Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

TypeScript 5.3.x incompatibility: TypeError: ts.getResolvedModule is not a function #49

Closed
ben-polinsky opened this issue Dec 20, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

TypeScript 5.3.x incompatibility: TypeError: ts.getResolvedModule is not a function #49

ben-polinsky opened this issue Dec 20, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@wgoehrig

Comments

@ben-polinsky
Copy link
Collaborator

This library is unusable with TypeScript 5.3.x:

TypeError: ts.getResolvedModule is not a function

TypeScript has moved the ts.getResolvedModule method to an internal API available off the program object.

To reproduce:

Upgrade TypeScript to 5.3.x in any project consuming this library, then run eslint.

References:

microsoft/rushstack#4404 (comment)

https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/pull/55818/files#diff-dbfa0e7f632eca196a5ee0e08e00743c46c03799e2704206cfccc065bb6f9e3a
@ben-polinsky ben-polinsky mentioned this issue Dec 20, 2023
Closed
GerardasB added a commit to iTwin/appui that referenced this issue Jan 24, 2024
@GerardasB
Lock TS version due to iTwin/eslint-plugin#49
1c8d691
@anmolshres98 anmolshres98 mentioned this issue Jan 25, 2024
Merged
GerardasB added a commit to iTwin/appui that referenced this issue Jan 29, 2024
@GerardasB
Update pnpm version (#694)
302efbf 
* Bump pnpmVersion

* rush update --full --purge

* rush update-autoinstaller --name rush-lintstaged

* rush update --full --purge --variant core-3x

* Ignore log files in .gitignore

* Fix linter errors.

* rush change

* Use pnpm audit instead of audit.js script

* Lock TS version due to iTwin/eslint-plugin#49

* Update visual snapshots.

* rush extract-api
@anmolshres98
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed by #51

@anmolshres98 anmolshres98 mentioned this issue Feb 14, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@wgoehrig wgoehrig

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@wgoehrig @ben-polinsky @anmolshres98