Remove hmisc dependency

[lshandross]

Solves Issue #55

[github-actions]

🚀 Deployed on https://6618322ffc810d18e6d24b17--hubensembles-pr-previews.netlify.app

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 42.63566% with 74 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 66.54%. Comparing base (7e12730) to head (dd86a19).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head dd86a19 differs from pull request most recent head 0316a2d. Consider uploading reports for the commit 0316a2d to get more accurate results

Files	Patch %	Lines
R/Hmisc-utils.R	42.18%	74 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #102       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   87.83%   66.54%   -21.30%     
===========================================
  Files           5        6        +1     
  Lines         148      275      +127     
===========================================
+ Hits          130      183       +53     
- Misses         18       92       +74     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[lshandross]

@annakrystalli is it ok that the functions from Hmisc aren't getting covered by tests, as they've been tested in the original package?

[elray1]

Let's address the linting issues that are introduced by changes in this PR before merging it in.

I also just filed a separate issue, #103 , to fix the other linting issues, which are in existing stuff in the package -- my vote is that it'd be good to take care of that issue next so that we get to a place where linting checks pass. Ideally, it'd really be nice to do that other one, get that merged in, and then merge main into this branch so that the linting check fully passes. But I'm personally ok with merging a PR where the lint check is failing as long as it doesn't add new linting issues.

[lshandross]

Linting issues have been fixed with pull request #105!