarah Bernhardt. But if we could suppose
him to fight it out, and give the case a hearing, what a solid
dissertation we should have upon it afterward at the bottom of the
"Temps" newspaper! How he would go into the causes of the badness, and
trace its connections with English civilization! How earnestly he would
expatiate and how minutely he would explain; how fervently he would
point the moral and entreat his fellow countrymen not to be as the
English are lest they should lapse into histrionic barbarism!

I felt, to myself, during these days, in a small way, very much like a
Francisque Sarcey; I don't mean as to the gloominess of my conclusions,
but as to the diffusiveness of my method. A spectator with his senses
attuned to all those easy Parisian harmonies feels himself, in London,
to be in a place in which the drama cannot, in the nature of things,
have a vigorous life. Before he has put his feet into a theatre he is
willing to bet his little all that the stage will turn out to be weak.
If he is challenged for the reasons of this precipitate skepticism, he
will perhaps be at loss to give them; he will only say, "Oh, I don't
know, _cela se seut_. Everything I see is a reason. I don't look out of
the window, I don't ring the bell for some coals, I don't go into an
eating-house to dine, without seeing a reason." And then he will begin
to talk about the duskiness and oppressiveness of London; about the
ugliness of everything that one sees; about beauty and grace being
never attempted, or attempted here and there only to be wofully missed;
about the visible, palpable Protestantism; about the want of expression
in people's faces; about the plainness and dreariness of everything
that is public and the inaccessibility of everything that is private;
about the lower classes being too miserable to know the theatre, and
the upper classes too "respectable" to understand it.

And here, if the audacious person we are conceiving is very far gone,
he will probably begin to talk about English "hypocrisy" and prudery,
and to say that these are the great reason of the feebleness of the
stage. When he approaches the question of English "hypocrisy" you may
know that he is hopelessly Gallicized, or Romanized, or Germanized, or
something of that sort; and indeed his state of mind at this point
strikes me myself with a certain awe. I don't venture to follow him,
and I discreetly give up the attempt. But up to this point I can see
what he may have meant, in the midst of his flippancy, and I remember
how to my own imagination at first everything seemed to hang together,
and theatres to be what they were because somehow the streets, and
shops, and hotels, and eating-houses were what they were. I remember
something I said to myself after once witnessing a little drama of real
life at a restaurant. The restaurant in question is in Piccadilly, and
I am trying to think under which of the categories of our Gallicized
observer it would come. The remarkable facade, covered with gilded
mosaics and lamps, is certainly a concession to the idea of beauty;
though whether it is a successful one is another question. Within it
has, besides various other resources, one of those peculiar refectories
which are known in England as grill-rooms, and which possess the
picturesque feature of a colossal gridiron, astride of a corresponding
fire, on which your chops and steaks are toasted before your eyes. A
grill-room is a bad place to dine, but it is a convenient place to
lunch. It always contains a number of tables, which accommodate not
less than half a dozen persons; small tables of the proper dimensions
for a _tete-a-tete_ being, for inscrutable reasons, wholly absent from
English eating-houses.

The grill-room in question is decorated in that style of which the
animus is to be agreeable to Mr. William Morris, though I suspect that
in the present application of his charming principles he would find a
good deal of base alloy. At any rate, the apartment contains a number
of large medallions in blue pottery, pieced together, representing the
heathen gods and goddesses, whose names are inscribed in crooked
letters in an unexpected part of the picture. This is quite the thing
that one would expect to find in one of those cloisters or pleasances,
or "pleached gardens," in which Mr. Morris's Gothic heroines drag their
embroidered petticoats up and down, as slow-pacedly as their poet
sings. Only, in these pretty, dilettantish cloisters there would
probably be no large tickets suspended alongside of the pictorial
pottery, inscribed with the monstrous words, _Tripe! Suppers!_ This is
one of those queer eruptions of plainness and homeliness which one
encounters at every turn in the midst of the massive luxury and general
expensiveness of England--like the big, staring announcement, _Beds_,
in the coffee-house windows, or _Well-aired Beds_ painted on the side
walls of taverns; or like a list of labels which I noticed the other
day on a series of japanned boxes in a pastry-cook's shop. They seemed
to me so characteristic that I made a note of them.

The reason of my being in the pastry-cook's shop was my having
contracted in Paris the harmless habit of resorting to one of these
establishments at the luncheon hour, for the purpose of consuming a
little _gateau_. Resuming this innocent practice on English soil, I
found it attended with serious difficulties--the chief of which was
that there were no _gateaux_ to consume. An appreciative memory of
those brightly mirrored little shops on the Paris boulevards, in which
tender little tarts, in bewildering variety, are dispensed to you by a
neat-waisted _patissiere_, cast a dusky shadow over the big buns and
"digestive biscuits" which adorn the counter of an English bakery. But
it takes a good while to eat a bun, and while you stand there solemnly
disintegrating your own, you may look about you in search of the
characteristic. In Paris the pastry-cooks' shops are, as the French
say, coquettish--as coquettish as the elegant simplicity of plate
glass, discreet gilding, polished brass, and a demonstrative _dame de
comptoir_ can make them. In London they are not coquettish--witness
the grim nomenclature alluded to above; it was distributed over a
series of green tin cases, ranged behind the counters: Tops and
bottoms--royal digestives--arrow-root--oat-cake--rice biscuit--ratafias.

I took my seat in the grill-room at a table at which three gentlemen
were sitting: two of them sleek British merchants, of a familiar and
highly respectable type, the other a merchant too, presumably, but
neither sleek nor British. He was evidently an American. He was a
good-looking fellow and a man of business, but I inferred from the
tentative, experimental, and even mistrustful manner with which he
addressed himself to the operation of lunching, and observed the
idiosyncrasies of the grill-room, that he found himself for the first
time in England. His experiment, however, if experiment it was, was
highly successful; he made a copious lunch and departed. He had not had
time to reach the door when I perceived one of the British merchants of
whom I just now spoke beginning to knock the table violently with his
knife-handle, and to clamor, "Waiter, waiter! Manager, manager!" The
manager and the waiter hastened to respond, while I endeavored to guess
the motive of his agitation, without connecting it with our late
companion. As I then saw him pointing eagerly to the latter, however,
who was just getting out of the door, I was seized with a mortifying
apprehension that my innocent compatriot was a dissembler and a
pickpocket, and that the English gentleman, next whom he had been
sitting, had missed his watch or his purse. "He has taken one of
these--one of these!" said the British merchant. "I saw him put it into
his pocket." And he held up a bill of fare of the establishment, a
printed card, bearing on its back a  lithograph of the
emblazoned facade that I have mentioned. I was reassured; the poor
American had pocketed this light document with the innocent design of
illustrating his day's adventures to a sympathetic wife awaiting his
return in some musty London lodging. But the manager and the waiter
seemed to think the case grave, and their informant continued to
impress upon them that he had caught the retiring visitor in the very
act. They were at a loss to decide upon a course of action; they
thought the case was bad, but they questioned whether it was bad enough
to warrant them in pursuing the criminal. While this weighty point was
being discussed the criminal escaped, little suspecting, I imagine, the
perturbation he had caused. But the British merchant continued to
argue, speaking in the name of outraged morality. "You know he oughtn't
to have done that--it was very wrong in him to do it. That mustn't be
done, you know, and you know I ought to tell you--it was my duty to
tell you--I couldn't _but_ tell you. He oughtn't to have done it, you
know. I thought I _must_ tell you." It is not easy to point out
definitely the connection between this little episode, for the
triviality of which I apologize, and the present condition of the
English stage; but--it may have been whimsical--I thought I perceived a
connection. These people are too highly moral to be histrionic, I said;
they have too stern a sense of duty.

The first step in the rather arduous enterprise of going to the theatre
in London is, I think, another reminder that the arts of the stage are
not really in the temperament and the manners of the people. This first
step is to go to an agency in an expensive street out of Piccadilly,
and there purchase a stall for the sum of eleven shillings. You receive
your ticket from the hands of a smooth, sleek, bottle-nosed clerk, who
seems for all the world as if he had stepped straight out of a volume
of Dickens or of Thackeray. There is almost always an old lady taking
seats for the play, with a heavy carriage in waiting at the door; the
number of old ladies whom one has to squeeze past in the stalls is in
fact very striking. "Is it good?" asks the old lady of the gentleman I
have described, with a very sweet voice and a perfectly expressionless
face. (She means the play, not the seat.) "It is thought very good, my
lady," says the clerk, as if he were uttering a "response" at church;
and my lady being served, I approach with my humbler petition. The
dearness of places at the London theatres is a sufficient indication
that play-going is not a popular amusement; three dollars is a high
price to pay for the privilege of witnessing any London performance
that I have seen. (One goes into the stalls of the Theatre Francais for
eight francs.) In the house itself everything seems to contribute to
the impression which I have tried to indicate--the impression that the
theatre in England is a social luxury and not an artistic necessity.
The white-cravatted young man who inducts you into your stall, and
having put you into possession of a programme, extracts from you,
masterly but effectually, the sixpence which, as a stranger, you have
wondered whether you might venture to give him, and which has seemed a
mockery of his grandeur--this excellent young man is somehow the
keynote of the whole affair. An English audience is as different as
possible from a French, though the difference is altogether by no means
to its disadvantage. It is much more "genteel"; it is less Bohemian,
less _blase_, more _naif_, and more respectful--to say nothing of being
made up of handsomer people. It is well dressed, tranquil, motionless;
it suggests domestic virtue and comfortable homes; it looks as if it
had come to the play in its own carriage, after a dinner of beef and
pudding. The ladies are mild, fresh  English mothers; they all
wear caps; they are wrapped in knitted shawls. There are many rosy
young girls, with dull eyes and quiet cheeks--an element wholly absent
from Parisian audiences. The men are handsome and honorable looking;
they are in evening dress; they come with the ladies--usually with
several ladies--and remain with them; they sit still in their places,
and don't go herding out between the acts with their hats askew.
Altogether they are much more the sort of people to spend a quiet
evening with than the clever, cynical, democratic multitude that surges
nightly out of the brilliant Boulevards into those temples of the drama
in which MM. Dumas, _fils_, and Sardou are the high priests. But you
might spend your evening with them better almost anywhere than at the
theatre.

As I said just now, they are much more _naif_ than Parisian
spectators--at least as regards being amused. They cry with much less
facility, but they laugh more freely and heartily. I remember nothing
in Paris that corresponds with the laugh of the English gallery and
pit--with its continuity and simplicity, its deep-lunged jollity and
its individual guffaws. But you feel that an English audience is
intellectually much less appreciative. A Paris audience, as regards
many of its factors, is cynical, skeptical, indifferent; it is so
intimately used to the theatre that it doesn't stand on ceremony; it
yawns, and looks away and turns its back; it has seen too much, and it
knows too much. But it has the critical and the artistic sense, when
the occasion appeals to them; it can judge and discriminate. It has the
sense of form and of manner; it heeds and cares how things are done,
even when it cares little for the things themselves. Bohemians,
artists, critics, connoisseurs--all Frenchmen come more or less under
these heads, which give the tone to a body of Parisian spectators.
These do not strike one as "nice people" in the same degree as a
collection of English patrons of the drama--though doubtless they have
their own virtues and attractions; but they form a natural, sympathetic
public, while the English audience forms only a conventional,
accidental one. It may be that the drama and other works of art are
best appreciated by people who are not "nice"; it may be that a lively
interest in such matters tends to undermine niceness; it may be that,
as the world grows nicer, various forms of art will grow feebler. All
this _may_ be; I don't pretend to say it is; the idea strikes me _en
passant_.

In speaking of what is actually going on at the London theatres I
suppose the place of honor, beyond comparison, belongs to Mr. Henry
Irving. This gentleman enjoys an esteem and consideration which, I
believe, has been the lot of no English actor since Macready left the
stage, and he may at the present moment claim the dignity of being a
bone of contention in London society second only in magnitude to the
rights of the Turks and the wrongs of the Bulgarians. I am told that
London is divided, on the subject of his merits, into two fiercely
hostile camps; that he has sown dissension in families, and made old
friends cease to "speak." His appearance in a new part is a great event;
and if one has the courage of one's opinion, at dinner tables and
elsewhere, a conversational godsend. Mr. Irving has "created," as the
French say, but four Shakespearian parts; his Richard III. has just been
given to the world. Before attempting Hamlet, which up to this moment
has been his great success, he had attracted much attention as a
picturesque actor of melodrama, which he rendered with a refinement of
effect not common upon the English stage. Mr. Irving's critics may, I
suppose, be divided into three categories: those who justify him in
whatever he attempts, and consider him an artist of unprecedented
brilliancy; those who hold that he did very well in melodrama, but that
he flies too high when he attempts Shakespeare; and those who, in vulgar
parlance, can see nothing in him at all.

I shrink from ranging myself in either of these divisions, and indeed I
am not qualified to speak of Mr. Irving's acting in general. I have
seen none of his melodramatic parts; I do not know him as a comedian--a
capacity in which some people think him at his best; and in his
Shakespearian repertory I have seen only his Macbeth and his Richard.
But judging him on the evidence of these two parts, I fall hopelessly
among the skeptics. Mr. Henry Irving is a very convenient illustration.
To a stranger desiring to know how the London stage stands, I should
say, "Go and see this gentleman; then tell me what you think of him."
And I should expect the stranger to come back and say, "I see what you
mean. The London stage has reached that pitch of mediocrity at which
Mr. Henry Irving overtops his fellows--Mr. Henry Irving figuring as a
great man--_c'est tout dire_." I hold that there is an essential truth
in the proverb that there is no smoke without fire. No reputations are
altogether hollow, and no valuable prizes have been easily won. Of
course Mr. Irving has a good deal of intelligence and cleverness; of
course he has mastered a good many of the mysteries of his art. But I
must nevertheless declare that for myself I have not mastered the
mystery of his success. His defects seem to me in excess of his
qualities and the lessons he has not learned more striking than the
lessons he has learned.

That an actor so handicapped, as they say in London, by nature and
culture should have enjoyed such prosperity, is a striking proof of the
absence of a standard, of the chaotic condition of taste. Mr. Irving's
Macbeth, which I saw more than a year ago and view under the
mitigations of time, was not pronounced one of his great successes; but
it was acted, nevertheless, for many months, and it does not appear to
have injured his reputation. Passing through London, and curious to
make the acquaintance of the great English actor of the day, I went
with alacrity to see it; but my alacrity was more than equalled by the
vivacity of my disappointment. I sat through the performance in a sort
of melancholy amazement. There are barren failures and there are
interesting failures, and this performance seemed to me to deserve the
less complimentary of these classifications. It inspired me, however,
with no ill will toward the artist, for it must be said of Mr. Irving
that his aberrations are not of a vulgar quality, and that one likes
him, somehow, in spite of them. But one's liking takes the form of
making one wish that really he had selected some other profession than
the histrionic. Nature has done very little to make an actor of him.
His face is not dramatic; it is the face of a sedentary man, a
clergyman, a lawyer, an author, an amiable gentleman--of anything other
than a possible Hamlet or Othello. His figure is of the same cast, and
his voice completes the want of illusion. His voice is apparently
wholly unavailable for purposes of declamation. To say that he speaks
badly is to go too far; to my sense he simply does not speak at all--in
any way that, in an actor, can be called speaking. He does not pretend
to declaim or dream of declaiming. Shakespeare's finest lines pass from
his lips without his paying the scantiest tribute to their quality. Of
what the French call _diction_--of the art of delivery--he has
apparently not a suspicion. This forms three-fourths of an actor's
obligations, and in Mr. Irving's acting these three-fourths are simply
cancelled. What is left to him with the remaining fourth is to be
"picturesque"; and this even his partisans admit he has made his
specialty. This concession darkens Mr. Irving's prospects as a
Shakespearian actor. You can play hop-scotch on one foot, but you
cannot cut with one blade of a pair of scissors, and you cannot play
Shakespeare by being simply picturesque. Above all, before all, for
this purpose you must have the art of utterance; you must be able to
give value to the divine Shakespearian line--to make it charm our ears
as it charms our mind. It is of course by his picturesqueness that Mr.
Irving has made his place; by small ingenuities of "business" and
subtleties of action; by doing as a painter does who "goes in" for
color when he cannot depend upon his drawing. Mr. Irving's color is
sometimes pretty enough; his ingenuities and subtleties are often
felicitous; but his picturesqueness, on the whole, strikes me as dry
and awkward, and, at the best, where certain essentials are so
strikingly absent, these secondary devices lose much of their power.

Mr. Fechter in Hamlet was preponderantly a "picturesque" actor; but he
had a certain sacred spark, a heat, a lightness and suppleness, which
Mr. Irving lacks; and though, with his incurable foreign accent, he
could hardly be said to _declaim_ Shakespeare in any worthy sense, yet
on the whole he spoke his part with much more of the positively
agreeable than can possibly belong to the utterance of Mr. Irving. His
speech, with all its fantastic Gallicisms of sound, was less foreign
and more comprehensible than that strange tissue of arbitrary
pronunciations which floats in the thankless medium of Mr. Irving's
harsh, monotonous voice. Richard III. is of all Shakespeare's parts the
one that can perhaps best dispense with declamation, and in which the
clever inventions of manner and movement in which Mr. Irving is
proficient will carry the actor furthest. Accordingly, I doubt not, Mr.
Irving is seen to peculiar advantage in this play; it is certainly a
much better fit for him than Macbeth. He has had the good taste to
discard the vulgar adaptation of Cibber, by which the stage has so long
been haunted, and which, I believe, is played in America to the
complete exclusion of the original drama. I believe that some of the
tenderest Shakespearians refuse to admit the authenticity of "Richard
III."; they declare that the play has, with all its energy, a sort of
intellectual grossness, of which the author of "Hamlet" and "Othello"
was incapable. This same intellectual grossness is certainly very
striking; the scene of Richard's wooing of Lady Ann is a capital
specimen of it. But here and there occur passages which, when one hears
the play acted, have all the vast Shakespearian sense of effect.

    ----To hear the piteous moans that Edward made
    When black-faced Clifford shook his sword at him.

It is hard to believe that Shakespeare did not write that. And when
Richard, after putting an end to Clarence, comes into Edward IV.'s
presence, with the courtiers ranged about, and announces hypocritically
that Providence has seen fit to remove him, the situation is marked by
one or two speeches which are dramatic as Shakespeare alone is dramatic.
The immediate exclamation of the Queen--

    All-seeing heaven, what a world is this!

--followed by that of one of the gentlemen--

    Look _I_ so pale, Lord Dorset, as the rest?

--such touches as these, with their inspired vividness, seem to belong
to the brushwork of the master. Mr. Irving gives the note of his
performance in his first speech--the famous soliloquy upon "the winter
of our discontent." His delivery of these lines possesses little but
hopeless staginess and mannerism. It seems indeed like staginess gone
mad. The spectator rubs his eyes and asks himself whether he has not
mistaken his theatre, and stumbled by accident upon some prosperous
burlesque. It is fair to add that Mr. Irving is here at his worst, the
scene offering him his most sustained and exacting piece of
declamation. But the way he renders it is the way he renders the whole
part--slowly, draggingly, diffusively, with innumerable pauses and
lapses, and without a hint of the rapidity, the intensity and _entrain_
which are needful for carrying off the improbabilities of so explicit
and confidential a villain and so melodramatic a hero.

Just now, when a stranger in London asks where the best acting is to be
seen, he receives one of two answers. He is told either at the Prince
of Wales's theatre or at the Court. Some people think that the last
perfection is to be found at the former of these establishments, others
at the latter. I went first to the Prince of Wales's, of which I had a
very pleasant memory from former years, and I was not disappointed. The
acting is very pretty indeed, and this little theatre doubtless
deserves the praise which is claimed for it, of being the best
conducted English stage in the world. It is, of course, not the Comedie
Francaise; but, equally of course, it is absurd talking or thinking of
the Comedie Francaise in London. The company at the Prince of Wales's
play with a finish, a sense of detail, what the French call an
_ensemble_, and a general good grace, which deserve explicit
recognition. The theatre is extremely small, elegant, and expensive,
the company is very carefully composed, and the scenery and stage
furniture lavishly complete. It is a point of honor with the Prince of
Wales's to have nothing that is not "real." In the piece now running at
this establishment there is a representation of a boudoir very
delicately appointed, the ceiling of which is formed by festoons of old
lace suspended tent fashion or pavilion fashion. This lace, I am told,
has been ascertained, whether by strong opera glasses or other modes of
inquiry I know not, to be genuine, ancient, and costly. This is the
very pedantry of perfection, and makes the scenery somewhat better than
the actors. If the tendency is logically followed out, we shall soon be
having Romeo drink real poison and Medea murder a fresh pair of babes
every night.

The Prince of Wales's theatre, when it has once carefully mounted a
play, "calculates," I believe, to keep it on the stage a year. The play
of the present year is an adaptation of one of Victorien Sardou's
cleverest comedies--"Nos Intimes"--upon which the title of "Peril" has
been conferred. Of the piece itself there is nothing to be said; it is
the usual hybrid drama of the contemporary English stage--a firm, neat
French skeleton, around which the drapery of English conversation has
been adjusted in awkward and inharmonious folds. The usual feat has been
attempted--to extirpate "impropriety" and at the same time to save
interest. In the extraordinary manipulation and readjustment of French
immoralities which goes on in the interest of Anglo-Saxon virtue, I have
never known this feat to succeed. Propriety may have been saved, in an
awkward, floundering, in-spite-of-herself fashion, which seems to do to
something in the mind a violence much greater than the violence it has
been sought to avert; but interest has certainly been lost. The only
immorality I know on the stage is the production of an ill-made play;
and a play is certainly ill made when the pointedness of the framework
strikes the spectator as a perpetual mockery upon the flatness of the
"developments." M. Sardou's perfectly improper but thoroughly
homogeneous comedy has been flattened and vulgarized in the usual way;
the pivot of naughtiness on which the piece turns has been "whittled"
down to the requisite tenuity; the wicked little Jack-in-the-Box has
popped up his head only just in time to pull it back again. The
interest, from being intense, has become light, and the play, from being
a serious comedy, with a flavor of the tragic, has become an elaborate
farce, salted with a few coarse grains of gravity. It is probable,
however, that if "Peril" were more serious, it would be much less
adequately played.

The Prince of Wales's company contains in the person of Miss Madge
Robertson (or Mrs. Kendal, as I believe she is nowadays called) the most
agreeable actress on the London stage. This lady is always pleasing, and
often charming; but she is more effective in gentle gayety than in
melancholy or in passion. Another actor at the Prince of Wales's--Mr.
Arthur Cecil--strikes me as an altogether superior comedian. He plays in
"Peril" (though I believe he is a young man) the part of a selfish,
cantankerous, querulous, jaundiced old East Indian officer, who has come
down to a country house to stay, under protest, accompanied by his only
son, a stripling in roundabouts, whom he is bringing up in ignorance of
the world's wickedness, and who, finding himself in a mansion well
supplied with those books which no gentleman's library should be
without, loses no time in taking down Bocaccio's "Decameron." Mr. Arthur
Cecil represents this character to the life, with a completeness, an
extreme comicality, and at the same time a sobriety and absence of
violence which recalls the best French acting. Especially inimitable is
the tone with which he tells his host, on his arrival, how he made up
his mind to accept his invitation: "So at last I said to Percy, 'Well,
Percy, my child, we'll go down and have done with it!'"

At the Court theatre, where they are playing, also apparently by the
year, a "revived" drama of Mr. Tom Taylor--"New Men and Old Acres"--the
acting, though very good indeed, struck me as less finished and, as a
whole, less artistic. The company contains, however, two exceptionally
good actors. One of them is Mr. Hare, who leads it, and who, although
nature has endowed him with an almost fatally meagre stage presence, has
a considerable claim to be called an artist. Mr. Hare's special line is
the quiet natural, in high life, and I imagine he prides himself upon
the propriety and good taste with which he acquits himself of those
ordinary phrases and light modulations which the usual English actor
finds it impossible to utter with any degree of verisimilitude. Mr.
Hare's companion is Miss Ellen Terry, who is usually spoken of by the
"refined" portion of the public as the most interesting actress in
London. Miss Terry is picturesque; she looks like a pre-Raphaelitish
drawing in a magazine--the portrait of the crop-haired heroine in the
illustration to the serial novel. She is intelligent and vivacious, and
she is indeed, in a certain measure, interesting. With great frankness
and spontaneity, she is at the same time singularly delicate and
lady-like, and it seems almost impertinent to criticise her harshly. But
the favor which Miss Terry enjoys strikes me, like that under which Mr.
Henry Irving has expanded, as a sort of measure of the English critical
sense in things theatrical. Miss Terry has all the pleasing qualities I
have enumerated, but she has, with them, the defect that she is simply
_not_ an actress. One sees it sufficiently in her face--the face of
a clever young Englishwoman, with a hundred merits, but not of a
dramatic artist. These things are indefinable; I can only give my
impression.

Broadly comic acting, in England, is businesslike, and high tragedy is
businesslike; each of these extremes appears to constitute a trade--a
_metier_, as the French say--which may be properly and adequately
learned. But the acting which covers the middle ground, the acting of
serious or sentimental comedy and of scenes that may take place in
modern drawing-rooms--the acting that corresponds to the contemporary
novel of manners--seems by an inexorable necessity given over to
amateurishness. Most of the actors at the Prince of Wales's--the young
lovers, the walking and talking gentlemen, the housekeeper and young
ladies--struck me as essentially amateurish, and this is the impression
produced by Miss Ellen Terry, as well as (in an even higher degree) by
her pretty and sweet-voiced sister, who plays at the Haymarket. The art
of these young ladies is awkward and experimental; their very speech
lacks smoothness and firmness.

I am not sorry to be relieved, by having reached the limits of my space,
from the necessity of expatiating upon one of the more recent theatrical
events in London--the presentation, at the St. James's theatre, of an
English version of "Les Danicheff." This extremely picturesque and
effective play was the great Parisian success of last winter, and during
the London season the company of the Odeon crossed the channel and
presented it with an added brilliancy. But what the piece has been
reduced to in its present form is a theme for the philosopher. Horribly
translated and badly played, it retains hardly a ray of its original
effectiveness. There can hardly have been a better example of the
possible infelicities of "adaptation." Nor have I the opportunity of
alluding to what is going on at the other London theatres, though to all
of them I have made a conscientious pilgrimage. But I conclude my very
desultory remarks without an oppressive sense of the injustice of
omission. In thinking over the plays I have listened to, my memory
arrests itself with more kindness, perhaps, than elsewhere, at the
great, gorgeous pantomime given at Drury Lane, which I went religiously
to see in Christmas week. They manage this matter of the pantomime very
well in England, and I have always thought Harlequin and Columbine the
prettiest invention in the world. (This is an "adaptation" of an Italian
original, but it is a case in which the process has been completely
successful.) But the best of the entertainment at Drury Lane was seeing
the lines of rosy child faces in the boxes, all turned toward the stage
in one round-eyed fascination. English children, however, and their
round-eyed rosiness, would demand a chapter apart.

H. JAMES, JR.




SOUNDING BRASS.

BEING A RIGHTE TRUTHFULL HISTORIE OF YE ANCIENT TIME.


"Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not
charity"--which is love--"I am become as sounding brass or a tinkling
cymbal."

It was Sergeant Wright who repeated the words thoughtfully to himself,
nearly two hundred years ago, while his gaze was riveted upon the
glowing rim and cavernous hollow of a ponderous brazen object. It was
not a bell, though there was metal enough in it to have formed a very
respectable one for the village church.

At that early day bells were not common in New England; in the seaport
towns, that formed the colony of Plymouth, the faithful were summoned
to church by the blowing of a conch shell; at other towns there are
records of a "_peece_" being fired, or of a drummer being paid to beat
a reveille for sleepy souls. In Deerfield, where the events we are
about to chronicle took place, the practice seems to have been to
simply hoist a flag at the time appointed for public service. Any of
these means, except the drum, appears on some accounts preferable to
the modern church bell. To any one who has resided in a Catholic
country, where the ringing of bells, from matins to vespers, is
incessant, to one with recent memories of college days, of being rung
up in the morning before having his sleep out, rung to prayers before
he had finished his breakfast, rung to recitation before he had
mastered his lesson, and rung to bed before reaching the "Yours
_truly_" of his love letter, the Sabbath bell is not likely to suggest
ideas of a devotional character. After all, is it not essentially a
relic of barbarism, a pagan institution like the beating of gongs in
the Chinese ceremony of chinchinning the moon? The blowing of the conch
shell is not open to the objection of degrading association; it must
have called to mind the trumpets and rams' horns in the awe-inspiring
Hebrew ceremonial. Fancy instead of the ding-dong of sounding brass in
most village churches, that can sometimes hardly be distinguished from
the locomotive bell, the clear liquid notes of a silver bugle, similar
in character to one of the musical infantry calls, flung by the echoes
from hill to hill, and dying faintly away over the meadows and along
the river. Even the custom of firing a cannon, one great noise, heard
at the furthest boundaries of the parish, and then done with, would be
better than the continual repetition of the strokes of a bell, now
violent and quick, as though calling out all the hose and hook and
ladder companies of the fire department, now slowly dying away,
tantalizing the listener with the expectation that now at last they are
really going to cease, only to bitterly disappoint him by breaking out
again with renewed clamor. Most beautiful of all must have been the
silent lifting of the flag, a symbol which evangelist Bliss has taken
from the signal service in "Hold the Fort":

    Wave the answer back to heaven,
    By Thy grace we will.

And how popular such a summons would be with the ungodly--leaving them
in peace to enjoy their Sunday morning nap!

But we are wandering from our subject. Suffice it to say that the object
of sounding brass into which Sergeant Wright was looking was not a bell.
Neither was it a cannon, for a howitzer of that calibre, or a few
smaller pieces of sounding brass, would have prevented the sad tragedy
of the Indian captivity, and in that case the events herein chronicled
would never have transpired. Sergeant Judah Wright was looking at Mr.
Hoyt's brass kettle. He was billetted upon the family, and had so won
the hearts of all but the mother, by his ready helpfulness and
kindliness of manner, that they had come to consider him as one of their
own number, and had almost forgotten the arbitrary way in which their
acquaintance had begun. His frequent presence in the kitchen, and
assistance in the labors of the family, was not, however, altogether of
a disinterested nature, being prompted by the same feeling that caused
Jacob's fourteen years of servitude for Rachel to seem but a day--"the
love he bore her."

If Jean Ingelow had lived and written at that time, the Sergeant might
have borrowed a verse or two to explain his love for Goodman Hoyt's
kitchen:

    For there his oldest daughter stands,
    With downcast eyes and skilful hands,
        Before her ironing board.

    She comforts all her mother's days,
    And with her sweet, obedient ways
        She makes her labor light:

    So sweet to hear, so fair to see!
    Oh, she is much too good for me,
        That lovely Mary Hoyt.

    She has my heart, sweet Mary Hoyt:
    I'll e'en go sit again to-night
        Beside her ironing board!

Ah, that flat-iron! It was while beneath her deft fingers it passed
swiftly over the smoking linen, that "the iron entered his soul"; iron,
we mean, of the nature from which Cupid forges his arrow-heads.

Matters came to a crisis in the spring of 1703. The family had "gone
a-sugaring" in Mr. Hoyt's "plantation" of maples, and the Sergeant and
Mary had been left to watch the great kettle of sap as it seethed and
boiled over the coals. The text which heads our story was one from which
the Rev. John Williams had preached on the preceding Sunday, and the
sermon had been the subject of conversation that day.

"I fear me much that thou art but as that kettle, Judah," was the remark
of Goodwife Hoyt as she moved away after another bucket of sap--"mere
sounding brass and a tinkling cowbell!"

Roguish Sally Hoyt, the younger sister of modest Mary, could not forbear
a saucy fling at the lovers.

"Yea, Judah, art thou like the kettle," she said, striking it a rap with
the paddle with which she was stirring its contents. But the kettle,
full to the brim of syrup, failed to respond with its usual resonant
ring. "Hearest thou, Sergeant? It is no more 'sounding brass,' the
reason thereof being that it is so filled with fire and sweetness that
it can hold no more. The same being a token, brethren, as our godly
pastor would say, that the heart of our beloved brother Sergeant Wright
is so filled with that charity which is love, that he hath lost his
proper and natural brazen-facedness, and can no more convey the
knowledge of his condition to the lady of his choice than can this
kettle utter the clamor which is natural unto it."

"Go thy ways for a saucy hussy," exclaimed Mary, with sudden
consciousness, and with a mocking laugh the merry girl was gone. But the
fat was in the fire, and when Goodwife Hoyt returned with more sap, she
found the syrup there too, and the Sergeant kissing the unresisting Mary
behind a neighboring maple. For which wanton proceeding the good woman,
since she could not banish him from her family, sent away her daughter
to dwell with a distant relative, saying ere she went:

"I do prophesy that this silly affection will presently fail; so long as
I have a tongue in my mouth I will speak against it, for the knowledge
that I have of Sergeant Wright tendeth not to edifying."

The Sergeant did not reply verbally; but when Mary in her exile opened
her Bible to the chapter containing the text which had led to a
declaration, she was attracted by another which bore marginal notes in a
well known hand and which seemed to answer for him:

"Charity," which is love, "_never_ faileth; but whether there be
_prophecies_, they shall fail; whether there be _tongues_, they shall
cease; whether there be _knowledge_, it shall vanish away."

Time passed on, and one winter's night the French and Indians burst upon
the little town of Deerfield, and carried it away captive. The last
sight that the Sergeant caught through the open kitchen door was of the
great brass kettle which he and Mr. Hoyt had the night before filled
with wort or new beer, standing by the side of Mary's ironing-board;
then the blazing timbers fell over both with a deafening crash, and he
was marched away with pinioned arms.

The horrors of that captivity are too well known to need repetition.
Through them all Sergeant Wright, by his manly heroism and patient
endurance, his care for Sally, and filial devotion to Mrs. Hoyt, at last
so won her unwilling heart that she was constrained to admit that the
old prejudicial knowledge which she had of him had vanished away.

The efforts put forth by the French to induce the captives to remain in
Canada are notorious. A young French officer having fallen in love with
Sally Hoyt, a Jesuit priest endeavored to persuade her to the marriage.
After a sermon from the texts Deuteronomy xxi., 10-13: "When thou goest
forth to war against thine enemies, and the Lord thy God hath delivered
them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them captive, and seest among
the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire that thou wouldest
have her to thy wife, then she ... shall remain in thine house, and thou
shalt be her husband and she shall be thy wife," and 1 Timothy v., 14:
"I will, therefore, that the younger women marry," etc., he addressed
her personally before the congregation. Sally, remembering how her
random shaft had in time past stirred up Sergeant Wright to an
expression of his feelings, and having in mind a bashful lover, a
certain shock-headed Ebenezer Nims, more generally known as "the Nims
boy," for whom she had an inexplicable good will and who had been
"captivated with her," as the ancient chronicle stated with more truth
than it knew, answered adroitly that she had no ill will toward marriage
as a state, but that she preferred to wed with one of her own people,
and requested that "inquisition should be made" whether there were not
one willing to become her husband among the captives. A cold shudder ran
down Sergeant Wright's spinal column. Who could the child mean but him?
Had she misinterpreted his brotherly care and affection? And yet she
knew of his love for her sister. It was with a great sigh of relief that
he saw "the Nims boy" suddenly start from his seat, a timid, shrinking
boy no longer, but transformed on the instant by the girl's challenge to
as brave a knight as ever tilted in tourney for lady's love, and running
the gauntlet of the eyes of friend and foe, place himself at her side.

The wily Jesuit was caught in his own toils; he acknowledged it by
marrying them upon the spot, and adding by way of benediction to the
usual Latin formula--"Mulier hominis confusio est."

When the younger sister marries before the elder it is the custom, in
some parts of the country, to bring in the brass kettle and make the
slighted one dance in it. Neither sister nor kettle were present on this
occasion, but the time was not far distant when both would be found
again. The captives were to be returned. Sergeant Wright had believed
all along, in spite of the mountains of difficulty in the way, that this
would be; and yet he said to himself on that homeward march, "Though I
have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity,"
which is love, "it profiteth me nothing." And in the joy of their first
meeting, the only words that Mary Hoyt could utter were: "Charity
suffereth long--beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all
things, endureth all things; charity _never_ faileth."

On their wedding day they visited the site of the old homestead. There,
in the hollow that had been the cellar, lay the old brass kettle, and in
it a flat-iron that had fallen off Mary's ironing-board. The wort with
which the kettle had been filled had prevented it from entirely melting,
and since she could not dance in it at her sister's wedding, she was
lifted in it now by her husband and danced in it at her own.

The kettle has been preserved as a relic by the Wright family. It hangs
in the upper part of the old mansion, and is so arranged that by pulling
a cord below, the flat iron strikes against it, and so awakens the
servants. And this story, which began with a tirade against bells, ends
in finding its beloved kettle transformed into one; yet to the whole
line and genealogy of the Wrights, by whom it has been cherished, it has
brought its blessing of faith and hope, and though but a bit of sounding
brass, yet in all its history to these presents it lacketh not that
charity which is love.

LIZZIE W. CHAMPNEY.




A ROMAN PICTURE.


    Close to the window I wheel my chair,
      In the afternoon, when my work is done,
    To get my breath of the scented air,
      To take my share of the Roman sun:
    The air that, over yon mossy wall,
      Brings me the sweetness of orange bloom,
    The sun whose going carries us all
      Out of a glory into a gloom.

    Calm in the light of the waning day,
      And peaceful, the convent garden lies;
    There, on the hillside cold and gray,
      The frowning walls and the old towers rise.
    To and fro in the wind's soft breath
      The bending ivy sways and swings;
    To and fro on the <DW72> beneath
      The Roman pine its shadow flings.

    To and fro the white clouds drift
      Over the old roof gray with moss,
    Over the sculptured saints that lift
      Each to the sky his marble cross,
    Over the stern old belfry tower,
      Where, from its prison house of stone,
    A pale-faced clock marks hour by hour
      The changes that the years have shown.

    Free glad birds this prison share,
      White doves in this old tower dwell.
    Not for them the call to prayer,
      Not for them the warning bell.
    As they flit about the eaves,
      How their white wings catch the sun!
    While below through orange leaves
      Gleams the white cap of the nun.

    Spotless kerchief, gown of gray,
      Forehead wrapped in band of white:
    These must labor, watch, and pray,
      These must keep the cross in sight;
    These are they who walk apart,
      Who, with purpose undefiled,
    Seek to fill a woman's heart
      Without home or love or child.

    Is it true that many hands
      Find that rosary a chain?
    True that 'neath these snowy bands
      Throbs, full oft, a restless brain?
    True that simple robe of gray
      Covers oft a troubled breast?
    True that pain and passion's sway
      Enters even to this rest?

    True, that at their holiest shrine,
      In their hours of greatest good,
    Comes to them a voice divine,
      Of a sweeter womanhood?
    It may be--how can _I_ tell
      Who, outside the garden wall,
    Only hear the convent bell.
      Only see the shadows fall?

MARY LOWE DICKINSON.




ENGLISH WOMEN.


The consideration of the interesting subject which I now take up is not
new to me. Long ago I found myself thinking about it when occasion to do
so presented itself; and in this I was helped by the views of English
society presented in the literature of the day, some of the most
interesting studies of which are furnished in the novels written by
Englishwomen. Indeed, the whole subject of English life and character
has long been of the profoundest interest to me; and a recent visit to
England is rather the occasion than the cause of much of what I shall
write upon it. To say this is due to myself if not to my readers.[1]

      [1] My article in the April number of "The Galaxy" happened to be
      sent in without a title; and in hastily adding that with which it
      appeared both the editor and myself forgot for the moment that it
      was the title of Mr. Emerson's well-known book. My silent adoption
      of it was an unintentional violation of courtesy which I regret.

One day a lady whom I had had the pleasure of taking in to dinner in a
country house near London, and whom I had soon found to be one of those
simple-minded, good-natured, truth-telling women who are notably common
in England, spoke to me about some ladies who on a previous day had
attracted her attention, adding, "I knew they were Americans." "How?" I
asked. "Oh, we always know American women!" "But how, pray?" She thought
a moment, and answered: "By their beauty--they are almost always pretty,
if not more--by their fine complexions, and by their exquisite dress." I
did not tell her that I thought that she was right; but that she was so
I had by that time become convinced. And yet I should say that the most
beautiful women I had ever seen were Englishwomen, were it not for the
memory of a Frenchwoman, a German, and a Czech. But the latter three
were rare exceptions. Beauty is very much commoner among women of the
English race than among those of any other with which I am acquainted;
and among that race it is commoner in "America" than in England. I saw
more beauty of face and figure at the first two receptions which I
attended after my return than I had found among the hundreds of
thousands of women whom I had seen in England.

The types are the same in both countries; but they seem to come near to
perfection much oftener here than there. Beauty of feature is, however,
sometimes more clearly defined in England than here. The mouth in
particular when it is beautiful is more statuesque. The curves are more
decided, and at the junction of the red of the lips with the white there
is a delicately raised outline which marks the form of the feature in a
very noble way. This may also be said of the nostril. It gives a
chiselled effect to those features which is not so often found in
"America"; but the nose itself, the brow, and the set and carriage of
the head are generally finer among "Americans." In both countries,
however, the head is apt to be too large for perfect proportion. This is
a characteristic defect of the English type of beauty. Its effect is
seen in Stothard's figures, in Etty's, and in those of other English
painters. Another defect is in the heaviness of the articulations.
Really fine arms are rare; but fine wrists are still rarer. Such wrists
as the Viennoise women have--of which I saw a wonderful example in the
Viennoise wife of a Sussex gentleman--are almost unknown among women of
English race in either country. It is often said, even in England, that
"American" women have more beautiful feet than Englishwomen have. This I
am inclined to doubt. The feet may be smaller here; and they generally
look smaller because Englishwomen wear larger and heavier shoes. They
are obliged to do so because they walk more, and because of their
moister climate. But mere smallness is not a beauty in a foot more than
in any other part of the body. Beauty is the result of shape,
proportion, and color; and feet are often cramped out of shape and out
of proportion in other countries than China. A foot to be beautiful
should seem fit for the body which it supports to stand upon and walk
with. It is said by some persons, who by saying it profess to know, that
nature, prodigal of charms to Englishwomen in bust, shoulders, and arms,
is chary of them elsewhere, and that their beauty of figure is apt to
stop at the waist. Upon this point I do not venture to give an opinion;
but I am inclined to doubt the judgment in question upon general
physiological principles. The human figure is the development of a germ;
and it is not natural that, whatever may be the case with individuals,
the type of a whole race in one country should present this
inconsistency. Possibly those who started this notion were unfortunate
in their occasions of observation and comparison.

There is more beauty in the south of England than in the north. When I
left Birmingham on my way southward, although in addition to my
observation northward I had there the opportunity of seeing the great
throngs chiefly of women called together by the triennial musical
festival, my eyes had begun to long for the sight of beauty. The women
were hard-featured, coarse in complexion, without any remarkable bloom,
but rather the contrary, and ungainly in figure. I found a great
improvement in this respect in the lower counties; and in London of
course more than elsewhere. For it is remarkable that according to some
law, which has never yet been formulated, or from some cause quite
undiscovered, perhaps undiscoverable, beautiful women are always found
in the greatest numbers where there are the most men and the most money.

Much has been said about the complexion of the women of England, which
has been greatly praised. I have not found it exceptionally beautiful.
It is often fresh, oftener ruddy, but still oftener coarse. A delicate,
finely-graduated bloom is not common. The rosy cheeks when looked at
closely are often streaked with fine lines and mottled with minute spots
of red; and the white is still oftener not like that of a lily, or,
better, of a white rose, but of some much coarser object in nature. It
is true that in making these odious comparisons I cannot forget certain
women, too common in "America," who seem to be composed in equal parts
of mind and leather, the elements of body and soul being left out so far
as is consistent with existence in human form. But such women are also
to be found in England, although perhaps in fewer numbers than here.

As to dress, that, as a man, I must regard as a purely adventitious and
an essentially unimportant matter. If a woman be beautiful, or charming
without actual beauty, a man cares very little in what she is dressed,
so long as she seems at ease in her clothes, and their color is becoming
to her and harmonious. There is no greater mistake than the assumption
that being dressed in good taste is indicative of good breeding, of
education, or of social advantage of any kind. Nor is it even a sign of
good taste in any other particular. You shall see a woman who has come
out of the slums, and whose life is worthy of her origin and her
breeding, although it may have become gilded and garish, and she shall
dress herself daily, morning, noon, and night, with such an exquisite
sense of fitness in all things, with such an instinctive appreciation of
harmony of outline and color, that your eye will be soothed with the
sight of her apparel; and she shall nevertheless be vulgar in mind and
manners, sordid in soul, in her life equally gross and frivolous. And
the converse is no less true. Women most happy in the circumstances of
their birth and breeding, intelligent, cultivated, charming, of whose
sympathy in regard to anything good or beautiful you may be sure, will
dress themselves in such an incongruous, heterogeneous fashion that the
beauty which they often possess triumphs with difficulty over their
effort to adorn it.

I feel, therefore, that I am saying very little against Englishwomen
when I say that in general they are the worst dressed human creatures
that I ever saw, except perhaps the female half of a certain class of
Germans. The reputation that they have in this respect among
Frenchwomen and "Americans" is richly deserved. Good taste is simply
absent. The notion of fitness, congruity, and "concatenation
accordingly" does not exist. In form the Englishwoman's dress is dowdy,
in color frightful. If not color-blind, she seems generally to be blind
to the effect of color, either singly or in combination. At the
Birmingham festival I saw a lady in a rich red-purple (plum color)
silk--high around the neck of course, as it was morning--and over this
swept a necklace of enormous coral beads. It made one's eyes ache to
look at her. This was not an uncommon, but a characteristic instance.
Such combinations may be justly regarded as the rule in Englishwomen's
dress. For purple they have strong liking. They not only wear it in
gowns, but they use it for trimming, in bands and flounces, in ribbons,
in feathers. They combine it with all other colors. An Englishwoman
seems to think herself "made" if she can deck herself in some way with
purple silk or velvet, or ribbons or feathers. Of course I am excepting
from these remarks a few who have intuitive good taste, and other few
who employ French _modistes_, and who submit implicitly to their
authority. The latter condition is essential; for even when the main
body of an Englishwoman's dress is in good taste she is very apt to
destroy its effect by some incongruous addition from her stores of
heterogeneous jewels, or by some other ornament--a collar, a cape, a
_fichu_, or a ribbon. They have a sad way of putting forlorn things
about their necks and on their heads which is very depressing, unless
it is astonishing, which happens sometimes. An Englishwoman will be
tolerably well dressed, and then will make a bundle of herself by tying
up her neck and shoulders in a huge piece of lace; or she will wear
specimens of two or three sets of jewels; or she will put a 
feather in her hair, or a bonnet on her head, that would tempt a tyrant
to bring it to the block. I remember seeing a marchioness whose family
was noble in the middle ages riding with an "American" lady who had not
as much to spend in a year as the other had in a week; but the
marchioness was so obtrusively ill dressed and the American with such
good taste and simplicity that both being unusually intelligent, both
perfectly well bred and self-possessed, and both fine healthy women, a
person ignorant of their rank would have been likely to mistake the
latter for the noblewoman.

It has been said that Englishwomen dress better in full evening dress
than in what is known as _demi-toilette_. I cannot think so. It is not
the English dress that then looks better, but the Englishwoman; that
is, if she has fine shoulders, breasts, and arms. It is the beauty that
is revealed, the woman pure and simple, that pleases the eye, just as
is the case elsewhere. For the things that an Englishwoman will put on,
or put half-off herself, in the evening, are amazing to behold. An
Englishwoman in full dress who has not a fine figure is even more dowdy
than she is in the morning. For then she is likely to be at least neat
and tidy, and she may wear a gown that is comparatively unobtrusive in
form and color. Indeed, the best dress that the average Englishwoman
wears is her simple street dress, which is apt to be of some sober
color--black, gray, light or dark, or a dark soft blue, and to be
entirely without ornament--not a flounce or a bow, or even a button
except for use, with a bonnet, or oftener a hat, equally sober in tint
and in form. And this is best for her; in this she is safe. If she
would not risk offence, let her enfold herself thus. Let her by no
means wander forth into the wilderness of mingled colors: "that way
madness lies." This outward show is in no way the consequence of
carelessness. No one in England seems to be careless about anything,
least of all a woman about her dress. It is helpless, hopeless,
elaborated dowdyism. And yet as I write there rise up against me, with
sweet, reproachful faces, figures draped worthily of their beauty; and
more could not be said even for the work of Worth himself. One of many
I particularly remember with whom I took five o'clock tea at the house
of one of the Queen's chaplains, and who bore a name that may be found
in the "Peveril of the Peak." Her bright intelligence and her rich
beauty (her oval cheek was olive) would have made me indifferent to her
dress had it been a homespun bedgown. But shall I ever forget the
beautiful curves and tint of that soft-gray broad-leafed felt hat and
feather, the elegance of the dark carriage dress that harmonized so
well with it, or the perfect glove upon the hand that was held out so
frankly to bid me good-by? No, fair British friends, it is not you that
I mean; it is those other women whom I saw, but did not know.

It is because of the average Englishwoman's sad failure in dressing
herself that the notion has got abroad that Englishmen are finer looking
than Englishwomen. For the dress of the men is notably in good taste. It
is simple, manly, neat; and although sober in tint and snug in cut, it
is likely to have its general sobriety lightened up with a little touch
of bright, warm color. On the other hand, the dress of "American" men is
generally far, very, very far, inferior to that of the women in the
corresponding conditions of life. This helps to produce the
corresponding mistaken notion that the women in "America" are handsomer
than the men; upon the incorrectness and essential absurdity of which I
have already commented.

As to another attributed superiority of the Yankee woman I must express
my surprised dissent. I have not only read, but heard their intelligence
and social qualities rated much higher than that of their sisters in
England. Fair countrywomen, heed not this flattery. It is not true. The
typical Englishwoman of the upper and upper middle class has in strength
of mind and in information no type counterpart in "America." She may not
know Latin, and she may, and get little good by it; she may not be
brilliant, or quick, or self-adaptive, and she generally is not; but she
is well informed both as to the past and the present; she shows the
effect rather of true education than of school cramming, of culture
inherited and slowly acquired, and of intercourse with able, highly
educated, and cultivated men. She generally has some accomplishment
which she has acquired in no mere showy boarding-school fashion, but
with a respectable thoroughness. England is full of ladies who paint
well in water colors, or who are musicians, not mere piano players, or
who are botanists, or who write well, and who add one or more of such
acquirements to a solid general education, a considerable knowledge of
affairs, and the ability to manage a large household.

The conversation of the society in which such women are found is far
more interesting, far worthier of respect than that which is heard in
fashionable society (and these women are fashionable) in "America." And
this without any reproach to the latter. For how could it be otherwise
than that women who are the daughters, sisters, and wives of men who
are themselves highly educated, and who have the affairs of a great
empire, if not in their hands, at least upon their minds, should in all
that can be acquired by intercourse with such men be superior to others
most of whom bear the same relations to men who are necessarily
inferior in all these respects, who are absorbed in business, and know
little beyond their business except what can be learned from the
hurried reading of newspapers? In England there is not only accumulated
wealth, but accumulated culture; and of this the result appears not
only in the men, but in the women. It could not be otherwise.
Englishwomen are companions, and friends, and helps to their fathers,
their husbands, to all the men of their household. They are not
absorbed in the mere external affairs of society; and society is not
entirely in their hands. Men, men of mature years, form the substance
of English society; they give it its tone; women its grace and its
ornamentation. Even in the Englishwoman's drawing-room the Englishman
is looked up to and treated with deference. The talk and the tone must
be such as pleases him. She finds her pleasure as well as her duty in
making it such as pleases him. She is even there his companion, his
friend, his help. No matter how clever or brilliant she may be, she
does not seek _tenir salon_ like the French female _bel esprit_. No
matter how beautiful or how fashionable she may be, she does not leave
him out of her society arrangements; unless, indeed, in either case,
she chooses to set propriety at naught and brave an accusation of "bad
form." And indeed, should she attempt this she would probably soon be
checked by a very decided interposition of marital authority. The
result of all this is a soberer tone in mixed society than we are
accustomed to, and the discussion of graver topics in general
conversation.

And yet in the household the Englishwoman is quite supreme--much more
so, I think, than she is in "America." She really manages all household
affairs, troubling her husband with no details, but being careful to
manage in such a way as to please him. For, as I have said before, the
wish of the master of an English household is the law of that household.
Notwithstanding all this, I have been led to the firm belief that
hen-pecking is far more common in England than it is with us, and that
curtain lectures are much oftener delivered there than here. "Mrs.
Caudle's Curtain Lectures" would hardly have suggested themselves to an
American humorist, although the thing itself--if not in its perfection,
in its germ--is sufficiently known here to make the humor and the satire
of that series perfectly appreciated. And, strange to say, the average
English husband seems to be a less independent creature than the
"American." English wives more generally insist upon their prerogative
of sitting solemnly up for their husbands at night; and latch-keys are
regarded as a personal grievance. What American wife would think of
making a fuss about a man's having a latch-key? Not a few of them,
indeed, have one themselves. And yet I have seen an Englishwoman of the
lower middle class flush and choke and whimper when the subject of the
inalienable right of a man to a latch-key to his own house was broached,
and begin to talk about the worm turning when it is trampled upon.

The devotion of Englishwomen to their families, and particularly to
their children, cannot be surpassed. I believe that they are the best,
the most self-sacrificing daughters, wives, and mothers in the world,
except the good daughters and wives and mothers in "America"; and even
them I believe they generally surpass in submissiveness and thoughtful
consideration. But this is the result of the general subordination which
in all things pervades English society.

It is generally believed in England, I cannot tell why, that women in
"America" take part in public affairs and are much more in the eye of
the world than Englishwomen are. Of this belief I met with an amusing
instance. One day at dinner in a "great house" I had on one side of me a
gentleman who had come in alone for lack of ladies enough to "go round";
it was a small family party. He was the brother of my hostess, a fine,
intelligent fellow about twenty-five years old, who had just taken his
bachelor's degree at Oxford. As I turned from his sister to him, in a
pause of conversation, he asked me with great earnestness, almost with
solemnity, "Is--it--true--that--in--America--the--women-- sit--on--juries?"
I answered instantly, and with perfect gravity, "Yes; all of them who
are not on duty as sergeants of dragoons." For one appreciable
delightful moment doubt and bewilderment flashed through his bright,
handsome eyes, and then he, as well as others within earshot,
appreciated the situation, and there was a hearty laugh and an
ingenuous blush mantled his cheeks--for young men can blush in England.
When I explained that in no part of that strange country "America" with
which I was acquainted did women sit on juries, or take any part in
public affairs, or even vote or go to public meetings, and that nine in
ten of the women that I knew would be puzzled to tell who represented
in Congress the districts in which they lived, who were the Senators
from their States, and possibly who were their Governors, I was
listened to with profound attention; and the surprise of my hearers was
very manifest, and was strongly expressed. It could hardly have been
otherwise; for nothing that I could have said would have brought into
clearer light the fact that women in America are very much less
informed upon public affairs and take very much less interest in them
than is the case with almost all Englishwomen of the cultivated
classes. In England almost all intelligent women of the upper and upper
middle classes take a very lively interest in politics, are tolerably
well informed upon the public questions of the day, and in many cases
they have no inconsiderable influence upon them. The reason of this is
that political life and the social life of the upper classes there are
so thoroughly intermingled. Politics form the chief concern of the
members of those classes; apart, of course, from their own private
affairs. Hardly a woman of that class is without a husband, brother,
kinsman, or friend who is, or who has been, or hopes to be a member of
Parliament, or who is in diplomacy, or connected in some way with
colonial affairs. Politics there are intimately connected with the
great object of woman's life in modern days--social success. It is
difficult for women in England, and even for men, to understand the
entire severance of politics and society which obtains in "America,"
and to believe that a man may be a member of Congress or even a
Senator, and yet be entirely without social position. Politics there
are the most interesting topic of conversation among intelligent and
cultivated people in general society, and such an acquaintance with
political questions and party manoeuvres as is here confined to a very
few women indeed, whose relations to public men are peculiar, and who
"go to Washington," is there very common among all women of superior
position.

Of this I met with a striking illustration on my way from Warwick to
Coventry. As I was about entering the railway carriage, a friend, an
Englishman, who was kindly travelling with me for a day or two, and
"coaching" me, told the porter who had my portmanteau to put it into the
carriage. This, by the way, is permitted there. If there is room, and no
one objects, you may take a huge trunk into a first-class railway
carriage. Indeed, one could hardly be taken into a second-class carriage
for lack of room; and a third-class carriage is hardly larger than that
marvellous institution known to American women--but to no others--as a
Saratoga trunk. I objected to my friend's proposal because there was a
lady in the carriage. She was standing with her back to me as I spoke,
but she immediately turned and said, in a clear, sweet voice, "Oh, yes;
bring it in; never mind me; there's quite room enough." I never saw a
more elegant woman. She was about forty years old, still very handsome,
tall, with a fine lithe figure, and a gentle loftiness of manner which I
might have called aristocratic, had she not reminded me strongly in
every way of an "American" woman whom I had known from my boyhood.
Nothing could have been more simple, frank, and good-natured than the
way in which she made me and my luggage welcome. Her maid, who was
standing by her, and who was herself a very lady-like person, soon left
us to take her place in a second-class carriage, and we three were left
in possession.

The train started with that gentle, unobtrusive motion which is usual on
English railways, and we fell into the chat of fellow travellers. I was
charmed with her. Her voice and her manner of speech would have made the
recitation of the multiplication table agreeable. She had a son at
Oxford, which I had left a few days before, and it proved that we had
common acquaintances there. She showed, with all her superiority of
manner, social and personal--for she was what would have been called in
the last generation a superior woman--that deference to manhood which I
have mentioned before as a trait of Englishwomen. Ere long my companion
mentioned that we had been at Kenilworth that day. She replied, "Oh, I
must go there. I have never been. Why! It is just like Americans to go
to Kenilworth. All the Americans go to Kenilworth, and to Warwick
Castle, and to Stratford." My companion replied that we had been at all
those places. She laughed merrily, and said, "You ought to have been
Americans to do that." My friend then told her that I was an "American."
She turned upon me almost with a stare, and after a moment of silence
spoke to me again, but with a perceptible and very remarkable change of
manner. It was very slight--of a delicate fineness. Her courtesy was not
in the least diminished, nor her frankness; but the perfectly
unconscious and careless expression of her face was impaired, and her
attention to me was a little more pronounced than it had been before.
She inquired if I had been pleased with my visit to Kenilworth, and told
me that a novel had been written about it by Sir Walter Scott. "But
perhaps you have read it," she added. "Have you met with it?" I
answered, "I have heard of it"; and my inward satisfaction was great
when I saw that I had done so with a face so unmoved that she replied
with a gracious instructiveness of manner, "Oh, you should have read it
before you went to Kenilworth; it would so have increased your pleasure.
But the next best thing for you is to read it now." I thanked her, and
said that I should like to do so. I think that she would have gone on to
recommend a perusal of the works of William Shakespeare to me in
connection with my visit to Stratford on Avon, although she looked at me
in a puzzled way once or twice. But my companion, although I saw he was
amused at something in her talk, marred whatever hopes I had of further
instruction by breaking in with some remark upon the politics of
Warwickshire. She rose to his fly like a trout on a hazy day, and in a
minute or two she had forgotten my existence in her discussion with him
of a topic which plainly was to her of far more interest than all the
Scotts that could have dwelt in Kenilworth, and all the Shakespeares
that could have stood in Stratford. He was a Birmingham magnate, and
knew everything that was going on in the country; but she was his equal
in information, and it seemed to me his superior in political craft. To
every suggestion of his she made some reply that showed that the
question was not new to her. She knew all the ins and outs of the
politics of the county: who could be expected to support this measure,
who was sure to oppose that. She knew all about the manufacturing
interests of Birmingham: who had retired from active management; who was
coming in; what money had been taken out of this establishment, what
changes had taken place in the other, and had an opinion as to what
effect this was going to have upon Parliament. I never heard the
beginning of such political talk from a woman in America, even from one
whose husband was in politics. The train stopped; her maid appeared, and
she bade us courteously good-by, with the puzzled look in her eye as it
rested upon the fellow passenger to whom she had recommended the perusal
of "Kenilworth"; and then my companion told me, what indeed I had been
sure of all along, that she was a member of the governing class.

A few days before, I had observed in Oxford, where a local election was
impending, small posters addressed to "The Burgesses," and these
invariably began "_Ladies_ and Gentlemen," a form of "campaign
document" as foreign to us as it would be to peoples subject to the
Salique law--than which worse laws have long prevailed in many
countries.

Not only in politics but in business women appear much more prominently
than they do in "America." If they do not keep hotels, which they
sometimes do, they manage them, whether they are great or small. The
place which in "America" is filled by that exquisite, awful, and
imperturbable being, the hotel clerk, is filled invariably in England by
a woman--so at least I always found it, and I found the change a very
happy one. To be met by the cheery, pleasant faces of these bright,
well-mannered women, to be spoken to as if you were a human being whom,
in consideration of what you are to pay, it was a pleasure to make as
comfortable as possible, instead of being treated with lofty
condescension, or at best with serene indifference, was a pleasant
sensation. And these women did their work so quietly and cheerfully, and
yet in such a businesslike way, that it was a constant pleasure to come
into contact with them. Dressed in black serge or alpaca, they affected
no flirting airs, and directed or obeyed promptly and quietly. And yet
their womanhood constantly appeared in their manner and in their
thoughtfulness for the comfort of those who were in their care. They
always had a pleasant word or a smile in answer to a passing remark,
were always ready to answer any question or give any information, and
were pleased at any acknowledgment of satisfaction. Naturally it was so;
for they were women; and they were chosen, it seemed to me, for their
pleasant ways as well as for their efficiency. From not one of them,
from one end of England to the other, in great cities or in quiet
country towns and villages, did I receive one surly word or look, or
anything but the kindest and promptest attention. I can say the same of
the shop women, who waited upon customers not as if they were
consciously condescending in the performing of such duties, but
cheerfully and pleasantly, and with a show of interest that a purchaser
should be satisfied. Their dress was almost invariably the same black
unornamented serge or alpaca, which, by the way, is the commonest street
dress of all women of their condition. In the telegraph offices the
clerks are generally women; and indeed, women seem to do everything
except plough, drive omnibuses and railway engines, and be soldiers and
policemen. They keep turnpikes, where turnpikes still exist; and in
Sussex I saw a woman's name with her husband's upon the pike-house.
Indeed, it seemed to me that in all public affairs, from politics down
to turnpike keeping, women were very much more engaged and before the
world in England than in America, although I saw no jury-women or she
sergeants.

As to the manners of Englishwomen, they are, like the manners of other
women, good, bad, and indifferent. And chiefly they are indifferent;
being in this particular also like others, especially of the Teutonic
races; which races, my readers may like to be reminded, are the Deutsch
(which we call German), the Hollanders, the Anglo-Saxon (or better, the
English), and the Scandinavians (Swedes, Norsemen, Danes, and
Icelanders). The average manners of these peoples, even of the women
among them, are on the whole truly indifferent. They are not coarse, but
as surely they are not polished. Manner, however, is a very different
thing from manners; and in manner Englishwomen, from the highest class
to the lowest, are all more or less charming--strong-minded women and
lodging-house keepers being of course excepted. This charm, like all
traits and effects of manner, is not easy to describe; but it left upon
me at this time, as it had left before, an impression of its being the
outcoming of an intense consciousness of womanhood, and with this a
feeling of modest but very firm self-respect. The most intelligent
Englishwoman, even in her most exalted moments, never seems to resolve
herself into a bare intelligence. Her mind is always clad in woman's
flesh; and her body thinks. Thus conscious of her own womanhood, she
keeps you conscious of it, not merely by the facts that her hair is
long, her face beardless, and that her body (in the evening the lower
part of it at least) is covered with voluminous and marvellous
apparel--in a word, not merely by outer show.

All this is but the outward sign; and it might exist--as it so often
does, I shall not say where--in women, without the least of that grace,
not of movement or of speech, or even of thought, but of moral
condition, which is to me the chiefest charm in woman. How often have I
sat by one of such women talking--no, talked at (for it reduces me to
silence)--in such a splendid and overwhelming manner, and with such a
superior consciousness of intellectuality, that I could not but think
that except for the silk and the lace, and the lack of moustaches, and
the evident expectation of a compliment, I might as well have been
talking with a man (only a man would have said more with less fuss), and
that I longed for the companionship of some pretty, well-bred ignoramus,
whose head was full only of common sense, and whose soul as well as
whose body was of the female sex. England is not without women of the
other kind, I suppose, but they are so rare that I met with none; while
all the women that I did meet had the soft, sweet charm given by the
contented consciousness of their womanhood. Womanhood looks out from an
Englishwoman's eyes; it speaks in every inflection of her voice. No
matter how clever she may be, how well informed, she never utters mind
pure and simple; she never lays a bare statement of thought or of fact
before you. She is too modest. A piece of her mind she does, indeed,
sometimes give you. But then, be sure, she is, of all times, the most
thoroughly womanlike and absolved from intellectuality; being, however,
thus in her excitement not peculiar among her sex. At all other times
she leaves an impression of gentleness, and a lack of intellectual
robustness; and, if you are a man at least, she, without any seeming
intention of so doing, keeps you constantly in mind that she is trusting
to you--to your strength, your ability, your position--to ensure that
she shall be treated with respect and tenderness, and taken care of; and
that therefore she owes you deference, and that it becomes her to be not
only as charming but as serviceable as possible. Even in the hardest
women there is a remnant at least of this. An Englishwoman shall be a
sort of she-bagman, a traveller for manufacturers, and in the habit of
riding second or even third class alone, from one end of England to the
other (and I talked with such women), and she shall yet show you this
gentle, womanly consciousness. A woman's eye there never looks straight
and steady into yours, saying, "I am quite able to take care of my own
person, and interests, and reputation. Don't trouble yourself about me
in those respects. Meantime, sir, I am taking your measure." There is
always a mute appeal from her womanhood to your manhood. This charm
belongs to the Englishwoman of all ranks, and beautifies everything that
she does, even if she does it awkwardly, which is not always. She shows
it if she is a great lady and welcomes you, or if she is a housemaid and
serves you. Not actually every Englishwoman is thus of course; for there
are hard, and proud, and cruel, and debased women there, as there are
elsewhere. But, apart from these exceptions, this is the manner of
Englishwomen; and, in so far as a man may judge, this manner, or the
counterpart of it, does not forsake them when they are among themselves.

This soft charm of the Englishwoman's manner is greatly helped and
heightened by her voice and her manner of speaking. In these she is not
only without an equal, but beyond comparison with the women of any other
people, except the few of her own blood and tongue in this country, who
have like voices and the same utterance. The voices and the speech of
Englishwomen of all classes are, with few exceptions, pleasant to the
ear--soft and clear; their words are well articulated, but not precisely
pronounced. They speak without much emphasis, yet not monotonously, but
with gentle modulation. Their speech is therefore very easily
understood--much more so than that of persons who speak louder and with
stronger emphasis. You rarely or never are obliged to ask an
Englishwoman to repeat what she has said because you have failed to
catch her words. This soft, yet crisp and clear and easily flowing
speech, is, as I have said, common to the whole sex there.

I remember that in one of my prowlings about London I found myself in a
little, dingy court that opened off Thames street--a low, water-side
street that runs under London Bridge. It was Sunday morning, and I had
come down from Charing Cross in one of the little Thames steamers, to
attend service at St. Paul's, and had half an hour to spare. The street
was almost deserted, and so quiet that my footsteps echoed from the
walls of the dull and smoke-browned houses. In this court I found two
women talking. One was Sairey Gamp. I am sure it was Sairey. The leer
upon her heavy face could not be mistaken, and she had grown even a
little stouter than when I was so happy as to make her acquaintance
years ago. The other was probably Betsey Prig; she was a mere wisp of a
woman; or, indeed, she may have been Mrs. Harris herself--her
shadow-like figure being the next thing in woman form to nonentity. As I
passed these two humble people, I was struck by the tone and manner of
their speech as they talked earnestly together. Their words and their
pronunciation were vulgar enough; but, as a whole, the speech of both
was rich and musical. The whole of that otherwise silent court was
filled with the soft murmur of their voices. I had no business there,
but I pretended to have, and went from dingy door to dingy door,
lingering and loitering all round the court, that I might listen. They
did not stare at me any more than I did at them--plainly, they would not
have thought of such rudeness--but they went on with their talk,
speaking their language and mine with tones and inflections that I never
heard from two women of like position in "America."

I was reminded of this afterward when one morning, at a great house, a
country seat, I lingered with my hostess at the breakfast table after
all the rest of the family had risen. She touched a bell, and a maid, an
upper servant, answered the summons. No servants, by the way, wait at
breakfast there, even in great houses. After you are once started, and
the tea is made, you are left alone, to wait upon yourselves--a fashion
full of comfort, making breakfast the most sociable meal of the day.
When the maid appeared the lady spoke at once, and the servant stopped
at the door and replied, and there was a little dialogue about some
household matter. The young woman's answers were little more than, "Yes,
my Lady," and, "No, my Lady," but I was charmed by them--more so than I
have ever been by a lecture or a recitation from the lips of one of the
sex. She spoke in a subdued tone; but every syllable was distinct,
although she was at the further end of a large dining-room. Her
mistress's voice was no less clear and sweet and charming, and as they
talked, in their low, even tones, with perfect ease and understanding at
this distance, the whole of the great room resounded sweetly with this
spoken music. When English is spoken in this way by a woman of superior
breeding and intelligence there is, of course, an added charm, and it is
then the most delightful speech that I ever heard, or can imagine.
Compared with it, German becomes hideous and ridiculous, French mean and
snappish, Spanish too weak and open-mouthed, and even Italian, noble and
sweet as it is, seems to lack a certain firmness and crispness, and to
be without a homely charm that it may not lack to those whose mother
tongue is bastard Latin.

One reason of this beauty of the speech of Englishwomen is doubtless in
the voice itself. An Englishwoman's voice is soft, but it is not weak.
It is notably firm, clear, and vibrating. It is neither guttural nor
nasal. While it soothes the ear, it compels attention. Like the tone of
a fine old Cremona violin, its softest vibrations make themselves heard
and understood when mere noise makes only confusion. Such voices are not
entirely lacking among women in "America"; but, alas! how few of the
fortunate possessors of such voices here use them worthily! For the
other element of the beauty of the Englishwoman's speech is in her
utterance. "Her voice is ever soft, gentle, and low, an excellent thing
in woman." Shakespeare knew the truth in this, as in so many other
things. One of the very few points on which we may be sure of his
personal preferences is that he disliked high voices and sharp speech in
women. Singular man! I fear that his ears would suffer here. The
Englishwoman's voice is strong as well as sweet, but her speech is low.
She rarely raises her voice. I do not remember having ever heard an
Englishwoman try to compel attention in that way; but I have heard
French and Spanish and Italian women, ladies of unquestionable position
and breeding, almost scream, and that, too, in society. Nor does the
Englishwoman use much emphasis. Her manner of speech is calm, although
without any suggestion of dignity, and her inflections, which rise
often, although they are full of meaning, are gentle. I remarked this
difference in her speech of itself, but much more when I heard again the
speech of my own countrywomen. I had not been in their company five
minutes--not one--when I was pierced through from ear to ear. They
seemed to me to be talking in italics, to be emphasizing every word, as
if they would thrust it into my ears, whether I would or not. They
seemed to scream at me. They did scream. I am sure that to their
emphatic and almost fierce utterance is due, in a very great measure,
the inferior charm of their speech, when compared with that of their
sisters who have remained in the "old home." If they would be a little
more gentle, a little less self-asserting, a little less determined, and
a little more persuasive in their utterance as well as in their manner,
I am sure that, with all their other advantages, they need fear no
rivalry in womanly charm, even with the truly feminine, sensible,
soft-mannered, sweet-voiced women of England.

RICHARD GRANT WHITE.




LIFE INSURANCE.


The most certain, and at the same time the most uncertain of events, is
the period of the termination of human life. This is a seeming paradox;
nay, it is more than seeming. The time when any member of the human
family will shuffle off this mortal coil no science can forecast, no art
discover; but the successive numbers out of any thousand men of given
ages who will, year after year, die, has been ascertained by actual
count in so many instances and verified by experience for so long a
time, that it is safe to say that no law in nature is better established
by proof. Given these elements, how easy to erect the fabric of life
insurance--how easy to spread among the many the misfortunes of the
individuals who die untimely deaths, their numbers being known
beforehand.

Upon this paradox life insurance rests. It is at once one of the most
simple and one of the most beneficent methods ever invented for
alleviating the evils necessarily incident to our complex civilization.
For a trifling sum, a man may make provision for his family against
untimely death, and thus gain the quiet of soul and peace of mind
necessary for the pursuit of his avocation.

But I do not mean to sing a paean to life insurance. It may be safely
said that the subject is not new, or the field uncultivated. On the
contrary, the topic has been said and sung in prose and verse for so
long that it ceases to attract for novelty's sake; while we have all
heard the ubiquitous agent sound its praises in our ears, until it
appeared to our excited imagination as if there were no need of any
further want, or care, or trouble in the world, and that life insurance
was, or was about to be, or at least

    Might be the be-all and the end-all here.

The object of the present writer is to suggest the spots upon the sun,
to point out the fallacies, the faults, and the frauds which have been
allowed to grow up around the system, and to make some suggestions for
the cure of the evils and their prevention.

To begin with, the frauds in life insurance date from the period when
companies were started for the purpose of making money, and with the
appearance of being philanthropical institutions. Savings banks have
gone through the same experience, and it is a sad one. Men who attempt
to lead the public to believe that they are engaged in an enterprise
based, not upon the selfish principle of profit, but upon the unselfish
principle of doing good, and who then deliberately go to work to fill
their own coffers by means of the business, are, to say the least,
obtaining their money by false pretences.

The capital of the Continental Life Insurance Company was $100,000, and
although, by the original charter, the stock-holders were entitled to
share with the policy-holders in the profits of the business, yet some
years ago an arrangement was made, upon the transfer of the risks of
another company to the Continental, that only seven per cent. should be
paid to stock-holders. Ever since the yearly statement to the State
authorities set forth under oath that only seven per cent. had been paid
to stock-holders, all the rest of the profits being presumably divided
among the policy-holders. But now, when the light is let in upon this
company, it appears that it always paid its stock-holders eighteen to
twenty-eight per cent., and that while, of late years, only seven per
cent. was charged on the books, yet the money was paid just the same.
Then, too, lest the policy-holders should get too much profits to be
divided among them, princely salaries were paid to the officers and
agents, and upon these salaries annuities were predicated, which were
also commuted, capitalized, and surrendered to the company each year. I
hardly know how to characterize this scheme. It came out in the evidence
of an officer, who said he had $2,000 per annum, with an annuity of five
per cent. That sounds quite simple, and persons not fully informed on
the subject of life insurance would hesitate to expose their ignorance
by asking questions. The annuity turns out to be $100 per annum for
life, which at the time it is granted the company capitalized and
purchased back, paying about $1,000 therefor. But next year there is
another annuity for life granted, of the same amount, which is again
purchased, and so on continually. The effect is to add to the officers'
salaries, yearly, about fifty per cent., and at the same time conceal it
from the public, the State department, and the policy-holders. The
president's $17,500 thus became over $26,000, without attracting
attention. Besides, it helps demonstrate the scientific principles upon
which life insurance and life annuities are based, and by practically
illustrating to the managers themselves the potency of algebraic formula
in figuring large sums out of small, convinced them of the truth of the
arguments which they are to make to the agents, and the agents to the
public, by which the money is to be brought in to keep this fine system
going.

You will say that this is only one case, and that it is an exception,
and that companies honestly managed will not permit such things. I grant
you the latter part of your answer, but ask you to show me an honestly
managed company; I know but very few. It will be found, on
investigation, that these practices, or others quite as bad, flourish in
every company, in this State at least, with few exceptions.

Commuted commissions is another item under the thin disguise of which
the policy-holders are robbed, but I defer the consideration of that
topic for that of changing policies, to which more pressing interest
attaches.

When a life policy has run for a certain number of years, and the
company has received upon the policy a large number of premiums, it is
obliged, both by prudential reasons and by law, to hold against the
liability upon it a certain sum of money. This sum is called the
reserve. It is also called the reinsurance fund. It is in fact the sum
which the company has been improving at compound interest against the
day when the policy must be paid. If for any reason the policy
lapses--say for non-payment of premium--this sum becomes the property of
the company. No policy-holder knows what the reserve on his policy is,
and the company will not tell him. It is one of those interesting facts
which you are not expected to ask questions about. It requires a
complicated calculation to arrive at it. The officers tell you so. The
fact is that every company has a book of tables which will tell you the
reserve at any moment, and the policy register should show the reserve
returned to the department the previous January. It will be seen that if
the company can induce the policy-holder to sell his policy to them for
a sum less than the reserve, it makes the difference in profit. This is
what is known as freezing out. This is open, notorious, bold robbery.
But there is a secret method which accomplishes the same result. This is
known as changing. If the company is not ready to incur the odium of
attempting to purchase its policies, it sends accomplished agents to
persuade its policy-holders that some new form of policy is more
desirable than the old. Hence the numerous plans of insurance. In the
change, it is safe to say that the reserve on the old policy is pretty
well used up, and out of it the agent takes a slice, and a pretty good
slice, and who takes the rest of it is no mystery. Every policy-holder
in a life insurance company who is asked to surrender his policy and
take money for it, or another policy, may rest assured that there is a
fraud at the bottom of the transaction, and that whoever will make money
by it, he will not. In the reinsurance of companies, and the consequent
changes of policies from one company to another, this has been the
method by which the promoters of the scheme have realized large amounts
of money.

Leaving the fertile subject of changing policies, and the frauds of
which that operation has been made the vehicle, let me examine the
subject of supervision by the State over the companies, and the effect
which such supervision has had upon the business. Of course the theory
of a State department is that of supervision. It is based upon the power
of visitation, as exercised by the founders of hospitals and colleges,
for the purpose of seeing that the corporation is carrying out the will
of the founder. Here the State, having conferred a corporate franchise,
has the right to see that the franchise is properly exercised. To that
end an officer is appointed, to whom each corporation is to make annual,
detailed reports of its operations, and who is vested with the power of
examining the companies, to ascertain if their reports be correct, and
if the laws have been complied with. There is no doubt but that if the
power were properly exercised, the action of the Superintendent of
Insurance would have a beneficial effect. The great difficulty in
carrying out the supervision effectively has been, however, the
imperfect character of the legislation on the subject. The laws fix an
arbitrary standard of solvency, which binds the Superintendent hand and
foot.

Insurance experts differ very widely as to the correctness of this
standard. It obliges the companies to have on hand invested a sum of
money, being a certain arithmetical proportion to the amount of
outstanding insurance. A company may not have this amount and yet be
solvent, and have before it a long and prosperous career of usefulness.
Another company may have the technical amount of assets and yet be
rotten to the core. It is said that the very largest and best managed
companies have passed through periods when if this criterion were to
have been applied to their condition, they would have been weighed and
found wanting. The mere amount of assets at any given time cannot be a
positive test of the condition of the business. The expense of doing
business in one company may be small, and all of it taken out of the
premium for the first year, in which case the technical reserve at the
end of the year may be very much impaired; yet the company may be in a
most promising and flourishing condition, with a good business on its
books, and a large future income secure without further cost. On the
other hand, a company may have the full technical reserve and yet have
acquired its business at ruinous application, out of its future
premiums, of large commissions. With laws so imperfect, with no
provision for examining the commercial condition of a company, it is not
strange that State supervision should gradually fade into an empty form.
It is true the department has been for some years kept in full apparent
efficiency. There has been a respectable head, and a very full body of
clerks duly appointed at the suggestion of members of the Senate. These
clerks have been agreeably employed in receiving, folding, and filing
the reports of the various companies; in receiving applications for
licenses from agents of foreign companies; in issuing such licenses; in
furnishing printed copies of the charters of companies to all who apply
for the same, and also copies of the reports of the companies. These
duties are supplemented by that of collecting the fees for the various
services, and by the composition of answers to letters of policy-holders
of the most Delphic character. The head of the department, I suppose, is
meantime fully employed in digesting the statements of the companies and
preparing his annual report of their condition, to be presented to the
Legislature, and afterward printed and bound in gilt covers, for
distribution among his constituents. These reports are quite pleasant
reading. You will find year after year faint and delicate suggestions as
to amendatory laws, opinions that there is doubt of the legality of
amalgamations, and other twaddle. Not a word, however, denunciatory of
the frauds being perpetrated under the very nose of the department, and
which every man in the State can see quite plainly but himself. Of the
epistolary productions of the Superintendent, it is hard to speak. If
language be given to conceal thought, how well it is used by the
Department of Insurance. Complaints, charges, requests to examine--all
are met so politely, so evasively, that while you feel you are being put
off, and that your request will not be granted, you know not why you are
refused.

Thus the Department of Insurance ran its natural course. It became a
storehouse of heaps of meaningless figures. The companies soon found
that their mistakes were not corrected, and it became convenient to make
mistakes. Gradually false statements grew out of exaggerated ones. Cash
in bank would continue to represent money which had been lost by a bank
failure. In one sense it was cash in bank--cash that would never again
come out. Then money in the hands of agents is an item which could rise
and sink with great facility. In some companies it grew to such
proportions as to warrant the suspicion that pretty soon all the money
of the company would be in the hands of agents, and very bad hands to be
in they have generally proven, have these agents' hands. The books of
the Continental Company show about a million of dollars in the hands of
those gentlemen, with very little chance of any considerable portion of
it ever getting into the hands of the receiver.

And the worst of this condition of affairs with respect to the Insurance
Department is that it is a delusion and a snare. If there were no
supervision, people would exercise their judgment themselves,
uninfluenced by annual reports and all the apparently officially
recognized, columnar, battalions of carefully disposed statistics. Then
instead of producing certificates with the departmental seal
authenticating solvency, the life insurance solicitor would be forced to
prove his company entitled to credit by other and more convincing
arguments. Naturally enough, the plain people suppose that when the
State undertakes to regulate the business, it will do the work which it
undertakes well and honestly. It has in fact done neither. While saying
to the country, our companies are under strict supervision; they are
obliged to make annual reports; and if there is any item in that report
which leads the Superintendent to believe the company should be
examined, it is immediately done, and we permit no company to continue
in business unless it has assets enough to reinsure all its outstanding
contracts. That is what in effect the State of New York says. How far
otherwise are its actual doings let the history of the Continental and
the Security answer. The receiver of the first named says it has been
insolvent for five or six years, and insurance people gravely suspected
that for some time. As to the Security, any boy in a life company will
tell you that its absolute insolvency has been well known for at least
two years to all persons having any knowledge of the business at all,
who have read their annual reports. Nevertheless the department did not
interfere. The Continental let it be understood in California that they
were insolvent, so that they could buy in their contracts at a low
price. At home they keep up the appearance of solvency, go through the
solemn farce of making out reports and filing them in the department,
showing a surplus of nearly a million, when in fact there was a
deficiency of two millions.

What an efficient department! What a splendid system! How careful of the
interests of the public! What a fatherly State to its expectant widows
and orphans!

Just here is the vice of the whole system. Relying on the care of the
State officers, the policy-holder takes out his policy and continues his
payments year after year. Relying on a broken reed!

Can it be conceived possible that the real owners of two hundred
millions of dollars would abandon to directors the entire charge of
their interests and the interests of those dear to them, unless they
were inspired by faith in that governmental supervision which they were
led to believe would be effectual to protect their interests, and to
make safe the provision which they had made, not for themselves, but for
those helpless ones whom it is the duty of the State to care for, and
the boast of our system of jurisprudence that it protects with jealous
care?

The result of all this faithlessness is seen in the present condition of
life insurance affairs. Is the remedy to be found in legislation, in new
attempts to make supervision on the part of the State more than a name,
or in the abandonment of the whole scheme of supervision and in leaving
the business to be carried on without any State control or supervision?
This is really the momentous question of the hour, and one that cannot
be too thoroughly discussed or too carefully considered.

In its consideration the status of a policy-holder in a life insurance
company must be taken into consideration. To thoroughly understand what
that status is, it is necessary to examine carefully the contract on
which it rests. Each policy in a life insurance company provides for a
life-long engagement on the part of the assured. He is to continue to
pay premiums as long as he lives, if he does not anticipate them by a
single payment, or by several payments. On its part the company agrees
to pay to the assured, or rather to his nominee at the death of the
assured, a certain sum. In addition, however, to this simple contract,
the policy-holder is entitled to a share in the profits of the company.
That share is greater or less as the case may be, as the organization of
the company provides. The policy-holder is thus in a certain sense a
partner in the business. He has an expectation of profits, either in the
shape of reduced premiums, increased insurance, or actual money. The
contract is not one of indemnity merely. It is a contract to pay at
death a fixed sum, in consideration of the payment during life of
certain sums known as premiums. It is an arrangement by means of which
the pecuniary hardships incident to premature death are borne by a great
number of persons instead of the family of the person who dies before
his expectation of life has been reached. It is apparent from this
contract that the company which issues it must in the nature of things
have the custody and management of large sums of money. It is
contemplated by the parties that accumulations in the hands of the
company must exist, and it is an incident of the contract that the
officers of the company shall have the management of that fund. Is the
fund a trust to be held by the company for the benefit of the
policy-holders? If it be, then the courts of equity have complete and
entire jurisdiction, and to them it should be left. They are competent
to enforce the proper execution of other trusts, and presumably of this.
Give perfect freedom of individual action to each policy-holder, take
off the leading-strings of State supervision, and leave the parties to a
life insurance contract where the parties to other contracts are left,
to themselves and the courts.




THE GREAT SEAL OF THE UNITED STATES.

CONCERNING SOME IRREGULARITIES IN IT.


It is a somewhat singular fact that although the United States assumed
all the rights, powers, and dignities of a nation on the Fourth of
July, 1776, no great seal was adopted until about five months before
the signing of the preliminary treaty of peace with Great Britain in
1782. This is the more remarkable when we consider that our forefathers
were brought up under the shadow of the English law, which prescribed
that no grant nor charter was _factum_ until it was sealed, and of
English custom, which taught that even the sign manual of the sovereign
must be authenticated by an impression from the privy seal.

But the inception of our government was attended with other
informalities than the neglect to provide a seal. Silas Deane, our first
political agent to France, wrote from Paris to the secret committee of
Congress, under date of November 28, 1776, acknowledging the receipt of
the committee's letter of August 7, enclosing a copy of another letter
of July 8, the original of which never came to hand, and also a copy of
the Declaration of Independence, which, he complains, had been
circulated in Europe two months before. This last letter conveyed what
was intended to be the official notification to the court of France of
the act of separation of the colonies, but was so unofficial in form
that Mr. Deane was prompted to say in answer that he would have supposed
that "some mode more formal, or, if I may say, respectful, would have
been made use of, than simply two or three lines from the committee of
Congress.... I mention this as something deserving of serious
consideration, whether in your applications here and your powers and
instructions of a public nature, it is not always proper to use a seal?
This is a very ancient custom in all public and even private concerns of
any consequence."

But although Congress neglected to provide a seal, it was not because it
had not anticipated the need of one, for this record appears in its
journal, under date of Thursday, July 4, 1776:

    _Resolved_, That Dr. Franklin, Mr. J. Adams, and Mr. Jefferson be a
    committee to prepare a device for a seal for the United States of
    America.

We obtain an insight of the acts of this committee in a letter from John
Adams to his wife, under date of Philadelphia, August 14, 1776.

After discussing matters irrelevant to the question at issue, he says:

    I am put upon a committee to prepare ... devices for a great seal
    for the confederated States. There is a gentleman here of French
    extraction, whose name is _Du Simitiere_, a painter by profession,
    whose designs are very ingenious, and his drawings well executed.
    He has been applied to for his advice. I waited on him yesterday,
    and saw his sketches.... For the seal, he proposes the arms of the
    several nations from whence _America_ has been peopled, as
    _English_, _Scotch_, _Irish_, _Dutch_, _German_, etc., each in a
    shield. On one side of them, Liberty with her pileus; on the other,
    a Rifler in his uniform, with his rifle-gun in one hand, and his
    tomahawk in the other: this dress, and these troops, with this kind
    of armour, being peculiar to _America_, unless the dress was known
    to the Romans. Dr. Franklin showed me a book containing an account
    of the dresses of all the _Roman_ soldiers, one of which appeared
    exactly like it.... Doctor Franklin proposes a device for a seal:
    Moses lifting up his wand, and dividing the _Red Sea_, and
    _Pharaoh_ in his chariot overwhelmed with the waters. This motto,
    "Rebellion to Tyrants is obedience to God."

    Mr. Jefferson proposed the children of _Israel_ in the wilderness,
    led by a cloud by day and a pillar of fire by night; and on the
    other side _Hengist_ and _Horsa_, the _Saxon_ chiefs from whom we
    claim the honor of being descended, and whose political principles
    and form of government we have assumed.

    I proposed the choice of _Hercules_, as engraved by _Gribelin_, in
    some editions of Lord _Shaftesbury's_ works. The hero resting on
    his club; _Virtue_ pointing to her rugged mountain on one hand and
    persuading him to ascend; _Sloth_, glancing at her flowery paths of
    pleasure, wantonly reclining on the ground, displaying the charms
    both of her eloquence and person, to seduce him into vice. But this
    is too complicated a group for a seal or medal, and it is not
    original.

On August 20 the committee reported to Congress as follows:

    The great seal should on one side have the arms of the United States
    of America, which arms should be as follows:

    The shield has six quarters, parts one coupe two. The first or, a
    rose, enamelled gules and argent for England; the second argent, a
    thistle proper for Scotland; the third vert, a harp or, for Ireland;
    the fourth azure, a flower de luce, for France; the fifth or, the
    imperial eagle, sable, for Germany, and the sixth or, the Belgic
    lion, gules, for Holland; pointing out the countries from which the
    States have been peopled. The shield within a border, gules,
    entwined of thirteen escutcheons, argent, linked together by a chain
    or, each charged with initial sable letters as follows: 1st. N.H.;
    2d, Mass.; 3d, R.I.; 4th, Conn.; 5th, N.Y.; 6th, N.J.; 7th, Penn.;
    8th, Del.; 9th, Md.; 10th, Va.; 11th, N.C; 12th, S.C; 13th, Geo.;
    for each of the thirteen independent States of America.

    Supporters, _dexter_ the Goddess of Liberty, in a corselet of
    armour, alluding to the present times; holding in her right hand
    the spear and cap, and with her left supporting the shield of the
    States; _sinister_, the Goddess of Justice, bearing a sword in her
    right hand, and in her left a balance.

    Crest. The eye of Providence in a radiant triangle, whose glory
    extends over the shield and beyond the figures. Motto, _E Pluribus
    Unum_.

    Legend round the whole achievement: Seal of the United States of
    America, MDCCLXXVI.

    On the other side of the said great seal should be the following
    device:

    Pharaoh sitting in an open chariot, a crown on his head, and a sword
    in his hand, passing through the divided waters of the Red Sea in
    pursuit of the Israelites. Rays from a pillar of fire in the cloud,
    expressive of the Divine presence and command, beaming on Moses, who
    stands on the shore, and extending his hand over the sea, causes it
    to overthrow Pharaoh.

    Motto, "Rebellion to Tyrants is obedience to God."

Mr. Adams's letter fortunately gives us the key to this elaborate
blazon, else we might have been left for ever in the dark in regard to
its authorship. In the general achievement we easily recognize the hand
of the "gentleman of French extraction," M. du Simitiere, who perhaps
was induced to adopt the Goddess of Justice, with her sword and balance,
in lieu of his "Rifler with his rifle-gun," in deference to Mr. Adams's
taste for allegory. Dr. Franklin's happy if not original design,
illustrative of the preservation of the children of Israel from the maw
of Pharoah and the Red sea, with a squint also at the deliverance of the
colonies from George III. and the billows of tyranny, though sent to the
rear, was adopted in whole, as well as his motto. The pillar of fire in
the cloud was doubtless taken from the design of Mr. Jefferson, who
perhaps had to be propitiated because his children of Israel were
discarded in favor of Dr. Franklin's. It needed but the addition of his
Hengist and Horsa, and of Mr. Adams's irresolute Hercules between Vice
and Virtue, to make a great seal such as the world had never looked
upon.

We, who look back through the gloze of a hundred years and are
accustomed to regard this trio of patriots as men with whom the
degenerate legislators of the present have little in common, may well
express astonishment that their work did not meet with immediate
approval. But history is a stern mistress, and we cannot efface the
record. The journal of Congress shows that the report of the committee
was ordered "to lie on the table," and we hear no more of it for three
long and momentous years.

On March 25, 1779, it was ordered that the report of the committee on
the device of a great seal for the United States, in Congress assembled,
be referred to another committee. On May 10 this committee reported as
follows:

    The seal to be four inches in diameter, on one side the arms of the
    United States, as follows: the shield charged in the field with
    thirteen diagonal stripes alternately red and white.

    Supporters, _dexter_, a warrior holding a sword: _sinister_, a
    figure representing Peace bearing an olive branch.

    The Crest, a radiant constellation of thirteen stars.

    The motto, _Bello vel Pace_.

    The legend round the achievement, "Seal of the United States."

    On the Reverse the figure of Liberty, seated in a chair, holding the
    staff and cap.

    The Motto, "Semper," underneath MDCCLXXVI.

This report was taken into consideration on May 17, and after debate
ordered to be recommitted. The result was another report:

    The seal to be three inches in diameter, on one side the arms of the
    United States, as follows: the shield charged in the field azure,
    with thirteen diagonal stripes, alternate rouge and argent.

    Supporters, _dexter_, a warrior holding a sword; _sinister_, a
    figure representing Peace, bearing the olive branch.

    The Crest, a radiant constellation, of thirteen stars.

    The motto, _Bello vel Pace_.

    The legend round the achievement, "The Great Seal of the United
    States."

    On the Reverse, _Virtute Perennis_, underneath MDCCLXXVII.

    A miniature of the face of the great seal and half its diameter to
    be prepared and affixed as the less seal of the United States.

But our critical forefathers were still dissatisfied, and exhibited no
more disposition to adopt the false heraldry of the committee of 1779
than the allegorical and Biblical monstrosity of that of 1776. Three
years more of incubation were needed to hatch the "bird o' freedom," and
it is not until 1782 that we hear of a further movement. On June 13 of
that year, William Barton of Philadelphia proposed the following for the
arms of the United States:

    Arms, Paleways of thirteen pieces argent and gules; a chief azure,
    the escutcheon placed on the breast of the American (the
    bald-headed) eagle, displayed proper; holding in his beak a scroll
    inscribed with the motto, viz., _E Pluribus Unum_, and in his
    dexter talon a palm or olive branch, in the other a bundle of
    thirteen arrows, all proper.

    For the Crest, over the head of the eagle, which appears above the
    escutcheon, a glory, or, breaking through a cloud, proper, and
    surrounding thirteen stars forming a constellation, argent on an
    azure field.

    In the exergue of the great seal, "Jul. IV. MDCCLXXVI."

    In the margin of the same, "Sigil Mag. Repub. Confed. Americ."

Mr. Barton proposed also a second device, which needs no notice, as it
did not meet with approval.

On the same day, the committee of Congress, then composed of Messrs.
Middleton (S. C), Boudinot (Penn.), and Rutledge (S. C), reported a
modification of Mr. Barton's device. The reports of the several
committees were then referred to the Secretary of Congress, and on June
20, 1782, the Secretary reported the following device for an armorial
achievement and reverse of the great seal of the United States, which
was formally adopted:

    Arms. Paleways of thirteen pieces, argent and gules, a chief, azure;
    the escutcheon on the breast of the American eagle displayed proper,
    holding in his dexter talon an olive branch, and in his sinister a
    bundle of thirteen arrows, all proper, and in his beak a scroll
    inscribed with this motto, _E Pluribus Unum_.

    For the Crest. Over the head of the eagle, which appears above the
    escutcheon, a glory, or, breaking through a cloud, proper, and
    surrounding thirteen stars forming a constellation, argent, on an
    azure field.

    Reverse. A pyramid unfinished. In the zenith an eye in a triangle,
    surrounded with a glory, proper. Over the eye these words, _Annuit
    Coeptis_. On the base of the pyramid the numerical letters
    MDCCLXXVI. And underneath the following motto, _Novus Ordo
    Seclorum_.

    The interpretation of these devices is as follows: The escutcheon is
    composed of the chief and pale, the two most honorable ordinaries.
    The pieces pale represent the several States, all joined in one
    solid, compact, and entire, supporting a chief which unites the
    whole and represents Congress. The pales in the arms are kept
    closely united by the chief, and the chief depends on that union and
    the strength resulting from it, for its support, to denote the
    confederacy of the United States of America, and the preservation of
    their union through Congress.

    The colors of the pales are those used in the flag of the United
    States of America; white signifies purity and innocence; red,
    hardiness and valor; and blue, the color of the chief, signifies
    vigilance, perseverance, and justice.

    The olive branch and arrows denote the power of peace and war, which
    is exclusively vested in Congress. The constellation denotes a new
    State taking its place and rank among the sovereign powers; the
    escutcheon is borne on the breast of the American eagle, without any
    other supporters, to denote that the United States of America ought
    to rely on their own virtue.

    Reverse. The pyramid signifies strength and duration: the eye over
    it and the motto allude to the many and signal interpositions of
    Providence in favor of the American cause. The date underneath it is
    that of the Declaration of Independence; and the words under it
    signify the beginning of the new era, which commences from that
    date.

After the ratification of the Constitution, this seal was formally
declared to be the seal of the United States, on September 15, 1789, and
on March 2, 1799, its custody was given to the Secretary of State, who
was empowered to affix it to such commissions, etc., as had previously
received the signature of the President.

Lossing, in his "Field Book of the Revolution," has the following, in
relation to the origin of the device on the seal: "In a manuscript
letter before me, written in 1818, by Thomas Barritt, Esq., an eminent
antiquary of Manchester, England, addressed to his son in this country,
is the following statement: 'My friend, Sir John Prestwich, Bart., told
me he was the person who suggested the idea of a coat of arms for the
American States to an ambassador [John Adams] from thence, which they
have seen fit to put upon some of their moneys. It is this he told
me--party per pale of thirteen stripes, white and red; the chief of the
escutcheon blue, signifying the protection of heaven over the States. He
says it was soon afterwards adopted as the arms of the States, and to
give it more consequence, it was placed upon the breast of a displayed
eagle.'"

But it is far more probable that the colors of the shield were suggested
by the stripes and union of the flag, which was adopted nearly a year
before Mr. Adams's first visit to Europe. Yet it is worthy of note, in
this connection, that the stripes in the flag are arranged alternately
red and white, which gives seven of the former and six of the latter;
while in the arms they are white and red, thus making seven white and
six red pales. In the seal of the Board of Admiralty (now the Navy
Department), adopted May 4, 1780, the stripes are arranged as in the
flag.

The critical reader will not fail to note a few heraldic lapses in the
arms as blazoned by the secretary of Congress, such as the omission of
the tincture of the scroll, and the denominating the collection of stars
a crest. By a somewhat similar error in the law by which our flag was
adopted, no method of arrangement of the stars in the union is
prescribed.

Notwithstanding that the great seal as adopted had an obverse and a
reverse, there is nothing to show that the reverse was ever made. Why
this was neglected does not appear of record. Nor does there seem to be
any means of ascertaining by what authority one half of the seal is made
to do duty for the whole. It is certainly not authorized by any law. Is
not its use then by the State department technically illegal?

But this is not all. The seal as originally engraved was in accordance
with the requirements of the law, but in 1841, Daniel Webster then being
Secretary of State, a new seal was made, probably because the old one
had become worn, and for some reasons not now discoverable, several
alterations were made in the design. In the shield of the seal thus
made, the red pales are twice the width of the white ones, so that it
reads heraldically, argent, six pales gules, instead of "palewise of
thirteen pieces, argent and gules," as expressed in the adopted report.
In the original, too, the eagle held in his sinister talon a "bundle of
thirteen arrows," but the poor bird grasps but a meagre six in the new
seal. There was some significance in the former number, all of which is
lost in the change. Application to the State department for the reasons
for these deviations from the original seal resulted in only the
following: "This change does not appear to have been authorized by law,
and the cause of it is not known."

Is it possible that an arbitrary alteration can be made in the great
seal of the United States by officials temporarily in charge of it? And
if so, what is to prevent some future Secretary of State, with notions
of his own in regard to heraldic bearings, from discarding the old seal
altogether, in favor of some creation of his own? The nation was
providentially saved from the artistic efforts of Jefferson, Adams, and
Franklin; but what guaranty have we for the future?

JOHN D. CHAMPLIN, JR.




DRIFT-WOOD.


THE TIMES AND THE CUSTOMS.

It will be four years in September since the crash of Jay Cooke
announced that hard times had come. During the _debacle_ continuing
from that day to this, the exposed rascalities of swindling
corporations have shown how full the world still is of sheep eager to
be fleeced, of geese to be plucked. Government officers prey on the
people; the people, on each other; the giant plunderer is the stock
company, to whose vast gobblings the pilfering of a Tweed or Winslow is
a mere sugar-plum. The individual swindler feels himself a rogue,
whereas the chartered thief holds a high head, builds him a palace from
the spoils of his victims, and curses their impudence when they
complain. They are legion, these mismanaged or fraudulent mining
companies, land improvement companies, artificial light companies,
normal food companies (for introducing camel-hump steaks to the
American breakfast-table), and, above all, railroad companies, savings
funds, and life insurance companies.

Satirists lash the sham enterprises--"Universal Association for Squaring
the Circle," "American and Asiatic Consolidated Perpetual Motion
Society," and what not; nowadays the main mischief is done not by these
transparent humbugs, but by the genuine companies, that fairly invite
trust and then betray it. Salted mines, watered stocks, lying
prospectuses, bribed experts, bought legislatures, packed meetings,
borrowed dividends, thimble-rig reports--we all know the tricks of
"substantial" enterprises. It is not the seedy adventurers, the Jeremy
Diddlers and Montague Tiggs of our day, that entrap the thrifty and ruin
the intelligent, but the high-toned trust and commercial companies,
seeming to be solid. These have wheels within wheels, rings within the
ring, whereby many shareholders can be tricked by few; for, as the
shellfish has foes that bore through his tough house and suck out the
unfortunate tenant within, so credit mobiliers, fast freight lines,
super-salaried officers, contractors for supplies, construction agents,
and the like, suck out the value of a stock company, and leave the
shareholders the shells. Let not a posterity of _laudatores temporis
acti_ sigh over ours as the Golden Age of commercial honesty. It is
only the Greenback Age. It is not even the Silver Age, unless, haply,
the German Silver--that is to say, the Plated or Pinchbeck Age. We might
perhaps style it the Brazen Age, in view of the all-pervading brass of
corporation claqueurs and drummers; or we might very well call it the
Shoddy or the Peter Funk Jewelry Age.

Still, our ancestry were worse beset with quack corporations. Mackay
mentions over eighty speculative companies that rose with the South Sea
bubble and were all crushed in a bunch by the privy council: one, a
company for getting silver out of lead; another, for developing
perpetual motion; a third, for insuring householders against losses by
servants--capital, $15,000,000; a fourth, "a company for carrying on an
undertaking of great advantage, but nobody to know what it is"--capital,
$2,500,000 in 5,000 shares of $500 each, on $10 deposit per share, which
deposit nearly a thousand persons actually paid on the first half day
the books were opened, so that before night the rascally manager was off
with $10,000 booty. Besides the matured projects, many companies
existing only on paper were able to sell "privileges to subscribe," when
formed, at $200 or $300 each; for in that day of manias people in Great
Britain paid premiums for the first chance to put their money into
companies for freshening salt water, extracting oil from sunflowers,
buying forfeited estates, capturing pirates, insuring children's
fortunes, fattening hogs, fishing for wrecks, and importing jackasses
from Spain--which last was surely bringing coals to Newcastle. As for
such really solid enterprises as the South Sea bubble, their shares rose
to a thousand per cent, above par.

Perhaps another South Sea bubble could not easily be blown; the Darien
canal will hardly excite a fever of speculation like William Paterson's
Darien project of one hundred and eighty years ago, for which prayers
were offered in the Edinburgh churches; we are not likely to see a
Mississippi scheme of the sort which caused cooks to struggle with
courtiers for places in the Rue de Quinquempoix to buy John Law's
shares, while office rents in that stock-jobbing thoroughfare rose from
five hundred to sixty thousand livres a year. But our late American
experience shows how swift men are to trust their hard-earned gains to
corporate enterprises simply on the reputation of the managers.
Insurance frauds and railroad wreckings thrive on the trustfulness of
professional men and the narrow scope of tradesmen. The latter find
sufficient occupation in the little gains of each day, and often are
puzzled how to employ the surplus. To spend it would be unthrifty; to
roll it in a napkin, bad stewardship; they are apt to be caught by the
popular stock companies or by some scheme of speculation. These
glittering prizes also attract sapient "men of business" who have been
entrusted with investing the funds of widows and children. From such
sources flow the rills that make the mighty rivers of stock enterprises,
so that, having gathered up the spare cash of the shopkeepers and the
annuitants, their bursting makes wide havoc.

Goodman Thompson's simple skill and joy are to gain five cents here, ten
there, a dollar yonder; three customers have bought at nine o'clock
to-day, at eleven the sales number fifteen, at noon no fewer than two
dozen; whereas at midday yesterday they were only twenty-three. Brooding
over these statistics, worthy Thompson fills up the day, the year, the
lifetime in modest local glory, until the name of John Thompson, grocer,
is taken from his door and put upon his coffin-plate, and John
Thompson's son continues the trade in his stead. Absorbed, I say, in
such details, some men seem strangely careless what the gross of their
gains is, or how secured--their pleasure is "doing business" rather than
growing rich, and equal fortunes by bequest would hardly give them the
same comfort; others, and the majority, are not so careless, but are as
surprisingly stupid, incautious, and gullible in investing their daily
gains as they are sharp and shrewd in getting them. That is why they put
their trust in treacherous princes of finance and railroad kings; that
is why sharpers of good moral character in savings and insurance
companies make many victims. It is wonderful how many tradesmen, subtle
and sagacious in their callings, thrive in the hard task of driving
bargains, only to lose their earnings to palpable knaves, or else by
making hap-hazard investments. Their faculty of accumulation seems like
that of the bee or the ant, good only to a given point, and within the
use of given methods; it seems to fail when sober judgment on
speculative fevers is called for.

But the hard times have temporarily taught first, caution; next,
economy. Caution unluckily has run to suspicion, while economy has
issued in a dearth of employment: thus the correctives applied to hard
times have perpetuated them. People are buying not only less, but
sometimes at second hand, so that every trade suffers--unless it be that
of the coffin-makers; I never knew anybody who wanted a second-hand
coffin. The economy that America usually needs is perhaps less that of
refraining from buying than that of turning things to account. The man
who needlessly cuts down his expenses is hardly so praiseworthy as the
one who only makes every thread yield its best uses.

A national fault of ours is that of not getting the full use of things.
European cities, for example, earn millions a year by selling their
street dirt. American cities pay millions to get rid of it. In Europe
it dresses sterile soil; in America it is dumped into channels to
obstruct navigation. One can almost admire the humble Paris
_chiffoniers_, as being a guild employed in redeeming to a hundred
services what has been thrown away as useless--they rescue vast
fortunes yearly. On the Pennsylvania oil lands twenty men put up a
derrick, sink a test well, and fail. Sixteen out of the twenty
reorganize, sink a new well within fifty rods of the other, build a new
derrick, and never touch the old one, leaving it to rot. The expense of
this kind of machinery is great; and yet out of the abandoned derricks
in the oil regions you could almost build a timber track from Corry to
New York. It is, I say, almost a national trait to accumulate what will
be left to rust unused--although it is doubtless not American ladies
alone that fill their wardrobes with garments never worn out. When a
European friend of mine came to travel in this country, one of his
first surprises was the hundreds of miles of expensive fences he saw
enclosing very ordinary fields; next he noted the unused ground along
the tracks of railroads. "That land would all be covered with
vegetables in our country," he said. At his hotels he thought there was
more wasted in labor, food, and superfluities than would have sufficed
to reduce the cost of living by a third; indeed, I fancy he believed
that despite our cry of "hard times" and "enforced economy," the sheer
current _waste_ of America would pay the national debt in a year.


VICTOR HUGO.

What freshness and fecundity in the veteran poet who signalizes his
seventy-sixth birthday by publishing the "Legende des Siecles"!
Hugoesque alike in its grand apostrophes and its gentle idyls, in its
resounding declamation and its simple pathos, this new outcome of an old
mint has every coin stamped with the image and superscription of its
creator--Hugo's in thought, feeling, audacious style, easy
versification, quaint novelty of metaphor; Hugo's in its cadence by
turns joyous and mournful, now in sonorous, thrilling ballads of battle,
anon in charming genre fireside pictures, here riotous in rhetoric,
there pedantic in research, everywhere lofty in aspiration, though
pushing oddity almost to madness.

Through all his works, what a mixture of genius and grotesqueness, of
majesty and absurdity in that wonderful man! Take his "Ninety-Three"--a
novel monstrously nonsensical and surprisingly splendid--a novel
demonstrating that to pass from the ridiculous to the sublime, as well
as the other way, needs but a step. With what magnetic power one of its
first incidents, the rushing about of the loose gun on shipboard, is
wrought out! You begin by despising the frivolity of the scene, and
momentarily wait to see the writer ludicrously break down in his
preposterous attempt at imposing on your credulity. By degrees the
situation is filled in till each successive objection of skepticism is
somehow spirited away, and even the foreign reader, sympathetically
following the working of the French mind, is startled at his own
yielding. This episode of the roving cannon ranks with the devil-fish
scene in the "Toilers of the Sea," where also the reader finds
appreciative horror overcoming his first impulse of contemptuous
incredulity.

Or, again, if you take the boat scene in "Ninety-Three," between the
sailor and count, you agree, at the end, that it is not overstrained.
Yet think of that frail skiff in the open British Channel, with the
waves running high, and say if the scene was possible. When Halmalo put
down his oars and the old man stood up at full height in the bow, the
boat must have swung into the trough of the sea and capsized in an
instant; if lack of steering failed to upset her, the old man's
performance would have done so; but we forget that trifle in the
dramatic intensity of the situation. The learned Sergeant Hill, talking
with a young law student regarding the will of "Clarissa Harlowe," told
him, "You will find that not one of the uses or trusts in it can be
supported." A sergeant of artillery would be equally severe on the
evolutions and skirmishes in "Ninety-Three"; but the genius of Hugo
triumphs over such blunders, like Shakespeare's over the seaports in
Bohemia.

"A poet is a world shut up in a man," says the "Legende," whose own
variety of theme helps to justify the definition. We have here the
majestic conceptions of the "Mur des Siecles," the "Vanished City," the
"Hymn to Earth," the "Epic of the Worm"; therewith we also have the
music and beauty of the "Groupe des Idylles." On one page the reader
is touched with sympathy by the "Cemetery of Eylau" and the "Guerre
Civile"; on another he is stirred by the scorn in the "Anger of the
Bronze," or by the hate in "Napoleon III. after Sedan":

    _Cet homme a pour prison l'ignominic immense,
    On pouvait le tuer, mais on fut sans clemence._

The city whose praise Victor Hugo never tires of sounding, and that has
adored and lampooned him for almost half a century, breaks out in a
prolonged concord of eulogy for these old-age strains, which recall no
little of the force, fire, and finish of twenty, forty years ago. Well
may the Parisians laud this man of mingled ruggedness and delicacy,
whose imagination has not yet lost its boldness with age, nor the heart
its warmth--the bard, in mockery of whom, nevertheless, they were lately
repeating with gusto the comical parody of a local wit:

    _Oh, huho, Hugo! ou huchera-t-on ton nom
    Justice encore rendue que ne t'a-t-on?
    Et quand sera-ce qu'au corps qu' Academique on nomme,
    Grimperas-tu de roc en roc, rare homme?_


EVOLUTIONARY HINTS FOR NOVELISTS.

We have Sheridan's authority that an oyster may be crossed in love--in
fact, Miss Zimmern has written a story about an oyster that actually was
a prey to the tender passion; we have Shakespeare's authority that a
hind will die of it, if she unfortunately seeks to be mated with a lion;
while it is a regular thing in the land of the cypress and myrtle (if
Lord Byron can be trusted) for the rage of the vulture to madden to
crime.

Still it was reserved for Darwin himself to give the great modern cue
to novelists in their study of human nature, by his "Descent of Man,"
where he says that "injurious characters tend to reappear through
reversion, such as blackness in sheep; and with mankind some of the
worst dispositions which occasionally without any assignable cause make
their reappearance in families, _may perhaps he reversions to a savage
state_ from which we are not removed by many generations. _This view
seems recognized in the common expression that such men are the 'black
sheep of the family.'_"

Now, whatever we may think of the odd logic of this passage, it clearly
stakes out a ground and preempts a claim for evolution as applied to
romantic literature. None of us could really blame the modern lover if,
in making a woful ballad to his mistress's eyebrow, he should slyly but
anxiously examine whether that eyebrow contained "a few hairs larger
than the rest, corresponding to the vibrissae of the lower animals." This
does occur in some eyebrows, we know; and as it is also clear from the
authorities first quoted, and many more that might be cited, that the
lower animals are capable of human passions, the cautious and
scientifically disposed lover of the modern epoch can hardly be asked to
take a mere manifestation of the heavenly instinct as proof of many
grades of removal, in his Dulcinea, from the condition of the oyster,
the hind, or, alas! the vulture.

Hence, even in protesting that his lady's beauty hangs on the cheek of
night like a rich jewel in an AEthiop's ear, naturally the modern Romeo
may not avoid a glance to see whether his Juliet's ear contains that
fatal auricular "blunt point" denoting assimilation to the lower
animals. And so it is with the work henceforth laid out for novelists:
the stereotyped heroine, with coral lips, pearly teeth, eyes of a
gazelle, raven locks, swan-like neck, and so on, should be carefully
guarded from too great animal resemblances, and above all from
"rudiments" or signs of reversion.

Perhaps it would be going too far to announce bluntly that "Lady
Amarantha's toes had not the remotest indication of ever having been
webbed," or to put on record the official declaration of Fifine, the
maid, that her fair mistress never had been able to erect her ears;
still the novelists might do well to take note of those two or three
points in which Mr. St. George Mivart and Mr. Wallace have pointed out
the great distinctions between men and apes, and so adroitly work them
up in those personal descriptions which form a delicious part of modern
novels, as to give their heroes and heroines a pedigree impregnable to
the most critically scientific scrutiny. Hints, also, I think, might be
gathered from the treatment of love on the evolution hypothesis, which
has been essayed by no less an authority than Herbert Spencer, who has
besides traced the changes in the methods of expressing passionate
emotions by gestures and cries, as our humble ancestry developed to
women and men.

Physiology, too, is not the only department into which the novelist of
the future must extend his studies. Under the doctrine of evolution,
sexual selection is at the basis of the variation of species; and what
new fields are open to the novelist, when he reflects for a moment that
his main task is only to depict the prosperities and adversities
attending such a mutual selection on the part of Albert and Angelina!

PHILIP QUILIBET.




SCIENTIFIC MISCELLANY.

                     *      *      *      *      *

THE TELEPHONE.

Great interest in telegraphic subjects has lately been aroused in the
American public by exhibitions of the telephone, an instrument for
transmitting sound vibrations by electricity. Two general forms of this
instrument are known, in one of which a series of tuning forks
communicates with a precisely similar series at the other end of the
wire, and the signals made to one are repeated by the other. A more
interesting form, and the one that has lately attracted so much
attention, is that which receives and transmits ordinary vocal sounds.
The operator talks to a membrane, and at the other end of the wire is a
resonator of some kind which talks to the auditor there. The fundamental
idea of the machine is not new. It was at first proposed to use it for
transmitting electric signals without a wire, and in that view a trial
was made with it during the siege of Paris. The armistice interrupted
the operations, but M. Bourbouze, the experimenter, and other inventors
have continued to study the subject, Mr. A. G. Bell, professor of vocal
physiology in Boston, being among them. M. Bourbouze used a vibrating
needle the movements of which were effected by sound waves, and another
Frenchman, M. Reuss, introduced the sounding box with its membrane. This
is a box with a membrane stretched over the top and a short tube of
large diameter in the side. The operator talks to this tube, and the box
strengthens the sound, which finally affects the membrane, causing it to
vibrate. Resting upon this membrane is a thin copper disc attached to a
wire leading from the electrical battery. Above and very near it hangs a
metallic point, which forms the end of a wire leading to the place to
which the message is to be sent. The membrane rises slightly with every
vibration, and touching the point, a current is established and
communication effected with the distant point; but this communication
ceases as soon as the vibration stops, and the membrane assumes a state
of rest. As every simple note is produced by a definite number of air
vibrations, and every compound sound is made up of the sum of several
simple notes, the apparatus transmits a definite number of vibrations
for each sound which it receives; and if those vibrations can be
communicated to the air at any point, however distant, the original
sounds will be reproduced. In short, the instrument may be explained as
one invented to transmit air vibrations by electricity.

The receiver consists of an iron rod about the size of a knitting
needle, wound with insulated copper wire, and supported on a wood box
having very thin sides. The rod vibrates with every passage of the
current, and the thin box increases the amount of these vibrations and
makes them audible. It is found best to introduce several rods into the
insulated coil, as with only one the sound produced is rather snuffling.
In either case, however, the vibrations of the rod are exactly the same
as those of the membrane, and even the character of the sound is
automatically reproduced.

The description here given is that of Reuss's instrument, which was
illustrated last year in the French paper "La Nature." The exact
construction of Mr. Bell's telephone has not been made public, but it
seems to be quite similar. He is said to make his vibrating membrane of
metal. The greatest distance to which sounds have been sent is one
hundred and forty-three miles, from Boston to North Conway, N.H. The
instrument is not yet perfect, the sounds being frequently indistinct.
With a private wire and two persons accustomed to each other's voices it
would probably be a greater success. It is therefore likely to be
quickly introduced into business uses. At present some rather wild
anticipations are indulged in by the daily press, but the instrument
probably has a really remarkable future before it.

                     *      *      *      *      *

DAMAGES BY AN INSECT.

Traffic on railways and canals has diminished, public taxes do not pay
for collection, and poverty, privation, and misery have come upon
twenty-five departments of France from the ravages of the phylloxera
insect which attacks the roots of the grapevines. Such is the official
report of a committee appointed by the Academy of Sciences. The
important districts of Champagne, Burgundy, the Loire, and the Cher, are
now threatened, and from the greatly extended foothold which the insect
has now gained it is feared that its operations will be very rapid. It
is not impossible that the principal industry of France will be crippled
for years. In spite of all this, wine is now quite cheap. The hard times
have lessened consumption, and the product is so huge--900,000,000
litres, or 180,000,000 gallons yearly from France alone--that the stock
in the market is maintained in spite of the great ravages of the insect.
The cheapest claret is sold in New York for $40 a cask, or about 66
cents a gallon. Of this 24 cents is for duty.

                     *      *      *      *      *

THE SUMMER SCIENTIFIC SCHOOLS.

Summer schools of science proved very popular last year, and are to be
continued this season. A lady who studied in the botanical school at
Harvard said that work began properly at nine o'clock and continued to
twelve; but the pupils were so eager to reap all possible benefit from
the six weeks' course, that some were in the laboratory by 7:30 in the
morning. One lady made herself sick in a week by over study, and many
others injured themselves by too close application. The Professor
finally prohibited work out of the regular hours. The schools will be
reopened July 6, and continue to August 17, the term being six weeks
long; applications to be made by June 1. The courses will be five in
number, as follows: General chemistry and qualitative analysis, under
Mr. C. F. Mabery, to whom (at Cambridge) applications must be sent; fee,
$25 and cost of supplies. Phaenogamic botany, by Prof. George L. Goodale;
fee, $25. For lectures without laboratory practice the charge is $10.
Cryptogamic botany will be taught by Prof. W. G. Farlow; fee, $25.
Microscopes, etc., are provided by the university. Students in this
course should have a previous knowledge of phaenogamic botany. In
addition to laboratory practice excursions will be made and lectures
given. Prof. Farlow's address is 6 Park Square, Boston.

Prof. N. S. Shaler and Mr. Wm. M. Davis, Jr., will give a course in
geology, including instruction in Cambridge, and a trip through
Massachusetts to New York. The tuition fee is $50, and other costs
_about_ $50 for board and lodging, and $25 for travelling expenses.
When the regular excursion is finished a more extended trip will be made
if desired, to the Mammoth Cave and other localities, on the way to
Nashville, where the American Association will have its next meeting.

Lastly, the school provides a course on zooelogy, by Mr. W. Faxon and Mr.
W. K. Brooks; fee, $25. It will comprise lectures, laboratory work, and
excursions to the neighboring seashores. Apply to Mr. W. Faxon,
Cambridge, Massachusetts.


_The Cornell Excursion._

Cornell university also has its summer school of natural history, and it
will take a peculiar form this year. Prof. Theodore B. Comstock
proposes, if sufficient encouragement is given before May 1, to charter
a steamer and spend six weeks on the great lakes. The cheapness of
steamer travel makes a trip of this kind in very comfortable style
possible at moderate expense. The price is fixed at $125, which includes
tuition fee and every other expense, for thirty days; and $3.50 per day
for ten days more. The time may be extended beyond forty days by a
majority vote of the excursionists. Buffalo or Cleveland will be the
starting point, and the line of travel will be around the south shore of
the lakes Erie, Huron, and Superior, returning by the north shore. The
steamer will be a free rover, and visit places outside of the usual
lines of travel. Lectures will be given and dredging done, the results
of which will be distributed among the pupils, and shares may also be
subscribed for by schools, teachers, and others. These shares will
entitle the holders to part of the botanical and zoological collections
made.


_Williams Rocky Mountain Excursion._

A more private but very extended excursion will be made by Williams
college students, under the care of Prof. Sanborn Tenney, who holds the
chair of natural history in the college. No fees are charged, and Prof.
Tenney receives no compensation. The number of students is limited to
fifteen, who will for the most part pay their own expenses, and the
expedition is not open to the public. The students are selected with
reference to the study of geology and mineralogy, botany, and the
various departments of zooelogy, entomology, ornithology, ichthyology.
Extensive collections will be made in all departments of natural
history, which will be deposited in the Williams college natural history
museum and the lyceum of natural history in the college. The excursion
will start early in July and return in time for the regular autumn
college opening. This is evidently intended to be one of the most
important enterprises of the year for field instruction.


_A Texas Trip._

Butler college, Irvington, Indiana, will send an expedition to Texas,
with headquarters at Dallas in that State. Studies in geology and
natural history will be mainly pursued, and collections made of birds,
fishes, reptiles, insects, plants, and fossils. The number of students
will be from ten to twenty-five, and they will leave Indianapolis June
20, under the charge of Prof. John A. Myers. Mammoth Cave, Lookout
mountain, and other places of interest in Tennessee and Alabama, will be
visited, and the party will return in time for the Association for the
Advancement of Science meeting at Nashville. Dallas, which is to be the
centre of operations, is a thriving town in the grazing region of Texas,
and is a good place for the study of botany and zooelogy.

Another lake excursion is projected by the Institute of Mining
Engineers, who expect to spend two weeks in visiting the famous mining
districts of that region. Though not precisely a "summer school," this
will be both a professional and social excursion.

A committee of Wisconsin teachers recommend the introduction of this
system of summer schools in that State. They want to have a class formed
under Prof. T. C. Chamberlin, State geologist, to commence at St. Croix
Falls, and make geological, zooelogical, and botanical studies down the
Mississippi to Rock Island. Headquarters would be on a large boat.

Directors of other summer schools are requested to send notices of the
work they are planning to do to the office of this magazine.

                     *      *      *      *      *

AN INTELLIGENT QUARANTINE.

The quarantine history of New York was quite remarkable in 1876. Yellow
fever was epidemic at several ports along the Gulf and Atlantic coast,
and no less than 363 vessels came into New York from those ports,
ninety-nine of which had the disease on board, either during the voyage
or in port. Under these circumstances, it may be supposed that the
authorities were not disposed to encourage commerce between the city
and the infected towns. Philadelphia and Baltimore adopted an
interdiction of all trade with Savannah, as a precaution. But a bolder
and wiser policy has gradually been introduced into the New York
quarantine. Instead of being a loser by the yellow fever, that city was
called upon to take the whole trade, and did so without hesitation,
though the voyage from Charleston and some other ports occupied less
time than the average incubation period of the disease, which might be
introduced unnoticed into the city unless preventative measures were
taken. Orders were given to receive no passengers from the afflicted
cities, so that the quarantine authorities had only the cargo and crew
to deal with. The ship was thoroughly fumigated and the cargo
discharged as rapidly as was consistent with safe supervision. This
rapid discharge is advised because a ship's heated hold is just the
place for the full development of the fomites. If the cargo does carry
the germs of the disease, the worst thing that can be done is to leave
it in the ship, which is then likely to become a pest-house. Prompt
removal reduces the danger to a minimum. By this intelligent course New
York was able to keep open her communication with Savannah in the
height of the epidemic, and she was the only city on the Atlantic to do
so. More cotton than ever came to her harbor. The hygienic results are
noticeable. Although more than a thousand deaths occurred in Savannah,
not one case of yellow fever reached the _city_ of New York by water.
Two or three cases of sickness from vessels occurred in that city and
Brooklyn; but though these were said to be yellow fever, their
subsequent history did not sustain the supposition. They were probably
a form of malarial fever which so nearly resembles the more dreaded
disease that time is required to distinguish between them. Two cases of
real yellow fever reached the city by rail, but all others were stopped
at quarantine, which contained patients from January to the latter part
of October, excepting one month--May. In all, sixty were treated there,
most of whom were supposed to have yellow fever; but of these only
thirty-nine really had that disease, the remainder having the peculiar
form of malarial fever before spoken of. These results sustain the
intelligent action of the quarantine officers who have stripped off the
terrors which once hung about the name quarantine, and still do in so
many parts of the world and of our own country.

                     *      *      *      *      *

THE "GRASSHOPPER COMMISSION."

The last Congress made an appropriation of $18,000 for an Entomological
Commission, and for once the Government has made a perfectly
satisfactory series of appointments. Prof. C. V. Riley, the
distinguished and experienced State entomologist of Missouri, is the
chief of the commission, while Prof. Cyrus Thomas, State Entomologist of
Illinois, one of the most noted American authorities, and Dr. A. S.
Packard, author of several works on insect and other morphology, are its
other members. They will have their headquarters at Dr. Hayden's office,
in Washington, and also a Western office in St. Louis. In the division
of work Prof. Riley takes the country east of the Rocky mountains and
south of the forty-eighth parallel, Prof. Thomas has Minnesota,
Nebraska, South Dakota, and East Wyoming, and Dr. Packard the remainder
of the country west of these two areas. The object of the commission may
be stated to be the discovery of the best means of lessening the ravages
of insects upon American crops; but to learn this it will be necessary
to study not only the life histories of the grasshopper and Colorado
beetle, but also their climatic and geographical relations. The damage
done by insects probably amounts to some scores of millions yearly, and
it has long been apparent that one of the next services demanded of
scientific men would be efficient aid and direction in the warfare of
man against his smallest foes in the animal world. In the early history
of a country, it is possible to provide against these losses by
cultivating an excess of land, but when population becomes concentrated
it is necessary to avoid the loss. The destructiveness of insects has
never attracted so much attention as within the last half century, which
is also notable as a period of extraordinary increase in the population
of the civilized portions of the world. Now that the welfare of a great
empire has been seriously threatened by the operations of one insect,
and several States in our own country have been so overrun with another
insect that both the States concerned and the general Government have
been compelled to modify their laws in order to afford relief to
farmers, the important relation of insect to human life has become
clear, and is receiving due attention.

                     *      *      *      *      *

SURVEYING PLANS FOR THE SEASON.

The work of the Government surveys will not be stopped by the
unfortunate failure of Congress to pass an appropriation for the army.
Hayden's party Will be in field by the middle of May, and Wheeler will,
no doubt, be equally prompt. The former will confine his work to the
region north of the Pacific railroad and east of the Yellowstone Park.
The triangulating party, under Mr. A. D. Wilson, will survey a system of
triangles, and locate the principal peaks. Mr. Henry Gannett will take
charge of the topographical work in the western and Mr. G. B. Chittenden
in the eastern half of the field. A fourth division, under Mr. G. R.
Bechler, will survey in the northern portion, near the Yellowstone Park.
Each of these divisions contains about ten thousand square miles, so
that if the parties are able to complete their work, the ground covered
will be quite large.

                     *      *      *      *      *

THE CAUSES OF VIOLENT DEATH.

The violent deaths in Great Britain in 1874 were no less than 17,920,
the highest number ever registered. There were 18 executions and 1,592
suicides, so that 16,310 may be classed as unexpected. Railways killed
1,249, horse conveyances 1,313, and it is noted that those modes of
conveyance which are mostly peculiar to cities were not responsible for
this great slaughter. Street, or so-called horse railroads, killed 62
persons, omnibuses 55, cabs 61, and carriages 82, and these numbers show
how great is the skill and care exercised in the crowded streets of
cities. The source of the remaining 1,053 deaths by horses is not given
in our authority (a Scotch paper), but it is probable that exercise in
the saddle had much to do with them. There were 942 deaths in coal
mines, and 118 in copper, tin, iron, and other mines. Lightning killed
25, sunstroke 90, and cold 114. There were 461 persons poisoned, about
one-third being suicides. The bite of a fox, of a rat, of a leech, the
scratch of a cat, and the sting of a hornet each killed one person, and
two were stung to death by wasps. Of other noteworthy causes of death,
it is mentioned that a girl fourteen years old died in childbed.

                     *      *      *      *      *

A NEW INDUCTION COIL.

The largest induction coil ever made has lately been constructed for Mr.
Wm. Spottiswoode by Mr. Apps. It has two primaries, of which the one
used for long sparks weighs sixty-seven pounds and is formed of a bundle
of iron wires 44 inches long and 3.5625 inches in diameter. The wire is
0.032 inch in diameter. This primary has 660 yards of copper wire 0.096
inch in diameter, and wound in 1,344 turns in six layers. The spark
obtained with this primary is remarkably long in proportion to the
battery power used. With five Grove's quart cells the spark was 28
inches, with ten cells 35 inches, with thirty cells 37.5 inches and 42
inches, and it is thought that even better results could be obtained.
The insulation is so good that seventy cells have been used without
injury. The condenser is smaller than usual, being of the size commonly
used with a ten-inch coil. It has 126 sheets of tinfoil, 18 by 8-1/4
inches, separated by two sheets of varnished paper. The other primary is
heavier than the above described, weighing 92 pounds. The secondary coil
contains 280 miles of wire, in 341,850 turns. It is used for
spectroscopes and for short sparks. The power of this instrument is
really comparable to that of lightning. A block of flint glass three
inches thick has been pierced with the 28-inch spark.

                     *      *      *      *      *

FRENCH PROPERTY OWNERS.

The financial strength of the French is a constant marvel to other
nations. Political economists point to the single standard of coinage or
to the double standard, according as they consider France to adhere to
one or the other of these systems, as the source of this strength. But
the difference between that and other nations is probably more
conspicuous in the management of government loans than in any other
thing. The French government does not depend on syndicates. More than
four million French men and women have subscribed to the public debt,
and whatever arrangements are made with great bankers, the common people
of France are always invited to take a part of the bonds at a fixed and
fair price. That country is noticeably distinguished from Great Britain
by the equally wide distribution of land. There are more than five
million peasant proprietors in France, while the United Kingdom is owned
by about 200,000 persons. In England one person in 130 probably owns
land, as distinguished from mere house property, and outside of London
one in 30 owns a house. In Scotland one in 400 is a landowner, and one
in 28 has a house in his name. In Ireland one in 315 owns land, but only
one in 120 has title to a house.

                     *      *      *      *      *

TRIGONOMETRICAL SURVEY OF NEW YORK.

The board of commissioners in whose charge is placed the projected
trigonometrical survey of New York State report that preparations have
been made for beginning the work in ten counties westward from the line
of the upper Hudson river to Seneca lake. The starting points are the
four United States Coast Survey stations at Mt. Rafinesque, near Troy,
Helderberg, Princetown, and Greenwich. The position of these points has
been very accurately ascertained by means of two independent lines of
triangles carried from New England and Fire Island through Connecticut
and Massachusetts. The State Survey, therefore, enjoys the advantage of
starting from points that belong to the great chain of stations
established by the general Government, and these are so placed that the
first line of triangles which crosses the State will connect directly
with another chain of similar stations on the great lakes. The plan
followed includes the selection of prominent elevations of land for
principal stations. An earthen vessel of peculiar shape and markings
will be sunk below the first line, and its centre clearly marked. Above
this will be placed a squared stone projecting from the ground. The
latter will be the visible base of operations in common use, but the
former will be the permanent and authoritative reference in case of any
difficulty or doubt. It is intended to establish these points about
twelve miles apart, and their positions will be determined by careful
astronomical observations, checked by accurate measurements of their
distance from neighboring stations. Wherever the nature of the ground
compels the placing of these stations at distances inconveniently great,
subordinate points will be established in the intermediate ground. In
the present working ground the highlands which bound the Mohawk valley
on the north and south afford admirable positions for these stations.

The director of the survey reports that the work is well received by
farmers, and he gives some excellent reasons why it should be. Boundary
marks have so generally disappeared that in tracing the boundaries of
eleven counties where sixty corners had been made, only two were found.
It is a part of Mr. Gardner's plan to preserve these old lines, marking
them in a permanent manner. The cost of bad work appears to have been
very large to the people. The citizens of the State spend $40,000 for
maps that are really worthless. Designing persons obtain aid for
improper enterprises by exhibiting false maps, and there is no means of
disproving their assertions. Counties and towns have contributed large
sums to such projects, and the total is estimated at forty million
dollars. Half of this was paid for the Oswego Midland railroad, which
Mr. Gardner says would never have been built had its supporters known
the character of the country it would cross and the ruinous original
cost and running expenses involved in its heavy cuttings and high
grades. The cost of surveying the whole State is estimated at $200,000
for the trigonometrical work, which is all that is now projected. To
this must eventually be added topography and mapping, though these are
not necessary for fixing boundaries. Still, the whole sum required,
distributed as it would be over ten years' time, would be a light burden
and a remunerative expenditure.

                     *      *      *      *      *

THE USE OF AIR IN ORE DRESSING.

A correspondent, Mr. M. F. M. Cazin, writes us that the article
on "Hot Water in Dressing Ores" in the March number "is another good
illustration of how great men will stumble over little things. Permit me
to express a principle with regard to the same matter, by which without
Rittinger's profound calculations, without Ransom's laboratory
experiments, the entire question about the best medium (liquid or fluid)
for separating two equal sized particles of solids according to their
density (specific gravity) can be settled for every special case." His
"principle" is that the ideal fluid for this purpose is one that is more
dense than the lighter of the two particles and less dense than the
heavier. But this is no new revelation. The difficulty is that there is
but one fluid of the kind, and only one metal (disregarding the very
rare ones) to which it can be applied. The fluid is mercury and the
metal gold. The latter has a specific gravity of say 19, and therefore
sinks when it is carried upon a bath of fluid quicksilver, with a
specific gravity of say 13.6. The sand with which the metal is mixed has
a specific gravity of only 2.6 to 5, and floats over the mercury bath
and away into the waste, thus effecting the desired separation. This
operation, and the fact that there is such a thing as a theoretically
ideal fluid, was clearly pointed out by Rittinger, for whom Mr. Cazin
appears to have so little respect. The latter gentleman does bring
forward one new point, and it is an important one. He asserts that air
can be made to act as an "ideal" fluid, in the sense referred to here,
by imparting motion to it. This conclusion depends on the consideration
that "motion of the fluid in an opposite direction to the fall of the
solid particles is equivalent (by friction, adhesion, resistance) to an
increase of density of the fluid. Therefore air may by imparted motion
have the same separating effect, in a specified case, as water would
have without motion."

If Mr. Cazin would state his case differently, he would see more
clearly the place that air has as a separating medium. It cannot be
made an _ideal_ fluid, but it is comparable with water, which also is
never an ideal fluid, for there is no ore of common occurrence that is
lighter than water. The question in ore dressing really is whether air
can be made to work as well as water. Theoretically we can see no
objection, but in practice a great many obstacles arise. The cost is
greater both for machinery and operating expenses; the ore has to be
dried either before or after crushing, and the efficiency of the
apparatus is still doubtful. It may be possible to save more fine dust
than by the wet methods, but this point remains unproved.

This subject is a very important one, and involves very great interests.
It is a singular fact that the mechanical treatment of ores, which is a
fundamental part of mining science and practice, is not taught in any of
the American mining schools. English scientific men occasionally point
to America as the land of sound and general scientific teaching, but we
fear that a nearer acquaintance with our schools would rob us of that
reputation. It is difficult to imagine a less complete system of
instruction than that in some of our technical schools, or a more
erratic sense of industrial needs than among some of our school
managers.

                     *      *      *      *      *

POLAR COLONIZATION.

Congress did not appropriate the $50,000 asked for by Capt. Howgate, but
from the peculiar state of politics in the last Congress this is not
thought to indicate an unfavorable reception of his scheme. The bill was
not reported from the naval committee. It will probably be brought up
next December. That will of course be too late to accomplish anything
this year, so that the summer is lost to the main expedition, but Capt.
Howgate now proposes to send out an agent to settle upon a site for the
proposed camp, engage Esquimaux, and make other preparations. In fact,
it is proposed to spend as much as $17,000 in preliminary work and
stores, and it is thought that this can be done without increasing the
ultimate cost of the expedition more than four thousand dollars. We
regret to see that the newspapers are apt to talk about "a dash to the
pole" when they speak of this scheme. It is to be hoped that no such
dash will be attempted. Capt. Howgate should start out with the fixed
determination of making no attempt whatever to reach the pole the first
year or two. The dashing style has been the only one used in the
centuries through which the history of Arctic exploration runs. What is
now of most importance is the inauguration of tentative methods. They
are pretty certain to win in the end, and the other method of management
is about as certain to fail.

The Government commission appointed to investigate the conduct of the
English expedition has reported that its failure was principally due to
the omission of lime-juice from the provision of the sledge parties. The
reason for leaving it out was that fuel would have to be carried to thaw
it, and with a load of 237 pounds to the man, the sledge parties were
already weighted down. This shows how the most labored and extensive
preparations for a "dash" may be defeated by failure in even one
apparently small item.

Now that the subject of Arctic colonization is so energetically
discussed in this country, it may be worth while to republish the
recommendations of a German government commission appointed to consider
the scheme, when it was first proposed by Weyprecht. These were as
follows:

"1. The exploration of the Arctic regions is of great importance for all
branches of science. The commission recommends for such exploration the
establishment of fixed observing stations. From the principal station,
and supported by it, are to be made exploring expeditions by sea and by
land.

"2. The commission is of opinion that the region which should be
explored by organized German Arctic explorers is the great inlet to the
higher Arctic regions situated between the eastern shore of Greenland
and the western shore of Spitzbergen.

"Considering the results of the second German Arctic expedition, a
principal station should be established on the eastern shore of
Greenland, and at least _two_ secondary stations, fitted out for
_permanent_ investigation of different scientific questions, at Jan
Mayen and on the western shore of Spitzbergen. For certain scientific
researches the principal station should establish temporary stations.

"3. It appears very desirable, and so far as scientific preparations are
concerned, possible, to commence these Arctic explorations in the year
1877.

"4. The commission is convinced that an exploration of the Arctic
regions, based on such principles, will furnish valuable results, even
if limited to the region between Greenland and Spitzbergen; but it is
also of opinion that an exhaustive solution of the problems to be solved
can only be expected when the exploration is extended over the whole
Arctic zone, and when other countries take their share in the
undertaking.

"The commission recommends, therefore, that the principles adopted for
the German undertaking should be communicated to the governments of the
States which take interest in Arctic inquiry, in order to establish, if
possible, a complete circle of observing stations in the Arctic zones."

It will be observed that the Germans looked forward to occupying the
adjacent parts of Greenland and Spitzbergen as their share of a line of
outposts to be established by different nations around the Arctic
circle. In any such scheme America would necessarily be called on to
bear a part, and by Captain Howgate's plan her station would be the
line of Smith's Sound and its northern prolongations. This is certainly
her natural field, and is not only the roadway by which most of our
explorers have made their attempts to reach the pole, and therefore
hallowed by their historical struggles, but it is also that portion of
the Arctic region which lies nearest us. It is emphatically a _home_
field to us.

                     *      *      *      *      *

Twenty-seven meteors fell in the United States, and two earthquake
shocks were experienced, in February.


When the Great Eastern was recently cleaned 300 tons of barnacles were
scraped from her bottom, an area of more than 52,000 square feet.


During the hurricane of January 30 the waves in the British channel were
forty feet high as measured by a mareograph.


In December, while the snow was blocking the roads of this country,
Australia enjoyed a temperature of 110 to 116 in the shade.


Search has again been made for the planet Vulcan, the existence of which
is indicated by Leverrier's calculations, but without success.


Among the results of Nordensjold's last trip to the Jenisei river in
Siberia was a piece of mammoth hide found with some bones of that
animal.


Hygeia, "the city of health," is to be built on the Courtland's estate,
about a mile and a half west of Worthing, Sussex, England. Work will be
commenced this spring.


The "Big Bonanza" yielded $20,108,958 gold and $25,700,682 silver from
its discovery to September 30, 1876. In this deposit the usual
preponderance of gold over silver is reversed.


The Mammoth Cave is but one among many caverns in the subcarboniferous
limestones of Kentucky, the total length of which Prof. Shaler thinks is
at least 100,000 miles.


During the continuance of the Centennial, the Pennsylvania railroad
carried nearly five millions of passengers to Philadelphia, and out of
their 760,486 trunks, valises, bags, boxes, and bundles only 26 were
mislaid.


The opening of the safes, more than twenty in number, which were exposed
in the great fire at the American Watch Company's New York building
proved that safes, as now made by good firms, are really fire-proof
under ordinary circumstances. Watch movements, bank bills, diamonds and
jewelry, all came out in good order from most of them, though in some
cases the outside plates were red hot. In one safe was a delicate lace
shawl, worth $1,500, which was quite uninjured.


Two French astronomers, MM. Andre and Angot, have asked to be sent to
San Francisco to observe the transit of Mercury on May 5, 1878. They
hope to obtain data which will make the next transit of Venus more
fruitful.


During the last year the Signal Service extended its telegraph lines
across the Staked Plain to San Diego, California. Two continuous lines
of telegraph now extend across the country, one in the northern and one
in the southern region.


Additions of interesting animals are frequently made to the New York
Aquarium. The blind Proteus from Austria, Axolotl from Mexico,
Salamanders from Germany, and some curious fish from China are among the
latest additions to the tanks.


The combined Signal and Life-Saving Service at Cape Henry is reported to
have saved $500,000 worth of property in the storms which marked the end
of March. Telegraphic connection is found indispensable to efficient
work in watching the coast.


The bullion product of the United States from July 1, 1875, to June 30,
1876, was about $85,250,000, of which $46,750,000 was gold and
$38,500,000 silver. The annual gold product of the world is supposed to
be about $25,000,000 greater than that of silver.


The copper-bearing rocks of Lake Superior are reported by the geologist
of Wisconsin to extend almost uninterruptedly across that State. In the
Nemakagon river masses of native copper have been found, and that
country may become a rich copper region.


The second congress of Americanistes will meet in Luxembourg September
10 to 13 next. Information and tickets may be had in England of Mr. F.
A. Allen, 15 Fitzwilliam Road, Clapham, S.W. It is to be hoped there
will be less speculation and more research than at the last congress.


Persons desirous of procuring brook and salmon trout for restocking the
waters of New York State can do so by addressing Seth Green at
Rochester, who will send them on the payment of the travelling expenses
of a messenger and the giving of full directions as to route and whom to
call on.


A class in plain cooking was lately formed at the New York Cooking
School. The course consisted of twelve lessons. The tuition fees for
girls who bear their own expenses are fifty cents for a single lesson,
or $5 a course; for charitable societies, in behalf of their protegees,
$5 a course; for ladies sending their cooks for instruction, $10 a
course.


A shower of stones is reported to have fallen February 16 in Social
Circle, Walton county, Georgia, varying in size from a hen's egg to that
of a man's two fists, irregular in shape, dark grayish color,
interspersed with a bright, shiny substance resembling mica. The shower
was brief, extended over about four acres of ground, and followed an
explosive sound.


Panic fears are likely to prove the destruction of the Spitz dog. The
belief that this species is peculiarly liable to hydrophobia, and
inclined to bite on small provocation, has led a great many owners to
deliver up their Spitz dogs to the police for destruction. In one city,
East Brooklyn, there was said to be 4,000 of them, but the number is now
much reduced. Is it not possible that a similar panic among brutes may
account for the extinction of some wild species of animals?


According to one of the German papers, the Zooelogical Garden at Cologne
has been the scene of a tremendous fight between two Polar bears. They
were male and female, and the latter, being overcome, was finally
dragged by the male to the reservoir of water in the den, and held down
until she was dead. Then her lifeless body was dragged around the place
for some time by her furious conqueror.




CURRENT LITERATURE.


Miss Martineau's "Autobiography,"[2] which comprises two-thirds of
this voluminous publication, is an interesting specimen of an
interesting sort of book. It appeals much more to the general reader
than most of the multitudinous volumes which she gave to the world
during her lifetime, and we shall not be surprised if it takes its
place among the limited number of excellent personal memoirs in the
language. (For this purpose, however, we must add, it would need to be
disembarrassed of the biographical appendage affixed to it by the
editor, which, though carefully and agreeably prepared, we cannot but
regard as rather a dead weight upon the book. It repeats much of what
the author has related, and envelopes her narrative in a diffuse,
eulogistic commentary which strikes the reader sometimes as superfluous
and sometimes as directly at variance with the impression made upon him
by Miss Martineau's text.) Miss Martineau was indeed, intellectually,
one of the most remarkable women who have exhibited themselves to the
world. She was not delicate, she was not graceful, or imaginative, or
aesthetic, or some of the other pretty things that literary ladies are
expected to be; but she was extraordinarily vigorous; she had a great
understanding--a great reason. She gives, intellectually, a great
impression of force. She was a really heroic worker, a genuine
philosopher, and she made her mark upon her time. Her reader's last
feeling about her is that she was thoroughly respectable. He will have
had incidental feelings of a less genial kind; he will have been
irritated at the coarseness of some of her judgments and the
complacency of some of her claims; at her evident want of tact and
repose; at a disposition to which he will even permit himself, perhaps,
to apply the epithet of meddlesome. But he will have a strong sense of
Miss Martineau's care for great things--her sustained desire, prompting
her always to production of some kind, to help along and enlighten the
human race. She was a combatant, and the whole force of her nature
prompted her to discussion. Such natures cannot afford to be
delicate--to be easily bruised and scratched; neither can they afford
to have that speculative cast of fancy which wastes valuable time in
scruples that are possibly superfluous and questions that are possibly
vain. In spite of any such apologetic view of her disposition as may be
put forth, however, it is probable that Miss Martineau's autobiography
will give offence enough. She speaks out her mind with complete
frankness upon most of the persons that she has known, subject to the
single condition of her book being published after her death. Of its
being postponed until the death of the objects of her criticism we hear
nothing, though this would have been more to the point. Miss Martineau
deals out disapproval with so liberal a hand, that among those persons
concerned who are still living much resentment and disgust must
inevitably ensue. Downright and vigorous as she is in spirit, there is
no mistaking the degree of her censure, and as (whatever else she may
be) she is not a flippant writer, it has every appearance of being
deliberate and premeditated. We do not pretend to decide upon the
propriety of her hard knocks, or to point out the particular cases in
which they might have been a little softer; but we cannot help saying
that there is something in Miss Martineau's general attitude toward
individuals which inspires one with a certain mistrust. She was
evidently always judging and always uttering judgments. Her business in
life was to have opinions and to promulgate them, and as objects of
opinion she seems to have regarded persons very much as she regarded
abstract ideas--attributing to them an equal unconsciousness of
denunciation. This eagerness to qualify her fellow members of society
would have been perhaps a great virtue if Miss Martineau's powers of
observation had been of extraordinary fineness; but in spite of an
occasional very happy hit, we hardly think this to have been the case.
Sometimes, evidently, she went straight to the point, and often,
independently of the justice of her appreciation, this is expressed
with an extremely vigorous neatness. But frequently her descriptions of
people strike us as both harsh and superficial, and more especially as
_heated_, even after the lapse of years. She goes out of her way to
pronounce very unflattering verdicts upon men and women who have
apparently had little more connection with her life than that they have
been her contemporaries. This is apart from the rightful spirit of an
autobiography, which, it seems to us, should deal only with people who
have been real factors in the writer's life. The latter pages of Miss
Martineau's first volume contain a series of portraits, some brief,
some more extended, of which it must be said that their very incisive
lines make them extremely entertaining. Miss Martineau's style is
always excellent for strength and fulness of meaning, and at times she
has a real genius for terseness. Lord Campbell "was wonderfully like
the present Lord; was facetious, in and out of place; politic;
flattering to an insulting degree, and prone to moralizing in so trite
a way as to be almost as insulting." That has almost the condensation
of Saint-Simon. There is a very vivid, satirical portrait in this same
chapter of a certain Lady Stepney, who wrote silly novels of the
"fashionable" type which Thackeray burlesqued, and boasted that she
received L700 a piece for them; and there are sketches of Campbell,
Bulwer, Landseer, and various other persons, which if they are wanting
in graciousness, are not wanting in spirit. Miss Martineau gives _in
extenso_ her opinion of Macaulay, and a very low opinion it seems to
be. It is, however, very much the verdict of time--save in regard to
the "dreary indolence" of which the author accuses him, and which will
excite surprise in the readers of Mr. Trevylyan's "Life." Of Lockhart
and Croker and their insolent treatment of herself and her fame in the
early part of her career, she gives a lamentable, and apparently a just
account; but stories about the underhandedness and truculence of these
discreditable founders of the modern art of "reviewing" are by this
time old stories. There is also a story about poor Mr. N. P. Willis,
which, though it consorts equally with the impression which this
_litterateur_ contrived to diffuse with regard to himself, it was less
decent to relate. When Miss Martineau left England for America, Mr.
Willis gave her a bundle of letters of introduction to various people
here; and on arriving in this country and proceeding to present Mr.
Willis's passports, she found that the gentleman was unknown to most of
the persons to whom they were addressed. A fastidious delicacy might
have suggested to Miss Martineau that her lips were sealed by the fact
that, of slight value as these documents were, she had at least
accepted and made use of them. We suppose there was no case in which,
even when repudiated, they did not practically serve as an
introduction. But Miss Martineau was not fastidiously delicate.

      [2] "_Harriet Martineau's Autobiography._" With Memorials by
      MARIA WESTON CHAPMAN. In 3 vols. Boston: Jas. R. Osgood & Co.

This copious retrospect appears to have been written about the year
1855, when the author had ceased to labor; having earned a highly
honorable repose, and being moreover incapacitated by serious ill
health. She appears then, at fifty-three years of age, to have thought
her death very near; but she lived to be a much older woman--for upward
of twenty years. Her motive in writing her memoirs is affirmed to be a
desire to take her good name into her own hands, and anticipate the
possible publication of her letters, an event which, very properly, she
sternly deprecates. As to these letters, however, Mrs. Chapman publishes
several, and makes liberal use of others. The reader wonders what her
correspondence would have been, since what she destined to publicity is
occasionally so invidious. Another motive with Miss Martineau appears to
have been a desire to set forth, in particular, the history of her
religious opinions--the history being sufficiently remarkable. Born
among the primitive Unitarians (the city of Norwich, her paternal home,
was, we believe, a sort of focus of this amiable form of Dissent), she
passed, with her advance in life, from a precocious and morbid youthful
piety to the furthest limits of skepticism. The story is an interesting
one, and it forms both the first and the last note that she strikes; but
we doubt whether (even among persons as little "theological" as herself)
her reflections on this subject will serve to exemplify her judgment at
its best. Her skepticism is too dogmatic and her whole attitude toward
the "superstition" she has cast off too much marked by a small eagerness
for formulas in the opposite direction, and a narrow complacency in the
act of ventilating her negations. She cannot keep her hands off
affirmations about a future state, and she lacks that imaginative
feeling (so indispensable in all this matter) which suggests that the
completest form of the liberty which she claims as against her
theological education is tacit suspension of judgment. In general Miss
Martineau is certainly not superficial, but here, in feeling, she is.
This however is the penalty of having been narrowly theological in one's
earlier years; it always leaves a bad trace somewhere, especially in
reaction. The chapters in which Miss Martineau describes these early
years are admirable; they place before us most vividly the hard
conditions of her childish life, and they describe with singular
psychological minuteness the unfolding of her character and the growth
of her impressions. They have a remarkable candor, and it certainly
cannot be said that the author's portrait of her youthful self is a
flattered one. We doubt whether, except Rousseau, any autobiographer
ever had the courage to accuse himself of so ungraceful a fault as
infant miserliness. "I certainly was very close," says Miss Martineau,
"all my childhood and youth." Her account of the circumstances which led
to and accompanied her first steps in literature, of the first money she
earned (she was in sore need of it), and of the growth of her form and
development of her powers, and her confidence in them--all this is
extremely real, touching, and interesting. She succeeded almost from the
first, but her success was the result of an amount of unaided exertion
which excites our wonder. What fairly launched her was the publication
of her "Tales in Illustration of Political Economy," and there was
something really heroic in the way that as a poor young woman with
"views" of her own and without helpful companionship, she explored and
mastered this tough science. Her views prevailed, and floated her into
distinction. We have no space to allude to the details of the rest of
her career, one of the principal events of which was her visit to
America in 1834. It lasted more than two years, and was commemorated by
Miss Martineau, on her return, in no less than six volumes. Mrs. Chapman
deals with it largely in her supplementary memoir, treating chiefly,
however, of the visitor's relations with the Abolition party. Miss
Martineau evidently exaggerates both the odium which she incurred and
the danger to which she exposed herself by these relations. They were
natural ones for an ardently liberal Englishwoman to form, for the
Abolitionists, to foreign eyes, must at that time have represented the
only eminent feeling, the only sense of an ideal, visible amid the
commonplace prosperity of American life. In her last pages Miss
Martineau indulges some gloomy forebodings as to the future of the
United States, which offers, she says, the only instance on record "of a
nation being inferior to its institutions." This was written in 1855; we
abstain from hazarding a conjecture as to whether she would think better
or worse of us now.

                     *      *      *      *      *

We have two good novels, one very foreign and the other very domestic.
The first is by Auerbach,[3] whose high purpose and truly ideal
treatment of the narrative all who have read "On the Heights" will
remember with pleasure. He preserves the same style essentially in this
story, although it is of an entirely different character. A painter
visiting a country village in company with a young scholar and
philosopher who is an assistant librarian and is called the
collaborator, paints as a Madonna the beautiful daughter of the keeper
of the village inn. He falls in love with her, attracted no less by her
unconcealed love for him than by her beauty. He takes her to town with
him, a town where there is a little German court, very refined
_esthetik_, and very high-dried old manners. The poor girl drives him
almost mad with her awkwardness, her ignorance of polished life, and
her independence. It does not help the matter that in the latter
respect she wins the favor of others, even of the Prince himself. After
a while he avoids her, takes to wine-drinking, and comes home drunk.
She sees her position, and from what he is suffering, and she goes back
to her parents, leaving behind her an unreproachful, fond, and most
touching letter of farewell. Poor girl! sad as it was for her, what
else could she do? It was the best course under the circumstances; for
although her heart broke over it, she at least kept her love for him,
and that by remaining she might have lost. After a while she dies, and
he after a long time betrothes himself to another woman, who loves him,
and to whose love he responds with such a feeling as beauty and
sweetness and devotion might raise in the breast of a man whose heart
is really in the grave of his dead wife. He dies before a second
marriage from injuries received in a dispute with his brother-in-law.
It will be seen that this simple story of humble life presented
temptations to treatment in the most literal and realistic way. But in
Auerbach's hands it is ideal. Its likeness in certain respects to the
story of "A Princess of Thule" will strike all the readers of William
Black's most charming novel. But the treatment is as unlike as the
incidents and the localities. Auerbach's little novel is essentially
German in thought, in feeling, in purpose, in treatment. We have never
read a more thoroughly German book. This character is given to it, and
its ideality is very much enhanced by the character of the
collaborator, who is constantly looking upon every incident of life
from a lofty philosophic point of view; serious generally, sometimes
humorous, often serio-comic. "Wilhelm Meister" itself is not a more
thoroughly characteristic production of the German mind. But it is
nevertheless a sweet, simple, touching story, the sentiment diffused
through which has a peculiar charm. It forms one of Mr. Henry Holt's
well selected "Leisure Hour Series." The translation is marked by
idiomatic vigor and a very skilful adaptation of the rustic phraseology
of one language to that of the other.

      [3] "_Lorley and Reinhard._" By BERTHOLD AUERBACH. Translated by
      Charles T. Brooks. 16mo, pp. 377. New York: Henry Holt.

--As unlike to this as can be is a novel by an author whose name is
entirely new to us, but whose work bears the traces of some literary
experience.[4] Its double title is very well chosen. In it a number of
people, young and middle-aged, are gathered together for the summer in
the beautiful Connecticut country house of one of them--a wealthy young
bachelor. There they all fall in love. We can hardly say that everybody
falls in love with everybody else; but it is pretty nearly that.
Everybody is in love with some one else; and the consequence is, after a
good deal of cross-purposing and some suffering, half a dozen marriages.
The change that has taken place in the purpose of the novel and in the
manner of treatment of character by the novel writer could not be more
clearly exampled than by "Love in Idleness." It is absolutely without
plot, has hardly enough coherence to be called a story, is entirely
without incident. And yet it is very interesting from the first page to
the last, although its interest is not of the highest kind even in the
novel range. To give our readers any notion of it is quite impossible
without telling them almost all that happens, all that is said, thought,
and felt by the various personages. The book is strongly American; but
its Americans are of the most cultivated classes; and it is guiltless of
hard-fisted farmers, Southern slave-drivers, and California
gold-diggers. It is entirely free from that irritating intellectual
eruption sometimes called American humor. In fact, its personages are
taken both from the Old England and the New; and side by side, one set
can hardly be distinguished from the other as in real life. He who must
perforce be called the hero is a Senator, forty-eight years old, who is
engaged to marry a rather cool, reserved, and stately woman of thirty,
but is loved almost at first sight by Felise Clairmont, a girl of
nineteen, half French, half American, of enchanting beauty, and still
more captivating ways. She is loved by almost every other man in the
book; but her avowed lover is the Senator's younger brother, who is the
host of the assembled company, exclusive of Felise, who lives near by
with her guardian, a certain judge. The Senator loves the young girl as
fondly as she loves him, and still more deeply, and what the result is
we shall leave our readers to find out from the book itself, which will
richly repay the novel reader. It is exceedingly well written, and its
social machinery is managed with skill; but it is a little too much
elaborated in the conversations, which are rather excessively
epigrammatic at times. The author of such a novel, if not an old hand,
should give us something better and stronger ere long.

      [4] "_Love in Idleness._ A Summer Story." By ELLEN W. OLNEY. 8vo
      (paper), pp. 131. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co.

--"The Man Who Was Not a Colonel"[5] is an amusing story of that kind
that may be denominated "light" even in fiction. The author rattles on
through a variety of incidents, and adventures, and true-love tangles,
without trying the reader's intellect with any particularly severe
infliction of character study. It is a model of that literature which
has received the distinctive title of _railway_, because in travelling
we do not care to be bothered with thinking on our own part or others.

      [5] "_The Man Who Was Not a Colonel._" By a High Private. Loring,
      publisher. $0.50.

                     *      *      *      *      *

Mr. Wallace has done well in selecting the comprehensive title
"Russia"[6] for his book. It is no mere record of a journey, or
description of a country or people as a traveller sees them. The author
spent six years in the land of the Tsars, studied the language, and
lived with the people, and now he endeavors to show the origin and
composition of the nation, its past history and present struggles,
besides making minute studies of the serf system, the communes,
emancipation in its methods and results, the peculiar conjunction of
autocracy and democracy in the principles and practice of government,
the agriculture, the religion, politics, population, and other
important factors of a great empire. The book is sufficiently praised
when we say that all these subjects are well treated. The author is
careful to point out, as an analyst should, where his studies are
incomplete, and he modestly tells us that his work is not presented as
an unassailable summation of truth, but as the conclusion to which an
unprejudiced observer came after long and careful study. We could not
ask for better evidence of his sincerity than in the defence which he,
an Englishman, makes of the Tsar's policy of foreign annexation! He
tells us that this is not the result of autocratic choice, but is the
only available one of three modes of restraint against marauding
tribes. These three are a great wall, a military cordon, and
annexation. The first is impossible in a country that for hundreds of
miles has no durable building material, the second has been tried and
found impracticable. As to the last, there is a choice between an armed
frontier and occupation of the marauder's country, and the latter
course is followed because it is cheaper in a pecuniary sense. To the
question so often asked in England, How far is Russian "aggrandization"
to go? Mr. Wallace answers that the Russian arms cannot stop until they
reach the frontier of some stable power. In short, to those
Russophobists in England who look with such alarm upon the approach of
the Russians toward India, he calmly replies that this approach is both
inevitable and desirable! No wonder he tells his countrymen that it is
their duty to know Russia better. It is plainly impossible to even
review in the most concise manner the numerous important discussions in
this remarkable book, without producing another book in doing so. Mr.
Wallace's work is one of the most valuable studies in social and
governmental economy ever written, and several causes, aside from his
personal fidelity and fitness, combine to make it so. In general,
Russian society exhibits, so far as the peasantry are concerned, a
simplicity of life and thought that carries the imagination
irresistibly back to prehistoric times. No civilized race, no
_culturvolk_, presents such aboriginal relations in its family and
commonwealth. The nobles, on the other hand, and all the cultured
class, are fermenting with great views and plans of social reform. The
ideas that made such havoc in the early days of the French revolution
have again swept within human vision, but this time they were caught up
by a practical-minded Emperor and crystallized into the greatest
premeditated political reform of this century! The wonderful feat of
quietly emancipating forty million bonded servitors, at one stroke, the
institution on a tremendous scale of what the dreamers have declared to
be the classic relation of social man--communism, the division of land,
taking about one-half from the rich and giving it to the poor--such
marvels as these throw a halo of Arabian magic about the history of
this simple people since 1861. When to these attractions is added the
fact that this land of social classicity and political ideals is
entirely accessible to study, as no other nation of like simple culture
is, we think that reasons enough have been given for saying that our
author has chosen the ripest field in the world for his harvest labors.
He has shown himself a most conscientious and able worker in it, and
our own country will be fortunate if the social revolution that has
taken place in its Southern States ever finds so unprejudiced and
painstaking a historian as he. To Americans Mr. Wallace's book should
be more interesting and valuable than to any other readers, for many of
these questions which he discusses so thoroughly have been settled in
precisely the opposite way in this country! For instance, emancipation
here was violent, the severance of master-and-slave relations complete,
the future _status_ of the two interested parties was not previously
fixed, and no compensation was given to either. Here land is held
solely by individual tenure; no person has enforced local bonds, but is
free to move everywhere--that is, with the sole exception of Indians.
We reject the colonization plan of dealing with marauding enemies, and
adopt the armed frontier system. In short, we are diametrically
opposite in our conclusions, and yet we have a national problem that is
in two important respects essentially the same as Russia's. The
settlement of a continent and the amalgamation of races is the double
task imposed on us as well as them. One mode of accomplishing it we can
see going on about us; its precise opposite is well exhibited in Mr.
Wallace's "Russia."

      [6] "_Russia._" By D. MACKENZIE WALLACE. New York: Henry Holt &
      Co.

                     *      *      *      *      *

Mr. Anderson cannot be considered a model traveller. His "Six Weeks in
Norway"[7] gives hardly anything but the starting out on each morning,
the names of places passed, and the arrival at night. But the traveller
in that country needs something of just this kind, and this book will
therefore do very well for a guide. Indeed, it is well filled with facts
suitable to such a service. Norway is a hard country to travel in. The
frequent rains and steady fish diet are depressing to dry foreigners
with a previous sufficiency of phosphorus, and like our own country
there is little besides the scenery to engage attention. Nor is the
interior the best part of the country. It looks best in a profile view
seen from the water. Whoever would see Norway must visit the fiords in a
yacht, and not trouble the land much.

      [7] "_Six Weeks in Norway._" By E. L. ANDERSON. Robert Clarke &
      Co.

                     *      *      *      *      *

The discussion of the mutual attitude of religion and science,
particularly in regard to what is known as the theory of development,
goes ceaselessly on. Books upon the subject follow each other so rapidly
that it would seem that they must long since have ceased to find any
considerable number of readers, much more of buyers. We confess that we
are somewhat weary of the controversy; particularly as it is kept up
chiefly on the side of those who call themselves religionists, who
mostly seem to be unable to bring forward any new arguments, and no less
to fail to appreciate the attitude and the purpose of those whom they
have made their antagonists. Science, as we believe, did not seek this
controversy, but was forced into it by the attacks of the champions of
religion, and is now necessarily kept somewhat on the defence. It would
seem that nearly all that can be said, and all that need be said, has
already been brought forward. But each new disputant that enters upon
the defence of theological dogma seems to be convinced that he is the
man of men who is to protect religion against what he believes to be the
danger in which it is placed by the observation of nature and the
speculation upon discovered facts which now occupies so many physicists,
including some of first-rate ability.

We may as well say, if we have not already said in our previous remarks
upon the books upon this question which have been reviewed in the pages
of "The Galaxy," that we do not regard the theory of evolution as
established. Facts of great interest bearing upon it have been
discovered, and deductions from those facts have been made and set
forth with great ingenuity and plausibility, so that it demands serious
attention _from the scientific point of view_. But this seems to us all
that has been done. Our feelings and our convictions, not to say our
creed, are all against it. It is a degrading and a hopeless view of the
universe, and particularly of man. Him it places in the attitude of a
mere physical item in the cosmos--one link, although the last and a
golden one, in a chain of events the beginning and the future of which
are alike unknown. All our instincts revolt against it. We don't
believe it; and we candidly confess that we are in the position,
abhorrent and ridiculous to the scientific mind, of not wishing to
believe it. We believe, and we desire to believe, that man was made,
however and when, as man; and that however inferior he may have been in
his first condition to what he is now, he was never anything less than
human.

Feeling thus and believing thus, we nevertheless cannot see that those
who are resisting science on the ground that its assumed discoveries are
at war with the assumed teachings of revealed religion are doing wisely,
or that they, even the best of them, have written one word which in the
least impairs the value or the significance of the facts and the
deductions which science has set forth. Science is only to be met by
science. Theology cannot touch it. A beast and a fish cannot fight: one
must stay on land and the other must stay in the water. Religionists, on
the one hand, say that if science has discovered, or professes to have
discovered, anything at variance with the Mosaic cosmogony, it is not to
be believed. Scientific observers say on the other that if theology
teaches anything at variance with fact and logic, so much the worse for
theology. This attitude of the two will be maintained. It is natural,
and in a certain sense right, that it should be maintained. Each will
hold its position. Neither can accept the conclusions of the other or
its methods without both ceasing to be what they are. Notwithstanding
this difficulty, which is radical, the controversy will go on, until it
is decided, not by argument, but by time, experience, and the moral and
intellectual development of mankind.

A laborious contribution to the controversy has been made, by Clark
Braden,[8] who announces himself as president of Abingdon college,
Illinois. It is our own fault, probably, that we have never heard before
of the president or of the college. Neither he, however, nor his
publishers will fail through lack of confidence to make themselves
known, or because they have any misgivings as to the sufficiency of
their work. The author, in a prefatory note addressed "to reviewers and
critics," invites the most searching criticism of his book, but
earnestly requests that it shall be carefully read, and asks to have all
criticisms, particularly those which are adverse, sent to him, that they
may, as he says, "aid him in his search for truth." But plainly he has
little doubt that he has settled "the question of the hour," and what he
wishes is to enjoy the spectacle of science vainly struggling in his
giant grasp. His tone throughout the book is one of overweening
self-confidence. Darwin, Tyndall, Huxley, Spencer, Carpenter, and the
rest are to be snuffed out by the president of Abingdon college,
Illinois; nay, their very methods of research and modes of reasoning are
to be swept into the intellectual dust-bin of that institution by his
besom. And in a long address which accompanies his book, in which the
publishers speak, but the style of which bears a remarkable resemblance
to that of Mr. Braden, it is pointed out with unction that while much
has been written by the advocates of the theory of creation by
intelligence, in refutation of the evolution hypothesis, yet "no
thoughtful reader has ever felt satisfied with any one book"; "no one
has attempted to present, in all its infinity, mystery, and unfathomable
depth, the problem for which evolution is offered as a solution. This is
a fundamental failure." Of course this great need is to be supplied,
this fundamental failure made good, by Mr. Clark Braden's book. And then
the publishers break forth in words which seem to be the genuine
utterances of their own feeling: "The book is a compactly printed volume
of four hundred and eighty pages, printed on the best quality of paper,
and printed and bound in the best style of art. It contains as much
matter as most three-dollar books, and more than many of them.... Every
preacher and believer of the Bible should have a copy. All who profess
to believe these theories of evolution should, above all others, have a
copy. We want to place a copy in the hands of all parties." Doubtless.
This is delicious. Every one who believes the Bible should "have a
copy," and every one who don't believe it should "have a copy." In a
word, to "have a copy" of this book is the chief end of man, the first
requisite to reasonable existence for every human being. And then the
publishers wind up with a request for copies of the reviews of the book,
as "we desire to use them in the sale of the book, and in selecting
papers in which we will advertise." Innocent creatures! that last touch
shows how guileless they are; how they wouldn't think of such a thing as
offering a bribe to editors and publishers of newspapers; and how purely
disinterested they are in their desire to place "a copy" in the hands of
"all parties."

      [8] "_The Question of the Hour, and its Various Solutions,
      Atheism, Darwinism, and Theism._" By CLARK BRADEN. 8vo, pp. 480.
      Cincinnati: Chase & Hall.

We fear that our pages will not be selected for the advertising of this
book; which, by the way, is commonly printed and meanly bound. Candidly
we do not think that it is the end of all things. Possibly there may be
some controversy hereafter; some men may go on investigating nature and
believing in facts alone. The book reminds us of a social sketch in
"Punch," which shows two dilapidated field preachers, evidently among
the most ignorant and feeble-minded of their class, meeting on the edge
of a heath from which people are going away. One says to the other,
"Been on the 'eath? What did you preach about?" "Oh," is the reply, "I
give it to Darwin an' 'Uxley to rights." Not that Mr. Braden is in any
sense ignorant, or in any way to be compared to "Punch's" field
preacher except in his evident belief that he has "give it to Darwin
an' 'Uxley to rights," and in the perfect indifference with which
Darwin and Huxley will regard his performance. Briefly, nothing worthy
of particular remark in Mr. Braden's book. Those who wish to find the
whole question between science and revealed religion set forth as it
appears to Mr. Braden, and the facts and arguments of science met by
the usual stock-in-trade weapons of the theologian and the
metaphysician, may find all this in Mr. Braden's book, in which the
author certainly does go pretty well over the whole ground. What is
really his theme is found in this passage of one of his appendices (p.
382): "The issue between theist and atheist is: What is the necessary,
absolute, uncaused, unconditioned being or substance? What is it that
is the self-existent, independent, self-sustaining and eternal? What is
the ground, source, origin, or cause of all existences and phenomena?
This is the problem of problems, that determines all systems of
science, philosophy, and thought." Well, to these questions science
answers, We don't know; we don't pretend to know, and we probably never
shall know. We have discovered by patient observation certain facts,
and, according to the laws of right reason, we think that between these
facts there are such and such relations. In this we may be mistaken. If
we are, very well; we shall be glad to correct our error. In either
case we shall go on observing, considering, and reasoning, but
confining ourselves strictly to fact. If any dogma or transcendental
notion that you know of is at variance with fact or with reason, we may
be sorry or we may not; but in either case we can't help it. Dogmas and
notions are nothing to us. And as to that self-existent, unconditioned,
eternal intelligence that you talk about, pray tell us what you know
about it. We shall be glad to learn. Don't tell us what you think,
believe, or have an inward conviction of, but what you know. What _do_
you _know_ about it? Give us at least a solid basis of absolute
knowledge to stand upon and to start from, and we are ready to listen
to you. If you cannot do this, good morning; look you after your
dogmas, and we will keep to our facts. The truth is that not Paul and
Barnabas were more driven to part company than the disputant who sets
up as of any authority a theological dogma, no matter what, or a
metaphysical abstraction, no matter what, and the man who studies
nature scientifically. One believes because he believes, and really at
bottom from no other reason; the other is in a chronic state of
inquiry; he believes nothing in regard to any subject of inquiry but
that which rests upon the ground of absolute knowledge. Mr. Braden's
book, although it is filled with evidences of wide reading and high
education, reads like a book of metaphysical and theological
commonplace. It reminds us of our college days in the lecture room of
the professor of moral philosophy. It is well enough in its way, but it
will attract little attention in the pending controversy. Of its style
we must say that, considering the position of its author, we wish it
were better, and that in the use of language it were an example more
worthy to be followed. Its first sentence is: "One of the _wise_
utterances of one _whom_ his contemporaries declared spoke as never man
spoke, was that no _wise_ man would begin," etc. On the next page we
have such vulgar error as "_transpiring_ before our eyes," "decay and
dissolution _transpiring_ in every department of nature"; and as to
_shall_ and _will_ the author seems to have no conception of their
proper functions in English speech. This, for the president of Abingdon
college, is not well.

--Of a somewhat different character, and of much greater importance, is
a little book which presents James Martineau's last utterances on this
subject.[9] It is made up of an address delivered in Manchester New
College, October 6, 1874, and two papers which appeared subsequently in
the "Contemporary Review." Dr. Bellows, in his introduction, expresses
the feeling with which religious minds will read these papers when he
says, "it is refreshing in the midst of the crude replies which alarmed
religionists are hastily hurling at the scientific assailants of faith
in a living God, to hear one thoroughly furnished scholar, profound
metaphysician, and earnest Christian entering his thoughtful and deeply
considered protest against the tendencies or conclusions of modern
materialism." Mr. Martineau may now be justly regarded as the leading
champion of faith. He has this distinction because he is not hampered by
creeds, or articles, or hierarchal responsibility; he is yet an earnest
believer in the essentials of the Christian religion as it is accepted
by all orthodox Protestant denominations, while to these qualifications
he adds a wide range of knowledge and eminent ability as a reasoner. He
is able to meet the men of science on their own ground, and he does so.
They will not acknowledge themselves vanquished; and perhaps from the
very nature of the case, as we have already remarked, they cannot be
vanquished by any argument in which revelation or metaphysics enters as
a premise; but they will not refuse their admiration at the union of
subtlety and strength, of ability and courtesy with which they are
treated. We find many admirable passages in this book marked for
reference, as we went through it; but we must pass them by. During the
last few months we have devoted so many pages of our department of
literature to the discussion of this subject, that readers with whom it
is not a hobby might reasonably object to a further continuance of the
subject here. We content ourselves with recommending this little,
thoughtful, strongly written book to the attention of our readers. They
will find the best array of arguments with which to meet scientific
materialism.

      [9] "_Modern Materialism in its Relations to Religion and
      Theology._" By JAMES MARTINEAU, LL.D. With an introduction by
      Henry W. Bellows, D.D. 16mo, pp. 211. New York: G. P. Putnam's
      Sons.

--From the same publishers, who seem very catholic in their reception of
authors, we have a volume which, the more because of its ability and its
calmness of tone, Mr. Martineau would regard with sadness, and with
horror, and perhaps with dread.[10] Mr. Frothingham has undertaken the
task of studying the records of the foundation of Christianity from a
purely literary point of view and with all the aids that can be derived
from criticism. The result of his studies may be said to be the
satisfaction of his own mind that Jesus of Nazareth was not and did not
intend to be the founder of a new religion; that he believed himself to
be and set himself up as the Messias, the temporal Messias, expected by
the Jews; and that Christianity was founded by Paul. His conception of
Paul is striking, and however he may fail in establishing his position
in regard to him, it certainly must be admitted that he has made of him
a very interesting and energetic figure, and one which is consistent
with itself and with all that we are told of the great apostle to the
Gentiles. He calls him both Jew and Greek--Jew by parentage, nurture,
training, and genius, Greek by birthplace, residence, and association,
an enthusiast, even to fanaticism, by temperament, and yet freed from
extreme narrowness of mind by intercourse with the people and the
literature of other nations. He was a Jew whose feeling upon the Christ
question was always intense, so much so that he worried and tormented
the people who did not believe as he did. He was a Messianic believer of
the school of the Pharisees, or strict Jews; but all at once, as such
things do happen to such men, another aspect of the Messianic
expectation burst upon him with the splendor of a revelation, and
determined his career. To the conception of the Messias and of Jesus's
conformity to it which suddenly took possession of Paul, Mr. Frothingham
assigns the origin of the Christian religion as it was known in the
second century. With a cool and almost humorous adaptation of a
political phrase of the day, he calls this Paul's "new departure." That
Mr. Frothingham's book is clear in thought, interesting in substance,
agreeable and good in style every one acquainted with his writings will
readily believe. As to the points that he has undertaken to establish,
we are pretty sure that after reading his book few will think with him
who were not ready to do so before they began it.

      [10] "_The Cradle of the Christ_: A Study of Primitive
      Christianity." By OCTAVIUS BROOKS FROTHINGHAM 12mo, pp. 233.
      New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.

                     *      *      *      *      *

Dr. Watson F. Quinby of Wilmington has written an odd pamphlet on
mongrelism in races. His belief is that population tends to become
homogeneous, but this is not an averaging process. When two races mingle
and intermarry, the mongrel product does not exhibit the balanced
characteristics of both, but the traits of the higher race are absorbed
and hid in those of the lower. Asia, he says, "was formerly powerful,
with white peoples all along its northern and eastern borders, and far
into the interior. But they first enslaved the black race, then mingled
their blood, and have finally become merged in them." The resulting
mongrel people always lacks the intellectual force necessary to maintain
the civilization of the higher. Arts decline and national decay sets in.
In this way is explained the existence of noble ruins among inefficient
and barbarous nations, who practise a much ruder style of architecture.
The Mexicans are the type of this retrogression. Dr. Quinby predicts for
them an increasing decline until Aztec civilization is restored. If the
Doctor's theories could be established, there are enthusiastic
ethnologists who would not hesitate to say that the Mexicans could not
be put to a better use than this. Shut them up and compel them to breed
themselves back into Aztecs! Dr. Quinby's speculations are, to a great
extent, based on studies of language, and of lingual affinities he is a
bold, not to say reckless, expounder. Some of his work reads as if Mark
Twain had turned philologist. For instance:

    "Eighty miles from the mouth of the Indus was a place called
    Hingliz. The people of this part celebrate the festival of Bhavani
    on the first day of May, when their custom is to erect a pole in
    the field and adorn it with pendants and garlands. They also
    celebrate another festival on the last day of March, called Huli
    (Phulee), when they amuse themselves by sending one another on
    foolish errands. _All this has a very Hinglish look(!)._ This is
    probably the place where the Hinglish people came from, for though
    the Romans called themselves angles, they call themselves English."

                     *      *      *      *      *

To explore libraries, to sift out from masses of irrelevant matter what
alone is of value to the naval student, to subject the poetical
descriptions of great battles to the cold eye of professional criticism,
and to give the results in a condensed, well written, and interesting
form, is the task Commodore Parker has assumed, and so far as the volume
under consideration is concerned[11]--the first of a series--the task has
been well and faithfully performed. The amount of labor involved is
immense! The author passes rapidly over the navies of antiquity for the
reason, probably, that we are more familiar with that history than with
the naval history of a period nearer to us both in time and
relationship. What schoolboy has not read of Xerxes sitting in his
golden chair overlooking the Piraeus and the galleys of his immense fleet
strung along the coast of Attica as far as the eye could reach?

    He counted them at break of day,
    But when the sun set where were they?

      [11] "_The Fleets of the World._" By Commodore FOXHALL A. PARKER,
      United States Navy. New York: D. Van Nostrand.

Such was Salamis.

When his narrative reaches the navies of the Italian republics of the
middle ages, however, our author seems all aglow with love of his theme,
and well he may be! Venice, in her day of glory, possessed the finest
navy of the times. Captain Pantero Pantera, writing of it in 1614,
speaks with enthusiastic admiration of its fine arsenals, numerous
stores, and numbers of workmen on permanent pay. These things, he says,
were always most "carefully attended to by the republic of Venice, which
indeed in this respect not only equals, but excels all the naval powers
of the Mediterranean." There is so much of romance and poetry, indeed,
in connection with the naval history of Venice, that it requires a cool
head and steady hand to steer along the courses of sober truth; but that
truth we must not be surprised to find, in that clime of sunshine and
beauty, often out-vieing the wildest efforts of fiction. Very similar is
the history of the sister republic of Genoa. Unfortunately these lovely
sisters were great rivals, and during wars which covered a period of
about one hundred and thirty years wasted each other's strength and
resources without achieving a particle of good to either. As a judgment,
it would almost seem, for such stupendous and long-continued folly, the
seeds of destruction were planted without their own bosoms. Both
attained the pinnacle of earthly glory, but from both issued forth a
wanderer who was destined in time to set his seal upon the fate of his
native city. The Genoese Columbus, followed by the Venetian Cabot, led
the way to the great western continent which, by diverting the course of
trade and commerce from its old channels, caused the loss of wealth and
the final decay of the Italian republic. The spirit of discovery once
aroused, other navigators followed, and Vasco da Gama, by opening the
road to the East Indies by the way of the Cape of Good Hope, so injured
the trade of Venice with the east as to render her downfall inevitable.
But the history of the old sea kings of the north, and the tracing of
their line of descent through old England to the hardy seaman of New
England, is still more interesting to our naval students.

The Vikings--"sons of the fiords"--were undoubtedly the most arrant
pirates of all history. They were the dread of all Europe. "A furore
Normanorum librera nos Domine," prayed the Church throughout
Christendom. Many of these piratical princes became, through habitual
success, so devoted to their calling that they never extinguished it,
but rather gloried in passing their lives on board their ships. It was
their fond boast that they never reposed under an immovable roof, nor
drank their beer in peace by their fireside, and the ships in which they
had led their wild and adventurous lives formed in death their
sepulchre. Passing over the discovery of North America by Eric the Red
(about 700 B.C.), we may come at once to Harold Harfagra--Harold the
Fairhaired, or Harold Fairfax, a name so well represented to-day in our
own navy. Having made himself master of all Norway, the restless young
spirits of the realm took themselves off on one of their accustomed
expeditions. Led by a youth named Rollo, son of the celebrated sea-rover
Jarl Ragnvald, they ascended the Seine and laid siege to Paris. So
successful were these Normans that Charles the Simple ceded to Rollo
that part of Neustria since called Normandy. By the terms of the treaty,
Charles was to give his daughter Gisele in marriage to Rollo, together
with the province of Normandy, provided he would do homage, and embrace
the Christian religion. To do homage was to kiss the feet of the king.
All that the sturdy Rollo could be prevailed upon to do, however, was to
place his hand in that of the king, and to depute one of his followers
to do homage for him. The gentleman to whom this duty was assigned
raised the king's foot so high that his majesty was thrown upon his
back; whereupon the rude Normans burst out laughing, so little respect
for royalty had these wild rovers of the sea. Two hundred years later
the descendants of these same Normans achieved the Conquest of England.
They became by the heat of much and continued contest and attrition
gradually fused, with the Angles and the Saxons, already inhabitants of
the island, into the modern Englishman and his representative on the
shores of New England.

This volume not only shows the reader--the general as well as
professional reader--the large scope embraced in a proper study of
history, but it also demonstrates that naval archaeology is not a mere
idle amusement, suited to the elegant leisure of the scholar. It has a
great and practical value, enabling an officer to understand his own
profession the more thoroughly in all its branches. Commodore Parker has
conferred a material benefit on his profession by the valuable
contribution he has made to its literature. He has, moreover, by his
straightforward narration, pleasant style, and copious illustrations
from standard authorities, rendered agreeable and entertaining to the
general reader what otherwise might have proved technical, and of too
special a character.

                     *      *      *      *      *

Mr. Perkins's book[12] almost disarms criticism by its very character,
for it is impossible to make a selection of books that is at the same
time limited in size and adapted to diverse and contrary necessities.
Private libraries want the best books, public libraries the books most
called for by the general and often undiscriminating public. "The Best
Reading" contains the titles of about ten thousand books, and as that is
less than half the number printed every year, the work is confessedly
incomplete from whatever point of view we look at it. Still it is useful
to librarians, of whom there are several hundred inexperienced ones in
the country, and to professional essayists, or magazine writers, a class
that must contain thousands of persons. With every allowance for
unavoidable imperfections, we think Mr. Perkins can revise the list with
advantage, taking out some obsolete writers and putting in some new ones
in their place--Herbert Spencer for example.

      [12] "_The Best Reading_: Hints on the Selection of Books, on
      the Formation of Libraries, Public and Private, on Courses of
      Reading," etc. With a Classified Bibliography. By FREDERICK
      BEECHER PERKINS. G. P. Putnam's Sons.

                     *      *      *      *      *

Both Mr. Loftie's "Plea for Art in the House" and the Misses Garrett's
advice on "House Decoration"[13] belong to the best kind of works on the
very important subject of cultivating good taste in the furniture of the
home. They are very direct and clear, and their authors are entirely
competent to instruct us all on this subject. Especially are they free
from what we consider to be the worst fault a book of this kind can
show, an obtrusive pretension to superior taste. It is a great mistake
to suppose that we can elevate people by showing them that we consider
ourselves far above them in taste and judgment; but this mistake is not
unfrequently made. That may be the fact, but if there is no evidence of
it but a patronizing treatment of others, there is little hope that much
good will be done. Both these books are free from that error, and Mr.
Loftie especially takes his readers into a survey of a good many
branches of decorative art, exhibiting a familiar acquaintance with them
all, talking alternately of the blunders and successes of collectors,
real and would-be, and all with a natural enthusiasm and freedom from
superciliousness. The Garrett sisters also give a great number of
valuable suggestions and some very taking illustrations of tasteful
decoration. We wish they had given less of their work to criticism of
the conventional London house and more to the description of what is
good. So far as we are acquainted with books of this class, they abound
in two faults, discursiveness and inordinate discussion of bad models.
Artistic house decoration is a technical art, and must be taught like
all other arts--by the exhibition of good precedents. Strictly speaking,
there can be no theories in matters of taste. All the so-called laws or
canons of taste are obtained by observing what has been well done. From
that we may learn what is well doing, and the educated taste produces
good work. There is nothing in art so implicit as the surveyor's
dependence upon the law of magnetic attraction. The notes of a survey
well made to-day can be given to a surveyor a century hence, and he will
bring the lines out to within half an inch, and put his hand upon each
boundary mark that has been made. But it is not so in art. In all the
reconstructions of ancient Grecian buildings not one has been rebuilt.
Neither the Madeleine nor the Valhalla repeat the art of the Parthenon,
however faithfully they repeat its form and measurements. Good taste is
a thing that no French surveyor can secure with any refinement whatever
of the metric system. But still there is a soil in which this plant can
be grown, and that soil is the collective evidences of good taste in the
past. Let us have a book so full of good illustrations that didactic
instruction shall not be needed.

      [13] "_A Plea for Art in the House._" By W. J. LOFTIE, F. S. A.
      Porter & Coates, Philadelphia. (Art at Home Series.)

      "_Suggestions for House Decoration in Painting Woodwork and
      Furniture._" By RHODA and AGNES GARRETT. Porter & Coates,
      Philadelphia. (Art at Home Series.)




NEBULAE.


--Our discussion of life insurance management, in this part of "The
Galaxy," was but preliminary to the thorough article upon the subject
which we present to our readers in this number. It is a subject of great
importance, and one which concerns multitudes of the very best class of
our citizens, to whom we recommend this article for thoughtful perusal.
Its writer has a more thorough acquaintance with life insurance
management than is probably possessed by any other one man in the
country. He _knows_, he does not infer or conjecture, and he has
learned by experience the only way in which to bring life insurance
companies to an effective responsibility. What they are, even when they
are not managed in a manner undeniably fraudulent, has been shown by the
recent investigations at Albany, which brought to light the payment of
salaries and bonuses of monstrous extravagance and the use of proxies by
the thousand on the part of the officers who took these great sums out
of the pockets of clerks and clergymen, widows and orphans. Something
must be done, and that speedily, to correct this abuse even among the
honest companies, and the way to doing it is pointed out in the article
to which we refer.


--Since we prepared our last nebulous notes, General Grant has passed
into private life. The country has accepted the event as a matter of
course; it has elicited very little comment. The end of his
administration was made the occasion of some retrospection and some
criticism, it is true; but that did not, in either case, touch the
subject which presents itself to us in connection with the change which
took place in Washington on the 4th of March. General Grant, by becoming
then a mere private citizen, closed one of the most remarkable careers
in modern history. Men, a very few men, have done more, or been more,
than he has done or has been; but it would be difficult to name a man in
modern times who rose from obscurity to such a height, passed through
such a series of events, held such power, and who passed peaceably, and
in full possession of his health and all his faculties, into an
absolutely powerless and private condition, and all this in sixteen
years. The experiences of Cromwell and Washington were most nearly like
Grant's. But Cromwell fought six years ere he won his crowning victory
at Worcester; and although he was made Lord Protector in 1657, was known
to all England as an able and energetic member of the Long Parliament,
and one of the leaders of the popular party in 1640, seventeen years
before. Washington also saw six years pass from the time when he drew
his sword under the old elm at Cambridge, as Commander-in-Chief of the
colonial forces, to that when he received Lord Cornwallis's at the
surrender of Yorktown; and, made President in 1789, he retired in 1797,
twenty-three years after he took command. But he was a prominent citizen
of Virginia thirty-five years before that date, and was nominated deputy
to the colonial congress in 1774. The position of our retiring President
was very different, and his career was briefer and more crowded with
events. In March, 1861, except his old West Point comrades and his few
personal acquaintances, there were probably not twenty people in the
country who knew of the existence of ex-brevet Captain Grant, U.S.A.
Three years saw him the victor in hard-fought fields, in which the
forces on either side more than trebled all that ever Cromwell or
Washington commanded, and in 1864 he became General-in-Chief of the
immense army of one of the great powers of the world; one year more saw
him absolute victor, and the saviour of the Union. Four years passed,
and he voluntarily laid down his sword and his supreme military command,
to become President of the United States, doing so because he was
regarded as the only man who could save in peace what he won in war. At
the end of four years, he received, like Washington and Jefferson,
Jackson and Lincoln, the honor of a reelection, and three years later he
seemed likely to have the unprecedented distinction of an election to a
third term. Now, although we may not say there is none so poor to do him
honor, he is entirely without position, military or civil, and it is
certainly true that many a mousing politician has far more influence
than the victor of Appomatox and he who was once dreaded by many people,
and looked to by others without dread, as the coming "man on horseback."


--Such a career in these days was possible only in this country, and
here it will probably be impossible hereafter. Of civil war we have, we
may be sure, seen the last, as it was really the first, that was ever
fought on our soil. And indeed it was big enough to suffice for our
share of that sort of thing for ever. That we shall ever be called upon
to wage war with a foreign foe is in the extremest degree improbable. No
other power wants any of our territory, at the price, at least, which it
would cost to get it; and we have taken all that we want from other
people. Cuba, if we get it--the advantage of which is not clear to all
minds--we shall get by purchase. We shall, therefore, it would seem,
never be so greatly indebted again to a successful general. In case we
should be so, and he should be one of General Sherman's successors, it
may be reasonably doubted if, with General Grant's experience before his
eyes, he will give up the assured life position of General-in-Chief for
the temporary honors and troubles of the Presidential chair. It is not
necessary to be a blind admirer of General Grant, or a member of the
party which made him twice President, to do him the justice of admitting
that his resignation of the office which he won with such eclat, and
held with such general honor, the world over, was a sacrifice to the
good of the Union for which he fought. He had for life a position
equally honorable with that of Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and
more striking in its distinction. He had no superior but the President
of the United States; not a certain man, but the incumbent of the office
for the time being. He might, and probably would, have seen a succession
of such men rise, and pass into powerless privacy, while he maintained
his high position. He gave up this permanent distinction, with its
well-assured emoluments, at what we must admit that he regarded as the
call of duty, of patriotism. And now he is, so to speak, a nobody.
Admitting all the errors that have been charged against him--and he
doubtless committed many--admitting even that the party which he
represented is hostile to the best interests of the country (we do not
say that it is so, for we speak for no party and in no political
interest in these pages)--the spectacle of the passage of such a man
into absolute public insignificance, without any public care or public
thought for his future, is a very impressive one, and one not in all
respects admirable. As his career was possible only in this country, so
also was the close of it. The government, the people of no other great
nation, would drop a man who had done what he did, and held the
positions which he held, into an unprovided, obscure future, putting him
off, like an old shoe. Once the victorious commander of an army of half
a million of men, a man whose name was in the mouths of all the
civilized world, for eight years the ruler, with more than kingly power,
of a nation of forty millions, and a country which stretched from the
Atlantic to the Pacific, and which covered the temperate zone in a
continent, he has been remitted again, as far as the nation is
concerned, into his former unimportance, we cannot say obscurity, to
live a private life upon a very moderate competence. It may be right
that this should be so; but none the less is the spectacle one of great
interest and significance; all the more is his brief career one of the
most remarkable in the history of civilized peoples.


--General Grant's successor seems to be in earnest upon one subject, in
his apparent purpose in regard to which he must have the hearty approval
of good men of all parties--civil service reform. In this there is no
doubt that General Grant himself was at first quite as earnest. But the
Republican politicians were too much for him; his own military habits of
thought and his devotion to his personal friends also led him to adopt a
course of action in this respect inconsistent with the purpose which he
first avowed in regard to it; and the great and much needed reform still
remains to be worked out. After all, the principal point, the great
good, to be attained is the suppression of office-seeking as a sort of
business, the extinction of office-seekers as a class. Our politics are
sadly in need of purification. The corruption which disgraces our
Government in the eyes of all good men at home and abroad taints both
parties. In this respect there is nothing to choose between them. Now
nothing would tend so much to better our condition in this respect as
the absolute removal from the arena of political strife of the tens of
thousands of minor offices at the disposal of the party in possession of
the Government. Let them no longer be the prizes of victory at the
polls, and the men who now make politics a trade would find their
occupation gone, and they would no longer concern themselves much about
nominations and elections. The political affairs of the country would
then naturally fall into the hands of the honest, intelligent, and
thrifty men who now have little influence upon them. Let it be once
understood that, whatever party is in power, no man in office, except
those directly around the President, is to be removed except for
incompetence, neglect, or malversation, and the first great step will
have been taken toward our political regeneration. Nor is its influence
upon politics the only great benefit which would thus be secured. The
existence of a great body of men who are withholding themselves from the
ordinary business and work of life in the hope that something will turn
up in politics which will enable them to live, and perhaps to get money
in irregular ways, by office-holding, is demoralizing. It tends to make
and to keep in existence a body of shiftless men who otherwise would be
obliged to turn their attention to mechanics, to trade, to agriculture.
It helps to increase our too great tendency to speculative and unstable
habits of life. It is bad in every way. As to the particular method by
which the much-needed change is to be brought about there may be various
opinions; but among sensible and decent men there is none as to the
prime necessity of the extinction of office-seeking. In whatever he may
do to effect this the new President will have the best wishes even of
the greater number of those who cast their votes against him.


--From civil service to domestic service is a great leap; but there is
this likeness between the two, that both, in this country at least, are
in a deplorable condition of inefficiency. And as to domestic service,
the complaints of householders in England are hardly less loud and
grievous than those which go up daily in America. In both countries
there is a great cry for provision for unemployed women; and yet in
both countries the procurement of women capable and willing to give
good household work in return for good wages seems to vibrate between
the not remote points of difficulty and impossibility. Disorder, dirt,
waste, and cooking which is only the destruction of good viands by
reducing them to an unpalatable and indigestible condition are,
according to all accounts, the lot of all housekeepers whose means do
not enable them to procure the most skilful and highly trained domestic
servants. In England a strange remedy has been proposed, adopted in a
measure, and thus far with success. It is the introduction of what are
called, even in England, "lady helps." There is something amusing in
seeing our cousins, who used to sneer at the Yankee phrase "helps," and
also at the Yankee help herself, who would not be regarded (unwisely it
may be) as a servant, turn in despair to the word and the thing as the
only relief in their domestic perplexity. The scheme was first proposed
by Mrs. Crayshaw, of Cyfarthfa Castle, the wife of one of the
wealthiest iron masters in England. Considering the fact, known to
everybody there, that there were thousands of poor gentlewomen--that
is, of women born and bred in the comparatively wealthy and cultivated
classes--who were absolutely penniless, living in want, in suffering,
or in a pitiful and oppressive dependence, she thought that many of
these women would be willing to enter domestic service under certain
conditions. She made inquiries; she was encouraged; and she set herself
to work to effect what promises to be a great and beneficent reform.
The conditions which she exacted for her _protegees_ were that they
should have comfortable and separate rooms, that they should be called
upon to do none of the rough work, like scrubbing, for example, or
boot-cleaning (although they were responsible for its being well done),
and that they should be treated with personal respect. They were to be
called "lady helps." She started her project only about two years ago;
and although it was met at first with incredulity and with ridicule,
already it is so successful that although the applicants for such
employment are many, she cannot supply the demand by housekeepers for
her helpful ladies. For it is found that these ladies give what is
wanted, intelligent, conscientious service. They are truthful; they can
be trusted; they learn easily; they work well; they are quiet, pleasant
in manner; and, strange to say, they are cheerful. To the last one
other of her conditions may contribute largely. They are to be hired
only in couples, so that they have companionship of their own sort.
What will be the end of all this who can tell? The prospect, however,
is cheering to that class of householders who have not large means and
who yet require faithful, well-trained, intelligent domestic servants
for their daily comfort, and no less to a large class of respectable
and educated women, who may find under the new domestic regime a refuge
from the woes of extremest poverty--poverty which presses the more
hardly upon them because they are educated and respectable. There is
nothing in itself degrading in the performance of domestic labor; quite
the contrary. No woman who is worthy of her sex hesitates to perform it
for her husband, her children, or herself, or feels in the least
degraded thereby, or is so regarded by her acquaintances. The feeling
against performing it for others is a mere prejudice born of custom, of
fashion. Let it once be understood that no woman loses the respect of
others or need diminish her own by doing it for others as a means of
livelihood, and the ranks of lady helps will be crowded.


--In illustration and in furtherance of Mrs. Crayshaw's truly, and, it
would seem, wisely benevolent scheme, a little book has just been
published in England, and reprinted in this country. It is by Mrs.
Warren, who is the writer of some half a dozen excellent hand-books of
household management. It professes to tell the story of the troubles of
a small household, that of a professional man, whose wife is reduced to
despair by the incompetence, the neglect, the wastefulness, the
untruthfulness, and the dishonesty of the servants, who come to her one
after another, each worse than the other. The causes of complaint are
exactly those from which American housewives suffer. Depending upon her
servants, whose deficiencies she is incapable of supplying herself, she
is sometimes unable to give her husband a wholesome meal, decently
served; and this preys upon her to such a degree that when he happens to
be kept away she fancies that he remains away voluntarily because his
home is unattractive. In her despair she proposes a "lady help" to him.
He scouts the suggestion. The thing is impossible, ridiculous. She
practises a pious deceit upon him; gets a lady help surreptitiously into
the house, and keeps her out of sight until order, and cleanliness, and
good dinners have subdued him into a proper frame of mind to receive
with meek acquiescence the announcement of the origin of this beneficent
change. Then all goes on happily. Money is saved, comfort supplants
wretchedness and confusion, and domestic life becomes enjoyable upon a
small income. It must be admitted that the authoress has it all her own
way. The lady help is a paragon. She is the niece of a distinguished man
of science, well bred, highly educated, self-respecting, but humble and
modest, kind-hearted, and without the least pride or false shame. She is
an angel of goodness to the under servant, who does the coarse work of
the house, and teaches her as if she were her younger sister. She
herself, although invited into the parlor and to sit at the family
table, prefers to remain in the kitchen, which she brings into such a
condition of neatness and order that it is a sort of little culinary
palace. Plainly such women cannot be always looked for in "lady helps,"
and, moreover, there is this difficulty: If it should get about, as it
surely would, that such a paragon of womanhood and housekeeping skill
was to be found, if she had only moderate personal attraction, the
kitchen over which she "presided" would be besieged by an army of
bachelors, among whom it would be quite out of the order of nature that
there should not be one that would victoriously carry her captive and
put her in a parlor somewhere, with "helps," lady or other, to do her
bidding.


--A story quoted by Mrs. Warren in illustration of the imperfect
apprehension and confused memory of many people, particularly those of
the class from which servants usually come, is too good to be passed by.
The Rev. Dr. McLeod relates in his journal that he once received from
two intending communicants the following replies to the following
questions:

    Who led the children of Israel out of Egypt?--Eve.

    Who was Eve?--The mother of God.

    What death did Christ die? [After a long time came the answer]--He
    was hanged on a tree.

    What did they do with the body?--Laid it in a manger.

    What did Christ do for sinners?--Gave his Son.

    Do you know of any wonderful works that Christ did?--Made the World
    in six days.

    Any others?--Buried Martha, Mary, and Lazarus.

    What became of them afterwards?--Angels took them to Abraham's
    bosom.

    What had Christ to do with that?--He took Abraham.

    Who was Christ?--The Holy Spirit.

    Are you a sinner?--No.

    Did you never sin? and do you love God perfectly?--Yes.

This reminds us of the Cambridge (England) student who, on his divinity
examination, being called upon to give the parable of the Good
Samaritan, after reciting the benevolent man's promise to the host, "and
when I come again I will repay thee," wound up with "This he said,
knowing he should see his face no more."


--Ex-Mayor Hall has made a very needless stir in New York and throughout
the country, and seems to have managed his disappearance very
bunglingly. Is it not, indeed, very commonly the case that men who wish
to go away secretly and have their whereabouts unknown--perpetrators of
great frauds, robberies, murders, and the like--neglect what seems to
disinterested persons the easiest, most obvious, and most sure means of
concealment, while they lay themselves out with great labor and
ingenuity upon others which are of secondary importance, and which seem
not likely to present themselves to the inquiring mind under such
peculiar circumstances? Mr. Hall, we assume for good reasons, wished to
leave New York suddenly, to live in retirement, and not to have the
place of his retreat known. He therefore gathers a little money
together, and without saying a word to any one, takes ship at Boston and
goes to England. He simply disappears. Consequently within twenty-four
hours suspicion is aroused, within forty-eight anxiety is felt, and in
the course of three or four days a hue and cry is sent over the whole
country. It goes to England, of course, by telegraph, and when the
steamers arrive a prying, mousing gentleman, whose business it is to
find out things for the New York press, visits them one by one, passes
the passengers under inspection, and of course finds Mr. Hall,
spectacles and all. It is strange that a man of Mr. Hall's experience of
the world, a criminal lawyer, an ex-mayor, a political associate of
Tweed, Sweeney, and Connelly, should not have seen that such would be
the inevitable course of events if he should leave New York as he did.
But how natural for him to say that he was called East, or West, or
South by important business which would keep him away ten days or a
fortnight, to provide his family and his clerk with that response to
inquiries, even if the former suspected the true state of the case, and
then to start for England. True enough, in the end his flight would be
known, which was inevitable; but he would have had a full fortnight's
start, and would have been comfortably on the continent or hidden in the
wilderness of London, probably the best place in the world for the
concealment of a fugitive person who is not very singular in appearance
and in habits, and who is not known at all to the London police. Mr.
Hall might, with a little forethought, have so arranged his affairs that
he would have been out of reach and past recognition before suspicion
was aroused, not to say before a hue and cry was raised. But as it was,
this astute lawyer, this crafty politician, who has been familiar with
the ways of tricky people all his life, who knows by constant
intercourse with them the habits of men that fly and men that pursue,
who is practically acquainted with journalism, does just what defeats
his purpose--whatever was the occasion of his leaving New York so
suddenly, as to which we say nothing.





End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Galaxy, May, 1877, by Various

*** 