fix: better error if attempting to run on Windows, refactor readline stuff

[ErikBjare]

Important

Refactor readline history handling to readline.py, add error handling for unsupported platforms, and clean up imports.

• Platform Support:
  • Raises exception in readline.py if readline is unavailable, indicating unsupported platform (e.g., Windows).
• Refactoring:
  • Moves _load_readline_history() from init.py to load_readline_history() in readline.py.
  • Updates init() in init.py to call load_readline_history() from readline.py.
  • Replaces readline.add_history() with add_history() in chat.py.
• Misc:
  • Removes unused imports atexit and readline from init.py.
  • Renames tabcomplete.py to readline.py.

^{This description was created by for 112cefb. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to f7b693d in 9 seconds

More details

• Looked at 132 lines of code in 2 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. gptme/tabcomplete.py:13

• Draft comment:
  Consider using a more specific exception type than Exception for better error handling. For instance, RuntimeError might be more appropriate here.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The import of readline is attempted, and if it fails, an exception is raised with a message indicating that the platform is unsupported. This is a good practice for handling platform-specific dependencies.

Workflow ID: wflow_XUHdIBHaVj1jRaQq

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 32506be in 20 seconds

More details

• Looked at 13 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. gptme/init.py:14

• Draft comment:
  The import statement should be corrected to reflect the new location of load_readline_history and register_tabcomplete.

from .tabcomplete import load_readline_history, register_tabcomplete

• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The comment suggests reverting the import change, but the diff and file content indicate the change was intentional. The comment lacks strong evidence of an issue, as the new import path is consistent with the diff.
  I might be missing context about why the import path was changed, but based on the diff and file content, the change seems intentional.
  The diff and file content provide enough context to conclude that the import change was intentional and correct.
  The comment should be deleted because it contradicts the intentional change made in the diff.

Workflow ID: wflow_FRzJqizybJDO72m7

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.07%. Comparing base (6e70168) to head (112cefb).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #221      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.32%   75.07%   -0.25%     
==========================================
  Files          57       57              
  Lines        3582     3591       +9     
==========================================
- Hits         2698     2696       -2     
- Misses        884      895      +11     

Flag	Coverage Δ
anthropic/claude-3-haiku-20240307	74.10% <100.00%> (-0.25%)	⬇️
openai/gpt-4o-mini	73.90% <100.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on a1973b8 in 12 seconds

More details

• Looked at 45 lines of code in 2 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. gptme/readline.py:33

• Draft comment:
  The add_history function is a good abstraction for handling readline history, especially for platform-specific issues.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0%
  The add_history function in gptme/readline.py is a simple wrapper around readline.add_history. This is a good refactor as it abstracts the functionality and makes it easier to handle platform-specific issues in one place.

Workflow ID: wflow_nxHHmj29BajGXeUY

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 112cefb in 9 seconds

More details

• Looked at 15 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. tests/test_readline.py:7

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding setup and teardown functions to ensure the test environment is consistent. The test assumes certain files and directories exist, which might not be the case in all environments.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The test file contains a test function test_matches() that uses assertions to check the behavior of the _matches function. However, there is no setup or teardown for the test environment, which might be necessary for consistent test results. Additionally, the test assumes certain files and directories exist, which might not be the case in all environments.

Workflow ID: wflow_2bKBezFlIAhnnYeU

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.