-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use rewrite #31
Use rewrite #31
Conversation
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ | |||
"mox": {:hex, :mox, "1.0.2", "dc2057289ac478b35760ba74165b4b3f402f68803dd5aecd3bfd19c183815d64", [:mix], [], "hexpm", "f9864921b3aaf763c8741b5b8e6f908f44566f1e427b2630e89e9a73b981fef2"}, | |||
"nimble_parsec": {:hex, :nimble_parsec, "1.2.3", "244836e6e3f1200c7f30cb56733fd808744eca61fd182f731eac4af635cc6d0b", [:mix], [], "hexpm", "c8d789e39b9131acf7b99291e93dae60ab48ef14a7ee9d58c6964f59efb570b0"}, | |||
"parse_trans": {:hex, :parse_trans, "3.3.1", "16328ab840cc09919bd10dab29e431da3af9e9e7e7e6f0089dd5a2d2820011d8", [:rebar3], [], "hexpm", "07cd9577885f56362d414e8c4c4e6bdf10d43a8767abb92d24cbe8b24c54888b"}, | |||
"rewrite": {:hex, :rewrite, "0.1.0", "c8eedbf527ae441c54218ea01c4ec0523ea8be95b0a8e6a875c1a3214df21bbe", [:mix], [{:beam_file, "~> 0.3", [hex: :beam_file, repo: "hexpm", optional: false]}, {:sourceror, "~> 0.11", [hex: :sourceror, repo: "hexpm", optional: false]}], "hexpm", "8b1ca2dce4e872f87e7008ff0acd5abe3a02b039dac487d64948d0a024aeb090"}, | |||
"sourceror": {:hex, :sourceror, "0.11.2", "549ce48be666421ac60cfb7f59c8752e0d393baa0b14d06271d3f6a8c1b027ab", [:mix], [], "hexpm", "9ab659118896a36be6eec68ff7b0674cba372fc8e210b1e9dc8cf2b55bb70dfb"}, | |||
"ssl_verify_fun": {:hex, :ssl_verify_fun, "1.1.6", "cf344f5692c82d2cd7554f5ec8fd961548d4fd09e7d22f5b62482e5aeaebd4b0", [:make, :mix, :rebar3], [], "hexpm", "bdb0d2471f453c88ff3908e7686f86f9be327d065cc1ec16fa4540197ea04680"}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have some unused dependencies that could be unlocked:
mix deps.unlock --unused
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build eeb74cc7d2e34d4ebaef9b4a0f6de44f7067415a-PR-31
💛 - Coveralls |
Co-authored-by: Vicente Merlo <vicenteamerlo@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PR is looking awesome @NickNeck! Thanks again for working on a project so interesting to the Elixir community. 💫 🏅
lib/recode/issue.ex
Outdated
@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@ | |||
defmodule Recode.Issue do |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a minor nit/idea, but what do you think of keeping Issue
in Recode instead of moving it to Rewrite?
Seems to me that Rewrite shouldn't be responsible for defining what an issue is - because it is API for rewriting sources. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. We could make the issues
in Rewrite.Source
to @type issues :: [term()]
and let the user of rewrite
decide what an issue is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@NickNeck seems like a good plan! ✔️
No description provided.