Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Just to show that differences were not so many ... #35

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

mscipio
Copy link

@mscipio mscipio commented Nov 29, 2017

But if you still don't want to merge I am fine with that, too.
I will keep working on my fork, and the first one that realizes how to do numeric integration or convolution inside a CUDA kernel will let the other know!

All the best, and really well done!

Michele Scipioni added 2 commits November 29, 2017 11:07
…void a compilation error \n defined a new CUDA header for a first example of compartmental model \n - added an example in Gpufit\example\KineticModel_fitExample to show the behavior of the new model
… fitted curve from gpu_data.values_. When we use the old call (16 parameters) to gpufit, everything works just as before, with the new pointer set to NULL and used as a flag to control the behavior of LMFit::get_results. If we call gpufit defining also a pointer for the 17th parameter float * output_data, we get an additional output from LMFit::get_results that works as output_data_ = gpu_data.values_.copy( n_fits*info_.n_points_, output_data_ ). The change is transparent to previous code that keeps working as espected without need of additional tuning. I also added an example of the behavior of the additional output parameter in Gpufit/examples/KineticModel_fitExample_withFittingOutput/
@jkfindeisen
Copy link
Collaborator

This is quite old and only related to a discussion in the issues about a very specific model and the code is conflicting with actual existing code. It's unlikely anything comes out of it and I will close it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants