Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TSDB] dont skip writing to TSDB index when chunk exists in cache #6664

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2022

Conversation

owen-d
Copy link
Member

@owen-d owen-d commented Jul 12, 2022

Because TSDB indices are accumulated on disks and eventually flushed, we rely on their replication factor, so ensure we don't skip writing index entries when the chunk exists in cache already.

ref #5428

Signed-off-by: Owen Diehl <ow.diehl@gmail.com>
@owen-d owen-d requested a review from a team as a code owner July 12, 2022 11:10
@grafanabot
Copy link
Collaborator

./tools/diff_coverage.sh ../loki-main/test_results.txt test_results.txt ingester,distributor,querier,querier/queryrange,iter,storage,chunkenc,logql,loki

Change in test coverage per package. Green indicates 0 or positive change, red indicates that test coverage for a package fell.

+           ingester	0%
+        distributor	0%
+            querier	0%
+ querier/queryrange	0%
+               iter	0%
+            storage	0%
+           chunkenc	0%
+              logql	0%
+               loki	0%

@owen-d owen-d changed the title dont skip writing to TSDB index when chunk exists in cache [TSDB] dont skip writing to TSDB index when chunk exists in cache Jul 12, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@sandeepsukhani sandeepsukhani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@owen-d owen-d merged commit 47b17b5 into grafana:main Jul 12, 2022
lxwzy pushed a commit to lxwzy/loki that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2022
)

Signed-off-by: Owen Diehl <ow.diehl@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants