Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add NearestPointLayeredSideAverage #13252

Closed
jortensi opened this issue Apr 17, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Add NearestPointLayeredSideAverage #13252

jortensi opened this issue Apr 17, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
C: Framework T: task An enhancement to the software.

Comments

@jortensi
Copy link

To support MAMMOTH/Rattlesnake modeling needs per meeting held 4/17/19.

@jortensi jortensi added P: normal A defect affecting operation with a low possibility of significantly affects. T: task An enhancement to the software. labels Apr 17, 2019
@permcody
Copy link
Member

Tag @fdkong

@permcody permcody added C: Framework P: critical and removed P: normal A defect affecting operation with a low possibility of significantly affects. labels Apr 18, 2019
@fdkong
Copy link
Contributor

fdkong commented Apr 23, 2019

I will be here soon. The conservative transfer is almost done.

@jortensi Do you mind send me some toy input files to demonstrate the requirements. It definitely speedups the development. @vincentlaboure added one simple example for the conservative transfer that actually help me a lot!

I am asking because I want to focus on you guys' requirements at this point even though a lot of stuffs can be added to the transfer system.

fdkong added a commit to fdkong/moose that referenced this issue May 1, 2019
fdkong added a commit to fdkong/moose that referenced this issue May 1, 2019
fdkong added a commit to fdkong/moose that referenced this issue May 1, 2019
fdkong added a commit to fdkong/moose that referenced this issue May 2, 2019
made the transfer to support multible variables

Refs idaholab#13252
fdkong added a commit to fdkong/moose that referenced this issue May 7, 2019
otherwise, you will get a different value when call
getValue() again

Refs idaholab#13252
fdkong added a commit to fdkong/moose that referenced this issue May 16, 2019
fdkong added a commit to fdkong/moose that referenced this issue May 16, 2019
fdkong added a commit to fdkong/moose that referenced this issue May 16, 2019
made the transfer to support multible variables

Refs idaholab#13252
fdkong added a commit to fdkong/moose that referenced this issue May 16, 2019
otherwise, you will get a different value when call
getValue() again

Refs idaholab#13252
fdkong added a commit to fdkong/moose that referenced this issue May 17, 2019
fdkong added a commit to fdkong/moose that referenced this issue May 17, 2019
fdkong added a commit to fdkong/moose that referenced this issue May 17, 2019
made the transfer to support multible variables

Refs idaholab#13252
fdkong added a commit to fdkong/moose that referenced this issue May 17, 2019
otherwise, you will get a different value when call
getValue() again

Refs idaholab#13252
@fdkong
Copy link
Contributor

fdkong commented Jul 8, 2019

Resolved at #13060

@fdkong fdkong closed this as completed Jul 8, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C: Framework T: task An enhancement to the software.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants