You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
PDFs also support editing markup such as highlighting, strikethroughs, and text insertion. These could also be captured and would be useful, for example, when providing lists of corrections for large documents such as PhD theses.
(the code below assumes that the offset suggested in #5 is also implemented)
Something like this could work. "Edits" aren't really a severity level though, and certainly shouldn't have higher severity than "Major comments". It would be better to leave them at level 0—if a user wants non-edits to have a different severity level they can add extra asterisks.
For insertions, the comment should be Insert "text"
I take it that one cannot easily identify the text corresponding to a strikethrough? In a long-forgotten version of pdfcomments I had [ink] as the comment text to remind myself to look there for comments scribbled with a stylus. You could use [deletion] for strikeout annotations.
A test case for the system added in #7 would be necessary.
PDFs also support editing markup such as highlighting, strikethroughs, and text insertion. These could also be captured and would be useful, for example, when providing lists of corrections for large documents such as PhD theses.
(the code below assumes that the offset suggested in #5 is also implemented)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: