Change from map function to use event API #32
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
segayuu
changed the title
|
Haven't tested yet, but the code change LGTM. |
|
@segayuu Do you want to close this since it will not work after |
|
Well, I'll close it once and create it again after marging the class refactor. |
segayuu
force-pushed
the
refactoring-JSONparse
branch
2 times, most recently
from
6180ccd
to
b08c852
Compare
…factoring-JSONparse
segayuu
force-pushed
the
refactoring-JSONparse
branch
from
b08c852
to
31726c8
Compare
SukkaW
approved these changes
Jan 3, 2020
SukkaW
approved these changes
Jan 4, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
By switching to the
dataevent handler (and header, footer), unnecessary branching is reduced.In addition, the second argument of
JSONStream.parse()is a map for processing all data, it is not suitable as a place to consume.