Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changes required to have a proper definition for get_face_dofs() for Nedelec FEs #1005

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 2, 2024

Conversation

amartinhuertas
Copy link
Member

Before this commit, it was actually returning own dofs

Before this commit, it was actually returning own dofs
@amartinhuertas amartinhuertas changed the title Changes required to have a proper definition for get_face_dofs() Changes required to have a proper definition for get_face_dofs() for Nedelec FEs May 2, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.18%. Comparing base (632d695) to head (55f5d66).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1005      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.16%   88.18%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         176      176              
  Lines       22027    22055      +28     
==========================================
+ Hits        19421    19449      +28     
  Misses       2606     2606              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@amartinhuertas amartinhuertas merged commit 88d34bf into master May 2, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant