Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: update todo-issue-reopener hash #1415

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ianlewis
Copy link
Owner

@ianlewis ianlewis commented Feb 2, 2024

Description:

Updates the hash for todo-issue-reopener to the correct value.

Related Issues:

Updates #1367

Checklist:

  • Review the CONTRIBUTING.md documentation.
  • Add a reference to a related issue in the repository.
  • Add a description of the changes proposed in the pull request.
  • Add unit tests if applicable.
  • Update documentation if applicable.
  • Add a note in the CHANGELOG.md if applicable.
  • Sign the Google CLA.

Signed-off-by: Ian Lewis <ianmlewis@gmail.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (af5f9ca) 82.09% compared to head (0a71102) 82.09%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1415   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.09%   82.09%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines        1078     1078           
  Branches       17       17           
=======================================
  Hits          885      885           
  Misses        140      140           
  Partials       53       53           

@ianlewis ianlewis merged commit aaf1d33 into main Feb 2, 2024
35 checks passed
@ianlewis ianlewis deleted the update-todo-issue-reopener-hash branch February 2, 2024 05:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant