for triplet loss #35

ssbilakeri · 2020-12-07T09:55:02Z

is the python 2.7 and pytorch 1.0.0 are not supportive for tripletloss ??

huanghoujing · 2020-12-13T07:51:53Z

Hi, python 2.7 and pytorch 1.0.0 are absolutely ok to run this code.

By the way, do you run the program in Linux? I ran it in Ubuntu.

ssbilakeri · 2020-12-13T08:39:01Z

Hello sir, I too ran the code on ubuntu python 2.7 and pytorch 1.0.0 The code works fine with ID and PS loss but when triplet is added it give error . Why is it so ?

…

On Sun, 13 Dec 2020, 1:22 pm Houjing Huang, ***@***.***> wrote: Hi, python 2.7 and pytorch 1.0.0 are absolutely ok to run this code. By the way, do you run the program in Linux? I ran it in Ubuntu. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#35 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOOYJBK4QGEBTE73W7PTKB3SURXCJANCNFSM4UQGVKRA> .

ssbilakeri · 2020-12-13T08:43:39Z

I'm getting below error when included triplet loss. Help me to resolve this issue File "/home/padmashree/anaconda3/envs/myenv/lib/python2.7/runpy.py", line 174, in _run_module_as_main "__main__", fname, loader, pkg_name) File "/home/padmashree/anaconda3/envs/myenv/lib/python2.7/runpy.py", line 72, in _run_code exec code in run_globals File "/home/padmashree/project_dir/EANet2/package/optim/eanet_trainer.py", line 135, in <module> trainer.train_phases() File "/home/padmashree/project_dir/EANet2/package/optim/eanet_trainer.py", line 126, in train_phases self.train() File "package/optim/reid_trainer.py", line 338, in train self.trainer.train_one_epoch(trial_run_steps=3 if cfg.trial_run else None) File "package/optim/trainer.py", line 36, in train_one_epoch self.train_one_step(batch) File "package/optim/trainer.py", line 24, in train_one_step pred = self.train_forward(batch) File "/home/padmashree/project_dir/EANet2/package/optim/eanet_trainer.py", line 102, in train_forward loss += self.loss_funcs[loss_cfg.name](reid_batch, pred, step=self.trainer.current_step)['loss'] File "package/loss/triplet_loss.py", line 124, in __call__ res3 = self.calculate(torch.stack(pred['feat_list']), batch['label'], hard_type=hard_type) File "package/loss/triplet_loss.py", line 107, in calculate dist_mat = compute_dist(feat, feat, dist_type=cfg.dist_type) File "package/eval/torch_distance.py", line 49, in compute_dist dist = euclidean_dist(array1, array2) File "package/eval/torch_distance.py", line 25, in euclidean_dist xx = torch.pow(x, 2).sum(1, keepdim=True).expand(m, n) RuntimeError: expand(torch.cuda.FloatTensor{[9, 1, 256]}, size=[9, 9]): the number of sizes provided (2) must be greater or equal to the number of dimensions in the tensor (3) On Sun, 13 Dec 2020, 2:08 pm Shavantrevva Bilakeri, <ssbilakeri@gmail.com> wrote:

…

Hello sir, I too ran the code on ubuntu python 2.7 and pytorch 1.0.0 The code works fine with ID and PS loss but when triplet is added it give error . Why is it so ? On Sun, 13 Dec 2020, 1:22 pm Houjing Huang, ***@***.***> wrote: > Hi, python 2.7 and pytorch 1.0.0 are absolutely ok to run this code. > > By the way, do you run the program in Linux? I ran it in Ubuntu. > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#35 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOOYJBK4QGEBTE73W7PTKB3SURXCJANCNFSM4UQGVKRA> > . >

huanghoujing · 2020-12-17T06:55:19Z

Hi, thank you for your feedback.

To run triplet loss, we have to

Use PK sampling for batch construction
Increase training epochs

I provide a setting file paper_configs/PAP_S_PS_Triplet_Loss_Market1501.txt, and a script script/exp/train_PAP_S_PS_Triplet_Loss_Market1501.sh, to train with both PS loss and triplet loss on Market1501.

Besides, I also fixed a mistake in part index when feeding feature to triplet loss. You can find the detail in this commit.

Now, you can run the script by

bash script/exp/train_PAP_S_PS_Triplet_Loss_Market1501.sh

The result I obtained is

M -> M      [mAP:  86.0%], [cmc1:  95.0%], [cmc5:  98.0%], [cmc10:  98.8%]
M -> C      [mAP:  11.0%], [cmc1:  12.1%], [cmc5:  24.1%], [cmc10:  31.6%]
M -> D      [mAP:  29.2%], [cmc1:  46.7%], [cmc5:  63.2%], [cmc10:  69.5%]

I hope it helps.

ssbilakeri · 2020-12-17T15:46:11Z

Thank you so much for ur informative response.

…

On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, 12:25 pm Houjing Huang, ***@***.***> wrote: Hi, thank you for your feedback. To run triplet loss, we have to 1. Use PK sampling for batch construction 2. Increase training epochs I provide a setting file paper_configs/PAP_S_PS_Triplet_Loss_Market1501.txt, and a script script/exp/train_PAP_S_PS_Triplet_Loss_Market1501.sh, to train with both PS loss and triplet loss on Market1501. Besides, I also fixed a mistake in part index when feeding feature to triplet loss. You can find the detail in this commit <e46d495> . Now, you can run the script by bash script/exp/train_PAP_S_PS_Triplet_Loss_Market1501.sh The result I obtained is M -> M [mAP: 86.0%], [cmc1: 95.0%], [cmc5: 98.0%], [cmc10: 98.8%] M -> C [mAP: 11.0%], [cmc1: 12.1%], [cmc5: 24.1%], [cmc10: 31.6%] M -> D [mAP: 29.2%], [cmc1: 46.7%], [cmc5: 63.2%], [cmc10: 69.5%] I hope it helps. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#35 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOOYJBO2TJRUMOOQRQWC23TSVGTOLANCNFSM4UQGVKRA> .

ssbilakeri · 2020-12-20T16:43:57Z

Hi sir, In your EANet paper did u train the model including triplet loss ?? Kindly reply On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, 9:15 pm Shavantrevva Bilakeri, <ssbilakeri@gmail.com> wrote:

…

Thank you so much for ur informative response. On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, 12:25 pm Houjing Huang, ***@***.***> wrote: > Hi, thank you for your feedback. > > To run triplet loss, we have to > > 1. Use PK sampling for batch construction > 2. Increase training epochs > > I provide a setting file > paper_configs/PAP_S_PS_Triplet_Loss_Market1501.txt, and a script > script/exp/train_PAP_S_PS_Triplet_Loss_Market1501.sh, to train with both > PS loss and triplet loss on Market1501. > > Besides, I also fixed a mistake in part index when feeding feature to > triplet loss. You can find the detail in this commit > <e46d495> > . > > Now, you can run the script by > > bash script/exp/train_PAP_S_PS_Triplet_Loss_Market1501.sh > > The result I obtained is > > M -> M [mAP: 86.0%], [cmc1: 95.0%], [cmc5: 98.0%], [cmc10: 98.8%] > M -> C [mAP: 11.0%], [cmc1: 12.1%], [cmc5: 24.1%], [cmc10: 31.6%] > M -> D [mAP: 29.2%], [cmc1: 46.7%], [cmc5: 63.2%], [cmc10: 69.5%] > > I hope it helps. > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#35 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOOYJBO2TJRUMOOQRQWC23TSVGTOLANCNFSM4UQGVKRA> > . >

huanghoujing · 2020-12-21T04:03:01Z

Hi ssbilakeri, I did not use triplet loss in the paper.

ssbilakeri · 2020-12-26T07:09:01Z

Hello sir, I'm trying to re-produce your paper result with re-ranking unfortunately I'm not able to do it.Since I need your paper result with re-ranking applied to compare with my work .could u please do it for me. It will be a great help Thank you

…

On Mon, 21 Dec 2020, 9:33 am Houjing Huang, ***@***.***> wrote: Hi ssbilakeri, I did not use triplet loss in the paper. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#35 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOOYJBOTSE45VUNQTKSVK5LSV3CIDANCNFSM4UQGVKRA> .

huanghoujing · 2020-12-27T11:47:14Z

Hi, ssbilakeri, for which Table of the paper do you need the re-ranking score?

ssbilakeri · 2020-12-27T13:08:50Z

I need it for PAP_S_PS (where ID loss and segmentation loss is used). Kindly help in in this regard. I will be looking forward to your response. Thank you.

…

On Sun, 27 Dec 2020, 5:17 pm Houjing Huang, ***@***.***> wrote: Hi, ssbilakeri, for which Table of the paper do you need the re-ranking score? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#35 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOOYJBKMJFZ7S2TPJ2AKWXDSW4NE3ANCNFSM4UQGVKRA> .

ssbilakeri · 2020-12-28T05:04:10Z

Hi sir, when I run your code with re-ranking getting below results. kindly suggest what could be the problem. I have attached the code with this mail. please help me . Thank you. Extract Feature: 0%| | 0/106 [00:00<?, ? batches/s]Loaded pickle file /home/padmashree/project_dir/dataset/market1501/im_path_to_kpt.pklLoaded pickle file /home/padmashree/project_dir/dataset/market1501/im_path_to_kpt.pkl Extract Feature: 100%|##########################################################| 106/106 [00:13<00:00, 7.75 batches/s] Extract Feature: 0%| | 0/498 [00:00<?, ? batches/s]Loaded pickle file /home/padmashree/project_dir/dataset/market1501/im_path_to_kpt.pkl Loaded pickle file /home/padmashree/project_dir/dataset/market1501/im_path_to_kpt.pkl Extract Feature: 100%|##########################################################| 498/498 [01:04<00:00, 7.75 batches/s] => Eval Statistics: dic.keys(): ['g_feat', 'q_feat', 'q_visible', 'q_label', 'q_cam', 'g_visible', 'g_label', 'g_cam'] dic['q_feat'].shape: (3368, 2304) dic['q_label'].shape: (3368,) dic['q_cam'].shape: (3368,) dic['g_feat'].shape: (15913, 2304) dic['g_label'].shape: (15913,) dic['g_cam'].shape: (15913,) M -> M [mAP: 1.5%], [cmc1: 7.3%], [cmc5: 14.5%], [cmc10: 19.3%] Extract Feature: 0%| | 0/44 [00:00<?, ? batches/s]Loaded pickle file /home/padmashree/project_dir/dataset/cuhk03_np_detected_jpg/im_path_to_kpt.pkl Loaded pickle file /home/padmashree/project_dir/dataset/cuhk03_np_detected_jpg/im_path_to_kpt.pkl Extract Feature: 100%|############################################################| 44/44 [00:05<00:00, 7.79 batches/s] Extract Feature: 0%| | 0/167 [00:00<?, ? batches/s]Loaded pickle file /home/padmashree/project_dir/dataset/cuhk03_np_detected_jpg/im_path_to_kpt.pkl Loaded pickle file /home/padmashree/project_dir/dataset/cuhk03_np_detected_jpg/im_path_to_kpt.pkl Extract Feature: 100%|##########################################################| 167/167 [00:20<00:00, 8.10 batches/s] => Eval Statistics: dic.keys(): ['g_feat', 'q_feat', 'q_visible', 'q_label', 'q_cam', 'g_visible', 'g_label', 'g_cam'] dic['q_feat'].shape: (1400, 2304) dic['q_label'].shape: (1400,) dic['q_cam'].shape: (1400,) dic['g_feat'].shape: (5332, 2304) dic['g_label'].shape: (5332,) dic['g_cam'].shape: (5332,) M -> C [mAP: 0.2%], [cmc1: 0.1%], [cmc5: 0.5%], [cmc10: 1.7%] Extract Feature: 0%| | 0/70 [00:00<?, ? batches/s]Loaded pickle file /home/padmashree/project_dir/dataset/duke/im_path_to_kpt.pkl Loaded pickle file /home/padmashree/project_dir/dataset/duke/im_path_to_kpt.pkl Extract Feature: 100%|############################################################| 70/70 [00:08<00:00, 7.90 batches/s] Extract Feature: 0%| | 0/552 [00:00<?, ? batches/s]Loaded pickle file /home/padmashree/project_dir/dataset/duke/im_path_to_kpt.pkl Loaded pickle file /home/padmashree/project_dir/dataset/duke/im_path_to_kpt.pkl Extract Feature: 100%|##########################################################| 552/552 [01:07<00:00, 8.15 batches/s] => Eval Statistics: dic.keys(): ['g_feat', 'q_feat', 'q_visible', 'q_label', 'q_cam', 'g_visible', 'g_label', 'g_cam'] dic['q_feat'].shape: (2228, 2304) dic['q_label'].shape: (2228,) dic['q_cam'].shape: (2228,) dic['g_feat'].shape: (17661, 2304) dic['g_label'].shape: (17661,) dic['g_cam'].shape: (17661,) M -> D [mAP: 0.3%], [cmc1: 1.2%], [cmc5: 2.8%], [cmc10: 4.3%] On Sun, 27 Dec 2020, 6:38 pm Shavantrevva Bilakeri, <ssbilakeri@gmail.com> wrote:

…

I need it for PAP_S_PS (where ID loss and segmentation loss is used). Kindly help in in this regard. I will be looking forward to your response. Thank you. On Sun, 27 Dec 2020, 5:17 pm Houjing Huang, ***@***.***> wrote: > Hi, ssbilakeri, for which Table of the paper do you need the re-ranking > score? > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#35 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOOYJBKMJFZ7S2TPJ2AKWXDSW4NE3ANCNFSM4UQGVKRA> > . >

huanghoujing · 2020-12-28T14:55:57Z

It seems that the trained model weight is not loaded.

ssbilakeri · 2020-12-28T14:58:53Z

Could you please check with your code hope you have trained weights

…

On Mon, 28 Dec 2020, 8:26 pm Houjing Huang, ***@***.***> wrote: It seems that the trained model weight is not loaded. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#35 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOOYJBIQXJJ6RGPQ2AOOLUTSXCMAXANCNFSM4UQGVKRA> .

huanghoujing · 2020-12-29T03:40:01Z

Hi, ssbilakeri. I have tested the re-ranking results for PAP_S_PS models (the script to run this is script/exp/test_PAP_S_PS_reranking.sh).

The original scores, as well as the re-ranking scores are as follows.

	mAP	Rank-1	Rank-5	Rank-10
M -> M	85.6	94.6	98.2	99.0
ReRank M -> M	93.5	95.7	97.5	98.3

M -> C	12.8	14.2	28.1	35.4
ReRank M -> C	19.4	17.6	28.1	35.9

M -> D	31.7	51.4	67.2	72.5
ReRank M -> D	47.6	57.6	67.9	73.4

C -> M	33.3	59.4	73.7	78.7
ReRank C -> M	47.3	64.0	72.0	76.1

C -> C	66.7	72.5	86.1	91.3
ReRank C -> C	80.8	80.1	86.9	92.2

C -> D	22.0	39.3	54.4	60.3
ReRank C -> D	36.1	47.7	57.5	61.8

D -> M	32.8	61.7	77.2	83.0
ReRank D -> M	48.0	65.6	74.1	78.8

D -> C	9.6	11.4	22.7	28.9
ReRank D -> C	15.4	14.4	22.1	28.7

D -> D	74.6	87.5	93.4	95.3
ReRank D -> D	85.5	89.7	93.6	95.2

I update the code, so that it can test with re-ranking now. Please refer to this commit. You can run it for yourself, by setting cfg.eval.rerank to True in package/config/default.py.

ssbilakeri · 2020-12-29T05:38:53Z

Thank you very much for your valuable response. Thanks a lot.

…

On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 9:10 AM Houjing Huang ***@***.***> wrote: Hi, ssbilakeri. I have tested the re-ranking results for PAP_S_PS models (the script to run this is script/exp/test_PAP_S_PS_reranking.sh). The original scores, as well as the re-ranking scores are as follows. mAP Rank-1 Rank-5 Rank-10 M -> M 85.6 94.6 98.2 99.0 ReRank M -> M 93.5 95.7 97.5 98.3 M -> C 12.8 14.2 28.1 35.4 ReRank M -> C 19.4 17.6 28.1 35.9 M -> D 31.7 51.4 67.2 72.5 ReRank M -> D 47.6 57.6 67.9 73.4 C -> M 33.3 59.4 73.7 78.7 ReRank C -> M 47.3 64.0 72.0 76.1 C -> C 66.7 72.5 86.1 91.3 ReRank C -> C 80.8 80.1 86.9 92.2 C -> D 22.0 39.3 54.4 60.3 ReRank C -> D 36.1 47.7 57.5 61.8 D -> M 32.8 61.7 77.2 83.0 ReRank D -> M 48.0 65.6 74.1 78.8 D -> C 9.6 11.4 22.7 28.9 ReRank D -> C 15.4 14.4 22.1 28.7 D -> D 74.6 87.5 93.4 95.3 ReRank D -> D 85.5 89.7 93.6 95.2 I update the code, so that it can test with re-ranking now. Please refer to this commit <a38f124>. You can run it for yourself, by setting cfg.eval.rerank to True in package/config/default.py. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#35 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOOYJBMU2NOGZZEGCDXCHZTSXFFR3ANCNFSM4UQGVKRA> .

ssbilakeri · 2020-12-30T04:38:32Z

Hello sir, when I train your model considering only segmentation loss it gives so less accuracy. have you run with only segmentation loss ? then what accuracy did you get? for me result is like this Epoch 60 M->M: 6.8 ( 1.4), M->C: 0.1 ( 0.2), M->D: 5.7 ( 1.2) kindly respond. On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 11:08 AM Shavantrevva Bilakeri <ssbilakeri@gmail.com> wrote:

…

Thank you very much for your valuable response. Thanks a lot. On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 9:10 AM Houjing Huang ***@***.***> wrote: > Hi, ssbilakeri. I have tested the re-ranking results for PAP_S_PS models > (the script to run this is script/exp/test_PAP_S_PS_reranking.sh). > > The original scores, as well as the re-ranking scores are as follows. > mAP Rank-1 Rank-5 Rank-10 > M -> M 85.6 94.6 98.2 99.0 > ReRank M -> M 93.5 95.7 97.5 98.3 > M -> C 12.8 14.2 28.1 35.4 > ReRank M -> C 19.4 17.6 28.1 35.9 > M -> D 31.7 51.4 67.2 72.5 > ReRank M -> D 47.6 57.6 67.9 73.4 > C -> M 33.3 59.4 73.7 78.7 > ReRank C -> M 47.3 64.0 72.0 76.1 > C -> C 66.7 72.5 86.1 91.3 > ReRank C -> C 80.8 80.1 86.9 92.2 > C -> D 22.0 39.3 54.4 60.3 > ReRank C -> D 36.1 47.7 57.5 61.8 > D -> M 32.8 61.7 77.2 83.0 > ReRank D -> M 48.0 65.6 74.1 78.8 > D -> C 9.6 11.4 22.7 28.9 > ReRank D -> C 15.4 14.4 22.1 28.7 > D -> D 74.6 87.5 93.4 95.3 > ReRank D -> D 85.5 89.7 93.6 95.2 > > I update the code, so that it can test with re-ranking now. Please refer > to this commit > <a38f124>. > You can run it for yourself, by setting cfg.eval.rerank to True in > package/config/default.py. > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#35 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOOYJBMU2NOGZZEGCDXCHZTSXFFR3ANCNFSM4UQGVKRA> > . >

huanghoujing · 2020-12-30T06:30:05Z

Hi, ssbilakeri. That's normal. Because segmentation does not learn anything about person re-identification. You have to train with at least one kind of re-identification loss, i.e. id loss or triplet loss.

ssbilakeri · 2020-12-30T06:50:23Z

I was not knowing that. Thank you for the information.

…

On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, 12:00 pm Houjing Huang, ***@***.***> wrote: Hi, ssbilakeri. That's normal. Because segmentation does not learn anything about person re-identification. You have to train with at least one kind of re-identification loss, i.e. id loss or triplet loss. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#35 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOOYJBMEAE7AHM4VTN3HT2DSXLCHTANCNFSM4UQGVKRA> .

ssbilakeri · 2021-01-06T05:29:11Z

Hi sir, how did you partition the feature map with keypoint delimitation. Which part of the code does that? Help me to understand Thank you. On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 12:22 PM Shavantrevva Bilakeri <ssbilakeri@gmail.com> wrote:

…

I was not knowing that. Thank you for the information. On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, 12:00 pm Houjing Huang, ***@***.***> wrote: > Hi, ssbilakeri. That's normal. Because segmentation does not learn > anything about person re-identification. You have to train with at least > one kind of re-identification loss, i.e. id loss or triplet loss. > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#35 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOOYJBMEAE7AHM4VTN3HT2DSXLCHTANCNFSM4UQGVKRA> > . >

huanghoujing · 2021-01-12T09:10:24Z

Hi, package/data/kpt_to_pap_mask.py is the code that partitions body into regions using keypoints.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

for triplet loss #35

for triplet loss #35

ssbilakeri commented Dec 7, 2020

huanghoujing commented Dec 13, 2020

ssbilakeri commented Dec 13, 2020 via email

ssbilakeri commented Dec 13, 2020 via email

huanghoujing commented Dec 17, 2020

ssbilakeri commented Dec 17, 2020 via email

ssbilakeri commented Dec 20, 2020 via email

huanghoujing commented Dec 21, 2020

ssbilakeri commented Dec 26, 2020 via email

huanghoujing commented Dec 27, 2020

ssbilakeri commented Dec 27, 2020 via email

ssbilakeri commented Dec 28, 2020 via email

huanghoujing commented Dec 28, 2020

ssbilakeri commented Dec 28, 2020 via email

huanghoujing commented Dec 29, 2020

ssbilakeri commented Dec 29, 2020 via email

ssbilakeri commented Dec 30, 2020 via email

huanghoujing commented Dec 30, 2020

ssbilakeri commented Dec 30, 2020 via email

ssbilakeri commented Jan 6, 2021 via email

huanghoujing commented Jan 12, 2021

for triplet loss #35

for triplet loss #35

Comments

ssbilakeri commented Dec 7, 2020

huanghoujing commented Dec 13, 2020

ssbilakeri commented Dec 13, 2020 via email

ssbilakeri commented Dec 13, 2020 via email

huanghoujing commented Dec 17, 2020

ssbilakeri commented Dec 17, 2020 via email

ssbilakeri commented Dec 20, 2020 via email

huanghoujing commented Dec 21, 2020

ssbilakeri commented Dec 26, 2020 via email

huanghoujing commented Dec 27, 2020

ssbilakeri commented Dec 27, 2020 via email

ssbilakeri commented Dec 28, 2020 via email

huanghoujing commented Dec 28, 2020

ssbilakeri commented Dec 28, 2020 via email

huanghoujing commented Dec 29, 2020

ssbilakeri commented Dec 29, 2020 via email

ssbilakeri commented Dec 30, 2020 via email

huanghoujing commented Dec 30, 2020

ssbilakeri commented Dec 30, 2020 via email

ssbilakeri commented Jan 6, 2021 via email

huanghoujing commented Jan 12, 2021