Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix PorousFlowAddMaterialAction and PorousFlowAddMaterialJoiner #13117

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 26, 2019

Conversation

cpgr
Copy link
Contributor

@cpgr cpgr commented Mar 26, 2019

Enable these actions to work with block restricted materials.

Fixes #13116

@WilkAndy
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @cpgr !

Copy link
Contributor

@WilkAndy WilkAndy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Excellent, thanks so much @cpgr

@moosebuild
Copy link
Contributor

moosebuild commented Mar 26, 2019

Job Documentation on 04f8536 wanted to post the following:

View the site here

This comment will be updated on new commits.

cpgr and others added 2 commits March 26, 2019 19:44
Enable these actions to work with block restricted materials.

Fixes idaholab#13116
Tests correct addition of PorousFlowJoiner for block restricted
materials.

Refs idaholab#13116
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ validParams<PorousFlowAddMaterialJoiner>()
}

PorousFlowAddMaterialJoiner::PorousFlowAddMaterialJoiner(const InputParameters & params)
: Action(params)
: Action(params), _already_joined()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You probably know this, but you don't need to explicitly initialize container types.

@permcody permcody merged commit 9d99261 into idaholab:next Mar 26, 2019
@WilkAndy
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for that review, @permcody . Super surprising that we didn't pick up this bug earlier.

@cpgr cpgr deleted the pfjoin branch March 26, 2019 20:56
@cpgr
Copy link
Contributor Author

cpgr commented Mar 26, 2019

Thanks Cody!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants