Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add administrative regions #45

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Add administrative regions #45

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2023

Conversation

datanel
Copy link
Member

@datanel datanel commented Sep 29, 2023

ntfs_fr.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ntfs_fr.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@datanel datanel requested a review from pbench September 29, 2023 13:44
ntfs_fr.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@datanel datanel force-pushed the admin_regions branch 4 times, most recently from fdabf2e to 011c3e5 Compare September 29, 2023 14:20
ntfs_fr.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ArnaudOggy ArnaudOggy self-requested a review September 29, 2023 16:01
Copy link
Contributor

@woshilapin woshilapin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here is an alternative proposition to get a hierarchical organization of the same information. How about addresses.txt only getting one new field admin_level_id referring to the lowest administrative region. And then, in administration_regions.txt, adding a new field name admin_parent_id that links all of them as a tree?

ntfs_fr.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ntfs_fr.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Arnaud Oggy <arnaud.ogiela@canaltp.fr>
@datanel datanel merged commit f6f96dd into master Oct 9, 2023
@datanel datanel deleted the admin_regions branch October 9, 2023 08:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants