-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
backport summer tests to iclab/centinel #59
Comments
Test primitives to migrate:
#60 backports 1 and 2, 3-5 should probably be their own issues because they affect primitives, and we still need to migrate 6-8. @gsathya, @rpanah, are you ok with including 6-8 in the alpha release, but pushing 3-5 back? 3-5 are basically redesigning our DNS, HTTP, and traceroute? primitives and I want to take the time to weigh the pros and cons of different options. Please comment below with your thoughts. |
@gsathya , to clarify, you vote for not including these tests? |
Yes |
@ben-jones I vote for not including 6-8 as they aren't actual tests. These were toy experiments to test functionality and to see what we can detect. There is no reason for them to be included in the alpha release. |
I'd say include include whatever basic DNS/HTTP Get/Traceroute we have now and then iterate to add more features/make them better (e.g., headless browsing). @rpanah has been meeting with a student here with some experiments that would benefit from the platform so we're getting some more concrete items that would be useful to implement (e.g., HTTP Proxy traceroute etc.) Also for CitLab's purposes a good HTTP Get is absolutely required and should be a very high priority feature/task. That is their bread and butter (along with logging DNS results, and tcpdumps to a lesser extent). |
At this point, we have 1-4 (HTTP, DNS, traceroute, TLS). Iran, Indonesia, and Israel never had their own custom experiments in the older code base. |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: