Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use time.monotonic instead of time.time where appropriate #31780

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2020
Merged

Use time.monotonic instead of time.time where appropriate #31780

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2020

Conversation

scop
Copy link
Member

@scop scop commented Feb 13, 2020

Proposed change

See time() vs monotonic() docs.

For netatmo, self._next_update appears to be unused, so removed.

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Example entry for configuration.yaml:

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • The code has been formatted using Black (black --fast homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

The integration reached or maintains the following Integration Quality Scale:

  • No score or internal
  • 🥈 Silver
  • 🥇 Gold
  • 🏆 Platinum

@probot-home-assistant
Copy link

Hey there @cgtobi, mind taking a look at this pull request as its been labeled with a integration (netatmo) you are listed as a codeowner for? Thanks!

@probot-home-assistant
Copy link

Hey there @k4ds3, mind taking a look at this pull request as its been labeled with a integration (proxmoxve) you are listed as a codeowner for? Thanks!

@pvizeli pvizeli merged commit 3018e8f into home-assistant:dev Feb 13, 2020
@scop scop deleted the time.monotonic branch February 14, 2020 07:40
@lock lock bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 15, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants