Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MAB 710 requested #109

Closed
jschnasse opened this issue Feb 5, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

MAB 710 requested #109

jschnasse opened this issue Feb 5, 2015 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jschnasse
Copy link

Are there plans to introduce transformation for MAB#710?

Example:
http://lobid.org/resource/HT018433961/about?format=source
vs.
http://lobid.org/resource/HT018433961

http://lobid.org/resource/HT018434138/about?format=source
vs.
http://lobid.org/resource/HT018434138

dr0i added a commit to lobid/lodmill that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2015
@dr0i dr0i self-assigned this Feb 6, 2015
@dr0i dr0i added the review label Feb 6, 2015
dr0i added a commit to lobid/lodmill that referenced this issue Feb 11, 2015
See hbz/lobid#109.

* add a test document
* add more RAM to java
@dr0i
Copy link
Member

dr0i commented Feb 11, 2015

Deployed to staging, see e.g. http://test.lobid.org/resource/HT001898812 , and
http://test.lobid.org/resource/HT018433961 and all other resources mentioned in this ticket.

@dr0i dr0i assigned acka47 and dr0i and unassigned dr0i and acka47 Feb 11, 2015
@dr0i dr0i assigned acka47 and unassigned dr0i Feb 25, 2015
@dr0i
Copy link
Member

dr0i commented Feb 25, 2015

@jschnasse you also may want to have a look.

@acka47
Copy link
Contributor

acka47 commented Feb 26, 2015

It's in the data but the literals are not splitted correctly. The cut should be made after a semicolon not after a slash.

E.g. instead

"1400-1468; Guttenberg, Johann", "1400-1468; Gensfleisch von Sorgenloch, Johann", ...

it should look like this:

Guttenberg, Johann / 1400-1468" "Gensfleisch von Sorgenloch, Johann / 1400-1468"

@acka47 acka47 assigned dr0i and unassigned acka47 Feb 26, 2015
@acka47 acka47 added working and removed review labels Feb 26, 2015
@acka47 acka47 added ready and removed working labels Mar 12, 2015
@dr0i dr0i added working and removed ready labels Sep 30, 2015
@dr0i
Copy link
Member

dr0i commented Sep 30, 2015

This should be resolved with API 2.0, see hbz/lobid-resources#1.
As it is in no way important to solve this issue right now => closing this one.

@dr0i dr0i closed this as completed Sep 30, 2015
@dr0i dr0i removed the working label Sep 30, 2015
@jschnasse
Copy link
Author

Do not understand closing. Where is the corresponding ticket in API 2.0 ?

@dr0i
Copy link
Member

dr0i commented Sep 30, 2015

The subject chain will be there implicitly because of having an ordered list (the order in the list reflects the position in the chain).

@acka47
Copy link
Contributor

acka47 commented Aug 17, 2016

For the sake of documentation, here is what colleague S.S. told us about field 710 via email on 2016-07-19:

Feld 710 ist ein "freies" Feld, hierzu gibt es für die Erfassung keine Verbundregeln. Insofern kann alles und vieles vorkommen. Dass hier im Beispiel Verweisungsformen angegeben wurden ist erlaubt, nicht unbedingt die Regel.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants