-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 370
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix system tests. #190
Fix system tests. #190
Conversation
@@ -1282,7 +1275,7 @@ describe('storage', function() { | |||
} | |||
|
|||
// Re-create the file. The tests need it. | |||
file.save('newcontent', done); | |||
file.save('newcontent', options, done); |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about other 2/5 now? :)
@@ -1228,13 +1228,6 @@ describe('storage', function() { | |||
}) | |||
); | |||
|
|||
it( |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
@@ -1385,14 +1378,6 @@ describe('storage', function() { | |||
}) | |||
); | |||
|
|||
it( |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
@frankyn Our system tests around requester pays started failing. I left comments on the diff-- could you take a look? Thanks! |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #190 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 100% 100%
=====================================
Files 7 7
Lines 1104 1104
=====================================
Hits 1104 1104 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
acking* I'm at a conference this week and will have delayed responses. |
So there's good news and bad news. 👍 The good news is that everyone that needs to sign a CLA (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) have done so. Everything is all good there. 😕 The bad news is that it appears that one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that here in the pull request. Note to project maintainer: This is a terminal state, meaning the |
|
@frankyn any availability to give this a quick look? |
Hey @stephenplusplus, taking a look now. |
Pinged GCS team for more context, resumable upload should be required to define user project unless I misunderstood. The testIamPermission is not as clear. I'll ping when I have an update. |
0b4c78d
to
1e4fc67
Compare
CLAs look good, thanks! |
|
Thanks @frankyn! |
|
A Googler has manually verified that the CLAs look good. (Googler, please make sure the reason for overriding the CLA status is clearly documented in these comments.) |
@googlebot The reason for overriding the CLA status is because you are wrong and should feel bad. :-) We really need to get @stephenplusplus whitelisted on this thing...someday... |
gentle ping what's the status on this one folks? |
@JustinBeckwith we are pending storage service bug on requester pays enabled buckets. bug:79524739 for more context. The gcs team is looking at it, it's acked as a potential bug at this time. We can skip tests for these two cases for now in order to move forward with this PR and we can revisit when there is a solution. Aka, bug is fixed. |
Restore test, but skip it.
CLAs look good, thanks! |
Thanks for your help, @frankyn! I've left the test in, but our test runner will skip it. There's also a Once tests pass, I'll merge this in. |
Do not merge: #190 (comment)
CI has been failing: https://circleci.com/gh/googleapis/nodejs-storage/4098.