-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Get Next Actionable Critical Dependencies Part 1 #1705
Get Next Actionable Critical Dependencies Part 1 #1705
Conversation
@mdeicas 👀 |
b70ef5f
to
7032600
Compare
fd88f21
to
a296ed7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, one nit
@mdeicas , would you be able to help review this? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for working on this @nathannaveen!! I added some comments on the code but also wanted to ask about the granularity of the dependency relationship at a higher level (see the comment on this).
280628a
to
fb8911d
Compare
c47967d
to
af96d18
Compare
ac00d9a
to
3211c93
Compare
@nathannaveen once PR #1807 merged, rebase and your tests should pass. |
3211c93
to
13ca53e
Compare
Thanks @pxp928! |
13ca53e
to
cf32140
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for making the changes @nathannaveen! A few more minor comments.
cf32140
to
1499be4
Compare
Everyone, thanks for your reviews! This PR has been open for a pretty long time, so if there are any nits in the future, can we create an issue for them so that we can get this PR merged in? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aside from these two comments, LGTM @nathannaveen!!
1499be4
to
c384f15
Compare
* Got all dependencies using `hasSBOM` * This finds the number of package that depends on each individual package * Packages with different versions are still the same package Signed-off-by: nathannaveen <42319948+nathannaveen@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: nathannaveen <42319948+nathannaveen@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: nathannaveen <42319948+nathannaveen@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: nathannaveen <42319948+nathannaveen@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: nathannaveen <42319948+nathannaveen@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: nathannaveen <42319948+nathannaveen@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: nathannaveen <42319948+nathannaveen@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: nathannaveen <42319948+nathannaveen@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: nathannaveen <42319948+nathannaveen@users.noreply.github.com>
c384f15
to
539b7d6
Compare
Description of the PR
hasSBOM
PR Checklist
-s
flag togit commit
.make generate
has been runcollectsub
protobuf has been changed,make proto
has been run