You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Way back in #84 and #219 we added rules for the order of imports.
The way these rules were implemented is kind of complex, and doesn’t match up with the original intention I suggested in the discussion for #84; partially, this is due to the import/order rule being kinda complex to use.
To reiterate my original suggestion: the core intention of ordering rules is to create clarity and have an unambiguous order that’s easily understandable. To do this, we want three groups of imports: things we don’t control (external packages), things we control (internal files), and side-effects imports (like import ‘./foo.css’).
Our current rules create distinctions within these groups that can be tough to understand. They require eg separating import … from ’fs’ from import … from ‘react’, which requires that you know which modules are Node built-ins and which are node_modules. They also separate import x from ‘./foo’ and import x from ‘../foo’ with no real distinction between these, as well as separating imports of index files; it’s unclear what value this provides, and it can be confusing to learn.
They also separate @wordpress/… imports from the others; this was intentional as these packages are provided by the externals configuration and loaded from WordPress’ built-in files rather than npm. Whether we want to keep this is up for discussion; one downside is the blanket rule also covers the edge cases where you do have to load these via npm, so can be confusing.
Proposal
I would like to simplify the rules to create only three groups:
External packages imported by name (e.g. import … from ‘some_name’ or import … from ‘@webpack/foo’)
Internal files imported by path (e.g. import … from ‘./foo’, import … from ‘../foo’, import … from ‘./index’)
As with the current rules, since side-effects are order-dependent, they can be placed anywhere; however, by convention, non-order-dependent imports should be separated.
(As noted above, we may want to keep @wordpress/ separate; I think for consistency with Gutenberg, these imports would want to be first overall?)
Under the current rules, the following is correct:
Also: I noticed we never actually documented either the rules or the side-effect convention, so we should ensure those also make their way back into the JS style guide!
Way back in #84 and #219 we added rules for the order of imports.
The way these rules were implemented is kind of complex, and doesn’t match up with the original intention I suggested in the discussion for #84; partially, this is due to the
import/order
rule being kinda complex to use.To reiterate my original suggestion: the core intention of ordering rules is to create clarity and have an unambiguous order that’s easily understandable. To do this, we want three groups of imports: things we don’t control (external packages), things we control (internal files), and side-effects imports (like
import ‘./foo.css’
).Our current rules create distinctions within these groups that can be tough to understand. They require eg separating
import … from ’fs’
fromimport … from ‘react’
, which requires that you know which modules are Node built-ins and which are node_modules. They also separateimport x from ‘./foo’
andimport x from ‘../foo’
with no real distinction between these, as well as separating imports ofindex
files; it’s unclear what value this provides, and it can be confusing to learn.They also separate
@wordpress/…
imports from the others; this was intentional as these packages are provided by theexternals
configuration and loaded from WordPress’ built-in files rather than npm. Whether we want to keep this is up for discussion; one downside is the blanket rule also covers the edge cases where you do have to load these via npm, so can be confusing.Proposal
I would like to simplify the rules to create only three groups:
import … from ‘some_name’
orimport … from ‘@webpack/foo’
)import … from ‘./foo’
,import … from ‘../foo’
,import … from ‘./index’
)import ‘fix-the-stuff’
,import ‘./foo.css’
)As with the current rules, since side-effects are order-dependent, they can be placed anywhere; however, by convention, non-order-dependent imports should be separated.
(As noted above, we may want to keep
@wordpress/
separate; I think for consistency with Gutenberg, these imports would want to be first overall?)Under the current rules, the following is correct:
With this proposal, the following would instead be correct:
(Note: the side-effects could be anywhere if they need to be, but things like CSS can be all in the one group.)
(I would love to make
../
sort after./
so that “closer” files are sorted first, butimport/order
doesn’t have any configuration for this.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: