Enhance HTTP Request Methods in Request.php

[guibranco]

User description

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

ℹ Additional Information

---

Description

• Enhanced the Request.php file by updating HTTP request methods to improve parameter handling.
• Changed the order of parameters in post, put, and patch methods to have headers come before data.
• Introduced default values for data as null to allow for optional data submission.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	Request.php Update HTTP request methods for better parameter handling src/Request.php Updated method signatures for post, put, and patch methods. Changed parameter order to have headers before data. Set default value of data to null. +3/-3

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

• New Features

  • Introduced a new Constants class to standardize user agent and content type headers across the application.

• Improvements

  • Updated HTTP request handling to utilize constants for headers, enhancing maintainability.
  • Reordered parameters in HTTP methods for consistency and clarity.

• Bug Fixes

  • Enhanced test coverage for HTTP methods, ensuring proper handling of payloads and headers.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@guibranco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 48 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6af21cc and 36f24a0.

Walkthrough

The changes introduced in this pull request include the addition of a new Constants.php file that defines constants for user agent and content type headers. These constants are then utilized in various classes, including HealthChecks, Logger, and OneSignal, to replace hardcoded values. Additionally, the Request class has seen a reordering of method parameters for HTTP requests. The RequestTest class has been updated to enhance test coverage for these methods, particularly focusing on payload handling and header management.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/Constants.php	Added class Constants with constants USER_AGENT_VENDOR, USER_AGENT_HEADER, CONTENT_TYPE_JSON_HEADER.
src/HealthChecks.php	Updated checkHeaders method to use constants for headers; modified parameter order in post method calls.
src/Logger.php	Updated constructor to use constants for headers; changed parameter order in log method's post call.
src/OneSignal.php	Updated constructor to use constants for headers; modified parameter order in sendInternal method's post call.
src/Request.php	Reordered parameters in post, put, and patch methods; made data parameter optional.
tests/RequestTest.php	Added new tests and modified existing ones for post, put, and patch methods to cover payloads and headers.

Possibly related PRs

• Enhance Request Handling in Request.php +semver: minor #227: The changes in Request.php involve modifications to the post, put, and patch methods, which are relevant to the main PR's introduction of constants used in HTTP headers, enhancing consistency across the application.

Suggested labels

size/L

Suggested reviewers

• gstraccini

Poem

In the code where constants dwell,
User agents ring a clear bell.
Headers now sing in harmony,
A tidy code, as it should be!
With tests that leap and bounds they make,
For every request, a joyful shake! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[deepsource-io]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 6af21cc..36f24a0. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Test coverage	✅ Success		View Check ↗
SQL	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Secrets	✅ Success		View Check ↗
PHP	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Docker	✅ Success		View Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

Metric	Aggregate	Php
Branch Coverage	100%	100%
Composite Coverage	95.3%	95.3%
Line Coverage	95.3%	95.3%

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and primarily involve parameter reordering with default values.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	Breaking Change: The order of parameters in the post, put, and patch methods has changed, which may affect existing code that relies on the previous parameter order.
🔒 Security concerns	No

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Enhancement	Implement error handling for HTTP requests to manage failures effectively Consider implementing error handling for the HTTP requests to manage potential failures gracefully and provide feedback to the user. src/Request.php [103] -return $this->execute($fields); +$response = $this->execute($fields); +if ($response->status !== 200) { + throw new RuntimeException('HTTP request failed with status: ' . $response->status); +} +return $response; Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10 Why: Implementing error handling is essential for robust applications, as it allows for graceful failure management and improves user experience, making this a critical enhancement.	10
Possible issue	Add validation for the $data parameter to ensure it is an array It may be beneficial to validate the $data parameter to ensure it is an array before processing it, which can prevent unexpected behavior. src/Request.php [126-128] -public function patch($url, $headers = array(), $data = null): stdClass +public function patch($url, $headers = array(), $data = array()): stdClass +{ + if (!is_array($data)) { + throw new InvalidArgumentException('Data must be an array.'); + } Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Adding validation for the $data parameter is crucial for preventing runtime errors and ensuring the method behaves as expected, making it a significant improvement.	9
Best practice	Change the default value of the $data parameter to an empty array for consistency Consider changing the default value of the $data parameter to an empty array instead of null to ensure consistency across all HTTP methods and avoid potential type errors when handling data. src/Request.php [96] -public function post($url, $headers = array(), $data = null): stdClass +public function post($url, $headers = array(), $data = array()): stdClass Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Changing the default value of $data to an empty array enhances consistency across methods and prevents potential type errors, making it a valuable improvement.	8
	Standardize the default value of the $data parameter in the put method to an empty array Ensure that the $headers parameter is consistently defined across all HTTP methods to maintain a uniform interface and avoid confusion. src/Request.php [106] -public function put($url, $headers = array(), $data = null): stdClass +public function put($url, $headers = array(), $data = array()): stdClass Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Standardizing the $data parameter across methods improves code readability and consistency, which is important for maintainability.	8

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	✅ 100.00%

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (6af21cc)	258	246	95.35%
Head commit (36f24a0)	258 (+0)	246 (+0)	95.35% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#229)	13	13	100.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

[github-advanced-security]

Phpcs (reported by Codacy) found more than 20 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the Files changed tab for more details.

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

6:34PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
6:34PM INF 168 commits scanned.
6:34PM INF scan completed in 407ms
6:34PM INF no leaks found

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud