dataProviderをGeneratorで書き直す

[hirokinoue]

コミットログを参照のこと。

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Updated multiple test methods to use \Generator for improved performance and memory efficiency.
  • Adopted yield statements for more efficient iteration in test cases.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent modifications focus on enhancing performance and memory efficiency across various test suites. By transitioning from returning arrays to utilizing the \Generator type for data providers and specific methods, the updates facilitate more efficient iteration processes. This change, primarily implemented through the introduction of yield statements, marks a significant improvement in how test data is generated and handled.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
.../ClassManipulator/ClassLikeWrapperTest.php, .../ClassLoaderTest.php	Updated return types of data provider methods to \Generator for efficiency.
.../DependencyVisualizerTest.php, .../Visitor/ClassVisitorTest.php	Changed return type to \Generator and updated methods to use yield.
.../DiagramUnitTest.php	Converted array return types to \Generator and implemented yield.

🐇✨
In the realm of code, where tests do play,
A rabbit hopped, making changes sway.
With a flick and a yield, it danced through the night,
Turning arrays to generators, making tests light.
"To efficiency!" it cheered, with a leap and a bound,
Leaving trails of improvements, profound.
🌟📜🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 10cda81 and 42d09ec.

Files selected for processing (5)

• tests/ClassManipulator/ClassLikeWrapperTest.php (2 hunks)
• tests/ClassManipulator/ClassLoaderTest.php (3 hunks)
• tests/DependencyVisualizerTest.php (2 hunks)
• tests/DiagramUnitTest.php (3 hunks)
• tests/Visitor/ClassVisitorTest.php (2 hunks)

Additional comments: 9

tests/DependencyVisualizerTest.php (1)

• 63-83: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [35-80]

The refactoring of data分析結果をテキスト形式で出力できること to use \Generator and yield statements is correctly implemented. This change aligns with the PR's objective to enhance performance and memory efficiency. By utilizing generators, the test suite can now handle data sets more efficiently, especially beneficial for large or complex data structures. Good job on this improvement!

tests/ClassManipulator/ClassLikeWrapperTest.php (2)

• 38-56: The conversion of dataクラスの名前が取得できること to use \Generator and yield statements is correctly implemented. This change enhances the test suite's efficiency by generating test data on-the-fly, reducing memory usage. Well done on this refactor!
• 79-99: Similarly, the method data宣言する要素が取得できること has been successfully refactored to use \Generator and yield statements. This consistent application of generators across data providers contributes to a more efficient and scalable test suite. Excellent work!

tests/ClassManipulator/ClassLoaderTest.php (2)

• 37-63: The method data対象に応じてロードできること has been successfully refactored to use \Generator and yield statements. This change is beneficial for handling test data more efficiently, particularly for tests that may involve large or complex data sets. Nicely done!
• 97-111: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [91-108]

The method dataロードしたことのあるクラスを再びロードしないこと also correctly implements the \Generator return type and utilizes yield statements. This consistent improvement across data providers in the test suite is commendable, contributing to better memory management and performance. Great job!

tests/Visitor/ClassVisitorTest.php (1)

• 124-130: The refactoring of data指定された名前空間を解析しないこと to use \Generator and yield statements is correctly implemented. This change aligns with the PR's objective to enhance performance and memory efficiency. By utilizing generators, the test suite can now handle data sets more efficiently, especially beneficial for large or complex data structures. Good job on this improvement!

tests/DiagramUnitTest.php (3)

• 110-116: The method data指定された名前空間のクラスをトラバースしないこと has been successfully refactored to use \Generator and yield statements. This change enhances the test suite's efficiency by generating test data on-the-fly, reducing memory usage. Well done on this refactor!
• 165-205: The method data解析結果のルートを見分けられること correctly implements the \Generator return type and utilizes yield statements. This consistent application of generators across data providers contributes to a more efficient and scalable test suite. Excellent work!
• 304-331: Similarly, the method dataトレイトを判定できること has been successfully refactored to use \Generator and yield statements. This consistent improvement across data providers in the test suite is commendable, contributing to better memory management and performance. Great job!