Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restyle Feature/for time interval #52

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: feature/forTimeInterval
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

restyled-io[bot]
Copy link

@restyled-io restyled-io bot commented Feb 10, 2022

Automated style fixes for #49, created by Restyled.

The following restylers made fixes:

To incorporate these changes, merge this Pull Request into the original. We
recommend using the Squash or Rebase strategies.

NOTE: As work continues on the original Pull Request, this process will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with updated style fixes as
necessary. If the style is fixed manually at any point (i.e. this process finds
no fixes to make), this Pull Request will be closed automatically.

Sorry if this was unexpected. To disable it, see our documentation.

@restyled-io restyled-io bot force-pushed the restyled/feature/forTimeInterval branch from e05397c to baf526e Compare June 9, 2022 21:32
@restyled-io restyled-io bot force-pushed the restyled/feature/forTimeInterval branch from baf526e to 452d93b Compare July 2, 2022 21:38
@restyled-io restyled-io bot force-pushed the restyled/feature/forTimeInterval branch 5 times, most recently from 320428f to a565520 Compare August 11, 2022 11:04
@restyled-io restyled-io bot force-pushed the restyled/feature/forTimeInterval branch 2 times, most recently from bc9eae4 to abcb574 Compare August 28, 2022 22:31
@restyled-io restyled-io bot force-pushed the restyled/feature/forTimeInterval branch from abcb574 to 3fd164d Compare September 12, 2022 09:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant