-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adjust standard/all field search #110
Comments
We might have to add a new API parameter for this "all fields" search that doesn't search all fields... |
Deployed to staging, see: http://test.lobid.org/nwbib/search?q=Melanargia |
Looks good but unfortunately an example provided by a customer doesn't work as expected. From a mail from 2015-07-09:
If I do the |
Redeployed with CROSS_FIELDS query to staging. Your test case: http://test.lobid.org/nwbib/search?sort=newest&word=Alfred+Flechtheim+Andrea+Bambi |
Not implemented for standard/simple search. Reopening. |
Fix for standard/simple search with query string syntax support deployed to staging, see: http://test.lobid.org/nwbib/search?q=Alfred+Flechtheim+Andrea+Bambi |
+1 |
Will deploy after hbz/lobid#207 is merged by @dr0i. |
One unwanted behaviour already reported by customers (see https://wiki1.hbz-nrw.de/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58949642): A standard search or
Alle Felder
search shouldn't search fieldbibliographicCitation
("Quelle"). The unwanted behaviour as described in German by customers:There might be more fields mthat should be excluded from a standard search. We may align this to the behaviour if the Aleph system that is described at http://www.hbz-nrw.de/dokumentencenter/produkte/verbunddatenbank/aktuell/arbeitsunterlagen/Schul_5_Indizierung_20140121.pdf, p. 14-16.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: