You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now the transit depth calculator takes "abundances", which has to be a dictionary of 13 x 30 arrays spanning pressures from 10^-9 bar to 1000 bar, and temperatures from 100 to 3000 K. However, sometimes we don't have abundance information for this whole range because ggchem is unstable at very low temperatures. Is there a way to make the format of "abundances" more flexible? Can the user just specify abundances at points along the atmospheric profile? Can abundances be replaced with an AbundanceGetter object?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now the transit depth calculator takes "abundances", which has to be a dictionary of 13 x 30 arrays spanning pressures from 10^-9 bar to 1000 bar, and temperatures from 100 to 3000 K. However, sometimes we don't have abundance information for this whole range because ggchem is unstable at very low temperatures. Is there a way to make the format of "abundances" more flexible? Can the user just specify abundances at points along the atmospheric profile? Can abundances be replaced with an AbundanceGetter object?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: