Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Updating license ISC to GPL3 in ./backend #50

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 28, 2022
Merged

Updating license ISC to GPL3 in ./backend #50

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 28, 2022

Conversation

vSt11
Copy link
Contributor

@vSt11 vSt11 commented Nov 22, 2022

Like specified, it needed to be simply updated

@vSt11
Updating license ISC to LICENSE.MD in ./backend
4a5b52c 
Like specified, it needed to be simply updated
@vSt11 vSt11 linked an issue Nov 22, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
License is GPL3 but otherwise defined in ./backend/package.json #32
Closed
@amtoine amtoine requested review from atxr and ctmbl November 22, 2022 09:11
ctmbl
ctmbl requested changes Nov 22, 2022
View reviewed changes
backend/package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ctmbl ctmbl unassigned atxr, amtoine and ctmbl Nov 22, 2022
@ctmbl ctmbl added this to the iScsc blog v0.2.0 milestone Nov 22, 2022
@ctmbl ctmbl added good first issue Good for newcomers repo issue An issue that address the whole project/repo not a specific code feature Priority: Medium The Issue must be addressed as soon as possible labels Nov 22, 2022
@ctmbl
Copy link
Contributor

ctmbl commented Nov 22, 2022 •
edited
Loading

I forgot to mention it, but maybe we should also update author? see the doc about person author and contributors, but I'm fine with letting Alexandre Tullot for now and update it on later PRs (contributing to the backend I mean)

@vSt11 vSt11 removed a link to an issue Nov 23, 2022
License is GPL3 but otherwise defined in ./backend/package.json #32
Closed
@vSt11 vSt11 linked an issue Nov 23, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
License is GPL3 but otherwise defined in ./backend/package.json #32
Closed
@vSt11
updating conventional license
7faddd7 
Should i write '3.0 only', or '3.0 or later' ?
@vSt11
Copy link
Contributor Author

vSt11 commented Nov 23, 2022

For the author field, do you allow me to give your email @atxr ? If so, you can reply it to me here then.
I don't really know all the people I should credit for now, maybe it's better to update it later, in a different issue ?

ctmbl
ctmbl approved these changes Nov 25, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@ctmbl ctmbl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After reading our license (really just the beginning) I think sticking with GPL-3.0-only is fine 👍

As for the author field I would like to see @atxr opinion first 😉
But as is this PR is good to merge according to me!

@ctmbl ctmbl mentioned this pull request Nov 25, 2022
Closed
atxr
atxr reviewed Nov 26, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@atxr atxr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aha I'm totally fine about being the author of this repo, even if it's the whole club 😉
About the mail, I don't have any problem, but I think putting the iscsc mail would be better
supaerocsclub@gmail.com

@ctmbl ctmbl changed the title Updating license ISC to LICENSE.MD in ./backend Updating license ISC to GPL3 in ./backend Nov 28, 2022
@ctmbl
Copy link
Contributor

ctmbl commented Nov 28, 2022

@atxr @vSt11
I think for now @atxr should approve the PR and we'll merge it 🚀 , we can continue this author discussion which is outside the scope of the PR here

atxr
atxr approved these changes Nov 28, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@atxr atxr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ctmbl is right, this author discussion is out of the scope of #50
Let's merge this 🚀

@atxr atxr merged commit e138d00 into main Nov 28, 2022
@atxr atxr deleted the 32-license-is-gpl3-but-otherwise-defined-in-backendpackagejson branch November 28, 2022 19:30
@ctmbl ctmbl mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2023
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@amtoine amtoine amtoine left review comments

@atxr atxr atxr approved these changes

@ctmbl ctmbl ctmbl approved these changes

Assignees

@vSt11 vSt11

Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers Priority: Medium The Issue must be addressed as soon as possible repo issue An issue that address the whole project/repo not a specific code feature
Projects
iScsc website
Status: Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

License is GPL3 but otherwise defined in ./backend/package.json
4 participants
@vSt11 @ctmbl @atxr @amtoine