[Pal] Remove STATIC_SLAB flag

[pwmarcz]

PAL doesn't work without STATIC_SLAB anymore.

(As discussed in #32).

How to test this PR?

Jenkins should be enough, there are no functional changes.

---

This change is 

[dimakuv]

Reviewed 5 of 5 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 3 unresolved discussions, not enough approvals from maintainers (2 more required), not enough approvals from different teams (1 more required, approved so far: ITL) (waiting on @pwmarcz)

---

-- commits, line 4 at r1:
I don't think it's "anymore", it's like "never really worked". This is from the Chia-Che times :)

---

Pal/include/pal_defs.h, line 5 at r1 (raw file):

/* maximum length of URIs */
#define URI_MAX 4096

Now that we have only one macro in this file, can we just move this file somewhere else and remove this header file altogether?

But if you think it's orthogonal to this PR, I will resolve.

---

Pal/src/slab.c, line 30 at r1 (raw file):

static void* g_high = &g_mem_pool[POOL_SIZE];
#else
#define ALLOC_ALIGNMENT g_slab_alignment

Heh, looks like this macro was never used

[pwmarcz]

Reviewable status: 0 of 52 files reviewed, 3 unresolved discussions, not enough approvals from maintainers (2 more required), not enough approvals from different teams (1 more required, approved so far: ITL) (waiting on @dimakuv)

---

-- commits, line 4 at r1:

Previously, dimakuv (Dmitrii Kuvaiskii) wrote…

I don't think it's "anymore", it's like "never really worked". This is from the Chia-Che times :)

OK. Changed.

---

Pal/include/pal_defs.h, line 5 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, dimakuv (Dmitrii Kuvaiskii) wrote…

Now that we have only one macro in this file, can we just move this file somewhere else and remove this header file altogether?

But if you think it's orthogonal to this PR, I will resolve.

And URI_MAX probably belongs in pal.h anyway.

Removed. It looks like we included that file everywhere, but sed /pal_defs.h/d took care of things.

---

Pal/src/slab.c, line 30 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, dimakuv (Dmitrii Kuvaiskii) wrote…

Heh, looks like this macro was never used

It was a parameter to slabmgr.h.

[dimakuv]

Reviewed 52 of 52 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, all discussions resolved, not enough approvals from maintainers (1 more required)

[mkow]

Reviewed 52 of 52 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved

[dimakuv]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, all discussions resolved, not enough approvals from maintainers (1 more required)

[mkow]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved