-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 769
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validate messages #741
Comments
I have a temporary solution for now. I forked a repo and improved it to make efficient validation. It's based on FluentValidation that injects Hope it could help! |
@JamesNK Is there any update on this issue? Code generated validation with https://github.com/envoyproxy/protoc-gen-validate is badly needed. |
No. This isn't a high priority at the moment. There is nothing stopping anyone from writing a library that inspects validation options defined in a proto file and uses them to validate Protobuf messages. |
I’m keen to assist with this issue. In my Blazor WebAssembly projects I need to be able to validate user input against my proto3 models at runtime. Preferably using the EditForm component and DataAnnotationValidator. Currently none of the projects I’ve seen work to that degree or they are missing dotnet support. I haven’t contributed to GitHub repos before so will require some assistance on getting started and would appreciate help planning out what work would be involved. |
Hi,
I’m writing a client library which has the same behavior as my server
validation library based on fluentValidation:
https://github.com/AnthonyGiretti/grpc-aspnetcore-validator
Keep posted!
Anthony
Le jeu. 17 déc. 2020 à 13:43, Xaeco <notifications@github.com> a écrit :
I’m keen to assist with this issue.
In my Blazor WebAssembly projects I need to be able to validate user input
against my proto3 models at runtime. Preferably using the EditForm
component and DataAnnotationValidator.
Currently none of the projects I’ve seen work to that degree or they are
missing dotnet support.
I haven’t contributed to GitHub repos before so will require some
assistance on getting started and would appreciate help planning out what
work would be involved.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#741 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFBX2JZVPO4IMPHC3TYLEQTSVJGOHANCNFSM4KM5TUIQ>
.
--
*Anthony Giretti*
*Blogger, Speaker | MVP, MCSD*
*m:* +1 514 557 1380 <+1+514+557+1380>
*s: *anthonygiretti.com
*e: *anthony.giretti@gmail.com
|
Thanks @AnthonyGiretti for your response. |
I define rules on messages with fluentValidation.
It’s unit testable.
There is no data annotation on messages.
Le jeu. 17 déc. 2020 à 19:12, Matthew Hill <notifications@github.com> a
écrit :
Thanks @AnthonyGiretti <https://github.com/AnthonyGiretti> for your
response.
I think decorating proto message declarations with validation conditions
is a good way forward. Is this your approach?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#741 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFBX2J2LRUYURKL6LYCXS5LSVKNATANCNFSM4KM5TUIQ>
.
--
*Anthony Giretti*
*Blogger, Speaker | MVP, MCSD*
*m:* +1 514 557 1380 <+1+514+557+1380>
*s: *anthonygiretti.com
*e: *anthony.giretti@gmail.com
|
One of the benefits of decorating proto message with validation annotations is the metadata will be available to other languages. There is probably already a set of open source annotations where we just need to implement some glue code for .net. |
As mentioned by @ansarizafar the https://github.com/envoyproxy/protoc-gen-validate repo is a great start. Just need to see if/how it can be extended for asp.net core and this repo. |
any updates on validation support? |
any update on validation support (8 months later, to keep the issue open) |
This really could use standardization. |
Provide a way to validate messages, similar to ASP.NET Core MVC's model validation - https://docs.microsoft.com/aspnet/core/mvc/models/validation
Potential solution: https://github.com/envoyproxy/protoc-gen-validate. Either code generation of validation, or runtime validation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: