-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request: better fg/bg contrast #19
Comments
well , I'm using a simple algorithm to process faster for generating fb/bg. |
By default, chrisbra/Colorizer just chooses black or white using
(See ~ Colorizer/autoload/Colorizer.vim:1487). I like ColorV's sophisticated coloring. But maybe ColorV can just have an option to choose black or white, for users who prefer maximum contrast. |
well, Don't have much time recently to get this small change.. |
I made an implementation for s:prev_list() which functions similarly to Colorizer, with a threshold at 777777.
But after trying it more, I don't like it. It badly distorts my perception of brightness. For example, 737373 looks much brighter than 787878 and even AAAAAA because of the selection of a white fg for the darker background. To me, it is so bad I would not even merge the option. My opinion is not important, but I don't like the feature enough to put my name on the commit. So if somebody else wants it, they can use it or come up with another solution. |
Fine~ |
Hi,
I am switching from chrisbra/color_highlight to ColorV, because ColorV has many more cool features. However, there is one minor annoyance: when displaying color names (e.g. with
:ColorVPreview
), the contrast between the fg and the bg colors is not always very readable.For example, compare the highlighting of #ff014b between ColorHighlight and ColorV. ColorHighlight uses a "pure" white, whereas ColorV has less contrast.
So what about providing (possibly as an option) a stronger contrast between the fg and bg colors?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: