-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add GPTJForQuestionAnswering #14503
Add GPTJForQuestionAnswering #14503
Conversation
Hi, @sgugger and @patrickvonplaten again. |
This seems good to me - @patil-suraj, do you mind taking a look at this? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for adding this new model!
Looks good to me as well! @patil-suraj - could you also take a quick look? :-) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for adding this model!
Thanks again for your PR! |
* Add GPTJForQuestionAnswering * Reformat for GPTJForQuestionAnswering * Fix isort error * make style for GPTJForQA * Add _keys_to_ignore_on_load_missing * Change the sequence of qa and classification Co-authored-by: Suraj Patil <surajp815@gmail.com>
What does this PR do?
GPTJForQuestionAnswering
class for GPTJ upstream and QA downstream taskFixes # (issue)
Before submitting
Pull Request section?
to it if that's the case.
Who can review?
Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag
members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.
@patrickvonplaten, @LysandreJik
@sgugger, @patil-suraj