Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move *ByteSlice* traits into byte_slice module #1286

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2024
Merged

Move *ByteSlice* traits into byte_slice module #1286

merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2024

Conversation

jswrenn
Copy link
Collaborator

@jswrenn jswrenn commented May 17, 2024

This helps declutter our top-level documentation.

@jswrenn jswrenn requested a review from joshlf May 17, 2024 19:39
@jswrenn jswrenn enabled auto-merge May 17, 2024 19:39
This helps declutter our top-level documentation.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 17, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 82.50000% with 14 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.76%. Comparing base (b39c772) to head (f1b18c5).

Files Patch % Lines
src/byte_slice.rs 82.50% 14 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1286   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.76%   87.76%           
=======================================
  Files          14       15    +1     
  Lines        5158     5158           
=======================================
  Hits         4527     4527           
  Misses        631      631           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jswrenn jswrenn added this pull request to the merge queue May 17, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 146c73b May 17, 2024
210 checks passed
@jswrenn jswrenn deleted the byte_slice branch May 17, 2024 20:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants