Possible bug in indices?

[vgupta1]

So i can't yet confirm if this is a real bug, or a problem in my own code, but in I keep getting an ERROR: BoundsError() thrown from

in generateCut at /Users/VGupta/.julia/v0.2/JuMPeR/src/oracle_poly.jl:261

I'm not sure what it could be. Reformulation works correctly. Any ideas?

VG

[IainNZ]

You're definitely on master?

[vgupta1]

Yeah, just pulled again...

---

Vishal Gupta
PhD Candidate, 2014
Operations Research Center
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
www.mit.edu/~vgupta1/

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Iain Dunning notifications@github.comwrote:

You're definitely on master?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/24#issuecomment-40780073
.

[IainNZ]

OK, can you pull and try again?

[vgupta1]

Nope... If it helps, the issue is that length(coeff_coeff) = 1, and where trying to access element 2.

[vgupta1]

So, for the moment, is the branch safe or broken?

[IainNZ]

Ahh I missed the other one.
Not sure what you mean about the branch - I'm working on master.

[IainNZ]

(well, fixing master)

[vgupta1]

By branch i meant master.... :) is master safe?

---

Vishal Gupta
PhD Candidate, 2014
Operations Research Center
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
www.mit.edu/~vgupta1/

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Iain Dunning notifications@github.comwrote:

Ahh I missed the other one.
Not sure what you mean about the branch - I'm working on master.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/24#issuecomment-40780831
.

[IainNZ]

I'll never put it in a state where the tests fail - doesn't mean there aren't bugs, but it should be monotonically improving

[vgupta1]

:) Thanks. you're a star. It seems to be running now. I'll let you know
if anything looks suspect.

VG

---

Vishal Gupta
PhD Candidate, 2014
Operations Research Center
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
www.mit.edu/~vgupta1/

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Iain Dunning notifications@github.comwrote:

I'll never put it in a state where the tests fail - doesn't mean there
aren't bugs, but it should be monotonically improving

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/24#issuecomment-40780943
.

[IainNZ]

Very keen to hear if the objectives match.
Although possibly all the bugs are now actually ironed out, I've got a plan for how to make sure the code is even more robust (haha)

[vgupta1]

The objectives do match for the robust model. (Sorry, I should have told you that earlier), and they match the nominal when Gamma =0.

This 2nd bug cropped up when using an affine formulation. Initial tests on the affine suggest taht they too do match!

The world is happiness and glee!