Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

a bug: compatibility rules not checked when removing a block from a stack of statements #15

Closed
ens-lg4 opened this issue Nov 21, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@ens-lg4
Copy link

ens-lg4 commented Nov 21, 2014

Dear developers,

We have found another bug (similar to #12) and produced a test-case to demonstrate it.

Please navigate to http://ens-lg4.github.io/blockly_bug_report/ to reproduce
and to https://github.com/ens-lg4/blockly_bug_report to see the test-case files involved.

Many thanks in advance for your attention.

@NeilFraser
Copy link
Contributor

Nicely spotted. I've added a patch (7cac5fe) and verified that it does not break typeless stacks, but haven't verified that it resolves this issue (though it absolutely should).

Out of curiosity, what are you working on? To my knowledge, you are the only ones using typed statement connections.

@ens-lg4
Copy link
Author

ens-lg4 commented Nov 22, 2014

Dear Neil, thank you very much for fixing it so fast!

I am working on Ensembl Hive project ( https://github.com/Ensembl/ensembl-hive/ ), it is a system for creating/running/monitoring computational pipelines. We have a language to describe pipeline structures in plain editable files, but they are much harder to healthcheck than to produce a fool-proof blockly diagram that also looks so nice and shiny :)

quachtina96 referenced this issue in quachtina96/blockly Jul 7, 2016
Minor bug fixes to pause and tutorial demo
drigz pushed a commit to drigz/blockly that referenced this issue Jul 14, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants