New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allows StochasticResults to be replicated or distributed #14437
Conversation
This should wait for #14191 |
97161ec
to
42e164e
Compare
Job Documentation on 4b5a07a wanted to post the following: View the site here This comment will be updated on new commits. |
cdaf209
to
9199026
Compare
Job Code Coverage on 5eece71 wanted to post the following: View code coverage site here |
5eece71
to
d06a6dc
Compare
Job Code Coverage on d06a6dc wanted to post the following: View code coverage site here |
modules/stochastic_tools/src/distributions/NormalDistribution.C
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/stochastic_tools/test/tests/multiapps/batch_commandline_control/tests
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/stochastic_tools/test/tests/transfers/sampler_transfer_vector/tests
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Looks like you still have a few diffs in downstream apps. |
d06a6dc
to
47d2867
Compare
Job Code Coverage on 47d2867 wanted to post the following: View code coverage site here |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. Looks great to me. I just have a few questions.
modules/stochastic_tools/src/transfers/SamplerPostprocessorTransfer.C
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
44e6046
to
4b5a07a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
Job Code Coverage on 4b5a07a wanted to post the following: View code coverage site here |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No more comments. Thanks.
This PR failed 9 targets when it was merged. Let's get it cleaned up before we put it in. |
Really?! I wouldn't have merged it if I knew that. Everything showed up green. |
The problem is that we always only test a small subset of targets on PRs.
It's always going to be that way. I think all 9 of the failed targets
weren't tested on the PR and since Andrew isn't here. I felt like we should
try to move forward.
…On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 2:41 PM Ben Spencer ***@***.***> wrote:
Really?! I wouldn't have merged it if I knew that. Everything showed up
green.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#14437?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAXFOIHZDHXCQNKCS4FOY3DQX23PFA5CNFSM4JRPWREKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEGKZW5Y#issuecomment-563452791>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAXFOIBJ2XUVPHD5IJQV43LQX23PFANCNFSM4JRPWREA>
.
|
OK, makes sense. |
I will fix things, that was my plan for Monday. |
(closes #14410)